Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan I Revised Scope of Work <br />City of Santa Ana, CA <br />5.1 Location Prioritization: Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand /Deficiency Analysis <br />Active transportation prioritization processes typically include measures that can be broadly <br />classified as reflective of demand (e.g., proximity to schools, parks, transit stops, population <br />density, employment density) and those reflective of network deficiency (e.g., collision history, <br />number of travel lanes, posted speed, AADT, availability or lack of traffic control). To inform the <br />selection of higher risk field review locations, we will <br />utilize a heat mapping exercise that identifies the <br />relative demand for walking and bicycling throughout <br />the city and compares it to the level of obstacle . <br />presented by the roadway network. This analysis will tj <br />illuminate areas with both high demand and high o a a <br />i <br />deficiency, which are frequently high priority areas. The t <br />t <br />resulting map, overlaid with the risk based and hot spot <br />collision analyses, will allow our team to suggest a list M= <br />of high risk locations from different parts of the city, <br />reflective of the differing conditions facing people r - _- <br />walking and bicycling throughout Santa Ana. ✓ <, <br />.at <br />5.2 Field Review: CommunityWalk/Bike <br />Audits <br />We will conduct community walk and /or bike audits at <br />a sub -set of the locations identified in Task 5.1. These <br />audits, conducted throughout the city, will provide <br />residents from different neighborhoods an opportunity <br />to share their perceptions of safety issues they <br />encounter when walking and bicycling. This task will <br />provide valuable information to complement the <br />consultant team's understanding of contributing <br />factors based on the collision data. In addition to <br />This map overlays an assessment of walking <br />demand with a measure of roadway conditions and <br />listening to the community, these audits will allow our Infrastructure quality to highlight areas with a <br />team to observe vehicle, walking and bicycling <br />mismatch of demand and supply. <br />behaviors or infrastructure elements that may be contributing to safety risk. The field reviews will <br />be conducted when school is in session. In addition to raising community understanding of the <br />Safe Mobility Plan issues, the mobile audit workshops will be used to confirm the relative <br />importance of the risk factors developed in Task 4.2 and Task 5.1. <br />Deliverables: Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand /Deficiency Analysis <br />Preparation, facilitation, and documentation of 3 Community walk/ <br />bike audits <br />Siuyoes2ions or special concerns that the Citp should be aware o " <br />Community input into the Mobility Safety Plan is important to project prioritization as <br />well as for future support for street capital expenditures. However, the short timeline for <br />the project requires city staff support for a meaningful engagement. <br />NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc 19 <br />