My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2013-04-01
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
04/01/2013
>
FULL PACKET_2013-04-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:27:55 PM
Creation date
4/1/2013 9:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
4/1/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
420
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Allocation of FY 2013-2014 ESG Funds <br />April 1, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />In November 2012, a Notice of Funding Availability was mailed to 48 non-profit providers soliciting <br />applications for FY 2013-2014 grant funding. Additionally, a notice was published in the Orange <br />County Register. Twenty-five proposals were submitted from 18 organizations with funding <br />requests totaling over $1,225,000. The City is estimating to receive $538,354 of which $40,350 <br />will be used for administration of the program. <br />On February 6, 2013, an ad hoc committee (comprised of two commissioners from the Community <br />Redevelopment and Housing Commission, one representative from the Orange County's <br />Community Services - Homelessness Prevention Department and one City staff member <br />conducted applicant interviews to rate and rank the proposals using the following criteria: 1) <br />community need, 2) capacity to provide service, and 3) effective and efficient use of funds. A list <br />of the agencies submitting proposals, type of program, grant amount requested, the evaluation <br />panel average rating, and the recommended funding for FY 2013-2014 is provided in Exhibit 1. <br />Twenty-one of the 25 proposals are being recommended for funding. The four organizations that <br />received the lowest average rating were not recommended. <br />The City has yet to receive information from the U.S. Department of HUD on the amount of ESG <br />funds to be awarded for FY 2013-2014. Therefore, staff has proposed the following contingency <br />plan. Each application that has been recommended for funding shall be increased or decreased <br />by a proportionate amount of the difference between the anticipated grant amount and the actual <br />grant amount while still remaining within the statutory caps per category. No recommended <br />application shall be reduced to an amount below $10,000 nor increased to an amount above the <br />requested amount. Additionally any unallocated FY 2012-2013 funds shall be redistributed in the <br />same manner. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />ESG funds will be available in the Emergency Solutions Grant account (no. 13518785-various). <br />APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: <br />11*,halln W A &4?4 - - <br />Nancy T. wards Francisco Gutierrez <br />Interim Ex utive Director Executive Director <br />Community Development Agency Finance & Management Services Agency <br />NTE/FH/kg <br />Exhibit: 1. ESG Recommendations <br />25B-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.