Laserfiche WebLink
income quartile had just $488 per month to spend on other essen- <br />tials -18 percent less than in 2001 after adjusting for inflation. The <br />added costs of utilities and transportation further strain household <br />budgets. Low-income households with children and older adults <br />with severe rental cost burdens are in a particularly precarious posi- <br />tion and may be unable to afford other goods and services that are <br />critical to health and well-being. <br />SHORTFALL IN RENTAL ASSISTANCE <br />Need for housing assistance continues to grow. HUD's Worst Case <br />Housing Needs 2017 Report to Congress shows that the number of <br />very low-income households receiving rental assistance increased <br />by 600,000 from 2001 to 2015. Over the same period, the number of <br />very low-income households (making less than 50 percent of area <br />median) grew by 4.3 million, with extremely low-income house- <br />holds (making less than 30 percent of area median) accounting for <br />more than half (2.6 million) of this increase. As a result, the share <br />of renters potentially eligible for assistance and that were able to <br />secure this support declined from 28 percent to 25 percent (Figure <br />6). Meanwhile, the share of very low-income renters facing worst <br />case needs—that is, paying more than half their incomes for hous- <br />ing and/or living in severely inadequate units—increased from 34 <br />percent to 43 percent. <br />Making matters worse, much of the subsidized rental stock is at risk <br />of loss either due to under -maintenance or expiring affordability <br />periods. Public housing is particularly under threat, with a backlog <br />of deferred repairs last estimated at $26 billion in 2010. In fact, the <br />number of occupied public housing units fell by 60,000 between 2006 <br />and 2016. The Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program was <br />launched in 2012 to convert public housing into long-term project - <br />based Section 8 contracts in order to provide more flexible financing <br />for improvements. The RAD program quickly reached its initial cap <br />of 60,000 units, which has since been increased to 225,000 units. <br />The two main sources of rental housing assistance are the Housing <br />Choice Voucher and Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) pro- <br />grams. Vouchers enable recipients to choose units on the open <br />market as long as they meet rent and quality standards. Despite a <br />6.8 percent increase in funding between 2011 and 2016, rising rents <br />kept growth in the number of voucher holders to just 5.8 percent. <br />In contrast, the LIHTC program provides funding for new construc- <br />tion as well as rehabilitation and preservation of existing assisted <br />housing. In recent years, the LIHTC program has supported 70,000 <br />affordable rental units per year, with roughly 55 percent added <br />through new construction. But over the next decade, nearly 500,000 <br />LIHTC units, along with over 650,000 other subsidized rentals, will <br />come to the end of their required affordability periods. The need for <br />funding to help rehabilitate and preserve this important stock will <br />fuel significant demand for LIHTC funding, thus limiting opportuni- <br />ties to build new affordable rentals. <br />In recognition of the important role that the LIHTC program plays, <br />the Congress is considering a bipartisan proposal to expand funding <br />while also introducing reforms that would improve the ability of <br />the program to serve both lower- and moderate -income households <br />Despite Recent Declines, the Number and Share of Cost -Burdened Renters Remain Well Above Levels a Decade Ago <br />Millions Percent <br />12 <br />10 <br />9 <br />A <br />7 <br />6 <br />5 <br />2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <br />■ Number ofMade rate lysuffered Ron Iurs (Left soahi G Number of Severely Burdened Renters (Left suite) a Shore of Renters with Cost burdens (Right scale) <br />Notes: Moderately (severely) cost -hardened households pay 30 50% from then W%I of income for housing. Households with seen or negative income are assumed to hove. severe burdens, <br />while households paying no cash rent are assumed to be where burdens. <br />Source'. LUIS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Amednen Community survey 1 -Year Estimates. <br />52 <br />50 <br />48 <br />46 <br />44 <br />42 <br />40 <br />38 <br />5 <br />