My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Potentially Unless Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />II. Agricultural Resources — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant <br />environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br />Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in <br />assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to <br />non- agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and <br />Monitoring Program in the California Resources <br />Agency, Department of Conservation, maintains <br />detailed maps of these and other categories of <br />farmland.) <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a ❑ ❑ ❑ rat' <br />Williamson Contract? <br />C. Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />which, due to their location or nature, could <br />individually or cumulatively result in loss of <br />Farmland, to non - agricultural use? = <br />Air Quality — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or <br />III. pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following <br />determinations. Would the project: <br />A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of <br />❑ ❑ ❑ _ <br />i�{ <br />applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion <br />j (' <br />Management Plan? <br />B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />I'ti� <br />contribute to an existing or proposed air quality <br />Y j <br />violation? <br />C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />�(f <br />of any criteria pollutant for which the project region <br />is non - attainment under an applicable federal or <br />state ambient air quality standard (including <br />releasing emission which exceed quantitative <br />thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br />D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />concentrations? <br />27 <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />and \msword \envcheck.docU. 15.99 21 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.