My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/16/2014
>
75A - PH - EIR 1584 E SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2014 3:43:48 PM
Creation date
9/11/2014 2:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
9/16/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
604
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Yld Ovidhard <br />Page 2 <br />while also allowing the current owners to realize a substantial economic benefit from this generous gift <br />bequeathed to them by Martha Sexlinger. <br />The recent California appellate case, Masonite Corporation v. County of Mendocino, 2013 DJDAR 9784, <br />as summarized in the attached letter from our legal counsel, Deborah Rosenthal, to Vincent Fregoso, <br />dated August 21, 2013, would seem especially relevant to the above proposed alternative. In her letter, <br />Ms. Rosenthal outlines that "[t]his case holds that a requirement to dedicate an agricultural conservation <br />easement is a legally feasible mitigation for impacts to prime farmland under CEQA. P. 9780. The <br />decision also notes that acquisition of agricultural conservation easements "over acreage equal to the <br />agricultural acreage lost due to a project is 'standard for California communities. "' P. 9791. Finally, the <br />Court of Appeal reaffirms that "the preservation of agricultural land is an important public policy" that <br />CEQA is intended to effectuate. P. 9791." <br />"Under Masonite, "standard" mitigation for loss of the highly productive Sexlinger Orchard would be an <br />agricultural conservation easement over 2.5 acres on -site or 5 acres off -site. The remaining 2.5 acres of <br />the Orchard would be available for compatible residential development, as proposed in" the option <br />outlined above. Depending on design, The Conservancy believes that such an alternative for the <br />Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard could comply with CEQA. <br />We respectfully request that you consider directing staff to revise the EIR prepared for the project to <br />include a preservation option such as the one presented above that could truly assure long -term <br />preservation of the historic Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard in accordance with CEQA. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jeannie Gillett <br />President <br />The Old Orchard Conservancy <br />Enclosure <br />cc: Ryan Bensley, TOOC Vice President <br />Patrick Mitchell, TOOC Director <br />Moises Plascencia, TOOC Director <br />Steve Ray, TOOC Director <br />Nick Spain, TOOC Director <br />Deborah Rosenthal, AICP, Esq. <br />Matthew Holbrook, Esq. <br />Sonia Carvalho, Esq. <br />vv ww,O�cl rcfiardCorisev- va�icy.org <br />75A -82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.