My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - AMEND GENERAL PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
02/04/2014
>
75A - PH - AMEND GENERAL PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 7:49:20 AM
Creation date
1/30/2014 4:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
2/4/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2014 -2021 SANTA ANA HOUSING ELEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATES <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />2. Environmental Checklist <br />2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br />1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately <br />supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. <br />A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the <br />impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault <br />rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific <br />factors, as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to <br />pollutants, based on a project- specific screening analysis). <br />2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, <br />cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br />3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist <br />answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with <br />mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is <br />substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If these are one or more "Potentially Significant <br />Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. <br />4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the <br />incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to <br />a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly <br />explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. <br />S) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, <br />an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section <br />15063(c)(3) P). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: <br />o�) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. <br />b-) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within <br />the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal <br />standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the <br />earlier analysis. <br />ci) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures <br />Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the <br />earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. <br />6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for <br />potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or <br />outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the <br />statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals <br />contacted should be cited in the discussion. <br />Page 30 • The Planning Center s DC&E <br />75A -52 <br />December 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.