My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The objective of this project is to analyze the impact of rent control on several population and <br />housing Issues. The project is organized around six questions: <br />• Goes rent control have an effect on the size of the resident population? <br />• Does rent control have an impact on the quantity of rental housing stock? <br />• Does rent control affect: household composition? <br />• What are the major economic issues involving rent control? <br />• Does rent control have any indirect effects on the demographics of the population? <br />q•OF• =0 <br />The effects of the restrictive rent controls in Berkeley and Santa Monica, implemented j ustprior <br />to the 1980 Census, can be measured through the changes in population, housing, and other <br />variables which occurred during the 1986.1990 decade tinder rent control, <br />Natal[ cities with rent control are Included in thisstudy, as it is only those with restrictive rent <br />control that may upset the balance between renters` needs and market forces, resulting In a <br />systematic Was that may include those for whom the ordinances are supposed to protect. <br />The restrictive rentcontrol ordinances in these t,wocities were created to meet perceived needs <br />of the community by attempting to meet stated goals. These ordinances were designed to <br />achieve the following goals: <br />• Assist certain subgroups, such as the elderly and disabled, families with children; and <br />minorities to find and remain in rental housing. <br />• Preserve and protect affordable rental housing and existing rental housing stock. <br />• Maintain the rich racial, ethnic; and economic diversity within the community, <br />The research process used in this report was designed to test whether progress toward these <br />goals have been achieved during the 10 years between the 1980 and 1990 Census. All data <br />are from the STF-3 summary tables in the Census reports, <br />A simple comparison of'population and housing variables for these two census years would <br />not be a fair test, however, because external economic, social, and demographic factors <br />unrelated to rent control have been operating, In orderto control for the effect of these external <br />factors, the changes in these two cities were compared in each case to the changes which <br />occurred over the same tune period in the counties in which they arelocated—Alameda and <br />Los Angeles counties, The use of the counties for comparison should correct for external <br />economic, social, and other factors which should have similar effects on the cities and <br />Counties, <br />The Caffornto State University-4eal fstete &.,Land Use lnstitum. <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.