Laserfiche WebLink
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2 <br />gate provides superior hydraulics and requires less long -term maintenance activities. It should be noted <br />that the anticipated life span of a radial gate exceeds fifty years in comparison of the rubber dam, which <br />may need a complete replacement after fifteen years of operation. <br />3.1.4 Operation and maintenance <br />Both structures can be installed in open channels. Radial gates require maintenance which includes <br />periodic lubrication of the side racks and bearings. Comparatively, the rubber dam has a more intensive <br />operation and maintenance schedule. The replacement costs for the rubber dam is relatively high, as it <br />cannot be replaced in parts, but rather the whole unit would have to be replaced. <br />Table 3- 1 Comparative Summary of Diversion Structures <br />Radial Gate (Hydro Gate) <br />Inflatable Dam (D rhoff Ltd. <br />• Dimension: 8 ft high x 26.5 ft wide x 2 <br />• Dimensions: 8 ft high x 55 ft wide x l span <br />• hoist/operator included <br />• Material of rubber body: <br />• Hot - Rolled Steel (Plates, Structurals, Flat <br />• EPDM rubber outer layer <br />Bars) ASTM A36 or A306, Grade 60 <br />• 2 layers of nylon fabric; <br />• Cold- Rolled Steel (Shafting and Pins) <br />• 1 layer of stainless steel wire mesh <br />• ASTM A108, Grade 1045 <br />• nominal thickness 3/8 inch <br />• Stainless Steel (Fasteners) <br />• Clamp plates: ductile iron <br />• ASTM F593 or F594 Group 1 <br />• Anchor bolts: carbon steel <br />• Cast Iron ASTM A126, Class B <br />• Special pipe connection flanges: stainless <br />• Rubber: ASTM D2000, Grade 1AA625 <br />steel 304 <br />• Stainless Steel: ASTM Al 67 or A240, Type <br />304L <br />$970,000 <br />$380,000 <br />Table 3- 2 Comparative Summary of Diversion Structures Costs <br />In summary, both structures are suitable for the project. While radial gates offer benefits of superior <br />hydraulics and clear water way, faster operation and lower maintenance requirements, its initial <br />installation capital cost is higher than that of the rubber dam. Comparatively, the rubber dam is <br />economically a more feasible option for this particular case. <br />UiLS 7 <br />25F -139 <br />Radial Gate <br />Inflatable Dam <br />Initial Capital Costs <br />$970,000 <br />$360,000 <br />Lifes an <br />60 <br />15 <br />Discount Rate <br />3.00% <br />3.00% <br />Annual maintanance <br />$6,000 <br />$12,000 <br />27.68 <br />11.94 <br />-Repayment <br />Equivalent Annual Costs <br />41,049 <br />42,156 <br />In summary, both structures are suitable for the project. While radial gates offer benefits of superior <br />hydraulics and clear water way, faster operation and lower maintenance requirements, its initial <br />installation capital cost is higher than that of the rubber dam. Comparatively, the rubber dam is <br />economically a more feasible option for this particular case. <br />UiLS 7 <br />25F -139 <br />