My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR THE HERITAGE 2001 E DYER
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
02/02/2016
>
75A - PH - EIR THE HERITAGE 2001 E DYER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 4:39:05 PM
Creation date
1/28/2016 4:04:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
2/2/2016
Destruction Year
2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
timing, sequencing, or phasing of the development or <br />construction of the Project on all or any part of the <br />Property, City agrees that, unless required by applicable <br />state or federal law, such ordinance, resolution or other <br />measure shall not apply to the Project, Property or this <br />Development Agreement, unless such changes are <br />adopted pursuant to the City's exercise of its Reserved <br />Powers or other applicable provision of this Development <br />Agreement. <br />5.1.6 Timing of Development. The parties acknowledge that <br />Owner cannot at this time predict when or if the Property <br />will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous <br />factors which are not within the control of Owner, such as <br />market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, <br />completion and other similar factors. Because the <br />California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. <br />v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal. 3d 465 that the failure of <br />the parties therein to provide for the timing of development <br />resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of <br />development to prevail over such parties' agreement, it is <br />the parties' intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging <br />and providing that, except as provided in and subject to <br />Section 5.8, Owner shall have the right to develop the <br />Property at such rate and at such time as Owner deems <br />appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business <br />judgment, <br />5.1.7 Development, Construction, and Completion of Public <br />Art. Owner shall include within the Project a single or <br />grouped permanent work of public art consistent with the <br />Public Art Plan (collectively, "Public Art "), attached <br />herewith and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, at a cost of <br />not less than one half of 1% of the total construction costs <br />( Thousand Dollars ($ ,000) (the <br />"Public Art Fee "). <br />5.2 Exclusion from Existing Rules, Regulations and Policies. <br />(a) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65866 and Pardee <br />Construction Co. v. Citv of Camarillo (1984) 37 CaL3d 465, City <br />retains the right to enact police power regulations on matters not <br />covered by Section 5.1 of this Development Agreement, including <br />without limitation: <br />(i) Municipal laws and regulations which do not interfere with <br />Owner's vested rights to develop and use the Property in <br />75A► -75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.