My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH 1901 East First St
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
11/18/2013
>
75A - PH 1901 East First St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2013 9:26:31 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 9:01:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
11/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rubber Tired Dozers 0,5 <br />Scrapers I <br />Based on this table, the proposed will result in a maximum of 1 acre disturbed during peak <br />construction grading activity (I dozer x 0.5 + I grader x 0.5 = I acres disturbed). <br />Per LST guidance, only on -site construction activity is considered in the LST analysis, On -site <br />construction emissions are provided in the CaIEEMod output files and do not include sources <br />such as on-road haul, worker commuting or vendor delivery emissions. Therefore, the following <br />thresholds and emissions are determined (pounds per day). <br />LST and Project Emissions <br />CaIEEMod Output in Appendix (maximout mitigated emissions from on -site construction) <br />LSTs were compared to the maximum daily construction activities. As seen above, emissions <br />are below the LST for construction. The only mitigation measure applied was the following dust <br />suppression measure: <br />• Water exposed surfaces at least 3 times per day for fugitive dust suppression <br />Facilities such as churches are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because church <br />employees do not typically remain on site fora full 24 hours, but are present for shorter periods <br />of time, such as eight hours, However, by applying a 24 -hour standard for pollutants with shorter <br />averaging periods, such as NO2 and CO, LSTs could also be applied to these receptors since it is <br />reasonable to assume that an employee at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight <br />hours. The Orange County Southern Baptist Church is immediately east of the site. Therefore, <br />comparing LSTs for CO and NOx for a source receptor distance of 25 meters would provide the <br />comparison (pounds per day). Again, LST emissions are much less than significance thresholds. <br />IM E OssAe � <br />75A -128 <br />CO <br />NOx <br />PM -10 <br />PM -2.5 <br />LST Thresholds Central <br />Orange County <br />1 acre 200 meters <br />2,109 <br />123 <br />60 <br />22 <br />Max On -Site Emissions <br />Demolition <br />Unmitigated <br />25 <br />42 <br />6 <br />2 <br />Mitigated <br />25 <br />42 <br />3 <br />2 <br />Grading <br />Unmitigated <br />20 <br />31 <br />& <br />5 <br />Mitigated <br />20 <br />31 <br />4 <br />3 <br />Construction <br />Unmitigated <br />19 <br />25 <br />2 <br />2 <br />Mitigated <br />]9 <br />25 <br />2 <br />2 <br />CaIEEMod Output in Appendix (maximout mitigated emissions from on -site construction) <br />LSTs were compared to the maximum daily construction activities. As seen above, emissions <br />are below the LST for construction. The only mitigation measure applied was the following dust <br />suppression measure: <br />• Water exposed surfaces at least 3 times per day for fugitive dust suppression <br />Facilities such as churches are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because church <br />employees do not typically remain on site fora full 24 hours, but are present for shorter periods <br />of time, such as eight hours, However, by applying a 24 -hour standard for pollutants with shorter <br />averaging periods, such as NO2 and CO, LSTs could also be applied to these receptors since it is <br />reasonable to assume that an employee at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight <br />hours. The Orange County Southern Baptist Church is immediately east of the site. Therefore, <br />comparing LSTs for CO and NOx for a source receptor distance of 25 meters would provide the <br />comparison (pounds per day). Again, LST emissions are much less than significance thresholds. <br />IM E OssAe � <br />75A -128 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.