My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
03/18/2013
>
65A - RPT - REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 4:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65A
Date
3/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and increased traffic. Residents observed that the busiest time for MariCare appeared to be from <br />4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. On a typical Friday, 66 cars were observed entering MariCare's facility; 49 <br />of these were observed to contain additional passengers. The slowest time appeared to be from <br />1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. On a typical Saturday, 44 cars were counted during this time, and 29 of these <br />were observed to have additional passengers. MariCare has claimed to serve 4,000 "patients." <br />E. Impact of Proposed Ordinance on MedDelivery Dispensary, El Sobrante <br />It is the position of Contra Costa County District Attorney Robert J. Kochly that a proposed <br />ordinance should terminate operation of the dispensary in El Sobrante because the land use of that <br />business would be inconsistent with both state and federal law. However, the Community <br />Development Department apparently believes that MedDelivery can remain as a "legal, non- <br />conforming use." <br />F. Banning Versus Regulating Marijuana Dispensaries in Unincorporated <br />Contra Costa County <br />It is simply bad public policy to allow the proliferation of any type of business which is illegal and <br />subject to being raided by federal and/or state authorities. In fact, eight locations associated with the <br />New Remedies dispensary in San Francisco and Alameda Counties were raided in October of 2006, <br />and eleven Southern California marijuana clinics were raided by federal agents on January 18, 2007. <br />The Los Angeles head of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration told CBS News after the <br />January raids that "Today's enforcement operations show that these establishments are nothing more <br />than drug-trafficking organizations bringing criminal activities to our neighborhoods and drugs near <br />our children and schools." A Lafayette, California resident who owned a business that produced <br />marijuana-laced foods and drinks for marijuana clubs was sentenced in federal court to five years <br />and 10 months behind bars as well as a $250,000 fine. Several of his employees were also convicted <br />in that case. <br />As discussed above, there is absolutely no exception to the federal prohibition against marijuana <br />cultivation, possession, transportation, use, and distribution. Neither California's voters nor its <br />Legislature authorized the existence or operation of marijuana dispensing businesses when given the <br />opportunity to do so. These enterprises cannot fit themselves into the few, narrow exceptions that <br />were created by the Compassionate Use Act and Medical Marijuana Program Act. <br />Further, the presence of marijuana dispensing businesses contributes substantially to the existence of <br />a secondary market for illegal, street-level distribution of marijuana. This fact was even recognized <br />by the United States Supreme Court: "The exemption for cultivation by patients and caregivers can <br />only increase the supply of marijuana in the California market. The likelihood that all such <br />production will promptly terminate when patients recover or will precisely match the patients' <br />medical needs during their convalescence seems remote; whereas the danger that excesses will <br />satisfy some of the admittedly enormous demand for recreational use seems obvious." (Gonzales v. <br />Raich, supra, 125 S.Ct. at p. 2214.) <br />As outlined below, clear evidence has emerged of such a secondary market in Contra Costa County. <br />In September of 2004, police responded to reports of two men pointing a gun at cars in <br />the parking lot at Monte Vista High School during an evening football game/dance. Two <br />19-year-old Danville residents were located in the parking lot (which was full of vehicles <br />and pedestrians) and in possession of a silver Airsoft pellet pistol designed to replicate a <br />© 2009 California Police Chiefs Assn. 27 All Rights Reserved <br />65A-88
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.