Laserfiche WebLink
A-2016-291 <br />INSURANCE NOT REOUIRED <br />WORK MAY PROCEED <br />DATE: <br />CLERK OF COUN40ND PROCEEDS EXPENDITURE AGREEMENT (2003A BONDS) <br />This BOND PROCEEDS EXPENDITURE AGREEMENT (2003A BONDS) <br />("Agreement") is entered into as of October 4, 2016, by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a <br />charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of <br />the State of California ("City"), and the SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, a public body <br />corporate and politic pursuant to Parts 1.8 and 1.85 of Division 24 of the California Health & Safety <br />Code ("Successor Agency"). <br />RECITALS <br />A. The City is a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under <br />the Constitution and laws of the State of California. <br />B. The Successor Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, organized and operating <br />under Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Dissolution Law (as defined in Recital D below). <br />C. The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana ("former Agency") <br />previously was a California public body, corporate and politic, duly formed by the City Council of the <br />City ("City Council") and was organized, existed and exercised the powers of a community <br />redevelopment agency under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code <br />Section 33000, et seq. ("CRL"). <br />D. Assembly Bill xl 26 ("AB xl 26"), effective on June 28, 2011, added Parts 1.8 and <br />1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code and which laws were modified, in part, <br />and determined constitutional by the California Supreme Court in the petition California <br />Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., Case No. 5194861 <br />("Matosantos Decision"), which laws and court opinion caused the dissolution of all redevelopment <br />agencies and winding down of the affairs of former redevelopment agencies. Thereafter, such laws <br />were amended further by Assembly Bill 1484 ("AB 1484") that was effective on June 27, 2012, and <br />thereafter further amended by subsequent legislation (together AB xl 26, the Matosantos Decision, <br />AB 1484, and subsequent legislation thereto are referred to as the "Dissolution Law"). All statutory <br />references herein are to the Dissolution Law unless otherwise stated. <br />E. As of February 1, 2012, the former Agency became a dissolved community <br />redevelopment agency pursuant to the Dissolution Law. <br />F. As of and on and after February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency is performing its <br />functions as the successor agency under the Dissolution Law to administer the enforceable obligations <br />of the former Agency and is engaged in activities necessary and appropriate to wind down the affairs <br />of the former Agency, all subject to the review and approval by a seven -member "Oversight Board" <br />formed thereunder. <br />G. Section 34191.4(c) of the Dissolution Law allows a successor agency that has received <br />a Finding of Completion ("Finding") to use bond proceeds from bonds issued prior to 2011 for the <br />purposes for which the bonds were sold, provides that such proceeds in excess of amounts needed to <br />satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall be expended in a manner consistent with the original <br />bond covenants, and further provides that such expenditures shall constitute "excess bond proceeds <br />