Laserfiche WebLink
2014 -2021 SANTA ANA HOUSING ELEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATES <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />3. Environmental Analysis <br />disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or <br />her authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. If <br />the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes <br />or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by <br />telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Although soil- disturbing activities <br />associated with development in accordance with the Housing Element could result in the discovery of human <br />remains, compliance with e.- sting law would ensure that significant impacts to human remains would not <br />occur. Therefore, adoption of the Housing Element would result in a less than significant impact on human <br />remains disturbance. <br />3.6 GEOLOGYAND SOILS <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, <br />injury, or death involving: <br />I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other <br />substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42. <br />No Impact. The entire southern California region is considered to be seismically active. Santa Ana is in a <br />high seismic risk zone subject to seismic activity from various nearby faults, including the El Modeno <br />Fault and the Newport- Inglewood -Rose Canyon faults (CGS 2010). However, none of these faults are <br />zoned under the guidelines of the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Thus, there are no <br />Alquist- Priolo fault zones within the vicinity of the City and no impact would occur. <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Santa Ana is located in southern California, which is <br />known to be seismically active. More specifically, the Newport- Inglewood -Rose Canyon fault lies <br />approximately eight miles southwest of the City and would likely generate the most severe ground <br />shaking. Any future development that occurs in conjunction with the proposed project would be required <br />to adhere to the most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code (CBC) adopted by the City <br />of Santa, Ana and would be subject to CEQA review The City has also adopted the CBC 2010 Edition <br />based on the 2009 International Building Code as published by the International Code Council under the <br />City's Code of Ordinances Chapter 8 (Buildings and Structures), Article II (Building Code). The CBC <br />includes building design standards for the construction of new buildings and /or structures and specific <br />seism c engineering design and construction measures to avoid the potential for adverse ground shaking <br />impacts. Thus, by adhering to state and local regulations, development in accordance with the Housing <br />Element would result in less than significant impacts to seismic ground shaking. <br />iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is the phenomenon in which uniformly sized, loosely <br />deposited, saturated, granular soils with low clay content undergo rapid loss of shear strength through <br />the development of excess pore pressure during strong groundshaking. Soils with these properties that <br />Page 48 • The Planning Center I DC&E, <br />75A -70 <br />December2013 <br />