My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2013-09-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
09/16/2013
>
FULL PACKET_2013-09-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 4:18:37 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 6:53:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
9/16/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
992
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />Environmental Checklist <br />for the Santa Ana Regime. Hence, Implementation of the project in compliance with existing <br />regulations would result in less -than- significant impacts related to water quality with <br />implementation of Mitigation Measure HYD -1. <br />g. Place housing within a 100 yearflood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br />Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br />Less - than - Significant Impact. The project site is not located within any type of Flood zone <br />(including a 100 -year flood hazard area) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No, 06059CO257j, December <br />3, 2009. Therefore, the project does not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area, and no <br />impacts would occur. <br />h. Place within a 100 year•flood hazard area structures that would Impede or redirectflood <br />flows? <br />No Impact. As discussed in 11g, the project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area as <br />mapped on the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the area. Further, the proposed religious development <br />is located within a developed urban area and would not be located in an area that would impede of- <br />redirect flood flows. No impacts related to 100 -year flood hazard areas would occur with <br />implementation of the proposed project. <br />f. Expose people or• structures to a sfgniffcant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, <br />looding, <br />including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or darn? <br />Less - than - Significant Impact. As described previously, the proposed project is not located within a <br />flood zone. However, it is located 0.5 mile east of the Santa Ana River, which (like large portions of <br />Santa Ana) is mapped (in Exhibit 4 of the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan) as within <br />the inundation zone of a significant failure of the Prado Dam that is located approximately 19 miles <br />upstream. Flood waters from the dam could travel down the Santa Ana River toward the Pacific <br />Ocean. in the event of a large -scale failure of the Prado Dam, flood waters would take approximately <br />6 hours to travel the distance to the project vicinity, approximately 7.5 hours for the flood waters to <br />peak at an elevation of 96 NAVD, which is approximately four feet over the existing Santa Ana River <br />bank height in the project vicinity, which is 0.5 mile to the east (CCCD 2011). <br />Implementation of the proposed project will redevelop the existing uses on the project site. The <br />project area has no history of dam inundation. Thus, dam inundation at the project site would have a <br />very limited potential of occurrence. Should a failure of the Prado Dam occur, the appropriate <br />emergency responders would notify downstream areas that could be inundated. Because the project <br />site is located approximately 19 miles from Prado Dam and flood waters would take approximately <br />six hours to the project area, the City's existing emergency response system would reduce impacts in <br />the unlikely event of a Prado Dam failure. As a result, the proposed project would not substantially <br />expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result <br />of the failure of a levee or dam. <br />J. Contribute to imtndatlon by selche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />No Impact. The project site is located over 10 miles away from the Pacific Ocean, and is generally <br />considered too far away to be subject to a tsunami. Additionally, the County of Orange Emergency <br />Operations Plan map of inundation zones along the coastline shows that the project site is not <br />located within an area anticipated to he at risk of a tsunami (County of Orange 2005). Therefore, the <br />project would not result in impacts related to potential tsunami inundation. <br />The Bat Nha Buddhist Meditation Center 3 57 June 2013 <br />Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ICr 00215.12 <br />31C-110 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.