Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-xx <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA DENYING APPEAL NO. 2017-05 AND <br />APPROVING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF <br />VARIANCE NO. 2017-05 FOR A REDUCTION IN PARKING <br />FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED <br />AT 200 NORTH CABRILLO PARK DRIVE <br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines <br />and declares as follows: <br />A. Robert Bisno with Cabrillo Community Partners, LLC (hereinafter referred <br />to as "Applicant') is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2016-03 <br />and Variance Nos. 2017-05 and 2017-06, to allow the construction of a <br />seven -story mixed-use development with up to 260 units at 200 North <br />Cabrillo Park Drive. <br />B. On December 11, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa <br />Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all <br />testimony, written and oral, and adopted a resolution denying Site Plan <br />Review No. 2016-03 and Variance Nos. 2017-05 and 2017-06. <br />C. The Planning Commission's decision to deny Site Plan Review No. 2016- <br />03 and Variance Nos. 2017-05 and 2017-06 was appealed to the City <br />Council by Robert Bisno on December 20, 2017, contending that the <br />project is appropriate at this location (Appeal No. 2017-05). Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code (SAMC) section 41-645 allows any interested party, <br />individual or group to file an appeal. <br />D. Appeal No. 2017-05 came before the City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />for a duly noticed public hearing on April 3, 2018, to consider all testimony, <br />written and oral. <br />E. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana determines that all of the <br />findings required for granting Variance No. 2017-05 pursuant to SAMC <br />Section 41-638 could not be made. Instead, the City Council determines <br />that the following finding has been established for Variance No. 2017-05 <br />for a reduction in parking: <br />That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public <br />welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The site does not meet <br />the minimum parking requirements. Based upon public hearing <br />EXHIBIT G <br />75A-137 <br />