My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
entire address history of individuals who resided in San Francisco at some point between the <br />years of 1980 and 2016.1 The data include not only individuals' San Francisco addresses, <br />but any other address within the United States at which that individual lived during the <br />period of 1980-2016. The dataset provides the exact street address, the month and year at <br />which the individual lived at that particular location, the name of the individual, and some <br />demographic information including age and gender. <br />To examine the representativeness of the Infutor data, we link all individuals reported as <br />living in San Francisco in 1990 to their census tract, to create census tract population counts <br />as measured in Infutor. We make similar census tract population counts for the year 2000 <br />and compare these San Francisco census tract population counts to those reported in the <br />1990 and 2000 population counts for adults 18 ,years old and old. A regression of the Infutor <br />populations on census population are shown in Figures A.1 and AY Figure A.1 shows that <br />for each additional person recorded in the 1990 Census, Infutor contains an additional 0.45 <br />people, suggesting we have a 45% sample of the population. While we do not observe the <br />universe of San Francisco residents in 1990, the data appear quite representative, as the <br />census tract population in the 1990 Census can explain 70% of the census tract variation <br />in population measured from Infutor. Our data is even better in the year 2000. Figure A.2 <br />shows that we appear to have 1.2 people in Infutor for each person observed in the 2000 US <br />census. We likely over count the number of people in each tract in Infutor since we are not <br />conditioning on year o death in theltrfut-GrdutT.,-lyding-tu-over counting of alive people. <br />However, the Infutor data still track population well, as the census tract population in the <br />2000 Census can explain 90% of the census tract variation in population measured from <br />Infutor. Now, Infutor matches well the level of the San Francisco population and generates <br />an even higher R2 of 89.9%. <br />We merge these data with public records information provided by DataQuick about the <br />4Infutor is a data aggregator of address data using many sources including sources such as phonebooks, <br />magazine subscriptions, and credit header files. <br />'We only can do data validation relative to the US Censuses for census tracts in San Francisco because <br />we only have address histories for people that lived in San Francisco at some point in their life. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.