My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
key insight is to use realized values of agents' future expected utility as a noisy measure of <br />agents' expectations. This method allows us to avoid needing to make explicit assumptions <br />about how agents form expectations. Further, we do not need to assume how all state <br />variables transition over time. Both of these assumptions are typically needed to estimate <br />dynamic discrete choice models. Scott leverages "renewal" actions in tenants' choice sets <br />which allows estimation to focus on specific actions in agents' choice sets which exhibit <br />finite dynamic dependence, greatly simplifying the dynamic problem (Arcidiacono and Miller <br />(2011), Arcidiacono and Ellickson (2011)). Our contribution is to show how Scott's method <br />can be generalized to a set of difference -in -difference style linear and instrumental variable <br />regressions that can be used in combination with a natural experiment to identify the model <br />parameters. <br />Finally, our paper is related to a separate strand of literature on community attachment <br />in sociology. Kasarda and Jauowitz (1974) provide survey evidence that length of residence <br />is correlated with various self-reported indicators of neighborhood attachment. We estimate <br />households' attachments to their neighborhoods, as revealed by their migration decisions. <br />Consistent with survey evidence, we find community attachment grows with years living <br />in one's neighborhood, but it accumulates quite slowly over time. One additional year of <br />residence increases one's community attachment by the equivalent of $300. <br />The remainder of the paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 discusses the history of rent <br />control in San Francisco. Section 3 discusses the data used for the analysis. Section 4 <br />presents our reduced form results. Section 5 develops and estimates a dynamic discrete <br />choice structural model. Section 6 discusses the welfare impacts of rent control. Section 7 <br />concludes. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.