Laserfiche WebLink
ENVULOMMENTAL. IMYAOP fl£eoai AooeNUUM AUMSTRONa RAN011 RavissD mojewr <br />9£PTBMN£R 301, aAN'rA ANA. 4AL@OANIA <br />2.15 RECREATION ,Nei N. 3uNaiu as <br />slgilacant More Saw Cli¢ua IN., <br />Would Me pmjeCl'; Impact Impact Pmton Aual}xis <br />❑ ❑ M <br />on of recreational facitifies which mightI El ElM <br />d effect on the em�ironment7 <br />Analysis of Project Changes: <br />a). According t .lhe,.City's,GentkaLPlati Open Space, Parks, and Recreation [louent (1982), the <br />City has approXimately 400, acres ofpulilie park and recreation facilities The, City maintains a <br />ratio and has adopted a standard of approximately two acres of open space per 1,000'residents.. <br />Tile addition oGapproximately 185 residents generated by the Revised Project could <br />incrementally increase usage of City parks and recreational facilities. Using the City's atio of <br />two acres per 1,0b0,resideuls, the 'additional,residentsavould. re <br />quire'047 acres of parkland, <br />which is .09.percent of existing'pink area intheCity. In addition,. Chapter 34, Article 8 of the <br />City'SM I unicipal Code war adopted to implement the provisions ofthe Wtuby Act (State of <br />California Planning and Zoning Law, Se 66477), Which allows the legislative body of a city <br />to'iequiFethe dedication of land far park facilities and'or the paymenl•ofin lieu fees for park'and <br />recreational purposes as a condition to;tlie approval forda find tract inap or parcel map for certain. <br />subdivisions. The Revised Prcjectwould-be subject to the,dedication of landfoe.park.facilities <br />and/or the payment of in -lieu fees for park and recreational purposes. The Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code Section34-264, Requirements, states that the subdivider may -he requiredto dedicate land <br />for park'and recreational purposes at the time of approval :of a final subdivision map. As <br />previously described in--Seclion 2.13, Public Services, thi Canified MR concluded that the <br />Approved Project would resph iti.less than sig+nifieant impacts with respect to, park facilities <br />through the provision of onsite private space and the payment of park dedication fees. The <br />Revised Proiect would be subject to the same park requirements:as the Approved. Project, which <br />would ensure.lhal the Revised • Project would not inerease.the use of existing neighborhood and <br />regional parks orother recreation facilities such that substantial deterioration of the facilities <br />would occur or he accelerated. The Revised Project would not result in new significant impacts <br />beyond those identified in the Certified FiR. No new initigation is required. <br />by The Remised Project would not include any recreational facilities that would be`open to the, <br />general public. Therefore, the propoccd Project does not includerecreational facilities float would <br />have.an adverse effect on thcanvironinent. The increase in population associated with the <br />proposed 42.unil Project would tic 185 residents. Based on'theCity's parkland requirement of <br />two acres per 1;000 residents, the Revised Project would increase the demand for parkland in the <br />City by 0.37 acre. As previously mentioned, the applicant is required by the City to,pay in -lieu <br />park fees thta vould serve to reduce impacts related to recreational facilities to a less than <br />significant level.The Revised Project would not result in new significant impacts beyond those- <br />identift in lhe.Ccrtificd IUR. No new mitignticn is required. <br />Mi(igaliun Measures: <br />P:ISIa1604',AddendumiAddenrmn.Jxc ,.09:U5117,, <br />75B-113 <br />2-64 <br />