My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31C - CUP - 803 S SULLIVAN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
09/16/2013
>
31C - CUP - 803 S SULLIVAN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2013 8:36:15 AM
Creation date
9/12/2013 4:38:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31C
Date
9/16/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana Environmental Checklist <br />Table 3-10. Estimate of Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Annual C02e Emissions (metric tons) <br />With Project-level <br />Mitigation and AB 32 <br />Types of Project Emissions Project Emissions Scoping Measures <br />Construction Emissions (30 year amortization) 32 32 <br />Operations Emissions - Mobile 971 682 <br />Operations Emissions - Area Sources <1 <1 <br />Operations Emissions - Energy Sources 190 119 <br />Operations Emissions - Waste Sources 127 127 <br />Operations Emissions - Water Consumption 15 13 <br />Sources <br />Project Emissions Annual Total 1,336 942 <br />Percent Reduction below BAU 30% <br />Source: ICF 2011. CalEEMod outputs and GHG calculation sheets are provided in Appendix A. <br />h. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />emissions ofgreenhause gases? <br />No Impact. As described previously, AB 32 identified a 2020 target level for GliG emissions in <br />California of 427 MMT of C02e, which is approximately 28.5% less than the year 2020 BAU <br />emissions estimate of 596 MMT C02e. To achieve these GHG reductions there will have to be <br />widespread reductions of GHG emissions across California. Some of those reductions will need to <br />come in the form of changes in vehicle emissions and mileage standards, changes in the sources of <br />electricity, and increases in energy efficiency by existing facilities. The remainder will need to come <br />from requiring new facility development to have lower carbon intensity than BAU conditions. <br />Therefore, this analysis uses a threshold of significance that is in conformance with the state's goals. <br />On December 12, 2008, ARB adopted the AB 32 Scoping Plan, which details specific GHG emission <br />reduction measures that target specific GHG emissions sources. While none of the Scoping Plan <br />measures are directly applicable to the proposed project, nevertheless, project-related GHG <br />emissions would be reduced as a result of several AB 32 Scoping Plan measures. The Scoping Plan <br />considers a range of actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, <br />monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, and market based mechanisms (e.g., cap- <br />and-trade system. Some examples include the following: <br />• Mobile-source GHG emissions reduction measures <br />o Pavley emissions standards (19.8% reduction) <br />o Low carbon fuel standard (7.2% reduction) <br />o Vehicle efficiency measures (2.8% reduction) <br />Energy production related GHG emissions reduction measures <br />o Natural gas transmission and distribution efficiency measures (7.4% reduction) <br />The Sat Nha Buddhist Meditation Center 3-43 June 2013 <br />initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CIF 00215.12 <br />31 C-96
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.