|
120
<br />f u)Y I City of Santa Ana, CA
<br />Table C 6 presents a summary of the suggested inspection projects listing total footages per project. It
<br />also indicates the footages by strategy group. As indicated, Inspection Project 01 includes all of the
<br />Group A and B pipe segments (highest risk). Therefore, this project should be completed as soon as
<br />practical. Projects 02 and 06 include fewer of the higher risk pipe so are candidates for delaying until
<br />years two or three if desired. Table C 7 presents the same information, but summarizes inspection costs.
<br />Table C- 6: Summary of Inspection Project Footages
<br />Inspect
<br />Project
<br />Inspect 01
<br />Group
<br />5,118
<br />Group
<br />472
<br />Group
<br />54
<br />Group
<br />13
<br />Group
<br />6,374
<br />Group
<br />16,858
<br />Group
<br />2,760
<br />Group
<br />Grand
<br />31,649
<br />Inspect 02
<br />919
<br />28,840
<br />1,749
<br />31,508
<br />Inspect 03
<br />844
<br />1,258
<br />3,423
<br />18,390
<br />84
<br />23,999
<br />Inspect 04
<br />2
<br />319
<br />377
<br />7,801
<br />17,320
<br />288
<br />26,107
<br />Inspect 05
<br />534
<br />320
<br />28,126
<br />365
<br />29,345
<br />Inspect 06
<br />106
<br />4,905
<br />21,835
<br />26,846
<br />Inspect 07
<br />499
<br />1,237
<br />85
<br />22,002
<br />21
<br />23,844
<br />Inspect 08
<br />8,607
<br />2,619
<br />16,776
<br />28,002
<br />Inspect 09
<br />76 0
<br />11,725
<br />1,263
<br />15,904
<br />186
<br />29,838
<br />Inspect 10
<br />1,653
<br />5,189
<br />3,558
<br />8,526
<br />162
<br />990
<br />20,077
<br />Total
<br />5,118
<br />472
<br />12,953
<br />19,846
<br />23,845
<br />185,057
<br />22,459
<br />1,464
<br />271,215
<br />Table C- 7: Summary of Inspection Project Costs
<br />Inspect
<br />Inspect 01
<br />. •
<br />$22,073
<br />Group
<br />$1,682
<br />Group
<br />$113
<br />Group
<br />$28
<br />Group
<br />$13,530
<br />Group
<br />$79,905
<br />Group
<br />$14,668
<br />Group
<br />Grand
<br />$132,000
<br />Inspect 02
<br />$1,378
<br />$171,674
<br />$7,304
<br />$180,356
<br />Inspect 03
<br />$1,267
<br />$3,127
<br />$14,445
<br />$64,164
<br />$202
<br />$83,205
<br />Inspect 04
<br />$4
<br />$599
<br />$585
<br />$24,582
<br />$64,094
<br />$628
<br />$90,492
<br />Inspect 05
<br />$801
<br />$650
<br />$116,983
<br />$1,846
<br />$120,279
<br />Inspect 06
<br />$219
<br />$8,430
<br />$120,948
<br />$129,597
<br />Inspect 07
<br />$749
<br />$2,394
<br />$168
<br />$77,734
<br />$62
<br />$81,106
<br />Inspect 08
<br />$12,910
<br />$3,942
<br />$48,325
<br />$65,177
<br />Inspect 09
<br />$1,832
<br />$22,233
<br />$2,203
<br />$47,065
<br />$454
<br />$73,787
<br />Inspect 10
<br />$3,108
<br />1 $9,878
<br />$5,948
<br />$28,409
<br />$390
<br />$2,413
<br />$50,145
<br />Total
<br />$22,073
<br />$1,682
<br />$20,784
<br />$38,477
<br />$51,279
<br />$779,788
<br />$88,566
<br />$3,495
<br />$1,006,144
<br />As previously addressed, recommended replacements or refurbishments should not be performed
<br />without further investigation and /or inspection. Based on the severity of BRE scores, pipes in Strategy
<br />Groups A and B were listed for 100% replacement. Therefore, replacement projects were prepared for
<br />these pipe segments; as shown in Figure C 7. Assets within the remaining Strategy Groups were listed
<br />for replacement as an assumed percentage of pipe lengths within each group. Until actual re- inspection
<br />results are available, it is impossible to know which specific segments need attention. Therefore,
<br />detailed replacement projects were not identified for those assets.
<br />65B -279
<br />NOVEMBER 2014
<br />
|