Laserfiche WebLink
Monday; July 29, 2013 Dally Appel <br />E. Roadway Mitigation <br />(1) Record <br />The plan is for aggregate mined in the Project <br />to be removed from the site by trucks travelling on <br />Kunzler Ranch Road to North State Street There <br />appears to be no dispute that Kunzler Ranch Road <br />is the 'only point of ingress and egress to the <br />Project site. The Draft estimated that the mining <br />as Kumner-Ranch Road and North State Street <br />.. are genermjy not :designed to accommodate <br />heavy vehicles, and truck travel. on these roads <br />would have the potential to adversely affect the <br />pavement condition. Roadway damage can <br />include conditions such as loose asphalt and <br />potholes that have the potential to make driving <br />conditions less safe. Roadways significantly <br />impaoted.from project truck traffic would have <br />to be upgraded to support vehicle weights up <br />to 25 tons, IT] ... 1911, .. Mile project would <br />have a significant impact on Kunzler Ranch <br />Road and aless than significant impact on North <br />State Street, M ... [911 The project applicant <br />has recently prepared an assessment of Kunzler <br />Ranch Road, Kunzler Ranch Road •Pavg »cent <br />Evaluation and Rehabilitation Strategies, April 28, <br />20W. This report was submitted to the County <br />and provides a detailed assessment of current <br />roadway conditions and a comprehensive plan to <br />i rehabilitate and maintain the roadway over a 30 <br />yearperiod. The report identified Kunzler Ranch <br />I Ron as being in serious condition and identifies <br />- various alternatives for addressing the condition <br />of the road. "s <br />To mitigate this significant impact, the <br />Draft' �'recanunended that Kunzler Ranch <br />Road be improved as needed (e.g., overlays or <br />reconstruction) per the April 28, 2009 Kunzler <br />Ranch Road study and the Caltrans Design <br />Manual standards.. The project applicant would <br />pay the full cost of road improvements, including <br />design and construction. [col Prior to operations <br />the projei:t'applicant shall enter into a Roadway <br />Maintenance Agreement with Mendocino <br />County providing their proportionate share of <br />the responsibility to maintain the proposed haul <br />roads." (talicsomitted) - - <br />When it commented on the Draft, die <br />County Department of Transportation (MDOT) <br />- . clarified that "Kunzler Ranch Road is not 'a <br />County maintained road and that MDOT has <br />no involvement in its operation, maintenance, <br />or upkeep.... IT) ... [911... Therefore there <br />is no need for the applicant to enter into a Road <br />Maintenance Agreement with the County for <br />maintenance of Kunzler Rauch 'Road" The <br />MDOT further stated; "Arriving at a cost sharing <br />arrangement is the responsibility of the applicant, <br />the mad's owner(s) and those property owners <br />having rights to its use.. ITT IT] ... Ideally, ail <br />the users of Kunzler Ranch Road would voluntarily <br />form :'a Road Maintenance Organization for the <br />improvement and. maintenance -of the road. <br />[However;] no party can unilaterally make this <br />ate Report 9793 <br />happen,..." <br />The MDOT proposed an alternative means to <br />mitigate the significant impact to Kunzler Ranch <br />Road, and it was adopted nearly verbatim in the <br />EIR The EIR states: 'Traffic-related repairs on <br />Minzler Ranch Road shall be initiated when the <br />owners of the road and users of the casement <br />reach a decision that such repairs are necessary. <br />Granite's fair share shall be calculated based on <br />the proportion of applicanCs heavy truck trips to <br />the total numherof heavy truck trips on the road <br />the cost and expense incurred for traffic-relate� <br />repairs of Kunzler Ranch Road." - <br />(2) Review <br />Masonfte argues dtat the mitigation measure; <br />for the Project's imnact on Kneader Ranch Rea, <br />=a <br />Won u• Cil of Anderson (2005) <br />h` -1173, 1188 [discussing fee-b: <br />'Programs for cumulative ttr <br />of, - Masonite's' •arguments <br />Ing. "IMleasuros to mitigate orn <br />they <br />wit be made or <br />funded. The EIR <br />to be made when: <br />decide they are r <br />of an agreement; <br />­M­ RAGm 11._ <br />75A -74 <br />to <br />construed to include <br />to accommodate the <br />sere is'no reason to <br />ment to enforce the - <br />valid point when it <br />measures have been t <br />mitigation measures <br />air share payments <br />rovenields must be <br />it the payments are <br />:sted private parties <br />