Laserfiche WebLink
.RNV[IIONMENTAL IMPAnT. REPORT ADDZND.VM AIItifTHONO pANCM'BEV1226 PADUOT <br />'39VTEMBRR 2117. - - ]ANTA. ANA:VAL1rORNIA <br />2.13 POPULATION ANM HOUSING'. NO. ma2c uasnhuHdttA <br />ajaina.it setiri Change ream <br />W014 the Pra ed Inipea Impact I'fevlous"Anfltd6 <br />,(e). Induce substantial pypulattori-dmwth in an area, eilherdirectly <br />(for example, fiy proposing view homes ahtl businesses) or 1-1 El -® <br />`indirectly (for example, through extension vt roads orother <br />inrraiuucture)?. <br />(b) Displace substantial numhers of existing housing, necessirating the Q <br />construction ofreylacenie tliousin-elSewllere? <br />`(c) - DiEl 0 <br />splacesuhsiantial numbers of people, neeLssitating lite O <br />construction era laceinenthousin elsewhere? <br />Analysis of Project.Changes:. <br />A) The Approved Pro ,(ect;proposed 1561 single-family detachet1restdeniial units (which.were. <br />constractcd,agd are not'occupied) The Certified EiR estimated that the Approved Pruject would <br />inorcase population by716 persons (based on 4:53 persons per ltouschold), which.reprtscttted a <br />0:2`uerccnt increase in aobulation. The Revised Projeet inchides an addit11 ional 42 single family <br />P.loh, 2(114-262 1 Housing Element Update, I to eiftwnt average houscliold size in the ,City is 4.4 <br />persons. Based on the City's current avemgc household size; the Rcviscd Protect w6uld introduce <br />18,51 'persons into the Project site compared to the Approved ,Proleect.2 ,nii addition Of 1851new <br />residents would be approximately 0:055 percent of the City's, population of 33412.17 in 2016, and <br />0.054 percent,oGlhc City.s projected population.of 343,100, in 2020..The increase in population <br />resulting from the Revised Project isnot considered sigmiftcant because it.only comprises a small <br />portion (less thi n I percent) of the total population of the City and does not wpresent a. <br />substantial increase in population: <br />Additionally, the Rei•ised Pro)ect:is surrounded by urban' -uses, ritcliiding single-fnthily residential <br />uses to the north,,easi, and south and.educationiil and recreational uses to the east.11he Revised <br />Project docs not propose .to expand surrounding utlhty'infrasttructure in the Project vicinity: <br />171eref ire , the Revised Project would not directly orindkeetly induce population growth thriiugh <br />the extedsinn of roads or other inliashvcture. Therefore, potential impacts related to substantial <br />inducelnerij,of population gowth, either directly or indirectly; would be less than sioillwant, and <br />he mitigation'is required; The Certified EIR also conded that impacts of the Approval Project <br />related to population growth would be :less than sigrnificant..Therefore,*llle Revised Proiva would' <br />not result'iti new significant itnpacts beyond those'identit ed in the Ccaifted EIR. Nu new <br />mitigation measures arc required <br />1 42 residences x.4.4 person,.hesidence - 184:8: <br />1'he 156 single -gamily residential units have been coo4ructdd; lhaefore, iT is, assume) that the population <br />associated wiihthese households are accounted for incurrent population esiiinates. <br />3 .United States, Census Bureau, Quick Facts. <br />ern Califoroia.f.ssociation of (imei-nmenls, 2016.2040'UNSCS Demographic & Growth Forecasts. <br />2016. <br />n:ISIIOtG'hAW.4lendumlr\dil�ndum.:,:cx �.CFIrUir 17�. <br />75B-106 <br />2-57 <br />