My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - AMEND GENERAL PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
02/04/2014
>
75A - PH - AMEND GENERAL PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 7:49:20 AM
Creation date
1/30/2014 4:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
2/4/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2014 -2021 SANTA ANA HOUSING ELEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATES <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />2. Environmental Checklist <br />I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />Less Than <br />X <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not <br />Significant <br />X <br />limited lo, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings <br />Potentially <br />With <br />Less Than <br />X <br />within a stale scenic highway? <br />Significant <br />Mitigation <br />Significant <br />No <br />Issues <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Impact <br />Impact <br />I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />X <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not <br />X <br />limited lo, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings <br />X <br />within a stale scenic highway? <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of <br />X <br />the site and its surroundings? <br />X <br />X <br />d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would <br />X <br />adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br />II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are <br />significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California. Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br />Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an - optional model to use in assessing <br />impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to .forest resources, including timberland, are <br />significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry <br />and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and <br />the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted <br />by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of <br />X <br />Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps <br />X <br />prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring <br />X <br />Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a <br />X <br />X <br />Williamson Act contract? <br />c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest <br />land (as defined In Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), <br />timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section <br />X <br />4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined <br />by Government Code section 51104(g))? <br />d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to <br />X <br />non - forest use? <br />e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due <br />to their location or nature, could result in conversion of <br />X <br />Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land <br />to non - forest use? <br />III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air <br />pollution control district maybe relied upon to make the followin determinations.Would the project; <br />a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air <br />quality plan? <br />X <br />b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to <br />X <br />an existing or projected air quality violation? <br />c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any <br />criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment <br />under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality <br />X <br />standard (including releasing emissions which exceed <br />quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br />Page 32 • The Planning Center I DC&F- <br />75A -54 <br />December2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.