Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />I� <br />i 2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />i <br />5 <br />I � <br />.I <br />7 <br />9 <br />N 9 <br />10 <br />1I <br />,2 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />M <br />17 <br />1B <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />31 <br />AND I KNOW MR. CASTEIX SPOKE ABOUT THE HEIGHT ON FENCES AND A <br />FENCING ORDINANCE; THEREFORE, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT SOUND <br />BARRIER WALLS BE NO HIGHER THAN FOUR FEET. SO IF WE'RE GOING <br />TO MAKE A UNIFORM ORDINANCE ABOUT FENCES, THEN TO CIE A SOUND <br />BARRIER WALL IS MORE OR LESS A FENCE. IT'S A WALL. AND SO WE <br />JUST SHOULD LIMIT THE HEIGHT OF FENCES. THAT WOULD -- THE <br />SOUND BARRIER WALLS, THE AIR POLLUTION CONFINED IN THAT AREA, <br />SOMEONE WHO HAS TO STOP AT A STOPLIGHT I5 GOING TO BE -- IT'S <br />REALLY GOING TO BE PRETTY BAD. <br />ALSO, WE'LL START BACK ON 2, AND THE FIRST PAGE <br />-WHERE THEY START WITH THE PROJECT'S ALTERNATIVES. THE <br />ALTERNATIVES UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE NEW STREET WOULD HAVE TO <br />BE 120 FEET, SANTIAGO CREEK TO WARNER. ALSO THE 14 -FOOT WIDE <br />RAISED MEDIAN, THAT 15 MORE THAN THE WIDTH OF A -- OF ONE OF <br />THE LANES, 50 IT SEEMS TO ME THAT SPACE IS BEING WASTED. AND <br />ALSO, WE KEEP CONSIDERING THAT THERE IS A DROUGHT CONDITION, <br />WATER SUPPLIES ARE LOW, AND P05SIBLY NOT. EVERYONE SAYS THAT <br />SANTA ANA HAS PLENTY OF WATER BECAUSE THEY'RE DRILLING DEEPER <br />AND BETTER WELLS. AND THE LANDSCAPING -- WELL, THAT WAS ONE <br />OF THEM, <br />ALSO, THAT THE STREET WOULD BE -- WOULD HAVE TO <br />BE WIDENED -- WELL, 120 FEET EXPANDED INTERSECTION, LEFT AND <br />RIGHT TURNS FOR BUSES; TEN EAST AND WEST STREETS WOULD BE <br />CUL -DE -SACS. THE PILE UP OF TRAFFIC ON OTHER EAST AND WEST <br />STREETS IF THEY COME UP TO BRISTOL AND WAITING FOR A LIGHT TO <br />