Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana Safe Mobility Plan I Revised Scope of Work <br />City of Santa Ana, CA <br />community survey, field review, and collision analysis tasks. Criteria may include, but not be <br />limited to: demand factors (volumes of pedestrians and bicyclists, proximity to specific land - <br />uses), deficiency factors (traffic volumes, posted speed, number of lanes, number of <br />collisions /severity of injuries, collision patterns) as well as feasibility factors (ease of <br />implementation, cost). We can also add criteria that address health and equity, providing points <br />for example to projects in low income neighborhoods or areas of high transit dependency. <br />Deliverables: Technical memorandum of proposed evaluation criteria <br />Prioritized list of safety projects <br />Assumptions and/ or exclusions to the scope of work <br />We suggest presenting preliminary draft prioritization criteria to TAC for feedback <br />during the first meeting early in the planning process. <br />Final Report and Executive Summary <br />We will assemble the results from the above tasks into a highly graphic and easy -to- understand <br />final report that effectively conveys the study findings and decision - making framework that <br />results in the recommended projects and actions. In addition to the items identified in the RFP, <br />we will develop a concise executive summary to convey the process and key findings /outcomes <br />that can be shared with the public, elected officials, or other decision- makers. <br />Final report will include but not be limited to the following: i. Introduction, ii. Relationship of this <br />document to existing documents, iii. Collision analysis, iv. Toolbox of potential street <br />improvements, v. Recommended improvements, vi. Cost estimates, vii. Prioritization, viii. Matrix <br />of proposed countermeasures, ix. Appendices (include all relevant data) <br />Recommended Rollout Strategy <br />The consultant will provide a multi scenario -based rollout strategy for all engineering, <br />enforcement, and education recommendations. The strategy should prioritize high impact /low <br />cost solutions for early rollout with additional phases based upon multiple funding scenarios. <br />Nelson \Nygaard will work with city staff to identify up to three rollout strategies that differ based <br />on the amount of available funding. For each investment scenario, we will identify a phased <br />approach to implementing engineering, enforcement and educational strategies. High impact /low <br />cost solutions will be prioritized for early roll out. <br />Deliverables: Draft and final Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan <br />Executive summary <br />Matrix of High, Medium and Low Impact engineering, enforcement and education <br />strategies including costs for implementation (staff resources and budget) <br />Recommendation for early rollout <br />Assumptions and, or exclusions to the sco�af work <br />We suggest developing a concise, graphical executive summary to convey process and <br />key outcomes that can be shared with the public, elected officials or other decision - <br />makers. <br />NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 114 <br />