Laserfiche WebLink
The Relative Comparison Analysis is similar to paired data analysis without the use of arbitrary or <br />unsupportable quantitative adjustments. This technique acknowledges the imperfect nature of the subject <br />real estate market. The primary objective is to bracket the subject property between the comparable sales <br />with respect to the similarity, superiority, and inferiority thereof. Superior elements of comparability of <br />an individual sale property would reflect a downward adjustment to the value indication thereof. <br />Conversely, inferior elements suggest an upward adjustment. <br />Additionally, it is important to note that the above elements of comparability were not assigned equal <br />weight in making the analysis of each property. The general location, immediate environmental <br />influences, land size, building size and features, building age/condition, as well as site <br />prominence/exposure were considered the most important factors in the subject case. <br />Overall marketability of each sale property was also considered. Marketability is the practical aspect of <br />selling a property in view of all the elements constituting value, and certain economic and financing <br />conditions prevailing as of the date of sale. Allowance was made for these factors when considered <br />applicable. <br />Another important factor considered in analyzing the overall purchase price per square foot of building <br />area is that of the land/builduig area ratio. The sale properties have ratios ranging between 2.63:1 and <br />6.20:], The subject property has a ratio of 3.50:1. <br />All of the sale transactions employed herein were considered helpful in the valuation analysis of the <br />subject property. Following is a summary relating the overall comparability of fire individual sale <br />properties to the subject site: <br />After considering the various elements of comparability, as well as economic and financial conditions <br />prevailing during the consummation of the various sale properties, as compared to current market <br />conditions, it is the appraiser's opinion that the value of the subject property is estimated as follows: <br />Building: <br />3,255 SF @ $465.00 = $1,513,575. <br />Inasmuch as the subject property is an improved property, and would be acquired for the utility and/or <br />income producing capability of the building improvements, the value indication produced by the building <br />factor has been assigned the most weight. The value of the subject property, as presently improved, and <br />as indicated by the Sales Comparison Approach, is adjusted to $1,515,000. <br />Income Capitalization Approach: <br />The Income Capitalization Approach is based on the capitalization of net income generated, or capable of <br />being generated, by the subject property. The net operating income is the product of the estimated gross <br />rental income, less allowances for long tern vacancy/credit loss and various expense charges. The <br />income/expense pro forma set forth herein is intended to reflect a typical stabilized holding period. <br />75K-25 <br />Overall <br />$ Per <br />Data <br />Cornnarability <br />SF Bldg. <br />1 <br />inferior <br />$315.13 <br />2 <br />inferior <br />$351.60 <br />5 <br />slightly inferior <br />$445.95 <br />3 <br />similar <br />$457.18 <br />Subject <br />- - - - <br />$465.00 <br />6 <br />similar <br />$472.12 <br />4 <br />superior <br />$806.16 <br />After considering the various elements of comparability, as well as economic and financial conditions <br />prevailing during the consummation of the various sale properties, as compared to current market <br />conditions, it is the appraiser's opinion that the value of the subject property is estimated as follows: <br />Building: <br />3,255 SF @ $465.00 = $1,513,575. <br />Inasmuch as the subject property is an improved property, and would be acquired for the utility and/or <br />income producing capability of the building improvements, the value indication produced by the building <br />factor has been assigned the most weight. The value of the subject property, as presently improved, and <br />as indicated by the Sales Comparison Approach, is adjusted to $1,515,000. <br />Income Capitalization Approach: <br />The Income Capitalization Approach is based on the capitalization of net income generated, or capable of <br />being generated, by the subject property. The net operating income is the product of the estimated gross <br />rental income, less allowances for long tern vacancy/credit loss and various expense charges. The <br />income/expense pro forma set forth herein is intended to reflect a typical stabilized holding period. <br />75K-25 <br />