P & D CONSULTANTS - 2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Grand Avenue Widening Project Environmental Impact Report Section 2.0 SECTION 2.0 IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY 2.1 OVERVIEW The environmental process requires the Lead Agency for a proposed project, in this case the City of Santa Ana, to prepare an Initial Study (IS) which addresses the potential environmental impacts which could result from the implementation of a proposed project. An environmental checklist which defines areas of concern must be completed as part of this process. The results of the IS determine whether further environmental documentation is required for a proposed project. The results of the IS for the proposed Grand Avenue widening indicated that a Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required to assess certain potential impacts associated with this project. The IS, which was circulated with the Notice of Preparation (NOP), and the supporting documentation for the proposed Grand Avenue widening are provided in Appendix A of this EIR. This Section summarizes those potential impacts of the proposed Grand Avenue widening that were determined in the IS to be below a level of significance or which could be mitigated to below a level of significance based on mitigation measures incorporated in the IS. 2.2 LAND USE IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT Alternatives 1 and 2 are consistent with the Circulation Element of the City of Santa Ana General Plan because they propose improvement of the project segment of Grand Avenue to the Major Arterial Standard as designated in the Circulation Element and the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Alternative 1 does not includes a bike lane and, therefore, would not be consistent with the City's Bikeway Master Plan, Policy 3.3 of the City's Circulation Element and the County Master Plan of Bikeways (now the Orange County Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan). Mitigation measure LU -1 in the Initial Study was proposed to mitigate this adverse impact. The potential adverse impacts of the deletion of this segment of bike lane from these Master Plans are assessed in Section 3.2 (Land Use and Planning). Mitigation measure LU -1, described originally in the IS, for Alternative 1 has been refined and updated with mitigation measure LP -1 that is described in Section 3.2.5. Alternative 2 includes a five-foot wide, on street, Class lI bike lane consistent with the City's Bikeway Master Plan and the Orange County Commuter Bikeway Strategic Plan. No mitigation is required. Because the IS and this EIR provide a detailed analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the widening alternatives and the No Project Alternative, the proposed alternatives comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Santa Ana environmental guidelines. No mitigation is required. F: IPROJ-ENMGrand eirWew Text - Gran&Section 2.0-new.doc Page 2-1.