Laserfiche WebLink
the best strategy for reducing family homelessness. This study was <br />launched in 2008 to test the relative efficacy of several approaches, <br />including priority access to long-term subsidies, temporary subsi- <br />dies, project -based transitional housing, and usual care through the <br />shelter system and other available supports. According to HUD's <br />evaluation of long-term outcomes, priority access to housing choice <br />vouchers significantly reduced the likelihood of homelessness, dou- <br />bling up, and shelter stays three years after enrollment in the study. <br />EVICTIONS AND FORCED RELOCATIONS <br />The frequency and consequences of evictions and forced relocations <br />have gained new attention from policymakers. According to the 2015 <br />American Housing Survey, 7.5 percent of all renter households that <br />moved in the prior two years did so because they were "forced to <br />move by a landlord, a bank or other financial institution, the gov- <br />ernment or because of a disaster or fire." It is difficult to know how <br />many of these forced moves were due to formal evictions through <br />the court system, informal evictions, or other events. <br />Less is known about the relative effectiveness of strategies to reduce <br />homelessness among the young. HUD's point -in -time estimates The Milwaukee Area Renters Study offers a more complete pic- <br />found 36,000 unaccompanied homeless youths in January 2016, ture, reporting that 13 percent of renter households in the City of <br />while the Homeless Management Information System shows that <br />137,000 unaccompanied homeless youths used the shelter system <br />at some point in 2015. HUD continues to improve its data collection <br />processes, and 2017 will be the initial year for estimating changes in <br />the number of homeless youth over time. <br />Findings from the Veterans' Homelessness Prevention Demonstration <br />also highlight the unique physical and mental health needs of <br />homeless veterans. For example, two-thirds of veterans in the dem- <br />onstration reported experiencing serious depression, anxiety, or ten- <br />sion—including 43 percent with symptoms of post-traumatic stress <br />disorder. The project also revealed the need for service providers to <br />have cultural competency in military norms and the ways in which <br />veterans experience civilian life. <br />A Milwaulcee Study Suggests that Informal Evictions <br />May Be Twice as Frequent as Formal Evictions <br />Share of Forced elders <br />Final Evicl <br />Building <br />Condemnations <br />5% <br />Land <br />Forenlos <br />23% <br />Milwaukee experienced a forced move within the two years pre- <br />ceding the study. Of these moves, almost half (48 percent) resulted <br />from informal evictions, 23 percent from landlord foreclosures, and <br />5 percent from building condemnations, and only a quarter were <br />due to formal evictions (Figure 36). While not broadly generalizable, <br />these estimates suggest that court records seriously understate the <br />frequency of forced relocations of renters. <br />In addition to stress and psychological trauma, evictions impose <br />high costs on renter households in terms of both time and money, <br />and can result in job absences, drain savings or increase debt, and <br />damage credit histories. Forced moves can also disrupt children's <br />school attendance and adults' employment options, particularly if <br />the household moves to a new town or school district. And for the <br />Low -Income Renters Are Likely to Live in Neighborhoods <br />with Other Low -Income Households <br />Average Share of Households to Neighborhood (Rsroontl <br />40 ___.......___...............................__.........................................._.. <br />30 <br />Informal <br />Evictions 20 <br />48% <br />10 <br />Notes Formal evictions are processed through the court system. Informal evictions include forted moves in <br />cases where the mneais were threatened with eviction or moved in anticipation of eviction. <br />Source: Milwaukee Area Renters Study data around in Desmond and Shollen oorger. 2015. <br />Renters Eamtng UnderS20,000 All Renters All Households <br />Household Income in Neighborhood <br />IN Under $20,00l) -7$20,0060.9999 +i$%oodr -99.999 0$100,000 or Moro <br />Note', Shams are calculated as the weighted average of households in each income categoryacross all US <br />manus tracts. <br />Sources, JCFIS tabulations of US Census Brom, 2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, and the <br />JCHS Neighborhood Change Database. <br />_ 35 <br />