Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana <br />Environmental Checklist <br />imported from Northern California and the Colorado River by the Metropolitan Water District of <br />Southern California (Metropolitan). Water recharge in Orange County occurs from the Santa Ana <br />River, recycled water, and imported water. The OCWD recharge basins are located solely in the cities <br />of Anaheim and Orange (OCWD 2012). The OCWD maintains 30 recharge facilities with a combined <br />total storage volume of about 26,000 acre-feet and 1,067 acres of wetted areas, none of which are <br />located near the proposed project site (OCWD 2009). <br />The project site is currently covered with 60% impervious surfaces. Any storm flows on site drain to <br />the street, and the site is not a source for groundwater recharge. The project would redevelop the <br />site and increase impervious surfaces to 91.7%. However, because the site does not contain <br />recharge facilities, the project would not interfere with groundwater recharge. <br />The projected water demand associated with the proposed project is estimated at approximately <br />3,056 gallons per day. This volume of water use by the proposed project will not result in substantial <br />depletion of water resources from the Orange County Groundwater Basin (see Utilities and Service <br />Systems for an expanded discussion on water). Therefore, although the proposed project would <br />involve dewatering activities, it world not result in the substantial depletion of groundwater <br />supplies or substantially interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would be net deficit in <br />aquifer volume or lowering of the groundwater table. Impacts related to lowering the groundwater <br />table and groundwater recharge are less than significant. <br />c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river, In a manner that would result in substantial <br />erosion or siltation on site or off site? <br />Less-than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would result <br />in an increase in the amount of impervious surfaces on site by approximately 20,160 square feet. To <br />capture and retain stonmwater on site, the project includes grassy swales and an onsite stormwater <br />drainage system that will control flows, and not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of <br />the project site. The swales are designed to accommodate the site drainage and will have a two-foot <br />bottom width and a 3:1 side slope within a four-foot-wide area adjacent to the project perimeter <br />wall. In addition to the swales, runoff that is captured by the driveway ramps or parking garage will <br />be intercepted by drain inlets and pumped into the sanitary sewer. This onsite infrastructure would <br />not result in any increase in offsite project flows, and would not result in alteration of the existing <br />drainage pattern. Further, implementation of the grassy swales would reduce offsite erosion or <br />siltation. Thus, impacts on offsite drainage and erosion during project operations would be less than <br />significant. <br />The project site is not within the vicinity of a stream or river that would be affected by the proposed <br />project. Current drainage patterns consist of surface flow across the site and into the curb/gutter <br />along Sullivan Street, which directs stormwater into a regional drain on McFadden Avenue to the <br />southeast of the project site. As a result, the project would not change the existing offsite drainage <br />patterns or alter the course of a stream or river. <br />As discussed above under IX.a, Mitigation Measure HYD-1 would ensure that an NPDES General <br />Construction permit and an SWPPP would be obtained to address sediment control and flooding <br />during construction activities. As a result of compliance with existing regional and local regulations, <br />impacts are related to changes in the drainage pattern of, erosion/siltation from the site and are less <br />than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measure HYD-1. <br />The Bat Nha Buddhist Meditation Center 3-55 June 2013 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ICF 00215.12 <br />31 C-108