My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RESO 2017-29_2222 E 1st St
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2017
>
RESO 2017-29_2222 E 1st St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2017 11:32:11 AM
Creation date
10/4/2017 11:31:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-29
Date
9/11/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
building area, resulting in a significant loss of units and <br />parking area. The Applicant intends to compensate for this <br />reduction by providing a greater average square footage of <br />private/common open space per unit on the project site. <br />Second, for a project of this size and construction type, the <br />Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) requires 360 -degree <br />circulation on the project site with minimum 20 -foot fire <br />lanes. The addition of landscaping and walkways around the <br />project perimeter results in the project not being able to meet <br />the maximum 10 -foot side yard requirement. Further, for a <br />project of this height, the MEMU requires a 100 -foot rear <br />yard setback. Implementing this standard would result in the <br />building being set back an additional 67 feet from the rear lot <br />line, resulting in a significant loss of units and parking area. <br />Third, if the project was designed with narrower driveways, <br />the driveways would not conform to minimum standards <br />established for fire ingress/egress by OCFA and for trash <br />truck ingress/egress established by the Public Works <br />Agency and Waste Management, the current waste collector <br />contracted by the City. <br />The Applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of <br />Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all <br />liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its <br />approval of this project, and any approvals associated with the project, <br />including, without limitation, any environmental review or approval, except to <br />the extent caused by the sole negligence of the City of Santa Ana. <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA), the recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15332 <br />(Class 32 "In -Fill Development Projects'). <br />The Class 32 exemption applies to projects characterized as infill development <br />meeting the following conditions: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable general <br />plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable <br />zoning designation and regulation; 2. The proposed development occurs within city <br />limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban <br />uses; 3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened <br />species; 4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to <br />traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and 5. The site can be adequately served by <br />all required utilities and public services. <br />The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the MEMU regulating <br />plan. The project meets several General Plan goals and policies, including the Land <br />Use Element's Goal 2 (to encourage diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and <br />Resolution No. 2017-29 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.