My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 11:30:18 AM
Creation date
12/5/2017 4:01:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
WS
Date
12/5/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ease the O.C. housing crisis by allowing development on small lots - Daily Pilot Page 2 of 3 <br />It should come as no surprise that home ownership rates are at an all-time low, with Orange and Los <br />Angeles counties facing the lowest in the nation. While many factors have contributed to our current crisis, <br />let's not ignore the simple concept of supply and demand, and figure out how to increase supply. <br />So, how do local policymakers work to generate more for -sale housing as available land remains scarce, <br />and the American dream of owning a home continues to remain just that — a dream? One solution: small <br />lot development. <br />Southern California is no stranger to the small lot home. Passed in 2005, Los Angeles was already <br />struggling with a lack of land, attainable housing and a twiddling home ownership rate and looked to a <br />smaller, innovative for -sale product to increase supply. In a nutshell, the city would subdivide lots within <br />existing multifamily and commercial zones to accommodate detached townhomes that would allow buyers <br />to own the unit and land underneath. According to the city, from 20o6-13, in a recessionary economic <br />climate, more than 16o subdivision cases were filed, resulting in the approval of over i,5oo individual lots. <br />In Orange County, Costa Mesa recognized similar characteristics and in 2014 passed the first small lot <br />ordinance in the county. The code change aimed at creating flexibility for developers by removing the <br />required minimum distance between buildings, reducing setbacks and open space requirements, and by <br />allowing live/work units on land zoned for multifamily units — all without increasing density. <br />This O.C.-style small lot has seemingly done well, as you will easily spot the modern homes driving <br />through the streets of Costa Mesa. According to the city, 120 units have been approved since the <br />ordinance's inception, with more in the process. <br />Townhomes and condominiums have always been a practical way to increase attainable for -sale housing, <br />but with higher -than -average fees, financing costs and insurance premiums, they can still be difficult to <br />build and sell. The small lot ordinance creates a townhome-style product with the same benefits and <br />ownership perks as your traditional single-family ranch home, making it a great product for the first-time <br />buyer. Small lots are efficient, create less of a footprint and can be built on underutilized commercial and <br />industrial zones as many businesses look to the online market, subsequently reducing traffic in these areas. <br />Homeownership rates may continue to struggle if nothing is done. Now is the time for local policymakers <br />and elected officials to look at innovative ways to increase for -sale housing supply by amending their <br />building codes to accommodate the small lot development. <br />STEVEN LaMOTTE is the chapter executive officer for the Building Industry Assn., Orange <br />County Chapter. <br />Copyright© 2017, Daily Pilot <br />ThisiklQa�11�A'�f>'i���#elate[pp�q��;e, Housing Market <br />Subscribe for on y 99¢ <br />http://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/opinionitn-dpt-me-commentary-sunday-2017090... 12/5/2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.