Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRESENTATION - 75CWARNER REDHILL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTApplications: 1) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2020-01 2) General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2020-02 3) Amendment Application / Zone Change (AA) No. 2020-014) Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Overrule (5 votes) Project Address: 2300, 2310 and 2320 South Redhill Avenue 1 •General Plan:Existing: Professional & Administration Office (PAO)Proposed: District Center (DC)•Zoning: Existing: Light Industrial (M1) Proposed: Specific Development No. 96 (SD-96)Site Info:14.3 acres2PROJECT LOCATION & LAND USE City of Tustin •Demolish three existing industrial buildings •Construct mixed-use development with five buildings consisting of: 1,100 residential units80,000 sq. ft. of commercial space 2,600 parking spaces 400 commercial parking spaces 2.0 residential parking spaces per unit (total 2,200 residential parking spaces)5.75 acres of onsite open space and amenities5-7 stories (94’ max height)77 du/ac 3PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4SITE PLAN 5PRIMARY COMMERCIAL AREA •Project will provide 5.75 acres of open space (40% of lot area)•3.18 acres will be private open space for the residents and their visitors •1.59 acres (of the 3.18 acres) will be provided through private residential patios and balconies6OPEN SPACE Ground Floor Open SpaceUpper Floors Open SpaceRoof Deck Open Space •2.57 acres of publicly accessible open space•Applicant will be required to pay in-lieu Park Fees to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency estimated at approximately $4,174,000 7PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE Publicly Accessible Open SpacePaseo / Fire LaneFire Lane /Programmed Open Space 8WARNER / REDHILL PERSPECTIVE 9WARNER / REDHILL PLAZA PERSPECTIVE 10RETAIL / PLAZA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH 11WARNER AVE. PROJECT ENTRY PERSPECTIVE 12BUILDING “D” PERSPECTIVE LOOKING WEST 13RETAIL BUILDING PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH 14PASEO PERSPECTIVE LOOKING WEST 15POTENTIAL FARMERS MARKET PERSPECTIVE •Site Plan and Land Uses:Site plan was designed to break the project site up into village“blocks”Central pedestrian paseo links rear portions of the site to the commercialarea and provides community amenityCommercial component is among the City’s largest within mixed-usedevelopments (City Place and MainPlace)•Onsite ParkingParking provided is consistent with other mixed-use code areas in theCity,such as MEMU and Harbor PlanCreative use of lifts (163) and commercial valet (61) maximizes siteplanning for pedestrians and minimizes vehicular dominance16PROJECT ANALYSIS •The project is consistent with the allowable density range, intent, andcharacter of the District Center General Plan land use designation•The project is consistent with similar projects in the vicinity (TheHeritage)•The project is consistent with Goals 2 and 4 of the General Plan LandUse Element that encourage diverse housing opportunities for theresidents of SantaAna•The project will create new permanent and temporary jobs17PROJECT ANALYSIS •Economic and fiscal impact analysis prepared byAECOM•Compared proposed project against an industrial prototype that couldbe built under current zoning and general plan•The project will result in positive fiscal impacts to the City•Approximately 1,200 jobs, of which 349 would be captured by SantaAna•Annual net revenue of $1million18ECONOMIC & FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS •On May 21, 2020, the ALUC found the project to be inconsistent with the AirportEnvirons Land Use Plan (AELUP) of JohnWayneAirport•Update provided to Planning Commission on May 26,2020•Per Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21676,the City Council may by two-thirds voteoverrule theALUC’s determination•The project will not adversely impact the current and future operations of the airport•The project is not located within the JWA 60 or 65 dBA CNEL noise contours, doesnot penetrate the notification surface of 172.4 feet AMSL and is it not within the JWAsafety zones.•The project will not create public health, safety or welfare concerns as it falls within alevel of acceptable noise risk considered to be a community norm•The applicant is required to prepare and record an avigation easement19OC AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION OVERRULE •An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared•Draft EIR was circulated for 45 days (January 3, 2020 to February18,2020)•Contains Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)•Unavoidable impacts to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas EmissionsandTransportation20CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) •Vote of 5-0-1-1 (Phan abstained,Contreras Leo absent)•Adopt a resolution certifying EIR No. 2020-01, including adoption of environmental findings offact pursuant to CEQA,adoption of a Statement ofOverriding Considerations,and adoption ofa MMRP•Adopt a resolution approving GPA No. 2020-02 to change the General Plan land usedesignation of the property from Industrial (IND) to District Center (DC)•Adopt an ordinance approving AA No.2020-01 to change the zoning of the property from LightIndustrial (M1) to Specific Development No.96•Adopt a resolution with findings overruling theOrange County Airport Land Use Commission’sdetermination of inconsistency with theAirport Environs Land Use Plan for JohnWayneAirport21PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 22