My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
090704 Jt PH Adotpion Amend Merger SA Redvlp Proj Areas EXHIBIT 2
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09/07/04
>
090704 Jt PH Adotpion Amend Merger SA Redvlp Proj Areas EXHIBIT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2013 5:08:13 PM
Creation date
11/4/2013 5:04:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V <br />fi <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br />q <br />1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported <br />by the Information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" <br />answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does <br />not apply to projects like the one Involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No <br />a <br />Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project- specific <br />screening analysis). <br />II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, <br />cumulative as well as project - level, Indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br />s "s <br />III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. if <br />there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is <br />required, <br />IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation <br />measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact ". <br />The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to <br />a less than significant level. <br />Potentially 4 <br />Significanta <br />Potentially Unless Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No — <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />a <br />1. Aesthetics —Would the project: <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings <br />within a state highway? <br />— C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character <br />or quality of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views <br />in the area? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Page 162 of 190 31 <br />and \mswordlenvcheck.doc \1.15.99 Page 1 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.