My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
P & D CONSULTANTS - 2002
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
P
>
P & D CONSULTANTS - 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 9:32:30 AM
Creation date
8/10/2017 11:34:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grand Avenue Widening Project Environmental Impact Report Section 3.0 <br />Inconsistency or conflict with established recreational, educational, religious our scientific uses <br />of the area. <br />3.2.3 METHODOLOGY RELATED TO LAND USE AND PLANNING <br />The revised preliminary plans for Alternatives 1 and 2 were evaluated to identify the needed right- <br />of-way to accommodate the widened cross section of Grand Avenue. Assessor's parcel maps were <br />used to identify the existing parcel boundaries for all potentially affected parcels. The potential <br />right-of-way takes were identified by the City as full takes based on the following assumptions: <br />The remainder of the affected parcel totals less than 15,000 square feet for commercial uses or <br />less than 6,000 square feet for single family residential uses. The required parcel sizes for <br />multiple family residential uses depend on the number of dwelling units on the site. <br />• The remainder of the parcel does not meet the required setback of 15 feet from the new edge of <br />the public right of way to the nearest structure on the site for commercial uses and 20 feet for <br />residential uses. <br />Takes that do not exceed these criteria were identified as partial takes. Under a partial take, the City <br />would acquire only a part of the parcel, which could include landscape areas, parking areas, <br />driveways and/or part of existing structures. Partial takes have been reviewed for conformance with <br />the General Plan and Zoning Code site development standards. Parcels that did not conform were <br />considered full takes. <br />The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the metropolitan planning <br />organization for the greater Los Angeles area, identified a number of land use policies in the growth <br />management and water quality chapters of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. The <br />proposed Grand Avenue widening alternatives were evaluated for consistency with these land use <br />policies as discussed in the next section. <br />3.2.4 IMPACTS RELATED TO LAND USE AND PLANNING <br />Impacts of Alternative 1 Related to Land Use and Planning <br />Impacts of Alternative 1 Related to Property Acquisition <br />Figure 3.2-1 shows the potential right-of-way impacts and the extent of takes for each property <br />affected under Alternative 1. A reference number has been assigned to each parcel along the Grand <br />Avenue study area. Table 3.2-1 summarizes the property acquisition under Alternatives 1 and 2 and <br />includes the corresponding map reference number. As shown, Alternative 1 would result in the full <br />take of 45 parcels and the partial take of 20 parcels. Table 3.2-2 summarizes the property takes for <br />single and multiple family residential dwelling units, commercial and public uses and vacant parcels <br />under Altemativel. <br />F.IPROJ-EWGrand eirWew Text- GrandWection 3 SplitlSection 3.2.doc Page 3.2-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.