My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities which might have an adverse <br />physical effect on the environment? <br />XV. Transportation /Traffic <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ ❑ ❑ I}� <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of <br />the street system (i.e. result in a substantial <br />increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the <br />volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion <br />at intersections ?) <br />3 <br />and \msword \envcheck.doc \1.15.99 EXHIBIT 2 Page 8 of 10 <br />27 <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Potentially <br />Unless <br />Less Than <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />All. Public Services <br />A. Would the project result in substantial adverse <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />El <br />impacts associated with the provision of <br />new or physically altered governmental facilities, <br />need for new or physically altered governmental <br />facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental impacts, in order to <br />maintain acceptable service rations, response <br />times or other performance objectives for any of the <br />public service: <br />Fire protection? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />Police protection? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />Schools? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />�{ <br />Parks? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑� <br />Other public facilities? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />XIV. Recreation <br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />r�if <br />neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />y� <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical <br />deterioration of the facility would occur or be <br />accelerated. <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities which might have an adverse <br />physical effect on the environment? <br />XV. Transportation /Traffic <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ ❑ ❑ I}� <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of <br />the street system (i.e. result in a substantial <br />increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the <br />volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion <br />at intersections ?) <br />3 <br />and \msword \envcheck.doc \1.15.99 EXHIBIT 2 Page 8 of 10 <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.