Laserfiche WebLink
vIte, approve thel'rojecEwithoutthoflood Iain 9j <br />S ,n¢hin %feilture. Deletion of that feature was weirandfuseplugt "curbdledmiOn insnongm <br />aPPe isofethel?Iannin9Commi son's eci ion. the record reflectsthat die EIltPlan." However <br />(c) Analysis rescue and .relonation programs specified <br />connection with die weir and fuse plug dell <br />An accurate projectdescrptionisnecessar Masonim also notes that adoption of ffie pot <br />for an intgMgent „evaluation poi the Y river connection led to removal of a midgad <br />euvironmehibij effect, of a potende! measure that mandated onnua] fns <br />(S{laena a ,ya3, proposed San activity' jfnecessar re pections at <br />(1B9 34 Cat; 4th 980, Palley Sanitary Dist. Butas omledontinti,te Count staff oporttefi <br />Y Aairoftheweirandsetbackare; <br />11 -! torl cane"lahledd�%�)nandun. "unstable" P <br />it <br />Of fl <br />I the <br />no <br />its.rola as an <br />respect to tite <br />• - °' ` ` :''M" PP• !h <br />argues that Granjte's <br />mt projecE doBe ban <br />for to ' -''- h "`wuae n ewninated the need <br />M onite lsonchstlengee <br />andcommentoneach <br />dchanges, However, <br />q Statement in the <br />ETR that removal of noodptain. benching "wotdd <br />not create an flooding <br />Y g impacts <br />nection and floodplau <br />in the Draft, <br />relative to the <br />baseliteconditi on , "Butthesfatementwascorrect <br />because the elimination flood <br />and the <br />conumeatfary an their <br />of henchog <br />would s mPIY ]Dave Ackornin Creep and the <br />Russian River in thofr <br />ERtimproper <br />'„ ly gave <br />1 about We Project <br />presort state, Masonite'e <br />arguments suggest dtatflnod lain beliehing was <br />Proposed to P <br />the PY11—, mitigate the environmental offrrtc „a <br />the <br />waa an ape <br />:nation abou <br />ly d'S A acrd <br />ted here. and <br />Y Inform the <br />wever, there <br />IvIasentte or <br />ilsled about <br />or whether <br />the Project <br />g from the <br />fa mtelligendY we <br />Tbere is `ao merit <br />it the Project descripti <br />thattheprojectchange <br />se envitronntea tad effec <br />at of the I .(Lour <br />4dt at o: 7tao ,a: <br />as "an effortPto jmvrrroreu as notedhlfhebrat <br />state oftheAckermanCreek.11 •current degrade <br />was eliminated when it appeared thatiE might tit <br />more environmental harm than good, Might d, <br />Is in posjdan to now argue for the necessity <br />Of county in c benchog because its expert told the <br />bonchiing way menu on die Draft that floodplaln <br />"unneeded undercurrrento�oniunwa unwarranted," and <br />(3) ?he Frog.; <br />(a) Record " <br />uuugaaon measures deslgued�`to�reduceedtoso <br />led Impacts to insignificance. <br />9di The table h special status Species Included <br />ag. tiro Frog: 'The table stated that. tiie Frog <br />Its Ibireeds.in shaded stream habitats <br />dte cobble Substrate, asuall Uelow 3, With rock, <br />gh elevation. AUsentor Y 000 feet in <br />to. inrit,nAM predators are entOrt�equentwhenintroduced <br />On :t h_:. •. -'Ihe tabla. eSdmahu;l F7,.. <br />s <br />provide, imuted habitat (slow /IoW flow ree!tio may. <br />t and Russian leapresoutin.bothAc,kermanCeeek <br />e! and Russian River Thus, the Draft specified Creek <br />itmltIgadon measures for the Frog <br />75B =224 -- <br />