Laserfiche WebLink
9n N-2096-038 <br />Assumption of Defense and Reservation of Rights Agreement <br />This Assumption of Defense and Reservation of Rights Agreement (the "Agreement") is <br />entered into by Christopher Shyan, an individual ("SITYNN"), and the City of Santa Ana <br />("CITY"). <br />RECITALS <br />A. On or about June 3, 2015 and thereafter, the City was served with three separate <br />lawsuits naming the CITY and SIIYNN as defendants. The lawsuits have all been consolidated <br />into one and are entitled MMZ, by and through her guardian ad litem JAZMIN ZARA TE, as <br />successor in interest to ERNESTO CANEPA, deceased and JAZM. IN ZARA TE, JUANA DIAZ, <br />ERNESTO CANEPA ALVARE7 individually v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, CHRISTOPHER SITYNN, <br />and DOES 1 through 10, INCLUS'I'VE, United States District Court Case No. 8:15-ev-00851; DC <br />by and through his guardian ad litem MARIA GUADALUPE GARCIA v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, <br />CHRISTOPHER SITYNN, and DOES I THROUGH 10; INCLUSIVE, United States District Court <br />Case No.. 8:15-cv-00852; and El.0 and Er.0 by and through their guardian ad litem TERESA <br />GARCIA, individually and as successor in interest to ERNESTO CANEPA, deceased, v. CITY <br />OF SANTA ANA, CHRISTOPHER SITYbi 'h; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCL USIVE, United <br />States District Court Case No. 2:15-ev-04071 (the "Lawsuits"). The Lawsuits assert claims <br />against CITY and all defendants for unreasonable search and seizure -detention and arrest (42 <br />USC section 1983); Unreasonable search and seizure -excessive force (42 USC section 1983); <br />Substantive Due Process (42 USC section 1983); and municipal liability for unconstitutional <br />custom, practice or policy (42 USC section 1983). Plaintiffs seek damages against CITY and <br />SIIYNN, <br />A. Under California Government Code sections 825 and 995, SITYNN has requested <br />that CITY provide his legal defense in the Lawsuit and signed an authorization of defense <br />providing that the City Attorney's Office was authorized to defend him in this matter. <br />C. On October 5, 2015, SITYNN was served with a Notice of Intent to Discipline as <br />a result of the incident that forms the basis for this lawsuit. As a result, the City of Santa Ana <br />has now determined that there is an actual conflict of interest between SITYNN and the CITY <br />warranting that separate counsel be provided to SITYNN for his representation in this matter. <br />D. CITY desires and agrees to provide a legal defense of SITYNN in the Lawsuit on <br />the terms and conditions set forth herein. <br />Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which <br />are hereby acknowledged —including, without limitation, the recitals, the covenants, conditions, <br />representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement — the parties hereto agree as follows: <br />1. Provision of Defense <br />A. The CITY, at its sole discretion, will select and pay for separate counsel to <br />represent SITYNN in this matter on the condition that SITYNN reasonably and in good faith <br />cooperate in the conduct of SITYNN'S defense with the CITY and understand that the CITY is <br />reserving its rights pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement. <br />