Laserfiche WebLink
Commission held a public hearing at which it conclusrvcly <br />- <br />resmonse to a comment on Cho ETR - itjonal <br />fUa llysis to study a Historic PresewItion Alternative. The Historic <br />modify its develoM e ut proposal to reflect the Historic <br />Element Goal 4 and- Policv 4.2. 15 -suehr this aker atiy Fni:ilaa <br />to tle propewed <br />Hopei, wcadd Coallic� v +th C�Gy of 5 ukta Ana <br />€tre eut�a ;rzs- the-- r- e- teufier�rtrl- reu;�tr�hi:; tot -i c-a l -laeei l cli n�+;s- �N�d -s i te: <br />13?- -t i�- v' rrrmrra %�ila- t- iiiiercmrizmzai2d <br />Usc Elc�rne }a- t-- Tr�rpl��rertGatiort- Plan - this- and- otEter-- ptejeeti --are <br />laroc .:ih tesl t t�rtFiu g als a+d Pal <br />Pkta -rand- Use- Eleine nt. <br />• The text of Section 7.6.2 (page 7 -1.5) should be modified as follows: <br />The Lower Density .Alternatives would result in decreased impacts <br />to air quality, noise, population and housing=; _Tlus alternative <br />would result in significant impacts to cultural resources---a 4 <br />eeattfF etu tkrEbe C of £tae l lzla�tnd TJse Filerrtertt Coal 4 <br />P- of -ici, '' -,-rye, ` d�htE,".- 2ncocnzsg�,- ttil'- r8ttntian- at2Et- rettf3e- o�li�stal -ieal <br />lair flinger ^gin — Furthermore, because of the significant <br />reduction in residential units and larger estate -type lots, the Low <br />Density Alternative would only partially meet the project <br />objectives. Therefore, this alternative was rejected. <br />3. Commercial Orchards and Museum Uses are Not Permitted or Conditionally <br />Permitted on the Project Site. <br />Some of the written and oral comments on the Draft and Final ETR focused on proposals <br />that would reinstate orchard operations on the project site. For example, in comments on the <br />proposed Final EIR, The Old Orchard Conservancy proposed a "Citrus Orchard Alternative" that <br />would involve the "operation of a commercial citrus operation on the site." (See also December <br />-9- <br />75B -253 <br />