My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - AMEND ZONING 2001 W MACARTHUR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
10/03/2017
>
75B - PH - AMEND ZONING 2001 W MACARTHUR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 5:09:37 PM
Creation date
9/28/2017 4:44:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
10/3/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENp1 f ON MF.MTAL IMJ- AU'r; CSPOR'r:All UNNO9M `AxMJTAONO RANCH RXVr9SO PaOJSOS <br />SRPTEM6691I17 - - _SANTA 'ANA;'CALVOYNIA <br />3.0' DETERMINATION <br />Bused on information and analyses in; this'' Alddendmnand pursuant to Section'15162 of the State <br />CF,QA Guidelines; the City of Santa Ana has determined the following; <br />It There are no substantial changes to the,Project that would requiramajor revisions of,the Certified <br />EiR due lo'new signific mt environmental` effects or a substantial increase in severity' of inpacts <br />identified in the Certified EIR. <br />2.; Substantial changes have not occurredinthe circumstances under.which the Project is' being <br />undertaken that will require major_ revisions to.the Certified EIR. to disclose new significant <br />impacts. <br />3.. There is no new, information of substantial ;importance"which was not known at the time the EIR. <br />was certified, indicating any of the followmgf <br />The Prgject,willhave;une,or mare newsign ficanteffects nofdisaiissed in the',Certified El[?; <br />There are, hapacts determined to -he signrficam inahe Cettified`EIR-thatwould be: <br />substantially;.more severe;, <br />• There are,addiijonal mitigation measmres or. alternatives to the Project that would <br />substantially reduce one or more sig 'ikcatit effects identified in the: Certified`EIR; and <br />• ThcTc, arc ndditionul mitigation inea-Sures or alternativesrejectird b"y the Project proponentthat <br />are corisicierably iiit%rent from those analyzed in the Certified EIR that would substantially <br />reduce asignikant impact.ldctitifled in &certified EIR: <br />Based on the information provided abo w;1I <br />beyond those idc-TWFied in'lhe Certified EIR <br />addressed above remain appIicalilelo.lhe Pi <br />the Certified FIR; the proposed improVcmei <br />Based upon the evidenco included in the ab <br />Section 2.0 Would'not result in a substantial <br />Certified EIR. <br />1'rojectwould not result in additional impacts <br />a measures identified in the Certified Elland. <br />e standards have changed since the approval of <br />e required to comply with"current regulations. <br />s, the,proposed improvements as described in <br />the conclu`stohs and analysis included in the <br />Although the Revised Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all <br />potentially significant effcets (a) have been analyzed adequately in the Certified HIR pursuant to <br />applicable standards, and (h) have been avoided or mitigated pursutmtto mitigation in the Certified <br />EIR, hicluding r visions or miligalion measures that are imposed upon the.proposed Project, nothing <br />further beyond this,Addendum to the cerlified FIR is, required. <br />P,ISt101 E:WLAddendumblddendum.ducx't1391Uz117n <br />75B-128 <br />3-79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.