75B - PH - AMEND ZONING 2001 W MACARTHUR

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AEPOR'r AYRY.NDGM ARMSTROND RANO"DiVISEU PROFE CT SEPTEMbRR 111) SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA during construction actMtiis, those activities would be halted in the vicinity of the find until it can be assessed for significance bya qualified archaeologist. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR 1 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources 16 a less than significant level. Likewise, according to the County of GraingeGeneral Plan, Resource Element (2015), the Project'site is not located in'a,general area of paleontological sensitivity. The Project Site was historically used for agriculture. Previous tilling of true site for agriculture would have resulted imground disturbance of up to no more than 2 feet in depth. According to the Certified EIR, if excavation on the Project site exceeds 5 feel in depth, the potential exists for fossil remains tote encountered at previously unrecorded fossil sites. The Revised Project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measures CR -2 through CR --11 from the Certified EIR. These measures comprise a paleontological. monitoring program in compliance with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standard measures for reducing potential impacts to paleontolo tical resources to a less than signific.mL level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CR -2 through CR -1 I would reduce impacts to paleontological resources are to a less than significant level by ensuring the appropriate identification, Lrcaun6t,and curation of any paleontological resources that have the potential to yield substantial information about history or prehimoiy..Therefore, the Revised Project would not result in new significant iitipacts beyond those identified in the Certified EIR. No new mitigation is required. b) The Project site, is, partially developed and is located in an urban area. The Revised Project is a residential development that includes 42.single-family detached residential units and a reduced or smaller Church campus. `the Revised Project Nvould rely out and can be accommodated by the existing road system, public parks, public services, and utilities. The Revised Project would not result in or contribute to a significant biological or culntral impact alicr implementation of Mitigation measures, Based on the Project Description and the preceding responses; impacts related to the,Revised Project are less than sigmiPcant or can be reduced to less than significant levels with incorporation of mitigation measures, The Revised Project's contribution to any significantcunnilative impacts would be less than cunutlativcly considerable. Therefore, the Revised Pro1ecr vrould not result in neiv significant impacts beyond those identified in the Certified EIR. No new mitigation is required - c) The Project site is partially developed and is located in :m urban area. The Revised Project is it residmitial development that includes 42 single-ramily detached residential units and a reduced or smaller Church campus. The Revised Project would be consistent with existing City zoning and General Plan designations for the site. Based on. the Project Description and the preceding responses, development of the Revised Project would not'causc substantial adverse effects on human beings because all potentially significant impacts of the Revised Project can be mitigated to a less than significant level. Therefore, the Revised ProicuCwould noticsutt iii new significant impacts beyond those identified in the Certified EIR. No.new mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required beyond those speci fled in Section 2.1 through 2.8. Findings Related to I'vlandalory Finding's of Significance: P:iS}InIbU+UdJendmnblddcndmn.dttia �U97USi 17n 75B-126 2-77