My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2013-09-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
09/16/2013
>
FULL PACKET_2013-09-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:18:37 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 6:53:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
9/16/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
992
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CUP Nos. 2013 -15, 2013 -16 & 2013 -17 <br />August 26, 2013 <br />Page 7 <br />The area of 305 East Fourth Street is located in Reporting District No. 185. This district is above <br />average in police - related incidents and ranks 9th out of 102 citywide reporting districts. The <br />proposed restaurant is also within 198 feet of residential property and within 514 feet of church <br />property. <br />The Police Department is concerned that this establishment may not consistently operate as a bona <br />fide eating establishment. For that reason, conditions are recommended to mitigate any negative <br />impacts this operation may have on adjacent residences, and prevent it from generating police calls <br />for service. <br />Public Notification <br />The project site is located within the boundaries of the Downtown Neighborhood Association. <br />Representatives from this Neighborhood Association were notified of this project. The project site <br />was also posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, and a notice was published in the <br />Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners and tenants within 500 <br />feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, <br />had been received from any members of the public. <br />CEQA Compliance <br />In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act the recommended action is exempt from <br />further review per Section 15061(b)(3), which is a general rule exemption applying to projects that <br />have no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. Categorical Exemption <br />Environmental Review No. 2013 -40 will be filed for this project. <br />Conclusion <br />Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission <br />approve Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2013 -15, 2013 -16 and 2013 -17 as conditioned. <br />Hally Sobole keS�oboolle ke <br />Associate Planner <br />HS:jm <br />hslNaUveSorAlehouse \cup13- 15thrul3.l8 NaliveSocWehouse.pc <br />Attachments: <br />Exhibit 1 —Vicinity Map <br />Exhibit 2 — Location Map <br />Exhibit 3 — Photo of location <br />Exhibit 4 — Site Plan <br />Exhibit 5 — Floor Plan <br />31 B -9 <br />Vince Fregoso, ICP <br />Principal Planner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.