My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Potentially Unless Less Than <br />Significant , Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />VII. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials —Would the project: <br />A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />environment through the routine transport, use or <br />disposal of hazardous materials? <br />B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ ❑ ❑ fQi <br />acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste !"( <br />within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed <br />school? <br />C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ r <br />hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to J�1 <br />Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a <br />result, would it create a significant hazard to the <br />public or the environment? <br />D. For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ i <br />or where such a plan has not been adopted, within j <br />two miles where of a public airport or public use <br />airport, would the project result in a safety hazard <br />for people residing or working in the project area? <br />VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality — Would the project: <br />A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />quality standards or waste discharge <br />requirements? <br />B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ ❑ ❑ — <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge <br />such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer <br />volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table <br />level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby <br />wells would drop to a level which would not support <br />existing land uses or planned uses for which <br />permits have been granted)? <br />and \msword \envcheck.doc\1.15. 99 EXHIBIT 2 Page 5 of 10 <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.