Laserfiche WebLink
8NVIRONHH0•tAL IMPACT ABYOE'r AUUENUVM. <br />SLNTYMDE] 2017 <br />ARMSTEOKO' RANCK REVISED PROJECT <br />SANTA ANA. OALIPORNIA <br />United Stmusp Fish arid Wildlife Serviee (USFWS) Therefore imptemen(auoii of the Revised <br />Project would hot impact "any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural comtnuitityidentitied in <br />local or regioual.plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS, and no'tmngation-is <br />required. The Certified EIR also concluded that no ripariatfhabitat or other sensitive natural <br />community would be impacted by ihaApproved Project, Therefore, the Revised Project would <br />not result in pow sitnii ficam impacts beyond those idcnti lied in the Certified EIR: No new <br />mitigation mettsures are required, <br />c) The Certified FIR did not identify <br />Howcvor, the guidance, for delincal <br />Cur iiflcation of the FIR in 20021 tl <br />of P.ngincors (USACE) or CDFWj <br />drainages are observed on,the Proj, <br />jurisdictional delineation -would be <br />authorization from. the CDFWr the <br />Board (RWQCit). Compcnsatoryi <br />beyond those <br />required. <br />fictional wctlands'or waters or the Project site. <br />fictional wetlands and waters has changes since <br />rnscncc.of arcas`subject to United Slates Army Corps <br />at cannot be ruled out. if potentially, jurisdictional <br />iring the biological survey, an additional <br />A, impacts to jurisdictional areas would require <br />and the Santa -Ana Regional Water Quality Control <br />i may be required as part of the perinitting processes, <br />be able to be reduced to a'less than' significant, level <br />tcle'signTeatures which'shall be discdssed in <br />!refore, the Rayised Project "would not'rdsultin ne\q <br />in the Certified SIR. No new mitigation mensures.a e <br />d) 116 northern portion of the Projects'tte.is developed with a small sanctuary "and o parking lot and <br />the southern portion is undeveloped.'lhere;are "no trees on the southern portion of the Project site <br />and the Revisi;d Project would not'impact imy of the existing trees on the uorthem portion ;of the <br />Project site; tl eiefore,"no frees d cold be remo4ed, cut, prpr ed, broken, or injure¢, -as psrt.of the <br />Revised Prgjecl.;There:forc, the Reiiiscd Project would not cotiniet.with the provisions in the <br />City's Municipal Code. The Reiised,Projcct %m uld not rccult it' a significant impact related to <br />local policies"or.ordinances protecting biological resources, and no mitigation is required. The <br />Corti lied F.IRconcluded that impacts of the Approved Project related to conflict:with any local <br />policies or ordinances }x0t0e1i11gbioiogi6al resources .would be less than significant and -no <br />mitigation measures wore required. Theret'ore,:the Revised Project would not result hrnew- <br />sigr.i icant impacts beyond tlto,e identified"in the Certified MR. No new, mitigation measures are <br />required. <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />Based on the analysis and infonna-don aliovo, Mitigation Measure "©IO -1 includedin the Certified <br />EIR"for the Approved Project would be applicable to the Revised Project. <br />BI0-1 Thirty days prior to the issuance ora grading permit, the City of Santa Ana shall <br />raluire.1he applicant to hire a;qualiftcd biologist with appiopriateyesource agency <br />permits to survey.within"dle limits of"disturbance for thatphaseof <br />developtncnt/construciion (i.c., the residential or church portion'of the project site) to <br />determine Ilse presence of active burrows for burrowing owl. Any active burrows <br />Found during survey efforts sball be mapped on the construction plans. <br />1':151101 2-22 <br />75B-71 <br />