Laserfiche WebLink
centered around a limestone quarry <br />and kiln at the southwest corner of <br />the district. Associated with this <br />limekiln is a concentration of Navajo <br />hogans, probably occupied by work- <br />ers at the mine. The sites are scattered <br />around the periphery of the valley <br />floor used for agricultural purposes <br />by the Puebloan occupants. <br />Boundary Description: Starting at <br />a point (area of Point A) on the 35-36 <br />section line, 1,500 feet south of the <br />marked corner of sections 25, 26, 35, <br />and 36, the boundary trends east <br />about 200 feet, then south for a chord <br />distance of approximately 2,700 feet, <br />crossing an unimproved road, to the <br />area of Point B. From there, the <br />boundary trends southwest, following <br />the edge of the canyon, approximately <br />9,200 feet (chord distance) to where <br />the boundary intersects the section 10- <br />11 line, in the area of Point C. From <br />there, the boundary trends west - <br />southwest for approximately 1,500 <br />feet (area of Point D), then north and <br />northeast approximately 3,000 feet to <br />Point E (crossing the canyon and two <br />unimproved roads). From Point E, <br />the boundary trends northeast, again <br />following the edge of the canyon for <br />about 4,400 feet to the area of Point F. <br />From there, the boundary continues <br />northeast, with a southeastward <br />curve, for a chord distance of 5,600 <br />feet to the point of beginning (area of <br />Point A -See Figure 7.) <br />Boundary justification: The <br />external boundary is based on the <br />known distribution of individual <br />cultural properties. The boundary <br />includes all culturally and behavior- <br />ally related sites associated with the <br />Pueblo II and early twentieth- century <br />limekiln settlements located within <br />the geographically defined canyon. <br />The two separate areas of significance <br />are considered as one district because <br />the property distributions overlap in <br />the southwestern area of the district, <br />with the additional acreage necessary <br />to include the entire limekiln complex <br />being minimal compared to the <br />overall district size. Within the <br />boundary is the alluvial valley used <br />for agricultural purposes by the <br />Puebloan occupants. The valley floor <br />has been included because it contains <br />the agricultural land that made <br />settlement here possible. Although <br />surface inspection revealed few <br />visible cultural resources, aerial <br />surveys may reveal buried agricul- <br />tural features in this valley. In this <br />particular case, the valley floor is <br />58 <br />included within the district without <br />evidence of archeological materials <br />due to the small scale of the district <br />and the dispersal of sites within the <br />district around the valley. However, <br />for larger districts, evidence of <br />agricultural use, such as the presence <br />of vegetable pollen, would be <br />necessary to justify the inclusion of <br />the valley floor within the bound- <br />aries of the district. In the absence of <br />such evidence, the boundaries would <br />be drawn to exclude the valley floor <br />from the center of the district or <br />become a "contiguous one. <br />Case 12. Archeological Site and <br />Traditional Cultural Property. This <br />nomination describes three archeo- <br />logical sites found within a cultural <br />landscape important to a Native <br />American group in a western state. <br />The property includes about 5 acres <br />of an adjacent river, which was used <br />in traditional subsistence practices. <br />Archeological components include a <br />village midden area with a depth of <br />about 2 feet, while the landscape <br />features include rocks, a grove of <br />trees, and a waterfall. Within this <br />site there is significant linkage be- <br />tween archeological record and <br />traditional cultural features. The site <br />was determined eligible under criteria <br />A and D. <br />The limits of the archeological sites <br />and cultural landscape were defined <br />using a combination of direct docu- <br />mentation (ethnographic and archeo- <br />logical studies) with topographic <br />setting. The boundaries for this site <br />were documented both by a series of <br />maps and an aerial photograph, each <br />showing the limits of the property <br />Boundary Description: The boundary <br />is indicated on the map accompany- <br />ing the nomination. (See Figure 8.) <br />Boundary justification The <br />property is situated on a 40 -acre river <br />terrace and that portion of the river <br />directly adjacent to the terrace. The <br />property is bounded on the north by <br />the mountainous slope rising from the <br />terrace. The river channel which loops <br />around the terrace forms the eastern <br />and southern boundary. The western <br />boundary is defined by a relatively <br />steep slope rising up from the terrace. <br />The boundaries encompass the <br />resources and their immediate setting. <br />LEGEND <br />•••••SIfEM1. iMOMY <br />p .Mip V[WPONL <br />PRFEVME <br />r CONIFER OV RSTORY <br />OPEN PRAIaE <br />F1.,7j\ I F2 r <br />�•. s <br />pp°WNSLOP 01 0P <br />i <br />, <br />Figure 8. (Case 12). This nomination from a western state included aerial photographs <br />to illustrate site boundaries. A transparency with the site boundary indicated was. <br />overlaid on the photo to show the extent of this site. The site also included elements of <br />a traditional cultural property. The boundaries of this site were determined through <br />archeological and ethnographic survey. <br />