My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR -1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
>
75A - PH - EIR -1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 5:04:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2014 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
3/4/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commission held a public hearing at which it conclusively <br />Preservation Alternative would preserve the existing farmhouse <br />trees), The additional a tat alvsis found that the Historic Preseration <br />Preservation Alternative. By these actions, it is clear that the City <br />has proactively encouraged Ate retention and reuge Plii5t4r caI <br />buildings and sites as required by the <br />woalil- e-r °`F' ^* ` "°^ City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Uce <br />Elet t7_ent Gnal 4 and - Policy 4 2- 4 sue]this ante t+alivs'tcttidaa <br />{ H-- t{- it'- t5E6p6ti2E1- j3F8&IE'�E- V.'HMId- C'(3r} €(- }fit - Vi-ih -L,u,t F ta All <br />�i$+ lek'- a%-- 1•? ifH- n�ai6-- o.- s�-, e+ ttet;i;--- t�3tTEkl— Li;— �41:18j^ .�, 'yrrrtL'tt <br />eneetw-agea4fie-felen ld FeL[se e h+sttai ital b i kEli+ b urd tes <br />�Hwe-1 ..r- ainiki@Ei- FC`r -�inu- vii' y- 6z- �tHlii %A+kR-1•.iP.n@rai- 1= 1tHi —, L-anii <br />Usc�len3ont� - Irx}rlei�nfat ion. P- la+ t- tiffs- �rtiti- oEier- g+o-jr."c:ts --sere <br />snijeeFto-projeet rtti- env - through- Nt�Git3�- reyievw pra;�t <br />project ktn�rke �e- evak+ate 4 EhrecrgirtiErEy s rem <br />taraeesss- witFra�G- tc�- t #e- ge�tl�- arid- ps�ic- ies- o�:he� -iz °y "- �- .r'- etet�1 <br />P- kan- ban,;�„e E�tenC: <br />• The text of Section 7.6.2 (page 7 -15) should be modified as follows: <br />The Lower Density Alternatives would result in decreased impacts <br />to air quality, noise, population and housing_; =This alternative <br />would result in significant impacts to cultural resources_ -afid <br />sotrfl;it =t- with- t} ie- tvit�j- o-F- 6enc3r-al- [?la +r6and- Lase- F;1 €irte+tt -Goal -4; <br />P-oldc e= 4al +ieh- eac,^,a�a- ate,- Ehe- reteu+t =ien- acrd - reuse -tt 1= l+irieirl <br />{suntletings -aitd- lies— Fwthermare, because of the significant <br />reduction in residential units and larger estate -type lots, the Low <br />Density Alternative would only partially meet the project <br />objectives. Therefore, this alternative was rejected. <br />3. Commercial Orchards and Museum Uses are Not Permitted or Conditionally <br />Permitted on the Prgiect Site. <br />Some of the written and oral continents on the Draft and Final EIR focused on proposals <br />that would reinstate orchard operations on the project site. For example, in continents on the <br />proposed Final EIR, The Old Orchard Conservancy proposed a "Citrus Orchard Alternative" that <br />would 'involve the "operation of a commercial citrus operation on the site." (See also December <br />-9- <br />75A -97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.