My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br />��' *X '4 .�k �j,a° aa;.c it ,r2.,fi. 5,,. � �' n x ➢}� oY <br />While Completions Are Still on the Upswing, Starts of Rental Units Have Slowed <br />Units Intended for Rent Thousands) <br />600 <br />500 <br />ago <br />300 <br />200 <br />100 <br />0 <br />1977 1979 1981 1983 198E 1997 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2981 2003 2005 2007 2089 2911 2013 2015 2017 <br />IS Completions . Starts <br />Notes'. Date include both multifamily and single-family units, Estimate for 2017 is based on the four quarters ending in 2017:3 <br />Source: Ji tabulations of US Census bureau, New Eesidential Ca emotion <br />recent production of new multifamily units (which make up the <br />lion's share of rental construction) is still slightly below the 420,000 <br />unit annual rate averaged since 1960. Growth in single-family rent- <br />als averaged some 390,000 annually from 2006 to 2016, supplement- <br />ing new construction in meeting the sharp increase in demand. <br />Although the national recovery has been robust, the pace of growth <br />in multifamily construction varied widely across markets. Over the <br />latest cycle from 2010 to 2016, multifamily starts added 15 percent or <br />more to the multifamily stock in fast-growing metros such as Austin, <br />Charlotte, Nashville, and Raleigh, but as little as 1 percent in slow- <br />growing areas like Cleveland and Providence. The largest increases <br />in multifamily supply occurred mainly in the South and West, where <br />production was still catching up with rapid population growth. <br />Overall, however, construction activity has begun to moderate <br />(Figure 20). Indeed, multifamily starts are down 9 percent year-to-date <br />through October 2017 on a seasonally adjusted basis. The slowdown <br />was first evident in 2016 when permitting fell in nearly half of the <br />nation's 50 largest markets. The five markets with the most multi- <br />family permitting in 2013-2015 declined sharply, collectively regis- <br />tering a 35 percent drop in 2016. This total includes declines of more <br />than 50 percent in Houston and New York, as well as more moderate <br />cuts in Dallas, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Permitting in other large <br />markets, like Atlanta and Denver, continued to increase. <br />Meanwhile, multifamily starts also fell in nearly half of the nation's 100 <br />largest metros in the 12 months ending August 2017. By comparison, <br />construction activity slowed in less than two-fifths of these markets <br />just a year earlier. Multifamily starts were down across metro areas of <br />all sizes, with the biggest declines reported in the South and Northeast. <br />Even so, multifamily construction in many locations was still strong <br />by historical standards. In the year ending August 2017, multifamily <br />starts in nearly half of the nation's 100 largest metro areas exceeded <br />their annual averages in the two decades leading up to the housing <br />peak (1986-2005). In 26 of these areas, multifamily starts were up <br />by more than 50 percent. Moreover, starts in several markets where <br />multifamily construction had not fully recovered by 2017—including <br />Jacksonville, Riverside, and Sacramento—remained on the rise. <br />EASING MAINLY AT THE HIGH END <br />With rental demand soaring, the national stock of vacant rental <br />units shrank from nearly 4.5 million in mid -2010 to just 3.2 million <br />in 2016. As a result, the rental vacancy rate fell sharply from 10.8 <br />percent to 6.9 percent in the third quarter of 2016. However, the <br />national vacancy rate rose to 7.2 percent in the third quarter of 2017, <br />suggesting the rental market is at a turning point. <br />Vacancy rates for professionally managed apartments in multifam- <br />ily buildings are even lower. RealPage, Inc. reports a vacancy rate of <br />4.5 percent in the third quarter of 2017, comparable to those at the <br />peak of the housing boom in 2006. Vacancy rates were under 4.0 <br />percent in more than 40 of the 100 markets tracked, and under 3.0 <br />percent in 16 markets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.