Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kylee Otto, Deputy City Attorney <br />August 6, 2004 <br />Page 6 <br />7. The reference to "general public" in Goal 2 likely includes persons working in the <br />affected commercial projects and living in the residential projects, but Goal 2 <br />should be revised to specifically define the "general public." <br />8. Policy 2.1 should also reference consultation with the ALUC. <br />9. Policy 2.3 should also reference compliance with the JWA AELUP. <br />10. A Policy 2.4 should acknowledge the stated goals to ensure that people and <br />facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents and to <br />ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable airspace. <br />11. Policy 3.4 on page 20 should include consultation with the ALUC consistent with <br />Public Utilities Code § 21670, et seq. and Title 21 California Code of Regulations <br />§ 3534 (regarding referral to ALUC of heliport applications). <br />Please accept my apology for taking so long to communicate this information to you, but <br />it was only during the past 7 to 10 days that I have been able to carefully review the submitted <br />materials in the context of the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook and the JWA <br />AELUP. However, it is my understanding that many of these issues are points that have been <br />raised in less detail in prior conversations and meetings, including the June 14 meeting. Please <br />contact me with any questions or comments. If you would prefer ALUC staff submit additional <br />suggested language for the City's proposed General Plan Amendment, I will work with them to <br />do so. <br />JWG:sa <br />cc: Airport Land Use <br />Very truly yours, <br />BENJAMIN P. de MAYO <br />COUNTY COUNSEL <br />Joan Golding, Airport Land Use Commission, Executive Officer <br />