My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additions to the Rental Stock Are Increasingly <br />at the Higher End <br />Share of recently Built Units <br />23% 15 <br />1 <br />22% <br />38°/a <br />29 <br />2009 <br />9% <br />9% , <br />40% <br />19% <br />15°!a <br />2016 <br />Monthly Housing Cost <br />Under$650 11 $050-849 Nd $650-1,090 N $1,100-1,499 ® $1,500 and Ovor <br />Notes'. Recently built units In 2991 129181 were constructed In 1999-2991 12914-29181. Monthly housing posts <br />include rent and utilities and are in constant 2016 dollars, adjusted for inflation using the CPI -U for All Itoms Less <br />Shelter Data exclude vacant units and units for which no cash rent Is paid. <br />Source: RIC tabulations of US Census Bureau. 2991 and 2916 American Community Survey 1 Year Gstimates, <br />ing labor and materials. According to estimates from RS Means, the <br />costs of building a basic, three-story apartment building increased <br />by 8 percent from 2016 to 2017 alone. Tight land use regulations also <br />add to costs by limiting the land zoned for higher -density housing <br />and entailing lengthy approval processes. <br />Given these high development costs, most of the demand for low- <br />priced rentals must be met by older units. Only a fifth of existing <br />units rented for under $650 a month in 2016, and nearly half of these <br />units were built before 1970. Affordably priced rentals are frequently <br />located in smaller multifamily structures, with one-quarter of low- <br />cost units in buildings with 2-4 apartments. <br />In many cases, the supply of these so-called naturally occurring <br />affordable rentals is replenished as rents on older housing fall due <br />to aging and obsolescence. But with overall rental demand strong, <br />particularly in centrally located communities, rents for an increas- <br />ing number of once -affordable units have become out of reach <br />for lower-income households. At the same time, the rents charged <br />for units in neighborhoods with weak demand may not support <br />adequate maintenance, leaving those rentals at risk of deterioration <br />and loss. Given the lack of new construction of lower-cost rentals, <br />preserving the existing stock of privately owned affordable units is <br />increasingly urgent. <br />RENTAL MARKETS AT A TURNING POINT <br />Rental construction led the housing recovery, rebounding nearly <br />four -fold from the market trough in 2009 to 400,000 units in 2015— <br />the highest annual level since the late 1980s. But after moving <br />sideways in 2016, the pace of multifamily starts has fallen 9 per- <br />cent through October 2017. The slowdown has occurred in markets <br />across the country, but is most evident in metros where multifamily <br />construction had been strongest. <br />In addition to the slowdown in construction, a variety of measures sug- <br />gest that the rental boom is cresting. RealPage reports increasing slack <br />in the professionally managed apartment market, with vacancy rates <br />rising over the past year in 94 of the 100 metros tracked. The clearest <br />signs of loosening are in the higher -priced Class A segment, where the <br />vacancy rate was up 1.5 percentage points year over year in the third <br />quarter of 2017, to 6.0 percent (Figure 3). vacancy rates in the lower-cost <br />Class C segment also rose but remain quite low at 4.1 percent. <br />Apartment rents are also increasing more slowly in all three seg- <br />ments of the market (Figure 4). This deceleration has appeared in all <br />four regions of the country and in large and small markets alike. <br />Even so, conditions in selected markets—particularly smaller metros <br />and locations in the Midwest, such as Cincinnati and Minneapolis— <br />were still heating up. <br />Over the last six years, increases in the median rent have exceeded <br />inflation in non -housing costs by more than a full percentage point <br />annually, with the largest gains in the South and West. Median rents <br />have risen at twice the national pace in markets with rapid popula- <br />tion growth, such as Austin, Denver, and Seattle. And within these <br />fast-growing metros, rents in previously low-cost neighborhoods <br />rose nearly a percentage point faster each year than in high-cost <br />neighborhoods. <br />Meanwhile, rental property owners continue to benefit from still <br />healthy increases in operating incomes and property values. According <br />to the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries, net <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.