Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet_2022-02-15City Council Meeting Packet February 15, 2022 CLOSED SESSION MEETING - 5:00 PM REGULAR OPEN MEETING - 5:45 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting) CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Vicente Sarmiento Mayor Thai Viet Phan Councilmember —Ward 1 Jessie Lopez Councilmember - Ward 3 Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Councilmember - Ward 5 David Penaloza Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 2 Phil Bacerra Councilmember - Ward 4 Nelida Mendoza Councilmember - Ward 6 Mayor and Council telephone: 714-647-6900 Agenda item inquiries: 714-647-6520 Sonia R. Carvalho Kristine Ridge City Attorney City Manager Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, ®'contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647-5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supporting documentation can be found on the City's website — www.santa-ana.org/city-meetings. City Council 1 2/15/2022 CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICS The City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and its community. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtful and inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets the challenges of today and tomorrow, as follows: Vision - The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment in youth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate - Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government services Mission - To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents. Guiding Principles - Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility - Innovation • Transparency Code of Ethics and Conduct - At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008, voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: - Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • Efficiency City Council 2 2/15/2022 Members of the public may attend the City Council meeting in -person or join via Zoom. The City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoom webinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet or smart phone via YouTube LiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrum channel 3 and AT&T U-verse channel 99. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public who wish to address the City Council on closed session items, items on the regular agenda or on matters which are not on the agenda, but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council may do so by one of the following ways: • MAILING OPTION written communications — Public comments may be mailed to: Office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza M-30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All written communications received via mail by 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City's document archive system which is available for public review. • SENDING E-MAIL OPTION — Public comments may be sent via email to the City Clerk's office at eComment@santa-ana.org. Please note the agenda item you are commenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received before 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City's document archive system which is available for public review. • LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION — Members of the public may provide live comments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on or type the following address into your web browser https:Hus02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900-9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerk when it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) general agenda item, iii) public hearing item, iv) special agenda item, or v) for Housing Authority item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you may virtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of the caller's phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 or microphone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identify themselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unless due to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide a different amount of time to speak. • IN -PERSON OPTION - Members of the public can provide in -person comments at the podium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend the meeting in -person. Face coverings are required for members of the public who enter City buildings. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presiding chair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a "Request to Speak" card by 5:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 6:00 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS —You can provide live City Council 3 2/15/2022 comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 4:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL BY 5:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue by 5:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON -AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) — You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 4:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL PRIOR TO 6:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue by 6:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS —You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 6:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball <!!>) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Mayor Pro Tern Mayor City Manager City Attorney Clerk of the Council ROLL CALL Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez Nelida Mendoza David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Phil Bacerra Vicente Sarmiento Kristine Ridge Sonia R. Carvalho Daisy Gomez PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS — The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain City Council 4 2/15/2022 matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: A. Hudson Clay Victoria Royer, et al. v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al., Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2019-01060146 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Negotiators: Human Resources Executive Director, Jason Motsick Employee Organizations: Santa Ana Police Officers Association (POA) • Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) Part - Time Non -Civil Service Employees 3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: Address of Properties: A. 605 W. Santa Ana Blvd, Santa Ana CA 92702 Parcel No. 008-067-36 B. 1221 E. 3rd St. Santa Ana CA 92701 Parcel No. 398-385-05 C. 1222 E. 4th St. Santa Ana CA 92701 Parcel No. 398-385-03 D. 1225 E. 4th St. Santa Ana CA 92701 Parcel No. 398-385-04 E. 202 N. Grand Ave. Santa Ana CA 92701 Parcel No. 398-453-06 F. 1222 E. 3rd St. Santa Ana Ca 92701 Parcel No. 398-453-05 Negotiator: Kristine Ridge, City Manager Negotiating with: State of California Terms: Price and terms related to the possible acquisition/sale of real property CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) to be taken at the Regular Open Session which will begin immediately following the Closed Session. RECESS — City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. RECONVENE — City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. City Council 5 2/15/2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WORDS OF INSPIRATION CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS Mayor Sarmiento Rupert Vega, Police Chaplain Proclamation presented by Mayor Sarmiento to The G.R.E.E.N. Foundation in Recognition of their Outstanding Contributions to the Community. 2. Certificate of Recognition presented by Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra to Little Onion Mexican Restaurant in Recognition of their 50th Anniversary and Outstanding Contributions to the Community. 3. Proclamation presented by Councilmember Hernandez declaring April 1, 2022 as Helen Shipp Day. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 4. COVID-19 Update in the Community 5. Solid Waste Agreement Update — Public Works Agency 6. Feasibility of a Public Health Agency Update — City Manager's Office and Community Development Agency CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENT — Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non -agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. ICONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 7 through 23. 7. Excused Absences Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office City Council 6 2/15/2022 Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 8. Minutes from the Regular and Housing Authority Meetings of February 1, 2022 Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 9. Appoint Gary Wood nominated by Councilmember Phan as the Ward 1 representative to the Personnel Board for a partial -term expiring December 10, 2024 Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Appoint Gary Wood to the Personnel Board representing Ward 1. 10. Receive and File Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021 Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Receive and file. 11. Pension Debt Cost Savings Update Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Receive and file and the pension debt cost savings update. 12. City -Produced Special Events Update for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and Proposed Events for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Department(s): Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: Receive and file a report regarding City -produced events scheduled for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and proposed City -produced special events for Fiscal Year 2022-23. 13. Authorize Purchase Order Agreements with FieldTurf USA in the Amount of $582,462 to Replace and Maintain the Synthetic Turf Field at Eddie West Field for an Eight -Year Period (Project 22-2752) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Authorize a purchase order with FieldTurf USA in the amount of $535,762 to remove and replace the existing synthetic turf field at Eddie West Field. 2. Authorize purchase order with FieldTurf USA for maintenance of synthetic field, FieldTurf "FieldCare", in the amount of $46,700, for an eight -year maintenance period. 14. Approve an Appropriation Adjustment and Increase the Contract Amount by $632,500 City Council 7 2/15/2022 for an Existing Construction Contract with Nationwide General Construction Services, for a Revised Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $3,296,357, for Santiago Park Gas House (Project No. 15-2645) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize prior - year fund balance of $582,500 in the Residential Development District 2 Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount into the Residential Development District 2, Acquisition and Development, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize prior -year fund balance of $50,000 in the Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount into the Capital Recovery Charges, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 3. Approve an amendment to the Project Cost Analysis to reflect the new amount of $392,938.40 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $760,000 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $632,500, which includes $82,500 in construction engineering funds and $550,000 for construction contingency funds, for the Santiago Park Gas House Project. 15. Approval of Historic Property Preservation Agreements Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with the below -referenced property owners for the identified structure(s), subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. Property Owner(s), Historic Property Preservation Agreement No., Address/House, Vote by HRC 1. Caroline La and Colin Donnelly, 2021-20, 2383 North Flower Street, 6.0:0:3 (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent) (Agreement No. 2022-XXX) 2. Andrew Dawson, 2021-21, 2445 North Park Blvd, 6:0.0:3 (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent) (Agreement No. 2022-XXX) 3. Michelle Helvig, 2021-22, 2311 North Santiago Street, 6.0:0:3 (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent) (Agreement No. 2022-XXX) 4. Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati, 2021-23, 2397 North Flower Street, 6:0:0:3 (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent) (Agreement No. 2022-XXX) City Council 8 2/15/2022 16. Approve an Agreement with Data Ticket Inc. for Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services for the Police Department in the amount of $1,269,648 (General and Non -General Fund) Department(s): Police Department Recommended Action: Approve a three-year agreement with Data Ticket Inc. for Automated Parking Citation Processing Services for the Police Department, for the period of February 15, 2022 through February 14, 2025, with the option to extend the agreement for two additional one-year terms, in an amount not to exceed $1,269,648, including a five percent contingency ($60,459), subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 17. Approve Agreements with Iteris, Inc., Fehr and Peers, and IBI Group, to Provide Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services for up to a Three-year, Four -Month Term in an Aggregate Amount not to Exceed $1,000,000 (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Iteris, Inc, Fehr and Peers, and IBI Group, to provide transportation and traffic engineering services for a three-year, four month term beginning February 15, 2022 and expiring June 25, 2025, with a provision for two, one-year extensions exercisable by the City Manager and the City Attorney, in a total shared aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 18. Approve Lease Amendment with Aldridge Electric, Inc. to Extend the Term Two Years to February 19, 2024 with a One -Year Renewal Option, for a Total Amount of $370,527 (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a third amendment to the site lease agreement with Aldridge Electric, Inc. for the rental of office space to extend the lease for a two-year period from February 20, 2022 to February 19, 2024, with a one-year renewal option, and increase the monthly rate to $10,361, for a total amount of $370,527, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 19. Approve Agreements with Inter -Pacific, LEED Electric, Inc., and M. Brey Electric, Inc. for On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services, for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $6,000,000 for up to a Five -Year Term (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Inter -Pacific, LEED Electric, Inc., and M. Brey Electric, Inc. to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services, for a three-year period beginning February 15, 2022 and expiring February 14, 2025, with provisions for one, two-year renewal City Council 9 2/15/2022 period exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney, with a shared aggregate amount not to exceed of $6,000,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 20. Approve First Amendments to Legal Services Agreements with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP and Everett Dorey LLP Establishing Total Agreement Compensation and Expanding Scope (General Fund) Department(s): City Attorney Office Recommended Action: 1. Authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP increasing the total agreement compensation to $750,000 and increasing the scope of services to include additional pending litigation subject to non -substantive changes approved by Assistant City Manager and Chief Assistant City Attorney; and (Agreement No. 2022-XXX) 2. Authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Everett Dorey LLP increasing the total agreement compensation to $400,000 and increasing the scope of services to include additional pending litigation subject to non -substantive changes approved Assistant City Manager and Chief Assistant City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 21. Agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for Modem Upgrade and Warranty for Smart Meters with Credit Card -Enabled Function (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for smart meter data management, modem upgrades, extended warranty, and sensors for a five-year term with an option of two one-year extensions, from February 15, 2022 to February 14, 2027, in an amount not to exceed $300,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 22. Approve Increase in Spending Capacity with Dyer 18 LLC for Unforeseen Tenant Improvement Costs Relating to the Homeless Navigation Center (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to increase spending capacity with Dyer 18, LLC for tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center, in the amount of $2,000,000. 23. Consider Approving the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for Meetings of City Council and All Boards, Committees, and Commissions Pursuant to the Provisions of Assembly Bill 361 Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office City Council 10 2/15/2022 Recommended Action: Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution to consider continuing the use of teleconferencing for City Council, board, committee, and commission meetings pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 361 for the next 30 days. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** I BUSINESS CALENDAR 24. Proposed License Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and Santa Ana Unified School District for use of Memorial Park Parking Lot Continued from the February 1, 2022 City Council meeting. Department(s): Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a license agreement with the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) to allow Washington Elementary school staff to utilize the Memorial Park east parking lot (46 spaces) for the period of February 2, 2022 through June 30, 2023, for an amount not to exceed $39,100, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 25. Adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX —ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021- 03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE First reading at the November 16, 2021 City Council meeting and approved by a vote of 4-2 (Mendoza, Penaloza dissented and Bacerra abstained). Published in the Orange County Reporter on November 26, 2021. Continued from the December 7, 2021, December 21, 2021 and January 18, 2022 City Council meetings. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Place Ordinance on second reading and adopt. **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public may address the City Council on Public City Council 11 2/15/2022 Hearing items. 26. Public Hearing - Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020- 03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa Ana General Plan Update Legal Notice published in the Orange County Reporter on November 26, 2021 and notices mailed on November 19, 2021. Continued from the December 7, 2021, December 21, 2021 and January 18, 2022 City Council meetings. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: 1. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution certifying Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 (SCH No. 2020029087), including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06. 3. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution of findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTED ITEMS 27. Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct Staff to Explore Options to Implement a Campaign Against Crime — Councilmember Mendoza CITY MANAGER COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE — If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended. ADJOURNMENT — Adjourn the City Council meeting. Future Items 1. Mental Health Mobile Outreach Services 2. Housing Element Update 3. Billboard Ordinance Update 4. Cannabis Ordinance Update 5. Proposition 218 Solid Waste Rates Public Hearing City Council 12 2/15/2022 City Council 13 2/15/2022 DRAF- Minutes of the Regular and Housing Authority Meeting of the City Council City of Santa Ana, California d February 01, 2022 SPECIAL CLOSED SESSION ME' LNG — 4:15 pm REGULAR OPEN MEET' j — 5:45 nm (Immediately following the C/o, Session ' --ting) CITY COUNCIL CHI. 'Ar 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, 92701 CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Fr- CL ° .J SESSION ,ouncil Me )ers . )nathan Ryan Hernandez Jc sie Lopez ,Jelida Mendoza David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan 'ayor k Tem Phil Bacerra for Vicente Sarmiento C' Manager Kristine Ridge 9 Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho .,lerk of the Council Daisy Gomez MINUTES: Mayor Sarmiento called the Special Closed Session meeting to order at 4:25 p.m. ROLL CALL City Council 8-1 22Y5/2022 MINUTES: Clerk of the Council Daisy Gomez conducted roll call. All councilmembers were present. Councilmember Hernandez joined the Closed Session meeting at 4:30 p.m. Councilmember Mendoza joined the Closed Session meeting at 5:28 p.m. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS —The Brown Act permits legislative bodies' .iscuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds :ed on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following rr ,r; prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursue j Government CL Section 54957.6(a): Agency Negotiators: Human ResourcF xecutive Di, ctor, Jason Motsi,;K Employee Organizations: Santa Ana F --�! Officerp sociation (POA) • Service Employe -)ter, final Union (SEIU) Part - Time Non -Civil Service Employees 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL CO, 'SL-"ISTING LITi. -ION pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of , ,tion 54_ - -f the G(, arnment Code: A. Santa Ana Police Officers Associ, )n ar ferry �- Ano v. City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Der- ant, David \ - j. Kristin (sic) Ridge, Sonia Carvalho, Jason Motsick, an,' ,d5 , Orange C ity Superior Court, Case No. 30-2021- 01230129 B. Santa P Police Offic Association, J Doe Officers v. David Valentin, Sonia Carvalho, Kn, Ridar Santa Ana Police Department, Santa Ana City Attorney's k a Does I-X, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30- 2021 '-' O'10134 CONFERENCE � -H REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government ".ode Section 54� ;.8: f1 ass of Prop j: APN #430-021-02; 1815 E. Carnegie Ave., Santa Ana, CA 921 Negoti, Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Negotiati, with: Dyer 18, LLC Terms: Price and terms related to the lease and possible acquisition of real property. MINUTES: During the Regular Open Meeting Councilmember Phan noted for the record that she recused herself from closed session Item 3 due to a conflict of interest and did not participate when the item was discussed. City Council 2-2 22Y5/2022 CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) to be taken at the Regular Open Session which will begin immediately following the Closed Session. RECESS — City Council will recess to Special Closed Session for the pu, e of conducting regular City business. MINUTES: Mayor Sarmiento recessed the portion of the meetir cot. '-r the Special Closed Session items at 4:28 p.m. RECONVENE — City Council will reconvene to cor' a regular ("-)usiness. MINUTES: Mayor Sarmiento adjourned Special Closeo -lion meeting at 6:14 p.m. and convened to the Regular Open Sessio, CITY COI'NCIL REL 11 A OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER MINUTES: Mayor rmiento cal i the Regul, -)pen Session meeting to order at 6:17 p.m. RO' .:ALL 'UTES: Clerk of th ,ouncil conducted roll call. All councilmembers were present. Mayo► -miento ann iced that redistricting public hearing item #16 will be heard at 7:00 p.m. During the Reguiar Open Meeting Councilmember Phan noted for the record that she recused herself from closed session Item 3 due to a conflict of interest and did not participate when the item was discussed. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Sarmiento City Council 8-3 22Y5/2022 MINUTES: Councilmember Penaloza led the Pledge of Allegiance. WORDS OF INSPIRATION Dr. Willie Holmes CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Certificate of Recognition presented by Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra to staff from Public Works Agency, Parks Recreation and Community Services Age, and Ice -America for the 2021 Winter Village and Outstanding Contributions to t` -,unity. MINUTES: Words of inspiration heard after the first ce -9monial prese►. '-In. 2. Proclamation presented by Councilmember Ph Aeclaring F,'-,ruary 1, 2022 as , et / Lunar New Year. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 3. Homeless Update MINUTES: City Manager Kristine k -fe any in►, ,ervices Division Manager Ken Gominsky provide,' a brief presE )t% Council discuss; ensued I direction ovided to staff. Councilme,. r Penaloz, -�-,I mon, ,iy reports. Mayor Sarmient(,' ;sted guidelines as to what legally we can do. . r the ss ups. item 3, council considered item 16. ' it Quality Manac lent District (AQMD) Update - Public Works Agency M). TES: M% . Sarmiento announced that the Air Quality Management District updaL, ation was continued to a future council meeting. 5. Residential Permit Parking Update - Public Works Agency MINUTES: Executive Director of Public Works Agency Nabil Saba provided a brief presentation. City Council 9-4 22Y5/2022 Council discussion ensued and provided direction to staff. Councilmember Phan requested consultant to look at adding consideration for overnight parking only and technology apps. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra requested staff to look at parking on a neighborhood wide basis. Inquired about enforcement. Executive Director of Public Works Agency Nabil Saba noted P-nforcement is managed by the Police Department and contractor. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra requested information be sent *o council to kri, what enforcement effort looks like. Councilmember Penaloza requested to move ay from stir'-Ars and consider placards instead. Councilmember Lopez asked staff to be intentions. teir outreach and include neighborhoods that have condos P —1 apartments. As. 'that the Request for Proposal (RFP) consider how sit. versus multi ,ily homes are treated. Requested that City Attorney Soni, 'area,. ',w-up wits, -about a 2015 opinion made by former General At ley Har ':',)mia stating that local government cannot discriminate amc. re, ;nts bassi_. upon their dwelling type. Inquired if the opinio, `finding. Councilmembr tendoza r jested a s `ion be included in the regulations to exempt tho, ,)at have th, isabled plac,. s. Councilmembe, .jez concurs w►Ln colleagues' comments. Is in support of have --`-ihle plae, in the rearview mirror. Noted that many communities such as , -111, -)u I nita, o Irtesia Pilar, particularly in the area closer to the Santa Ana .ollege and -)ur La(,' `the Pilar Church, have reached out to him expressing their concern wi, arking. , asked staff to look into these areas to mediate parking issues. N, r Sarmien' rovided direction to staff to find creative ways for joint use of Santa Ana "Pied ` jol campuses. Also, directed staff to compel developers who introdu, ii-family housing to incorporate stacked parking. CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. MINUTES: City Attorney Sonia Carvalho stated there was no reportable action. City Council 8-5 22Y5/2022 PUBLIC COMMENT — Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non -agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. NOTE: Redistricting Public Hearing Item #16 will be heard at 7:00 p MINUTES: Larry Gonzales Rivas spoke on the city arts sculpture th s unveiled a couple of weeks ago. Thanked Mayor and council members who .;n(, encouraged council to continue to foster funding public art. Invited residents , visit the -)te statute that is located across from Abraham Lincoln Elementary. Nathaniel Greensides gave acknowledgment to the' ,upon which we are sitting a,.,D conducting our business that once belonged to try.-iacheme, ,d Tongva peoples. Spoke on Black History month and the wrongs that a. "ill b, j perpetuated today. Wished all a Happy Lunar New year, Happy Black Histc,. ,tth and read last two stanzas from Maya Angelou's poem, "And Still I '';se". Patricia Boe with Moms Demand Action kk�e in j item J. Thanked Councilmember Lopez and Councilmemenct request to consider item and asked council to suppo,,' —finance. Lorrie Ortiz with Mor ..Demand f on spoke support of item 19. Thanked Mayor and council for their lr arship. Clerk of the Council DG omez reported out on correspondence received. Vic, ✓lendez exp. -ed co►, with the amount of money being awarded for item 9. l' d council to put, I recor,, ar item and involve local business. Expressed concern Closed Session itt s 2A and 2B. Lastly, spoke in appreciation of the arts. CONSENT CALENDAR RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 6 through 15. 6. Excused Absences Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office City Council 8-6 22Y5/2022 Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 7. Minutes from the Regular and Special Successor Agency Meetings of January 18, 2022 Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. 8. Quarterly Report for Housing Division Projects and Activities for period of October 2021-December 2021 Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Receive and file the Quart , Report for Housing !Sion Projects and Activities for the period of October ^ -December 2021. 9. Approve Amendment to the Construction Cony, with CJ , icrete Construction, Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $1,105,789.-- �r --w Estimated Total Project Delivery Cost of $1,700,000, to Perform Additional :rete Repairs (Project No.22- 6970) (General and Non -General F -d) Department(s): Public Works Agk ,y Recommended Action: 1. Authoril he City' amend the construction contract with CJ Concrete Constructic Inc an incre(.,e of $1,105,789.50 to perform additional cr'mprovemE it a new estimated project delivery cost of $1,700,000. 2. Approve th, ,vised Projr Cost Analy increasing project contingencies by $1,105,780, for a new , nrojeci .alivery cost of $1,700,000. 10. Proposed Licen, dement between the City of Santa Ana and Santa Ana Unified -+rict for . of Memorial Park Parking Lot .;ontinued i, the Fe. y 1, 2022 City Council meeting. Department(s, arks, Recreation, and Community Services 'recommended :;tion: Authorize the City Manager to execute a license agreement the Santa ! / Unified School District (SAUSD) to allow Washington Elementary sc. ' staff t, .Mize the Memorial Park east parking lot (46 spaces) for the period of Febr, j22 through June 30, 2023, for an amount not to exceed $39,100, subject . ,on -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). MINUTES: Council discussion ensued. Councilmember Penaloza inquired about the hours in the tentative agreement, the opening and closing of gates as it relates to public use and use of funds to City Council 9-7 22Y5/2022 purchase trash receptacle bins. Executive Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Agency Lisa Rudloff addressed council regarding parking mitigation. Councilmember Penaloza requested and motioned to have agreerr 'it (Section 1.3) to be amended to include the following language: licensee w;" responsible to open gates at said time. Requested funds to be earmarked f ie parks. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra seconded. Councilmember Lopez supportive of recommen , action as is. Councilmember Phan not supportive of agrt ant. As' about outreach. Mayor Sarmiento supportive of staffs recommenoL ^tion. Concurs if there are inferior receptacles that we sho! -1 a way to fund ,:placement of trash bins. Executive Director of Parks, Recrk `ion, ano .pity Agency Lisa Rudloff noted that there are funds for trash septa -; anu .. gash receptacles will be placed in this year of " -arks along I- a dog weigh station. Councilmemr Penaloza reel with jncilmember Phan that their is a lack of outreach t, ganizationF escinded hiz. otion. Councilmembe. oza motioned to deny the agreement and died to a lack of Councilmemt. ''han rn, ned for a continuance of the item to ensure that proper outreach has bt , performed. Seconded by Councilmember Lopez. Mo. 'by ancilmember Phan, seconded by Councilmember Lopez to Contik. the February 15, 2021 council meeting. YES: 6 — Hernandez, Councilmember, — Lopez, Councilmember, — Mendoza, Councilmember, — Phan, Councilmember, — Bacerra, Mayor Pro Tern, — Sarmiento, Mayor NO: 1 — Penaloza, Councilmember ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT:0 City Council 8-8 22Y5/2022 Status: 6 - 1 - 0 - 0 - Pass 11. Approve an Agreement with the County of Orange for Continued Access to the Countywide Coordinated Communications Public Safety Radio System Department(s): Police Department Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute the Joint Agreement with the County of Orange for the Operation, Maintena, and Financial Management of the Orange County 800 MHz Countywide Coor ced Communications System, subject to non -substantive change �,� ed by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). MINUTES: This consent Item -Agreement No. " _-011 was appror. 12. Approve a Lease Agreement with Railworks -1 , - Sere' Inc., for Office Space at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center foi year Term with Twelve One - month Extensions for a Total Amount of $87,120 (Nu ',neral Fund) Department(s): Public Works A i Recommended Action: 1. Aub ' e the �, er to execute a site lease agreement with RailWorks Track S es, 1, to 7 isate the City $3,630 per month, with any partial -,)nth prorate 4 " _0 per day, or the lease of 1,452 square feet of office space ,�_ + the San, oa Regional Transportation Center, for a one-year term r ning Fk .nary 1, 2C and ending January 31, 2023, with an option for twr . month -to nth extensi for a total of $87,120 in lease revenue for the ent' -rm of the r ,cm-nt. ind i , optional extensions, subject to non - substantive Ies e ,��u _, Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). an ape. riation adjustment recognizing Fiscal Year 2021-22 lease . icome in t� mount . 18,150 into the PWA-SARTC Operations, Rental-RailWorks revenue acco� and apt, ,riating the same amount to the PWA-SARTC Operations, Contract Servic, Orofessional expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) M. 'TES: T , consent Item - Agreement No. 2022-012 was approved. 13. Approve Agreements with California Barricade Rentals, Inc. and Statewide Traffic Safety and Signs, Inc. for up to a Three-year Term in an Aggregate Amount not to Exceed $500,000 (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with City Council 8-9 22Y5/2022 California Barricade Rentals, Inc. and Statewide Traffic Safety and Signs, Inc. to provide on -call traffic control services and equipment rental for a three-year period beginning February 1, 2022, and expiring on January 31, 2025, with a provision for one two-year extension, for a total shared aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). MINUTES: Councilmember Phan recused herself from item 13, to a conflict of interest out an abundance of caution. This consent Item - Agreement No. 2022-013 was Pop. oved. 14. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Executive r' ,;tor of the F lic Works Agency to Execute Program Supplement Agreements v< `" e Statr California Department of Transportation, as Required by Master Agreemt- ' ir A0274, and Approve the Master Agreement for State -Funded Transit Projet- o. 64AO274 to Secure State Grant Funds Department(s): Public Works A( c Recommended Action: 1.Resol No. 2r' Adopt a resolution authorizing the Executive Director o P, Works t-.gency to execute all program supplement agreerr wired by t, aster Agreement for State -Funded Transit Projects No. 64P , 4 wit, State o, ilifornia Department of Transportation to reimburse the y for StatE nded pro, `s. 2. Authori. City Mar - ^Ypcute .` 1 Master Agreement for State -Funded Transit Proje, ',lI--yity 61,�1'+ & ate of California Department of Transportation �,ear term, subject to non -substantive changes approved by th- '-nageAttorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). MINUTES: P . conse. 1 `sm - Resolution No. 2022-008 was approved. This consent It - Agreement No. 2022-014 was approved. 15. Accept, uitclaim Deed of an "L" shape parcel at Centennial Park, Deed of Release of 2.42 acres at Centennial Park, and Declaration of Restrictions on three Park sites to complete the Land Conversion Process Department(s): Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: 1. Acknowledge the City Manager's acceptance of a Quitclaim Deed on Parcel D at Centennial Park from the Federal Government City Council 80- 10 22Y5/2022 pursuant to her authority under Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 33-55. 2. Resolution No. 2022-XXX - Adopt a resolution Accepting a Deed of Release on 2.42 acres at Centennial Park removing the public park and recreational deed condition to be transferred over to the replacement properties. 3. Resolution No. 2022-XXX - Adopt a resolution approving a Declaration of Restriction on Pacific Electric site. 4. Resolution No. 2022-XXX - Adopt a resolution approving a Dec' tion of Restriction on 6th and Lacy site. 5. Resolution No. 2022-XXX - Adopt a resolution approving : :claration of Restriction on Raitt and Myrtle site. All recommended actions are subject to non -substantive _ ,nges ap, :�d by the City Manager and City Attorney. MINUTES: Councilmember Phan recused her from item 15 due to a cG. of interest out an abundance of caution. Mayor Sarmiento noted reasons for supporting,, . Thanked Parks, Recreation, and Community Agency staff, includir,_ ' dministrative Services Ron Ono, for their work in obtaining t' nw parks. This consent Item - Resolution ► s. 2022-''')-010, 2022-011, and 2022- 012 were approved. Moved by Mayor mientoJsnded by N► r Pro Tem Bacerra to Approve Consent Caleno, `ems 6 -- aY a ,aon of item 10. Councilmember Phan recused herself fro. `qm and iz) u__ j a conflict of interest out an abundance of caution.. YES -kernant*_ -.ounce. -nber, - Lopez, Councilmember, - Mendoza, C cilmember, - P,_ 'oza, Cu -ilmember, - Phan, Councilmember, - Bacerra, Mayor Tem, - Sarmiento, yor N t. ABS ► ': 0 ABSEN . Status: 7 - - Pass **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS - Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. City Council 01- 11 22Y5/2022 16. Hold Sixth Public Hearing Regarding Redistricting Ward Boundaries Resolution of Intention No. 2021-060 published in the Orange County Register on October 23 and 30, 2021. Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Open and close the sixth public hearing se ig input regarding the content of the draft map(s). MINUTES: Mayor Sarmiento opened the public hearing P' ib , Consultant Paul Mitchell with Redistricting Partner. )vided a brief prt 'fation. Ana Charco with Santa Ana Redistricting Cr on (SARCI ,00ke on the vanuus communities of interest the coalition identh. ;n their dr- 7aps: SARC1 and SARC2 and encouraged council to adopt ont `hem -,ted that the communities of interest should represent Sarai Arpero spoke in support (, ,. 'munity arourt, 'lestnut and Halladay and urged council to support the San 4na , . ^ting Coa. 7 map 1. Noted that the districts should represent the(, munitie rather than power votes. Clerk of the Coun, Gomez, r, ted out on eComments received for item 16. Araceli Ro, support, ---Pnt,�d by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Re.. �ted ner uu,... y be supported and that the map chosen represent her cu .pity. Silvia Hern, z des(,. I her community of interest. Spoke in support of the map presented by. Santa t a Redistricting Coalition and asked council to consider it. Helvig er gaged council to keep communities in tact based on what is best for , `Vy manta Ana and expressed concern with the prison population data. Executive Director of Chispa Hairo Cortez spoke in support of the proposed maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Expressed concern with the revised Santa Ana Goals Southern district. Urged council to adopt one of the SARC maps. Gerson Nunez with Orange County Congregation Community Organization City Council 82-12 22Y5/2022 (OCCCO) spoke in support of the maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Expressed concern with the revised Santa Ana Goals map. Urged council to adopt one of the SARC maps. Biff Baker with Orange County Congregation Community Organization (OCCCO) expressed support of the maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistr' 'ing Coalition: SARC1 and SARC2. Expressed concern with the revised Santa a Goals map. Maria Estella Valencia with Orange County Congregation ,nn. `v Organization (OCCCO) spoke in support of the maps submitted by th,. janta An,districting Coalition: SARC1 and SARC2. Expressed concern - '-,,other maps. u I council to consider one of the SARC maps. Organizer Karen Alvarado with Orange Co, � Congrep, , i Community Organization (OCCCO) thanked council for e., -tina redistricting process to allow deeper community engagement by all resin. Spoke in support of the maps submitted by the Santa Any Redistricting Co. n: SARC1 and SARC2. Expressed concern with the Sa, , . '=oals map. U►, 'council to consider advancing maps SARC1 and Sl -;2. Orange County Cona►-oation Com► ii{ irganization (OCCCO) leader Blanca Ruelas spoke in c __ naps SA, , and SARC2 submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting C ►tion. Staff memi, ith Viet'-,gvocated for one of the two maps submitted by the Santa.-, R, ,tricting Coa►►L,,n. Expressed concern with plan F also known as _U GS Daisy Cruz c, -1 on tht half of the Kennedy Commission and urged council to adopt one of thk to maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. ,ent Tran c dinator with VietRISE spoke in support of the maps submitted by th6 nta A, . ?edistricting Coalition. Expressed concern with plan F #86656 map. AskeL ,il to reject map F, and support Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 1 and Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition 2 map. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) staff attorney with Julia Gomez urged council to support maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition and reject any maps the split communities of interest identified by Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. City Council 83- 13 22V5/2022 Leonel Flores spoke in support of maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Expressed concern with plan F, #86656. Orange County Environmental Justice Redistricting Organizer Kayla Asato expressed concern with map F, #86566. Urged council to support maps submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition Danny Vega spoke in support of plan F. Expressed that all It, a residents should have an equal voice. Jeffry Katz advocated for plan F and spoke on tl- immunities of interest -1ria. Orange County Asian and Pacific Islander, -,munity / nce representative (OCAPICA) Kristen Nguyen thanked council t(,. th, irk done to ensure that that all communities in Santa Ana, particularly the vui, ile, low income, and at risk communities can be heard ands -licipate in the reL. '^ting process. Spoke in support of SARC1 and SARC2 -yr- `-pitted by the eta Ana Redistricting Coalition. Expressed concern wit, 'an F, ,. maps. Volunteer with Oranr- 'aunty ConC y- n Community Organization (OCCCO) Fatima Nu, -)ke in suF rt of maps SARC1 and SARC2 submitted by the Santa . Redistric g Coalitio. Anabel Part. scribr _. _ and spoke in support of maps SARC1 and SARC2 submit, ' .ne Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. irange Cc. , Asiar, -1 Pacific Islander Community Alliance (OCAPICA) representativL ordinate ✓fanny De Leon thanked council for the redistricting process. Expre, d concern with plan F, # 86566, map. Spoke in support of maps SARC1 a SARC2 submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Lau 7anr' ./ with Orange County Congregation Community Organization (OC( , ,)oke in support of maps, SARC1 and SARC2, submitted by the Santa Ana Reaistricting Coalition. Community organizer Jesus Santana currently supporting the resident group Sullivan En Accion spoke. Thanked the Arts and Culture office and the Neighborhood Initiative's team for involving Sullivan leaders in the planning of the Willits and Sullivan Beautification project celebration. Thanked city staff, council City Council 84- 14 22Y5/2022 and residents who joined the Sullivan residents for the unveiling of the coyote sculpture on January 22, 2022. Encouraged council to support one of the maps, SARC1 or SARC2, submitted by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Thanked the Santa Redistricting Coalition for taking Sullivan into account and for ensuring that the city has options for equitable maps that do not continue to separate communities such as Willowick and Sullivan. Speaker spoke in support of maps, SARC1 and SARC2, subr ;d by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. Irene Bautista with Orange County Congregation Cr-lunity Organizes. (OCCCO) spoke in support of maps, SARC1 and RC2, submitted by --anta Ana Redistricting Coalition. Expressed concer, rh Santa Ana Goals map. Thanked council for extending the deadlinr Mayor Sarmiento closed the public hearing at 8:. n. Council discussion ensued and, '4cL._ --ided to sta. ,d consultant. Councilmember Lopez reiterated c, 'ern, .;ard ttu. ne community regarding map F. Expressed c l draft plan. .C1, A, and J. Councilmen' Hernande ,oncurred , Councilmember Lopez. Spoke on the importanc, taking into ;ount social joice and equity. Expressed concern with maps: D, E, nd Viet' support for maps A and A2. Noted reasons why as able to supp SARC1 and SARC2. Noted that mar-;naIized coi. nities must be included. Councilmen. Mend(,. iterated support for map #86566, known as map F, and provided reasc, for supporting it. vor Pro Terr .icerra provided reasons for supporting map F. Coun .oer Phan spoke on the various communities of interest that exist and the diffic,.ity of establishing them. Inquired about Section 2 district. Consultant Paul Mitchell addressed council regarding Section 2 Voting Rights district. Councilmember Phan noted that the SARC maps only have four 50 plus 1 Latino City Council 85- 15 22Y5/2022 districts and thus give her pause as she is advocating for an Asian plurality district that was created subsequent to a settlement in a California voting rights lawsuit. Noted that she has heard the Sullivan community. Looking to keep them together in the same district. Noted that the southern area around South Bristol deserve to continue to be together. Requested to elevate updated map F, # 104634. Councilmember Penaloza thanked all who spoke and expressed s, art of plan F, #86566. Mayor Sarmiento noted that the adopted map will require _13 n,, ';ty vote according to Article 1, Section 10 1. 2 of the City Charter. . ►anked st.-onsultant, Clerk of the Council, and council for their work on thr districting proG, Supports colleagues maps. Expressed the importance of cr ►ying with the settle. -'t in respect to the Asian Plurality, respect the EJ co, -)rand Willowick. Noted she maps are drafts and require further tweaking f arrow dowr Support plans A, ,-A2 and SARC1. Councilmember Phan stated the draft maps coun, quested to be elevated: A, A2, F, J, SARC 1, SARC 2 and ►" '14634. Councilmember Lopez requested 91evate ' `-d plan J map. Mayor Sarmiento , redistrict►, am will be brought back to the February 15, 2022 Cour meeting. Clerk of tht incil Dp" i,ie draft maps to be brought back for council consio. A2, J, new version of J, F, 104634, SARC1, and SARC2 ter dire was p, red to staff, council considered item 5, residential permit parking upda, esenta, 17. , '�c Hearing ,dopt a Resolution of Necessity Determining Public Interest and Ne_ 'ity fr e Acquisition of Real Property Located at 2702 N Bristol Street (Propt- iner: Metro Star, LLC) (Project No. 17-6883) (Non -General Fund) Notice of Hearing letter regarding acquisition of real property by eminent domain mailed to property owners on January 5, 2022. Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Resolution No. Adopt a resolution of necessity authorizing the condemnation of a portion of the real property located at 2702 N. Bristol Street City Council 86- 16 22Y5/2022 (APN 002-261-06), owned by Metro Star, LLC, declaring the public necessity and interest thereof. (Requires five affirmative votes) MINUTES: City Manager Kristine Ridge noted that there is no presentation and that staff is available to answer any questions. Mayor Sarmiento opened the public hearing at 9:52 p.m. Clerk of the Council, Daisy Gomez, noted that there was nr ,tt, orrespondence received or in -person request to speak on item. Note for record +ter submitted by Mark Rosen was included as part of the staff report oac,Ket when ti. -Yenda was published. Mark Rosen, attorney for property owner, MF ' star, noted ' , submitted a lett6,r and asked Council to allow the development pt. -s to prow and postpone recommended action until June. Mayor Sarmiento closed the pul '--aring at 9:55 p. City Manager Kristine Ridge note, 'ie actio►. Ming a resolution of necessity and that staff will continue to work w, the r ,erty u�. . This Public He , ig Iten, Zesolutic, Vo. 2022-013 was approved. Moved by Cc. ,fir giber Phan, .-zonded by Councilmember Penaloza to Ad n„+ r ES: 6 — I,, ndez, �_ ,cilmember, — Mendoza, Councilmember, — Penaloza, Councilmembt Phan, , ,uncilmember, — Bacerra, Mayor Pro Tem, — Sarmiento, Mayor NO: 1 — Lopez, 11 ncilmember 'STAIN: 0 AL -NT:0 Stag. — 0 — 0 — Pass 18. Public Hearing - Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Washington Avenue Well Project (Non -General Fund) Legal Notice was published in the Orange County Reporter on January 21, 2022. Department(s): Public Works Agency City Council 87-17 22Y5/2022 Recommended Action: 1. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution approving an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Washington Avenue Well Project. 2. Approve the Washington Avenue Well Project. MINUTES: Executive Director of Public Works Agency Nabil Sal- ovided a brief presentation. Mayor Sarmiento opened the public hearing and seeing ;re wet. speakers, closed the public hearing at 10:00 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra expressed concern w; indscaping. Asked to pos, include public art and referred to the Arts C' aission. Councilmember Penaloza expressed support to, . to the Arts Commission. This consent Item - Reso/utioi fo.. ' #114 was ape. red. Mayor Sarmien' acesse ,ity Coun meeting and convened to Housing Authority MP ,gat 10:05 m. Chair Sarmir, ad/r .da me , .- _4 Authority meeting and reconvened to the Regular Meeth., ,:06 p.m. to consider Councilmember Requested items, City An "omme, end Council Comments. Moved by May, Oro Tern Bacerra, seconded by Councilmember Phan to "I aprove Item 1 YL ' — HP .,idez, Councilmember, —Lopez, Councilmember, —Mendoza, Coun, - -jer, — Penaloza, Councilmember, — Phan, Councilmember, — Bacerra, Mayor P . fem, — Sarmiento, Mayor NO: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT:0 Status: 7-0-0-0— Pass City Council 88- 18 22Y5/2022 COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTED ITEMS 19. Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct Staff to Introduce a Firearms Safe Storage Ordinance — Councilmembers Mendoza and Lopez MINUTES: Councilmember Lopez expressed reasons for supporting item. Asked colleagues to advance this item to the Public Safety Committee. After their research, have the item brought back to council at a future council ating. Councilmember Mendoza supportive of item. Requested sta' more research and bring the item back to council. Councilmember Penaloza supportive of item whethF "s an ordinance , public safety campaign, and have it be considered by tlh ublic Safety Comm►, Councilmember Phan agrees in part with C cilmember naloza. Supportive of it being considered by the Public Safety Cori. ''Pe. Wr , to see how safe storage is addressed when it is being transported. Regt. a item be brought back to a future council meeting. Council Member Hernandez sup ,r►- ,ry a firearm storage ordinance. Wants to see a policy brought baL `rom tr►,- - `,at is rou .ad in equity and safety. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra supportive tF going to the Public Safety Committee. Requested staff b, _ _ `nformatio. owing the practicality of how it would be applied, enforc, .find wha possible 'finance would like. Mayor Sa. nto suppe -' ." m_ Req .asted item be brought back to council after it has b, ,onF , ou uy is Safety Committee. 20 ,iscuss a,, -)nside, acting City Manager to Direct Staff to Review and Amend the City Cour, ?ecogn,. Policy — Councilmember Phan MINUTES: Coo Imember Phan requested to update resolution to contact City 'gnager's Offic 4 days in advance of a council meeting. Requested that idual cou, members be given the option to issue a certificate of recognition rat. 'ban P J it be issued by the entire council. Also, asked staff to advise if there is art., the resolution that needs to be updated from their perspective with the recogn►. , policy that might be outdated or no longer useful. Councilmember Lopez expressed support for Councilmember Phan's requests. Councilmember Penaloza supportive of item. Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra supportive of the effort. City Council 89- 19 22Y5/2022 Mayor Sarmiento supportive of item. 21. Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct Staff to Draft a Resolution for Adoption by the City Council to Support Assembly Bill (AB) 485 to Require Local Law Enforcement Agencies to Report Hate Crime Data on Their Own Web-ite Monthly — Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra MINUTES: Mayor Pro Tem Bacerra asked council to be in(' and support Assembly Bill AB 485 Santa Ana by adopting a resolutio, Councilmember Lopez supportive of item. Councilmember Phan supportive of item. Councilmember Hernandez supportive of ite, Councilmember Mendoza supportive of item. Councilmember Penaloza suppL Ve Mayer Sarmiento supportive of itet. CITY MANAGER jMMENTS MINUTES: Wished Hr y Lunar New . jar! CC" .-IL COMMA 'S 234 DISCLOSUR If the G-Y paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for ri. ')ers of the Counc, provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or con, pion meeting or conference, meeting or event attended. MINUTL "'ouncil, nber Hernandez thanked residents and staff that assisted with the council mee .y. Wished the community a Happy Lunar New Year. Noted today is the first day of . .,ck History Month and that Santa Ana is the heart of Black Orange County since the early sixties. Expressed that he is proud to represent the largest black demographic in Ward 5 and that there is special history there such as, Warren Bussey who recently celebrated 108 years of life and history. Noted Helen Shift was the Founder of the Black History Parade, which will take place this Saturday in the City of Anaheim. Noted that the Black History parade was a Santa Ana history parade started by 8 people. It slowly evolved into what it is today where there are thousands of participants in this parade. City Council RQ 20 22115/2022 Expressed that it is his aspiration and goal to bring it back to its home in the City of Santa Ana. Stated that he, along with Mayor Sarmiento and Councilmember Lopez will be there with the community. Councilmember Lopez wished all a Happy Lunar New Year. Noted she will attend the Black History Parade and will also try to attend the Tet Parade. Encouraged res' its to attend one of the events. Thanked staff for working with her and UAB Foundat' where they teamed up to provide free COVID testing in Ward 3, Prentice Park r -,nd the Santa Ana Zoo. Regarding the homeless update thanked staff for working w' . nui. encies. Noted that she along with city staff are aware of the ongoing issue on L- St First S, ` and are considering options to move forward. Wished all a Happy L , ,r New Year ar,, '40py Black History Month. 1 hope everyone has a good week, Councilmember Mendoza announced that the city a lot of pr available for public use. Announced the grand opening of Thornton thb -rude e, .;ise areas. Wished all a Happy Lunar New Year along with a Happy Valentines n ,p week. Councilmember Phan wished all a Ha,r ' • �nar New Year,-. Tet. Spoke on the importance of the holiday in the Vietna, st - it focuses. family, it focuses on gathering together and it focuses on a bt r ana -new yeb . Announced the UVSA Tet Festival held on Saturday and Sunda) I the C .;U,. ;r. Spoke on the importance of attending to eynnse ourselvt `o arent cultures. Challenges everyone to be brave in everything th, _ _ ,o that ke with the spirit. Councilmember Pe oza wisher I a Lunar N • Year. Mayor Pro Tem Ba.- � am ,ceu tit . ,y office hours this month. Noted he will attend the Tet Parade , iting the lunar new year. Announced that he had attended the annual ' ' ,1 Use L -ind Planning Conference which provided good updates on legis' ,n and su. 'and us ws. Wished those who are welcoming in the year of the tip a very happy at. rosperu iew year- Happy Lunar New Year. MG. Sarmiento thanl 'city team along with Daisy Perez, Paul Eakins, Rosa Flores, City -lger, and tho who participated in the State of the City Address held on January 26, 202.- 'shed all happy Lunar New Year. He noted the Black History Month Parade and Tet Pa, i� the same day. Noted that we need to work with both those groups to make sure tht as do not conflict with each other. Wished all a Happy Black History Month. The next regularly scheduled meeting is on February 15, 2022. ADJOURNMENT - Adjourn the City Council meeting and convene to the Housing Authority City Council 21- 21 22V5/2022 meeting. Mayor Sarmiento adjourned the City Council meeting at 10:37 p.m. City Council 22-22 22Y5/2022 HOUSING AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Authority Members Vice Chair Chair City Manager City Attorney Clerk of the Council Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez Nelida Mendoza David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Phil Bacerra Vicente Sarmie►- Kristine R; Sonia P arvalho Dais, omez MINUTES: Chair Sarmiento called the Housing Authority sting at 10.05 p.m. ROLL CALL Clerk of the Council condurl-I roll call. All. tN rMem*bers were present. PUBLIC COMM" 'S - Memr r` `1, n bblic ay address Housing Authority on items on the Housing AuthorlL, �Pnd� MINUTE`' - 'liblic c(,. gnts on Housing Authority items. I ONSENT CALENDAR -COMMENDED TION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: X and X. 1. Exc , A AbSr aS Departs. Ks): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 2. Minutes from the Special Housing Authority Meeting of December 21, 2021 Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Approve minutes. City Council 23- 23 22Y5/2022 3. Quarterly Report for the Housing Choice Voucher Program for the Period of October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Receive and file the Quarterly Report for the Housing Choice Voucher Program for the period of October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2 01 Moved by Councilmember Mendoza, seconded by Councilmem' Penaloza to Approve consent calendar items 1- 3. YES: 7 - Hernandez, Lopez, Mendoza, Penaloza, Phan, Bac^rra, Sarmiento NO: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT:0 Status: 7-0-0-0- Pass **END OF C-k'SENT CALENL. ** HOUSING AUTHORITY MEMBER CO, 'IEN . MINUTES: None. ADJOURNMENT - Adjr, using Am .,y meeting. MINUTES: Chair S the Regular Mee' Manager Commet, aento adjc led the He ng Authority meeting and reconvened to at 10:06 p to consider � ancilmember Requested items, City nd Co - City Council 24 24 22Y5/2022 Finance and Management Services www.santa-ana.org/finance Item # 10 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Periodic Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021. AGENDA TITLE: Receive and File Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021 RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file. DISCUSSION California Code Section 53646 (b) states that if a quarterly report is rendered to the legislative body, the quarterly investment report shall be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. In an effort to meet the statutory requirement, Finance and Management Services Agency ("FMSA") submits the Report via email for review and distribution to the City Council in advance. The report was emailed for distribution on January 24, 2022. The legislation specifies that this quarterly report contain the seven major elements listed below: 1. Type of investments 2. Date of maturity 3. Par and dollar amounts invested in each security 4. Weighted average maturity of the investments 5. Market value as of the date of the report 6. Source of the market value information 7. Any funds, investments or programs, including loans, under the management of contracted parties. These specifications include a statement outlining the ability of the City to meet the budgeted expenditures for the subsequent six months be submitted to the City Council on a quarterly basis. Staff performs an end -of -month expenditure analysis to comply with the expenditure requirement and a statement confirming the ability to meet this requirement in the monthly and quarter -ending Treasurer's Report. The information is in compliance with State law and the City's Investment Policy. The attached Treasurer's Report (Exhibit 1) accurately reflects all pooled investments held on behalf of the City as of December 31, 2021. City Council 10 — 1 2/15/2022 Quarterly Report of Investments February 15, 2022 Page 2 The attached Cash held by Bank and Cash held by Fund(s) Listing (Exhibit 2) is a schedule of cash by funds added to the monthly and quarterly Report of Investments to enhance FMSA's reporting and transparency. The following two tables represent the following: (1) percentage limits set by the City's Investment Policy and State Law and shows respective City investment portfolio investment types, amounts, and percentages; and (2) the restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2021. Type of Investment yP Amounts Invested $ Portfolio % COSA Policy Limits State Law Limits Certificates of Deposit CDs $5,208,000 1.29% 30% 30% Federal Farm Credit Bank FFCB $51,909,210 12.88% None None Federal Home Loan Bank FHLB $162,395,858 40.30% None None Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. FHLMC $49,991,250 12.41 % None None Federal National Mortgage Association FNMA $61,899,880 15.36% None None Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF $14,069,652 3.49% None None Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF — ARPA $57,472,684 14.26% None None Sub- Total: $402,946,534 100% None None Cash : $45,606,721 Total: $448,553,255 Restricted Cash In $ Restricted Cash t, $3,059,372 Total $3,059,372 t Restricted cash is held by various Trustees such as Bank of New York Mellon; US Bank; Signature Bank; and State of California Condemnation Fund. Restricted Cash is segregated from cash used for daily operations. The following City investment portfolio graph represents percentages within the respective investment types as of December 31, 2021. City Council 10 — 2 2/15/2022 Quarterly Report of Investments February 15, 2022 Page 3 LocaIAgency Investment Fund (LAIF Local Agency OVUM 4- nt Fund (LAIF) 3.49 Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA),,. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FHLMC) 12.41% LAI City crf Sarrta Ana Inrrestmeht Portfolio December .31, 2021 Certificates of Deposit (CD) 1.29% Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) 12,88% Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) 40.30% The following two tables represent, as of December 31, 2021: (1) the aggregate Average Market Yield To Date (AMTD); and (2) the breakdown of by investment type. Aggregate Average Market Yield To Date Average Month To Date (AMTD) 1 0.788% Investments Par Value of Investments YTM % of Portfolio Certificates of Deposit $5,208,000 0.900% 1.29% 0.012% LAIF $14,069,651.53 0.212% 3.49% 0.007% LAIF ARPA $57,472,683.73 0.212% 14.26% 0.030% Federal Agency Securities $326,196,198.58 0.912% 80.95% 0.738% $402,946,534 0.788% 100.00% 0.788% Cash held by Bank and Cash by Fund(s) Listing (Exhibit 2) The above -referenced exhibit (Exhibit 2) includes a comparison of bank balances between each City Cash account including Investments; Cash held at a City designated financial institution; Cash on Hand; and Restricted Cash versus the Cash held by various Fund(s). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. City Council 10 — 3 2/15/2022 Quarterly Report of Investments February 15, 2022 Page 4 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Treasurer's Report 2. Cash Held by Bank and Cash Fund(s) Listing Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, FMSA Executive Director Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 10 — 4 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 City of Santa Ana Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary December 31, 2021 Par Market Book % of Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Days to YTM/C Term Maturity Certificates of Deposit 5,208,000.00 5,119,272.45 5,208,000.00 1.29 1,604 1,567 0.900 Local Agency Investment Funds 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 3.49 1 1 0.212 Cash in Banks 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 14.26 1 1 0.212 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 326,350,000.00 323,032,051.75 326,196,198.58 80.95 1,709 351 0.912 403,100,335.26 399,693,659.46 402,946,533.84 100.00% 1,404 305 0.788 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings 45,606,720.96 45,606,720.96 45,606,720.96 448,707,056.22 December 31 Month Ending 445,300,380.42 Fiscal Year To Date 448,553,254.80 1 1 0.000 1,404 305 0.788 Current Year 254,499.26 1,491,364.24 Average Daily Balance 439,900,865.03 448,996,594.50 Effective Rate of Return 0.68% 0.66% This report contains all the required information in SB 866 and SB 564 and accurately reflects all pooled investments held during this reporting period on behalf of the City and the City of Santa Ana acting on behalf of the Community Redevelopment Agency. The information reported herein is in compliance with State law and the City's Investment Policy. Based on liquidity of investments, the City of Santa Ana is able to meet budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months, barring any catastrophic natural disasters. Market pricings are obtained through the City's third party trust services at BNY Mellon Trust. Finance & Mgmt Services Agency, Reporting period 12/01/2021-12/31/2021 City Council Run Date: 01/16/2022 - 12:1 10-5 Portfolio COSA 2/15/2022 CID PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.5 City of Santa Ana Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2021 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Certificates of Deposit 06417NF73 14051 02568KAJ4 14043 70962LAV4 14050 549104ZS9 14046 87165FD76 14047 15721UET2 14044 32022EAUO 14065 88413QDE5 14056 38149MR47 14064 856285YQ8 14057 59013KPNO 14049 30781JAWO 14054 05580AH64 14061 45776NEN2 14062 58404DMQ1 14063 89235MMB4 14052 292079AR1 14045 73319FBJ7 14053 320337EZ7 14048 39573LCCO 14055 795451BAO 14060 BANK OZK American Equity Bank PENTAGON FCU LUANA SAVINGS BK SYNCHRONY BANK CFBANK FIRST FEDERAL THIRD FEDERAL S&L GOLDMAN SACHS ST BK INDIA NY MERRICK BANK FARMERS & MERCHANTS BMW BANK OF NA INSBANK MEDALLION BK UT TOYOTA FINANCIAL EMPIRE ST BK NA POPPY BANK FIRST GENERAL BK GREENSTATE CU SALLIE MAE BANK Subtotal and Average 4,272,000.00 Page 1 Stated YTM/C YTM/C Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 11/12/2021 248,000.00 240,350.12 248,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 1,592 05/12/2026 11/26/2021 248,000.00 241,355.39 248,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 1,607 05/27/2026 11/10/2021 248,000.00 243,768.08 248,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,774 11/10/2026 11/05/2021 248,000.00 239,087.18 248,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 1,769 11/05/2026 11/05/2021 248,000.00 244,964.73 248,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 1,769 11/05/2026 11/10/2021 248,000.00 242,692.65 248,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 1,651 07/10/2026 12/29/2021 248,000.00 244,491.17 248,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 1,336 08/29/2025 11/24/2021 248,000.00 244,581.42 248,000.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1,238 05/23/2025 12/22/2021 248,000.00 245,259.18 248,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,451 12/22/2025 11/29/2021 248,000.00 245,519.85 248,000.00 1.150 1.134 1.150 1,794 11/30/2026 11/09/2021 248,000.00 244,951.83 248,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 1,773 11/09/2026 11/19/2021 248,000.00 241,965.52 248,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 1,783 11/19/2026 12/17/2021 248,000.00 246,545.65 248,000.00 0.950 0.937 0.950 1,081 12/17/2024 12/20/2021 248,000.00 243,367.76 248,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 1,630 06/19/2026 12/20/2021 248,000.00 246,622.48 248,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 1,815 12/21/2026 11/12/2021 248,000.00 244,953.30 248,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 1,776 11/12/2026 11/12/2021 248,000.00 243,248.69 248,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 1,654 07/13/2026 11/17/2021 248,000.00 241,378.77 248,000.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1,781 11/17/2026 11/05/2021 248,000.00 242,804.47 248,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,131 02/05/2025 11/23/2021 248,000.00 244,452.36 248,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 1,423 11/24/2025 12/15/2021 248,000.00 246,911.85 248,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,080 12/16/2024 5,208,000.00 5,119,272.45 5,208,000.00 0.888 0.900 1,567 Local Agency Investment Funds LAIFCITY LAIFCITY Local Agency Investment Fund 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 0.212 0.209 0.212 1 Subtotal and Average 18,908,361.21 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 14,069,651.53 0.209 0.212 1 Cash in Banks LAIF ARPA LAIF ARPA Local Agency Investment Fund 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 0.212 0.209 0.212 1 Subtotal and Average 96,128,095.56 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 57,472,683.73 0.209 0.212 1 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133EJ5W5 13868 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/29/2019 925,000.00 961,620.75 924,195.25 2.650 2.634 2.670 660 10/23/2023 3133EKBW5 13876 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/04/2019 3,000,000.00 3,131,310.00 2,998,740.00 2.610 2.583 2.619 787 02/27/2024 3133ECPMO 13884 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/15/2019 2,000,000.00 2,049,680.00 1,975,960.00 2.125 2.396 2.430 499 05/15/2023 3133EKPG5 13897 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2019 1,500,000.00 1,543,005.00 1,512,465.00 2.125 1.894 1.920 612 09/05/2023 Portfolio COSA II++ Council 10 - 6 2/15/2022 CID Run Date:01/16/2022-1(:1�;$`y PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.5 City of Santa Ana Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2021 Page 2 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate YTM/C 360 YTM/C Days to Maturity 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133EKY91 13932 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/11/2019 2,500,000.00 2,524,350.00 2,496,700.00 1.375 1.401 1.420 283 10/11/2022 3133EK3M6 13934 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/23/2019 5,000,000.00 5,105,950.00 5,003,650.00 1.625 1.584 1.606 660 10/23/2023 3133ELX33 13974 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/22/2020 6,000,000.00 5,903,760.00 6,000,000.00 0.690 0.681 0.690 1,298 07/22/2025 3133EMBH4 13988 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/29/2020 5,000,000.00 4,877,950.00 5,000,000.00 0.530 0.523 0.530 1,367 09/29/2025 3133EMFR8 13991 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/03/2020 5,000,000.00 4,875,600.00 4,997,500.00 0.540 0.543 0.550 306 11/03/2025 3133EMSU7 14005 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/09/2021 4,000,000.00 3,944,360.00 4,000,000.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 432 03/09/2026 3133EMUP5 14006 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/01/2021 6,000,000.00 5,922,240.00 6,000,000.00 0.710 0.700 0.710 90 04/01/2025 3133EMWH1 14016 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/21/2021 5,000,000.00 4,919,150.00 5,000,000.00 0.710 0.700 0.710 110 04/21/2025 3133EM2C5 14032 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/10/2021 6,000,000.00 5,861,820.00 6,000,000.00 0.710 0.700 0.710 586 08/10/2026 3130AAKW7 13825 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/11/2017 3,175,000.00 3,176,016.00 3,170,488.33 1.950 1.953 1.980 9 01/10/2022 3130ABBNS1 13845 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/27/2017 5,000,000.00 5,037,600.00 5,000,000.00 1.815 1.790 1.815 177 06/27/2022 3130ADMX7 13854 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/31/2018 1,500,000.00 1,536,450.00 1,486,650.00 2.500 2.662 2.699 433 03/10/2023 3130AFW94 13873 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/27/2019 2,000,000.00 2,072,220.00 1,996,220.00 2.500 2.506 2.541 773 02/13/2024 3130AB3H7 13889 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/29/2019 3,000,000.00 3,100,290.00 2,999,250.00 2.375 2.348 2.380 797 03/08/2024 3130AKPQ3 13996 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 4,000,000.00 3,920,040.00 4,000,000.00 0.580 0.572 0.580 27 01/28/2026 313OAKU53 13997 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 5,000,000.00 4,890,200.00 5,000,000.00 0.520 0.513 0.520 27 01/28/2026 313OAKN69 13998 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 6,000,000.00 5,866,440.00 6,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 27 01/28/2026 3130ALA53 13999 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2021 5,000,000.00 4,899,000.00 5,000,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 55 02/25/2026 3130ALBM5 14001 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/24/2021 5,000,000.00 4,903,150.00 5,000,000.00 0.625 0.616 0.625 54 02/24/2026 3130ALB52 14002 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2021 5,000,000.00 4,889,400.00 5,000,000.00 0.375 0.370 0.375 55 02/25/2025 3130ALDZ4 14003 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/10/2021 4,000,000.00 3,926,360.00 4,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 68 03/10/2025 3130ALKN3 14004 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/24/2021 4,000,000.00 3,954,200.00 4,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 82 09/24/2024 3130ALLP7 14007 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/29/2021 6,000,000.00 5,918,760.00 5,997,000.00 0.650 0.692 0.702 75 03/17/2025 3130ALW67 14008 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/22/2021 5,000,000.00 4,971,200.00 5,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 21 04/22/2026 3130AMYUO 14024 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/30/2021 6,000,000.00 5,941,860.00 6,000,000.00 1.050 1.036 1.050 88 06/30/2026 3130AMYCO 14025 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/30/2021 6,000,000.00 5,945,580.00 6,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 88 03/30/2026 3130AMSFO 14026 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/28/2021 6,000,000.00 5,950,440.00 6,000,000.00 0.400 0.395 0.400 86 06/28/2024 3130ANFU9 14027 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/29/2021 5,000,000.00 4,918,100.00 5,000,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 209 07/29/2026 3130ANFGO 14028 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/18/2021 5,000,000.00 4,925,050.00 5,000,000.00 0.875 0.863 0.875 48 05/18/2026 3130ANE30 14029 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/29/2021 5,000,000.00 4,947,550.00 5,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 28 07/29/2026 3130ANHV5 14033 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/19/2021 5,000,000.00 4,953,600.00 5,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 0.550 1,083 12/19/2024 3130ANPE4 14034 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/26/2021 6,000,000.00 5,897,100.00 6,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 237 08/26/2025 3130ANQ78 14035 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/27/2021 6,000,000.00 5,905,920.00 6,000,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 422 08/27/2026 3130AP3E3 14036 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 4,917,200.00 5,000,000.00 0.820 0.809 0.820 272 09/30/2026 3130ANX62 14037 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 4,921,100.00 5,000,000.00 0.650 0.641 0.650 88 06/30/2025 3130APB79 14038 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 4,941,200.00 5,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 272 09/30/2026 Run Date:01/16/2022-1(:1$`y Council 10-7 Portfolio COSA 2/15/2022 CID PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 City of Santa Ana Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2021 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C YTM/C Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3130AP3A1 14039 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/29/2021 5,000,000.00 4,914,300.00 4,998,750.00 0.850 0.844 0.855 87 06/29/2026 3130APB46 14040 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/13/2021 10,000,000.00 9,852,200.00 10,000,000.00 0.950 0.937 0.950 650 10/13/2026 3130APQC2 14041 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/23/2021 5,000,000.00 4,989,750.00 5,000,000.00 0.750 0.740 0.750 142 05/23/2024 3130APQB4 14042 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/23/2021 5,000,000.00 4,995,600.00 5,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 22 11/23/2026 3130APVC6 14058 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/14/2021 5,000,000.00 4,997,850.00 4,997,500.00 1.375 1.366 1.385 151 12/01/2026 313OAQAB9 14059 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/30/2021 3,750,000.00 3,750,300.00 3,750,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 88 12/30/2026 3134GBVA7 13839 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 06/29/2017 5,000,000.00 5,041,250.00 4,997,500.00 1.925 1.909 1.936 179 06/29/2022 3134GVQX9 13962 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 05/05/2020 5,000,000.00 5,001,750.00 4,995,000.00 0.700 0.711 0.720 1,220 05/05/2025 3134GVVX3 13964 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 05/28/2020 5,000,000.00 4,928,550.00 4,998,750.00 0.750 0.752 0.763 58 05/28/2025 3134GVR26 13967 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 06/25/2020 6,000,000.00 5,903,700.00 6,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 175 06/25/2025 3134GVT99 13968 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 06/30/2020 6,000,000.00 5,909,880.00 6,000,000.00 0.650 0.641 0.650 180 06/30/2025 3134GV5R5 13979 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 07/15/2020 6,000,000.00 6,000,660.00 6,000,000.00 0.570 0.562 0.570 14 07/15/2024 3134GWUE4 13987 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 09/30/2020 5,000,000.00 4,881,350.00 5,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 272 09/30/2025 3134GW4Z6 13989 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 10/27/2020 6,000,000.00 5,862,000.00 6,000,000.00 0.540 0.533 0.540 299 10/27/2025 3134GXJL9 13995 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 12/30/2020 6,000,000.00 5,871,840.00 6,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 363 12/30/2025 3135GOT94 13850 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 03/28/2018 2,000,000.00 2,041,080.00 1,971,780.00 2.375 2.653 2.689 383 01/19/2023 3135GOT45 13856 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 05/31/2018 1,000,000.00 1,004,120.00 971,950.00 1.875 2.611 2.647 94 04/05/2022 3135GOT78 13857 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 05/31/2018 1,000,000.00 1,012,710.00 971,400.00 2.000 2.665 2.702 277 10/05/2022 3135GOX24 13940 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 01/15/2020 5,000,000.00 5,091,350.00 4,990,750.00 1.625 1.641 1.664 1,102 01/07/2025 3135GOW66 13941 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 01/15/2020 5,000,000.00 5,094,100.00 4,994,000.00 1.625 1.629 1.651 1,018 10/15/2024 3136G4WV1 13965 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 06/16/2020 5,000,000.00 4,948,750.00 5,000,000.00 0.750 0.740 0.750 1,262 06/16/2025 3136G4D42 13976 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 07/28/2020 8,000,000.00 7,821,360.00 8,000,000.00 0.510 0.503 0.510 573 07/28/2025 3136G4C43 13977 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 08/14/2020 6,000,000.00 5,895,240.00 6,000,000.00 0.650 0.641 0.650 1,321 08/14/2025 3136G4G98 13978 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 08/12/2020 6,000,000.00 5,876,100.00 6,000,000.00 0.560 0.552 0.560 223 08/12/2025 3136G45Q2 13990 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 10/28/2020 6,000,000.00 5,861,040.00 6,000,000.00 0.530 0.523 0.530 300 10/28/2025 3135GA4VO 13992 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 11/25/2020 5,000,000.00 4,900,900.00 5,000,000.00 0.625 0.616 0.625 328 11/25/2025 3135GAAN1 13993 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 12/17/2020 6,000,000.00 5,873,820.00 6,000,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 75 12/17/2025 3135GO6J7 13994 Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc. 12/10/2020 6,000,000.00 5,863,680.00 6,000,000.00 0.650 0.641 0.650 68 12/10/2025 Subtotal and Average 320,592,408.26 326,350,000.00 323,032,051.75 326,196,198.58 0.899 0.912 351 Total and Average 439,900,865.03 403,100,335.26 399,693,659.46 402,946,533.84 0.777 0.788 305 Run Date:01/16/2022-lpltty Council Portfolio COSA 2/15/2022 CID PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 City of Santa Ana CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash December 31, 2021 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated Book Value Rate YTM/C 360 Page 4 YTM/C Days to 365 Maturity Cash in Banks PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY OF SANTA ANA 07/01/2021 90,053.00 90,053.00 90,053.00 0.000 0.000 1 HOUSING 13943 JP MORGAN CHASE 07/01/2021 3,584,835.07 3,584,835.07 3,584,835.07 0.000 0.000 1 WORKERS COMPENS 37983 JP MORGAN CHASE 1,122,829.42 1,122,829.42 1,122,829.42 0.000 0.000 1 GENERAL LIABILI 38130 JP MORGAN CHASE 1,414,148.51 1,414,148.51 1,414,148.51 0.000 0.000 1 PROPERTY MANAGE 8695 JP MORGAN CHASE 07/01/2021 34,084.30 34,084.30 34,084.30 0.000 0.000 1 PROPERTY MGMT 2 PROP MGMT 2 JP MORGAN CHASE 07/01/2021 1,492.50 1,492.50 1,492.50 0.000 0.000 1 HEALTHCARE SPEN 0112 JPMorgan Chase 344,349.86 344,349.86 344,349.86 0.000 0.000 1 COMMISSARY 7962 JPMorgan Chase 472,363.64 472,363.64 472,363.64 0.000 0.000 1 GENERAL ACCOUNT 9500 JPMorgan Chase 37,782,622.22 37,782,622.22 37,782,622.22 0.000 0.000 1 FSS FSS Santa Ana Federal Credit Union 759,942.44 759,942.44 759,942.44 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 1 Total Cash and Investments 439,900,865.03 448,707,056.22 445,300,380.42 448,553,254.80 0.777 0.788 305 Run Date: 01/16/2022-12-14'.y ---''"" 10-9 Portfolio COSA 2/15/2022 CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CASHISECURITIES HELD IN TRUST Portfolio Management Page I Portfolio Details - Investments Digitally signed by Alexander Alexander Trinidad December 31, 2021 Trinidad DaFe:2022.01.14 17:06.44-08'00' Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Par Value Market Value Book Value Date Money Market Accounts X9USDDTPC 80364 Dreyfus Treasury 10,571,46 10,571.46 10,571.46 X9USDDTPC 80365 Dreyfus Treasury 1,204.38 1,2U4.38 1.204.38 X9USDDEFU— 80107 INSTL RES THE AND AGNY CASH 19.19 19.19 19.19 9AMMF05B2— 80406 US BANK MONEY MARKET 0.71 0.71 0.71 9AMMF05S2- 80407 US BANK MONEY MARKET 1.05 1.05 1.05 SYS80418 80418 US BANK MONEY MARKET 522,967.96 522,967.96 522,967.95 SYS80419 80419 US BANK MONEY MARKET 105,345.07 105,345.07 105,345.07 SYS80421 80421 US BANK MONEY MARKET 5.30 5.30 5.30 X9USDMOR3- 80243 MORGAN STANLEY GOUT INSTL 108,858.10 108.858.10 108,858.10 X9USDMOR3 80248 MORGAN STANLEY GOUT INSTL 1.56 1.56 1.56 Subtotal and Average 748,974.78 748,974.78 748,974.78 Other S8620971G 80225 MBIA INSURANCE POLICY 1.00 1.00 1.00 981NP5PV2 80398 ASSURED GUARANTY MUNI CORP 1.00 1.00 1.00 Subtotal and Average 2.00 2.00 2.00 Cash in Bank SYS80414 80414 SIGNATURE BANK 1,268,869.87 1,258,869.87 1,268,869.87 SYS80415 80415 CONDEMNATION DEPOSIT FUND 1,041,525.00 1,041,525.00 1,C41,525.D0 Subtotal and Average 2,310,394.87 2,310,394.87 2,310,394.87 Total and Average 3,069,371.66 3,059,371.66 3,069,371.65 RunDate:ovisrzo i �COUnCIl 10 — 10 Portfolio TRST AC 2/ 1 5/20262_PM2j 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.5 Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021 EXHIBIT 2 Exhibit 2 - Cash held by Bank and Cash by Fund(s) Listing Investments Amount Certificates of Deposit 5,208,000 Bank of New York Mellon - Investment Custodian 326,196,199 Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) 14,069,652 Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) - ARPA 57,472,684 Total - Investments 402,946,534 Cash Held at City Financial Institution(s) and Cash on Hand Amount General Account 37,782,622 General Liability Account 1,414,149 Housing Account 3,584,835 Workers Compensation Account 1,122,829 Santa Ana Federal Credit Union - Family Self Sufficiency (FSS-Housing) 759,942 Commissary Account 472,364 Flexible Benefit Spending Account 344,350 Property Management Account 34,084 Property Management - Phase 2 Account 1,493 Petty Cash 90,053 Total - Cash Held at City Financial Institution(s) and Cash on Hand 45,606,721 Restricted Cash Amount Signature Bank - Streetlight Project 1,268,870 US Bank - Pension Stability Funds (Section 115 Trust with PARS) 522,968 Bank of New York Mellon - Various 120,634 US Bank - Warner Industrial Community 105,345 State of California Condemnation Fund - Right of Way Deposits 1,041,525 US Bank - Gas Tax Bonds 30 Total -Restricted Cash 3,059,372 Total Cash Held City at Financial Institution(s), Cash on Hand and Restricted Cash Cash by Fund(s) - Total (see below for listing) Fund Fund description Amount 011 GENERAL FUND 49,269,855 012 CANNABIS PUBLIC BENEFIT 19,805,868 016 CASP CERTIFICATION & TRAINING 294,592 020 OTS-TRAFFIC OFFENDER PROGRAM 38,579 021 PRCSA CATV FUND 1,317,107 022 PRCSA FEE & DONATION 941,716 023 INMATE WELFARE FUND 1,722,824 024 PD ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES LEAGUE (116,016) 025 IDB & EZ VOUCHER MONITORING 477,024 026 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 135,463 027 PARKING FUND 404,883 029 SPECIAL GAS TAX 27,637,193 030 PROP 1B BOND ACT OF 2006 153,148 031 AIR QUALITY IMPR. (AB 2766) 1,574,871 032 MEASURE M-STREET CONSTRUCTION (5,712,965) 033 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 572,636 034 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA E 1,537,420 035 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA F 1,807,604 041 TRANSP SYS IMPR AREA A-2 697,039 042 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 9,544 048 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA C-2 213,173 049 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA G 98,255 051 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 4,582,962 053 CITY SERVICES 6,858,153 054 SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL 18,977,190 055 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 9,762,022 056 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 6,924,590 057 FED CLEAN WATER PROTECTION ENT 4,891,213 058 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT 4,846,292 059 SELECT STREET CONSTRUCTION 17,862,843 060 WATER REVENUE 49,372,731 066 ACQUISITION & CONSTRUCTION 2,525,173 067 REGIONAL TRANSP CENTER (1,683,955) 451,612,626 451,612,626 City Council Page 1 of 3 10 — 11 2/15/2022 Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021 Exhibit 2 - Cash held by Bank and Cash by Fund(s) Listing 068 069 070 071 073 074 075 076 078 080 081 082 083 085 086 087 088 089 090 093 094 095 096 100 101 103 104 106 107 109 110 120 121 122 123 124 125 127 128 130 133 135 136 137 138 139 140 142 143 144 145 147 148 149 152 153 154 155 157 158 160 161 162 164 165 166 167 169 170 172 175 176 177 178 SANITATION FUND 7,170,809 REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE 5,702,550 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 7,211,538 CENTRAL SERVICES (221,692) BUILDING MAINT FUND 475,025 CIVIC CENTER MAINTENANCE (730f562) FLEET MAINTENANCE/STORES (597,297) STORES & PROPERTY CONTROL (344,690) RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,861,278 LIABILITY AND PROPERTY INS FND 13,864,633 EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE (1,865,873) WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 15,693,846 PAYROLL REVOLVING 7,457,251 CITY YARD OPERATION 129,710 PUB WKS ENG/PROJ MGMT (694,245) PT RETIREMENT FUND 7,598 QUALITY SERVICE TRAINING 375,463 CA SEISMIC HAZARD PROGRAM 48,727 ORANGE CO SANITATION DIST 2&3 1,200,858 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 130,887 INTEREST AGENCY - POLICE COMMISSARY ACCOUNT 419,069 SA TOURISM MARKETING DISTRICT 103,846 SECTION 457 FIDUCIARY ADMIN 77,034 PUB WKS-ADMIN & PLANNING (1,203,175) PMA RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE (455,634) SEIU RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 34,602 MGMT RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 5,366 UC RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 1,824 INFO SYS STRATEGIC PLAN 12,709,643 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION 100,614 FIRE FACILITIES FUND 2,031,056 SPECIAL REPAIR/DEMOLITION 614,754 EMERGENCY & HEALTH GRANTS 5,385,916 WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (922,220) ORANGE COUNTY SSA GRANTS (110,824) OES UASI (838,500) D.O.J. GRANT FUND (318,491) POLICE BLOCK GRANTS 990,478 HOME PROGRAM FEDERAL GRANT 1,422,260 HOUSING AUTHORITY -ISSUER FEE 2,737,138 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT (956,133) HOUSING AUTHORITY -VOUCHER HAP 852,814 HOUSING AUTHORITY- MAINSTREAM - HOUSING AUTHORITY -MS 5 1,079,682 HOUSING AUTHORITY -NEW CONSTR 134,169 HOUSING AUTHORITY -VOUCHER ADM 1,911,780 NSP FEDERAL GRANT 1,400,911 CALHOME MFGD HSG LOAN 648,944 PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (598,772) RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT 394,983 FEDERAL AID SAFETY PROGRAM (913,887) TRAFFIC SYSTEM MGMT GRANT (7,566,154) WIC ASSESSMENT DIST ST IMPRV 32,704 PUBLIC LIBRARY GRANT FUND (2,783) LIBRARY GRANTS 42,388 LIBRARY SVCS & TECHNOLOGY ACT 1,375 OCJP GRANT 36,355 HSG ADMIN CARES ACT COVID-19 544 PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM 2,554,402 HSG HAP CARES ACT COVID-19 - PRCSA CAPITAL GRANTS (879,956) ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM 86,445 PUB WKS-WTR QUALITY & CONTROL (1,811,557) OFFICE OF SAFETY GRANT 203,781 US DOJ ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 1,137,303 US TREASURY ASSET FORFEITURE 139,182 RECREATION GRANTS FUND 432,243 MS5 HAP CARES ACT COVID-19 (1,062,375) NATL RECREATION TRAILS FND ACT 17,129 CARES ACT - CESF - CARES ACT - State - EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PG 6,357,195 COVID RELIEF FUND - City Council Page 2 of 3 10 — 12 2/15/2022 Quarterly Report of Investments as of December 31, 2021 Exhibit 2 - Cash held by Bank and Cash by Fund(s) Listing 179 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 548,705 180 ARPA EHV ADMIN FEES 215,808 181 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 57,041,456 201 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 1 132 202 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 2 1,428 203 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 3 754,343 204 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 4 1,055 205 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 5 599 206 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 6 879 207 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 7 193,995 209 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 9 732 210 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 10 17,154 211 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 11 222 212 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 12 13 213 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 13 2,695 221 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA I 987,323 222 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA II 240,056 223 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA III 419,366 224 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA IV 465,708 225 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA V 264,296 226 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA VI 217,298 301 REC/COMM SVS 6,036 311 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 1 3,035,920 312 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 2 6,199,774 313 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 3 11,203,895 314 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 4 582,263 400 POLICE UUT LEASE REVENUE BONDS 1,933,289 403 SCAG GRANTS - 404 COSA 2014 LEASE FINANCING 1,781,272 417 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEE 16,519,602 418 CDA - PEEBLER CAPITAL FUND 3,993,037 607 HOUSING AUTHORITY LMIHF 4,761,168 652 2003A SERIES TAX ALLOC BOND - 654 2011A SERIES TAX ALLOC BOND - 655 2018A SERIES TAX ALLOC BOND 11,768 658 2003E SERIES ALLOC BOND - 670 COSA RDA 369,738 671 COSA RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT 409,135 980 SAN JUANQUIN TRANS CORRIDOR - 981 EASTERN FOOTHILL TRANS CORRIDO - 991 TRAN SYS IMP AUT C-2 TUSTIN 2,171,898 992 TRAN SYS IMP AUT AREA D-TUSTIN 10,752,257 993 WIC ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 340,098 998 TREASURERS AGENCY COLLECTIONS 28,362 999 Lawson Clearing 2,035 Reconciling Item(s) - Outstanding Checks * 2,719,108 Reconciling Item(s) - Bank Direct Deposits* 11,281,824 Reconciling Item(s) - Deposits in Transit* 209,726 Reconciling Item(s) - Withdrawals in Transit* - Reconciling Item(s) - Various* 794,847 Reconciling Item(s) - Various: A difference between Cash held by Financial Institution, Fiscal Agent and Cash on Hand exists when comparing to Cash by Fund due, to reconciling items such as timing of payments; outstanding checks; and deposits in transit City Council Page 3 of 3 10 — 13 2/15/2022 Finance and Management Services www.santa-ana.org/finance Item # 11 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Pension Debt Cost Savings Update AGENDA TITLE: Pension Debt Cost Savings Update RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file and the pension debt cost savings update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City has completed the project to refinance its debt to the employee pension plan. The result is significant long-term savings, immediate short-term savings, and a long-term strategy for predictable budgeting and cost reduction in 2029 and 2039 to coincide with Measure X revenue decreases. DISCUSSION Project History On February 2, 2021, the City Council adopted the Unfunded Employee Pension Liability Cost Reduction Policy and directed staff to proceed with pension debt refinancing. On September 21, 2021, staff reported the pension debt refinancing was complete with $425.8 million of bonds sold and the proceeds sent to the California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS), resulting in estimated savings with a net present value of $138 million. At that time, the remaining $40.6 million of the FY 2021-22 budget for pension debt payments was set aside in the Section 115 Trust for future additional pay - down of the pension debt. The next step in the pension cost -savings strategy was to wait until the CalPERS Board set its new discount rate (the interest -rate charged on the City's pension debt), and then analyze the best way to apply the remaining $40.6 million to maximize long-term savings in accordance with the Policy noted above. On November 15, 2021, the CalPERS Board set the discount rate to 6.8 percent. On December 20, 2021, the City sent the remaining $40.6 million to CalPERS and acquired a 20-year fresh start amortization on the remaining debt. The original CalPERS City Council 11 — 1 2/15/2022 Pension Debt Cost Savings Update February 15, 2022 Page 2 amortization estimated pay-off of the City's pension debt in 2046. The new estimated pay-off year is 2042. As a reminder, the schedule of debt payments to CalPERS are estimates. The pension debt with CalPERS will increase when plan assumptions are not met (e.g. investment return, retiree mortality, employee wage increases) and will decrease when actual results are better than plan assumptions. When and if the pension debt increases, CalPERS will amortize each new base over 20 years, thereby extending pay-off of the pension debt. Long -Term Outlook The following chart summarizes the bond debt service and the estimated remaining payments to CalPERS. The chart shows future obligations compared to the current year budget of $54.3 million for pension debt payments. $80,000,000 $10,0w,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Pension Debt Obligations vs. Current Budget O Bond Deht Service O Estimated CAPERS Payments -FY21-22 Citywide Budget O N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N The FY 2022-23 savings vs. the budget is $9.5 million across all funds. With the proposed FY 2022-23 budget, staff will recommend funding at the same $54.3 million level, but deposit the $9.5 million savings into the City's Section 115 Trust for future cost stabilization. City Council 11 — 2 2/15/2022 Pension Debt Cost Savings Update February 15, 2022 Page 3 Strategy Accumulating money in the Section 115 Trust will enable the City to pay for spikes in future debt service and reduce the budget in 2029 and 2039 to coincide with Measure X revenue decreases. The illustrative example below includes the following assumptions. • The budget to fund pension debt predictably increases by 3 percent per year. • The City deposits or withdraws any difference between the stable budget amount and the fluctuating pension debt payments. • The Section 115 Trust earns 4.2 percent per year, based on the 10-year performance for the PARS Trust conservative investment strategy at June 30, 2021. • The budget for pension debt decreases by $18 million in 2029 and $36 million in 2039, in conjunction with future Measure X revenue decreases. $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 5- Pension Debt Obligations vs Illustrative Budget O Bond Debt Service OEstimated CAPERS Payments -Illustrative Budget r m m o N N in a � o r m m o ti N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N In this illustrative example, the City is able to reduce its pension debt budget each time Measure X revenue decreases and still afford pension debt payments through 2042. Even if the City's debt to CalPERS continues to grow with unfavorable plan performance, this strategy still enables the City to have a predictable budget for pension debt. The City City Council 11 —3 2/15/2022 Pension Debt Cost Savings Update February 15, 2022 Page 4 may simply not be able to reduce the budget to coincide with future Measure X revenue decreases. Staff will continue to provide a pension debt update to City Council during each budget cycle and make strategic recommendations. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation. Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, Executive Director Finance and Management Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 11 — 4 2/15/2022 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency www.santa-ana.org/parks Item # 12 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: City -Produced Special Events AGENDA TITLE: City -Produced Special Events Update for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and Proposed Events for Fiscal Year 2022-23 RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file a report regarding City -produced events scheduled for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-22 and proposed City -produced special events for Fiscal Year 2022-23. DISCUSSION Since its incorporation, Santa Ana has been characterized as a community that hosts special events and cultural celebrations, such as festivals, fairs, sporting events, and other similar events that enhance the vitality, quality of life, and economic prosperity of the city. As the local government, the City of Santa Ana typically produces annual special events, referred to as "City -produced events," that include Plaza Navidena, Fiestas Patrias, 5k Fun Run, Shakespeare in the Park, 4t" of July Celebration, and Dia de los Ninos, Dia de los Libros. Due to the COVID-19-related restrictions imposed upon in -person activities such as events, the City recently canceled several major City -produced events for Fiscal Year 2021-22 (such as the Fourth of July Celebration and Fiestas Patrias). While the decision was difficult, these events were canceled out of an abundance of caution to limit in -person activities to limit the spread of COVID-19 and protect residents, staff and the surrounding community. However, the City hosted two smaller -scale outdoor events: the Revive Santa Ana 5k Run and Plaza Navidena. In addition, the City hosted the outdoor Movies in the Park series, offering 14 movies at various parks throughout the community. These events were coordinated following public health guidance relating to COVID-19, focusing on preventing the spread of COVID-19. Taking into consideration COVID-19-relatedpublic health guidance, the City will host the following City -produced events for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-22, which concludes on June 30, 2022: City Council 12 — 1 2/15/2022 City Produced Events February 15, 2022 Page 2 1. The Egg-cellent Adventure @ Centennial Park Saturday, April 16, 2022; 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. This free egg hunt is for children ages 10 and under and will include activities, entertainment, pony rides, petting zoo, face painting, arts and crafts, trackless train, bounce houses and photos with the Easter Bunny. Local food vendors will also provide tasty drinks and treats for purchase. 2. Dia de los Ninos, Dia de los Libros @ Main Library Saturday, April 30, 2022; 10:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Dia 2022 celebrates the importance of children, families, and literacy. The Santa Ana Public Library will highlight a variety of fun -filled activities, including a community resource fair, entertainment for the entire family, and much more. The event will take place outside of the Main Library and will expand to the Plaza of the Sun. The event will be free for attendees. 3. Santa Ana Movies in the Park Series @ Various City Parks Wednesdays, June 8 through August 10, 2022; 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. This free movie series will include 10 outdoor movie screenings of family -friendly classics and newly released films. Tentative location and dates are as follows: Date Ward Park Location 6/8/2022 2 Jerome Park 6/15/2022 1 Campesino Park 6/22/2022 2 Thornton Park 6/29/2022 3 Portola Park 7/6/2022 3 Santiago Park 7/13/2022 4 Memorial Park 7/20/2022 4 Lillie King Park 7/27/2022 5 El Salvador Park 8/3/2022 6 Delhi Park 8/10/22 1 Centennial Park Pre -show activities will include live music, arts and crafts, games, bounce houses and free opportunity drawings. Movies will begin promptly at dusk. Local food vendors will provide a variety of tasty drinks and treats for purchase. Free popcorn will be distributed to guests who arrive early. Guests who would like to enjoy the movie selection in a second language will have the ability to rent audio headphones. City Council 12 — 2 2/15/2022 City Produced Events February 15, 2022 Page 3 4. Juneteenth Celebration @ Centennial Park Saturday, June 18, 2022; 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. In observance of the Juneteenth holiday, this event will commemorate the abolishment of slavery in the United States of America and celebrate African American heritage, culture and achievement. The event will include live music and dance performances, exhibitors, vendors, food, and fun activities for the whole family. Separately, below are the proposed City -produced events for Fiscal Year 2022-23 (from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023), pending budget approval: 1. Summer at the Plaza July to August 2022 This multi -faceted event series will be a combination of both City and privately produced event programming. A variety of dynamic and inclusive events will include the following: roller-skating rink activation, concerts, outdoor movie screenings, food fair/festival, cultural celebrations, and more. 2. Fourth of July Celebration @ Centennial Park Monday, July 4, 2022; 5:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. This family -friendly patriotic celebration will include special speakers, live music performances, exhibitors, vendors, food trucks, arts and crafts, games, bounce houses and free opportunity drawings. The event will conclude with a 20-minute fireworks finale. 3. Birch Summer Nights @ Birch Park Every Friday; August 5 through 26, 2022 This new series will include four outdoor performances at Birch Park. Performances will include music, dance, theater, film or other forms of interactive programs. Coordination with downtown businesses and restaurants, as well as collaboration with the City on cross -promotion and marketing opportunities will take place. Guests will be invited to bring their own lawn chairs and dinner from local Santa Ana restaurants. 4. Santa Ana Concerts in the Park Series @ Centennial Park Thursdays, August 4 through 25, 2022; 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. This concert series will include four outdoor concerts of various music styles. Additional activities will include arts and crafts, games, bounce houses and free City Council 12 — 3 2/15/2022 City Produced Events February 15, 2022 Page 4 opportunity drawings. Local food vendors will also provide tasty drinks and treats for purchase. 5. Celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month @ Various Santa Ana locations September 15 through October 15, 2022 This citywide marketing campaign will promote and celebrate Hispanic Heritage month in Santa Ana. The campaign will promote a combination of City -produced events, as well as events produced by participating non-profit organizations, businesses, educational institutions and neighborhood organizations. Event producers with previous experience in creating successful community events will be encouraged to apply. The City will market and promote activities, events and programs during the campaign period and will produce the opening and closing ceremony for the campaign. 6. Indigenous People's Day Celebration @ Civic Center Plaza Monday, October 10, 2022 and Monday, October 9, 2023 This new cultural event celebrates the lives and cultures of Indigenous Americans and provides education on the rich heritage, traditions and contributions Indigenous people have had on American history. In collaboration with the Santa Ana Public Library, this event will include music and dance performances, educational demonstrations and exhibits, traditional food and artisanal vendors. 7. Santa Ana Winter Village and Plaza Navidena @ Civic Center Plaza November 19, 2022 — January 7, 2023 Back by popular demand! The Santa Ana Winter Village will return to provide a wide variety of activities for visitors of all ages, including family -friendly ice skating, live entertainment, holiday shopping, delicious treats, warm beverages, and so much more! The opening ceremony for the Winter Village will include the City's annual tree lighting ceremony, "Plaza Navidena". 8. Revive Santa Ana 5K Run @ Flower Street and 6t" Street April 2023 The annual 5K Run is moving to spring 2023! This annual community run attracts over 2,000 runners of all ages and fitness levels. Winners in each category will win a commemorative plaque and all participants will receive a custom medal and t-shirt. The event will also include a health and wellness resource fair, where attendees can learn about local resources, programs and services available in their community. City Council 12 — 4 2/15/2022 City Produced Events February 15, 2022 Page 5 At this time, there is no action required by the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) N/A Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 12 — 5 2/15/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 13 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Santa Ana Stadium Synthetic Turf Replacement Project AGENDA TITLE Authorize Purchase Order Agreements with FieldTurf USA in the Amount of $582,462 to Replace and Maintain the Synthetic Turf Field at Eddie West Field for an Eight -Year Period (Project 22-2752) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize a purchase order with FieldTurf USA in the amount of $535,762 to remove and replace the existing synthetic turf field at Eddie West Field. 2. Authorize purchase order with FieldTurf USA for maintenance of synthetic field, FieldTurf "FieldCare", in the amount of $46,700, for an eight -year maintenance period. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Stadium, also known as the Eddie West Field, hosts several sporting events for the City, including high school and college sports. It was last renovated and retrofitted in 2016. Located at the southwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Flower Street in the Civici Center (Exhibit 1), Eddie West Field continues to serve the community as a focal point for sports fans and athletes in the city. The Stadium Synthetic Turf Replacement Project will replace the existing synthetic turf with the latest technology turf system, which will refresh the field for continued use. Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell (formerly National Joint Powers Alliance) is a public agency that serves as a national municipal contracting agency that provides competitive procuring services to participating agencies. Sourcewell awarded a contract to FieldTurf USA (Sourcewell contract # 060518-FTU) as a result of open competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies (Exhibit 2). In accordance with the City's existing purchasing guidelines, staff recommends awarding purchase order contracts to FieldTurf USA for the purchase and maintenance of synthetic turf at Eddie West Field (Exhibit 3-4). Through this purchase order agreement, the City also has the option to purchase maintenance equipment as needed. City Council 13 — 1 2/15/2022 Santa Ana Stadium Synthetic Turf Replacement Project February 15, 2022 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed cost of the project is $535,762, which includes removal of existing synthetic turf, purchase and installation of new turf, and painting of all sports lines. Adding the maintenance purchase agreement of $46,700, the total delivery cost + maintenance is estimated to be $582,462. Project Item Total FieldTurf Synthetic Turf Replacement $535,762 FieldCare Maintenance Program $46,700 TOTAL PROJECT DELIVERY COST + MAINTENANCE $582,462 Funds are budgeted and available as follows: Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit - Fiscal Year - Account No. Description Account Amount Project No. No. Description Residential Acquisition and 2021-2022 31213260-66220 Development Development, $535,762 (22-2752) District 2 Improvements Other Than Building Park Facilities Service 2021-2022 01113250-62320 General Enhancement,Maintenance $46,700 &Repair, Buildings & Ground TOTAL $582,462 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. FieldTurf Contract with Sourcewell 3. FieldTurf Proposal 4. FieldCare Maintenance Proposal Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 13 — 2 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 LE i j L 41 1Ll• 1 rt 1 Y rF -4 4 ------------ fff .y -ALA, 40UP e^—�IIiYW�! i a 13-3 © 2012-2017 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved. .y k� 130 feet N 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 2 Form C, EXCEPTIONS TO PROPOSAL, TERMS, CONDITIONS, �%�^. f M � L \ AND SOLUTIONS REQUEST ;�{�pn,A) \,ifi Company Name: FIELDTURF USA, INC. Any exceptions to the terms, conditions, specifications, or proposal forms contained in this RFP must be noted in writing and included with the Proposer's response. The Proposer acknowledges that the exceptions listed may or may not be accepted by NJPA or included in the final contract. NJPA will make reasonable efforts to accommodate the listed exceptions and may clarify the exceptions in the appropriate section below. Section/page Term, Condition, or Specification Exception NJPA ACCEPTS N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposer's Signature: , �— Date: 5 �/ NJPA's clarification on exceptions listed above: Not applicable. No exceptions. Sourcewell, formerly known as NJPA, received this document blank. E HCP Initials July 31, 2018 Date City Council 13 — 4 2/15/2022 Contract Award RFP 1#06051$ FORM D Formal Offering of Proposal `'JPA (To be completed only by the Proposer) ATHLETIC SURFACING WITH RELATED MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, INSTALLATION, AND SERVICES In compliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) for [ATHLETIC SURFACING WITH RELATED MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, INSTALLATION, AND SERVICES, j he undersigned warrants that the Proposer has examined this RFP and, being familiar with all of the instructions, terms and conditions, general and technical specifications, sales and service expectations, and any special terms, agrees to furnish the defined products and related services in full compliance with all terms and conditions of this RFP, any applicable amendments of this RFP, and all Proposer's response documentation. The Proposer further understands that it accepts the full responsibility as the sole source of solutions proposed in this RFP response and that the Proposer accepts responsibility for any subcontractors used to fulfill this proposal. Company Name: FIELDTURF USA, INC. Date: cj/ ? , ZS Company Address: 7445 COTE-DE-LIESSE, SUITE 200 City: MONTREAL State: QUEBEC Zip: H4T 1G2 CAGE Code/DUNS: 131862364 Contact Person: ERIC FISHER Title: DIRECTOR OF SALES Authorized Signature: _ �—� ERIC DALIERE (Name printed or typed) City Council 13 — 5 2/15/2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: B4CB32AC-DB7F-4E62-ASEF-A66A90BF971A FORM E CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE AND AWARD F w� o y x Sourcewell t®; r-,-1y I: A^,. (Top portion of this form will be completed by Sourcewell if the vendor is awarded a contract. The vendor should complete the vendor authorized signatures as part of the RFP response.) Sourcewell Contract #: 060518-FTU Proposer's full legal name: FieldTurf USA Inc. Based on Sourcewell's evaluation of your proposal, you have been awarded a contract. As an awarded vendor, you agree to provide the products and services contained in your proposal and to meet all of the terms and conditions set forth in this RFP, in any amendments to this RFP, and in any exceptions that are accepted by Sourcewell. The effective date of the Contract will be August 7, 2018 and will expire on August 7, 2022 (no later than the later of four years from the expiration date of the currently awarded contract or four years from the date that the Sourcewell Chief Procurement Officer awards the Contract). This Contract may be extended for a fifth year at Sourcewell's discretion. weweH Authorized Signatures: 7A'144D870 :684E3 SOU RCEWELL DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND /(��L.� F O SIGNATURE l.+tiaa7� SOURCEWELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/CEO SIGNATURE Awarded on August 3, 2018 Vendor Authorized Signatures: Jeremy Schwartz (NAME PRINTED OR TYPED) Chad Coauette (NAME PRINTED OR TYPED) Sourcewell Contract # 060518-FTU The Vendor hereby accepts this Contract award, including all accepted exceptions and amendments. Vendor Name � � y Authorize ig QrysTitle v �c� Vr� �j{��'.��7 j 1i(lG?C! VENDO THORIZED SIGNATURE (NAME PRINTED OR TYPED) Executed on 1hf q , 20j_> Sourcewell Contract # 060518-FTU City Council 4� — 6 2/15/2022 Form F�*:;`�� PROPOSER ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE Proposal Affidavit Signature Page PROPOSER'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned, authorized representative of the entity submitting the foregoing proposal (the "Proposer"), swears that the following statements are true to the best of his or her knowledge. 1. The Proposer is submitting its proposal under its true and correct name, the Proposer has been properly originated and legally exists in good standing in its state of residence, the Proposer possesses, or will possess before delivering any products and related services, all applicable licenses necessary for such delivery to NJPA members agencies. The undersigned affirms that he or she is authorized to act on behalf of, and to legally bind the Proposer to the terms in this Contract. 2. The Proposer, or any person representing the Proposer, has not directly or indirectly entered into any agreement or arrangement with any other vendor or supplier, any official or employee of NJPA, or any person, firm, or corporation under contract with NJPA, in an effort to influence the pricing, terms, or conditions relating to this RFP in any way that adversely affects the free and open competition for a Contract award under this RFP. 3. The Proposer has examined and understands the tenns, conditions, scope, contract opportunity, specifications request, and other documents in this solicitation and affirms that any and all exceptions have been noted in writing and have been included with the Proposer's RFP response. 4. The Proposer will, if awarded a Contract, provide to NJPA Members the /products and services in accordance with the terms, conditions, and scope of this RFP, with the Proposer -offered specifications, and with the other documents in this solicitation. 5. The Proposer agrees to deliver products and services through valid contracts, purchase orders, or means that are acceptable to NJPA Members. Unless otherwise agreed to, the Proposer must provide only new and first -quality products and related services to NJPA Members under an awarded Contract. 6. The Proposer will comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, regulations, rules, and orders. 7. The Proposer understands that NJPA will reject RFP proposals that are marked "confidential" (or "nonpublic," etc.), either substantially or in their entirety. Under Minnesota Statute §13.591, Subd. 4, all proposals are considered nonpublic data until the evaluation is complete and a Contract is awarded. At that point, proposals generally become public data. Minnesota Statute §13.37 permits only certain narrowly defined data to be considered a "trade secret," and thus nonpublic data under Minnesota's Data Practices Act. 8. The Proposer understands that it is the Proposer's duty to protect information that it considers nonpublic, and it agrees to defend and indemnify NJPA for reasonable measures that NJPA takes to uphold such a data designation. [The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank. Signature page below] City Council 13 — 7 2/15/2022 By signing below, Proposer is acknowledging that he or she has read, understands, and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions specified above. Company name: FIELDTURF USA INC. Address: 7445 COTE-DE-LIESSE ROAD, SUITE 200 City/State/Zip: MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA, H4T 1G2 Telephone Number: 1-888-209-0065 E-mail Address: ERIC.DALIEREna.TARKETTSPORTS.COM s� Authorized Signature: Authorized Name (printed): ERIC DALIERE Title: PRESIDENT Date: 5 / 2 % ZO i 2i Notarized VAS,sj- 9� Canine Nagl i S # 210653 c��\ a. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ��� day of 520 1 Notary Public in and for theuff4 of (Ze"L_ --Sw"f—lc- G3£C My commission expires: Signature: 701 City Council 13 — 8 2/15/2022 Form P (`�'JPA his PROPOSER QUESTIONNAIRE Payment Terms, Warranty, Products and Services, Pricing and Delivery, and Industry - Specific Questions Proposer Name: FIELDTURF USA, INC Questionnaire completed by: ERIC FISHER Payment Terms and Financing Options 1) What are your payment terms (e.g., net 10, net 30)? Response FieldTurf's payment terms: net 30 ARTICLE 5 PAYMENTS § 5.1 PROGRESS PAYMENTS § 5.1.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Owner by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Contractor, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 5.1.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month, or as follows: « N/A » § 5.1.3 All Payments shall be in accordance with the provisions of Illinois Local Government Prompt Payment Act. (Federal, state or local laws may require payment within a certain period of time.) § 5.1.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The schedule of values shall allocate the entire Contract Sum among the various portions of the Work. The schedule of values shall be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Owner may require. This schedule, unless objected to by the Owner, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor's Applications for Payment. § 5.1.5 Applications for Payment shall show the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment. § 5.1.6 Subject to other provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress payment shall be computed as follows: .1 Take that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Contract Sum allocated to that portion of the Work in the schedule of values, less retainage of «Five » percent ( «5 » %). Pending final determination of cost to the Owner of changes City Council 13 — 9 2/15/2022 in the Work, amounts not in dispute shall be included as provided in Section 7.3.9 of AIA Document A201 Tm-2007, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction; .2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of << Five » percent ( «5 )) %); .3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and .4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Owner has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Section 9.5 of AIA Document A201-2007. § 5.1.7 The progress payment amount determined in accordance with Section 5.1.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances: .1 Add, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to the full amount of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Owner shall determine for incomplete Work, retainage applicable to such work and unsettled claims; and (Section 9.8.5 of ALA Document A201-2007 requires release of applicable retainage upon Substantial Completion of Work with consent of surety, if any.) .2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereafter materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor, any additional amounts payable in accordance with Section 9.10.3 of AIA Document A201-2007. § 5.1.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: (Ifit is intended, prior to Substantial Completion of the entire Work, to reduce or limit the retainage resulting from the percentages inserted in Sections 5.1.6.1 and 5.1.6.2 above, and this is not explained elsewhere in the Contract Documents, insert here provisions for such reduction or limitation) N/A § 5.1.9 Except with the Owner's prior approval, the Contractor shall not make advance payments to suppliers for materials or equipment which have not been delivered and stored at the site. § 5.2 FINAL PAYMENT § 5.2.1 Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when .1 the Contractor has fully performed the Contract except for the Contractor's responsibility to correct Work as provided in Section 12.2.2 of AIA Document A201-2007, and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which extend beyond final payment; and .2 a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Contractor. § 5.2.2 The Owner's final payment to the Contractor shall be made no later than 30 days after the issuance of the Contractor's final Certificate for Payment, or as follows: 2) Do you provide leasing or financing options, especially those options that schools and governmental entities may need to use in order to make certain acquisitions? Response PNC Bank partners exclusively with FieldTurf USA. Offering industry leading financial rates, accommodating any market and any project size. Please see: Exhibit AA: 2.1 FieldTurf PNC Financial Flyer City Council 13 — 10 2/15/2022 3) Briefly describe your proposed order process. Please include enough detail to support your ability to report quarterly sales to NJPA. For example, indicate whether your dealer network is included in your response and whether each dealer (or some other entity) will process the NJPA Members' purchase orders. Response • Client/ owner/ owner's representative makes contact with FieldTurf or Beynon Sports. • FieldTurf or Beynon Sports Representative (or authorized representative) sets up a site visit. • A FieldTurf/ Beynon Sports/ NJPA proposal is produced for review by the client/owner/owner's representative. • Proposal is reviewed and if changes or additions are needed, they are completed. • Once approved the client/ owner/ owner's representative sends FieldTurf a P.O. • A sales agreement, AIA contract or similar form of agreement is entered into (owner's choice if they want a contract at all or if they only want to issue a PO.) • Construction begins with progress payments throughout. • Construction is substantially complete and 100% of the contract price (including any retention) is acquired. • NJPA is remitted their fee for the project. • Project is closed. Outlined previously, Ross and Lesley bring more than five years of experience in billing and contracting, specific to the terms and conditions of each cooperative's means, methods and needs. They are proficient in dealing with the specific requirements of NJPA and adhere exactly to the reporting needs. They also have access to SysPro, MAS 90 and other advanced accounting systems with the ability to produce complex sales, accounting and operational reports, spreadsheets and other pertinent data. Any necessary specifics outlined in the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement regarding reporting would be satisfied above and beyond what is required. In addition, Ross and Lesley are backed by the efforts of Jennifer Hopper (Controller) and CFO Pedro Azevedo. FieldTurf USA, Inc.'s supplemental accounting team is well -versed in the day-to-day, monthly, quarterly and annual reporting requirements within the FieldTurf SmartBuy Cooperative Purchasing Division. FieldTurf has a strong record of over 4 years of submitting NJPA quarterly reports and remitting the admin fee to NJPA in a timely manner. As part of the Tarkett Group, FieldTurf USA, Inc. has the ability to produce a variety of reports including but not limited to: • Private client lists • Federal client lists • National Sales (annual) • Sales by Agency (co-op, city, state, school district, etc.) • Quarterly sales reports by region, state, product type, etc. • Annual Sales reports by region, state, product type, etc. • Outstanding billings City Council 13 — 11 2/15/2022 • Subcontractor reports and billings • Activity reports • Pipeline reports (upcoming project info) In summary, FieldTurf has the capability to produce necessary reports, as needed. 4) Do you accept the P-card procurement and payment process? If so, is there any additional cost to NJPA Members for using this process? Response No, not applicable. Most owners use a PO and progress payment process to purchase turf and track systems. Warranty — only supply sample — see attached 5) Describe in detail your manufacturer warranty program, including conditions and requirements to qualify, claims procedure, and overall structure. You may include in your response a copy of your warranties, but at a minimum please also answer the following questions. • Do your warranties cover all products, parts, and labor? Response Yes, for more information please see the following exhibits. Exhibit AB: 5.1 FieldTurf Sample Court Warranty 1 Year Exhibit AC: 5.2 FieldTurf Sample Full Depth Track Warranty 5 Year Exhibit AD: 5.3 FieldTurf Sample Maintenance Track Warranty 1 Year Exhibit AE: 5.4 FieldTurf Warranty Template Baseball 8 year Exhibit AF: 5.5 FieldTurf Warranty Template Baseball 5 year Exhibit AG: 5.6 FieldTurf Warranty Template 8 Year SAMPLE Exhibit AH 5.7 FieldTurf Warranty Template 5 Year SAMPLE Exhibit Al: 5.8 EasyField SAMPLE Warranty Exhibit AJ: FieldTurf CORE 10 Year Warranty STANDARD • Do your warranties impose usage restrictions or other limitations that adversely affect coverage? Response This varies. Please see the attached exhibits (AB: 5.1, AC: 5.2, AD: 5.3, AE: 5.4, and AF: 5.5, AG: 5.6, AH 5.7, Al: 5.8, AJ: 5.9) referenced above. • Do your warranties cover the expense of technicians' travel time and mileage to perform warranty repairs? City Council 13 — 12 2/15/2022 Response Yes. • Are there any geographic regions of the United States for which you cannot provide a certified technician to perform warranty repairs? How will NJPA Members in these regions be provided service for warranty repair? Response No, there are not any geographic regions of the US that FieldTurf cannot provide a certified technician to perform warranty work. Please see our Customer Service Representative Region map below to see that the entire US is covered. Customer Service Regions ihn-ry 20161 S& Lisa Kerwin M Janet Lamarche ■ TBD ■ Tara Beach M Tyler Fitzsimons Tracy Gonsalves 0 Will you cover warranty service for items made by other manufacturers that are part of your proposal, or are these warranties issues typically passed on to the original equipment manufacturer? Response City Council 13 — 13 2/15/2022 This varies, please see the attached exhibits Please see the attached exhibits (AB: 5.1, AC: 5.2, AD: 5.3, AE: 5.4, and AF: 5.5, AG: 5.6, AH 5.7, AI: 5.8, AJ: 5.9) referenced above. • What are your proposed exchange and return programs and policies? Response Not applicable, exchanges and returns are not available due to the nature of our business. Customer service will step in to evaluate the situation and determine a solution that is acceptable to the customer if there is a concern regarding their turf, track, court system. 6) Describe any service contract options for the items included in your proposal. Response • FieldTurf FieldCare 1: 1 Yr. Contract — 2 Visits per Year (Continental US only, excludes Alaska and Hawaii). FieldCare is a national maintenance program geared towards making FieldTurf synthetic turf field systems perform at their optimal level for even longer. FieldTurf's FieldCare Maintenance Program will support years of consistent, high performance to your field and let you maximize your investment. Consult with your FieldCare Service Manager to find the FieldCare program that's right for you. (Additional charges may apply for alternate infill fields) • FieldTurf PureCare: PureCare 1 year- (3 times a year) Field Assessment summary, infill depth measurements, select warranted seam and inlay repairs (not to exceed 8), perimeter debris cleaning, Cork infill replenishment (max 1 supersack of cork atI500lbs per year across the 3 visits) if necessary for infill topdressing material, field infill decompaction (only if needed), field magnet sweeping for metal debris, surface temperature reading, static brush in multiple directions to redistribute infill, application of Anti -static spray during and after maintenance service (5 bottles ber session). G-Max testing: one per year to be performed right after 2nd maintenance visit. • Beynon: Beynon service contract options can be customized to fit each individual customers needs. Beynon Sports is committed to providing customers the highest level of workmanship and customer service. Beynon stands behind our products and the experience of working with Beynon Sports. It is our goal that each client that utilizes a sports surface or athletic surfacing component designed and manufactured by Beynon Sports be 100% satisfied. Any deficiencies in providing the highest level of service will be addressed immediately. Beynon Sports employees are committed to diligently executing each of our duties thoroughly and conscientiously. Our highly skilled professionals design, engineer, manage City Council 13 — 14 2/15/2022 and service each project, and we carefully ensure that our products meet your unique specifications from beginning to end. Pricing, Delivery, Audits, and Administrative Fee 7) Provide a general narrative description of the equipment/products and related services you are offering in your proposal. Response • Indoor/ Outdoor synthetic turf supply and installation. • Indoor/ Outdoor running track supply and installation. • Indoor/ Outdoor tennis court/ sport court/ synthetic flooring supply and installation. • Related site work preparation (on a per project basis) including but not limited to: asphalt, concrete, curbing,, football and track equipment, drainage, stone, grading, HDPE piping, demolition, removal/ disposal services, irrigation, subgrade prep., construction management, project management, layout, survey work, SWPP, milling, capping, turf/ track protection, geotextile fabric etc. • Professional Services (Engineering, project management, construction management etc.) See the price list for full list of products and detailed descriptions: Exhibit AG 8.1 8) Describe your pricing model (e.g., line -item discounts or product -category discounts). Provide detailed pricing data (including standard or list pricing and the NJPA discounted price) on all of the items that you want NJPA to consider as part of your RFP response. Provide a SKU for each item in your proposal. (Keep in mind that reasonable price and product adjustments can be made during the term of an awarded Contract. See the body of the RFP and the Price and Product Change Request Form for more detail.) Response FieldTurf s pricing model is line -item discount. Please see NJPA Primary Pricing Spreadsheet for pricing model, additional pricing information and pricing notes. FieldTurf acknowledges the NJPA Vendor Change & Price Form, see signed blank example. Please see: Exhibit AK: 8.1 NJPA Primary Pricing Exhibit AL: 8.2 NJPA Primary Pricing Notes For additional product information please refer back to the following exhibits: Exhibit B: 3.2 FieldTurf Product Specs Exhibit C 3.3 Beynon Product Specs City Council 13 — 15 2/15/2022 9) Please quantify the discount range presented in this response. For example, indicate that the pricing in your response represents is a 50% percent discount from the MSRP or your published list. Response 9% off MSRP/ Public bid marketplace. 10) The pricing offered in this proposal is a. the same as the Proposer typically offers to an individual municipality, university, or school district. b. the same as the Proposer typically offers to GPOs, cooperative procurement organizations, or state purchasing departments. X_ c. better than the Proposer typically offers to GPOs, cooperative procurement organizations, or state purchasing departments. d. other than what the Proposer typically offers (please describe). ➢ Published pricing is consistent across all cooperative offers but includes a 9% discount off of typical MSRP/ Bid marketplace pricing for additional savings to NJPA customers. 11) Describe any quantity or volume discounts or rebate programs that you offer. Response If a client purchases both a Beynon running track and a FieldTurf field, FieldTurf/ Beynon Sports will discount the total and in certain circumstances and based on project size, may offer additional discounts. If a client purchases multiple fields, running tracks or tennis courts at once (on the same P.O.) FieldTurf will offer volume discounts that are substantial but vary based on total size location etc. Overall the nature of our business is not commodity base. Fixed discounts are not offered. Rather, varied discounts are and we pass on savings based on economies of scale. These savings can be substantial depending on the scope and total cost of the project. 12) Propose a method of facilitating "sourced" products or related services, which may be referred to as "open market" items or "nonstandard options". For example, you may supply such items "at cost" or "at cost plus a percentage," or you may supply a quote for each such request. Response All items that fall under the category of "open market" or "nonstandard options" will be priced according to RS Means. RS MEANS explanation: Construction Cost Estimating Tool RS MEANS: RS MEANS is self-contained and consists of a turn -key solution that includes a complete line -item listing of all the products, supplies, material, equipment, services, accessories and options with their description, specification, terms, conditions and associated pricing for each item, sub -assemblies and/or assemblies. FieldTurf City Council 13 — 16 2/15/2022 reserves the right to offer a discount or "adjustment down" to the RS MEANS calculation to account for volume discounts or to stay within standard market pricing. 1. RS MEANS is a division of Reed Business Information and is a construction cost estimating tool that has been in place for over 74 years. 2. RS MEANS provides current, regionally —customizable data that reflects cost information to the construction industry so contractors can provide accurate estimates and projections for their project costs. There are over 20 specialized cost data titles for various construction categories. 3. RS MEANS has become a data standard for government work in terms of pricing and is widely used by the construction industry as a whole. 4. RS MEANS pricing books are updated annually and have over 50,000 material and labor unit line items associated with various types of construction. The unit prices are adjusted for location using a "City Index." (otherwise known as a Coefficient) Site work or new construction may include but is not limited to: removal and disposal of existing sports surface, lighting, demolition, excavation, rock base aggregate, top rock, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, turf shock absorption underlayment such as e-layer or padding, tie in to existing drainage, drainage systems, conduits, fencing, crack repair, asphalt repair, etc. which can be purchased through RS MEANS. 13) Identify any total cost of acquisition costs that are NOT included in the pricing submitted with your response. This cost includes all additional charges that are not directly identified as freight or shipping charges. For example, list costs for items like installation, set up, mandatory training, or initial inspection. Identify any parties that impose such costs and their relationship to the Proposer. Response Not applicable. Product pricing is all inclusive if minimum purchase amount is met. Additional costs may apply for projects that are less than minimum purchase quantities provided in Pricing Notes. Pricing and warranty applies to turf fields that are 40,000sf or more. For projects less than 40,000 sf, owner, NJPA and FieldTurf can discuss a possible adjustment to pricing that all agree upon if necessary (RS MEANS can also be used). EasyTurf sq. foot pricing applies for a minimum purchase of 4000 sf. For projects that do not meet the minimum requirement, owner, NJPA and FieldTurf can discuss a possible adjustment to pricing that all agree upon. Pricing is for track projects over 3500 sy and applies to only standard black or red colors. Custom color track surfacing is available at an increased price per square yard. 14) If delivery or shipping is an additional cost to the NJPA Member, describe in detail the complete shipping and delivery program. Response All product pricing is "all -in" and contains shipping (in continental US), delivery and associated installation costs. City Council 13 — 17 2/15/2022 15) Specifically describe those shipping and delivery programs for Alaska, Hawaii, Canada, or any offshore delivery. Response Shipping and Freight to Canada, Hawaii, Alaska or other areas outside of the continental US is not included in standard Primary pricing and will be an additional cost based on site location. Additional shipping costs will be based on the cost to transport equipment and materials from the closest US port to the job site. Additional costs may also be added for crew transportation and accommodations to any site outside of the continental US. 16) Describe any unique distribution and/or delivery methods or options offered in your proposal. Response Not applicable, we utilize standard shipping and delivery methods. 17) Please specifically describe any self -audit process or program that you plan to employ to verify compliance with your proposed Contract with NJPA. This process includes ensuring that NJPA Members obtain the proper pricing, that the Vendor reports all sales under the Contract each quarter, and that the Vendor remits the proper administrative fee to NJPA. Response FieldTurf USA, Inc has a dedicated Cooperative Purchasing Team = SmartBuy. The team consists of. SmartBuy Sales Director Eric Fisher, Operations Director Sarah Morehead, Project Manager Ross Hinrichs and Project Administrator Lesley Miles. Eric Fisher is responsible for implementing sales strategies, attending lunch and learns and educating the FieldTurf and Beynon Sales Personnel. Sarah Morehead is responsible for the coop proposal compliance with NJPA bid oversees bid compilation and pricing aspects of the program. Sarah review's each NJPA proposal to ensure compliance with NJPA bid response. Ross and Lesley and responsible for generating, sending proposal, submittals and other information to owner's and have five (5) year's combined experience doing so. Sarah Morehead has more than twelve years of experience in cooperative purchasing. Eric Fisher has over eight experience in cooperative purchasing. Our division has generated more than 500 million dollars in total co-op contracts resulting in approximately 4 million dollars in revenue for cooperative purchasing agencies. Ross and Lesley bring more than five years of experience in billing and contracting, specific to the terms and conditions of each cooperative's means and methods. The FieldTurf Cooperative Purchasing "SmartBuy" Division Team has worked with many cooperative state agencies successfully to market, educate and guide municipal members in their purchase of Beynon running tracks, outdoor courts, and FieldTurf synthetic fields. This past experience and our successful current contracts with NJPA will only continue to add to the benefits that we as a group can bring to the table. We already have systems and processes in place to handle a high volume of Cooperative Purchasing projects. Additionally, our FieldTurf City Council 13 — 18 2/15/2022 and Beynon sales forces are already currently utilizing various cooperative purchasing programs aiding in maximizing their sales efforts. As part of the current Co -Op requirements, FieldTurf keeps and manages admin fee report spreadsheets and maintains an honest and transparent rapport with NJPA. All co-op fees are identified and FieldTurf will send quarterly, annually or in any format or fashion that NJPA requires. Please see: Exhibit AM: 17.1 NJPA Quarterly Report Sample 18) Identify a proposed administrative fee that you will pay to NJPA for facilitating, managing, and promoting the NJPA Contract in the event that you are awarded a Contract. This fee is typically calculated as a percentage of Vendor's sales under the Contract or as a per -unit fee; it is not a line -item addition to the Member's cost of goods. (See RFP Section 6.29 and following for details.) Response We propose the same administrative fee we pay NJPA for our current contract; 1.25% admin fee. Fieldturf will remit back to NJPA the 1.25% once FieldTurf has been paid 100% by owner. The fee is calculated as a percentage of our sales and is not a line -item addition to the Member's cost of goods as per RFP 6.29 requirements. Industry -Specific Questions 19) Identify the categories in which you provide solutions: wood, turf, rubber, and/or synthetic. Response FieldTurf supplied synthetic sports surfacing such as FieldTurf turf products and Beynon running tracks. Scope of Services Turf Professional Services 1. Project design, development or consultant/construction management. 2. Professional engineering services. 3. Installer/admin (tradesman) (not related to turf, track, or court installation. Project Administrator costs for site work. Products — Synthetic Turf Systems 1. FieldTurf CORE 2.5" 2. FieldTurf CORE 2.25" 3. FieldTurf CORE 2.0" City Council 4. FieldTurf Revolution 360 2.5" 5. FieldTurf Revolution 360 2.25" 6. FieldTurf Revolution 360 2.0" 13 — 19 2/15/2022 7. FieldTurf Classic HD 2.5" 8. FieldTurf Classic HD 2.25" 9. FieldTurf Classic HD 2.0" 10. FieldTurf XM6-65 (2.5") 11. FieldTurf XM6-57 (2.25") 12. FieldTurf XM6-50 (2.0") 13. Fieldturf XT 65 (2.5") 14. FieldTurf XT 57 (2.25") 15. FieldTurf XT 50 (2.0") 16. FieldTurf Vertex Prime 2.5" 17. FieldTurf Vertex Prime 2.25" 18. FieldTurf Vertex Prime 2.0" 19. FieldTurf Vertex 2.5" 20. FieldTurf Vertex 2.25" 21. FieldTurf Vertex 2.0" 22. FieldTurf - Elite Double Play 23. FieldTurf - Prestige Double Play 24. FieldTurf Numbers/Arrows 25. Inlaid Soccer Markings 26. FieldTurf Hash Marks 27. FieldTurf Logo 28. FieldTurf - Endzone Letters 29. FieldTurf - Field Hockey Lines 30. FieldTurf - Lacrosse Lines 31. FieldTurf - Baseball Lines 32. FieldTurf - Flag Football Lines 33. FieldTurf - Softball Lines 34. FieldTurf - Football Restraining Lines 35. FieldTurf - Lacrosse Tick Marks 36. FieldTurf - GMAX Alternate Inrd1s, Underlayment Options and Misc. 1. Rondi - PDS Drain Tiles 2. Schmitz Proplay - Proplay 16mm 3. Brock Power Base 4. Brock - SP 14 5. Beynon Shock Base 26mm 6. Beynon Shock Base 19mm 7. Rondi - Veratile 8. FieldTurf - Removal and disposal of existing field 9. Natural Grass Field - Sod or Seed 10. Amorim - CoolPlay V3 11. E-Core/EPDM 12. USGreentech - Coated Sand 13. EnviroFill 14. Sustanable Performance Solutions - ECO Grind 15. SofterSpa - EcoGreen Plus Environmental Infill (TPE Infill) 16. Colorex - Eco Max Infill 17. DOF Cork - Purefill Infill 18. FieldTurf - Purefill Plus 19. Pure Elite Products - EASYTURF FieldTurf - EasyTurf Playground Turf FieldTurf- EasyTurf Playground Pad FieldTurf- EasyTurf Canine Turf FieldTurf- EasyTurf Command Turf FieldTurf- EasyTurf Command Select FieldTurf- EasyTurf Command Premium FieldTurf- EasyTurf General Purpose Site Work S. FieldTurf- EasyTurf General Purpose Blend 9. FieldTurf- EasyTurf Signature Pro Golf 10. FieldTurf- EasyTurf Easy Play 11. FieldTurf- EasyTurf Drainage Tiles 12. FieldTurf- EasyTurf Versa Lush 13. FiedlTurf - EasyTurf AirField Turf City Council 13 - 20 2/15/2022 New Construction — Sq. foot/yard pricing is for supply and installation of sports surfacing only. FieldTurf is prepared to offer turn -key solutions for the construction of the base of running tracks, courts, indoor flooring projects and fields through use of RS Means. The best value pricing for base or civil work is obtained through this costing method. Site work or new construction may include but is not limited to: removal and disposal of existing sports surface, lighting, demolition, excavation, rock base aggregate, top rock, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, turf shock absorption underlayment such as e-layer or padding, tie in to existing drainage, drainage systems, conduits, fencing, crack repair, asphalt repair, etc. which can be purchased through RS MEANS. RS MEANS is self-contained and consists of a turn -key solution that includes a complete line -item listing of all the products, supplies, material, equipment, services, accessories and options with their description, specification, terms, conditions and associated pricing for each item, sub -assemblies and/or assemblies. FieldTurf reserves the right to offer a discount or "adjustment down" to the RS MEANS calculation to account for volume discounts or to stay within standard market pricing. Scope of Services Track Professional Services 1. Project design, development or consultant/construction management. 2. Professional engineering services. 3. Installer/admin (tradesman) (not related to turf, track, or court installation. Project Administrator costs for site work. Track Surfaces on Existing Stable Base 1. Beynon - BSS 50 2. Beynon—BSS 100 3. Beynon - BSS 200 4. Beynon - BSS 300 Resurfacing on an Existing Rubber Running Track 1. Beynon — BSS 100 RE 2. Beynon-BSS 200 RE 3. Beynon-BSS 300 RE 4. Beynon-BSS 2000 RE 5 mm 5. Beynon- BSS 2000 RE 7mm Site Work 5. Beynon — BSS 1000 (IOMM) 6. Beynon — BSS 1000 (13MM) 7. Beynon — BSS 2000 (13MM) 6. Beynon- BSS 1000 ML 7. Beynon- Hobart Coating 8. Beynon- In situ Base 9. Beynon: E-layer City Council 13 — 21 2/15/2022 New Construction — Sq. foot/yard pricing is for supply and installation of sports surfacing only. FieldTurf is prepared to offer turn -key solutions for the construction of the base of running tracks, courts, indoor flooring projects and fields through use of RS Means. The best value pricing for base or civil work is obtained through this costing method. Site work or new construction may include but is not limited to: removal and disposal of existing sports surface, lighting, demolition, excavation, rock base aggregate, top rock, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, turf shock absorption underlayment such as a -layer or padding, tie in to existing drainage, drainage systems, conduits, fencing, crack repair, asphalt repair, etc. which can be purchased through RS MEANS. RS MEANS is self-contained and consists of a turn -key solution that includes a complete line -item listing of all the products, supplies, material, equipment, services, accessories and options with their description, specification, terms, conditions and associated pricing for each item, sub -assemblies and/or assemblies. FieldTurf reserves the right to offer a discount or "adjustment down" to the RS MEANS calculation to account for volume discounts or to stay within standard market pricing. City Council 13 — 22 2/15/2022 FieldTurf THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE A Tarkett Sports Company Scope of Services Indoor/Outdoor Court Surfacing Polyurethane Indoor Sports Floors and snort striping 1. OS 6.5 3. Tarkolay Moisture Barrier 2. PTP P&P 7 + 2 Outdoor Court Surfacing and sport striping 1. Outdoor Court Surfacing (4 Coat Plexipave or 3 Coat Action Pave. Includes painting 1 set of game lines) Site Work 2. Site Work for Track and Court projects New Construction — Sq. foot/yard pricing is for supply and installation of sports surfacing only. FieldTurf is prepared to offer turn -key solutions for the construction of the base of running tracks, courts, indoor flooring projects and fields through use of RS Means. The best value pricing for base or civil work is obtained through this costing method. Site work or new construction may include but is not limited to: removal and disposal of existing sports surface, lighting, demolition, excavation, rock base aggregate, top rock, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, turf shock absorption underlayment such as e-layer or padding, tie in to existing drainage, drainage systems, conduits, fencing, crack repair, asphalt repair, etc. which can be purchased through RS MEANS. RS MEANS is self-contained and consists of a turn -key solution that includes a complete line - item listing of all the products, supplies, material, equipment, services, accessories and options with their description, specification, terms, conditions and associated pricing for each item, sub -assemblies and/or assemblies. FieldTurf reserves the right to offer a discount or "adjustment down" to the RS MEANS calculation to account for volume discounts or to stay within standard market pricing. Services 1. Track Restriping Scope of Service Service and Maintenance 2. Track Cleaning FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC H4T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council TT 23 2/15/2022 FieldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company Grooming and Maintenance 1. Groom -All 2. GroomRight 3. GroomRight Wings 4. SweepRight 5. SweepRight Pro Site Work THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE 6. Hydraulic Sweeper 7. Tow Behind Magnet 8. FieldTurf Static Brush 9. FieldTurf Fieldcare New Construction — Sq. foot/yard pricing is for supply and installation of sports surfacing only. FieldTurf is prepared to offer turn -key solutions for the construction of the base of running tracks, courts, indoor flooring projects and fields through use of RS Means. The best value pricing for base or civil work is obtained through this costing method. Site work or new construction may include but is not limited to: removal and disposal of existing sports surface, lighting, demolition, excavation, rock base aggregate, top rock, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, turf shock absorption underlayment such as e-layer or padding, tie in to existing drainage, drainage systems, conduits, fencing, crack repair, asphalt repair, etc. which can be purchased through RS MEANS. RS MEANS is self-contained and consists of a turn -key solution that includes a complete line -item listing of all the products, supplies, material, equipment, services, accessories and options with their description, specification, terms, conditions and associated pricing for each item, sub -assemblies and/or assemblies. FieldTurf reserves the right to offer a discount or "adjustment down" to the RS MEANS calculation to account for volume discounts or to stay within standard market pricing. 20) Specifically describe any manufacturing processes or material specification -related attributes that differentiate your offering from your competitors. Response FieldTurf has manufacturing facilities in the USA, France, and Spain. In addition FieldTurf opened a 500,000 square foot facility in Calhoun, GA with complete tufting and coating abilities. FieldTurf also reached triple ISO Certification (Environmental 14001, Occupational Health and Safety 18001, and Quality 9001) in 2010 which is the only turf company in North America with this distinction. FieldTurf performs the following directly: • Manufacture, supply and installation of turf • Design and engineering FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC 1­14T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council 'f — 24 2/15/2022 eFieldTurf THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE A Tarkett Sports Company • Design assist • On -site supervision • Maintenance • Recycling of infill • Removal/disposal services • Infilling • Sewing • Stitching • Gluing • Painting • Drafting • Logo Design, manufacture and installation In addition to these items, FieldTurf is one of the most vertically integrated companies in the industry with sales, manufacturing, project management, marketing and installation/ construction resources capable of supporting more than 400 fields per year THE BEYNON DIFFERENCE: Beynon surfaces are found in North America's most prestigious track and field facilities, reputed collegiate campuses, high schools, and city parks. Not only do we strive to make you fast but we help to keep you safe. Our specialized, high performance synthetic athletic surfaces are designed for speed, competition, and most importantly, daily training. Should it be at one of our thousands of outdoor tracks, indoor fieldhouses or multipurpose gymnasiums, you will feel the difference a Beynon surface makes. BEYNON RUNNING TRACK SURFACE & MANUFACTURING: Beynon Surfaces are built to last. They are manufactured and installed with the highest attention to detail. Beynon systems showcase proven durability. Numerous Beynon surfaces have seen over 20 years of use. Beynon controls all aspects of the manufacturing chain, which allows us to create the right product, regardless of the facility. Because our founder's name stands behind each track that we make, we take special care throughout the entire installation process. We do this by only using certified Beynon track installers, specialized equipment, and skilled craftsmen, which ensures impeccable results. FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC H4T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council 13 — 25 2/15/2022 11 W>IJ FieldTurf THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE A Tarkett Sports Company 21) Describe any serviceability attributes that your offered solutions contain. Please indicate which of these attributes are considered "industry -expected attributes" and which you believe are "vendor differentiators." Response • FieldTurf has the most innovative product offering. • Independent testing has proven that FieldTurf is the safest turf system when compared to natural grass. • FieldTurf is one of the most vertically integrated companies in the world. • When it comes to playability and performance, FieldTurf is the clear market leader. • No other long pile, artificial turf system has lasted longer than FieldTurf. • FieldTurf may be priced higher, but it costs less. • For peace of mind, FieldTurf provides clients with the best insured warranty in the business. • FieldTurf is the clear choice of the pros. • FieldTurf offers First Class Customer Service. • When combining all these benefits it's clear that FieldTurf is simply ...the best investment. 22) Please explain the installation and maintenance services that are available. Response • Manufacture, supply and installation of turf • Design and engineering • Design assist • On -site supervision • Maintenance • Recycling of infill • Removal/disposal services • Infilling • Sewing • Stitching • Gluing • Painting • Drafting • Logo Design, manufacture and installation In addition to these items, FieldTurf is one of the most vertically integrated companies in the industry with sales, manufacturing, project management, marketing and installation/ construction resources capable of supporting more than 400 fields per year. FieldCare FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC H4T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council 13 — 26 2/15/2022 FieldTurf SU ULTIMATE .1 SURFACE EXPERIENCE A Tarkett Sports Company hgp: //www. fieldturf. com/en/service/fiel dcare-maintenance-pro gram The proper maintenance of your FieldTurf surface will not only keep your field looking and playing its best, but will extend the life span of your field by many years. FieldCare is a national maintenance program geared towards making FieldTurf synthetic turf field systems perform at their optimal level for even longer. The FieldCare program is comprised of complete field inspections and regular maintenance done only by FieldTurf authorized maintainers. Twice per year, our industry -best certified FieldTurf maintainers will visit your facility for regularly scheduled maintenance which consists of a deep sweep and rejuvenation.This in-depth grooming will remove all dirt, bird droppings, gum, blood, skin and other detritus that ultimately collects in any playing surface, leaving your field bright and clean. A complete inspection of all areas of the field, including: • Fiber Fibrillation Analysis • Seam Analysis • Perimeter Anchoring • Excessive Wear Analysis • LTV Fade Inspection • Infill - Consistency in Depth • Infill - Migration Analysis • Glued Inlay Analysis • Base Stability Analysis • Painted Markings Inspection Other services offered by our maintenance professionals include: • Logo or line painting removal • Goal post installation/repair • GMAX testing • Snow removal • Ceremony/event preparation Total Care hqp://www.fieldtufcom/en/service/totalcare With over 7,000 fields in the ground customers can benefit from FieldTurf s unmatched expertise and advanced technology to find the most economical method to replace their existing turf system. Let our experts evaluate your field and give you economic options you can live with. FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC H4T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council 1 127 2/15/2022 4DFieldTurf THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE A Tarkett Sports Company TotalCare is the complete package. Our comprehensive program helps you save money and ensure maximum performance on your field replacement. Here's how it works: ➢ Field Removal Our objective is simple - remove the maximum amount of infill at the lowest cost to you. ➢ Base Remediation Our team of experts will help determine if any base remediation is necessary. ➢ Field Replacement Only the best materials go back in to the field. Our assessment will help determine how much of the existing infill can be reused and how much, if any, cleaning of the infill is necessary. To find out more about this program, check out the FieldTurf Infill Renewal guidelines. ➢ Comprehensive Maintenance The TotalCare program includes an 8-year service plan of 2 visits per year from our FieldCare team. This maintenance includes deep grooming and field rejuvenation along with any spot repairs. Plans are customized for each customer based on needs. For additional information please refer back to the following exhibit: Exhibit T: 27.1 FieldTurf Total Care & Beynon Sports Maintenance Signature: See Signature Page Below Date: FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC 1-14T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 WWWCity Council 1Q u T _ 28 2/15/2022 THE U LTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE Tarkett Sports Company Please quantify the discount range presented in this response. For example, indicate that the pricing in your response represents is a 50% percent discount from the MSRP or your published list. 10) The pricing offered in this proposal is a. the same as the Proposer typically offers to an individual municipality, university, or school district. b. the same as the Proposer typically offers to GPOs, cooperative procurement organizations; or state purchasing departments. c. better than the Proposer typically offers to GPOs, cooperative procurement organizations, or state purchasing departments. d. other than what the Proposer typically offers (please describe). 11) Describe any quantity or volume discounts or rebate programs that you offer. 12) Propose a method of facilitating "sourced" products or related services, which may be referred to as "open market" items or "nonstandard options". For example, you may supply such items "at cost" or "at cost plus a percentage," or you may supply a quote for each such request. 13) Identify any total cost of acquisition costs that are NOT included in the pricing submitted with your response. This cost includes all additional charges that are not directly identified as freight or shipping charges. for example, list costs for items like installation, set up, mandatory training, or initial inspection. Identify any parties that impose such costs and their relationship to the Proposer. 14) If delivery or shipping is an additional cost to the NJPA Member, describe in detail the complete shipping and delivery program. 15) Specifically describe those shipping and delivery programs for Alaska, Hawaii, Canada, or any offshore delivery. 16) Describe any unique distribution and/or delivery methods or options offered in your proposal. 17) Please specifically describe any self -audit process or program that you plan to employ to verify compliance with your proposed Contract with NJPA. This process includes ensuring that NJPA Members obtain the proper pricing, that the Vendor reports all sales under the Contract each quarter, and that the Vendor remits the proper administrative fee to NJPA. 18) Identify a proposed administrative fee that you will pay to NJPA for facilitating, managing, and promoting the NJPA Contract in the event that you are awarded a Contract. This fee is typically calculated as a percentage of Vendor's sales under the Contract or as a per -unit fee; it is not a line -item addition to the Member's cost of goods. (See RFP Section 6.29 and following for details.) Industry -Specific Questions 19) Identify the categories in which you provide solutions: wood, turf, rubber, and/or synthetic. 20) Specifically describe any manufacturing processes or material specification -related attributes that differentiate your offering from your competitors. 21) Describe any serviceability attributes that your offered solutions contain. Please indicate which of these attributes are considered "industry -expected attributes" and which you believe are "vendor differentiators." 22) Please explain die installation and and maintenance services that are available. Signature: FieldTurf — 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 — Montreal, QC H4T 1 G2 — Tel 1-800-724-2969 City Council "'"'"� 1e u fit" 29 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 3 la FoleldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company NJPA QUOTATION Sourcewell Contract # 060518-FTU This QUOTATION is dated this 21st day of December 2021. Between: City of Santa Ana (The "Customer") 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Ron Ono 714-571-4220 rono(a)-santa-ana.orq And: FieldTurf USA, Inc. (The "Supplier") 175 N. Industrial Blvd. NE Calhoun, GA 30701 Tel: (514) 340-9311 Fax: (514) 340-9374 CA GC LICENSE # 849044 NJPA is now called Sourcewell. FieldTurf USA, Inc. is pleased to present the following proposal based on our Sourcewell contract (formerly NJPA) pricing. Sourcewell provides predetermined preferential pricing through approved vendors. Since the products have already been bid at the national level, individual municipalities do not have to duplicate the bidding process per Sourcewell Contract # 060518-FTU. WHEREAS Supplier wishes to remove/recycle our existing surface at Eddie West Field; and sell, supply and install via Direct Purchase under our Sourcewell Agreement an artificial in -filled playing surface for use as an outdoor football/soccer field detailed below measuring 81,246 sq ft. to the Customer located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. WHEREAS the Customer wishes to purchase same on the preliminary terms and conditions set out below; QUOTATION DETAILS: I 1=1111=1011111011 The Supplier hereby agrees to sell, to supply and to install FielclTurf Super Elite Vertex Prime w CORE infilled artificial grass ("The Product") for use on an outdoor field measuring 81,246 sq. ft. to be installed on an existing drainage base at Eddie West Field. 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com FoleldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company The Supplier shall perform the work required by this Agreement as diligently and expeditiously as is consistent with the highest professional standards and the orderly progress of the work and in a good and workmanlike fashion, and subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof. The Supplier requires a minimum of 12 weeks lead time from the acceptance of layouts and approval of all plans prior to any work commencing at the Site. SITE PREPARATION WORK Notwithstanding, any work regarding the existing drainage base of the field other than ensuring its planarity ready for the new surfacing is specifically excluded from the Supplier's scope of work and the Sourcewell Agreement. FieldTurf shall not be responsible for the stability or the porosity of the existing base or drainage system upon which the FieldTurf surface will be installed, nor any construction or modification of existing installations around the field. If remediation of the existing base is necessary, FieldTurf will assist in providing scope and costs. On occasion the existing 'header board' that is attached to the curb around the perimeter of an older field needs to be replaced. We will inspect the header at Eddie West once the existing field is removed and offer pricing to do this if necessary. PRICE The purchase price for the Product fully installed is below, plus any other permanent inlaid lines, logos not listed, and any other unforeseen costs. The Purchase Price is subject to increase if affected by a tax increase, new taxes, and levies or any new legally binding imposition affecting the transaction. Eddie West Football / Soccer Field Replacement: FieldTurf Super Elite Vertex Prime w CORE series turf...... Remove / Recycle Existing Field ......... $30,000 Existing Base Fine-Tuned.................$18,000 FieldTurf / Installed 81,246 sq ft ........ $402,356 (10 Year Old Customer Savings: <$37,500>) FieldTurf CoolPlay................$40,623 Permanent Football Markings ........... No Charge (10 Year Old Customer Savings: <$17,500>) 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 9 Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com FoleldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company Permanent Soccer Markings ............ No Charge (10 Year Old Customer Savings: <$8,500> Permanent Media Line...............No Charge (10 Year Old Customer Savings: <$9,075>) Midfield Logo.............................$15,500 (10 Year Old Customer Savings: <$4,000>) Sourcewell Fees......... Included Sales Tax on materials only (7.75%).............$22,669 Bonds 1.25%.............$6,614 Total Savings Included For 10 Year FieldTurf Customer. <$76,575> The Purchase Price shall be payable to Supplier by way of wire transfer or banker's cheque in accordance with the following payment schedule: i) Thirty five percent (35%) of the Purchase Price due upon Customer's execution of the Supplier's Sales Agreement; ii) Thirty-five percent (35%) of the Purchase Price on delivery and receipt of the components of the Product to the Site; iii) Twenty-five percent (25%) of the Purchase Price upon completion of the work; iv) Remaining balance five percent (5%) upon the signing of the Certificate of Completion. The Supplier will issue an invoice to Customer upon the occurrence of each of the events listed above, and payment of each invoice is due within 30 days following the date to the applicable invoice. Any unpaid balance bears interest at a rate of 10% per year. ACCEPTANCE Upon the Supplier giving the Customer notice of completion of the work, the parties agree, acting reasonably, to mutually determine whether same conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and in the event the parties mutually determine that there are deficiencies, the Supplier will undertake to correct the deficiencies noted ("Acceptance"); Upon Acceptance both parties sign the Certificate of Completion in the form currently in force; 7445 C6te-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com FoleldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company The Warranty takes effect upon the signing of the Certificate of Completion. No use whatsoever shall be made of the field by the Customer until the Certificate of Completion is signed and delivered to Supplier. Any such use will be deemed as Acceptance of the field, triggering final payment and will automatically void any and all warranty of the work, subject to the reinstatement of the Warranty later at the discretion of the Supplier upon the signing of the Certificate of Completion and final payment. The Customer shall prohibit use of the field if the Customer alleges said field to be incomplete or dangerous. For greater security, in the event that the Customer deems the field to be incomplete or dangerous the Customer will immediately notify its insurers of this additional risk. INSTALLATION The installation of the Product shall be performed by Supplier's designated and approved installers. The Customer agrees to allow representatives of Supplier all necessary uninterrupted access and suitable staging area to the site for purposes of installation, and inspection. All lighting and electrical supply must be operational during the installation process. Minimum staging area required is 9,625 square feet and no more than 100 feet from the field. Minimum access should be 15 feet wide by 15 feet high. A 25 feet wide by 25 feet long hard or paved surface area located within 50 feet of the playing surface shall be provided for purposes of proper mixing of in -fill material. Access to any field will include suitable bridging by the Customer over the field curbs from the staging area to permit suitable access to the field by low clearance vehicles. Force Majeure. No Party shall be liable for delay or failure to perform under this Agreement if such delay or failure is due to any contingency beyond its reasonable control, including acts of God, war, explosion, fire, flood or civil disturbance or labor actions, disputes and disruptions by the employees or sub -trades of either Party hereto or delay or destruction caused by public carrier. In addition to force majeure, the parties recognize that in certain cases severe weather while not constituting force majeure could delay the installation process of the work contemplated under this agreement. The Supplier shall not be responsible for any acts of violence or vandalism. The Customer holds Supplier harmless and indemnifies the Supplier from vandalism and acts of violence regarding the present project. The Customer understands that it is to its benefit and therefore undertakes to accept and store for the length of the warranty period, the remaining synthetic turf left over from the project in case of need. 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 9 Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com FmieldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company THIS QUOTATION IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SUPPLIER'S STANDARD SOURCEWELL AGREEMENT WHICH SHALL PREVAIL OVER THIS QUOTATION, AND BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE FROM TIME TO TIME. THIS QUOTATION IS OPEN FOR ACCEPTANCE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS, AFTER WHICH TIME, IF NOT ACCEPTED, IT WILL BE NULL AND VOID. FOR QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELDTURF REPRESENTATIVE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; TIM COURY BY TELEPHONE (760) 310-2139, EMAIL tcfieldturfOamail.com ACCEPTED QUOTATIONS, DULY SIGNED SHALL BE SENT TO: 1- FIELDTURF USA, INC. 825 DeWitt Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024, TELEPHONE (760) 310-2139, FAX (760) 632-0906 EMAIL tcfieldturf(aD-gmail.com ATTENTION: Tim Coury, Regional VP Sales READ, AGREED, AND ACCEPTED Per: Date: 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada 1-14T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com EXHIBIT 4 0 FieldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company To: Ron Ono City of Santa Ana — Eddie West Field 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)571-4220 Email: rono@santa-ana.ora Sourcewell Contract # 060518-FTU THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE Re: SOURCEWELL QUOTE — FIELDCARE MAINTENANCE FOR EDDIE WEST FIELD 1-FieldTurf offers to provide maintenance services for the following FieldTurf field(s): Field Name: Eddie West Field Size: 81,246 SgFt Product: FTVTP — 2.25" The scope of services under this proposal shall consist of the following on each visit offered herein: 1/12/2022 ADVANCED CARE MAINTENANCE- SMG SportChamp maintenance sessions including: (a) a general sweeping to remove foreign objects such as dirt, leaves, bird droppings, gum and other debris that may collect on the field surface; and (b) a deep groom, sweep and rejuvenation to de -compact infill in an effort to maintain appropriate G- Max levels. This is a three step process: decompaction, brushing and infill cleaning with a vacuum rotary brush and fine groom with a power surface brush. Overall analysis and inspection of the field and its applicable systems, including infill depth and consistency, infill migration, field edging attachments, sewn and glued seams, line verification and field inserts (inlays). Up to eight (8) minor repairs (including sewing/adhesive failures, inlay separation, and general workmanship) to the FieldTurf surface, in the discretion of the FieldCare crew at time of visit. If necessary, additional repairs can be performed on a separate visit and at an additional cost, if applicable. Additionally, any additional warranty repairs discovered during the maintenance visit may need to be performed on a separate visit, to be scheduled on a mutually agreeable date, as the time set aside for the proposed services may not provide enough time to complete all required repairs discovered during the performance of the services. This offer does not include the repair of any damage to the field as a result of acts of vandalism and/or neglect. The price includes normal wear and tear; any major repairs or necessary maintenance as a result of damage due to abnormal wear and tear, abuse, vandalism, or neglect are subject to additional cost. Pro_- ram- Eight (8) Year Agreement: Two (2) site visits per year to Eddie West Field Includes: -Sixteen (16) Advanced Care Visits -Pre and Post Field Inspection with written Field Maintenance Summary -Minor Seam and Inlay Repairs, not to exceed eight (8) repairs up to fifteen (15) linear SgFt -Field Magnet Sweep -Light Infill added to High Traffic Areas City CounCII FieldTurf USA, Inc. 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Rd.,'S8ite24f)Montreal, Quebec H4T 1G2 Ca245/2022 Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 Tel.: (514) 340-9311 Fax: (514) 340-9374 Website: http://www.fieldturftarkett.com 0 FieldTurf A Tarkett Sports Company 2-The price offered is the following PROGRAM 1: TOTAL COST PROGRAM 1: OPTION: MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT (GROOMRIGHT & FIELDSWEEP) THE ULTIMATE SURFACE EXPERIENCE $35,200.00 ($2,200.00 PER VISIT) $11,500.00 The price is subject to an increase without notice in the event that there is an increase in raw materials, freight, or direct expenses in maintaining the grass surface. The Price is valid for a period of sixty (60) days. 3- Notwithstanding any other document or agreement entered into by FieldTurf in connection with the supply and installation only of its product pursuant to the present proposal, the following shall apply: a) This bid proposal and its acceptance is subject to strikes, accidents, delays beyond our control and force majeure; b) Payment shall be due within thirty (30) days of completion of each scheduled maintenance visit; c) Unless otherwise agreed upon and noted herein, the maintenance visit shall be performed as scheduled by the parties on an agreed -upon date; d) FieldTurf requires suitable access to all fields proposed herein. The suitable access area must be at least five (5) feet wide and comprised of a hard, stable or paved surface. To the extent suitable access is not provided, additional costs may apply and service delays may occur. Additionally, FieldTurf will not be responsible for damage to any access or surrounding area due to unsuitable conditions. e) Accounts overdue beyond 30 days of billing will be charged at an interest rate of 1.5% per month (19.56% per annum); f) This proposal is based on a single mobilization. If the site is not ready and additional mobilizations are necessary additional charges will apply; g) The proposed price does not include any applicable sales or use taxes; and h) In the event that FieldTurf is ultimately obliged to take collection procedures for payment, acceptor of this bid shall be liable for FieldTurf's collection costs including attorney fees and costs. FieldTurf USA, Inc. Per: Lisa /rem-w4 Lisa Kerwin, Customer Service Coordinator P: 514.375.2632 E: hsa.kerwinkfieldtur£com READ, AGREED, AND ACCEPTED BY ADDRESSEE Signature: Print Name: Date: PO #: Program Selection: For FieldTurf to schedule and execute above services, a signed agreement and/or PO from the customer must be sent to FieldTurf directly. RETURN SIGNED AGREEMENT AND/OR PO TO: FieldTurf USA, Inc. Fax: 514.375.2632 Email: lisa.kerwin(&fiedturf .com PO/Agreement can be mailed, emailed and/or faxed All payments should be mailed to: FieldTurf Tarkett 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Road Suite 200 Montreal, Quebec H4T 1G2 City COunCII FieldTurf USA, Inc. 7445 Cote-de-Liesse Rd.,'S8ita.236Montreal, Quebec H4T 1G2 Ca245/2022 Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 Tel.: (514) 340-9311 Fax: (514) 340-9374 Website: http://www.fieldturftarkett.com Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 14 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Santiago Park Gas House AGENDA TITLE Approve an Appropriation Adjustment and Increase the Contract Amount by $632,500 for an Existing Construction Contract with Nationwide General Construction Services, for a Revised Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $3,296,357, for Santiago Park Gas House (Project No. 15-2645) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize prior -year fund balance of $582,500 in the Residential Development District 2 Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount into the Residential Development District 2, Acquisition and Development, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize prior -year fund balance of $50,000 in the Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount into the Capital Recovery Charges, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 3. Approve an amendment to the Project Cost Analysis to reflect the new amount of $392,938.40 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $760,000 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $632,500, which includes $82,500 in construction engineering funds and $550,000 for construction contingency funds, for the Santiago Park Gas House Project. DISCUSSION On March 2, 2021, the City Manager authorized the award of a contract to Nationwide General Construction Services for The Santiago Park — Gas House Area Development Project. The project involves the renovation of this structure, renovation of existing restrooms, and site development, including the construction of an amphitheater, installation of native riparian landscaping, automatic "smart" irrigation, drainage through City Council 14 — 1 2/15/2022 Santiago Park Gas House February 15, 2022 Page 2 natural infiltration, decomposed granite walkways, site amenities, and interpretive signage (Exhibit 1). During construction, a water main broke and flooded the work site. To continue construction, the project was redesigned to relocate the utilities and raise the grade. With the redesign, there is opportunity to add a new playground area, slides, install electrical infrastructure to provide lighting for the Santiago Creek parking lot, and construct a recreational vehicle pad for the future Park Host Program. To deliver these additional improvements and capitalize on the existing favorable pricing of the existing contract with Nationwide General Construction Services (Project No. 15- 2645), staff recommends amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program by $632,500 — increasing the construction administration and inspection amount by $82,500 and project contingencies by $550,000 — for a new estimated project delivery cost of $3,296,357 (Exhibits 2-3). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2019-59 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT Appropriation adjustments are requested to add $632,500 to the contract with Nationwide General Construction Services as follows: (1) Recognize $582,500 from prior year fund balance in the Residential Development District 2 Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account (No. 31213002-50001) and appropriate the same amount to the Residential Development District 2, Acquisition & Development, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 31213260-66220); (2) Recognize $50,000 from prior year fund balance in the Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account (No. 05417002-50001), and appropriate the same amount into the Capital Recovery Charges, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 05417647-66220). Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure as follows: Fiscal Accounting Unit _Account No. Fund Accounting Unit -Account No. Amount Year Project No. Description Description ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST 2020- 05113263-66220 Capital Park Improvements, Improvements $265,818 21 (15-2645) Outlay Other Than Building 2020- 31213260-66220 Residential AcquisitionAcquisition and Development, $g01,505 21 (15-2645) District 2 Improvements Other Than Building City Council 14 — 2 2/15/2022 Santiago Park Gas House February 15, 2022 Page 3 Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit -Account No. Year _ Account No. Accou(Projec Description Description Amount No. 2020- 31213261-66220 Residential Development Acquisition and Development In Lieu, $496,534 21 (15-2645) District 2 Improvements Other Than Building 2020- 16113263-66220 PRCSA Santa Ana River Conservancy 21 (15-2645) Capital Program, Improvements Other Than $1,000,000 Grants Building APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 2021- 31213260-66220 Residential AcquisitionAcquisition and Development, $582,500 22 (15-2645) District 2 Improvements Other Than Building 2021- 05417647-66220 Sanitary Capital Recovery Charges, 22 (15-2645) Sewer Improvements Other Than $50,000 Capital Building Total $3,296,357 All funds are scheduled for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2021-22. However, any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into FY 2022- 23 for expenditure. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Revised Cost Analysis 3. Amendment to Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 14 — 3 2/15/2022 Exhibit 1 SANTA ANA PW1 Project No. 15-2645: Santiago Park- Gas House Area Development PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY COST ANALYSIS PROJECT NO. 15-2645: SANTIAGO GAS HOUSE AREA EXPENDITURE ORIGINAL ADDITIONAL NEW TOTAL CATEGORY AMOUNT FUNDING Construction Contract $2,143,418.60 -- $2,143,418.60 Construction Administration, $310,438.40 $82,500.00 $392,938.40 Inspection, Testing Contingencies $210,000.00 $550,000.00 $760,000.00 Total $2,663,857.00 F $632,500.00 $3,296,357 City Council 14 — 5 2/15/2022 PROJECT TITLE: Santiago Park Gas House Area Improvements PROJECT CATEGORY: City & Park Facility Improvements Park Facility CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 21/22CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project involves the renovation of this structure, renovation of existing restrooms, and site development, which includes the construction of an amphitheater, installation of native riparian landscaping, automatic "smart" irrigation, drainage through natural infiltration, decomposed granite walkways, site amenities, and interpretive signage. Improvements also include a new playground area and new slides that would connect to the lower existing oak grove picnic areas; installation of new electrical infrastructure which would provide lighting for the Santiago Creek parking lot; and construction of a Recreational Vehicle pad for the future Park Host Program. EXHIBIT 3 EL PROJECT NEED: City Council previously approved the renovation of the Santiago Park Gas House area, west of Valencia Street to Santiago restroom. The project is currently in construction and a number of community meetings were held to obtain community input and approval of the conceptual plan. PROJECT COSTS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 Construction 632,500 - - - - - - TOTAL 632,500 - - - - - - SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 A & D District 2 In -Lieu 582,500 - - - - - - SEWER 50,000 TOTAL 632,500 - - - - - - AGENCY: DIVISION: Parks, Rec. & Community Services Administrative Services CONTACT: DATE: Ron Ono, Administrative Services Manager 12-Jan-2022 City Council 14 — 6 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Historic Property Preservation Agreements AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Historic Property Preservation Agreements RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the attached Mills Act agreements with the below -referenced property owners for the identified structure(s), subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. Historic Property Property Owner(s) Preservation Address/House Vote by HRC Agree ent No. Caroline La and Colin 2383 North Flower 6:0:0:3 Donnelly 2021-20 Street (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent 2445 North Park 6:0:0:3 Andrew Dawson 2021-21 Boulevard (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent 2311 North Santiago 6:0:0:3 Michelle Helvig 2021-22 Street (Frazier, McLoughlin, and Shipp Absent Deanna Kashani and 2021-23 2397 North Flower 6:0:0:3 (Frazier, McLoughlin, Behzad Samavati Street and Shipp Absent DISCUSSION On November 4, 2021, the Historic Resources Commission (HRC) recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the above -referenced Mills Act agreements with the identified property owners for historic structure(s) in the City, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. This action allows for the approval of a Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act contract) which provides a property tax reduction whereby property owners agree to reinvest the tax savings towards the maintenance of the historic property. Additionally, the agreement prevents inappropriate alterations to the protected historic structure(s). City Council 15-1 2/15/2022 Historic Property Preservation Agreements February 15, 2022 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed projects are exempt from further review. The following Categorical Exemptions will be filed for this project: • ER No. 2021-100 (2383 North Flower Street) • ER No. 2021-101 (2445 North Park Boulevard) • ER No. 2021-102 (2311 North Santiago Street) • ER No. 2021-103 (2397 North Flower Street) FISCAL IMPACT The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $4,714.72 annually noted below, for a period of not less than ten years. HPPA No. Address Estimate Exhibit No. 2021-20 2383 North Flower Street $1,070.69 1-2 2021-21 2445 North Park Blvd. $1,524.60 3-4 2021-22 2311 North Santiago Street $1,033.73 5-6 2021-23 2397 North Flower Street $1,085.70 7-8 Total for All Properties: $4,714.72 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Mills Act Agreement — 2383 North Flower Street 2. HRC Staff Report — 2383 North Flower Street 3. Mills Act Agreement — 2445 North Park Boulevard 4. HRC Staff Report — 2445 North Park Blvd. 5. Mills Act Agreement — 2311 North Santiago Street 6. HRC Staff Report— 2311 North Santiago Street 7. Mills Act Agreement — 2397 North Flower Street 8. HRC Staff Report — 2397 North Flower Street Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 15 — 2 2/15/2022 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Colin Edward Donnelly, a single man and Caroline La, a single woman as joint tenants, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. City Council 1 15 — 3 2/15/2022 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 16, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. City Council 2 15 — 4 2/15/2022 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the City Council 3 15 — 5 2/15/2022 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2383 North Flower Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-073-14, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying City Council 4 15 — 6 2/15/2022 the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Caroline La and Colin Donnelly 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. City Council 5 15 — 7 2/15/2022 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} City Council 15 — 8 2/15/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: JOHN M. FUNK Sr. Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: COLIN EDWARD DONNELLY By: CAROLINE LA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency City Council 15 — 9 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS PER RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-073-14 City Council 15 — 10 2/15/2022 Exhibit B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Head-Wimpey House 2383 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME Head-Wimpey House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2383 N. Flower street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1935 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation City Council 15 — 11 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary #. HRI # Trinomial_ NRHP Status Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Head-Wimpey House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 31 2015 *c. Address 2383 North Flower Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-073-14 *133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Floral Park, the Head-Wimpey House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a complex gable and wing roof with a moderately steep pitch, clad in composition shingle roofing. The massing, roof configuration, and fenestration define a three -bay fagade, with an overlapping gable front porch and entrance stoop flanked by a side -gabled projecting wing on the south, a side -gabled projecting wing on the north and a prominent front -facing gable along the west elevation. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled textured stucco. The entryway is characterized by a wooden front door, accessed via the entrance stoop. Fenestration consists of multi -paned and fixed casement windows used on the west elevation, while double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, a lawn, low vegetation and simple walkway that connects the entry stoop to the main sidewalk. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in sandy -textured stucco. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19351 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Colin Donnelly and Caroline La 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information City Council 15 — 12 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: Head-Wimpey House 131. Historic Name: Head-Wimpey House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): November 1, 1935. Constructed. $4,000. September 10, 1952. Disposal for A. Newcomer by Grimes. March 16, 1953. Range for John Crivner. July 10, 2018. Tear off existing comp shingle/shake roof and apply new comp shingle. $14,500. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original locatio *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. 139a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: H.C. Head *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1935 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Head-Wimpey House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1935, and was valued at approximately $4,000 according to the original building permit. It was built by Horace Caldwell Head, son of Dr. and Captain William Head who was a member of the California Assembly and surgeon. Dr. Head was said to have fought in the American Civil War on the Confederate side and was Grand Cyclops to the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee. Dr. Head is also said to have personally delivered the bill to Sacramento to allow Orange County to secede from Los Angeles County. He Horace Head was a graduate of University of California, Berkeley and was the attorney of the Orange County Flood Control District, and later, was District Attorney for the County of Orange from 1904 to 1908. He served as President of the Orange County Bar Association from 1915 to 1920. The Head-Wimpey House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. A.B. Wimpey in 1936. Mrs. A.B. Wimpey was a member of the First Presbyterian Woman's auxiliary circles. Their daughter, Shirley Wimpey, was a member of the Christian Endeavor Society of the First Christian Church. The Wimpeys lived in the property until the late 1940s. A. Newcomer purchased the property in 1952 and then later sold it to John Scrivner in 1953. Since then, the Head-Wimpey House has been occupied by various owners until the current homeowner purchased the home in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattellnc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map Head-Wimpey House 2383 North Flower Street O 073 0 47" (D XDo _ 0 _ Q 3 3 � y 49 48 46 45 r 44 ao 20 19 18 254 55 56 57 50 5.3 51 '" j9 52 lO P 10 11 �_ 12 13 14 g (9, ' 0, ' 0, �Y 9 I ,o N0. #54 I a City Council 15 — 13 2/15/2022 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: Head-Wimpey House *Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 El Continuation ❑ Update *1310. Significance (continued): The Head-Wimpey House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). `Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45, 000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War Il, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, anotherbuilder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, they were mostly revival in style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Characteristics of the Tudor Revival include steeply pitched complex gable roofs, shallow roof overhangs, asymmetrical massing, stucco exterior and multipaned windows. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Character - defining features of the house include a complex gable and wing roof of moderately steep pitch; shallow roof overhangs, roof detailing such as wooden bargeboards and exposed rafter tails; multi -paned wood casement windows used on the primary elevation; double -hung wood windows where extant; and hand -troweled textured stucco exterior walls. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. " Sacramento: March 1995. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry. com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 191 Z 1923, 1932, and 1955. Armor, Samuel. History of Orange County. Los Angeles: History Record Company, 1921, page 989. Arellano, Gustavo. "Gustavo Arellano."OC Weekly, 17Apr. 2008, https://www.ocweekly.com/the-kkk-took-my-county-away- meet-th e-klansman-who-helped-to-found-orange-county-6398456/. City Council 15 — 14 2/15/2022 DPR 523L MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with City Council 1 15 — 15 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. City Council 2 15 — 16 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency Item # 2 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Historic Resources Commission Staff Report November 4, 2021 Topic: HRCA No. 2021-20, HRC 2021-20, HPPA No. 2021-20 — The Head-Wimpey House RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 20 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-20 (Exhibit 1). 2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with Caroline La and Colin Donnelly, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Exhibit 2). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Caroline La and Colin Donnelly are requesting approval to designate an existing residence located at 2383 North Flower Street to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, as well as approval to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana. DISCUSSION Project Location and Site Description The subject property is located on the east side of North Flower Street in the Floral Park neighborhood. The site contains a 1,450-square-foot, Tudor Revival style residence and detached garage on a 6,000-square-foot residential lot (Exhibit 3). Analysis of the Issues Historical Listing In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, BibtdOcLftdources Commission 25-117 2/115/2022 Exhibit 2 HRCA No. 2021-20, HRC 2021-20, HPPA No. 2021-20 — Head-Wimpey House November 4, 2021 Page 2 designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old. The structure identified meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as the structure is 86 years old and is a good example of period architecture. No known code violations exist on record for this property. The Head-Wimpey House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1935, and was valued at approximately $4,000 according to the original building permit. It was built by Horace Caldwell Head, son of Dr. and Captain William Head who was a member of the California Assembly and a surgeon. Dr. Head was said to have personally delivered the bill to Sacramento to allow Orange County to succeed from Los Angeles County. He fought in the American Civil War on the Confederate side and was Grand Cyclops to the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee. He was a graduate of University of California, Berkeley and was the attorney of the Orange County Flood Control District, and later, was District Attorney for the County of Orange from 1904 to 1908. He served as President of the Orange County Bar Association from 1915 to 1920. The Head-Wimpey House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. A.B. Wimpey in 1936. The Head-Wimpey House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a complex gable and wing roof with a moderately steep pitch, clad in composition shingle roofing. The massing, roof configuration, and fenestration define a three -bay fagade, with an overlapping gable front porch and entrance stoop flanked by a side -gabled projecting wing on the south, a side -gabled projecting wing on the north and a prominent front - facing gable along the west elevation. The exterior of the building is clad in hand - troweled textured stucco. The entryway is characterized by a wooden front door, accessed via the entrance stoop. Fenestration consists of multi -paned and fixed casement windows used on the west elevation, while double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, a lawn, low vegetation and simple walkway that connects the entry stoop to the main sidewalk. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in sandy -textured stucco. Character - defining features of the house include a complex gable and wing roof of moderately steep pitch; shallow roof overhangs, roof detailing such as wooden bargeboards and exposed rafter tails; multi -paned wood casement windows used on the primary 8ibtc0icLRe9ources Commission 25-218 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-20, HRC 2021-20, HPPA No. 2021-20 — Head-Wimpey House November 4, 2021 Page 3 elevation; double -hung wood windows where extant; and hand -troweled textured stucco exterior walls. The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Characteristics of the Tudor Revival include steeply pitched complex gable roofs, shallow roof overhangs, asymmetrical massing, stucco exterior and multipaned windows. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Mills Act Agreement Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner's voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property's assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include: • Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • Allows for a mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation • Provides additional incentive for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discourages inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement. Public Notification The subject site is located within the Floral Park Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public. BibtdOcLftdources Commission 25-319 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-20, HRC 2021-20, HPPA No. 2021-20 — Head-Wimpey House November 4, 2021 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 — Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2021-100 will be filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,070.69 annually, for a period of not less than ten years. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2. Mills Act Agreement 3. 500-Foot Radius Map Submitted By: Pedro Gomez, AICP, Associate Planner Approved By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency, Planning and Building Agency BibtdOcLftdources Commission 25--420 21115/2022 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-20 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET, SANTA ANA, ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2021-20 PLACING SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTIVE CATEGORY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 4, 2021, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-20) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2021-20) of the Head-Wimpey House located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana. B. The Head-Wimpey House has distinctive architectural features of the Tudor Revival style and was built in 1935. C. The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Characteristics of the Tudor Revival include steeply pitched complex gable roofs, shallow roof overhangs, asymmetrical massing, stucco exterior and multipaned windows. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Character -defining features of the house include a complex gable and wing roof of moderately steep pitch; shallow roof overhangs, roof detailing such as wooden bargeboards and exposed rafter tails; multi -paned wood casement windows used on the primary elevation; double -hung wood windows where extant; and hand - troweled textured stucco exterior walls. D. The legal owners of the property are Caroline La and Colin Donnelly. E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 6ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 25-521 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. G. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the Contributive category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(3) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-100 will be filed for this project. Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves: A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-20 to place the Head-Wimpey House located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, and B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-20 placing the Head-Wimpey House located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Contributive category. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled "Historical Property Description," and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description" is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. ADOPTED this 4t" day of November, 2021. Tim Rush Chairperson Bibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 25-622 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: �K ,rV 14 John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Commission members Commission members Commission members Commission members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 4, 2021. Date: Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 8ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 25723 2/Iv5/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN Address Legal Description Owner Names 002-073-14 2383 North Flower Street REAL PROPERTY IN THE Caroline La and CITY OF SANTA ANA, Colin Donnelly COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS PER RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Bib)cOcLftdources Commission 25-824 20MV 2W I MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Colin Edward Donnelly, a single man and Caroline La, a single woman as joint tenants, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. Bib)cOcLRedources Commission 1 25-925 2M/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on January 19, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other parry. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. BittoDci.Redources Commission 2 25-106 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the Bib cOiei_Redources Commission 3 25-127 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2383 North Flower Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-073-14, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Bib)cOiei-Redources Commission 4 25-128 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Caroline La and Colin Donnelly 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 5 25-129 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} Bib cOiei.Redources Commission 6 25-140 V15/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: JOHN M. FUNK Assistant City Attorney MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: COLIN EDWARD DONNELLY By: CAROLINE LA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Bib)cO Redources Commission 23-131 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS PER RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-073-14 Bib cOiefedources Commission 8 25-162 V15/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Head-Wimpey House 2383 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME Head-Wimpey House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2383 N. Flower street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1935 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE �5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation BittdftLRedources Commission 25-133 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Head-Wimpey House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: -March 31 2015 *c. Address 2383 North Flower Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-073-14 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Floral Park, the Head-Wimpey House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a complex gable and wing roof with a moderately steep pitch, clad in composition shingle roofing. The massing, roof configuration, and fenestration define a three -bay fagade, with an overlapping gable front porch and entrance stoop flanked by a side -gabled projecting wing on the south, a side -gabled projecting wing on the north and a prominent front -facing gable along the west elevation. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled textured stucco. The entryway is characterized by a wooden front door, accessed via the entrance stoop. Fenestration consists of multi -paned and fixed casement windows used on the west elevation, while double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, a lawn, low vegetation and simple walkway that connects the entry stoop to the main sidewalk. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in sandy -textured stucco. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19351 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Colin Donnelly and Caroline La 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information Bit0cftLRedources Commission 25 —184 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: Head-Wimpey House 131. Historic Name: Head-Wimpey House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): November 1, 1935. Constructed. $4,000. September 10, 1952. Disposal for A. Newcomer by Grimes. March 16, 1953. Range for John Crivner. July 10, 2018. Tear off existing comp shingle/shake roof and apply new comp shingle. $14,500. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. 139a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: H.C. Head *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1935 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Head-Wimpey House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1935, and was valued at approximately $4, 000 according to the original building permit. It was built by Horace Caldwell Head, son of Dr. and Captain William Head who was a member of the California Assembly and surgeon. Dr. Head was said to have fought in the American Civil War on the Confederate side and was Grand Cyclops to the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee. Dr. Head is also said to have personally delivered the bill to Sacramento to allow Orange County to secede from Los Angeles County. He Horace Head was a graduate of University of California, Berkeley and was the attorney of the Orange County Flood Control District, and later, was District Attorney for the County of Orange from 1904 to 1908. He served as President of the Orange County Bar Association from 1915 to 1920. The Head-Wimpey House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. A.B. Wimpey in 1936. Mrs. A.B. Wimpey was a member of the First Presbyterian Woman's auxiliary circles. Their daughter, Shirley Wimpey, was a member of the Christian Endeavor Society of the First Christian Church. The Wimpeys lived in the property until the late 1940s. A. Newcomer purchased the property in 1952 and then later sold it to John Scrivner in 1953. Since then, the Head-Wimpey House has been occupied by various owners until the current homeowner purchased the home in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattel Inc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map Head-Wimpey House 2383 North Flower Street 0073474�'U' O30. 0 49 4B 96 45 se 44 ao 20 19 �a i8 50\ 2 54 55 56 57 � 53 511IO52P,o & O` 11 12 NO. 4 w I a BittdftLftdources Commission 25--195 2nv5/2o22 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: Head-Wimpey House 'Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 ❑x Continuation ❑ Update *610. Significance (continued): The Head-Wimpey House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). "Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45,000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War 11, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, they were mostly revival in style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Characteristics of the Tudor Revival include steeply pitched complex gable roofs, shallow roof overhangs, asymmetrical massing, stucco exterior and multipaned windows. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture, " representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Character - defining features of the house include a complex gable and wing roof of moderately steep pitch; shallow roof overhangs, roof detailing such as wooden bargeboards and exposed rafter tails; multi -paned wood casement windows used on the primary elevation; double -hung wood windows where extant; and hand -troweled textured stucco exterior walls. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry.com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. Armor, Samuel. History of Orange County. Los Angeles: History Record Company, 1921, page 989. Arellano, Gustavo. "Gustavo Arellano." OC Weekly, 17 Apr. 2008, https://www.ocweekly.com/the-kkk-took-my-county-away- meet-the-klansman-who-hel ped-to-found-orange-county-6398456/. 6it0dftLRe6ources Commission 26--206 2AI5/2022 DPR 523L MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 1 25237 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Bib cOmRedources Commission z 25228 V15/2022 500' RADIUS H RC 2021-20/ H RCA 2021-20/ H PPA 2021-20 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET HEAD-WIMPEY HOUSE PLANNING AND BUILDING AGENCY BibtdOcLftdources Commission 25239 2nv5/2022 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 OR# 3523344 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING raising only those issues you or someone BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC else raised at the public hearing RESOURCES COMMISSION described in this notice, or in written The City of Santa Ana encourages the correspondence delivered to the Historic public to participate in the decision- Resources Commission or City Council of making process. We encourage you to the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the COPY OF NOTICE contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Historic Resources Commission Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667- Action: The Historic Resources 2259. Commission will hold a Public Hearing to Neu can lien I@c bang tieng Vigt, An receive public testimony, and will take dign tho@i cho Tony Lai so (714) 565- action on the item described below. Their 2627. decision is final unless appealed to the 10/22/21 Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE City Council within 10 days of the decision OR-3523344# by any interested party or group. Ad Description Project Location: 2383 North Flower Street (historically known as the Head- 2383 N Flower St Wimpey House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Caroline La and Colin Donnelly To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using newspaper. Please y g our news p p Commission Application No. 2021-20, read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Historic Register Categorization No. 2021- 20, and Historic Property Preservation Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you allow the placement ta d cai gori categ-20 orization the Santa after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned 10/22/2021 property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER- 2021-100 will be filed for this project. InVOICe. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, Publication $119.35 at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Total $119.35 ic n or may aCA Members ttend tthismeeti g in in -person join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa- ana.org/pb/meeting-parUcpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to Dail Journal Corporation PBAeComments5-santa-ana.org v p (reference the topic in the subject line) or Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 92701. Deadline to submit written BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE 951 ( ) 784-0111 comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 record. Where To Get More Information: SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 Additional details regarding the proposed SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE 408 287-4866 ( ) including the full text of the discretionary discretionary item, may be found on the THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa- THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 ana.pdmegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 2724747 you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(gbsanta- ana.org or714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to II 25240 2nv5/2022 * 8 6 2 * m' CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency ` r 20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988 r Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 500 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. Project Location: 2383 North Flower Street (historically known as the Head-Wimpey House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Caroline La and Colin Donnelly Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-20, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-20, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-20 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-100 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting-particpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments ansanta-ana.orq (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Bibtd0cl.Redources Commission 25-251 21115/2022 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(a-_)santa-ana.orq or 714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667-2259. Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, xin dien thoai cho Tony Lai so (714) 565-2627. 500' RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP Publish: OC Reporter Date: October 22, 2021 6ib)cl@icLRe4ources Commission 25-262 2/115/2022 On -Site Posting — 2383 N. Flower Street—10.25.21 NOTICE OF PUMC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. 2383 North Flower Street (historically known as the Head-Wimpey House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Caroline La and Colin Donnelly Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 20, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-20, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-20 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Arta Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-100 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic; Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in - person or join via zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.or I blmeetin - artic ation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeCommenls _ganla-ana.oro (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:00 p.m, on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing af: hftosJ/santa- ana primeaov com(publicloortal. Who To Contact For uestionss. Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGme oz Santa-ana.or or 714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, er prior to, the public hearing. si tiene preguntas en espaflol, favor,, do Ilamar at Angelina Becerra (714) 667-2259. Neu cin lien lac hang tie`ng Vigt, �,* ,P thoai eho Tony Lai sit (714) 565-2627. Bit ciftLRedources Commission 25 -243 2AI5/2022 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Andrew Dawson, a Married Man as his sole and separate property, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. Fxhihit I City Council 1 15 — 45 2/15/2022 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 16, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. City Council 2 15 — 46 2/15/2022 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the City Council 15 — 47 2/15/2022 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-063-20, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying City Council 4 15 — 48 2/15/2022 the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Andrew Dawson 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. City Council 5 15 — 49 2/15/2022 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} City Council 15 — 50 2/15/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: 9w � JOHN M. FUNK Sr. Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: ANDREW DAWSON RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: u OP6 . : Executive Director Planning and Building Agency City Council 15 — 51 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 31 OF TRACT 755, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGES(S) 33, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-063-20 City Council 15 — 52 2/15/2022 Exhibit B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY W.D. Johnston House 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME W.D. Johnston House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2445 North Park Boulevard CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1927 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival The most universal of all American domestic building styles, the Colonial Revival has been popular since the 1876 Centennial celebration in Philadelphia stimulated a patriotic interest in the American architectural past. Beginning in the second half of the 1930s, and continuing in the two decades following World War II, the late Colonial Revival departed from the more literal historicism of the previous half -century and was often reduced to a few signature elements. These features include stylized door surrounds; pseudo-quoined corners; multi -paned casement or double -hung sash windows, often framed by decorative shutters; circular, oval, or octagonal accent windows; and eaves nearly flush with the exterior walls. A hipped roof subtype sometimes contained Regency references such as bow and bay windows. Another popular subtype was split-level, ranch, or Cape Cod in appearance and plan, and normally topped by gabled roofs. The materials used in the late Colonial Revival were similar to those of the earlier period —wood, brick, stone, and stucco —although stucco came to be used more frequently than before (McAlester 1984, 320-339). SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation. City Council 15 — 53 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary #. HRI # Trinomial_ NRHP Status Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) W.D. Johnston House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 31 2015 *c. Address 2445 North Park Boulevard City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-063-20 *133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The W.D. Johnston House is a two-story single-family residence constructed in the Georgian/Federal variant of the Colonial Revival architectural style. Symmetrical in design, the house is clad in red brick and consists of a three bay wide, two story block and a small, one story, one -bay extension set back on the west elevation. A medium -pitched, side -gabled roof with enclosed soffits in the modest overhangs and asphalt shingle cladding tops the main volume. In the central bay of the fagade, (south elevation), a prominent entry portico consists of stylized Doric columns and pilasters that rise to molded frieze, flat roof with enclosed soffit, and X-patterned balustrade. The entry features a six -panel wood entry door framed by an elliptical fanlight and sidelights. Multi -paned casement windows with an elliptical fanlight flank the entry porch in the side bays of the lower story. Paired six -over -one, double -hung, wood windows in the side bays and multi -paned French doors in the central bay, all framed by shutters, characterize the second story fenestration. Similar double -hung wood windows also appear on the north, east, and west elevations, all featuring a "lamb tongue" detailing. Brick detailing at the openings includes soldier and header brick courses. A rebuilt brick chimney is centered at the west elevation, towards the side gable ridgeline. The property includes a one-story addition, brick clad and topped by a balustrade, on the west elevation that has taken on significance over time and is within the period of significance of the style. A driveway to the east of the property leads to a detached, one-story, side -gabled garage, built at the same time as the residence. The front setback is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and a hedge -lined brick pathway that curves towards the junction of the driveway and sidewalk. Other than the noted changes, the house appears intact and is in good condition. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other South elevation, view north September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 1927/ City of Santa Ana Building Permits W. Owner and Address: Andrew Dawson 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑ArchNullu ❑Artifa l bk7Rliotograph Record ❑ Other (list) 5-5 �J 5 622 DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: W.D. Johnston House 131. Historic Name: W.D. Johnston House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): June 20, 1927. Constructed. $13,000. April 6, 1933. Rebuild fireplace chimney. June 9, 1942. Alteration to residence by Reine Chew, contractor. $100. January 19, 2017. Reroof residence and detached garage. $6,100. September 12, 2018. New 195-square-foot swimming pool. $30,000.. September 14, 2018. New detached arbor with lattice roof cover. $4, 500. May 13,2021. Voluntary seismic retrofit. $8,000. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *1310. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1927 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The W.D. Johnston House is architecturally significant for its embodiment of the Georgian/Federal variant of the Colonial Revival style. According to city directories, the first occupant was William Dean Johnston. Johnston was a 62-year resident of Orange County, mostly in Santa Ana where he worked as both Second President of the County Farm Bureau and the Secretary and Manager of the Farmer's Mutual Insurance Copany in Santa Ana for over 25 years. Johnston divorced his second wife Ruth L. Johnston in 1940-41 and she retained the home. Mrs. Johnston later sold the property in 1942 to Frank and Catherine McClellan. During World War //, Frank McClellan would join the army and serve as an officer. Little information is available regarding occupancy of the residence from 1950-1990's. In early 2000, Cecil and Kathryn Hollon purchased the property, selling it in 2017 to Dion and Leslie Genchi. The property was sold to the current homeowner in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) 1311. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) 1920 Federal Census 1930 Federal Census Santa Ana Register July 29, 1940 (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) Sketch Map W.D. Johnston House B13. Remarks: 2445 North Park Boulevard *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers /Chattel Inc. n5 *Date of Evaluation: November4, 2021 �3 3 C 3i ie, 33 ,z vs• Zs 2 1 JS .36 37 JO 1 . 17 xu 321 -*1 s19s• 75 uee• 1 Si (This space reserved for official comments.) LJ y� e4•NO. 754 I I van. t> >,• I � 4 N 2/15/2022 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: W.D. Johnston House *Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 El Continuation ❑ Update *1310. Significance (continued): The W.D. Johnston House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of oranges, avocados, and walnuts and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). "Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45, 000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War II, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, homes in the neighborhoods were mostly developed in the revival styles. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Identifying features of this style include its two-story massing, symmetry, classically inspired detailing, formal portico, elliptical fanlights, and multi -paned fenestration. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the W.D. Johnston House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: roof configuration, materials, and treatment (medium -pitched side gabled roof,enclosed soffits); massing and composition (two-story block design;symmetry); portico, brick exterior walls trimmed with wood; fenestration (entry door with elliptical fan and sidelights and original wood windows); architectural detailing (columns, frieze, balustrades, red brick detailing, and window shutters); brick entry pathway; and the one-story garage. *1312. References (continued): City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. " Sacramento: March 1995. Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969. `Alison Honer Dies at 84," The Santa Ana Journal, September 21, 1981. "History of Floral Park." http://www.floral-park.com/page2.html. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1941-1962. Santa Ana Daily Register, April 4, 1923 City Council DPR 523L 15-56 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with City Council 1 15 — 57 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. City Council 2 15 — 58 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency Item # 3 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Historic Resources Commission Staff Report November 4, 2021 Topic: HRCA No. 2021-21, HRC 2021-21, HPPA No. 2021-21 — The W.D. Johnston House RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 21 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-21 (Exhibit 1). 2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with Andrew Dawson, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Exhibit 2). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Andrew Dawson is requesting approval to designate an existing residence located at 2445 North Park Boulevard to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, as well as approval to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana. DISCUSSION Project Location and Site Description The subject property is located on the north side of North Park Boulevard in the Floral Park neighborhood. The site contains a 2,880-square-foot, Colonial Revival style residence and detached garage on a 7,800-square-foot residential lot (Exhibit 3). Analysis of the Issues Historical Listing In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria BibtdOcLftdources Commission 35-159 2/115/2022 Exhibit 4 HRCA No. 2021-21, HRC 2021-21, HPPA No. 2021-21 — W.D. Johnston House November 4, 2021 Page 2 set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old. The structure identified meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as the structure is 94 years old and is a good example of period architecture. No known code violations exist on record for this property. The property, recognized as the W.D. Johnston House, is a representative example of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style in Santa Ana. It was built in 1927 for $13,000. According to city directories, the first occupant was William Dean Johnston. Johnston was a 62-year resident of Orange County, mostly in Santa Ana where he worked as both Second President of the County Farm Bureau and the Secretary and Manager of the Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company in Santa Ana for over 25 years. Johnston divorced his second wife Ruth L. Johnston in 1940-41 and she retained the home. Mrs. Johnston later sold the property in 1942 to Frank and Catherine McClellan. The W.D. Johnston House is a two-story single-family residence constructed in the Georgian/Federal variant of the Colonial Revival architectural style. Symmetrical in design, the house is clad in red brick and consists of a three bay wide, two story block and a small, one story, one -bay extension set back on the west elevation. A medium - pitched, side -gabled roof with enclosed soffits in the modest overhangs and asphalt shingle cladding tops the main volume. In the central bay of the fagade, (south elevation), a prominent entry portico consists of stylized Doric columns and pilasters that rise to molded frieze, flat roof with enclosed soffit, and X-patterned balustrade. The entry features a six -panel wood entry door framed by an elliptical fanlight and sidelights. Multi -paned casement windows with an elliptical fanlight flank the entry porch in the side bays of the lower story. Paired six -over -one, double -hung, wood windows in the side bays and multi -paned French doors in the central bay, all framed by shutters, characterize the second story fenestration. Similar double -hung wood windows also appear on the north, east, and west elevations, all featuring a "Iamb tongue" detailing. Brick detailing at the openings includes soldier and header brick courses. A rebuilt brick chimney is centered at the west elevation, towards the side gable ridgeline. The property includes a one-story addition, brick clad and topped by a balustrade, on the west elevation that has taken on significance over time and is within the period of significance of the style. A driveway to the east of the property leads to a detached, one-story, side -gabled garage, built at the same time as the residence. The front setback is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and a hedge -lined brick pathway that curves towards the junction of the driveway and sidewalk. BittdftLRedources Commission 35--260 21I15/2022 HRCA No. 2021-21, HRC 2021-21, HPPA No. 2021-21 — W.D. Johnston House November 4, 2021 Page 3 Character -defining features of the W.D. Johnston House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: roof configuration, materials, and treatment (medium - pitched side gabled roof, enclosed soffits); massing and composition (two-story block design; symmetry); portico, brick exterior walls trimmed with wood; fenestration (entry door with elliptical fan and sidelights and original wood windows); architectural detailing (columns, frieze, balustrades, red brick detailing, and window shutters); brick entry pathway; and the one-story garage. The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. Mills Act Agreement Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner's voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property's assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include: • Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • Allows for a mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation • Provides additional incentive for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discourages inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement. Public Notification The subject site is located within the Floral Park Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of BibtdOcLftdources Commission 35-361 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-21, HRC 2021-21, HPPA No. 2021-21 — W.D. Johnston House November 4, 2021 Page 4 this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 — Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2021-101 will be filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,524.60 annually, for a period of not less than ten years. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2. Mills Act Agreement 3. 500-Foot Radius Map Submitted By: Pedro Gomez, AICP, Associate Planner Approved By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency, Planning and Building Agency BibtdOcLftdources Commission 35--462 21115/2022 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-21 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2445 NORTH PARK BOULEVARD, SANTA ANA, ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2021-21 PLACING SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE KEY CATEGORY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 4, 2021, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-21) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2021-21) of the W.D. Johnston House located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Santa Ana. B. The W.D. Johnston House has distinctive architectural features of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style and was built in 1927. C. The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Identifying features of this style include its two-story massing, symmetry, classically inspired detailing, formal portico, elliptical fanlights, and multi -paned fenestration. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the W.D. Johnston House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: roof configuration, materials, and treatment (medium -pitched side gabled roof, enclosed soffits); massing and composition (two-story block design; symmetry); portico, brick exterior walls trimmed with wood; fenestration (entry door with elliptical fan and sidelights and original wood windows); architectural detailing (columns, frieze, balustrades, red brick detailing, and window shutters); brick entry pathway; and the one-story garage. D. The legal owner of the property is Andrew Dawson. E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Bittd@icLftdources Commission 35-563 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. G. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the Contributive category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-101 will be filed for this project. Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves: A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-21 to place the W.D. Johnston House located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, and B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-21 placing the W.D. Johnston House located at 2445 North Park Boulevard, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Contributive category. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled "Historical Property Description," and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description" is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. ADOPTED this 4t" day of November, 2021. Tim Rush Chairperson 6ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 35-664 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: (� John fJl. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: Commission members NOES: Commission members ABSTAIN: Commission members NOT PRESENT: Commission members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 4, 2021. Date: Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 6ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 35- 765 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN Address Legal Description Owner Names 002-063-20 2445 North Park REAL PROPERTY IN THE Andrew Dawson Boulevard CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 31 OF TRACT 755, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGES(S) 33, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Bib)cOcLftdources Commission 35-866 20MV 2W I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY W.D. Johnston House 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME W.D. Johnston House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2445 North Park Boulevard CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1927 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE �5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival The most universal of all American domestic building styles, the Colonial Revival has been popular since the 1876 Centennial celebration in Philadelphia stimulated a patriotic interest in the American architectural past. Beginning in the second half of the 1930s, and continuing in the two decades following World War II, the late Colonial Revival departed from the more literal historicism of the previous half -century and was often reduced to a few signature elements. These features include stylized door surrounds; pseudo-quoined corners; multi -paned casement or double -hung sash windows, often framed by decorative shutters; circular, oval, or octagonal accent windows; and eaves nearly flush with the exterior walls. A hipped roof subtype sometimes contained Regency references such as bow and bay windows. Another popular subtype was split-level, ranch, or Cape Cod in appearance and plan, and normally topped by gabled roofs. The materials used in the late Colonial Revival were similar to those of the earlier period —wood, brick, stone, and stucco —although stucco came to be used more frequently than before (McAlester 1984, 320-339). SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation. BittdftLRedources Commission 35-967 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) W.D. Johnston House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 31 2015 *c. Address 2445 North Park Boulevard City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-063-20 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The W.D. Johnston House is a two-story single-family residence constructed in the Georgian/Federal variant of the Colonial Revival architectural style. Symmetrical in design, the house is clad in red brick and consists of a three bay wide, two story block and a small, one story, one -bay extension set back on the west elevation. A medium -pitched, side -gabled roof with enclosed soffits in the modest overhangs and asphalt shingle cladding tops the main volume. In the central bay of the fagade, (south elevation), a prominent entry portico consists of stylized Doric columns and pilasters that rise to molded frieze, flat roof with enclosed soffit, and X-patterned balustrade. The entry features a six -panel wood entry door framed by an elliptical fanlight and sidelights. Multi -paned casement windows with an elliptical fanlight flank the entry porch in the side bays of the lower story. Paired six -over -one, double -hung, wood windows in the side bays and multi -paned French doors in the central bay, all framed by shutters, characterize the second story fenestration. Similar double -hung wood windows also appear on the north, east, and west elevations, all featuring a "lamb tongue" detailing. Brick detailing at the openings includes soldier and header brick courses. A rebuilt brick chimney is centered at the west elevation, towards the side gable ridgeline. The property includes a one-story addition, brick clad and topped by a balustrade, on the west elevation that has taken on significance over time and is within the period of significance of the style. A driveway to the east of the property leads to a detached, one-story, side -gabled garage, built at the same time as the residence. The front setback is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and a hedge -lined brick pathway that curves towards the junction of the driveway and sidewalk. Other than the noted changes, the house appears intact and is in good condition. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ❑Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) South elevation, view north September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19271 City of Santa Ana Building Permits W. Owner and Address: Andrew Dawson 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaaningiral Rarnrrl r1n',ztrirrt Rarnrrl rll inaar Faafiira Rarnrrl 1--I11Ailling Cfnfinn Rarnrrl I-IRnrk Art Rarnrrl ❑Artifa8l LffldW aMt F0GM 1 4t1(Iist) 35-108 2AI5/2022 DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: W.D. Johnston House 131. Historic Name: W.D. Johnston House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): June 20, 1927. Constructed. $13,000. April 6, 1933. Rebuild fireplace chimney. June 9, 1942. Alteration to residence by Reine Chew, contractor. $100. January 19, 2017. Reroof residence and detached garage. $6,100. September 12, 2018. New 195-square-foot swimming pool. $30,000.. September 14, 2018. New detached arbor with lattice roof cover. $4, 500. May 13,2021. Voluntary seismic retrofit. $8,000. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *1310. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1927 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The W.D. Johnston House is architecturally significant for its embodiment of the Georgian/Federal variant of the Colonial Revival style. According to city directories, the first occupant was William Dean Johnston. Johnston was a 62-year resident of Orange County, mostly in Santa Ana where he worked as both Second President of the County Farm Bureau and the Secretary and Manager of the Farmer's Mutual Insurance Copany in Santa Ana for over 25 years. Johnston divorced his second wife Ruth L. Johnston in 1940-41 and she retained the home. Mrs. Johnston later sold the property in 1942 to Frank and Catherine McClellan. During World War 11, Frank McClellan would join the army and serve as an officer. Little information is available regarding occupancy of the residence from 1950-1990's. In early 2000, Cecil and Kathryn Hollon purchased the property, selling it in 2017 to Dion and Leslie Genchi. The property was sold to the current homeowner in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: 1920 Federal Census 1930 Federal Census Santa Ana Register July 29, 1940 (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314.Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers /ChattelInc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map W.D. Johnston House 2445 North Park Boulevard .q (D 063 3i ,e, 33 ,: vs• 19 . 2 73 , 16 s+nr 25 u!e• JS .36 Jj ". J21 3J =* ^u•NO. 754 +ter k> „• I esex1- I I x.r• _ 4 N 2AT512022 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: W.D. Johnston House 'Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 ❑x Continuation ❑ Update *610. Significance (continued): The W.D. Johnston House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of oranges, avocados, and walnuts and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). "Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45,000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival, The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War 11, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, homes in the neighborhoods were mostly developed in the revival styles. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The W.D. Johnston House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Georgian/Federal variant of a Colonial Revival style home. Identifying features of this style include its two-story massing, symmetry, classically inspired detailing, formal portico, elliptical fanlights, and multi -paned fenestration. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Key" because it has distinctive architectural style and quality and is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture. (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the W.D. Johnston House that should be preserved include, but may not be limited to: roof configuration, materials, and treatment (medium -pitched side gabled roof,enclosed soffits); massing and composition (two-story block design;symmetry); portico, brick exterior walls trimmed with wood; fenestration (entry door with elliptical fan and sidelights and original wood windows); architectural detailing (columns, frieze, balustrades, red brick detailing, and window shutters); brick entry pathway; and the one-story garage. *612. References (continued): City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. " Sacramento: March 1995. Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969. "Alison Honer Dies at 84," The Santa Ana Journal, September 21, 1981. "History of Floral Park." http.//www.floral-park.com/page2.html. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1941-1962. Santa Ana Daily Register, April 4, 1923 6it0dftLRe6ources Commission 35 —120 DPR 523L MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 1 35-1a1 V15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2445 North Park Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Bib cOmRedources Commission z 35-142 V15/2022 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 OR# 3523348 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING else raised at the public hearing BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC described in this notice, or in written RESOURCES COMMISSION correspondence delivered to the Historic The City of Santa Ana encourages the Resources Commission or City Council of public to participate in the decision- the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the making process. We encourage you to public hearing. C O PY OF NOTICE contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Si tiene preguntas en espahol, favor de Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667- Historic Resources Commission 2259. Action: The Historic Resources Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, An Commission will hold a Public Hearing to dien thoai cho Tony Lai s6 (714) 565- receive public testimony, and will take 2627. action on the item described below. Their 10/22/21 decision is final unless appealed to the OR-3523348# Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. Ad Description Project Location: 2445 North Park Boulevard (historically known as the W.D. 2445 N. Park Blvd Johnston House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Andrew Dawson Project Description: The applicant is To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-21, ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank ou for usin our news a er. Please y g p p Historic Register Categorization N read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of 21, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-21 to allow the Publication will be filed with the Count Clerk, if required, and mailed to you y q y Placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Key for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property 10/22/2021 Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER - date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an 2021-101 will be filed for this project. Invoice. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Publication $117.80 Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public Total $117.80 may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa- ana.org/pb/meeting-parUcpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments5-sa nta-ana.org Dail Journal Corporation (reference the topic in the subject line) or v p mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 comments is 3:00 p.m, on the day of BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE 951 784-0111 ( ) the meetimay not be received after the deadline may not be distributed to the DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 Commission but will be made part of the record. LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 action(s), including the full text of the SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE 408 287-4866 ( ) discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 hearing at: https:llsanta- ana.pdmegov.com/public/portal. THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 2724747 Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(gbsanta- ana.org or714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone II 35--194 2ff5/2022 * 8 6 9 * m' CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency ` r 20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988 r Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 500 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. Project Location: 2445 North Park Boulevard (historically known as the W.D. Johnston House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Andrew Dawson Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-21, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-21, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-21 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Key for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-101 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting-particpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments ansanta-ana.orq (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Bibtd0cl.Redources Commission 35-175 2/115/2022 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(cD_santa-ana.orq or 714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667-2259. Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, An dien thoai cho Tony Lai so (714) 565-2627. 500' RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP Publish: OC Date: October 22, 2021 BibtdCiet.Redources Commission 35-196 21115/2022 On -Site Posting — 2445 N. Park Blvd. — 10/25/2021 � r ILM NOTICE OF PW_A' 1t , W h BEFORE THE 't A A HISTORIC RESOUR(;Z. �OMM,boSft The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Historic Resources commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive i public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City ` Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. i Project t Location: 2445 North Park Boulevard (historically known as the W.D. Johnston House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Andrew Dawson Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 21, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-21, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-21 to aitow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Key for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-101 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, Please visit www.santa-ana.or ! bmeetin - artic ation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeCommenls(a?santa-ana.org (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submif written comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting- Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made port of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City websiie 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: baps/Isanta- ana. rime ov.coml ublic( ortal. who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez santo-aria or or 714-667-2790 Note: it you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or soone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written Correspondence delivered to the me Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si bone preguntas an espanol, favor de Ilamar a] Angelina eecerra (714) 667-2259. Ntzu clan lien lac bang tiling Viet, cin Elgin thoal cho Tony Lei 58 (114) 566-2627. t- M Bittd tRedources Commission 35 —107 2AI5/2022 On -Site Posting — 244S N. Park Blvd. — 10/2S/2021 Ag_z_ox an ■■� === iaT� we \MM EEO:! Kr N;A MI , wwwwm��,�, l� IN ■ FIS on 11 -S �l �'ldn go all IN 11l ■f�A� II 6ib)cl@icLReiAources Commission 35208 2nv5/2022 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Michelle Helvig, a single woman, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. Exhibit 5 City Council 1 15 — 79 2/15/2022 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 16, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. City Council 2 15 — 80 2/15/2022 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the City Council 3 15 — 81 2/15/2022 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 003-092-24, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying City Council 4 15 — 82 2/15/2022 the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Michelle Helvig 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. City Council 5 15 — 83 2/15/2022 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} City Council 15 — 84 2/15/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: %YI! JOHN . FUNK Sr. Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: MICHELLE HELVIG RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: u OP6 . : Executive Director Planning and Building Agency City Council 15 — 85 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 16 IN BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 378, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 4, OR MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 003-092-24 City Council 15 — 86 2/15/2022 1: oil$T[111:3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Burkett House 2311 N. Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME Burkett House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2311 N. Santiago Street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1926 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Park Santiago CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house is also of interest as it is a unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Park Santiago neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation City Council 15 — 87 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary #. HRI # Trinomial_ NRHP Status Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Burkett House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 31 2015 *c. Address 2311 North Santiago Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 003-092-24 *133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Park Santiago, the Burkett House is a one and a half -story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. The house is of interest as it is influenced by an unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a front -facing gable with wing roof design of high pitch, with roof eaves of little to no overhang, clad in composition shingle roofing. The prominent front -facing gable is located along the north side and features a massive brick chimney with two chimney pots, extending past the roofline. The entryway is characterized by a non -original full - light wood front door, accessed via a brick front porch walkway. Fenestration consists of multi -paned casement windows used on the primary elevation framed with shutters, while four -over -four double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. Along the primary elevation, the second floor features a wide shed dormer with four multi -paned casement windows, also framed by shutters. The property is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and curved brick walkway through the front setback. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in clapboard siding. Other than the noted changes, the house appears intact and is in good condition. *133b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other P5a. Photo West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19261 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Michelle Helvig 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: Noveember 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information City Council 15 — 88 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: Burkett House 131. Historic Name: Burkett House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): January 28, 1926. Constructed. $7,000. June 27, 1944. Fixtures for Mrs. Burkett by G. Cocking. $75. August 11, 1972. Heater by Pacific Heating. June 28, 1982. Water heater, backflow for M/M Wenot by Ron Riegling. November 3, 1997. Tear off existing roofing and apply new comp shingle. $5,200. September 29, 2021. Voluntary foundation strapping. $22,000. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. 139a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Santora Land Co. *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1926 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Burkett House is architecturally significant as a unusual example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1926, and was valued at approximately $7,000 according to the original building permit. Constructed by Santora Land Company., the house remained under its original ownership for nearly three decades. The first recorded owners and occupants were Frederick A. Burkett, who went by F.A. Burkett'; and Mabel Lillian Burkett. Mr. Burkett was involved in oil and was superintendent of various oil companies near Huntington Beach, CA. Mrs. Burkett was very active in Santa Ana women's organizations such as Ebell and hosted "section events" in the home. The home was featured in the Santa Ana Register on Thursday June 2, 1927, "as an attractive home of Santa Ana." The Burkett's children, Fred Jr. Eleanor, Sarah Jane and JoAnn were socially and academically active and attended Southern California universities. The Burkett's filed homestead on the property in 1958 and the home remained in the family for several years after the deaths of Fred Sr. and Mabel. Since then, the Burkett House has been occupied by various owners until the current homeowner purchased the home in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) 1311. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattellnc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map Burkett House 211311 North Santiago Street �7 27 28 �l 1D 31 3a Asr 1 sn So 1 �p r l w Q ` a 1 7 28 T9 30 Jr 32 .7J 34 I35 .36 ]b I � 18 19 27'SSy� 22 33 24 1 21378 AVENEC o _ r a City Council 15-89 2/15/2022 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: Burkett House *Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 El Continuation ❑ Update *1310. Significance (continued): The Burkett House is located in the Santiago Park neighborhood. The neighborhood is bounded by Santiago Creek and Park on the north, East Seventeenth Street on the south, North Lincoln Avenue on the east, North Main Street on the west, and the 1-5 freeway on the southwest. In large part these boundaries reflect the transportation lines that were constructed towards the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, when the Pacific Electric interurban railroad ran up Main Street; the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe tracks followed Lincoln; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way mirrored the freeway route. This area remained primarily agricultural well into the 1920s. As of 1905, the city directories listed around twenty households on East Santa Clara, Twentieth Street, "C Street" (now North Santiago Street), North Bush Street and North Main Avenue, the only streets in the area at the time. The vast majority of the residents were ranchers. By 1911, the number of households had increased to about thirty, and Edgewood Road and Valencia Street had been partially laid out, but most residents continued to list "rancher" or "fruit grower" as their occupation in the city directories. This pattern of land use was evident on the 1912 plat map of the City, which illustrated two small, Craftsman era subdivisions along Bush north of Santa Clara and on Valencia and Poinsettia south of Twentieth Street, with the remaining area divided into larger, agricultural parcels held by approximately forty landowners. While the area east of Santiago Street was not subdivided until after the mid-1920s, most of the present day streets west of Santiago had been laid out when the City was mapped in 1923. Ranching continued to be the most prevalent occupation in the neighborhood, but increasing numbers of professionals, small business owners, merchants, and people in service professions such as painters, electricians, and carpenters made their homes in the western half of the neighborhood during the 1920s and 1930s. The area also attracted several city and county officials, including the City Attorney (Z. B. West, Jr., 321 East Santa Clara Avenue), County Supervisor, First District (C. H. Chapman, 2315 North Santiago Street), County Surveyor (E. H. Irwin, 2407 North Santiago Street), and County Auditor (William C. Jerome, 2422 Poinsettia Street). By April 1942, when the Sanborn Company first mapped the western half of the area, most of the lots had been improved with single-family homes, many in the revival styles popular during the 1920s and 1930s. Subsequent development of the eastern half of the neighborhood and infill construction in the western half displayed the simplified ranch style that emerged following World War ll. The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house displays characteristics of the Tudor Revival through its high pitched multi gabled roof, shallow eaves, asymmetrical massing, multi -paned windows and prominent brick chimney. The house is also of interest as it is a unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it `contributes to the overall character and history" of the Santiago Park neighborhood and is a good example of period architecture, " representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the house include the one and a half -story massing, high pitched and side gabled roof, massive chimney; dormers; clapboard siding; roof eaves with little to no overhang; and multi -paned, casement windows framed with shutters. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. " Sacramento: March 1995. Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry. com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. City Council DPR 523L 15-90 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with City Council 1 15 — 91 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. City Council 2 15 — 92 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency Item # 4 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Historic Resources Commission Staff Report November 4, 2021 Topic: HRCA No. 2021-23, HRC 2021-22, HPPA No. 2021-22 — The Burkett House RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 23 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-22 (Exhibit 1). 2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with Michelle Helvig, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Exhibit 2). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Michelle Helvig is requesting approval to designate an existing residence located at 2311 North Santiago Street to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, as well as approval to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana. DISCUSSION Project Location and Site Description The subject property is located on the east side of North Santiago Street in the Park Santiago neighborhood. The site contains a 2,240-square-foot, Tudor Revival style residence and detached garage on a 6,500-square-foot residential lot (Exhibit 3). Analysis of the Issues Historical Listing In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails BittdOcLftdources Commission 45-193 2/115/2022 102119 HRCA No. 2021-23, HRC 2021-22, HPPA No. 2021-22 — Burkett House November 4, 2021 Page 2 applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old. The structure identified meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as the structure is 95 years old and is a good example of period architecture. No known code violations exist on record for this property. The Burkett House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1926, and was valued at approximately $7,000 according to the original building permit. Constructed by Santora Land Company, the house remained under its original ownership for nearly three decades. The first recorded owners and occupants were Frederick A. Burkett, who went by "F.A. Burkett," and Mabel Lillian Burkett. Mr. Burkett was involved in oil and was superintendent of various oil companies near Huntington Beach. Mrs. Burkett was very active in Santa Ana women's organizations such as Ebell and hosted "section events" in the home. The Burkett House is a one and a half -story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. The house is of interest as it is influenced by an unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a front -facing gable with wing roof design of high pitch, with roof eaves of little to no overhang, clad in composition shingle roofing. The prominent front - facing gable is located along the north side and features a massive brick chimney with two chimney pots, extending past the roofline. The entryway is characterized by a non - original full -light wood front door, accessed via a brick front porch walkway. Fenestration consists of multi -paned casement windows used on the primary elevation framed with shutters, while four -over -four double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. Along the primary elevation, the second floor features a wide shed dormer with four multi -paned casement windows, also framed by shutters. The property is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and curved brick walkway through the front setback. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in clapboard siding. Character -defining features of the house include the one and a half -story massing, high pitched and side gabled roof; massive chimney; dormers; clapboard siding; roof eaves with little to no overhang; and multi -paned, casement windows framed with shutters. The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house displays characteristics of the Tudor Revival through its high-pitched multi gabled roof, shallow eaves, asymmetrical massing, multi -paned windows and prominent brick chimney. The house is also of interest as it is an unusual example of Tudor Revival 8ibtdOcLftdources Commission 45-294 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-23, HRC 2021-22, HPPA No. 2021-22 — Burkett House November 4, 2021 Page 3 featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Santiago Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Mills Act Agreement Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner's voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property's assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include: • Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • Allows for a mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation • Provides additional incentive for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discourages inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement. Public Notification The subject site is located within the Park Santiago Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 — Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions BittdOcLftdources Commission 45-395 2ff5/2022 HRCA No. 2021-23, HRC 2021-22, HPPA No. 2021-22 — Burkett House November 4, 2021 Page 4 are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2021-102 will be filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,033.73 annually, for a period of not less than ten years. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2. Mills Act Agreement 3. 500-Foot Radius Map Submitted By: Pedro Gomez, AICP, Associate Planner Approved By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency, Planning and Building Agency BibtdOcLftdources Commission 45--496 2/115/2022 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-23 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2311 NORTH SANTIAGO STREET, SANTA ANA, ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2021-22 PLACING SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTIVE CATEGORY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 4, 2021, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-23) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2021-22) of the Burkett House located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana. B. The Burkett House has distinctive architectural features of the Tudor Revival style and was built in 1926. C. The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house displays characteristics of the Tudor Revival through its high-pitched multi gabled roof, shallow eaves, asymmetrical massing, multi -paned windows and prominent brick chimney. The house is also of interest as it is an unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Santiago Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Character -defining features of the house include the one and a half -story massing, high pitched and side gabled roof; massive chimney; dormers; clapboard siding; roof eaves with little to no overhang; and multi -paned, casement windows framed with shutters. D. The legal owner of the property is Michelle Helvig. E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 8ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 45-597 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. G. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the Contributive category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(3) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-102 will be filed for this project. Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves: A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-23 to place the Burkett House located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, and B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-22 placing the Burkett House located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Contributive category. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled "Historical Property Description," and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description" is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. ADOPTED this 4t" day of November, 2021. Tim Rush Chairperson 6ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 45-698 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:� John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Commission members Commission members Commission members Commission members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 4, 2021. Date: Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 8ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 45799 2/Iv5/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN Address Legal Description Owner Names 003-092-24 2311 North Santiago THE LAND REFERRED TO Michelle Helvig Street HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 16 IN BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 378, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 4, OR MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Bib)cOcLftdources Commission 45--8100 20MV 2W I MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Michelle Helvig, a single woman, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. Bib)cOcLRedources Commission 1 45-9101 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on January 19, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other parry. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. BittoDci.Redources Commission 2 45-1002 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the Bib c1 icLRe9ources Commission 3 45-1103 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2311 North Santiago Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 003-092-24, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Bib)c0ci-Redources Commission 4 45-1204 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Michelle Helvig 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. Bib c0ci-Redources Commission 5 45-1305 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} Bib cOiei.Redources Commission 6 46-1406 2ff5/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: JOHN M. FUNK Assistant City Attorney MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: MICHELLE HELVIG RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Bib)cO Redources Commission 45-1507 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 16 IN BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 378, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 4, OR MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 003-092-24 Bib cOmRedources Commission 8 45-1608 2ff5/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Burkett House 2311 N. Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME Burkett House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2311 N. Santiago Street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1926 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Park Santiago CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE �5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house is also of interest as it is a unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Park Santiago neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation BittdftLRedources Commission 45-1709 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Burkett House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: -March 31 2015 *c. Address 2311 North Santiago Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 003-092-24 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Park Santiago, the Burkett House is a one and a half -story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. The house is of interest as it is influenced by an unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a front -facing gable with wing roof design of high pitch, with roof eaves of little to no overhang, clad in composition shingle roofing. The prominent front -facing gable is located along the north side and features a massive brick chimney with two chimney pots, extending past the roofline. The entryway is characterized by a non -original full - light wood front door, accessed via a brick front porch walkway. Fenestration consists of multi -paned casement windows used on the primary elevation framed with shutters, while four -over -four double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. Along the primary elevation, the second floor features a wide shed dormer with four multi -paned casement windows, also framed by shutters. The property is simply landscaped with a lawn, low vegetation and curved brick walkway through the front setback. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in clapboard siding. Other than the noted changes, the house appears intact and is in good condition. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19261 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Michelle Helvig 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: Noveember 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information Bit0cftLRedources Commission 45 —1810 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: Burkett House 131. Historic Name: Burkett House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): January 28, 1926. Constructed. $7,000. June 27, 1944. Fixtures for Mrs. Burkett by G. Cocking. $75. August 11, 1972. Heater by Pacific Heating. June 28, 1982. Water heater, backflow for M/M Wenot by Ron Riegling. November 3, 1997. Tear off existing roofing and apply new comp shingle. $5, 200. September 29, 2021. Voluntary foundation strapping. $22,000. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Santora Land Co. *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1926 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Burkett House is architecturally significant as a unusual example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1926, and was valued at approximately $7,000 according to the original building permit. Constructed by Santora Land Company., the house remained under its original ownership for nearly three decades. The first recorded owners and occupants were Frederick A. Burkett, who went by "F.A. Burkett'; and Mabel Lillian Burkett. Mr. Burkett was involved in oil and was superintendent of various oil companies near Huntington Beach, CA. Mrs. Burkett was very active in Santa Ana women's organizations such as Ebell and hosted "section events" in the home. The home was featured in the Santa Ana Register on Thursday June 2, 1927, "as an attractive home of Santa Ana." The Burkett's children, Fred Jr. Eleanor, Sarah Jane and JoAnn were socially and academically active and attended Southern California universities. The Burkett's filed homestead on the property in 1958 and the home remained in the family for several years after the deaths of Fred Sr. and Mabel. Since then, the Burkett House has been occupied by various owners until the current homeowner purchased the home in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattel Inc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map Burkett House 2311 North Santiago Street {{7� A 5V ` ]0• o 7 . is 3P IJr 32 33 r34 35 y 36 A it 18 19 2�� 121 22 23.:�� 30 s5• 1 � i I _ A VFNW a r a BittcftLftdources Commission 45 —1911 2nv5/2o22 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: Burkett House 'Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 ❑x Continuation ❑ Update *610. Significance (continued): The Burkett House is located in the Santiago Park neighborhood. The neighborhood is bounded by Santiago Creek and Park on the north, East Seventeenth Street on the south, North Lincoln Avenue on the east, North Main Street on the west, and the 1-5 freeway on the southwest. In large part these boundaries reflect the transportation lines that were constructed towards the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, when the Pacific Electric interurban railroad ran up Main Street, the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe tracks followed Lincoln; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way mirrored the freeway route. This area remained primarily agricultural well into the 1920s. As of 1905, the city directories listed around twenty households on East Santa Clara, Twentieth Street, "C Street" (now North Santiago Street), North Bush Street and North Main Avenue, the only streets in the area at the time. The vast majority of the residents were ranchers. By 1911, the number of households had increased to about thirty, and Edgewood Road and Valencia Street had been partially laid out, but most residents continued to list "rancher" or "fruit grower" as their occupation in the city directories. This pattern of land use was evident on the 1912 plat map of the City, which illustrated two small, Craftsman era subdivisions along Bush north of Santa Clara and on Valencia and Poinsettia south of Twentieth Street, with the remaining area divided into larger, agricultural parcels held by approximately forty landowners. While the area east of Santiago Street was not subdivided until after the mid-1920s, most of the present day streets west of Santiago had been laid out when the City was mapped in 1923. Ranching continued to be the most prevalent occupation in the neighborhood, but increasing numbers of professionals, small business owners, merchants, and people in service professions such as painters, electricians, and carpenters made their homes in the western half of the neighborhood during the 1920s and 1930s. The area also attracted several city and county officials, including the City Attorney (Z. B. West, Jr., 321 East Santa Clara Avenue), County Supervisor, First District (C. H. Chapman, 2315 North Santiago Street), County Surveyor (E. H. Irwin, 2407 North Santiago Street), and County Auditor (William C. Jerome, 2422 Poinsettia Street). By April 1942, when the Sanborn Company first mapped the western half of the area, most of the lots had been improved with single-family homes, many in the revival styles popular during the 1920s and 1930s. Subsequent development of the eastern half of the neighborhood and infill construction in the western half displayed the simplified ranch style that emerged following World War ll. The Burkett House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact and representative example of a Tudor Revival style home. The house displays characteristics of the Tudor Revival through its high pitched multi gabled roof, shallow eaves, asymmetrical massing, multi -paned windows and prominent brick chimney. The house is also of interest as it is a unusual example of Tudor Revival featuring clapboard siding. The Burkett House has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Santiago Park neighborhood and `is a good example of period architecture, "representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the house include the one and a half -story massing, high pitched and side gabled roof, massive chimney; dormers; clapboard siding; roof eaves with little to no overhang; and multi -paned, casement windows framed with shutters. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry. com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. 6it0dftLRe6ources Commission 45-2012 DPR 523L 2AI5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 1 452113 2ff5/2022 10 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2311 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Bib cOmRedources Commission z 452214 2ff5/2022 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 OR# 3523337 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING else raised at the public hearing BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC described in this notice, or in written RESOURCES COMMISSION correspondence delivered to the Historic The City of Santa Ana encourages the Resources Commission or City Council of public to participate in the decision- the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the making process. We encourage you to public hearing. C O PY OF NOTICE contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Si tiene preguntas en espahol, favor de Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667- Historic Resources Commission 2259. Action: The Historic Resources Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, An Commission will hold a Public Hearing to dien thoai cho Tony Lai s6 (714) 565- receive public testimony, and will take 2627. action on the item described below. Their 10/22/21 decision is final unless appealed to the OR-3523337# Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. Ad Description Project Location: 2311 North Santiago Street (historically known as the Burkett 2311 N. Santiago House) located in the Single Family g Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Michelle Helvig Project Description: The applicant is To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-23, ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using newspaper. Please y g our news p p Historic Register Categorization No. 2021- read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of 22, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-22 to allow the Publication will be filed with the Count Clerk, if required, and mailed to you y q y Placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic 10/22/2021 Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER - date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an 2021-102 will be filed for this project. Invoice. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Publication $117.80 Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public Total $117.80 may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa- ana.org/pb/meeting-parUcpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments5-sa nta-ana.org Dail Journal Corporation (reference the topic in the subject line) or v p mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE 951 784-0111 ( ) the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 Commission but will be made part of the record. LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 action(s), including the full text of the SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE 408 287-4866 ( ) discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 hearing at: https:llsanta- ana.pdmegov.com/public/portal. THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 2724747 Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(gbsanta- ana.org or714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone II 46-2416 2ff5/2022 * 8 6 4 * -M1111�: ---_-i CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 500 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. Project Location: 2311 North Santiago Street (historically known as the Burkett House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Michelle Helvig Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-23, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-22, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-22 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-102 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting-particpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments(a)santa-ana.org (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santahttps://santa-anaprimegov.com/public/portal./public/portal. BiNdOicl-Redources Commission 45-2517 2/115/2022 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(asanta-ana.org or 714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Pedro Gomez al (714) 667-2790. Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, An dien thoai cho Tony Lai so (714) 565-2627. 500' RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP Publish: OC Reporter Date: October 22, 2021 IL 4 12,2 `2PS A 6ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 45-2618 2/115/2022 On -Site Posting — 2311 N. Santiago Street — 10.25.21 NOTICE OF Pk;Z�LIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA STORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION HI in the d The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate f I ou have elm process. We encoufage you to contact its prior to the public Hearing y questions. c Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources commission will hold a Public Hearing re HistoriCit ibed below. Their decision is final unless appealed too Cif public testimony, and will take action on the item descrthe Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group. 2311 North Santiago Street (historically known as the Burkett House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. i protect 0asdri�The applicantle requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 23, Historic Register Calegodzalion No. 2021-22, and Historic Property Preservation Agraement No. 2021-22 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Prepertles as with the City of15anta far the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation AgosePee Environmental impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Ctuality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review antler Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource RestomtionfRehabilitationl, as this action Is designed to preserve a historic resource- Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-102 will be filed for this project. Meetlnp Detalls: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4, 2021, at 4:30 p... In the CityCounoll Chambers, 22 Clvic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in - person or join via Zap.. For the most up to dale information on haw to participate virtually in this meeting, please Vim —Sa0la-a o.roblmeegna-oars-anon Written Com ants: If you are unable to pertlolpete in the meeting, you may send written comments by a -mail M PNAeCommentsfi4sante.ana ero (reference the topic In the gab,—t in.) or all to saran aemal, Recording Secretary, City qi Santa Ana, 20 Civic center Plaza — M20. Santa Arai, CA 92701. Deavel— to submit rvrrften manta is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeNeg. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed tq the Commission but will be made part of the raced. Wbere To Get U.I. Infomneaom Additional del ills f ,sding the proposed ecllon(s(, Including the full text of the di screlionary Itgm. may be lound on the City webelte 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https l/santa- �aaavrnmlouhl'rJood I Who To Cpntapt Fpr p d : Should yov have any quesllons, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning say Bedding Agency at PGomesanla om z®ar 714-667-2790 Note; If you challenge the decis11 on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or e else raised at Ice public hearing deauibed In This nottca, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commissdn or Clty Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prier to, the publlc hearing_ al bens ores antes an eapahol, favor da liamer al Angeliha Became (714( 667-2259. N@u c5n non lac b$ng a6ng Viet, zln diQn thopi cho Tony Lei ad (714( 666-2627. �� Z Bib)cOcLftdources Commission 452719 V15/2022 On -Site Posting — 2311 N. Santiago Street — 10.25.21 Ii ��It _ate �L-1-2 `- _ .�ti" � �,` bra '� �r� '� tea.. �� � _ ��' � � �.-;M� 4" 1 a r' a �`•,;,. ,� _ t 5F!_•w � _ Ry Ry .�SNa$. a L�d,'yh .�.ef w �.u,,w' .�.� ra'�-.e it�' '•^x I j ° A J '".��,ya���t � {1 ��� ���5adal ��Fi Y .,y2�.�{,[-,;'�<. � tK r ��_ �\- - _ - � t 'Oi :t b "fi�rs lr °i 1 NOTICE OE 1WINO e + �Y^ ye�y#�.d �L o- �RIc1gEio WCEs MlaalON �r��,,Y '`. z'x zz °a BibtdOcLftdources Commission 452820 V15/2022 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Behzad Samavati and Deanna Kashani, husband and wife as community property with right of survivorship, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. City Council 1 15 — 121 2/15/2022 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 16, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. City Council 2 15 — 122 2/15/2022 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the City Council 3 15 — 123 2/15/2022 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2397 North Flower Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-073-10, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying City Council 4 15 — 124 2/15/2022 the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Behzad Samavati and Deanna Kashani 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. City Council 5 15 — 125 2/15/2022 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} City Council 6 15 — 126 2/15/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: ' %W JOHN M. FUNK Sr. Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: BEHZAD SAMAVATI RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency City Council 15 — 127 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 53 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-073-10 City Council 15 — 128 2/15/2022 Exhibit B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY H.A. Smith House 2397 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME H.A. Smith House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2397 N. Flower street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1931 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation City Council 15 — 129 2/15/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary #. HRI # Trinomial_ NRHP Status Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) H.A. Smith House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 31 2015 *c. Address 2397 North Flower Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-073-10 *133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Floral Park, the H.A. Smith House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a steeply pitched roof clad in composition shingle roofing. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled stucco. The three -bay fagade features a central, slightly recessed, wooden entry door and brick entrance stoop, tucked beneath the extended south rake of the projecting front gable wing that rests on an attached brick pier. A tapered, slightly raised chimney bisects the front gable and is capped by a course of bricks. Single, eight -light casement windows flanking the chimney. A triple casement window is located further to the north, beneath a side -gabled portion of the roof. Recessed on the south elevation, another side gable tops a projecting wing that contains a large, square, single -light fixed window on its fagade. Fenestration on the side and rear elevations consists of multi - paned casement windows. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, lawn, low vegetation and a curved walkway lined by hedges connecting the front porch and driveway. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in stucco. Alterations to the house include the additions of canvas awnings to the front entry and side elevation windows and rebuilding of the front stairs and stoop. The house appears intact and is in good condition. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 1931/ City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Arch ❑ArtifacGi46�GQ1.lml✓Fiotograph Record ❑ Other (list) 15 - 130 2/15/2022 DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: H.A. Smith House 131. Historic Name: H.A. Smith House 132. Common Name: Same B3. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): October 29, 1931. Constructed. $3,500. April 23, 1956. Termite repairs for C.H. Fuller by C.C. McLaughlin. $230. August 1, 1957. Repair fire damage for J. Stodola by Marshall Welty. $2,000. August 8, 1957. Plastering for J. Stodola by Hart. October 22, 1962. Extend garage by J. Stodola. $200. July 6, 1989. Re -roof with tear -off of residence and detached garage. March 15, 2016. Tear -off existing roof and install new comp. shingles. $16,960. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Roy Russell *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1931 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C13 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The H.A. Smith House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival architectural style. It was built in 1931 for $3, 500 by prominent developer and builder Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965). Along with developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), Roy Russell was credited as a subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The H.A. Smith House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. H.A. Smith in 1932 and they lived on the property until mid-1950s. The property was sold to C.H. Fuller in 1955, who briefly resided on the property before selling it to J. Stodola in 1957. Little information is available regarding occupancy of the residence from 1960-1990's. However, during the 1990s Steven and Kathleen Cooper bought the property and resided there until 2021, when the property was sold to the current homeowners. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) 1311. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattellnc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map H.A. Smith House 2397 North Flower Street AL 10rROPE A 73 oQ O awe = o z � � n 10} 3 & 52 i io 46 0is455 6 0is 5-a7 _ 20 °i3 5 555 5, o` 0L NO. 759 ik FLOWR a City Council 15 — 131 2/15/2022 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: H.A. Smith House *Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November 4, 2021 El Continuation ❑ Update *1310. Significance (continued): The H.A. Smith House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). `Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45, 000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War Il, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, homes in the neighborhood were mostly developed in the revival style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. The steeply pitched, complex roof, asymmetrical massing, prominent chimney, and multi - paned windows are characteristics of this style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and is a good example of period architecture, " representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the house include its steeply pitched complex gable roof with no overhangs; multi -paned casement windows used on all elevations with fabric awnings; recessed entry; stucco exterior walls with brick trim, and prominent chimney. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. " Sacramento: March 1995. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry. com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 191 Z 1923, 1932, and 1955. City Council DPR 523L 15 — 132 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with City Council 1 15 — 133 2/15/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. City Council 2 15 — 134 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency Item # 5 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Historic Resources Commission Staff Report November 4, 2021 Topic: HRCA No. 2021-24, HRC 2021-23, HPPA No. 2021-23 — The H.A. Smith House RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021- 24 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-23 (Exhibit 1). 2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Exhibit 2). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati are requesting approval to designate an existing residence located at 2397 North Flower Street to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, as well as approval to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana. DISCUSSION Project Location and Site Description The subject property is located on the east side of North Flower Street in the Floral Park neighborhood. The site contains a 1,423-square-foot, Tudor Revival style residence and detached garage on a 6,000-square-foot residential lot (Exhibit 3). Analysis of the Issues Historical Listing In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site BibtdOcLftdources Commission 55-1135 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-24, HRC 2021-23, HPPA No. 2021-23 — H.A. Smith House November 4, 2021 Page 2 having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old. The structure identified meets the minimum selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as the structure is 90 years old and is a good example of period architecture. No known code violations exist on record for this property. The H.A. Smith House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival architectural style. It was built in 1931 for $3,500 by prominent developer and builder Roy Roscoe Russell. The H.A. Smith House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. H.A. Smith in 1932 who lived on the property until mid-1950s. The property was sold to C.H. Fuller in 1955 who briefly resided on the property before selling it to J. Stodola in 1957. The H.A. Smith House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a steeply pitched roof clad in composition shingle roofing. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled stucco. The three -bay fagade features a central, slightly recessed, wooden entry door and brick entrance stoop, tucked beneath the extended south rake of the projecting front gable wing that rests on an attached brick pier. A tapered, slightly raised chimney bisects the front gable and is capped by a course of bricks. Single, eight -light casement windows flanking the chimney. A triple casement window is located further to the north, beneath a side -gabled portion of the roof. Recessed on the south elevation, another side gable tops a projecting wing that contains a large, square, single -light fixed window on its fagade. Fenestration on the side and rear elevations consists of multi -paned casement windows. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, lawn, low vegetation and a curved walkway lined by hedges connecting the front porch and driveway. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in stucco. Alterations to the house include the additions of canvas awnings to the front entry and side elevation windows and rebuilding of the front stairs and stoop. The house appears intact and is in good condition. Character -defining features of the house include its steeply pitched complex gable roof with no overhangs; multi -paned casement windows used on all elevations with fabric awnings; recessed entry; stucco exterior walls with brick trim, and prominent chimney. The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. The steeply pitched, complex roof, asymmetrical massing, prominent chimney, and multi -paned BittdftLRedources Commission 56-2136 2/115/2022 HRCA No. 2021-24, HRC 2021-23, HPPA No. 2021-23 — H.A. Smith House November 4, 2021 Page 3 windows are characteristics of this style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana Mills Act Agreement Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner's voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property's assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include: • Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • Allows for a mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation • Provides additional incentive for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discourages inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement. Public Notification The subject site is located within the Floral Park Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 — Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions BittdOcLftdources Commission 55-3137 21I15/2022 HRCA No. 2021-24, HRC 2021-23, HPPA No. 2021-23 — H.A. Smith House November 4, 2021 Page 4 are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2021-103 will be filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,085.70 annually, for a period of not less than ten years. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution 2. Mills Act Agreement 3. 500-Foot Radius Map Submitted By: Pedro Gomez, AICP, Associate Planner Approved By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency, Planning and Building Agency BibtdOcLftdources Commission 55--4138 2/115/2022 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2021-24 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2397 NORTH FLOWER STREET, SANTA ANA, ON THE HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2021-23 PLACING SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTIVE CATEGORY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 4, 2021, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-24) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2021-23) of the H.A. Smith located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana. B. The H.A. Smith has distinctive architectural features of the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival architectural style and was built in 1931. C. The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. The steeply pitched, complex roof, asymmetrical massing, prominent chimney, and multi -paned windows are characteristics of this style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the house include its steeply pitched complex gable roof with no overhangs; multi -paned casement windows used on all elevations with fabric awnings; recessed entry; stucco exterior walls with brick trim, and prominent chimney. D. The legal owners of the property are Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati. E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Bittd@icLftdources Commission 55-5139 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. G. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the Contributive category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(3) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-103 will be filed for this project. Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves: A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-24 to place the H.A. Smith located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, and B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-23 placing the H.A. Smith located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Contributive category. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled "Historical Property Description," and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled "Historical Property Description" is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder's Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029. ADOPTED this 4t" day of November, 2021. Tim Rush Chairperson Bibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 55-6140 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:7°� John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: Commission members NOES: Commission members ABSTAIN: Commission members NOT PRESENT: Commission members CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 4, 2021. Date: Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana 8ibtd@icLRe9ources Commission 557141 2/115/2022 Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 4 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN Address Legal Description Owner Names 002-073-10 2397 North Flower Street REAL PROPERTY IN THE Deanna Kashani CITY OF SANTA ANA, and Behzad COUNTY OF ORANGE, Samavati STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 53 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Resolution No. 2021-XXX BibtdOcLftdources Commission 55-8142 20MV 2W I MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Behzad Samavati and Deanna Kashani, husband and wife as community property with right of survivorship, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. RECITALS A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity. B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2397 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the "Historic Property". C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. Bib)cO Redources Commission 1 55-9143 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on January 19, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other parry. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. BittoDci.Redources Commission 2 05-1044 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 1/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the Bib cOiei_Redources Commission 3 55-1145 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2397 North Flower Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-073-10, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Bib)cOiei-Redources Commission 4 56-1246 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Behzad Samavati and Deanna Kashani 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 5 55-1347 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows} Bib cOiei.Redources Commission 6 55-1448 2ff5/2022 ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council OWNER Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: JOHN M. FUNK Assistant City Attorney MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager By: BEHZAD SAMAVATI By: DEANNA KASHANI RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Bib)cO Redources Commission 55-1549 2ff5/2022 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 53 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-073-10 BibtdOoLRedources Commission 8 55-1650 2ff5/2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY H.A. Smith House 2397 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME H.A. Smith House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2397 N. Flower street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1931 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE �5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation Bit0cftLRedources Commission 55--1751 2AI5/2022 State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) H.A. Smith House Date P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publication ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: -March 31 2015 *c. Address 2397 North Flower Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-073-10 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Floral Park, the H.A. Smith House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a steeply pitched roof clad in composition shingle roofing. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled stucco. The three -bay fagade features a central, slightly recessed, wooden entry door and brick entrance stoop, tucked beneath the extended south rake of the projecting front gable wing that rests on an attached brick pier. A tapered, slightly raised chimney bisects the front gable and is capped by a course of bricks. Single, eight -light casement windows flanking the chimney. A triple casement window is located further to the north, beneath a side -gabled portion of the roof. Recessed on the south elevation, another side gable tops a projecting wing that contains a large, square, single -light fixed window on its fagade. Fenestration on the side and rear elevations consists of multi - paned casement windows. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, lawn, low vegetation and a curved walkway lined by hedges connecting the front porch and driveway. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in stucco. Alterations to the house include the additions of canvas awnings to the front entry and side elevation windows and rebuilding of the front stairs and stoop. The house appears intact and is in good condition. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District ■Element of District ❑Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) West elevation, view east September 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ■historic 19311 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ❑None ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeoingical Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑ArtifaSi�t.mdhzffde� 10"I ��i (list) 55-1852 2AT512022 DPR 523A (11 ) *Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 *Resource Name or #: H.A. Smith House 131. Historic Name: H.A. Smith House 132. Common Name: Same 133. Original Use: Single -Family Residence 134. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *135. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *136. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): October 29, 1931. Constructed. $3,500. April 23, 1956. Termite repairs for C.H. Fuller by C.C. McLaughlin. $230. August 1, 1957. Repair fire damage for J. Stodola by Marshall Welty. $2, 000. August 8, 1957. Plastering for J. Stodola by Hart. October 22, 1962. Extend garage by J. Stodola. $200. July 6, 1989. Re -roof with tear -off of residence and detached garage. March 15, 2016. Tear -off existing roof and install new comp. shingles. $16,960. *137. Moved? ■No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: *138. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Roy Russell *1310. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1931 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The H.A. Smith House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the front facing gable variant of the Tudor Revival architectural style. It was built in 1931 for $3,500 by prominent developer and builder Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965). Along with developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), Roy Russell was credited as a subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The H.A. Smith House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. H.A. Smith in 1932 and they lived on the property until mid- 1950s. The property was sold to C. H. Fuller in 1955, who briefly resided on the property before selling it to J. Stodola in 1957. Little information is available regarding occupancy of the residence from 1960-1990's. However, during the 1990s Steven and Kathleen Cooper bought the property and resided there until 2021, when the property was sold to the current homeowners. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *1312. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *1314. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattel Inc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map H.A. Smith House 2397 North Flower Street HEL 10TOPE o -0ea o_ 73. Sao=ono n o$. '0� 3 -09� & 46 -0S 44 a 20 13 "'� O �� 54 5'S 56 57 5 5. 5] � 52 - NO. 754 I b FLOWER ^^' a Bit0cftLRedources Commission 55-1953 2nv5/2o22 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: H.A. Smith House 'Recorded by Pedro Gomez "Date November 4, 2021 ❑x Continuation ❑ Update *610. Significance (continued): The H.A. Smith House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). "Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45,000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War II, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, homes in the neighborhood were mostly developed in the revival style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The H.A. Smith House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival home. The steeply pitched, complex roof, asymmetrical massing, prominent chimney, and multi - paned windows are characteristics of this style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture, " representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Character -defining features of the house include its steeply pitched complex gable roof with no overhangs; multi -paned casement windows used on all elevations with fabric awnings; recessed entry; stucco exterior walls with brick trim, and prominent chimney. *1312. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry.com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. 6it0dftLRe6ources Commission 55--2054 DPR 523L MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with Bib cOiei-Redources Commission 1 55-2155 2ff5/2022 10 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2397 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Bib cOmRedources Commission z 55-2256 2ff5/2022 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 OR# 3523346 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING raising only those issues you or someone BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC else raised at the public hearing RESOURCES COMMISSION described in this notice, or in written The City of Santa Ana encourages the correspondence delivered to the Historic public to participate in the decision- Resources Commission or City Council of making process. We encourage you to the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the COPY OF NOTICE contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Historic Resources Commission Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667- Action: The Historic Resources 2259. Commission will hold a Public Hearing to Neu can lien I@c bang tieng Vigt, An receive public testimony, and will take dign tho@i cho Tony Lai so (714) 565- action on the item described below. Their 2627. decision is final unless appealed to the 10/22/21 Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE City Council within 10 days of the decision OR-3523346# by any interested party or group. Ad Description Project Location: 2397 North Flower Street (historically known as the H.A. 2397 N Flower St Smith House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the Project Description:The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using newspaper. Please y g our news p p Commission Application No. 2021-24, read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Historic Register Categorization No. 2021- 23, and Historic Property Preservation Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you allow the placement ta d cai gori categ-23 orization the Santa after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned 10/22/2021 property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER- 2021-103 will be filed for this project. InVOICe. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4 2021, Publication $119.35 at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Total $119.35 ic n or may aCA Members ttend tthismeeti g in in -person join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa- ana.org/pb/meeting-parUcpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to Dail Journal Corporation PBAeComments5-santa-ana.org v p (reference the topic in the subject line) or Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 92701. Deadline to submit written BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE 951 ( ) 784-0111 comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 record. Where To Get More Information: SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 Additional details regarding the proposed SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE 408 287-4866 ( ) including the full text of the discretionary discretionary item, may be found on the THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa- THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 ana.pdmegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 2724747 you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(gbsanta- ana.org or714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to II 55- 2458 2ff5/2022 * 8 6 8 * m' CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency ` r 20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988 r Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 500 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Project Location: 2397 North Flower Street (historically known as the H.A. Smith House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Deanna Kashani and Behzad Samavati Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-24, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-23, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-23 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-103 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting-particpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments(�santa-ana.org (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernal, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at PGomez(ja�santa-ana.orq or 714-667-2790 Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or Somenne else raised nt thin piihlir hearinn rlesrriherl in this nntire nr in written rnrrespond ence Bib)d0cl-Redources Commission 55-2559 2/115/2022 delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Angelina Becerra al (714) 667-2259. Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, xin dien thoai cho Tony Lai so (714) 565-2627. 500' RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP Publish: OC Reporter Date: October 22, 2021 Bib)cl@icLRe4ources Commission 55-2660 2/115/2022 On -Site Posting — 2397 N. Flower Street — 10/25/21 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING "I" BEFORE 'THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions, Project Location. 2397 North Flower Street (historically known as the H.A. Smith House) located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Deanna Kashani and Beh7ad Samavati Proiect Description: The applicant is requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2021-24, Historic Register Categorization No. 2021-23, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2021-23 to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Contributive for the above mentioned property and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana. Environmental Impact: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31 (Historical Resource RestorationlRehabilitation), as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2021-103 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 4 2021, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in -person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www,santa-ana oralablmeeting-nagtpation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments santa-ana.or (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Sarah Bernet, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza - M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submitwritten comments is 3:oo p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: htt salsenta-ana. rime ov.coml ublicl orta(. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Pedro Gomez with the Ptonn1ng and Building Agency at PGome—zigsanta-ana.ory or 714-667-2790 Note: 1t you challenge the decislan on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues ycu or someone else raised at the publlc hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the �"!,W,a Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si time preguntas en espanol, favayd lama" al Angelina Became (714) 657-2250. Neu can 116n lac bang tieng VIBt, xiVl nthoai cho Tony Lai sa (714) 566-2627. BitocftL edources Commission 56-2761 V15/2022 On -Site Posting — 2397 N. Flower Street — 10/25/21 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING EFORE Y E SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION nmw. rin0.yi5 rAnimnnn m.iz m Win in n..,. nmmaa.� m "'e hPC,7�Y T Ap ` Bittd LRedources Commission 55-2862 2/15/2022 Police Department www.santa-ana.org/pd Item # 16 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services for the Police Department AGENDA TITLE: Approve an Agreement with Data Ticket Inc. for Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services for the Police Department in the amount of $1,269,648 (General and Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve a three-year agreement with Data Ticket Inc. for Automated Parking Citation Processing Services for the Police Department, for the period of February 15, 2022 through February 14, 2025, with the option to extend the agreement for two additional one-year terms, in an amount not to exceed $1,269,648, including a five percent contingency ($60,459), subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION On November 3, 2021, the Police Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP #21- 128) to select a vendor to provide automated parking citation processing services. On November 30, 2021 the City received proposals from the following four vendors; Data Ticket Inc., IPS Group Inc., T2 Systems, and Turbo Data Systems. An evaluation committee consisting of representatives from the Police Department's Traffic Division and the City's Finance Department reviewed and rated the four proposals. The proposers were ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria as established in the RFP: Responsiveness to the RFP (10%), Experience of Firm and Personnel (50%), Cost of Proposal (30%), and References (10%). The scoring for each proposal out of a maximum of 500 points is as follows: Vendor Score Data Ticket 492 Turbo Data 446 T2 Systems 431 IPS Group 356 City Council 16 — 1 2/15/2022 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services for the Police Department February 15, 2022 Page 2 Based upon each respondent's proposal score, staff recommends entering into a three- year agreement with Data Ticket Inc. with the option to extend the agreement for two additional one-year terms. The Police Department will continue to issue parking citations through hand-held automated units to maintain the current level of efficiency and reduced cost associated with this technology. In addition, staff will work with Data Ticket to establish a dedicated telephone line for Santa Ana residents, ensure that phone call wait and hold times are mitigated, and establish a callback feature in English and Spanish. The total not -to -exceed amount of $1,269,648 for Data Ticket Inc. comprises four separate categories spanning three years. First category covers the base annual cost of $227,688 for processing of all parking citations. The second category manages overpayments to members of the public (estimated annual amount of $24,000). The third category facilitates payments for the delinquency collections program (estimated annual amount of $151,375). Lastly, the final category provides a five percent contingency ($20,153 annual amount). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds in the amount of $1,269,648 are available in the Police Department's Traffic Division, Contractual Services account and Parking Meter Fund (account no. 02718131 62300) for the following fiscal years as follows: Fiscal Year Traffic Division — Contract Services 01114405 62300 CDA — Parking Meter Fund 02718131 62300 Amount FY 21-22 $153,416 $22,924 $ 176,340 FY 22-23 $368,198 $55,018 $ 423,216 FY 23-24 $368,198 $55,018 $ 423,216 FY 24-25 $214,782 $32,094 $ 246,876 Total $1,269,648 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Agreement with Data Ticket Inc. Submitted By: David Valentin, Police Chief Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 16 — 2 2/15/2022 AGREEMENT WITH DATA TICKET, INC. TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED PARKING CITATION PROCESSING THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 15th day of February, 2022 by and between Data Ticket, Inc., a California corporation, ("Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On November 3, 2021, the City issued a Request for Proposal No. 21-128 ("RFP"), seeking proposals from qualified firms and organizations to provide the Santa Ana Police Department with automated parking citation and processing services. B. On November 30, 2021, Contractor submitted a timely proposal that was selected by the City. Contractor represents that it is able and willing to provide the services as outlined in its proposal to the RFP, incorporated by reference as though attached hereto. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional automated parking citation and processing service firm. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Contractor shall perform automated parking citation processing services as set forth in the Scope of Services provided in the City's RFP, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference to this Agreement, and as provided in Citation and Processing System and Contractor's Proposal dated November 30, 2021. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $1,269,648.31. This amount includes a 5% contingency to compensate the Contractor for services as directed by the City. b. City agrees to compensate Contractor for services provided from February 6, 2022 through the effective date of the Agreement, as detailed below. c. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment City Council 16 — 3 21%g 0�2f 10 need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence the date first written above and continue for a three (3) year term with the option for the City to grant up to a two (2) additional one (1) year renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 15, below. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 6. INSURANCE MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed City Council 16 — 4 21V1 0�of 10 operations,property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the generalaggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non - owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (Not required if vendor does not require an automobile to provide services) 3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees) 4. Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress,invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. ➢ Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions Appropriate to the Consultant's profession and work hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by the Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. a. The Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information "property" of the Agency in the care, custody, or control of the Vendor. If not coveredunder the Vendor's liability policy, such "property" coverage of the Agency may be endorsed onto the Vendor's Cyber Liability Policy as covered property as follows: City Council 16 — 5 2iV1 6 of 10 If the Vendor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limitsmaintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: Additional Insured Status The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additionalinsureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Vendor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used). Please note, if there is an insured vs. insured exclusion on the vendor's policy, carefully review with the vendor and their insurance carrier on whether being added as an additional insured onto the vendor's policy removes your organization's ability to file suit against the vendor anddraw upon the policy should final adjudication in a lawsuit state that the vendor shall pay damages to your organization. Primary Coverage For any claims related to this contract, the Vendor's insurance coverage shall be primary. Coverage for commercial liability shall be at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 0413 as respectsthe City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of theVendor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Notice of Cancellation Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, exceptwith notice to the City. Waiver of Subrogation Vendor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of saidVendor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Vendor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Self -Insured Retentions Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Vendor to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by City Council 16 — 6 21V1g O of 10 either the namedinsured or City. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims -made basis: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or thebeginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims - made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Vendor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. Verification of Coverage Vendor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to the City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Vendor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copiesof all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. Subcontractors Vendor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Vendor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature ofthe risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and City Council 16 — 7 2iV1 6 of 10 hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 9. RECORDS Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. 10. CONFIDENTIALITY If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor City Council 16 — 8 21V1 6�of 10 without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Contractor covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 12. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 14. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City. 15. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of City Council 16 — 9 21V1 6?�of 10 termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 19. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) City Council 16 — 10 21V1 O�of 10 P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714- 647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Chief of Police City of Santa Ana 60 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714-245-8007 To Contractor: Data Ticket, Inc. 2603 Main Street Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92614 Fax: 949-281-3195 ClientServices@DataTicket.com A parry may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other parry. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. The Agreement is the final and complete agreement and any prior or contemporaneous agreements for similar services between the parties is superseded by this Agreement. This shall not apply where the Parties are currently engaged and Contractor is providing services not contemplated by this Agreement All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. City Council 16 — 11 21V1 6�of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney r f By: {J Tamara Bogosian Senior Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: David Valentin Chief of Police CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager DATA TICKET, INC. Brook Westcott Chief Operating Officer City Council 16— 12 205/2?&10 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES City Council 16 — 13 2/15/2022 (2) XVII. SCOPE OF SERVICES CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES The City of Santa Ana is issuing this Request for Proposals (RFP) for Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services. The City desires an integrated software and hardware service solution to parking citation and payment processing. The preferred solution will include compatibility with our current mobile computing devices (e.g. smart phones, tablets, etc.) for ticket issuance and data download with real-time, online access for public safety officers, the City's Parking Citation Coordinator and Finance Staff to citation information and citation status on a user-friendly reporting structure. A complete package of citation issuance, processing, collection, reporting, hardware and software maintenance is required. The program and service must also accept and support hand-written citation forms. The Vendor shall coordinate its efforts with the City of Santa Ana Police Department, City of Santa Ana Finance Department, Orange County Court System and other agencies affected by the project. The Vendor will be expected to work closely with the Police Department's Traffic Division and Finance Department to ensure compatibility and uniformity. A. SOFTWARE/USER INTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS These specifications are not all inclusive, but are intended for the purpose of giving the Vendor a general idea of the City's system. Specific details will be provided after an agreement has been entered. Vendors must provide a software solution for electronic issuance of citations. Software must be installed on and compatible with current mobile computing devices (e.g. smart phones, tablets, etc.) and incorporate the following features: a. Citation must be capable of printing on a 2"- 4.5" thermal printer (brand name to be determined later). Vendor must recommend a printer compatible with their software product. b. The software solution must be able to take and associate multiple photos to each citation record. 2. Records Management System Interface (RMS) a. The software solution must include an automated export interface to the City's Records Management System (RMS). The interface must be able to send data in a Comma Separated Values (CSV) format to be defined by the City. The interface shall also export any photos associated with citation records as separate image files following a naming convention defined by the City to facilitate their import into the RMS. rzaamigne M • c (2) CITY OF SANTA ANA 3. The user interface includes payment information as well as parking citation specific information. It will include the fields listed below, including the validations for each field. Ticket Information: • Citation number - all City tickets begin with "PC" and have a unique 6 digit identifier that follows. • Date - the date the citation was issued • Amount - the amount of the parking ticket. Vehicle: • Vehicle License number • State (state of vehicle's license plate) - in two letter format. Contact Information: • Name • Address • Phone - should include an input mask or validation that does not allow users to enter an invalid number. Payment Information: • Credit Card Type - Choices are VISA or MasterCard. • Credit Card number • Expiration Date • Name on Card 4. Be able to develop a custom interface with City payment system, iNovah, to provide for the ability of City cashiers to accept payment of parking citations, process refunds and to process NSFs. B. CITATION PROCESSING SERVICES Data Entry from Handwritten Citations. a. Receive and date stamp weekly batches of all handwritten citations sent by City; b. Enter citation information into the database; c. Batch, record, and verify receipt of all manual citations within two (2) business days; d. Edit capability to correct dates, duplicate citations, violation codes and fine amounts; e. System for filing/storing citations in easily retrievable format for a minimum of two (2) years and then dispose in accordance with City direction. 2. Automated Transfer and Upload of citations issued by the mobile computing device. a. Loading of batch files immediately upon transfer; b. Edit capability to correct dates, duplicate citations, violation codes, and fine amounts; c. System to promptly notify City regarding citations unable to be entered for any reason (no violation code, unreadable license, etc.) rzomigne � . c CITY OF SANTA ANA 3. Registered Owner Name Retrieval. a. Retrieve data online from the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV); b. Provide daily access to registered owner information; c. Validate DMV makes upon return of registered owner information from DMV to ensure proper make of vehicle issued citation; d. Review DMV "No Hit" list to ensure that license plate and state have been entered correctly; e. Daily registered owner name retrieval for all citations without a name on the system. 4. Out -of -State Registered Owner Retrieval from State DMV. a. Maintain regularly scheduled communications with DMV offices in the 50 states; b. Maintain regularly scheduled communications with the Transportation Ministries in Canada and Mexico that permit registration and name acquisition; c. Mail collection letters; d. Communicate with individuals outside of the United States who were issued a parking citation by the City. 5. DMV Registration Holds/Releases. a. Process DMV holds or releases daily; b. Access DMV records online; c. Capability to release registration holds upon City's request; d. Report monthly holds and payments made at DMV; e. Immediate update of database with monthly payment information from DMV. 6. Automated processing of Administrative Review Requests. a. Vendor shall provide tracking and correspondence for all administrative review; b. Vendor shall enter and maintain database of all administrative review, showing current status of each request. System must be integrated with parking citation issuance and processing system. Ensure a result is received for each correspondence; c. Administrative review requests must be entered into the system within two (2) business days from date of receipt; d. Provide inquiry capabilities for citations in the administrative review process; e. Print and mail (by first class mail) all administrative review result letters; f. Notify the City of citations that have been successfully dismissed through the review process and have had payments processed, (or are cancelled) so the City can issue a refund; g. File and store all source documents for ease of retrieval; h. Provide staff to respond to telephone inquiries regarding how to contest a violation, determine outstanding penalty amounts or delinquent fees, identify time frames, and any other pertinent information in order to contest a citation by mail or in -person; i. Link the hearing tracking system to the citation database in real time to obtain citation information such as citation issue date, delinquent date, amount owed, and other citations open with the same license plate numbers; j. Ensure that the computer system is capable of recording data and comments for historical background, suspending action while appeals are under investigation, sort citations by type of violation and/or defense, record case decisions, generate letters and use customized liability reason codes; k. Provide monthly report of review results by citation number. mmumigne � . . c (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA 7. Administrative Hearings a. Provide tracking and correspondence for all administrative hearing requests; b. Vendor shall enter and maintain a database of all administrative hearing requests, showing current status of each request. System must be integrated with parking citation issuance and processing system. Ensure a result is received for each correspondence; c. Schedule Administrative hearings and forward schedule to the City; d. Print and mail (by first class mail) customized hearing notification letters for the City; e. Respond to inquiries for the City and the public regarding date of hearing, mailing date, location of hearing and directions to hearing location; f. Re -send letters should room or date changes be necessary; g. The Hearing Officer will forward results of Administrative Hearing to the City and to the Vendor; h. Letters regarding the results of Administrative Hearings will be mailed by the Vendor; i. When a refund is appropriate, the Vendor shall provide information to the City. The City will issue the refund; j. Provide monthly report of review results by citation number. 8. Payment Plan Administration a. Provide and manage a payment plan to comply in accordance with Assembly Bill No. 503 and business rules as defined by the City of Santa Ana i. Review each request for an Indigent Payment Plan ii. Approve or deny each request for an IPP based on the City's business rules 9. Payment Processing a. Provide a separate Post Office Box for the City where payments, administrative review correspondence, and other documents are to be mailed; b. Provide mail pick-up from post office at least once per day; c. Sort and batch all incoming mail by postmark date for payment posting; d. Enter and process payments received within one (1) business day, including opening all mail received, verifying payment amounts, updating computer system, and making daily bank deposits in the City's designated bank account; e. Conduct daily reconciliation of all payments entered with bank deposits; f. Provide daily reporting of bank deposits made for the City; g. File and store all source documents in an easily retrievable system; h. Track rebilling on partial payments, checks returned for insufficient funds upon notification from City, vehicle change of ownership, and leased vehicle information; i. Provide for payment by credit card (Visa and MasterCard) and be capable of securing authorization from the banking institution. Payments made by credit card are to be immediately updated in the database in real time. Payments will be made by automated telephone system; j. The Vendor will have the ability to accept payments via the Internet. 10. City's Online Payments. a. The vendor must also accept data from the City's cashiering system. Data would be provided electronically on a daily basis. (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA C. CORRESPONDENCE PROCESSING 1. All correspondence shall be processed within two (2) business days from date of receipt; 2. Obtain approval from the City on all standard forms, notices of delinquent violation, and correspondence. The Vendor must ensure that all forms conform to applicable State and Federal laws. 3. Submit copies of standard forms, notices of delinquent violation, and other types of standard correspondence with bid proposal. D. REPORTING 1. The Vendor shall be responsible for providing regular daily, weekly and monthly reports on demand to the issuing agency within three working days of the report being requested. 2. Although other reports may be required, the vendor shall be capable, at a minimum, of producing reports relating to scofflaws, open citations, bank deposits and citation dispositions. The vendor must be capable of delivering these reports to the Police Department on an agreed schedule. 3. The Vendor shall provide duplicate or replacement reports at no additional cost to the city. 4. Copies of citation abstracts shall be provided to violators at no cost upon request. 5. The following Vendor reports are required monthly; Repeat offender list (5 or more), citation analysis by officer, citation analysis by violation, citation status report, out of state status, out of state revenue, hot sheet, distribution revenue summary, violation statistics, violation analysis by officer, detail citation report by officer, monthly citation statistics, yearly statistics of issuance, citation summary report, bail payment summary report, DMV citation cleared with bail (collected), DMV citations cleared without bail (not collected), DMV registration hold listing, Refunds report. Provide an online report generation capability; 6. Provide weekly license plate number to citation number cross reference reports sorted by license and citation. Provide additional reports monthly as may be needed by management or auditors; 7. Submit a sample of the standard reports used with bid proposal. 8. Able to work with the Agency to design reports upon need and provide it to the Agency at no cost. E. TOLL -FREE TELEPHONE SERVICE 1. Provide a toll -free telephone number for inquiries and credit card payments; 2. Operate the toll -free telephone service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days per year, for the 50 states, Canada, and Mexico; 3. Ensure that customer service representatives are available to provide instructions and information on general parking policies, procedures and administrative adjudication procedures for the City. At least one customer service representative shall be available for Spanish translation during regular business hours Monday through Friday. (2) CITY OF SANTA ANA F. AUTOMATED VOICE RESPONSE SYSTEM Provide a customized recorded voice response system in English and Spanish to convey information on: a. How to pay and contest violations; b. Registration violation information; c. Mail address information; d. Ensure that the automated telephone system is capable of receiving a minimum of 500 incoming calls per month. Planned downtime must be between midnight and 4 a.m.; G. CUSTOM NOTICES AND LETTERS 1. The Vendor shall provide at no extra cost: The necessary postage, correspondence and stock forms to meet all applicable State and local laws and regulations for citation processing and adjudication. 2. Vendor will provide samples of mailing and return envelopes with proposal; 3. Ensure that Delinquent Notices are generated at least one business day prior to becoming delinquent. Delinquent Notices generated will be mailed at least once a week by first class mail to registered owners; 4. Ensure that returned check notices are mailed by first class mail to individuals immediately upon notification from the City that a check has been returned for non- payment. The notices will state the amount of original penalty, delinquent amount, and the appropriate returned check fee; 5. Ensure that Drive Away Notices (fled letters) are mailed by first class mail to registered owners of vehicles that drive away from the officer at citation issuance time as required by the California Vehicle Code. Notices must be mailed no later than 15 days from the date of the original citation to the registered owner; 6. Ensure that partial Payment Notices are sent by first class mail to those who do not pay the full penalty amount. The notice should indicate the amount that was paid and the balance that is due; 7. Communicate with violators in a timely manner by mail in response to correspondence such as incomplete registration, citation, or payment information. 8. Issue letters of correction 9. Issue automated mismatched letters of correction as the mismatch occurs. H. ONLINE INQUIRY ACCESS 1. Design and implement an online inquiry system to allow access to the citation database by designated City employees; 2. The on-line inquiry system must provide real time access to all citation information including registered owner information, payment information, and administrative adjudication history. ruamigne M . c (9) CITY OF SANTA ANA I. SUPPORT 1. Provide staff for all aspects of processing parking citations, including any changes related to new Federal, State, or local legislation. Days and hours of operation shall be consistent with normal office hours Monday — Friday unless otherwise approved. 2. Provide on -going support to the City to access and interface with the parking citation database; 3. Vendor shall provide user's manual which includes step-by-step instructions for accessing computer database information and a list and description of any and all codes used in screens accessed by the issuing agency; 4. Provide technical support and troubleshooting assistance for any and all hardware and software used by the City. Technical support and assistance must be available between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except City recognized holidays. J. DATABASE BACKUP & OFF -SITE SECURITY 1. Ensure that all systems are backed up daily to ensure safety of data in the event of a power outage or natural disaster; 2. Transfer and store off -site all backups of data for disaster recovery. K. INTERAGENCY INTERCEPT PROGRAM (FRANCHISE TAX BOARD) 1. Vendor must be able to interface with the Interagency Intercept Program (FTB) for collection of delinquent fees. 2. Vendor will send a FTB Notice to the Customer as required by the Interagency Intercept Program; this notice will be sent via 1 st Class Mail and will be sent at no cost to the city 3. All notices are attached to the citation online and are viewable via the web L. CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 1. No portion of the contract shall be permitted to be subcontracted to another private or public agency without express written approval from the City. Vendors must disclose the nature of work being subcontracted and the name of the private or public agency; 2. All processing functions performed shall be completed within two business days after receipt from the agency; 3. The Vendor shall comply with all requirements of the State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) in regard to processing and adjudication of citation records sent by the City; 4. The Vendor shall be required to send notices to lessees of cited vehicles when provided with the information provided on "Certificate of Non -Ownership"; 5. The Vendor shall provide necessary on -site training and support for City staff to retrieve information stored in the computer system; (9) M. OTHER CITY OF SANTA ANA 1. Attend City meetings as needed or when requested at Vendor's expense. This includes but not limited to, transportation, lodging, meals, and staff time; 2. Vendor shall comply with California Vehicle Code Section 40200.3 (b), regarding the Annual Report. The City may audit the report at its own expense. 3. Work with Traffic Engineering to process and track issued parking permits. 4. Ensure that no information associated with the notice of parking violation system is disclosed to anyone other than the City for any purpose other than the collection of penalties, fines and fees. The Vendor will ensure compliance with appropriate State and Federal regulations pertaining to the confidentiality of information. N. IMPLEMENTATION City staff shall have the right to modify, reduce, or delete the services as needed by City. O. DATA TRANSFER Submit a plan to transfer data from the existing Vendor. gazzurne EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION Fee Proposal including hourly rates if applicable City Council 16 — 22 2/15/2022 Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128 O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services Attachment A: Proposer's Certification & Proposal Item Pricing r: CITY OF SANTA ARIA ATTACHm,l=N,r A PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION & PROPOSAL TEEM PRICING X IS. PROPOSER'S CEFt'1`IFICATIQN a PRopMX, ITEM PRICING—ArrAC ME11T A Certifleartlian -I callfyflhot I have read, undi rmtanda,>1d iagrae to the temrs and odndireons &this Raguesl for Propoaela. I have exarriJnad 111e Scopc- of Servlcaa {ExNblt 1} and am quabfied to prnvlde gervkes being requested as speaFled herein_ I undarsland and agree thal I am responvible far ropariwq any errors. ofnlsMWE. or discrepancles to 11te City for ciarlk.Akri prior to the submissron of my prop naal_ Proposal Item Pricing - Fees must be mclusivevf aJl costs, including bUi notllml!ad to, dirar and iindkaot eta for Tabor. averhead, instal Wppueq. travel, mileage, zind itrel. Any spapoiA1 rnsterials will he purchased by t}re oonlrantor only after -ffiscussed and aunwtge-d by the Oily lrqButs rnDnaWr or dnnignw in YOUng_ InClUdO allmhments roW&d to pricing andior pcMrdial cptaanal serinqi�S, PRQPOSIER'S STATEMENT: I have rho¢, understood and agree to the farms -arid rindha s on all pages Df Iho keque:q�t for Oualtfimtlarm. Upon rcqu-w, I wilF transfer and d INLhr good, or servlrios to the City In a000rdarlce with said term and conditions. Data Ticket, I no, 94' -d:29-7240 + 909-281 •S 195 LEGAL NAME OF OOMPA,NY PHONE AND FAX NUM9ERS 2603 Maln meet, Sulte 300 Irvine, CA 92614 BUSINESS ADDRESS 5rook Wastcoll Chlef Qperut g Officer PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE --� ff 1 f✓ 42 I CarentSorYIcas@diat3ffia1get,cm or BWostwHX&etebr e.j.cpm SIGUTURE QE AUTHORIZED AGENT GATE E-MAIL ADDRESS 93-1010811 n+Ek FEDERAL ID NUMRER (IF APPLIOAKE� CONTRAC-9TOR LICENSE NUMBER WAPPLICABLE) THS FORM MgSTR CQMPLETEm ANO IN--U DED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT Do NOT -CONTAIN THIS FCQM WILL BE COPODEWD NCWRESPONS11VE, RFP No. 21-128 At17`DhMT€Q FIAF?1C NG C1TAT2ohr. ivD Ppot~EssfFfG SERvicES f' a 2.a&3X City Council 16 — 23 2/15/2022 Data Ticket, Inc. Irvine, CA 0: 949 752-6937; 0: 949 428-7240 Cost Proposa I Pricing - ATTACH M ENT A j CONT.j City of Santa Ana RFP NO. 21-128 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services Service Cost per Unit Year 1 Estimated units per Year Year 1 Cost Costper Unit Year 2 Estimated Units per Year Year 2 Cost Lost per Unit Year 3 Estimated Units per Year Year 3 Cost Total Parking Citation Processing: H a n d wr7tten Paper Citat: on 0.39 6,000 2.280.00 0.38 6,DGG 2,28C.00 0.38 6,GGD 2.28G.00 6,840.GG Electronic Citations 0.25 85,GG0 21,250.00 G.25 85,CGC 21,25C.CC C.25 85,GCG 21,25G.CO 63,75C.GG Notices: _st Courtesy Notice 0.781 91.GOG 7G.9H.GC1 C.78 9I.GCO1 7G.980.CC G.791 91.GDO 7C.98C.GG 212.910.00 .2nd Notice G.00 50,D00 G.CC G.OG 50.000 G.CC C.CG 5G,GGG O.GO D.GC 3rd Notice O.DO 3G,2OD 0.00 D.00 30,20D G.00 G.OD 30,200 0.00 O.GO Drve Away Not-.ce/Fled Letter 0.90 LDG 80.GG 0.50 100 80.GG 0.80 100 SO.GG 246.OD Letter of Correction G.SO 250 20D.G0 0.80 250 200.G0 0.80 250 200.00 63G.DD Custom Notice 0.80 100 9G.00 0.80 1C0 8D.CC 0.80 10O 80.GO 240.GG Adjudication: 1st Leve' Disposition Letter Rev'Ew G.SO 5,000 4,DOG.GO 0.80 5,GC0 4,000.GO 0.80 5,C00 4,GC0.00 12,OCO.OD 1st Leve' Rev!ew Hold 0.50 6.0ODJ G.5GI 6,000 3,000.OG G.5Gl 6,GO0 3,OGO.00 9,00G.DO 2 n d Leve+. H e a ri ng/Ad m i n l strative Result Letter 4.S❑ 250 20D.00 D.SG 250 200.00 D.SD 25G 200.00 60D.G0 Hearing Officer Time [hr] SS.CO 168 14,280.G0 85.00 168 14,280.G0 85.00 168 14,280.GG 12,840.00 Payment - Collection Processing: P aym ent Proc es s i ng O.CO SS,ODO C.00 C.CO 88,OCD D.00 D.OD 89.000 D.OG G.GO Credit Card Usage Fee [Citizen Pavment] D.00 54,000 C.DD 0.00 54.000 C.DD O.OD 54,000 C•.CO D.DG Payment Pia, Administration (AS 503) 6.06 9,000 54,D00.00 6.00 9,00D 54.000.00 6.00 9,GGD 54,0GC.00 162,DCG.00 F'B Col iecti an 0.15 5 20G,C00 33,DGO.00 0.15 S 20G,GG0 3D,GG0.00 G.15 $ 20G,G00 30,0OD.00 9G,GDG.GO Out of State Cal! ecti on D.21 $ 130,000 27,3GO.DD G.21 $ 130,GDC 27,300.DD G.21 $ 13C,DDO 27,3GG.00 81,9CC.CC Other: Process NSFs -.25 30 37.5C -.25 30 37.5GI 1.251 3G 37.50 112.SC Total: 227,657.5C 227.687_5G1 I 227.687.5GI 693.062.50 Please note: Credit Card Usage Fee [C?tizen Payment] has not heen included as it is charged to the 'nd'v:dua' �vho eiects to pay using a credit 1 debit card. This fee is $3.5G per transaction Pease note: All correspondence and noticing charges include 1st Class Postage.As the LISPS increases the postal rate, so too will these costs. Additional, optional pricing has been provided below and on the following pages. Joint/Escrow Banking Services $85.00 per account per month Services for the above -mentioned item include: • Daily deposits of funds to the Agency's escrow account • Online, real-time reconciliation reports that tie directly to the bank statement • Processing of all credit card chargebacks and Insufficient Funds • Month -end reconciliation of all funds collected • Disbursement of County / State Surcharges at month -end • Payment of Data Ticket's invoice • Disbursement of the net remittance to the Agency • Scanning of all payments directly to joint bank account daily using remote check deposit • The Agency will be responsible for the purchase of banking supplies, including checks and endorsement stamps; these fees typically run $200.00 per year Chargebacks and NSF's $2.50 per issued instance • Data Ticket will process credit card chargebacks and NSFs when notified of each occurrence • Once processed, Data Ticket will send a custom letter to the individual detailing the returned item and the amount due on the citation Refunds $2.50 per issued instance • Data Ticket will process refunds when notified of each need • In the event the city utilizes Joint Banking, Data Ticket will verify, generate, and send each refund due • Refunds will be issued weekly • Refunds will be sent via 1 st Class Mail City Council 16 - 24 2/15/2022 Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128 O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services • The anticipated costs for the city to issue refunds to individuals is expected to be $24,000 per year. These funds are furnished by the city to Data Ticket to replenish the city's refund account. Deliquency Collections Program 20% of amount collected • Delinquent collections include sending an additional three notices per citation, handling all customer service and processing all payments. The estimated cost of the program is $151,375 (20%) per year based on $756,877 in collections in the prior year. Parking Citation Payment Plan Processing (non -indigent) $12.00 per transaction • An administrative fee will be assessed to Patrons who wish to participate in a payment plan • The administrative fee will be added to the Agency's invoice and once the 1 st payment plan installment is paid by the Patron, the administrative fee will be reimbursed to the Agency • This fee will cover the cost of the payment plan initiation, and the cost of a confirmation letter that is sent to the Patron confirming the details of the payment plan • The Agency will have the ability to determine whether Payment Plans are accepted and if so, what the parameters for payment will be Payment Plan Administration (AB 503 — indigent) $6.00 per transaction • Acceptance and scanning of Indigent payment plan requests • Approval/Denial by Data Ticket • Inclusive of the approval/denial letter Credit Card Chargeback Processing $30.00 per transaction • If a chargeback occurs, a fee will be charged to the Patron for the processing of the chargeback • No fee will be charged to the Agency Postal Rate Increase Offset — If postal rates increase during the term of the agreement, fees to DTI shall be raised immediately to offset the effect of the actual postal rate increase. DETAILED ANDROID PRICING 3 Year Lease Price Samsung Galaxy A52+ & New 3" Printer $39.00 per unit per month m Purchase Price Samsung Galaxy A52+ & 3" Printer $1,277.00 per unit The city states it would like to proceed with the existing printers utilized by the city. If so, we have provided Lease and Purchase prices below for the handheld ticket writers only below. City Council 16 — 25 2/15/2022 Data Ticket, Inc. Irvine, CA 0: 949 752-6937; 0: 949 428-7240 3 Year Lease Price Samsung Galaxy A52+ OR Purchase Price City of Santa Ana RFP NO. 21-128 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services $30.00 per unit per month Samsung Galaxy A52+ $1,000.00 per unit Handheld Software Licensing $100.00 per unit per year This fee covers all software licensing and upgrades provided to the city. Handheld Software Maintenance $25.00 per unit per month This fee covers complete repair and replacement of any handheld unit damaged for any reason. There is no deductible charged to the city. Upon notification of damage, we simply prepare a unit to be FedEx'd to the City for replacement. Data Plan —$45.00 per unit per month This fee will be a passed through from the selected cellular provider. Exhibi City Council 16 — 26 2/15/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 17 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services AGENDA TITLE Approve Agreements with Iteris, Inc., Fehr and Peers, and IBI Group, to Provide Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services for up to a Three-year, Four -Month Term in an Aggregate Amount not to Exceed $1,000,000 (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Iteris, Inc, Fehr and Peers, and IBI Group, to provide transportation and traffic engineering services for a three-year, four month term beginning February 15, 2022 and expiring June 25, 2025, with a provision for two, one-year extensions exercisable by the City Manager and the City Attorney, in a total shared aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION On November 2, 2021, the Public Works Agency issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for contractors to provide on -call transportation and traffic engineering services. The selected contractor(s) will supplement City staff by assisting with general transportation and traffic engineering projects. The projects may include any of the following: sidewalks, bike paths, signing, striping, neighborhood traffic studies, traffic signal modifications, grant application writing, bikeway planning, Traffic Signal Master Plan, Street Light Master Plan, SIB 743 compliance, traffic study, and other related projects as required. The RFP was advertised on the City's online bid management and publication system, with bids due on November 30, 2021 (Exhibit 1). Fifteen consultants submitted proposals. The proposals were reviewed by a three -member committee composed of Public Works Agency staff. RFPs were rated based on experience, qualifications, project understanding, scheduling, past performance, and the overall proposal. Staff recommends awarding agreements to the top three responding contractors listed below (Exhibit 2-4). City Council 17 — 1 2/15/2022 Approve Agreements with Iteris, Inc., Fehr and Peers, and IBI Group February 15, 2022 Page 2 Rank Firm Average Score 1 Iteris, Inc. 95 2 Fehr & Peers 93 3 IBI Group 93 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact at this time. Prior to utilizing any of these on -call services, Public Works staff must receive Finance and Management Services Agency approval of funding and accounts to ensure that funds are available under the authorization and aggregate limit of these agreements. Upon successful completion of this fiscal review, a corresponding Notice to Proceed containing specific scope and maximum expenditure for the task order will be issued to a contractor. EXHIBIT(S) 1. RFP No. 21-125 On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services 2. Agreement — Iteris, Inc. 3. Agreement — Fehr and Peers 4. Agreement —IBI Group Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 17 — 2 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-125 CITY OF SANTA ANA Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Azadeh Azad Project Manager (714) 647-5667 Office aazad rksanta-ana.or Approved for Release:,,_, Zdenek Kekula KEY RFP DATES (Subiect to change at discretion of City): Issue Date: Deadline for Requests for Information: Proposal Due Date: Projected Award Date: Principal Civil Engineer Public Works Agency Tuesday, November 2, 2021 Tuesday, November 16, 2021 Tuesday, November 30, 2021; 2:00 PM, Tuesday, January 11, 2022 City Council 17 — 3 2/15/2022 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that proposals will be received from qualified On -Call Transportation / Traffic Engineering Services Firms. Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) must be submitted electronically to the PlanetBids system no later than November 30, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Proposals received after this date/time will not be considered. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that any proposals submitted have sufficient time to be received by the City of Santa Ana prior to this proposal due date and time. Additionally, it is a requirement that hard copy proposals also be sent by courier service, mailed, or hand delivered in an enclosed sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following "SEALED PROPOSAL FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.21-125 IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL." City of Santa Ana Attn.: AZADEH AZAD Public Works Agency; M-43 20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 For further instructions regarding hard copy submission of proposals, refer to PlanetBids. All notifications, requests for information, updates and addenda will be posted online on PlanetBids at https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=20137. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive qualification. City Council City of Santa Ana PIFf 2-4125 2/15/2022 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 6 A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION D. ADDENDA E. LICENSES & PERMITS F. INSURANCE G. INFORMATION PACKET H. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT J. BID PROTESTS III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 8 A. GENERAL B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE 3. FEE PROPOSAL 4. CERTIFICATIONS IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) 10 A. EVALUATION AND RATING B. SELECTION V. CONTRACT AWARD 10 A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT VI. IMPLEMENTATION 10 A. KICK-OFF MEETING B. NOTICE TO PROCEED VII. PUBLIC RECORDS 11 VIII. APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT 2: AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 3: CERTIFICATION City Council City of Santa Ana PIFf 2'S 125 2/15/2022 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION Nature of Work: The City of Santa Ana is seeking qualified On -Call firm(s) to provide Transportation/ Traffic Engineering as directed by the City of Santa Ana. The City reserves the right to enter into fewer, or more agreements, and to issue several or no task orders to each contractor, as determined by the City s needs. Attachment 1 includes a detailed Scope of Work in this RFP's Appendix. Number of Proposals and Signature: Five (5) hard copies are required to accompany an electronic submittal of the complete proposal package on PlanetBids. One of the hard copies shall be marked as "ORIGINAL" and be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company, and submitted to the City of Santa Ana. Please be explicit in identifying the appropriate person with legal authority to bind the company. The Statement of Qualifications shall be limited to a maximum of (10) double -sided pages (excluding front and back covers, section dividers and attachments such as resumes, forms). Font size shall be minimum 11-point Arial. Proposal exhibits shall be maximum 11" x 17". Proposal Evaluation and Rating_ The criteria for evaluating the RFP submitted will take the following items into consideration: • Finn/Team Experience 25% • Understanding of Need 25% • Relevant Project Experience 30% • Schedule of Delivery 10% • References 10% The City has established a proposal review committee to evaluate proposers based on the response to this RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank the proposers. City Council City of Santa Ana FIFA€' 213125 2/15/2022 Page 4 Project Funding: Funding sources for each project may vary and shall comply with the funding agency's requirements. Special conditions may apply. Refer to Attachment 1 (Scope of Work) in the Appendix of this RFP. Term of Contract Agreement: The City desires to enter into a contract with the top scoring firm(s) for an initial three (3) year term with a City option for two (2) one (1) year extension period. This term shall be outlined in the Standard Consultant Agreement, as shown in the Appendix of this RFP as Attachment 2. City Council City of Santa Ana PIFf 217125 2/15/2022 Page 5 II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City will provide information in its possession relevant to preparation of required information in this RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein. B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES Point of Contact: The selected proposer will assume responsibilities for all services in its proposal. The selected proposer shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge concerning the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of all charges resulting from the Agreement. Contact information such as email and phone number must be included into the proposal. Evidence of Financial Capacity: Proposer may be requested to submit its most recent audited financial statement, evidencing proposer's financial capacity to fully perform the required services, including provision of equipment and personnel expenses over a ninety (90) day period. If said financial statement does not reflect full ninety (90) day operational capacity, proposer may include a letter of credit as evidence of supplemental capacity. C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION All questions or requested clarifications shall be made only in writing to the Q&A section located in PlanetBids no fewer than five (5) calendar days prior to the date and time set for opening of proposals. No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this REP. D. ADDENDA Any changes in RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on PlanetBids at httns://www.nlanetbids.com/aortal/portal.cfm?ComnanvID=20137 as set forth in the Notice Inviting Proposals. Addenda shall become part of the agreement documents. E. LICENSES & PERMITS The selected proposer shall be required to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business license within ten (10) business days of selection and must provide a copy to the City's project manager or designee prior to commencing any work in Santa Ana. Additionally, Proposer will be responsible for obtaining any licenses/permits required by the Scope of Work. F. INSURANCE City Council City of Santa Ana Fff 2t125 2/15/2022 Page 6 The Selected Proposer shall provide the required evidence of insurance coverage as set forth in the Scope of Work within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice that the contract has been awarded. Failure to provide the required insurance certificates shall be cause for the annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guaranty. The City will provide the Selected Proposer with a "New Vendor Checklist", which outlines insurance requirements. G. PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET The selected proposer shall return a completed payment information packet within ten (10) business days after the successful proposer has received notice that the contract has been awarded. H. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING Should a pre -proposal meeting be scheduled, the date, time, and location is identified on the cover page of this RFP. The meeting will include discussion of the project scope and a question -and -answer session. It is highly recommended that the Proposer's key team members attend this meeting. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, as described above in "Section D: Addenda." I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate components of this proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality or technical defect in the proposal. The City reserves the right to reject, replace, and approve any and all subcontractors. All subcontractor(s) shall be identified in response to this RFP. Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the successful proposer and the City shall assume no liability of such subcontractors. J. BID PROTESTS Proposers with concerns or rebuttal of any staff determination of non -responsiveness or non- responsibility may submit, in writing within five (5) business days, to the Project Manager, any concerns regarding the RFP process or staff determination. Such writing shall be considered by the Public Works Director or her/his designated representative, and may be acted upon within five (5) business days. If no action is taken within such time, there shall be no change to the staff determination. The exercise by the Proposer of its right to submit written concerns shall be a condition precedent to seeking judicial review of any award of a contract hereunder. City Council City of Santa Ana FJF 21j125 2/15/2022 Page 7 III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. GENERAL 1. The number of Proposal Copies and signature is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. Deadline: Proposals are due to the City of Santa Ana at the date, time, and location specified in the Notice Inviting Proposals. B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS The proposal format and page limitation, if any, is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS a. Cover Letter: Proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. b. Contract Agreement Statement: Proposal shall include a statement outlining your concurrence or concerns with any and all provisions contained in the Agreement attached herein as Attachment 2 in the Appendix. Firm and Team Experience: Proposal shall include a profile of the firm's experience. Include resumes of project team/sub-consultants that will be providing services which outline their technical and design experience. At a minimum, this should include the project manager/principal agent, associates in charge when project manager/principal agent is unavailable, key personnel, firm size, and an organization chart identifying only those who will perform work for the proposed project and the percentage of each individual's time devoted to this project. The project manager/principal agent shall be the primary contact person to represent your firm and will be the person to conduct the presentation, if invited for an interview. City Council City of Santa Ana FfF 2' -025 2/15/2022 Page 8 d. Understanding of Need: Proposal shall include an outline which demonstrates the firm's understanding of the work. This outline should include anticipated approach, tasks necessary for successful completion, deliverables, and suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware of. Identify any assumptions and/or exclusions used in preparation of the scope of work and associated fee estimate. Relevant Project Experience: Proposal shall include a list of relevant projects, which your firm or personnel have completed within the last 5 years, including significant work with public agencies. Project information should include project description, project location, year completed, client name and contact information, and name of consultant project manager. City of Santa Ana staff may conduct site visits at select projects. f. References: Proposals shall include a listing of relevant projects with references for three public entities with valid current emails for which Proposer has performed similar work within the past five (5) years. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE: Proposal shall include a Scope of Services and Schedule which details the work phases to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished, the deliverables to be provided, and the schedule / timeline to complete the project, based upon the requested Scope of Work detailed in Attachment 1 of this RFP. 3. FEE PROPOSAL: The fee proposal shall be submitted separate and concurrently with the technical proposal, both submitted electronically in PlanetBids and as a hard copy in a separately sealed envelope, clearly labeled as "Fee Proposal." This shall include the firm's Standard Hourly Fee Schedule. The fee proposal will not be opened until the proposals have been evaluated by the proposal selection committee. The City will select the consultant based on qualifications, and then negotiate a contract price based on available funding. 4. CERTIFICATIONS: The following forms shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package: Attachment 3-1: Non -Collusion Affidavit Attachment 3-2: Non -Lobbying Certification Attachment 3-3: Non -Discrimination Certification City Council City of Santa Ana [dFf 21-J25 2/15/2022 Page 9 IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) A. EVALUATION AND RATING The criteria for evaluating the proposals are specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION. B. SELECTION The selection committee will be comprised of at least (3) City staff from multiple departments. The committee may interview the top ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of contracts to the proposers who will provide the best value to the City. The City reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into a contract without interview or further discussions. V. CONTRACT AWARD A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee and acceptance from Funding agency following financial audit, the Project Manager will recommend award contracts to the top-ranking proposer(s) that will provide the best value to the City. B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The Scope of Services, Schedule, and Fees submitted in the proposal will be the basis of any negotiation of final terms, which will lead to a completed agreement ready for execution based on the standard Agreement attached herein as Attachment 2 in the Appendix. VI. IMPLEMENTATION A. KICK-OFF MEETING A kick-off meeting will be held after award of contracts. Consultants and their team will meet with City of Santa Ana staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of services, and implementation processes. B. NOTICE TO PROCEED Prior to issuance of a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP), Consultants shall provide all required bonds, insurance documents, and contents of the Information Packet for review and approval by the City. For "On -Call" contracts, individual City Project Managers will request project/task specific proposals from Consultants on an as -needed basis. Proposals will then be evaluated by City staff and written NTPs will be issued accordingly per each task order. City Council City of Santa Ana Fff 21-225 2/15/2022 Page 10 VII. PUBLIC RECORDS All data, documents and other products used, developed, or produced during response preparation of this RFP will become property of the City. All responses to this RFP shall become property of the City. Proposer information identified as proprietary information be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. Proposals will become public record after award of contract. Proposer information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. City Council City of Santa Ana Fff 21-�25 2/15/2022 Page 11 Appendix ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-125 Introduction / Background The City of Santa Ana intends to retain Transportation and Traffic Engineering Consultants on an as -needed or "on- call" basis. A Professional Services Agreement will be entered into with one or more of the qualified firms Transportation and Traffic Engineering consultant(s) to provide professional services for a variety of projects on an on -call basis. On an on -call, as - needed basis, the selected firm(s) may later be asked to provide professional engineering services proposals on specific, project -by -project basis, based on an agreed -upon specific scope of services and fees. In general, work consists of general Transportation and Traffic Engineering projects. Funding sources for each project may vary for each project/task order assignment shall comply with the funding agency's requirements. The projects may include; sidewalks, bike paths, signing, striping, neighborhood traffic studies, traffic signal modifications, grant application writing, Bikeway Planning, Traffic Signal Master Plan, Street Light Master Plan, SB743 compliance, Traffic Study and other related projects as required. The consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services. The consultant shall utilize in-house staff and/or sub -consultants to complete the assignments to meet the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub -consultant. Prime consultant mark-ups for sub -consultant work will not be allowed. All proposals, plans, drawings, specifications, estimates, grant applications, and/or studies will be subject to the final approval and satisfaction of the City of Santa Ana. Scope of Services The work consists of Transportation and Traffic engineering design and cost estimating for civil works projects, and other related projects as required. The work in general, consists of work in the following areas and not limited to: City Cnunri1 17 — 14 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-1 • Traffic Signal Design • Striping Design • Traffic Engineering Design • Transportation Support • Traffic Studies • Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Compliance • Traffic Modeling • Traffic Signal Master Plan • Street Light Master plan • Street Light Design Training • Grant Writing- Services If there are any exceptions to the core of requested services, proposers shall list said exceptions in their proposal (matrix form). For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub - consultant. The selected consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrated resources available to perform the work described in this RFP. General Requirements and Project Deliverables The Consultant's services for plans specifications and estimating (PS&E) for engineering project preparation and special studies/investigations shall include and in be in conformance with the latest editions of the following: Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards Code). American Water Works Association, California Department of Transportation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), professional Standards established by the City, and or federal, state and local guidelines established in the project. As part of the preparation of the PS&E, the consultant shall prepare the special provisions pertaining to the items of work included in the plans that are not addressed on the latest editions of the applicable standards. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all documents and plans prepared. The plans will be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the documents and the plans. The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and checker identified. City Council 17 — 15 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-2 The Consultant shall have project management control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. This task shall include the following: Project Management Plan- the consultant shall provide a detail management plan including information and coordination with other agencies to ensure compliance and completion of the (PS&E) packages. This plan shall include all milestones and task breakdown for each of the tasks and subtasks included therein. The project management shall be submitted to the Project Manager for review and within 15 calendar days of the issued Notice to Proceed Deliverables • Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) Plan • Project Schedule/Invoicing • Project Correspondence In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, the consultant shall submit the matter to the City for clarification. The Consultant shall perform engineering design services resulting in contract documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates "PS&E") for various projects on an as -needed basis. However, work tasks may include studies or a variety of engineering tasks. If requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed schedule of the assigned project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed and/or Task Order. Specific Task Orders with Notices to Proceed ("NTPs") will be provided for project(s) at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order and this agreement. The following services/items shall include, but are not be limited to: 1. Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed improvements with existing field conditions. 2. Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and or National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). (If required) Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in MicroStation V8i Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City, shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects. 4. Complete the design of projects including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The Consultant shall contact manufacturers and/or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Citv Council 17 — 1 F 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-3 Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to the Consultant. 5. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum paper using MicroStation V8i CADD software program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD Standards and any special provisions thereof. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provide plans and/or specifications accordingly. 6. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer responsible/in-charge of the project. 7. If a part of the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and construction phases of the project, including, but not limited to: • Respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall attend the pre -construction meeting. • Review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. • Respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three (3) working days. • Provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so. 8. If included in the on -call project scope, upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as -built plans and submit them to the City. The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built plans shall be submitted to the City with an electronic copy (in MicroStation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built drawings via CD ore- mail. 9. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of the work performed by in-house staff and/or sub -consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation necessary for the consultant to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce a professional -level quality of work product. 10. If included in the on -call project scope, attend meetings with the City staff as required. 11. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and an; other issues with the City, ether Agencies, and all utility companies Citv Council 17 — 17 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-4 as required. At the direction of the City, the Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies. 12. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. All information regarding the plans and specifications and or documentation related to the project and approved by the City, will then become property of the City. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. All tasks orders shall include the staff title, hours, hourly rate and totals as related to the project. Construction Plans, Standard Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) Preliminary Design- Attend project scope meeting with City Staff to review project details. Consultant shall field review, inspect and conduct all necessary surveys to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) or alternatives, preliminary cost estimate and preferred alternative as requested by the project manager. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 30% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 60% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at for FINAL independent design review. The City will review and comment on the PS&E packages with a turnaround goal of (2) weeks. One (I) copy of the documents with comments will be returned to the consultant. Unless, several agencies are involved in the review process multiple documents with comments will be provided to the consultant. After the final design comments have been incorporated the consultant shall provide the City with final (PS&E) package ready for bid. See Section - General Requirements and Project Deliverables Section. Project Schedule and Progress: Progress review meetings shall be held at intervals deemed appropriate by the City. The Consultant shall furnish two copies of all completed work or partially completed update/status since the last progress review meeting. Progress reports shall be submitted monthly in electronic format indicating achievements and project schedule progress. City Responsibilities: Citv Council 17 — 18 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-5 The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. • Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project • All plan check coordination within the City • Advertise, award, and administer of construction contract • Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards) • Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities Fee Proposal: In addition to Section IV.13.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured as follows: The fee proposal shall include the firm's standard hourly fee schedule, and/or project fee schedule where applicable and as outlined in this this documents. A list of all positions and hourly rates required to perform the services described herein. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. Other Terms and Conditions: 1. The project will be implemented in compliance with the City of Santa Ana's policies, as well as Prevailing Wages and State/Federal Requirements. 2. The City regards the inclusion of California based designs, engineering, and construction professionals, facilities, and services as part of the Team to be highly desirable, but not mandatory. 3. The City reserves the right to amend this Request for Proposal by addendum prior to the final dates of submission. 4. All reports, proposals, or other data or materials which are submitted shall become the sole property of the City of Santa Ana with the exception of the confidential Financial Capacity information and sealed fee proposals which will be returned to all proposers after award of contract to the selected Team. 5. All products used or developed in the execution of any contract resulting from this request will remain in the public domain at the completion of this project. 6. The City has an affirmative action program. The purpose of the affirmative action program is to encourage certified minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. All submitting firms must have established affirmative action programs approvable by the City. During the RFP stage, all firms will need to complete a "Certification of Non - Discrimination by Contractors" for each firm on their team. Citv Council 17 — 19 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-6 City Council 17 — 20 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 2 STANDARD AGREEMENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT CITY OF SANTA ANA THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day of , 2022 by and between ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of- B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $xxxxxx during the term of this Agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. CU Council 17 — 21 2/16�0222f I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) b. Payment by City shall be made within 45 days (forty-five) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a with the option for the City to grant up to a renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 16, below. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and CU Council 17 — 22 2/16�022af I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: i. Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or CU Council 17 — 23 2/19#202Zf 11 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. iv. Where the amounts or coverage provided by the certificates of insurance provides coverage greater than those listed by this Agreement, the amounts provided by the certificates of insurance shall be incorporated by reference into the Agreement. V. Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. CU Council 17 — 24 2/16�0222f I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) 10. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. CU Council 17 — 25 2/16�022af I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 16. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 17. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. CU Council 17 — 26 2/16�0�2af I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) 18. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. 21. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714- 647-6956 CU Council 17 — 27 2/19#20 zf 11 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) With courtesy copies to: Nabil Saba Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714-647-5635 To Consultant: First & Last Name Title Consultant Firm Name Address City, State, Zip Fax: A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager CU Council 17 — 28 2/16�02Zf 11 Non -Fed nding (6.1.2020) APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: John Funk Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Nabil Saba Executive Director Public Works Agency CONSULTANT: (name) (title) CU Council 17 — 29 2/16�02Zf I I Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES City Council 17 - 30 2/15/n2Q 10 of 11 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION Fee Proposal including hourly rates if applicable City Council 17 - 31 2/15/n2Q 11 of 11 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-1: NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATIONS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -Collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non -Collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20, by proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal City Council City of Santa Ana [IF-P-213225 2/15/2022 Page A3-1 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Signed and Printed Name: Title Date City Council City of Santa Ana [IF-P-2113325 2/15/2022 Page A3-2 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council City of Santa Ana W_P-2i3425 2/15/2022 Page AM by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: City Council City of Santa Ana FAFP-2f 5525 2/15/2022 Page A3-4 AGREEMENT WITH ITERIS, INC., TO PROVIDE ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022, by and between Iteris, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On November 2, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-125, by which it sought a qualified consultant to provide on -call transportation and traffic engineering services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-125. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-125, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Consultant's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in the Fee Schedule, which is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated in full. Consultant is one of three (3) consultants selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-125. The total annual compensation for services provided by all consultants selected under RFP No. 21-125 shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of one million dollars and zero cents ($1,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council 17 — 36 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 10 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on June 25, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for two (2) one (1) year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all City Council 17 — 37 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 10 Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability: if Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council 17 — 38 2/15/2022 Page 3 of 10 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work City Council 17 — 39 2/15/2022 Page 4 of 10 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. City Council 17 — 40 2/15/2022 Page 5 of 10 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this City Council 17 — 41 2/15/2022 Page 6 of 10 Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Consultant: Iteris, Inc. 1700 Carnegie Avenue, Suite 100 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Attn: Ramin Massoumi, Senior Vice President A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not City Council 17 — 42 2/15/2022 Page 7 of 10 bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the parry waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council 17 — 43 2/15/2022 Page 8 of 10 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page/ City Council 17 — 44 2/15/2022 Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency ITERIS, INC. Steven Bradley Digitally signed by Steven Bradley Date: 2022.01.20 16:23:17-08'00' Name: Steven Bradley Title: Regional Vice President City Council 17 — 45 2/15/2022 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A City Council 17 — 46 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-125 Introduction / Background The City of Santa Ana intends to retain Transportation and Traffic Engineering Consultants on an as -needed or "on- call" basis. A Professional Services Agreement will be entered into with one or more of the qualified firms Transportation and Traffic Engineering consultant(s) to provide professional services for a variety of projects on an on -call basis. On an on -call, as - needed basis, the selected firm(s) may later be asked to provide professional engineering services proposals on specific, project -by -project basis, based on an agreed -upon specific scope of services and fees. In general, work consists of general Transportation and Traffic Engineering projects. Funding sources for each project may vary for each project/task order assignment shall comply with the funding agency's requirements. The projects may include; sidewalks, bike paths, signing, striping, neighborhood traffic studies, traffic signal modifications, grant application writing, Bikeway Planning, Traffic Signal Master Plan, Street Light Master Plan, SB743 compliance, Traffic Study and other related projects as required. The consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services. The consultant shall utilize in-house staff and/or sub -consultants to complete the assignments to meet the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub -consultant. Prime consultant mark-ups for sub -consultant work will not be allowed. All proposals, plans, drawings, specifications, estimates, grant applications, and/or studies will be subject to the final approval and satisfaction of the City of Santa Ana. Scope of Services The work consists of Transportation and Traffic engineering design and cost estimating for civil works projects, and other related projects as required. The work in general, consists of work in the following areas and not limited to: City Cnunri1 17 — 47 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-1 • Traffic Signal Design • Striping Design • Traffic Engineering Design • Transportation Support • Traffic Studies • Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Compliance • Traffic Modeling • Traffic Signal Master Plan • Street Light Master plan • Street Light Design Training • Grant Writing- Services If there are any exceptions to the core of requested services, proposers shall list said exceptions in their proposal (matrix form). For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub - consultant. The selected consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrated resources available to perform the work described in this RFP. General Requirements and Project Deliverables The Consultant's services for plans specifications and estimating (PS&E) for engineering project preparation and special studies/investigations shall include and in be in conformance with the latest editions of the following: Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards Code). American Water Works Association, California Department of Transportation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), professional Standards established by the City, and or federal, state and local guidelines established in the project. As part of the preparation of the PS&E, the consultant shall prepare the special provisions pertaining to the items of work included in the plans that are not addressed on the latest editions of the applicable standards. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all documents and plans prepared. The plans will be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the documents and the plans. The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and checker identified. City Council 17 — 48 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-2 The Consultant shall have project management control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. This task shall include the following: Project Management Plan- the consultant shall provide a detail management plan including information and coordination with other agencies to ensure compliance and completion of the (PS&E) packages. This plan shall include all milestones and task breakdown for each of the tasks and subtasks included therein. The project management shall be submitted to the Project Manager for review and within 15 calendar days of the issued Notice to Proceed Deliverables • Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) Plan • Project Schedule/Invoicing • Project Correspondence In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, the consultant shall submit the matter to the City for clarification. The Consultant shall perform engineering design services resulting in contract documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates "PS&E") for various projects on an as -needed basis. However, work tasks may include studies or a variety of engineering tasks. If requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed schedule of the assigned project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed and/or Task Order. Specific Task Orders with Notices to Proceed ("NTPs") will be provided for project(s) at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order and this agreement. The following services/items shall include, but are not be limited to: 1. Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed improvements with existing field conditions. 2. Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and or National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). (If required) Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in MicroStation V8i Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City, shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects. 4. Complete the design of projects including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The Consultant shall contact manufacturers and/or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Citv Council 17 — 49 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-3 Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to the Consultant. 5. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum paper using MicroStation V8i CADD software program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD Standards and any special provisions thereof. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provide plans and/or specifications accordingly. 6. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer responsible/in-charge of the project. 7. If a part of the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and construction phases of the project, including, but not limited to: • Respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall attend the pre -construction meeting. • Review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. • Respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three (3) working days. • Provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so. 8. If included in the on -call project scope, upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as -built plans and submit them to the City. The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built plans shall be submitted to the City with an electronic copy (in MicroStation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built drawings via CD ore- mail. 9. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of the work performed by in-house staff and/or sub -consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation necessary for the consultant to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce a professional -level quality of work product. 10. If included in the on -call project scope, attend meetings with the City staff as required. 11. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and an; other issues with the City, ether Agencies, and all utility companies Citv Council 17 — 50 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-4 as required. At the direction of the City, the Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies. 12. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. All information regarding the plans and specifications and or documentation related to the project and approved by the City, will then become property of the City. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. All tasks orders shall include the staff title, hours, hourly rate and totals as related to the project. Construction Plans, Standard Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) Preliminary Design- Attend project scope meeting with City Staff to review project details. Consultant shall field review, inspect and conduct all necessary surveys to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) or alternatives, preliminary cost estimate and preferred alternative as requested by the project manager. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 30% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 60% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at for FINAL independent design review. The City will review and comment on the PS&E packages with a turnaround goal of (2) weeks. One (I) copy of the documents with comments will be returned to the consultant. Unless, several agencies are involved in the review process multiple documents with comments will be provided to the consultant. After the final design comments have been incorporated the consultant shall provide the City with final (PS&E) package ready for bid. See Section - General Requirements and Project Deliverables Section. Project Schedule and Progress: Progress review meetings shall be held at intervals deemed appropriate by the City. The Consultant shall furnish two copies of all completed work or partially completed update/status since the last progress review meeting. Progress reports shall be submitted monthly in electronic format indicating achievements and project schedule progress. City Responsibilities: Citv Council 17 — 51 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-5 The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. • Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project • All plan check coordination within the City • Advertise, award, and administer of construction contract • Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards) • Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities Fee Proposal: In addition to Section IV.13.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured as follows: The fee proposal shall include the firm's standard hourly fee schedule, and/or project fee schedule where applicable and as outlined in this this documents. A list of all positions and hourly rates required to perform the services described herein. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. Other Terms and Conditions: 1. The project will be implemented in compliance with the City of Santa Ana's policies, as well as Prevailing Wages and State/Federal Requirements. 2. The City regards the inclusion of California based designs, engineering, and construction professionals, facilities, and services as part of the Team to be highly desirable, but not mandatory. 3. The City reserves the right to amend this Request for Proposal by addendum prior to the final dates of submission. 4. All reports, proposals, or other data or materials which are submitted shall become the sole property of the City of Santa Ana with the exception of the confidential Financial Capacity information and sealed fee proposals which will be returned to all proposers after award of contract to the selected Team. 5. All products used or developed in the execution of any contract resulting from this request will remain in the public domain at the completion of this project. 6. The City has an affirmative action program. The purpose of the affirmative action program is to encourage certified minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. All submitting firms must have established affirmative action programs approvable by the City. During the RFP stage, all firms will need to complete a "Certification of Non - Discrimination by Contractors" for each firm on their team. Citv Council 17 — 52 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-6 City Council 17 — 53 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT B City Council 17 — 54 2/15/2022 l�lllfll1111fi11111�' 1111111111111111111 1 i11111111i 11111111 1111111111111111111I ELECTRONIC COPY November 30, 2021 iteris Submitted to: d l►r '« I F"A The LegUr9r°�mart Mobility Infrastructure Management— 55 2/15/2022 iteri5 COVER LETTER November 30, 2021 Mr. Azadeh Azad City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency, M-43 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 949.270.9400 1700 Carnegie Avenue, Suite 100 iteris.com Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re: Proposal for On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Dear Mr. Azad: Iteris, Inc. (Iteris) is pleased to submit the enclosed RFP to provide Professional Engineering Transportation and Traffic Services as well as Project/Program Management to the City of Santa Ana (City). At Iteris, we want to play a key role in transforming built and natural environments into thriving communities. The firm's unmatched experience and broad range of professional consulting services helps our clients plan and implement innovative strategies to meet the challenges of tomorrow, focusing our efforts on revitalizing and building resilient cities. The various projects that will be released as part of this on -call provides a unique opportunity for the City to improve mobility by upgrading traffic signals and communication infrastructure. Iteris' proposes Mr. Braulio Ramirez, PE, as Project Manager (PM) for this project. Mr. Braulio Ramirez, PE, will be the primary principal contact for any Task Orders (TO) that may arise from this contract. He will oversee work from project inception to completion and will also be responsible for coordinating staff activities and meetings. Iteris will provide the City with the following distinct advantages: EXPERIENCED PROJECT MANAGER AND PROJECT TEAM The proposed PM, Mr. Ramirez has over 16 years of hands-on Traffic Engineering experience, respectively, working on both public and private sector projects. Mr. Ramirez has extensive experience in traffic management and municipal transportation planning and engineering, making him the ideal team to manage task orders for this on -call. Iteris has also provided recent timing and infrastructure improvements as part of the Orange County Transportation Authority's (OCTA) Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) projects for the City of Santa Ana along Harbor Boulevard, Bristol Street and Main Street. Iteris provides on -call support to public agencies throughout California and EXTENSIVE ON- has over 100 technical staff to meet any agency need, at any time. Iteris CALL has successfully served over 20 local agencies in the past 10 years EXPERIENCE with on -call assignments in Transportation Planning and Traffic THROUGHOUT Engineering (including the City of Santa Ana), and Operations, both as LOS ANGELES on -site staff extension as well as through completing various TOs at Iteris' AND ORANGE offices. Iteris recently assisted the Cities of Laguna Niguel and Irvine with COUNTIES preparation of the grant applications for the OCTA RTSSP for the Crown Valley Parkway -Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Bake Parkway corridors. City Council 17 — 56 2/15/2022 949.270.9400 1700 Carnegie Avenue, Suite 100 I te 15 iteris.com Santa Ana, CA 92705 Iteris' expertise in technology and ITS, coupled with traditional traffic ITERIS IS AT THE engineering proficiency, offers the City a more holistic set of solutions for 44 FOREFRONT OF transportation needs. We take pride in our ability to do it all, as a one -stop - INDUSTRY shop providing enhanced safety and mobility. Iteris is uniquely situated ADVANCES to provide the entire spectrum of services starting with planning, through design, system integration, operations, and performance management. Iteris concurs with all provisions contained in the City's Standard Agreement. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (949) 270-9527 or rmm@iteris.com, or your designated PM, Mr. Ramirez, at (949) 270-9663 or bxr@iteris.com. We appreciate your consideration of Iteris as an extension of your Public Works Department team. Sincerely, Iteris, Inc. Ramin Massoumi, PE Senior Vice President & General Manager Consulting Solutions SHARED GOALS FOR SAFETY AND ENHANCED MOBILITY Iteris is the global leader in smart mobility infrastructure management — the foundation for a new era of mobility. We apply cloud computing, artificial intelligence, advanced sensors, advisory services, and managed services to achieve safe, efficient, and sustainable mobility. Our end -to -end solutions monitor, visualize and optimize mobility infrastructure around the nation to help ensure that roads are safe, travel is efficient, and communities thrive. CONSULTING SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ANALYTICS I SOFTWARE EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES MANAGES] SERVICES ANALYZE SENSORS . O U� a� ❑ z a GOALS Vision zero 1 Safety ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ATMs) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ENGINEERING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 111sUq�� TSM&O �� ZF 00 r>> Tfi 2� 17-57 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LEADERS SIGNAL OPERATIONS LEADERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE...................................................................................................1 2. UNDERSTANDING OF NEED........................................................................................................4 3. RELEVANTPROJECT EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES........................................................11 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE...................................................................................21 APPENDIX A RESUMES..................................................................................................................31 APPENDIX B CERTIFICATIONS.....................................................................................................52 Tables Table 1 — Key Team Members, Role, Location and Experience.........................................................3 Table 2 — Iteris' Southern California On -Call Experience.................................................................12 Figures Figure 1 — Project Team Organization................................................................................................2 Figure 2 — Project Controls Process.................................................................................................23 Figure 3 — Proposed Project Schedule............................................................................................. 30 l U VV Ail ruE COUNTY Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. I iii [Page Intentionally Blank] City Council 17 — 59 2/15/2022 1. FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE Iteris, a publicly -traded corporation (NASDAQ: ITI), is r;, the market leader in applying d0v. informatics solutions to the„,• transportation industry since RtnmoM • 4i�mr° 1987. Iteris' 425 staff have decades of expertise in traffic management, along with superior services and patented products that help detect, measure, and manage traffic and vehicular performance; minimize traffic congestion; and empower Iteris clients with solutions to better manage their transportation networks. Iteris staff members specialize in the fields of traffic engineering, ITS and transportation planning. Knowledge of these practice areas enables us to provide comprehensive services ranging from initial traffic impact studies, transportation modeling, planning, systems engineering, and detailed design, through implementation and performance monitoring. Iteris combines the knowledge of traffic engineers, systems engineers, system integrators, software engineers and transportation planners to offer an unmatched combination of talent and experience. Iteris develops and deploys innovative solutions that help agencies reduce traffic congestion, enhance transit use, monitor and manage transportation networks and provide greater access to reliable traveler information. Core Disciplines Iteris was founded based on the principle of providing quality solutions on time and within budget. Committed to the transportation industry, Iteris applies in depth knowledge to solve the most challenging problems associated with the movement of people and goods to enhance a growing economy. Iteris delivers precise solutions that meet customer needs and expectations in the following areas: 0 ITS & Mobility & Data Smart Connected & Integration, Advanced Commercial Engineering Analytics Insights Communities Autonomous Operations & Traveler Vehicle Vehicle- Maintenance Information C�ctPmc Operations City Council 17 — 60 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 1 1 Project Team Organization With offices in Santa Ana, Los Angeles and Oakland, Iteris has the resources of over 100 team members throughout California dedicated to Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, and ITS. Iteris' proposed team organization is provided in Figure 1 as well as key staff member's role, availability, and experience in Table 1. Complete Resumes for our proposed staff are provided within Appendix A. Figure 1 — Project Team Organization Chris Devlin '� Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA♦ Ted Huynh, PE, TE Jason Xu, PE, PTOE Jennifer Martin, PE Naree Kim, PE Sean Daly, AICP, PTP Dariel Tapia KEY ♦ Expert Advisors (Task Leads) BERNARD K. LI, EE, TE, PTOE Principal -in -Charge City Council 17 — 61 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) 2/15/2022 Iteris, Inc. 12 Project Team Availability Iteris has assembled a team of experienced engineers that include traffic design engineers, traffic operations engineers and traffic planners, ITS engineers, TMC experts, and adaptive traffic operations experts. This team not only includes experts in each of the categories listed above, but engineers with hands-on experience in the City of Santa Ana. Table 1 below outlines key staff member's role, availability, and experience. Complete Resumes for our proposed staff are provided within Appendix A. Table 1 — Key Team Members, Role, Location and Experience Bernard Li, EE, TE, PTOE Senior Advisor & QA/QC 25% Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA Traffic Engineering Task Lead 50% Chris Devlin Transportation Planning Task Lead 65% Sean Daly Transportation Planning Support 40% Ted Huynh, PE, TE Transportation Planning Support 40% • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Jennifer Martin, PE Transportation Planning Support 45% Jason Xu, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineering Support 50% Naree Kim, PE Traffic Engineering Support 50% Dariel Tapia Traffic Engineering Support 70% • • • • • • • • • • • • • City Council 17 — 62 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 13 on k. 2. UNDERSTANDING OF NEED Project Understanding The City has requested qualifications to provide professional Transportation/Traffic Engineering consulting services on an on -call basis. The following work plan focuses on Iteris' core areas of expertise — Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering. The City will require the expertise of skilled transportation engineering professionals best suited to successfully complete a variety of projects. Iteris team members possess the required expertise and availability to achieve success for the City. For each task order received, Iteris will conduct kickoff and meetings with the City staff and other stakeholders that have jurisdiction in the 0 proposed project area to determine needs and requirements. Iteris will submit the minutes from each meeting to City. Iteris has Analysis methodology parameters will, at the discretion of the City, demonstrable and conform to the most current version of the City's Standards, Highway relevant timing Capacity Manual (HCM), Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) experience in Trip and Parking Generation Manuals, the Federal Highway consensus building Administration (FHWA) Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the Caltrans MUTCD California Supplement. Other among multiple local agency standards, where applicable, the America Public Works interrelated project Association Standard Plans for Public Works Construction, Caltrans jurisdictions spanning Standard Plans and Standard Specifications, and "A Policy on 20+ years. Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO) will also be referenced when appropriate. Analyses will be conducted in accordance with City guidelines. Where required, the HCM and/ Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodologies will be used for conducting level of service (LOS) analyses to determine if the operation of a roadway segment or intersection is acceptable in accordance with the City's Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Under the City of Santa Ana's guidelines (which may include LOS policy from the General Plan Circulation Element and the Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Guidelines, the LOS is calculated using ICU, but may utilize the HCM particularly where high pedestrian traffic exists. City Council 17 — 63 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 14 Iteris staff will work in effect as an extension of City staff and as an advocate for the City in meetings and during the planning and review process. The amount of time allocated to each review and applicable charges to each project will be discussed with City staff prior to beginning each project review so that the charges to each project can be managed before costs are incurred. Any changes to the expected labor allocations will be discussed with City staff as soon as they are identified. Services Relevant to this Project Iteris has extensive, relevant experience in Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering, and has work with several agencies throughout Southern California and throughout the nation. Projects range from planning and design to the implementation of multimodal transportation systems. • Signal System Selection, • Intersection Modifications • Traffic Circles Design, Deployment, • Lighting and Parking Design Planning/Design Operation and Coordination • Traffic Simulation • Traffic Control Plans • Bicycle Lane Design • Pedestrian Crosswalk • Training and Research • Bulb -outs Design Enhancement • Warrant Studies Iteris specializes in the design, evaluation, and operation of intersections and arterials to improve the efficiency and safety of vehicular traffic flow, pedestrian mobility, transit operations, and bicycle traffic. Iteris has co-authored the industry standard FHWA Traffic Control Systems Handbook and has assisted multiple agencies throughout the U.S. in the development of signal operation standards. TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN • Traffic signal design As a leader in traffic engineering, Iteris has extensive and modification experience providing planning and design of traffic signals • TSP and EVP and associated systems to improve safety and efficiency, extend capital implementation investment life, and modify and improve operations, including for transit • Signage and striping and emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Iteris has been • Detection selection an integral part of design and deployment of thousands of signals and implementation nationwide. Our approach stems from a comprehensive understanding • Signal Performance of traffic operations, and our engineers strive to provide cost-effective Measures (ATSPM) and problem -solving solutions within our signal planning and design. modifications Iteris has extensive experiences in all stages of design development • Traffic signal phasing from signal system analysis, evaluation, and master planning to • Standard detailed Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), hardware development selection, and integration of hardware in the field. We utilize our • Construction extensive equipment knowledge and experience to help municipalities Assistance implement the right solution for their needs. • Testing and training CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT/INSPECTION • Communications X Iteris keeps traffic moving during project construction. The Infrastructure firm's ITS, traffic engineering, and transportation planning • Community Outreach experts provide a dynamic combination of skills to anticipate traffic • Detour Plans management challenges, implement traffic control plans, and design • ITS Surveillance during the different phases of development. Iteris has significant Elements experience in building consensus on construction period traffic patterns ap npq pl ihlir prias hi iciness nwQQn a @Qd the p blir Iteris also City Council 17 — 64 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 15 UNDERSTANDING OF NEED 1 2 -T T•'r'r . • Pre -construction designs temporary installations of traffic control devices such as Planning video/radar detectors, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), and ramp • Signing and Striping meters that can be relocated during various stages of construction. Plans Traffic Management Plans (TMP) frequently utilize portable DMS and • Staged Construction highway advisory radio. Iteris prepares plans for temporary parking, Analysis temporary access to adjoining properties, and transit service and • Traffic Maintenance mitigation measures on detour routes. Iteris is fully acquainted with • Traffic Management many local agency and Department of Transportation guidelines and Centers requirements for TMP. Iteris also provides program and project • Traffic Management management assistance during construction by serving as an extension Planning of agency staff, directly interfacing with adjacent cites, Caltrans, utility • Traffic Signal companies, and third -party contractors. Iteris will ensure projects are Systems deployed according to plans and specifications, on schedule, and within budget. Iteris staff can be available to support the activities listed below: Attendance at pre -bid meeting • On -site construction support • Assistance with bid process, selection and award • Communicating through agency staff, respond via phone and email to requests for information by contractor or agency staff • Support approval process of submittals and shop drawings • Travel Demand Modeling and Forecasting • Transit Planning • Traffic Impact Analysis • Graphic Information Systems • Microsimulation • Goods Movement • Bus Rapid Transit • Environmental Studies • Airport Ground Access • Area -Wide Circulation Plans • Corridor Studies • Neighborhood Traffic Impacts • Non -Motorized Planning • Parking Studies • Policy Analysis • Land -Use Planning • Master Plan Development • Light Rail Transit • Strategic Transportation Plans • System Performance Monitoring • Traffic Operations Analysis • Transportation Finance Every successful project begins with thorough planning, from site access studies for neighborhood commercial centers to route alignment studies for new rail corridors. Iteris applies technical planning expertise to a wide variety of transportation projects, establishing a solid foundation of success in Transportation Planning. Iteris thoroughly understands the project development process and the importance of building public consensus in order to implement successful, long-term transportation solutions. Iteris offers experienced transportation planners who exemplify innovation in multimodal travel demand modeling, traditional and innovative transportation planning, and traffic engineering. Iteris' transportation planners apply travel demand modeling to prepare transportation master plans for cities and counties, as well as for large private development projects. Iteris' expertise in goods movement analysis and forecasting makes the firm a leader in traffic analysis, circulation, and master planning for ports and airports. Iteris' expertise in traffic operations analysis allows the firm to team with agencies proposing roadway and freeway improvements. Iteris is involved in every facet of transit planning, from conceptual corridor alignment studies to environmental clearance of light rail, heavy rail, commuter rail, and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Iteris is also at the leading edge of traffic impact fee studies, climate change analysis related to transportation, and can assist clients with Senate Bill 743 (SB-743) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis, climate action plans, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) studies, and transportation system sustainability planning. City Council 17 — 65 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 16 TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING/FORECASTING • Model Development Q Iteris has a reputation as an industry leader for its expertise in • Model Calibration and travel demand model application and special purpose focused Validation modeling for multimodal travel, heavy duty truck, rail, BRT, ports and • Customization airports, and active transportation demand forecasting. Iteris staff have • Tour -based Models worked closely with various regional and subregional agencies • Trip Generation, including SCAG, ATAM, VCTC, Metro, OCTA, RCTC, WRCOG, and Distribution and SBCTA for over 25 years in the development and application of some Assignment of the largest and most intricate travel demand models. Iteris has also • Special Generators developed city-wide models for General Plan Circulation Elements and • Transit Modeling special studies for over 30 local agencies; complex highway and transit • Model Installation corridor models for interchange and alignment studies; and subregional • Model Applications and area -wide models. Iteris staff specialize in the development of and Scenarios county -wide and city-wide models, including the development of the • Agency Staff Training current ATAM, Ventura County, Riverside County, and Imperial County models. Most importantly, Iteris developed and has maintained the • Modeling Research current ATAM model for nearly 10 years, and has used it to support multiple development projects. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) • TDM Ordinance q TDM strategies reduce the number of vehicles travelling on Development roadways by promoting alternatives to driving alone. These • Last -Mile and Trip alternatives include rail and bus transit, ridesharing options like carpools Reduction Analyses and vanpools, and active transportation options like bicycling and • Curb Utilization Plans walking. Higher -occupancy travel modes such as rail transit, lanes for • Advanced Intellegent HOV, and managed lanes do more than reduce demand by single- Transportion System occupant vehicles; they also have the capacity to transport a larger • Micro -Transit number of people. TDM programs improve mobility, accessibility, and air • Park and Ride quality. Changes in technology, the workplace, business travel, and Facilities personal travel are changing the travel behavior in communities which will create both challenges and opportunities. The Iteris Team provides policy support to agencies developing TDM programs through development requirements or incentives by providing expertise in the followings areas, but not limited to micromobility planning; neighborhood electric vehicle planning; emerging technologies/advanced ITS; TDM studies, plans and pilot projects; commuter policies and programs technical support; market research; marketing and branding; and airport access strategies. PARKING ANALYSIS AND STUDIES • Parking q Iteris provides a broad range of consulting services related to Supply/Demand parking facilities, supply and demand studies; facility layout and Analysis design; access and control plans; site selection; and parking • Parking Planning and management. Iteris staff has also prepared numerous parking studies Policy Reviews and relevant at the City and neighborhood level, ranging from parking Studies demand and capacity analyses for large projects and downtowns, • Demand shared parking demand projections for new projects and site Management redevelopments, on -street parking policy review, parking facility design Analysis and circulation, and parking demand mitigations as part of the suite of • Parking Operations, transportation demand management (TDM) strategies. The Iteris team City Council 17 — 66 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 17 st f' UNDERSTANDING OF NEED I �i • — —T T.•"r'r Technology, and understands the need for parking analyses to also correspond and Implementation listen to stakeholder and staff concerns while going through the study Parking Design process, in order to meet and "right -size" the needs of the community COMPLETE STREETS • Mobility and gA Iteris provides policy development services to integrate Circulation Element complete street concepts into roadway classification and Policy and circulation/mobility elements of General Plans. Iteris also provides Classification analysis of Complete Street elements including safety analysis, Updates crosswalk implementation analysis, bicycle planning, and signal • Complete Street detection for active transportation. Other policy services include the Assessments identification of first/last mile objectives, and the development of • Streetscape Design guidelines for street crossings, wayfinding/signage and education • Planning & programs. Iteris provides transportation planning and engineering Engineering for services to retrofit auto -centric roadways and to support the potential Retrofiting Auto- traffic and travel time impacts of reducing lanes on existing roadways Centric Roadways and replacing them with alternatives such as buffered bicycle lanes and • Safe Route to improved pedestrian facilities such as median islands. Planning Schools services include analyzing potential delay, queuing and diversion to • SB 743/Multimodal parallel streets. Engineering services include conceptual design Level of Service through implementation of signing and striping, lighting, Intelligent (LOS) Transportation System (ITS)/traffic signal modifications and traffic • Grant Application management systems to support Complete Streets and Smart City Preparation Support implementations. In addition to technical analysis, Iteris is experienced in presenting Complete Streets concepts and analysis at community outreach meetings. Outreach plays a major role in conveying project benefits while also disclosing potential impacts to concerned citizen. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND COMPLETE STREETS PLANNING & DESIGN • Bicycle Master Plan • Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Planning Design • Bicycle Box Design • Low -Cost Curb Modification • Pedestrian Safety and Access Study • Pedestrian Safety Auditing • Pedestrian Crosswalk Enhancement • Safe Routes to School • Complete Street Planning and Design • Traffic Calming Pedestrian and Bicycle Advocacy Iteris has successfully completed innovative bicycle- and ......: pedestrian -related planning and design that involved roadway features of traffic calming, active transportation, and complete street. These projects are usually safety driven in response to the concerns about lack of bicycle or pedestrian facilities or speeding issue. Iteris staff are highly experienced in project technical support and are able to assist from project initialization through the completion of construction phase. Many of Iteris' recommendations include both specific projects and systemic improvements, including addition of bike lane, enhanced intersection treatment for bicycle and pedestrian, upgrade of signage, deployment of warning flashers and modifying striping to reduce conflicts between bicycles and parked vehicles. Projects such as this include the City of Los Angeles' Bicycle Plan's First Five -Year Implementation Strategy Traffic Study and Outreach, the North Santa Monica Boulevard (NSMB) Reconstruction for the City of Beverly Hills and the Design and Implementation of Traffic Signal Synchronization along Four Bicycle Corridors for the City of Pasadena. Iteris staff have assisted numerous agencies in application of HSIP projects and the subsequent PS&E and permitting phases. Iteris staff are seasoned with benefit -cost ratio calculation procedures and requirements, including the HSIP Analyzer required for Cycle 9. City Council 17 — 67 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 18 st r +UNDERSTANDING OF I REGIONAL PLAN / CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT • Goods Movement nicennal, area ,9 Iteris provides component Analysis and � wide and corridor transportation planning. Iteris also provides Transportation System travel demand model development and calibration for regional, Impacts countywide, citywide and project -level analysis. Iteris conducts various • Cost/Benefit Analysis topical analyses that support regional planning efforts such as goods of Goods Movement movement, highway and transit system assessment, financial forecasting Projects of fiscal constraint, project identification and prioritization. Iteris has • Railroad Grade supported recent regional planning and corridor development efforts Crossing Analysis including the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the South Bay Cities Council of Government's (SBCCOG) Highway Assessment, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)/Ventura County Transportation Commission's (VCTC) US-101 Multimodal Corridor Study. Throughout client support on these efforts, Iteris is always mindful of federal and state mandates such as FAST Act, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction targets, SCS goals, as well as funding opportunities through Senate Bill 1. SAFETY ANALYSIS • Hand -on Experience with Caltrans Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) • Road Safety Audit and Assessment (RSA) • Countermeasure Development • Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) Iteris offers hands-on experience utilizing collision data and v field evaluation to develop collision factor identification, safety and operation improvements and implementation plans, as well as assessing the application of innovative solutions to improve safety for all road users. This includes recent development of traffic signal phasing for unique geometries at intersections to improved pedestrian visibility near a high school in the City of San Marcos, CA, collision data analysis to support countermeasure recommendations for the City of Thousand Oaks in CA, Pedestrian Safety Studies, and Road Safety Audit and Assessment (RSA) for numerous local agencies. GRANT WRITING ASSISTANCE • Active Transportation Iteris has successfully assisted several local agencies with Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 1 9 Program -� similar funding applications, including the recent FY 19 - 21 • Caltrans Sustainable RTSSP applications with the various agencies, as well as Los Angeles Transportation County Metro with federal and state grants. The lessons learned from Planning Grant these applications and from implementing multiple RTSSP projects Program since the program's inception will be applied to this on -call contract. • Sustainable Based on the recommendations and direction from City staff, Iteris will Communitites Program develop a Supplemental Application document. This will include, but will • Transit and Intercity not be limited to, project scope write-up, populating necessary tables, Rail Capital Program developing a project schedule, and summarizing estimated points. • Bus and Bus Facilities Coordination with each application stakeholder will be required to Program confirm and finalize project scope, cost, and scoring. A draft • Low or No Emission supplemental application document will be provided for comment and Bus Program approval. Once updated with comments received, a final document with all backup files will be provided to the City and uploaded into OCFundtracker as well. City Council 17 — 68 2/15/2022 A PLANNING DESIGN Communications Master Plan . Communication Systems Development . Street Lighting Design ITS Master Plan . Detection and Surveillance Development Systems Traffic Signal System . Traffic Management Centers Planning and Design . Information Delivery Systems INTEGRATION Systems Design, Engineering, Management, Installation, Integration, Implementation Hardware and Software Development 'Fol'�_ PLANNING — ITS embrace complex multimodal surface transportation improvement 11. solutions at regional and local levels, and on corridor or site specific basis. ITS employs various communications networks and technologies that are networked together to exchange information, support coordinated cross -modal applications, and enhance interagency coordination. Careful planning for the deployment of ITS systems requires a comprehensive understanding of local and regional ITS components, their interaction, and their operation. Iteris has completed hundreds of ITS Planning projects, paving the way for ITS systems architecture, design, and deployment. Iteris' depth of experience working in large and small regions, and with a wide variety of ITS stakeholders, including cities, counties, metropolitan planning organizations, states, regional transit agencies, public safety agencies, emergency management agencies, and the private sector, has allowed the firm to emerge at the forefront of ITS Planning. DESIGN — Iteris provides agencies with state-of-the-art, cost-effective approaches to the design and implementation of ITS field elements, communications networks, Traffic Management Systems (TMS) and TMCs. Iteris produces comprehensive Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) packages for CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), detection, TMCs and communications networks. Iteris' communications designs include numerous corridor and agency -wide Gigabit Ethernet networks for traffic management and agency -Wide Area Networks (WAN), as well as older communications technologies such as SONET, ATM, and serial networks. Iteris has designed communication networks comprised of fiber optics, twisted pair cable, spread spectrum, and up to II AGB microwave wireless communications. Several of Iteris' communication network projects have included the procurement, integration, and installation of Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet hardware, providing agencies with a turnkey solution to implementing a Gigabit Ethernet network. Iteris' TMC design services include feasibility analysis; functional operations and maintenance requirements; staffing analysis; conceptual layout; and final design. Iteris' innovative TMC designs incorporate not only the current requirements of the client, but also flexibility to incorporate new technologies and scalability to support future growth. #a INTEGRATION — Systems integration is a key component of successful multimodal, multi- agency, and complex operating environments. Specialized engineering expertise and skillsets are necessary to overcome all institutional challenges, whether deploying a new system, expanding a legacy system, or aggregating subsystems. Iteris utilizes its extensive experience in complex system engineering, design, product development, systems integration, implementation, system acceptance testing and continued operational maintenance, to integrate all necessary aspects of a complete system including but not limited to hardware, software, and the user -interface into a fully -functional, cost-effective, and turnkey solution. Iteris is committed to providing high -quality products, integrated solutions, and around -the -clock support to meet the client's needs during the entire lifecycle of the program and keep them up and running well into the future. City Council 17 — 69 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 110 1 _Alligir 3. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES Iteris is well known within the industry and has a long history of successful projects similar in scope for several California agencies. Specifically regarding the City of Santa Ana, Iteris is very familiar with City standards and has recently worked on the Bristol Street RTSSP, Main Street RTSSP, and Harbor Boulevard RTSSP; Additionally, Iteirs built the City's TMC video wall in 2016. With a proven track record of on -time, within -budget performance, Iteris encourages the City/Agency to verify with the references provided for the project qualifications provided. Iteris has initiated over 1,000 ITS/Engineering and Planning projects within the last five years for a wide range of public and private entities including local agencies, counties, MPO, and Caltrans. Approximately 70% of these projects represent repeat clients - a testament to Iteris' ultimate goal of client satisfaction. Iteris' extensive on -call traffic engineering, transportation planning, and ITS experience is demonstrated by the contracts and project outlined in this section. • Traffic Engineering • Transportation Planning • ITS • Traffic Signal Design/Synchronization • Travel Demand Modeling and Forecasting -W• • Environmental Studies (CEQA/NEPA) • Transit • Goods Movement • Grant Apllication Assistance Iteris has extensive transportation engineering, planning and ITS on -call experience, E having successfully managed and completed hundreds of on -call task orders for a wide variety of public agencies and municipalities. Iteris can serve any technical needs and respond quickly to task orders with accelerated schedules without sacrificing quality of work. The blend of Iteris' local knowledge and vast transportation management experience provides the resources needed to tackle any technical requests that arise. Iteris' past on -call engagements have involved the evaluation of impacts to traffic, transit and safety as a result of new developments (i.e. residential, retail, commercial), trip/parking generation, traffic control warrants, queuing analysis, travel demand forecasting, capacity analysis/simulation, pedestrian/bicycle/ transit access studies, origin/ destination analysis (using models, license surveys and MacID addresses), circulation analysis and traffic engineering design tasks. Table 2 provides a selection of agencies to which Iteris has provided on -call services over the past five years. W City Council 17 — 70 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 111 Table 2 — Iteris' Southern California On -Call Experience Caltrans • • • • California State University, Long Beach • City of Anaheim • • • • • City of Beaumont • City of Beverly Hills • • • City of Buena Park • • • City of Burbank • • • • City of Chino • City of Corona • • • • City of Cypress • • • City of Diamond Bar • • • City of Eastvale • • • City of Fountain Valley • • • City of Garden Grove • • City of Glendale • • • City of Irvine • • • • • City of Irwindale • • • • City of Laguna Niguel • • • City of Laguna Woods • • • City of Los Angeles Planning Department • City of Long Beach • • • • City of Moreno Valley • • • • City of Newport Beach • • • • City of Orange • • • City of Oxnard • • • City of Pasadena • • • • City of Pomona • • • • • City of Rancho Palos Verdes • • • • City of Rialto • • City of San Diego • City of Santa Ana • • • • City of San Marcos • • City of Yorba Linda • • • CRA, City of Los Angeles • Los Angeles Department of Transportation • • • Los Angeles Parks and Recreation Los Angeles County Metro Orange County Transportation Authority Port of Long Beach 0 • Port of Los Angeles P • Riverside County Transportation Commission P • Riverside County • San Diego Association of Governments Ventura County P Westside Cities Sub -region • • • • City Council 17 — 71 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 112 Relevant Project Qualifications and References The following contracts showcase just a few of Iteris' relevant project qualifications. Client references are included within this section for each corresponding project. HARBOR BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION (TSS) PROJECT — CITY OF SANTA ANA, CA Reference Cesar Rodriguez, PE, Acting Senior Civil Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza M-43, P.O. Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA, 92702, (714) 647-5626, crodriguez5@santa-ana.org Duration June 2015 — June2018; O&M July 2018 — June 2020 Budget $601,213; $98,230 (O&M) This multi -jurisdictional project involved signal synchronization and equipment upgrade along Harbor Boulevard from Chapman Avenue to Newport Boulevard, spanning across the Cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Fountain Valley, and Costa Mesa, as well as freeway on/off ramps at SR-22 and 1-405 within Caltrans jurisdiction. The project was funded by the Renewed Measure M from OCTA, with the City of Santa Ana serving as the lead agency. In addition to generating PS&E packages for equipment upgrades, such as ADA-compliant upgrades, Bluetooth travel time devices, controller cabinet, emergency vehicle preemption and new fiber optic communication, the project also included the development, implementation and fine-tuning of the AM, PM, mid -day, off-peak and weekend traffic signal coordination timing plans for all 46 intersections along the corridor. Iteris will also provide TMC upgrades to the cities of Costa Mesa and Santa Ana, which spans from CCTV licenses and workstations to designing and replacing the City's existing video wall system with newer and more advanced capabilities. Iteris staff will be present during construction and will also perform all necessary integration, implementation, and fine-tuning tasks. _ I:I�APAIn V — NN7AN YALL "1" SANTA AI Gfff - GAR�ENYE Esnua� anv — LEGEND ,y enl�f�si nsaus�sr Nms 'AuhGmn Q • Gown Grew Ga CO SANTAANA- -1 O MURMIN VALLE`• As per the requirements of the M2 guidelines, Iteris will also provide operations and maintenance (O&M) support for two years. MASTER ON -CALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM/TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND VARIOUS TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES — CYPRESS, CA Reference David Roseman, Traffic Engineer, City of Cypress, Public Works Department, 5275 Orange Ave., Cypress, CA 90630, (714) 229-6700, TrafficEngineer@cypressca.org Duration July 2015 — Ongoing Budget $18,000 per year Iteris was contracted by the City of Cypress to provide on -call traffic engineering services for traffic signal interconnect system support, traffic signal operations services and various traffic engineering studies on an "as -needed" basis. Some of the professional services Iteris provided the City with include: • Assistance performing traffic signal timing modifications and traffic operations support for 59 signalized intersections, 56 of which are connected to the City's Econolite Aries Closed Loop Interconnect System; City Council 17 — 72 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 113 Modification of signal operations and implementation of signal timing (in the field and through the interconnect system) on the Econolite ASC3 controllers as well as modify and implement timing on the Econolite Aries Closed Loop Interconnect System; Troubleshoot Ethernet communication issues associated with the City's fiber optic communication system, various traffic signals, and CCTV system throughout the City; and Performing traffic signal warrant studies, pedestrian studies, radar speed studies and the preparation of design plans, estimates and specifications for the construction of various traffic control devices. Projects Included: • Cypress - 2 Pedestrian Signal Design ($16,000; 8/2015 — 9/2016) • Cypress - 2 Signal Modifications ($13,000; 8/2015 — 7/2016) • Cypress CCTV Maintenance ($15,000; 7/2017 — Ongoing) NORTH SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD (NSMB) RECONSTRUCTION — CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, CA Reference Aaron Kunz, City of Beverly Hills, 455 North Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, (310) 285-2563, akunz@beverlyhills.org Duration January 2013 — June 2017 Budget $551,615 Iteris has served as the lead transportation consultant for the planning, design and construction of NSMB in Beverly Hills, a corridor that is being converted from a former Caltrans state highway into a modern complete street. Iteris' role included working with a Blue Ribbon Committee to review the state of the art in urban complete streets to evaluate alternatives and recommend a new design for the boulevard. Features investigated included bicycle lanes, off-street pathways for bikes and pedestrians, curbside bio-swales, transit amenities, and median islands. Once the design parameters were approved by the City Council, Iteris prepared the signing and striping plans and signal modification plans for the corridor and worked with the City's Traffic and Parking Commission on the construction traffic mitigation plan, including numerous public outreach meetings. Once construction began, Iteris has assisted the construction management team with the implementation of the traffic mitigation plan, including a public process to develop a temporary restriping of South Santa Monica Boulevard to maintain access to the City's business district. Also during the construction process, Iteris conducted an analysis of the potential cumulative impacts of the NSMB construction Droiect simultaneouslv with the Wilshire subwav construction. coordinated with Metro City Council 17 — 73 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 114 on bus stop/route relocations and fine-tuned traffic signal timing of critical intersections as the construction phases progressed, monitored neighborhood traffic conditions to assess the need for implementation of the neighborhood traffic mitigation tool box, and assisted the City Council in making the decision to revise the design plans to add bicycle lanes to the project. Through these efforts, Iteris staff has been in the forefront of complete streets planning and design in Beverly Hills and has successfully worked with policy makers, residents, and business leaders in evaluating street design issues in the City. As part of design, Iteris led signing and striping including solid bicycle lanes, decorative street lighting including illumination analysis using AGi32 software, traffic signal modifications at all signalized intersections and coordinated with IT communication design. The construction of the project completed June 2018. BUENA PARK ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING — CITY OF BUENA PARK, CA Reference Nabil Henein, Interim Director of Public Works, City of Buena Park, 6550 Beach Blvd., Buena Park, CA, 90622, NHenein@buenapark.com, (714) 562-3670 Duration December 2015 — June 2019 Budget $500,000+ July 2015, the City initiated a new approach to managing transportation issues, and determined that future transportation engineering services would be more efficiently provided by consultants rather than City staff. Iteris currently provides on -site staffing four days per week, functioning as an extension of City staff and participated in interdepartmental meetings on new developments and initiatives. Iteris staff also reviewed plans for new developments and temporary construction closures, represented the City at County -level meetings, coordinated maintenance responsibilities with the City's traffic signal maintenance contractor, and addressed traffic inquiries from City Councilmembers and residents. Furthermore, Iteris staff provided training and education to City staff so they can be well -versed in the full capabilities of the City's TMC and signal system. Iteris staff also attended City Council and Transportation Commission meetings on behalf of the City, speaking to projects and specific items under consideration. Lastly, Iteris staff prepared and submitted a grant application for the Caltrans Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Cycle 3 call for projects for a Safe Routes to School (SR2S) project. As part of this application, improvements to pedestrian facilities around elementary schools and school bus stops were researched and identified. The grant application was selected by OCTA for funding via the County's Measure M sales tax measure, and Iteris worked with the City to fast -track funding and completion. Projects Included: • On -Site Staffing ($454,334; 2016 — Ongoing) • On -Call TMC Support ($117,950; 2016 — Ongoing) • Los Coyotes Traffic Study Review ($2,400; 1 /2016 — 5/2016) • Traffic Circulation at Beach Boulevard/La Mirada Boulevard/Santa Guertrudes ($5k; 2/2016 — 5/2016) • Fire Station 63 TSD ($17,860; 10/2016 — Ongoing) • Beach Wayfinding Signs Electrical Plans ($5k; 5/2017 — 3/2018) • Porto's Parking and Queuing Analysis ($5k; 5/2017 — 6/2017) • Installation of Surge Protectors & Signal Inventory Update ($2,640; 5/2017 — 12/2017) • Commonwealth and Indiana Avenue Traffic Signal Support ($2,864; 7/2017 — 9/2017) • Municipal Code Review ($7k; 8/2017 — 12/2017) • Manual Advance Push Button System ($2k; 8/2017 — 12/2017) • Install four (4) Wireless Radios along Crescent Avenue ($3k; 1/2018 — 6/2018) City Council 17 — 74 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 115 IRVINE ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING AND MODELING SERVICES — CITY OF IRVINE, CA Reference Jaimee Bourgeois, City Traffic Engineer, City of Irvine, 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA, 92606, (949) 724-6369, jourgeois@cityofirvine.org Duration January 2014 — December 2019 Budget $500,000+ On -Call Professional Traffic Engineering Services (2014 — 2016) Iteris is one of the City of Irvine's approved consultant team to perform the following services on an on -call basis: • Traffic Signal & Traffic Signal System Upgrade Design • Travel Impact Analysis & Fee Nexus Studies • SB 743 Implementation and VMT • Traffic Engineering Plan Check • Project Development Services • On -Call Transportation Planning/Engineering Services As part of this recent on -call with the City, Iteris is serving as extension of City staff to manage the City's Irvine Traffic Research and Control Center (ITRAC) during construction activities and measure new vehicle and pedestrian clearance distances. Iteris has also upgraded the City's existing video wall assisted the City in developing design alternatives for the dips ��_... ..drrl ®;■erg — * I: City of Irvine traffic management center video wall upgrade. Through this effort, we developed four design alternatives using various video wall technologies and configurations with conceptual drawings to assist the City in selecting the best technology and configuration that suits their operational requirements. Iteris also provided design services at Jamboree Road and Main Street, and recently on the Barranca Regional Signal Synchronization Program with upgrades to communication systems and traffic control equipment. Based on the successful completion on previous signal synchronization projects with the City and other Orange County agencies, Iteris has been selected to complete the Von Karman Regional Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Project within the cities of Irvine and Tustin. This project, similar to many RTSSP led by the City, will include the development of a PS&E package for bid and construction; development and implementation of new signal timing plans for the weekday and weekend; and operations and maintenance for a period of two years to ensure proper operation for all signals and equipment installed as part of this project. Projects Included: • Barranca/Muirlands RTSSP Project ($444,576; 06/2014 — Ongoing) • Various Technical Traffic Signal Services ($168,000; 12/2016 — Ongoing) • Jamboree Rd and Main Street Intersection Improvement Project ($79,375; 10/2015 — 8/2016) • Von Karman/Tustin Ranch RTSSP Project ($404,540; 04/2017 — Ongoing) • Projects Development and Applications for Competitive Measure M2 ($75,000; 08/2017 — Ongoing) On -Call Traffic Modeling Services (2014 — 2016) Iteris provided on -going support to City Staff for the development and operation of ITAM (the City's Travel Demand Forecasting Model). Support extended from development of Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) system, integration with OCTAM (OCTA's Regional Travel Demand Forecasting), though trip City Council 17 — 75 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 116 r �r generation, distribution, assignment and validation. We also assisted the City with post -processing model results and the development of level of service analysis for input to Traffic Studies and Environmental Impact Reports. Iteris also supported City staff with review of Traffic Studies and other Transportation analysis and provides GIS support as -needed basis. Projects Included: • Irvine Business Complex NEXUS Update ($433,000; 4/2018 — 12/2020 • OCFA Fire Station Emergency Preemption Design Services ($5,455; 7/2015 — Ongoing) ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES — CITY OF ANAHEIM, CA Reference Rafael Cobian, Principal Traffic Engineer, City of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Ste. 276, Anaheim, CA 92805, (714) 765-50164991, jborregorcobian@anaheim.net Duration March 2014 — July 2017 (Planning); Budget $200,000+ March 2017 — July 2020 (Engineering) On -Call Traffic Engineering Services (2017 — 2020) In 2017, The City of Anaheim selected Iteris, Inc. to serve the Public Works Department to provide on -call traffic engineering services. In this capacity, Iteris will support services in the following: • Traffic Signal Design • Traffic Studies for Capital Projects • Traffic Impact Studies • Travel Demand Forecasting • Technical support for funding and grant applications • SB 743 Implementation and VMT • Intelligent Transportation Systems Design • Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Studies • Technical services and support for non -motorized capital projects On -Call Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering, and Parking Services (2014 — 2017) The City of Anaheim had selected Iteris, Inc. to serve as an extension of City Planning Department staff to provide on -call services for land use project development Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering and Parking Services. In this capacity, Iteris facilitated land use development project reviews with focus on their contributing to the City's General Plan goals to: City Council 17 — 76 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 117 Provided comprehensive multimodal transportation system for circulation of people and goods. Protected and encouraged active transportation (bicycle and pedestrian) travel and transit connectivity. Ensured adequate parking with consideration of strategies for the control of parking demand such as improved transit service, amenities for bicyclists, and rideshare vehicles, and strategies for shared parking opportunities in mixed -use and multiple -use development. Projects Included: • Anabella Hotel TIA • Anaheim Platinum Triangle Model Runs #3 • ATAM Model Runs — Trumark At Lewis • Ball Road Basin ATAM Model Support • Hampton Inn Traffic Study — 100 W Katella • Link OC TIA Peer Review • Nohl Ranch Condo TIA • Quality Inn Traffic Study — 1441 S. Manchester • TIA Peer Review — 901 E. South Street • TIA Peer Review — Parking Study & TIA Packing District • TIA Peer Review — Tract No 18045 — Anaheim • TIA Radisson Hotel — Anaheim ATMS MASTER PLAN UPDATE, GRANT SERVICES, ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES — CITY OF CORONA, CA Reference Aaron Cox, Associate Engineer - Traffic, Public Works, City of Corona, 400 S. Vicentia Ave., Corona, CA 92882 (951) 279-3515, Aaron.Cox@CoronaCA.gov Duration November 2019 — Ongoing The original Master Plan developed by Iteris in 2006 followed a system engineering approach that employed an iterative process in assessing the City's need and mapping those needs to system solutions which included the design and construction of two phases. The City has contracted Iteris to prepare an update to the original Master Plan effort which will research technologies for IP-addressable cameras, changeable message signs, video detection, network redesign, fiber management, data analytics, connected vehicles, and Gigabit Ethernet network. The Master Plan will include a full Traffic Budget $456,338 Management Center (TMC) re- design and cost. Iteris will use the master plan to help the City secure funding for future phases as they continue to expand their ITS infrastructure. Once the Master Plan has been completed and approved, Iteris will design Phase 3 and provide construction management and integration support. City Council 17 — 77 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 118 OXNARD ITS MASTER PLAN, DESIGN, INTEGRATION, AND MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING PROJECTS — CITY OF OXNARD, CA Reference Jason Samonte, City Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Division, 214 South C Street, Oxnard, CA 93030, 805-385-7872, Jason.Samonte@ci.oxnard.ca.us Duration December 2012 — Ongoing In December 2012, the City of Oxnard initiated the construction phase of the ITS project. During the construction phase of the project, Iteris is serving as the City's system integrator responsible for procurement and integration of all project hardware including Ethernet switches, Gigabit Ethernet hub switches, CCTV camera installations, video detection systems, and wireless hardware. Iteris is responsible for developing the IP/VLAN schema, and configuration and bench testing of the hardware prior to installation by the contractor. Iteris is Budget $1,864,468 III �1W E LA MR WE Li Irl"_ r --- •.-- -- . �. — _.— cirrnvrwt�BB also responsible for overall systems integration and acceptance testing. Lastly, Iteris is responsible for the design -build of the City's new TMC. WARNER AVENUE REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM (RTSSP) PROJECT — OCTA & CITIES OF SANTA ANA, HUNTINGTON BEACH, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, AND TUSTIN, CA Reference Amy Tran, Principal Transportation Analyst, OCTA, 600 South Main Street, P.O. Box 14184, Orange, CA 92863-1584, (714) 560-5379, atran@octa.net Duration June 2012 — October 2016 Budget $703,000 S MAIiNr BEACH Ce w� I anI ! As part of the renewed Measure M Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P), the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) initiated the Warner Avenue Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Project to improve and enhance signal timing and synchronization services and operations along Warner Avenue. The project provided operations and infrastructure improvements at 41 intersections along the 13-mile segment of Warner Avenue. In addition to OCTA, four municipalities were involved with the project: Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Santa Ana, and Tustin. The three main phases of the project consist of: traffic signal equipment/software upgrades to communication, cabinets, and controllers; traffic signal synchronization involving new coordination plans and travel time studies; operation and maintenance of equipment and timing support. Iteris worked closely with OCTA and all participating agencies to ensure that all the involved Cities received the necessary traffic signal upgrades, communication infrastructure upgrades, optimized plans, and on -going support as detailed in the M2 applicatior. City Council 17 — 78 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 119 BRISTOL STREET RTSSP PROJECT — OCTA, CALTRANS & CITIES OF SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA, AND NEWPORT BEACH, CA Reference Amy Tran, Principal Transportation Analyst, OCTA, 600 South Main Street, P.O. Box 14184, Orange, CA 92863-1584, (714) 560-5379, atran@octa.net Duration June 2016 — June 2018 Budget $2,160,358 June 2018 — May 2020 (O&M) $127,052 (O&M) Iteris was retained by OCTA through the 2014-2019 on -call traffic - - engineering contract, which Iteris was once again the top -ranked firm, to provide operations and infrastructure improvements at 45 intersections along an 8-mile segment for Bristol Street, spanning across the Cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach. Bristol Street is a major north -south arterial that is used by travelers and commuters, and also serves as the main access road to South — Coast Plaza, the largest shopping mall by size on the West Coast. The primary goal of the project is to improve traffic flow and safety for all users including vehicles, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians..T~''" s- Iteris designed and constructed traffic signal equipment and infrastructure upgrades, including Ethernet -over -copper and fiber optic communications, traffic signal controllers, traffic signal cabinets, signal modification, CCTV cameras, EVP equipment, Bluetooth, loop detection, and TMC upgrades for Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, and GPS unit at 1-405 ramp for time -based coordination. All 45 intersections, including Caltrans ramp signals, were retimed with AM, PM, mid -day and weekend traffic signal coordination timing plans. Iteris worked closely with OCTA and participating municipalities to ensure all involved Cities received the necessary traffic signal upgrades, communication infrastructure upgrades, optimized plans, and 2-year ongoing O&M support. The before/after studies revealed that the project benefits were estimated to be $12.6 million over three years with a benefit -to -cost (B/C) ratio of 12:1. ON -CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, PLAN CHECKING, DESIGN, AND PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION SERVICES — CITY OF ORANGE, CA Reference Mr. Larry Tay, PE, City Traffic Engineer, Public Works Department, City of Orange, 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92866, (714) 744-5534, Itay@cityoforange.org Duration September 2017 — Ongoing Budget $54,177 Iteris has been providing traffic engineering and transportation planning services on an on -call basis to the City of Orange for several years. As part of this contract, Iteris staff has executed task orders such as the review of traffic control plans as well as the City's annual pavement plan. Iteris developed new signal timing plans for the new signal at the Santiago Canyon Road/Holy Sepulcher Cemetery Driveway intersection, including generating new basic timing parameters to match the latest state and City standards. In addition, Iteris prepared a peer review of an existing TIA for Sunrise Assisted Living at Lincoln/Oceanview, which included a high-level review of an existing TIA and identifying whether implementing a signal would be feasible even if the study showed that no signal was warranted. Other measures to alleviate resident complaints were considered as well. Iteris evaluated the option of implementing a mini roundabout at Palmyra Avenue and Glassell Street, which included alternatives and potential costs. Iteris also prepared a simulation to identify potential operational issues that were completed along Palm Avenue between Cypress Street and Glassell Street with a pedestrian scramble intersection. Lastly, Iteris' services included preparing traffic control plans per the City's preference (on aerial background) for events in the City, such as the C)rgnga Mgg Pgrwia gnri an avant nn .liilg `;rd City Council 17 — 79 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 120 SCOPE ti 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE Iteris has an estimated 15,500 customers, providing municipalities and government agencies around the United States with the necessary design, real-time analytics, and actionable informatics to improve mobility with our communities and ready our roadways for connected/autonomous vehicles and smart cities. Iteris is the market leader in emerging Internet of Things (IoT) for transportation infrastructure and are trusted advisors to 20 countries, 50 State Departments of Transportation, 1,000+ counties, and 10,000+ municipalities. The following paragraphs describe Iteris' general approach to providing transportation and traffic engineering services. This general work plan approach will be further refined based on the specifics of either each particular project or a general task order to ensure that any project review and scheduled work product will be completed on schedule and to the City's satisfaction without resulting in additional charges or delay to the City. In addition, prior to each and every project submittal, all deliverables will be reviewed by experienced staff to ensure the work is free of errors. The scope of work under this service may include one or more of the following tasks: TASK — PROJECT MANAGEMENT The following narrative outlines the Iteris Team approach and proposed activities to accomplish Project Management and Coordination functions and goals. Project Kick-off Meeting The Iteris Team Project Manager will coordinate and plan a project kick-off meeting with the City Project Manager. Iteris will schedule meeting invitations, as well as a prepare a meeting agenda and materials for a kick-off meeting that will include representatives from City of Santa Ana staff, and key Iteris Team members. The purpose of the kick-off meeting will be to discuss goals and objectives of the project, the project schedule, and the role of the Iteris Team in conducting the project. It is anticipated that project team communication protocols will be discussed, as well as scheduling for recurring project meetings, and progress reporting. The Iteris Team Project Manager may propose a separate "pre -meeting" with City staff only to discuss invoicing and potentially other relevant project administrative matters. The Iteris Team will generate meeting notes that will include key action items, with responsible parties and due dates. City Council 17 — 80 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 121 Schedule and Budget Project management and coordination is a key element in delivery of any Iteris project. For any project on this on -call, Iteris will document the project management elements early in the project so everyone has a clear understanding of the project management structure and reporting. Successful outcomes of projects will require some iterative coordination between Iteris and City Project Manager. Iteris will submit a Project Management Plan (PMP) within fifteen calendar days of Notice to Proceed, to document management reporting and coordination. Project Meetings Mr. Ramirez and key staff from the Team will participate "virtually," in regularly scheduled, recurring project team meetings. Mr. Ramirez will coordinate with the City Project Manager to conduct project team meetings in a manner that provides good communications throughout the project team on project status, and progress in the development and review of project deliverables. Meeting materials will be provided to City PM prior to distribution to the project team members, allowing adequate time for review and edits. Action minutes shall be provided to the project team within three (3) business days of a project team meeting. In general, Mr. Ramirez will communicate project status and progress with the City PM on a regular basis, and no less frequently than every two weeks. Methods to Ensure Quality, Budget, and Schedule Control Iteris' ability to implement high -quality deliverables is a result of Iteris' adherence to a quality assurance program that ensures accuracy, product usability, and an overall commitment to product excellence and user satisfaction. The Iteris project manager ensures the team - commitment to these objectives by identifying goals at the outset of the project and monitoring the product implementation and delivery process. Iteris strives to improve the processes and tools Iteris uses to provide high -quality products and services. The Iteris QA/QC Plan is an all -encompassing plan that covers documents and plan sets. The following are excerpts from Iteris' QA/QC plan, focused on documentation. Not only will the Task Leaders ensure that Iteris staff members follow this plan, but also that other Iteris Team members adhere to Iteris' quality requirements: The following is an excerpt from Iteris' Quality Control Manual: `7t is the goal of Iteris to provide on -time, within budget quality products in accordance with ISO 9001:2008 requirements and specific project requirements. Each associate within Iteris will adhere to the QA/QC procedures adopted by the organization to insure that each deliverable is designed and developed appropriately, timely, and accurately to meet both the scope of work and client satisfaction." The QA/QC process is a major factor in reducing project issues and design errors and will assist with identifying conflicts or inconsistencies within project documentation. The QA/QC process will also require that each project be set up with a dedicated task for QA/QC tracking and that an individual be charged with Quality Control for each task in the Statement of Work. In addition to project budget, ample time must be provided in the project schedule to complete reviews, as well as provide sufficient time for comments to be addressed and incorporated into the final delivery to the City. The production of top quality products for the City is Iteris' number one project goal, and the QC process is followed by associates working on each project undertaken by Iteris. All documents produced by Iteris associates and team members, whether for transmittal to a client, prospective client, another consulting firm, or for public distribution, are reviewed by someone with expertise in the relevant area other than the author to ensure that they are comprehensible and well written. It is difficult for the author of a product to always catch obvious mistakes or to realize when something may be confusing to the reader, particularly when writing technical reports geared toward a City Council 17 — 81 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 122 lay audience. A second opinion is also invaluable in identifying alternative approaches to the analysis. Inter -disciplinary review is invaluable on a multi- disciplinary project like this one, as it helps to ensure that recommendations are consistent among team members. Also, a fresh "outsider's" review often catches errors that go undetected through multiple reviews by the same person. Figure 2 illustrates Iteris' QA/QC flowchart. It is Iteris' policy that all documents be reviewed by senior staff (QC Lead) before distribution, and that this person be identified early in the process. During the internal project kick-off meeting, once the deliverables are identified, the Mr. Ramirez and QC Lead for each task shall identify specific senior staff who are able and qualified to perform the reviews. At each level of document review, the author shall review their own work relative to the underlying analysis, calculations and graphics of the report, and does not assume that someone else will be reviewing it to catch any mistakes. This same attention to detail is applied to graphics (maps and presentation materials) that will be incorporated into documents and presentations. They must all be reviewed by someone other than the "author" and the graphic technician who produced them to make sure that the information and message conveyed is clear and understandable. Graphics and presentation materials are often the most critical elements of a project as they are what the public and policy makers' focus on and they must be accurate and concise. Deliverables • Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan • Project Schedule/Invoicing • Project Correspondence TASK — TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Figure 2 — Project Controls Process TASK INITIATED Preparation YES of Document Task Lead Transportation Planning Studies The types of transportation planning services we perform include: • Traffic impacts studies • Parking studies • Traffic Circulation analysis • Circulation Elements Update of • City's General Plan • Travel demand forecasting • Corridor studies • Traffic Calming Analysis and Design • Infrastructure transportation planning studies Ae.i.,e and Safe Rsutes to Srheel studies City Council 17 — 82 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 123 Typical transportation planning studies conducted by Iteris include the following key tasks: • Project scoping and coordination with City, identification of issues, identification of study area, affected roadway and facilities, agreement on methodology • Data collection including field review of existing transportation facilities near the project, traffic data collection, collection and review of recent documents • Analysis of the project including trip generation potential, mode split (auto, transit, truck, non - motorized), capacity analysis of links and/or intersections, analysis of transit system impacts • Deficiency identification — identify deficiencies in the transportation system caused either by the project, by cumulative conditions, or both, in terms of level of service, traffic volumes, future speeds • Recommendations including physical improvements to intersections, lanes, bridges, freeway facilities, transit facilities, bicycle facilities, other infrastructure, plus operational improvements or changes • Documentation that is clear and understandable to not only the technical professional, but also to the public since transportation planning is often a key element of local projects Traffic Engineering Design Iteris will prepare traffic engineering plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) conforming to the latest City's and Caltrans' Standard, including: • New traffic signal installation • Traffic signal modifications • Signing and striping • Street lighting • Work area traffic control Traffic signal interconnect (twisted -pair copper, fiber- optic and/or wireless) • Intelligent Transportation System (ITS), e.g. CCTV cameras, video detection • Traffic Management Center (TMC) enhancements In general, for developing the PS&E package for design plans, Iteris will complete the tasks as identified by the City. These tasks in general will include, but not be limited to the following activities: • Research of existing utility company and City records to coordinate proposed improvements with existing field conditions. This activity is of prime importance to assure the accuracy of the field conditions, early identification of utility conflicts and avoiding contract change orders during the construction. • Completion of design projects including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. Specifications shall be written in Microsoft Word and both physical and electronic copies shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boilerplate to Iteris. • All plans will be drawn using the MicroStation and be be completed per City Standards. • All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Iteris' licensed professional engineer supervising the project. These signed originals will then become property of the City. Design parameters will conform to the latest guidelines of the California Vehicle Code; Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications; Highway Design Manuals. the Federal and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); and all other applicable local, county, state, and federal policies, guidelines, codes, and regulations. City Council 17 — 83 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 124 CEQA/NEPA Iteris has assisted several agencies update their traffic study guidelines to conform to SB 743 for their California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation analysis including the City of Irvine, City of Seal Beach and City of Laguna Niguel. Our team have extensive experience of developing Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) forecasts using traffic models including OCTAM and we are currently working on several project -level VMT studies. We are able to readily implement the screening and VMT calculations required for CEQA analysis as outlined in the City's recently updated Traffic Study Guidelines. Iteris is also familiar with the VMT requirements needed for input to air quality and noise studies for CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). TASK — MASTER PLAN Data Collection and Field Review Iteris will collect existing traffic and street light infrastructure information through a series of activities, including interviews with City traffic engineering staff, City maintenance staff (contract) and review of signal interconnect/signal system documentation. Although Iteris staff already has some knowledge and field notes of the existing traffic/communication system, it is envisioned that Iteris staff will visit and thoroughly document each City traffic signal. There are discreet components to a traffic/street lighting signal system. Each component will be evaluated and discussed separately. However, ultimately the system will function at its best when all of the components are fully and completely integrated. Components of the signal system include: • The general street network and configuration; • Full inventory of traffic signal controller hardware and software at each intersection including field hubs • Communication infrastructure between TMC and intersections • TMC infrastructure • Street light infrastructure Detailed inventory documents will be prepared to ensure City staff will have an appropriate record of existing equipment and infrastructure. Iteris will submit an Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum summarizing the findings. Surrounding System Evaluation Potentially, one goal of the Traffic Master Plan could be is to develop a strategy for the City of Santa Ana to establish communications with adjacent jurisdictions, such as Caltrans and the cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and Garden Grove, Tustin, Irvine, and Orange. There is currently one known fiber intertie between the City and Costa Mesa, however more discussions may be needed if additional data sharing is considered. Through the use of communication links, or interties, between the City TMC and those of boundary agencies, the City will be able to share traffic signal timing data, synchronize clocks and share video surveillance data. Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 125 In order to establish an agency -to -agency intertie, a number of alternatives are available that will be further explored as part of the project. This intertie can be accomplished through a high -bandwidth intertie or virtual private networks (VPNs). This task will result in a deliverable that presents an assessment of the existing and planned traffic signal systems for Caltrans and participating neighboring agencies, as well as a recommended approach to establishing communications with these agencies to improve overall traffic operations coordination across jurisdictional boundaries. This includes conducting up to one meeting with each of the noted agencies, if necessary. Needs and Opportunities Assessment Based upon the details of the existing conditions and the evaluation of the surrounding systems, the Iteris Team will prepare a Technical Memorandum that details the needs, opportunities and solutions in support of the Traffic Signal System Master Plan. Needs Identification The Needs Identification will utilize the findingsto conduct an assessment of the City's Traffic Signal/Street Light System needs. The findings from the existing conditionswill detail the existing traffic signal system, communications, and TMC operations, as well as the identified deficiencies along the major corridors, which in turn will support the overall traffic signal system and ITS goals, needs and objectives for the City of Santa Ana. The findings from the evaluation of the surrounding systems will provide the requirements to establish communications with outside agencies. Iteris will then compare System Master Plan goals and objectives with the existing conditions to determine the City's needs. It is envisioned that the needs identification will include, but not be limited to, the following traffic signal system improvement strategies and solutions: 1. Communication System 2. Traffic Signal System 3. TMC 4. Traffic Operations 5. CCTV Camera System 6. System Detection 7. Video Detection Systems 8. Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) 9. Bluetooth Travel Time 10. City Facilities 11. Performance Measurements and Data Analytics 12. Connected Vehicles (DSRC Radios)/Smart City Applications 13. Operations and Maintenance Costs and Requirements 14. Street Lighting System Opportunities and Recommended Solutions Based upon the needs identification, in combination with the existing data collection activities conducted, Iteris will develop a comprehensive analysis of the City's needs, opportunities and recommended solutions as they relate to the traffic signal/street light system, traffic management, ITS and communications, which will be noted herein as Opportunities and Solutions. The Opportunities and Solutions will focus on the identified strategies and solutions, and begin with an assessment of the current systems employed by the City, define requirements and specifications for future systems and deployments, and create combined solutions along with performance measures for the City inclusive of the stakeholders participating in this Project. The strategies identified in the Master Plan will also address industry best practices and assess impacts of maintenance on the City's existing staff to develop overall costs and benefits of the ITS deployments by phase. This task will result in a deliverable that presents the needs, opportunities and recommended solutions to Traffic Management in the City of Santa Ana. It is envisioned that the deliverable will include recommendations on improvements to the City's TMC, traffic signal system and communications network; and recommendations on deployment of CCTV cameras, video detection systems, system detection and interties with Caltrans and other agencies. City Council 17 — 85 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 126 Master Plan Preparation The objectives of the Traffic and Street Light Master Plans are to develop a multi -step process to implement upgrades to the existing TMC, develop solutions and strategies for upgrading the City's traffic signal/street light system, and developing a plan for improved citywide communications to all signalized intersections. The master plans will leverage the existing traffic signal/street light system and infrastructure to the greatest extent possible to create a plan for improved inter -jurisdictional coordination. In adherence with the systems engineering process, Iteris will prepare the draft and final Master Plans, based on the details of the proceeding deliverables prepared in the previous sub - tasks, including client comments. Details from the Technical Memoranda prepared in the previous tasks will collectively be compiled to create the Traffic Signal and Street Light Master Plans. The Master Plans will detail the phased deployment of the recommended infrastructure solutions including an improved traffic signal communications system, traffic signal system upgrades and other traffic management and ITS strategies as appropriate. A key element of this task will be to create a prioritized ranking of the recommended projects based upon needs, project cost, and availability of existing infrastructure, level of service goals, project duration and schedule. This document will discuss design alternatives as well as staging techniques to allow the City to achieve its final goal — deployment of a comprehensive citywide traffic signal/street light system that also serves to support citywide communications. The Plan will include the following elements: • Prioritized listing of projects • Utilize the existing and planned infrastructure to the extent possible • Cost estimates associated with each project • Schedule and Critical Path for the deployment of the projects • Summary matrix of projects by priority and implementation schedule • Capital improvements and associated costs • Operations, maintenance and life -cycle costs • Interagency coordination issues (Intertie, coordinated operations, etc.) • Multi -jurisdictional coordination issues • Detail roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders for the corresponding projects • Identify applicable standards The Master Plans will identify the needs and readiness to integrate with certain technological advancements such as connected/automated vehicles. Iteris has, in the past, contract with the United States DOT to help develop and implement the design architecture of connected vehicles for future connectivity. Connected/automated vehicles apply new communication capabilities, new data sources, and security to the ITS environment. The Master Plan will detail out the future of the City's ITS network with ability to expand as connected vehicles become more commonplace in the market. The Master Plans will also detail a series of projects to deploy solutions that will include expansion of the existing communications network and additional field devices. The corresponding systems will likely require coordination between City Departments for the operations and maintenance (O&M) of the system. It is imperative to identify the roles and responsibilities to determine who will maintain the system and hardware, and the corresponding costs for this maintenance. City Council 17 — 86 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 127 The master plan and needs assessment will identify the O&M activities, associated costs and roles, and responsibilities for the project elements. The resulting final Master Plans will serve as a living documents to guide the City to plan, fund, deploy, and operate future projects aimed at improving the City's traffic management capabilities for the next 10 years. TASK — GRANT APPLICATION ASSISTANCE Iteris has successfully assisted several local agencies with funding applications, including the recent FY 19 - 21 RTSSP applications for Project P. The lessons learned from these applications and from implementing multiple RTSSP projects since the program's inception will be applied to this on -call contract. Based on the recommendations and direction from City staff, Iteris will develop a Supplemental Application document. This will include, but will not be limited to, project scope write- up, populating necessary tables, developing a project schedule, and summarizing estimated points. Iteris provids the graphics, formatted cost tables, and may create an internal calculator to estimate the points expected for any grant applications. Staff will coordinate with participating agencies to collect the desire improvements to generate a cost estimate per the guidelines set forth in the funding programs guideline. Iteris will also provide any review and updates needed for the applications per agency comments. TASK — CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT To ensure smooth project construction and implementation, Iteris will provide support services throughout the construction process, including integration of communication network hardware and software, as detailed below. Construction Support Iteris will provide construction support to City inspection staff. During construction, Iteris staff will help the City staff approve traffic control, review RFIs, daily reports, etc. Iteris will make on -site inspections to check the quality and quantity of the work performed by all trades, if needed. This effort will assist the City in avoiding defects and deficiencies in the work of the Contractor. As necessary, Iteris will inspect construction to evaluate the Contractor's compliance with the intent of the construction documents. In support of this task, Iteris will conduct the following activities: • Be available for construction site visits to assist in the resolution of problems that arise during construction activities. • Respond to RFIs and, if necessary, revise and/or modify plans based on construction changes made in the field. • Assist City staff in the preparation of contract change orders. • Manage the project construction budget • Document project construction and prepare any necessary reports • Assist staff with grant reporting, documentation, and project closeout procedures. • Participate in the final walk through ensuring compliance with construction requirements and providing a thorough "punch -list" of items that must be corrected and/or completed to satisfy the project requirements. After construction has been completed, Iteris will create and submit the final as-builts per the Contractor's final redlines. Additional field review may be needed to verify any changes made during construction. City Council 17 — 87 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 128 x System Integration Iteris can provide full integration services for all proposed network devices and upgrades proposed on on -call projects. Iteris can conduct the following integration activities: • Configuration of all network devices proposed in the design process, including local switches, hub switches, traffic signal controller communication settings, CCTV cameras, and VDS. • Creation of VLAN and IP addressing schematics for all proposed traffic devices. • Integration of field elements into the TMC. • Provide training to City staff on the City's as necessary Iteris will provide documentation on all network devices configured including IP addressing and passwords to ensure effective turnover of the traffic signal communication system to City staff. ri_F•'i:Q•'� 1�J �] I X+'�:7 � 1�1:i � 1►[rII�l�j �:7 �_Z�:O �:Z�Zrl:7_1►�i � �] � � IJ/ �:�'1 Iteris offers experienced transportation planners who exemplify innovation in multimodal transportation planning, travel demand modeling, environmental studies, and traffic engineering. Iteris' transportation planners produce analysis for planning studies and research for the transportation aspects of multidisciplinary infrastructure and development projects. This includes preparation of grant applications, outreach events, public presentations, and assessment of transportation demand management. Iteris' staff can assist the City in reviewing environmental studies/traffic impact studies for proposed development projects, studies, and report preparations for asset inventory, citizen participation, operations analysis, safety issues and speed surveys/speed limit determinations. Depending on the task order, Iteris will present the City with a team of planners and engineers, based on the personnel provided, that will provide the services required. With our depth of expertise, Iteris is more than capable of providing the support the City is seeking. TASK — INTER -AGENCY COORDINATION Iteris has supported many agencies with their capital improvement projects and programs. Iteris' knowledge of the City's infrastructure, land use, needs and future plans provide us with the information required to make decisions on the capital improvement projects that are most beneficial to the City. This includes preparation of memoranda of understanding and letters of agreement between the City and grantors such as LA Metro and SCAG. We have prepared funding agreements between LA Metro and Cities which include Project Study Reports (PSRs) and Project Study Report Equivalent (PSRE) documents and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) requests as part of our program management under the Measure R Highway Program. We also assist our agency clients with the preparation CEQA and NEPA documentation and transportation analysis. We work with both local agencies and Caltrans District 7 for encroachment permits, project dewelepment documents awd plans, spacifications and estimates, City Council 17 — 88 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 129 Sample Project Schedule Iteris has provided the following sample schedule as shown in Figure 3 for the recent Main Street RTSS Project. Figure 3 — Proposed Project Schedule 1 1.0 Project Management (PI Phase) 20 21 2.0 Data Collection 27 28 3.0 Field Review and P5&E 33 34 4.0 Corridor'Before' Studies 39 40 .5.0 Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation 51 52 6.0 Cni ridor'After' Studies 57 58 7.0 Synchronization System Construction fib 69 8.0 Operations Maintenance and Monitoring Phase 70 R.1 Project Management (OMM Phase) 97 8.2 Continuing Signal Timing Support 99 10d 9.0 Project Report 101 9.1 Project Report (PI Phase) 106 9.2 Project Report (OMM Phase) 111 112 10.0 Traffic Signal Mod elingSupport 318 days IMon 4/1/19 Iwed 6/17/20 I V - days ITue4/2/19 IMonfr/17/19 I days I-rue4/2/19 IMon5127119 days IFri 4/12119 IFri 6/7/19 days ITue4/16/19 IMon3123/24 days IMon 3/16/20 IFri 5/1/20 I I I W—* days IMon 4/15/19 IMon 2/24/24 543 days Mon 6/1/20 Wed 5/29/22 541 days Wed 6/3/20 Wed 6/29122 521 days Mon 6/1/20 Mon 5/30/22 3 days Mon 4/27/20 Wed 6129122 days Mon 4/27/20 Fri 5/29/20 days Tue 5/31/22 IWed 6/29/22 15 days Mon 4/15/19 Fri 5/3/19 I !7 &nbsp; Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) City Council Iteris, Inc. 130 &nbsp;17 &ndash;&nbsp;89 2/15/2022 &nbsp; APPENDIX APPENDIX A RESUMES • Braulio Ramirez, PE • Bernard Li, EE, TE, PTOE • Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA • Chris Devlin • Jason Xu, PE, PTOE • Ted Huynh, PE, TE • Naree Kim, PE • Jennifer Martin, PE • Dariel Tapia • Sean Daly, AICP, PTP City Council 17 — 90 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 131 BRAULIO RAMIREZ, PE Project Manager EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2007 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 12 Total: 14 REGISTRATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) CA #85189, 2016 CORE DISCIPLINES Traffic Engineering ITS Planning, Design and Integration Transit Construction Assistance AFFILIATIONS Orange County Traffic Engineering Council (OCTEC) iteris Mr. Ramirez serves as a Senior Engineer of Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with the firm since August 2007. He has 14 years of experience with a background in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Design and Traffic Engineering, and has served as Project Engineer on numerous ITS, Transit Signal Priority (TSP), and traffic engineering projects. Mr. Ramirez' design experience includes wireless communication systems, fiber optic communication systems, Wireless Vehicle Detection Systems, Video Detection Systems (VDS), Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), signing and striping, traffic control, stage construction, neighborhood traffic management, and operations of other ITS elements. He has worked with multiple agencies including Caltrans, Louisiana DOT, Minnesota DOT, Utah DOT, Kansas DOT, Texas DOT and Missouri DOT, and is familiar with their CAD standards and standard plans. Mr. Ramirez's software knowledge includes MicroStation, CADConform, AutoCAD, Synchro, and Tru-Traffic. ' You eraulio enjoys the pastime of drinking distinctive craft beers know?on the weekends. Project Experience On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant — Laguna Woods, CA Mr. Ramirez is serving as a Project Engineer to the City of Laguna Woods. Services provided include: • Monitor and operate all traffic signals within the City via the Econolite Centracs traffic signal system • Provide monthly update of operational compliancy for the two red-light photo enforcement intersections • Design golf -cart push buttons at three intersections. • Recommend operational improvements for two signalized intersections with split -phase operations • Coordinate with OCTA for the recently implemented El Toro Road TLSP and Moulton Parkway TLSP projects • Address resident complaints on various traffic engineering and roadway lighting matters Brookhurst Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (RTSSP), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mr. Ramirez serves as the Design and Integration Lead to provide traffic signal/ITS equipment upgrade and signal synchronization along Brookhurst Street. This project consists of 45 study intersections along a 10-mile stretch in the cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and Caltrans. Fiber- optic cables will be installed at various segments of the corridor to close the communication gap. Many intersections will be upgraded with new controllers, cabinets, service, Emergency Vehicle Preemptions (EVP) and Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV). The project began in July 2018 and is will complete in December 2019, followed by two years of Operations and Maintenance (O&M). City Council 17 — 91 2/15/2022 BRAULIO RAMIREZ, PE Project Manager 1-405 Design -Build Improvement Project, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mr. Ramirez is serving as a Project Engineer for Iteris, acting as a subconsultant of a multidisciplinary design and construction team, on this $1.2 billion dollar design build project in Orange County California. The project will improve 16 miles of the I- 405 between the SR-73 freeway in Costa Mesa and the I-605 near the Los Angeles County line. The project includes adding one regular lane in each direction from Euclid Street to I-605, making improvements to freeway entrances, exits and bridges, and will also implement Express Lanes that expands the existing HOV lane from one lane to two lanes in each direction from SR-73 to I-605. Iteris is responsible for the design of the Caltrans ITS field infrastructure, temporary ITS field infrastructure supporting maintenance of traffic during construction, toll system infrastructure and coordination, street lighting, agency traffic signal improvements along the corridor and development of the project Traffic Management Plan. Mr. Ramirez is responsible for preparing Electronic Toll and Traffic Management ETTM and signal plans. The project began in February 2017 and is ongoing. Traffic Signal Modifications for Hawthorne Boulevard and Highridge Boulevard Road — Hawthorne, CA Mr. Ramirez served as Project Manager responsible for coordinating field work, review of Traffic Signal Modification Plan, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the intersection at Hawthorne Boulevard and Highridge Road under an on -call agreement with the City. The project installed a blank -out "No U Turn" sign and new controller to provide conditional northbound right -turn overlap operations. The project began in October 2017 and completed in July 2018. 5th Street Communication Upgrades — San Bernardino, CA Mr. Ramirez serves as Project Manager on this communication infrastructure upgrades project for the City of San Bernardino. Wireless and twisted wire pair interconnect upgrades will be installed to bring traffic signal connectivity between the TMC and intersections along 51h Street between H Street and Sierra Way. Iteris is preparing the design plans, procuring and configuring the equipment, and will be providing integration and construction support iteris services during construction. The project began in January 2019 and is expected to be completed in June 2019. C-Street Improvement — Port of Los Angeles, CA Mr. Ramirez served as Project Engineer assisting with the development of the design package for the C-Street improvement project that included traffic control, stage construction, signing and striping, and traffic signal design plans for the existing and new roadway alignment for the project area. The project began in December 2011 and completed in December 2014. Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA As Project Manager, Mr. Ramirez' responsibility was to ensure all project stakeholders received the equipment and signal timing improvement requested for this project. This OCTA-led project consists of 45 study intersections along the eight - mile stretch of Bristol Street in the cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach. Mr. Ramirez coordinated with his team to provide necessary ITS improvements (e.g. controller, Ethernet switches, communication, Bluetooth travel time devices, detection, etc.). These improvements fed into the ultimate goal of the project, which was regional synchronization. The project began in July 2016 and completed in December 2018. Two years of Operations and Maintenance (O&M) will be provided through January 2020. Hamner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) — Eastvale, CA Mr. Ramirez served as the Lead Engineer to provide traffic/ITS design services for the City of Eastvale as part of Iteris' on -call traffic signal operations contract. The project involves the design of new fiber-optic communications systems along 6 intersections of Hamner Avenue, as well as the upgrade of Video Detection Systems (VDS) at two intersections. In addition to the traffic signal infrastructure improvements, Iteris is also developing signal coordination plans for AM, Mid - Day, and PM peak hours for all project traffic signals along the corridor. The project began in June 2014 and completed June 2016. City Council 17 — 92 2/15/2022 BERNARD K. LI, EE, TE, PTOE Principal -in -Charge EDUCATION BS, Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1988 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 8 Total: 31 REGISTRATIONS Electrical Engineer (EE) CA #14842, 1995 AZ #37241, 2002 Traffic Engineer (TE) CA #1763, 1994 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer PTOE #214, 2000 CORE DISCIPLINES Traffic Engineering & Design Signal Timing & Coordination Traffic Signal Operations Signal System Selection & Deployment ITS Planning & Design ITS Systems Engineering Traffic Simulation & Transportation Planning Municipal Traffic Engineering AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Orange County Traffic Engineering Council (OCTEC) iteris Mr. Li serves as a Vice President of Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with the firm since November 2010. He has over 31 years of experience in providing professional services in planning, design and implementation of traffic engineering and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Mr. Li has served as Project Manager or Principal -in -Charge on numerous traffic and ITS design/construction, traffic signal timing and synchronization, operational analysis, feasibility studies and municipal traffic engineering projects. His traffic engineering design expertise includes traffic signal installation, signal modification, roadway sign age/striping, street lighting, and worksite traffic control and neighborhood traffic management. Mr. Li's ITS experience comprises fiber optic communications, wireless communications, Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV), Video -Detection System (VDS) and Dynamic Message Signs (DMS). He is also highly experienced in traffic signal operations, having assisted numerous agencies in the analysis, retiming, and synchronization of traffic signals, both corridor and network wide. Mr. Li's transportation planning expertise includes traffic impact studies, parking studies, transportation master plans, signal warrant analysis and stop warrant analysis. He has served as City Traffic Engineering Consultant for many agencies, helping to resolve numerous day-to-day traffic engineering issues, including resident inquiries, plan checking, and safety evaluations. Did You Before becoming a LA Lakers season ticket holder in 2007, know?Bernard used to be a huge Boston Celtics' fan Project Experience On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant — Laguna Woods, CA Mr. Li currently serves as a consultant traffic engineer to the City of Laguna Woods from April 2012 to June 2019. Services provided include: • Monitor and operate all traffic signals within the City via the Econolite Centracs traffic signal system • Provide monthly update of operational compliancy for the two red-light photo enforcement intersections • Design golf -cart push buttons at 3 intersections • Recommend operational improvements for two signalized intersections with split -phase operations • Coordinated with OCTA for the El Toro Road and Moulton Parkway TSS projects • Attend OCTA Traffic Forum meetings • Address resident complaints on various traffic engineering and roadway lighting matters • Public Safety Committee Meeting Presentations City Council 17 — 93 2/15/2022 BERNARD K. U, EE, TE, PTOE Principal -in -Charge Traffic and Parking Analysis for a Senior Day Care Center— Montebello, CA Mr. Li served as Project Manager for the traffic and parking analysis of a proposed Senior Day Care Center located on Beverly Boulevard at Taylor Street in the City of Montebello. The study addressed different traffic issues related to the proposed project, including: on -site parking requirements, on -site circulation evaluation, passenger loading and unloading recommendations, and traffic impact analysis. Duration: 4 months (2002) Traffic Study for a Commercial Development on Pipeline Avenue — Chino Hills, CA Mr. Li served as Project Manager to prepare a traffic impact study for a proposed commercial development located on Pipeline Avenue just north of Chino Hills Parkway (SR-142) in the City of Chino Hills. A total of nine intersections were included in the study. Different scenarios for Opening Year and Horizon Year were analyzed and feasible mitigation measures were presented for intersections with significant impacts. The project required coordination with and approval from City of Chino Hills, City of Chino and Caltrans. Duration: 8 months (2003) Traffic and Parking Study for Bernards Bros Headquarters — San Fernando, CA Mr. Li served as Project Manager and Traffic Engineer to prepare a traffic impact and parking study for a proposed multi -story headquarters building of Bernards Bros Construction Company in the City of San Fernando. The project also involved vacating Ilex Street at Fox Street to accommodate the new parking lot. Closure of Ilex Street would result in loss of several on -street parking spaces. Besides evaluating the traffic impacts as a result of the project and street closure, the study also addressed the effect of the loss of parking spaces to the surrounding businesses. Mr. Li attended the Planning Commission and the City Council meetings to present the study results and to answer questions from the Commission/Council Members and from local businesses within the project area. The project was subsequently approved by the City Council. Duration: 9 months (2003) Traffic Study for South Center Street PSSR — Westmorland, CA Mr. Li served as Project Manager for the preparation of a traffic study along South Center Street from Highway 86 to Baughman Road in the City of iteris Westmorland. The City of Westmorland is in a strategic location on the northwestern portion of Imperial County and serves as the gateway into the Imperial Valley from Los Angeles and Riverside Counties. Hwy 86, which traverses in an east -west direction through the City, is the primary surface transportation corridor into the County. With the implementation of the North American Fair Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the region has experienced a dramatic increase in surface transportation, especially 18-wheel truck traffic. The purpose of the study was to forecast the future traffic demands, including truck traffic, in 5-, 10- and 20-year horizon, and to propose improvements at key intersections that would alleviate any future traffic problems. A traffic signal warrant analysis was also conducted at the intersection of S. Center Street and Hwy 86 as part of this project. Duration: 11 months (2002) On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant — Eastvale, CA Mr. Li served as a Traffic Engineering Consultant for City of Eastvale from March 2014 to June 2016: • Citywide signal timing monitoring, including responding to residents' requests for timing check • Citywide traffic signal equipment inventory • Traffic signal timing parameter update per latest MUTCD requirements • Traffic signal warrant analysis • Traffic signal timing sheets preparation for new signals • Fiber optic communication upgrade design for Hamner Avenue • Traffic signal synchronization along Hamner Ave State Route 75 (SR-75) Adaptive Traffic Signal Control (ATSC) System — Coronado, CA Mr. Li served as Project Manager for this project which consists of the evaluation, design, installation, and maintenance of the Siemens SCOOT ATSC system at four signalized intersections along SR-75, next to the Navy Amphibious Base in the City of Coronado. Iteris, as part of a multidisciplinary team, is responsible for conducting the "before/after" study analysis to assess the efficiency of the adaptive signal system in reducing traffic congestion, delays, travel times, and traffic emissions along the study segment. In addition, during the installation of the ATSC system, Iteris utilized a Synchro simulation model to quantify the expected traffic flow improvements that the ATSC system brought. The project began in July 2017 and completed in April 2018. City Council 17 — 94 2/15/2022 PAUL M. FRISLIE, PE, IMSA Traffic Engineering Task Lead EDUCATION MBA, University of Phoenix, 2011 BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2000 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 18 Total: 19 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) CA #72982, 2008 International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) FOA Fiber Optic Technician, #CFOT_97189 Signal Inspector Level II, #AT_97189,2018 Traffic Signal Level 11, #BB97189,2012 Work Zone Safety, #ZZ97189,2010 iteris Mr. Frislie serves as a Principal Engineer of Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with firm since January 2001. For over 18 years, Mr. Frislie has been involved in several transportation and traffic engineering projects that include both planning as well as design and deployment of ITS, systems integration, and traffic signal design. Recently, he has served as the Project Manager for the Rosecrans Avenue Arterial Improvement Project, Cypress Phase 1 through 3 ITS Projects, the Newport Beach ITS Phase 5 through 8 Projects, the Santa Monica ATMS Phase 4c project. He has also been the Lead Design Engineer for the development of design plans for the Oxnard ITS Master Plan Design Project, Vermont Avenue Arterial Improvement project, the Santa Monica ATMS 4a/4b Project, SR-710 ITS Design Project, Newport Beach ITS Phase 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 Projects and the Fountain Valley Phase IV project, as well as the Signal Construction Inspector for completion of the Oxnard ITS Master Plan and the Rosecrans and Vermont Arterial Improvements. ' Paul is very musical and enjoys playing guitar in a rock band, sports, and watching movies. Project Experience El Toro Road Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Project — Laguna Woods, CA Mr. Frislie served as QA/QC Lead and Construction Manager as part of a multidisciplinary team for the Laguna Woods TSS project which will provide signal synchronization and equipment upgrades along El Toro Road from Bells Vireo Lane and Bridge Road/1-5 NB Ramps in collaboration with the Cities of Aliso Viejo, Laguna Hills, Laguna Woods, and Caltrans. The project includes the development, implementation and fine-tuning of the AM, PM, mid -day, and Saturday peak periods traffic signal coordination timing plans for all 15 intersections along the corridor. The traffic signal upgrades include the installation of new video detection system and Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) to IP at 7 Laguna Woods intersections which also includes installing a new Ethernet Switch at each location. The project began in August 2015 and will be completed in December 2018. O&M began in July 2016 and completed in December 2018. CORE DISCIPLINES Moulton Parkway Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) and Operations and Traffic Engineering & Operations Maintenance (O&M) Project — Laguna Woods, CA Mr. Frislie served as QA/QC Lead and Construction Manager as part of a ITS Planning/Design/Integration multidisciplinary team for the Laguna Woods TSS project which will provide Traffic Signal Design signal synchronization and equipment upgrades along Moulton parkway Construction Management from Lake Forest Dive and Camino del Avion in collaboration with the Cities Transit of Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, and Caltrans. The project includes the development, implementation and fine-tuning of the AM, PM, mid -day, and Saturday peak periods traffic signal coordination timing plans for all 37 AFFILIATIONS intersections along the corridor. The traffic signal upgrades include the Orange County Traffic installation of new video detection system at 3 project intersections, Engineering Council (OCTEC) Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) to IP at 7 project intersections, wireless communication upgrade form Moulton Parkway at El Toro Road to City of Laguna woods City Hall, new Type P cabinet at Moulton Parkway at GIPmAmnrd Dr'N/P anrd npNA/ 12-nari #19 cr lord cnpppr intarronnart cable along City Council 17 — 95 2/15/2022 PAUL M. FRISLIE, PE, IMSA Traffic Engineering Task Lead Golden lantern from paseo Escuela to Paseo de la Colinas. The project began in August 2015 and will be completed in December 2018. 0&M began in July 2016 and will be completed in December 2019. 1-405 Design -Build Improvement Project, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mr. Frislie is serving as TMS Engineer for Iteris, acting as a subconsultant of a multidisciplinary design and construction team, on this $1.2 billion dollar design -build project in Orange County California. The project will improve 16 miles of 1-405 between SR-73 in Costa Mesa and the 1-605 near the Los Angeles County line. The project includes adding one regular lane in each direction from Euclid St to I- 605, making improvements to freeway entrances, exits and bridges, and will also implement Express Lanes that expands the existing HOV lane from one lane to two lanes in each direction from SR-73 to I- 605. Iteris is responsible for design of the Caltrans ITS field infrastructure, temporary ITS field infrastructure supporting maintenance of traffic during construction, toll system infrastructure and coordination, street lighting, agency traffic signal improvements along the corridor and development of the project Traffic Management Plan (TMP). Mr. Frislie is responsible for the planning, design, and deployment of the TMP. The project began in February 2017 and is ongoing. Bayside Drive Intersection Improvement Project — Newport Beach, CA Mr. Frislie serves as Iteris Project Manager as part of a multidisciplinary team and responsible for leading the visual inspection and field inventory of traffic signal poles, overhead sigh poles and equipment; and plans for all intersection improvements at 1) Bayside Drive/Jamboree Road -Marine Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, and 2) Jamboree Road/Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive. The project began in August 2017 and was completed in June 2019. Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Project — Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Cities of Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, and Santa Ana, CA Mr. Frislie served as System Construction Task Lead for the Bristol TSS project to provide operations and infrastructure improvements at 45 intersections along an 8-mile segment for Bristol Street. Iteris iteris designed and constructed traffic signal equipment and infrastructure upgrades, including Ethernet - over -copper and fiber optic communications, traffic signal controllers, traffic signal cabinets, signal modification, Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, EVP equipment, Bluetooth, loop detection, and additional TMC upgrades for Santa Ana and Costa Mesa. All 45 intersections will be retimed with AM, PM, mid -day and weekend traffic signal coordination timing plans. The project began in June 2015 and will be completed in January 2021. Newport/Balboa Boulevard Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project — Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach, CA Mr. Frislie serves as the QA/QC leader and Engineer of Record to OCTA to provide turn -key traffic/ITS improvements and traffic signal synchronization for 33 intersections along Newport/Balboa Boulevard corridor from Bristol Street in Costa Mesa to Main Street in Newport Beach. Iteris was responsible for the design, procurement and construction of all the infrastructure improvements, including Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) camera installation, new fiber optic cables, controller, cabinet and service upgrades, EVP systems, detections and miscellaneous Ethernet switches. In addition to the traffic signal infrastructure improvements, Iteris also developed signal coordination plans. This project began in July 2014. The design was completed in March 2015 with construction commencing shortly after. Upon completion of new timing implementation and fine- tuning, Iteris provided O&M support for two years. Dover Drive Improvements Project — Newport Beach, CA Mr. Frislie served as Project Manager to provide full traffic engineering design services to the City of Newport Beach for the Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive Improvement Project. Iteris was responsible for the signal modification design of four intersections at Dover Dr/Cliff Dr, Dover Dr/16th St, Dover Dr/Westcliff Dr and Dover Dr/Irvine Ave; signal interconnect plan, and signing/striping plans. Lighting analysis calculations were prepared for all four signal locations to provide GE LED safety luminaires. Iteris assisted in construction management and support for any RFI's, submittals and design revisions. The project began in January 2014 and completed construction in March 2016. City Council 17 — 96 2/15/2022 CHRIS DEVLIN Transportation Planning Task Lead EDUCATION MSc, Transportation Planning and Engineering, University of Leeds, UK, 1991 BA, Economics, Durham University, UK, 1987 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 6 Total: 27 CORE DISCIPLINES Transportation Planning & Analysis Travel Demand Forecasting Geographic Information Systems Transportation Surveys iteris Mr. Devlin has served as a Senior Engineer of Iteris' Consulting Solutions division since November 2013. He has 27 years of experience in transportation planning and has managed and participated in a wide variety of transportation studies including travel demand forecasting studies, travel surveys, traffic impact studies, parking studies, and corridor studies. Mr. Devlin is an experienced travel demand forecaster having developed and worked on over twenty different traffic models throughout the world. He is proficient in several modeling packages including TransCAD, Cube and emme2 and in the use of microsimulation packages. He has developed model outputs to support the economic, financial and environmental analysis of major highway, transit and aviation projects. Mr. Devlin is also proficient in the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for problem - solving, analysis, and presentation of results. He has designed and run GIS training courses specifically for Transportation Planners, including the design and coding of GIS utilities and scripts. Mr. Devlin has also performed several large-scale transportation surveys from the survey design stage, through implementation, data cleaning, database population, and reporting. ' Chris enjoys mountain biking in the Santa Ana Mountains • and other scenic areas. Project Experience 1-215 Traffic Study to Support the French Valley Parkway — Temecula, CA Mr. Devlin was project manager for a series of traffic forecasts for the Environmental Assessment of Phase II of the French Valley Parkway project in Riverside County using the 2016 SCAG RTP Model. This Collector - Distributor Road project will improve traffic operations on 1-15 at the 1-15/1- 215 junction. Localized enhancements were made to the SCAG highway network to include more detail. Traffic counts including side -fire radar counts to identify truck percentages were obtained. Model volumes for Traffic Asset Management freeway mainline, ramp and connectors as well as adjacent intersections were post -processed using traffic counts. The resultant forecasts provided Systems the input to the operations analysis. Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) data for air quality and noise analysis was developed .The project began in January AFFILIATIONS 2017 and completed in March 2018. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Irvine On -Call Traffic Modeling and Transportation Analysis — Irvine, CA Orange County Traffic Mr. Devlin provided modeling support for the City's traffic model (ITAM) for Engineering Counsel (OCTEC) performing various upgrades to the City's modeling process including links with OCTA's travel model (OCTAM) and developed GIS outputs. He also provided the City with transportation planning support for a series of major traffic studies. The support was performed between January 2014 and June 2016. Ventura County Travel Model (VCTM) Update, Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) — Ventura County, CA Mr. Devlin has provided technical support for the model development process and its applications. Iteris is utilizing the SCAG 2016 RTP model and subarea modeling tool for use in the development of a subarea model specifically designed to meet the needs of Ventura County. City Council 17 — 97 2/15/2022 CHRIS DEVLIN Transportation Planning Task Lead Scripting for the travel model includes the development of additional add -in support for conversion from land use to socioeconomic data, as well as post -processing results in the required format for NEPA/CEQA analysis. The project began in April 2016 and was completed in December 2018. On -Call Transportation Engineering Services — Buena Park, CA Mr. Devlin currently serves as part of the Iteris team acting as on -call transportation engineer for the City of Buena Park. In this capacity, Mr. Devlin supports the City Staff in the completion of transportation engineering functions within the City's Public Works Department. Mr. Devlin periodically works on -site at City Hall, providing as -needed services to support City services in the Public Works, Planning, and Police Departments. Mr. Devlin supports in the review of new development plans, the completion of new traffic signal installations or signal upgrades, and the response to citizen inquiries regarding traffic flow and safety conditions. The project began in December 2015. Mr. Devlin's involvement started in January 2018 and is ongoing. Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Reclassification Study— County of Orange, CA Mr. Devlin managed this project involving three potential MPAH amendments in the County of Orange. These are Santiago Canyon Road widening, and the proposed extensions of Jeffrey Road and Blackstar Canyon Road. The project involved a traffic study to assess the traffic impacts of removing these future improvements from The Orange County MPAH and identify any potential mitigation measures. The project required co-ordination with several stakeholders including local jurisdictions, OCTA, Caltrans and the Transportation Corridor Authority (TCA). The project began in June 2016 and completed in July 2017. SR-571SR-6o Confluence, Supplemental Needs Study, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) — Diamond Bar, CA Mr. Devlin managing Iteris' role in evaluating a variety of freeway improvement alternatives at a highly congested segment of two converging freeways. Iteris updated and validated a VISSIM model to provide future forecast volumes for input to traffic operations analysis. The project began in February 2016 and completed in June 2017. iteris Irvine Business Complex (IBC) Five -Year Traffic Study Update — Irvine, CA Mr. Devlin is Project Manager for a traffic study to update the IBC Traffic Study with updated land uses, traffic counts and highway network improvements. The study analyses over 200 intersections and arterial segments in the City of Irvine and adjacent jurisdictions as well as 60 freeway segments and over 100 freeway ramps. The project involved the collection and quality control of a large program of intersection turning movement and tube counts along with a comparison to historical data and continuity of flow analysis. PeMS data was collected for the freeway mainlines. Traffic model runs from the City of Irvine Traffic Model (ITAM) were analyzed for Existing, Interim and Buildout years with and without the IBC Vision Plan land uses. Intersections and arterials were analyzed using Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology and freeways using Highway Capacity Manual 2010 analysis. Traffic impacts associated with the Vision Plan were identified and a series of potential mitigation measures, and their associated costs identified for further study in a subsequent Nexus and Fee study. Additional analysis involved the testing of alternate roadway configurations and signal warrant analysis. The project began in May 2018 and is ongoing. Mr. Devlin also performed the previous iteration of this study between May 2015 and October 2016 Bob Hope Airport Multimodal Ground Access Plan Study (MGAPS) — Burbank, CA Mr. Devlin was lead transportation planner for the data collection phase of a multimodal transportation planning project analyzing surface access to Bob Hope Airport in Burbank. Data collection included land use and employment data, travel surveys of Metrolink and airport passengers, vehicle counts and passenger counts. The study was performed throughout 2012 and 2013. Traffic Asset Management System (TAMS), Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) — Los Angeles, CA Mr. Devlin was project manager for an exercise to incorporate various traffic control device assets including traffic signs, traffic signals, pavement markings and parking meters from disparate legacy systems into a centralized GIS-based asset and work order management system. Mr. Devlin managed this project between December 2005 and May 2007. City Council 17 — 98 2/15/2022 JASON (FENG) XU, PE, PTOE, PMP Traffic Engineering Support EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 2007 MS, Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2004 BS, Transportation Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2001 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 3 Total: 16 REGISTRATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) CA #80744, 2011 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer (PTOE) PTP #3480, 2013 Project Management Professional (PMP) #2815124,2020 CORE DISCIPLINES Traffic Engineering & Operations O&M AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation iteriso Mr. Xu serves as Associate Vice President for Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with the firm since January 2018. He has 16 years of experience working in various fields of traffic engineering and design, transportation planning, ITS design, signal system upgrade and integration, Transportation Management Center (TMC) operation, active transportation planning and design, freeway and arterial performance analysis, transportation system simulation, and a variety of engineering studies. Mr. Xu is an expert with traffic signal operation and synchronization. He served as project manager or task lead on numerous development/implementation of regional -based signal synchronization master plans, city-wide signal coordination, multi -jurisdictional signal synchronization, transit signal priority, and special signal operation logic. Mr. Xu is also skilled in the technologies of signal system interconnect, traffic detection, Signal Performance Measures (SPM) and Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP). Jason and his wife have been hiking on a weekly basis, and ' You recently joined by their 4-year-old daughter. Their goal is to explore all popular trails listed on Al/Trails along the West Coast. Project Experience Main Street Signal Synchronization - City of Ventura, CA Mr. Xu serves as Project Manager on this signal synchronization project to develop and implement optimized coordination timing plans for 24 signals along Main Street, Mills Road, Telephone Road, and Telegraph Road in City of Ventura. The four project corridors formed a grid network within the core business area in the City. Iteris also expanded the Synchro network to include additional intersections within original awarded budget to ensure that project corridors are well synchronized with crossing arterials. The project began in November 2018. Mr. Xu's involvement on the project began in November 2018 and is ongoing. Citywide Traffic Signal Synchronization - City of Upland, CA Mr. Xu served as Task Lead on this Signal Synchronization project for the City of Upland. As part of the Update Coordination Timing task for SBCTA, Iteris developed and implemented optimized basic timing parameters and coordination plans at 69 signalized intersections in the City of Upland. This project updated signal timings to the current standards and optimized signal coordination progression within the grid based network of all the major arterials. The project began in June 2018. Mr. Xu's involvement on the project began in June 2018 and concluded in March 2019. The project ended in March 2019. Engineers (ITE) San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS), San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) — San Bernardino County, CA Mr. Xu is providing engineering support on this regional TSS project to assist 16 local agencies within the San Bernardino Valley area to improve traffic progressions along many key regional corridors. Mr. Xu assists in the assessment of the existing signal operation and development traffic signal City Council 17 — 99 2/15/2022 JASON (FENG) XU, PE, PTOE, PMP Traffic Engineering Support coordination master plans for five different sub- regions within the Valley. The Master Plan will serve as a roadmap for all future signal coordination in the Valley. Second, update signal coordination timings for over 500 traffic signals with a goal of reducing travel times, delays and GHG emissions. The project began in January 2017 and is scheduled to be completed in January 2020. Design Services Safe Routes to School (SRTS), Pedestrian Improvements at Four Schools — City of Santa Monica, CA Mr. Xu serves as Project Manager as part of a multidisciplinary team leading the review of key findings of the Walk Audits conducted at each school location with City staff and seeking input from City stakeholders regarding key challenges and opportunities at each school site. He will also lead Iteris staff in supporting the design effort by providing Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the replacement of existing flashing beacons with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) on Ocean Park at 16' Street and 18th Street; design of a southbound No Right Turn on Red restriction on 17th Street at Ocean Park Boulevard; and design of an eastbound No left turn during peak hours restriction on 16th Street at Ocean Park Blvd. Iteris will also provide Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCPs) suitable for submittal to the City of Santa Monica for temporary construction closures of 11 public roadways within the City. The project began in August 2017 and is ongoing. LA Metro Orange Line TSP, LA Metro — Los Angeles, CA Mr. Xu serves as Task Leader on the signal preemption phasing design for this Metro Orange Line Railroad Type Gate Operation Study. Iteris provided engineering services for the simulation of all at -grade busway crossings with city streets and PE&E for the pilot project crossing to improve safety and reduce travel times along Orange Line. Mr. Xu provided phasing schematics. The project began in September 2017. Mr. Xu's involvement on the project began in February 2018 and is ongoing Brookhurst Street/Road Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Corridor — Orange County, CA, OCTA — Orange County, CA Mr. Xu serves as Task Leader to optimize traffic signal synchronization timing plans at 59 intersections along the 16.5-mile Brookhurst Street rnrririnr r)P\/PlnnmPnt and imnlamantatinn of thic dZw'hyhiQ0Ld wigjurisdictional signal optimization iteriso involves OCTA, six local cities, and Caltrans. The project began in June 2018. Mr. Xu's involvement on the project began in June 2018 and is ongoing. The project is ongoing. Pacific Coast Highway Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County and City of Newport Beach, CA Mr. Xu is providing engineering support on this regional traffic signal synchronization project for OCTA. This project will: 1) develop a Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) package for approximately 11 miles of fiber optic cable, integration of three new High -Definition (HD) Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance cameras, a new Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) sign and system; 2) upgrade 15 controllers to 2070 controllers for Caltrans and provide fiber optic communication connection to City Hall and Caltrans Traffic Management Center (TMC); 3) develop new timing plans for the entire corridor which include 4 timing plans; 3 weekday peak period timing plans and a weekend timing plan; and 4) provide 24 months of Operations and Maintenance (O&M) services to maintain the communication system as well the signal timing operations of the corridor. The project began in June 2016 and is ongoing. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Program, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mr. Xu served as Project Manager under an on -call project with OCTA. The projects included traffic signal system upgrade and signal retiming/ synchronization for three corridors (MacArthur Boulevard, Santa Margarita Parkway, and Bake Parkway) including 65 intersections. The project required cooperative efforts between seven cities, OCTA, and Caltrans. With this turn -key type project, signal systems on project corridors have been upgraded to meet the latest guidelines and requirements with safety features, efficient signal coordination operations, considerations of pedestrian and bicyclist, and "responsive" operation features. The system upgrades include fiber design and installation, cabinet and controller replacement, communication switch, customized cabinet cables, video detection, battery backup system, radio wireless communication, and deployment of TMC central program and integration. MacArthur corridor was finished in 2015. Santa Margarita Parkway and Bake Parkway are currently in rnntiniml mnnitnring.phaca 17 - 100 2/15/2022 TED HUYNH, PE, TE Transportation Planning Task Support EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering (Transportation), University of California, Berkeley, 2009 BS, Civil Engineering (Minor: Political Science), University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 2008 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 4 Total: 11 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) CA #80087, 2012 Traffic Engineer (TE) CA #2778, 2015 CORE DISCIPLINES Traffic Engineering & Operations Transit Transportation Planning Microsimulation AFFILIATIONS State of California Board for Professional Engineers —Subject Matter Expert (Traffic Engineering) iteris Mr. Huynh serves as a Senior Engineer for Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with the firm since November 2017. He has over 11 years of experience working in the field of transportation engineering. His expertise includes traffic operations analyses, transportation impact analyses, traffic microsimulations, parking management planning, rail planning, complex spreadsheet and dataset analyses, cost estimation, and benefit -cost analyses. Mr. Huynh's software experience includes VISSIM, Synchro, SimTraffic, Traffix, ArcGIS, HCS, Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office, and AutoCAD. ' Ted has memorized all of the interstates in the Country and • where they start and end. Project Experience US-1ol High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) / Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) — Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC), Ventura County, CA Mr. Huynh serves as Project Engineer responsible for intersection operations analysis and future alternatives forecast volumes. In addition to modeling and forecasting, Iteris was responsible for providing post -processed travel model outputs (including turning movements) for over 140 intersections along the 20+ mile corridor between SR-23 and SR-33 in Ventura County. The project began in June 2018, is ongoing, and is expected to be completed in June 2023. Santa Ynez Valley Traffic Circulation and Safety Study (Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) — Santa Ynez Valley, CA Mr. Huynh served as Task Lead responsible for developing a hybrid mesoscopic/microscopic VISSIM simulation model to assess traffic needs and impacts. Iteris is currently preparing a traffic and safety study of the Santa Ynez Valley within Santa Barbara County. The work effort includes three phases: 1) initial outreach and data collection, 2) simulation model development, 3) improvement alternatives evaluation. Iteris is working with SBCAG to form a Technical Advisory Committee for the project, consisting of local agency representatives. A VISSIM model including intersection -level traffic volumes and signal timing will be prepared for the study area, in order to evaluate traffic operations. In addition, a study area bus tour will be arranged with elected officials and committee members to identify system inefficiencies, safety issues, and potential improvement recommendations. The project began December 2018 and completed in June 2020. Artesia Blvd. Arterial Improvements from Western Ave to Vermont Ave — City of Gardena, CA Institute of Transportation Mr. Huynh served as Project Engineer responsible for preparing a Engineers (ITE) Southern traffic study documenting traffic operations, especially existing queuing and California delay issues affecting the corridor. Iteris provided traffic operations and Orange County Traffic Engineers planning services to the City of Gardena regarding updating and evaluating Council (OCTEC) potential operational improvements that could be implemented along the Artesia Boulevard corridor in the City, which is a heavily -travelled corridor connecting several major regional freeways. Iteris staff evaluated traffic City Council 17 — 101 2/15/2022 TED HUYNH, PE, TE Transportation Planning Task Support controllers and current operations at key signalized intersections, observed corridor performance, and evaluated queuing and operational issues. The project began March 2019 and completed in June 2019. Metro Orange Line (MOL) Environmental Clearance, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) — Los Angeles, CA Mr. Huynh served as a Senior Engineer and reviewed the existing VISSIM model, including signal operations and vehicle behaviors, and helped to recalibrate the model, as well as prepare a calibration and results memorandum for the project. He then prepared the project VISSIM model, which included complex preemption parameters, revised geometrics, and updated signal timing. Iteris staff updated and expanded the traffic simulation model previously developed for the MOL Grade Separation Feasibility Study, which had served as the traffic analysis tool for comparing improvement alternatives along the MOL. The model network contains approximately 50 signalized intersections, including the busway priority and preemption signals and signalized intersections on parallel roadways. The project began in Nov. 2017 and is still ongoing. Mr. Huynh's involvement in project ended in March 2019. Redondo Beach Blvd Arterial Improvements — City of Gardena, CA Mr. Huynh served as Project Manager and Primary Engineer responsible for preparing a traffic study assessing the effects of median implementation on traffic operations along the corridor. Iteris provided transportation planning services to the City of Gardena regarding evaluating the operational improvements proposed for the Redondo Beach Boulevard corridor in the City. Improvements include improved signal operations, addition of extra travel lanes, and implementation of a raised median to replace the existing two-way left -turn lane (TWLTL). Iteris staff evaluated the traffic operations changes associated with implementation of improvements, including an iterative analysis of median locations and effects on left -turns along the corridor. The project began February 2019 and completed in June 2019. iteris two proposed projects near Disneyland within the City. Iteris staff read and reviewed the documentation, including summaries and technical analysis, reviewed key inputs and data collection results, and documented findings in draft and final peer review memos. The project began in January 2019 and completed in May 2019. On -Call Transportation Support - Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA Mr. Huynh served as the Primary Engineer and Simulation Modeler responsible for corridor analysis along the Pico Avenue study area. The Port of Long Beach has asked Iteris to provide traffic engineering services involving a study of travel times, queuing, and intersection LOS performance for the Pico Avenue corridor while construction of the new Gerald Desmond bridge is ongoing. For the project the Port is removing and rebuilding multiple connectors and roadways, all of which alter traffic and circulation patterns in the area. This project began in March 2018 and completed in September 2018. US-1ol NB Auxiliary Lanes and NB/SB Ramp Metering PSR-PDS — City of Camarillo, CA Mr. Huynh is serving as the Project Manager and Primary Engineer responsible for public meeting materials, an initial work plan, an HCM and safety analysis, and overall preparation of a Caltrans Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) as part of an overall project study report/project development support (PSR-PDS). The City of Camarillo, in coordination with Caltrans, is proposing to construct new northbound auxiliary lanes along US 101 in order to enhance safety and improve traffic operations in the area. A supplemental assessment of ramp metering operational impacts was also conducted on behalf of the City, as an alternatives analysis study. This project began in December 2017 and completed in May 2020. Professional On -Call Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services — City of Diamond Bar, CA Mr. Huynh served as a Project Engineer responsible for conducting analysis review and peer document review for traffic studies submitted to the City. Iteris provided citywide traffic signal operations and TIA Peer Reviews — City of Anaheim, CA on -call traffic engineering services. Services include, Mr. Huynh served as Project Engineer responsible but not limited to, traffic signal operations and for conducting technical and peer document review monitoring, traffic signal timing, TMC staffing, traffic for Disneyland traffic studies submitted to signal installation and interconnect design, traffic the City. Iteris provided transportation planning management plan, and warrant analysis. This project services to the Citv of Anaheim regardinE reviews of began in Nov. 2017 and completed in Jan. 2020. ta#f c,j�(),Mgffation impact analyses/studies for 17 - 102 2/15/2022 NAREE KIM, PE Traffic Engineering Task Support EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2003 BS, Civil Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2000 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 13 Total: 18 REGISTRATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) NV #22518, 2013 CORE DISCIPLINES Traffic Engineering & Operations ITS Planning & Design ITS Operations & Management ITS Systems Engineering & Architecture Grant Application Support AFFILIATIONS Orange County Traffic Engineering Council (OCTEC) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) iteris Mrs. Kim serves as a Senior Engineer of Iteris' Consulting Solutions and has been with firm since October 2008. She has over 18 years of experience in the delivery of transportation and traffic engineering projects, with experience that includes the planning, design, and deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and traffic signal projects. Mrs. Kim's ITS design experience includes fiber optic communications, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), Video Detection Systems (VDS) and Traffic Signal System (TSS) upgrades. She has also served as Project Manager and Task Lead on a variety of planning and traffic signal design projects including preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for traffic signals, arterial signing and striping, traffic operation systems, ramp metering systems and street lighting. She has accomplished a number of traffic impact studies and traffic and circulation sections of EIRs/EISs. Mrs. Kim is proficient in the use of design and traffic analysis software including AutoCAD, MicroStation, AGI 32, ArcGIS, Synchro, and Autoturn. Naree enjoys snowboarding and hiking. Project Experience 1-405 Design -Build Improvement Project, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mrs. Kim serves as the MOT/Detour Plan and Street Lighting Design Plan Task Lead for Iteris, acting as a subconsultant of a multidisciplinary design and construction team, on this $1.2 billion dollar design build project. The project will improve 16 miles of the 1-405 between the SR-73 freeway in Costa Mesa and the 1-605 near the Los Angeles County line. The project includes adding one regular lane in each direction from Euclid Street to 1-605, making improvements to freeway entrances, exits and bridges, and will also implement Express Lanes that expands the existing HOV lane from one lane to two lanes in each direction from SR-73 to 1-605. Iteris is responsible for the design of the Caltrans ITS field infrastructure, temporary ITS field infrastructure supporting maintenance of traffic during construction, toll system infrastructure and coordination, street lighting, agency traffic signal improvements along the corridor and development of the project Traffic Management Plan. Mrs. Kim is assisting project management with the preparation and development of Plans and Specifications for the maintenance of traffic, traffic management systems, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), tolling integration and traffic signals. The project began in February 2017 and is ongoing. FY21 Grant Application Support — City of Irvine, CA Mrs. Kim serves as Project Manager for providing Grant Preparation Support for the City of Irvine during the preparation of the FY21 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (RTSSP or Projects P) application and Intersection Capacity Enhancement Project (ICE or Project 0). Iteris initiated the collection of count data and desired improvements from all stakeholders to develop preliminary project assessments. Follow up fieldwork in addition to the cabinet inventory is performed to refine the improvement cost estimates. The project began in September 2020 and completed in October 2020. City Council 17 — 103 2/15/2022 NAREE KIM, PE Traffic Engineering Task Support Von Karman Avenue/Tustin Ranch Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization (RTSSP) Project — City of Irvine, CA Mrs. Kim serves as Reviewer for this project in which Iteris is assisting the City with multi -jurisdictional improvements of the 7.9-mile stretch of Von Karman Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road in the cities of Irvine and Tustin. The project requires retiming of 30 signalized intersections, which includes the two Caltrans crossings at the 1-5 interchange. Iteris will assist the agencies with the design and construction management of the new signal improvements which include new Video Detection Systems (VDS), controller cabinets, pedestrian heads, first fiber communication to Tustin signals and a new Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) to remotely monitor the signals. Iteris also assisted with conversion of new configuration modules to transition existing signals online in their Actra system to their newer Centracs system. The project began in April 2017 and is scheduled to be completed in June 2019. Two years of Operations and Maintenance will occur from July 2019 through September 2022. Von Karman Avenue/Tustin Ranch Road RTSSP Project — City of Irvine, CA Mrs. Kim serves as Reviewer for this project in which Iteris is assisting the City with multi -jurisdictional improvements of the 7.9-mile stretch of Von Karman Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road in the cities of Irvine and Tustin. The project requires retiming of 30 signalized intersections, which includes the two Caltrans crossings at the 1-5 interchange. Iteris will assist the agencies with the design and construction management of the new signal improvements which include new Video Detection Systems (VDS), controller cabinets, pedestrian heads, first fiber communication to Tustin signals and a new Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) to remotely monitor the signals. Iteris also assisted with conversion of new configuration modules to transition existing signals online in their Actra system to their newer Centracs system. The project began in April 2017 and is scheduled to be completed in June 2019. Two years of Operations and Maintenance will occur from July 2019 through September 2022. Traffic and Intelligent Transportation Systems Engineering Services, Main Street RTSSP, OCTA — Orange County, CA Mrs. Kim serves as Project Engineer under this project agreement, which will provide services that %mill iipgrarJP tmffir rignal alartrnnirr and Cofi Gomnoi equipment, and optimize signal iteris timing along Main Street, a major north -south corridor that comprises 67 major signalized intersections. As part of the project, Iteris' Intersection-as-a-Servicel" end -to -end solution offering will deliver proactive monitoring of traffic signal operations at all project intersections. The primary goal of this project is to deploy new Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) equipment and communication infrastructure to support the management of the cities' transportation network, implement optimized coordination timing plans to achieve optimal traffic flow, and improve safety for all road users, including vehicles, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians. The project began in December 2019 and is ongoing. MacArthur Boulevard Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Project - Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach, CA Mrs. Kim serves as Project Manager for this project which involves signal synchronization and equipment upgrades along MacArthur Boulevard from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and State Route 55 (SR-55) ramps, spanning across the Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach. The project was funded by Measure M2 funds, with the City of Irvine serving as the lead agency. The corridor spans 8.2 miles totaling 22 traffic signals. Iteris is providing updated clearance parameters for the safety of vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclist accompanied with new coordinated plans that will provide progression improvement along MacArthur Boulevard corridor without significantly increasing delays on the side streets. The project began in March 2020 and will be complete in December 2023, followed by two years of Operations and Maintenance. 151" St. Rehabilitation - City of Newport Beach, CA Mrs. Kim served as Task Lead for this design and construction project for the City of Newport Beach. The project was divided into two phases. For the initial preliminary engineering phase, the team performed detailed field investigation of the 15t" Street and Balboa Boulevard to identify deficiencies and recommended improvements to enhance safety and traffic flow including median concepts and community meetings. Upon City's approval of the Preliminary Design Concept, the full Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) package was prepared during the design phase, which includes traffic signal upgrades, signing and striping modifications for entire 15t" Street in Harbor Island araa Tha ripragn nha�nlatarJ in Deremher 2015 17-an104ristruction completed in 12AI502022 JENNIFER EMERSON-MARTIN, PE Transportation Planning Task Support EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 2003 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 7 Total: 18 REGISTRATIONS Civil Engineer (PE) ID #18578, 2019 NE #E17065, 2018 WA #54719, 2017 TX #128405, 2017 AK #11998, 2008 CORE DISCIPLINES Travel Demand Modeling & Forecasting Transportation Planning Traffic Impact Analysis Peer Review AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Women's Transportation Seminar (WTS) WTS Spokane/Coeur d'Alene Chapter Board Member (Treasurer) iteriso Ms. Emerson -Martin serves as a Senior Planner for Iteris' Consulting Solutions division and has been with the firm since 2014. She has over 18 years of experience working in transportation forecasting and modeling, transportation planning, traffic engineering and analysis, traffic operations and management plans, and project management. Ms. Emerson -Martin is fluent with a variety of travel demand modeling software, traffic engineering software, and traffic analysis methods. She has national experience applying, modifying, and developing travel demand models for both large and small scale projects, and has experience in evaluating outputs for environmental analysis, air quality and noise impact analyses, and traffic impact analyses. Ms. Emerson -Martin is highly skilled in travel model performance measure output, as well as developing model analysis tools for project efficiency. She currently serves as a company resource for projects which utilize both big -data analytics and traditional planning methods. Did o Jennifer has lived in four states: Washington, Idaho, Alaska, and California. She has many hobbies, including cooking, sewing, and winemaking. Project Experience Travel Demand Modeling — National As a Senior Engineer, Ms. Emerson -Martin has experience applying, modifying, developing, and analyzing multiple travel demand models nationally. She is experienced with many Southern California models (SCAG, OCTA, RivTAM, SBTAM, VCTM, and other subregional travel models). She developed the City of Columbus, NE model in 2019, and most recently has been updating the City of Hayden, ID model. She has used these models to support various projects, including general plan updates, long-range planning efforts, transportation strategic plans, environmental project support, traffic impact analysis, fee nexus and traffic impact fee studies, corridor studies, and local development projects. US-1oi High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) / Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) — Ventura County, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin serves as Task Lead for travel demand modeling. In addition to modeling and forecasting, she was responsible for providing post -processed travel model outputs (including turning movements) for over 140 intersections along the 20+ mile corridor between SR-23 and SR-33 in Ventura County. The project began in June 2018, is ongoing, and is scheduled to be completed in June 2023. Citywide Traffic Model Development and On -Call Modeling and Planning — City of Anaheim, CA As Ongoing Model Support, Ms. Emerson -Martin is responsible for modifying and running the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) model for on -call modeling requests. Her tasks include compiling zone level trips to be used in the fee assessment and reviewing model inputs and outputs for land use development projects. She has also managed a significant number of traffic impact studies, traffic impact analysis, peer reviews, and trip generation studies. The project began in 2009 and will conclude in 2021. City Council 17 — 105 2/15/2022 JENNIFER EMERSON-MARTIN, PE Transportation Planning Task Support City of Simi Valley Nexus Fee Impact and Travel Demand Model Update, City of Simi Valley, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin updated the of a city-wide windowed travel demand model to a base year of 2019, TransCAD Version 6.0, updated the geographical user interface to a singular model add - in, and developed standard SB 743 VMT model outputs for project analysis. In addition, Jennifer updated the model documentation and developed a stand-alone model analysis spreadsheet for the City's SB 743 analysis use. The project began in December 2018 and completed in September 2020. City of El Centro Modeling — VMT Ms. Emerson -Martin acted as the project manager and task lead for the use of the Imperial County Travel Demand Model (a SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS sub - regional model in TransCAD) to produce model outputs as well as VMT for the development of a regional mall. This project began in June 2020 and is completed in December 2020. Camarillo Traffic Impact Fee Update — City of Camarillo, CA As the lead Transportation Modeler, Ms. Emerson - Martin was responsible for validating and updating the travel demand model to verify previously calculated traffic impact fees based on the updated project set including the US-101 auxiliary lanes through the City of Camarillo. The project began in April 2018 and completed in September 2020. City of Murrieta General Plan Update, City of Murrieta, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin serves as task lead for the development of a city-wide windowed travel demand model using the SMDT process for the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS regional model. On this project, Iteris is responsible for developing the circulation portion of the General Plan Update. The project began in December 2018 and completed in December 2019. Ventura County Travel Model (VCTM) Update — Ventura County, CA As the lead Transportation Modeler, Ms. Emerson - Martin is responsible for utilizing the SCAG 2016 Regional travel demand model (TransCAD) and subarea modeling tool for use in the development of a subarea model specifically designed to meet the needs of Ventura County. Scripting for the travel model includes the development of additional add -in support for conversion from land use to socioeconomic data, as well as post -processing Q1YsQQt10Pi6ject began in April 2016 and completed in December 2018. iteriso I-to/1-110 Express Lanes Microsimulation, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) — Los Angeles, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin served as the Project Manager and Task Lead for the microsimulation and data collection efforts for the fast -paced express -lane to HOT lane microsimulation analysis for two major corridors within Los Angeles County. She was primarily responsible for verifying data collection efforts for the entire project, as well as verifying Origin -Destination inputs from the 2016 RTP/SC travel demand model into the VISSIM microsimulation software analysis. The project began in May 2018 and completed in December 2018. MicroTransit Pilot Project, Los Angeles County Metro — Los Angeles, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin served as the Project Manager and technical lead for the microtransit zone definitions and analysis efforts for the microtransit pilot project within Los Angeles County. She was primarily responsible for obtaining useable data from the 2016 RTP/SCS travel demand model, as well as directing the project team in brainstorming sessions for preferred pilot program evaluation. The project began in and ended in 2018. Inglewood Transit -Oriented Development — City of Inglewood, CA As Lead Transportation Modeler, Ms. Emerson - Martin was responsible for modifying the SCAG 2012 Regional travel demand model (TransCAD) for use in the analysis of transit -oriented development centering on newly developed rail stations in the City of Inglewood. Her tasks included land use modifications, network editing and producing travel model outputs for intersection and roadway analysis. The project began in September 2017 and completed in September 2018. Anaheim Plaza Hotel Traffic Impact Analysis — City of Anaheim, CA Ms. Emerson -Martin served as the deputy PM responsible for preparing the traffic impact analysis for the high -quality, four diamond full -service hotel located in the Resort District of Anaheim. The hotel includes restaurants, retail, and conference/meeting facilities, and is located within the Garden Walk district. Ms. Emerson -Martin was also responsible for developing a resort specific trip generation rate for the Anaheim Resort District. Intersection and roadway analysis was completed at 13 intersections and 14 roadway segments, including multimodal 17 Le �° -Service LOS at t e inl�11gj���� Disney Way and Harbor Boulevard. The project began in September 2015 and completed in March 2016. DARIEL TAPIA Traffic Engineering Task Support iteris Mr. Tapia serves as Assistant Engineer Planner for Iteris' Consulting Solutions and has been with the firm since 2021. He has over a year of experience working in the field of Traffic Design. He has also been the primary designer for numerous traffic signal modifications. He taken lead roles in the design and implementation of multiple Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and several sidewalk enhancements. Mr. Tapia has familiarity with City legislation regarding Traffic Commission and Planning Commission staff reports. He is also experienced in the design of temporary traffic control plans including his involvement with Garden Grove Open Streets 2021. ' Dariels' chief amusement during his leisure time includes • camping and hiking. EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, California Project Experience with Other Firms p State University of Long Beach, CA, 2020 Traffic Signal Modification for Lampson Avenue at Monarch Street — City YEARS OF EXPERIENCE of Garden Grove, CA With Iteris: 1 Total: 1 Mr. Tapia served as the lead designer for the relocation of the controller cabinet and partial road rehabilitation. The project encompassed the CORE DISCIPLINES installation of new signal equipment. Mr. Tapia was also involved with the Traffic Engineering oversight of construction as well as the implementation of a new Cisco IE- 3000-4TC Fiber Switch. The project began in November 2019 and was ITS Planning, Design, & completed in December 2020. Integration Traffic Signal Modification for Euclid Street at Stanford Avenue — City of AFFILIATIONS Garden Grove, CA American Society of Civil Mr. Tapia embraced the role of the lead designer for this project which Engineers (ASCE) encompasses the installation of all new traffic equipment hardware. Project components include the installation of two new signal poles with all new Great Minds in STEM (GMiS) equipment and the relocation of two existing signal poles. Upgraded Orange County Traffic controller foundation as well as a complete intersection rewire are within the Engineering Council (OCTEC) scope of the project. New mast arms with more vehicle heads will provide a safer stopping sight distance for roadway conditions. The project began in Society of Hispanic September 2020 and is ongoing. Professional Engineers (SHPE) Traffic Signal Modifications along Garden Grove Boulevard — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia was responsible for the design of the four intersections including three offset intersections along Garden Grove Boulevard. The focus of the project is to eliminate all signal poles from the medians and implement new signals along the perimeter of the intersections to increase safety on the roadway and decrease maintenance costs for the City. This project is an expansion of the ongoing RTSSP project along Garden Grove Boulevard where the timing coordination as well as implementation of upgraded signal equipment is being performed by Iteris. This project began in June 2020 and is ongoing. City Council 17 — 107 2/15/2022 DARIEL TAPIA Traffic Engineering Task Support Traffic and Intelligent Transportation Systems Engineering Services, Main Street Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects (RTSSP), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — Orange County, CA Mr. Tapia is involved with the design of this project. Aspects of project will upgrade traffic signal electronics and communications equipment, and optimize signal timing along Main Street, a major corridor that is comprised of 67 major signalized intersections. As part of the project, all of these intersections will be encompassed by Iteris' Intersection -as -a -Service'" end -to -end solution by delivering proactive monitoring. The scope of the project includes the integration of intelligent Transportation System (ITS) equipment and communication infrastructure to support the management of the cities' transportation network, implement optimized coordination timing plans to achieve optimal traffic flow, and improve overall safety conditions. The project began in December 2019 and is ongoing. Garden Grove Open Streets 2021 — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia was responsible for designing temporary traffic control plans for a City-wide event that required many closures for pedestrians to have access to streets. The plans include multiple lane closures, street closures and detours that minimized traffic congestion and avoided potential issues or complaints from residents. The project began in December 2019 and has been prolonged. Local Streets Rehabilitation — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia was involved with the design process and construction of the road design within multiple neighborhoods throughout the city. He assisted with the surveying data collection, cross-section designs, curb designs and the signing and striping. These projects began in February 2020 and are ongoing. Crosswalk Enhancement for Trask Avenue at Leda Lane — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia served as the designer for the installation of RRFBs at the existing crosswalk. The design also incorporated an entire restriping of existing lane lines, continental crosswalk and the installation of new yield lines, red curb, and proper signage. Mr. Tapia was also responsible for the management of the construction phase for the project. This project began in March 2020 and was completed in August iteris Crosswalk Enhancement for 9tn Street at Reva Drive — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia served as the designer for the enhancement and implementation of two RRFBs. The project required a modification to existing striping conditions which included shifting a left turn pocket and reducing the length of a median. Thermoplastic was utilized for all striping and audible pedestrian push buttons where also utilized. This project began in February 2020 and was completed in August 2020. Garden Grove Open Streets 2021 — City of Garden Grove, CA Mr. Tapia was responsible for designing temporary traffic control plans for a City-wide event that required many closures for pedestrians to have access to streets. The plans include multiple lane closures, street closures and detours that minimized traffic congestion and avoided potential issues or complaints from residents. The project began in December 2019 and has been prolonged. Council 17 — 108 2/15/2022 SEAN T. DALY, AICP, PTP Transportation Planning Task Support iteris Mr. Daly is a Senior Planner for Iteris' Consulting Solutions division. He has 21 years of public sector and professional consulting experience in transportation planning and has been with Iteris since 2006. Sean's approach to planning puts people first to ensure access and connectivity rather than barriers and isolation. He is supported by Iteris' focus on to + bring professional planning services to his clients through a broad array of ,.. knowledge, expertise, and experience. Before Iteris, Sean was the Transportation Improvement Program Manager at the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). He is the Membership Officer for the American Planning Association (APA) Louisiana Chapter, and previously served on the National Planning Conference Committee as the Mobile Workshop Chair for the 2018 National Planning Conference in New Orleans. He is the past Chair of the ASCE Louisiana Transportation and Development Institute, and EDUCATION currently serves on the St. Tammany Parish Board of Zoning Adjustment. MCP, City Planning, University of Pennsylvania, 2002 Mr. Daly has officiated three weddings including one in an BA, Geography, University of airplane. im California, Los Angeles, Minor in Public Policy, 1998 Project Experience YEARS OF EXPERIENCE With Iteris: 15 Total: 21 Freight Corridors Study, Ventura County Transportation Commission — REGISTRATIONS & Ventura County, CA Sean was the Project Manager for the Ventura County Freight Corridors CERTIFICATIONS Study, a partnership between the Ventura County Transportation American Institute of Certified Commission, the Port of Hueneme, Caltrans, and the Southern California Planners (AICP) Association of Governments to identify and prioritize the most significant AICP #021297 freight corridors for safer, more efficient, and sustainable freight Professional Transportation connections. The team worked with community and industry groups and the Planner (PTP) general public to refine the objectives, focus analysis efforts, and develop PTP #23 solutions with the greatest benefit to both the County's economic competitiveness and environmental health to establish a more thorough Transportation Worker understanding of the highway and rail freight corridors in Ventura County, Identification Credential along with key related local roads, and use the knowledge to inform future (TWIC®) planning and investment decisions. The project began in 2019 and completed TWIC #1107253 in fall 2021. CORE DISCIPLINES Valley Boulevard Multimodal Transportation Improvement Project— Los Transportation Planning Angeles, CA Mr. Daly is the Iteris project manager and traffic analysis lead for the Valley Traffic Engineering &Operations Boulevard Multi -Modal Transportation Improvement Protect which envisions Goods Movement transformative corridor improvements for all modes of transportation, including auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian activities along the corridor. With AFFILIATIONS this project, City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering, in partnership with American Planning Association City Council District 14, aims to improve transit service, connectivity and (APA) ridership as well as increase safe access for travelers to employment centers, American Society of Civil educational facilities, healthcare facilities, parks and recreational centers in Engineers (ASCE) the area. The development of existing conditions, conceptual alternatives, and alternatives analysis are part of this phase of the project. The project started in Fall 2020 and is ongoing. City Council 17 — 109 2/15/2022 SEAN T. DALY, AICP, PTP Senior Planner Compton Boulevard Complete Streets Planning and KBK Site Traffic Impact Analysis — City of Compton, CA Mr. Daly served as the CEQA transportation analyst and QA/QC for the Compton Boulevard Complete Streets Planning and KBK Site Traffic Impact Analysis. Transportation analysis of the projects located near the Compton A (Blue) Line station in Compton included multimodal assessment of the proposed projects. The project included a reimagination of Compton Boulevard, with conceptual design of protected bike lanes, curb extensions, and mid -block crossings. The project began in June 2020 and completed in February 2021. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline Implementation for Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Mr. Daly served as the project manager and planning task lead for the development of CEQA transportation methodology, guidelines and potential mitigation measures for the Cities of South Pasadena, Seal Beach, Laguna Niguel, Glendora, Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley and Irvine. Mr. Daly supported City staff from both a technical and policy standpoint including presenting at public meetings and stakeholder outreach events. Los Angeles County Metro Grant Support — Los Angeles, CA Mr. Daly authored the following grant applications for the Los Angeles County Metro in 2019 and 2020: High Desert Intercity Rail Corridor Service Development Plan The application and benefit/cost analysis for the High Desert Intercity Rail Corridor Service Development Plan to connect the Palmdale Transportation Center Metrolink and California High Speed Rail service with the Virgin Trains USA Victor Valley terminus station in partnership with California State Transportation Agency (CaISTA), Virgin Trains USA (VTUSA) and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). • Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program — Federal Railroad Administration Zero Emission Busses and Charging Infrastructure Deployment and System Integration The benefits of the program were demonstrated in concert with Metro's NextGen restructuring to increase ridership, reduce system costs, benefit iteris communities traditionally underinvested and disadvantaged through analysis of walkability, land use, connectivity, job and affordable housing access, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Mr. Daly coordinate the submission of applications related to this program for: • Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program - California State Transportation Agency • Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure component of the Affordable Housing and Sustainability Communities grant for the 3rd and Dangler development — California Strategic Growth Council Low or No Emission Bus Program (5339(c) - Federal Transportation Administration Bus and Bus Facilities Program - Federal Transportation Administration Senate Bill 743 Mitigation Measures Analysis, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) — Los Angeles County, CA Mr. Daly served as task leader on this project analyzing potential impacts under a new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) metric to previously certified Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) where Metro is/was the Lead Agency. This effort addressed the State of California, Office of Planning and Research's (OPR) update to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Senate Bill 743, which would change the transportation impact analysis methodology from Level of Service (LOS) to VMT under CEQA. Iteris evaluated six case studies assembled by Metro under the VMT metric, and assisted with making judgments regarding determining and assigning mitigation measures to the projects. The project began in September 2017 and completed in March 2018. OCTA 1-605 Katella Avenue Interchange Improvements PACED — Los Alamitos, CA Mr. Daly was the project manager for the traffic analysis in support of the Project Approval Environmental Documentation (PA/ED) phase of the 1-605/Katella Avenue Interchange. The analysis included development of traffic volumes, microsimulation analysis of the project corridor, and identification of operational deficiencies in the interchange. The project began in September 2016 and completed in September 2018. City Council 17 — 110 2/15/2022 APPENDIX APPENDIX B CERTIFICATIONS • Non -Collusion Affidavit • Non -Lobbying • Non -Discrimination City Council 17 — 111 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 152 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-1: NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATIONS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -Collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non -Collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioneAljlat makit)gl false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to (or of proved to before me. Notary Public before me on this Ay of 20_, by on the basis of satisfactory eviden to be the person(s) who appeared Notary Public Seal Cl" City Council nta Hna r Page A3- 2/15/2022 CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 FVSee Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) ❑ See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) 4 5 Signature of Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (f any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verges only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Lgro •,E•. f CHRISTINE BRADY Notary Public - California Orange County Commission # 2298480 �""°""�� My Comm. Expires Aug 21, 2023 �r __ Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this � day of � " 0V&Ab&- 20 . by Date ,� A Month t Year (1)—Kam i ri 0as,%UNl.t' (and (2) ) Name(s) of Signer(s) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the per}sepn(s) who appeared before me. of Seal Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL' Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signers) Other Than Named Above: 02014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org-1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5910 City Council 17 — 113 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Iteris, Inc. Signed and Printed Name: Ramin Massoumi, PE Title Senior Vice President & General Manager, Consulting Solutions Date November 22, 2021 City Council City of Santa Ana [IF-'-21�145 2/15/2022 Page A3-2 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council City of Santa Ana [ IF-P-2t155 2/15/2022 Page AM by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: 1 -�Z Ramin Massoumi, PE Title: Senior Vice President & General Manager, Consulting Solutions Firm: Iteris, Inc. Date: November 22, 2021 City Council City of Santa Ana FARP-211-165 2/15/2022 Page A3-4 51 r t/ A i0000, 1die/ AI-ddo 1 17-11 i � EXHIBIT C City Council 17 — 118 2/15/2022 iteris 1i11!!11l1111111111� 1i1llllllllllllllllf I11111l111111111111I , 1111111111111111111 I ' �" FEE PROPOSAL submitted to: November 30, 2021 The LRd PPmaIt Mobility Infrastructure Management 119 2/15/2022 ® 949.270.9400 1700 Carnegie Avenue, Suite 100 I •e r 15 iteris.com Santa Ana, CA 92705 FEE PROPOSAL The table below provides a schedule of Iteris' standard hourly rates by job classification. ITERIS STANDARD BILLING RATES Support Staff 1 $80 $132 Support Staff II $132 $175 Analyst $100 $135 Technician $80 $120 Specialist 1 $106 $144 Specialist II $144 $181 Assistant Engineer/Planner $114 $134 Associate Engineer/Planner $124 $157 Engineer/Planner $150 $204 Senior Engineer/Planner/Manager 1 $215 $239 Senior Engineer/Planner/Manager 11 $239 $265 Senior Systems Engineer $286 $323 Associate Vice President/Principal/Director $302 $333 Vice President/Chief Scientist $334 $352 Software Development Engineer 1 $110 $144 Software Development Engineer 11 & 111 $144 $185 Software Development Engineer IV/Data Scientist $185 $221 Product Manager/Owner $193 $250 Senior Manager/Software Development Lead 1 $216 $246 Senior Manager/Software Development Lead 11 $233 $286 (Rates effective through May 31, 2022) Standard Terms and Conditions • Billings will be monthly at the individual Categories and Maximum Rates for the persons actually performing the work during the performance period and are subject to annual adjustments. • An escalation of 4% will apply to the rates above effective June 1 of each year. • Expenses will be billed at cost plus 10% for services and handling. Expenses include project -related costs, such as subcontractor services, traffic counts, postage/delivery service, reproduction, transportation, and subsistence. • All mileage rates will be based upon current IRS standard rates. City Council 17 — 120 2/15/2022 Santa Ana, On -Call Transportation & Traffic Engineering Services (RFP No. 21-125) Iteris, Inc. 1 1 51 r t/ A i0000, 1 AI-ddo EXHIBIT 3 AGREEMENT WITH FEHR & PEERS TO PROVIDE ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022, by and between Fehr & Peers, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On November 2, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-125, by which it sought a qualified consultant to provide on -call transportation and traffic engineering services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-125. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-125, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Consultant's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in the Fee Schedule, which is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated in full. Consultant is one of three (3) consultants selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-125. The total annual compensation for services provided by all consultants selected under RFP No. 21-125 shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of one million dollars and zero cents ($1,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council Page 1 Of 1017 — 122 2/15/2022 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on June 25, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for two (2) one (1) year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all City Council Page 2 of 1(� 7 — 123 2/15/2022 Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability: if Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council Page 3 of 10 7 — 124 2/15/2022 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. City Council Page 4 of 10 7 — 125 2/15/2022 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf in their performance of the services described in Section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of Consultant's breach of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, .just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of Consultant's breach of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be reasonably selected by the City, for any action by a third party asserting that personal .injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of Consultant's breach of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its rcprescntation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent City Council Page 5 of 19r 7 — 126 2/15/2022 Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. t0. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. City Council page 6 of 1017 — 127 2/15/2022 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Consultant: Fehr & Peers, Inc. 101 Pacifica, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92618 Attn: Jason D. Pack, P.E., Principal A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no City Council Page 7 of 1017 — 128 2/15/2022 representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shalt be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement, 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council Page 8 of 1o17 — 129 2/15/2022 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and -enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City filly, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page] City Council Page 9 of 1� 7 — 130 2/15/2022 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney t By: _ w.... randon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency FEHR & PEERS Title: /�r�N�► / City Council Page 10af117 — 131 2/15/2022 r City Council 17 — 132 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-125 Introduction / Background The City of Santa Ana intends to retain Transportation and Traffic Engineering Consultants on an as -needed or "on- call" basis. A Professional Services Agreement will be entered into with one or more of the qualified firms Transportation and Traffic Engineering consultant(s) to provide professional services for a variety of projects on an on -call basis. On an on -call, as - needed basis, the selected firm(s) may later be asked to provide professional engineering services proposals on specific, project -by -project basis, based on an agreed -upon specific scope of services and fees. In, general, work consists of general Transportation and Traffic Engineering projects. Funding sources for each project may vary for each project/task order assignment shall comply with the funding agency's requirements. The projects may include, sidewalks, bike paths, signing, striping, neighborhood traffic studies, traffic signal modifications, grant application writing, Bikeway Planning, Traffic Signal Master Plan, Street Light Master Plan, SB743 compliance, Traffic Study and other related projects as required. The consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services. The consultant shall utilize in-house staff and/or sub -consultants to complete the assignments to meet the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub -consultant. Prime consultant mark-ups for sub -consultant work Ali 1j1Qt be allowed. All proposals, plans, drawings, specifications, estimates, grant applications, and/or studies will be subject to the final approval and satisfaction of the City of Santa Ana. Scone of Services The work consists of Transportation and Traffic engineering design and cost estimating for civil works projects, and other related projects as required. The work in general, consists of work in the following areas and not limited to: City Council City of Santa Ana R 24- Page Al-1 • Traffic Signal Design • Striping Design • Traffic Engineering Design • Transportation Support • Traffic Studies • Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Compliance • Traffic Modeling • Traffic Signal Master Plan • Street Light Master plan • Street Light Design Training • Grant Writing- Services If there are any exceptions to the core of requested services, proposers shall list said exceptions in their proposal (matrix.forin). For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub - consultant. The selected consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrated resources available to perform the work described in this RFP. General Henuirements and Project De iverables The Consultant's services for plans specifications and estimating (PS&E) for engineering project preparation and special studies/investigations shall include and in be in conformance with the latest editions of the following: Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards Code), American Water Works Association, California Department of Transportation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), professional Standards established by the City, and or federal, state and local guidelines established in the project. As part of the preparation of the PS&E, the consultant shall prepare the special provisions pertaining to the items of work included in the plans that are not addressed on the latest editions of the applicable standards. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all documents and plans prepared. The plans will be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the documents and the plans. The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and checker identified. City Council City of Santa Ana R 2i- Page Al-2 The Consultant shall have project management control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. This task shall include the following: • Project Management Plan- the consultant shall provide a detail management plan including information and coordination with other agencies to ensure compliance and completion of the (PS&E) packages. This plan shall include all milestones and task breakdown for each of the tasks and subtasks included therein. The project management shall be submitted to the Project Manager for review and within 15 calendar days of the issued Notice to Proceed • Deliverables • Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) Plan • Project Schedule/Invoicing • Project Correspondence In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, the consultant shall submit the matter to the City for clarification. The Consultant shall perform engineering design services resulting in contract documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates "PS&E") for various projects on an as -needed basis. However, work tasks may include studies or a variety of engineering tasks, If requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed schedule of the assigned project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed and/or Task Order. Specific Task Orders with Notices to Proceed ("NTPs") will be provided for project(s) at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order and this agreement. The following services/items shall include. but are not be limited to: 1. Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed improvements with existing field conditions. 2. Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and or National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), (If required) Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in MicroStation V8i Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City, shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects. 4. Complete the design of projects including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The Consultant shall contact manufacturers and/or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in City Council City of Santa Ana 00 21- Page Al-3 Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to the Consultant. 5. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum paper using MicroStation V8i CADD software program.. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD Standards and any special provisions thereof. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provide plans and/or specifications accordingly. 6. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer responsible/in-charge of the project. 7. If a part of the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and construction phases of the project, including, but not limited to: • Respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall attend the pre -construction meeting. • Review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. • Respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three (3) working days. • Provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so. 8. If included in the on -call project scope, upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as -built plans and submit them to the City. The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built plans shall be submitted to the City with an electronic copy (in MicroStation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built drawings via CD ore- mail, 9. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of the work performed by in-house staff and/or sub -consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation necessary for the consultant to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce a professional -level quality of work product. 10. If included in the on -call project scope, attend meetings with the City staff as required. 11. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the City, other Agencies, and all utility companies City Council City of Santa Ana RM1721-136 2/15/2022 Page A1-4 as required. At the direction of the City, the Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies. 12. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. All information regarding the plans and specifications and or documentation related to the project and approved by the City, will then become property of the City. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. All tasks orders shall include the staff title, hours, hourly rate and totals as related to the project. Construction Plans, Standard Specifications and Estimate (PS&El Preliminary Design- Attend project scope meeting with City Staff to review project details. Consultant shall field review, inspect and conduct all necessary surveys to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) or alternatives, preliminary cost estimate and preferred alternative as requested by the project manager. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 30% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 60% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at for FINAL independent design review. The City will review and comment on the PS&E packages with a turnaround goal of (2) weeks. One (1) copy of the documents with comments will be returned to the consultant. Unless, several agencies are involved in the review process multiple documents with comments will be provided to the consultant. After the final design comments have been incorporated the consultant shall provide the City with final (PS&E) package ready for bid. See Section - General Requirements and Project Deliverables Section. Proi ct Schedule and Progress: Progress review meetings shall be held at intervals deemed appropriate by the City. The Consultant shall furnish two copies of all completed work or partially completed update/status since the last progress review meeting. Progress reports shall be submitted monthly in electronic format indicating achievements and project schedule progress. City Resilonsibilities: I y Counal City of Santa Ana RW 2t- Page Al -5 The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein, • Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project • All plan check coordination within the City • Advertise, award, and administer of construction contract • Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards) • Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities )E{e, Proposal• In addition to Section IV.13.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) 1.ee schedule shall be structured as follows: The fee proposal shall include the firm's standard hourly fee schedule, and/or project fee schedule where applicable and as outlined in this this documents. A list of all positions and hourly rates required to perform the services described herein. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. ®ther Terms and Conditions: 1, The project will be implemented in compliance with the City of Santa Ana's policies, as well as Prevailing Wages and State/Federal Requirements. 2. The City regards the inclusion of California based designs, engineering, and construction professionals, facilities, and services as part of the Team to be highly desirable, but not mandatory. 3, The City reserves the right to amend this Request for Proposal by addendum prior to the final dates of submission. 4. All reports, proposals, or other data or materials which are submitted shall become the sole property of the City of Santa Ana with the exception of the confidential Financial Capacity information and sealed fee proposals which will be .returned to all proposers after award of contract to the selected Team. S, All products used or developed in the execution of any contract resulting from this request will remain in the public domain at the completion of this project. 6, The City has an affirmative action program. The purpose of the affirmative action program is to encourage certified minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. All submitting firms must have established affirmative action programs approvable by the City. During the RFP stage, all firths will need to complete a "Certification of Non - Discrimination by Contractors" for each firm on their team. City Council City of Santa Ana ROW N- Page Al -6 City Council 17 — 140 2/1-5/2022 City of Santa Ana On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services SUBMITTED ON: SUBMITTED TO: November 30, 2021 SUBMITTED BY: FEHR � PEERS 101 Pacifica, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92618 PROPOSAL NUMBER: RFP NO: 21-125 City Counc — 141 2/15/2022 TABLE OF A. COVER LETTER 03 B. SECTION 1 - FIRM DESCRIPTION 04 C. SECTION 2 - PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 05 D. SECTION 3 - KEY STAFF a E. SECTION 4 - RELEVANT PROJECTS 13 F. SECTION 5 - SAMPLE SCOPE OF WORK 20 & SCHEDULE G. SECTION 6 - APPENDIX [RESUMES/FORMS] 23 Z City Council 17 — 142 2/15/M5 & PEERS November 30, 2021 Azadeh Azad City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Subject: RFP NO.: 21-125 - On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services Dear Ms. Azad: Fehr & Peers is distinctly suited for the services requested in the request for proposals, as we specialize in Traffic Engineering Design, Traffic Modeling and Transportation Impact Studies, and have been serving as on -call consultants to the City for several years. It has been a privilege to serve as experts when the City has called, whether it be for traffic study peer review, focused traffic engineering memorandums, or lighting design training. We look forward to the opportunity to continue this role with the City. Fehr & Peers has consistently demonstrated our expertise in transportation engineering. Recently we assisted the City through California Senate Bill 743 Implementation and helped the City transition their Traffic Impact Study Guidelines from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Fehr & Peers are renowned experts in traffic modeling and traffic forecasting, specifically with the County of Orange's travel demand forecasting model (OCTAM), having worked closely with OCTA on modal development and the VMT estimation tool. We also have a history of traffic engineering design in the City, having worked on the Standard Avenue Bike Lanes design, 5th Street Protected Bike Lanes design, and safe routes to school projects. Fehr & Peers offers an array of transportation planning and engineering specialists that are adept to handle the unique challenges Santa Ana faces. I will serve as the Principal -in -Charge and key contact person but will utilize the best staff at our disposal to successfully complete tasks identified by the City. We have reviewed the City's terms and conditions, and request the ability to work with the City on how the indemnification requirements relate to 3rd party entities who are not yet identified. We will accept all other terms and conditions noted in the City's terms and conditions. If you have any questions about the content of our proposal or need further information, you can reach me by phone at (951) 823-6379, by fax at (949) 859-3209, by email at j.pack@fehrandpeers. cam, or at 101 Pacifica, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92618. Sincerely, Jason D. Pack, P.E. Principal RFP NO.: I y Z touncil 17 — 143 2/15/2022 Firm Description Fehr & Peers is passionate about transforming transportation consulting through innovation and creativity. The firm derives inspiration by partnering with communities to understand and shape local transportation futures objectively tailored to diverse needs. Clients trust Fehr & Peers to help them overcome barriers and uncertainty by combining advanced expertise with curiosity, humility, and initiative to deliver implementable, data -driven solutions that reinforce community values. From the most straightforward to the most complex, team members actively listen to client and community needs and handle every project with diligence and focus. With a focus on innovation, Fehr & Peers differentiates itself by investing in research and development to anticipate needs, explore the unknown, and collaboratively imagine a better future. The company's culture of applied innovation generates an appetite for new and better ways of approaching problems, motivates team members to explore emerging transportation concepts and mobility trends, and inspires the development of new analytical tools and techniques. As the firm grows, a steadfast commitment to inclusive, local, and long-term community relationships remains central to the core philosophy. Many of the company's client relationships are decades long, built on years of listening, understanding, collaboration, and successful outcomes. Clients of Fehr & Peers have appreciated the firm's long-term commitments to local communities, trusting the team as their objective partner in transportation since 1985. Together with the firm's clients, Fehr & Peers is motivated by shared success, inclusive partnerships, and the positive impact the company's work has on the communities it serves. At Fehr & Peers, we take a creative, data -driven approach to each of our practice areas: • Travel Behavior & Forecasting • Transportation Impact Studies • Traffic Signal, Signing and Striping, and Street Light Design • Transportation Engineering & ITS Design • Multimodal Operations & Simulation • Transit Planning • Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning • Sustainable Transportation 98 say we met or exceeded expectations in quality, service, and value and over 75% said we are better than our competitors. City Council 17 — 144 2/15/ & PEERS Professional Experience Fehr & Peers has developed a strong reputation as a trusted advisor in developing effective and innovative transportation solutions. Our experience working with Planning and Public Works Departments, cities, and other public sectors agencies is extensive. We have worked directly for or in coordination with the Santa Ana Public Works Department on the Standard Avenue Bike Lanes Design, 5th Street Protected Bike Lanes design, Downtown Parking Study and Safe Routes to School projects, among many other efforts. Fehr & Peers has completed several traffic studies for developers and on behalf of the City using traditional level of service analysis and most recently conducting VMT assessment. We have also worked in conjunction with both the Planning and Public Works Departments on the City's Senate Bill 743 Implementation and helped the City transition their Traffic Impact Study Guidelines from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Fehr & Peers authored the City's latest TIA Guidelines and has been retained on an on -call basis to assist in review of VMT assessments since the adoption of the new process. We have been preparing transportation impact studies for City applicants for many years and have also served as on -call consultants for both the Planning and Public Works Departments offering as -needed support to the City for over 15 years, and many other efforts. These projects cover many of the services desired in this RFP and more information regarding our experience is provided as follows. Fehr & Peers is one of the few firms that routinely applies OCTAM, the SCAG model, and other regional models in Southern California to different projects. We have accumulated extensive knowledge and application experience in those models, which includes unique insights about the modeling through our recent support on SB 743 for OCTA and our past projects involving OCTAM enhancements. Fehr & Peers actively applies travel demand modes to a variety of projects, following modeling requirements compliant to SB 743/CEQA. Working closely with both Caltrans districts and headquarters, we address induced vehicle travel, especially for roadway expansion projects, from model calibration/validation to application based on Caltrans' first edition of Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF) and Transportation Analysis under CEQA JAC). Complementing our SB 743 experience is our knowledge of local transportation issues in the county. This local planning context is important when implementing a new statewide law that was not written with full consideration of the unique geographic differences throughout the state. RFP NO.: I y bouncil 17 — 145 2/15/2022 Planning Project Fehr & Peers employs a Quality Control (QC) process on all transportation planning and traffic operations projects. At the core of the QC process is a hierarchy of staff that are responsible for various aspects of each project. The following hierarchy may be employed on any given project depending on the project requirements and resources. The Principal -in -Charge or Associate -in -Charge provides oversight, review, and strategic direction on the study as necessary. The Project Manager (PM) is responsible for the overall quality of the study, and adherence to schedule and budget. The PM is the primary point of contact for the client. The Project Engineer/Planner conducts the technical calculations, prepares reports, and supports the PM. Experts are individuals that have considerable experience on specific topics and are available to collaborate on innovative solutions to a variety of planning and operational problems. Technical/Administrative Staff includes individuals who prepare high -quality graphics, process reports, set up conference calls, and conduct other project -related activities as necessary. This staff allows our Engineers and Project Managers to focus on the technical analysis. The QC process varies by the prevailing jurisdiction's requirements and type of analysis being conducted (e.g., General Plan, Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, etc.). A transportation engineerlplanner who is not directly involved in this study reviews all technical calculations for accuracy. The technical calculations may include but are not limited to the following; • Trip Generation Calculations • Intersection LOS analysis • Trip Assignment / Trip Distribution assumptions • Roadway segment LOS analysis • Travel demand forecasts • Mitigation testing • Traffic operations analysis • Documentation The same transportation engineer or a separate document specialist ensures consistency of figures and tables in the report with technical calculations, thereby minimizing the likelihood of technical errors that could affect the study findings. Grant Writing Fehr & Peers has successfully helped agencies and their stakeholders win over 65 grant funding pursuits totaling awards of over $260 mil. Grant applications often include data like VMT analysis, ridership for transit projects, or number of users/trips for bike/pedestrian projects. With our in-depth knowledge and experience in areas such as forecasting, multimodal operations, goods movement, and benefit -cost analysis, we are uniquely qualified to assist in navigating numerous types of funding programs. To date, Fehr & Peers has successfully helped agencies and their stakeholders win over 50 grant funding pursuits totaling awards of over $180 mil. Our experience has ranged from preparing the entire grant application to providing portions of the application such as conducting needed analyses, feasibility studies, ridership forecasts or VMT reduction estimates. Fehr & Peers has experience in all types of grants (examples shown below) with over $46 mil in awards for Tiger grants alone. • Caltrans Sustainable Communities Planning Grants • Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) • Regional Funding Programs • Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) • California Transportation Commission's SB 1 Programs such as Local Partnership and Solutions for Congested Corridors • Strategic Growth Council Transformative Climate Communities Planning Grant • Strategic Growth Council Cap and Trade ---Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities • US Department of Transportation Grants (TIGER, BUILD) City Council 17 — 146 2/15/= & Peas Traffic Engineering Fehr & Peers has unique expertise in providing traffic engineering services from early conceptual design through construction documents and field implementation. We have extensive experience in traffic signal design, signing and striping design, and street lighting design. We integrate our design and construction experience with our knowledge of planning and operations to provide clients with a unique combination of creative, yet practical solutions that address the needs of all travel modes. This comprehensive approach to transportation engineering is an obvious benefit to clients looking to make cost-effective decisions and develop biddable projects with minimal questions during construction. Our transportation engineering services range from Conceptual Engineering to Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) to Construction Support. Commitment to Traf, Services One of our main goals is providing innovative technical solutions that complement each community's values in order to plan for sustainable developments that will thrive long-term. With tailored projects to suit each community we serve, we endeavor to minimize the impact of development on the environment through smart transportation and urban design. An important part of this philosophy is collaborating with communities and our clients to create these customized solutions. Clients hire Fehr & Peers because of our commitment to being the best at what we do. We live out this commitment by investing heavily in our culture to ensure that we are attracting and retaining the best and brightest staff in the industry. In addition, we have a robust, internally - funded research and development program that enables us to develop new analytical methods and advance the state of the practice. Fehr & Peers' develops strong client relationships by following our core values: • Professional integrity and honesty: We emphasize quality over quantity • Responsive and hard-working: We emphasize service over sales • Problem -solving, can -do attitude: We emphasize solutions over process Quality Control/Quality Assurar Fehr & Peers prides ourselves on the quality of the services we offer. Our QC/QA process is customized on a project -by -project basis. As such, our standard process for design projects is described below followed by our standard process for planning efforts. Fehr & Peers sends out a client survey at the close of every project we work on. In 2018, 99% of our clients noted that we met or exceeded expectations. This is the ultimate verification that we are producing quality products for our clients. Fehr & Peers developed and maintains a QAI QC plan ("Plan") for Engineering Design projects. The Plan is written for all staff, and is available to anyone within the company via our internal website, and is available to external clients upon request. It provides definitions related to the engineering process, explains the QA Plan procedures, our internal file system protocol and also outlines our Quality Assurance (QA) Auditing program. RFP No.. i y Council 17 — 147 2/15/2022 The Plan outlines individual responsibilities of everyone, as well as unique responsibilities of key staff (i.e Principal -in -Charge, Project Manager, Lead Designer). The Plan explains our records management and retention protocols to comply with federal and state law. Perhaps the most referenced element of the Plan is the explanation of our standard procedures regarding CADD file creation and management, creation of construction documents, engineering estimates and other calculations. Checklists are available to ensure the process is followed, including such activities as coordination with utilities, affected agencies, ensuring agency comments are responded to, etc. Each of our design documents undergoes an independent internal review for which we have additional technical checklists depending on the type of plan prepared. Finally, once per year several projects are audited to ensure compliance with our QA Plan. Through this process, Fehr & Peers ensures that our construction documents are reviewed multiple times by multiple people wduring the design process, and we maintain the high level of quality that our clients expect. For task orders from this potential on -call agreement, Fehr & Peers will develop a detailed scope of services, fee estimate (in-cluding staff hour estimates with billing rates identified), and schedule for review by City staff. We have found that detailed scopes of work ensure that City staff and Fehr & Peers staff know exactly what is included in our fee and what is not included in our fee. This is the first management technique that needs to be clearly identified and agreed to by both parties. Once that is complete, Fehr & Peers will open the task order on our end in our system. That includes an internal kick-off meeting with all staff who will participate in the project (to set expectations) and opening the project in our Deltek accounting management system. The task manager and principal in charge of the project will receive real- time budget tracking updates, including the total budget for the project, the budget spent on the task, and the budget remaining. We submit monthly invoices with progress reports reflecting our work over the previous month, with progress reports outlining the work completed and the tasks remaining. City Council 17 — 148 2/15/ &PEERS Key Staff SANTA ANA 1 I85si — JASON PACK, PE PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE PAUL HERRMANN, PE PROJECT (MANAGER L_ _ STEVE BROWN, PE, RSP1 PROJECT ADVISOR CLAUDE STRAYER, PE, RSP1 MIKE JOHNSTONE JOLENE HAYES, AICP JINGHUA XU, PHD, PE ENGINEERING DESIGN LEAD LIGHTING DESIGN GRANT WRITING LEAD TRAFFIC MODELING & SPECIALIST VMT LEAD REP NO.: tffVtouncil 17 - 149 2/15/2022 9 KEY PERSONNEL The key to the Fehr & Peers approach to this on -call assignment is the designation of the appropriate staff to participate on projects as they arise. Our proposed key participants are shown on the personnel organization chart. Jason Pack will serve as Principal -in -Charge and lead traffic studies. Paul Herrmann will serve as Project Manager and be the City's main contact. Full resumes may be found in the appendix to this submittal. The proposed project team will function as an integrated group of staff professionals. The success of projects of this nature depends on the individuals assigned and the availability of these individuals to fulfill their respective roles. This approach is a tradition with Fehr & Peers. The icons below were used to indicate which staff have expertise in each of the services requested in the RFP and which project qualifications show experience in those fields. SIGNING & STRIPING DESIGN SIGNAL DESIGN LIGHTING DESIGN 0 JASON PACK, PE PRINCIPAL 0*000 50% AVAILABILITY TRAFFIC MODELING & VMT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GRANT WRITING o STOP o 11;1 �a� Mr. Pack began working for Fehr & Peers after receiving his degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Davis in 1999. He worked in the Bay Area market for over four years and worked in the Sacramento market for another five years before moving to Southern California in 2008, He has worked on a wide variety of transportation projects, from general plans and specific plans to detailed corridor, interchange, and signal coordination studies. Additionally, he has applied or developed travel demand forecast models on over 50 projects in the State of California. Jason services our clients throughout Southern California and Arizona, with projects from Bakersfield to San Diego, and Phoenix to Long Beach. Jason has had papers/presentations accepted to the TRB National Roundabout Conference, the ITE National Conference, and the California APA Conferences. Jason also teaches two classes for the ASCE national webinar series on Roundabout Feasibility Assessment and Process of Signal Coordination. 10 City Council 17 — 150 2/15/ & PEERS 0 STEVE BROWN, PE, RSPZ PRINCIPAL 00*• 40%AVAILABILITY Mr. Brown is a Senior Principal with 30 years of experience in transportation planning and engineering. In addition to his 25 years of consulting experience, Mr. Brown was the Director of Transportation Planning for the City of Sacramento. He has managed projects in eight states and three countries. Mr. Brown is a licensed Traffic Engineer in CA with practical and research experience in safety issues related to: autos, freight, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Mr. Brown is a senior partner in the firm and has day-to-day responsibilities for the Southern California Region. PAU L H ERRMAN N, PE O ASSOCIATE 009000 60%AVAILABILITY Mr. Herrmann has ten years of experience in transportation engineering and transportation planning at Fehr & Peers. Prior to Fehr & Peers, Paul worked at the City of Corona in the Traffic Engineering Department. He has led a wide variety of projects including traffic studies, infrastructure prajec#s, travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long-range development plans. Mr. Herrmann has led several SB 743 implementation projects and has managed a significant number of projects that have used travel demand forecasting models to produce VMT estimates, including for CEQA. Mr. Herrmann is an active member of the Fehr & Peers SB 743 Working Group that meets monthly to discuss best practices and latest developments. O CLAUDE STRAYER, PE, RSPZ SENIOR ASSOCIATE 0000 35% AVAILABILITY Mr. Strayer has a range of transportation experience with the design of bicycle facilities, signing and striping plans, safe routes to school improvements, pedestrian facilities, traffic signal upgrades, wayfinding and the public involvement process. He has led teams of designers on a variety of other transportation engineering projects such as temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting. He also has experience performing traffic analysis as well as studies with respect to parking, circulation and school zone safety. RFP NO.: 2driVbouncil 17 — 151 2/15/2022 11 0 MIKE JOHNSTONE SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN • 0 * • 40% AVAILAB I LITY Mike Johnstone is a Senior Technical Specialist with over 19 years of experience, and currently manages a number of traffic signal and lighting design projects. Mr. Johnstone's experience includes preparing plans, specifications and estimates for the design of traffic signals; highway lighting and sign illumination, street lighting, ramp metering, and signal interconnect systems, signing and striping plans; as well as roundabout concept designs. Mr. Johnstone has completed projects in the cities of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, and Anaheim. He is proficient with AutoCA❑ and Microstation, the latest drafting software programs; AG132, lighting analysis software; AutoTurn, vehicle turning analysis software; and SignCAD, and sign panel design software. 0 JOLENE HAYES, AICP SENIOR ASSOCIATE 0000• 50%AVAILABILITY Ms. Hayes, located in our Orange County office, brings more than 20 years of experience in local, regional and statewide transportation, land use and goods movement planning, environmental analysis, and implementation. Ms. Hayes began her career as a graduate research assistant with Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) and then as a planner working for Arlington, Texas followed by a move home to So Cal where she went to work for Pasadena, California in Community Development. With both agencies, she worked on major General Plan updates (land use, mobility and housing) coupled with specific plans and zoning code updates. Similar to Oceanside today, Pasadena was at a crossroads — with a desire for a vibrant downtown free of crime, a mandate to accommodate more housing, and an opportunity to capitalize on rail transit. In addition to general planning, throughout her career, Jolene has planned, prioritized and implemented a variety of transportation projects ranging from traffic calming and bikeway improvements to major freight infrastructure projects. She is well -versed in local, regional and national issues, understands the importance complete streets to balance the movement of people and goods, and focuses on innovative solutions for minimizing the impacts of autos and trucks on local communities. O JINGHUA XU, PHD, PE SENIOR ASSOCIATE 000*0 40%AVAILABILITY Jinghua Xu has more than 15 years of experience. Her expertise includes travel demand model development and application, network modeling and simulation, and transportation planning. Jinghua has extensive experience in modeling with both highway and transit focuses. She has in-depth understanding in model estimation, calibration and validation, and has developed, enhanced and applied a wide range of complicated regional travel demand models for large MPOs, such as SCAG and SANDAL, as well as for counties, such as OCTA, SBCTA. 12 City Council 17 — 152 2/15MY2 & PEERS Revelant Projects SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION SANTAANA, CA (2019 - 2020) Fehr & Peers guided the City of Santa Ana through the process of updating and adopting the City's traffic impact study guidelines consistent with requirements of SIB 743. Fehr & Peers made VMT estimates for the entire Orange County region in support of the recommended thresholds of significance, including screening maps to facilitate City processing of projects. Fehr & Peers also provided a guidance document with sample projects to assist the City with implementation. This effort included education of staff and collaborative meetings to meet City goals. The City VMT thresholds and TIA Guidelines have been adopted by the Santa Ana City Council. This project was delivered on budget and on schedule, within the July 2020 adoption deadline. Clint ReferencF Staff Involved: Zden6k "Zed" Kekula, P.E., T.E., Senior Civil Jason Pack Engineer Paul Herrmann City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Total Cost: e: zkekula@santa-ana.org 1 (714) 647-5606 $45,000 RFP NO.: tity ouncil 17 — 153 2/15/2022 13 CEQA TECH NICAsL STOn- Y PF SANTA ANA, CA (2019 - ONGOING) za Fehr & Peers is currently under contract to review technical studies related to transportation impact assessment for CEQA on behalf of the City. Following our completion of the Senate Bill (SB 743) implementation study for the City, we were asked to review some of the initial or more complicated submittals by applicants to provide consistency with the recently adopted thresholds and traffic impact study guidelines. Fehr & Peers has provided comments on development projects and transportation projects. Client Refpr-�nr�e Staff Inkinh/ed: Zdenek "Zed" Kekula, P.E., T.E., Senior Civil Jason Pack Engineer Paul Herrmann City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Total Cost: e: zkekula@santa-ana.org 1 (714) 647-5606 $15,000 1y111Y OO ep 14 City Council 17 — 154 2/15/ & PEERS OC iA SB 743 ORANGE COUNTY, (2020 - 2020) Fehr & Peers provided services to support the OCTA modeling section with the new requirements from SB 743. We worked with OCTA to evaluate the model for CEQA/SB 743 compliance and refine the modeling process for VMT estimation, This project included the following: 1. Reaching out the other public agencies in California to document how they are approaching the revised CEQA Guidelines. 2. Assessing and updating OCTAM for CEQA/SB 743 compliance by addressing key technical questions including VMT outside modeling region and induced travel. 3. Developing Mitigation Measures toolbox 4. Identifying key OCTA documents requiring updates following CEQA Guidelines for transportation impact analysis. Client Reference Staff Involved: Jason Pack Anup Kulkarni, Section Manager Jinghua Xu OCTA - Regional Modeling and Traffic Operations Paul Herrmann 600 South Main Street, Orange, CA 92868 e: akulkarni@octa.net 1 (714) 560-5867 Total Cost: $99,990 RFP NO.: Ity 2 6ouncil 17 — 155 2/15/2022 15 Fehr & Peers evaluated traffic calming measures for implementation on Temple Hills Drive from Thalia Street to Mountain View Drive. This residential street has a significant grade, and care was taken to evaluate treatments that would reduce speed and be clear to all users. We also performed cost estimating for each of the treatment options. Upon consideration by the City, our detailed field investigation and public input, Fehr & Peers completed the plans, specifications and cost estimate (PS&E) necessary to complete the construction of the traffic calming measures. These measures included ground mounted signs, electronic speed feedback signs, new roadway striping, as well as speed tables. Client Referent.; Staff Involved: Torn Sandefur, P.E., (Formerly with City of Laguna Steve Brown Beach) Claude Strayer Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach -, Casa: 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 $5,900 e: tandefur@newportbeachca.gov 1 (949) 644-3321 SPEED TA9LES y,„ nHFiW • SPEED TABLE �a•^ � —xkk: . IWO �e®e.r wnc AM �N. COAST VIEW nn _.s Y OP GiMn^BE c ignPF1C cw[.Mao PI.A�i 16 City Council 17 — 156 2/15/L�t' PEERS MENDEZ HISTORIC TRAIL WESTMINSTER, CA (2019 - 2021) Fehr & Peers is currently involved in the design of a two-way, class IV bicycle facility for the City of Westminster. Fehr & Peers lead the design for traffic signal modifications and street lighting associated with the new bikeway. The new class IV bikeway repurposes the cross section on Hoover to remove one travel lane, shifts traffic and includes new bicycle traffic signals, bicycle detection, new ATC controllers, video detection, push buttons and other traffic signal upgrades intended to improve traffic flow and safety for all users throughout the corridor.We also prepared updated Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for each city. Adolfo Ozaeta, City Traffic Engineer, City of Jason Pack Westminster Claude Strayer 8200 Westminster Blvd., Westminster, CA 92683 Mike Johnstone e: aozaeta@westminster-ca.gov 1 (714) 548-3462 Total Cost: $56,000 ®�ees�o>oe m�e>voo>oe F%. RA�pAD_ PRE-EMPTI6N {TO REM>i N1 SP 1.. E %I5RA1A PRt7P(Y..FD P-ASF RI ioBam 47 k h 80L1A AVE ,x,,,,o ce FEHR�'PE�R5 a REVISEONS REFERENCES APPROVAI S I■w�o�®o�mom®m� ®000��oeaeoaos�� 0000amr��o�o©�oQ�r r��aoo�®eoAeom�Q�r� �omm��ra�o eo�moL o�aa�ea�aeea��e a0ee��eeee®iar�Q�� .ems m m..ow rw enr.. e<•wu ewa�no-�.wa m�'aw..,.[ e�' n P11 F I —ATON Pus- e-j"UN La CnT� DAIL �A" _ . e' SEC. E'ENn UE G1Gx4M gd:�i n R011TE ® yg TRUCK LM _ � f:DNtTRIIf.TIDN N[]TFC lTHic -FFT !xN v1 ,� MENDEZ HISTORIC FRAIL HOOVER 5T d EQLSA AVE TS, SIGNAL MOpIEICATION PLAN TH!j ni LU-1mi-1— — ;�ngin rmn jirpt. RFP NO.: I y ouncil 17 — 157 2/15/2022 17 LIGHTING ®ESIG SANTAANA, CA (2021 - ONGOING) Fehr & Peers is currently assisting the City with training on street lighting engineering and as needed engineering plan review. Training topics covered have included voltage drop calculations, bonding and grounding, service connection types, lighting control, and roadway lighting level guidance as present in the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) RP-8-18, Recommended Practice for Design and Maintenance of Roadway and Parking Facility Lighting. Client Reference 5t off Intro %;eci Zdenek "Zed" Kekula, P.E., T.E., Senior Civil Engineer Mike Johnstone City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Total Cost: e: zkekula@santa-ana.org 1 (714) 647-5606 $5,000 y s IMPROVEMEI STATIONS (2019 - 2020) After leading an innovative First/Last Mile Planning effort covering 22 light rail station areas and bringing eight Community -Based Organizations (CBOs) onto the project team as equal partners, Metro expanded Fehr & Peers' contract to include grant assistance for 27 priority projects. Fehr & Peers coordinated with both Metro and local agency staff to develop conceptual designs and cost estimates for each project which were then rolled up into grant applications for participating jurisdictions including the City of Compton who had one of the highest scoring applications of Cycle 4 and was recommended for over $20 million in ATP grant funding. (Note: Compton had to decline the funding due to administrative issues and this funding was reallocated to six other lower scoring projects.) Client JR-ferenc�+ Staff Involve, Katherine Lemmon, Senior Manager Claude Strayer, PE First/Last Mile Planning Metro One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Total Cost: e: lemmonk@metro.net 1 (213) 922-7441 $121,490 18 City Council 17 — 158 2/15/ & PEERS ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION ENGINFFRING/K..ANNINC SERVICES FOR CAI_:. POLY POW POMONA, CA 0 (2008 - ONGOING) Fehr & Peers has served as on -call transportation engineering staff to Cal Poly Pomona for over ten years. Fehr & Peers has assisted with site access, traffic studies, signage, signal design, conceptual designs, and major planning efforts, including some of the following major efforts on campus: • University Shuttle Only Lane Design (2020-Ongoing) — Fehr & Peers first led a feasibility study for the shuttle only lane design project along University Drive around Cal Poly Pomona. Fehr & Peers is currently providing traffic engineering recommendations, the signing and striping plans, and lighting design plans during the PS&E phase. • Campus Master Plan Update & EIR (2017-Ongoing) — Fehr & Peers was part of the Campus Master Plan Update and provided recommendations on campus mobility including vehicle access, parking, transit access, bike access and on -campus pedestrian mobility. Fehr & Peers is currently preparing the transportation impact analysis for the EIR. • TDM Plan (2021-Ongoing) — Fehr & Peers is currently leading the campus' first comprehensive Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan. Fehr & Peers is undertaking a data -driven approach to recommend policies to better manage trips and parking on campus. • Kellogg Dr. & University Dr. Signal Design (2013-2014) — Fehr & Peers designed a traffic signal and signing/striping improvements at the Kellogg Drive & University Drive intersection. The project plans, specifications, and cost estimates were developed using the applicable Caltrans Standard Plans, and specifications and standards provided by the Campus. The signal was designed to include interconnect infrastructure to connect to downstream intersections. • On -Campus Bike Lane Design (2013) — Fehr & Peers completed the campus' first on - campus bike lane design. The facility stretches from Parking Lot B, adjacent to South Campus Drive and the proposed Mobility Hub site, up to the center core of campus. Client Reference Danny Wu, Executive Director, Transportation and Planning Cal Poly Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 e: dannywu@cpp.edu (909) 869 - 5044 ,�t�3ff Involved. Jason Pack Steve Brown Paul Herrmann Claude Strayer Mike Johnstone $500,000+ s a SS4 RFP No.: 26iiVouncil 17 — 159 2/15/2022 19 Sample Scope of Work & Schedule The request for proposals is for on -call services with undefined tasks. As such, the below scope of services and schedule is a sample traffic study that could be provided for an applicable project upon request form the City of Santa Ana. Fehr & Peers is pleased to provide this proposal to prepare a traffic study for Project X in the City of Santa Ana, California. This sample project is large enough to warrant Level of Service (LOS) analysis, consistent with policies defined in the Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and a Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) assessment, consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, 2019. Fehr & Peers will work with the Project team and City of Santa Ana to determine the appropriate scope of the traffic study. A trip generation estimate, trip distribution assumption and project traffic assignment will be prepared to assist in selecting the appropriate analysis locations. It is assumed that the City will require inclusion of any major intersections that the Project adds 50 or more peak hour trips to. Fehr & Peers will summarize the traffic study methodologies and assumptions into a memorandum for the City to approve. The memorandum will address the City's analysis guidance, significance criteria, and other traffic related concerns. The memorandum will include identification of the final study locations, data collection methods, software verification, trip generation estimates, trip distribution, forecasting methodology, and analysis scenarios. Fehr & Peers will submit the methodology and assumptions memorandum for Project team review prior to submitting to the City. Fehr & Peers will review the project description and conduct a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening assessment to determine if it can be screened from VMT impact analysis. Fehr & Peers will prepare a VMT screening assessment memorandum if the Project can meet the VMT screening criteria. Task 3 —VMT Modeling Analysis Task 3.1- VMT Impact Assessment If the Project doesn't meet VMT screening criteria, VMT impact analysis will be required. We will identify the project level VMT for existing and cumulative year scenarios and the project effect on VMT assessment for cumulative scenario. The County of Orange Travel Demand Forecasting Model (OCTAM) will be utilized to prepare VMT forecasts for each scenario. Summary tables will be provided to document VMT and VMT per service population, per resident, and/or per employee for each of the study scenarios at the regionwide geographic scales. Based on the adopted City of Santa Ana thresholds, we will identify the project generated and cumulative impacts on VMT. 20 City Council 17 — 160 2/15/05 & PEERS Task 3.2 - Mitigations For VMT-related impacts identified above, we will evaluate potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce those impacts. If needed, we can work with the project team and the City to identify a feasible TDM program and will test the associated VMT reductions from that program through the methodology and information presented in the CAPCOA guide. The scope of services for this task will be determined in Task 1 Task 4.1- Data Collection It is assumed that intersection counts will be required for an intersection LOS analysis and roadway segment counts will be required for air/nose analysis. As such, this scope assumes data collection at up ten intersections and ten roadway segments during the AM and PM peak periods (7:00 — 9:00 AM and 4:00 — 6:00 PM). Counts will be collected during fair weather, while school is in session, and during a typical (non -holiday) Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Task 4.2 - Intersection Analysis The scope of work assumes analysis at up to ten intersections. As part of this assessment the following will be completed: • Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment - we will estimate the number of weekday AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the Project through the methods established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 11th Edition, 2021. We will estimate the origins and destinations of trips associated with the Project based on local traffic patterns, a select zone travel assignment from OCTAM, and discussions with City staff. Weekday AM and PM peak hour project trips will be assigned to the roadway network serving the site using the trip generation and trip distribution estimates. • Opening Year Forecasts — we will either interpolate OCTAM projections or assign trips from approved projects to study intersections and Project driveways to estimate growth through the opening year of the Project. We will add the project trip forecasts to the "no project" forecasts to develop traffic volumes for "with project" scenario at the study intersections. • Future Year Forecasts — we will utilize OCTAM to develop future forecasts at the study intersections and Project driveways after incorporating approved and pending projects in the study area. We will add the project trip forecasts to the "no project" forecasts to develop traffic volumes for "with project" scenario at the study intersections. • LOS Analysis — LOS analyses will be prepared for the analyzed intersections. Fehr & Peers will utilize the City of Santa Ana's LOS standard to identify intersection deficiencies and we will recommend potential improvements and appropriate fair share costs, if necessary. • Ramp Queueing Assessment — A queuing assessment will be performed at all Caltrans off -ramps to review storage capacity on Caltrans facilities, consistent with the latest Caltrans safety guidance. Task 4.3 - Non -Automotive Assessment As part of this assessment, Fehr & Peers will evaluate the project effect on bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. This will be completed by evaluating the project's consistency with existing and future infrastructure and policies supporting these modes. RFP NO.: Ity tounci1 17 - 161 2/15/2022 21 Task 4.4 — Documentation Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft transportation impact study report that summarize the analysis methods, data, and the results of the VMT impact analysis; the non -automotive assessment; and the methods, data, and results of the LOS assessment. The draft report will be submitted to the project team for review. We have included up to four hours of staff time to respond to one round of consolidated comments from the project team on the draft report. The updated report will be submitted to the City for review. We have included up to four hours of staff time to respond to one round of consolidated comments from the City on the draft report. The final report will be submitted to the project team. Task 4.5 — Meetings This proposal includes attendance at up two virtual meetings. Please note additional meetings requested outside of this scope of work will be scoped and budgeted on a time -and -materials basis with prior authorization from the client. Schedul3 Fehr & Peers can complete Tasks 1-4 according to the following schedule: Task 1 — Fehr & Peers will submit the draft scoping memorandum within two weeks of receiving a task order from the City of Santa Ana. We will respond to comments within one week and submit a final scoping memo. Task 2 — The draft VMT screening assessment will be completed within two weeks of an approved scoping memo. We will respond to comments within one week and submit a final screening memo. Task 3 — Fehr & Peers will complete VMT modeling and forecasting within four weeks of an approved screening memo. This data can then be used in the Noise and GHG sections of the EIR. A draft transportation impact assessment will be submitted two weeks after the modeling and VMT forecasting is completed. We will respond to comments within one week and submit a final Transportation Impact Analysis memo. Task 4 — Fehr & Peers will order traffic counts following an approved scoping memo. We will complete a draft LOS traffic study within six weeks of receiving the traffic counts. We will respond to comments within two weeks and submit a final LOS traffic study report. Disclaimer: Please note that the above schedule represents a sample of an appropriate schedule for the time to complete the sample scope of work. All schedules will need to be negotiated based on the scope of work, context of the project, and staff availability. 22 City Council 17 — 162 2/15/ & PEERS Appendix [Resumes/ Forms] RFP NO.: 2 IclY C o u n c i 1 17 — 163 2/15/2022 23 L011i4Tr11101Z Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis,1999 REGISTRATIONS Licensed Traffic Engineer, State of California (TR2402) PRESENTATIONS Multi -Modal Levels of Service — ULl SCIC Innovative Interchange Designs — District 8 Professional Liaison Committee Meeting, 2011 Parking Strategies and GIS Based Parking Analysis — SCAG Toolbox Tuesday, 2011 Roundabout Operations and Feasibility — ASCE national webinar series, 2011 and 2012 FEHRtPEERS Jason Pack,PE Principal ABOUT Mr. Pack began working for Fehr & Peers after receiving his degree in Civil Engineering frorn the University of California, Davis in 1999. He worked in the Bay Area market for over four years and worked in the Sacramento market for another five years before moving to Southern California in 2008. He has worked on a wide variety of transportation projects, from general plans and specific plans to detailed corridor, interchange, and signal coordination studies, Additionally, he has applied or developed travel demand forecast models on over 50 projects in the State of California. Jason services our clients throughout Southern California and Arizona, with projects from Bakersfield to San Diego, and Phoenix to Long Beach. Jason has had papers/presentations accepted to the TRB National Roundabout Conference, the ITE National Conference, and the California APA Conferences. Jason also teaches two classes for the ASCE national webinar series on Roundabout Feasibility Assessment and Process of Signal Coordination. PROJECT EXPERIENCE CEQA/NEPA Assessment Jason has completed transportation assessments for over 150 projects dictated by either CEQA or NEPA. These included impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs. In addition, Jason assisted in developing transportation impact analysis guidelines and a travel demand management manual for the California State University Statewide Systern, which is defining the state of the practice and recommended procedures for assessment of CSU projects. Jason is also the Southern California leader in assisting jurisdictions with SB 743 implementation. Jason has been the Principal -in -Charge an all efforts out of the OC Office, including major endeavors for WRCOG, SBCTA, the CSU System, the North Orange County Collaborative. Some other example projects include the following: • SBCTA SB 743 Countywide VMT SB 743 Implementation, CA • CSU SB 743 Guidelines, CA • County of San Bernardino Transportation Impact Study Guidelines, CA • Corona SB 743 Implementation, CA • Eastvale SB 743 Implementation, CA • Moreno Valley SB 743 Implementation, CA • Temecula SB 743 Implementation, CA 24 City Council 17 — 164 2/15/ �PEERS General Plans Jason has worked on a wide variety of General Plans throughout the state of California, including: • City of Carlsbad • City of Redlands • City of Corona • County of San Bernardino • City of Fountain Valley • City of Moreno Valley • City of San Marcos • City of Chico • City of Saratoga • City of Rancho Cordova Most of these projects included Complete Street elements, extensive travel demand forecasting, and some level of multi- modai transportation assessment. Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans Jason has completed assessment for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below: • Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan - Evaluated a land use plan along Beach Blvd in Anaheim including vehicle and multi -modal capacity assessment • MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability Study — Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors in the greater Phoenix area • Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan — Completing the transportation recommendations and assessment for this corridor in the City of Long Beach including extensive rnulti-modal assessment • Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan — Completed the transportation recommendations and assessment of the proposed University Master Plan • Dolt Boulevard Corridor Plan — Assessing the corridor in the City of Ontario to consider multi -modal opportunities along the corridor (including a Bus Rapid Transit application) • Wine Country Community Plan — Assisted Riverside County in developing a travel demand forecasting model and evaluation of the plan for the Temecula Wine Country Area • CollegeTown Specific Plan — Assessing redevelopment of the block south of the Cal State Fullerton Campus including the closure of Nutwood Avenue, application of a street car through the project, and mixed -use development on the site (including Elope International University, retail, housing, and other development opportunities) • Sari Bernardino Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study -- Assisting in developing transportation strategies in support of TOD along the SBx BRT system Interchange and Corridor Studies Jason has completed the Traffic Report for numerous transportation infrastructure studies throughout California. The most notable of these studies are described below: • Monterey Avenue Signal Coordination Study — Palm Desert • OCTA Main Street Grade Separation Study — Orange • OCTA Ball Road Grade Separation Study —Anaheim • Rock Springs Bridge Study— San Bernardino County • Avenue 66 Grade Separation Study — Riverside County • SR-32 Project Study Report (PSR) - Chico Travel Demand Model Development Jason has completed applied or completed travel demand models on over 50 projects in the State. His use of models has given him an extensive understanding of forecasting and its integration with operations assessment. Some of his notable projects are summarized below: • Temecula Wine Country TransCAD TDF Model Development • City of Upland TransCAD TDF Model Development • Kern COG Voyager 4-D TDF Model Enhancement • Tulare CAG Voyager 4-D TDF Model Enhancement • Butte County TransCAD TDF Model Development • Grass Valley TransCAD TDF Model Development • Rancho Cordova Sub Area TP+/MINUTP TDF Model Development • MAG Sustainability Study — Direct Ridership Forecasting Development Parking Assessment Jason has completed numerous parking assessments. Key studies are identified below: • Downtown Roseville Parking Management Plan — Developed a GIS-based shared parking model to assess parking demand in the downtown area • Downtown Fullerton Parking Management Plan • Cupertino City Center Shared Parking Assessment • San Bernardino TOD Overlay Parking Code Development RFA NO.: I y ounCil 17 — 165 2/15/2022 25 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of California, Berkeley,1985 Master of Science in Transportation University of California at Berkeley,1987 Master of Business Administration Golden Gate University, 1998 FEHRtPEERS Steven J. Brown, PE Senior Principal ABOUT Mr. Brown is a Senior Principal with 30 years of experience in transportation planning and engineering. In addition to his 25 years of consulting experience, Mr. Brown was the Director of Transportation Planning for the City of Sacramento. He has managed projects in eight states and three countries. Mr. Brown is a licensed Traffic Engineer in CA with practical and research experience in safety issues related to: autos, freight, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Mr. Brown is a senior partner in the firm and has day-to-day responsibilities for the Southern California Region. REGISTRATIONS TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT PLAN EXPERIENCE Licensed Traffic Engineer, State of California JR1510) Mr. Brown was either the project manager or principal -in -charge of all the following Road Safety Professional (cert 2019) studies conducted by Fehr & Peers: AFFILIATIONS Pedestrian Safety Audits (25 cities) Fehr & Peers developed a manual for Pedestrian Safety Audits to be performed upon Member of NCHRP Committee to Develop request from California cities/communities. The manual included collaboration with an Safety Manual for Unsignalized intersections, expert review panes and review of best practices in pedestrian safety. The program 2012 -2015 won numerous awards and has been recognized as a national model for such Member of Bicycle Sub -Committee of programs. NCUTCD,1995/96 Upon completion of the manual, Fehr & Peers was retained to conduct audits ITE Northern California Section President throughout California. Mr. Brown was the lead investigator for more than 25 2000-2001 individual studies from small towns (Lomita and Hermosa Beach) to large cities (Los Co-chair ITF District 6 Conference, 20044 Angeles and Irvine). These audits included a full day of walking the streets with City AWARDS staff and interested parties to identify the problems and remedies related to pedestrian safety. The studies aiso created a GIS map of historical pedestrian -involved 2nd Place, APA Transportation Planning collisions in each jurisdiction, Division National Student Paper Competition Roadway Safety Expert Witness EXPERTISE Mr. Brown has conducted roadway safety analysis as an expert witness. These ana#yses included field reviews of potentially hazardous conditions, comparison of • MLrltimodal Corridor Planning roadway designs to professional standards, and statistical analysis of collision records • Corridor Safety Studies to identify patterns. Mr. Brown testified in each of these cases, and the courts have • Transportation Demand Management ruled favorab#y for our client in each case. • Freight Planning 26 City Council 17 — 166 2/15/�b �" PEERS Traffic Calming, National Expert Mr, Brawn, who co-authored the US Tiaffic Calming Manual, has led the firm's efforts in creating citywide traffic calming programs (more than 15) and developing plans for individual neighborhoods (more than 25). This includes the largest traffic calming project in the US (Downtown Sacramento) and award - winning programs from Ithaca, NY to Ft. Bragg, CA. Truck Safety, Beverly Hills Mr. Brown was the principal investigator on behalf of the City of Beverly Hills in developing remedies to enhance safety for trucks on their steep residential streets, A series of fatal collisions led the City to engage Fehr & Peers in creating a plan to improve conditions. The plan included treatments such as a city - sponsored truck inspection program, escorting of over -sized trucks, time -of -day limitations, parking management, traffic calming treatments, and new signing/striping, Cal Poly Pomona Pedestrian Safety Study Fehr & Peers conducted a pedestrian safety study of the entire Cal Poly campus. We evaluated existing pedestrian facilities and vehicle data on campus, with particular attention to pedestrian - vehicle conflict locations. As part of our work we recommend specific crosswalk, roadway, and intersection improvements both on -campus and on City of Pomona roadways. We developed guidelines for the University for future pedestrian treatments, including crosswalk design standards. As a result of our recommendations, we have designed the first in -roadway warning light crosswalk system on the Cal Poly campus. This design will alert motorists when pedestrians are in the crosswalk with the use of embedded flashing LEDs. California Central Valley Freight Safety Fehr & Peers, as part of two related studies, created a GIS spatial database of truck -related collisions covering five counties in central CA. This database was then used to query issues related to location, type, and cause of collisions to develop counter- measures for both pilot testing and long-term implementation. Mr. Brown was the principal for both of these efforts. Rancho Mission Viejo Sustainable Transportation Program Fehr & Peers prepared a sustainable transportation program for Rancho Mission Viejo, a new development in Southern Orange County. Our work on the sustainable transportation program included development of the bicycle plan, bicycle facilities and NEV (Neighborhood Electronic Vehicle) plan. The comprehensive NEV network is a unique feature that highlights the development's sustainable transportation program and is only the second such plan in the state. In Rancho Mission Viejo NEVs, bicyclists, and pedestrians will coexist on a well-connected network of paths and trails that link residential, retail, and recreational land uses, thus reducing the amount of automobile trips within the development. Downtown Anaheim Pedestrian Safety Fehr & Peers assisted the City of Anaheim on a number of transportation projects that will enhance the downtown environment. We evaluated the safety and performance of modifications to Anaheim Boulevard and Broadway, which included: angled parking, bulb -outs, reduced lanes, and wider sidewalks. Our analysis resulted in several refinements to the proposed street modifications. We have also analyzed the ability of the existing and proposed parking supply to support additional development if) the area. Auto/Ped Safety Study, West Hollywood Mr. Brown led an effort by Fehr & Peers to address auto/pedestrian safety conflicts on a critical section of Santa Monica Boulevard. The data collection effort included a detailed review of drlver behavior during evening hours when bars and nightclubs are active. Our recommendations included adding traffic signals, consolidating crossing locations, enhancing pedestrian visibility, and removing dynamic pedestrian signals. RFP No.: 2di y ounci1 17 — 167 2/15/2022 27 FEHR,�PEERS Paul HerTmann, PE Associate EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, Pomona, CA (2011) REGISTRATIONS Traffic Engineer, CA #TR2797 AFFILIATIONS nstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Member ABOUT Mr. Herrmann has ten years of experience in transportation engineering and transportation planning at Fehr & Peers. Prior to Fehr & Peers, Paul worked at the City of Corona in the Traffic Engineering Department for two years. He has led a wide variety of projects including traffic studies, infrastructure projects, travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long-range development plans. Mr. Herrmann is an expert in SI3 743 Implementation and VMT Analysis for CEQA projects. Mr. Herrmann serves clients throughout Southern California with projects throughout the SLAG region. PROJECT EXPERIENCE S3 743 Implementation and VMT Impact Guidelines, Anaheim, CA Mr, Herrmann was [he Project Manager for this effort. Fehr & Peers assisted the City of Anaheim with SB 743 implementation. We are evacuated the available tools to conduct VMT analysis and prepared possible strategies for the City in determining VMT analysis methodology and CFQA transportation impact thresholds. We updated their traffic impact study guidelines consistent with requirements of SB 743. Fehr & Peers also provided a guidance document to assist the City with their decision -making process. The document consists of potential VMT screening maps, VMT comparison charts, TPA maps, and sample project evaluation. We provided guidance and recommendations on available project level mitigation and TDM strategies specific to the City of Anaheim, including many special generators such as sports stadiums and theme parks. The project adopted of CFQA compliant thresholds of significance by the July, 2020 deadline. The project concluded with recommendations on a future tool for the City to facilitate SB 743. On -Call Transportation Engineering/Planning Services, Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona, CA Fehr & Peers has served as on -call transportation engineering staff to Cal Pay Pomona for over ten years, Mr. Herrmann is the main contact and Project Manager currently for the campus. Fehr & Peers has assisted with site access, traffic studies, signage, signal design, conceptual designs, and major planning efforts, including some of the following major efforts on campus: University Shuttle Only Lane Design (2020-Ongoing) — Herrmann is the Project Manager for Fehr & Peers on the initial feasibility study for the shuttle only lane design project along University Drive around Cal Poly Pomona. Fehr & Peers is currently providing traffic engineering recommendations, the signing and striping plans, and lighting design plans during the PS&E phase. Mr. Campus Master Plan Update & EIR (2017-Ongoing) — Mr. Herrmann was the Project Manager Fehr & Peers was part of the Campus Master Plan Update, a project led by Ayers Saint Gross, and completed the transportation component of the project. Fehr & Peers provided recommendations on campus mobility including vehicle access, parking, transit access, bike access and on -campus pedestrian mobility. Fehr & Peers is currently preparing the transportation impact analysis for the FIR. 28 City Council 17 — 168 2/15 PEERS TDM Plan (2021-Ongoing) — Mr. Herrmann is the Project Manager for the campus' first comprehensive Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan. Fehr & Peers is undertaking a data -driven approach to recommend policies to better manage trips and parking on campus, Kellogg Dr. & University Dr, Signal Design (2013-2014) — Mr. Herrmann was the lead designer on the traffic signal design and signing/striping design at the Kellogg Drive & University Drive intersection at Cal Poly Pomona. The project plans, specifications, and cost estimates were developed using the applicable Caltrans Standard Plans, and specifications and standards provided by the Campus, The signal was designed to include interconnect infrastructure to connect to downstream intersections. On -Campus Bike Lane Design (2013) — Mr. Herrmann was the lead designer on the campus' first on -campus bike lane design. The facility stretches from Parking Lot 8, adjacent to South Campus Drive and the proposed Mobility Hub site, up to the center core of campus. On -Call CEQA Technical Study Peer Review, Santa Ana, CA Fehr & Peers is currently under contract to review technical studies related to transportation impact assessment for CEQA on behalf of the City. Following our completion of the Senate Bill (SB 743) implementation study for the City, we were asked to review some of the initial or more complicated submittals by applicants to provide consistency with the recently adopted thresholds and traffic impact study guidelines. Fehr & Peers has provided comments on development projects and transportation projects. Mr. Herrmann is the primary contact and Project Manager for these efforts. 100 E. Ocean Boulevard Long Beach Hotel Project, Parking, Traffic & TDM Study Mr. Herrmann was the Project Manager for Fehr & Peers who conducted a shared parking analysis, traffic study, TDM Plan and traffic control plans for the environmental clearance of a proposed hotel project at 100 E. Ocean Boulevard in downtown Long Beach. The shared parking analysis was used to determine the optimal mix of land uses within the development given the site constraints and to identify needed parking supply off -site during major events. The traffic study reviewed 14 intersections under traditional leve€ of service assessment as well as screening the project from VMT assessment with the City's recently adopted CEQA TIA Guidelines, Site access was also reviewed for the limited driveway queuing capacity and alternative valet operations were recommended. Fehr & Peers also prepared a transportation demand management plan (TDM) for the project for hotel guests, and conference/event attendees, designed to reduce reliance on vehicle traffic, and increase the use of walking, biking, and transit use by guests of the project. Lastly, traffic control plans for project construction were prepared for the project. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan/EIR, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Mr. Herrmann was the Project Manager for Fehr & Peers on the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan and FIR project. Fehr & Peers reviewed the General Plan and the City's street standards and provided the tears with a report summarizing the policies in support of sustainable, walkable neighborhood development, and policies that may be unsuppertive of or in conflict with such development. We also evaluated the local, citywide, and regional transportation networks as part of the site opportunities and constraints analysis, with a focus on identifying multi -modal transportation options, Fehr & Peers is investigated the capacity of regional freeway interchanges and arterials, and existing patterns of vehicular and active transportation modes within the neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area. Fehr & Peers was responsible for preparing a traffic impact study in support of an Environmental Impact Report prepared forthe Project. Fehr & Peers studied over 40 intersections and conducted a VMT analysis consistent with SB743. On -Call CEQA Transportation Impact Study Peer Review, Corona, CA Fehr & Peers is currently under contract to review technical studies related to transportation impact assessment for CEQA on behalf of the City. Following our completion of the Senate Bill (SB 743) implementation study for the City, we were asked to review submittals by applicants to provide consistency with the recently adopted thresholds and traffic impact study guidelines. Fehr & Peers has provided comments on development projects and transportation projects. Documentation is typically prepared as a peer review memorandum. Mr. Herrmann is the primary contact and Project Manager for these efforts. SB 743 Implementation & VMT Impact Guidelines, Santa Ana, CA Mr. Herrmann was the Project Manager assisting the City of Santa Ana through the process of updating and adopting the City's traffic impact study guidelines consistent with requirements of SB 743. Fehr & Peers made VMT estimates for the entire Orange County region in support of the recommended thresholds of -significance, including screening maps to facilitate City processing of projects. Fehr & Peers also provided a guidance document with sample projects to assist the City with implementation. This effort included education of staff and collaborative meetings to meet City goals. The City VMT thresholds and TIA Guidelines have been adopted by the Santa Ana City Council. This project was delivered on budget and on schedule, within the July 2020 adoption deadline. RFP NO.: I y ouncil 17 — 169 2/15/2022 29 FEHRtPEERS _r Aim" ik Claude Strayer, PE, RSP Associate EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, MA (2011) Minor, Mathematics, Northeastern University, MA (2011) REGISTRATIONS Civil Engineer, CA #86774 Civil Engineer, AZ #68882 Civil Engineer, Hi #17856 AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Member ITE Pedestrian & Bicycle Standing Committee, Vice Chair CERTIFICATIONS • VISSIM Software Training — PTV Group, May 2014 Roadway and Interchange Lighting Design Training — MD State Highway, April 2014 • Sustainable Transportation Professional (STP) Certification — Greenroads Foundation, February 2013 • Signing & Pavement Marking Design Training — MD State Highway, January 2013 • Erosion & Sediment Control Certification — ABOUT Mr. Strayer has a range of transportation experience with the design of bicycle facilities, signing and striping plans, safe routes to school improvements, pedestrian facilities, traffic signal upgrades, wayfinding and the public involvement process. He has led teams of designers on a variety of other transportation engineering projects such as temporary traffic control, roadway and sidewalk design, and lighting. He also has experience performing traffic analysis as well as studies with respect to parking, circulation and school zone safety. FXPERIENCE City of Beverly Hills On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Beverly Hills, CA Fehr & Peers selves the City of Beverly Hills with an on -call contract for traffic engineering services. We have assisted the City in a wide range of tasks, including an in-depth assessment of safety and operations at a complex intersection, which included presentations to the City Council and Traffic and Parking Commission; development of a Transportation Division Procedures Manual for internal use; review of site plans for the new bikeshare stations; assessment and implementation of a pilot project to convert traditional school crosswalks to continental; evaluation of existing and proposed crosswalks to identify appropriate treatments/enhancements; and traffic -related concerns submitted by residents and business owners. We have also prepared plan check comments for temporary traffic control plans associated with minor encroachment permit work and very complex utility work associated with the Metro Westside Subway Project. We have commenced work on a signal modification and corridor synchronized timing plan update along Olympic Boulevard. In addition, we have served as the on -site Traffic Engineer for the City with the recent retirement of City staff. Mr. Strayer has joined the team in June as a designer and is part of the traffic control review team. Temple Hills Drive Traffic Calming, Laguna Beach, CA Fehr & Peers evaluated Traffic Calming measures for residential streets with a MD State Highway, July 2012 significant grade in Laguna Beach. We recommended treatments for the city`s consideration, and they have been advanced to the design phase. Claude is the Project Manager for the design and cost estimation of these recommended traffic calming treatments. 30 1 & PEERS City Council 17 — 170 2/15/�_ 2 Mendez Trail PS&E, (Westminster, CA) Fehr & Peers is currently involved in the design of a two-way, class IV bicycle facility for the City of Westminster. Mr. Strayer is the Project Manager and is responsible for the design of traffic signal modifications and street lighting associated with the new bikeway. The new class 1V bikeway takes away one travel lane, shifts traffic and includes new bicycle traffic signals, bicycle detection as well as other traffic signal upgrades for motor vehicles. SR-60 at Archibald Avenue Interchange PS&E (Ontario, CA) Fehr & Peers was part of a team working on the SR-60/Archibald Interchange project for SANBAG. As part of the Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA), Fehr & Peers is assisting the project team in developing up to two build alternatives. For the PA/ED analysis, we are conducting a traffic impact analysis of eight study intersections, developing a traffic demand forecasting model, and analyzing traffic operations. We also evaluated roundabout feasibility as part of the Caltrans` Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) process. During the PS&E phase, Fehr & Peers was responsible for preparing the plans, specifications and cost estimates for the traffic signals, signal interconnect, ramp metering, and street lighting plans. SR-14 at Avenue K PS&E (Lancaster, CA) Fehr & Peers prepared the Traffic Analysis Report (TAR) for the proposed SR-14/Avenue K Interchange Improvements project. Fehr & Peers is currently preparing plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the project. PS&E phase plans includes preparation of the traffic signal plans, City street lighting, City traffic signal interconnect, highway lighting, ramp metering, main line communications, and closed-circuit television (CCTV) improvements. Honolulu Complete Streets Planning & Design, Honolulu, HI Fehr & Peers conducted multimodal transportation analysis, complete streets planning, and design plan development for 1S.6 miles of bikeway facilities throughout Honolulu's Primary urban Center (PUC). This project was envisioned as a critical first phase of the expansion of a low traffic stress bicycle and pedestrian network, and a trophy project for Honolulu's leadership in innovative bikeway planning and design. A key component of our work focused on the design, which Mr. Strayer is contributing to, of Complete Streets that provided improved and balanced bike, pedestrian, transit, and vehicular mobility and access while supporting the civic life of streets and an economically and environmentally sustainable context. Mr. Strayer was the project manager of the design phase which included final (PS&E) design of signing and striping, bicycle facilities, and traffic signal modifications. Fullerton Caltrans Priority Bike Connection, Fullerton, CA Fehr & Peers is assisting a team and the City of Fullerton in providing better bicycle connections across freeway barriers. Our portion of the study focuses on crossing SR-57 between NUtWood Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard, and a potential overcrossing or undercrossing into the Cal State Fullerton campus at Madison Avenue. We are evaluating the route and suggesting safer ways to cross the freeway. During the process, we are documenting quantitative information for later use in grant applications. Fehr & Peers is responsible for a traffic analysis of the focus areas using Synchro to determine the possible impacts of various interventions, as well as performing a safety evaluation. We are creating preliminary design plans and cost estimates for the possible alternatives for new crossings. These alternatives are being vetted through a public participation process. CSUN G6 Parking Structure Improvements PS&E, (Northridge, CA) Fehr & Peers is prepared the design plan, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for a traffic signal modification associated with a new parking structure at the CSU Northridge Campus. We were also responsible for the signing and striping design at the intersection approaches and within the structure itself. LADOT review and the B Permit approval process were successfully completed and the project is currently in construction. North Park Mid City Bikeway, San Diego, CA Fehr & Peers completed the planning, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for 11 traffic signal modifications along the Meade, Georgia, and Landis bikeways in the North Park -Mid City area of San Diego, as well as the wayfinding design for the Meade and Landis bikeways. The signal modifications included the preparation of 100% plans that addressed the planned removal of separate left -turn lanes at numerous intersections, the installation of curb extensions/bendouts, and modifications to signal phasing. Mr. Strayer was a design engineer on the team working to review and design traffic signal modification plans. The wayfinding plans included PS&E for confirmation and destination signage based on guidelines previously prepared for SANDAG by Fehr & Peers. Short Street Traffic Calming, Yorba Linda, CA Fehr & Peers lead the planning and design of traffic calming treatments along Short Street, a residential neighborhood street in Yorba Linda. The improvements were prepared in both planning level exhibits and graphics, as well as final design PS&E. Mr. Strayer served as the Project Manager and Engineer of Record, which uitimately included signage, striping as well as speed humps for controlling vehicle speeds. I2FP No City ouncil 17 — 171 2/15/2022 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Geology California State University, 2000 AFFILIATIONS American Public Works Association (APWA) EXPERTISE • Traffic Signal Design • Street Lighting • Roundabouts • Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities • Construction Management • Cost Estimating FEHR�PEERS 4 J Mike ohnstone Senior Engineering Technician ABOUT Mike Johnstone is a Senior Technical Specialist with over 19 years of experience, and currently manages a number of traffic signal and lighting design projects. Mr. Johnstone`s experience includes preparing plans, specifications and estimates for the design of traffic signals, highway lighting and sign illumination, street lighting, ramp metering, and signal interconnect systems, signing and striping plans; as well as roundabout concept designs. Mr. Johnstone has completed projects in the cities of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, and Anaheim. He is proficient with AutoCAD and Microstation, the latest drafting software programs,- AGI32, lighting analysis software; AutoTurn, vehicle turning analysis software, and SignCAD, and sign panel design software. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Citywide Major Street Rehabilitation (Pomona, CA) Fehr & Peers prepared roadway improvement plans For the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, which are part of the major street rehabilitation project within the City of Pomona. The locations for these improvements include Holt Avenue and Hamilton Boulevard, Halt Avenue and Towne Avenue, Holt Avenue and San Antonio Avenue, San Bernardino Avenue and Indian Hili Boulevard, and San Antonio Avenue at Barfield E€ementary School. The project constructed curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks as well as upgraded signal equipment to including accessible pedestrian signals, countdown pedestrian signal heads, signal poles, vehicle heads for the pedestrian improvements. Construction was completed in 2018. Mike was the Project Manager and Lead Transportation Designer on the team. Colorado Esplanade and Downtown Plaza Design (Santa Monica, CA) The Coioraclo Esplanade, from 4th Street to Ocean Avenue, is a designed to connect the Downtown Expo Light Rail station, the Santa Monica Pier, the Civic Center, Downtown District, and Tongva Park. The project converted Ocean Avenue from a 2- way street to a 1-way street, providing multiple travel modes access from the light rail station to the Santa Monica Pier via a 2-way cycle track and pedestrian promenade. Fehr & Peers assisted the design team and city staff with refinement of the Schematic Design, Design Development, and prepared final project plans and specifications. Fehr & Peers prepared plans and specifications for the signal modifications fiom 4"' City Council 17 — 172 2/15/ b ` &PEERS Street to Ocean Avenue, which included a pedestrian scramble phases, and bicycle signals for the cycle track. Fehr & Peers also prepared plans and specifications for the roadway and cycle track signing and striping, We were a subconsultant on the architect's team. Construction was completed in 2016. Mike was the Lead Transportation Designer on the team. Los Angeles Trade Tech College (LATTC) Fehr & Peers led the design of the traffic and transportation elements of the construction of a parking structure and classroom technology building at Los Angeles Trade Tech College (LATTC). The design included elements of traffic calming, pedestrian safety features, traffic signals, street lighting, signing and striping, traffic control, construction staging and construction support. Fehr & Peers worked with the project team to gain input from project stakeholders including LATTC, LADOT, LA Bureau of Street Lighting, Metro and LADWP. Project construction was completed in 2015. Sapwi Trails Community park (Thosand Oaks, CA) Fehr & Peers prepared final plans, specifications, and estimates for the Sapwi Trails Community Park Off -Site traffic signal improvements in the City of Thousand Oaks, CA. The project consisted of new 17-acre Community Park with various recreation amenities within the Conejo Recreation & Park District. Fehr & Peers prepared new traffic signal installations plans for the park entry on Westlake Boulevard at Rdnfield Boulevard and on Avenida de Los Arboles at Kensington Avenue. Construction was completed in 2018. Mike was the Project Manager and Lead Transportation Designer. Bikeway planning and Design (Beverly dills, CA) Fehr & Peers supported the City of Beverly Hills in the planning and signing and striping design of bicycle routes and bicycle lanes on Burton Way and Crescent Drive in the City of Beverly Hills, CA. Fehr & Peers assessed the feasibility of installing bicycle facilities on selected roadways as identified by the Clty's Bicycle Ad Hoc Committee. We provided research on the additional safety benefits for bicyclists and vehicles from the installation of bicycle facilities. Following the City Council's approval of two of the proposed bicycle routes, Fehr & Peers provided the engineering design drawings and cost estimates for construction. Rail to Rail Active Transportation Corridor Project Environmental Review (Los Angeles, CA) Fehr & Peers was part of a team working on 30% engineering design and environmental clearance for Segment A of the Rail to Rail active transportation corridor project. The project entailed the conversion of the Harbor Subdivision rail right-of-way in South Los Angeles into an active transportation corridor providing a safe and comfortable bicycle and pedestrian connection between the existing Metro Blue Line station in the east to the future Metro Crenshaw Line Fairview Heights station in the west. Fehr & Peers was tasked with designing intersection crossings and signal modifications, conducting an anaiysis of any potential project - related traffic impacts, and assisting in the selection and design of possible on -street routing options from the intersection of the rail right-of-way and 11111 Avenue to the Fairview Heights light rail station. This on -street segment forms a critical firstflast mile connection between the station and the off-street corridor. To further our understanding of the project area and context, Fehr & Peers conducted a detailed existing conditions analysis including collisions, access and circulation, traffic, and signals and crossings. LMU Life Sciences lgnatian Circle Signing and Striping Fehr & Peers assisted the Loyola Marymount University (LMU) campus with the signing and striping design on lgnatian Circle for the new project frontage improvements and stop -controlled intersection improvements for the primary access to the new Life Sciences building located at the southern end of the alumni mall. The detailed signing and striping plan included curb striping and signage for loading and short-term parking. Roundabout Designs • Vista Canyon, City of Santa Clarita • Sand Canyon Plaza, City of Santa Clarita • RMV Community Development ADS, Orange County. CA • Neil Road/Kietzke Lane, Reno NV • California Avenue/Old Davis Road, UC Davis • Quarry Heights Roundabout, Petaluma, CA • US395/Muller Parkway, Reno NV On -Call Traffic Engineering Services Omcall services provide public agencies additional design staff and capabilitles on an as -needed basis. • City of Pomona • City of Beverly Hills r FP NO.: ' y touncil 17 — 173 2/15/2022 33 FEHR t PEERS Jolene Hayes, mcp Project Manager EDUCATION ABOUT M.C.R.P., City and Regional Planning, Jolene Hayes has more than 20 years of experience in local, regional and statewide University of Texas at Ar1ington,1999 transportation, land use and goods movement planning, environmental analysis, and BA., Political Science, University of Texas at implementation. With a focus on cWaboration and stakeholder input, Jolene Arlington,1997 leverages her port and local planning experience to identify policies, programs and projects that balance environmental and economic health in communities. Her PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (#26392) AFFILIATIONS Transportation Research Board Intermodal Freight Committee (AT045) — Chair Transportation Research Board Issues in Major U.S. Cities (ABE30) — Former Member Transportation Research Board Transportation Programming, Planning, and Systems Evaluation (ADA50) — Former Member American Planning Association Institute of Transportation Engineers experience in project prioritization and implementation includes her current efforts with developing an incentive -based, targeted approach to green logistics development for the Utah Inland Port, as well as writing federal grants for Los Angeles Metro, Port of Long Beach and SLAG (TIGER, INFRA, BUILD and PIDP). Throughout her career, Jolene has planned, prioritized and implemented a variety of transportation projects ranging from traffic calming and bikeway improvements to major freight infrastructure projects. She is well -versed in local, regional and national issues and understands the importance of balancing the movement of goods and people on railways, roadways and waterways from a local, port, regional, state and national perspective. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Southern California Strategic Freight Plan Ms. Hayes is the project manager of this plan that is focused on furthering strategies that were recently adopted through the California Freight Mobility Plan Update. This study is focused in Caltrans Districts 7, 8, and 12 covering Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties. Women's Transportation Seminar, California State Freight Mobility Plan (CFMP 2019) Orange/Los Angeles Counties Ms. Hayes provided policy guidance and insight into port and freight rail operations and drafted sections on freight trends, strategies, and implementation. Urban Land Institute —Public Sector Chair for ULI Orange County Young Leaders Group Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Update (Long Beach, CA) (2006 — 2008) Ms. Hayes is providing guidance on the development of the PortTAM model scenarios, related projects, and traffic impact analysis methodology. The Master Plan Update includes planning for terminal expansions to accommodate projected growth in international import and export cargo. She prepared the draft and final traffic section for the programmatic environmental impact report and supported the response to comments process. 34 City Council 17 — 174 2/15/M5"' PEERS San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments SB 743 Implementation (Irwindale, CA) Ms. Hayes is currently leading the SB 743 implementation for 26 cities in Los Angeles County. The project includes VMT workshops for city staff, providing staff with data and information to make decisions on baselines and thresholds of significance, assisting with drafting staff reports and resolutions, and making detailed presentations at planning commission and city council meetings to aid in the adoption of VMT thresholds of significance. This process also includes a web -based VMT assessment tool for the cities to use for screening projects, estimating VMT, and viewing the effects of mitigation options. Union Pacific Railroad Intermodal Container Transfer Facility (ICTF) Expansion Project EIR While with a previous firm, Ms. Hayes, acting as an extension of staff for the ICTF Joint Powers Authority, managed the development of an EIR for a proposed doubling in capacity of the existing 750,000 lifts/year ICTF near the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. This project has been on hold since 2016, Port of Long Beach Rail Impact Analysis Methodology (Long Beach, CA) While with the Port of Long Beach, Ms. Hayes spearheaded and led the development of rail impact analysis guidelines in response to litigation on the Middle Harbor Terminal EIR. The rail analysis considers the impacts of proposed port projects that were expected to add rail traffic to the Class I rail lines throughout the Southern California region. San Joaquin Valley 1-5/SR 99 Goods Movement Corridor Study Ms, Hayes served as the Project Manager for this study while with another firm, which entailed a comprehensive analysis of the existing conditions of goods movement in the Central Valley along a 200+ mile of 1-5 and SR-0. (Fehr & Peers was a sub on this project.) This analysis incorporated GPS data (Streetlight) for understanding activity to/from freight clusters within the Central Valley, investigated freight bottlenecks, reliability and safety, and identified projects to address these concerns. City of Los Angeles Complete Streets Project Development Reports (2020) Ms. Hayes led Fehr & Peers effort as a major sub -consultant to develop pre -project development (PDR) reports for nine high - priority corridors in the City of Los Angeles. This effort identified key corridor features and potential funding sources to assist the City with phasing the implementation of complete street features and safety enhancements. The program aims to improve access and mobility, encourage walking, biking and transit, and reduce greenhouse gases. National Cooperative Freight Research Project (NCFRP) 37 - Making U.S. Ports Resilient as Part of Extended Intermodal Supply Chains Ms. Hayes served as a researcher and author for this report that focused on the impacts of port disruptions and key elements of supply chain resiliency. FHWA Intermodal Connectors Case Studies (FHWA, Southern California) Ms. Hayes prepared two types of case studies, including an analysis of primary freight connectors and exploration of other types of key freight connectors for consideration. NCHRP B-98 Freight Bottlenecks Guidebook Development Ms. Hayes assisted with the development of the freight bottleneck handbook that provides detailed instructions for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing freight bottlenecks, 1-710 Corridor EIR/EIS (Long Beach, CA) Ms. Hayes represented the Port of Long Beach as a Technical Advisory Committee member and as a funding partner on the preparation of the 1-710 EIR/EIS, Port of Long Beach Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project (Long Beach, CA) While with the Port of Long Beach, Ms, Hayes managed the tolling sensitivity analysis, the traffic impact analysis, FHWA Cost Estimate Review, acted as the Owners Representative for the Design -Build Contract Request for Qualifications (RFQ), managed the funding and programming (including preparation of TIGER grant and TIFIA loan applications), and coordinated with FHWA to obtain funding approval for the addition of a separated Class Bike Path, Federal Freight -Related Grant Applications Ms. Hayes authored the recently awarded $14.5M PIDP grant for the Port of Long Beach. Previously, Ms. Hayes managed the preparation of FASTLANE grant applications for SR 60/57 Convergence for the City of Diamond Bar, CA, SR-60 Corridor Improvements for the City of Moreno Valley, CA, Pier B. On -Dock Rail Support Facility for the Port of Long Beach, and a regional rail application for LA Metro, Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and the Alameda Corridor East. Ms, Hayes has been successful in applying for TIGER funding for the Port of Long Beach rail improvements, Port of Charleston Waldo Wharf improvements, and City of Providence Amtrak Station improvements. Utah Inland Port Authority (Salt Lake City, UT). Ms. Hayes led the greenhouse gas and air quality evaluation and incentives programs strategies for the Utah Inland Port Authority's Strategic Business Plan. RI P Na.: ity Council 17 — 175 2/15/2022 35 112tu Xu, I! deler FEHRtPEERS PhD, PE EDUCATION ABOUT Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, University of Jinghua Xu has more than 15 years of experience. Her expertise includes travel Massachusetts, Amherst, 2004 demand model development and application, network modeling and simulation, and M.E, in Transportation Fngineering, Bejing transportation planning. Jinghua has extensive experience in modeling with both liaotong University, BeiJnrg, China,1997 highway and transit focuses. She has in-depth understanding in model estimation, calibration and validation, and has developed, enhanced and applied a wide range of 3.17, in Transportation Engineering, Belting complicated regional travel demand models for large MPOs, such as SCAG and Jiaotong University, Bejing, China,1994 SANDAL, as well as for counties, such as OCTA, SBCTA. REGISTRATIONS PROJECT EXPERIENCE Licensed Civil Engineer, State of California OCTAM Active Transportation Tool Development (73925) Jinghua is the project manager to develop an active transportation (AT) tool for OCTA, to increase OCTAM's sensitivity to AT investments. This AT tool will have the AFFILIATIONS capability to quantify additional non -motorized trips associated with changes in land use and/or with the addition of active transportation facilities, specifically bicycle lanes Transportation Research Board (TRB) and sidewalks. As the final product, this post -processing tool will be seamlessly Standing Committee on Urban integrated in the OCTAM TransCAD to analyze AT projects. Transportation Data and Information OCTAM Emission Tool Development Systems (ABJ30), member Jinghua was the project manager to update the air quality modeling component for Women's Transportation Seminar, member OCTAM, for both TRANPLAN and TransCAD versions. This component involves International Chinese Transportation converting OCTAM outputs to the inputs required by FMFAC 2014, call FMFAC2014 Professional Association — Southern directly from OCTAM TransCAD User Interface, and reporting the FMFAC2014 results. California Chapter, board member The component is integrated to the OCTAM framework. OCTA Goods Movement Study Fehr & Peers helped OCTA to identify technologies likely to have an impact within a 20-year horizon and industry trends with respect to warehousing, distribution, and vertical integration, determine which strategies OCTA should consider promoting or facilitating, such as truck -only lanes or variable speed limits, and position OCTA to take advantage of new freight -related funding via the FAST legislation. Jinghua led on the analysis and summary on rail goods movements in the final freight plan. 36 City Council 17 — 176 2/15/�bf2& PEERS Sit-55 (1-5 to SR-91) PAED This project is to prepare traffic study in support of the SR-55 (1-5 and SR-91) widening PA/ED in Orange County. Jinghua is leading all the modeling related effort and providing future traffic volume forecasting for various alternatives in support of traffic operations report. SANDAL Urban Area Transit Strategy This project is to assist SANDAG in updating the long-range regional transit plan to reflect new technologies including driverless vehicles and transportation network companies. Fehr & Peers led the technical analyses including advising SANDAL on performance measures, travel demand modeling approaches to reflect new technologies, and completing a travel markets analysis and updates to the proposed transit and ITS investments in corridors throughout the region. Jinghua is leading the travel demand modeling associated with the analyses, including setting up model parameters and procedures to reflect the impact of new technologies in demand forecast, developing off -model procedure to estimate the use of the modes that are not included in the SANDAG ABM, including microtransit and roesharing modes, as well as generating required performance measures. Caltrans Transportation Modeling/Forecasting Service This project is to provide on -call model development and updates to the California Statewide Freight Forecasting Model (CSFFM) in order to better integrate the results with the passenger forecasts from the California Statewide Travel Demand Modes (CSTDM). Jinghua assists in enhancing the base year 2012 model, including the update of submoddes to forecast truck trip table and the subsequent procedures such as assignment Procedure, and model validation. RCTC Truck Study, Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee As part of a team, Fehr & Peers is assisting RCTC in determining the level of impact of warehousing and logistics activities on the Riverside County highway system, the proportional amount of a fee to mitigate these impacts, and documenting the nexus for a fee program. Jinghua supported the interpretation of the regional model in forecast growth in logistics facilities through 2040. South OC Mobility Study This project is to assist the local toll agency (TCA) in evaluating mobility options for South OC. This effort has included working with a variety of stakeholders to define a range of future mobility treatments focusing on SR-241 connection and local facility improvement, testing those treatments via technical analysis to see how they perform, and reporting the results to the team for their consideration. Jinghua led all the modeling related tasks including toll/HOT demand forecasting and provided technical information to gain the confidence of all participants in the objective. San Bernardino County Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) Modeling Support Jinghua has supported SBTAM since 2014, She provided modeling support for SANBAG's Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP), leading the effort to develop SBTAM 2040 scenarios, and performing scenario analysis for both highway and transit sides. In addition, Jinghua assists the clients to maintain SBTAM and enhance its functionalities. OCTAM FTA New Starts Update Jinghua was the key modeler to update OCTA's mode choice model to meet FTA guidelines for models intended to support projects seeking funding from the New Starts program. Jinghua was responsible for the model review, generating calibration targets and leading the effort to develop and fully implement the model updates. The emphasis of the model updates was on the mode choice model, including the revision of the nesting structure following current best practice models and by introducing new transit modes (e.g., BRT and high-speed rail), the corresponding update of utility calculations, auto calibration procedure, and reporting functions. OCTAM Modeling Support Jinghua was the project manager to help update OCTAM TransCAD, from input preparation to model enhancement. Jinghua was responsible to manage the project, and in charge of OCTAM modes updates, including revision to the model zone structure, highway and transit network, as well as the improvement of the GISDK code to streamline the model processes and enhance functionalities of OCTAM TransCAD. SCAG Activity -based Model Development and Validation in Support of the 2016 RTP/SCS Jinghua was the key modeler in developing SCAG's Activity - Based Model (ABM). Starting from the model developed in the previous stage, an extensive re -specification of the model was performed, to advance the ABM to the point where it is a practical tool that supports the 2016 RTP and other regional planning needs. SCAG Mode Choice Model Enhancement and Regional Model Update Jinghua was the key modeler to help enhance SCAG's Trip -Based Model (TBM), including application of 4D concepts to the SCAG regional model, mainly to the mode choice model, vehicle availability, and trip generation models, and other model components. aFP NO.: i ouncil 17 — 177 2/15/2022 37 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-1: NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATIONS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAy1T (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the laid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bid&ig; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid; and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Nan -Collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non -Collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that rpa npa false certification may subject the -certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of (Dr4..%6_P . `J 4 ove'40,er Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on tlus Za_ day of 2011 by m w . proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. R. J. MILLER r.� �_ Notary Public - CaVom3a x a ,�_. �= flran�eCounty Cnmmissian = 2241642 My Comm. Expires Jul 3, 2023 Nota Public Signature Notary Public Seal City of Santa Ana RPP 21-125 City Council 17 — 178 2/15/2022 CALIFORNIA JURAT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF _- } Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 23 day of _1� o-la. r 2-92-1 L Dote Month Year by rN.— Name of Signers proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Signature: _ __ _ Si tore of Notary Public ^moo. J. MILLER A Cahforn4a Notary Public . z.y Orange County C9mmi551on' 2241642 My Comm. Expires Jul 3, 2023 Seal Place Notary Seal Above --------------------------------------------------- OPTIONAL --------------------------------------------------- Though this section is optional, completing this information con deter alteration of the document or froudulent attachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Docume t Title or Type of Document: O V1 " C.0 Document Date: 2 Z Number ofPaees:---Ti--n�o tnGlua'.,riC "-k-u.i Uc '--o Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: City Council 17 — 179 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated Rinds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the malting of any federal grant, the malting of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. 1f any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for malting or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall. certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Fehr & Peers Signed and Printed Name:Jason Pack Title Principal Date 11/30/2021 City Council Page A3-217 — 180 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION. CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council Page A3-317 — 181 2/15/2022 by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed; .- Title: Principal Firm: Fehr & Peers 11/30/2021 Date: (1 f Confin Ano RG12'M-195 City Council Page A3-417 — 182 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT C City Council 17 — 183 2/15/2022 FEHR�'PEERS 2021 -2022 (July 2021 through June 2022) Hourly Billing Rates Classification Principal Senior Associate Associate Senior Engineer/Planner Engineer/Planner Senior Engineering Technician Senior Project Accountant Senior Project Coordinator Project Coordinator Technician Intern Hourly state $220.00 - $350.00 $195.00 - $290.00 $160.00 - $245.00 $145.00 - $195.00 $115.00 - $170.00 $135.00 - $200.00 $165.00 - $170.00 $120.00 - $175.00 $105.00 - $140.00 $120.00 - $155.00 $90.00 - $110.00 • Other Direct Costs / Reimbursable expenses ore invoiced at cost plus 70% for handling. • Personal auto mileage is reimbursed at the then current IRS approved rate (56 cents per mile as of Jan 2021). • Voice & Data Communications (Telephone, fax, computer, e-mail, etc.) are invoiced at cost as a percentage of project labor. Fehr & Peers reserves the right to change these rates at any time with or without advance notice. City Council 17 — 184 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 4 AGREEMENT WITH IBI GROUP TO PROVIDE ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022, by and between IBI Group, A California Partnership ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On November 2, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-125, by which it sought a qualified consultant to provide on -call transportation and traffic engineering services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-125. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-125, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Consultant's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in the Fee Schedule, which is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated in full. Consultant is one of three (3) consultants selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-125. The total annual compensation for services provided by all consultants selected under RFP No. 21-125 shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of one million dollars and zero cents ($1,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council 17 — 185 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 10 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on June 25, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for two (2) one (1) year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all City Council 17 — 186 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 10 Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability: if Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council 17 — 187 2/15/2022 Page 3 of 10 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work City Council 17 — 188 2/15/2022 Page 4 of 10 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. City Council 17 — 189 2/15/2022 Page 5 of 10 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this City Council 17 — 190 2/15/2022 Page 6 of 10 Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Consultant: IBI Group, A California Partnership 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: William Delo, Director A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not City Council 17 — 191 2/15/2022 Page 7 of 10 bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the parry waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council 17 — 192 2/15/2022 Page 8 of 10 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page/ City Council 17 — 193 2/15/2022 Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency IBI GROUP, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP Name: William Delo Title: Director IBI GROUP, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP Name: Steve Schibuola Title: Director City Council 17 — 194 2/15/2022 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A City Council 17 — 195 2/15/2022 Appendix ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-125 Introduction / Background The City of Santa Ana intends to retain Transportation and Traffic Engineering Consultants on an as -needed or "on- call" basis. A Professional Services Agreement will be entered into with one or more of the qualified firms Transportation and Traffic Engineering consultant(s) to provide professional services for a variety of projects on an on -call basis. On an on -call, as - needed basis, the selected firm(s) may later be asked to provide professional engineering services proposals on specific, project -by -project basis, based on an agreed -upon specific scope of services and fees. In general, work consists of general Transportation and Traffic Engineering projects. Funding sources for each project may vary for each project/task order assignment shall comply with the funding agency's requirements. The projects may include; sidewalks, bike paths, signing, striping, neighborhood traffic studies, traffic signal modifications, grant application writing, Bikeway Planning, Traffic Signal Master Plan, Street Light Master Plan, SB743 compliance, Traffic Study and other related projects as required. The consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services. The consultant shall utilize in-house staff and/or sub -consultants to complete the assignments to meet the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub -consultant. Prime consultant mark-ups for sub -consultant work will not be allowed. All proposals, plans, drawings, specifications, estimates, grant applications, and/or studies will be subject to the final approval and satisfaction of the City of Santa Ana. Scope of Services The work consists of Transportation and Traffic engineering design and cost estimating for civil works projects, and other related projects as required. The work in general, consists of work in the following areas and not limited to: City Cnunri1 17 — 196 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-1 • Traffic Signal Design • Striping Design • Traffic Engineering Design • Transportation Support • Traffic Studies • Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Compliance • Traffic Modeling • Traffic Signal Master Plan • Street Light Master plan • Street Light Design Training • Grant Writing- Services If there are any exceptions to the core of requested services, proposers shall list said exceptions in their proposal (matrix form). For specialized work for which the prime consultant shall require a sub -consultant, the prime consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and the sub - consultant. The selected consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrated resources available to perform the work described in this RFP. General Requirements and Project Deliverables The Consultant's services for plans specifications and estimating (PS&E) for engineering project preparation and special studies/investigations shall include and in be in conformance with the latest editions of the following: Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards Code). American Water Works Association, California Department of Transportation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), professional Standards established by the City, and or federal, state and local guidelines established in the project. As part of the preparation of the PS&E, the consultant shall prepare the special provisions pertaining to the items of work included in the plans that are not addressed on the latest editions of the applicable standards. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all documents and plans prepared. The plans will be reviewed by the City of Santa Ana for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the documents and the plans. The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and checker identified. City Council 17 — 197 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-2 The Consultant shall have project management control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. This task shall include the following: Project Management Plan- the consultant shall provide a detail management plan including information and coordination with other agencies to ensure compliance and completion of the (PS&E) packages. This plan shall include all milestones and task breakdown for each of the tasks and subtasks included therein. The project management shall be submitted to the Project Manager for review and within 15 calendar days of the issued Notice to Proceed Deliverables • Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) Plan • Project Schedule/Invoicing • Project Correspondence In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, the consultant shall submit the matter to the City for clarification. The Consultant shall perform engineering design services resulting in contract documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates "PS&E") for various projects on an as -needed basis. However, work tasks may include studies or a variety of engineering tasks. If requested by the City, the Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed schedule of the assigned project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed and/or Task Order. Specific Task Orders with Notices to Proceed ("NTPs") will be provided for project(s) at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order and this agreement. The following services/items shall include, but are not be limited to: 1. Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed improvements with existing field conditions. 2. Conduct an environmental assessment for each project and prepare all documentation required to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and or National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). (If required) Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in MicroStation V8i Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City, shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects. 4. Complete the design of projects including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The Consultant shall contact manufacturers and/or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Citv Council 17 — 1 q8 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-3 Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to the Consultant. 5. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum paper using MicroStation V8i CADD software program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD Standards and any special provisions thereof. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provide plans and/or specifications accordingly. 6. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer responsible/in-charge of the project. 7. If a part of the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and construction phases of the project, including, but not limited to: • Respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall attend the pre -construction meeting. • Review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. • Respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three (3) working days. • Provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so. 8. If included in the on -call project scope, upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as -built plans and submit them to the City. The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built plans shall be submitted to the City with an electronic copy (in MicroStation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built drawings via CD ore- mail. 9. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of the work performed by in-house staff and/or sub -consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation necessary for the consultant to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce a professional -level quality of work product. 10. If included in the on -call project scope, attend meetings with the City staff as required. 11. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and an; other issues with the City, ether Agencies, and all utility companies Citv Council 17 — 199 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-4 as required. At the direction of the City, the Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies. 12. If included in the on -call project scope, the Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. All information regarding the plans and specifications and or documentation related to the project and approved by the City, will then become property of the City. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. All tasks orders shall include the staff title, hours, hourly rate and totals as related to the project. Construction Plans, Standard Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) Preliminary Design- Attend project scope meeting with City Staff to review project details. Consultant shall field review, inspect and conduct all necessary surveys to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) or alternatives, preliminary cost estimate and preferred alternative as requested by the project manager. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 30% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at 60% design for independent City review. A (PS&E) package shall be submitted to review at for FINAL independent design review. The City will review and comment on the PS&E packages with a turnaround goal of (2) weeks. One (I) copy of the documents with comments will be returned to the consultant. Unless, several agencies are involved in the review process multiple documents with comments will be provided to the consultant. After the final design comments have been incorporated the consultant shall provide the City with final (PS&E) package ready for bid. See Section - General Requirements and Project Deliverables Section. Project Schedule and Progress: Progress review meetings shall be held at intervals deemed appropriate by the City. The Consultant shall furnish two copies of all completed work or partially completed update/status since the last progress review meeting. Progress reports shall be submitted monthly in electronic format indicating achievements and project schedule progress. City Responsibilities: Citv Council 17 — 200 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-5 The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. • Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project • All plan check coordination within the City • Advertise, award, and administer of construction contract • Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards) • Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders • Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities Fee Proposal: In addition to Section IV.13.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured as follows: The fee proposal shall include the firm's standard hourly fee schedule, and/or project fee schedule where applicable and as outlined in this this documents. A list of all positions and hourly rates required to perform the services described herein. A more detailed scope of work will be provided when/if a specific project or Task Order proposal is requested of a consultant. Other Terms and Conditions: 1. The project will be implemented in compliance with the City of Santa Ana's policies, as well as Prevailing Wages and State/Federal Requirements. 2. The City regards the inclusion of California based designs, engineering, and construction professionals, facilities, and services as part of the Team to be highly desirable, but not mandatory. 3. The City reserves the right to amend this Request for Proposal by addendum prior to the final dates of submission. 4. All reports, proposals, or other data or materials which are submitted shall become the sole property of the City of Santa Ana with the exception of the confidential Financial Capacity information and sealed fee proposals which will be returned to all proposers after award of contract to the selected Team. 5. All products used or developed in the execution of any contract resulting from this request will remain in the public domain at the completion of this project. 6. The City has an affirmative action program. The purpose of the affirmative action program is to encourage certified minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. All submitting firms must have established affirmative action programs approvable by the City. During the RFP stage, all firms will need to complete a "Certification of Non - Discrimination by Contractors" for each firm on their team. Citv Council 17 — 201 2/1.5/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-125 Page Al-6 City Council 17 — 202 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT B City Council 17 — 203 2/15/2022 On -Call Transportation and Traffic EngineeringServices RFP NO. 21-125 �I i All,ILI 11 ALI m !I'ref NI r, r1 ;1 A ice, Submitted to: City of Santa Ana By IBI Group with Mark Thomas Novem ity Council 17 — 204 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP I^ I 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300 IVY Irvine CA 92612 USA tel +1 949-833-5588 1 1 ibigroup.com November 30, 2021 City of Santa Ana Attn.: AZADEH AZAD Public Works Agency; M-43 20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 Re: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) 21-125 - ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES Dear Evaluation Committee: IBI Group, A California Partnership is pleased to respond to the Request for Proposal issued by the City of Santa Ana to provide on -call transportation and traffic engineering services. Our team brings extensive experience working with the City of Santa Ana on multi -modal transportation projects, traffic engineering, and traffic analysis. Through this experience, we bring a keen understanding of the City and its street network. Our proposal details this experience and discusses our approach to serving the City through this on -call. IBI Group has the experience and capacity to bring all the necessary resources to the City of Santa Ana for the requested services outlined in the RFP. Our team is committed providing the City with quality professional services and to meeting the City's schedule and scope requirements for any assignment received under this contract. IBI Group is submitting this proposal as the prime consultant. We have augmented and enhanced IBI's capabilities with the addition of the following subconsultant to our team: ■ Mark Thomas & Co. (MTC) -Will provide additional transportation engineering capabilities and support. MTC is also actively working with the City of a variety of projects, and the staff members included within our proposal provide a long history of working together on a range of transportation projects throughout Orange County. We acknowledge the firm's concurrence with the provisions contained in the City's Sample Agreement attached to the Request for Proposals as Attachment 2 in the Appendix. This cover letter is signed by authorized signatories of IBI Group, A California Partnership. Our proposal shall remain valid for a period of 90 days from the date of this letter. IBI Group's primary point of contact during the RFP review process is William Delo, Director. Mr. Delo can be reached at (949) 293- 0676 or bdelo@ibigroup.com at your convenience. Thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal. We look forward to hearing from you and are excited about the opportunity to continue our work with the City. Sincerely, IBI Group vvimam ueio, Am i- Director Steve Schibuola Director City Council 17 - 205 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Firm and Team Experience rr As a technology -driven design firm, IBI Group is designing and building B I IBI GROUP the cities of tomorrow through our globally integrated professional services practices that specialize in Intelligence (transportation, systems, communications), Buildings (architecture, civil engineering), and W� Infrastructure (land planning, urban design, multimodal transportation planning). 100 The integration of these disciplines allows us to provide comprehensive professional services for creating sustainable social and economic LJ 020 environments, while project management services deliver quality control and cost efficiency in project implementation. WORLD ARCHITECTURE RANKINGS BY PRACTICE Established in 1974, for 47 years IBI Group has grown steadily and now has over 60 offices throughout the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, LOCAL OFFICE/CONTACT and the Middle East, employing over 2,700 professionals and support staff. 18401 Von Karman Ave., Suite 300 From local, collector, and arterial roads to freeways and highways, bike Irvine CA 92612 Contact: William Delo, AICP infrastructure, and trails to public parks and amenities, retaining walls and u, g Tel:949-833-5588 culverts to bridges, bus rapid transit facilities, transit stations to airports Fax: 949-833-5511 Email: bdelo@ibigroup.com and highway toll systems, industrial buildings to highrises, schools and state-of-the-art hospitals, including smart city infrastructure, we design every aspect of a truly integrated city for people to live, work and play while applying innovation, technology, and creativity to the planning, design, and operations of cities. As a firm, we are committed to delivering better, more sophisticated, rapid and cost-effective results while creating and harnessing new technologies. We also leverage existing technologies, with the aim of providing clients with real world solutions that are easy to engage with, deploy and use. IBI is proud of our curated selection of ground -breaking digital products. Created in response to specific client needs, we feel they are uniquely positioned to support our customers in this rapidly changing world. \,A MARK Mark Thomas provides civil and structures engineering, surveying, construction T H O M A S management, landscape architecture, and urban design services to public agencies and municipal clients throughout California. Providing excellent client service and delivering projects to meet our clients' goals is our highest priority. Mark Thomas is committed to providing the City with exceptional service, a responsive project manager, and a project team that will be available and easily accessible throughout the duration of your project. We have more than 270 professionals working in offices that are strategically located to support the communities that we live in. Originating in San Jose (corporate headquarters), we have grown to establish additional offices in Rancho Cucamonga, Lakewood, Irvine, Cupertino, Walnut Creek, Oakland, Carmel, Fresno, Sacramento, and Roseville. City Council IBI GROUP 17 — 206 2/15/2022 William DelO, AICP Principal -in -Charge Director IBI Group Mr. Delo is a Director of IBI Group and a Transportation Planner with over 20 years of experience in transportation planning, multi -modal planning, active transportation, and traffic engineering. Mr. Delo is an experienced project manager His transportation planning experience includes the preparation of multi -modal plans, complete streets plans, first/last mile plans, and conceptual design efforts. Mike Arizabal Project Manager Senior Transportation Planner IBI Group "W'f Michael Arizabal is a senior transportation planner and has led the technical work on a wide variety of transportation planning and traffic engineering projects, and is an expert on all traffic analysis software and tools. Mr. Arizabal has a broad background of professional experience, focusing on multimodal transportation planning and traffic engineering, and specializing in site access/circulation, transit planning, corridor studies, parking management, complete streets application, and traffic impact analysis. EDUCATION B.A. (Environmental Analysis and Design), University of California, Irvine, CA, 2000 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • OCTA Active Transportation Plan (OC Active), Orange County, CA • Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, Santa Ana, CA • IBC Trails Feasibility Study, Irvine, CA • Purple Line First/Last Mile Plan, Los Angeles, CA • Agua Caliente Section 14 Complete Streets Plan, Palm Springs, CA EDUCATION B.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2004 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element Update, Santa Ana, CA • Port of Long Beach (POLB), On -Call Transportation Planning, Long Beach, CA • Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), State Route 55 (SR 55) Access Study, Costa Mesa, CA • Mount San Jacinto College Menifee Campus Master Plan, Menifee, CA • Century Boulevard Reconstruction Project, Inglewood, CA City Council 17 — 207 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 3 Cristina Martinez, AICP, LEED GA Traffic Analysis/Bicycle Planning Transportation Planner IBI Group f� APP- Ms. Martinez is a Transportation Planner with project experience ranging from large-scale freeway and transit impact projects to local active transportation projects, transit - oriented development, first and last mile planning, master and specific plans, and parking management studies. Ms. Martinez's area of expertise lies within transportation and land use planning, complete streets, active transportation, and multimodal connectivity Technical skills include data management and analysis, and the application of GIS software, including ArcGIS Desktop and ArcGIS Online, for various project types and needs. These often include data visualization, geospatial analysis, and web tool or interactive map development. Brooke Acosta 4A'� Traffic Analysis/Bicycle Planning Transportation Planner IBI Group Ms. Acosta is a Transportation Planner that specializes in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in IBI Group's Irvine office. Ms. Acosta's area of expertise as a planner includes local active transportation projects, complete corridor planning and multi -modal connectivity planning. Her GIS experience includes spatial data creation, geospatial analysis, and data management, manipulation, and visualization. Ms. Acosta also has experience using various components of the ArcGIS toolbox on ArcGIS Desktop and creating interactive maps through ArcGIS Online. She also has experience maintaining and sharing spatial data between various formats. EDUCATION Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine, 2016 B.S. Environmental Science and Policy, Chapman University, 2013 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Fresno -Madera State Route 41 & Avenue 9 Sustainable Corridors Study, Fresno/Madera County, CA • SCAG East San Gabriel Valley Mobility Action Plan, Los Angeles, CA • Ventura County Transportation Commission Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Ventura County, CA EDUCATION B.S. Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton, 2020 B.A. Geography & the Environment, California State University, Fullerton, 2020 Certificate in Geographic Information Systems (GIs), California State University, Fullerton, 2020 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Fresno -Madera State Route 41 & Avenue 9 Sustainable Corridors Study, Fresno/Madera County, CA • SANDAG Central Mobility Hub Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan, San Diego, CA • Cathedral City Active Transportation Plan, Cathedral City, CA • City of Fontana Sierra and Summit Warehouse VMT Analysis, Fontana, CIA City Council 17 — 208 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP Lydia La Point, PE, LEED AP Transportation Engineer Transportation Engineer IBI Group AIIIIIP� Ms. La Point is a Civil Engineer with 18 years of experience with IBI Group. Her depth and breadth of planning and engineering experience includes active transportation projects, pedestrian and bicycle plans, Complete Streets, road diets, corridor studies, Project Study Reports, multi -modal studies, mobility hub design, grant funding applications, and the preparation of conceptual design and engineering plans, specifications and estimates. She understands the relationship between transportation and land use, and the elements of design that make modes of travel and public spaces attractive and inviting. She also has extensive experience with public outreach and agency coordination, and incorporating public and stakeholder feedback into design. Ms. La Point is currently the engineering task lead for Metro's North San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Study and the Metro Purple Line First/Last Mile Project. Karen Sujata, PE Transportation Engineer Transportation Engineer IBI Group Ms. Sujata is a Transportation Engineer at IBI Group with experience in preparation of local street improvement plans, signing and striping plans, bike path plans, surface parking lot and parking structure conceptual plans, as well as multimodal level of service analyses, comprehensive evaluations and reports, and traffic impact analyses for various transportation projects throughout California. She also has experience working on projects which have implemented active transportation concept elements, such as bike boulevards and complete streets planning and design. Ms. Sujata is adept in a range of software including AutoCAD, MicroStation, Synchro, and Traffix. Her versatility and expertise can be seen on a wide variety of transportation projects. Ms. Sujata is registered as a Civil Engineer in the State of California. EDUCATION B.S. (Civil Engineering with a Minor in Information and Computer Science), University of California, Irvine, 2003 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • North San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor Planning and Environmental Study, San Fernando, CA • Metro Purple Line First/ Last Mile Project, Los Angeles, CA • Figueroa Corridor Streetscape Project, Los Angeles, CA • Metro Bus Rapid Transit Vision and Principles Study, Los Angeles, CA • Fourth District Bikeways Collaborative, Orange County, CA EDUCATION B.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2014 M.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2015 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • North San Fernando Valley BRT Corridor, Los Angeles, CA • TRIP Centennial Corridor, Bakersfield, CA • CRA/LA Figueroa Streetscape, Los Angeles, CA • Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Facilities Master Plan, San Jose, CA • Wilshire Avenue Bicycle Boulevard, Fullerton, CA City Council 17 — 209 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Vivian Hang, EIT Transportation Engineering Junior Transportation Engineer IBI Group -qmw fl- Ms. Hang is a Project Designer who has experience in a variety of transportation planning and engineering projects. Her project experience ranges from large-scale corridor and transit projects to local transportation improvement projects. Ms. Hang's area of expertise lies within transportation engineering and planning which includes conducting traffic impact analysis. Her skills include using ArcGIS for data visualization, MicroStation and AutoCAD for engineering design purposes, and a range of traffic analysis and modeling software in order to assess the performance of a network and mitigate its impacts which includes Synchro and Traffix. '+►,� Jonathan Levy, PE, TE Y *' Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineer IBI Group r Mr. Levy has 43 years of experience in Engineering and Public Works. He has experience in and is currently working on the planning, design and management of a number of complex multi -disciplinary projects as listed below. Mr. Levy also has experience in operating within and producing results working with complex public agencies including the, the City of Los Angeles, Caltrans, and the CPUC. His various responsibilities over the years included multi -modal transportation planning, traffic engineering, construction management, and public works maintenance. Mr. Levy is registered both as a Civil and Traffic Engineer in the State of California, and as a Professional Engineer in the State of New York. EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering — Transportation Systems University of California, Irvine, CA, 2017 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Wilmington Freight Mitigation Study, Wilmington, CA • Wilshire Avenue Bicycle Boulevard, Orange County, CA • West Athens -Westmont TOD Specific Plan, Los Angeles County, CA • 1-405 Renton to Bellevue ETL & Widening, Washington, CA • Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Facilities Master Plan, San Jose, CA EDUCATION Master of Public Administration, San Diego State University 1992 Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN, 1976 Bachelor of Science (Civil Engineering), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1975 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Uptown Bikeway, Phase 3, San Diego CA • MyFigueroa Corridor Redesign, Los Angeles, CA • Monrovia Station Square, Monrovia, CA • Crenshaw/ LAX LRT Design, Los Angeles, CA • San Diego Trolley ADA Station Review, San Diego CA City Council IBI GROUP 17 — 210 2/15/2022 Amy Frank, PE, LEED AP Traffic Engineering Transportation Engineer IBI Group ' Ms. Frank is a Transportation Engineer with four years experience in the Land Development sector of Civil Engineering and nine years of experience in Transportation Engineering, with projects ranging from small-scale residential to roles in minor roadway design, signal and signing/striping layouts, and stage construction/traffic handling layouts. Ms. Frank's area of expertise lies within signal design, signing and striping design, stage construction planning, traffic handling plans, precise grading, and limited exposure to; wet utility planning and profile design, rough grading, hydrology, street plan and profile layouts. Project participation includes conceptual engineering, preliminary engineering, and final design. Software knowledge includes AutoCAD 2002, 2006, and 2008, 2011, 2014, and Microstation v8i. Design software experience includes minor exposure to Land Desktop, InRoads, AutoTurn software, and WSPG Hydrology. Briann@ Poole, EIT Traffic Engineering Engineering Support IBI Group f Ms. Poole is a Transportation Engineer at IBI Group and has experience in a range of transportation engineering projects including permanent and temporary traffic signal design, bikeway design, light rail transit, design and implementation of bus rapid transit and transit signal priority. She has drafted AutoCAD and MicroStation plans for numerous projects, used Vissim to model alignments and analyze operations, and has created and optimized timing plans using Transync and Synchro. EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Iowa, 2003 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Hurontario LRT Detailed Design, Mississauga/ Brampton, ON • Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Improvements, Los Angeles, CA • 1-405, Renton to Bellevue Corridor Widening and Express Toll Lanes, Design -Build, WSDOT • Uptown Bikeways — Phase 3 Final Design, San Diego, CA • MyFigueroa, Los Angeles, CA EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 2018 SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Monitoring, San Diego, CA • South Bay Rapid TSP & One-way Transitway (OWT) System Design, Chula Vista, CA • Measure P Traffic Signal Improvements, Chula Vista, CA • LA Metro Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Improvements, Los Angeles, CA • SANDAG Uptown Bikeways Phase 3 Final Design, San Diego, CA City Council 17 — 211 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 y Paul Martin, PE, TE, LC.I C SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Traffic Analysis/Bicycle Planning • Standard Avenue Bikeway, Santa Ana, CA 0 Mark Thomas • The OC Loop — Z Paul Martin has more than 21 years of experience as a Promotion Strategy, Orange County, CA y transportation manager and traffic engineer. He has a strong C engineering and planning background that is focused on improving OC Loop Segments O, P, public travel and safety. Paul's expertise includes community Q, Orange County, CA 17 64 assessments, active transportation, public engagement, traffic • Mendez Historic Freedom Zengineering, and strategic funding programs. As the first OCTA Trail, Westminster, CA Z Active Transportation Coordinator, Paul secured over $6 million in ten unique grants to address infrastructure and non -infrastructure needs. At OCTA, he was involved in supporting local agency active transportation design projects as well as leading bikeway planning and safety studies. Paul is currently leading the final design for the Standard Avenue Bikeway Project for the City. Aaron Silva, PE SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Transportation Engineering • Mendez Historic Freedom Trail, Westminster, CA Mark Thomas • Garden Grove Complete Aaron Silva has more than 13 years of experience in design Streets, Westminster, CA and delivery of municipal and transportation projects. He • Central City Mobility is knowledgeable in both local agency and Caltrans design Improvements, standards and has successfully delivered projects with sensitive Sacramento, CA and significant public outreach efforts. He is a recognized expert • West Village Connectivity, in the design of bike and pedestrian facilities, helping design DAVIS and implement state of the practice solutions to improve active transportation safety throughout California. Ryan Bissegger SELECTIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Grant Writing Assistance McKinley Street Grade Separation Project Mark Thomas Funding Support, Corona, CA Ryan Bissegger has more than 17 years in the professional OC Loop Segment O, engineering industry. He has held various roles and has grown to P, Q - Coyote Creek become Mark Thomas' funding expert. He is very knowledgeable Channel ATP Grant of federal and state funding sources including ATP, HSIP, SB Application, Santa Ana, 1 programs, and federal discretionary programs. He tracks the CA programs and is knowledgeable of call for project schedules. He has provided funding recommendations to agencies to pursue in 1-80 Westbound Cordelia order to implement improvements. Ryan has experience developing Commercial Vehicle and reviewing grant applications. His understanding of the funding Enforcement Facility progra i; @-Ad s+a-+o @.nrJ fodQpal pglirvos hx � boon to„oranoho TCEP Application. prepara(d1Ycq@Y"btitive grants. 17 — 212 Fairfield 2/15/2022 1131 GROUP __7 N � N U Q � o �? o .Q � U CL L N 5+ .N 0 W W LU H J _ W � W O = J O •L r c a t u_ c _ .M w c > M Hw -3FW—' QQ m W L W LJ C ++ � W a O ca c = a ,� c ^ o 'CL 0 J Q � 2 � 0 i C •M 0 i C W W H W J_j 1> Q a� a U LU Q m N N C W ca v = `� Q = •N Q >r E p V Q ~ � v o — v �a 0 m a_ � City Council 17 — 213 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 9 Understanding of Need The City of Santa Ana is rapidly changing its street and transportation network to respond to the needs of the City's residents. The past several years has seen the City advance a range of innovative and advanced active transportation and multi -modal transportation improvements to make the City's streets safe and more convenient for all users. With the likely imminent adoption of the General Plan Update (and the associated Mobility Element Update) by the City Council, the City's efforts to continue the remake and rethink the street network will continue and will advanced more quickly. The IBI Group Team has been assembled to provide the necessary experience, knowledge, and capabilities to assist the City in the implementation of a range of transportation and traffic engineering projects. We bring extensive experience in all of the service areas identified by the City in the RFP, from traffic impact studies and VMT analysis, to active transportation project planning and design, to traffic signal design and transit priority systems. Our team also brings a long history of work with City staff on a range of projects, which provides a strong understanding of the City's priorities, as well as the challenges and opportunities faced by City staff. This experience allows us to offer our services working as an extension of City staff, focused on the same goals and outcomes. We have organized our proposal to highlight our team's overall approach to project management as part of on -call contracts and our key areas of expertise and capability should we be selected for this contract. Following this understanding, we have provided a sample scope of work and schedule of tasks, per the requirements of the RFP. Project Management Approach IBI Group and its team of transportation planners and engineers have the experience and knowledge to successfully perform all of the services identified by the City of Santa Ana for this On -Call Contract. Our Project Manager, Mike Arizabal, will serve as the primary point of contact for City staff. Mr. Arizabal is well qualified to lead this assignment because of his 15+ years of experience in transportation planning and engineering. Supporting Mike will be our Principal -in -Charge, William (Bill) Delo. Together, Mike and Bill will be available points of contact for the City and will assign the appropriate staff and task leads for the assignments that emerge from this on -call. Our overall team includes a mix of transportation engineers, traffic engineers, and transportation planners capable of providing the range of services requested by the City for this contract. The IBI Team is currently working with several local and regional agencies on an on -call basis providing engineering services ranging from planning -level conceptual engineering to the preparation of Plans Specifications and Estimates (PS&E). These on -call projects have ranged from large interchange and transit improvement projects to smaller scale traffic impact analysis, traffic signal, and active transportation projects. Based on our previous on -call experience, the IBI team believes the following key contributors are essential to a successful on call contract: • Communication between Consultant's Project Manager and City Staff: Keeping the client in the loop with respect to the project status and issues allows City staff to quickly act when key decisions need to be made in order to keep the project moving. • Understanding the Assignment: Establishing a clear understanding of the assignment with the City is —21 10 IBI GROUP Schedule & Cost Management: Developing a detailed fee estimate and schedule for the assignment and the continuous monitoring of both throughout the task's duration are essential to meeting the City's schedule and budget needs. Responsiveness and Flexibility: The ability of the consultant's Project Manager to act quickly in mobilizing the appropriate members of the consultant team is critical to meet the City's schedule requirements. A consultant Project Manager must also be able to react and adapt quickly to project and schedule changes once the technical work has begun. Staff Continuity: Retaining the same key staff throughout the life of an on -call contract helps expedite assignments and provide quality service. Our current and previous experience working on an on -call basis has allowed the IBI team to polish these key skills, and we are eager and excited to utilize them once again by offering our continued services to the City. Knowledge The City of Santa Ana is soliciting proposals to provide transportation and traffic engineering consulting services on an as -needed basis for a variety of different services from design, project management, project development, and traffic analysis services. IBI Group highlights our capabilities in the following areas: Systems Engineering IBI Group brings a rightsized Systems Engineering approach to technology solution projects to guide development of our implementation plan and manage design and requirements development. "Right - sized" to us means we scale the application of Systems Engineering principles to meet the needs of the project. For example, because of the size and complexity of the project, for MTC we developed and continue to update a Systems Engineering Management Plan to govern the technical work on the project from initial concepts through system acceptance. We also create leaner applications of the systems engineering approach where we focus on the critical aspects of building logically from a needs assessment and prioritization through to technical requirements (what rather than how). We have worked with clients at all stages of projects ensuring that this approach is followed, not just as a standard, but because we have consistently found great success with it. This not only ensures that our clients meet all Federal requirements tied to Federal funding, but also that their projects receive the benefits of a well -managed implementation. Traffic Feasibility and Striping Plans IBI Group understands the importance of traffic feasibility studies to solid intersection design, including intersection and arterial network analyses. IBI is an expert at using Synchro, SimTraffic, Traffix, and HCS to prepare trip generation forecasts, identify trends from data, and perform HCM and/or ICU LOS and/or VMT analysis as required. Final plans will be produced in AutoCAD and in accordance with the 2012 California Manual of Traffic Control Devices, 2010 Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans, the City of Irvine Standard Plans and Details. Our transportation engineers and planners have deep experience working within Caltrans and City of Irvine guidelines to prepare feasibility and striping plans. The IBI concept is to create a feedback loop that takes potential engineering and environmental considerations as input and returns traffic operations outcomes. Through an iterative process of alternatives screening and refinement we can work with the City of Irvine to select the most viable preferred alternative. On -Call Traffic Studies The provision of on -call traffic studies requires firms to be available and responsive to assignments issued by the City. IBI Group offers a full complement of locally -based and experienced staff capable of providing services to the City. IBI Group is familiar with the City of Santa Ana guidelines and requirements related to traffic impact and parking studies, having prepared several studies either City Council 17 — 215 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 on behalf of the City or for individual projects within the city limits. IBI Group's staff team is also fully capable of supporting City staff in reviewing project development applications, traffic studies, and transportation plans. ITS / Traffic Signal Coordination IBI Group has deep experience in ITS design and traffic signal coordination. IBI Group staff authored the San Diego Region ITS Strategic Deployment Plan, demonstrating an understanding of compliance with federal, state, and local codes and regulations. IBI staff are fully versed in multimodal ITS planning, design and implementation with a full knowledge of Caltrans and federal ITS requirements and industry -leading systems engineering approaches. This experience will allow IBI to provide expert on call services for any projects the City of Santa Ana requires. Future Proofing of Emerging Technology IBI Group's traditional transportation planning and engineering expertise is strongly influenced by current and emerging technologies that are playing an increasing role in our urban lives and environment. We are moving forward as a firm to stay ahead of the rapidly shifting transportation environment that is moving from singular mode user decisions to decisions based on a network of multimodal options and supported by real-time data. This means looking at both: • The present mobility eco-system defined by increasing interconnectivity; and • The future that will be marked by a completely connected user in a smart city with a responsive and resilient mobility environment. Both eco-systems are very different from the one of traditional transportation/ITS planning, design, and deployment which tended to be solely agency infrastructure and operations focused. Under this traditional model, customer information and interactions were viewed as secondary or an outcome of operational improvements. Increasingly, the lines between customer information and operational support systems are blurring, as has the line between planning and implementation. IBI Group has the depth and breadth of skills and expertise to tackle all potential elements of the emerging 21 st century mobility paradigm. It is also integrated and linked through all stages of ITS and transportation planning, engineering, implementation, and operations support to provide the City of Santa Ana with the flexibility and capabilities it will need to respond effectively as the ITS and mobility environments continue to evolve rapidly over the coming years. Scope of Services IBI Group has developed a sample work plan to address the common elements associated with transportation planning and engineering services. IBI recognizes the importance of all project aspects as well as the differences in how they will need to be handled. Management of individual tasks is the responsibility of the Project Manager to ensure that elements of the project affecting the schedule, project cost and approval process are tracked, monitored and reported on accordingly. Task 1 — Project Kick -Off Meeting IBI Group's first order of work will be to meet with the City of Santa Ana's Project Manager, to review the project, identify specific review issues, and agree on the scope and schedule for the project. Once the preliminary review scope is defined, we will perform all or part of the following tasks described in this approach. Task 2 — Development of Scope of Work and Project Plan After meeting with City staff, IBI's Project Manager will develop a detailed scope of work and project plan detailing the services to be performed including costs and estimated time for completion. Our project manager will be responsible for communicating the work plan to all the involved agencies City Council 17 — 216 2/15/2022 12 IBI GROUP and stakeholders, and will work collaboratively with these parties to ensure smooth execution of the complete project plan. We understand that these projects may require clear communication with local stakeholders and regional transportation agencies. iasK s — uata uainering ana meview IBI Group will prepare a detailed data needs memo following the initial meeting. IBI planners and engineers have years of experience in working with municipal transportation departments. The project manager understands that City staff has multiple demands on their time, therefore IBI Group correspondence will be clear, concise, and well organized. Data requirements will be clearly detailed in order to save time. IBI staff will research City records for prior approvals, including resolutions and conditions of approval, as necessary. In addition, IBI Group has experience contracting traffic counts and performing field reviews. IBI Group will review data gathered from other sources for accuracy and relevance. Task 4 — Traffic Analysis Specific Tasks In the category of traffic engineering, IBI Group will approach projects from a comprehensive perspective. IBI Group understands that traditional traffic engineering and traffic modeling approaches do not always support multi -modal planning. Further the transition to VMT-based analysis will require adjustments to the approach in how traffic studies are completed and in the identification of project mitigation measures. IBI Group understands the importance of providing rigorous traffic engineering. As shown in our firm qualifications, IBI has extensive experience in developing traffic generation and parking demand estimates for innovative projects that include Transportation Demand Management (TDM) components. We will apply our expertise in these areas on any projects to satisfactorily complete these assignments for the City. Task 5: Prepare Preliminary Design Plans IBI Group will prepare plan, profile, typical sections and construction details including intersection contour plans for street widening or areas of overlay and rehabilitation. Alternatives will be prepared to evaluate various impacts, constraints, costs, and geometric solutions to achieve the proposed street cross section and right-of-way. The traffic study will define the groundwork for identification of the proposed improvements including number of lanes, location and length of turning pockets, need for signals, etc. Development of project alternatives will involve coordination with the traffic engineers to determine the geometric needs. Design will commence using an iterative process with the traffic information to determine conceptual geometrics and determine if more than one alternative is warranted. The team will assess the data along with project goals and objectives to develop alternatives for further evaluation. Task 6: Preliminary Cost Estimate For each alternative, IBI will prepare a conceptual project cost estimate that details estimated quantities and unit costs for major work items, including right-of-way acquisition, drainage improvements and utility impacts. Project cost estimates will show quantities and unit prices with back-up calculations for all quantities. Preliminary cost estimates will be provided at each draft submittal and a final estimate will be provided with the final Project Design Report. Task 7: Prepare Project Final Report After the completion of the tasks above, IBI Group will prepare a Project Final Report in accordance with the City of Santa Ana's requirements. City Council 17 - 217 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 13 Task 8: Review and Comment on Improvement Plans Regarding Traffic Improvements This task will include a review of the proposed vehicle circulation improvements and vehicle volumes associated with the proposed project. IBI Group will review the improvement plans, analyzing the impacts these improvements have on traffic, circulation, bicycles and pedestrians. IBI Group will produce a technical memorandum summarizing the comments on the issues analyzed. Task 9: Attendance at City Council and Commission Meetings IBI Group recognizes the importance of attending City Council and Commission meetings for specific traffic -related assignments, supplementing the City full-time as needed. Our project manager and proposed staff have extensive experience with presentations at public meetings, Planning Commission Meetings and City Council meetings. Our staff is fully capable of representing the City on traffic engineering issues at these public meetings. Sample Schedule We anticipate that most projects assigned through this on -call would have a duration typically lasting from one month to one year. The typical sequence of tasks would include: 1. Project Kick -Off and Data Gathering — 1 week to 1 month 2. Analysis, Design Development — 2 weeks to 2-3 months 3. City Review, Comment — 2 weeks to 1 month 4. Refinements and Updates to Work Products — 1 week to 1 month 5. Development of Final Report and/or Design Package — 2 weeks to 3 months 6. Final Review and Presentations — 2 weeks to 2 months City Council 14 IBI GROUP 17 — 218 2/15/2022 Relevant Project Experience Santa Ana Circulation Element Update Santa Ana, CA IBI Group is leading the effort to update the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element. As part of this project, IBI Group is performing the following tasks: establishing Circulation Element goals, objectives, and policies; evaluating impacts that traffic growth will have on the circulation within the City and recommending appropriate improvements to mitigate these impacts; updating the objectives and policies for public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities; providing objectives and policies for transportation demand management, intelligent transportation systems, traffic calming measures; and providing modeling and analysis of alternative future network assumptions. An important component of this study is updating the Circulation Element to comply with the State requirements for Complete Streets planning, which require that roadways accommodate all users from autos to transit to bicyclists and pedestrians. The City's Bicycle Master Plan will also be updated as part of this study. OC Streetcar Orange County, CA IBI Group completed the Land Use and Economic Development components of a $144 million New Starts Grant application for the Santa Ana — Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The proposed streetcar project will bring greater mobility to the heart of Orange County by broadening the reach of Orange County's backbone rail system, and linking key employment and activity centers in Santa Ana and Garden Grove to SARTC. The alignment of the streetcar will also serve mature, densely populated, and ethnically diverse cities, where 92.2 percent of residents are identified as a racial or ethnic minority. GIS was utilized to extract and analyze spatial data for the application, which included station area statistics, demographics, and land use characteristics. Based on the application, the project received a medium -high overall rating and was recommended by the FTA to receive New Starts funding. Client: City of Santa Ana Client Contact Information: Melanie McCann, Project Manager City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 667-2746 mmccann@santa-ana.org Year Completed: 2021 Client: HDR Engineering, Inc. Client Contact Information: Stephanie Shipp (602) 792-8817 Stephanie.Shipp@hdrinc.com Year Completed: Ongoing City Council 17 — 219 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 15 Orange County Civic Center Traffic Study Orange County, CA IBI Group prepared the traffic impact study for the County of Orange Civic Center Master Plan. The existing Civic Center complex (superblock) includes three administrative buildings for the County that house various departments and government functions. The existing complex is not large enough to house all County staff, creating a condition where certain departments are housed in off -site buildings located within one mile of the Civic Center complex. The Master Plan calls for the construction of a new Building 16 in the southwest corner of the site and then demolition and replacement of Buildings 10, 12, and 14 over the course of 20 years. The traffic study prepared by IBI Group analyzes the near -term conditions with the construction of the new Building 16 and buildout conditions with the implementation of the full Master Plan. The traffic study was completed consistent with City of Santa Ana guidelines and included assessment of the Grand Avenue/1-5 interchange ramps per Caltrans guidelines. IBI is currently working on the Building 14 Access Study to identify appropriate geometric configurations of the driveways to ensure the safe and efficient interface between automobiles and bicyclists/pedestrians. OCTA Active Transportation Plan Orange County, CA IBI Group was engaged by OCTA to prepare the first county -wide active transportation plan, which with covers all 35 local jurisdictions within Orange County. Development of the plan involves the identification of regional bikeways, pedestrian priority areas, and a bicycle/pedestrian best practices toolkit that provides strategies, case studies, and sample tools for each of the Five E's (education, encouragement, enforcement, engineering, and evaluation). Understanding the important role active modes of transportation serve amongst disadvantaged communities, the IBI Group team recognized the need to ensure the plan was equitable and considered the needs of the many underserved communities in Orange County. The IBI Group team employed a variety of outreach methods ranging from the traditional to the more innovative to ensure outreach methods were engaging and inclusive. The project also applied innovative techniques in geospatial data analysis. As a part of the identification of priority areas process, the IBI Group team utilized a GIS-based bicycle and pedestrian propensity model to identify priority areas for bicycle/pedestrian improvements. The project also incorporated creative and engaging outreach. Key components included a school -focused chalk art contest, opportu ti o e, interact wall police,joint `R' school ayyeveni�s with the Orange County Public Health Agen Client: County of Orange Client Contact Information: Eric Hull, AICP County of Orange Hall of Administration 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 144 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4062 Eric.Hull@ocgov.com (714) 834-2345 Year Completed: 2019 -1�b lTIp ­­, © 0 i 00 mm 0m Client: Orange County Transportation Authority Client Contact Information: Greg Nord, Section Manager III 550 South Main Street P.O. Box 14184, Orange County, CA 92863 (714) 560-5885 Year Completed: 2019 2020 WINNER Orange Section Award for Planning 16 111311 GROUP Uptown Bikeways Phase 3 San Diego, CA The Project will create connections within neighborhoods, improve streets, and provide links to the larger bikeway network being built throughout the region. The Project will offer on -street connections in the City of San Diego from Old Town and Mission Valley through uptown to downtown, North Park, and Balboa Park. It is part of the SANDAG Regional Bike Plan Early Action Program (Bike EAP), a ten-year effort to expand the regional bike network and complete high -priority bikeway projects from Riding to 2050: The San Diego Regional Bike Plan (Bike Plan). The Bike Plan and Bike EAP are part of the region's efforts to make riding a bike a viable, attractive choice for everyday trips. The Project involves providing a bikeway along Washington Street between the Washington Street Trolley Station and University Avenue; San Diego Avenue between Washington Street and Noell Street; Walnut Avenue between Third Avenue and Fifth Avenue; Third Avenue between Walnut Avenue and Lewis Street; Lewis Street between Third Avenue and Bachman Place; Bachman Place between Lewis Street and Hotel Circle South; and along Hotel Circle South, Camino De La Reina, and Avenida Del Rio between Bachman Place and Riverwalk Drive. Chula Vista Traffic Signal On Call Chula Vista, CA IBI Group was selected by the City of Chula Vista California to provide on -call Traffic Engineering & Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Consulting Services for various programs consisting of traffic, transportation, civil, ITS, telecommunications, and networking projects. The work is assigned on an as needed basis for a variety of capital improvement projects and/or city programs. In the initial stages of the contract, IBI has been assigned three tasks which are currently underway. The first is the design of thirteen traffic signal modifications to upgrade existing traffic signals within the City. The 65% plans for these upgrades are current in City review. The second task was to specify, purchase and install cellular modem connections for various locations to provide connectivity between the City's traffic management center, and traffic control systems in the field. This work is nearing completion. The third task assigned to date is to provide ongoing expertise and troubleshooting for the recently installed transit signal priority systems in the City. These systems are complex and include the control system for a one lane, two way bus only bridge that just began operation over the SR125 freeway, and peer -to -peer communications between signals to provide seamless transit priority along an exclusive center running bus guideway. Client: SANDAG Client Contact Information: Daneil Veeh, Associate Planner 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 699-7317 Daniel.veeh@sandag.org Year Completed: Ongoing Client: City of Chula Vista Client Contact Information: Jose Serrato, P.E., Associate Civil Engineer 276 Fourth Ave., Bldg. B Chula Vista. CA 91910 (619)409-5922 jserrato@chulavlstaca.gov Year Completed: Ongoing City Council 17 — 221 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 17 V) Mendez Historic Trail CWestminster, CA The Mendez Historic Trail runs along Hoover Street and was redefined from an auto -centric 5-lane roadway to a bicycle and 0 pedestrian friendly street. Paul Martin, while working for OCTA, Z worked with the City of Westminster to identify potential active y transportation solutions for the Mendez Historic Trail Green & C Street Bikeway and secure $2.3M from the California Natural Resource Agency's Urban Greening Program. Mark Thomas is currently providing the City of Westminster Z with engineering design services for a range of local roadway improvements to complete this project that will develop layered transportation networks, reduce vehicle travel lanes and create a two-mile long Class IV bikeway along the western limits of the corridor. A raised median will be incorporated to provide separation between vehicles and bicycles, and serve as a stormwater treatment for roadway runoff. Project improvements also include traffic signal modifications, pedestrian lighting, correction of deficient driveways, ADA upgrades, pavement rehabilitation and overlay, and curb ramps. Client: City of Westminster Client Contact Information: Adolfo Ozaeta City of Westminster aozaeta@westminster-ca.gov Year Completed: Ongoing Standard Avenue Bikeway Project Santa Ana, CA Client: City of Santa Ana Client Contact Information: The City of Santa Ana (City) continues to advance active Gilbert Castillo transportation projects to better serve the community and City of Santa Ana (714) 647-5647 enhance traffic safety. The Standard Avenue Bikeway Project gcastillo@santa-ana.org was developed collaboratively with the community and formalized Year Completed: in the Central Santa Ana Complete Streets (CSACS) Plan. It Ongoing addresses multimodal mobility needs with high -quality public space improvement. Mark Thomas is leading the preparation of engineering design plans (PS&E) to right -size and reconfigure two miles of Standard Avenue from Warner Avenue to First Street. The project includes buffered bicycle lanes, separated bikeways, and shared use bicycle routes as well as green conflict striping, crosswalks, and landscaping. The project will include the first protected intersection design within the City at Standard Avenue/McFadden Avenue and continue to anchor Santa Ana as a community that delivers mobility solutions for the residents. Our team is leading the community engagement, stakeholderwMw.�a--..a•m� K coordination, and final design of this important backbone corridor o- o • for travel north -south within the City. The future facility provides enhanced connectivity to four parks, four elementary schools, local commercial stores, residential properties, and employment centers. Public engagement has included pop-up tabling events, digital and print media promotion, and one public workshop in July 2021. Additional engagement will continue in fall 2021 to raise awareness of the project and solicit ideas for improvements that can be ilnwma l 17 — 222 2/15/2022 18 IBI GROUP Strategic Grant Funding Support Client: Various Agencies Various Client Contact Information: N/A Mark Thomas is adept at strategic funding positioning and preparing Year Completed: competitive grant applications to support communities throughout the 2020 State. We are experienced with a wide range of funding programs including HSIP, ATP, BCIP, SB 1, OCTA CTFP, and federal discretionary program applications. We are practiced at matching project needs with available funding programs, developing project financing needs, writing convincing grant narratives and creating benefit cost analyses, preparing cost estimates, developing exhibits and maps, and collaborating with stakeholders for letters of support. Mark Thomas has secured more than $310 million in grant funding for clients throughout the state. Example efforts are described below. OC Loop Mark Thomas has prepared ATP applications for Segments B, O, P, and Q of the OC Loop. We developed grant narratives describing the benefits of the OC Loop, analyzed crash data and safety impacts to bicyclists and pedestrians, developed web surveys, compiled public engagement data, prepared illustrative exhibits and maps, and advanced 20% design plans for segments O, P, and Q. Our recent ATP Cycle 5 applications scored 91 (Segment O; the highest score in Orange County) and 85 (Segment B). Both segments are anticipated to be funded through the regional ATP component at the June 2021 CTC meeting. HSIP Grant Applications (Various) We have prepared over 60 HSIP grant applications over Cycles 6 through 10 for agencies statewide. We've analyzed crash data and identified safety countermeasures, prepared benefit/cost analyses, prepared grant narratives, and developed engineering concept plans and cost estimates. Project types have included pedestrian and guardrail set -asides, signal installations, pedestrian hybrid beacons and RRFBs, acceleration and deceleration lanes, turn lanes, and roundabouts. For Cycles 6, 7, 8, and 9, we had an 82% success rate on our applications. City of Stockton Grants Mark Thomas has been supporting the City of Stockton's funding efforts since 2015. We have prepared 19 HSIP applications for Cycles 7 through 10, nine ATP applications, and five regional Measure K (similar to OCTA's BCIP) applications. These applications involved preparing grant narratives, analyzing collision data and developing safety countermeasures, preparing concept plans and cost estimates, and developing various maps and exhibits. Through our efforts, the City has secured more than $25 million in competitive funding. Senate Bill 1 Programs In 2020, we were heavily involved in the development of various Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) grant program applications. Our team prepared seven Local Partnership Program applications, five Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, and one Solutions for Congested Corridors Program applications. These applications involved convincing grant narratives, exhibits and maps, fund programming documents, and benefit/cost analyses. Over 50% of Mark Thomas' applications were successful and secured approximately $190 million SB-1 funds for projects ranging from local roadway safety enhancements and pavement rehabilitations to railroad grade separations and highway capacity improvements. City Council 17 — 223 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 19 References= IBI Group San Diego Association of Client: County of Orange Orange County Governments Transportation Authority Daneil Veeh, Contact: Eric Hull, AICP, Hall of Greg Nord, Section Associate Planner Administration Manager III 401 B Street, Suite 800 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd., 550 South Main Street Address: San Diego, CA 92101 Suite 144 P.O.Box 14184, Santa Ana, CA 92701-4062 Orange County, CA 92863 Email: Daniel.veeh@sandag.org Eric.Hull@ocgov.com gnord@octa.net Telephone: (619) 699-7317 (714) 834-2345 (714) 560-5885 References - Mark Thomas Client: City of Westminster Contact: Adolfo Ozaeta City of Sacramento Elizabeth Weeks City of Santa Ana Gilbert Castillo Email: aozaeta@westminster-ca. eweeks@cityofsacramento. gcastillo@santa-ana.org gov org City Council 17 — 224 2/15/2022 20 IBI GROUP City Council 17 — 225 2/15/2022 111311 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION B.A. (Environmental Analysis and Design), University of California, Irvine, CA, 2000 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners #019993 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals William Delo AICP Principal -in -Charge Director IBI Group Mr. Delo is a Director of IBI Group and a Transportation Planner with over 20 years of experience in transportation planning, multi - modal planning, active transportation, and traffic engineering. Mr. Delo is an experienced project manager. His transportation planning experience includes the preparation of multi -modal plans, complete streets plans, first/last mile plans, and conceptual design efforts. Relevant Experience OCTA Active Transportation Plan (OC Active), Orange County, CA Project Manager for IBI Group's effort to prepare the first ATP for Orange County. Project elements included identification of pedestrian priority areas, regional bikeways, and design toolboxes. Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, Santa Ana, CA Mr. Delo was the project manager of this effort to update the General Plan Circulation Element. The update focused on rethinking the city's transportation network, focusing on moving people rather than cars, and making city streets safer for all users of the transportation system. IBC Trails Feasibility Study, Irvine, CA Mr. Delo was the Project Manager of this feasibility study, examining the potential for implementation of multi -use trails along rail and flood control channels. Project included extensive community outreach for both residents and business in the Irvine Business Complex. Purple Line First/Last Mile Plan, Los Angeles, CA Project Manager for this project involving the planning and community engagement efforts for bicycle and pedestrian first/last mile improvements at seven subway stations in West Los Angeles. Agua Caliente Section 14 Complete Streets Plan, Palm Springs, CA Project manager for this study focused on the development of a Complete Streets plan and vision for the Section 14 Master Plan. VTA Light Rail Station Access Studies, San Jose, CA Project manager for two light rail station access studies in San Jose. Examined strategies to improve bicycle and pedestrian access to the Blossom Hill and Tamien stations. Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway, Santa Monica, CA Mr. Delo was IBI Group's task lead for the conceptual design element for the neighborhood greenway project. SR-41/Ave 9 Sustainable Transportation Study, Fresno, CA CityCouncil g recommendations for the ,venue 9 corridors in Fresn��a� ��r Counties. IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Mike Arizabal Project Manager Senior Transportation Planner IBI Group Michael Arizabal is a senior transportation planner and has led the technical work on a wide variety of transportation planning EDUCATION and traffic engineering projects, and is an expert on all traffic B.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2004 analysis software and tools. Mr. Arizabal has a broad background of professional experience, focusing on multimodal transportation PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS planning and traffic engineering, and specializing in site access/ Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) circulation, transit planning, corridor studies, parking management, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) complete streets application, and traffic impact analysis. Orange County Traffic Engineering Council (OCTEC) Relevant Experience City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element Update, Santa Ana, CA Mr. Arizabal is leading the technical effort to assist the City of Santa Ana in updating their General Plan Circulation Element. The update is being conducted to incorporate Complete Streets policies into the Element and to reflect current planning efforts for the Streetcar in the City. The update is focused on rethinking the City's transportation network, focusing on moving people rather than cars, and making City streets safer for all users of the transportation system. Port of Long Beach (POLB), On -Call Transportation Planning, Long Beach, CA Led a team that was selected to help support the Port's functions in three primary categories: transportation planning/traffic engineering, transportation modeling, and data collection. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), State Route 55 (SR 55) Access Study, Costa Mesa, CA Served as the primary staff in the analysis and identification of alternative transportation strategies through the Newport Boulevard (SR 55) corridor, from the current terminus of the SR 55 freeway south to 16th Street in Newport Beach. Facilitated cooperative effort between OCTA, Caltrans, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach. Mount San Jacinto College Menifee Campus Master Plan, Menifee, CA Served as lead technical analyst for the preparation of a Traffic Impact Study in support of an Environmental Impact Report for the proposed community college in Menifee. Century Boulevard Reconstruction Project, Inglewood, CA Mr. Arizabal served as the primary technical analyst on the Century Boulevard Reconstruction Project on behalf of the City of Inglewood and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority. The purpose of the project was to enhance flow of traffic and increase level of safety for motorized vehicles and pedestrians alike. City Council 17 — 227 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine, 2016 B.S. Environmental Science and Policy, Chapman University, 2013 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners #31139 U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED Green Associate #10930484 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Cristina Martinez AICP, LEED GA Traffic Analysis/Bicycle Planning Transportation Planner IBI Group Ms. Martinez is a Transportation Planner with project experience ranging from large-scale freeway and transit impact projects to local active transportation projects, transit -oriented development, first and last mile planning, master and specific plans, and parking management studies. Ms. Martinez's area of expertise lies within transportation and land use planning, complete streets, active transportation, and multimodal connectivity. Technical skills include data management and analysis, and the application of GIS software, including ArcGIS Desktop and ArcGIS Online, for various project types and needs. These often include data visualization, geospatial analysis, and web tool or interactive map development. Relevant Experience Fresno -Madera State Route 41 & Avenue 9 Sustainable Corridors Study, Fresno/Madera County, CA IBI Group is conducting a study to identify sustainable and multimodal mobility solutions for a quickly -growing region with increasing travel demand among residents, commuters, and visitors. The study is particularly focused on expanding mobility options for disadvantaged communities and overcoming barriers to mode choice, such as socioeconomics, environmental pollution, health -related conditions, and safety. Ms. Martinez developed an existing conditions report and produced maps detailing current multimodal infrastructure, demographic data, travel conditions, and historical collision data. She is also developing corridor improvement strategies for the roadway, active transportation, and transit modes. SCAG East San Gabriel Valley Mobility Action Plan, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is conducting a multi -modal planning study to identify near -term and long-term sustainable mobility solutions for unincorporated portions of the East San Gabriel Valley. The project includes a robust and creative community engagement process. Ms. Martinez conducted an existing conditions analysis, prepared a web map for public use, and is building a spatial data model using GIS to conduct suitability analysis and identify geographic areas of high need. Ventura County Transportation Commission Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Ventura County, CA IBI Group is developing an update to Ventura County Transportation Commission's 2013 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Plan will address local priorities and opportunities to advance transportation and mobility throughout the County. Ms. Martinez developed an existing conditions report including maps detailing current multimodal infrastructure, demographic data, travel modes, safety conditions, and an equity analysis of health and socioeconomic conditions. City Council 17-228 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Cristina Martinez AICP, LEED GA OC Active Transportation Plan, Orange County, CA IBI Group developed the first countywide Active Transportation Plan for Orange County with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Ms. Martinez led the analysis of existing local active transportation plans and efforts within the county to inform the development of a regional plan and evaluated existing conditions to develop prioritization strategies for bikeway and pedestrian improvements countywide. This includes analyzing demographic and socioeconomic data as well as metrics related to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and safety to create GIS-based maps and engage stakeholder and community feedback. Additionally, she developed a best practices toolkit regarding bikeway development in Orange County, incorporating all project tasks into the Final Plan. Purple Line & First Last Mile Guidelines, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is developing systemwide First -Last Mile Guidelines for LA Metro and a First -Last Mile Plan for the four transit stations that comprise Sections 2 and 3 of the Los Angeles Metro Purple Line Extension, identifying needs and potential solutions for station access and connectivity improvements, including active modes of transportation. The Guidelines will establish Metro's role in integrating First -Last Mile improvement projects into the capital transit delivery process, from planning to environmental review, design, and implementation. Ms. Martinez is also leading first -last mile analysis and participating in community outreach efforts for each of the four Purple Line extension stations. VTA Tamien Station and Blossom Hill TOD Access Studies, San Jose, CA IBI Group conducted access and parking studies surrounding the Tamien and Blossom Hill Stations in San Jose for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to identify improvements to multimodal station access. In addition to assessing conditions for multimodal access, Ms. Martinez assessed the impact on circulation and parking in light of future rail/bus ridership and two proposed transit -oriented developments adjacent to the station. SCAG Torrance Citywide Wayfinding and Signage Plan, Torrance, CA Ms. Martinez is managing a SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) -sponsored project collecting wayfinding signage inventory for the City of Torrance. The comprehensive inventory will be collected using GIS-enabled tools and delivered as an Esri-compatible geodatabase. The information collected will be used to develop a citywide wayfinding and signage plan and increase accessibility to alternative modes of transportation. Irvine Business Complex (IBC) Trails Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan, Irvine, CA IBI Group is conducting a feasibility study for the City of Irvine to implement a proposed network of trails and multi -use facilities that would enhance connections to existing active transportation facilities. Ms. Martinez is serving as the Lead Planner for this project that plans to use existing flood and rail rights -of -way to make convenient connections to several major corridors and destinations in the IBC. This requires extensive coordination with several stakeholder entities as well as strategic public outreach to inform the plan. Dracaea Avenue Greenway, Moreno Valley, CA Ms. Martinez is managing the recommendations of traffic -calming improvements to be made to Dracaea Avenue to develop it into a greenway accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians. The street currently serves several schools as well as residential and commercial uses. Project work includes conducting physical inventory and public life surveys, developing a traffic calming toolkit tailored to Moreno Valley, and preliminary design guidelines for the proposed greenway plan. Brea Connecting the Core Active Transportation Plan, Brea, CA Ms. Martinez managed the task of developing recommendations for active transportation improvements to be made to the Brea Downtown Core. The recommendations incorporated analysis of existing conditions and input from the community and City of Brea staff. Recommendations were presented on a corridor -by -corridor basis, with multiple improvement options for each corridor, and an implementation plan. This required coordination of concept drawings, cost estimates, and funding strategies. Los Angeles Civic Center Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA Ms. Martinez provided transportation planning support in developing a Master Plan for the Civic Center of the City of Los Angeles. Ms. Martinez analyzed public parking and a multitude of existing and proposed active transportation initiatives to improve access for bicyclists and pedestrians and enhance the walkability of the Civic Center core. City Council 17 — 229 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Brooke Acosta Traffic Analysis/Bicycle Planning Transportation Planner IBI Group Ms. Acosta is a Transportation Planner that specializes in EDUCATION Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in IBI Group's Irvine office. B.S. Biological Science, California State Ms. Acosta's area of expertise as a planner includes local active University, Fullerton, 2020 transportation projects, complete corridor planning and multi -modal B.A. Geography & the Environment, connectivity planning. Her GIS experience includes spatial data California State University, Fullerton, 2o2a creation, eos atial analysis, and data management, manipulation, g p Y g p Certificate in Geographic Information and visualization. Ms. Acosta also has experience using various Systems (GIS), California State University, components of the ArcGIS toolbox on ArcGIS Desktop and creating Fullerton, 2020 interactive maps through ArcGIS Online. She also has experience maintaining and sharing spatial data between various formats. Relevant Experience Fresno -Madera State Route 41 & Avenue 9 Sustainable Corridors Study, Fresno/Madera County, CA IBI Group is conducting a study to identify sustainable and multimodal mobility solutions for a quickly -growing region with increasing travel demand among residents, commuters, and visitors. The study is particularly focused on expanding sustainable mobility options for disadvantaged communities and overcoming barriers stemming from income, environmental justice, disparities in public health, and safety. Ms. Acosta assisted in developing several technical reports including an existing plan review, public engagement plan, and planned improvements and goals and objectives reports. Ms. Acosta also produced maps detailing current multimodal infrastructure, collision data, demographic data, public health, and CalEnviroScreen data within the study area. SANDAG Central Mobility Hub Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan, San Diego, CA IBI Group is conducting a study which aims to refine the Central Mobility Hub site concept and integrate sustainable transportation connections throughout the surrounding community which includes the Airport People Mover (APM), the freeway and surface road network, and connections to Coronado. The study integrates existing and planned transit services, intercity rail, intercity high-speed rail, local roadway connections, highway connections, and active transportation connections. Ms. Acosta planned several regional and neighborhood mobility hubs with enhanced multi -modal access for bicyclists and pedestrians making first -last mile connections throughout the region. In addition, she created maps which utilized demographic, air quality, resiliency, and origin -destination data and reflected the proposed transportation network improvements. City Council 17 — 230 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Brooke Acosta Cathedral City Active Transportation Plan, Cathedral City, CA IBI Group is leading the development of an Active Transportation Plan for the city of Cathedral City. The plan aims to address network connectivity, environmental issues, and safety concerns in an effort to increase bicyclist and pedestrian activity within the City. Lastly, the plan will propose improvements to the active transportation network with design guidelines for implementation. Ms. Acosta assisted with developing the plan and leading the walk and bike audits in Cathedral City. In addition, Ms. Acosta assisted with data management and mapping assignments using GIS. City of Fontana Sierra and Summit Warehouse VMT Analysis, Fontana, CA IBI Group is conducting a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis in support of the environmental documentation for the proposed warehouse project in Fontana, California. Ms. Acosta conducted a VMT screening, which utilized both the State of California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and City of Fontana Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines to screen whether the construction of the Sierra and Summit Warehouse would contribute a significant environmental impact to VMT. The screening utilized the San Bernadino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM) to estimate VMT as it considered the interaction between different land uses based on socio-economic data such as population, housing, and employment. VTA Blossom Hill TOD Access Study, San Jose, CA IBI Group is conducting an access and parking study surrounding the Blossom Hill Station in San Jose for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to identify improvements to multimodal station access. Ms. Acosta assisted with reviewing the existing conditions at the station, as well as throughout the surrounding area. Ms. Acosta assisted with analyzing and visualizing collision data gathered from the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. Using this data, Ms. Acosta proposed multi -modal access improvements to improve safety for station visitors, particularly for those traveling via an active modes. SCAG Torrance Citywide Wayfinding and Signage Plan, Torrance, CA IBI is conducting a SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) -sponsored project collecting wayfinding signage inventory for the City of Torrance and developing a citywide wayfinding and signage plan to increase accessibility to alternative modes of transportation. The project scope includes assessment of resident and commuter travel patterns to determine optimal signage placement to increase connectivity for active transportation users, especially to the planned Torrance Regional Transit Center. In addition to collecting the required geospatial data throughout the City of Torrance, Ms. Acosta is also analyzing, managing, and visualizing the collected data using GIS. Purple Line & First Last Mile Guidelines, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is developing systemwide First -Last Mile Guidelines for LA Metro and a First -Last Mile Plan for the four transit stations that comprise Sections 2 and 3 of the Los Angeles Metro Purple Line Extension, identifying needs and potential solutions for station access and connectivity improvements, including active modes of transportation. Ms. Acosta assisted in creating maps which reflected key access corridors, preliminary staion locations, points of interest, and land use. City Council 17 — 231 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION B.S. (Civil Engineering with a Minor in Information and Computer Science), University of California, Irvine, 2003 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Chi Epsilon National Civil Engineering Honor Society Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society Society of Women Engineers Women in Transportation Seminar (WTS- OC) 2010-2011Scholarship Chair Registered Civil Engineer California No. 70858 Arizona No. 52638 Lydia La Point P.E., LEED AP Transportation Engineer Transportation Engineer IBI Group Ms. La Point is a Civil Engineer with 18 years of experience with IBI Group. Her depth and breadth of planning and engineering experience includes active transportation projects, pedestrian and bicycle plans, Complete Streets, road diets, corridor studies, Project Study Reports, multi -modal studies, mobility hub design, grant funding applications, and the preparation of conceptual design and engineering plans, specifications and estimates. She understands the relationship between transportation and land use, and the elements of design that make modes of travel and public spaces attractive and inviting. She also has extensive experience with public outreach and agency coordination, and incorporating public and stakeholder feedback into design. Ms. La Point is currently the engineering task lead for Metro's North San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Study and the Metro Purple Line First/Last Mile Project. Relevant Experience North San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor Planning and Environmental Study Ms. La Point is the engineering task lead for this project to provide quality east - west bus rapid transit (BRT) service through the North San Fernando Valley. Ms. LaPoint is managing the preparation of street improvement and signing and striping plans for the preferred corridor. This project included coordination with California State University Northridge (CSUN) to expand the CSUN Transit Center with more amenitites for pedestrians, bicycles and transit. Roadway improvements include bus exclusive lanes, curb extensions, ADA curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk widening at station locations. This project requires substantial coordination with Metro, Caltrans, city staff, the local community and other stakeholders. Metro Purple Line First/Last Mile Project, Los Angeles, CA The Metro Purple Line Extension continues west from the line's current terminus at Wilshire/Western to Beverly Hills and Westwood. Ms. La Point is the engineering task lead for the project, and is preparing Pathway Network maps from future station locations. She will be reviewing station access and circulation, signing and striping, lighting, pedestrian and bicycle amenities, and traffic signal operations. Potential first/last mile improvements could include wayfinding, lighting, signalized crossings, pedestrian refuges, bike lanes, or emergency call boxes. Figueroa Corridor Streetscape Project The Figueroa Corridor Streetscape Project explored streetscape opportunities along Figueroa Street between 7th Street and 41st Street in Downtown Los Angeles. The goals of the project were to better serve pedestrians, cyclists and transit riders on +ho ^"";dcikzy c�c g asafo, 0.,,,0+o.,g `c1� o D,.k c .o nn_ I - o inn p;epared City Council 17 — 232 2/15/2022 1111311 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Lydia La Point P.E.,LEEDAP the traffic analysis for the project, which included over 70 signalized intersections, and the signing and striping design plans for the preferred alternative. The plans featured buffered bike lane segments, cycle track segments with on -street parking located between the travel lanes and the bike lane, high visibility crosswalks, and colored bike lane striping at driveways, intersections and conflict zones. The plans also included cycle track segments that crossed bus platforms on curb extensions and light rail tracks. IBI worked closely with LADOT to design bike infrastructure that had not been previously implemented in the City. Metro Bus Rapid Transit Vision and Principles Study, Los Angeles, CA The Metro Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Vision and Principles Study developed design guidelines to provide clear instructions to designers and developers on operating characteristics, running ways, stations and branding. Ms. La Point developed the Running Ways chapter, which focused on designing BRT corridors with a consistent baseline quality of service. Topics included running way placement, roadway and intersection geometrics, gates, pavement sections, street signing and striping, Green Streets and landscaping, traffic operations, utility considerations and optional betterments. Fourth District Bikeways Collaborative, Orange County, CA This project identified and planned for regional bikeway priorities in the Fourth District of Orange County. The project involved working with staff and bicycle advocates from each city to identify priority routes and work towards a more cooperative planning process for regional bike routes that would cross jurisdictional boundaries. Ms. La Point was the task lead for the development of conceptual design plans prepared for two bikeway corridors. Pasadena Road Diets Study This study was prepared for the City of Pasadena to test the effectiveness of Road Diets in reducing speed and improving safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Road Diets typically involve the removal of existing traffic lanes and allocating newly available street right-of-way to left turn lanes, bicycle lanes, and/or improved pedestrian facilities, including: sidewalks, median refuges, and landscaping. Ms. LaPoint utilized the CompleteStreets software package to analyze conditions on various corridors with and without Road Diet projects. The results of the study were used to determine the potential benefits and impacts of extending a completed Road Diet project on Cordova Street from Lake Avenue to Arroyo Parkway. Agua Caliente/Section 14 Complete Streets IBI Group developed a complete streets plan for Section 14 in the City of Palm Springs as part of an overall update to the Master Plan for a one square mile area located within the Agua Caliente Reservation. As the Tribe and City of Palm Springs plan for future growth within Section 14, there is a specific goal to improve travel for all modes, particularly pedestrians and cyclists through the adoption and implementation of complete street principals. Ms. La Point prepared the conceptual layout plans that included bulb - outs, ADA curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, angled on -street parking, cycle tracks and landscaping. Westgate Transportation Demand Management Plan, Los Angeles, County, CA Ms. La Point served as the Project Manager for the preparation of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program Plan for the Westgate Project, which is a 12-acre transit -oriented urban village located immediately east of the 710 Freeway on the northeast corner of Pasadena Avenue and Del Mar Boulevard. Recommended measures included a transportation information area, a commuter ride -matching program, resident parking space management, priority parking for low -emitting and fuel -efficient vehicles, dedicated vanpool or car -share parking spaces, covered bicycle parking for 15% of the building occupants, and active promotion and marketing of the TDM Program. ATP Cycle 3 Application for the Westpark Multi -Use Trail, Bakersfield, CA Ms. La Point managed the preparation of an ATP Cycle 3 Application for the Westpark Multi -Use Trail project in Bakersfield, CA. The team completed the required forms, summarized the project scope, provided project location and description, identified the project sub -types, measured quantites from design plans, developed cost estimates, and provided project schedule and funding information. Ms. La Point also worked with the City of Bakersfield to demonstrate fiscal need, show consistency with the regional transportation plan, identify disadvantaged communities served by the project, and describe how the project will increase walking and biking in the area while reducing the risk of injuries to pedestrians and bicyclists. City Council 17 — 233 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION B.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2014 M.S. (Civil Engineering) University of California, Irvine, CA, 2015 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Civil Engineer, California Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, CA No. 88791 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Karen Sujata PE Transportation Engineer Transportation Engineer IBI Group Ms. Sujata is a Transportation Engineer at IBI Group with experience in preparation of local street improvement plans, signing and striping plans, bike path plans, surface parking lot and parking structure conceptual plans, as well as multimodal level of service analyses, comprehensive evaluations and reports, and traffic impact analyses for various transportation projects throughout California. She also has experience working on projects which have implemented active transportation concept elements, such as bike boulevards and complete streets planning and design. Ms. Sujata is adept in a range of software including AutoCAD, MicroStation, Synchro, and Traffix. Her versatility and expertise can be seen on a wide variety of transportation projects. Ms. Sujata is registered as a Civil Engineer in the State of California. Relevant Experience North San Fernando Valley BRT Corridor, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group was tasked to complete an alternatives analysis and to environmentally clear a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project in the North San Fernando Valley (NSFV) pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The goal of the project is to provide premium, high capacity, east -west BRT service in the Valley that will connect key activity centers, ease traffic congestion, improve regional transit connectivity, promote transit -oriented communities (TOC) and meet the growing demand for transit services in the area. Ms. Sujata is currently working on the alternatives analysis, traffic analysis, and conceptual design of the BRT corridor. TRIP Centennial Corridor, Bakersfield, CA This project will construct a new alignment to connect State Route 58 to Interstate 5 freeway in Bakersfield, CA. The Thomas Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) is interested in utilizing the remnant parcels of land along both sides of the freeway to create a Class I multi -use path. Ms. Sujata worked on various aspects and stages of this project, starting with the Centennial Corridor Pedestrian and Bicycle Path Planning and Feasibility Study to identify the best route for the proposed bicycle path. Ms. Sujata then assisted in the creation of the bike path plan and profile sheets. She also worked on preparing local street improvement plans, which involved an extensive redesign of street profiles, sidewalks, signing and striping, and ADA curb ramps. CRA/LA Figueroa Streetscape, Los Angeles, CA This project proposed the recreation of streetscape along Figueroa Street in Los Angeles between the Financial District/Staples Center and Exposition Park/USC with extensive restriping and resigning to better serve the mix of pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, transit and businesses that utilize the corridor. Primary project elements included a separated and protected bike lane, pedestrian improvements, and streetscape improvement. Ms. Sujata worked on signing and striping design, City Council undelgrountl UL111Ly rebe I I = 23 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Karen Sujata PE Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Facilities Master Plan, San Jose, CA The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) initiated this study effort to examine existing conditions at the Cerone and Chaboya bus maintenance divisions, and to make recommendations for near -term improvements at both facilities to accommodate near -term needs for bus storage, bus maintenance, operator and maintenance training, and paratransit vehicle storage. Ms. Sujata developed near -term as well as future designs for each bus facility. Designs include employee/visitor parking, paratransit parking, bus parking, and light rail track and storage. Wilshire Avenue Bicycle Boulevard, Fullerton, CA IBI Group was tasked with a feasibility study examining the implementation of a bicycle boulevard on Wilshire Avenue east of Downtown Fullerton. Strategies such as neighborhood traffic circles, diverters, and curb extensions were explored in order to lower vehicle speeds and emphasize pedestrian and bicycle safety along the road. Ms. Sujata worked on the design of a live mock-up installation of the bike boulevard, in which temporary neighborhood traffic circles were installed and assessed for effectiveness. Uptown Bikeways Phase 3, San Diego, CA SANDAG is investing in active transportation as part of its regional plan to mitigate traffic congestion, advance climate goals, and emphasizes the health benefits or these modes of travel for individuals and communities. Phase 3 of the Uptown Bikeways consists of adding bicycle and pedestrian facilities to multiple roadways in the Mission Valley and Hillcrest communities. Ms. Sujata assisted in alternatives design and in the development of drawings in preparation of 30% design. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Parking Facility Conceptual Design, Los Angeles County, CA Phase II of the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension extends the existing Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority rail line from Azusa to the cities of Glendora, San Dimas, La Verne, Pomona, Claremont, and Montclair. Ms. Sujata aided in the development of conceptual parking facility designs for each of the stations. Elements of work included conceptual site plans with access/egress locations, parking layout and internal circulation, cross sections showing internal garage ramping systems, elevation views, and identification of aesthetic enhancement. Agua Caliente/Section 14 Complete Streets, Agua Caliente Reservation, CA IBI Group was retained by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians to lead an effort to develop a complete streets plan for Section 14 in the City of Palm Springs as part of an overall update to the Master Plan for a one square mile area located within the Agua Caliente Reservation. Section 14 is home to the Spa Resort and Casino and the Palm Springs Convention Center, as well as a mix of residential and commercial uses. Ms. Sujata prepared conceptual layout plans that included bulb -outs, ADA curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, angled on -street parking, cycle tracks and landscaping. District 3 / District 5 ITS Improvements, Massachusetts DOT, Multiple Locations This project designs new CCTV and dynamic message signs along multiple corridors throughout the state. IBI Group lead the design for ITS, power service, and communications design. Ms. Sujata worked on evaluating each location for need of highway and local streets guardrail to protect from new fixtures, and designed and prepared drawings as necessary. She also provided responses to RFIs as part of the construction process. Hurontario Light Rail Transit, Toronto, ON This project is proposing to implement a light rail transit in the middle of the corridor of Hurontario Street located in Toronto. This light rail will connect the cities of Mississauga and Brampton from Port Credit to Brampton Gateway Terminal with 22 stops along the way. Ms.Sujata worked in identifying properties along the entire corridor that were needed to obtained in order for the construction of the light rail. She gathered information such as property index numbers (PIN), addresses, and property owners for all parcels located on both sides of the corridor, and created property information sheet sets. District 4 / District 6 ITS Improvements, Massachusetts DOT, Multiple Locations Closely following the District 3 and District 5 improvements, this project designed new CCTV and dynamic message signs along multiple corridors throughout the state. IBI Group lead the design for ITS, power service, and communications design. Ms. Sujata worked on evaluating each location for need of highway and local streets guardrail to protect from new fixtures, and designed and prepared drawings. City Council 17 — 235 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering - Transportation Systems University of California, Irvine, CA, 2017 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Engineer - In -Training Certificate #166901 American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers Vivian Hang EIT Transportation Engineering Junior Transportation Engineer IBI Group Ms. Hang is a Project Designer who has experience in a variety of transportation planning and engineering projects. Her project experience ranges from large-scale corridor and transit projects to local transportation improvement projects. Ms. Hang's area of expertise lies within transportation engineering and planning which includes conducting traffic impact analysis. Her skills include using ArcGIS for data visualization, MicroStation and AutoCAD for engineering design purposes, and a range of traffic analysis and modeling software in order to assess the performance of a network and mitigate its impacts which includes Synchro and Traffix. Relevant Experience Wilmington Freight Mitigation Study, Wilmington, CA The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) retained IBI to perform a transportation planning study to assess the impacts of increased truck travel on a disadvantaged community in the Wilmington area of Los Angeles. Ms. Hang developed and recommended traffic and general land use mitigations to improve the quality of life for the residents in this community. To deter truck travel within the community, mitigations such as implementing roundabouts, curb extensions/ bulb -outs, cul-de-sacs, vertical clearance height structures, and raised islands were explored and designed. Additionally, Ms. Hang created striping designs on Pacific Coast Highway as a mitigation to reroute truck traffic around the community. Wilshire Avenue Bicycle Boulevard, Orange County, CA The City of Fullerton is proposing to construct a bicycle boulevard along Wilshire Avenue near downtown Fullerton. The goal of the project is to improve bicycling conditions along the corridor and create an environment that allows for the safe and efficient movement of bicycle and vehicular traffic. The City is interested in studying various potential traffic calming strategies for the corridor and their associated impacts on traffic. Additionally, the City of Fullerton is also interested in developing a bicycle boulevard handbook that will serve as a reference for the City for any future bicycle boulevard projects. As a part of the project, Ms. Hang assisted in the public outreach phase, technical support for the development of the bicycle boulevard design concepts, and the associated traffic analysis. City Council 17-236 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Vivian Hang E.I.T. West Athens -Westmont TOD Specific Plan, Los Angeles County, CA IBI Group was tasked with developing the Mobility Element of the West Carson TOD Specific Plan. The focus of the Specific Plan is to identify strategies that would leverage existing transportation infrastructure and lay the groundwork for future mobility enhancements. For this project, Ms. Hang provided assistance in analyzing existing conditions relating to the street, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian network, as well as identifying strategies that would improve multimodal connections within the area and increase transit ridership. This task included providing in-depth corridor analyses, developing street design concepts, mitigating impacts, and identifying land use and transportation policies to facilitate a safe and efficient multimodal network. 1-405 Renton to Bellevue ETL & Widening, Washington, CA The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is seeking to add new capacity by creating a dual express toll lane system on the 1-405 between SR 167 in Renton and NE 6th Street in Bellevue. Ms. Hang worked in signal modifications of six locations which includes a redesign of traffic signal heads and its phasing, conduits, loop detection, and pole locations using city and county standards. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Facilities Master Plan, San Jose, CA The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) initiated this study effort to examine existing conditions at the Cerone and Chaboya bus maintenance divisions, and to make recommendations for near -term improvements at both facilities to accommodate near -term needs for bus storage, bus maintenance, operator and maintenance training, and paratransit vehicle storage. Ms. Hang developed near -term as well as future designs for each bus facilities and the corresponding cost estimates. Designs include reconfiguring the employee/visitor parking, paratransit parking, bus parking, and light rail track and storage at both the Cerone and Chaboya bus facilities. Purple Line Extension & First -Last Mile Plan, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is developing systemwide First -Last Mile Guidelines for LA Metro and First -Last Mile Plan for the four transit stations that comprise Sctions 2 and 3 of the Los Angeles Metro Purple Line Extension across Interstate 405, identifying needs and potential solutions for station access and connectivity improvements, including active modes of transportation. Ms. Hang worked on creating various configurations of traffic lanes for roadway segments in question to provide optimal and efficient designs. These designs include incorporating bike lanes without removing on -street parking as well as on -street parking bulb -out strategies. Standard and protected bikes lanes were utilized in the configurations to enhance bicycle ridership. Additionally, Ms. Hang assisted in identifying locations where wayfinding signs were needed to provide further active transportation connectivity within the network. North San Fernando Valley BRT Corridor, Los Angeles, CA The Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is seeking alternative analysis for a proposed implementation of a bus rapid transit in the North San Fernando Valley. This bus rapid transit system will connect key activity centers, reduce traffic congestion, improve regional transit connectivity, and promote transit -oriented communities (TOC). Ms. Hang created exhibits of various configurations of traffic lanes in order to accommodate the BRT route of alternative alignments using MicroStation as well as performing traffic impact analysis at each intersection with and without the project. She assisted in the redesign of signing and striping along the corridors to incorporate dedicated bus lanes and bikeways. Hurontario Light Rail Transit, Toronto, ON This project is proposing to implement a light rail transit in the middle of the corridor of Hurontario Street located in Toronto. This light rail will connect the cities of Mississauga and Brampton from Port Credit to Brampton Gateway Terminal with 22 stops along the way. Ms. Hang worked in identifying properties along the entire corridor that were needed to obtained in order for the construction of the light rail. She gathered necessary information such as the property index numbers (PIN), addresses, and property owners for all parcels located on both sides of the corridor. She aided in the redesign of signing and striping as well. TRIP Centennial Corridor, Bakersfield, CA The Centennial Corridor Project proposed to construct a new alignment and provide route continuity and traffic congestion relief by connecting State Route 58 and Interstate 5 in the City of Bakersfield. The Thomas Roads Improvement Program (TRIP) is a collective effort put forth between the City, County of Kern, Caltrans, and the Kern Council of Governments in order to relieve stress on outdated infrastructure by utilizing land along the freeway to create multi -use paths. Ms. Hang assisted in identifying necessary right-of-way needed for the new alignment as well as preparing MicroStation sheets. Additionally, she assisted in the redesign of ADA curb ramps, signing, and striping. City Council 17 — 237 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION Master of Public Administration, San Diego State University 1992 Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN, 1976 Bachelor of Science (Civil Engineering), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1975 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Professional Engineer in California, Civil, Certificate # C39712 Traffic. Certificate #TR1222 Professional Engineer in New York Jonathan Levy PE, TE Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineer IBI Group Mr. Levy has 43 years of experience in Engineering and Public Works. He has experience in and is currently working on the planning, design and management of a number of complex multi- disciplinary projects as listed below. Mr. Levy also has experience in operating within and producing results working with complex public agencies including the, the City of Los Angeles, Caltrans, and the CPUC. His various responsibilities over the years included multi - modal transportation planning, traffic engineering, construction management, and public works maintenance. Mr. Levy is registered both as a Civil and Traffic Engineer in the State of California, and as a Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Relevant Experience Uptown Bikeway, Phase 3, San Diego CA IBI Group designing a bikeway that will connect some of San Diego's busiest and most popular areas including Old Town, Mission Valley, Downtown, North Park, and Balboa Park. Mr. Levy is the project manager fr the project which is now in the final design phase. The project will create about three miles of safe and comfortable bikeways. Mr. Levy is leading the group of consultants that are developing plans to enhance the experience of all modes of travel with protected bikeways, contra - flow bikeways, bicycle signalization, buffered bike lanes, high -visibility crosswalks, retaining walls, and other streetscape improvements. MyFigueroa Corridor Redesign, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is leading the traffic signal, signage, striping design, and analysis for the Figueroa Corridor Streetscape Project. Figueroa Street is a major thoroughfare that serves as an alternative to the Interstate 110 freeway in downtown Los Angeles. It also provides access to Staples Center, the Los Angeles Convention Center, Exposition Park, the University of Southern California (USC) and historic auto uses. The Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) is looking at ways to enhance Figueroa Street to better serve the mix of pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, transit and businesses that utilize the corridor. Mr. Levy was responsible for the development of concepts, and design of 28 traffic signals for the project which includes Figueroa Street from 7th Street to 41st Street, 11th Street from Figueroa Street to Broadway, and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard from Vermont Avenue to Figueroa Street. The project is currently under construction. Monrovia Station Square, Monrovia, CA Mr. Levy led the engineering design for the off -site improvements on the Monrovia Station Square Project. The Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority (the "GLCA") is in the process of expanding the Gold Line light -rail system from its current terminus in East Pasadena to Azusa. As a result, the Gold Line Operations Campus, a GLCA public parking structure, and a station platform stop will be located in the Planned City Council 17 — 236 2/15/2022 1111131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Jonathan Levy P.E.,T.E. Development Area. Additionally, the City constructed public improvements in the off -site areas to complement the on -site work at Station Square. The proposed improvements include: street reconstruction, undergrounding of utilities, freeway beautification, sidewalks, streetlights, signals, signing & striping, landscaping, bus stop improvements, and bikelanes. The project has been completed. Crenshaw/ LAX LRT Design, Los Angeles, CA IBI Group is a lead member of the Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) design team for METRO in Los Angeles. The project will provide an eight mile long connection from the Exposition Line to the Green Line at LAX. The project is currently completing construction. Mr. Levy led the traffic analysis and traffic and roadway design for the corridor. He also led the preliominary and detailed grade crossing analysis for the project using the Metro Grade Crossing Policy. He also worked with METRO through the CPUC grade crossing application process, including providing support during the hearing process. The traffic analysis provided traditional level of service and delay information for intersections along the corridor and adjacent intersections, as well as microsimulation of vehicle and LRT operations using VISSIM for the on -street running portions of the route. Mr. Levy also led the development of the Traffic Management and Stage Construction Plans for the entire project, as well as the roadway design for the on -street running portions of the corridor and grade crossing design where the LRT runs in a separate right-of-way. The project is currently under construction. San Diego Trolley ADA Station Review, San Diego CA Mr. Levy led the project for the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) to ensure that the work for the construction of the trolley low floor improvements at 34 stations was completed in compliance with ADA guidelines. The project entials a review of the construction documents and previous FTA audits to identify which constructed items are required to comply with the 2012 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and specifications and a field evaluation of each station to verify that the standards have been met within the constructed area of each affected station. Mr. Levy supervised this work and the development of technical memoranda summarizing what was checked at each station and which features were found to be non-ADA compliant. Reference is made to the standard violated, and where appropriate, potential solutions are provided. South Bay Bus Rapid Transit — Chula Vista, CA IBI Group is providing traffic signal operations and transit priority expertise in implementing a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along East Palomar Street and eventually around Town Center Mall to Birch Road in the City of Chula Vista, California. The BRT route and then continues south on SR 125 to an Intermodal Transportation Center near the Otay Mesa U.S/Mexico Border Crossing. This service will include several improvements to provide enhanced service, customer amenities, and enhanced schedule reliability. This project includes the implementation of a control system for a oneway transitway (OWT) bridge over SR125. This control system is part of the larger construction project and bridge development. This OWT is necessitated by right of way limitations on the west side of SR125, and operations will be coordinated with traffic signals at E Palomar/Magdalena and at Town Center Dr. Mr. Levy is working in cooperation with SANDAG, the City of Chula Vista and the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) to ensure proper implementation and bench and operational testing of the OWT system, and of the proposed peer -to -peer connection between traffic signals along the corridor in order to expedite the BRT travel times and reliability along the corridor currently under construction W. Palm Street Pedestrian Access Improvements, San Diego CA Mr. Levy led this project which is designing a walking connection along the north side of West Palm Street to provide an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)- compliant pedestrian access from the Middletown Trolley Station to the new airport shuttle service that will run on a roadway just west of Pacific Highway. The total distance between the Trolley station and the shuttle station is approximately 450 feet. A portion of West Palm Street near the Trolley station is very steep (12 percent), which therefore requires the construction of a switchback ramp to meet ADA standards. The project provides wider sidewalks and increased street lighting along the connection. City Council 17 — 239 2/15/2022 1111311 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Amy Frank P.E., LEED AP Traffic Engineering Transportation Engineer IBI Group Ms. Frank is a Transportation Engineer with four years experience EDUCATION in the Land Development sector of Civil Engineering and nine years B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Iowa, of experience in Transportation Engineering, with projects ranging Zoos from small-scale residential to roles in minor roadway design, PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS signal and signing/striping layouts, and stage construction/traffic P.E. License handling layouts. Ms. Frank's area of expertise lies within signal LEED AP design, signing and striping design, stage construction planning, traffic handling plans, precise grading, and limited exposure to; wet utility planning and profile design, rough grading, hydrology, street PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS plan and profile layouts. Project participation includes conceptual American Society of Civil Engineers engineering, preliminary engineering, and final design. Software (ASCE) knowledge includes AutoCAD 2002, 2006, and 2008, 2011, 2014, and Microstation v8i. Design software experience includes minor exposure to Land Desktop, InRoads, AutoTurn software, and WSPG Hydrology. Relevant Experience Hurontario LRT Detailed Design, Mississauga/Brampton, ON IBI Group is the Prime Consultant leading the design and construction phase services for the Hurontario LRT DBFMO project. As Design Lead for the civil infrastructure of the Project, IBI Group is responsible for managing a multi-disciplinaryteam of main as well as specialty sub -consultants, and for providing complete consulting services. The Hurontario LRT will provide 18km of rapid transit line connecting the cities of Mississauga and Brampton, offering more transit choices to both growing cities. The LRT line will operate along a separated guideway primarily in the median of Hurontario Street with transit signal priority throughout most of the corridor. Ms. Frank is providing design support for temporary traffic staging, traffic signals, and roadway electrical design services. Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Improvements, Los Angeles, CA Ms. Frank is leading the design effort for Traffic Signal and Traffic Control plans for the Metro Orange Line BRT project. Metro seeks to enhance Metro Orange Line BRT operations through grade separation, gating, and transit signal priority improvements. IBI is working with Mott Macdonald and LA Metro to provide traffic signal design expertise on Metro Orange Line for the installation of gated crossings along this existing BRT route. Thus far, IBI has provided 65% design level for the 45+ crossings. The project is transitioning to Progressive Design Build, with IBI Group possibly providing guidance along the way. City Council 17 — 240 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Amy Frank P.E., LEED AP 1-405, Renton to Bellevue Corridor Widening and Express Toll Lanes, Design -Build, WSDOT Ms. Frank is the Traffic Signal Lead for the 1-405 project. This project is a design build project that will add new capacity to create a two-lane express toll lane system between SR 167 in Renton and NE 6th Street in Bellevue. IBI Group is responsible for the ITS, communications, tolling infrastructure, illumination and traffic signal design for the corridor. The project includes all new ITS including CCTV cameras, ramp meters, vehicle detection, and variable message signs, as well as a new fiber optic mainline and distribution system. Uptown Bikeways — Phase 3 Final Design, San Diego, CA Ms. Frank is providing design support and QA/QC in the traffic signal and signing & striping design for the Uptown Bikeways Project. The project will improve travel between the San Diego neighborhoods within the Uptown area and connect to Old Town, Mission Valley, Downtown, North Park, and Balboa Park. It will create inviting and convenient bikeways that connect key community destinations, including schools, parks, transit, and commercial centers. The project is ongoing. MyFigueroa, Los Angeles, CA Ms. Frank provided design support in the traffic signal and signing & striping design for the Figueroa Corridor Streetscape Project. Figueroa Street is a major thoroughfare that serves as an alternative to the Interstate 110 freeway in downtown Los Angeles. It also provides access to Staples Center, the Los Angeles Convention Center, Exposition Park, the University of Southern California (USC). The Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) is looking at ways to enhance Figueroa Street to better serve the mix of pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, transit and businesses that utilize the corridor. Ms. Frank is responsible for the design support of 28 traffic signals to implement cycle tracks with protected right and left -turn phasing to separate bicycle and vehicular flows, and Class II bike lanes. The project is complete and the goal is to better serve pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders by implementing a safe, inviting, and unique public realm. Monrovia Station Square, Monrovia, CA Ms. Frank provided design support in the signing and striping, traffic signal design, and traffic handling plans for the off -site improvements on the Monrovia Station Square Project. The Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority (the "GLCA") is in the process of expanding the Gold Line light -rail system from its current terminus in East Pasadena to Azusa. As a result, the Gold Line Operations Campus, a GLCA public parking structure, and a station platform stop will be located in the City of Monrovia. This area is identified as the Station Square Transit Village Planned Development Area. Additionally, the City will be constructing public improvements in the off -site area to complement the on -site work at Station Square. The proposed improvements include: street improvements, undergrounding of utilities, freeway beautification, sidewalks, streetlights, signals, signing & striping, landscaping, bus stop improvements, and open space. The project is complete. C-Street At Grade Crossing & Traffic Synchronization Improvement Project, San Diego, CA Ms. Frank provided design support for the traffic signal and striping design on the C-Street project in San Diego, CA. The project is ongoing and includes signal work at three different intersections and new striping along the street -running light rail transit. The tasks performed included: aiding in the signal plan layout to safely handle both LRT/vehicular traffic in conjunction with pedestrians, and creating the accommodating striping plans. Crenshaw LRT, Los Angeles, CA Ms. Frank provided design support for the advanced conceptual and preliminary engineering stages on the Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) project in Los Angeles, CA. The project is ongoing and includes engineering work to implement a light rail transit system that will provide an eight -mile long connection from the Metro Green Line at LAX to the Exposition Rail Line. The tasks performed included: preparation of striping and traffic control during construction plans, and providing design support for the CPUC Permit Application Drawings. All tasks followed a very challenging project timeline. SR 210 — Pepper Interchange Project, Rialto, CA Ms. Frank provided design support for the preliminary and final design engineering stages on the SR-210 Pepper Interchange Project. The project is complete and includes engineering work to extend Pepper Ave, and construct a new interchange at the SR- 210 crossing. The tasks performed included: Stage Construction, Traffic Handling, Pavement Delineation, Signage, and Quantity plans. City Council 17 — 241 2/15/2022 111131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 2018 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Engineer - In -Training (IET) No. 165274, California Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Women's Transportation Seminar - San Diego 2018-Present Brianne Poole EIT Traffic Engineering Engineering Support IBI Group Ms. Poole is a Transportation Engineer at IBI Group and has experience in a range of transportation engineering projects including permanent and temporary traffic signal design, bikeway design, light rail transit, design and implementation of bus rapid transit and transit signal priority. She has drafted AutoCAD and MicroStation plans for numerous projects, used Vissim to model alignments and analyze operations, and has created and optimized timing plans using Transync and Synchro. Relevant Experience American Association of Civil Engineers - Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Monitoring, San Diego, CA San Diego 2018-Present IBI Group is providing traffic signal operations and transit priority expertise as well as management of the San Diego regional Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Monitoring project for the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). The project provides route monitoring of the operation of TSP systems throughout San Diego County, as well as troubleshooting and resolution of issues found during monitoring, reported by the transit agencies, or cities involved. The monitored TSP systems use a variety of systems to detect and provide priority to the transit vehicles including both passive (signal coordination) and active (detection of the transit vehicle) priority. Some of the systems use advanced traffic control technology, and IBI has participated with the traffic control software vendors to implement and test proposed TSP system improvements for the control software. Ms. Poole coordinates with the City agencies, SANDAG and MTS for the TSP Monitoring work and participates in field data collection and analysis. Ms. Poole has provided support and analysis for the eight Bus Rapid routes including more than 130 TSP-equipped intersections and 90 TSP-equipped buses. Ms. Poole coordinates and takes part in the collection and analysis of corridor data to examine the effectiveness of TSP on individual routes, and adjustment of intersection configurations and IR thresholds to increase TSP effectiveness. Ms. Poole has tested and programmed timing with multiple vendors' controllers and firmware, including McCain and Q-Free Intelight. South Bay Rapid TSP & One-way Transitway (OWT) System Design, Chula Vista, CA SANDAG has implemented a Bus Rapid Transit route along East Palomar St that connects downtown San Diego and the Otay Mesa Border Crossing. Ms. Poole contributed to the design of the transitway traffic signal system including test plans, traffic controller and software bench testing, and implementation support. Ms. Poole also developed, tested, and implemented traffic controller peer -to -peer logic and signal timing for the twenty-seven intersections along the bus -only guideway on East Palomar St and the one -lane bidirectional transit bridge, as well as provided onsite traffic signal turn on support. Ms. Poole contributed to the extensive test plan of the OWT and co -lead numerous days of field testing. City Council 17-242 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Brianne Poole E.I.T. Measure P Traffic Signal Improvements, Chula Vista, CA IBI is worked with the City of Chula Vista to design improvements at 13 of the oldest signalized intersections in the City to modernize the existing traffic signal systems. IBI provided engineering plans, specifications, engineer's estimates, and bid quantities for the traffic signals. These improvements include replacement of poles, conduits, and signal equipment. The designs also include signing and striping changes, required roadway improvements, replacement of cross gutters, proposed right-of- way acquisitions and utility relocations, as well as ADA improvements, where necessary. As part of the project team, Ms. Poole was responsible for traffic signal design, signing and striping design, and replacement of conduits and wireless communications interconnect equipment. LA Metro Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Improvements, Los Angeles, CA Metro plans to enhance BRT operations through grade separation, gated intersections, and transit signal priority improvements. Under Hatch Mott Macdonald, IBI is working with Mott Macdonald and LA Metro to provide traffic signal design expertise on Metro Orange Line for the installation of gated crossing along this existing BRT route. Thus far, IBI has provided BRT crossover exhibits for Metro Orange Line, reviewed the traffic analysis and micro -simulation of the proposed corridor operation, reviewed the plans for the proposed test installation of the gate system, and contributed to the Basis of Design report. Ms. Poole assisted in design and drafting of the forty traffic signal modifications, field check of existing conditions, and a traffic signal plan and restoration plan for the planned test pilot gate. For the pilot gate, Ms. Poole also worked with the rail system designer to develop a test plan and is scheduled to be onsite during testing. SANDAG Uptown Bikeways Phase 3 Final Design, San Diego, CA Uptown Bikeways will create bikeways in the Uptown area to connect to Old Town, Mission Valley, Downtown, North Park, and Balboa Park. IBI Group is leading the design efforts for SANDAG's phase 3 uptown bikeways project, which will create biking connections in San Diego's Five Points, Hillcrest, and Mission Valley, improve streets, and provide links to the larger bikeway network being built throughout the region. The design effort includes roadway, drainage, structural, signage & striping, traffic signals, electrical, landscape, hydrology/hydraulics, geotechnical, and survey. As part of the design team, Ms. Poole designed traffic signal plans, electrical plans, class I bikeways, pedestrian bulbouts, and multi -use pathways. LA Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor, Los Angeles, CA (2020) under Hatch Mott MacDonald IBI Group was part of the Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) design team for LA Metro for this project, which provides a connection from the Exposition Line to the Green Line at LAX. IBI designed the traffic signals and grade crossing interface at eleven at - grade crossings, prepared the plans, and coordinated with the CPUC to obtain approval of the crossings. The project is under construction and IBI provided program support for Metro. IBI Group evaluated newly collected traffic counts to analyze the feasibility of proposed closures and staging space that were not originally called for in the traffic control plans. Ms. Poole designed plans for the modification of seven traffic signals, which include the installation of twelve left turn advisory gates at intersections where the LRT is center -running. Montgomery County MD355 Bus Rapid Transit This project under Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) consists of proposed BRT services along 22 miles of MD355. In the process of design considerations, IBI Group was asked to develop additional alternatives that would minimize construction and right of way costs, accommodate existing infrastructure constraints, and provide well -performing BRT service. Ms. Poole assisted with the conceptualization of proposed alternatives which included lane reconfigurations, queue jumps, BAT lanes, exclusive center running BRT lanes, passive TSP, and coordinated timing. Ms. Poole used PTV Vissim to model each option and evaluate intersection level of service and BRT travel times results. Transync and Synchro were utilized to create timing with coordination and passive TSP and Ms. Poole refined timing and programmed values in controller timing files. City Council 17 — 243 2/15/2022 11131 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 ►�I MARK ■ T H O M A SRESUME PAUL MARTIN, PE, TE, LCI Paul Martin has more than 21 years of experience as a transportation manager and traffic engineer. He has a strong engineering and planning background that is focused on improving public travel and safety. Paul's expertise includes community assessments, active transportation, public engagement, traffic engineering, and strategic funding programs. As the first OCTA Active Transportation Coordinator, Paul secured over $6 million in ten unique grants to address infrastructure and non -infrastructure needs. At OCTA, he was involved in supporting local agency active transportation design projects as well as leading bikeway planning and safety studies. Paul is currently leading the final design for the Standard Avenue Bikeway Project for the City. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTc- PROJECT ROLE STANDARD AVENUE BIKEWAY, SANTA ANA Project Manager Project manager leading the community engagement and engineering design EDUCATION for the project to redesign two miles of Standard Avenue to include buffered BS in Civil bicycle lanes, cycletrack, and bicycle boulevard. Key challenges that were Engineering, addressed through the project include on -street parking preservation, sight University of distance analysis, constrained right-of-way, protected intersection design, utility California, Irvine, 1999 and drainage impacts, transit operations at the intersection, and storm drain and power pole relocations. REGISTRATION CA C65868 THE OC LOOP — PROMOTION STRATEGY, ORANGE COUNTY CA TR2315 Program manager responsible for leading communications and funding LCI 4936 strategy for the 66-mile OC Loop to close the gap on the remaining 30-percent of unbuilt portions. Led presentations introducing project and soliciting input to over ten City Councils and coordinate a demonstration event of a gap closure linking with the Santa Ana River in Yorba Linda. Collaborated with two cities, railroad owner, and California Public Utilities Commission to negotiate land acquisition for 4.1 mile long rails -with -trails portion. Over $20 million has been secured to close gaps along the OC Loop since 2012. OC LOOP SEGMENTS O, P, Q, ORANGE COUNTY Project manager responsible for assisting with the preparation of ATP Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 ATP grant applications for construction of the OC Loop Segment O and Segments O, P, Q of this regional trail system. Segments OPQ define a 2.7-mile off-street multi -use path along the Coyote Creek flood channel. The project includes two bridges over the channel, three roadway/highway undercrossings, three railroad undercrossings, and three roadway at -grade crossings. MENDEZ HISTORIC FREEDOM TRAIL, WESTMINSTER Project manager responsible for initiating concept for roadway reallocation to provide the first cycletrack in the City of Westminster. Supported City engagement with the CPUC related to adjacent active rail corridor. Positioned the City to seek regional Go Human event funding illustrating pop-up cycletrack in 2016 which later led to securing $2.4 million in funding to implement the Mendez Historic Freedom Trail. The trail will provide an outdoor education opportunity related to the historic Mendez school desegregation case while also serving to manage stormwater runoff and provide a high -quality bikeway fnr sti irdPntc anrd rnmmi inity memhPrc City Council 17 — 244 2/15/2022 \J MARK ■ ■ THOMAS/////////////////////////// RESUME AARON SILVA, PE Aaron Silva has more than 13 years of experience in design and delivery of municipal and transportation projects. He is knowledgeable in both local agency and Caltrans design standards and has successfully delivered projects with sensitive and significant public outreach efforts. He is a recognized expert in the design of bike and pedestrian facilities, helping design and implement state of the practice solutions to improve active transportation safety throughout California. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Project Role MENDEZ HISTORIC TRAIL/GREEN STREET BIKEWAY, WESTMINSTER Civil Project manager for this historic trail and Green Street bikeway project that will EDUCATION reduce vehicle travel lanes and create a two-mile long Class IV bikeway along BS in Civil the western limits of the corridor. A raised median will be incorporated to Engineering, provide separation between vehicles and bicycles, and serve as a stormwater California State treatment for roadway runoff. Additional project improvements include University, pedestrian level lighting, correction of deficient driveways, ADA upgrades, Sacramento pavement rehab, asphalt overlay, and curb ramps. REGISTRATION GARDEN GROVE COMPLETE STREETS, WESTMINSTER CA C75938 Project manager for this ATP-funded bikeway project that will repurpose Garden Grove Boulevard to include one lane in each direction, a two -way -left -turn lane, and a Class IV protected bikeway with landscape median. The project also provides a road diet at Edwards Street/Trask Avenue and adds buffered bike lanes. The project requires a Caltrans encroachment permit and approval from UPRR. Additional project improvements include pedestrian level lighting, correction of deficient driveways, pavement rehabilitation, and curb ramps. CENTRAL CITY MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS, SACRAMENTO Project Manager responsible for managing the preliminary engineering, design concept plans, and PS&E to the City of Sacramento to implement the second phase of the Central City Specific plan which includes two-way conversions on 5th Street and I Street to improve circulation for vehicles and bicyclists. Additionally, parking protected bikeways on 9th, 10th, 19th, 21 st, P, and Q Streets will create a facility for all ages and abilities. WEST VILLAGE CONNECTIVITY, DAVIS Project manager responsible for preparation of preliminary and final design documents for several critical transportation improvement projects in the West Village area of the UC Davis campus. Projects include widening the multi -use path and adding lighting along the south side of Russell Boulevard, modifying the bike path and extending connections from the West Village to the pedestrian overcrossing at Acer Street, widening the pedestrian pathway from the pedestrian overcrossing to Orchard Park Drive, constructing a traffic circle at Orchard Park Circle and Orchard Park Drive and altering the existing two lane vehicle roundabout at the West Village to a single lane roundabout. City Council 17 — 245 2/15/2022 ►I MARK ■■ T H 0 M A S RESUME RYAN BISSEGGER Ryan Bissegger has more than 17 years in the professional engineering industry. He has held various roles and has grown to become Mark Thomas' funding expert. He is very knowledgeable of federal and state funding sources including ATP, HSIP, SIB 1 programs, and federal discretionary programs. He tracks the programs and is knowledgeable of call for project schedules. He has provided funding recommendations to agencies to pursue in order to implement improvements. Ryan has experience developing and reviewing grant applications. His understanding of the funding programs and state and federal policies has been leveraged in the preparation of competitive grants. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PROJECT ROLE MCKINLEY STREET GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT FUNDING Funding SUPPORT, CORONA EDUCATION Funding support responsible for preparing a Section 190 funding nomination BA in International and a S13-1 TCEP grant application. The project constructs a four -lane arterial Business, Westminster grade separation over the BNSF double tracks. The bridge is a 291-foot College, 2004 network tied arch bridge. Mark Thomas is providing comprehensive project ** in Funding and management services for the grade separation project, including project Programming management; funding/grant application assistance; Caltrans, BNSF, and Transportation Projects CPUC coordination, right of way certification, and utilities relocation. in CA, UC Berkeley Technology Transfer, OC LOOP SEGMENT O, P, Q - COYOTE CREEK CHANNEL ATP GRANT 2018 APPLICATION, SANTA ANA Project Manager for preparation of ATP Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 ATP grant applications for construction of the OC Loop Segment O and Segments O, P, Q of this regional trail system. The project is a 2.7-mile Class I multi -use path adjacent to Coyote Creek flood channel. The project includes two bridges over the channel, three roadway/highway undercrossings, three railroad undercrossings, and three roadway at -grade crossings. 1-80 WESTBOUND CORDELIA COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT FACILITY TCEP APPLICATION, FAIRFIELD Grant writing support for the preparation of a TCEP Grant application for the $100 million 1-80 Westbound Cordelia Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility (CCVEF). The project will construct new westbound truck scales on I- 80 as well as braided ramps at the 1-80/SR-12E Interchange and reconfiguration of the 1-80/Chadbourne Road Interchange. Responsibilities included supporting Caltrans to prepare grant narrative write ups as well as coordinating with the economic consultant for the preparation of the Cal B/C model. LIMONITE GAP CLOSURE PROJECT LPP APPLICATION, EASTVALE Funding support and lead grant writer for a S13-1 Local Partnership Program grant application for the project. The project constructs a new four -lane roadway alignment with Class I multi -use paths and a 330-foot bridge over Cucamonga Creek Channel. The grant application focused on how the project supports economic development and housing needs by providing multimodal access for vehicles, trucks, and non -motorized travel. City Council 17 — 246 2/15/2022 City Council 17 — 247 2/15/2022 ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-1: NUN-CULLUSIUN AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATIONS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid pace of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDEN or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -Collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non -Collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioneo that makings certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed Stage of County of El /OaS o MJ Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before nae on this 2-3"61 day of 1*y 2014j, by q. & 40 proved to nie on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before ine. Kevin P Breidt NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 10# 20214021870 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 06MI2025 f � � Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal I y Council City of Santa Ana R 0 Pr 21 6 2/15/2022 Page A3-1 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Sign Title Director Date November 23rd, 2021 City Council City of Santa Ana W_P-22-4215 2/15/2022 Page A3-2 Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council City of Santa Ana aIFP-22-505 2/15/2022 Page AM by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subiect tc ,q enalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. �.. . Signed: Title: Director Firm: IBI Group, A California Partnership Date: November 23rd, 2021 City Council City of Santa Ana FAFP-22-515 2/15/2022 Page A3-4 EXHIBIT C City Council 17 — 252 2/15/2022 On -Call Transportation and Traffic Engineering Services RFP NO. 21-125 4 l� ri tit 71 �d �Y r Submitted to: City of Santa Ana By IBI Group with Mark Thomas Novem ity council 17 — 253 2/15/2022 IBI Group Fee Schedule and Hourly Labor Rates — Effective December 1, 2021 Principal in Charge $275 Project Manager $175 Principal Transportation/Traffic Engineer $225 Senior Transportation Engineer $175 Senior Transportation Planner $165 Civil Engineer $140 ITS Engineer $125 Transportation Engineer $125 Transportation Planner $110 Assistant ITS Engineer $110 Assistant Transportation Planner $100 Assistant Transportation Engineer $110 Graphic Designer $90 Senior Graphic Designer $150 CADD Manager $125 Clerical $85 City Council 17 — 254 2/15/2022 111311 GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 L. A MARK RATE SCHEDULE (P-1) THOMAS EXHIBIT A Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Rate Schedule Expires June 30, 2022* HOURLY Engineering Services Survey Services Intern $52 - $90 Survey Intern $65 - $112 Technician $72 - $137 Survey Technician $85 - $151 Planner 1 $85 - $115 Sr. Survey Technician $98 - $186 Design Engineer 1 $101- $144 Surveyor $118 - $171 Planner II $111- $137 Sr. Surveyor $134 - $198 Sr. Technician $124 - $180 Lead Survey Technician $131- $218 Design Engineer II $131 - $169 Project Surveyor $164 - $216 Project Engineer $154 - $191 Sr. Project Surveyor $180 - $238 Sr. Project Engineer $167 - $227 Survey Manager $191- $263 Sr. Technical Engineer $167 - $227 Sr. Survey Manager $238 - $311 Project Manager $200 - $256 Survey Division Manager $284 - $396 Technical Lead $200 - $256 ** Single Chief $157 - $216 Sr. Project Manager $232 - $328 ** Single Instrumentman $150 - $191 Sr. Technical Lead $222 - $328 ** Single Chainman $132 - $187 Engineering Manager $294 - $378 ** Apprentice $71- $176 Practice Area Leader $294 - $378 ** 1 Person Field Crew $157 - $216 Sr. Engineering Manager $327 - $450 ** 2 Person Field Crew $290 - $403 Principal $422 - $500 ** 3 Person Field Crew $361- $580 Drone Pilot $220 Construction Management Services Office Technician $65 - $108 Project Support/Coordination Services Office Engineer $115 - $216 Project Assistant $72 - $108 ** Asst. Resident Engineer $164 - $297 Technical Writer $69 - $115 ** Inspector - CM $164 - $297 Sr. Project Assistant $101- $137 RE/Structural Representative $213 - $360 Project Coordinator $98 - $144 Project Manager - CM $213 - $324 Graphic Designer $105 - $162 Sr. Project Manager - CM $229 - $360 Sr. Technical Writer $105 - $176 Area Manager - CM $321- $468 Project Accountant $105 - $162 Division Manager - CM $294 - $360 Sr. Project Coordinator $131- $173 Sr. Graphic Designer $118 - $198 District Management Services Sr. Project Accountant $164 - $223 ** Inspector - Apprentice $69 - $104 Sr. Graphic Manager $147 - $216 ** Inspector $101- $140 ** Sr. Inspector $128 - $166 Urban Planning/Landscape Architecture Services Assistant Sanitary Engineer $144 - $184 Landscape Intern $49 - $90 Associate Sanitary Engineer $160 - $216 Landscape Designer 1 $85 - $115 Sanitary Project Engineer $160 - $248 Landscape Designer II $111 - $137 Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer $203 - $295 Landscape Architect $115 - $198 Operations Manager $232 - $328 LAUD Division Manager $255 - $284 Deputy District Manager $288 - $353 LAUD Project Manager $193 - $248 District Manager -Engineer $321- $374 Sr. LAUD Project Manager $229 - $281 Sr. LAUD Division Manager $268 - $317 Grant Writing Services Special Services Funding Specialist $158 Expert Witness $440 Sr. Funding Specialist $263 Strategic Consulting $440 Note: Additional Promotional Steps Exist within Various Rate Categories OTH E R D I RECT COSTS Reimbursables including, but not limited to: Reproductions, Delivery and Filing Fees Cost Plus 5% Outside Consultant Fees Cost Plus 5% Mileage Per IRS Rate Survey Field Expenses Cost Plus 5% *Rates subject to escalation with new hourly rate schedule as o f July 1, 2022 **TheSP cilinQ WnQv Inwc and I Wn mnfmc PAGE 1 OF 1 City Council 17 — 255 2/15/2022 IBI GROUP ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES - RFP NO. 21-125 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 18 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Site Lease Agreement Amendments with Aldridge Electric, Inc. AGENDA TITLE Approve Lease Amendment with Aldridge Electric, Inc. to Extend the Term Two Years to February 19, 2024 with a One -Year Renewal Option, for a Total Amount of $370,527 (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute a third amendment to the site lease agreement with Aldridge Electric, Inc. for the rental of office space to extend the lease for a two-year period from February 20, 2022 to February 19, 2024, with a one-year renewal option, and increase the monthly rate to $10,361, for a total amount of $370,527, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The OC Streetcar is the first modern streetcar project to be built in Orange County and will service Santa Ana's historic downtown, which includes federal, state, and local courthouses, government offices, colleges, an artists' village, and a thriving restaurant scene. The OC Streetcar will operate along a 4.15-mile route that connects the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and a new transit hub at Harbor Boulevard and Westminster Avenue in Garden Grove. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is the lead agency for the OC Streetcar project. Aldridge Electric, Inc. is one of the contractors working on the OC Streetcar Project and is currently leasing 4,934 square feet on the third floor of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center. The lease agreement is due to expire on February 19, 2022 and Aldridge Electric, Inc. has requested to extend their lease for two years with a one-year renewal option (Exhibit 1). With the proposed extension, the monthly rental rate will increase to $10,361. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. City Council 18 — 1 2/15/2022 Site Lease Agreement Amendments with Aldridge Electric, Inc. February 15, 2022 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Lease Income in the amount of $370,527 will be deposited into the SARTC Operations Rental — Aldridge Electric, Inc. revenue account (No. 06717002-53826) for future appropriations. Lease and License Agreement Term (February 20, 2022, through February 19, 2024) Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year — Account No. Description Account Description 2021-22 06717002-53826 Regional Transportation PWA- SARTC Operations, $44,510 (Feb -June) Center Rental — Aldridge Electric 2022-23 06717002-53826 Regional Transportation PWA- SARTC Operations, $123,509 (July -June) Center Rental — Aldridge Electric 2023-24 06717002-53826 Regional Transportation i PWA- SARTC Operations, $78,999 (July -Feb) Center Rental — Aldridge Electric Lease and License Agreement 1-year Renewal Option (February 20, 2024, through Februar 19, 2025 2023-24 06717002-53826 Regional Transportation PWA- SARTC Operations, $44,510 (Feb -June) Center Rental — Aldridge Electric 2024-25 06717002-53826 Regional Transportation PWA- SARTC Operations, $78 999 (July -Feb) Center Rental — Aldridge Electric Total: $370,527 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Third Amendment to Site Lease Agreement with Aldridge Electric, Inc. Submitted By: Nabil Saba, Executive Dir Public Works Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 18 — 2 2/15/2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 66317063-A4B0-48E6-877B-8EE14BC8F2EB EXHIBIT 1 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to the above -referenced agreement is entered into on February 15, 2022, by and between Aldridge Electric, Inc. ("Tenant") and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The parties entered into Agreement No. A-2019-029, dated February 19, 2019 ("Lease Agreement"), by which City leased to Tenant certain office space at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center for Tenant's business operations ("Premises"). B. On June 18, 2019, the parties entered into First Amendment No. A-2019-029-01, by which the City amended the Lease Agreement to expand the square footage of the Premises being leased by Tenant and to provide for Tenant's correct entity name. C. On April 7, 2020, the parties entered into Second Amendment No. A- 2019- 029- 02 to expand the square footage of the Premises, extend the Term through February 19, 2022, provide additional extension periods of up to twenty-four (24) months on a month -to -month basis, and increase the monthly rent to Eight Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($8,300), with any partial month prorated at $273 per day. D. The parties now wish to further amend the Lease Agreement to extend the term of the Lease for two years from February 20, 2022 with a one-year renewal option, update insurance requirements and increase the monthly rent. The Parties therefore agree: 1. Section 3, Commencement of Term, is amended to extend the Term of the Lease Agreement from February 20, 2022 to February 19, 2024 2. Section 5, Extension Periods, is amended such that the Term of the Lease Agreement may be extended by mutual agreement of the Parties for up to one (1) one (1) year renewal period. All other terms of Section 5, as applicable, shall remain in effect. 3. Section 6, Rent, is amended such that, effective February 20, 2022, the Rent payable under the Lease Agreement shall be the monthly sum of Ten Thousand Three Hundred Sixty -One $10,361 per month, with any partial month prorated at $341 per day. 4. Section 17, Insurance, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Tenant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims forinjuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Tenant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. City Council 18 — 3 2/15/2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 66317063-A4B0-48E6-877B-8EE14BC8F2EB A. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Tenant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limitno less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If the Tenant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the tenant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. B. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Tenant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Tenant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Tenant's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 0104 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Tenant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. City Council 18 — 4 2/15/2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 66317063-A4B0-48E6-877B-8EE14BC8F2EB 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Tenant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Tenant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Tenant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiverof subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theTenant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (note — should be applicable only to professional liability, see below) If any of the required policies provide claims -made coverage: a. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or thebeginning of contract work. b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. c. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims - made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Tenantmust purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Tenant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Tenant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City Council 18 — 5 2/15/2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 66317063-A4B0-48E6-877B-8EE14BC8F2EB 9. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 5. Except as modified by this Third Amendment, and the First and Second Amendments, all terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment to Lease Agreement on the date and year first written above. ATTEST Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO, City Attorney Jose Montoya Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. DocuSigned by: AAAA, WlAtr 112012022 eneffuegner Chief Financial Officer City Council 18 — 6 2/15/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 19 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services AGENDA TITLE Approve Agreements with Inter -Pacific, LEED Electric, Inc., and M. Brey Electric, Inc. for On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services, for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $6,000,000 for up to a Five -Year Term (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Inter -Pacific, LEED Electric, Inc., and M. Brey Electric, Inc. to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services, for a three-year period beginning February 15, 2022 and expiring February 14, 2025, with provisions for one, two-year renewal period exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney, with a shared aggregate amount not to exceed of $6,000,000, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency's Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the City's water and sanitary sewer systems. The water system is composed of approximately 480 miles of water main, 21 groundwater wells, seven pump stations, 10 reservoirs with a storage capacity of 49 million gallons, four pressure regulating stations, and seven connection points to Metropolitan Water District. The system has an average daily demand of 30 million gallons from its roughly 45,000 service connections. The City's water system heavily relies on complex electrical systems to operate the various reservoir stations, well sites, lift stations, interconnections, pressure -reducing valves, and the facilities that house them. Licensed electricians with specialized knowledge in these systems are needed to perform regular maintenance, installation, repair, and replacement to ensure machinery is operating efficiently and effectively. On October 14, 2021, the Public Works Agency issued Request for Proposals (RFP) 21- 122 for on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services. The RFP was advertised on the City's online bid management and publication system with bids due on November 16, 2021. Forty-one vendors were notified and 39 vendors downloaded proposal files. Four proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee. Based on the criteria City Council 19 — 1 2/15/2022 Agreement for On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services February 15, 2022 Page 2 as outlined in the RFP, all of the proposals received were categorized as responsive, and their respective scores are as follows: FIRM LOCATION PROPOSAL SCORE Inter -Pacific Tustin 91 LEED Electric, Inc. Beaumont 88 M. Brey Electric, Inc. Fallbrook 74 Polar Electrical Company Santa Fe Springs 63 In accordance with the RFP scores, staff recommends entering into agreements with Inter -Pacific, LEED Electric, Inc., and M. Brey Electric, Inc. to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services for the Water Resources Division (Exhibit 1-3). The proposals demonstrated high levels of technical competency and experience performing similar services. The proposals contained a clear path toward achieving City goals and objectives as required by the RFP. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure in the current fiscal year and will be budgeted in future fiscal years, including the renewal option, based on the needs of the Water Resources Division. The following is an estimate of expenditures by fiscal year: Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year - Account # Description Account Description Contract (3-Year Term) Water Utility 2021-22 06017640-62300 Water Fund , Production & Supply, $350,000 (Feb -June) Contract Services - Professional Water Utility 2022-23 06017640-62300 Water Fund Production & Supply, $17200,000 (July -June) Contract Services - Professional Water Utility 2023-24 06017640-62300 Water Fund Production & Supply, $1,200,000 (July -June) Contract Services - Professional City Council 19 — 2 2/15/2022 Agreement for On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services February 15, 2022 Page 3 Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit, Year - Account # Description Account Description Amount Water Utility 2024-25 06017640-62300 Water Fund Production & Supply, $850,000 (July -Feb) Contract Services - Professional Optional Two -Year Extension Water Utility 2024-25 06017640-62300 Water Fund Production & Supply, $350,000 (Feb -June) Contract Services - Professional 2025-26 06017640-62300 Water Fund $1,200,000 (July -June) Water Utility 2026-27 06017640-62300 Water Fund Production & Supply, $850,000 (July -Feb) Contract Services - Professional Total: $6,000,000 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Agreement with Inter -Pacific 2. Agreement with LEED Electric, Inc. 3. Agreement with M. Brey Electric, Inc. Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 19 — 3 2/15/2022 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022 by and between Inter -Pacific, Inc., an Illinois corporation dba Inter -Pacific Systems, Inc. ("Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On October 14, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-122, by which it sought a qualified contractor to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitations services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Contractor submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Contractor represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-122. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Contractor shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-122, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Contractor's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. Contractor is one of two (2) contractors selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-122. The total compensation for services provided by all contractors selected under RFP No. 21-122, including any extension period, shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of six million dollars and zero cents ($6,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council 19 — 4 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 10 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on February 14, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for one (1) two (2) year period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all City Council 19 — 5 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 10 Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. If Contractor is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council 19 — 6 2/15/2022 Page 3 of 10 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theContractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work City Council 19 — 7 2/15/2022 Page 4 of 10 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. City Council 19 — 8 2/15/2022 Page 5 of 10 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other parry is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this City Council 19 — 9 2/15/2022 Page 6 of 10 Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Contractor: Inter -Pacific Systems, Inc. 1421 Edinger Ave., Unit A Tustin, CA 92780 Attn: Richard Kuk, President rkukkinter-pacific. com A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument City Council 19 — 10 2/15/2022 Page 7 of 10 that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply City Council 19 — 11 2/15/2022 Page 8 of 10 with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page/ City Council 19 — 12 2/15/2022 Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: � randon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency INTER -PACIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. G Name: I//4. ` Title: City Council 19 — 13 2/15/2022 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A City Council 19 — 14 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Appendix ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page. 13 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is located in the County of Orange in Southern California. The City encompasses 27.2 square miles and a population over 343,000 people. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency — Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the Water System and Sanitary Sewer System. The City of Santa Ana's water system is comprised of approximately 478 miles of water main, 45 MG of storage at five (5) sites, seven (7) MWD connections, 21 groundwater wells, seven (7) pump stations, four (4) pressure regulating stations and utilizes two (2) pressure zones. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency Water Resources Division is soliciting proposals from qualified industrial electrical firms to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services. The City intends to select and enter into agreements with up to three firms to provide the described services for an aggregate annual amount amongst all selected firms. B. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES The City of Santa Ana invites proposals to establish multiple contracts with vendors for electrical maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation at the City's water and wastewater facilities. Qualified respondents will be expected to provide new electrical installations, as well as scheduled and unscheduled electrical maintenance and/or repairs on an "as needed" basis. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, services, and equipment necessary for the complete installation of electrical systems. All work shall be in accordance with applicable trade practices, workmanship, meet warranties and shall conform to all applicable laws, codes and regulations. Business hours are considered from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. (Monday through Friday). Any time outside of business hours of operation may be considered after hours/weekends. All work will be scheduled upon confirmation of scope and cost and completed within the time agreed upon for each specific item of work. The Contractor may not begin work before receiving a written Notice to Proceed by the City's Project Manager. All services, equipment and materials provided by the Contractor must be in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations, laws, and codes such as the California Electric Code, California Building Code, and other applicable codes not listed. C. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Contractor shall provide all transportation, labor, materials and equipment necessary to repair, replace, and install existing and new electrical systems as required for the following types of facilities; Water Booster Stations, Sewer Lift Stations, Water Reservoir Sites, Pressure Control Stations, and Water Well Sites. The Contractor shall provide the following scope of services: City of Santa Ana REP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 14 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 1. ELECTRICAL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to perform, but are not limited to, the following electrical services: • Repair or replacement of motor control stations (up to 480 volts) • Repair or replacement of exterior wiring, interior wiring, conduit, solid state soft starters, variable -frequency drives (VFD), motor controls and motor control centers (MCC), switch gears, fuses, electrical circuit boxes, transformers, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), etc. • Trouble shooting of existing electrical wiring and appurtenances (electrical testing) • New installations of electrical wiring and appurtenances • Telecommunication installations • Instrumentation installations and fiber connections (not including programming) • Technical electrician support to City Staff as requested • Lighting installations • Electrical distribution and control equipment installations (underground distribution conduit, cables, and pull boxes) • Poles, pole foundations and concrete work installations and excavations • Excavations, backfilling and compaction for trenches and pull boxes • Branch circuit panels and wiring installations • Shop and record drawings, material submittals, and work schedules 2. PERFORMANCE TESTS When requested by the City and upon completion of electrical installation, the Contractor shall test and demonstrate that the system operates in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications. Performance tests shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Wire Testing; The Contractor shall perform insulation resistance tests on each complete circuit prior to energizing. Insulation resistance between the conductors and between the conductors and ground shall not be less than 25 megaohms. 2. Operation Testing: The Contractor shall test the operation of each control panel and associated interlocks to verify proper functionality and performance. 3. RECORD DRAWINGS The Contractor shall be capable of providing electrical plans marked with any changes, deviations or addition to any part of the electrical work. The Contractor shall clearly indicate on as -built plans the following information: 1. All conduits runs installed 2. Locations of underground conduits and stubouts accurately dimensioned 3. Forming, cabling, and identification of all power and control circuits within pull boxes and terminal box City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 15 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 4. All changes, deviations, in locations, routing, or dimensions or additions to any part of the electrical work 5. Interior views of each pull box identifying each conduit entrance by conduit number 4. TRAINING AND OPERATION MANUALS The Contractor shall offer training services and provide operation, maintenance and repair manuals consisting of all system drawings, block diagrams, schematics, shop drawings, and other pertinent data required to completely describe the operation and maintenance of the electrical system. The manuals shall be submitted prior to the final acceptance of the system and shall reflect the as -built conditions. The electrical system information in the operation and maintenance manuals shall contain: System operating instructions for normal operational conditions utilizing names of controls as they appear on nameplates 2. Calibration and maintenance instructions 3. Troubleshooting instructions 4. Instructions for ordering replacement parts 5. List of fuses, lamps, seals, and other expendable equipment and devices 6. Parts list including the make, model, and manufacturer of the equipment listed 5. EMERGENCY ON -CALL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to provide emergency on -call electrical maintenance and repair services within four (4) hours of receiving the call. The Contractor's service technician is required to be on site and commence work within four (4) hours of initial contact if deemed by the City to be an emergency. The response time may be waived by the City if service can wait to be performed during Contractor's normal business hours. D. CODE COMPLIANCE All materials and workmanship shall be in strict conformity with standards of the latest editions including revisions of the following: • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) • National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) • National Electrical Code (NEC) standards • National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) • Insulated Cable Engineers Association (ICEA) • lntarnatinnnl FlPrtriral Tt-stinn Association (NETA) City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 16 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES • National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) • State Department of Industrial Safety (CAL/OSHA) • Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) • California Building Code (CNC) E. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION When a request for service is issued by the City, the Contractor shall issue a project estimate and schedule to the City's designated Project Manager. The Contractor shall not proceed with any work without the approval in the form of a notice to proceed from the City's designated project manager. Contractors shall invoice the City on a monthly basis for all work performed during the period or provide a one-time invoice at the completion of work issued. Each invoice shall be accompanied by a summary of tasks performed, contract agreement number, results and progress on long-term tasks if any. F. VALUE ADDED RELATED SERVICES The Contractor may propose additional related services that the City has not specifically identified in this RFP to accomplish the stated goals of this RFP. Value added related services will be considered by the City and may or may not be incorporated in the agreement. All parts and materials must be supplied new and factory approved. G.SUBCONTRACTORS The use of Subcontractors is allowed, but will require approval by City prior to start of any assigned work. Upon commencement of work, the Contractor shall be responsible for services provided by any subcontractor as if Contractor were providing the services with its own organization. When a Subcontractor performs all or any part of the work, a markup shall be applied to the Subcontractor's actual cost of such work. The Contractor may add a markup of 10 percent on the first $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the extra work and a markup of 5 percent on work added in excess of $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the work may be added by the Contractor. H. MARKUP The following markup percentages shall be added to the Contractor's costs and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profits (to the sum of the costs and markups, one (1) percent shall be added as compensation for bonding): 1) Labor.............................................................................................. 20 2) Materials.............................................................. ........................15 3) Equipment Rental............................................................................. 15 4) Other Items and Expenditures.......................................................... 15 I. MINIM11M QUALIFICATION5 C:iy of Santa Ana OP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 17 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES The Contractor shall meet the following minimum qualifications- 1 . All work is to be performed in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, laws, standards, due care, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety requirements. 2. The Contractor shall hold a current California C-10 Electrical Contractor's License. 3. The Contractor shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in providing industrial control panel building services. 4. The Contractor shall possess state and local permits, licenses and certificates required by law to commence, carry, and complete the work. 5. Provide all necessary equipment to competently perform and complete work as specified. J. SAFETY Proposer shall be solely and completely responsible for the condition of the project site, including safety of all persons and properties during the performance of the work. In addition, proper safety equipment must be worn at all times. These requirements shall apply continuously until the contract is terminated and shall not be limited to normal working hours. The Contractor/Consultant shall assure that each employee or subcontractor under the contractor's supervision is trained in the work practices necessary to safely perform his or her job. K. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The successful bidders shall furnish the City with original copies of valid insurance policies herein required upon execution of the contract and shall maintain said policies in full force and effect at all times during the term of this contract. Said insurance policies shall comply with all requirements set forth in these specifications. Contractor(s) shall keep a current certificate of insurance at the City of Santa Ana at all times and shall immediately report any changes to the City. L. FEE SCHEDULE Contractor shall submit a fee schedule as described in Section IV.B.3 of RFP. The Well 32 Reservoir Rehabilitation Plans provided as Exhibit A and the General Specifications in Exhibit B are to be used as the basis for completing the Fee Schedule form and any other documents requested below (assume all system integration programming will be provided by the City). Upon award of a contract, work will proceed as authorized by the City, but may not necessarily be the project as described in Fee Proposal (inclusive of Exhibit A and Exhibit B). No separately stated freight or deliveries will be considered. Bidders shall include all costs in the unit price bid. Furthermore, the Contractor shall submit additional labor, material and rental equipment rates alQng with fee schedule. Contractor's labor and equipment rate sheet shall list rates for all City of Santa Ana FWP 2 -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES labor designations, equipment, rentals, and materials. The bid items specified in the fee schedule are for reference purposes only. Labor increases shall be subject to mutually agreeable terms between the City and the Contractor. The City may request related services that will be paid at the vendor's standard labor and equipment rate submitted. Fee proposal shall be outlined as follows: ---End of SCOPE OF WORK Section --- City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 19 EXHIBIT B City Council 19 — 22 2/15/2022 9 Inter -Pacific Bid for: RFP No.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 22 S. Daisy Avenue, Bldg A Santa Ana, CA 92703 Attn: Armando Fernandez, P.E. Bid Deadline: November 16, 2021 4:OOPM PDT 9 Inter -Pacific Inter -Pacific, Inc. 1421 Edinger Ave Unit A Tustin, CA 92780 C-7, C-10 License #917831 Enoch Kang Project Engineer 949-529-5977 x204 ekang@inter-pacific.com Richard Kuk President 949-529-5977 x107 rkuk@inter-pacific.com Central Office 1278 Barclay Blvd Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 FEIN 20-0514362 GSA Contract GS-07F-5611 P Cage Code 3A4G3 DUNS #083763834 SEALED BID — CONFIDENTIAL — DO NOT OPEN UNTIL BID OPENING sty Cb6incil 19 — ? 21 Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/IPQ 529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter- Pacific November 16, 2021 To: City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency 220 S. Daisy Avenue, Bldg A Santa Ana, CA 92703 Attn: Armando Fernandez: We [Inter -Pacific] are herein submitting our response to the Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Services Request For Proposal. We confirm that all elements of the RFP have been considered and that we are qualified and capable of performing all work that has been proposed. In addition, we are willing to enter a contract under the terms and conditions prescribed by this RFP. Inter -Pacific is a nationwide integrator of video surveillance, networking, and AV products with offices near Chicago since 2002 and in Tustin, CA since 2014. Inter -Pacific provides complete System Integration services including design and engineering for the Federal, State, and Municipal government agencies. You will find that our experience includes work on projects of similar or greater scope providing quality, value, and service that meets and exceeds expectations. Our employees and staff have the necessary knowledge and experience to complete minor electrical maintenance to major electrical upgrades. show a great deal of commitment towards the work of our clients. Inter -Pacific is a Veteran owned, SBA certified 8(a) Disadvantaged Minority Enterprise. We strongly hope that our bid will be considered positively. We look forward to working with you. Enoch Kang, Project Engineer Richard Kuk, Project Manager / President bt� Cbencil g — 2421 Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/�(949J 529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter -Pacific Table of Contents 1. Title Page 2. Letter of Interest 3. Table of Contents 4. Executive Summary 5. Company Profile 6. Previous Relevant Projects 7. Corporate Hierarchy and Key Personnel 8. Cost Proposal 9. Required Forms and Documents bt� Ctuncil 19 — 1L Edinger Ave, UnitA 2/�(9491529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter- Pacific 4. Executive Summary Inter -Pacific understands that The City of Santa Ana is seeking proposals from firms that would be able and willing to offer On -Call electrical services for the Well 32 and Chemical Building sites. We propose that our services will meet or exceed all expectations outlined in the RFP. We have professionally designed and installed large-scale electrical solutions for nearly twenty years. We have successfully completed electrical upgrades for colleges, school districts, and several other city public works projects. Inter -Pacific offers "one -stop" solutions for conduit installation, wiring pulling, and start up/testing of various types of generators. Our dedicated engineers and installers stand ready to ensure City of Santa Ana expectations and requirements are met. We have reviewed all additional drawings for the site and VFD specifications and are pleased to provide a total bid of $778,573.20 thanks to outstanding relationships we have with our conduit and wiring suppliers. If you have any questions about our proposal, please reach out to me at (949) 529-5977. Respectfully, Richard Kuk President bt� CbOncil 19 — ?�21 Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/�(949J 529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter- Pacific 5. Company Profile Inter -Pacific is a nationwide integrator of video surveillance, networking, and AV products with offices near Chicago since 2002 and in Tustin CA since 2014. Inter -Pacific provides complete System Integration services including design and engineering for the Federal, State, and Municipal government agencies. You will find that our experience ("Experience and References") includes work on projects of similar or greater scope. Inter -Pacific is a Veteran owned, SBA certified 8(a) Disadvantaged Minority Enterprise. Services available and/or provided by Inter -Pacific, Inc: o Full CCTV/ Video Surveillance design, integration and installation o Lighting Upgrades o UPS and Generator Installation and Maintenance o Structured Cabling and Network Installation o Fiber Optic cabling, Connection and Switching o Wireless Integration o Control Room and Public Address systems o Access Control and Communication o Trenching and Boring Inter -Pacific is an Authorized Solution Provider for: • Axis Communications Vivotek • Genetec Firetide • Pelco ExacgVision • Bosch Milestone • Cisco OnSSi • Hanwha Techwin (Samsung) Geovision • Sony Inter-Pacific's competitive advantage over other A/E firms is our relationship with numerous manufacturers and experience of completing many Design to Build projects. We have handled all phases of complex video surveillance projects to ensure the system's design and features meet the needs of the end users. Inter -Pacific shall collaborate with District, District advisors, and local agencies as necessary to capture existing conditions, develop an installation plan and complete the turnkey system. Insurance and Bonding: Inter -Pacific, Inc. is fully insured and bonded. Limits include $1 million per occurrence, $2 million general aggregate. Certificate of Liability Insurance can be provided. Additional information can be found on the website at www.inter-pacific.com. bt� Cbencil g - �421 Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/�(949J 529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter -Pacific 6. Previous Relevant Projects Saddleback College — IT IDF Room ePower Project Installation of new underground wiring and conduit, electrical panels, transformers, receptacles, access panels, thermostats, junction boxes, submersible electrical vaults, and steel cable troughs. Contact: Louis Sessler, (949) 582-4947, Isessler@saddleback.edu Location: 28000 Marguerite Parkway, Mission Viejo, CA 92692 Original Value: $399,000.00 (including $42,000.00 allowance) Total Value: $377,557.07 Period of Performance: January 27, 2020—July 7, 2020 City of Pico Rivera - Electrical Panel Replacement at Plant No. 2 Capital Improvement Project No. 21297 Electrical power upgrade for Water Plant. Installed new transformer, replaced new Main Switch Board (MSB) and Motor Control Center (MCC). New electrical feed from SoCal Edison with trenching and new concrete pads. Contact: Gabriel Gomez, (714) 732-0398, gabriel.gomez@libertyutilities.com Location: 8316 Washington Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660 Original Value: $325,000.00 Total Value: $334,689.21 (addition of cam locks on MSB, grounding rod and well) Completion: August 2017 — February 2018 City of Santa Ana - Lighting Upgrade, Structured Cabling, & Camera Systems LED Lighting upgrade of all City Water Plants, including installing light poles and Camera Systems. Personnel involved: Evan Kao, Project Engineer, Ben Hurtado, Primary Electrician Contact: Cesar Barrera, 714-673-3408, cbarrera@santa-ana.org Location: Water Resources Division, Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Original Value: $136,480 Total Value: $160,560 Period of Performance: September 2017 — March 2019 City of Santa Ana — City Yard Electrical and Communication Upgrade. Ran conduit and installed 85 Cosa Private Network, 9 SCADA, and 3 PLC drops from TR room and Server room electrical panels to 1st floor Control room and 2nd floor open area. New junction boxes and face plates to accommodate all new drop locations. Contact: Miguel Renteria, 714-586-6294, mrenteria@santa-ana.org Location: Santa Ana City Yard 220 S. Daisy Ave, Santa Ana, CA 92703 Original Value: $80,191.45 Total Value: $114,559.25 Period of Performance: May 2021 Kern County Superintendent of Schools - WAN Fiber Network Installation of new WAN fiber network connecting 3 schools within Kern County Unified School District. Provided boring and placement of manholes and conduit over 2 miles to provide high speed network connectivity. Provide pathways, fiber terminations, single mode fiber optic patch cables, and cabinets. Contact: Jenny Hannah, (661) 636-4000 Location: 1300 17th St, Bakersfield, CA 93301 Original Value: $178,532 Total Value: $178,532 Period of Performance: March 2017 Additional references available upon request Ut� CbuIICIi 19 — 1L Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/�(9491529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter- Pacific 7. Corporate Hierarchy and Key Personnel Inter -Pacific will assign three key personnel to complete the project. All assigned employees shall be professionally qualified for the roles which they shall perform. Assigned staff are local (Tustin, CA), licensed, and will be available throughout the lifespan of the project. Richard Kuk — President, Project Manager (POC) Experience - Sprint/Nextel Communications — Engineering Manager supervisor to 14 Engineers maintaining the Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois network. Worked with Motorola to implement all new technologies. - USAF Captain — Defense Contract Management Command (DCMC) Program Manager for Sundstrand Aerospace overseeing team of Contracting, Engineers, QA and Finance personnel. - USAF Procurement Officer for Columbus AFB, MS Defense Acquisition Professional Level II Certified - DePaul University, MBA - USAF Academy, Bachelor of Science Job Duties - Primary POC to Customer - Lead Project Manager and Designer of Control Room Systems - Develop Master Project Plan - Review Drawings and SOW - Evaluate cost and progress of contractors Benjamin Hurtado — Electrician Experience - CA Journeyman License #154219 - ABC Apprenticeship 4.5-year program - Electrician Supervisor — Oregon National Guard, Electrical Heating upgrade for warehouse Specialist in lighting and control system Enoch Kang — Project Engineer (POC) Experience - University of California, Irvine, Bachelor of Arts Job Duties - Prepare project proposals - Create project drawings - Design and implementation of daily deliverables - Supervise contractors - Develop training and user documents (as needed) - Perform site surveys - Plan and schedule timelines and project milestones bt� Czancil 19 — ?L Edinger Ave, Unit A 2/�(949J 529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Sinter- Pacific 8. Cost Proposal (please see attached spreadsheet) bt� Czancil 19 — W21 Edinger Ave, Unit 2/jPQ 29 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com Cost Proposal - RFP21-122 Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Services Location Part Measurement Qty Price Extended 1 Electrical Conduit (Well 32) 1 $ $ 1 E- 3 (1) COORDINATE WITH SCE PLANS FOR SCE WORK DETAIL $ $ 1 E- 3 (1) SS 5.89" = 11.78' OF UNDERGROUND PIPE AND WIRE WITH ONE ELBOW - FROM SCE TRANSFORMER TO SWBD-010 (PER SCE PLAN) $ $ 1 E-3 (2) COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW SWITCHBOARD AND THE RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING METER FROM THE EXISTING "SWBD" TO THE NEW 600A, 480/277V, 3PH, 4W, NEMA 1 SWITCHBOARD "SWBD-010". $ $ 1 E-5 P101 3" OCAL 3" OCAL 8.84" = 17.68' $ $ 1 E-5 P101 3#350KCMIL 1#1 FROM SWBD-010 TO MCC-010 3#350KCMIL 1#1 8.84" = 17.68' $ $ 1 E-5 P102 3" OCAL 3" OCAL 2.5" = 5' $ $ 1 E-5 P102 3#250KCMIL 1#2 FROM MCC-010 TO VFD-010 3#250KCMIL 1#2 2.5" = 5' $ $ 1 E-5 P102A 4" OCAL 4" OCAL 17.73" = 35.47' $ $ 1 E-5 P102A 3#250KCMIL 1#2 FROM VFD-010 TO PMP-010 (VFD SHIELDED CABLE) 3#250KCMIL 1#2 17.73" = 35.47' $ $ 1 E-5 P102B 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 17.73" = 35.47' $ $ 1 E-5 P102B 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 1 E-5 P102B 2#12 1#12 FROM VFD-010 TO WELL 32 SPACE HEATER 2#12 1#12 17.73" = 35.47' $ $ 1 E-5 P103 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 5.25" = 10.5' $ $ 1 E-5 P103 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 1 E-5 P103 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-011 (IN MCC-010) TO RTU- 010 (CKT-1) 2#12 1#12 5.25" = 10.5' $ $ 1 E-5 P104 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 7.63" = 15.26' $ $ 1 E-5 P104 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ 1 E-5 P104 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-011 (IN MCC-010) TO FIT- 030 (CKT-3) 2#12 1#12 7.63" = 15.26' $ $ 1 E-5 P105 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 12.74" = 25.48' $ $ 1 E-5 P105 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ 1 E-5 P105 3#12 1#12 FROM PDP-011 (IN MCC-010) TO MOV-030 (CKT-11,13,15) 3#12 1#12 12.74" = 25.48' $ $ 1 E-5 P106 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 0.84" = 1.68' $ $ 1 E-5 P106 2#14 FROM RTU-010 TO FIT-040 (24VDC) 12#14 0.84" = 1.68' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;31 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 1 E-5 P107 1" OCAL 1"OCAL 8.65" = 17.30' $ $ 1 E-5 P107 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ E-5 P107 3#12 1#12 FROM MCC-010 TO AIR CONDITIONING UNIT ACU-010 (VIA 30A/3P NON -FUSED 1 DISCONNECT SWITCH) 3#12 1#12 8.65" = 17.30' $ $ 1 E-5 P108 1" OCAL OCAL 11.93" = 23.86' $ $ 1 E-5 P108 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ E-5 P108 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-011 (IN MCC-010) TO 1 EXHAUST FAN (CKT-17) 2#12 1#12 11.93" = 23.86' $ $ Copper Conductors: Comply with NEMA WC 70/ICEA 5-95- 1 658 $ $ LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY 1 EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Subtotal: $ 20,000.00 2 Building and Site Electrical System (Well 32) 1 $ $ - 2 E-2 (2) F0102 - 3" OCAL QTY. x2 E-2 (2) OCAL STICK 44.92" = 89.84' x2 $ $ E-2 (2) OCAL 2 E-2 (2) F0102 - 3" OCAL ELBOWS QTY. x2 ELBOWS 12 x2 24 $ $ E-2 (2) F0102 48 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER FROM WELL 32 COMMUNICATION RACK TO JOHN GARTHE 48 STRAND SINGLE 2 COMMUNICATION RACK - QTY. x2 MODE FIBER 44.92" = 89.84' x2 $ $ E-2 (2) SP101- 3"CO OCAL FROM WELL 32 COMMUNICATION RACK TO JOHN GARTHE 2 COMMUNICATION RACK - FIBER OPTIC SPARE CONDUIT E-2 (2) OCAL STICK 44.92" = 89.84' $ $ E-2 (2) OCAL 2 E-2 (2) SP101 - 3" OCAL ELBOWS ELBOWS 12 12 $ $ E-11 (1) PROVIDE A NEW STAINLESS STEEL NEMA 4X PULL 2 BOX. $ $ E-11 (2) LIGHT SWITCH (WP) AND FAN SWITCH (WP) 2 SHALL BE MOUNTED NEAR TOP OF LADDER ENTRY. $ $ E-11 (3) ROUTE CONDUITS INSIDE THE VAULTS EXPOSED AND ALONG THE WALL WITH PVC COATES RIGID STEEL 2 CONDUIT. $ $ E-12 (1) COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW SWITCHBOARD "SWBD-010" AND RELOCATION OF THE KWH 2 METER WITH SCE. $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash; &nbsp; 3 2 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; E-12 (2) PROVIDE A NEW 200A/3P CIRCUIT BREAKER INSIDE THE JOHN GARTHE MOTOR CONTROL CENTER "GAR-MCC- 2 010" TO POWER THE NEW CHEMICAL STORAGE FACILITIES $ $ 2 E-12 WELL 32 $ $ 2 E-12 P101 $ $ 2 E-12 P102 $ $ 2 E-12 P102A $ $ 2 E-12 P102B $ $ 2 E-12 P107 $ $ 2 E-12 D102 $ $ 2 E-12 #4/0 BARE COPPER WIRE $ $ 2 E-12 JOHN GARTHE MCC $ $ 2 E-12 P201 $ $ 2 E-12 P202 $ $ 2 E-12 P203 $ $ 2 Pullboxes $ $ 2 Panelboard Installation $ $ 2 Generator Installation $ $ LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY 2 EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Subtotal: $ 20,000.00 3 VFD Motor Control Center (Well 32) 1 $ $ - install complete, solid-state variable frequency drive systems. This Specification describes variable speed motor control which includes the design, fabrication, testing, installation and support requirements for variable frequency drive systems for 3- phase squirrel cage rotor, induction motors listed in the table below. Where noted on the drawings, in addition to the variable frequency drive, provide each system with a starter for bypass starting during variable frequency drive 3 downtime. 3 $ $ VFD Driven Equipment Tag Number - W32_WELL_ VFD Number - VFD_01 0 Motor Rating (hp) 250 Motor Rating (Volts) - 480, 3 phase 3 Motor Rating (Amperes) - 302 Amps $ $ 3 LABOR ONLY 3 $ 35,000.00 $ 105,000.00 3 *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING EQUIPMENT $ $ - &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;33 2/15/2022 &nbsp; Subtotal: $ 105,000.00 4 Automatic Transfer Switch (Well 32) 1 $ $ - 4 E-3 (2) COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW SWITCHBOARD AND THE RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING METER FROM THE EXISTING "SWBD" TO THE NEW 600A, 480/277V, 3PH, 4W, NEMA 1 SWITCHBOARD "SWBD-010". $ $ - 4 LABOR ONLY 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 4 *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING EQUIPMENT $ - $ - Subtotal: $ 10,000.00 5 E-6 Instrumentation and Control Equipment (Well 32) 1 $ $ - 5 C101 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 19.01" = 39.02' $ $ 5 C101 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 C1018#141#14 FROM VFD-010 TO CST-010 8#14 1#14 19.01" = 39.02' $ $ 5 C102 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 14.97" = 29.94' $ $ 5 C102 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ 5 C102 4#141#14 FROM VFD-010 TO MOV-030 4#141#14 14.97" = 29.94' $ $ 5 C103 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8.97" = 17.94' $ $ 5 C103 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 C103 10#14 1#14 FROM RTU-010 TO CST-010/VIT-010 (LOS AND HOA LOCATED INSIDE CST-010) 10#141#14 8:97" = 17.94' $ $ 5 C104 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 16.66" = 33.32' $ $ 5 C104 I" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ 5 C104 4#141#14 FROM VFD-010 TO PSH-012/PSL-012 4#14 1#14 16.66" = 33.32' $ $ 5 C105 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 21.48" = 42.96' $ $ 5 C105 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 1 $ $ 5 C105 4#141#14 FROM VFD-010 TO SV-011, FS-011 4#141#14 21.48" = 42.96' $ $ 5 C106 1-1/2" OCAL 1-1/2" OCAL 8.67" = 17.34' $ $ - 5 C106 1-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 C106 26#14 1#14 FROM RTU-010 TO VFD-010 26#141#14 8.67" = 17.34' $ $ 5 C107 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 2" = 4' $ $ - 5 C107 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;34 2/15/2022 &nbsp; 5 C107 6#141#14 FROM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT TO AC THERMOSTAT (MULTI -CONDUCTOR CABLE) 6#14 1#14 2" = 4' $ $ 5 C108 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 19.17" = 38.34' $ $ 5 C108 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 2 2 $ $ 5 C108 18#14 1#14 FROM RTU-010 TO YA- 100A/100B/110A/110B/120A/120B HS-100/110/120 18#14 1#14 19.17" = 38.34' $ $ 5 C109 3/4" OCAL 3/4" OCAL 9.80" = 19.60' $ $ 5 C109 3/4" OCAL ELBOW 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 5 C109 4#141#14 FROM RTU-010 TO YA-121, HS-121 4#14 1#14 9.80" = 19.60' $ $ 5 C112 3/4" OCAL 3/4" OCAL 8.66" = 17.32' $ $ 5 C112 3/4" OCAL ELBOW 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 1 1 $ $ 5 C112 2#141#14 FROM RTU-010 TO YA-122 2#141#14 8.66" = 17.32' $ $ 5 A101 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8.97" = 17.94' $ $ 5 A101 OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 A101 1#16TSP FROM RTU-010 TO LIT-010 1#16TSP 8.97" = 17.94' $ $ 5 A102 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8.25" = 16.49' $ $ 5 A102 1#16TSP FROM RTU-010 TO PIT-030 1#16TSP 8.25" = 16.49' $ $ 5 A102 1-CAT6 FROM RTU-010 TO FIT-030 1-CAT6 8.25" = 16.49' $ $ 5 A103 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 5 A103 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 A103 1#16TSP FROM RTU-010 TO FIT-040 1#16TSP 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 5 A1041-1/2" OCAL 1-1/2" OCAL 16" = 38' $ $ 5 A1041-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 A104 8#16TST FROM VFD-010 TO WELL 32 RTD 8#16TST 16" = 38' $ $ 5 D101 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8.67" = 17.34' $ $ 5 D101 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 D1012-CAT6 FROM RTU-010 TO VFD-010 2-CAT6 8.67" = 17.34' $ $ 5 D102 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 4.22" = 8.44' $ $ 5 D102 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 D102 1-CAT6 FROM RTU-010 TO PQM (IN MCC) 1-CAT6 4.22" = 8.44' $ $ 5 D103 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 10.57" = 21.14' $ $ 5 D103 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 1 $ $ 5 D103 2-CAT6 FROM WELL 32 SECURITY RACK TO CAMERAS 2-CAT6 10.57" = 21.14' $ $ 5 D104 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 19.07" = 38.14' $ $ 5 D104 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 11 1 $ $ 5 D104 2-CAT6 FROM WELL 32 SECURITY RACK TO CAMERAS 2-CAT6 19.07" = 38.14' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;35 2/15/2022 &nbsp; 5 F01013" OCAL 3" OCAL .6" = 1.2' $ $ 5 F0101 2 STRANDS SINGLE MODE PATCH FIBER FROM RTU-010 TO WELL 32 COMMUNICATION RACK 2 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER .6" = 1.2' $ $ 5 F0102 3" OCAL - QTY. x2 3" OCAL 6.70" = 13.40' x2 $ $ 5 F0102 48 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER FROM WELL 32 COMMUNICATION RACK TO JOHN GARTHE COMMUNICATION RACK - QTY. x2 48 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER 6.70" = 13.40' x2 $ $ 5 F0103 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 5 F0103 2 STRANDS SINGLE MODE PATCH FIBER WELL 32 COMMUNICATION RACK WELL 32 SECURITY RACK 2 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 5 LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Subtotal: $ 20,000.00 6 E-7 Building Lighting (Well 32) 1 $ $ - 6 (1) ROUTE #4/0 BC GND IN SLAB FROM GROUNDING RING AND BOND TO EQUIPMENT GROUND BUS. E-13 GROUND ROD TYPE OF 4 116.25" = 232.50' $ $ 6 (2) FIXTURE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY PACK. AA / 50 1 1 $ $ 6 (3) CENTER OF FIXTURE SHALL BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH CENTER OF BENEATH DOOR. ALL WALL FIXTURE SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE SAME ELEVATION. LABOR $ $ 6 (4) EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH PHOTOCELL. B / 55 1 1 $ $ 6 (5) CKT-2 3/4"C - OCAL STICK IN PANEL PDP-011 3/4"C- OCAL STICKS 43.84" = 87.68' $ $ 6 (5) CKT-2 3/4"C - OCAL ELBOW IN PANEL PDP-011 3/4"C- OCAL ELBOWS 2 2 $ $ 6 (5) CKT-2 2#12+1#12G IN PANEL PDP-011 2#12+1#12G 43.84" = 87.68' $ $ 6 (5) CKT-4 3/411C OCAL PANEL PDP-011 3/4"C OCAL STICKS 55.52" = 111.04' $ $ 6 (5) CKT-4 3/4"C OCAL PANEL PDP-011 OCAL ELBOWS 3/4"C OCAL ELBOWS 3 3 $ $ 6 (5) CKT-4 2#12+1#12G - PANEL PDP-011 2#12+1#12G 55.52" = 111.04' $ $ 6 (5) CKT-6 3/4"C PANEL PDP-011, CKT-6 OCAL STICKS 3/4"C OCAL STICKS 44.78" = 89.56' $ $ 6 (5) CKT-6 3/4"C PANEL PDP-011, CKT-6 OCAL ELBOWS 3/4"C OCAL ELBOWS 9 9 $ $ 6 (5) CKT-6 2#12+1#12G - PANEL PDP-011 2#12+1#12G 44.78" = 89.56' $ $ 6 ILIGHTING INSTALLATION $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash; &nbsp; 3 6 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 6 LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Subtotal: $ 10,000.00 7 Electrical Equipment and Facilities (Chemical Building) 1 $ $ 7 E-4 (1) DISCONNECT AND REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUITS AND WIRES. DEMO 459.40" = 918.80' 1 $ $ E-4 (2) (P401-C401-C402-C403-SP401-SP402) 7 E-4 (2) P401- 3" OCAL - QTY. x2 3" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' x2 $ $ 7 E-4 (2) P401- 3#300 KCMIL 1#3 FROM JOHN GARTHE MCC TO (E) INDUCTION GEN (BLDG SA-1) - QTY. x2 3#300 KCMIL 1#3 403.44" = 806.88' x2 $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C401 - 2" OCAL 2" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C401 - 28#14 1#14 FROM JOHN GARTHE RTU TO SA-1 ITC 28#141#14 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C402 - 2" OCAL 2" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C402 - 10#14 1#14 FROM JOHN GARTHE RTU TO SA-1 ITC 10#14 1#14 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C403 - 2" OCAL 2" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) C403 - 10#14 1#14 FROM JOHN GARTHE RTU TO SA-1 ITC 10#141#14 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) SP401- 3"CO OCAL FROM JOHN GARTHE ELECTRICAL BLDG TO SA-1 BLDG -NOTE POWER SPARE 3" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) SP402 - 2"CO OCAL FROM JOHN GARTHE ELECTRICAL BLDG TO SA-1 BLDG - NOTE COMMUNICATION SPARE 2" OCAL 403.44" = 806.88' $ $ 7 E-4 (2) P401-C401-C402-C403-SP401-SP402 OCAL ELBOWS X 6 WIRES P401-C401- C402-C403-SP401- SP402 OCAL ELBOWS 5 30 $ $ E-4 (P201-FO201-SP203) 7 E-4 P201 - 2-1/2" OCAL 2-1/2" OCAL $ $ 7 E-4 P201 - 2-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 2-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 2 $ $ 7 E-4 P201- 3#4/0 1#6 FROM JOHN GARTHE MCC TO PDP- 100 3#4/0 1#6 203.53" = 407.06' $ $ 7 E-4 F0201 - 3" OCAL 3" OCAL 203.53" = 407.06' $ $ 7 E-4 F0201- 3" OCAL ELBOW 3" OCAL ELBOW 12 $ $ - &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash; &nbsp; 3 7 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; E-4 F0201 - 24 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER FROM JOHN GARTHE COMMUNICATION 24 STRAND SINGLE 7 TO RACK RIO-100 MODE FIBER 203.53" = 407.06' $ $ E-4 SP203 - 3"OC OCAL FROM JOHN GARTHE COMMUNICATION RACK TO RIO-100 - FIBER OPTIC SPARE 7 CONDUIT 3"OC OCAL 203.53" = 407.06' $ $ 7 E-4 SP203 - 3"OC OCAL ELBOW 3"OC OCAL ELBOW 2 $ $ 7 E-4(P301-P302-C301-C302) $ $ 7 E-4 P301- 1" OCAL STICK 1" OCAL STICKS 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 P301 - 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ E-4 P301- 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT SUMP PUMP SMP-100 (VIA POWER 7 PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 36" = 72' $ $ E-4 P301 - 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 7 TO PRESSURE VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 36" = 72' $ $ E-4 P301 - 4#12 2#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER 7 PULL BOX) 4#12 2#12 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 P302 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 P302 - 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ E-4 P302 - 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 7 TO CHEMICAL VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 36" = 72' $ $ E-4 P302 - 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-CHEMICAL VAULT LIGHT 7 AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 C301 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 C301- 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ E-4 C301- 4#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-100 AND VAULT-LSHH-100 (PRESS. VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH AND 7 FLOAT SWITCH. VIA CONTROL PULL BOX.) 4#14 1#14 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 C302 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS 36" = 72' $ $ 7 E-4 C302 - 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ E-4 C302 - 2#14 1#14 RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-110 7 (CHEMICAL VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH) 2#14 1#14 36" = 72' $ $ E-8 (1) CONDUIT ROUTING IS SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY AND THEY 7 SHALL BE ROUTED TO SUIT FIELD CONDITIONS. $ $ E-8 (2) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ON -SITE SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION (OSHG) CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY FOR CONDUIT STUB -UP LOCATION AND 7 CONNECTION POINT. $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash; &nbsp; 3 8 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 7 E-8 (3) P2012-1/2" OCAL 2-1/2" OCAL 3" = 6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P201 3#4/0 1#6 FROM JOHN GARTHE MCC TO PDP- 100 3#4/0 1#6 3" = 6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P202 1-1/2" OCAL 1-1/2" OCAL STICK 4.75" = 9.5' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P202 1-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P202 3#2 1#8 FROM PDP-100 TO 75KVA TRANSFORMER XFMR-100 (CKT-7,9,11) 3#2 1#8 4.75" = 9.5' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P203 2-1/2" OCAL 2-1/2" OCAL 20.25" = 40.50" $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P203 2-1/2" OCAL ELBOW 2-1/2" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P203 3#4/0 1#6 FROM 75KVA TRANSFORMER XFMR-100 TO PDP-200 3#4/0 1#6 20.25" = 40.50" $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P204 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 13.60" = 27.20' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P204 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P204 3#10 1#10 FROM PDP-100 TO MICROCLOR GENERATION SKID (CKT-1,3,5) 3#10 1#10 13.60" = 27.20' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P205 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 4.37" = 8.75' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P205 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P205 2#10 1#10 FROM PDP-200 TO MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL (CKT-1,3) 2#10 1#10 4.37" = 8.75' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P206 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 3" = 6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P206 4#12 2#12 FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO HYDROGEN BLOWER BLR-410 4#12 2#12 3" = 6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P207 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 8.30" = 16.60' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P207 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P207 3#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO AIR CONDITIONING UNIT (VIA 20A/3P NON -FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH) 3#12 1#12 8.30" = 16.60' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P208 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 10.15" = 20.30' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P208 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P208 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO METERING PUMP SKID MP-310 (CKT-8,10) 2#12 1#12 10.15" = 20.30' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P209 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 10.15" = 20.30' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P209 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P209 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO METERING PUMP SKID MP-320 (CKT-12,14) 2#12 1#12 10.15" = 20.30' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P210 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 4.40" = 8.80' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P210 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO ROOF EXHAUST FAN EF-1 (CKT-9) 2#12 1#12 4.40" = 8.80' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash; &nbsp; 3 9 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 7 E-8 (3) P211 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 18.35" = 36.70' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P211 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P211 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO ROOF EXHAUST FAN EF-2 (CKT-19) 2#12 1#12 18.35" = 36.70' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P212 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 13" = 26' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P212 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P212 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO AIT-200 (CKT- 13) 2#12 1#12 13" = 26' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P213 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 7.04" = 14.08' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P213 (CKT-17) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO ROLL- UP DOOR 2#12 1#12 7.04" = 14.08' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P213 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P214 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 13" = 26' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P214 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P214 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO WATER QUALITY STATION (CKT-15) 2#12 1#12 13" = 26' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P215 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 0.53" = 1.06' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P215 (CKT-20) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO RIO- 100 2#12 1#12 0.53" = 1.06' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P216 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 12.75" = 25.50' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P216 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P216 2#2 1#8 FROM PDP-200 TO WATER HEATER (CKT-22,24) 2#2 1#8 12.75" = 25.50' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P217 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P217 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOW 1 $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P217 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO SUMP PUMP SMP-100 (CKT-21) 2#12 1#12 2.3" = 4.6' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P301 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P301(1) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT SUMP PUMP SMP-100 (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P301(2) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P301(3) 4#12 2#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 4#12 2#12 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P302 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P302(1) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ 7 E-8 (3) P302(2) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 8.12" = 16.24' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;40 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; E-8 (4) INSTALL THE REQUIREDWI RES BETWEEN THE INDOOR AND 7 OUTDOOR AC UNITS $ $ E-8 (5) INSTALL A NEW 200A, 480V, 30, 3W, NEMA 4X STAINLESS STEEL 7 PANEL BOARD "PDP-100". PDP-100 $ $ E-8 (6) INSTALL A NEW 208/120V, 200A, 30, 4W NEMA 4X STAINLESS 7 STEEL PANEL BOARD "PDP-200" PDP-200 $ $ E-8 (7) THE HYPOCHLORITE GENERATOR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE 7 PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS $ $ 7 E-11 VAULT ELECTRICAL PLANS $ $ E-11 (1) PROVIDE A NEW STAINLESS STEEL NEMA 4X PULL 7 BOX. $ $ E-11 (2) LIGHT SWITCH (WP) AND FAN SWITCH (WP) SHALL BE MOUNTED 7 NEAR TOP OF LADDER ENTRY $ $ E-11 (3) ROUTE CONDUITS INSIDE THE VAULTS EXPOSED AND ALONG THE 7 WALL WITH PVC COATES RIGID STEEL CONDUIT $ $ 7 E-11 PRESSURE CONTROL VAULT PLAN $ $ 7 E-11 (3) P301 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 18.6" = 37.20' $ $ E-11 (3) P301(1) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT SUMP PUMP SMP-100 (VIA POWER 7 PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 18.6"37.20' $ $ E-11 (3) P301(2) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 -= 7 TO PRESSURE VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 $ $ E-11 (3) P301(3) 4#12 2#12 FROM PDP-200 TO PRESSURE VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER 7 PULL BOX) 4#12 2#12 $ $ 7 E-11 C301 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS 7" = 14' $ $ 7 E-11 C301- 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ E-11 C301- 4#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-100 AND VAULT-LSHH-100 (PRESS. VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH AND 7 FLOAT SWITCH. VIA CONTROL PULL BOX.) 4#14 1#14 7" = 14' $ $ 7 E-11 CHEMICAL INJECTION VAULT PLAN $ $ 7 E-11 (3) P302 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK 18.6" = 37.20' $ $ E-11 (3) P302(1) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL 7 VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 18.6" = 37.20' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;41 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 7 E-11 (3) P302(2) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 $ $ 7 E-11 (3) P302 1" OCAL 1" OCAL STICK $ $ 7 E-11 (3) P302(1) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL VAULT FAN (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 $ $ 7 E-11 (3) P302(2) 2#12 1#12 FROM PDP-200 TO CHEMICAL VAULT LIGHT AND RECEPTACLE (VIA POWER PULL BOX) 2#12 1#12 $ $ 7 E-11 C302 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS 7" = 14' $ $ 7 E-11 C302 - 2#14 1#14 RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-110 (CHEMICAL VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH) 2#14 1#14 7" = 14' $ $ 7 E-11 C302 - 1" OCAL STICKS 1" OCAL STICKS $ $ 7 E-11 C302 - 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 7 E-11 C302 - 2#14 1#14 RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-110 (CHEMICAL VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH) 2#14 1#14 $ $ 7 LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 196,000.00 $ 196,000.00 Subtotal: $ 196,000.00 8 E-9 Instrumentation and Control Equipment (Chemical Building) 1 $ $ - 8 (1) INTRUSION SWITCHES CONNECTED IN SERIES. YA-120A and YA-120B YA-120A and YA- 120B $ $ 8 (2) C201 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 23.80" = 47.60' $ $ 8 (2) C201 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 2 $ $ 8 (2) C201 12#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO YA-110/120A/120B HS-110/120A/120B (THROUGH CHEMICAL STORAGE FACILITY GUTTER TERMINAL BOX) 12#14 1#14 23.80" = 47.60 $ $ 8 (2) C202 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 2.06" = 4.12' $ $ 8 (2) C202 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) C202 2#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO FLOAT LEVEL SWITCH LSH-100 2#14 1#14 2.06" = 4.12' $ $ 8 (2) C203 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 12.10" = 24.2' $ $ 8 (2) C203 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) C203 8#141#14 FROM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT TO AC THERMOSTAT (MULTI -CONDUCTOR CABLE) 8#14 1#14 12.10" = 24.2' $ $ 8 (2) C204 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 9" = 18" $ $ 8 (2) C204 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;42 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 8 (2) C20416#14 1#14 FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO METERING PUMP SKIDS (CONDUCTORS BY OTHER) 16#14 1#14 9" = 18" $ $ 8 (2) C205 3/4"CO OCAL BY MANUFACTURER? 3/4" OCAL $ $ 8 (2) C205 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) C205 CONDUCTOR BY MANUFACTURER CONDUCTOR BY MANUFACTURER $ $ 8 (2) C206 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 3" = 6' $ $ 8 (2) C206 2#14 1#14 FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO BRINE STORAGE TANK (CONDUCTORS BY OTHER) 2#14 1#14 3" = 6' $ $ 8 (2) C207 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 5.5" = 11' $ $ 8 (2) C207 1" OCAL ELBOW OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) C207 4#14 1#14 FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO SODI.HYPO TANK (CONDUCTORS BY OTHER) 4#14 1#14 5.5" = 11' $ $ 8 (2) C208 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 17.66" = 35.32' $ $ 8 (2) C208 1" OCAL ELBOW 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) C208 4#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO YA-130/HS-130 - RESTROOM ISTRUSION AND OVERRIDE SWITCHES 4#14 1#14 17.66" = 35.32' $ $ 8 (2) C301 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8" = 16' $ $ 8 (2) C3014#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-100 VAULT-LSH H-100 (PRESS. VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH AND FLOAT SWITCH. VIA CONTROL PULL BOX.) 4#14 1#14 8" = 16' $ $ 8 (2) C302 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 8" = 16' $ $ 8 (2) C302 2#14 1#14 FROM RIO-100 TO VAULT-YA-110 (CHEMICAL VAULT INTRUSION SWITCH) 2#14 1#14 8" = 16' $ $ 8 (2) A201 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 10.5" = 21' $ $ 8 (2) A201 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) A201 1#16TSP FROM RIO-100 TO CHLORINE ANALYZER HACH SC200 CONTROLLER AIT-200 1#16TSP NO GND 10.5" = 21' $ $ 8 (2) A203 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 6.36" = 12.72' $ $ 8 (2) A203 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) A203 1#16TSP NO GND FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO SODI HYPO TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER LIT-200 (CONDUCTORS BY OTHER) 1#16TSP NO GND 6.36" = 12.72' $ $ 8 (2) A204 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 9" = 18" $ $ 8 (2) A204 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) A204 2#16TSP FROM MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL TO METERING PUMP SKIDS (CONDUCTORS BY OTHER) �2#16TSP NO GND 9" = 18" $ $ 8 (2) F0201 3" OCAL 3" OCAL 6.2" = 12.4' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;43 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 8 (2) F0201 24 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER FROM JOHN GARTHE COMMUNICATION RACK TO RIO-100 24 STRAND SINGLE MODE FIBER 6.2" = 12.4' $ $ 8 (2) D201 1" OCAL 1" OCAL 4" = 8' $ $ 8 (2) D201 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) D201 1-CAT6 FROM RIO-100 TO MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL PLC-200 1-CAT6 4" = 8' $ $ 8 (2) SP201 1"CO OCAL FROM RIO-100 CHEMICAL STORAGE TO FACILITY GUTTER TERMINAL BOX 1" OCAL 8.7" = 17.4' $ $ 8 (2) SP201 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (2) SP202 1" OCAL FROM RIO-100 TO MICROCLOR CONTROL PANEL 1" OCAL 4" = 8' $ $ 8 (2) SP202 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1" OCAL ELBOWS 1 $ $ 8 (3) ALL CONDUITS ROUTING ARE SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY AND THEY SHALL BE ROUTED TO SUIT FIELD CONDITIONS. $ $ 8 (4) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OSHG CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY FOR CONDUIT STUB -UP LOCATION AND CONNECTION POINT. $ $ 8 LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Subtotal: $ 20,000.00 9 E-10 Building Lighting (Chemical Building) 1 $ $ - 9 (1) CENTER OF FIXTURE SHALL BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH CENTER OF DOOR. ALL WALL FIXTURES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE SAME ELEVATION. LABOR $ $ 9 (2) BOTTOM - 3/4"C OCAL 3/4"C OCAL 57.56" = 115.12' $ $ 9 (2) BOTTOM - 2#12, 1#12G 2#12, 1#12G 57.56" = 115.12' $ $ 9 (2) BOTTOM - 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 4 4 $ $ 9 (2) LEFT - 3/4"C OCAL 3/4"C OCAL 54.64" = 109.27' $ $ 9 (2) LEFT - 2#12, 1#12G 2#12, 1#12G 54.64" = 109.27' $ $ 9 (2) LEFT - 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 10 10 $ $ 9 (2) MIDDLE - 3/4"C OCAL 3/4"C OCAL 27.80" = 55.60' $ $ 9 (2) MIDDLE - 2#12, 1#12G 2#12, 1#12G 27.80" = 55.60' $ $ 9 (2) MIDDLE - 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 2 2 $ $ 9 (2) RIGHT - 3/4"C OCAL 3/4"C OCAL 8.28" = 16.56' $ $ 9 (2) RIGHT - 2#12, 1#12G 2#12, 1#12G 8.28" = 16.56' $ $ &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;44 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; 9 (2) RIGHT - 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 3/4" OCAL ELBOWS 1 1 $ $ 9 (3) FIXTURE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY PACK. 1 $ $ 9 (4) EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH PHOTOCELL 1 $ $ 9 LIGHTING INSTALLATION $ $ 9 LABOR *PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE FURNISHING ANY EQUIPMENT OR PARTS. ADDITIONAL FEES MAY APPLY —7 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Subtotal: $ 10,000.00 10 Fiber Optics Conduits (3" Conduits) 3900 $ 37.19 $ 145,033.20 10 ***PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE LABOR $ - $ - 10 TRENCH OR BORING *TRENCHING MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COSTS BORING 1 $ 90,540.00 $ 90,540.00 Subtotal: $ 235,573.20 11 Fiber Optic Pull Box 8 $ 4,875.00 $ 39,000.00 11 E-2 24" X 36" X 36" FIBER OPTIC CABLE PULL BOX $ - $ - 11 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 11 LABOR 1 $ 32,000.00 $ 32,000.00 Subtotal: $ 73,500.00 �12Mobilization/Demobilization 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Subtotal: $ 15,000.00 13 Commissioning and Training (EA) FOR 3 VFD 3 $ 13,500.00 $ 40,500.00 Subtotal: $ 40,500.00 14 As Built Plans, O&M Manuals and Warranties 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Subtotal: $ 3,000.00 Total $ 778,573.20 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;19 &ndash;&nbsp;45 2/ 15/2022 &nbsp; Sinter- Pacific 9. Required Forms and Documents (please see attachments as per project documents required) bt� Czancil 19 — iL Edinger Ave, UnitA 2/�(9491529 5977 Tustin, CA 92780 www.inter-Pacific.com CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 2: FEE PROPOSAL Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal. I have examined the ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK. I am familiar with all the existing conditions and limitation that may impact work requests. understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal. Proposer shall submit hourly rates schedule, which shall include but not limited to, direct and indirect costs for labor, for staff per job classification, material, equipment rates, overhead, incidental supplies, travel, mileage, and fuel. Any special materials will be purchased by the contractor only after discussed and authorized by the City projects manager or designee in writing. Prior to commencement of services, Contractor shall provide separate quotes, upon request by the City, which shall be approved by the City's Public Works Water Resources Division. FEE SCHEDULE The undersigned declares that he/she has carefully examined the request for proposal, that he/she has examined the Proposed Scope of Services, and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said Proposed Scope of Services, for the unit price(s) set forth in the following schedule: Note: This contract is subject to prevailing wages. TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Inter -Pacific, Inc. Item # Bid Item Unit Quantity Amount Well 32 Electrical Rehabilitation 1. Electrical Conduit LS 1 $ 20,000.00 2. Building and Site Electrical System LS 1 $ 20,000.00 3. VFD Motor Control Center LS 1 $ 105,000.00 4. Automatic Transfer Switch LS 1 $ 10,000.00 5. Instrumentation and Control Equipment LS 1 $ 20,000.00 6. Building Lighting LS 1 $ 10,000.00 7. Electrical Equipment and Facilities (Chemical Building) LS 1 $196,000.00 IC-1 Ili Z-VIC-Z- City of Santa Ana 1 P 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 20 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 8 Instrumentation and Control Equipment (Chemical Building) LS 1 $ 20 000.00 9. Building Lighting (Chemical Building) LS 1 $ 10,000.00 10. Fiber Optics Conduits (Y Conduits) LF 3,900 $ 235,573.20 11. Fiber Optic Pull Box EA 8 $73,500.00 12. Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $15,000.00 13. Commissioning and Training EA 1 $40,500.00 14. As Built Plans, O&M Manuals and Warranties LS 1 $3,000.00 Tota 1 $ 778, 573.20 Contractor shall submit additional labors material and rental equipment rates along with fee schedule. Contractor's labor and equipment rate sheet shall list rates for all labor designations, equipment and materials. *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SPREAD SHEET BIDDER INFORMATION: Legal Company Name: _ Complete addres& Phone Number: IaANNMAII:Cil1=0111 Inter -Pacific, Inc. 1421 Edinger Ave Unit A, Tustin, CA 92780 949-529-5977 ext. 204 ekang@inter-pacific.com Authorized Signature Name: Enoch Kang Title: Proiect Enaineer z City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 21 APPENDIX CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSER'S REFERENCES List and describe fully the contracts performed by your firm which demonstrate your ability to provide the supplies, equipment or services included in the scope of the proposal specifications. Attach additional pages if required. The City reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications. Reference Saddleback College Customer Name: IT IDF Contact Individual: Room ePower Project Louis Sessler Address: 28000 Marguerite Parkway, Mission Viejo, Phone Number: (949) 582-4947 CA 92692 Contract Amount: $377,557.07 Facsimile Number: Isessler@saddleback.edu Year: January 27, 2020 — July 7, 2020 Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Installation of new underground wirino and conduit, electrical panels, transformers, receptacles, access panels, ermos a s, junction Boxes, su mersi e e ec nca vau sit an �f steel c�a le troughs. Reference City of Pico Rivera - Electrical Panel Replacement at Plant No. 2 Gabriel Gomez Customer Name: Contact Individual: Address: 8316 Washington Boulevard, Phone Number: Pico Hivera, CA 90BBU— Contract Amount: $334,689.21 714-732-0398 Facsimile Number: gabriel.gomez@libertyutilities.com Year: August 2017 — February 2018 Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Electrical power upgrade for Water Plant. Installed new transformer, replaced new Main Switch Board (MSB) and Motor Control Center (MCC). New electrical feed from SoCal Edison with trenching and new concrete ReferenceCity of Santa Ana - Lighting Upgrade Structured Cabling, & Camera Systems Cesar Barrera Customer Name: Contact Individual: Address: Water Resources Division, Santa Ana, e Number: 714-673-3408 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA Contract Amount: $160,560.00 Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Facsimile Number: cbarrera@santa-ana.org Year: September 2017 — March 2019 City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 22 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Reference City of Santa Ana — City Yard Electrical and Communication Upgrade Customer Name: Contact Individual: Miguel Renterla Address: Santa Ana City Yard 220 S. Daisy Ave,Phone Number: Santa Ana, CA 92703 Contract Amount: $114,559.25 Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Facsimile Number: Year: May 2021 714-586-6294 mrenteria@santa-ana.org THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City of Santa Ana P 1-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 23 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Appendix ATTACHMENT 4: STANDARD AGREEMENT c City of Santa Ai7a ITP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 24 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO,: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES CONSULTANT AGREEMENT CITY OF SANTA ANA THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 16 day of November , 2021 by and between Inter -Pacific, Inc. , ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in electrical repair and rehabilitation services. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES a. Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $XXX,XXX during the term of this Agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a number (3) year -term City of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 25 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES with the option for the City to grant up to a one two (2)-year renewal, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non- exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 26 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Workers' Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the California Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: (i) Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. (ii) Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. (iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect, by Consultant, without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. (iv) Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been nri.PQd @.Ad is in fQ=Q aAd paid fnr City shall tho rightat Oho City's election, City of Santa Ana R 2 - 22 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 27 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, Consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow City of Santa -Ana P -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 28 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Consultant: City of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 29 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Consultant's Firm Name Inter -Pacific, Inc. Address 1421 Edinger Ave Unit A City State, Zip Code Tustin, CA 92780 Attn: Enoch Kang A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City. Wl IFITIAWZIN No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. City of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 30 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 940IT, III,YIN 9[Q IN,I This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. City of Santa Ana'RFP Z1=122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 31 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. signatures follow on next page City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 32 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney LOM John M. Funk Senior Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, P.E. Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager CONSULTANT Inter -Pacific, Inc. Name: Richard Kuk Title: President APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 5: CERTIFICATIONS City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 33 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of D� Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this d4 day of D0V, , 20g, by E ft l\ , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal KATHREEH KIM Comm, #2221981 z Notary Public - California !•:,• Orange County My Comm. Expires Nov. 16, 2Q21� Citx Council 14 — City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Pale 34 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: K Title: President Firm: Inter -Pacific, Inc. Date: 11 /16/2021 City of Santa Ana FP i -1 22 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 35 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. Ci[j of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 36 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: x2a Title: President Firm: Inter -Pacific, Inc. Date: 11/16/2021 City of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 37 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES ***END OF RPF 21-122** City of Santa Ana FP -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 38 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022 by and between LEED Electric, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On October 14, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-122, by which it sought a qualified contractor to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitations services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Contractor submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Contractor represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-122. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Contractor shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-122, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Contractor's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. Contractor is one of two (2) contractors selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-122. The total compensation for services provided by all contractors selected under RFP No. 21-122, including any extension period, shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of six million dollars and zero cents ($6,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council 19 — 66 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 10 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on February 14, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for one (1) two (2) year period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all City Council 19 — 67 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 10 Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. If Contractor is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council 19 — 68 2/15/2022 Page 3 of 10 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theContractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work City Council 19 — 69 2/15/2022 Page 4 of 10 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. City Council 19 — 70 2/15/2022 Page 5 of 10 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other parry is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this City Council 19 — 71 2/15/2022 Page 6 of 10 Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Contractor: LEED Electric, Inc. 13138 Arctic Circle Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Attn: Seyed Jamali, CEO A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or City Council 19 — 72 2/15/2022 Page 7 of 10 obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council 19 — 73 2/15/2022 Page 8 of 10 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page] City Council 19 — 74 2/15/2022 Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: randon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency LEED ELECTRIC, INC. Name: Seyed A. Jamali-Dinan Title: CEO City Council 19 — 75 2/15/2022 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A City Council 19 — 76 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Appendix ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page. 13 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is located in the County of Orange in Southern California. The City encompasses 27.2 square miles and a population over 343,000 people. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency — Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the Water System and Sanitary Sewer System. The City of Santa Ana's water system is comprised of approximately 478 miles of water main, 45 MG of storage at five (5) sites, seven (7) MWD connections, 21 groundwater wells, seven (7) pump stations, four (4) pressure regulating stations and utilizes two (2) pressure zones. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency Water Resources Division is soliciting proposals from qualified industrial electrical firms to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services. The City intends to select and enter into agreements with up to three firms to provide the described services for an aggregate annual amount amongst all selected firms. B. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES The City of Santa Ana invites proposals to establish multiple contracts with vendors for electrical maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation at the City's water and wastewater facilities. Qualified respondents will be expected to provide new electrical installations, as well as scheduled and unscheduled electrical maintenance and/or repairs on an "as needed" basis. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, services, and equipment necessary for the complete installation of electrical systems. All work shall be in accordance with applicable trade practices, workmanship, meet warranties and shall conform to all applicable laws, codes and regulations. Business hours are considered from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. (Monday through Friday). Any time outside of business hours of operation may be considered after hours/weekends. All work will be scheduled upon confirmation of scope and cost and completed within the time agreed upon for each specific item of work. The Contractor may not begin work before receiving a written Notice to Proceed by the City's Project Manager. All services, equipment and materials provided by the Contractor must be in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations, laws, and codes such as the California Electric Code, California Building Code, and other applicable codes not listed. C. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Contractor shall provide all transportation, labor, materials and equipment necessary to repair, replace, and install existing and new electrical systems as required for the following types of facilities; Water Booster Stations, Sewer Lift Stations, Water Reservoir Sites, Pressure Control Stations, and Water Well Sites. The Contractor shall provide the following scope of services: City of Santa Ana REP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 14 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 1. ELECTRICAL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to perform, but are not limited to, the following electrical services: • Repair or replacement of motor control stations (up to 480 volts) • Repair or replacement of exterior wiring, interior wiring, conduit, solid state soft starters, variable -frequency drives (VFD), motor controls and motor control centers (MCC), switch gears, fuses, electrical circuit boxes, transformers, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), etc. • Trouble shooting of existing electrical wiring and appurtenances (electrical testing) • New installations of electrical wiring and appurtenances • Telecommunication installations • Instrumentation installations and fiber connections (not including programming) • Technical electrician support to City Staff as requested • Lighting installations • Electrical distribution and control equipment installations (underground distribution conduit, cables, and pull boxes) • Poles, pole foundations and concrete work installations and excavations • Excavations, backfilling and compaction for trenches and pull boxes • Branch circuit panels and wiring installations • Shop and record drawings, material submittals, and work schedules 2. PERFORMANCE TESTS When requested by the City and upon completion of electrical installation, the Contractor shall test and demonstrate that the system operates in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications. Performance tests shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Wire Testing; The Contractor shall perform insulation resistance tests on each complete circuit prior to energizing. Insulation resistance between the conductors and between the conductors and ground shall not be less than 25 megaohms. 2. Operation Testing: The Contractor shall test the operation of each control panel and associated interlocks to verify proper functionality and performance. 3. RECORD DRAWINGS The Contractor shall be capable of providing electrical plans marked with any changes, deviations or addition to any part of the electrical work. The Contractor shall clearly indicate on as -built plans the following information: 1. All conduits runs installed 2. Locations of underground conduits and stubouts accurately dimensioned 3. Forming, cabling, and identification of all power and control circuits within pull boxes and terminal box City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 15 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 4. All changes, deviations, in locations, routing, or dimensions or additions to any part of the electrical work 5. Interior views of each pull box identifying each conduit entrance by conduit number 4. TRAINING AND OPERATION MANUALS The Contractor shall offer training services and provide operation, maintenance and repair manuals consisting of all system drawings, block diagrams, schematics, shop drawings, and other pertinent data required to completely describe the operation and maintenance of the electrical system. The manuals shall be submitted prior to the final acceptance of the system and shall reflect the as -built conditions. The electrical system information in the operation and maintenance manuals shall contain: System operating instructions for normal operational conditions utilizing names of controls as they appear on nameplates 2. Calibration and maintenance instructions 3. Troubleshooting instructions 4. Instructions for ordering replacement parts 5. List of fuses, lamps, seals, and other expendable equipment and devices 6. Parts list including the make, model, and manufacturer of the equipment listed 5. EMERGENCY ON -CALL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to provide emergency on -call electrical maintenance and repair services within four (4) hours of receiving the call. The Contractor's service technician is required to be on site and commence work within four (4) hours of initial contact if deemed by the City to be an emergency. The response time may be waived by the City if service can wait to be performed during Contractor's normal business hours. D. CODE COMPLIANCE All materials and workmanship shall be in strict conformity with standards of the latest editions including revisions of the following: • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) • National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) • National Electrical Code (NEC) standards • National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) • Insulated Cable Engineers Association (ICEA) • lntarnatinnnl FlPrtriral Tt-stinn Association (NETA) City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 16 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES • National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) • State Department of Industrial Safety (CAL/OSHA) • Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) • California Building Code (CNC) E. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION When a request for service is issued by the City, the Contractor shall issue a project estimate and schedule to the City's designated Project Manager. The Contractor shall not proceed with any work without the approval in the form of a notice to proceed from the City's designated project manager. Contractors shall invoice the City on a monthly basis for all work performed during the period or provide a one-time invoice at the completion of work issued. Each invoice shall be accompanied by a summary of tasks performed, contract agreement number, results and progress on long-term tasks if any. F. VALUE ADDED RELATED SERVICES The Contractor may propose additional related services that the City has not specifically identified in this RFP to accomplish the stated goals of this RFP. Value added related services will be considered by the City and may or may not be incorporated in the agreement. All parts and materials must be supplied new and factory approved. G.SUBCONTRACTORS The use of Subcontractors is allowed, but will require approval by City prior to start of any assigned work. Upon commencement of work, the Contractor shall be responsible for services provided by any subcontractor as if Contractor were providing the services with its own organization. When a Subcontractor performs all or any part of the work, a markup shall be applied to the Subcontractor's actual cost of such work. The Contractor may add a markup of 10 percent on the first $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the extra work and a markup of 5 percent on work added in excess of $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the work may be added by the Contractor. H. MARKUP The following markup percentages shall be added to the Contractor's costs and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profits (to the sum of the costs and markups, one (1) percent shall be added as compensation for bonding): 1) Labor.............................................................................................. 20 2) Materials.............................................................. ........................15 3) Equipment Rental............................................................................. 15 4) Other Items and Expenditures.......................................................... 15 I. MINIM11M QUALIFICATION5 C:iy of Santa Ana OP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 17 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES The Contractor shall meet the following minimum qualifications- 1 . All work is to be performed in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, laws, standards, due care, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety requirements. 2. The Contractor shall hold a current California C-10 Electrical Contractor's License. 3. The Contractor shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in providing industrial control panel building services. 4. The Contractor shall possess state and local permits, licenses and certificates required by law to commence, carry, and complete the work. 5. Provide all necessary equipment to competently perform and complete work as specified. J. SAFETY Proposer shall be solely and completely responsible for the condition of the project site, including safety of all persons and properties during the performance of the work. In addition, proper safety equipment must be worn at all times. These requirements shall apply continuously until the contract is terminated and shall not be limited to normal working hours. The Contractor/Consultant shall assure that each employee or subcontractor under the contractor's supervision is trained in the work practices necessary to safely perform his or her job. K. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The successful bidders shall furnish the City with original copies of valid insurance policies herein required upon execution of the contract and shall maintain said policies in full force and effect at all times during the term of this contract. Said insurance policies shall comply with all requirements set forth in these specifications. Contractor(s) shall keep a current certificate of insurance at the City of Santa Ana at all times and shall immediately report any changes to the City. L. FEE SCHEDULE Contractor shall submit a fee schedule as described in Section IV.B.3 of RFP. The Well 32 Reservoir Rehabilitation Plans provided as Exhibit A and the General Specifications in Exhibit B are to be used as the basis for completing the Fee Schedule form and any other documents requested below (assume all system integration programming will be provided by the City). Upon award of a contract, work will proceed as authorized by the City, but may not necessarily be the project as described in Fee Proposal (inclusive of Exhibit A and Exhibit B). No separately stated freight or deliveries will be considered. Bidders shall include all costs in the unit price bid. Furthermore, the Contractor shall submit additional labor, material and rental equipment rates alQng with fee schedule. Contractor's labor and equipment rate sheet shall list rates for all City of Santa Ana FWP 2 - 22 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES labor designations, equipment, rentals, and materials. The bid items specified in the fee schedule are for reference purposes only. Labor increases shall be subject to mutually agreeable terms between the City and the Contractor. The City may request related services that will be paid at the vendor's standard labor and equipment rate submitted. Fee proposal shall be outlined as follows: ---End of SCOPE OF WORK Section --- City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 19 EXHIBIT B City Council 19 — 84 2/15/2022 ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC November 16, 2021 City of Santa Ana - Public Works Agency Attn: Armando Fernandez, P.E. 220 S. Daisy Ave. Bldg A Santa Ana, CA 92703 Ref: Statement of Qualification Dear Mr. Fernandez: RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification LEED Electric, Inc. is pleased to submit this statement of quality commitment as the Electrical Contractor for the solicitation for the City of Santa Ana Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Service contract. LEED Electric has provided quality services through a long 42 year history with the County of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles, County of Orange, Orange County Sanitation District, City of Santa Ana, Mesa Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the Department of Water and Power, Long Beach Water Department, City of Santa Monica Water Resources Division and most recently the Water Replenishment District (WRD) of Southern California and Los Angeles Wastewater Information Network System (LAWINS). LEED Electric, Inc. is a qualified Small Business Enterprise with the State of California Department of General Services as well as County of Los Angeles Office of Affirmative Action Compliance as an eligible participant in the County of Los Angeles Local Small Business Enterprise (LSBE) Preference Program. Numerous other public works projects have been successfully completed for virtually every local City and/or County governmental agency including Orange County Water District, Orange County Sanitation District, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, State of California Water Resources and other state agencies. LEED Electric, Inc. employs local tradesmen affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and is signatory with IBEW locals from Ventura to San Diego County and complies with Project Labor Agreements (PLA). LEED Electric has extensive experience in industrial water related projects and intricate electrical control projects in the greater Los Angeles, Orange County and Riverside County areas. LEI is dedicated to on -time delivery of materials, labor and services for construction endeavors at all times, and along with the on -time delivery LEI responds to all inquiries for service in a timely and professional manner, with a commitment to provide the products or services meeting or exceeding the specifications of the customer. LEED Electric, Inc. (LEI) is a local full service electrical contractor with extensive experience in public works projects, having successfully completed hundreds of public works contracts during their 42 year history -from a high end of $7.OM to various projects in the $500K to $2.OM ranges. In summary; our team of local craftsmen overseen by an experienced management team that consists of a Chief Executive Officer, Operations Manager, Superintendents, Project Managers and Project Engineers to oversee quality products and services are provided and has the requisite expertise and experience in working as the electrical subcontractor for the City of Santa Ana. Some of our satisfied customers are included in the latter portion of this statement of qualification for reference. We hope you determine that our qualifications meet your requirements. Please contact me at sjamali@leedelectric.com or (562) 270-9500 with any questions. Authorized Representative, yours truly, Seyed A. Ja@i* Vk=iChief Executive Officer 19 — 85 2/15/2022 P a g e 11 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LM■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Firm Name LEED Electric, Inc. Corporate Office Address 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Firm Phone # Firm Fax # Corporate Phone and Fax Numbers (562) 270-9500 (562) 863-5723 Federal Tax ID # 95-3337191 Business Type S-Corporation Established 3/1/1979 in California DUNS No.: 09-916-2901 CAGE Code: OXJ H 1 0048-131380000-1 Exp. Date: 06/30/2022 Business License City of Santa Fe Springs, California License No. 379096 Exp. Date: 07/31/2023 State of California Contractors State License Board Contractor License A - General Engineering Contractor C-10 - Electrical Contractor DIR Contractor Registration DIR Registration No. 1000004633 EXP. Date: 06/30/2022 County of Los Angeles (LSBE) #139996 Exp. Date: 04/30/2022 SBE Certification State of California (Dept. of Gen Services) #36862 Exp. Date: 04/30/2022 NAICS 238210 Seyed A. Jamali Dinan, Chief Executive Officer Principals/Officers Annette Iribarren, Corporate Secretary & Controller Rodney Dean, Vice -President & Chief Estimator Years with Company Seyed A. Jamali Dinan: 8 years Rodney Dean: 18 years Telephone and Fax Numbers Phone # Fax # (562) 270-9500 (562) 863-5723 Seyed (Seth) A. Jamali Dinan Name, Title, Phone No., and Email of (562) 270-9500 Contact Person for the Proposal sjamali@leedelectric.com Total # of Employees with the Firm 100 WebVen # 13999601 City Council 19 — 86 2/15/2022 P a g e 12 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification AGREEMENT STATEMENT LEED Electric Inc. does not have any disputes with the Standard Agreement. BACKGROUND LEED Electric Inc. is an experienced and highly -recommended full -service commercial and industrial electrical, control & instrumentation contractor. The company has a reputation for completing projects on time, within budget and to the client's satisfaction. The company's comprehensive knowledge of new technologies combined with the highly trained staff and more than 42 years of experience performing heavy contracting work make LEED Electric a provider of choice. LEED Electric began operations in 1979 performing work at oil refineries, chemical plants and aerospace facilities. Later began doing public work for various municipal and county facilities on pumping plants, water treatment plants, and sewage treatment plants installing power and control systems, automation/measuring systems. MISSION The mission of LEED Electric is to provide highest quality electrical, control & instrumentation installations performed safely by highly trained, skilled craftsmen to meet or exceed customer specifications. VERSATILITY Contracts ranging to over $5.0 million have been successfully completed. Maintenance programs with special rates designed to fit customer needs have been provided. PERFORMANCE LEED Electric has a consistent record of completed projects on or before target dates. SAFETY Strict adherence to safety standards is an integral part of daily operations. COMMUNICATION LEED Electric's experienced management team is concerned about completing projects correctly and on time. The company understands that growing reputation depends on it. Constant communications with field personnel enables project managers to stay informed of job progress insuring smooth operation to timely completion. LITIGATION LEED Electric has not had any litigation or threatened litigation against the firm that will affect the company's performance or completion of this proposed program. a. The organization has never been subject of litigation for failure to meet contracted obligations to deliver or supply electricity since its inception in 1979. b. The company has no breach of contract or criminal legal actions with potential liabilities above $50,000 or involving imprisonment (now or pending) against the company itself, any official, officer or employee of the company submitting qualifications over the last 42 years. c. LEED Electric has not filed for bankruptcy, is not currently in default of business loans and is not responsible for undisputed payments to suppliers or transporters which are over 60 days past due. City Council 19 — 87 2/15/2022 P age 13 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification In addition to the minimum qualifications for participation in this Maintenance Services Contract, LEED Electric offers: • 42 year history of excellent working relationship with public agencies throughout California • Southern California locally -based operations, with an Orange County office located in Aliso Viejo, and satellite offices in Fountain Valley, Santa Clarita and Playa Del Rey. • Experienced project managers and staff as relates to compliance with goal -oriented projects • Locally hired union workforce with vast manpower capabilities • LEED Electric is certified Small Business (SB-PW) by the State of California Department of General Services, (SBE) by the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles Office of Affirmative Action Compliance as an eligible participant in the County of Los Angeles Local Small Business Enterprise (LSBE) Preference Program. • LEED Electric has prior experience in related projects and is extremely competent in the installation of Electrical, Instrumentation and Control Systems. • LEED Electric has previously held the Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Contract since 2017 with the City of Santa Ana. City Council 19 — 88 2/15/2022 P a g e 14 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Led by Seyed A. Jamali Dinan, CEO of the company, the executive management team possesses impressive credentials, critical industry experience and education. The team, which comprises a combined industry experience of over 100 years, provides oversight and proficiency in all key functional areas of the business. Seyed (Seth) A. Jamali Dinan, Chief Executive Officer: As CEO of LEED Electric, Mr. Jamali Dinan enhances the company's leading posture in the industry by implementing new strategies and technologies in the field and for in-house operations. He is responsible for leading the company into new product development and new market expansion, assuring its continued growth and prosperity. Mr. Jamali-Dinan oversees all aspects of company operations including: estimating, project management, accounting, purchasing, contact administration, project development, customer relations, and employment development for all employees. Mr. Jamali Dinan has over 18+ of experience in the field of general and electrical contracting and provides the intuitive real and nuanced insights needed to detect and assess the most inconspicuous challenges and undefined subtle issues and exact the precise solution for any situation. Mr. Jamali Dinan actively serves as the guiding influence to the entire management team as well as the other members of the firm. Mr. Jamali Dinan obtained his Electrical Engineering degree from the University of Nottingham in the UK in 1999 later on attended the University of Southern California (USC) receiving his MS in Construction Management in 2006. Prior to joining LEED Electric, Mr. Jamali Dinan worked as a Project Manager for over 14 years for a major General Contractor in the US and successfully completed construction projects ranging from $32M to a high end of $225M in value. Rodney Dean, Vice President/Chief Estimator: As Chief Estimator, Mr. Dean is responsible for the oversight and organization deployment of an estimating department, utilizing an in-house proprietary computer estimating system developed over a twenty -six -year period. Mr. Dean joined LEED Electric in 2002 as Chief Estimator and over the ensuing 18+ years has focused mainly on projects in water and wastewater treatment industry. City Council 19 — 89 2/15/2022 P a g , 15 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Darren Roesch, Operations Manager: The Operations Manager is to oversee all operations, coordinate safety plans, control the manpower, provide for equipment scheduling and insure the production standards and project schedules are met. Aid as a problem solver on the project and interact with the General Contractor, Project Managers and Foreman, insure the proper training and serve as a Mentor for the Foreman in his area of control in order to maintain the High Standards of the Company. Mr. Roesch's educational background includes: I.B.E.W Local 11 Apprenticeship, Microsoft, Certified Systems Engineer, State of Calif. Journeyman Electrician License No. 132051, and Medium Voltage Cable Splicer. Mr. Roesch has 17+ years of experience, primarily on industrial projects consistingf1�Ik1Fl#Iill�il�l�lkfi of petro/chemical, water/wastewater treatment, heavy manufacturing, internet infrastructure, and TELCOM facilities. He specializes in process control automation and upgrading existing systems and plants. Effective labor management, completing projects on time and under budget, and being orientated toward customer satisfaction are additional strengths. Mr. Roesch joined the LEED Electric Team in 2016, but has worked on several past projects in this field, some of which include: • West Basin Municipal Water District, West Basin Phase V Expansion, where he worked as a Superintendent for the Phase V expansion from 20 MGD to 60 MGD and received an Electrical Excellence Award for the project, and the project contract was over $5 million dollars. • Castaic Lake Water Agency, Rio Vista Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project, he worked as a Superintendent in charge of a crew of Foreman and Journeyman Electricians for the construction of a treatment plant electrical and instrumentation expansion, and again was awarded an Electrical Excellence Award for the project, and the contract amount was over $7 million dollars. • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Joseph Jensen Water Treatment Plant, he worked as a Superintendent, in charge of the installation Fluorosilicic acid upgrades, new chlorination storage & treatment facilities in a project valued at over $8 million dollars. Mr. Roesch is a valued addition to the LEED Electric team, starting out as our Superintendent and receiving the promotion to Operations Manager, he continues to lead, learn, educate and mentor others with his extensive knowledge of water and wastewater treatment facilities and has helped insure the growth of LEED Electric. City Council 19 — 90 2/15/2022 P a g , 16 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Gary Van Eede, General Superintendent: Mr. Van Eede has 28 years of experience. Primarily on industrial projects consisting of petro/chemical, water/wastewater treatment, heavy manufacturing, internet infrastructure, and TELCOM facilities. He specializes in process control automation and upgrading existing systems and plants. Effective labor management, completing projects on time and under budget, and being orientated toward customer satisfaction are additional strengths. As Superintendent his role is to Manage day to day field activities on multiple projects; Detailing and problem solving on design build projects. Assisting daily in scheduling and planning of projects; Safety and QC ongoing daily; management of field installations and field staffing requirements. His Education and Experience: CSUDH Construction Management, Cerritos College — Structural Welding Technology, Industry Tenure: 30 years, Professional Affiliations: IBEW Local 11, Certifications: State Licensed Electrician No. 109612, City of Los Angeles Certified welder License # P027427, EPRI Level 2 Instrument technician, Attributes Relevant to Water and Wastewater Facilities: Large project Microfiltration and RO membrane experience, Extensive Design -Build experience and Multiple expansion projects successfully completed in operating facilities. Francisco Miranda, Superintendent: Mr. Miranda is a United States Marine Corp Veteran. His electrical education was obtained at Electrical Training Institute. He comes to LEED Electric with 17 years of experience. His experience is vast, but he has primarily worked on petro/chemical, water/wastewater treatment facilities, heavy manufacturing, internet, infrastructure and Telcom facilities. He specializes in process control automation, upgrading existing systems, electrical/instrumentation, and motor control. Mr. Miranda prides himself in effective communication, customer satisfaction, building relationships with the client and contractor/trades, he effectively manages daily project activities, meets deadlines and utilizes resources efficiently, so that projects come in under budget. As a Superintendent his role is to oversee the daily project activities on multiple projects, quality control, detailing and problem solving on design -build projects, field installation, and field staffing requirements. Mr. Miranda's professional affiliations include: IBEW Local 11 and National Electrical Contractors Association. Certifications: State Licensed Electrician No. 141714. City Council 19 — 91 2/15/2022 P a g e 17 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Cody Engelhardt, Superintendent: Mr. Engelhardt joined the LEED team in July 2020, as our Orange and Riverside County 14 Superintendent, he is a state certified, journeyman electrician with over 10 years of experience in the electrical industry. The projects that Mr. Engelhardt has been involved with have ranged from small single -owner operations to Fortune 500 companies. Mr. �! Engelhardt is a goal -oriented individual with a customer service focus, he thrives in high energy, fast -paced work environments and enjoys working with others. His background jincludes all facets of electrical construction from ground up, to tenant improvement projects and service jobs as a journeyman and a foreman electrician. Mr. Engelhardt is extremely organized and adept in keeping records from project tracking to crewmember staffing logistics. Some of the projects Mr. Engelhardt has completed and/or been involved with are Tustin Fire Station #37, Berth 200 PV System, Vista/ Valley Substation Control Building for Southern California Edison, Crafton Hills Pump Station, as well many more, such as Irvine Valley College - Technology Building, BBraun Pharmaceuticals - Mixing Tank Replacement 2017 & 2018. His qualifications are: California State License Number #153070, OSHA 10 & 30, First Aid/CPR trained, Heat Illness, Arc Flash/Energized Work, QSP and Confined Space trained. Mr. Engelhardt is a great leader to our Orange County crews. Kevin Schwab, Senior Project Manager: Mr. Schwab started at LEED Electric in April 2019 and comes to us with over 40 years of experience in the Electrical Industry, some of his qualifications are noted in the latter of this statement following his career history, and He has been in past positions as Division Management and Business Development, Estimating, Purchasing Cost Management, and Logistics. Mr. Schwab supports the company as senior project manager bringing management level support to division personnel including estimators, project managers and superintendents, as well as interface with other trades for Electrical systems installations; Water/Wastewater, Oil and Gas, Underground Utility, Utility Grade Solar, Electrical Systems Infrastructure. Provide management level support to division personnel including staff management and training. Some of the projects Mr. Schwab has completed as Project Manager are: Los Alamitos High School Infrastructure Upgrade $ 10.5 Million, LA BCA DC Tillman Power Upgrade $ 7.7 Million Prime Contract MV Service and Infrastructure, OCSD P2 Demolition and UPS System Upgrade $4.8 Million, LACSD San Jose Creek $ 1.8 Million Sodium Hypochloride Upgrade, City of Torrance Amie Basin $485,000 Flood Control Upgrade, LACSD Carson UV Demonstration Service Upgrade Prime $585,000 and EBX II Craton Hills Pump Station Upgrade $ 10.8 Million. As evidenced by his many years of successful employment in the industry and extensive training which includes IBEW Local 11 Member, Accubid, Primavera OSHA 30, TWIC Certified, Master/JW Electrician Certification and possessing his own C-10 Electrical Contractors License, he brings skilled professional abilities in multiple fields of performance to each project. As a manager, he has the interpersonal skills needed to lead and direct others, while maintaining the integrity and timing of the overall project. City Council 19 — 92 2/15/2022 P a g , 18 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC Michael Sanchez, Senior Project Manager: RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Mr. Sanchez started at LEED Electric in August 2020 and comes to us with 24 years of experience in the Electrical Industry and joins this team as a Senior Project Manager. He spent most of his career as a Senior Project Manager working for Rosendin Electric where he managed projects from $2M to $IOM. Mr. Sanchez, has also served as reputable operations manager, senior project manager, field superintendent, and foreman with more than 24 years of experience directing new development, expansion, and renovation initiatives for a number of top-ranking electrical contractors. Consistently meeting key project deliverables while ensuring superior quality and client satisfaction. Talented communicator, with demonstrated success in building valuable relationships with personnel, vendors, clients, city officials and government entities. Expertly manages multi -million -dollar projects for a wide range of sectors including transportation, municipal, hospitality, office, residential, gaming, retail, education, and healthcare. Areas of expertise include: Electrical Contracting Operations, Project Lifecycle Management, Contractor Management, Quality Assurance Team, Leadership, Recruitment, Training & Development, Budgeting & Estimating, Planning, Procurement Blueprints & Specifications, Safety Awareness, Scheduling, Client & Vendor Management. Some of his career background consists o£ • Operations manager for the Ontario office location managing Project Management and Field Operations Managed numerous Projects between 250k- 7M as a SR. PM. Managing 3 PM's, 3 PE's, 2 PA's, Warehouse, Prefab, 18 Foreman, 50-100 field employees. Bid reviews, Cost to complete for 20+ projects. Directly report to Executive Vice President. • Senior Project Manager on Kaiser Hospital Projects $42M+ DB/DA and High rise in Downtown LA 12th & Fig. Signage. Manage all aspects pertaining to electrical portion of project, report to the Division Manager • Managed 3 large projects simultaneously all valued at $IOM+ • $142M initiative to expand the 2M+ sq. ft. 2.4B$ McCarran International Airport Facilitated project startup within 90 days of notice to proceed; included purchase orders & submittals for all material deliverables. City Council 19 — 93 2/15/2022 P a g , 19 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Paul Bergeron, Senior Project Manager: Mr. Bergeron joined Leed Electric in December 2020 with an extensive background of 13 years of experience in the electrical industry by completing his Journeyman Wireman Program at Sanitago Canyon College in 2007 and receiving is certified general wireman license. Some of his education accolades are Electrical Project Supervision (EPS) 1-3, OSHA 30-Hour Certification, First Aid and CPR Certification, Anti -Harassment Training, Pricing and Negotiating Change Orders and Claims Like a Pro Seminar, and Procore — Project Manager: Core Tools Certification. Some of the aspects he handles at Leed are Manage Project Engineer and Other Support Staff for Multiple Projects, Develop, Review and Coordinate Schedules with Owners, General Contractors, Subcontractors, and Field Superintendents, Review Bid Documents for Schedule Impacts, Conflicts with Other Trades and Potential Manpower Issues, Request, Review and Process Potential Change Orders, RFI's, ASI Drawings and Submittals, Provide Detailed Labor and Material Take- Offs/ROM's/Estimates/Change Orders for Scope Changes and Bids, Order Buy -Out Quotation Materials and Systems, Monitor Drawing Approvals and Schedule Material Arrivals, Coordinate the Procurement, Delivery, Installation, QA/QC, Testing, Startup, Commissioning and Close -Out of Multiple Projects, Provide Acceptable Billing Breakdown and Monthly Billings to the General Contractor and Coordinate with Various Jurisdictional Authorities and Update Owner on Inspections, Shutdown Requests, Job Walks, Schedule and All Other Activities. Some of the project he has worked on are: • OCWD — YLWD — HQ PFAS $2,489,063 • SoCal Gas — Industrial Electrical Services $4,000,000 • SDGE — Industrial Electrical Services $1,000,000 • LACDPW — West Coast Basin Barrier Project Unit 13 $1,021,941 • LACDPW — Low Flow Diversion System Wide Update $1,150,000 • IRWD — ZARRPS — Zone A Rattlesnake Reservoir Pump Station $2,287,000 • TIWRP — CIP 8170 — CISCO 11 — HWRP IPS Screw Pump No. 9 Replacement $35,654 • TIWRP — CIP 8542 — CISCO 10 — Advanced Water Purification Facility Phase 1 Chemical Piping Replacement $389,897 • TIWRP — CIP 5249 — CISCO 10 — EPP Pump #3 Train Rehabilitation $160,887 • City of Oceanside — Oceanside Beach Operations Facility and Restrooms Project Mr. Bergeron has improved his skills in this industrial and knowledge and connections while working for other major competitors in this industry such as starting out as a Project Engineer at Morrow -Meadows Corp, then Assistant Project Manager and finally to Project Manager over a 10-year career while at Morrow -Meadows, as well as working for Anderson and Howard and Giannelli Electric and Whiting -Turner Construction for a few years before coming to Leed. We look forward to all that Mr. Bergeron has to offer and utilizing his extensive network base, skills and knowledge of this industry in the many years to come. City Council 19 — 94 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 10 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Antonio Bracamontes, Project Manager: Mr. Bracamontes joined LEED Electric, starting in August 2015, but he has over 18+ years' experience in the Industrial Electrical Project Management Field specializing in water and wastewater treatment facilities construction management. Mr. Bracamontes currently working as a Project Manager for LEI on several of its current projects and has also managed several industrial water/wastewater projects in the past some of which include: • City of Cypress Department of Public Works, Myra Ave. Pump Station No. 2 Reconstruction, worked as a Project Manager, interfacing with the Owner and General Contractor to coordinate the installation of a new Motor Control Center, VFDs, Pumps, a SCADA System and backup generator at a 45 year old pump station rehabilitation to prepare for the 100 year flood. • Irvine Ranch Water District, Orchard Hills (PA1) ILP Turnout, worked a Project Manager to coordinate and oversee the installation of flow meters, pressure transmitters, an antenna mast, site lighting and electrical conduit and wiring for the new station for the water district. • Irvine Ranch Water District, Zone 3 to 4 Domestic Water PRV Site Northwood Reservoir, again worked as a Project Manager to oversee the field construction of the PRV station for the water district. Coordinated the installation of new MOV's, a service pedestal, pumps, and instrumentation. Mr. Bracamontes has Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing in Communication from the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Prior to joining LEED Electric, Mr. Bracamontes worked as a Project Manager for over 13 years for another local contractor, Beard Electric in Santa Fe Springs and 2 years working as an Electrical Systems Engineer with Trams International, Inc. before joining the Leed Electric team. City Council 19 — 95 2/15/2022 Page 111 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Jerry Romero, Project Manager: Mr. Romero joined LEED Electric in June 2018 to be a part of its Project Management Team. Mr. Romero has over a combined 23 years of experience in the electrical and instrumentation & controls industry. This includes site field superintendent positions in the heavy industrial construction sector, with a specialty in the water/wastewater, chemical plants, booster and lift stations. Mr. Romero has managed many industrial water/wastewater projects, some of which include: • City of Perris chemical treatment plant: This project consisted of a new freshwater treatment facility. Included in the scope of work were underground duct banks, manholes, service board, MCC, Pumps, instrumentation & controls, SCADA, PA and fire alarm systems. • City of Long Beach Haynes facility: This project was a design build reverse osmosis plant. Included in the scope of work were new pumps, VFD's, MCC's, motor operated valves and instrumentation and controls. • City of Anaheim, Lenain Water Treatment Plant, Contract Value: $2.3M, Installation of Switchgear, Motor Control Center, VFD's, Instrumentation and Control Panels, and Lighting. Role: Project Manager • Mission Village Temporary Pumping Plant and Force Main for new construction in the Valencia area. Installation of conduit, wire, Switchgear, Motor Control Center, new VFD's, Instruments, Control Panels and Lighting for a ground up new construction pump facility. Contract value: $664,488, role was Project Manager. Mr. Romero experience of accountability included submittals, material procurement, scheduling of field crews, as well as sub -contractors and startups. Michael Gomez, Project Manager: Mr. Gomez brings more than 15 years of experience to his current role. He has performed many functions in the industry, attaining a foundation in the field as an electrician, and leading in roles such as Project Engineer, Assistant Project Manager and Project Manager. Mr. Gomez actively participates in project bids, project development, managing schedules and discerningly managing project deliverables. His responsibilities entail initiating projects, project planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and the successful projects close- out. He has a bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and hold a General Electrician license. He is proficient in Bluebeam, Accubid and Microsoft office. Mr. Gomez completed ' projects are as follows: Los Angeles Federal Courthouse, MCAGRCC — Generator Upgrade, Orange County Sanitation District P2-110, LACSD JWPCP Power Service for the Advance Water Treatment Demonstration Facility. He is currently the Project Manager for the OSCD P2 A — Side Primary Clarifiers Replacement project. City Council 19 — 96 2/15/2022 Page 112 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Karen Ankenbauer, Assistant Project Manager: Ms. Ankenbauer has been in the electrical construction industry since 1999, starting at a small shop in the Los Angeles area (Angeles Electric) that mainly did TI and commercial work in the LA and Long Beach areas. Some of the project highlights at Angeles Electric were the: Marion Davie Rehab and Reuse project in Santa Monica, Solar project at Burbank Airport and four floors at the Doctor's Hospital project. Some of Ms. Ankenbauer' responsibilities at Angeles included (not limited to): Billing, Collections, Completing Prequalification's, Preliminary Notices (and tracking 30, 60, 90 days after final labor so we didn't lose our lien rights), T&M pricing and billing, Change Order processing and updating SOV's for billing. From Angeles Electric Ms. Ankenbauer went to Doty Bros. where her primary functions were Bid Coordination, Job Walks, Some Estimating, submittals, and following through on contract documents, some projects were the Morris Dam, Oxnard Advanced Water Purification Plant, and Weymouth MWD. From Doty Bros. Ms. Ankenbauer went to Neal Electric where she focused on change orders, billing, collections, assisting the division manager, Prequals, PLA documents, writing subcontracts and major PO's following through with the PLA documents for compliance, bid advertisements, and office facilities. Some of the highlight projects at Neil were the Haynes Power Plant, Long Beach Pumping Plant, & San Jose Creek. After Neal Electric Ms. Ankenbauer went to A-C Electric as a Project Assistant where she did everything from contract routing, PLA documents, submittals, change orders, RFI's, job walks, pre job orientation meetings, bid/contract scope reviews with the PM's, major PO buyout reviews, billing, collections, assisting PM's with their projections. Some of the project highlights were the Jockey Pump at Port Hueneme, Roosevelt High School (LAUSD), Santa Ana Jr. College Student Center. Programs: Textura & Procore License: Notary, Completed: Basic Estimating at LA NECA. I Engineer: Mr. Sepehr Fanaeian has been with LEED Electric since August 2017. He has 9 years of experience in Electrical and Control Engineering field. He worked for 5 years with Science Instrument Co. in Baltimore, Maryland as well as overseas in Haifa, Israel at the Baha'i World Centre in the Engineering Department - Electrical/Control Engineering Management Team for more than 4 years of his stay there. He has extensive experience on electrical system project and upgrading of control and security systems. Mr. Sepehr Fanaeian has a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering Degree, with Electronics Minor from BIHE — online University in Tehran, Iran, and he continued his post -baccalaureate at the University of Maryland — UMBC. Mr. Fanaeian is responsible for the production of project submittals, from generation to approval and tracking these documents, field RFI's, and supporting the Project Manager, Superintendent and Field Foreman, attending meetings, generating schedules and tracking materials and gear to ensure on -time delivery. City Council 19 — 97 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 13 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Abdel Hamid, Project Engineer: Mr. Hamid joins the Leed Electric team most recently in October 2020 possessing a strong education Bachelor of Science in Electrical Power Engineering Technology, University of Houston, College of Technology, with experience and skills that consist of. Proficient in MS Office, Bluebeam Revu, AutoCAD, Electrical Circuit & Power Systems Analysis, Basics of C++ Programming, Matlab, MIPS, VHDL, PLCs, Altium Designer, AutoCAD, SAP and Accubid. He plans to apply his technical knowledge, analytical skills, and achieve hands-on experience in a leading organization while expanding his electrical design knowledge and workplace competency through continuous research and training. Additionally, his previous job facilitated in him being committed to quality, continuous improvement, and the ability to function effectively as a member of a team with the highest professional and ethical standards. He comes to us with skills as a Project Engineer managing multiple low voltage subcontractors, submittal processing, RFI's, coordination of trades, Oversee QA/QC procedures for low voltage systems and experience assisting with change orders and negotiations for added scope. Cindy Roman, Project Coordinator: Mrs. Roman joins the Leed Electric team most recently in August 2021. She comes to us with skills as a strong Project Administrator assisting in multiple projects ranging from 18 million- 32 million dollars. Mrs. Roman has also Provided T&M processing and Auditing at Jet Propulsion Lab for a contract value of $13 million which includes Change Order processing and updating SOV's for billing. Some or her other abilities include managing all project document control inclusive of billings, submittals, project access, procurement, Field Time Cards, GC Dailies and Safety documentation. Programs Procore and MS Office. Completed Basic Project Management NECA courses. City Council 19 — 98 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 14 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Anthony Santoro, Preconstruction Engineer: Mr. Santoro started with Leed Electric in August 2015, although his career in the electrical industry began with Beard Electric in Santa Fe Springs, California in 2004. He has over 10 years' experience working as an assistant PM/Support Staff at Beard Electric and looks to take on more challenging rolls now at Leed Electric in the coming years of his career. He worked as an assistant PM on several water and wastewater projects working with fellow employee Mr. Bracamontes while at Beard Electric, generating submittals, RFI's and assisting with purchasing and change order management. Currently with Leed Electric Mr. Santoro works as a Preconstruction Engineer, overseeing Estimate preparation and procurement of project plans and specifications as well as interfacing with General Contractors and attending pre -bid meetings and generating company prequalification packages and successfully obtaining prequalification's for LA County Department of Public Works, City of Santa Ana, Water Replenishment District of Southern California and Mesa Water District, most recently Chino Basin Desalter Authority and the City of Seal Beach as their Electrical Maintenance Contractor. Mr. Santoro previously worked on submittal packages for both in house submittals and packing vendor submittals along with processing RFI's all of the Time and Material Estimates / Change Orders and supported the Project Managers, Field Operations Manager and Executive Supervisors with delegated tasks, before being promoted to the Estimating Department where his current focus is estimating support, bid packages, and prequalification, to pre -con responsibilities. Mr. Santoro also helps in processing work orders for the current On -Call Operations Telemetry System Maintenance Services Project with LACDPW in the capacity of supporting the field crewmembers as well as office management staff, to ensure purchases are made on time and work orders are scheduled and completed in a timely and professional manner. Mr. Santoro graduated with an Associate's Degree in Administration of Justice from Long Beach City College and looks to further his knowledge of project management, preconstruction and supervisory skills while working with the Leed Electric team. City Council 19 — 99 2/15/2022 Page 115 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Daniel Flores, IBEW Certified Electrician: General Foreman Electrician: Mr. Flores has been with Leed Electric, Inc. since 2004, and has completed the IBEW apprenticeship program and worked for Leed Electric as an Apprentice and graduated to Journeyman and was promoted to Foreman then General Foreman. Mr. Flores is OSHA 10 and 30 certified and completed Confined Space Training, and graduated with an Associate Degree in Liberal Arts from Santa Monica College. He has worked on and completed several projects for Leed Electric which some are listed here: • LACDPW Compton Creek, Foreman demo of existing conduits, wires and controls at lift station facility to run new conduit and wire for new engines and pumps installed at the facility by the general contractor. Installed gas detector system and propane gas backup for engine operations, conducted field testing and started up system. Installed field site lighting and inside pump station, conducted field meetings and coordinated work with project manager and general contractor, the project concluded in 2015. Position: Foreman • LACDPW Terminal Island WRP Tertiary Filters Rehabilitation, Foreman Installed conduit systems and wiring to new MOV's at the sand filter area, installed new control panel for new MOV's and pulled analog, control and power wire to (64) new MOV's, the project was completed in 2015. Position: Foreman • West Basin Municipal Water District Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility Clean -in -Place Waste Discharge Project, Foreman Worked on field layout and material procurement and installation. Made field installation schedule for project, conducted safety meetings, started the project from underground conduit installation and up, installed utility conduit run, installed new Switchgear, MCC and lighting. Ran conduit and wire in the pump station and treatment system, tested system and startup conducted. Managed installation and coordination with owner and general contractor to complete the project in late 2018. Position: Foreman • City of Los Angeles, Venice Dual Force Main and Generator Installation, General Foreman, he has overseen the installation from underground PVC conduits to above ground GRC and PVC Coated conduits. He has assisted in the redesign and installation of (2) large Cummins generators. Installation of new control panels, Switchgear, Instrumentation and Controls, The project completed in late summer 2019. With the training and experience working for Leed Electric for so many years Mr. Flores is qualified for any wastewater project that LEI is awarded and in currently supervising several LEI projects in his General Foreman capacity where he will oversee a Foreman and his crew to ensure the project is completed on time and per spec. City Council 19 — 100 2/15/2022 Page 116 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Edgar Saldivar, IBEW Certified Electrician: General Foreman Electrician: Mr. Saldivar has over 18 years of Commercial and Industrial experience. Adept in performing electrical installations, maintenance, and repairs in water plant facilities; knowledgeable in all areas of the national electrical code; and excel in analyzing and solving problems with various electrical controls and systems. For the past 5 years, as a Foreman, Mr. Saldivar has completed several projects in Los Angeles County. The following projects executed by Mr. Saldivar are as follow: • San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant, in Whittier, installed a Unit Substation IC2-ID2 and associated electrical duct banks, cable trays, manholes, pull boxes and 5-kv conductors. At the Sludge pump station, I coordinated the installation of VFCs, switchboards, panelboards, transformers, Control Panel and instruments. • Terminal Island Water Reclamation Plant: Microfiltration, reverse osmosis and chlorination underground duct banks, manholes and Prefab Electrical Rooms. Control Panels and all Instrumentation such as FITS, PITS, DPITs, LITs AITS, • Maywood Mutual Water Company, in Huntington Park, the electrical room with ATS and Generator was modernized. Installed new Backwash Pump, Reclaim Pump, Sludge Pump Microfiltration vessel with MOVs, DPITs, FITS and PITS. • Mesa Water District, Well Automation and Rehabilitation Project at Mesa Wells 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 spread across the city of Costa Mesa. The work included, the upgrades of the wells, pump replacement, gas engine replacement, general electrical equipment replacement, new emergency generators, construction of new chemical storage and feed systems area, replacement of wellhead piping, instrumentation upgrades, and site security improvements, with the contract constraints that only I well could be offline at a time and there was a schedule as to when it was okay to take wells offline. Work for this project took place in 2 shifts with Mr. Saldivar working as the General Foreman, overseeing both day and night activities due to project requirements. Mr. Saldivar is a Certified General Electrician and has obtained a C-10 state license and has completed the following courses; code, instrumentation, and foreman courses at Electrical Training Institute through IBEW. Edgar has the skills to complete any instrumentation project and is currently working for the City of Santa Ana as the maintenance contractor of choice for several of the cities Pump Stations and Treatment Systems. As well as working for Mesa Water District in a service contract for their reservoirs and has expertise in this industry that is very hard to match. City Council 19 — 101 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 17 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Joseph Evanilla, IBEW Certified Electrician: General Foreman Electrician: Mr. Evanilla came to Leed Electric in early 2020 as a General Foreman Electrician, with more than 35 years of experience planning, developing, and implementing construction projects. Extensive understanding in Public Works Water Production. Mr. Evanilla has spent his careering working for A & B Electric Company, then over to Morrow -Meadows Corp before joining Leed Electric. His career and training highlights are EPRI Certification, AC/DC power and control systems, Electro-mechanical proficiency, Complex issues management, Understanding of client business requirements, Strong customer focus, Works well in team environment, Blueprint takeoff, Project layout, Control schematic production and an Extensive knowledge in electrical tools and equipment. Some of the many projects Mr. Evanilla has completed are listed here: LAXFUEL Corporation, 4 TANK Project 2019, Metropolitan Water District, Joseph Jensen WTP Plant Electrical Upgrades Stage 1A 2018, City of Chino, Eastside Water Treatment Plant 2016, Three Valleys Municipal Water District, San Antonio Spreading Grounds 2014, City of Brea, La Florista Sewer Lift Station 2014, City of Covina, Charter Oak Reservoir 2014, Fontana Water Co., Sandhill Hydroelectric Generators Plasent 2013 and Rancho Cucamonga Water District, Arthur Bridge WTP 2013 and many more dating back to 2003. Mr. Evanilla is a valued addition to the Leed Electric team with his unmatched experience, skills and leadership qualities. Michael Marshall, IBEW Certified Electrician: Foreman Electrician: Mr. Marshall joined Leed Electric in 2016; he completed the IBEW Five Year Apprenticeship Program in 2016. Mr. Marshall has previous experience working for Neal Electric working on water and waste water projects. When Mr. Marshall joined Leed Electric in 2016 he began working on several water and wastewater treatment projects in varies stages of completion. Some of the projects Mr. Marshall has completed are the following: • Los Angeles Wastewater Integrated Network Systems (LAWINS), working with the integration at Hyperion Treatment Plant under the supervision of our General Foreman Instrument Tech. • 2017 West Coast Basin Barrier Telemetry Project, for Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, upgraded the existing telemetry system by adding new PLC's with battery backup, re -terminated the system to work with the new interface. For the West Coast Barrier reach of the Seawater Barrier System for LACDPW. Position: Journeyman • Currently working on the Seawater Barrier Maintenance Contract as the dedicated Certified Electrician, when WO's come in he reviews the requirements and completes the necessary work for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Installing new sensors, troubleshooting, working with our subs troubleshooting communication issues and solving these problems so that County may have a working monitoring system. Mr. Marshall has also worked on projects such as the West Basin Project Phase V, LAX/Crewshaw Transit Corridor and has some experience in Photovoltaic Systems in his training. While at Leed Electric he has worked under the direction of Miguel Chavez working on the Telemetry Projects recently completed by Leed Electric and has valuable expertise at the Barrier Systems. City Council 19 — 102 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 18 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Sergio Hernandez, IBEW Certified Electrician: General Foreman Electrician: Mr. Hernandez completed the IBEW Apprenticeship Program; He has over I I years of electrical experience in this field. He joined Leed Electric in 2016 working on several water and wastewater treatment projects in varies stages of completion. Some of the projects Mr. Hernandez has completed are the following: • 2010-2012 Morris Dam provide and install switchgear, MCC, PLC, Control Panels, 6 MOV's, FIT's, PITS, Generator, and Lighting for the Dam. Position: Journeyman • 2013-2016 San Jose Creek Ras Pump Station - Install substation, Manholes, MCC, PLC, Control Panels, VFC's, FIT's, LIT's, PIT's, and installed medium voltage cable. Position: Journeyman • 2016 Long Beach Pump Station- installed Bus Duct, switchgear, MCC, PLC's, Control Panel's, VFC's, 6 MOV's, vibration switches, and fire alarm. Position: Foreman • 2017-Current Santa Anita Dam Spillway Modification Project, Position: Foreman, overseeing the installation of underground and above ground conduits, above, below and on the Santa Anita Dam face. Safety is his top priority while supervising this projects crew. The work consists of installing Lightings, as well as helipad lights, Manual Transfer Switch, UPS, Generator Connections, Cable Tray Systems and Fiber Optic Cable and Hardware. Mr. Hernandez has a solid work ethic and keeps close eye on safety performance of not only his crew, but of crews working alongside so as to ensure nothing dangerous goes on with a potential for injury. Mr. Hernandez is an asset to LEI. Christian Tomren, IBEW Certified Electrician: Foreman Electrician: Mr. Tomren joined Leed Electric in 2017; he completed the IBEW Electrician Program in 2009. He joined Leed Electric in 2017 working on several water and wastewater treatment projects in varies stages of completion. Mr. Tomren has many qualifications, which are: CA General Electrician Certified 2008, Advanced Lighting Control 2013, Solar PV/Installer 2009, OSHA 10 & 30, First Aid, CPR Trained, Confined Space Certification and can operate several different types of construction equipment with different certifications. Some of the projects Mr. Tomren has completed are the following: • Mr. Tomren completed the MWD Advanced Water Treatment Demonstration Facility, General Foreman Electrician. • CIP 5233 Terminal Island Advanced Water Purification Facility Doubled Capacity of Clean water to 12 MGD. Installed two new 200HP VFD. New MF Facility and Electric Room with 2 60 HP VFD's. New RO Facility and Electric Room with 2 500HP VFD's. New AOP UV System Facility. 10 Chemical Metering Pumps and new Sodium Hypochlorite Facility. 3 125 HP Product Water VFD's. New UPS System for 8 PCM's. 3 New Man Holes and Associated Duct Banks. 8 PCM Demo and Installation of New PCM's. Managed 21 Electrician's during the peak of the project. New MCC inside main electric building. Position: General Foreman Electrician • Carbon Canyon Water Recycling Facility, PLC Upgrades, Install New Conduit and Wire, 4 New PLC's and Cutover I train at a time. New Server Room. Position: Foreman Electrician Mr. Tomren has the proven ability to schedule/manage employees while maintaining maximum productivity, and is an excellent addition to Leed Electric and is prepared for any project, and is a valued asset to have a part of our team, ready to tackle what may come ahead. City Council 19 — 103 2/15/2022 P a g , 1 19 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. ■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Sean Eagle, IBEW Certified Electrician: Foreman Electrician: Mr. Eagle joined Leed Electric a few years back and has been a Union Electrician since 2011 with Orange County IBEW Local 441. His education began at Brooks College where he received his Associate's Degree in Programming and Networking. Shortly after he began his electrical education with the union where he became a State Licensed Electrician. Mr. Eagle also has several certifications, those in CPR and first aid, High -reach fork lift, and Hilti powder actuated gun. His job responsibilities in the past have included, Chapman University, Mary Pickford Theater, Fox Studios, solar in Huntington Beach Civic Center, utility yard and library, solar at George F Bailey Detention in Chula Vista, solar at Kaiser in Yorba Linda and solar in schools, new construction High Rise buildings in Fashion Island and Irvine, commercial Tenant Improvements, and multiple parking structures. Mr. Eagle joined Leed Electric in 2017 as a 5th year apprentice and became a Foreman officially in September 2018. He has lead projects at Mid -Basin, Orange County Water District, and Temescal Valley Water District Water Reclamation Plant Phase IV Expansion as well as assisted at Mesa Well Automation, Mesa Water District. Mr. Eagle is currently leading the Yorba Linda Water District HQ PFAS Water Treatment Plant located in Yorba Linda for the Orange County Water District. City Council 19 — 104 2/15/2022 P a g , 120 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Project No. 1 Project Name Seawater Barriers Maintenance Services for Telemetry System and Appurtenances2015-2020 Location Los Angeles County, CA Owner County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Project Manager Name Adam Lee, P.E. E-mail and Telephone No. (626)458-6185 awlee@dpw.lacounty.gov Contract Value $416,309.00 Annually (including change orders) Electrical and Instrumentation Maintenance for LA Counties Seawater Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Barrier Injection Wells and Observation Wells. Installation of sensors, Work for the Project instruments, conduit, wire, testing of instruments and equipment as well as water levels with sounder tool. Over 30 wells in the Long Beach, Wilmington, Carson area. Completion Date July 2020 Project No. 2 Project Name On -Call Consultant Services for the Los Angeles Wastewater Information Network System (LAWINS) Location Playa Del Rey, CA Owner City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Sanitation Bureau Project Manager Name Tim Makela E-mail and Telephone No. 310-648-5920 timothy.makela@lacity.org Contract Value $ 7,300,000.00 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Instrumentation and System Integration for Honeywell DCS Cutover, Testing Work for the Project of over 15,000 field instruments and replacement of over 100,000 LF of Instrument and Power Cable (HWRP, TIWRP, DCTWRP & LAGWRP) Completion Date December 2019 City Council 19 — 105 2/15/2022 P a g e 121 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Project No. 3 Project Name Burris Pump Station Phase 2 Location Anaheim, CA Owner Orange County Water District Project Manager Name Ryan Bouley E-mail and Telephone No. (714) 378-3200 rbouley@ocwd.com Contract Value $ 2,501,583.50 (including change orders) Electrical and Instrumentation for a new pump station. 4160V, 2000A New Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Service, CITY (4) 1750HP 4160 VFD's 2000A Motor Control Center Work for the Project Installation, Allen-Bradley PLC, HMI and SCADA Installation and installation Of a 12KV/4.2KV Transformer. Completion Date November 2017 Project No. 4 Project Name Regional Treatment Plant Cogeneration & Switchgear Upgrade Project Location Laguna Niguel, CA Owner South Orange County Wastewater Authority Project Manager Name Mike Matson & Brian Peck E-mail and Telephone No. (949) 234-5400 mmatson@socwa.com & bpeck@socwa.com Contract Value $ 1,811,025.28 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Demolition of existing conduit and wire, furnish and install underground Work for the Project conduit, manholes, 2,000FT of 12x750MCM XHHW Power Feeder Wire, Instrument Cable, Switchgear, Cogeneration Engine, PCL and SCADA Completion Date July 2018 Project No. 5 Project Name Dominguez Gap Barrier Telemetry Systems Location Los Angeles County Owner County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Project Manager Name Adam Lee, P.E. E-mail and Telephone No. (626)458-6185 awlee@dpw.lacounty.gov Contract Value $ 2.1M (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Furnish & Install 9 Miles of Fiber Optics, Power and Instrumentation Cable Work for the Project for SCADA and Telemetry System and Flow Diversion. Completion Date June 2018 City Council 19 — 106 2/15/2022 P a g e 122 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Project No. 6 Project Name Mesa Well Automation & Rehabilitation Location Costa Mesa, CA Owner Mesa Water District Project Manager Name Kieler Smith E-mail and Telephone No. (949) 330-4172 kielersmith@mbakerintl.com Contract Value $ 3,343,284.82 (including change orders) 5 Well Sites, Integration & Automation, (4) Variable Frequency Drives, (5) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Motor Control Centers, (5) Switchboards, Instrumentation at all Sites, Work for the Project Flowmeters, Control Panels at all Sites, Setting of a 164 Sq Ft Prefabricated Electrical Building at Well 1. Completion Date February 2019 Project No. 7 Project Name Temescal Canyon Park Stormwater BMP Project Phase II Location Los Angeles, CA Owner City of Los Angeles Depart. Of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Project Manager Name Waleed Azar E-mail and Telephone No. (213) 272-4254 Waleed.azar@lacity.org Contract Value $ 659,143.00 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Installation of new conduit, wire, instrumentation and instrument cable. Work for the Project Furnish and Install VFD, MCC Switchgear, and new Stormwater Treatment System. Completion Date August 2018 City Council 19 — 107 2/15/2022 P a g e 123 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Project No. 8 Project Name Advanced Water Treatment Demonstration Facility Location Carson, CA Owner Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Project Manager Name Joe Robles, P.E. E-mail and Telephone No. (909) 392-2586 JRobles@mwdh2o.com Contract Value $4,039,000.00 (including change orders) New Ground up Advanced Water Treatment Demonstration Facility with 0.5MGD Clean Water Production. Systems installed MSR, Chemical Feed Brief Description of Firm's Scope of System, RO System, Advanced Oxidization UV. Turn Key Electrical and Work for the Project Instrumentation which included Prefabricated Electrical Building, Service Switchboard, MCC, VFD's, Main PLC (1,500 1/0's), RTU, Local Control Panels, (11) Analyzer Racks, Ammonia, PLC & SCADA, Programming, Testing, Start- up & Commissioning. Completion Date December 2019 Project No. 9 Project Name Hyperion Secondary Effluent Pump Station Improvements Location Playa Del Rey, CA Owner West Basin Municipal Water District Project Manager Name Kevin Cullen, MSCE E-mail and Telephone No. (310) 660-6259 KevinC@westbasin.org Contract Value $3,080,000.00 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Furnish & Install Electrical Ductbank, Medium Voltage Switchgear, Control Work for the Project Panels, DCS System, Motor Control Center and Pumps, 4160V, Qty (2) 600A with Main -Tie -Main Circuit Breaker Completion Date January 2020 City Council 19 — 108 2/15/2022 P a g e 124 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Project No. 10 Project Name Venice Dual Force Main & Pumping Plant Generator Replacement Location Venice, CA Owner City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering Project Manager Name Richard Southerland E-mail and Telephone No. (310) 301-2109 Richard.southerland@lacity.org Contract Value $4,688,790.00 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Replacement of Generators, furnish and install Instrumentation and Work for the Project Controls, Underground conduits, wire, cable and controls. Completion Date Jan. 2020 Project No. 11 Project Name Valencia Water Reclamation Plant UV Disinfection Facilities Location Valencia, CA Owner Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District of Los Angeles County Project Manager Name Jelmer Torres E-mail and Telephone No. (562) 699-7411 jtorres@lacsd.org Contract Value $3,633,922.00 (including change orders) Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Furnish and install new UV Disinfection System, infrastructure, including 2 Work for the Project Unit Substations, MCC's VFD's, Control Panels, Instruments, Commissioning and Startup Services. Completion Date March 2021 Project No. 12 Project Name Greg Avenue Pressure Control Structure Pump Modification and New Control Building Location Sun Valley, CA Owner The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Project Manager Name Joe Robles, P.E., (909) 392-2586, JRobles@mwdh2o.com E-mail and Telephone No. Shane Singh, (303) 995-1287, shane.ramcharansingh@stantec.com Zakir Hirani, (626) 375-6780, zakir.hirani@stantec.com Contract Value $3,539,258.00 (including change orders) New pump station building, infrastructure, including new LADWP Brief Description of Firm's Scope of Substation, MV Switchgear, MV VFD's, 4160V switchgear, 1,200AMP, Work for the Project temporary 4160V switchgear, bus duct, security system, control panels, flow meters, PLC and programming, commissioning, and startup. Completion Date Feb. 2021 City Council 19 — 109 2/15/2022 P a g e 125 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Client No. 1 Client Name County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Adam Lee Contact E-mail, Telephone No. (626) 458-6185 900 S Fremont Ave and Address Alhambra, CA 91803 AWLEE@dpw.lacounty.gov Client No. 2 Client Name City of Santa Ana Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Juan Ramirez 220 S. Daisy Ave and Address (714) 647.3377 Santa Ana, CA 92703 jramirez@santa-ana.org Client No. 3 Client Name Mesa Water District Dustin Burnside Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Dustin Burnside 1965 Placentia Ave and Address Costa Mesa, CA 92627 DustinB@MesaWater.org Client No. 4 Client Name Irvine Ranch Water District Jacob Moeder Contact E-mail, Telephone No. 15600 Sand Canyon Ave (949) 453-5544 and Address Moeder@IRWD.com Irvine, CA 92618 Client No. 5 Client Name City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Contact E-mail, Telephone No. John Hamilton 12000 Vista Del Mar and Address (310) 648-6129 Playa Del Rey, CA 90293 John.cobb.hamilton@lacity.org Client No. 6 Client Name Orange County Water District Bouley Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Ryan Ryan 18700 Ward Street, and Address (714) 3 uley 78-3200 .com Fountain Valley, CA 92708 ocwd P a g e 126 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 2/15/2022 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� L M M U RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services ELECTRIC LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Client No. 7 Client Name City of Santa Monica Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Deborah McCloskey 2500 Michigan Avenue (310) 458.2201 and Address Deborah. McCloskey@SMGOV.NET Santa Monica, CA 90404 Client No. 8 Client Name Water Replenishment District (WRD) of Southern California Tom Knoell Contact E-mail, Telephone No. 4040 Paramount Blvd. (562) 275.4266 and Address Lakewood, CA 90712 tknoell@wrd.org Client No. 9 Client Name City of Santa Ana Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Cesar E. Barrera, P.E. 220 S. Daisy Ave (714) 647.3387 and Address cbarrera@santa-ana.org Santa Ana, CA 92703 Client No. 10 Client Name J.F. Shea Construction Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Ray Watford (909) 595-4397 667 Brea Canyon Road, Suite 30 and Address ray.watford@jfshea.com Walnut, CA 91788-0489 Client No. 11 Client Name Pacific Hydrotech Corporation Ozzie Garibaldo Contact E-mail, Telephone No. (951) 943-8803 314 E. 3rd St. and Address ozzie@pachydro.com Perris, CA 92570 Client No. 12 Client Name RSH Construction Bob Hamilton Bob Hamilton Contact E-mail, Telephone No. 3883 Wentworth Drive 88 and Address Hemet, CA 92545 bhamilton@rshconstruction.com City Council 19 — 111 P a g e 127 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 2/15/2022 LEED Electric Inc. LS■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification Client No. 13 Client Name Schuler Engineering Brian Sohl Contact E-mail, Telephone No. 564 Bateman Circle (951) 738-9215 and Address brian@schulerengineering.com Corona, CA 92880 Client No. 14 Client Name SS Mechanical Construction Corp. John Whelan Contact E-mail, Telephone No. (714) 847-1317 26561 Jacinto Drive and Address Mission Viejo, CA 92692 John@ssmechanical.com Client No. 15 Client Name PPC Construction, Inc. Contact E-mail, Telephone No. Samuel P. Hannah 930 Colorado Blvd., Suite 3 and Address (323) 256-2600 Los Angeles, CA 90041 samuel.hannah@ppcco.net City Council 19 — 112 2/15/2022 P a g e 128 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. LM■ ��� `CCU ELECTRIC RFP For On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services LEED Electric, Inc. Statement of Qualification City Council 19 — 113 2/15/2022 129 13138 Arctic Circle, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-5508 LEED Electric Inc. `C C 3 ELECTRIC 13138 Arctic Cir, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 LEED ELECTRIC INC 2021 IBEW Electrician Rate Sheet P: (562) 270-9500 F: (562) 863-5723 ELECTRICIAN WORKING GEN'L FOREMAN APPRENTICE Straight Time & Double Straight Time & Double Straight Time & Double LABOR COST ITEMS PER HOUR Time 1/2 Time Time 1/2 Time Time 1/2 Time ELECTRICIAN BASE RATE $103.61 $138.33 $173.06 $121.93 $165.40 $208.90 $81.59 $107.65 $133.69 ELECTRICIAN NET RATE (AFTER 20% MU) $124.33 $166.00 $207.67 $146.32 $198.48 $250.68 $97.91 $129.18 $160.43 STANDARD MARK-UP Labor 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% Material 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% Subcontracts 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% Equipment (Rental or Owned) 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% Truck With Tools $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 $28.46 Bending and Threading Trailer with Generator $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 $18.23 Note 1: Truck hours only applies to Working Foreman/GF. Trucks generally not used for commissioning. For installations truck will be charged at $28.46/HR Note 2: Per IBEW requirements, every construction job needs at least one Foreman/GF Note 3: Straight Time is Based on 8 Hours of Working Note 4: Time & 1/2 applies for time spend for the first 2 Hours after Straight Time and Saturdays (10 Hours Max) Note 5: Double Time applies for time spent over Time & Half (2 Hours), Sundays and Union Holidays Note 6: All Labor rates are based on prevailing wage and includes cost of WC Insurance, GL Insurance, Tax and Fringe Benefits City Council 19 - 114 2/15/2022 LrLEEM ELECTRIC Estimate Proposal and Change Order Form LEED ELECTRIC INC. 13138 Arctic Circle Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 TEL: (562) 270-9500 www.leedelectric.com Project: On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehab Services LEI CE# TEXXXXX-XXX DATE: XX/XX/XXXX Contract: TXX-XXX RFI # LOCAL: 11 Customer: City of Santa Ana CD/DOC # ESTIMATOR: AS Description of -SAMPLE- Work: I. Material 1 . Material (See attached detail sheet) $ 2 . Quoted Material & Services (See attached vendor quotes) $ 3 . Allowance Miscellaneous Material/Consumables/Small Tools 0.00% of Line 1 &2 $ 4. Subtotal: $ 5 . Sales Tax at applicable rate 10.50% of Line 4 $ 6 . Shipping and Handling $ 7 . Total Material Cost: $ II. Field Labor Regular Time Over Time x1.5 Over Time x2.0 8a . Electrician Labor Man Hours (see attached detail sheet) 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 8b . Job Factor 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 8c . Electrician Labor Efficiency Factor 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 8d . Safety 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs Be . Clean-up 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 8f . As -Built Drawings 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 8g. TOTAL ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR MH (8a thru 8f) 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 0.00 hrs 9 . Journeyman hours (from 8g above -Regular Time) 0.00 hrs @ $103.61 /hour $ 9a . Journeyman hours (from 8g above-OT 1.5x) 0.00 hrs @ $138.33 /hour $ 9b . Journeyman hours (from 8g above-OT 2.0x) 0.00 hrs @ $173.06 /hour $ 10 . Electrician GF/FM (Regular Time) 0.00 hrs @ $121.93 /hour $ 10a . Electrician GF/FM (Over Time 1.5x) 0.00 hrs @ $165.40 /hour $ 10b . Electrician GF/FM (Over Time 2.0x) 0.00 hrs @ $208.90 /hour $ 11 . Helper/Apprentice (Regular Time) 0.00 hrs @ $81.59 /hour $ 12a . Helper/Apprentice (Over Time 1.5x) 0.00 hrs @ $107.65 /hour $ 12b . Helper/Apprentice (Over Time 2.0x) 0.00 hrs @ $133.69 /hour $ 13 . Total Direct Labor 9 thru 12 0.00 $ 14. Allowance Miscellaneous Material/Consumables/Small Tools 0.00% $ 15 . Overtime Expense from attached Schedule if applicable. 16. TOTAL LABOR COST: $ III. DIRECT JOB EXPENSE 17 . Truck w/tools 0.00 hrs @ $28.46 /hour $ 18. Bending/Threading Trailer 0.00 hrs @ $14.56 /hour $ 19. Power Generator (under 1OKW) 0.00 hrs @ $4.66 /hour $ 20. Forklift 0.00 hrs @ $500.00 /Week $ 21 . Gradall 0.00 hrs @ $950.00 /Week $ 22 . Project Manager/Design Consult/Fabrication 0.00 hrs @ $125.00 /hour $ 23 . Make Copies of Prints $0.00 $ 24. Rented/Owned Tools & Equipment (See attached Equipment list) $ 25 . Allowance Miscellaneous Material/Consumables/Small Tools 0.00% $ 26. TOTAL EXPENSES: $ IV. OVERHEAD AND PROFIT 27. Material $ 28. Material Markup 15.0% of line 27 $ 29 . Field Labor $ 30. Field Labor Markup 20.0% of line 29 $ 31 . Direct Job Expense $ 32. Direct Job Expense Markup 15.0% of line 31 $ 33 . Subcontract (See attached subcontractor quotes) $ 34 . Subcontract markup 15.0% of line 33 $ 35 . Totals of Line 27 through 34 $ 36 . Extended Overhead Breakdown (see attached Breakdown sheet) $ 37 . Inefficiency Costs (see attached worksheet) $ 38 . Subtotal $ 39 . Bond Adder 0.00% of line 38 $ - 40. TOTAL FOR THIS ESTIMATE V. EXTENSION OF TIME REQUOREB. 0 We Ieii iSsn's Beeed eii a H ... ei eev Note: This Pricing is valid for 14 c I dar d ■ ��� `MMLI ELECTRIC LIC. # 379096 C10, A Power, Control and Instrumentation Contractor Since 1979 MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES RFP NO.: 21-122 November 16, 2021 at 4:OOPM City Council 19 — 116 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.. 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 2: FEE PROPOSAL Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal. I have examined the ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK. I am familiar with all the existing conditions and limitation that may impact work requests. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal. Proposer shall submit hourly rates schedule, which shall include but not limited to, direct and indirect costs for labor, for staff per job classification, material, equipment rates, overhead, incidental supplies, travel, mileage, and fuel. Any special materials will be purchased by the contractor only after discussed and authorized by the City projects manager or designee in writing. Prior to commencement of services, Contractor shall provide separate quotes, upon request by the City, which shall be approved by the City's Public Works Water Resources Division. FEE SCHEDULE The undersigned declares that he/she has carefully examined the request for proposal, that he/she has examined the Proposed Scope of Services, and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said Proposed Scope of Services, for the unit price(s) set forth in the following schedule: Note: This contract is subject to prevailing wages. TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: LEE❑ Electric, Inc. Item # Bid Item Well 32 Electrical Rehabilitation Electrical Conduit Building and Site Electrical System VF❑ Motor Control Center Automatic Transfer Switch instrumentation and Control Equipment Building Lighting Electrical Equipment and Facilities Chemical Buildin Unit LS LS LS LS LS LS LS Quantity 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 Amount $ 116,200 1. 2. 3_ 4. 5, 5_ $ 130,687 $78,00 $ 18,000 $ 72,000 $ 21,960 $ 47 000 City Council ""y UT oar ita rvia. rjd'r 'Il��� 2/15/2022 on -Call Electrical Repair and�KkleFa iltt tion Services Page 20 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ❑N-CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES $ Instrumentation and Control Equipment Chemical Building)- LS 1 s68,000 9. Building Lighting (Chemical Building) LS 1 $,14,880 10, Fiber Optics Conduits (3" Conduits) LF 3,900 $198,900 11. Fiber Optic Pull Box EA 8 `& 46,400 12. Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $ 40,000 13. Commissioning and Training EA 1 $ 25,000 14 As Built Plans, ❑&M Manuals and Warranties LS 1 $ 10,000 Total $_ 887.027 Contractor shall submit additional labor, material and rental a ui meat rates aloe with fee schedule. Contractor's labor and equipment rate sheet shall list rates for all labor designations, equipment and materials. BIDDER INFORMATION: Legal Company Name: LEER Electric, Inc. Complete address: 13138 Arctic Circle Santa Fe Springs, Phone Number: 562 270-950 Email Address: estimating@leedelectric.com Authorized Signature: -� Name: Se ed A. Jamali Dinan Title: Chief Executive Qfficer City Council On -Call Electrical Repair and Qhablaion services 2/15/2022 Page 21 APPENDIX CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSER'S REFERENCES List and describe fully the contracts performed by your firm which demonstrate your ability to provide the supplies, equipment or services included in the scope of the proposal specifications. Attach additional pages if required. The City reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications. Reference Customer Name: City of Santa Ana Address: 215 S. Center Street Santa Ana, CA 92703 Contract Amount 676,673.00 Contact Individual: Cesar Barrera cbarrera(a--)santa-ana.org Phone Number: 714-647-3387 Facsimile Number: N/A Year: 2017-2021 Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Electrical maintenance, repair, troubleshooting, installation at city pump stations, installation of holiday lighting Reference Los Angeles County Public Work�ontact Individual: Adam Lee awleeadpw�lacount Customer Name: Y•gov Address: 900 S. Fremont Ave. Alhambra, CA 91803 Phone Number: 626-458-6185 Facsimile Number: N/A Contract Amount: 727,272_00 Year: 2019-Present Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Electrical and Instrumentation Services and Maintenance on LA County's 100+ Seawater Barrier __ Injection and Observation Wells in Wilmington Redondo RpqCh qnd I nnq Reach Reference Customer Name: Contact Individual: Dustin Burnside dustinb(a-)_mesawater.org Address: 1965 Placentia Ave. Phone Number: 949-207-5466 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Facsimile Number: N/A Contract Amount: 100,000.00 Year: 2018-Present Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Electrical maintenance, repair, troubleshooting. lighting, tempo astal.l.atio.n_at-agency operated pump s City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 22 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Reference Customer Name: City of Santa Monica Contact Individual:Tim Vosecky tim.voseck santamonica.gov Address: 2500 Michigan Ave. Bldg 1 Santa Monica, CA 90404 Contract Amount: 1,660,000.00 Phone Number: 310-458-2201 Facsimile Number: N/A Year: 2018-Present Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided: Electrical Installation, Service, Troubleshooting, Maintenance at several of the Water Treatment Facilities in Santa Monica. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE. City of Santa Ana RFP 217122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 23 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7105 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California Co1baty of Subscribed an orn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20_, by , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appe before me Notary Public Signature Nota ublic Seal City Council On -Call Electrical Repair and itghabli &lion Services 2/15/2022 Page 34 CALIFORNIA JIJRAT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 «:�Ti:s:":'cvF�' =e? :.�'?r- r :y.'-'1.:=�c:F#_7L IV-i't A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California Countyof Los Angeles ANNETTE IRIBARREN Notary Public - California Los Angeles County r Commission x 2278485 My Comm, Expires Mar 25, 2023 Place Notary Seal and/or Stomp Above Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 12th day of November 12021 , by Date Month Year (1) Seyed A. Jamali-Dinar) (and (2) Name(s) of Signer(s) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Signature 6-h,�s-.--- Signature of Notary Public Pl9371r%3U A 1 Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to on unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document; Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Number of Pages: c: rrra�yYs!�t'Fo-��;"r15��ef�ep'i d3�e.xe� e�'sd"�ts;t... --Fits ,. 02019 National Notary Association City Council 19 — 122 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA REP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law Ci.y of Santa Ana RFP 2 -122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 36 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 7, The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant t❑ California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 543 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national ❑rigin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Chief Executive Officer Firm: LEED Electric, Inc. ❑ate: 11 /1 F/2021 City of Santa An af RF ,124 22 2/15/2022 T On -Cali Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 37 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.' 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension. continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he cr she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. .Z Signed: Title: Chief Executive Officer Firm: LEED Electric, Inc, Date: 11/16/2021 City of Santa 2/15/2022 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 35 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15th day of February 2022 by and between M Brey Electric, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On October 14, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-122, by which it sought a qualified contractor to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitations services for the City's Public Works Agency. B. Contractor submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Contractor represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP 21-122. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES On an on -call basis, and at the City's sole discretion, Contractor shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-122, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated in full, and as further described in Contractor's Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full. 2. COMPENSATION a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. Contractor is one of two (2) contractors selected to provide services on an on -call basis under RFP 21-122. The total compensation for services provided by all contractors selected under RFP No. 21-122, including any extension period, shall not exceed the shared aggregate amount of six million dollars and zero cents ($6,000,000). b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City Council 19 — 126 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 10 Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 15, 2022 and terminate on February 14, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for one (1) two (2) year period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all City Council 19 — 127 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 10 Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. If Contractor is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. If the Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such City Council 19 — 128 2/15/2022 Page 3 of 10 work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theContractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability): i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work City Council 19 — 129 2/15/2022 Page 4 of 10 iii. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. City Council 19 — 130 2/15/2022 Page 5 of 10 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney's fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other parry is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this City Council 19 — 131 2/15/2022 Page 6 of 10 Agreement. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax 714- 647-6956 Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 To Contractor: M Brey Electric, Inc. 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 Attn: Matthew Brey, President A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or City Council 19 — 132 2/15/2022 Page 7 of 10 obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services that are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City. 16. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council 19 — 133 2/15/2022 Page 8 of 10 19. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager [signatures continued on next page] City Council 19 — 134 2/15/2022 Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney Bye/v� aiandon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Nabil Saba, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency M BREY ELECTRIC, INC. Name: Matthew Brey Title: President City Council Page 10 of it — 135 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT A City Council 19 — 136 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES Appendix ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page. 13 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is located in the County of Orange in Southern California. The City encompasses 27.2 square miles and a population over 343,000 people. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency — Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the Water System and Sanitary Sewer System. The City of Santa Ana's water system is comprised of approximately 478 miles of water main, 45 MG of storage at five (5) sites, seven (7) MWD connections, 21 groundwater wells, seven (7) pump stations, four (4) pressure regulating stations and utilizes two (2) pressure zones. The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency Water Resources Division is soliciting proposals from qualified industrial electrical firms to provide on -call electrical repair and rehabilitation services. The City intends to select and enter into agreements with up to three firms to provide the described services for an aggregate annual amount amongst all selected firms. B. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES The City of Santa Ana invites proposals to establish multiple contracts with vendors for electrical maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation at the City's water and wastewater facilities. Qualified respondents will be expected to provide new electrical installations, as well as scheduled and unscheduled electrical maintenance and/or repairs on an "as needed" basis. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, services, and equipment necessary for the complete installation of electrical systems. All work shall be in accordance with applicable trade practices, workmanship, meet warranties and shall conform to all applicable laws, codes and regulations. Business hours are considered from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. (Monday through Friday). Any time outside of business hours of operation may be considered after hours/weekends. All work will be scheduled upon confirmation of scope and cost and completed within the time agreed upon for each specific item of work. The Contractor may not begin work before receiving a written Notice to Proceed by the City's Project Manager. All services, equipment and materials provided by the Contractor must be in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations, laws, and codes such as the California Electric Code, California Building Code, and other applicable codes not listed. C. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Contractor shall provide all transportation, labor, materials and equipment necessary to repair, replace, and install existing and new electrical systems as required for the following types of facilities; Water Booster Stations, Sewer Lift Stations, Water Reservoir Sites, Pressure Control Stations, and Water Well Sites. The Contractor shall provide the following scope of services: City of Santa Ana REP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 14 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 1. ELECTRICAL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to perform, but are not limited to, the following electrical services: • Repair or replacement of motor control stations (up to 480 volts) • Repair or replacement of exterior wiring, interior wiring, conduit, solid state soft starters, variable -frequency drives (VFD), motor controls and motor control centers (MCC), switch gears, fuses, electrical circuit boxes, transformers, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), etc. • Trouble shooting of existing electrical wiring and appurtenances (electrical testing) • New installations of electrical wiring and appurtenances • Telecommunication installations • Instrumentation installations and fiber connections (not including programming) • Technical electrician support to City Staff as requested • Lighting installations • Electrical distribution and control equipment installations (underground distribution conduit, cables, and pull boxes) • Poles, pole foundations and concrete work installations and excavations • Excavations, backfilling and compaction for trenches and pull boxes • Branch circuit panels and wiring installations • Shop and record drawings, material submittals, and work schedules 2. PERFORMANCE TESTS When requested by the City and upon completion of electrical installation, the Contractor shall test and demonstrate that the system operates in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications. Performance tests shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Wire Testing; The Contractor shall perform insulation resistance tests on each complete circuit prior to energizing. Insulation resistance between the conductors and between the conductors and ground shall not be less than 25 megaohms. 2. Operation Testing: The Contractor shall test the operation of each control panel and associated interlocks to verify proper functionality and performance. 3. RECORD DRAWINGS The Contractor shall be capable of providing electrical plans marked with any changes, deviations or addition to any part of the electrical work. The Contractor shall clearly indicate on as -built plans the following information: 1. All conduits runs installed 2. Locations of underground conduits and stubouts accurately dimensioned 3. Forming, cabling, and identification of all power and control circuits within pull boxes and terminal box City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 15 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 4. All changes, deviations, in locations, routing, or dimensions or additions to any part of the electrical work 5. Interior views of each pull box identifying each conduit entrance by conduit number 4. TRAINING AND OPERATION MANUALS The Contractor shall offer training services and provide operation, maintenance and repair manuals consisting of all system drawings, block diagrams, schematics, shop drawings, and other pertinent data required to completely describe the operation and maintenance of the electrical system. The manuals shall be submitted prior to the final acceptance of the system and shall reflect the as -built conditions. The electrical system information in the operation and maintenance manuals shall contain: System operating instructions for normal operational conditions utilizing names of controls as they appear on nameplates 2. Calibration and maintenance instructions 3. Troubleshooting instructions 4. Instructions for ordering replacement parts 5. List of fuses, lamps, seals, and other expendable equipment and devices 6. Parts list including the make, model, and manufacturer of the equipment listed 5. EMERGENCY ON -CALL SERVICES The Contractor shall be able to provide emergency on -call electrical maintenance and repair services within four (4) hours of receiving the call. The Contractor's service technician is required to be on site and commence work within four (4) hours of initial contact if deemed by the City to be an emergency. The response time may be waived by the City if service can wait to be performed during Contractor's normal business hours. D. CODE COMPLIANCE All materials and workmanship shall be in strict conformity with standards of the latest editions including revisions of the following: • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) • National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) • National Electrical Code (NEC) standards • National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) • Insulated Cable Engineers Association (ICEA) • lntarnatinnnl FlPrtriral Tt-stinn Association (NETA) City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 16 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES • National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) • State Department of Industrial Safety (CAL/OSHA) • Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) • California Building Code (CNC) E. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION When a request for service is issued by the City, the Contractor shall issue a project estimate and schedule to the City's designated Project Manager. The Contractor shall not proceed with any work without the approval in the form of a notice to proceed from the City's designated project manager. Contractors shall invoice the City on a monthly basis for all work performed during the period or provide a one-time invoice at the completion of work issued. Each invoice shall be accompanied by a summary of tasks performed, contract agreement number, results and progress on long-term tasks if any. F. VALUE ADDED RELATED SERVICES The Contractor may propose additional related services that the City has not specifically identified in this RFP to accomplish the stated goals of this RFP. Value added related services will be considered by the City and may or may not be incorporated in the agreement. All parts and materials must be supplied new and factory approved. G.SUBCONTRACTORS The use of Subcontractors is allowed, but will require approval by City prior to start of any assigned work. Upon commencement of work, the Contractor shall be responsible for services provided by any subcontractor as if Contractor were providing the services with its own organization. When a Subcontractor performs all or any part of the work, a markup shall be applied to the Subcontractor's actual cost of such work. The Contractor may add a markup of 10 percent on the first $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the extra work and a markup of 5 percent on work added in excess of $5,000 of the subcontracted portion of the work may be added by the Contractor. H. MARKUP The following markup percentages shall be added to the Contractor's costs and shall constitute the markup for all overhead and profits (to the sum of the costs and markups, one (1) percent shall be added as compensation for bonding): 1) Labor.............................................................................................. 20 2) Materials.............................................................. ........................15 3) Equipment Rental............................................................................. 15 4) Other Items and Expenditures.......................................................... 15 I. MINIM11M QUALIFICATION5 C:iy of Santa Ana R P 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 17 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES The Contractor shall meet the following minimum qualifications- 1 . All work is to be performed in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, laws, standards, due care, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety requirements. 2. The Contractor shall hold a current California C-10 Electrical Contractor's License. 3. The Contractor shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in providing industrial control panel building services. 4. The Contractor shall possess state and local permits, licenses and certificates required by law to commence, carry, and complete the work. 5. Provide all necessary equipment to competently perform and complete work as specified. J. SAFETY Proposer shall be solely and completely responsible for the condition of the project site, including safety of all persons and properties during the performance of the work. In addition, proper safety equipment must be worn at all times. These requirements shall apply continuously until the contract is terminated and shall not be limited to normal working hours. The Contractor/Consultant shall assure that each employee or subcontractor under the contractor's supervision is trained in the work practices necessary to safely perform his or her job. K. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The successful bidders shall furnish the City with original copies of valid insurance policies herein required upon execution of the contract and shall maintain said policies in full force and effect at all times during the term of this contract. Said insurance policies shall comply with all requirements set forth in these specifications. Contractor(s) shall keep a current certificate of insurance at the City of Santa Ana at all times and shall immediately report any changes to the City. L. FEE SCHEDULE Contractor shall submit a fee schedule as described in Section IV.B.3 of RFP. The Well 32 Reservoir Rehabilitation Plans provided as Exhibit A and the General Specifications in Exhibit B are to be used as the basis for completing the Fee Schedule form and any other documents requested below (assume all system integration programming will be provided by the City). Upon award of a contract, work will proceed as authorized by the City, but may not necessarily be the project as described in Fee Proposal (inclusive of Exhibit A and Exhibit B). No separately stated freight or deliveries will be considered. Bidders shall include all costs in the unit price bid. Furthermore, the Contractor shall submit additional labor, material and rental equipment rates alQng with fee schedule. Contractor's labor and equipment rate sheet shall list rates for all City of Santa Ana P 2 -1 2 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES labor designations, equipment, rentals, and materials. The bid items specified in the fee schedule are for reference purposes only. Labor increases shall be subject to mutually agreeable terms between the City and the Contractor. The City may request related services that will be paid at the vendor's standard labor and equipment rate submitted. Fee proposal shall be outlined as follows: ---End of SCOPE OF WORK Section --- City of Santa Ana RFP 21-122 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 19 EXHIBIT B City Council 19 — 144 2/15/2022 r7 LKj8reyElec6 tric, I I ML City of Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services RFP# 21-122 SUBMITTED BY: M. BREY ELECTRIC, INC. 408 ELM AVE. BEAUMONT, CA92223 License#581224 DIR#1000005926 City Council 19 — 145 2/15/2022 �41MBE BEAUMONT, CA Residential -Commercial -Industrial 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA. 92223 951-845-5438FX 951-845-5642 www.mbreyelectric.com CA#581224 DIR#1000005926 City of Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services RFP # 21-122 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................Page 1 Relevant Experience........... ....................................... .. Pages 2-4 Capability Statement..................................................... Page 5 Core Competencies .......................................................Page 6 Company Organization Chart ............................................... Page 7 Service Work Plan............ ........ ............... ..................Page 8-9 Stephen Bayne (PM) Resume .............................................. Pages 10-11 John Magill (Superintendent) Resume ....................................... Pages 12-13 Non Collusion Affidavit ................................................... Page 14 Non Lobbying Certification.................................................Page 15 Non Discrimination Certificate....... .................................. Pages 16-17 References................................................................. Pages18-19 Fee Schedule............................................................... Page 20 City Council 19 — 146 2/15/2022 M. Brey Electric. Inc. City of Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services RFP #21-122 Executive Summary M. Brey Electric, Inc. (MBE) formally Brey, Electric, Inc. remains committed in our mission to be an industry leader in the design, installation, and maintenance of electrical systems. Spearheaded by its founder and President Matthew Brey with 32 years of experience in the electrical industry, he demonstrates his proven professional ability by consistently promoting the company's dedication to provide quality, excellence and environmentally friendly solutions in a safe and professional manner to our commercial, industrial, and residential clientele. As a California corporation with an A, B, & C-10 license classification, MBE has the ability to operate as a prime contractor or a subcontractor while servicing a wide variety of clients. As such, MBE prides itself on being an experienced solution provider integrating and tailoring products and services to support today's market sector's specific electrical needs. MBE well understands that in providing any proposal to perspective clients that it must completely comprehend the particulars of the client's prerequisites and its ultimate goals and requirements in providing the product and services as outlined. Respectfully, M. Brey Electric, Inc. Matthew Brey, President 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 C5LB #581224 DIR #1000005926 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 City Council 19 — 147 2/15/2022 M. Brey Electric, Inc. Residential -Commercial -industrial Relevant Experience With more than thirty years of experience as a licensed electrical contractor, M. Brey Electric, Inc. (MBE) was built with competent and skilled workman trained in all aspects of electrical installations and distribution. We strive to achieve and maintain the highest in safety standards and continue to inspire commitment in providing exceptional electrical services to our clients. The following illustrates and highlights the relative aspects of our essential performance qualifications. Underground Electrical Distribution: Work includes excavation, (trenching) conduit /conductor installations and compacted backfills. All work is performed with our own crews and equipment. MBE has completed multiple underground projects for the Federal government as well as cities and counties throughout. The picture to the right is an example of uG work for a project completed at Camp Pendleton. Installation of Electrical Pull Boxes and Vaults: In conjunction with underground electrical distribution (duct banks) installation of pull boxes and various vaults are generally included in the completed installations. MBE has installed hundreds of underground structures ranging in an assortment of sizes as dictated by project requirements. These structures in some cases require the use of our heavy equipment and skilled operators to ensure accurate placement. As always with explicit priority to safety and communication. Installation of Building Conduits: Work includes planning, layout and installation of various types of conduit and wiring within building construction to include coordination with other trades such as Fire Alarm, Communications and HVAC. MBE is fully equipped with its own hydraulic conduit benders that can bend EMT and Rigid pipe ranging in size from W to 4". Installation of Type 3 Meter Pedestals and foundations: MBE has installed several Type 3 meter pedestals in city parks, homeowners associations, and roadway landscape medians for lighting and irrigation controls. A few of these locations include City of Santa Ana, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Beaumont, 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 CSLB #581224 DIR #1000005926 City Council 19 — 148 2/15/2022 Sun Lakes Country Club, and Tournament Hills Country Club. Install and/or repair of transformers, panels boards, buss gear, lighting controls, motor controls (including variable frequency drives), branch and feeder conductors, circuits, circuit breakers, fuses, and fusible disconnects: MBE performs troubleshooting, maintenance, and new installation at well sites and pumping plants for the City of Adelanto, maintenance at water treatment facilities in the City of Loma Linda for PERC Water, troubleshooting, maintenance, and new installations at the Waste Water Treatment Plant and lift stations for the City of Beaumont and for the Morongo Band of Mission Indians and more recently installation of a new well site for 29 Palms Water District. Additionally, MBE maintains electrical systems for several commercial and industrial customers to include emergency electrical service to all commercial, industrial, and municipality customers. Pictured above is the well extension for 29 Palms Water District. Installation of large free standing switchgear and concrete pads: MBE has performed several switchgear installations ranging from 400amp 120/208volt to 4,O00amp 12,470volt. As a cost savings and time saving practice, MBE performs its own concrete and earthwork. Install and/or repair furniture systems circuits: Because MBE has many commercial and industrial customers, furniture systems are a constant part of several customers' projects. MBE is adept in assembling, installing, and relocating office partitions and power/data poles. Work on live and de -energized circuits: In order to effectively troubleshoot or not to interrupt critical power, an electrician is sometimes required to work on energized circuits. MBE is equipped to work on energized circuits ranging from 120volt to 34,500volt. MBE routinely performs "Hot Work" for the United States Navy and several commercial and industrial customers. MBE workers are equipped with "Arc flash" protective gear when required. All safety equipment and meters are routinely tested and certified. Obtain required permits and coordinate all inspections: As a specialty contractor and a general contractor, MBE is accustomed to working with different agencies, building departments and public works divisions to obtain the proper building permits or easements. Safety and code compliance are essential aspects of MBE's day to day operations. 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 CSLB #581224 DIR #1000005926 City Council - 19 — 149 2/15/2022 Install and/or repair of interior, exterior security, monument, sports field, and landscape lighting: MBE has completed LED retrofits to Fairway Ford and Fairview Ford dealerships, new equestrian sports lighting for Beaumont /Cherry Valley Parks District and streetlight replacement for the Cities of Beaumont and Palmdale. Also, MBE has installed sports field lighting, as pictured, for the City of Palm Springs and NAWS China Lake. Additionally, MBE performs street light, parking lot lighting, and walkway lighting maintenance for several home owners associations including Sun Lakes Country Club and Solaria. M Brey Electric, Inc. has performed several landscape lighting entrance projects for developments. Notify Dig Alert USA Mark Out when excavation is required: As part of a regular routine and because the type of work MBE is engaged in, notifying Dig Alert at least 48 hours before any excavation takes place is standard procedure. Also, MBE owns several pieces of underground locating equipment. Traffic control: When projects require traffic control, MBE is able to provide the required traffic control plans in accordance with MUTCD guidelines. MBE owns and maintains its own traffic control truck and is properly equipped to perform traffic control such as lane, ramp or shoulder closures, or more complex plans such as one way traffic, detours, and all freeway and highway traffic control. As the designated service provider to our client, during the course of the contract MBE will possess and maintain all Federal, State, and local permits, licenses, certifications, accreditations, insurance, associated fees and approvals necessary to provide the goods and services outlined in the RFP. 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 CSLB #581224 DIR #1000005926 City Council 4 19 — 150 2/15/2022 M. Brey Electric, Inc. is dedicated to being a top full service electrical contractor that provides superior quality and customer service to its clients. Honesty and integrity will be the driving force behind all business decisions while providing all customers with prompt, quality service at a reasonable price. CAGE: 6Y6A6 NAICS CODES DUNS: 078631914 Primary: 238210 CA# 581224 Secondary: 237130 DIR# 1000005926 Bonded & Insured SDBE Certified: California DOT M. Brey Electric, Inc. (MBE) is a well -established industry leader in the design, installation, and maintenance of electric systems. MBE is led by its founder and owner, Matthew Brey, who has the proven ability in his 30 years of electrical industry professional experience. MBE's experience in commercial, industrial, and residential projects comes with commitment to consistent delivery of quality, safety, and environmentally friendly solutions. Our experienced staff are product specialists, technical support experts, and have in-depth knowledge of state codes and regulations. As such, MBE is an experienced solution provider tailoring products and services to support market sector's specific electrical needs. City WnciIRESIDENTIAL COMMERIdA1L- 151# INDUSTRIAL 2/W/2022 5 i M. Brey Electric, Inc. In the construction market, M. Brey Electric, Inc. has the ability to operate as a prime contractor or a subcontractor while servicing a wide variety of clients. MBE electrical solutions integrates their core competencies into these market sectors: CORE COMPENTENCIES I MARKET SECTOR • Design Build and Maintenance • Street & LED Parking Lot Lighting • Electric Vehicle Charging Station • Runway Reconstruction • Waste Water Treatment Plant Electrical Maintenance • Troubleshooting • New Installations, Repairs, and Remodeling • Security Lighting • Ceiling Fans, Plugs, and Switches • LED Retrofit IDIFFERENTIATORS e • SBE Certified: California DOT • Ability to meet difficult deadlines • Ability to provide emergency and 24/7 service • Partnerships with industry leaders • Guaranteed quality: Warranty on all services and products ATTN: Matt Brey 408 Elm Ave PO Box 3159 Beaumont, CA 92223 • Commercial Industrial Buildings • Government and Military Sites • Health Care Facility • Hospitality and Entertainment • Single and Multi -Family Residential • Retail Stores and Complexes • State & Local Government Projects • Utilities • Transportation PH: (951) 845-5438 FAX: (951) 845-5642 EMAIL: info@mbreyelectric.com WEBSITE: www.mbrevelectric.com City WnciIRESIDENTIAL ♦ COMMERId®1L- 152* INDUSTRIAL 2/0/2022 0 ►� City Council 19 — 153 2/15/2022 I• M. Brey Electric, Inc. Commercial -Industrial 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA. 92223 951-845-5438 FX 951-845-5642 www.mbreyelectric.com CA#581224 DIR#1000005926 City of Santa Ana On -Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services RFP # 21-122 Services Work Plan • Establish initial communication guidelines and procedures with City of Santa Ana personnel. • MBE provides 24 hour emergency service and provides direct communication to a MBE employee who will engage the appropriate response team as necessitated. • For tasks requiring immediate attention as delineated by the City of Santa Ana, MBE will dispatch required personnel within (60) minutes of receiving notice during normal business hours for emergency repair services between (7:30AM — 6:0013M) M-F. • City of Santa Ana may assign Work Authorization for scheduled and/or pre -arranged projects in which MBE will assess and assign necessary personnel for the task including providing any required submittals for review prior to commencement of authorized work. • As tasks are assigned, MBE will evaluate the labor, material and equipment required to complete the task and develop an estimate offering value engineering relative to the cost of repair or replacement and advising the City of Santa Ana personnel. • Once authorization to proceed is received, MBE will mobilize with all required labor, materials, tools and equipment ready to initiate service requirements and perform the task at hand. On site supervision will be provided at all times during the performance of the work. • MBE shall install all material and equipment as approved or specified in strict accordance with manufacturer's written instructions. • During the performance of each work authorization MBE will insure that safety is of the highest standards and will make every effort to minimize disruption to City activities or 8 City Council 19 — 154 2/15/2022 operations. All work to be performed in compliance with Cal OSHA regulations in conjunction with MBE safety program. • Any necessary interruption of electrical services will be coordinated with the City of Santa Ana as mandated. The City will be responsible to coordinate for lock -out and tag procedures. All materials and supplies will be made available prior to scheduled interruption. • MBE will attend all Project & Work Authorization meetings as scheduled by the City of Santa Ana prior to start of work as necessitated. RI City Council 19 — 155 2/15/2022 U STEPHEN E, BAYNE 951-845-7259 10500 Cherry Ave. - Cherry Valley, CA 92223 stbaynel9@gmail.com OBJECTIVE Construction/Project Manager/ Superintendent eager to contribute expertise toward actively supporting a dynamic organization in optimizing bottom -line performance PROFILE ➢ Offer extensive experience in construction supervision and project management, with comprehensive background working with public works, private, K-12 and higher education projects ➢ Entrusted with achieving optimal utilization of resources while managing all aspects of various multi -million -dollar projects through proactive workflow planning, coordination, administration and team building ➢ Effectively develop and implement targeted action plans to maximize productivity, efficiency and profitability ➢ Dynamic communication, presentation, relationship building and problem -solving abilities ➢ Highly versatile; quickly master new roles, responsibilities, technologies, and environments ➢ Proficient in Word, Excel, Expedition, Primavera, SureTrak and Microsoft Project PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Project Manager — M. Brey Electric, Inc. Beaumont, CA 2015-Present ■ CV Kane Rest Area, $1.2M, Elderberry Pump Station, $300K, Desert Highland Unity Center, $410K, City of San Marcos- Electrical Maintenance, $500K Project Manager - Sinanian Development, Inc., Tarzana, CA 2014-2015 ■ San Bernardino Unified School District Crafton Hills College Occupational/ Educational Facility New $18M EMT/Firefighting Educational Facility Project Manager/Superintendent - McGillivray Construction 2012-2013 ■ Metro Redline New Car Wash $10M Demolition of and new construction of Metro Redline (Train) Car Wash (Work performed around active HV third rails and scheduled rail yard activities) General Superintendent — Keller CMS, Inc. 2009-2011 ■ The Village at Northridge — 275 Unit Asst. Living New construction of $75M high end Asst. Living Facility Sr. Construction Manager - DMJMH+N, Inc., Los Angeles, CA 2004-2008 ■ LAUSD BB Bond Program /JOC Program (Modernization Projects / Region 3 ) Under direction of the LAUSD Regional Manager and CM Sr. Project Manager, directly led 50+ construction team members while cost-effectively supervising $100M in construction modernization projects. Maintained effective and efficient coordination and communication with M&O and Faculty personnel General Superintendent - Projects West Const., Calabasas, CA 2003-2004 ■ Wilshire/Western (21 story adaptive re -use) $20M Demolition /Abatement /Structural upgrades to interior commercial structure. New interior build out and exterior upgrades for residential and commercial use. Project Manager - Sinanian Development, Inc., Tarzana, CA 2001-2003 ■ City of LA Public Libraries (Encino -Tarzana, Northridge, Canoga Park, Pico Union) LA Library Bond Program. Demolition and new construction of LA Public Libraries $25M Project Manager - Keller Builders, Inc., El Monte, CA 1999-2001 ■ Hermosa Beach House New construction of 3 story high end Owner leased Hotel N"ffu�fm qr of commercial tilt -ups in Agoura Hills amd El 45ge 2/15/2022 �w Project Manager - Sinanian Development, Inc., Tarzana, CA 1998-1999 ■ LAX Interline Baggage Area Remodel New remodel of Tom Bradley terminal to include baggage conveyance system tie-in to new covered baggage carousel located on the airport tarmac Career Highlights ■ Contributed leadership skills in managing all levels of team members including Construction Managers, Office Engineers and Administrative Support, with full accountability for overseeing all aspects of day-to-day operations • Performed strategic job costing to ensure competitiveness while controlling expenses to optimize profits ■ Spearheaded broad range of managerial activities ranging from JOC, project cost control and document control to Change Order negotiations and weekly/monthly status reporting ■ Exhibited advanced communication and interpersonal relation skills in building and establishing key relationships and liaising effectively with owners and customers ■ Strategically planned and coordinated schedules to maximize use of resources while minimizing costs and meeting customer needs ■ Steered construction contract administration, material/equipment procurement, manpower/inventory control and Owner/Subcontractor pay application processing, demonstrating industry expertise and detail orientation skills Additional Experience Project Manager/Estimator - Brey Electric Company, Beaumont, CA ■ Various modernization projects with Alvord, Riverside, and Yucaipa school districts Provided electrical services to various bungalows/modulars throughout the 3 school districts. Total construction value approximately $300,000.Duties included securing permits, job costing, preparing and managing construction contracts, preparing and managing construction schedules, material/equipment procurement, manpower/inventory control, Owner/Subcontractor pay application processing, and Change Order processing. Operations/Project Manager - Empire Waterproofing, Inc., Fontana, CA ■ Specialty Contractor Below and above grade waterproofing to include elastomeric coatings, caulking and window sealants, epoxy injections and waterproof deck coatings. Proficient in Hi -Rise swing stage work PROFESSIONAL TRAINING/ DEVELOPMENT 30-Hour OSHA Certification / USACE Construction Quality Management Certification City Council 19 — 157 2/15/2022 John R. Magill 1457 Saffron Ct. Beaumont, Ca. 92223 951-801-0040 iohn mbrzyu,,_. � Professional Profile I have been in the construction business for 36 years. I have worked in almost all stages of the industry, from estimating, to finish work and everything in between. • Plan take -off and estimating. Ability to read and interpret drawings, details, and prints. • Operate backhoe, excavator, skip loader, dozer, and other pieces of heavy equipment. • Layout and set forms for cast -in -place concrete. • Layout jobsite, elevations and locations. • Layout and frame, both residential and commercial applications. • Work in plumbing. Professional Experience • Journeyman level Concrete Finisher foundations, flatwork, structural decks, tilt -up buildings, runways. • Framing; cutting and stacking complex roof structures, stairs, both residential and commercial. • Drywall work including tape and texture. • Electrical: commercial, residential and Flight Line • Computer literate, some college courses completed on-line. • General contractors license holder. Superintendent /Service Manager- M. Brey Electric Inc. Beaumont, Ca Mar. 2013 to present Service Electrician - State of California Journeyman Certified Electrician Duties include: Scheduling and resource allocation of commercial, residential and industrial electrical and construction activities. Troubleshooting, repairs and new construction applications including renovations; panel upgrades; underground and overhead work; lighting and controls. Electrician — Baldi Bros Enterprises, Beaumont, Ca 4/2011 to 4/2012 Travis AFB Runway 21L Replacement. Duties included: Concrete finisher, set-up, grading. Electrical: ALSFII approach lighting, installing runway fixtures and lighting, wiring, vault work, cad welding, and all related work. Field Supervisor — HPC Building and Restoration, Ontario, Ca. 6/07 to 4/15/2011 Achievements: Completed numerous restoration projects ranging from minor repairs to complete rebuilds of damaged houses. Responsibilities: purchasing materials and scheduling activities. Oversight of in-house crews and sub -contractors performing concrete finishing, framing, cabinetry, finish carpentry, and other trades. City Council 12 19 — 158 2/15/2022 Project Manager — Sunquest Development Inc. San Bernardino, Ca 5/05- 6/07 Achievements: Completed conversion of basement to subterranean parking, City View Lofts, 3rd and Broadway, Los Angeles Ca. Bid, managed, and supervised 2 level subterranean parking structure and framing of 4 story apartment project Carlton Way, Hollywood, Ca. Responsibilities: Estimating, take -off, finding and scheduling sub -contractors, Field supervision, co -coordinating with other subs, project manager. General Contractor — JRMC, Victorville, Ca. 12/04-5/05 Achievements: Completed several remodel, room addition, concrete and framing projects Responsibilities: Estimating take -offs and client liaison. Performance of contract work, accounting and payroll activities. Foreman — Ron Burns Construction Inc Grand Terrace, Ca. 11/02-12/04 Achievements: Completed several tilt -up projects including site work. Responsibilities: Supervision of others. Reading blue prints and Scheduling. Form setting, place and finish concrete, equipment operation, lifting and placing panels in coordination with crane company, framing, roof structures, site work. Education Enterprise High School — Redding, Ca. Graduated with 3.0 average. Studies included ROP heavy equipment operation and maintenance, and auto shop. References References available upon request. City Council 19 — 159 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed 1- �i _ State of California County of Riverside _ Subscri ed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of OOVftf�r, 20%1, by (, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persono) who0appeared before me ry �ublic Signature Notary Public Seal ANGELINASYLVIATAMt1LON15 Notary Public - California Y:� ? Riverside County Commission N 2257553 My Comm. Expires Sep 8, 2022 r City Council City ot Santa 1na - 2/15/2022 On -Call Electrical Repair and ha ' ion Services Page 34 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California 1 County of Riverside J} On 11/16/2021 Date personally appeared before me,. Angelina Tamulonis, Notary Public Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Matthew A. Brey Name(e) of Signer(g)- who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons} whose names} Waxe-subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheltbey executed the same In his/IwAheir, authorized capacity4w), and that by hisfbw/their signature.M on the instrument the persons), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(* acted, executed the Instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. ANGELINA SYLVIATAMULONIS WITNESS m hand and official eal. Notary Public -California z y �., I = Riverside County > _ . Commission # 2257553 My Comm. Expires Sep 8, 2022 _. Signature Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above $ig lure of Notary Public OPTIONAL Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages; Signers) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: _M_atthew A. Bre), IXCorporate Officer — Title(s):. President ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: T C2017 National Notary Association Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(sy ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: City Council 19 — 161 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any ,person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Title: President Firm: M. Bre% Electric In Date: 11/16/21 City Council City of Santa Anal gEP%2 22 2/15/2022 On -Call Electrical Repair and Rehabilitation Services Page 35 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be-imposed-qn remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. City Council City of Santa An at FP 22 2/15/2022 On -Call Electrical Repair and eha i i ation Services Page 36 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 21-122 ON -CALL ELECTRICAL REPAIR AND REHABILITATION SERVICES 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in. the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: President Firm: M. Brea Electric, Inc: Date: 11/16/21 City Goun YI City of Santa Anal TFP 22 On -Call Electrical Repair and ehabilitation Services Page 37 2/15/2022 M. Brey Electric, Inc. REFERENCES Owner: City of Santa Ana —On-Call Electrical Repair & Rehabilitation Services On -going multi -year contract since April 2017 ending in March 2022. Services have included Security camera installations @ five sites, pedestal replacements, LED lighting retrofit, new sit lighting, transformer/panel R&R, softstarters, troubleshooting, etc. Contact: Juan Ramirez Production Supervisor 714-647-3377 _ ita-ana.org, Owner: City of Santa Ana — As -Needed Electrical Service On -going multi- year contract beginning 10/1/20 and ending 9/30/22 with renewable options. Contact: Eva Pierce (714) 647-6584 Owner: City of Anaheim Dept. of Public Works— Facility Maintenance, Repairs, Replacement & Immediate Response Services Pre -Qualified Contractor status for On -going multi -year contract with renewal options. Current project: Demolition removal and replacement of transformer and switchgear to include all underground distribution, pull boxes and vaults. Project Cost. $293,600.00 Contact: Sean Saxton Operations Supervisor (714) 765-6809 ssaxton@anaheim.n( Owner: City of Laguna Niguel— On Call Citywide Electrical Maintenance On -going multi -year contract with renewal options —NTE $100,000.00 per year Troubleshoot, lighting controls, sports lighting replacement, new circuitry, metered pedestals, LED lighting upgrades, conduit & wiring. Contact: Bruce Lindemann Bldg. & Facilities Superintendent (949) 362-4376 blindemann@citvo -aunaniguel.orR Owner: Dept of Transportation (Caltrans) — Restoration of Damaged, Vandalized, or Stolen Electrical Installations. — Contract Completed On -going multi -year contract - $578,450.00 R&R light standard foundations, new pull boxes, conduit & wiring, traffic signal cabinets, battery back-up systems, UG boring, system controllers, traffic cameras, traffic control. Contact: Robert Trujillo — Electrical Supervisor robert.truiillo@dot.ca.gov 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 CSLB# 581224 DIR #1000005926 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 City Council 18 19 — 165 2/15/2022 Owner: Contact: Footnote: City of San Marcos — Electrical Maintenance Services On -going multi -year contract with renewal options - $500,000.00 Troubleshoot, lighting controls, LED upgrades, CAT5/6 cabling, subpanels, landscape lighting, new circuitry, new conduit & wiring. Lisa Fowler (760) 744-1050 IfowlerC�san-marcos.net In addition to the above, MBE has similar on -going multi -year maintenance contracts with: County of San Bernardino, Riverside Courts, Desert Aids Project, City of Beaumont, City of Palmdale (2 contracts) City of Moreno Valley 408 Elm Ave. Beaumont, CA 92223 CSLB# 581224 DIR #1000005926 Ph. (951) 845-5438 Fax (951) 845-5642 City Council ig 19 — 166 2/15/2022 oD __ o 0 0 d rn rn m a, a, 0 0 0 d te 0 � � E s Ln m N W w to t/? tn• U T000000 �p O O O O O O O O v ` M ai � m m m v v m m v v kD 0 tNi> t`ii> t`n �1 m 0 O O O 0 0 O O G H ih th th ih tn. th V} t/� d E O O O O O O O O CS C5 O O 00 rq m Ln O +/} -1 rq kD0 L1 t00o t�h :M/) w E H �. la O O O O O O O O O O O n O W M M IO 0 "1 "1 00) T-I LLM O Ln V CC th th th th t4 Afh th -Ln tR G1 to C: ar O 'U 01 L 'L N ° y = N m R 41 N i G1 f6 Ol 7 ai U N v o t r W O c Ca -be U x N 0 E L Ln 10 J W U � s L V--I LPL C A C OJ d t'0 .OU. OA OD _ = N •L L VI C L N 'O O W •'^ c2 '� N V 4' *' C C N 3 N f0 7 CL U m 0) +�+ M i V ti Q CL Q 0 cn CD N N V N t0 tCl Q O 00 o m E m w o 00 m v v N � Ln N Q e0 [t E Q o0 W CO r-I to 00 In O1 C� lJ v s o_ O fV City Council 19 — 167 2/15/2022 City Attorney Office www.santa-ana.org/ca Item # 20 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: First Amendment to Legal Services Agreements AGENDA TITLE: Approve First Amendments to Legal Services Agreements with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP and Everett Dorey LLP Establishing Total Agreement Compensation and Expanding Scope (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP increasing the total agreement compensation to $750,000 and increasing the scope of services to include additional pending litigation subject to non -substantive changes approved by Assistant City Manager and Chief Assistant City Attorney; and 2. Authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Everett Dorey LLP increasing the total agreement compensation to $400,000 and increasing the scope of services to include additional pending litigation subject to non -substantive changes approved Assistant City Manager and Chief Assistant City Attorney. DISCUSSION On November 8, 2021, the Santa Ana Police Officers Association and Gerry Serrano filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court against the City, the Santa Ana Police Department, and four individually named City Defendants. The matter has since been removed to federal court. On November 8, 2021, the Santa Ana Police Officers Association and Doe Officers filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court against the City, Santa Ana Police Department, City Attorney's Office and three individually named City Defendants. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP is a well -regarded, full -service national law firm and the attorneys defending the litigation are experienced employment defense civil litigators. Likewise, Everett Dorey LLP is a well -regarded, civil litigation defense firm City Council 20-1 2/15/2022 First Amendment to Legal Services Agreements February 15, 2022 Page 2 located in Irvine. The attorneys defending the litigation are also experienced municipal defense and employment civil litigators. Initially, the City entered into $50,000 legal services agreements with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP and Everett Dorey LLP under staff purchasing authority for the vigorous defense of these two pending litigation matters. Based upon budgets prepared by both law firms, the City Attorney's Office is asking for a total not -to -exceed amount of $750,000 for the Legal Services Agreement with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP and a total not -to -exceed amount of $400,000 for the Legal Services Agreement with Everett Dorey LLP. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Specialized legal services during the terms of these Agreements will be paid out of the Non -Departmental Professional Services (Account No. 01105015-62300). Future budget adjustments may be necessary to provide for future year costs (Fiscal Years 22-23 and thereafter). Agreement with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Account Amount Account # Description FY 21-22 01105015-62300 Contract Services $200,000 Professional FY 22-23 01105015-62300 Contract Services $250,000 Professional FY 23-24 01105015-62300 Contract Services $250,000 Professional Total: $750,000 Agreement with Everett Dorey LLP Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Account Amount Account # Description FY 21-22 01105015-62300 Contract Services $125,000 Professional FY 22-23 01105015-62300 Contract Services $150,000 Professional FY 23-24 01105015-62300 Contract Services $75,000 Professional Total: $400,000 City Council 20 — 2 2/15/2022 First Amendment to Legal Services Agreements February 15, 2022 Page 3 EXHIBIT(S) 1. First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 2. First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Everett Dorey LLP Submitted By: Laura Rossini, Chief Assistant City Attorney Approved By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager City Council 20 — 3 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 15th day of February, 2022, by and between Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP [ ("Attorneys"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). Consultant and City are also referred to herein as "Parties" or individually as a "Party." RECITALS A. On November 19, 2021, the City and Attorneys entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("Agreement") N-2021-254 for Attorneys to represent the City and certain individual City defendants in pending litigation. B. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to increase the compensation of the Agreement, and to expand the scope of services to include additional pending litigation. THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE: Section 1, RETENTION OF ATTORNEYS, will be amended to add civil litigation defense of employment related matters including, but not limited to, Santa Ana Police Officers Association, et al. v. City of Santa Ana, et al. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01230134). 2. Section 2b, COMPENSATION, will be amended to increase total agreement compensation from fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars and zero cents ($750,000.00). 3. Except as hereinabove modified, the terms and conditions of said Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council [Signatures continue on the next page] CITY OF SANTA ANA Steven Mendoza Assistant City Manager City Council 20 — 4 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: f a,n N. Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Name: Jeffrey S. Ranen Title: Partner City Council 20 — 5 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 2 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EVERETT DOREY LLP THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 15th day of February, 2022, by and between Everett Dorey LLP [ ("Attorneys"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). Consultant and City are also referred to herein as "Parties" or individually as a "Party." RECITALS A. On December 3, 2021, the City and Attorneys entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("Agreement") N-2022-013 for Attorneys to represent an individual City defendant in pending litigation. B. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to increase the compensation of the Agreement, and to expand the scope of services to include additional pending litigation. THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE: 1. Section 1, RETENTION OF ATTORNEYS, will be amended to add civil litigation defense of employment related matters including, but not limited to, Santa Ana Police Officers Association, et al. v. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021- 01230134). 2. Section 2b, COMPENSATION, will be amended to increase total agreement compensation from fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to four hundred thousand dollars and zero cents ($400,000). 3. Except as hereinabove modified, the terms and conditions of said Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council [Signatures continue on the next page] CITY OF SANTA ANA Steven Mendoza Assistant City Manager City Council 20 — 6 2/15/2022 Page 1 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney EVERETT DOREY LLP Name: Title: City Council 20 — 7 2/15/2022 Page 2 of 2 Community Development Agency santa-ana.org/cd Item # 21 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Smart Parking Meter Upgrades AGENDA TITLE: Agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for Modem Upgrade and Warranty for Smart Meters with Credit Card -Enabled Function (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for smart meter data management, modem upgrades, extended warranty, and sensors for a five-year term with an option of two one-year extensions, from February 15, 2022 to February 14, 2027, in an amount not to exceed $300,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION Improving the experience of visitors to various areas of the City and their ability to access parking remains a priority for Santa Ana. The city's density, along with the number of people working or visiting the city on a daily basis, significantly affects traffic circulation and parking availability on the existing street network and off-street parking facilities. The City is continuously identifying innovative equipment and software or apps to provide a streamlined parking experience. In 2014, the City of Santa Ana entered into an agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for the purchase and installation of approximately 593 credit card -enabled parking smart meters, which also included data management of the meters. IPS Group, Inc. presented quality equipment, approach, and methodology with the credit-card enabled meters, real-time data, and sensors. The smart meters are now in their seventh year without full warranty coverage and are in need of modem upgrades. There are 575 smart meters serviced by the IPS Group, Inc. that are in need of a modem upgrade. The wireless carriers, Verizon and T-Mobile, are planning to sunset the older networks of 2G/3G to the new technologies of 4G/5G. The smart meters require a modem upgrade to continue their functionality of all payment options (coin and credit card), along with data tracking. IPS Group, Inc. provides proprietary smart meters and are the only firm that can provide such upgrade. City Council 21 — 1 2/15/2022 Smart Parking Meter Upgrades February 15, 2022 Page 2 In addition to the modem upgrade, IPS Group, Inc. is offering the City an opportunity to purchase extended warranty for the meters at a competitive rate, which is in the City's best interest financially (and for efficiency). The City has the discretion to opt in to either a 12-month extended warranty or 60-month extended warranty at a cost of $210 per meter after the modem upgrade has been completed at a cost of $185. Warranty coverage specifications are outlined in the Exhibit 1. The most comprehensive option is to purchase the 60-month extended warranty after the modem upgrade is completed because it will provide long-term sustainability, and is the most cost-efficient compared to purchasing and installing new meters that range in cost of $500,000. City parking meter technicians have extensive experience with installing, troubleshooting, and repairing meters. Further, staff has the expertise to make the determination to send the meters for full repair to IPS Group, Inc. as needed. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-807 requires that contracts for City purchases be awarded on the basis of obtaining maximum quality goods, services or performance at a minimum cost for the City after a competitive process. The Municipal Code also allows for awards of purchase that are exempt from the bidding process whenever the City desires to maintain an established aesthetic standard and/or functional characteristic for the purpose of preserving appearance and/or a cost savings for replacement. The City has approximately 575 smart meters, which are proprietary meters that only IPS Group, Inc. can repair or upgrade. The IPS Group, Inc. smart meters have been reliable, easy to use, and offer multiple payment options. It will also be the most time efficient and cost effective to upgrade the modems and purchase the extended warranty instead of acquiring new meters. Product/Service Price Per Unit 4G Modem Upgrade (includes new solar panel) $ 185 Optional: RMA Repair Service (includes 90 day warranty) $ 95 Shipping Free Optional: Extended Warranty for 60 months (City may exercise this option at any point up to 1-year from date of repair) $ 210 Total $ 490 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Parking Enterprise account (no. 02718131-62300) and will be appropriated in the future fiscal year budgets as follows: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Fund Description Annual Amount Account FY 2021-2022 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 100,000 City Council 21 — 2 2/15/2022 Smart Parking Meter Upgrades February 15, 2022 Page 3 FY 2022-2023 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 190,000 FY 2023-2024 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 2,500 FY 2024-2025 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 2,500 FY 2025-2026 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 2,500 FY 2026-2027 02718131-62300 Parking Enterprise $ 2,500 Total $ 300,000 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Agreement — IPS Group, Inc. Submitted By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 21 — 3 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AGREEMENTTO PURCHASE PARKING TECHNOLOGY AND RELATED SERVICES This Agreement To Purchase Parking Technology And Related Services ("Agreement") is made effective (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of Santa Ana, a municipal corporation (the "City"), and IPS GROUP, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation ("IPS"), with reference to the following: RECITALS A. City is a duly organized charter city and validly existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City. B. IPS is a Pennsylvania corporation that is qualified to do business, and is doing business in the State of California. IPS markets and supports a variety of parking technologies, hardware, software and related services. C. IPS has duly performed prior work for the City regarding parking meters and related services, pursuant to Agreement #A-2014-119, entered into on May 20, 2014, and there are no known claims related to the existing contract; As this contract shall now replace any and all prior contract(s), and to prevent any doubt, the City waives any and all claims, which it has or may have against IPS arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's execution of the previously existing contract. D. City and IPS desire to enter into this Agreement for IPS to deliver and install its parking technology hardware (the "Equipment") and related software services (the "Services", and collectively "Equipment and Services") to the City upon the terms and conditions set forth below. The Equipment and Services are described in Attachments A (Proposal Letter dated August 19, 2021) and B (Pricing). Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Term of Agreement. 1.1. Initial Term. The term of the Agreement means the period from the Effective Date above and will be in effect for a period of five (5) years ("Initial Term"). 1.2. Option to Extend. City shall have the option to extend the term of the Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year increments, for a total period not to exceed seven (7) years. City shall notify IPS of its intention to exercise the option to extend the Agreement at least ninety (90) days prior to the end of each such term. 2. IPS Services. 2.1. Scope of Services. IPS agrees to diligently undertake, perform, and complete all of the services described in Attachments A and B as directed by the City. In the case of any conflict, the Terms and Conditions section of this agreement shall supersede information contained in the Attachments or Exhibits contained herein. 3. City Services & Responsibilities. The City agrees to: City Council 21 — 4 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 3.1. Make available to IPS any currently existing documents, data or information required for the performance of this Agreement, including any material updates therein. 3.2. Designate a representative authorized to act on behalf of the City. 3.3. Keep, at its own cost and expense, the Equipment in good repair, condition and working order, adhering to any requirements for preventative maintenance. 3.4. Notify IPS of any need for customer service support or warranty repair work and will coordinate the return process with IPS. 3.5. Be solely responsible for meter posts and housings, including keeping meter posts, keys locks and housings in good working order and in compliance with all applicable laws. 3.6. Comply with applicable national, state, and local laws and regulations in any way relating to the possession or use of the Equipment and Services. 3.7. Be fully responsible, at its own cost and expense, to provide and maintain a merchant account and associated merchant account services using the City designated third party provider. 4. Equipment Delivery, Installation and Acceptance. 4.1. IPS shall deliver new, fully -tested Equipment. No used or previously owned Equipment will be allowed unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City. 4.2. Delivery and installation of all Equipment will take place during standard business hours. 4.3. Unless otherwise notified in writing, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by the City and to its satisfaction no later than ten (10) business days following completed installation or thirty (30) days following delivery, whichever occurs first. 5. Compensation 5.1. The City will compensate IPS for the Equipment and Services, as set forth in Attachment B. The total sum to be expended during this Agreement, including any extension periods, shall not exceed $300,000. 5.2. City further agrees to pay to IPS the amounts specified in Attachment B on a Net 30 basis from the date of invoice, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standards of performance set forth herein that may reasonably be expected by City. 5.3. Payment for the Equipment shall be due and paid upon delivery of each batch or invoiced line item of Equipment to the City. Payment need not be made for equipment that fails to meet the standards of performance set forth herein that may reasonably be expected by City. 5.4. City agrees to promptly notify IPS in writing of any dispute with any invoice, and those invoices for which no such notification is made within 30 business days after receipt of the respective invoice shall be deemed accepted by the City. 5.5. Reserved. 5.6. All pricing excludes any taxes that may be applicable to the City. Any applicable taxes will be added to invoices and will be paid by the City on submission of an invoice. Exemption from the payment of applicable City Council 21 — 5 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 taxes shall be provided by the City in writing. The City indemnifies IPS against any claim for payment of any such taxes. 6. Risk and Title. 6.1. IPS shall bear risk of loss of the Equipment, including any damage sustained during transportation to the delivery site. IPS will not perform any field installation or maintenance. City will ship meters to IPS for services, IPS will perform the work, and then IPS wilIsendthemeters backtothe City. Riskin the Equipment shall pass to City upon delivery back to the City after the work is completed by IPS. Transfer of title to Equipment shall only pass to City upon full payment for the Equipment. 7. Warranties. 7.1. IPS shall provide a limited 12-month warranty on the Equipment as described in Attachment B, IPS Limited Warranty. Extended warranties are available for an additional fee. 7.2. IPS shall provide technical support via telephone Mondays through Fridays from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM PST. IPS can provide on -site services at the City's request. Lead times and costs for such services will be provided at the time of the request. IPS shall ensure the availability of current manuals and shall provide all manuals for any future upgraded or new services to the City. 7.3. Wireless Coverage & Longevity: IPS does not operate a mobile wireless network, but relies on third party carriers for this service. City agrees that it is not a 3`d party beneficiary from any agreements between IPS and its carrier partners, and as there is no direct contract between the City and the carrier for this agreement, the wireless carrier shall have no liability of any kind created by this Agreement. Carriers from time to time may change coverage areas, wireless technology platforms or make other network changes that are not within the control of IPS. During the term of this contract, IPS shall provide the City the ability to upgrade or change carriers as needed at the prices contained herein or at such prices as may be agreed. Any such change or upgrades shall be at the sole cost and discretion of the City. 7.4. IPS warrants that the software Services will substantially conform to the applicable scope of work. IPS does not warrant that the software Services will operate uninterrupted or error -free. IPS will use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver to the City software Services free from any viruses, programs, or programming devices designed to modify, delete, damage or disable the software Services or City data. 7.5. City warrants that it shall not share usernames or passwords to allow any 3`d party, including but not limited to consultants, agents, or any other individuals, to gain access to Equipment and Services of any kind without the written permission of IPS. City further agrees to not do anything that could potentially compromise the security of IPS Equipment and Services or use IPS Equipment and Services in any manner which could violate local, provincial, state or federal law. 7.6. THE WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE IPS'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTIES. IPS AND ITS 3RD PARTY SUPPLIERS PROVIDE SOFTWARE SERVICES "AS IS". THE EXTENT OF IPS'S LIABILITY FOR A WARRANTY CLAIM IS LIMITED TO THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT OR DEFECTIVE SOFTWARE SERVICE. IPS DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH REGARDS TO 3RD PARTY EQUIPMENT, WIRELESS COVERAGE OR SOFTWARE SERVICES, WHETHER SUPPLIER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHERWISE. IPS AND ITS 3RD PARTY SUPPLIERS AFFIRMATIVELY EXCLUDES ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, OR REPRESENTATIONS City Council 21 — 6 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 (EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN), WITH RESPECT TO THE EQUIPMENT AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED INCLUDING ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY PURPOSE (WHETHER OR NOT IPS KNOWS, HAS REASON TO KNOW, HAS BEEN ADVISED, OR IS OTHERWISE IN FACT AWARE OF ANY SUCH PURPOSE) WHETHER ARISING BY LAW OR BY REASON OF CUSTOM OF THE TRADE. 7.7. The provisions of this Section will survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Intellectual Property and Ownership. 8.1. IPS represents and warrants that it owns or has acquired all requisite rights and licenses to use all intellectual property embodied, practiced or employed in IPS Equipment and Services being used by the City. 8.2. IPS hereby grants the City, including its departments, commissioners, officials, officers, employees, consultants, and agents (collectively, "City") all the rights and licenses required to use IPS Equipment and Services. Such rights and licenses are limited, non -assignable, non -transferable and non-exclusive, and solely for the City's internal use for the specific purposes of this Agreement. 8.3. All pre-existing and independently developed intellectual property (including copyrights), and any derivation thereof, including but not limited to designs, models, inventions, processes, methodologies, software, associated documentation, software upgrades, modifications and customizations, copyrightable material and other tangible and intangible materials authored, and combinations thereof, prepared, created, made, delivered, conceived or reduced to practice, in whole or in part, by the IPS and provided to the City ("Pre -Existing and Independently Developed IP") will at all times remain the sole and exclusive property of IPS and/or its vendors. Nothing in this Section or elsewhere in this Agreement shall be construed as assigning, selling, conveying, or otherwise transferring any ownership rights or title in IPS's Pre -Existing and Independently Developed IP. 8.4. IPS understands the nature of public information and the requirement for the City to adhere to all rules and laws that apply to public information, such as the Freedom of Information Act, Public Records Act(s), and the like. The City agrees that it shall not knowingly agree, whether directly or indirectly, sell, loan or rent any equipment or allow any third party to gain access to equipment, software, back -office software, reporting or documentation provided by IPS for any purpose, including but not limited to the purposes of inspection, benchmarking or reverse engineering or evaluation without the prior written consent of IPS, or as mandated by applicable law or any binding order of Court. 8.5. The provisions of this Section will survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Confidential Information. 9.1. "Confidential Information" shall mean, without limitation, all strategic information, business plans, data, sketches, drawings, pictures, business records, customers lists, marketing plans, policies and procedures, pricing, product information, drawings, source code, API documentation, designs, specifications, information relating to processes, technologies, methodologies, concepts or theory and any or all other information which may be disclosed by the disclosing party to the recipient that may reasonably be considered to be proprietary and non-public data, including correspondence both written and verbal and identified as "confidential". City Council 21 — 7 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 9.2. The recipient acknowledges the competitive value and confidential nature of the Confidential Information and the damages that would result to the disclosing party if any such information were disclosed or misused, therefore, recipient will keep Confidential Information protected, utilizing the same level of care and discretion that is used by the recipient to protect similar sensitive information, and shall not be disclosed by the recipient in any manner whatsoever. 9.3. The recipient shall have no non -disclosure obligation hereunder with respect to any Confidential Information which (A) has been legally made public, other than by acts of the recipient in violation of this Agreement or (B) was or becomes independently known or available to the recipient, on a non -confidential basis, from a source other than the disclosing party and which is not subject to any restrictions or disclosure or (C) is independently developed by the receiving party, such independent development being reasonably documented or (D) is disclosed with written permission by the disclosing party or (E) is obligated to be produced where required by a court order or (F) is obligated to be produced as required by law, including the Freedom of Information Act, Public Records Act(s), and the like. 9.4. The recipient shall notify the disclosing party promptly of any loss, misuse or misappropriation of the Confidential Information. Recipient agrees that no license, either expressed or implied, is hereby created or granted to recipient by disclosing party to use any of the Confidential Information. All rights and title to the Confidential Information shall remain in the disclosing party. 10. Dispute Resolution. 10.1. If any dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the parties agree to meet and confer and negotiate in good faith prior to initiating a suit for damages. However, this Section does not prohibit the filing of a lawsuit to toll the running of a statute of limitations or to seek injunctive relief. Either party may make a written request for a meeting between representatives of each party within 14 calendar days after receipt of the request or such later period as agreed by the parties. Each party shall include, at a minimum and to the extent possible, one senior level individual with decision making authority regarding the dispute. The purpose of this and any subsequent meeting is to attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If, within 30 calendar days after such meeting, the parties have not succeeded in negotiating a resolution of the dispute, they will proceed directly to mediation via a mutually agreed third party, with the cost of mediation equally shared between the City and IPS or as otherwise agreed to between the parties. Negotiation may be waived by a written agreement signed by both parties, in which event the parties may proceed directly to mediation as described above. 11. Termination of Agreement. 11.1. If either the City or[ PSviolates any material term or condition of this Agreement or fails tofu If ill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, then the aggrieved party may give the other party (the "responsible party') written notice of such failure or violation. The responsible party will correct the violation or failure within 30 calendar days or as otherwise mutually agreed. If the failure or violation is not corrected, this Agreement may be terminated immediately by written notice from the aggrieved party. The option to terminate will be at the sole discretion of the aggrieved party. 12. Insurance. IPS shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for security breaches, system failures, injuries to persons, damages to software, or damages to property including computer equipment) City Council 21 — 8 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by IPS, its agents, representatives, or employees. IPS shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance claims arising out of their services and including, but not limited to loss, damage, theft or other misuse of data, invasion of privacy and breach of data. a. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit: 2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if IPS has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non -owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (Not required if IPS does not require an automobile to perform services.) 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance: Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if IPS provides written verification it has no employees.) 4. Cyber Liability Insurance: Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by IPS in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. 5. Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions: Technology Professional Liability Errors and Omissions Insurance appropriate to IPS's profession and work hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by IPS in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach responsecosts, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. (a) The Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information "property" of the City in the care, custody, or control of the IPS. If not City Council 21 — 9 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 covered under IPS's liability policy, such "property" coverage of the City may be endorsed onto IPS's Cyber Liability Policy as covered property. 6. If IPS maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broadercoverage and/or the higher limits maintained by IPS. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions — The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1, Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of IPS including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to IPS's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or both CG 2010, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used). Please note, if there is an insured vs. insured exclusion on IPS's policy, City will carefully review with IPS and their insurance carrier on whether being added as an additional insured onto IPS's policy removes City's ability to file suit against IPS and draw upon the policy should final adjudication in a lawsuit state that IPS shall pay damages to City. 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, IPS's insurance coverage shall be primary, Coverage for commercial liability shall be at least as broad as ISO CG 20 0104 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of IPS's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiverof Subrogation: IPS hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of IPS may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. IPS agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require IPS to provide proof of abilityto pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies: If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims -made basis: City Council 21 — 10 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, IPS must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. 8. Verification of Coverage: IPS shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive IPS's obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: IPS shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and IPS shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 13. Indemnification and Limits of Liability 13.1. IPS agrees to defend with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, contractors and agents (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties") from and against losses, claims, expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees), costs, liabilities or damages (collectively, "Losses") arising from IPS's breach of its obligations under this Agreement, arising from IPS's acts or omissions, for any Losses incurred by or asserted against any one or more or all of the Indemnified Parties by reason of damage to property or injury to, or death of, any person, caused by the acts, omissions, or negligence of IPS, its employees, agents or contractors. IPS shall not be responsible for any Losses attributable to acts, omissions, or negligence of the Indemnified Parties, including misuse or abuse of IPS Equipment and Services, nor for any Losses arising directly or indirectly caused by acts of vandalism. 13.2. IPS represents and warrants that any products or services provided under this Agreement are either original, or not encumbered, and do not knowingly infringe upon the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights of any third party or are in the public domain. If any products or services associated with this Agreement provided hereunder become the subject of a claim, suit or allegation of copyright, trademark or patent infringement, IPS agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, actions, costs, City Council 21 — 11 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 judgments or damages, of any type, alleging or threatening that any products or services provided under this contract infringe the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property. 13.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this indemnification shall not apply to claims made by third parties in instances in which (a) IPS simply followed the directions or instructions provided by City; (b) City changed, modified or altered the services rendered or tasks performed by IPS such that, absent City's actions, no such claims would have been brought against IPS and/or City; or (c) the claims asserted by a third party derive from the combination of technology and/or intellectual property of IPS when used with City's owned or licensed technology and/or intellectual property such that, absent such combination, no such claims could have independently been brought by or against IPS. 13.4. In order for City to obtain the indemnification from IPS specified herein, City must: (a) notify IPS in writing of the claims for which indemnification is sought; (b) provide IPS with copies of all pleadings, writings and documents pertaining to such claim; (c) permit IPS to control the defense of such claim and all settlement discussions in regards to resolving such claim; and (d) provide reasonable cooperation to IPS in regards to the litigation or negotiation of a resolution of such claim. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, IPS will not enter into any settlement without City's prior written consent, unless all third party claims against City are released without any further liability on City's part. This paragraph shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 13.5. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute any form of real or implied revenue guarantee by IPS. 13.6. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENTTOTHE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENTSHALL EITHER PARTY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, ANTICIPATED RENVUES OR OTHER MONETARY LOSS, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENTAND ANY ACTIONS OR OMISSIONS WITH RESPECTTHERETO, WHETHER OR NOTANY SUCH MATTERS OR CAUSES ARE WITHIN A PARTY'S CONTROL OR DUE TO NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER FAULT ON THE PART OF A PARTY, ITS AGENTS, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVES, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY ARISES IN TORT, CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR OTHERWISE. WITH THE EXCEPTION FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAIMS, THE TOTAL CUMMULATIVE LIABILITY INCURRED BY IPS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SOLELY LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE INSURARABLE LIMITS PROVIDED BY IPS. 13.7. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT IPS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, ANTICIPATED RENVUES OR OTHER MONETARY LOSS, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT AND RESULTING FROM INTERRUPTION OF OR OTHER DEFICIENCIES IN WIRELESS OR INTERNET SERVICE, WHETHER OR NOTANY SUCH MATTERS OR CAUSESARE WITHIN A PARTY'S CONTROL, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY ARISES IN TORT, CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR OTHERWISE. 13.8. Both Parties acknowledge that the Limitations of Liability set forth above are fundamental elements of this Agreement, without which IPS would not have entered into this Agreement. 14. Liens and Taxes. City Council 21 — 12 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 14.1. City shall keep the Equipment free and clear of all levies, liens, and encumbrances, except those created by this Agreement. City shall pay, when due, all charges and taxes (local, state, and federal), which may now or hereafter be imposed in conjunction with this Agreement. 15. Notices. 15.1. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing, shall refer to the title and effective date of this Agreement, and shall be sufficient if given personally, sent and confirmed electronically, or mailed certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and at the address hereinafter set forth or to such address as such party may provide in writing from time to time. Any such notice will be deemed to have been received five days subsequent to mailing. Notices shall be sent to the following addresses: 1PS: To City: IPS Group, Inc. 7737 Kenamar Court San Diego, CA 92121 Attn: Chad Randall chad.randall@ipsgroupinc.com tel : 858-4040-0607 Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714- 647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Community Development Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-25) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax:714-647-6549 City Council 21 — 13 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 16. Relationship of the Parties. 16.1. This Agreement shall not be construed as creating an agency, partnership, joint venture or any other form of association between the parties, and both parties shall be and remain independent entities. Neither party has the right or authority, express or implied, to assume or create any obligation of any kind, or to make any representation or warranty, on behalf of the other party or to bind the other party in any respect whatsoever, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 17. Assignment. 17.1. Should the City enter into an agreement with a third party for parking operations during the term of this Agreement, IPS shall provide that operator the same rights, terms, and conditions as included in this Agreement. Such assignment shall not be effective unless and until the City has provided notice to the IPS of such assignment, and any such third party will be required to adhere to all terms and conditions contained herein. 17.2. IPS may not assign, hypothecate or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 18. General Provisions. 18.1. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition of this Agreement. No delay or failure on the part of either party to insist on compliance with any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of such party's right to enforce such provision, no matter the length of the delay. in the case of any granted waiver by the consenting Party, which must be provided in writing, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of the same obligation or any other obligation under this Agreement. 18.2. Documentation. IPS shall provide the City with any required documentation to substantiate our ability to conduct business and shall also provide security documentation related to our credit card processing services, including the Attestation of Compliance (AOC), upon request. The City acknowledges that the security documents provided by IPS shall be considered Confidential documents and shall be subject to the terms of section 9 above. 18.3. Modification or Amendment. No oral modifications shall be effective and nothing shall be deemed as a modification of this Agreement unless provided in writing and signed by both Parties. 18.4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Understandings, agreements, representations or warranties not contained in this Agreement, or as written amendment hereto, shall not be binding on either party. Except as provided herein, no alteration of any terms, conditions, delivery, price, quality or specifications of this Agreement shall be binding on either party without the written consent of both parties. 18.5.Injunctive Relief. The parties agree that a breach of the obligations in Section 8 ("Intellectual Property and Ownership") and Section 9 ("Confidential Information") may cause irreparable harm to the affected party, the amount of which would be impossible to ascertain, and that there is no adequate remedy at law. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10 ("Dispute Resolution"), and in addition to any other rights and remedies it may have, the affected party shall have the right to obtain an injunction from a City Council 21 — 14 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 court of competent jurisdiction restraining such breach or threatened breach and to specific per- formance of any provision of this Agreement, and both parties agree that no bond or other security shall be required in obtaining such equitable relief. 18.6. Integration. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of such taken together shall constitute only one Agreement, superseding all prior understandings, oral or written; and it is expressly understood and that this Agreement does not obligate either party to enter into any other or further agreements. 18.7. Governing law. This Agreement shall not be construed against either party regardless of which party drafted it. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California, without regards to conflict -of -laws principles, and all local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. 18.8. Venue and Jurisdiction. The City and €PS agree that the venue shall be in Orange County, California. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement may only be brought in either the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division, or the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, as appropriate. The parties agree that venue exists in either court, and each party expressly waives any right to transfer to another venue. The parties further agree that either court will have personal jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement. 18.9. Attorney's Fees. If any suit, action, arbitration or other proceeding is instituted upon this Agreement or to enforce rights, judgments or otherwise pursue, defend or litigate issues, or any other controversy arises from this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party and the other party agrees to pay the prevailing party, in addition to costs and disbursements allowed by law, such sum as the court, arbitrator or other adjudicator may adjudge reasonable as an attorney's fee in such suit, action, arbitration or other proceeding, and in any appeal. Such sum shall include an amount estimated by the court, arbitrator or adjudicator, as the reasonable costs and fees to be incurred in collecting any monetary judgment or award or otherwise enforcing each award, order, judgment or decree entered in such suit, action or other proceeding. 18.10. Force Majeure. If any party is prevented from performing its obligations stated i n this Agreement by any event not within the reasonable control of that party, including, but not limited to, acts of God, war, civil disturbance, insurrection, civil commotion, destruction of production facilities or materials by earthquake, fire, flood or storm, labor disturbances including strikes or lockouts or epidemic, and failures of public utilities (such as internet, cellular network, and electricity), it shall not be in default in the performance of its obligations stated in this Agreement. Provided, however, any party delayed by such an event shall request an extension of time to perform its obligations stated in this Agreement by notifying the party to which it is obligated within ten days following the event. If the notified party agrees that the event was the cause of the delay, the time to perform the obligations stated in this Agreement shall be extended by the number of days of delay caused by the event. if the required notice is not given by the delayed party, no time extension shall be granted. If any event of force majeure exists for a continuous period of more than 120 days, then either party shall be entitles to terminate this Agreement without being liable for any claim from the other party. City Council 21 — 15 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 18.11, Severability. If any provision in this Agreement subsequently is determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that determination shall notaffect the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions stated in any section or sub -section of this Agreement unless that effect is made impossible by the absence of the omitted provision. 18.12. Authorization. Both parties represent and warrant that the person executing this Agreement on behalf of each party is an authorized agent who has actual authority to bind each party to each and every term, condition, and obligation of this Agreement and that all requirements of each party have been fulfilled to provide such actual authority. 18.13. Determination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, should either Party be required to make any determination in terms of this Contract, such determination shall be made in a reasonable and objective manner. 18.14. Binding Document. The City and IPS each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto in respect to all covenants, conditions, and obligations contained in the Agreement. 18.15. Section Headings. All section headings in this Agreement are for the convenience of reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. 18.16. Survival of Provisions and Obligations. Any provision of this Agreement, which by its nature must be exercised after termination of this Agreement, will survive termination and remain effective for a reasonable time. Any obligation that accrued prior to termination of this Agreement will survive termination of this Agreement. SIGNATURE PAGES WILL FOLLOW City Council 21 — 16 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal corporation By: Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge City Clerk City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: /a I Ryan ; Hod(e Assistant CitAttorney IPS GROUP, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation By: ae. Z44 CHAD P. RANDALL Chief Operating Officer City Council 21 — 17 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHMENT A PROPOSAL LETTER DATED AUGUST 19, 2021 City Council 21 — 18 2/15/2022 ATTACHM ENT A Julie Castro -Cardenas Economic Development Specialist II City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency Date: August 19, 2021 Re: IPS 4G Modem Upgrade Dear Julie, EXHIBIT 1 7737 Kenamar Court San Diego, CA 9212' 1 877 630 6638 ipsgroup.com As wireless carriers are planning to sunset older networks in favor of newer 4G and 5G technologies, IPS wants to give you the latest information on 2G/3G network longevity based on the information available today. VERIZON Verizon Wireless has provided a written commitment to IPS that Verizon Wireless will continue to operate and maintain our existing CDMA (2G) network until the end of 2022. T-MOBILE T-Mobile has stated that they intend to sunset their 3G network starting as early as January 2021, with no further definition on exact time or the schedule of affected geographic markets. However, all IPS T-Mobile 3G modems also support 2G, which means that if 3G service is not available, the modem will use the available T-Mobile 2G network when possible. While there is not yet a firm commitment with regards to T-Mobile 2G longevity, we believe that 2G is likely to continue to be available until the end of 2021, and perhaps longer. However, we do not have a firm commitment in writing at this time, although we have requested it. To provide our customers with peace -of -mind, IPS can offer our clients with 4G LTE upgrades for older 2G/3G wireless systems and/or offer new products which come standard with 4G LTE wireless technology. Today, IPS operates the largest 4G LTE install base in the world for parking meter products. Many existing customers nationwide are actively making plans to upgrade their systems. The City of Santa Ana currently has 593 meters that are eligible for upgrade to 4G modems: .. T-Mobile 434 $ 185,00 $ 20.00 $ 205.00 $ 88,970.00 k Verizon 159 $ 185.00 I $ 20.00 $ 205.00 I $ 32,595.00 City of Sant Ana From IPS Group Inc. TOTAL 1 $ 121,565.00 1 *Option to RMA meters at time of upgrade for additional $95. Page 1 of 2 City Council 21 — 19 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 7737 Kenamar Court San Diego. CA 92121 1 877 63, 6638 ♦♦♦ ipsgroup.corn We can supply these upgrades shortly after you may elect to purchase the upgrades and can do this at times/intervals that ensure that there is no loss of revenue for the City. This will ensure the longevity of the City's fleet and further ensure that the City is not obliged to spend additional capital on its parking assets for many years to come. As IPS is the manufacturer of the MS` meter, IPS is the only company that can upgrade your 4G modems. This is a proprietary product designed and manufactured solely for IPS meter technology. We await your decision. If you need anything further from us to assist you in moving forward please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully, Chad P Randall, C00 — IPS Group Inc. City of Sant Ana From IPS f;roun Inr Page 7 of 2 City Council 21 — 20 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHMENT B PRICING City Council 21 — 21 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHMENT B City of Santa Ana (COSA) has approximately 575 IPS Smart Meters that are in need of a modem upgrade because they currently have a 2G modem in which Verizon and T-Mobile will no longer be able to support as of December 2022. In order to keep the Smart Meters functioning properly, a modem upgrade is needed to 4G before December 2022. COSA has the option to upgrade the Smart Meters at the price per unit listed below. As an additional option, COSA may opt in to a new warranty option based on the terms and prices listed below. MKS Single -Space 4G Modem Upgrade Capitol Cost * Extended warranties are only available on items that undergo RMA Repair Service. *Warranty starts on date RMA Repair Service is completed. COSA has the option to purchase sensors at any point throughout the duration of the term of this agreement. Capital and Ongoing Costs Product/Service M5 "' IPS Credit Card -Enabled Single -Space Meter (includes 12-month warranty, RFID tag) $495.00 Optional: Add BLE capability $65.00 Optional: Add NFC contactless payment capability $45.00 0 fional: Extended`Warran er 12:month period)..... :.:.: t1' (p......... P . ) .. . $50.00' Optional: Extended:Warranty.(48:month period)::..:, ::.:.:: $170.00:.:.:: Dome Mount Vehicle Detection Sensors (includes 12-month warranty) $295.00 Pole Mount Vehicle Detection Sensors (includes 12-month warranty) $295.00 Shipping (Ex Works — to be quoted based on ship to zip code) TBQ Installation (to be quoted based on scope) TBQ Dana 1 of 9 City Council 21 — 22 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 *COSA has the option to remain at the existing license fee as listed in Option 1 or change to Option 2 at any point throughout the duration of this agreement Note: This pricing is FOB, IPS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes and shipping charges will be added to the final invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjust Agreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics forAll Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers CCPI-U) for the U.S. City Average compounded annually. Spare Parts COSA has the option to purchase spare parts as needed based on the price list as show below. COSA and IPS may negotiate competitive pricing for bulk orders as needed/requested. .. Single Space Electronic Meter Mechanism $495.00 Card Entry Keypad Assy $55.00 Hybrid Card Reader $52.00 Coin Validator $75.00 Complete Top Cover with Lexan insert $75.00 Lexan for Top Cover $25.00 Coin Entry Slot $2.00 M5 Battery Pack (H3) $35.00 M5 Battery Pack (H5) (available on the 147/247 models only) $45.00 Solar Panel / Communications Board $185,00 Main Board $185.00 Display Board $95.00 Display Board with NFC $140.00 BLE Beacon Upgrade $65.00 RFID Tag $10.00 MKS Batter Charger (daisy chain charging unit) $125.00 Card Reader Cleaning Card featuring Waffletechnology® (40) per box $54.00 IPS vehicle detection sensor $295.00 Battery Replacement (per D-cell) $20.00 onno 7 oflq City Council 21 — 23 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Note: This pricing is FOB, IPS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes and shipping charges will be added to the final invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjust Agreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S. City Average compounded annually. MULTI -SPACE METERS COSA has the option to purchase the following equipment as needed throughout the duration of this agreement. �. epeiunit: IPS MS11' Multi -Space Pay Station - Pay and Display, Pay -by -Space, or Pay -by - Plate (Monochrome Display, Card and Coin, Solar powered, Includes 12-month $5,850.00 warranty) IPS MS3"' Multi -Space Pay Station - Pay and Display, Pay -by -Space, or Pay -by - Plate (Color Display, Card and Coin, Solar powered, Includes 12-month $6,600.00 warranty) Shipping and Installation (per unit) - During normal business hours. (Ex Works -to be quoted based on final scope of work. Concrete work is not TBQ included) ......:::..:....:...:...: ... ... . �.....: d d... O tional::Conta tless:Car Rea er. NFC "::: '::::::::.:..:..:..::.':.:;`:'-.:.::;::; ::::" '. :;:: $399.00.::..:.:.':::. Optional: Add for. Bill Note Acceptor (BNA) and:1. Stacker::::,:;' :.:.:: :.'..:. :::: : ::: : ' ::.:,:.: `:::.:.' :.-$1,250:00 0 tiorialAdditional:Com::B.ox.:... ::.:.::...:.:.:.:....,:.;...:::;:.:.::.; : ., .::.:.:.... ;: 9 $1 ....................... Optional: Additional BNA Stacker; $.230.00..::.. . . Optionah,MS1 Extend4 Part sWarr an. er 12::month'period)' ..: ;;.;: ..::.: ty.cp $295.00.:..:.`. Optio.nal;.:MS3 E.xte.nded Parts Warranty (per :l2 month:pe.riod).. ` ":>.:': :': '..:..'. ; `; <:::."':; ;$3.95:00::.::..::.: . Secure Wireless Gateway/Data Fee and Meter Management $55.00 $25.00 / $55.00 System Software License Fee (per meter per month) Secure Credit Card Gateway Fee Included $0.13 / $0.06 (per transaction) Optional: Merchant Processing Fees (per transaction) To be quoted based on volume Optional: API or Data Integration Services To be quoted based on need Note: This pricing is FOB, IPS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes and shipping charges will be added to the final invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjust Agreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S. City Average compounded annually. Pa9a of 9 City Council 21 — 24 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Spare Parts p. Standard Card Reader Assembly $129.00 $149.00 AC power upgrade kit $150.00 $150.00 Coin Validator Assembly $75.00 $95.00 Bill Note Acceptor Assembly (with 600 note stacker)* $1,250.00 $1,250.00 Additional 600 note stacker cartridge* $230.00 $230.00 Solar Panel Replacement Kit $795.00 $895.00 Main Operating Board $995.00 $995.00 4G wireless modem assembly $250.00 $250.00 LCD Display only (monochrome) $295.00 n/a LCD Display only (color) n/a 1,100.00 Armored Display Glass $125.00 $125.00 Thermal Printer $795.00 $795.00 4-key Horizontal Keypad $69.00 $69.00 4-key Horizontal Keypad $69.00 n/a 4-key Vertical Keypad $69.00 n/a 6-key Horizontal Keypad $75.00 $75.00 Pay -by -Space Keypad Assembly $195.00 $195.00 Pay -by -Plate Alphanumeric Keypad Assembly $225.00 $225.00 Coin Shutter $195.00 $195.00 Contactless Payment Reader (NFC) $735,00 $735.00 E-lock $175.00 $175.00 Battery 32Ah (rechargeable) $324.00 n/a Battery 72Ah (rechargeable) $450.00 $450.00 Additional Large Coin Canister $195.00 $195.00 Additional Small Coin Canister $95.00 $95.00 Standard Paper Rolls (standard) approx 2000 3" tickets .0045" thick $25.00 $25.00 Sticky Back Paper Rolls approx. 2400 2.75" tickets .004' thick $30.00 $30.00 Note: This pricing is FOB, 1PS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes and shipping charges will be added to the final invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjust Agreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S. City Average compounded annually. Page 4 nf 9 City Council 21 - 25 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 u. � T11�7:�`fu.f.. ► 1 ParkSmarter'" Mobile Payment Solution On -site setup: IPS shall provide the City with instructions on how to setup / install decals in support of the ParkSmarterr" mobile payment application. However, IPS will send staff to provide installation and setup services. The costs for these services will be based on the costs of travel, rental car, hotel, and per diem expenses and will be added to the setup invoice at the completion of the service based on $950/day/person. Per transaction fees: IPS shall charge the City the same per transaction gateway fee as we currently charge for the meter program in place today. No additional convenience charges are required, but can be added to the user transaction if the City does not wish to pay this fee. Preferred Card Processing Rates: Using our own payment provider IPS can provide preferred pricing for small ticket mobile payment merchant processing. Quotes for this service are available upon request. Integration Services Implementation: IPS shall integrate with 3rd party enforcement software or IPS can provide the City with IPS enforcement software at prices not included in this proposal. If any city designated 3rd party charges IPS for such implementation, then those charges will be passed along to the City at IPS costs. Note: This pricing is FOB, IPS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes andshipping charges will be added to the frnal invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjustAgreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S City Average compounded annually. DanA R of 9 City Council 21 — 26 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 REDE ENT PARM REPWILURVICES: IPS shall provide warranty and non -warranty repair services based out of our office in San Diego, CA. For repair services not able to be first achieved on -site by the Customer or by phone, these meters will be returned to IPS at 7737 Kenamar Court, San Diego, CA, 92121, for repair or rework and IPS will endeavor to ship within 3-4 weeks of receipt, depending on the quantities received and work schedules. ALL RETURNS REQUIRE AN "RMA" NUMBER prior to shipment to IPS in order to avoid additional delays. An RMA may be requested by contacting the responsible IPS customer support manager, by contacting the IPS Help desk, phone ((877) 630-6638 or (858) 404-0607) or email (customersupport@ipsgroupinc.com). All items returned to IPS must be securely package to avoid further damage in shipment and all shipments will be via Ground Freight Service unless expedited service and payment of associated fees are requested. Automated RMA tracking, including work performed to repair meters, can be viewed at any time using IPS meter management system. Price Per unit.:: Single Space M3 T" Non -Warranty repair work (includes parts/labor) $125.00 + shipping Single Space M5T" Non -Warranty repair work (includes parts/labor) $95.00 + shipping Multi -Space MS1" To be quoted Non -Warranty repair work On -site technical services: shall be quoted to include labor, travel costs, $150 per accommodation, car rental and per diem costs. Spare Parts shall be quoted and hour or $950 added to final costs based on the identified needs. per day Shipping costs for any of the above shall be added to the final invoice Note: This pricing is FOB, IPS Group, San Diego, CA. Sales taxes and shipping charges will he added to the final invoice. IPS shall have the right to adjust Agreement pricing due to increases in Inflation as published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S City Average compounded annually. onge 6 of 9 City Council 21 — 27 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 IPS Limited Warranty IPS will provide a limited parts warranty for any new meter or sensor product manufactured and supplied by IPS for 12 months under normal use. The warranty protects against defects in materials and workmanship from the point of installation or 15 months from the date of delivery, whichever is sooner, and 90 days from the date of delivery received in the case of spare or repaired products. Software Services are provided "as -is" and IPS shall provide bug fixes at no cost during the contractterm. Additional Warranty Provisions: IPS must have the opportunity to assist in the initial deployment and system installation. Repair or replacement under warranty of any defective product (including any meter or subcomponent) does not extend the warranty period for that product or subcomponent. IPS will either repair or replace products or subcomponents, at our discretion, that are found to be defective within the defined warranty period, with transportation costs pre -paid by the customer. Returns for credit will only apply once IPS has received defective product (including any meter or subcomponent) and confirmed that defects were within the warranty period and are covered under the terms and conditions of the warranty provided. IPS strongly recommends that customers pre- purchase spare parts inventory for immediate access. Defective parts can be replaced immediately from customer stock and IPS shall replace such components upon receipt and determination of defect. On -site labor is explicitly not included in this limited warranty, Customer shall be sufficiently trained to perform all on -site work, including meter or sub -component removal/replacement. IPS can provide additional on -site services under a separate maintenance agreement or quoted on an as -needed basis. THE WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE IPS'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTIES. THE EXTENT OF IPS'S LIABILITY FOR A WARRANTY CLAIM IS LIMITED TO THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT OR DEFECTIVE SERVICE OR SOFTWARE AT THE SOLE OPTION OF IPS. IPS AFFIRMATIVELY EXCLUDES ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, OR REPRESENTATIONS (EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN), WITH RESPECT TO THE EQUIPMENT AND/OR SERVICES OR SOFTWARE PROVIDED INCLUDING ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY PURPOSE (WHETHER OR NOT IPS KNOWS, HAS REASON TO KNOW, HAS BEEN ADVISED, OR IS OTHERWISE IN FACT AWARE OF ANY SUCH PURPOSE) WHETHER ARISING BY LAW OR BY REASON OF CUSTOM OF THE TRADE, Exclusions: Warranty voided with use of imitation or non -genuine IPS replacement parts, un-authorized alterations, abuse, vandalism, improper installation by customer, handling or general misuse to the equipment (hardware or software), including attempted repairs that result in damage. Warranty specifically excludes any consummable items such as paper, batteries, etc. Software warranty is void if usernames and/or passwords are shared with 3rd parties, or allowance of 3rd party access to IPS software without IPS written consent. Force Majeure; IPS shall not be liable for any warranty provisions where such product failure is as a result of Acts of Nature (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane or other natural disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war is declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist activities, nationalization, government sanction, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike, lockout or interruption or failure of electricity, internet services or cellular telecommunication failures caused by any of the events or causes described above. IPS provides no warranty with respect to any 3rd party hardware or software, whether supplied in connection with this Agreement or otherwise. Preventative Maintenance: The primary operational elements will be a working battery, card reader, coin validator and printer (ifapplicable). All product surfaces should be kept clean with mild soap and water. No harsh chemicals should be used on any plastic surfaces. The card reader heads should be cleaned with a cleaning card every 1-2 months to ensure optimum performance. Cleaning cards may be purchased from IPS. Batteries should be replaced when notified by the IPS Data Management System. At 6 month increments, the coin validator shall be visually inspected for any damage or debris. Compressed air may be used to keep the card reader, coin acceptor or printer (if applicable) clear of debris, every 6 months. Additional preventative maintenance shall be administered by customer staff at such time as it is apparent to be necessary, even if it should occur on a more frequent basis than described herein. Qanc 7 of 9 City Council 21 — 28 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Alternative Parking Payment Model Subject to the final quantities and total cost, IPS can provide the City with an alternative payment option which is based on the increased revenue generated by converting coin meters to IPS credit card meters. The City may pay more up front to reduce the total monthly payments. IPS will provide a complete amortization schedule in final agreement. Formula for Alternative Payment Model: ALL PARKING REVENUES (Cash and card) - (less) MONTHLY IPS FEES - BASELINE REVENUE _ MONEY REMAINING to pay for IPS HARDWARE PAYMENT. Definitions: • Cash: IPS data management system will be used to quantify the monthly cash generated by the meter system. • Card: Revenues which are generated using credit / debit card at IPS meters. IPS will hold the merchant account and reconcile each month with the City, no later than 10 business days following the end of each calendar month. • MONTHLY IPS FEES: as defined in IPS Pricing, all monthly IPS service, credit card gateway fees are paid first out of the parking money generated by both cash and card. • MONTHLY IPS HARDWARE PAYMENT: Monies paid towards the IPS meter hardware on a schedule defined by IPS. The MONEY REMAINING will be used to first pay for the IPS MONTHLY HARDWARE PAYMENT. If there is not enough MONEY REMAINING in each calendar month to pay for the full MONTHLY IPS HARDWARE PAYMENT, then IPS would receive 100% of what is available, and the remaining payment balance for MONTHLY IPS HARDWARE PAYMENT would be deferred and would accumulate until paid in full during future periods. • BASELINE REVENUE: Shall be the average monthly revenue generated by the parking meter system for the areas to be upgraded over the last 12 months. This amount is defined by this Agreement as [To be Determined]. Key terms and conditions of the Alternative Pricing Proposal: • The IPS MONTHLY IPS FEES AND CC FEES shall continue for so long as the meters are installed and are necessary for the ongoing operation of the meters. • IPS Group retains complete ownership and title to all equipment until the IPS HARDWARE PAYMENT is paid in full. • Number of metered spaces and number of paid parking days cannot decrease by more than 5% during the term, unless there are exceptional situations, for example construction, which will be discussed with IPS in advance. • Parking meter rates cannot decrease below current rates. 9 City Council 21 — 29 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 • Parking enforcement staffing cannot decrease during the term of the Agreement, and City cannot materially lessen enforcement that would result in lower meter payment compliance. • City staff shall continue to maintain all equipment according to recommended practices for preventative maintenance and shall respond in a timely manner to any meter alerts in the field with a target of 24 hours response time. • City shall purchase all necessary spare parts and pay for any repair services as needed, including but not limited to accidents or vandalism. • IPS shall bear risk of loss of the Equipment, including any damage sustained during transportation to the delivery site. Risk in the Equipment shall pass to City upon delivery. Transfer of title to Equipment shall only pass to City upon full payment for the Equipment. • The program contains a 12-month parts warranty, unless extended warranty is included in the costs provided by this program. After this time, the City shall become responsible for warranty repairs and associated costs. IPS Is relying on City information related to parking meter revenues. Specifically, referring baseline revenue over the last 12 months which is [to be determined]. This is a material fact upon which IPS is making this proposal. Failure for the system to generate similar revenue in future years will require the parties to negotiate in good faith to find an equitable solution, including an adjustment of the payments schedule, term of the agreement, catch-up payments or return of the parking meters to IPS. In the event that meters are returned to IPS, no revenues received by IPS shall be refundable to the City. This process shall be initiated by IPS based on the payments received and revenue performance of the system every six (6) months. Page 9 of 9 City Council 21 — 30 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 IPS Limited Product Warranty IPS will provide a limited parts warranty for any new meter or sensor product manufactured and supplied by IPS for 12 months under normal use. The warranty protects against defects in materials and workmanship from the point of installation or 15 months from the date of delivery, whichever is sooner, and 90 days from the date of delivery received in the case of spare or repaired products. Software Services are provided "as -is" and IPS shall provide bug fixes at no cost during the contract term. Additional Warranty Provisions: IPS must have the opportunity to assist in the initial deployment and system installation. Repair or replacement under warranty of any defective product (including any meter or subcomponent) does not extend the warranty period for that product or subcomponent. IPS will either repair or replace products or subcomponents, at our discretion, that are found to be defective within the defined warranty period, with transportation costs pre -paid by the customer. Returns for credit will only apply once IPS has received defective product (including any meter or subcomponent) and confirmed that defects were within the warranty period and are covered under the terms and conditions of the warranty provided. IPS strongly recommends that customers pre -purchase spare parts inventory for immediate access. Defective parts can be replaced immediately from customer stock and IPS shall replace such components upon receipt and determination of defect. On -site labor is explicitly not included in this limited warranty. Customer shall be sufficiently trained to perform all on -site work, including meter or sub -component removal/replacement. IPS can provide additional on - site services under a separate maintenance agreement or quoted on an as -needed basis. THE WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE IPS'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTIES. THE EXTENT OF IPS'S LIABILITY FOR A WARRANTY CLAIM IS LIMITED TO THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT OR DEFECTIVE SERVICE OR SOFTWARE ATTHE SOLE OPTION OF IPS. IPS AFFIRMATIVELY EXCLUDES ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, OR REPRESENTATIONS (EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN), WITH RESPECT TO THE EQUIPMENT AND/OR SERVICES OR SOFTWARE PROVIDED INCLUDING ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY PURPOSE (WHETHER OR NOT IPS KNOWS, HAS REASON TO KNOW, HAS BEEN ADVISED, OR IS OTHERWISE IN FACT AWARE OF ANY SUCH PURPOSE) WHETHER ARISING BY LAW OR BY REASON OF CUSTOM OF THE TRADE. Exclusions: Warranty voided with use of imitation or non -genuine IPS replacement parts, un-authorized alterations, abuse, vandalism, improper installation by customer, handling or general misuse to the equipment (hardware or software), including attempted repairs that result in damage. Warranty specifically excludes any consummable items such as paper, batteries, etc. Software warranty is void if usernames and/or passwords are shared with 31d parties, or allowance of 3'd party access to IPS software without IPS written consent. Force Majeure: IPS shall not be liable for any warranty provisions where such product failure is as a result of Acts of Nature (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane or other natural disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war is declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist activities, nationalization, government sanction, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike, lockout or interruption or failure of electricity, internet services or cellular telecommunication failures caused by any of the events or causes described above. IPS provides no warranty with respect to any 31d party hardware or software, whether supplied in connection with this Agreement or otherwise. Preventative Maintenance: The primary operational elements will be a working battery, card reader, coin validator and printer (if applicable). All product surfaces should be kept clean with mild soap and water. No harsh chemicals should be used on any plastic surfaces. The card reader heads should be cleaned with a cleaning card every 1-2 months to ensure City Council 21 — 31 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 optimum performance. Cleaning cards maybe purchased from IPS. Batteries should be replaced when notified by the IPS Data Management System. At 6 month increments, the coin validator shall be visually inspected for any damage or debris. Compressed air may be used to keep the card reader, coin acceptor or printer (if applicable) clear of debris, every 6 months. Additional preventative maintenance shall be administered by customer staff at such time as it is apparent to be necessary, even if it should occur on a more frequent basis tha n described herein. City Council 21 — 32 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 IPS Limited Enforcement/Permitting Software Warranty IPS will provide a limited parts warranty for any physical product, such as handhelds or printers, in accordance with the manufacturer's warranty. Software Services are provided "as -is" in accordance with the scope of services, and shall perform substantially in accordance with an identifiable set of functional specifications. IPS shall provide bug fixes and generally available upgrades at no cost during the contract term. Additional Warranty Provisions: IPS must have the opportunity to assist in the initial deployment and system installation. Repair or replacement under warranty of any defective product does not extend the warranty period for that product or subcomponent. IPS will either repair or replace products or subcomponents, at our discretion, that are found to be defective within the defined warranty period, with transportation costs pre -paid by the customer. Returns for credit will only apply once IPS has received defective product and confirmed that defects were within the warranty period and are covered under the terms and conditions of the warranty provided. THE WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE IPS'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE WARRANTIES. THE EXTENT OF IPS'S LIABILITY FOR A WARRANTY CLAIM IS LIMITED TO THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT OR DEFECTIVE SERVICE OR SOFTWARE AT THE SOLE OPTION OF IPS, IPS AFFIRMATIVELY EXCLUDES ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, OR REPRESENTATIONS (EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN), WITH RESPECTTO THE EQUIPMENTAND/OR SERVICES OR SOFTWARE PROVIDED INCLUDING ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY PURPOSE (WHETHER OR NOT IPS KNOWS, HAS REASON TO KNOW, HAS BEEN ADVISED, OR IS OTHERWISE IN FACT AWARE OF ANY SUCH PURPOSE) WHETHER ARISING BYLAW OR BY REASON OF CUSTOM OF THE TRADE, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT TO THE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES OR OTHER MONETARY LOSS, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY ACTIONS OR OMISSIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO, WHETHER OR NOT ANY SUCH MATTERS OR CAUSES ARE WITHIN A PARTY'S CONTROL OR DUE TO NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER FAULT ON THE PART OF A PARTY, ITS AGENTS, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVES, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY ARISES IN TORT, CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR OTHERWISE. ANY LIABILITY INCURRED BY IPS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE CONTRACT VALUE AS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT. Exclusions: Warranty voided with use of imitation or non -genuine replacement parts, un-authorized alterations, abuse, vandalism, products subjected to unusual physical or electrical stress, improper handling or general misuse to the equipment (hardware or software), including attempted repairs that result in damage. Warranty specifically excludes any consummable items such as paper, batteries, etc. Software warranty is void if usernames and/or passwords are shared with 31d parties, or allowance of 31d party access to IPS software without IPS written consent, or any unauthorized changes or attempts to change IPS software. Force Majeure: IPS shall not be liable for any warranty provisions where such product failure is as a result of Acts of Nature (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane or other natural disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war is declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist activities, nationalization, government sanction, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike, lockout or interruption or failure of electricity, internet services or cellular telecommunication failures caused by any of the events or causes described above. IPS provides no warranty with respect to any V party hardware or software, whether supplied in connection with this Agreement or otherwise. City Council 21 — 33 2/15/2022 Community Development Agency www.santa-ana.org/cd Item # 22 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Increase Spending Capacity for the Homeless Navigation Center Construction AGENDA TITLE: Approve Increase in Spending Capacity with Dyer 18 LLC for Unforeseen Tenant Improvement Costs Relating to the Homeless Navigation Center (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to increase spending capacity with Dyer 18, LLC for tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center, in the amount of $2,000,000. DISCUSSION On March 2, 2021, the City Council approved a lease agreement with Dyer 18 LLC for an industrial building located at 1815 Carnegie Avenue to be used as a homeless navigation center. This lease agreement included tenant improvements (construction), as well as a purchase option. The original tenant improvement costs were estimated as $8,500,000 with an additional contingency of $850,000. It has become apparent that the original estimate to complete the tenant improvements will be insufficient to complete the work on this site based on reoccurring unanticipated costs, COVID-19 pandemic -related expenses, and changes in scope. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges for supply chains and goods nationwide. Furthermore, there was a disruption in service when goods were unavailable, along with an increase in costs of goods. Specifically, when the current contractor evaluated and estimated construction related costs to make the location habitable, various items were believed to have been completed by a prior construction. It was determined, however, that all work performed by the prior construction entity needed to be re -addressed and or altered. Costs associated with these unforeseen issues were not originally part of the original cost estimate. Additionally, with the goal of opening the site as quickly as feasible, overtime pay was approved as a contingency response. The totality of issues at the site have created these unforeseen financial impacts, and therefore necessitate increased expenditures in the amount of approximately $2,000,000, for a total of $11,350,000 to complete construction and allow occupancy. City Council 22 — 1 2/15/2022 Increase Spending Capacity for the Homeless Navigation Center Construction February 15, 2022 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds in the amount of $2,000,000 are available in the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) 2 grant, Building Improvement account (no. 12218716- 66200) for expenditure in the current fiscal year. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Lease including Addendum 2. Schedule of Values Matrix Submitted By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 22 — 2 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 �,H� - -L�UIRF irJ 'C 0CE' MAR 0 9 2021 A-2021-028 p : CDR Cr) (T-ylt-I A I R C R 9 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE -TENANT LEASE - NET (DO NOT USE THIS FORM FOR MULTI -TENANT BUILDINGS) 1. ewlcProvIdont("BaslcProvisions"). L1 Parties. This lease ('lease'), dated for reference purposes only .MarCh 1, 2021. , Is made by and between -DYER _ B LLLC• ('Lessor") and THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ('Lessee'), (cD4cdvaly the "Partin," or In dividu ally a "Party'), 11 Premises: That certain real property, Including all Improvements therein or to be provided by Lessor under the terms of this Lease, commonly known as (street address, city, state, tip): 1815 EA5T CARNEGIE AVENUE, 5ANTA ANA. CA 92705 ("Premises'). The Premises are locatedlnthe County of ,ORANGE- , and are generallydescrbed as(descelbe briefly the nature of the property and, If applicable, the "Project," If the property Is located within a Project): AN APPROXIMATE 29,503 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING . (See also Paragraph 2) 1.3 Term: 1S years and _ months ("Orlllnal Term") commencing —March 2021_ ('Commencement Date") and ending _Janua[y 31,- 2036 ("Expiration Date'), (See also Paragraph 3) 1.4 Early Possesslon: If the Premises are available lessee may have non-exclusive possession of the Premises commencing N/A ("Early Posseulon Data'). (See also Paragraphs 3.2 and 3.3) 1.5 Base Rent: $61,666.00 per month ("Base Rent"), payab)e on the 1ST day of each month commencng SEE ADDENDUM , (See also Paragraph 4) ❑ If this box Is checked, there are provisions in this Lease for the Base Rent to be adjusted. See Paragraph .SEE ADDENDUM 1.6 Base Rent and Other Monies Paid Upon Execution: (a) Base Rent: $61,666.00_ for the period 15T MONTH RENT,. (b) Security Dopoilt:-$20Q,000,00 ("Security Deposit'). (See also Paragraph 5) (c) Associamn Fees: for the period (d) Other: for (el Totai OueUpon Execution of this Lease: $261,666 . 1.7 Agreed Use: EMERGENCY HOMELESS SHELTER AND ANCILLARY USES . (see also Paragraph 6) 1.0 Insuring Parry. LBssoris the "Insuring Party" unless otherwise stated herein. (See also Paragraph B) 1-9_ Reel Estate Broken. (See also Paragraph 15 and 25) (a) Representation: Each Party acknowledges receiving a OlWosure Regarding Real Estate Agency Relationship, confirms and consents to the following agency relationships in this Leasewlth the followingreal estate brokers ('Brokar(s)') and/or their agents ("Agnent(s)'): Lessor's Brokerage Firm N/A Ucense No. _ Is the broker of (check one): Elthe Lessor; or is troth the Lessee and Lessor(dual agent). Lessor's Agent N/A License No. _ Is (check one): ❑ the Lessor's Agent (salesperson or broker associate); or ❑ both the Lessee's Agent and the Lessor's Agent (dual agent). Lessee's Broke rage Firm N/A License No. Is the broker of (check one): ❑ the Lessee; or ❑ both the Lessee and Lessor (dual agent). Lessee's Agent N/A Llcense No. _ Is (eheckone): ❑ the Lessee's Agent (salesperson or broker associate); or both the Lessees Agent and the Lessor's Agent (dual agent). (b) Payment to Broken. Upon execution and delivery of this Lease by both Parties, Lessor shall pay to the Brokers the brokerage fee agreed to Ina separate written agreement (or If there is no such agreement, the sum of _ or _ % of the total Base Rent) for the brokerage services rendered by the Brokers. 1.10 Guarantor. N/A ("Guarantor"). (See also Paragraph 37) 1.11 Attachments. Attached hereto are the following, allof which constitute a partof this Lease: an Addendum consisting of Paragraphs 51 through 70 ❑ aplot plan depicting the Premises; acurrent setof the Rules and Regulations; El a Work Letter; olher(specify): 2. Premises. 2.1 letting, Urssor herebyleases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, the Premises, for the term, at the rental, and upon ailof the terms, covenants and conditions set forth In this Lease. While the approximate square footage of the Premises may have been used In the marketing of the Premises for purposes of comparison, the Base Rent stated herein Is NOT tied to square footage and Is not sub)ect to adjustment should the actual slae be determined lobe different. NOTE: lessee Is advised to verify the actual site prior to oxecudngthls lease. 2.2 CDotiltion-J. uo balldaik+tic•tkwAreasi4a4& PcaaChsccus41424- ad•4aaol41abt,14-44-GaasmaacameasDascoo-Stw-Cutt.Aoccracclo4Data, wNrh4uar fivaoccus&4!3"A0,to 4.and,cokn&nth►-wqulsad&404WcaatsactcCie culbod•Ja.4acagrapha.4b)balow4tao6Wnod byLauaaaadJoottauxlWwthAMtdAw kliou,lagtbaStactDatq-wawals tWtthaaxkda0alatscica4-plumb)ng,Ficacpdaklcar,ligharsg.Aaaaag,•yonnsadag-an4alc soadltSoalag tycteraa �=b1WC-'�rlwdk+9 doors,-wm?zDumpe llany.aadallnihat.such.ofaawats-la-tAaFramisac�ottwc-Wantbocacva,kuciadb}1ecsae-shall beta gaodapaaring-coadlctoava-uddata- INITIALS INITIALS Q 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:S3 AM STN-27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page 1 of 16 City Council 22 — 3 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 tAatt64-cuvctwalaromaAwas#,.ocoof,•bwFiag wa4v^�z�^^•^- .��Laa}Dulfdkrgt-aatbv•RF4m3sai�4ba=Ji.utldla�'-}tbaULp•twpnlFaaLDFiat,doblcttra�nd tbaiitta GramicOt•d4-rwLooAtala-b»arda,tlauolaoFaaymo3d acivagl d4ttaadatsoxk-uad4FapputabratsawastDdasatlaw.-1tsAaA•coAapUaAcawtttr ptd-+,�quaaty� a>tktcac of tbaStaNt>atD,•ostlana atia<# tyci4miasalvawatsihartLd maUuactloa-ac#ltwtWta lbaapprapclaivyur+aatyrpealad,taGa. ibaU,-aG all 006 4 ataabsigatsoa w La 1,049004o"-matle;,4xcaptaf•4U*PAGaprovW44la-ihaiLaDif.pcomg3ly91116;W pc4lwFI40-A09lGfFomtaciavaWagtartivNkA•tpot131ctyLtwwLu4aAd- aFLaAtot •wGh S;OA• tAiApkaMA,•n4atrtfaGdaA 4r la4ararFaGpl•) Laraa•i11.4tiat'L axpoAt4-•TAe4Faf:aatY ptirlodi•ihailb9 il•tat3a: ws(i}b awAllu•a4ta Lha-ttlt�iyLtamir• aad+[�•10 dayG..utoihaFVFaalalagga6.outs-gndottur-Gom4altoE tha.8ulldtn�leLauavdoas RaLgkcD lvieoN3s►trqutFictAottse•NJtbla-Lp4appFVPFbiLD-wacraaty. pasiod,torr4ctioaolaayiucb aanoompAaacoTAlaEfarncdoA oFliuurgsbaAbv-tltaobllBatkDnaf•LatsYa•at•Lauoe`i141v cDctaAd4oiPa0146-3 atiaraito-watraais,ihyt ualaseothaavW-cpocdi4diA a�crtdaB,L,attaF3i.uA;waca-ot• {!} Pay Focordvd11oi1sroc•ot-t?abuk-u3gttlagttwFtamlta}{U} Pay doNAgavnLawouAttOw aadvF.aaµ.lgan- fatur4dtry-CtaaAwaslwtiaad+Ul}aaytfaakcupttyptvcaadla$.aflacriAg tAa-Rr4fstltsi 1.2—ComPftaaca�t,attoowauiALc thaLao lAvJavtt•at kikaauEvdg4tbaktuprouwaDall• 4n•tk4•Atvaakac WmAA�� LhabuUcUagradac; apP.Uca!>IloSawcr ca wruattoc wttskdo"04Gcacd, t»agtclatlo"AdordtAiricss 4'ApQUcs6ta-Rag+il+uaeasi'}LAatxwu 3naU4ctatiba4w4,that4a4hlraprov4mont,"PAW on- tA4raab�•ras aaaslra4 tad�S old warsaAiyda4i riot apply tq 1#P U[a tDwhktslvtt4aw44Qutiha Rr4mk4iraladlacatlaAG.wblCh.may [?a 44gW" by 444AAwriwaiwitts Oaab4ktatAUaraay.tlatUaatarucas4wtcdiofLauaa'[too(mastaPagcapb-444c-Uq"444atiom-otAA114-twO444nt+asdegQQd•kaparabwpbz4(44ma14acto- b4,naao-t}yt4t1YY dso LaCa4tt4i{!Qq{lt7t•t4.Kd.3.r,INk+lae wrt.tti.coGiwL.Q4A111111C+141 4.244414POM4911r00d=41116211Y. lht ian►ne, an apP%w4 owe tw. Loctao'i1Fr1ortladuoo,♦adai3raosalad*"4W"1*4+rtNot444-POGM &&-TAaIAa•loaparba4U Wb&L-tlthoFr4aJGstc4Gv 4"*Rly4AI4wtd•xaauaaty,•J*&wr-LhaU,- oxcapt ai•4lheaNtf4Pr4Nidad, 7�^^r�^I'if14rNCalpt•Df=,GfRLAn-ADtIG9lrOiti-Lai6O4tgLQlr1�a01til•M'lillLpaG:tLGiLy thQAsiYiOiAdYKLDaiatinFChADFhiaiAPGant4,.aadfY- ih4t3rAia-sU gitOr•`i�lfQQaW.-J�LOLN6dDaC A9L✓�a-1<itiar• wr3tt4AA011ii-ati A4A•GOAip1E?AGaNsLtti��i��lVaFFaalrj4Fltl1la5AlAntiC-faEtOr4la�tl14it7ri Data,- coutxgoa•aEt3utaou•compUaaw thaUAathoabUgalWaattatt4wi•testae'uolaGot6aad�paoie.-ttttwAppUabiD RagsFiranaoalc-xahor4afiaachaagvdaoxt-to- requiq dueiagtha t4rm-oith3tLaaea tba caoctruu{aa plsa addtnoo to-aw-aA alsarailert ottha F,evrwUat-aadrtaF-W+Gd1ag,. Uw rrrwodlipoA 4l-aay ttaaraiaut: SubuaAevr attire-r4lataFCariaaAL as athoiQltyt4cataHIdittt ►1tGA-Of l#b.ttal4, plWti{iAL.'aAd,�Mi,4itdtag�=fftptlil�MdltLFa"},.iptwc• aad.Lacivvit>a3t•aUow totbacottal cucl� uwrksc-foltow� (a+--Subjactto•FarlgrtpA•2.3{cj>wk>+tlt;4ch Caplial gxp4aditus4saa•ragtdfad•at sLviuii o62bcCP4thiicaAd•valqusacv.afia•ta,ram4aclavlvctaa.at. wAapaFod�Nit#.utai•bytvaautt lAgonorafrt.vicvashaU•bY•lu4y�-Lotpaaslak-tactkccoct• WaFoaE, pjtuwdad,3wwrvv4r,lhatlLwch•Ca{+ltal &rtwadkus'alcsvqulrad.duFLag. tha.lati3ywrt-ai lhk L4atvaAdttw cocF thowvl•aawodc imaat#t�4ac4RaatTl,vttvo mvf-iacLvadLaaAlaato this LW,tauw14cs1aGwF•aotUi4c14uaarMavciUagr ssdlhlsl.ladalklalat.t> C41ro(1osiea.'S.tQEWIJp41lun.acLUM1l.4assor.has.elAtalltopaythedlNnrmcnbetumvut6r,acI-)mtf.lbretcof.Dadan.amnunte4ud.to& AapatAttltisaRaAt 1E14tt44tlaCLCtirHAtraattaM101604tbaplAtmvdlals3Ycax►tiwutoDitbatUarAtwcwb3cl-wgulwc•NIG#t:iplti3SxWAdituwaaddaUtwttal4Kac- wxitt4aaoilcotpaciF/iagat4casYtatioaaftiaattvau-04drfatk4ctaltrr.—A'ihLvrminaU4a datN GhaUriK++�+Duot,aA ao4vvAt-ha aacU4F•ttuaih4lacidaytha+tt4ciaa• coutdlogalfY utlUa4iha�r4raltei+.dtiu;wLcotaaAVAda&aGrchtapltal-EMpaAdttuca (b}-7LcuGb CapkaliapvadUuwicAotLtwraacEtat•4h4ip4ciUwnd.ualquat�tadlhaRromkaibyl4tsgv}wthatr�0000gawatail,pasaadatvdcakmtc- wodtflutfoacl thva 14ct4 thawgaytoG w4h,Q*14 litawia"h moat dwlaotha r4AaakidaCattkaspraaollbitlaar7- af say4xtvattoa tbatfwl. as ikadata• Lltai•anit�bicAih4 isaia Aaaik dwraA-araouai aovalia-iti4Atb of tkaP�oa of -stub coitc-raasoaably-ater3bulaWo-to Zrb4 psamieaeri4ct4atAi31 iFayrtaLaaaat 4A•tlso balaaev-httt Puy PwPaY at abUgarioA-at aaY itma-dr Ao rovarrtueh Capital-i>tpondltuw k sag4k4dduFiag ihclast-�yoar� al [bit• laat4 r>t• 3t 14tiotroasaaably. doiosmlAaf-that 14k Act aco»omkaJly-toot Wtv to ¢ay -its LtaFq iharaalr lattactpail-ba�o 4haopttpato. torr#aata ihfa"ataa,{stw. Sirldays Qriorwdts4A-aossco u Laccoa uaWcsl4Gta4-aoUdail4twrr lauaidag,aFlib3a aOdayt-afivP sauipLatLacioc'itatatiaotlOa-aouwl�tutl4ctoawAly.iµ.lortuc#.• Capkal.tx},eadk4ra-ttl4atar. dwt AD4 �14GiiO•tarmhFitarsad• laity w taAdvr. kt-s#ua•alanyr•itub Gapltilgxp4adUtua,laK� mayradwae4 Guth ftu4ieaaddaduit iiAaa,.rrlltb•Mtaia[t,:WAt•tlQatYAULiftWF�i•CtFiFItOt tttGlFGot" 4"4-6" yGa A"Wilaaw oi•ifis u•duo• Pad payabta Los-t#?t4malYWaPatihii ttiatek-aab LSIft1G3aAi lof+dly.ulwstwstvlaGcvDowaAoffivt•badcrl,vciayshsUhiustt3ta4 i�gbi.ta tara>iaatatbEt lease upoa34 days wdU" Aobrai Ao J,"w- (t;-sIPaMlibisaAdlan�h4abover"OPo+riiaFst•GOACQ64;j%Ca Uai i&Kpegajl rotar4tat4ndadtoaDsal'roaiy30-r1Qa�414sF1#ijrytFniMj?Q4t4drindaeM APfrUcablo/ia4ulumvalt-!t•tb4GapltalLrpaadllucat aV lanced- Wggorad LylAcwa asa coc4ko[ an-acictaLvapropoudohaAgv-3nutv,.d>aagv lninLt�aUtY.af+wv.•o,r- awdillcatioa to. Ah*UtoallLpL then,andla-thatAwntrLett4ochsU okAva: (1} im4,nodl41i43y. caaWI sac# chaagod 4w.or.'AsaaAsy�Ct•uG4aad joFLak4 st+cA othaF• cWpiat. Asaybo�4toswF>rev-oBFptaaWttwm4uloamMAt4astwh-C40WUpa;4044ra,-or{4kaasptatnsuch cap,4 gatpaaaturaallts.0ualaxpaAiv-l4Giaa-t3nitaot,baww+a;• belle-aAy-Ft$hita•Lasalipata i1ttL 10afa. ZA Acknowledgaments. Lessee acknowledges that: Wit has been given an oppoitualty to Inspect and measure the Premises, (b) it has been advised by Lessor and/or Pickers to satisfy itself with respect to the sire and condition of the Premises lincluding but not limited to die electrical, WAC and fire sprinkler systems, security, environmental aspects, and compliance with Applicable Requlfements and the Americans with Disabilities Act), and their suitability for lessee's Intended use, (c)Lessee has made such investigation as It deems necessaryw4h reference to tuck matters and assumes ail responsiblllty therefor as die same relate tolls occupancy of the Premises, (dj it Is not relylne on any representation as to the slceof the Premises made by Brokers or Lassa, (el the square footage of the Premises was not material to lessee's decision to lease the Premises and pay the Rent stated herein, and Qj nelther tesso , Lessor's agents, nor Brokers have made any oral or written representations or warranties with respect to sold matters other than as set forth In this Lease. In addition, Lessor acknowledges that (1) Brokers have made no representations, promises or wait anttes conc"ng Le ssee's ablllty to honor the lease or suitability to occupy the Premises, and Ui) it is lessor's sole responsibility to investigatethe financlal capability and/or sultablUty of all proposed tenants. 2.5 testers as Pilot Owner/Occupant, Thewarranties made by Lessor In Paragraph 2 shalt 6e of no forty or effect If Immediately prior to the start Cote Lessee was the owner or occupant of the Premises. in such event, Lessee shall be responsible for any necessary corrective work. 3. Term. 3.1 Term, The Commencement Date, Expiration Date and Original Term of this lease areas specified in Paragraph 1.3. 3.2 Early Possession. Any provision herein granting Lessee Early Possrisslon oftho Premises Is subject to and conditioned upon the Premises being ava liable for such posseuion prior to the Commencement Date. Any grant of Early Possession only conveys a non-exclusive right to occupy the Premises, if Lessee totally or partially occupies the Pmrrlses prior to the Commencement Date, the obligation to pay Base went shall be abated for the period of such Early Possession, All other terms of this [-ease (including but not limited to the obllgations to pay Beat Property Taxes and Insurance premiums and to maintain the Premises) shall be in effect during such period. Any such Early Possession shall not affect the Expiration Date, 3,3 Delay In Possession. Lessor agrees to use Its best commercially reasonable efforts to deliver possession of the Premises to Lessee by the Commencement Date. 11, despite said efforts, lessor Lt unable to deliver possession by such date, Lester shag not be lub{act to anyllablllly, therefor, nor shall such feliure affect the validltyof this Lease or change the Expiration Date. Lessee shall not, however, be obliga led to pay Bent or perform its other obligations until Lessor delivers possession of the Premises and any period of rent abatement that Lessee would otherwlse have enjoyed shalT run from the date of dellvery of possession and continue for aperiod equal to what Lessee would otherwise have enjoyed under the terms hereof, but minusany days of delay caused bytheac.tsoremissions o1 Less e, if possession Is not delivered within 60 days after the Commencement Date, as t be extended under the terms of any Work Letter executed by INITIALS V 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved, Last Edited; 2/25/2021 9:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 2 of 15 City Council 22 — 4 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Parties, Lessee may, at Its option, by notice In wrlHng within 10 days after the and of such 60 day period, cancel this Lease, in which event the Parties shall be discharged from all obligations here under, If such written notice Is not received by lessor within said 10day period, Lessee's rlght to cancel shall wrminale. if possessloo of the Premises is not delivered within 120 days afler the Commencement Date, this Lease shall terminate unless other agreements are tea shed between lessor and Lessee, In writing. 3.4 Lessee Compliance. Lessor shall not be required to tender possession of the Premises to Lessee until lessee compiles with Its obligation to provide evidence of Insurance (Paragraph 8.5), Pending dellveryof such evidence, Lessee shalt be required to perform all of itsobilgations under this teaser from and afterthe Start Date, including the payment of Rent, notwithstanding Lessor's eletrlanto withhold possession pending receipt of such evtdence of Insurance. Furiher, if Lessee Is required to perform any other conditions prior to or concurrent with the Start Date, the Start Dateshall occur but Lessor may elect to withhold possession until such conditlonsare satisfied. 4. Rent. 4.1 Rem Defined. All monetary obligations of Lessee to Lessor under the terms of this Lease (except for the Security Deposit) are deemed to be rent ("Rent"), 4.2 Paymant Lessee shah oust: paymentof Bent lobe received by Lessorin lawful moneyof the United States, without offset or deduction (except as specifically permitted In this lease), on or before the day on which it Is due. All monetary amounts shall be rounded lathe nearest whole dollar. In the event that any Invalce prepared by Lessor Isinacturate such inaccuracy shalf not constitute a waiver and Lossee shag be obligated to pay the amount set forth in this Lease, Rent for any period during the tram hereof which Is for loss than one full calendar month shall be prorated based upon the actual number of days of said month. Payment of Rentshall bemade to Lessor at its address stated herein ortosuch other persons or placeas Lessor may from timoto time designate Inwiling. Acceptance of a paymentwhich Mess than the amount then due shall not be a walver of Lessor's rights to the balance of such Rant regardless of Lessor's endorsement of any check so stating. In the event that any check, draft, or other Instrument of payment given by Lessee to Lessor is dishonored for any reason, lessee agrees to pay to lessor the sum of $25 In addition to any late Charge and Lesso, at Its optlon, may require all future Rent be paid by tashler's check, Paymentswlll be applied first to accrued late charges i M attorney's fees, second to accrued Interest, then to Base Rent, Insurance and Real Property Taxes, and any remaining amount to any other outstanding charges oncosts. 4.3 Assoclation Fees. Intentionally Omitted.•tn ea,nnu V equal ioau>po—ge, arauciatWn ar-coadwala[ura coat rev bad ac auassad•a6a ust•csw-suwataas—Sob• asoalaa shalt-"im"t at 4he taaaa ilmaaari ta lira catna+su aaneaac-3ha8asa go". S. Security Depmlt. Lessee shall deposit with lessor upon execution hereof the Security Depositas security for Lessee's faithful perfarmance of Its obllgatlons under this Lease. If Lessee falls topay Rent, or otherwise Defaults under this Lease, Lessor may use, apply or retain all or any portion of said Security Deposit tot the payment of any amount already due Lessor, for Rents which wind be due In the future, and/or to reimburse orcompensate Lessorfor any Ilabllity, expense, loss or damage which Lessor may suffer orincur by reason thereof. If Lessor uses or applies all or any portion of theSectirlty, Deposit, lessee shalt within 10 days after written request therefor deposit modes with lessor sufficient to restore said SecuiltyDe posit to the full amount requlred by this lease, ff Me ease Rent Increases during file term of thlslease, Lessee shall, upon written request from tcssor. deposit additional monies with lessor so that the total amount of the Security Deposit shall atoll times bear the same proportion to the Increased Base Rent as the Initial Security Deposit bore to the Initial Base Rent. Should the Agreed Use be amended to accom modate a material change In the business of Lessee or to accommodate a sublessee or assignee, Lessor shall have the right to Increase the Security Deposit to the extent necessary, In Letsor's reasonable judgment, to account for anyincfeased wear and tear that the Premises may suffer as a resuft thereof, if a change in control of Lessee occurs duringthls tease and following such change the financialcondliton oftessee It, In Lessor's reasonable judgment, slgnificanity reduced, Lessee shall deposit such additional monies with Lessor as shall be sufficient to cause the Security Deposit to be at a commercially reasonabhs level based on such change in financial condition. Lessor shag not be required to beep the Security Deposit separate from [is general accounts, Within 00 days after the expiration or termination of this Lease, lessor shall return that portion of the Security Deposit not used or appkd by Lessor- Lessor shall upon wthitun request provide Lessee with an accounting showing how that portion of the Security Deposit that was not returned was applied, No part of the SacurityDeposlt shall be toruldeted to be held in trust, to bear interest or to be prepayment for any monies to be paid by Lessee under thislease, THE SECURITY WPOSITSHALL HOt BE USlD BY LESSEE IN LIEU OF PAYMENT OF THE LAST MONTH'S RENT, 6. Use, 6.1 Use lessee shall use and occupy the Premises only for the Agreed use, or arty other legal use which Is reasonably comparable thereto, and for no other purpose. Lessee shall not use or permit the use of the Premises In a manner that Is unlawful, creates damage, waste or a nuisance, or that disturbs occupants of or causesdamage to neighboring premises or properties, Othaa-thaw-gultle,-algnalsndceokgrye>ZarlarwaatsaU-awtJwapar-aUaualaihAFewnkoaaa fpeu.aalassaic,- Wrda,ttsA,a:.cepUiac Lessor shall not unreasonably withhold or delay itsconsent to any written request for a modification of the Agreed the, so long as the same will not Impair the structural Integrity ofthe Improvements on the premises or the mechanical or electrical systems therein, andfor Is not slgnlfttamly more burdensome to the Premises. If Lessor elects to withhold consent, Lessor shall within 7 days after such request give written notification of same,whlch notice shall include an explanation of Lessor's objections to the change In the Agreed Use. 6.2 Hazardous Substances, (a) Reportable Uses Require Consent. The term "Hwardous Substance" as used In this tease shall mean anyproduct, substance, or waste whose presence, use, manufacture, disposal, transportation, or release, either by itself or In combination with other materials expected to be on the Premises, Is either., (I) potentially injurious to the publichealth, safety or welfare, the environment or the Premises, (fs) rogulaled or monitored by any governmental authority, or (IR) a basis lot potential liability of Lessor to any governmental agency or third party under any applicable statute or common law theory. Hazardous Substances shall include, but not be limited to, hyd(ocarbons, petroleum, gasoline, and/or crude allot anypfoducts, by-products orfractiom thereof. Lessee shall not engage In any activity In or on the Premises which constitutes a Reportable Use of Hazardous Substances without the express pnarwritten consent oflessot and timely compliance (at Lessee's expense) with all Applicable Requirements, "Reportable Use" shall mean if) the Installation or useof any above or below ground storage tank, ill) the generation, possession, storage, use, transporlatlon, ordlsposalof a Hazardous Substance that requires a permit from, or with respect to which a report, notice, registration of businessplan Is required to be hied with, any governmental authoilty, and/or till) the presence at the Premisesof a Hazardous Substance with respect to which any Applicable Requirements requires that a notice be given to persons entering or occupvingthe Premises or neighboring properttes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, lessee may use arty ordinary and customary materials reasonably required to be used In the normal course ofthe Agreed Use, ardinoryofflcesupplies (copler toner, liquid p R, glue, etc.) and common ho usehold cleaning materials, so long as such use Isin compliance with all Applicable Requirements, is not a Reportable Use, and does not expbsethe Premisesor neighboring property to any meaningful risk of contamination ordamage or expose Lessor to any lability therefor, In addition, Lessotmay condition its consent toarry Reportable Use upon receiving suchaddltionalassurances as Lessor reasonably deems necessary toproteCt Itself, the publlc, the Premises andforthe environment against damage, contamination, injury and/or liability, Including, but not limited to, the installation (and removal on or before tease explraton or termination) of protective modifications (such as concrete encasements) and/or Increasing the Security Deposit. (b) bury to Inform lessor. It lessee knows, or has reasonable cause to believe tit t a HatardotuSubstancehascome to be located in, on, under er INITIALS lIl © 2019AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25120219:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 3of 16 City Council 22 — 5 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 about the Premises, other than as previously consented to by tessoy Lassoa thall Immediately give written notice of such fact to lessor, and provide Lessorwlth a Copy of any report, notice, clalmor other documentation which It has concerning the presence of such HazardousSubslance. (c) lessee Remodlation. Lessee shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Substance to be spilled or released In, on, under, or about the Premises (inciuding through the plumbing or sanitary sewer system) and shalt promptty, at Lessee's expense, comply with all Applicable Requirements and take all Investigatory and/or remedial action reasonably recommended, whether or not formally ordered or required, for the cleanup of any eontaminatlon of, and for them aintenance, secur3y and/or monitoring of the Premises or neighboring properties, that was caused or malerialty sontributed to by Lessee, or pertaining to or Involving any Hatardous,Substance brought onto the Premisesduring thetermofthls Lease, byor lot Lessee, or any third party. (d) Lessee Indemnification. Lessee shall indemnify, defend and hold Lessor, Its agents, employees, fenders and ground Lessor, harry„ harmless from and against arty and all loss of rents and/or damages, Il►blllties, Judgments, claims, expenses, pen antes, and attorneys' and consultants' fees arlsingout of or Involving any Hazardous Substance brovahtanto the Premises by or for lessee, or any third party (provided, however, that lessee shall nave no tlabdltyunder this lease with respect to undecground mlgradon of any Hazardous Substance under the Premises from ►diatent properties not caused or contributed to byLesteel. Lessee's obligations shall Include, but not be limited to, the effects of any contamination or Injury to person, property or the erwlronmew created or sulfated by lessee, and the Cost of Investigation, removal, remedlalion, restoration and/or abatement, and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease, No ttrmlrnation, cancellation or release agreement entered into by Lessor and Lemes %hall rsleast Lessee from its obligations under this lease with respect to Hazardous Substances, unless tpeciNcaliyto agreed by Lassor In writing at the time of such agreement, (e) Castor indemnlOatlon. Except as otherwise provided In paragraph 9.7, Lessor and Its successors and assigns shall Indemn7y, defend, reimburse and hold Lessee, its employees and lenders, harmless from and agalnst any and all environmental damages, Including the cost of remedlation, which result from Hazardous Substances which existed on the Premises prior to Lessee's occupancy or which are caused by the gross negligence orwlllfut misconduct of Lessor, its agents or employees. Lessor's obligations, as and when required by theAppiicabla Requirements, shall include, but not be limited to, the cost of Investigation, removal, remedlation, restoration and/or abatement, and shallsurvNvethe expiration or termination of this Lease. (f) InveiH¢attons and Rernedlattoru. Lessor shall retain the responsibility and pay for any Investigations or remedlation measures required by governmental emtiltes having jurisdiction with respect to the existence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to Lessee's occupancy, unless such remedlation measure Is required as aresultof Lessee'suse (Vncludina'Alterations", asdollnedIn paragraph7.3(a) below) of the Premises, In which event Lessee shall be responsible for suth payment. Lessee shalt cooperate fully In a ray suthactivitiesat the request of Lessor, Including allowing Lessor and Lessor's agents to have reasonable access to the Premises at reasonable times In crderto cacryout Lessor's Investigadveand remedial responsibilities. Jill Lessor Termination Option. If aHazardous Substance Condition (see Paragraph 9.1(e)) occurs during the teemof this Lease, unless Lessee Is iegsily responsible therefor (Inwitith case Lessee ;hall make the Investigation and remedlation thorvof required by the Applicable Requirements and this Lease shall continue In full force and effect, but subject to Lessor's rights under Paragraph 6.2(d) and Paragraph 13), Lessor may, at Lessa'soplion, either (11 Investigate and remediate such Hazardous Substance Condition, If required, as soon as reatonably possible at Lessor's expense, In which event this lease shall continue In full force and effect, or (11) If the estimated cost to remedlate such condition exceeds 12 times the then monthly Base Rent or $200,000, whichever Is greater,give written notice to Lessee. within 30 days after receipt by Lessorof knowledge of the occurrence ofsuch Hazardous Substance Condition, of Lessor's desire to terminate this lease as of the date 60 days following the date of such notice. in the event Lessor elects to give a termination notice, lessee may, within 10days thereafter, glue written notice to lessor al Lessee's commitment to pay the amountby which the cost of the rernediatfon of such Hazardous SubstanceConciltion exceeds an amount equal to 12 times the then monthly Use Rent or $200,000, whichever Is greater. Lessee shall provide lessor with said funds of Ptttfactory assurance thereofwithin 30 days following such commitment. In such event, Ws Lease shall continue In full foiceandelfecl, and Lessor shall proceed to make such remedlation as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are available. It Lessee does not give such notice and provide the required fundsor assurance thereof within the time provided, this Lease shall terminate as ofthe date specified In Lessor's notice of tecmination. 6.3 Lessee's Compliance with Applicable Requirements, fxwpias otbettµVFe{uavWed lalAkiwcp, Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, fully, dlilgently and Ina timely manner, materially comply with allAppllcabte Requirements, the requirements ofany applicable Ore Insurance undetwrlter or rating bureau, and the recommendations of Lasso r's engineers and/or consultantswhich relate in any manner to the premises, withoutregard to whether said Applicable Requbaments ate nowin effector besomeeffective after the Start Rate Lessee shall, within 10days after receipt of lessor's written request, provide Lessor with copies of all permits and other documents, and other Infurmadon evidencing Lessae's compliance with any Applicable Rcqultements specified byLessor, and shall Immediately upon receipt, notify Lessor In writing (witheoples of any documents involved) of any threatened or actual claim, notice, citation, xaming, complaint or report pertaining to or Involving tho failure of Lessee or the Premises to comply with any Applicable Requirements, Ukewlse, Lessee shall Immedlately give written notice to Lessor of: (1) any water damage to the Premises and any suspected seepage, pooling, dampness or other condition conducive to the production of mold; or (f) any mustiness or other odors that might indicate the presence of mold In the Premises. In addldon, Lessee shall provide copies o fall relevant material safety data sheets (MSDSI to Lessor within 10days o (the tecelpt of a written request therefor. In addition, Lessee shall psovlde lessor with enples of its business licence, cerdllcate o foccupancy andior any similar document within 10days of the receipt of awritten request therefor. GA Inspection; Compllance, Lessor and Lessor's "tender" (as defined in Paragraph 301 and consultants authorized by Lessor shall have the right to enter into Premises at any time, In the case of en emergency, and otherwis,eal reasonable tlmesafter reasonable notice, for the purpose of Inspecting and/or testing the condition of the Premises and/or forverilyfng compliance by Lessee with this Lease, The cost of any such Inspections shall be paid by Lessor, unless aviolation of Applicable Requirements, or a Hazardous Substance Condition (see paragraph M) Is toured to exist tat be imminent or the Inspection Is requestod o i ordered b v a governmentalautitoffty. In such.case, Lessee shall upon request reimburse Lessor for the cost of suth Inspection, so long as such Inspection It reas.onablyrelated to the vsolatlon or contamination. In addition, Lessee shall provide copies of all relevant materlalsafety data sheets (MSGS) to Lessor within 10 days of the rocefpt of a written request therefor. Lessee acknowledges that any (allure on its part to allow such Inspections or testing will expose lessor to risks and potentially cause Lessor to Incur costs not contemplated bythls Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difhtult to ascertain. Accordingly, should the lessee improperly or unreasonably fall to allow such inspections and/or testing Ina timely fashion Lesseeshall pay to Lessor a fee in the amount of ��OOthe baseAeetshaN•irsa+riaasat#ail{y ltrcreased,�vitlwutanrrequkesnaaQ%r-neileeta.leabeerbyan-anwunt ekua4ta i.49taJlhea tbeaexlaetiagRasaileao car. AArwhitttcverl59aaatewfoFtlso+amafn4aFao-LhQJwta. The Parties agree that such and reasonable compensation for the additional rile/coststhat lessor will Incur by reason of Lessee's failure to allow such Inspectoon and/or testing. Such a„° a " shall in no event constitule a waiver of Lessee's Default or Breach with respect to such fagure nor prevent the exercise of any ofthts other rlghtsand remediesgranted hereunder. 7. Maintenance; Repairs; Utility Installattons; Trade fhdurm and Alterations. 7.1 Lessee's Obllgatforu• 1act�(a) In General. subject toltwpzaultlaat ttos►},a.2{tampu Wu Raqukstatarstt},x1 sObilgalaoasy-4jllaruagearCattwcttoal,andis{Caadamnagan� Lessee shall, at Re ole expense, keep the Premises. Utility Installations (intended for INITIALS R1 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:53 AM STN.27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page A of 16 City Council 22 — 6 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee's excluslve use, no matter where located), and Alterations In goad order, condition and repair (whether or not the portion of the Premises requiring repairs, or the means of repairing the, ame, are reasonably or readily accessible to Lessee, end whether ce not the need for such repairs occurs as a restrtt of Lessee's use, any prier use, the elements or theege of such portion of the Premises), Including, but not limited to,all equipment or facilides, such as plumbing, NVAC equipment, electrlcal,110ting faclildes,bolleis, pressufavessels, Are protection system, Rxlums,walls (intodorand exi0rior), foundations, tetlings, roofs, roof drainage systems, floors, windows, doors, plate glass, skylights, landscaping, driveways, parking lots, fences, feialning walls, signs, side"lksand parkways located In, on, or adjacent to the Premises. Lessee, In keepingthe Premises In good order, condition and repair, shalt exercise and perform good maintenance practices, specifically including the procurement and maintenance of the service contracts required by Paragraph 7.1(b) below, lessee's obligations shall Include restorations, replace menns or renewals when necessary to keep the Premises and all Improvements thereon or a part thereof In good order, condition and State of repair. Lessee shall, during the term of this wain, koep the exterior appeatanco of the Building In a first-class condition (Inc;u dine, e.g, graffiti removal) consistentwith the exterior appearkme of other similar facllitiasof comparable age and site In thevldnity, Including, when necessary, theexterlor repalnting or the Building, (b) Service Contracts. Lessee shall, at Laisee's sole expense, procure and maintain contracts,with copies to Lessor, In customary formand substance for., and with contractors speclallring and experienced in the rnalotenance of the following equipment and Improvements, If any, Ifand when liutelled on the Premises: (1) 14VACequipment, (R)boller, and pressure vessels, (III) fire extinguishing systems, including fire alarm and/or smoke detection, (hr)Iandscaping and Irrigation systems, (vl roof coveringand drains, and [A) clarifiers. However, lessor reserves the right, upon notice to Lessee, to procure and malntain any or ail of suchservlce contracts, and lessee shall reimburse Lessor, upon dernwd, for the cost thereof. (c) Failure to Perform. If lessee falls to perform LOssee'sobligations under this Paragraph 7.1, Lessor may enter upon thePremisesaher 10days' prior written notice to lessee (except In the case of an emer6oricy, In which case no notice shall be requlred), perform such obligations on lessee's behalf, and put the Premises in good order, condition and repair, and lessee shall promptly payia Lessor a sum equal to 115% of the cost thereof. (d) Replacement Subject to lessee's indemnification of lessor as set forth in Paragraph 8,7 below, and without relieving lessee of Itabllity resulting from Lessee'sfallure to exerclse and performgood malntenance practices, if an item described In Paragraph 7,1(b) cannot be repaired other than at acost which Is in excess of 50% of the cost of replacing such Item, then such Item shall be replaced by lessor, and the cost thereof shall be prorated between the Parties and Lessee shill only be obligated to pay,, each month during she remainder of the term of this Lease or any extension thereof, on the date on which Base Rent Is due, an amount equal to the product of multiplying the cost of such replacement bya (raction, the numerator ofwhich is one, and the deeominrtor of whkh is 144 (Le, 1/144thof the cost per month), Lessee shall pay Interest on theunamortited balance but may prepay Its obligation at any time. 7.1 tinsor's Obilgations. Strbiecllo tillnresvlslortt�i PataRoahS22 ({ 13ttam up nn,m) 3(Bamign nrnstsn rrsnnl anA id�rnnAe�,n�r;�. t� Itis Intended by the Parties heretothat Lassor haven obllgatfon,In any manner whatsoever, to repair and mointaln the Premises, or the equipment therein, all of which obligations are intended to be that of the Lessee. It Is the intention ofthe Parties that the terms of this lease govern the respective obligations of the Parties as to ma Intenance and repair of the Premises. 7.3 UNRty installations; Trade Fixtures; Alterations, (a) Definitions, The term -Utility installations" refers to all floor and window coverings, air and/or vacuum lines, power panels, electrical distribution, security and fire protection systems, communication cabllne, ilghtingfixtures, NV,ACequipment, plumbing, and fencing In or on the Premises, The term "Trade Fixtures' shall mean Lessee's machinery and equipment plat can be removed without doing material damage to the Premises. The term "Alterations' shall mean any modification of the Improvements, other than Utility Installations or Trade Pbnures, whether by addition or deletion. "Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations" are defined as Altetatlen$and/or Utility Inslalatians made by lessee that are not yet owned by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 7.4(a), (b) Consent. Lessee shall notmake any Alterations or Utility Installations to the Premises without Lessors prlorwritten consent. Lessee may, however, make non•stmcturalARerations or Utility Inslallatlonsto the interior of the Premises (excluding the roof) without suchconsentbut upon notice to Lessor, as long as they are not visible from theoulside, do not involve puncturing, raiocatingorremoving the toot or any existing walls, will nil effect the electrical, plumbing, NVAC, and/or life safety systems, do sxd trigger the requirement for add Ilional modifications and/or improvements to the Premises resulting from Applicable Requirements, such as compliance with Title 24, and the Cumulative cost thereof during this Lease as extended does not exceed a sum equal to•3 month's (lase Rent in the aggregate ora sum equal to one month's Base Rent in any one year. Notwlthstandlog the foregoing, Lessee shall not"Ve or permit any roof penetrations and/or Install anything on the roof without theprlor written approval of tessor, Lessor may, as a precondition togranting such approval, require Lesseo to Willa a contractor chosen and/or approved by Lessor, Any Alterations or Utility Installations that Lessee shall desire to malra and which require the consentof the lessor shall be presented to Lessor In writtenformvrRh detaged plans. Consent shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee's: (1) acquirlog all applicable governmental permits, (II) furnishing Lessor with copies of both the permits and the plans andspedficatiom prior to commencement of the work, and (Ill) compliance with all conditions of said permits and other Applicable Requirements in a prompt and expedhious manner, AnyAlteratlons or Utility Installationsshill be performed in a workmanlike manner with good and sufficient materials. Lessee shall promptly, upon completion furnish Lessorwith as -built plans and specifications. for work which costs an amount in excess of one month's Base Rent, Lessor maycondltlon llsconsent upon Lessee providing a lien and completion bond in in amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost o(suthAlteration of Utility installation and/or upon lessee's posting an additional Security Oeposit with Lessor. fc)f Liens; Bonds, Lessee shall pay, when due, ail clalmsfor labor or materials furnished or alleged to have been furnished to or for lessee at or for use on the Premises, which claims are or may be secured by any mechanlc's or materialmen`s lien agalnst the Premises or any Interest therein. Lessee shall give Lessor nor less than 10 days notice prior to We commencement of any work In, on of about the Premises, and Lessor shall have the right to post noticesof non -responsibility, If Lessee shall contest the valldityof any such lien, claim or demand, then Lessee shall, at Its sole expense defend and protect Itself, Lessor and the Promises against the same and shall pay and sadsty any such adverse judgment that may be rendered thereon berate the enforcement thereof, If Lessor shall require, Lessee shall furalsh a surety bond In an amount equal to 150% of the amount of such contested lien, claim or demand, indemnifying Lessor agatAst liability for thesame, If Les for elects to participate In any such action, Lessee shall pay lassor's attorneys' fees and costs. 7.4 Ownership; Removal; Surrender, and Restoration. (a) ownership. Subject to Lessor's right to require removal or elect ownership as hereinafter provided, all Alterations and Udlltyinstallatlons made by Lessee shall he the property of lessen, but considered a part of the Premises. Lessor may„ at any time, elect Inwrltlng to be the owner of all or any specified part of the Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility installations, Unless otherwise Instructed per paragraph 7.4(b) hereof,all Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility ;nstallations shall. at the expiration or termination of thltLease, become the property of lessor and be surrendered by Lessee with the Premises, (b) Removal. By deltyety to Lessee of written notice from Lessor not earlier than 90 and not later than 30 days prior to the end of the term of this Lease, Lessor may require that any or all Lessee Owned Alterations or U611tylnstallations be removed by the expiratlon or termination of this Lease, Lessor may require the removal at any time of all or any part of any Lessee Owned Alterations or Utility installations made without the required consent. (cl Surrender; Restoration. Lessee shall surrender the Premise sby the Fxpkalfon Pate or any eaflleT termination date, with all of the Improvements, parts and surfaces thereof broom clean and free of debris,and In good operating ord er, condition and state of repair.ordlnary wear and tear excepted. "Ordinary wear and tear` shall not include any damage or deterioration that would have been prevented by good maintenance practlee. Notwithstanding the foregoing and the provisions of Paragraph 7.1(a), If the Lessee occupies the Premises for 12 months or less, then Lessee shall surrender the Premises In the same condition as delivered IV — INITIALS (S PS gl 2019 AIR CRC:, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:51 AM STN-27.30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 5 of 16 City Council 22 — 7 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 to Lessee on the Start pate with NO allowance for ordinary wear and tear, Lessee shall repair any damago occaslonod by the Installation, maintenance or removal of Trade Fixtures, Lessee owned Alterations and/or UUtlty Installations, furnishings, and equipment os well as the removal of arty storage Iankinstalled byor for Lessee. Lessee shall also remove from the Premises any and all Hazardous Subslances brought onto the Premises byor for lessee, or any thltd party (except Hazardous Substances which weredeposhed via underground migration Iiomare as outside of the Premises) to tholevel specified In Applicable Requirements. Trade Fixtures shall remain the properly of Lessee and shall be removed by Lessen, Any personal property of Lessee not removed on or before the Expiration Date or any ear for terminatlondate shaftbe deemed to have been abandoned by Lessee and maybe disposed of or retalnedby Lessor as Lessor may desire. The falIure by Lessee to time Iyvacale the Premises pursuanttothIs Paragraph 7,4(c) without the expresswrltten consent oflessor shall constitute a holdoverunder the provlslonsol Paragraph 26 below. 8, Insurance; Indemnity. 8.1 Payment For Insurance, lessen shall pay for all Insurance requlred under Paragraph 8 except to the extent ofthe cost attributable to liability insurance carried by lessor under Paagraph 8.2(b) In exmssof $2,0(50,000 per occurrence, Premiums for polity periods commencing prior to or extending beyond the Lease tatm shall be prorated to cer(aspond to the Lease term Payment shall be made by lessee to Lessor within 10 days following receipt of an Invoice, 82 liability Insurance, la) Carried by lessee, lessee shall obtain and keep In force a Commercial General Ltabllky polloyofinsurance protecting Lessee and Lessor as an additional Insured agalnstclalms for bodily Injury, personal Injury and property damage based upon or arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto. Such Insurance shall be on an occurrence basis providing singiegmtt coverage In an amount not less than $1,000,ODO per occurrence with an annualaggregate of not less than $2,000,000. Lessee shall add Lesser as an addtonal insured by means of an endorsement at least as broad as the Insuranceservlco Organlzatlon's"Additional Insured•Managem orteisorsof Premises" Endorsement. The policy shall not contain any Intra-Insured excluslons as between insured persons or orga nitat Inns, but shall include coverage for liability assumed under this Lease as an "Insured contnici far the performance of Lessee's Indemnity obligations under this Leasa, The limits or sold Insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of lessee not relieve lessee of any obligation hereunder, Lessee shall provide an endorsement onus IN bliltypolicyfles) which provides that itslnsurance sha€! be primary to and not contributory with any similar insurance carried by Lesso,whose Insurance shall be considered excess Insurance only. (b) Carried by Lessor. Lessor shall maintain liability Insurance asdescrlbed in Paragraph8.2(a), in addition to, and not in lieu of, the Insurance required to be maintained by lessee. Lessee shall, to the extent available, riot be named as an additional insured therein. The City of Santa Ana, and its officers, employees, Agent and representatives, shall to the extent no costis incurred with respect thereto and to the extent reasonably available to Lessor shall be additional insureds with respect to any general liability or auto liability policy obtained by Lessor, by endorsement, and all such insurance policies shall be primary and non-contributory. Lessor shall send certificates of such insurance to Lessee to Its Risk Management Division, qth Floor, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana 92701, 8.3 Property Insurance - Building, improvements and Rental value. (a) Building and Improvements, The insuring Parry shall obtain and keep in force a policy orpolicies in the name of Lessor with loss payable to Lessor, any ground -lessor, and to any Lender Insuring loss or damage to the Premises. The amount of such Insurance shall be equal to the full nsurable repiacementcost of the Premises, as the some shall exist from time to time, or the amount requlrsad by any Lender, but in no event more than the commerclalty reasonable and available insurable value thereof. Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations, Trade Flxturos,and Lessoe's personal property shall be insured by lessee not by lessor. If the coverage Is avallable and commeicialiv appropriate, such policy or policies shall insure against all risks of direct physical loss or damage (eacept the perils of flood ondjor earthquake unless required by a Lender}, including coverage for debris removal and the enforcement of any Applicable Requirements requiring the upgrading, demolition, reconstructfoA or replacement of anyportion of the Premises as theresult of a covered loss, Sold policy or policies shall also contain an agreed valuation provision In lieu of anytoinsurance c1suse, waiver of subrogation, and Inflation gu and protection causing an Increase In the annual property Insurance coverage amount by a factor of not less than the adjusted U.S, Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the city nearest to where the Premises are looted, if such Insurance coverage has a deductible clause, the deductible amount shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence, and lessee shall be liable For such deductible amount In the event of an Insured Loss, (b) Rental Value. The Insuring Party shall obtain and keep In force a policy or policies In the name of Lessor with loss payable to Lessor and any Lender, Insuring the loss of the full Rent for one yearwlth an extended period of Indemnity loran additional Wodays ("Rental value Insurance"), said insurance shall contain an agreed valuation provision In lieuof anycolnsurance clause, and the a mountof coverage shalt be adjusted annually toreflect the projected Rent otherwise payable by lessee, for the next 12 month period. lessee shall be liable for anydeductlble amount in the event of such loss, (c) AdjatentPtemises. If the Premises are part of a larger building, prof agroup ofbuildkngsowned by Lessor which are adjacent to the Premises, the Lessee shall pay far anyinctease In the premiums for the property Insurancti of such building of buildings If said Increase Is caused by Lessea's acts, omisslons, use or occupancy of the Premises. 8.4 Lessee's Property; Business interruption Insurance; Worker's Compensation Insurance. (al Property Damage. Lessee shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage on allot Lessee's personal property, Trade FBtturts, and Lessee owned Alterations and Utility installations. Such huuranco shalt bo full replacement cost covenagewith a deductible of not to exceed $t,(xio per occurrence. The proceeds Irom any such Insurance shall be used by Lessee for the replacement of personal property, Trade Fixtures and Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility instailatioti (b) Business Interruption. Lessee shall obtain and maintain loss of Income and extra expense Insuronceln amounts as will reimburse Lessee for direct or Indirect loss of earnings attrlbulabie to all perlls commonly Insured against by prudent lessees In the business of lessee or attributable to prevention of access to the Ptemisesas aresult of such perils, (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain Worker's Componsation Insurance in such amount as may be required by Applicable Requirements- Such policy shall include a'Walver of Subtogadon' endorsement. Lessee shall provide Lessor with a copy of such endorsement along with the certificate of Insurance or copy of the policy squired by paragraph It.5. (d) No Representation of Adequate Coverage. Lessor makes no mpresentatlan that the lin itsor forms of coverage of insurance speclRed herein are adequate to cover Lessee's property, business operations or obligations under this Least. 8.5 Insurance Policies. Insurance required herein shall be by companies maintaining during the pollcyterm a'General Policyholders Rating" of at least A•,vh, as set forth In the most cu rrent issue of "8est's Insurance Gulde", or such other rating as maybe required by a lender. Lesseashan not do or permit to be done I g which Imrelldates the required Insurance policies, Lessee shall, prior (o the Start Date, deliver to Lessor certified copies of policies of such insurance or INITIALS AWS 0 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved. Last Edited; 2/25/2021 SIMAM STN-27,30, Revised 11.25.2019 Page 6 of 16 City Council 22 — 8 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 certilicateswlth copies of the required endorsements evidencing the existence and amounts of the requlred Insurance. No such policy shall be canretabie or subject to modification except after 30days prior written notice to Lesser, lessee sha% at least 10days prior to the expiration of such policies, furnish Los so( with Qvldence of renewals or "Insurance binders' evidencing renewal thereof, or Lessor may Incream his 110111ty lnsuIance coverage and chargo the Cost thereof to Lessee, which amount shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor upon demand, Such pollcks shall be far a term cf at ]tail one year, or the length of the remaining term of this lease, whichever Is less. If either Party shallfall to procure and maintain the insurance required to be carried by It, the other party may, but shall not be required to, procure and maintain the same, 8.6 Waiver ofSubroltation, W"out affecting any other rlghtsor remedies, levee and Lessor each hereby release and relieve the other, and waive thelrentire right to recover damages against the other, fortoss of or damage to its property arising out ofor hxldentto the perils required to be Insured agalnstherein. The effect of such releases and waivers Is not limped by the amount of Insurance carried or required, or by any deductibles applicable hereto. Tha parties agree to have their respective propertydamage Insurante carrleu waive any right to subrogation that such companies may have against Lessor or Lessee, as the case may be, so long as the Insurance is not Invalidated thereby. 8,7 Indemnity, Except for Lessor's gross negligence or wlllful misconduct, lessee shall indeirnffy, protect, defend and hold harmless the Prefelses, Lessor and Its agents, Lessor'smmiler orground lessor, partners and Lenders,fram and against any and all claims, lessor rents and/or damages, liens, Judgments, penalties, attorneys' and consultants' fees, expenses and/or liabilities arlsing out of, Im,olvlrlg, or Inconnectfon with,a Breach ofthe Lease by Lessee and/or the useand/or occupantyof the Premises and/or Project by Lessee and/or by lessee's employees, con tractors or invitees, If any action or proceeding Is brought against Lessorby reason of any of the foregoing matters, lessee shall upon notice defend the same at Lessee's expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessor and Lessor shall cooperate with Lesseeln such defense, Lessor need not have flrstpald any such claim in order to be defended or indemnified. BA Exemption of Lotor and Its Aganu from Llabhlty, Notwithstanding the negligence or breach of this Lease by lesser or hs agents, neither Lessor nor Its agenssshall be liablQ under any circumstances for. (1) injury or damage to the person or goods, wares, merchandise orother property of Lessee, Lessee's employees, contractors, Invitees, customers, or any other person In or about the Premises, whether such damage or Injury is caused byor results from fire, steam, electricity, gas, water or rain, indoor a1r quailth the presence of mold or from the breakage, leakage, obstruction or other defects of pipes, fire sprinklers, wires, appliances, plumbing, RVAC or fighting fixtures, or fromany other cause, whether the said Injuryor damage results from cmdllionsarising upon the Premises or upon other portions of the bulldl ng of which the Premises are a part, or from other sources or places, (ill any damages arising from any ad or neglect of any other tenant of Lessor or from the fallureof Lessor or lit agents to enforce the provtslons of any other lease Inthe Project, or;Rl(tnjuryto Lessee's business or forany lossof Income orprolit therefrom. Instead, It Is intended that Lessea%sole recourse In the event of such damages or injury be to his a claim on the insurance palicy(;es) that Lessee Is required to maintain pursuant to the "loons of paragraph 8, 89 failure toProvlde Insurance. Lessee acknowledges that anyfallure on Its pan to obtain or maintain the Insurance required herein will expose Lessor to risks and potentially cause Lessor to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difficult to ascertain. Accordingly, for any month or portion thereof that Lessee does not maintabn the required Insurance and/or does not provide lesser with the required binders or certificates evldencingthQ axttence of the requlred insurance after notice and resaonable opportunity to cure, Lessee shall pay to Lessor a fee Olrs$500,-iheI4kenQxiWARga66Re4l or$a09rwhlehererisgreater,Thepxtiesagree that such fee•lnew ewQaseReedrepresentsfalrandreasonablecompensationfortheadditionalrisk(coststhat Lessor will Incur by reason of Lessee's failure to maintain the required Insurance, Such Increase In Base Rent shallln no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's Default or Rreach wllhfespect to the failure to maintain such Insurance, prevent the exercise of any of theolher rightsand remedies granted hereunder, nor mileve Lessee of itsobllation to maintain the Insurance specified in this Lease. 9, 0amage or Oestruction, 9.1 Definitions. (al "Pre mlies Pardal0amatM" shatimean damage or destruction to the Improvementson the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and utility Installations, which can reasonably be repalred in 6 months or less Irom the date of the damage or destruction. lessor shallnotify lessee In writing within 30 days from the date of the da mage or destruction as to whether or not the damage is Partial or Total. (b) "Prsmisgs7otai 0estructlon' shall mean damage of destruction to the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility installations and Trade Fixtures, which cannot reasonably be repaired ks 6 months or less from the dale of the damage or destruction. Lessor shall notify Lessee In wthingwlthln 30 days from the date of the damage ordestructlon es to whether or not the damage Is Partial er rotal, (c) "Insured toss" shall mean damago or destruction to improvements on the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations and Trade Fixtures, which wat caused by an event requlred lobe covered by the Insurance deserlbed In Paragraph 8.3(a), Irrespeltive of anydeductible amounts at coverage limits Involved. (d) "Iteplacement Cost" shall mean the cost to repairer rebuild the improvements owned by Lessor at the time of the occurrence to thelrcondleon existing immediately prior thereto, Including demolition, debris removal and upgrading requlred by lheoperatloo of Appficable Requirements, and without deduction fordepreclWon, (e) "Harardous Substance Condition's haIf mean the occurrence or discovery of a mndltloa involuing the prosenco of, or a contamination by a llaaardousSubstance, In, on, or under the premises which requires restoration. 0.2 Partial Damage - insured Loss, If a Promises Partial Damage tha t Is an insured Lossoccurs, then Lessor shall, at lessor's expense, repalrsuch damage (but not Lessee's Trade Fixtures or i.esseeOwned Alterations and UdlltyInstallations) as soon as reasonably possible and this lease shall continue Infull force and effect; provided, however, that Lessee shall, at Lessor's electlon, make the repair of any damage or destruction the total cost to repair of whkh Is $10,000or less, and, In such event, lessor shall make any applicable insurance proceeds evsfiable to Lessee on a reasonable basis for that Purpose, Notwithstanding the foregoing.ff the requlred Insurance was not in force orthe Insurance proceeds are not sufflcientto effect such repair. the Insuringparty shall promptly, contribute the shortage in proceeds (except as to the deductible which is Lessee'sresponslbility) as and when required to complato said repairs. In the event however, such shortage was due to the fact that by reason of the unique nature of the Improvements, full replacement cost insurance coverage was not tommerclally reasonable and available, Lessor shall have no obligation to pay [of the shortage In insurance proceedsor to fully restore the unique aspects of the Premises unless Lessee provides Lessor with the funds to coves same, or adequate assurance thereof, wlthin 10 days following receipt of written notice of such shortage and request therefor. If Lessor receives said funds or adequate assurance thereof wlthln said 10 day period, the party respoesibte for making the repaks shall complete them as soon as reasonably possible and this Lease shall remain In full f orceand effect If suchfunds or assurance are not received, Lessor may neveriheless elect by written notice to Lessee within 10days thereafter to; (1) make such restoration and repair as A commercially reasonable with Lessor pbying any shortage In proCveds, In which case this Lease shall remain In full force and effect, or (It) have this Lease terminate 30 days thereafter, Lessee sha1 not be entitled to reimbursement of any funds contributed by Lessee to repair any such damage or destruction, Premises Partial Damage due to flood or earthquake shill be subject to Paragraph 9.3, notwithstanding that them tray be some Insurance —vR but the net proceed s of any such insurance shallbe made avallabie for the repalts it made by either Party. INITIALS S 0 2019 AiR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited: 2PS/20219:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 7 of 16 City Council 22 — 9 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 9.a Partial Damso*. Uninsured Lon, Ifa Premises Partiat Damage that Is not an Insured Loss occurs, unless caused by a negligent orwxlful act of Lessee (In which avant Lessee shall make the repairs at Lessee's expense), tassor may elthert (I) repair such damage as soon as reasonably possible at Lessor's expense, in which event INs Lease&hot I continue Infuli force and effect, or (11) terminate this Lea seby glvingwrllten notice to Lessee wlihIn 3Odays after receipt by Lessor of knowledge of the occurrence of such damage, Such termination shalt be effective 60 days following the date of such notice, In the event Lessor elects to terminate this Lease, Lessee shall have the right within 10 days after recalitt of the termination notice to give written notice to Lessor of Leiwo% commitment to pay for the repair of such damage without m1mbursementfrosn lessor. Lessee shall provide Less or with said funds or tat Ishctory assurance thereof within 30 days after making such commitment. In such event this Lease shag continue in full force and effect, and Lessor shall proceed to make such repairs as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are ovallable, IF Lessee does not make the required Commitment, INS Lease shall terminate as of the date specified In the tdrmination notice. 9.4 Total Dust rut ton, Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, If a Premises Total Destruction occurs, this Lease shall terminate 60dar" following such Destruction. lithe damage ordeslruction was caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of lessee, Lessor shall have the right to recover Lessor's damages from lessee, except as provided in Paragraph 8.6. 9.S Damage Near End of Term. If at any time during the last 6.months of this Lease there Is damage for which the cost to repair exceeds one month's Base Rent, whether or not an Insured Loss, tensor may terminate this Lease effective gO days following the date of occurrence of such damage by giving a written termination notice to Lessee within 30days after the date of occurrence of such damage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, If Lessee atthat time has an exercisable option to extend this tease or to purchase the Premises, then Lessee may preserve this lease by, (a) exercising such option and (b) providing Lessorwith any shortage inlnsurance p roceeds (or adequate assurance thereof) needed to make the repairs on or beforethe earlier of (I) the date which Is 10 days after Lessee's receipt of Lessor's written notice purporting to terminate this Lease, or (ti) the day prlorto thedsto upon which such option expires. If Lessee duly exertisassuch option during such period and provides fluor with funds joradequate assurancethereol') to tovnrany shortageto Insurance proceeds, Lessor shall, at Lessor's commercially reasonable expense, repair such damage as soon as reasonably possible and this Lease shall continue in fun force and effect iflesseefalfs to exercise such option and provide such Fundsor assurance during such period, then this lease shall terminate on the date specified In the terrain Won notice and Lessee's option shall be extinguished, 9.6 Abatement of Rent; tmest's Remedies. (aj Abatement. In the event of Premises Partial Damage or Premises Total Destruction or a Hazardous Substance Condition for which Lessee is not responsible under this Lease, the Rent payable by Lessee for the period required for the repair, remedlation or restoration of such damage &tall be abated In proportion to the degree to which Lessee's use of the Premises Is Impaired, but not to exceed the proceeds received from the Rental Value insurance. All other obligations of Lessee hereunder shall be performed by Lessee, and Lessor shall have no liability for any wch dame Be, destruction, remedlatlon, repair or restoration except as provide dhe(ein. I b) Ramedles, If Lessor Isobltgated to repab or restore the Premises and does not commence, In a substantial and meaningful way, such repair or restoration within 90 days after such obligation shag accrue, Lessee may at anytime prtorto the commencement of such repair or restoration, give written notice to Lessor and to any lenders of which Lessee has actual notice, of Lessee's election to terminate this lease on a data not less than 6Odays following the giving of such notice. If Lessee gives such n otice and such repairor restoration is not comnnersced within 30days thereafter, this lease shalltarminate as of the date specified Insaid notice. if the repair or restoration acommenced within such 30days, thls Lease shalt continue In full force and effect. "Commence" shall meaneftherthe unconditional authorhation ofthe preparation of the required plans, or the beginning of the actual workon the Premises, whichever first occurs. 9.7 Termination; Advance Payments. Upon termination of this Lease pursuant to Paragraph 5.2(g) or Paragraph 9, are equitable ad)ustment shall be made concerning advance ease Rent and any other advance payments made by lessee to Lessor, Lessor shall, in addition, return to Lessee so much of Lessee's Security Deposit as has not been, or Is not then required to be, usedby lessor. 10, Neal Property Taxes. 20.1 Deflnition, As used herein, the term"Real Property Taxes" shall Include any form of assessment; real estate, general, special, ordinary or extraordinary, or rental levy or tax (otherthan Inheritance, personal Income cremate taxes); Improvement bond; and/or license fee Imposed upon or levied against any legal or equitable interest of Lessor In the Premises or the Project, Lessor's right to other Income th erefrom, and/or Lessor's business of teasing, byany authority having the directorIirditactpowertotaxandwherethefundsaregeneratedwithreferencetotheBuildingaddress. Real Property Taxes shot) also Include any tax, fee, levy, assessment or charge, or anyincrease therein: (1) Imposed by reason of events occurring during the term of this lease, Including but not limited to, a change In the ownership of the Premises, and (11) levied or assessed on machinery or equipment provided by lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Lease, 10.2 Payment of Taxes, in addition to ease Renq Lessee shell payto Lessor an amount equal to the Real Property Tax Installment due at least 20 days prior to the applicable delinquency date. if any such Installment shall cover any period of time prior to or after the expli atlon or termination of this lease, lesteo's share of such Installment shall be prorated. In theevent Lessee Incurs a latecharge on any Rent payment, Lessor mayestlmte the current Real PropettyTaxes, and require that such taxes be paid in advance to Lessor by lessee monthly In Wwte with the payment of the Rase Rent. Suchmonihfy paynimtsshall bean amount equal to the amount of the estimated installment of taxes divided by the number of months remaining before the month in which said Installment becomes deilnquent, When the actual amount of the appilcable tax bill Is known, the amount of such equal monthly advance payments shall be adjustsad as required to provide the funds needed to pay the applicable taxes. if the amount collectedby lossorls Insufficient to pay such Real Property Taxes when due, Lesweshall pay Lessor, upon demand, such additional sum as Is necessar}t Advance payments maybe Intermingled w4th other Moneys of Lessor and shall not bear interest. In the event of a8reach by lessee In the performance of Its obligations under this tease, then any such advance payments may be treated by Lessor as an additional Security Deposit. 10.3 Joint Assessment if the Premises are not separately assessed, lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Tares for all of the land and improvements Included Wlbin the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuedons assigned In the assessor's work sheets orsuch other Informatlon as may be reasonably available. 10A Personal Property Taxes. Lessee shall pay, prior to delinquency. ail taxes assessed against and levied upon Lessee Owned Alterations, Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures, furnishings, equipment and all personal property of Lessee. W hen possible, Lessee shall cause its Lessee Owned AlteradOnsand Utility Installations, Trade Fboures, furnishings, equipment and another personal property to be assessed and billed separately from the real property of lessor. If any of Lessee's said properly shall be assessed with Lessor's real property, Lessee shall pay Lessorthe taxes attributable to terse e's propertywithln 10 days after receipt of a written statement setting foiththe taxes applkobte to Lessee's property. 1t, Utilities and Servkea. Lessee shall pay for all water, gas, heat, light, power, telephone, trash disposal and other utilities and servlcessupplied to the Premises, together with any taxes thoreon. If any such services are not separately metered or billed to Lessee, Lessee shall pay a reasonable proportion, to be determined by Lessor, of all charges Jointly metered or billed. There shall be no abatement of rent and Lessor shall not be ;table Inane respect whatsoever forthe Inadequacy, stoppage, interruption or discontinuance of any utility or service due to dot, strike, labor dispute, breakdown, accident, repair or other cause beyond Lessor's reasonable control or In cooperation with governmental request or dlrecdons, thl fteendaysofLessor'swrittenrequest,LesseeagreestodelivertoLessorsuchInformation,documentsand)orauthorizatfonastessorneedsInorderfor 1 INITIALS t 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, last Edited: 2/25/20219t53 AM STN•27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page 8 of Ifa City Council 22 — 10 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessor to comply with new or existing Applicable Requirements relating to commercial bOding energy usage, ratings, and/or the reDotttog thereof. 17�-1,tLlgrstAoat-and SulslottiA$• 4446tcWr' Coc)tatsOKegulrod (a1—LVKaesbalLaPt uvtuRtarJl y.ocby •a4ougoa af• lawa�ulga•xcaRtit4crmortEcigoa oawa+bQs i+h `�IRaa.aHi�wwAe"} of swt►lot•altorast- PDrtal Lostoa'sJataratlw4Wt6WLaarinlbaoccmlutwlthcu4lauoc'spdoi.tloao�n�N. (b}--llntaulAtwa-sca4oapaattoaaadttc rtocklt•µrlhildy-Lrad+doA-aaatlanat,vtociaaxch+ng4ra•chsago•In-3M-wai+ot•aG4atwothalGCaRLStwt4aa awlgnmonswquWae•Soot.ba4--.Yka•LrsatieJ,PA•iwm,+{i11va-batliraG•1.tK armirs•at tho.uattpgW46-PU40t0. jc}-xhoM>rrDlM OrAAAI-ati9tLQY-Pc ltb�iNtL-W Day, LqAiaGitApriW i0t1Yt4tlRiaLaCti0r1L �iy' Lr?y q�1�Irr'iatYr3GQlaChtOArHRaRC4Rgr• tq WttOG.ti�+afa�Gd- bryya+Lar.ottNw9ta{, wholbae-aapta ioa+uilaaVgamoal.pc.4vµpotpotat{PA-at4bSaioitoor•4atsw'sattatG4eeutlr+t�Gt+toutl4toe•+NlUasw41A•zAzduetsoAokha Nalr4NQ4h-at tocwa bN anamauRtgcoato4thaa•16aLot scab•Slotluoriback 4uasaaproctAtod ab ibsticasai Lbaorasangaripftltltlaau ac.aGibatGcao akttw.Aaott cOWAas1164M At dtnRtaedoAartr3AgeGoRtsoRvatvtiag-wcbc4duafloat�++bScb4uDwisor7t lautLudiag2asµ guaatntau}4uabSfibod-uad4s-gDa4railµattoptadat.ca•+attRgprSAGipSot. {d►—AAau;gAwaatow�Liwtag.+rltbo�u4asutatsbaklratlotsatit-opttoR, Lai Dofisdtsurabla-altaL Aoaca.patAawgtapAl�,lW�,.ocaaoRcuraUJaitcucl>_ vdtho�a.;h4 AKgtiity at a.ayaatic4 aqd-gcacs poriod-!t laccac ikuL to•tra3ttuGh-untpfuoscodautgnmoRt cF sualkdAgacanoncYrabloAtasGbrLettaFinay.4Whsr; (ij• iatmlaato ibis LtaGPros•Nµ++P�•g4daowNrittoa• Aaticar iacsozco•tls9 asvatk3+� 4aLo BARL.io. L10si ottk4 Wba Ao+sL tSwA lA aft�t,-FuLWartiA Ahawo+tt aEstikA tiroaub. pr�sJD:,ity.�-attsct,aad {It}aitUxadaad AorsttfOd rOAtal•ad}ustauatc•scboduloddudAg iha•u•azilAd4cot•ibo loacatoua stsalt 6alaccoacodio.LLA9i.nt.tbo.cchadulod ad}uc4ad rsAt. lal— Lacw4'GsamadylocaaY�wob�E AaragLaph lZl br L4Lfo+ abyh-bt IlmR.d 4p c0atpoRsztPpµdaRaagpc aad(uc la}unit4w•toAat. {4—J.—ot-44cyw40slalsi U;h d10PIGAI40•aWQpoLadatt+gaca" 0f4Vbtopiag41 otaw!c-JAA4twlLu.11w.ttaDo4oAuaAttLL4gaackd Ig)—•t0n twistutawdtag sba tuwgaiag,-aUrwrSAga ds Adntm k yacuoa• eltha-Rtpralro c,la.J4tq�urakoi .atSott,ta Srotk4d.hµaJdtLd paetyiwRdar, lA. taARas traAivStA tA4iRLuuauoa atao.RdtraB,•rwcb4sa aL•piypborw sbau• aa4 cuALlituto a tubw4tlAa 1a.1-A►tRu•saltt CawdtttoasApP�+kiNo,�sit4Alo.Rt•aAd>iuh{.tx►RM' (al, aegicdtest.ntla ssnsi.coacent.aaass�ament—hlafflng chauYjkj.ba.ettecsfrrra_udttsou:.theaapmsL•rcrwaa.aLsssmpsim.�eucct�aulaas subWctaaat• iba oLUgitioru-ottatwt undoL-4hk S oicor{Ujrokaca ttusooat aAy obllgatiaasbipr Iadoc •ac{SYvalfor-41Npiteazal+•iiaOUlgrptiecc4akL.kw pa�aRoatot liORkaF fOFtIW pad0<Asance otaMt-Oti+aL DtillgitlORf•:Pt>6$aitOrAiKI-liyLYLi69. [o)-14,40 Q4 y-444W404k 4;+*90i44 Are 446""t 94ii83UOiWUO=apy.{SztYOp.a1h4R thiA•4M$" itiigAAi4AG- NoStltota dola µ 4t•itaspproual or• ditapprouat of•aucb-stdgAmwst rwsilsaatGapioR4o•at ttoat•or {sadarmaac4 thaJL aoa sikutoawahroracattop,Pal. otlattoL•'s•dghl to. axatUtoJu•LaWOdlat totlotC94'tIIolaul4pL•iLwzcb. lc}-Latsac's GOAt4Rt-taa,Ay-atLigAaaaAtor tDblwtiag cbaUAat cPacdsuiascaac4at to•ar�subtoqupA13uigAauaat •grLublattJag. td}-•-1rFib4 ovoat aEaayaotauA ac•&roacbby.louao, lzuot.oxarµ pLouad cSro4xSy-agaiauiauaa•.sAY Guariatwt•oc-aayarw atW+. catpaAtlbta lac4b4 pottoraaaA<a at lacvao'sabUgattoac uRdocihk Laico� lncludlag aAyatLlgaop aFsulitosto 4, udiUgwt Ursa• aKbalutSaga�►iLPds+Dmediosa6aiActa�ayr. aUwapiwDaar aatilyretpoAclbla •thorotPc tc-LottoR, Pr•aRy catucpM #abd•bY S,octor- Ep;'-%7iA•i4Q�+Ott-taFiORiaRt•Sa3Rari1gAA10ALPt-4+�t110WAg-GtiaJlbWlA t4riilAg,•?CGOR1paRlGd•byl lRtOHA7t7aR fY:OWAtW1Ai i<katirrtYiPitiPR Ali-t0-{Ib4- Uaixial aad-apaaatlaAai rlstpoAttG{ttgs aadaPpwpciitotuctot 4tsaprapowd- auSgrwaar-t'abiatiao.iAtludinghu4-AotltmsN41lo•thatatagdad-1+telaad/ca aoq+llro4 modiNcatiaA-aLW4rtroruSt4s,1f iAy tvg4thacwJW a ta4ol 45W acto4adatadoA fot lostar•'L-coavdaclAg and Om""lag siSd-coRD4ct-lauaoaggat W p aDs+ldz laruw witU•tuch• Dlhar.ar•addiUoA3GlAlauAadWtaadstDvdacuRwDtatbaa,Dmaµb4 i►arowhiys Laq+ratud•{Sao•aJLo-uuagrapb•� {GI.•-�l�Ajl3tLigAYY-OG,•Ai•dY�iitLPOJ1Rd8t+•.thtLlAla:4L/loll,-bV-FOiG0A4taLGOptiAgLLLCb ALrigAMpclty AAtOtjgF}-iai,D iLdM N�bI4iL1T 4tYAtitlAgtR{a �0GL4WIaf1• Oliha• Rtamlcat ac o A'�QPNi00./b4tOpt�-b0 dMRIOd to-Gta4O-ar131A10d3ad>BcY4d-Z040AGOtAt iRd4a{R p%j�1ItJF •OiCti �111d AY W�I4OFM, 40�FORaAtrOaAdttfOA.DAd atiG&itJDo• horpla4vbaobtor+god•wc•po4i4cm4dbM•LtuaodutfagaAotKacalsatdattAgAmaRt-ocsubloac4,-otSaof LbaAbuGta•obttgadoAtaL-aracoRtrat�2aaFSaaRciLtaRt•-w4th• prOOitjORLof•aAaKigAR+aai o4Wbloit9la-Wti1CA�.aiGOi-t{#iL�iOGiiiGali�!•GORLiA14dt4W W;itlAg. tg�loµoe+t eoaloAtu-artµseeigsussgRt o! eubiptttag Lbaq-a,ot•seaattaato•ttw a.uSgROP or iublDLeoo aAy OpgoR$caaWd 1P ib4 origiAaLlatspp bytSslGLaaHe- "44" chtaadeslttpoclk*consoAtrtdtobytor4Pc•iRuAdag-{saaRiagapl> 3p•21 UI-Addk$oOA TaraiG.RAd•."OAdltioM,ilppAtibt4SD Fible0%-1t14 tA13a4dA�tOLtPi and.LpAditlagti�iatl-appt/tO-iAMLGbiP'KiRg t>µtaiL440t�1�•OLaRµ{:isiOk- liatltaraisal-usdaball-ho doamadS.ArlsldrdJA-aD.subLDasatuadoc tb1i14itolvhalFuiL•oruotorpratitykuarpoutrdthawlA: {i�-lOitOtbGFOby7LCi$AiaAik4riAGtori •tp-LP W atatGPi.LbLlAil4•1RtiLtittA3uAeAtyli",�7blo•aR3Ay4Y�laiWriAdIWKtM-itlly7• GOtIKG4WCb R4alaadapply�. wrw.taward tAlipo'G abllgauaat uadoF thk lwcpy-grao:Wud, Sww4u zyttsat awt11• aYLoacq sbzU 4CG4F SA-tlsapadorraaAco.aG Lotiso'b a011gaUon Lr iaU44 ata� uvtsact- taidAOpL-hs•4iw41swni3baF4twarRouAt40UaGwd-Gyla{bOLpxGDildi Lauoa'i-thaAausttaAdlgg 0tlilgiitaAG+i+ay�45rGti•474CQ{Littitt•iYpWkilAd4dkPLficO4•-liWOLt�NiG Rat, by .saatort Dktp4torigaiagar-aay astSgaa4tatalsvL.b• wbloato, slorks�roacor+a!-tbo caUctcklaAPl 13eAtr bo dooawd ttabls 4o thatubIciLa4 lasaaµ lalluca• atlaLtoo- toJadocai.444compiy.wlihaaµa1-LALtoo!t•aW 3UOA4404u4h•fill' orl4GWoAawbySrrouaGab4ywtkDriiosaadtiirock•air,sutbsubialvDorupoA•cacaipiaE� writtoA•aatiw.twmlotsoc•Ltutagil+aia•ALaacb-arktt• ba t4 a µadonmaoca otla uao�- abUgattaAc uadoz-tAis loac4,to payto-4ouac 3URaA4 dw-4a botomt dw, uadortho4ubloasa SuWautoshiuioWupaasRYlueAm4ealswaloetoeaad-tbsU•payaURoatrtoloatoFurlihavtaWtgrtiaaorsighiaatRquktas•toui+eitwc wah Yroach..oxitit.Rot4taLhiWadJcsg aRy+clWRz from lusoo 30 lhacauLaa}. {W-SA.ttw�wAcotaY.aut+bY-Lwc+ao:wcca•rwy, aitca•uPtiaR.c4q++k4-tubtouaa•to-uiDrwkrlascLot,•JAwbkA•a��aatLouosslaaU•�adactakotAa DDltgattaAL otitwstrtstoLtoc-++AdoLsusbstsbtwta tLorAttw-tkaaak Cbao+larGltaotsitduptiaA.satlwaxpiwdaarats.uGb•4uWoiGq; prowd� hawovoc� loLao4stuU Aotbo Uablo.tosaay<ptopifd•wists4LwwsJ4>fdapocRpaidbµtucbsubtoLi4oLoLurh Gubtlutorar•toraRppciof8ofiuticar proaGhvGQ4tuGt�wWocivr• {c}�ARYmattaxtogtdLiAgtl+aGOAwataltho•iWJlatuu•wuWr•a.ivbitaLo•shiStaltosaquloo ttwconwaFotlattac• �}—lJo.tDOtatw!•thaliturtSLoL a'rilgAacsubtot•aUoo-aRppart of ihaRcwalLoc+r.4tbautiottor'cpdaFu�.rktorscauoru. io;.._lotttu.idaii.dDJwoca aopy+ai•awyaotica.niJaaia�dr.os ar4ac6bys Littoa4oLlw-tubloww,avha ibali tuw4lwAgbs to-ca+csth4 Gitautt Dt linos -within. thaggco-pariod,lL3Ay, tpaciliod JA tuchuotko-Sba-cc Ciottoe tbaUbaua arigAt at•roimbutroR+saiaAd aftsot ltarA-iRdagairtu lecbw fac• aaybu�b DoianliL•cw40 hY• tbu-tubSoLLpa 11. Default; Breach; Remedies. 13A Default; Stench, A "Default" Is dellned as a failure by the Lessee to comply with or perform any of the terms, covenants, conditions or Rules and Regulations under this Lease. A'91eath' Is delved as the ouurrence of one or more of the following Defaults, and the falltueof Lesseeto cure such Oebult within a applicable grace period! RTIALS la ® 2019 AIR CRE. Ail Rights Reserved. STN-27,30, Revised i1•25.2019 Last Edited: 2/25/20219:53 AM Page 9of 15 City Council 22 — 11 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 (al The abandonment of the Premises; or the vacating of the Premises without providing a commorclafly reasonable level of security, or where the coverage of the property Insurance described In 94ragraphB,3 Is leopard lied asa,result thor,'Df,or without providing reasonable assurances to minlmlte potential vandalism. (b) The fallura of lessee to make any payment of Rent or any Securlly Deposit required to be made by Lessee hereunder, whether Lo lessor or to a third party. when due, to provide reasonable evidence of Insurance or surety bond, or to Fulfill any obligation under this leasewhlch endangers or threatens IIle or property, where such failure continues for a period of 3 business days followingwrltten notice to lessee. THE ACCEPTANCE BY LESSOR OF A PAATIAL PAYMENT OF RENT OR SECURITY DEPOSIT SNAIL NOT CONSTIME A WAIVER OF ANY OF LESSOR'S RIGHTS, INCUIOING LESSOR'S RIGHT TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES. (ci The failure of lessee to allow Lessor and/or its agents access to the Premises or the commission of waste, actor acts constituting public or private nuisance, and/or an Illegal actsvliyon the Pramises by Lessee,where such actions continue lot a period of 3 business days following written notice to lessee, In the event that lessee commits waste, a nuisance or an Illegal activity a second time then, the lessor may elect to treat such conduct as a non -curable Breach rather than a Default. (dj The failure by lessee to provide (1) reasonable written evidence of compliance wlthAppflcable Requirements, (III the service contracts, jlll)tho rescission of an unauthorized assignment or subletting, (Iv) an Estoppel Certificate or financial statements, (v) a requested subordination, (0) evidence concerning any guaranty and/or Guarantor, (vh) any document requested under Paragraph 42, (vlll) matoriat safely data sheets tMSDS), or (Ix) any other documentation or Information which Lessor may reasonably require of Lestoe under the terms of this Leese, where aity such failure continues for a period of 10 days following written notice to lessee, (e) A Default by Lessee as to the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of thlslease, or cf the rules adopted under Paragraph 40 hereof, other than prose described In Subparagraphs 134(a), jb), (c) orjd), above, whens such Default continues for a period of 30 daysafter written notice; provided, however, that If the nature of lessee's Default Is such that more than 30 days are reasonably required for Itscure, then it shall not be deemed to ba a Breach If Le&seo commences such cure within said 90 day period and thereafter dirgently prosecutes such cure to completion. (I1 The occurrence of any of the followingevents: (1) the making of any general arrangement of assignment forthe benefit of creditors; (11) becoming a 'debtor' as defined In 11 U.S.C. 4 101 or anysuctessor statute thereto (unless, in the case of a petition filed agalt4t lessee, the same is dismissed within 50days); jBl) the appointment of a trustee or receiver to take possession of substantially all of Lessee's assets located at the Premises or of lessee's }Merest lnthis lease, where possession Is not restored to tasiee within 30 days; of (iv) the attachment, execution orother judicial seizure of substantially all of Lessee's assets located at the Premises or of Lessee's Interest tit thls Leine, where such seizure Is not discharged within 30 days; provided, however, in the event that any provision of this subparagraph Is contrary to any applicable law, such provision shall be of no force or effect, and not affect the validity of the temainlog provisions. (g) The discovery that any financial statement of lessee or of any Guaranty given to Lessor was materially false, (h) if the performance cf Lessee's obligations under this Lease Is guaranteed: (I) the death of a Guaran tor, (It) the termination of a Guarantor's liability with respect to this tease other than in accordance with the terms of such guaranty, (nl) a Guarantor's becoming insolvent or the subject of a bankruptcy filing, tiv) a Guarantor's refusal to honor the guaranty, or (v) a Guarantor's breach of its guaranty obligation on an anticipatory basis, and lessee's failure, within 60 days following written notice of arty such event,to provide wr Itten alternative assurance or security, which, when coupled with the then exliting resources of lessee, equals or exceeds the combined financial resources of Lessee and the Guarantors that existed at the time of eKecutforsofthis Lease, 13.2 Remedies. If lessee fallsto perform any of its affirmative duties or obligations, within 10 days after written notice jot Incase of anemergency, without notice), lessor may, at its option,perform such duty or obligation on lessee's behalf, Including but not limited to the obtaining of reasonably required bonds, insurance policies, or governmental Ilcenses, permltsor approvals. Lessee shall pay to Lessor an amount equal to 115% of the costs and expenses incurred by Lessor In such performance upon receipt of an Invoice therefor. In the event of a Breath, Lessor may, with or without furtheraotfceot demand, and without limiting Lessor In the exercise of any right or remedy which Lessor may have byreason of such preach; (a) Terminate Lessee's fight topossesslon of the Premises by any lawful means, In which case this Leaseshall terminate and Lessee shall Immedlataty surrender possession to Lessor, in such event Lessor shall be entitled to recover from lessee: (I) the unpaid Rent which had been earned at the limo of termination; (If) the worth at the limeof award of the amount bywhlch the unpaid rent which would have been earned after termination until the time ofasvard exceediihe amount of such rental loss thatthe lessee proves could have been reasonably avoided; (IIQ the worth at the time of award of the arnounthy which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after the lime of award exceeds the amount of such rental toss that the Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; and IN) any otheramoant necessary to compensate lessor for all the detriment proximately caused by the lessee's failure to perform Its obligations under this lease orwhlch In the ordinary course of thing.s would be likelyto resuittherefrom, including but not ilmlled to the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, expenses of retetting, Including necessary renovation and altetstion of the Premises, reasonable attorneys' fees, and that portion of any leasing commission paid by Lessorlo connection with this Lease applicable to the unexpired term of this Lease. The worth at the time of award of the amount referred to In provision (III) of the Immediately preceding irnience shall be computed bydlscounting such amount at the discount rate of the Federal Reserve Bank of the District within which the Premises are located at the time of award plus one percent, Efforts by Lessor to mitigate damages caused by Lessee's Breach of this Lease shall not waive Lessor's right to recover any damages to which lessor Is otherwise entitled. If termination of this lease Is obtained through the provisional remedy of unlawful delainer, lessor shall have the right to recover In such proceeding any unpaid Rent and damages as are recoverable therein, or Lessor may reserve the right to recover all or any part thereof In aseparate suit, it a notice and grace period required under Paragraph 13.1 was not previously given, a notice to pay rent o r quit, or to perform or quit given to Lessee under the unlawful detalner statute shall also constitute the notice requlred by Paragraph 13.1. in such case, the applicable grace period required by Paragraph 13.1 and the untawful detalnef statute shall tun concunerift and the fa0ure of lessee to cure the Default within the greater of the two such grace periods shall constitute both an unlawful detalner and a Breach of this Lease entitling lessor to the remedies provided for In this lease and/or by said statute. jbt Continue the Lease and Lessee's right to possession and recover the Rent as It becomes due, In which event Lesseemay sublet or assign, subjectonty to reasonable limitations. Acts of maintenance, effortsto rebel, and/or the appointment of a receiver to protect the Lessor's Interests, shall not constitute a terminaton of the lessee's right to possession. (c) Pursueany other remedy now orhereafter available under the laws or judicial decisions of the state wherein the Premises are located. The expiration or termination ohhis Lease and/or the termination of lessee'sright to possesslon shall not relieve Lessee from liability under any Indemnity provisions of this Lease as to matters occurring or accruingduring the term hereof or by reason of Lessee's occupancy of the Premises. 11.3 Inducement Recapture, Any agreement for free orabaied rent or other charges, the cost of tenant improvements for Lessee paid for or performed by l.essor, or for the giving or paying by Lessor to or forlessee of any cash or other bonus, Inducement or consideration for lessee's entering Into this Lease, all of which concessions are hereinafter referred to u"hrducement Provisions," shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee`s full and h Ithful performance of all of the terms, covenants and conditioos of this lease. Upon Breach of this Leaseby Lessee, any such inducement Provision shall automatically be deemed deleted from thlslease and of no further force orelfett, and any rent, other tharge,bonus, inducement or consideration theretofore abated, g"n or paid by lessor under such an d meni Provision shall be immediately due and payableby lessee to Lessor, notwithstanding any subsequent cure ofsald Breach by Lessee. The acceptance by INITIALS �y 0 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved. Last Edited., 2/25/2021 9.53 AM STN-27,30, RevlSed 11-25-2019 Page 10 of 15 City Council 22 — 12 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessor of renter the cure of the Breach which Initiated the operation of this paragraph shalt not be deemed a waiver by Lessor of the provisions of this paragraph unless spedheally so stated in writing by Lessor at the time of such acceptance. 13.4 late charges, lessee hetaby etknowledges that late payment by Lessee of Rent will cause lessor to Incur costs not contemplated bythls lease, the exact amount of which will be extremely difficult to ascertaln. Such costs Include, but are not limited to, processing and accounting charges, and late charges which maybe Imposed upon Lessor by any tender. Accordingly, if any pent shall not be recelved by Lessorwittdn s days after such amountshall bedue, then, without any requirement for notice to lessee, Lesseeshag immediately pay to lessor a one-timelate charge equal to 10%of each such overdue mount or S100, whichever h greater. The Parties hereby agree that such late charge represents a fair and reasonabte estimate ofthe costs Lessorwlll Incur by reason ofsuch late payment, Acceptance of such late charge by lessor shalt in no event constitute a waiver of tessee's Oefauft or Breach with reipect to such overdue amount, not prevent the exercise of any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder. InAs dLnrrxs ti ••• L ,"w'• t e.. refs ee rt—Al—tedlta,3.00464,uomq taatracy,-rtaaa4taa4 chah,•al tassar•c apttoar becamrtduwAd payiWa•quartarheus advaAca, 13.5 Interest. Any monetary payment due Lessor hereunder, other than late charges, not received by lessor, wilen due shall bear interest from the 3tst day after It was dua. The Interest ('Interest"( charged shallbe computed at the rate of 1o%per annum but shall notexceed the maximum rate allowedby law. Interest It payable In addition to the potential late thorgeprovtded farm Paragraph 13.4, 0.6 Breach by Lessor. (a) Notice ofgreach. Lessor shall not be deemed in breach ofthls Lease unless Lessor falls within a reasonable time to perform an obligation required to be performed by Lessor. For purposes of this Paragraph, a reasonable time shall In no event be less than 30 days after receipt by Lessor, and any Lender whose name and address shall have been furnished to Lessee in writing for such purpose, of written notice spetifyingwherelnsuch obilgationof Lessor has not been performed; provided, however, that If the nature of lessor's obligation Is such that more than 30days ate reasonably required for its performance, then lessor shall not be In breach If performance is commenced within such 30 day period and lhereafterdlggontlypursued tocompieffon, (b) Performanceby Lessee on Behalf oftessor. in the event that neither lessor nortander curessald breads within 30 days after receipt of said notice, orll having commented said cure they do not diligently Pursue ittocompletion, then lessee may electto cure said breach at Lessee's expense and offset from Rent the actual and reasonable cost to perform suchture, provided, however, thatsuch offset shall not exceed an amovnt equal to the greater of one month's Base Rent a the Security Deposit, reserving lessee's right to seek reimbursement from Lessor for anysuch expense In excenof such offset. Lesseesha6 document the cast of said cure and supply said documentation to Lessor. 14. Condemnation. 0 the Premises or any portion thereof are taken under the power of eminent domain or sold under the threat of the exercise of said pourer (oollecttvety"Condemnation'), this lease shallterminate as to the part taken as of the date the condemning authority takes dtleor possession, whichever first occurs. If more than 10% of the Building, or more than 25% of that portion of the Premises not occupied by any building, Is taken byCondemnation, Lessee may, at Lessee's option, to be exercised in writing within 10days after lessor shall have given Lessee written notice of such taking (at In the absence ofsuch noth•.e, within 10 days eater the candemaingauthorlty shall have taken possesslon)terminate this tease mof the date the condemning authority takes such possession. It Lessee does not terminatethls Leaseln accordance with the faregoing, this Lease shag remain In full forceand affectas to the portion ofthe Promises temaining,except that the Base Rantshall be reduced In proportion to the reduction In utility of the Premises caused by such Condemnation. Condemnation awards and1or payments shall be the property of Lessor, whether such award shrill be made as compensation far d Iminutlon In value of the leasehold, the value o f the part taken, or for severance damages; provlded, however, that tcsseeshall be entitled to any compensation paid by the condemnor for lessee's relocation expenses, loss of business goodwill and/or Trade Fixtures, without regard towhether or not this Lease Is terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Paragraph, All Alterations and utility Installations made to the Premfses by lessee, for purposes of Condemnation only, shall beconsldered the property of the lessee and Lessee shall be entitled toany and all compensation which is payable therefar. in the event that this Lease Is net terminated by reason of the Condemnation, Lessor shall repair any damage to the Premises caused bysuch Condemnation. iS.—arolurraaa•r"aaa 35.1•Addittocrl CarwakataA--10 #ddlttoatathe pa yawAicaur4d•purtuuatta-Raraggph3-0•abouarinrtaf agrwa Wsto-ja}•l4taapaa�ciiNs#ajt-Gariggritlf �- toscaaar•aayoaaapivatad•vvtfEssar•w�tacqulws•aayrights to4NaRraatsaaoFWraacprasnlaarwvAad•byletsaaFaA4WeatadwRhiA-ttssnanw Rra}aecrJLarsyv w4ttua wbkb•iha-JrrtrAsaa4k• 4o Galati"{c}4E.tasiaa•aeasaiap ia.puswxcloA•oE2kaRsamiwc,-urith.Lhf cowwAt etc asaobaEWettraaxp{raq�sn-ofttric•4aaca,ard�d}if.aact• Raatk. Pacraacad,+whathscDyagaaamsni+rr+sparatssraaE•area"aatastnractaup#rawia,ihaoyLKcaRcpalspaylirokarsafoeJr►icwrdaaonw�R#tlw fact ccAadrda-aEiho- Bcclwrs to atlactaLihatlrrw laa.Laasarr+aa aaacufad.-IAa•pns+rklarrcaEitds•paraerapt► arolaWntivd-io-cupartada tho-ptwktonaot-aayaartiaaagaw�rsai/a ttse•caatra+�. 1,i,i-Auuwytloa-of44RM.HaAa�Auytinarez:-nutraAsfarrracitocsor'e GaNrwtJathfalaasa•sul>aUlaadaamadioAwa aRwraadiascaa's.Waligau oa AnrauAdK". &etas ndtagbPihttdpaAytlsaAtHciariaaaE she{uouisiruu-aEAatag+xpbs•�.0..3,fir23arad7l—tEtascoc tactile• fsayLoarokars•aay as»a•natc-tluoaa aAdtor:boolrarag► Eaas. PCB4oihitlaaca-vAteadu% then such amounts cEsailaocnsaUgow4t.-ta•ad&Aoo,IE1,eiwrfapc4P(>aM arnGNMelalasc+sa'sCrakarwdn*a•dutylarwa�c Broker•may.aead•vuigaa•ap41ca4aituw•sAdlacsN afaucN•fathwaadJE•LacsalaAs•4apaysucb #auruak�IGrlatJiO�dayr•aEsar; saldAatica.lartaasbattyayuld r»oAliti4.ltr•:iakAFiAfi•Q�Ni4iw<t�•ima4Att•aBaPRit-RY Ai�•Lr17ddhkinri i4nkariEr:tlJFilPeeAladtag ba+iltdrit f aCga. bMhaRi:ai>1rLiinj�•LQA}iN:KiQ1l i&raarAeat• aautari.tacabynaadlar•baiMawa4,aaeac aad 4asWr"e&aka"-for eba7tmlwdpurposa aE caltacttagaayJarotwa9alw-eased. u•.�•R.paw.ntaaaAa• aad4naefaAl4Ns•ei•Brokae.Ratatiartahipa�toaaaaaars 4afataaaach r4pras;stat.aAdaarragt 4ottw-alhea Hsasll-baG4sad• Rlydaa4Ags•wkh•an f- paweA,.lirm,-hrukarr•agaALar•dadar {atiWr•lhaa•4ha-Jlrakoa aad-Agaatrr�aayJ-lnconaac3foa tut;A4hlFtnaea,•aad tbat•Ao oga ohhat-thee aats#tsnmadurokara aad Ayagtek-aruttladia•aAyaarpralatloaor•9ndar�-fat4n4oaaadtaa4earowltft •laws aadlaswc•ds►eachAaeabyagraolo tndamatEy,pocks",•daiawtaad bald thsothw haradtsc frem•aadagataes.Jtabtusyloaeampanrauon.oc.eNargos.suAlch may.#►actalnwd JrysaMwabuaAaarMt; tNaPNrandtr• W atl�• alraGae pMgr3y=+Baser oft -ray drngpgc oracttorsGaE ihafadaaraUytegRarty,-tadnrdkr�n� fawns,�paAcas,•atiaraaydlwa raaroaabknr•iacurrad+�+kh�a6prcl-ttwrtla 16. Estoppel certificates. (a) Each Party(as "Respanding Party") shall within 10 days after wrlitennotice from the other Party (the "Requesting Party -)execute, acknowledge and deliver to the Requesting Party a statement In writing In form simltartothe then most current'Estoppel Certificate" form published Bf AIR CRE, plus such additional Information, confirmation and/or statements as maybe reasonably requested by the Requesting Party. (b) If the RespondingParty shall fall to execute or deliver the Estoppel Certificate within stKit 10 day petlod, the Requesting Party may execute an Estoppel Certificate stating that: (i) the tease is in f ullforceand effect without modification except as maybe represented by the Requesting Party, (10 there are no uncured defaults In the Requesting Iraftyrsparformance, and (1111 if lessor is the Requesting Party, not more than me month'stent has been paid in advance. Prospective purchasers and eacumbrancers may rely upon lheFlequesting Party's Estoppel Certificate, and the Responding Party shall bo estopped fromdenying the truth of the facts contained In said Casrtlflcate, inaddidon, lessee acknowledges that any fallure an Its part to provide such an Estoppel Certillcatewill expose Lessor )and potentially cause Lessor to Inturcosts not contemplated by this Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difffcuti to ascertain. Accordingly should the INITIALS �Ad)S W 2019AIR CU. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited; 2/25/20219:53 AM S M-27,30, Reylsed 11.25-2019 Page 11 of 16 City Council 22 — 13 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee fall to execute and/or deliver a requested Estoppel Certi scale In a timely fashion, Lesser shall pay to Lessor a fee of $5oo- - BaFo apnt -^ �F �- _-lawaadoity sacca•ued.wl+hcwt-any raqukarnaat far•aoUea+o L""o, 3heaNsl4ttag aa4�tlopsae.jLAO,. wAklwua+4r-gseatw lot csasaiadaa•of+halauo The Pardes agree that such Increaseln Base ftenI represents fair and reasonable compensation forth e additional rlsh/costs that Lestor will Incur by reason of tessee's failure I provide the Estoppel Certificate, Such Increasa In Base Rent.shall In no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's aelault or Breach wllh respect to (lie failure to provide the Estoppel Ceralicate nor prevent the exercise at any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder. (c) If Lessor desires to finance, refinance, or sell the Premises, or any pan thereof, Lessee and all Guarantors shall within 10 days alter written notice from Lessor deliver to any potential lender or purchaser designated by Lessor such financial statements as maybe reasonably required by such lender or purchaser, Including but not limited to Lassee's fins nclai statements for the past 3 years. All such finanalal statements shall be received by lessor and such lender or purchaser In confidence and shall txi used only for the purposes herein set forth. 17, Definition of Lessor. The term "Lessor" as used herein shill mean the owner or ownersat the time In question of the feelitie to the Premises, or,lf this is a sublease, of the Lessee's Interest In the prior lease. In the event of a transfer of Lessor's title or Interest In the Premises or this Lease, Lessor shaft deliver to the transferee or assignee(In cash or by credit) any unused Security Deposit held by Lessor.. Upon such transfer or assignment and delivery of the Security Deposit, as aforesaid, the prior Lessor sholibereileved of all IlabAltywlth respectlo the obligations and/or covenants under this Leasethereaher to be performed by the Lessor, Subject to the foregoing, the obllgaeonsand/•or covenants in this Lease to be performed by the Lessorshall he binding only upon the Lestor as herainaboye defined. 10, 3everabRity. The Invallcityrot any provision of this Lease, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, shall In no wayalfect the validity ofany other pwvislon hereof. i9, Days. Unless otherwise specifically Indicated to the contrary, theword 'days' as used In lhlstease shall mean and refer to calendar days. 20, tim"tion on Uebllky. The obligations oftessur under this Lease shall not constitute personal obligations of tensor, orits partners, members, directors, officers or shareholders, and Lessee shall look to the Premises, and to no other assets of Lessor, for the satisfaction of a ny liability of lessor with respect to this Lease, and shall not seek recourse againstLessor'spartners, members, directors, officers or shareholders, or any of their personalassetsfor such satisfection. 21, Time of f Bence. Time Is of the essence withrespect to the performance of all obligations to be performed orobserved by the Parties under this tease. 22. No Pilot or Other Agreements; Broker Disclaimer. This Lease contains a Ilage"ments between the Partleswlth respect to any matter mentioned herein, and no other prior or contemporaneous agreement or under;tanding shall be effective. Lessor and lessee each represents and warrants to the Brokers that it has made, and is retying solelyupon, hsown Investigation as to the nature, quality, character and financial responslbillty of the other Party to this tease and as to the use, nature, quality, and character of the Premises. Bro! ors have no responsibility with respectthereto or with respect to any default or breach hereof by either Party. U - Notke, ]],1• tiatisF Rsgals«rurais�AltAa+icacavqul4ad-cFr-pvrmliWti-b1+ 3biFtAaia• at apPi�o lawtba4ba J natutdn8 a,nrs aaayho•dafi�aad• In• �raow;hyha+rd-oaby taaufaF) oF-rnayba tept.bµ+agulu,-ca4tiEiW or.aa;ictoradmait vcls5-Aorta+tFr�rA-lixpsa4i •AiaU, withgwtagaprapausror•bµi34•AralbLraa4raiuWnrocbµ-aas><ilrind. +hall ba-dsamadwfAelantly gbFoaJiWroad-lna�swaaot+paeitWd�'+r t33k• we►�aph.2i-lta-addFaeoveaoaod ad}aoantto aFaF�4tlgga4aq. an this• L*aw ahatl Jw•+haR Rady�F addaou-feed Wuaay-a maWagcLpagc�4-Gktsac W4eyataapDy,anitian•uDticoaa+haatisvccp4ctly.,a.dtl4anantaddwukcaadce,-natApi tbu++pvfliauea'a FahlaBpoFcatdor4 of li,a-Apmisaarthaitra,ukaa•.thaatanatl{uta LsuYa'saddrou.la4+wtica� Atvpy� 4lag wwtlws-tvls4tor.--tkaU bo.cancwcaatfy-irantmlittd to.+uch pxtµor•parti,a4 ><-ouch addrasuu au:laswsasawfram tuna to tursabaaafNr•daNgF►ata►Irs�cWarg. 322•tue►of Nodta.-AayFuattte-toot bµragk4a4ad000aAlRod-Fuailrratusa•:oceipt raquvttvd, 4hait badaFwedbuwaoarthada4aakdelkreq thownaa•:ir4 racglp4a a4d,•Otaf a0 dailvorµdato il• 4lt owr4rttrapottmack 4hvraoa-9 taatb)L tagulacasotl thF►ao>rw 4Aa11•b�deamsd givaa-a2• hours-aftaF tea♦ saFr+a+4 addaat4ad-O4• r6quir6dhorata-andm4Lad-with Pottle raWid•-t+odtu•doihwosodtsµUAW btata4twtpra+t-futa W0AMIGh4cosFrJacthnteuarinWrra•rseFr4day do"PjF "be. doomedl7Gaan-�Ghowt-aka4dotbrarye6L iLataRl4tPLtra RaLi7i SaPrI000+G taU+l�i.••i+tacit/idatiW/ad.t)y-tiai�dJCF•3#aAirA4t4Ydtr'FF faC41rni1a+ga4WIti10l1Oi4tlyanlilt- haRba•46iamad4alivarod kip oaacluatrasokp4w14nod k•aycaivWon4Sa4ar"*cuadaVaotepai•hdA,&%.144hall.bo4voAi"sccA44ad•an0a,"Mbust""day,• �.3•-OptioaarptohulthcWtdtag-Uwiorogaiag,•Sa acdor.+o-pworet4a• gay Cytbat#so*•paragrayh 3P)r•LtwNvtieq•awttba4eat•byGaWticdMaq•tWtutnaDcesp4. revise.44vd)ra.>tProwldaJl{stgnalure rrqultod�rcauclvR{4tgaaWra• 4a�tslr4d�at-some•otla+atuwttwdoiagythaLyroulctoFssaWtpt•etL7bti4Air+g Wrl•viaW33wnoiS4o-vru. 14. Waivers, (a) No walvorby Lessor of the Default or Breach of any term, covenant or condition hereof by Lessee, shall be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant or condition hereof, or of any subsequent Default or Breach by Lessee of the same or of any other term, covenant or to4bon hereof. Lessor's consent to, or approval of, any act shot[ not be deemed to render unnecessary the obtaining of lessor's consent to, or approval of, any subsequent or similar act by tessee, or be construed as the basis ofan woppel to enforce the provision or provisions of this Lease requiring suchconsenl. (b) The acceptance of Rent bytesslot shall not boa waNvr of any Default or Breach hV Lessee. Any Payment by Lessee may be accepted by Lessor on account of monies or damages due Lessor, notwithstanding arty quatryina statements or conditions made by Lessee h connection therewith, which such statements andlor condidons shall be of no force or effect whatsoever unless spoclhcally agreed to In writing by Lessor at or before the time of deposit of such payment. (c) THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE SHALL GOVERN WITH REGARDi0 ALL MATTERS RELATEDTHERETO AND HERE11Y WAIVE THE PROVISIONS OF ANY PRESENT OR FUTURE STATi1TE TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH STATUTE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS LEASE. jib-�ilbaFaootadag le+a-atGscuuion •wkh•a real �4tatsFageflt+aea+ding ar4a.La;tatauaatactiwt,.aLvs4ory,G Lo4rva•shauld�wwuihil4u4totarudgrs4and uhaL4µPoofagaagr-w ta0iomhip i44)t@4raA+aGif4n-La4sor7nt11efiiP34kaawlvdbabolnBad✓lWdby4w•4solwr4-4a• Wk trawsa4tivar acloUa uu (ij—.LKtac',tAyRgt,-A1s44o+'4 agaa4 und+u3:is+ingagwoFrinat�suliA +Ao•1duaKycetu•thu-agoatiorbha Losuar-ady+-,4 La4ws'ca�gawsor• eubsgaat- haatlw talluw4aaaffiFaaatlua�Wlaa3i4no4:-To tAs3a4wua ltlldueiuvdup,Fat+aaaotteuo�uu4arltvhonoctvtand•tovalteria-dasUuacrv1t1414a ig4soa #ttaa tareuap+s diccb4waitbui.kaowntathaagaal-motalallyafEactin8-chow-,a•acdacSrabUlgror•tAapwper+y.4hat awmo4-Aauwa•+v,•acyFltblr4tlWdgigawt-a4Wntion.and. ob+a�vatiw4atrtfwPartia4•-Aaagt+nt•L4uat-abilga+adtvaawlto okAoc•Paaa}agsycvoAtWnisallaf4µnatfvn obialacdkdawifw cthvr• Paciµwhiclydoa4+svL uswtuotha aitur? k,e4uU" wRfartlrabova U. INITIALS m 2019AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25120219:53AM STN•17,30, Revised 11.25-2019 Page 12 of 16 City Council 22 — 14 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 6U;--tarsga'cA,�t--Anxpaat<anagraatvacixagaattor•lhalacwaoaty._iR.tt+ar4aituaurrocitra�ganikaatt�halauaFasgealrAuea-ltby. agceamaatshwsgaat ava><tatalaraca aipaaadaRfor catwkec►aadaradrNshaalafuilsa• lrapaaL tFaapllW �Anaga+�xURgonlylocaLauaa•ttat WaIaJW�Wa� attirmsti+wobligstloas-#l+-AAdutiary-dvty.af• utaraiirarartRLegrfly,-1toWescydaad•foyatty4wdaaffagr•.vatA•t!w•Correa•?adhaJauaaaadthalatios:-�a{- IAngeP4ttM414eftaacataa6kr•ckfilt•�Rdsaw•lei•pttdota>aaoao4thaagoat't�tuttacr4b�AdutyoiltpAfttl3adfaltdol4ngaadGe4d•#attic 4�Adutµlo•dittlotoalllutc• knavaF So -the agent• anatarsalbµatl4cda� Nuwluaoc-doskabtgty 4l the• pcopaatµ lhat•ar�flallraaarp-� 4Far1i tUia •tba dWliaat atseadaaaad• 4btaPvatton aE, thaRartfat.- Aaagaat fir os obfegatad to raaaf Lu aithut FartVan yeoafidartifallalormat3aaahtaLwd-item lhiattwr-RaFtyaublW dnn4aa� l auobq tha attiFarativa• dutWe�at SaRh itA�+tgevfRnacrrsaglfnaWFKAla[locoadlaisao-Ay4 tbaagaat ofboth.tf:alauFaFaadlh4laua•✓<a;•Lrancactfaa,i A v{tlsu dlAtbaknaur1adge•oadcawtaat•o4 botb•tiraJxasoca Rd thaLascoa-Jae dual agoaW.alWattan,- ttwagaratAusha iaUawiae attiaaatvraahilgattoru-Saboth•sfsalyttor-aacillwiwaer={s;likcuGtsA� i'GRubraoct-cuylnWt3 ty k4'atty!A-,he daalfagc With Ndwc lassaFaF•rite-LA4�4Y•^{b)$ihnf•d+ltfat W-tha.lauar SnGtlty.IaGtu-i6 if atad#�GWa IA WbpiCa8pj3h4 oF•{f:.�3a•WQFaiAPI�R(3 bOf7bLafiatafKl•lessee,-Xd4. agoar may riot,wftltout.sltoaxpsaeF paraueeiaaotthe-Fapaekva aarty,•dlubteto thaotbeF W Fry-9oandaRUal7�RloFm atiaRr laelwdiag,•fxet.natJl+akwtiw,iaele+alattag io•aUhrwlauaa'sao-Lauasft Ra�RctaigosigaR,-meant,bar@aEasssg•fvxltioa,ocntluupartaaatlniamattoa theta+aKlmp�ctcaat,lacludfagluioc'c•x,dhfcgrwaL.ta accapt4-rantMuta shag rice UuiaQ card -vs latsaa'cualJlkignats-tapayr teat-graataa:tbaa •aria FaaLoftasad.-:ttaaaba•a dutlasof YAa agaat- ia3 coat asgla Ksntactiaa-da oat 144aiw ap agcaameau w aiawa that tkFap 4-4—fafPwcow Rua41144 W aka abwa-Faalecww� Jt apt or• cox• adufcok dau•ad,-COP"- atoapaWalpcolauloaal�serifSatsosaadLattwshas+ldat4aagly-40"kie4."U AllJax-athdca-fwaaacomPataatProlastloaatbocauta-ihaladaul•andtwotax. raruaquanusoLatraasa,ctias caR bawrrrpWx-aad•ctsb}au-W caanga• (bi---awkau have -no racpaaclatU ty wftp raePact,ta. aay.dafauti ar bwub tvoFaaf bµnitlraF A.irAy.- iA4RaFtiatagfaa• kulaaluwtak•nFoibaF.legai• pr4caedlag kaaolsagg-aaybraash• af• dciy,•arroF•oFaaifssfoA• Fa3adRg w• chit laaromsy ba luauglrt- agalast sFolsacraara-than orw `� abet. ehaitart Alta arad shot -IA a tiabilliy{iaetudlag•souFtsaet«aadattaFaEyt faatl afaaµ&okar-withwtpau-2oanysueU•iawcuttsadjockgslgcoevadlagihsunataxeaadttwfwceeaAadby.such. Brolafpuru,aa�4 So3l>la..laata; proulslod,• bowauar,-lbat•Sh,a. foragofwgltraliattaa-aa each O.Fokai a• IlabWtytna4-unlba appUcabM-to artygeouaegttgaaca aFv dUfut cnstcoadauof tushsrokas,• fbl-� LAitaFarld iattlatiaWa �OIdap4✓'y W-'QWkarb aa^+.HRGde#1at� i1W-GGRKa1rRf Wif61tOFiRf�FKlatf4n• gIWR AFGi44FF Lhaf• 1L iORifda"a----�.r`�!• Q•��"1^ he•toufideadal. 26. No Right To Holdover. Lessee has no right to retain possession of the Premises or any part thereof beyond the expiradanor termination of this lease. In the event that lessee holds over, then the Base Rent strati b6 Int;reased to 190% oft he Base Rent applicable Immediately preceding the expiration or termination. Holdover Base Rent shall be calculated on monthiybasls. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as consent by Lessor to any holding over by Lessee. 27. Cumulative Remedies. No remedy or elaltfon hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall, wherever possible, becumutative with all other remedies at law or in equity. 28. Covenants and Conditions; Construction of Agreement, All provisions or this base to be observed or performed by lessee are both covenants and conditions. In construing this Lease, all headings and titles are for the asrurenlen+ce of the Parties only and shall not he considered a part of this Lease. Whenever required bythe context, the singularshalt include theplural and vice versa. Thlslease shall not be construed asif pteparedby one of the Pa rtles, but rather according to its Fair meanlog as a whole, as if both Parties had prepared It. 29. Binding Effect; Choice of Low, ihlsLeaseshallbebindingupontheParties,thelrpersonalrepresentatives,tuccessorsandasstgnsandbegovwriodbythelaws of the State In which the premises are located. Any iltigation between the Parties hereto concerning this Lease shall be Initialed In the countyln which the Premises are located. Signatures tothls Lease accomplished by meant of electronic signature or slmllartechnology shall be legal and binding. 30. Subordination; Attomment; Non Oisturbsnce, 30.1 Subordination. Thit tease and any Option granted hereby shall be subject and subordinate to any ground lease, mortgage, deed of trust, or other hypothecation or security device (collectively, "Securlty Device"), now or hereafter placed upon the Premises, to any and all advances made on the securltythereof, and to all renewals, modifications, and extensions thereof. tesseeagrees that the holders of any such Security Devices (ln this leasetogetherieferred to as "Lender") shall have no liability orobllgation to perrorm any of the obligations of Lessor under this Lease. Any lender may elect to have this lease and/or any Option granted hereby superior to the lien of Its Sea rlty Devict by giving written notice thereof to lessee, whereupon this Lease and such Options shall be deemed prior to such Security Device, notwithstanding the relative datesof the documentation or recordation thereol, 30.2 Attomment. In the event that lessor transfers title to the Premises, or the Premises are acquired by another upon the foreclosure or termination of a Security Device to wh Ich this lease Is subordinated (1) Lessee shall, subject lathe non -disturbance provisions of Paragrapti 30,3, atlnm to such new owner, and upon request, enter into a new lease, containingall of the terms sod provisions of this tease, with such new ownertot the remainder of the term hereof, or, at the election of the new owner, this leasewill automatically btco me a new lease between Lessee and such newowner, and (ll) lessor shall thereafter be relieved of any further obllgationtheeeander and such newowner shah assume all of Lessors obligations, except that such new owner shalloot: (a) he liable lot any actor omission of any prior lessor orwith respect to events occurring prior to acquisition of ownership; (b) be subject to any offsets or defenses which Lesseemlght haveagalnst any print lessor, (c) be bound by prepayment of more than one month's rent, or (d) be Rabic for the return of any seturltydeposit paid to any prior lustor which was not paid or credited to such new owner. 30.3 Non-Dhturbanca, With respect to Security Devices entered Into by lessor after the execution of this Lease, Lessee's subordination of this Lease shall be subject to receiving comma rdallyreasonable non•dlstu(bance agreement (a "Non-OlsturbanceAgreement") from the Lender which Non -Disturbance Agreement provides that Lessee's possession of the Premises, and this Lease, Including any options to extend the term hereof, will not be dlsturbcd So long as lessee Is not in Breach hereof and ati ores to the record oweerof the Premises. rurther,w)lhln 60 days after the execution ofthfs Lease, Lessor shall, If requested by Lessee, use its commercially reasonable efforlsto obtain a Non -Disturbance Agreement From theholder of anypre-existing Security Device whkhls secured by the Premises. In the event that Lessor is unable to provide the Non-Olsturbante Agreement within said 60days, then Lessee may, at LOStee'a option, directly contact tender and attempt to negotiale for the mcecution and delivery of a Non -Disturbance Agreement. 30,A Self -Executing, the agreements contained In this Paragraph 30 shall be effative without the execution of any further documents; provlded, however, that, upon written request from Lossoror a lender In connection with a sale, financing or refinancing of the Premises, Lessee and Lessor shall execute such further writings as may be reasonably required to separately document any subordination, attomment and(-orNon-Olsturbance Agreement provided For herein. 31. Attorneys' Fees, If any Party or Broker bringsan action or proceeding Involving the Premises whether founded to tort, oontract or equlty, or to declare rights 11gvreoer, the Prevailing Party (as hereafter defined) In any such proceeding, action, or appeal thereon, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, such fees may Mr— l INITIALS AL5 LD 2019 AIR CAL All Rights Reserved, Last Edited; 2/25/20219!53 AM Sf N-27,30, Revised 11.25-2019 Page 13 of 15 City Council 22 — 15 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 be awarded In the some suit or recovered Inasepalate suit, whether or not such action or proceeding Is pursued to declslon or judgment. The terns, "Prevailing Party" shall Include, without Ilmltatlon, a Party or Broker who substantially obtains or defeats the rellei sought, as toe case maybe, whether by compromise, settlement, judgment, or the abandonment by the other Party or Broker of Its claim or defense, The attorneys' fees award shall not be computed in accordance with any court fee schedule, but shall be suchas to fully reimburse all attorneys' tees reasonably Incurred, In addition, Lessor shall be entitled to attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in the preparation and service of notices of Default and consultations in connectlontherewlth, whether or not a legal action Is subsequently tommenced in connoction with such Default or resulting Breach ($200 is a reasonable minimum per occurrence for such services and consultation), 32, Lessor's Access; Showing Pr4m1m; Repaim Lessorand Lessor's agents shall havexhe r1ght to enivr1he Premises at any time, Inthecaso of an emergency, and otherwise at reasonable times after reasonable prior notice for thepurpose of showingthe same to prospective purchasers, lenders, or tenants, and making such alteration, repairs, Improvements or addltium to the Premises as lessor may deem necessary or deslrable and the erecting, using and maintaining of utilities, services, pipes and conduits through the Premises and/or other premiset as long as there fine material adverse effect on Lessee's use of the Premises. All such activltles shall be without abatement of rent or (}ability to Lessee. 33. Auctions, Lessee shall not candmt, nor permit to be conducted, anyauction upon the Premises withautLessor's prior written consent. Lessor %hail not be obligated to exercise any standard of reasonableness In determining whether to permit an auctton. 34. Signs. Lessor may place on the Premises ordinary "For Sale" signs at any time and ordlnary"For Lease` signs during the last 6 months of the term hereof. Except for ordinary "for sublease" signs, Lessee shall not place any sign upon the Premises without Lessor's prior wiliten consent. All signs must comply with all Applicable Requirements, 33, Tetmination;Merger. Unles4 specifically stated otherwise In writing by Lessor, ihevolunta,y or other surrender of thls-Leaseby Lessee,tho mutual Wmination or cancellation hereof, or a terminadon hereof by Lessor for Breach by lessee, shall automaticallyterminate any sublease or lesser estate in the Premises; provided, however, that Lessor may elect to continue any one or all exlsdng subtenancles, Letter's failure within 10 days followingany such event to elect to the contrary by written notice to the holder of any such lesser interest, shall constitute Lessor's aleCden to have such event Constitute the terminadon of such interest. 36. Corients, All requests for consent shall be in vrritfng. Except it otherwise, provided herein, wherever hi this Least the consent of a Party Is required to an act by or for the other Parry, such consent shill not be unreasonabiy withheld or delayed. Lessor's actual reasonable costs and expenses (Including but not limited to architects', attorneys', englneere and other consultants' fees) incurred in the consideration of, or response to, a request by Lessee for any lessor consent, including but not limited to consents to on assignment, a subletting or the presence or use of a Hazardous Substance, shall be paid by Lessee upon receipt of an Invoice and suppordng documentation therefor, Lessor'sconsent to any act, asslgnme nt or subletting shall not constitute an acknowledgment that no Default or Breach by Lessee of this tease exists, nor shall such consent be deemed a waiver of any then existing Default or Breach, except as may be otherwise specifically stated in writing by Lessor at the time of such consent. The failure to specify herein any partcular condition to lessor's consent shall rot preclude the Imposition by Lessor at the time of consent of such further or other conditions as are then reasonable with reference to the particular matter for which consent Is being glyen. In the event that either Party disagrees with any determination made by theother hereunder and reasonably requests the reasons for such determination, the determining party shattfurnish Its reasons In writing and In reasonable detallwithln 10 business days following such request, 37. Guarantor. 37.1 Execution. The Guarantors, Ifa ny, shall each execute a guaranty In the form most recently published BY AIR CAF, and each such Guarantor shall have the same obligations as Lessee under this Lease, 372 Default It shall constitute a Oelaultof the Lessee If any Guarantor falls er refuses, upon request to provide. (a)evidence of the oxecudon of lho guaranty, Including the authority of the party signing on Guarantor's behalf to obfgate Guarantor, and In the case of a corporate Guarantor, acertlfied copy of a resolution of tts board of directors authotizing the making of tech guaranty, (b) current financial statements, (c) an Estoppel Certificate, or (d) written confirmation that the guaranty Is still In effect. 38. quiet Possession, Subject to payment by lessee of the Rent and performance of all oithe covenants, conditions and provisions on lessee's part to be observed and performed under this Lease, Lessee shall havequiel possession and quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term hereof, 39. Options, If Lessee Is granted any Option, as defined below, then the following proulsions shall apply. 39A Deflnition, "Option' shall mean: (al the right to extend or reduce the term of or renew this lease or to extend or reduce the term or or renew any tease that Lessee has on other p roperty of Lessor; (b) the right of first refusal orfirst offer to lease either the Promises or other property of Lessor,(c) the right to purchase, the right of first offertepurchase or the rightof first refusal to purchase the Promises of other p(opertyof Lessor, 39.2 options Personal To Original lessee. Any Option granted to Lessee In Chit Lease Is personal to the orlginal Lessee, and cannot be assigned or exerclsed by anyone other then said orlglnal lessee and onlywhile the oNgInA Lessee Is In full possession of the Premises and, If requested by Lessor, with Lessen certifying that Lessee has no intention of thereafter aSSlgning or subletting, 39.3 Multiple Options. In the event that Lessee has any multiple Options to extend or renew this tease, a later Optlon cannot be exercised unless the prior Options have beenvalldly errerclsed. 39.4 Effect of Defaulton Options, (a) lessee shall have no right to exercise an Option; (I)d uring the period commencing with the giving of any notice of Default and continuing until sald Default is cured, (11) during the period of time any Rent Is unpaid (without regard to whether notteethereof Is given Lessee),(lil) during the time Lessee Is 0 Breach of this Lease, or IN) In the event that Lessee has been given 3 or mare notices of separataDefault, whothefor not the Defaults are cured, during the 22month period Immediately preceding the exercise ofthe Option. (b) The period of time within which an Option may be exercised shall not be extended or enlarged by reason of Lessee's inability to exercise anOption because of the provisions of Paragraph 39.4(a). (c) An Option shall terminate and beef no further force or effecl, notwithstanding Lessee's due and timely exercise of the Option, If, after such exerclse and prior to the commencement ofthe extended term orcompletion of this purchase, (1) Lessee falls to pay Rent for a parlor[ of 30days after such Rent becomes due (without any necessity of Lessor to give notice thereof), or (4) if Lessee commits a Breach of this lease, 40. Multiple Oulfdings, lithe Premises are a part of a groupof bulldingscontrofied by Lessor, Lessee agrees that it willabide by and conform to all reasonable rules and regulations which lessor may make from time to time for the management, safely, and care ofsald properties, Including the care and cleanliness of the grounds and including the parking, loading and unloading of vehicles, and to cause Its employees, suppliers, shippers, Customers, contractors and Invitees to so abide and W ssee al%p agrees to pay Its lair share of common expenses Incurred in Connection with such rules and regulatlons. iNITIALS- 0 2019AiR CRE, All Rights Reserver!, Last Edited; 2/25/2021 9;53 AM STN•27.30, Revlsed 11.25-2019 Page 14 of 16 City Council 22 — 16 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 41, Security Measures. Lessee hereby acknowledges that the Rent payable to Lessor hereunder does not include the sort ofguard service or other security measures, and that lessor shall have no obligation whatsoever to provide same. Lessee assumes all responsibility for the protection of the Premises. Lessee, Its agents and invitees and thelr propertVIronn the acts of third parties. 42. Reservations. Lessor reserves to Itself the right, from time to time, to gra ntwllhout the consent or joinder of Lessee, such easements, rights and dedications that Lessor deems necessary, and to cause the recordation of parcel maps and restrictions, so long as such easaments, rights, dedications, maps and restrictions do not unreasonably Interfere with the use of (he Premises by lessee. Lessee agrees to sign any documents reasonably requested by lessor to effectuate any such easamontrights, dedkatlon, map orrestrlctions. 43. Performance Under Protest, If at anytime a dispute shall arise as to any amount or turn of money to be paid by one Party to the other under the provlslons hereof, the Paftyagatnst whom the obligation to pay the money is asserted shall have the right to make payment "under protest" and such payment shall not be regarded as a voluntary payment and there shall survive the right on the part of said Party to institute suit for recovery of such sum. It It shall be adjudged that there was no legal obligation on the part of said Party to pay such sum or any part thereof, said Party shall be entitled to recover such sum or so much thereof as it was not legally required to pay, A Party who does not Initiate suit for the recovery of sums paid "under protest' within 6 months shall be deemed to have waived its right to protest such payment 44. Authority; Multiple Parties; Execution. (a) IfeltherPatty hereto Is corporation, trust, limited I',ablilty aompany,partnership. of similar entity, eachindividual executing this Lease an behalf of tuchtnmy represents and warrants that he or she IsduN authorized to execute and deliver thlit.ease on its irthall. Each Party shall, within 30 days after reques4 deliver to the other Party satisfactory e0dence of such authority. (b) if this lease Is executed by more than one person or entity as "lessee", each such person or entity shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder, it Is agreed that anyone of the named Lessecs shall beempowered to execute any amendment to this Lease,or other document ancillary thereto and bind all of the named Lessees, and Lessor may relyon Use same as IF all of the named lessees had executed such document. (c) This Laase may be executed by the Parties In counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Instrument. 45. Conflict. Any conflict between the printed provisions ofthis Lease and the typewritten or handwritten provisions shall be controlled bythe typewritten or handwritten provisions, ( 46. Offer. Preparation of this tease by either Partyor their agent and submission of same to the other Party shall not be deemed an offer to lease to the other Party. This lease Is not Intended to be binding undl executed and delivered by all Parties hereto. 47. Amendments. This Lease maybe modified only In wilting, signed by the Partiesin Interest at the time of the modification. As long as they do not materially change Lessee's obligations hereunder. Lessee agrees to make such reasonable non•monelary modifications to this Lease as may be reasonably required by a lender in connection with the obtaining of normal financing or raflnandng of the Premises. 48. Waiver of luryTrfal. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING tNVOLVING THE PROPERTY DR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT. 49. Arbitration of Disputes. An Addendum requiring the Arbitration of all disputes between the Parties and/or Brokers arising out of this Lease o IS M Is not attached to this Lease. SQ. Accettibtilty;Amerlcanswlth Disabi4ft3Act. (a) The Premises; have not undergone an inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp). NOW A CerbfieclAcce ss Specialist (CASp{ con Inspect the subject premises and determine whether Use subject premises comply with all of the applicable comtructiomretoted accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp Inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp Inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, It requested bythe lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree an the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp Inspection, the payment of the fee for the CAS p Inspection, and the cost of making any repairs necessary to correctvlolatlons of construction -related a cesslbl IILy standards within the premises. have und ergone an inspection by aCerdhed Accessspeciallst (CASpI and It wasdetermined that the Premises met ail applicable construction -related accessibillty standards pursuant to Calllomla Civil Code §55.51 et seq. Lessee acknowledges that It received a copy of the inspectlon report at least 48 hours prior to executing this Lease end agreesto keep such report confidential. El have undergone an Impaction by a Certified AccessSpedallst (CASpI and Itwas determined that the Premises did not meetall applicable conStructiomrelated accesslblilly standards pursuant to California Civil Code §55.5t et seq. Lessee acknowledges that It received a copy of the Inspection report at ieast48 hours prior to executing this Lease and agrees to keep such report confidential except as necessity to complete repairs and corrections of violations of construction related accessibility standards. In the eventthat the Premises have been Issued an inspection reporttsy a CASp the Lessor shall provide a copy of the dlmblllty access inspection certificate to Lessee within y days of theexecution of thlslease. jb) Since compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other slate and local accessibility statutes aredependent upon tessee'sspeciBc use of the Premises, Lessor makes no warranty or representation as to whether or not the Premises comply with ADA or anyslingaf legistaUon. In the avent that Lessee's use of the Premises requires modlfications or additions to the Premises In order to be in compliance with ADA or other actessibliitystatutes, Lessee agrees to make any such necessary modifications and/or additions at Lessee's expense. LESSOR AND LESSEE HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND REVIEWEDTHIS tEASEAND EACH TERM AND PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND BY THE EXet1fT1ON OF Tilts LEASE SHOW THEIR INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT THERETO. THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE THAT, ATTHE 11MET1itSLEASE I$ EXECUTED, THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE AR£COMMI<RCIALLY REASONABLEAND EFFECTUATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE Of LESSDR AND LESSEEWIT'H RESPECTTOTHE PREMISES, ENTIONt NO REPRESENTATION OR RECOMMENDATION 15 MADE BY AIR CAE OR BY ANY BROKERAS TOTHE LEGAL SUFFSCIENCY, LEGAL EFFECT, OR TAX INITIALS SZP C 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited- 2/25/20219:53AM STN"27.30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 15 of 16 City Council 22 — 17 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 CONS£QUENORS OF THIS LIASE ON T111TRANSAC71ON TO WHICH fT RSI.M0, THE PARTIES ARE URGEO TOt 1. SEER ADVICE Of COWILAS TO THE ILWAL AND TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE, 2. RETAIN APPROPRIATE CONSULTANTSTOUVittvANDINVISTWAR!MECONDITION OFTHE PREMISE$. $AID INVESTIOATIONSNOULDt4CLUDEDUTNOT LIE LIMITBDTO: THt POSSIBIR PREkNCE OFItWoDOUS SUBSTANCES,THE tONINOOFTHE PREMiSFA,Tilt STRUCTURAIINTE0Rk1Y, THE CONDITION OF THE R00' AND 0 PLEATING 5Y5TEM& AND THE SUITA01trtV OF THE PREMISES FOR 1ESSIE'S INTENDED USE, WARNINet IPTHE PRIMISESARE LOCATED IN A STATEOTHER THAN CAUFORNIA, CIATAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 4MEMAY NEED TO BE REVISED70 COMPLY WITH THELAW$ OF THE STAIR IN WHICH THRPREMISES ARE LOCATED. Theparktas hereto have executed INS Iaota at the plact and or,&a datos specified aA+we their raspocdvo fignatures. Eraeculedat, ixarutadat., On; _ On: By US By Im E£t 3vs Bv; NemaPtik t NamePdritedt lLttes Title: Phooas Phone; Fait Fax• EmaNI emat AVI 6y: - NamePtintedi — Hama Prteted: Title; _,__ Phenet ,�,.,• tltiel Phone: See attached City of Santa Ana Fix. _,.., ____ signature Wall:rox page Addtass: T federal ID No VROXER —WA— Aft. Title:.„., Address: Phone; Fax: Fadoml ID No.i OroWDAEUtenr ll; — ABantDRE ticente HI AtMresa: _ WOW IDNo.1 BROKER 9- Atte: Addtess: Phow _ WOOL 10Noa, , Drokt DRE lkensa n; Agent ORE UcenteM AIRERE + hapst/lwww.atrare.aam 4' 211-897•OM • ContMQt1QAlreracam NOTICEt No part oMase woAx maybe reprodut:ad to a►ytarm wlthout parntirslon to wrtttng. INITIALS iAL © 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/2S/20219;5S AM STN•2730, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 28 of 16 I ti i City Council 22 — 18 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 A-2021-028 Lessee City of Santa Ana Signature Page to: Addendum to Standard Industrial/Commercial Single -Tenant Lease — Net For Certain Premises Commonly Known as 1815 East Carnegie, Santa Ana, California 92705 March 1, 2021 CITY OF SANTA ANA: pristine Ridge City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City ttorney Ryan O,Hodge Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: -/Daisy Gomez _Clerk of the Council RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Steven Nlendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency City Council 22 — 19 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM TO STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE -TENANT LEASE -NET FOR CERTAIN PREMISES COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1815 EAST CARNEGIE, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92?05 MARCH 1, 2021 This Addendum (this "Addendum") is being executed concurrently with and is made a part of that certain )ease titled "Standard IndustHal/Commercial Single -Tenant -Net" dated March 1, 2021 (the "Form [.ease") by and between dyer 18, LLC ("Lessor") and The City of Santa Ana ("Lessee" and sometimes herein the "City") and this Addendum shall control in the event of any inconsistency with the provisions of such Form Lease. The Section and Paragraph Numbers of this Addendum are new added Sections and Paragraphs to the Form Lease. As used herein, the "Lease" shall mean the Form Lease as supplemented and amended by this Addendum. Uniess otherwise defined in this Addendum, any defined word contained in this Addendum has the some meaning as it is defined in the Form Lease. 51, Intentionally Omitted, 52, Rent Commencement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Base Rent shall commence, and the first monthly payment of Base Rent shall be paid, on the Commencement Date. If the Commencement Date is not the First day of a calendar month, then such first monthly payment of Base Rent shall be in an amount equal to the aggregate of a prorated Base Rent payment (based on a 30 day month) from such day to the end of that calendar month plus the amount of the full Base Rent payment for the next consecutive calendar month. 53. Rent AdiustmenM On July 1, 2021 ("First Rent Adjustment bate"), the monthly Base Rent payable under this Lease shall automatically increase by 3.01/o from the monthly Base Rent amount due and payable during the immediately preceding year. Thereafter, on each anniversary of the First Rent Adjustment Date (each being a "Subsequent Rent Adjustment Date") during the Term hereof, the monthly Base Rent payable under this Lease shall further automatically increase by 3.0% from the monthly Base Rent amount due and payable during the immediately preceding year from the then last immediately preceding Subsequent Rent Adjustment Date. 54. Lessee's Improvements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, all Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessen Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, shall be free and clear of any and all liens and/or encumbrances in favor of any third -party and shall be available, without limitation, to secure Lessee's faithful performance of its obligations as set forth in this Lease. Upon any default or breach of this Lease by Lessee whereby Lessor elects to terminate the Lease, such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, shall remain upon and be surrendered by Lessee to Lessor with the Premises, subjeot to Lessee's right to remove the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, as set forth below, The Premises shall otherwise be returned to Lessor in the same condition as of the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tsar excepted. After the Commencement Date, and thereafter from time to time at the reasonable request of Lessor, Lessee hereby agrees to execute certain security instruments, including, but not limited to, a UCC Form-1 or other filing, in order to create and/or perfect Lessor's security interest in such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, as set forth herein, which security instruments will be prepared by Lessor and submitted to Lessee, and recorded by Lessor, at Lessor's sole cost and expense. Upon any termination or earlier expiration of this Lease not resulting from the default or breach of this Lease by Lessee, all Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, located in the Premises shall remain upon and be strtrendercd by Lessee with the Premises, subject to 1292" 7.1 City Council 22 — 20 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee's right to remove the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expenses, as set forth below, The Premises shall otherwise be returned to Lessor in the same condition as of the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted, Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any termination or expiration of this Lease not resulting from the default or breach of this Lease by Lessee, Lessee, at Lessee's option, shall have the right to remove any such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, provided that (a) all such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations shall be removed by Lessee within 15 days after such termination or expiration of this Lease and (b) Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair any damage to the Premises caused by such removal. 55, Lessor's Obligati nc Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Lease, Lessor shall not be required to (a) rcmediate or rectify any future non-compliance with governmental regu lations or (b) provide ADA upgrades to the Premises or the Project resulting from the specific and unique use of the Premises (including without limitation, the Shelter) by Lessee or resulting from any Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, or other alternations or improvements to the Premises, made by Lessee or Lessor, unless such remediation or upgrades are required as part of the "Work" as set forth in Section 62 herein below prior to occupancy of the Premises and to the extent required to permit Lessee's occupation and use of the Premises and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below, Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Section S 5 below, Lessor shall not be required to make or incur any capital expenditures or commence or complete any remediation of Hazardous Substances or any non-compliance with governmental regulations now In effect; provided, however, the foregoint is not intended to and shall not impose upon Lessee or Lessor any obligation to rcmediate any Hazardous Substances located on the Premises as of the date hereof unless such remediation is required with any work, improvements or Alterations made or being made by or on behalf of Lessee or Lessor to the Premises prior to occupancy of the Premises to the extent required to permit Lessee's occupation and use of the Premises and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below, Furthertnore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Lease, it is the intent of Lessor and Lessee that Lessor shall have no responsibility or obligation whatsoever, for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all or any portion of the Premises, Building, or Project, including, without limitation, the roof and the HVAC system, such responsibility and obilgations being that of Lessee. Lessee shall properly use, operate and safeguard the Premises, including, if applicable, any landscaping, furniture, fu mishing and appliances, and all mechanical, electrical, boilers, refrigeration equipment, gas and plumbing fixtures, HVAC and other building systems, and smoke detectors and fire alarms, and keep them and the Premises clean, sanitary and well ventilated and all drains free from blockages or stoppages, Lessee shall be responsible to pay for all utilities, sewer charges and any roof repairs caused by Lessee's use or misuse of the roof or otherwise, Lessee shall properly insure all of the Premises and all of Lessee's and its guests', patients' and invitees' personal property. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Lessee is solely responsible for any and all upgrades to the existing "VAC system (including, without limitation repair, replacement or additions) and any current repairs or replacements of the roof to accommodate and permit Lessee's use of the Premises as a Shelter and its required occupancy -and usage of the Premises, all of which shall be completed prior to Lessee's opening of the Shelter at the Premises, at Lessee's sole cost and expense and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below; provided, further, Lessee hereby affirms and agrees that (a) the current HVAC system in the Premises is acceptable to Lessee in its current condition, (b) the roof is acceptable to Lessee in its current condition, and (c) the current structural portions of the Premises are acceptable to Lessee 12926447,1 City Council 22 — 21 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 in their current condition Nothing in this Section 55 shall be deemed or construed as modifying or amending Lessee's obligations for the regular and timely maintenance and repair of the Premises, roof and HVAC system. 56. Neighborhood Conditions. Lessee represents and warrants to Lessor that it is aware of neighborhood or area conditions, including schools, proximity and adequacy of law enforcement, crime statistics, proximity of registered felons or offenders, fire protection, other governmental services, availability adequacy and cost of an speed -wired, wireless intemet connections or other telecommunications or other technology services and installations, proximity to commercial, industrial or agricultural activities, existing and proposed transportation, construction and development that may affect noise, view, or traffic, airport noise, noise or odor from any source, wild and domestic animals, other nuisances, hazard or circumstance, cemeteries, facilities and condition of common areas, conditions and influences of significance to certain cultures and/or religions, and personal needs, requirements and preferences of Lessee. 57. Condition of. Premises. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Lease, Lessor shall deliver the Premises in its current "as is" condition as of the date hereof, and Lessee shall, and does hereby, accept delivery of the Premises as of the date hereof ("Delivery Date", "Effective Date" or "Commencement Date"). Lessee shall provide Lessor a copy of Lessee's certificate(s) of liability insurance concurrently with the execution hereof; provided, however, the failure to do so shall not extend the Delivery Date. The Premises are hereby leased to Lessee "as is", without representation or warranty by the Lessor (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease), and Lessee hereby accepts the Premises in the condition thereof existing as of the date hereof subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county, state and federal laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, restrictions of record and requirements now or hereafter in effect during the Term (colleotively, "Applicable Requirements", "Applicable Laws" or just"Laws"). Therefore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Lessee represents and warrants that Lessee has inspected the Premises, and that Lessee is familiar with the general and specific condition(s) of the Premises and that Lessor shall have no responsibility or liability (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease) with respect to the general or any specific condition of the Premises or any system (including, without limitation, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, refrigeration and fire sprinkler) and that Lessee represents and warrants that, except as expressly set forth herein, Lessee is acting, and will act only, upon information known to, or obtained by, Lessee directly from Lessee's own knowledge and inspection of the Promises (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease). Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease, Lessor hereby makes no claims, representations or warranties as to the suitability or lack of suitability of the Premises for any proposed or intended use, or availability or lack of availability of (a) permits or approvals of governmental or regulatory authorities, or (b) easements, licenses or other rights with respect to any such proposed or intended use of the Premises or (c) any condition of the Premises, and the availability or lack of availability shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Lessee hereunder. Therefore, AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR T141S LEASE AND THE AMOUNT OF RENT TO BE PAYABLE HEREUNDER, LESSEE AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, LESSEE LEASES AND ACCEPTS THE PREMISES ON AN "AS IS" AND "WHERE IS" BASIS, WITH ALL FAULTS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, NO WARRANTY, REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE OF ANY TYPE (EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, WRITTEN OR ORAL) HAS OR IS MADE BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, AS TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING- (1) FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, (it) MERCHANTABILITY, (1I1) CONDITION OR WORKMANSHIP, (IV) ABSENCE OF DEFECTS OR FAULTS, (V) PRESENCE OR 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 22 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ABSENCE OF HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES, (VI) OPERATION OR PERFORMANCE OF THE PREMISES OR SYSTEMS THEREIN OR THE HABITABILITY OF THE PREMISES, (VII) COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES OR REGULATIONS (FEDERAL, SATEOR LOCAL) and, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE RELATING TO HEALTH, SAFETY, AND THE'ENVIRDNMENT, AS THEY MAY APPLY TO THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE PREMISES OR LESSEE'S INTENDED USE OR (Vlll) ANY GOVERNMENT LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION, OR ABSENCE THEREOF, PERTAINING TO THE PREMISES. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LESSEE HAS ENTERED INTO THIS LEASE RELYING UPON ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF THE PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMPLIANCE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AND THAT LESSEE IS NOT NOW RELYING, AND WILL NOT LATER RELY, UPON ANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES MADE BY LESSOR OR ANYONE ACTING OR CLAIMING TO ACT, BY, THROUGH OR UNDER OR ON LESSOR'S 1SEHALF CONCERNING THE PREMISES. Lessee is familiar with the Premises and their suitability for Lessee's Intended use, All documents which have been given to Lessee by Lessor have been delivered as an accommodation to Lessee and withuut any representation or warranty as to the sufficiency, accuracy, completeness, validity, truthfulness, enforceability, or assignability of any of the documents, all of which Lessee relies on at its own risk, 58, Release. Lessee shall rely solely upon Lessee's own knowledge of the Premises based on its investigation of the Premises and its own inspection of the Premises in determining the Premises' physical condition. Lessee and anyone claiming by, through or under Lessee hereby waives its right to recover from and fully and irrevocably releases Lessor and its respective members, employees, officers, directors, partners, shareholders, beneficiaries, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, attorneys, affiliates, parent, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firnis, corporations and organizations acting in their behalf ("Released Parties") from any and all claims that it may now have or hereafter acquire against any of the Released Parties for any costs, loss, liability, damage, expenses, demand, action or cause of action arising from or related to any construction defects, errors, omissions or other conditions, latent or otherwise, including environmental matters, affecting the Premises or any portion thereof. This release includes claims of which Lessee is presently unaware or which Lessee does not presently suspect to exist which, if known by Lessee, would materially affect Lessee's release to Lessor. In tltis connection and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee hereby agrees, represents and warrants that Lessee realizes and acknowledges that factual matters now unknown to it may have given or may hereafter give rise to causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which are presently unknown, unanticipated and unsuspected, and Lessee further agrees, represents and warrants that the waivers and releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that realization and that, as a material portion of the consideration given to Lessor by Lessee in exchange for Lessor's performance hereunder, Lessee nevertheless hereby intends to release, discharge and acquit Lessor from any such unknown causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which might in any way be included. Lessor has given Lessee material concessions regarding this transaction in exchange for Lessee agreeing to the provisions of this Paragraph, The releases set forth above are full and complete releases of all the persons and entities described above of and from any and all liability of any nature whatsoever for all damage, injury, loss, expense, including any consequential expense, loss or damage, whether the same are now known or unknown to the parties, expected or unexpected by said parties, and all rights under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby waived and relinquished. Section 1542 of the Civil Code provides as follows; 12926441.1 City Council 22 — 23 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY." L sec's Initials Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the foregoing release in this Section 58 is not intended to and does not cover (i) any claims arising from a breach by Lessor of any Lessor's obligations under this Lease, or (lii) any gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud committed by Lessor. 59. Reservations. Lessee agrees to consent to Lessor's (i) grant of such easements, rights and dedications that Lessor deems necessary, (0) recordation of parcel maps and restrictions, and (ili) creation and/or installation of new utility raceways, only if such easements, rights, dedications, maps, restrictions, and utility raceways shall not, in Lessee's reasonable discretion, unreasonably interfere with the use of the Premises by Lessee or otherwise materially negatively impact Lessee's use or occupation of the Premises; and in such event, Lessee agrees to sign any documents reasonably requested by Lessor to effectuate such rights so long as such documents do not impose any cost or liability on Lessee which is non-de-Minimis, Lessor further reserves the right to change the name by which the Building or the Project (if any) is called with Lessee's prior written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 60, Assignment and Subletting. Lessee shall have no right to, and shall not, assign, sublet or otherwise transfer all or any portion of the Premises or its rights under and to this Lease without the prior written consent of Lessor, which such consent may be given or denied in Lessor's sole and absolute discretion (and which such consent may be conditioned upon Lessee entering into a lease guaranty ("Lease Guaranty") in favor of Lessor (upon terms and- conditions reasonably acceptable to Lessor), whereby Lessee guaranties the performance by such assignee, Any assignment, subletting or transfer without such consent shall be a non -curable Default and Breach hereunder, without any prior notice need being given. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to enter into one or more agreements (collectively, with any extension, renewal, amendment or replacement thereof, the "City Agreements") with an established third party operator of similar situated homeless navigation centers as the Shelter ("Third Party Operator), provided, however, that Lessee shall have first provided the name of such propused Third Party Operator, and the terms of the City Agreements and provided further, that no such City Agreement shall modify or amend Lessee's obligations under this Lease. 61, insurance, Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the l:urm Lease, Lessee shall carry and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance: (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance (occurrence form) including coverage for death, bodily injury, with coverage for vandalism and malicious mischief, broad form property damage, contractual liability, owner's protective, host liquor liability and prod ucts/eomp leted operations with coverage limits as reasonably required by Lessor from time to time, but in no event less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00), combined each occurrence and in the aggregate insuring against any and all liability of the Lessee with respect to the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto or arising out 12926447,1 City Council 22 — 24 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 of the maintenance, use or occupancy thereof (Lessee may satisfy any portion of this requirement with umbrella liability coverage); (ii) Insurance covering any and all improvements, including Lessee's furniture, fixtures and equipment and any Alterations permitted hereunder, and ail personal property, in an amount not less than their full replacement cost providing protection against any peril included within the classification "Special Form" including fire, vandalism and malicious mischief; (iii) Automobile liability insurance for all motor vehicles operated by or for Lessee, including owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, with minimum combined single limit coverage for bodily injury and property damage as reasonably required by Lessorfrom time to time, but in no event less than tale Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, (iv) full replacement cost plate glass insurance and business interruption insurance in such amount as will reimburse Lessee for direct or indirect loss of earnings for up to 12 months attributable to all such perils insured against herein or any other cause, (v) Workers' Compensation, including employer's liability insurance, in compliance with all laws governing worker's compensation. If Lessee falls to maintain such insurance, Lessee shall be deemed to have assumed the risk of all losses which would have been covered by such insurance and Lessor shall have no liability for any such losses. All of Lessee's policies of Insurance shall be issued by insurance companies with general policyholder's rating of not less than A and a financial rating of not less than Class A VI as rated in the most current available "Nest's" Insurance Reports and qualified to do business in the State of California. All policies shall name Lessor, its related or affiliated entities, parents, subsidiaries, partnerships, joint ventures, limited liability companies, members, trusts and assigns of every tier (as identified by Lessor), and each of their respective directors, officers, partners, agents, employees, volunteers, members, managers, trustees, shareholders and any successors or assigns of the foregoing, as well as Lessor's management company and if requested by Lessor, Lessor's first mortgagee or beneficiary as additional insureds (to the extent Lessor gives written notice to Lessee of the names and addresses of such parties), Certificates for all policies shall be delivered to Lessor prior to delivery of possession of the Premises to Lessee, and thereafter within thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term of each such policy. Until Lessee has delivered to Lessor such certificates of insurance, Lessor shall not be obligated to deliver keys to the Premises to Lessee, and Lessee shall not be entitled to take occupancy of the Premises notwithstanding the fact the Term of the Lease and Lessee's obligation to pay rent hereunder may have already commenced. All policies of insurance must contain a provision that Lessor will receive thirty (30) days' advanced written notice ofany cancellation, lapse or reduction in the amounts of insurance. All public liability, property damage and other casualty policies shall be written as primary policies, not contributing with or in excess of coverage which Lessor may carry. Ali of Lessee's insurance policies shall contain the following provisions; severability of interest, cross liability, and contingent liability and builder's risk, with respect to improvements and alterations required or permitted to be made by Lessee under this Lease. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Lessee hereunder, if Lessee fails to maintain or procure such insurance, Lessor shall havethe right, but not the obligation, to procure and maintain the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expense. Lessee and Lessor each hereby waive any and all rights of recovery against the other, or against the officers, employees, agents and representatives of die other, for lass of or damage to such waiving party or its property or the property of others under its control to the extent that such loss or damage is insured against under any insurance policy required to be carried under this lease. Each patty shall, upon obtaining the policies of insurance required hereunder, give notice to the insurance carrier or carriers that the foregoing mutual waiver of subrogation is contained in this Lease, and shal I obtain any special endorsements required at the insuring parry's cost, if any. The parties agree in the event of any damage to Lessee, the Premises, Lessee's property, and/or any loss to Lessee's employees or inv itces each shall resort to insurance coverage prior to asserting any claim or demand against the other or its assets. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to constitute a waiver by the 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 25 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 respective insurance carriers of either Lessee or Lessor of any other remedies available to said carriers 62. Initial Improvements and Work, Lessor, through the "General Contractor" (as defined below), shall construct, furnish and install within the Premises, Including outside yard area, those items of construction (the "Work") shown on the "Plans" (as defined below), It is the intent and agreement of the parties that the Work is comprised of all work (including all hard and soft costs associated with the design and construction of improvements for the Premises, but excluding any costs for furniture, fixtures, Trade Fixtures and other such similar personal property used in connection with the operation of the Shelter) to enable Lessee to furnish and install the Shelter and comprehensive supportive services, which such facility shall contain sleeping areas, restrooms, showers, laundry rooms, kitchen and storage areas, common areas, and offices, and all other ancillary improvements in connection therewith to enable Lessee to operate the Shelter. The architectural, structural, grading, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, sewer and fire/life safety standards that shall be applicable to the construction required to complete the Work, shall be subject to Lessor's rules and regulations applicable to the performance of the Work (collectively, the "Work Standards"j. Lessor hereby appoints Jeremy ogulnick as Lessor's representative ("Lessor's Representative") to act for Lessor in all matters in connection with the Work. Lessee hereby appoints as Lessee's representative(s) ("Lessee'a Representatives)") to act for Lessee in all matters in connection with the Work and Lessee shall be responsible for all costs authorized by Lessee's Representative(s). All inquiries, requests, Instructions, authorizations and other communications with respect to the Work shall be made to Lessor's Representative or Lessee's Representative(s), as the case may be. Authorizations made by Lessee's Representative(s) shall be binding on Lessee. Authorizations made by Lessor's Representative shall be binding on Lessor. Either party may change its representatives under this Section 62 at any time by written notice to the other party, but any such change shall be effective only upon receipt by the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall any direction by Lessor's Pw-presentative or Lessee's Representative(s) constitute a change in the terms or conditions of the Lease, unless the Lease is expressly modified In a writing executed by both Lessor and Lessee, All work shall be done pursuant to those architectural, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, life safety and structural drawings and specifications (including all finishes) for the Work, which shall be approved by Lessor and Lessee (collectively, the "Plans"), Lessee may not make any material changes, modifcations or alterations in the Plans (collectively, "Lessee Changes') at any time without Lessor's prior written approval thereof which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and the cost of any such Lessee Changes shall be added to the Cost of the Work and shall not be included in the "Contingency Amount" (as defined below) and in the event of any such approved Lessee Changes, the Cost Estimate shall be increased by the amount of such lessee Changes. Lessor may from time to time during the prosecution of the Work require reasonable modifications or amendments to the Plans due to unforeseeable conditions or to the extent changes are required to comply with applicable Laws ("Lessor Changes') and the cost of any such Lessor Changes shall be included In the "Contingency Amount" (as defined below), unless it is considered a "Change order" (as defined below) approved by Lessee, Lessor acknowledges and agrees that Lessor shall be solely responsible for causing the Work to be constructed and maintained, in accordance with all applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq. and any governmental regulations with respect thereto (the "ADA") and other similar Laws. Additionally, to the extent applicable to the Work, Lessor shall be responsible for complying with all pertinent prevailing wage laws pursuant to California Labor Code sections 1720, et seq, Lessee shall pay the entire "Cost of the Work". As used herein, the terra "Cost of the Work" means all costs and expenses in connection with the design, furnishing, construction and installation of the Work, including without limitation; (a) all architectural, W2i447,1 City Council 22 — 26 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 engineering and consultant fees associated with the preparation of the Plans; (b) governmental agency plan review, permit, license and other fees (including, without limitation, any charges required by any governmental entity or authority having jurisdiction over the Premises); (c) sales and use taxes; (d) insurance costs and expenses; (e) testing and inspecting costs; (f) costs and expenses of material and labor, including without limitation, General Contractor's profit and general overhead; (g) costs and expenses associated with the compliance with applicable Laws; (h) costs and expenses of alterations of the Premises and all lire safety systems necessitated by any applicable Law; (i) costs and expenses associated with any modification or addition to the Premises or any street or public right of way; t j) all costs and expenses of construction work required to complete the Work; (k) costs and expenses of Lessee signage, if any, (1) costs and expenses associated with the placement of any new, additional or supplemental mechanical, electrical, plumbing or life safety systems on the Premises, including, without limitation, costs associated with any repair or replacement of any HVAC units or systems, and running piping and conduit to such systems (the location for such piping and conduit shall be selected by Lessor); (m) costs and expenses associated with any Lessee Changes or Lessor Changes; and (n) any out- of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by Lessor or Lessor's consultants associated with the review of the Plans. Lessor proposed that the entire Cost of Work would be $ 8, 500,000 for the completion of the Work ("Cost Estimate"). Any changes to the scope of Work that would increase the "Cost Estimate" must be approved in writing by Lessee prior to commencement of such extra Work ("Change Order") provided, however, that Lessor and Lessee also agree to a 10% contingency amount equal to $850,000 ("Contingency Amount"), which such Contingency Amount may be incurred in connection with any Lessor Change, and is to be paid and reimbursed to Lessor by Lessee, without such prior written approval or Lessee. Concurrently upon the execution of this Lease, Lessee shall deposit with Lessor, the sum of$850,000, which such amount shall be a "retainer" against fees and costs incurred by Lessor in connection with Lessor's completion of the Work. All Work shall be completed by a general contractor chosen by Lessor but approved by Lessee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed (the "General Contractor"). Lessor shall be required to obtain the required permits for the Work, with any costs and expenses included within the Cost Estimate. Lessee hereby approves Bentley Construction as the General Contractor. Lessee must arrange with an insurance company to provide the coverage required under the Lease, the cost of which is not included in the Cost Estimate. Prior to the start of Work, Lessor must receive the certificates of insurance required under the Lease. Such certificate of insurance shall name Lessor as additional insured. Lessor shall cause the General Contractor to perform all Work in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with good industry practice, applicable Laws and the Lessor's Work Standards, and in material compliance with the Plans. Lesscr shall deliver to Lessee a request for payment from the General Contractor, approved by Lessor, showing the schedule, by trade, of percentage of completion of the Work and the cost of tabor rendered and materials delivered to the Premises for which such payment is being requested, which such request for payment may be submitted weekly and on or before the seventh (7th) Business Day after receipt of such request for payment, Lessee shall deliver a check to Lessor trade payable to hither Lessor or General Contractor, the amounts so requested by Lessor. Duringthe construction of the Work, Lessor's Representative and Lessee's Representative shall meet as often as deemed reasonably necessary by Lessor and/or Lessee to discuss construction progress. For purposes hereof, "Substantial Completion" (and any correlative variations thereof) of the Work shall mean completion of construction of the Work in material compliance with the Plans, with the exception of any Punch List Items. For the purposes hereof, the terra "punch List Items" shall mean minor details of construction or decoration or meohanical adjustments that can reasonably be completed after the date Lessee commences its operations within the Premises without causing substantial interference with Lessee's operations at the Premises. Lessor shall use its good faith efforts to 1292644 7,1 City Council 22 — 27 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 correct (or cause General Contractor to correct) all Punch List Items within thirty (30) days after Substantial Completion of the Lessee Work. 63. Operations/Use. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Form Lease, Lessee agrees that at all times, the Premises (and the navigation center ("Shelter')) shall be operated (a) in complete compliance with the attached Exhibit B, (b) In a first class manner, consistent with the highest quality standards of case, cleanliness and safety for employees, guests, patients, invitees and neighbors, and with proper levels of experienced management and staffing, to enable the provision of appropriate programs and assistance for homeless individuals in the City, and (c) In full compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. Furthermore, Lessee covenants and agrees that it (and any Third Party Operator) shall not discriminate against any person or group of persons on account of race, disability, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry, in the use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the Shelter. Lessee (and any Third Party Operator) shall refrain from restricting the use of the Shelter on the basis of the race, age, disability, color, religion, creed, gender, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, or national origin of any person, nor shall Lessee, any Third Party Operator or any person claiming under or through Lessee orany Third Party Operator, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of the Shelter. Lessee and any Third Party Operator shall comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,29 U.S.C. section 651 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C, section 12101 et seq„ and any analogous legislation in California (collectively, "the Acts"), to the extent that the Acts apply to the Shelter and any activities thereon. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Lessee covenants to maintain all non-structural portions of the Shelter including working areas, all machinery, electrical facilities and the like upon the site in a condition that fully complies with the requirements of the Acts. 64. Indemnity. Lessee shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel satisfactory to Lessor) and hold harmless Lessor and the Released Parties, from and against any and all claims arising out of, involving, or in connection with, the use and/or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee, any Third Party Operator or any Lessee's or any Third Party Operator's employees, customers, patients, guests, invitees, directors, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms, corporations and organizations acting in their behalf of the Lessee and any Third Party Operator (collectively, "Lessee Parties") or any act, omission or negligence of any Lessee and/or any of the Lessee Parties or any Default and/or Breach by Lessee of any covenants, terms and/or conditions set forth in this Lease, either prior to, during, or after the expiration of the Term and including any claims brought or arising out of any civil tort or criminal activity; provided however, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply to the extent arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or the Released Parties. if any action or proceeding is brought against Lessor by reason of any of the foregoing matters, Lessee shall upon notice defend the same at Lessee's sole cost and expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessor and Lessor shall reasonably cooperate with Lessee in such defense. If Lessor In its sole discretion shall determine that it is in Lessor's interest to have separate legal counsel, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor for any legal fees and costs incurred by Lessor for the defense of any such claims. Lessor need not have first paid any such claims in order to be defended or indemnified hereunder, Lessor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel satisfactory to Lessee) and hold harmless Lessee and the Lessee Patties, from and against any and all claims arising out of, involving, or in connection with, the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor relating to the Premises either prior to, during, or after the expiration of the Tenn and Including any claims brought or 0 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 28 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 arising out of any civil tort or criminal activity; provided however, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply to the extent arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessee or the Lessee Parties, if any action or proceeding is brought against Lessee by reason of any of the foregoing matters, Lessor shall upon notice defend the same at Lessor's sole cost and expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessee and Lessee shall reasonably cooperate with Lessor in such defense. If Lessee in its sole discretion shall determine that it is in Lessee's interest to have separate legal counsel, Lessor shall indemnify Lessee for any legal fees and costs incurred by Lessee for the cl&nse of any such claims, Lessee need not have first paid any such claims in order to be defended or indemnified hereunder. 65, Notices. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Form Lease, all notices, requests, or demands herein provided to be given or made, or which may be given or made by either party to the other, shall be given or made only in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given: (i) upon delivery, or if delivery is rejected when delivery was attempted, of U.S. Certified Mail, properly addressed, postage prepaid with return receipt requested; or (ii) upon delivery, or if delivery is rejected when delivery was attempted, when sent via overnight or express mail courier, properly addressed and postage prepaid; (iii) when delivered personally at the address listed below their respective signatures (signature required), or (iv) by e-mail, and if so sent, (a) the subject line of the e-mail shall state "URGENT: NOTICE TO [LESSEE] [LESSOR]" (or substantially similar thereto) and (b) followed within one (1) business day by a copy sent by a method prescribed in (i), (ii) or (iv) above; provided however, that nil deliveries or attempted deliveries shall only be made or attempted to be made on a Business Day. Notwithstanding the prescribed methods of delivery set forth above, actual receipt of written notice by a party designated below shall constitute notice given in accordance with the Agreement on the date received, unless deemed earlier given pursuant to the foregoing methods of delivery. The proper address to which notices, requests or demands may be given or made by either party shall be the address set forth for such party as set forth in the Form Lease, or to such other address or to such other person as any party shall designate in writing, such address may be changed by written notice given to the other party In accordance with this Paragraph. 66, ADA Ui)wades. Except with respect to the Work as set forth in Section 62 above, Lessor shall not be required to provide ADA upgrades to the Premises. 67, Intentionally Omitted. 68. Inspections. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Form Lease, upon reasonable notice to Lessee, Lessor shall have the right to inspect the Premises, or cause the Premises to be inspected by a third party chosen by Lessor, to verify that Premises are at all times being operated in full compliance with the terms of Paragraph 61 of this Addendum and as otherwise required by this Lease. In the event that any such inspection reveals any such non. compliance, the same shall be, at the option of Lessor, a Default and or Breach by Lessee under the Lease, As additional consideration for Lessor's entering into this Lease, Lessee shall reimburse and pay to Lessor. in addition to Base Rent and other Rent due hereunder, the cost of any such inspection, up to $500 per inspection but no more than once each calendar month, to help offset the cost of such inspections, such amounts to be paid by Lessee to Lessor within 5 days after Lessee's receipt from Lessor of a copy of the applicable inspection report and invoice therefor, and all such amounts being deemed Rent under this Lease. 69. Ontion to Purchase. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee an option (the "Purchase Option") during the Purchase Option Period (as defined herein below) to purchase the Premises upon the following terms; 10 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 29 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 69.1, Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for the Premises shall be equal to the sum of $9,200,000 (the "Initia) Price") plus the Increase Amount (as defined below) (said Initial Price plus the Increase Amount, if any, being the "Purchase Price"), payable in cash at Closing (as defined below); provided, however, that the Initial Price is based in part upon Lessor's original purchase price of the Premises and in the event that Lessor receives any monies back in respect thereof from its seller as set forth in its original purchase agreement, the Initial Price shall be reduced by said amount so received. The "Increase Amount" shall be the amount equal to 50% of the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area, all items published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1982- 84-1.00) ("Index") from May 2020 ("Base Index") to the date of the Notice of Exercise (as defined below); such increase to be calculated by taking the Initial Price and multiplying it by a fraction, the numerator being the Base Index, and the denominator being the Index published for the month in which the Notice of Exercise is delivered. If the Index is changed so the Index differs fYom that used as of the date hereof, the Index shall be converted under the conversion factor published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the index Is discontinued or revised during the Lease Term, such other governmental Index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used to obtain substantially the same results as would be obtained if the Index had not been discontinued or revised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Increase Amount shall not increase the Initial Price by an amount equal to more than 1.S°/a per year (non -compounding), Additionally, in the event Lessor receives funds for the Regulatory Safety Permit, the Purchase Price shall be reduced by $1,000,000 or the amount of such funds that are received by Lessor, provided, however, that any interest collected by Lessor in connection with such Regulatory Safety Permit amount shall not be included in the reduction of such Purchase Price. 69.2. Term -of Purchase Option. The term of the Purchase Option shall commence upon the Ia day of the W1 month of the Term of the Lease (the "Purchase Option Commencement Date") and shall expire on the earlier of (a) the five (5) year anniversary of the Commencement Date and (b) the expiration or termination of this Lease for any reason whatsoever (the "Purchase Option Termination Date"), The period between the Purchase Option Commencement Date and the Purchase Option Termination Date shall be referred to herein as the "Purchase Option Period" In the event lessee fails to timely exercise the Purchase Option within the Purchase Option Period, the Purchase Option, and all rights of Lessee, shall immediately and automatically cease and terminate, and the Purchase Option shall in that event be null and void and be of no further force or effect whatsoever. Lessee may exercise the Purchase Option only in the manner provided in Section 69.4 below. 69.3. Investigations. During the Purchase Option Period, Lessee shall be permitted to investigate the Premises and undertake all actions that it deems necessary or desirable to ascertain the condition of the Premises which includes, but is not limited to, the environmental condition of the Premises, status of title to the Promises, and the condition of the improvements on tite Premises. Accordingly, during the Purchase Option Period, Lessee shall have, in addition to its rights as the tenant of the Premises hereunder, and is hereby granted, the right to make and conduct such non-invasive surveys, studies, tests, investigations, and inspections (environmental and otherwise) as Lessee deems reasonably necessary or convenient; provided that Lessee may make such invasive surveys, studies, tests, investigations or inspections as it deems reasonably necessary or convenient only upon the prior written consent of Lessor which shalt not be unreasonably 12926441.1 City Council 22 — 30 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 withheld, All such surveys, studies, tests, investigations and inspections shall be performed at the sole cost and expense of Lessee and Lessee shall Indemnify, defend and hold Lessor harmless from and against any and all cost, expense, liability arising from or in connection with any such surveys, studies,tests, investigation and inspections. 69.4, Exerclse.of purchase 0 tR ion. To exercise the Purchase Option, Lessee shall serve written notice of exercise upon Lessor or Lessor's legal representatives at any time after the Purchase Option Commencement Date but prior to the Purchase Option Termination Date ("Notice of Exercise"), which such Notice of Exercise shall be accompanied by a cash or cash equivalent in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000,00) ("Deposit"). The Deposit shall be invested by Escrow Holder (as defined below) in a federally Insured interest -bearing account with any interest accruing thereon to be paid or credited to Lessee. At the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, the Deposit and any accrued interest thereon shall be applied and credited toward payment of the Purchase Price. The Notice of Exercise shall provide at least 90-120 days for Lessor to locate an exchange property prior to the Closing of the Purchase Option Escrow. 69.5. Escrow. If Lessee timely exercises the Purchase Option by the timely delivery of the Notice of Exercise and the Deposit, Lessor and Lessee shall immediately open an escrow ("Option Escrow") with Chicago Title Company ("Escrow Holder", the specific escrow officer being chosen by Lessor, or Lessor may choose such other escrow or title company in its reasonable discretion upon written notice to Lessee, which such escrow or title company shall be subject to Lessee's approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), whereupon the Deposit shall be delivered to Escrow Holder, This Agreement shall constitute joint escrow instructions to Escrow Holder with respect to the purchase and sale of the Premises. The parties shall execute such additional escrow instructions which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement and which may be required by Escrow Holder in order to close such escrow. 69.6. Payrnent, The Purchase Price shall be paid in cash upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow (as defined below). 69.7. Closing. The close of the Purchase Option Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Premises shall occur on or before the date which is thirty (30) days ("Scheduled Closing Date") after the date of delivery of the Notice of Exercise by Lessee to Lessor (the "Close of Purchase Option Escrow" or "Closing"). For purposes hereof, the Close of Purchase Option Escrow (and Closing) shall be the date on which the Grant Deed conveying the Premises to Lessee is recorded. a) if, following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of the Purchase Option, the Closing fails to occur as a result of Lessor's breach or default and if Lessor should retrain in default in any material respect in the performance of any of Lessor's obligations under the Lease with respect to the sale of the Premises after the fifth (5th) Business Day following the delivery by Lessee to lessor of written notice of such default, Lessee shall be entitled, as its sole and exclusive remedy for any such default, to elect any one of the following remedies (so long as title to the Premises has not been further encumbered involuntarily or by or with the consent of Lessor, and Lessor elects not to remove such encumbrance on or prior to Closing): (i) terminate its Purchase Option and receive the retuni of the Deposit, and, thereafter, the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except that if applicable, the Lease shall continue thereafter in full 12 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 31 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 force and effect, or for obligations which expressly survive dte termination of the Purchase Option; or (ii) bring and pursue an action for specific performance of the Purchase Option; or (Ili) waive the default and proceed to close the transaction contemplated herein, As a condition precedent to Lessee exercising any right it may have to bring an action for specific performance hereunder, Lessee must commence such an action within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of Lessor's default. Lessee agrees that its failure to timely commence such an action for specific performance within such thirty (30) day period shall be deemed a waiver by it of its right to commence an action for specific performance as well as a waiver by it of any right it may have to file or record a notice of lis pendens or notice of pendency of action or similar notice against the Premises. b) If, following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of the Purchase Option, the Closing falls to occur as a result of Lessee's breach or default, and if Lessee should remain in default in any material respect in the performance of any of Lessee's obligations with respect to the purchase of dte Premises after the fifth (5th) Business Day following the delivery by Lessor to Lessee of written notice of such default, THEN AND IN SUCH EVENT, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING HEREIN TO THE CONTRARY, LESSEE AND LESSOR AGREE THAT LESSOR WILL INCUR DAMAGES BY REASON OF SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE, WHICH DAMAGES SHALL BE IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO ASCERTAIN. LESSEE AND LESSOR, IN A REASONABLE EFFORT TO ASCERTAIN WHAT LESSOR'S DAMAGES WOULD BE rN THE EVENT OF SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE HAVE AGREED BY PLACING THEIR INITIALS BELOW THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE DEEMED TO CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF LESSOR'S DAMAGES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1671 OF THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE AND THE PAYMENT AND RETENTION OF SUCH AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3369, IN THE EVENT OF AND FOR SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE; LESSOR SHALL RETAIN THE DEPOSIT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AS LESSOR'S SOLE REMEDY THEREFOR, UNLESS LESSEE WRONGFULLY REFUSES TO CAUSE ESCROW HOLDER TO CANCEL THE ESCROW OR TO RELEASE THE DEPOSIT TO LESSOR, IN WHICH INSTANCE LESSOR SHALL ALSO BE ENTITLED TO ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES, INCLUDING ACTUAL ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED BY LESSOR WITH RFSPECT TO THOSE CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE INCURRED BY LESSOR, AFTER THE CLOSING DATE OR OTHER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR CANCELATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS HEREIN CONTEMPLATED BY REASON OF THE CLOUD ON TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WHICH MAY RESULT FROM LESSEE'S WRONGFUL FAILURE TO CANCEL THE ESCROW AND THIS AGREEMENT. ESCROW HOLDER IS HEREBY INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY RELEASE THE DEPOSIT TO LESSOR IN THE EVENT OF A BREACH BY LESSEE HEREUNDER, 1N ADDITION, IF LESSEE WRONGFULLY FAILS TO CAUSE SUCH SUM TO BE DELIVERED TO LESSOR AS HERETOFORE PROVIDED, INTEREST SHALL ACCRUE THEREON AT THE MAXIMUM RATE ALLOWED BY 13 City Council 22 — 32 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 LAW FROM THE DATE OF LESSOR'S WRITTEN NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION UNTIL PAYMENT THEREOF. IN ADDITION, LESSEE SHALL PAY ALL TITLE AND ESCROW CANCELLATION CHARGES. FURTHERMORE AND NOT WITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS PARAGRAPH PERTAINS ONLY TO A DEFAULT BY LESSEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASE OPTION AND SHALL NOT RESTRICT, LIMIT, MODIFY, ALTER OR AMEND, IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, ANY RIGHT OR REMEDY OF LESSOR IN THE EVENT OF A WEB T BY LESSEE UNDE ,T 111 LEASE, Le nitiala Lessor's Initials (c) Except as otherwise set forth herein, either party shall not be liable for consequential or speculative damages in connection with such party's breach or default hereunder. (d) Additionally, and notwithstanding the foregoing, if following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of its Purchase Option, the Premises suffer a material casualty (which, for purposes hereof shall mean damage with a cost to repair in excess of$100,000 not caused by Lessee or any employee, resident, guest or invitee of Lessee), then Lessee shall have the right to either (i) proceed with the Close of Escrow (in which case, if there were such a material casualty Lessee shall be entitled to receive all available insurance proceeds and rcceiva a reduction of the Purchase Price in an amount equal to the deductible amount and any required co-insurance payment with respect to the insurance, and there shall be no other reduction in the Purchase Price),or (u) rescind the Notice of Exercise, in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Lessee, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect (including Lessee's right to later re -exercise the Purchase Option), and Lessee shall not be liable for any costs incurred by Lessor with respect to the failod Closing; provided, however that each of Lessee and Lessor shall pay one-half of the Escrow Holder's costs and fees in connection with the Option Escrow and its cancellation. (e) Additionally, and notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Closing is unable to occur for a reason other than a breach or default by Lessee or Lessor, then Lessee shall have the right to rescind the Notice of Exercise, in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Lessee, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect (including Lessee's right to later re -exercise the Purchase Option), and Lessee shall not be liable for any costs Incurred by Lessor with respect to the failed Closing-, provided, however that each of Lessee and Lessor shall pay one- half of the Escrow Holder's costs and fees in connection with the Option Escrow and its cancellation. 69.8. Condition of Property. Lessee represents and warrants that Lessee has, or shall have inspected and conducted tests and studios of the Premises, and that Lessee is familiar with the general condition of the Premises. Lessee understands and acknowledges that the Premises may be subject to earthquake, fire, Hoods, erosion, high water table, dangerous underground soil conditions, hazardous materials and similar occurrences that may alter its condition or affect its suitability for any proposed use. Except as otherwise 14 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 33 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 expressly provided in the Lease, Lessor shall have no responsibility or liability with respect to any such occurrence. Lessee represents and warrants that, except for Lessor's express representations and warranties herein, Lessee is acting, and will act only, upon information obtained by Lessee directly from Lessor's own inspection of the Premises. Lessor hereby makes no claims, representations or warranties as to the suitability or lack of suitability of the Premises for any proposed or intended use, or availability or lack of availability of (a) permits or approvals of governmental or regulatory authorities, or (b) easements, licenses or other rights with respect to any such proposed or intended use of the Premises shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Lessee hereunder. 69.9. "As Is". Lessee expressly agrees that if it completes the purchase of the Premises (1) that it is purchasing the Premises on an "As Is" basis and based on its own investigation of the Premises, (ii) that, except as expressly set forth herein, neither Lessor nor Lessor's employees, agents, brokers, representatives, managers, property managers, asset managers, officers, principals, beneficiaries, trustees, attomeys or contractors (collectively, "Lessor's Representatives") have made any warranty, representation or guarantee, expressed, implied or statutory, written or oral, including, without limitation, any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for any use or purpose or of reasonably workmanship, concerning the Premises or any of the products or improvements located thereon or therein,, (III) that, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, neither Lessor nor Lessor's Representatives have made any warranty, representation, or guarantee, expressed, implied or statutory, written or oral, pertaining to the Premises' compliance with any laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, federal, state or local and (iv) except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, that neither Lessor nor Lessor's Representatives have made any warranty, representation or guarantee, expressed, Implied or statutory, written or oral, as to any government limitation or restriction, or absence thereof, pertaining to the Premises, oral to the presence or absence of any latent defect, subsurface soil condition, environmental condition, hazardous substance, toxic waste or any other matter pertaining to the physical condition (title, mapping, grading, construction, or otherwise) of the Premises. Lessee is or as of the Close of Purchase option Ncrow will be familiar with the Premises and their suitability fir Lessee's intended use. All documents which have been given to Lessee by Lessor, or Lessor's Representatives, have been delivered as an accommodation to Lessee and without any representation or warranty as to the sufficiency, accuracy, completeness, validity, truthfulness, enforceability, or assignability of any of the documents, all of which Lessee relies on at its own risk. Lessee acknowledges and agrees that, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, Lessee's only recourse for any defect in title shall be against the title company and not Lessor. 69,10. Release. Lessee shall rely solely upon Lessee's own knowledge of the Premises based on its investigation of the Premises and its own inspection of the Premises in determining the Premises' physical condition. Effective upon the Close of Escrow, Lessee and anyone claiming by, through or under Lessee hereby waives its right to recover from and fully and irrevocably releases Lessor and its respective members, employees, officers, directors, partners, shareholders, beneficiaries, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, attorneys, affiliates, parent, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms, cirporations and organizations acting in their behalf ("Released Parties") from any and all claims that it may now have or hereafter acquire against any of the Released Parties for any costs, loss, liability, damage, expenses, demand, action or cause of action arising from or related to any construction defects, errors, omissions or other conditions, latent or otherwise, including environmental matters, affecting the Premises 15 129264 41.1 City Council 22 — 34 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 or any portion thereof. This release includes claims of which Lessee is presently unaware or which Lessee does not presently suspect to exist which, if known by Lessee, would materially affect Lessee's release to Lessor. In this connection and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee hereby agrees, represents and warrants that Lessee realizes and acknowledges that factual matters now unknown to it may have given or may hereafter give rise to causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which are presently unknown, unanticipated and unsuspected, and Lessee further agrees, represents and warrants that the waivers and releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that realization and that, as a material portion of the consideration given to Lessor by Lessee in exchange for Lessor's performance hereunder, Lessee nevertheless hereby intends to release, discharge and acquit Lessor from any such unknown causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which might in any way be included. Lessor has given Lessee material concessions regarding this transaction in exchange for Lessee agreeing to the provisions of this Section. 69,11. Additional Release, The releases set forth in Section 69.10 above and this Section 69.11 are full and complete releases of all the persons and entities described above of and from any and all liability of any nature whatsoever for all damage, injury, loss, expense, including any consequential expense, loss or damage, whether the same are now known or unknown to the parties, expected or unexpected by said parties, and all rights under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby waived and relinquished. Section 1542 of the Civil Code provides as follows. "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DE ASED PARTY." L4ssee"Aials Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the foregoing releases in Section 69.10 and this Section 69.11 are not intended to and do not cover (i) any claims arising from a breach by Lessor of any Lessor's obligations under this Lease, or (iii) any gross negligence, willful misconduct er fraud committed by Lessor. 69.12, Permissible Title Exceptions. Upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, Lessor shall convey the Premises to Lessee by a grant deed (the "Grant Deed"). The Grant Deed shall be subject only to the following (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions")-. a) Current Matters of Record. Those matters of record identified on the attached Exhibit b) LeLaM This Lease. c) Luturee lion-Monetaa Exceptions. All monetary and non -monetary encumbrances placed against the Premises or which may appear of record after the date hereof as the result of any action or inaction of Lessee (including any 16 1292W7,1 City Council 22 — 35 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 monetary encumbrances appearing of record as a result of any action or inaction by Lessee during the Purchase Option Term). d) Taxes. Non delinquent general, special and supplemental real property taxes and assessments; provided however, all delinquent taxes and assessments relating to the period following the Commencement Date of the Lease are the responsibility of Lessee pursuant to this Lease and shall be paid by Lessee at Closing. e) Printed..Exceptlons. Matters shown as printed exceptions in the standard form of Owner's Policy of Title Insurance. Title insuranec, Lessor shall cause to be delivered to Lessee upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, an ALTA standard coverage owner's policy of title insurance on the Premises issued by Escrow Holder with policy limits equal to the Purchase Price and insuring title to the Premises in the condition set forth above and otherwise vested in Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to request issuance of an ALTA extended coverage owner's policy of title insurance and any endorsements it may require, but the Closing shall not be delayed or conditioned on the issuance of same, Lessee shall obtain, at its sole cost and expense, any survey required to obtain any such extended coverage Title insurance, and the obtaining or failure to obtain any such survey shall not delay the Closing. 69.13. Additional Closing Documents. As part of the Closing, the parties shall execute and deliver the following additional documents to the Escrow Holder: a) Lessor and Lessee shall execute and deliver an Assignment and Assumption of Lease; b) Lessor shall execute and deliver a Bill of Sale and General Assignment; c) Lessor shall execute and deliver a Transferor's Certification of Non -Foreign Status, together with a California Form 593-C, reflecting that no tax withholding is required; and d) Lessor and Lessee shall deliver such additional, customary escrow closing documents and instruments as Escrow Holder shall reasonably require, including appropriate evidence of authority and a customary owner's affidavit. The Grant Deed and those documents specified in Paragraphs 69.9 (a), (b) and (c) shall be prepared by Lessor and delivered to Lessee for review and approval not later than ten (10) days prior to the Scheduled Closing hate. The exact form and content of such documents shall be subject to good faith negotiation by Lessor and Lessee and the failure of Lessor and Lessee to agree upon the forth of such documents not later than 2 Business Days prior to the Scheduled Closing Date shall constitute the failure of a.condition of closing, and either parry shall then have the right to terminate the Purchase Option and the sale of the Premises. 69.14. Prorations and Credits. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, all real property taxes and assessments and utilities are to be paid by Lessee and as such no prorations for the same are to be made, 17 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 36 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 69.15. Closing Costs. Lessor shall pay for (a) all premiums for the ALTA standard coverage portion of the Title Policy, (b) one-half ('/2) of all Escrow fees and costs, (c) all sales and gross receipts taxes, (d) all documentary transfer and/or stamp taxes, if any, and (e) Lessor's share of prorations, if any. Lessee shall pay for (i) all premiums for the ALTA extended coverage portion of the Title Policy and any endorsements requested by Lessee, (ii) all costs relating to the survey and all reports, studies, inspections, investigations and all other costs and expenses incurred by Lessee in connection with its review of any materials, documents, materials, the Premises and other such due diligence conducted by Lessee, (iii) any document recording fees and charges, (iv) one-half (%2) of all Escrow fees and costs, and (v) Lessee's share of prorations, if any. Lessor and Lessee shall each pay for all of its respective legal and professional fees and fees of other consultants incurred by such respective party, and if Lessee shall finance any of the Purchase Price, Lessee shall pay all costs and expenses incurred or arising in connection with such financing. All other normal and customary closing costs and expenses shall, except as otherwise herein set forth, be allocated between Lessor and Lessee in accordance with the customary practice in the County in which the Project is situated. 69.16. Purchase Option Assignment. The Purchase Option is personal to Lessee and may not be assigned in whole or in part at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may assign the Purchase Option to any other governmental entity approved by the City to whom this Lease is assigned as set forth in Section 60 herein above. (remainder of page left intentionally blank) 129i14Y Council 22 — 37 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 70, QgOggeallo, The Form Lease and Addendum may each be executed fn multiple countorparts and by separate parties on separate couaterpwis and delivered via fhosimile orothor moans of electronic image transmission, each of which shall be deemed an origlpal fbr all purposes, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument, LESSOR: LBSSU: DYER K LLC Syt Na et t 'I: Un 6►r See attached City of Santa Ana signature page 19 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 38 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee City of Santa Ana Signature Page to: Addendum to Standard Industrial/Commercial Single -Tenant Lease — Net For Certain Premises Commonly Known as 1815 East Carnegie, Santa Ana, California 92705 March 1, 2021 CITY OF SANTA ANA: Kristine Ridge City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho Citottorney Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: aisy Gomez Clerk of the Council RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Steven Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency City Council 22 — 39 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT "A" -- L15T OF PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS See attached 20 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 40 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT "B" -- DESCRIPTION OF LESSEE USES 'Che property will be used as an emergency homeless shelter and ancillary uses thereto are center, health clinic, and ancillary office space, Services to be provided include case management, housing navigation, behavioral health and substance use counseling, healthcare coordination, and job development. Outdoor property perimeter will be covered with screened fences to limit visibility into the area. Outdoor facilities will include client storage area, pet accommodations, smoking area, outdoor common area, recreational area, and temporary modular housing. There will be 2417 security guard presence at the property to promptly resolve any security issues that may arise, In addition, this property is not a walk-in facility. All client transportation to and from the facilities will be provided. In addition, there is a Good Neighbor Policy which will be implemented by Lessee (and Its 'Third Party Operator) to promote positive communication and relationship with neighbors on an ongoing basis. 21 12926447.1 City Council 22 — 41 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT 2 Dyer 18, LLC 240 Newport Center Dr. Suite #200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Project Number: CAR-1 Dyer 18, LLC -1815 Carnegie Original Updated Use of $SSOK Contingency (Aker Covering Reason for Change Commands Schedule of Values" Anticipated Cost Anticipated Cost Difference Increased Difference) Additional Funds Re d quire vided, the budget *At time .... ptual bid as pro was an educated guess as plans were not yet generated. $ (125,000) Requested by the City to speed up the delivery of Payroll Overtime $ $ 125,000 $ (125,000( the building - Increase in sewer line size from 4 inches to 6. The original "as -built" plans from Gensler showed the existing condition as 6 inches. - Additional plumbing for the pump in the back yard. Rough Plumbing $ 742,240 $ 792,240 $ (50,000( $ (50,000) Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Public Works required replacement of Fire and Domestic water in the street. - Emergency I" Ming changes -Additional bug -eye - Redo lounge room 105 electrical per City's request Electrical $ 1,007,330 $ 1,042,330 $ (35,000) $ (35,000) Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope -Additional underground conduits that were not expected - Framed upstairs which was not part of the original scope -Framing Square footage increased substantially due to framing of the mOriginall assumptions had us using ICF, however we needed to use wood framing which increased material cost by 25% - Lumber prices have greatly increased in the past year Rough Framing $ 550,000 $ 850,000 $ (300,000) $ (300,000) Change of Scope and increase in material cost - Fire treated wood had to be used at the front that we were not anticipating to have to use. Never had to use on any other project. Finished Carpentry $ 100,000 $ 110,948 $ (10,948( $ (10,948) Change of Scope - Increase in cabinetry scope (after 1st round of plans were produced) NVAC $ 700,000 $ 785,000 $ (85,000) $ (85,000) Change of Scope and increase in material cost - Increase in material cost and change in scope (after 1st set of plans were produced) - Required to protect the unused upstairs area, which was not part of 1st set of plans Fire Alarm System $ 169,000 $ 204,000 $ (35,000) $ (35,000) Change of Scope - Upgraded to a voice activated system Fire Sprinklers $ 210,700 $ 245,700 $ (35,000) $ (35,000) Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Increase in sprinkler heads because of conflict with lighting system and bathroom plumbing -Fire safety requirement - UpsWrg of fire water line Underground Utilities $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ (50,000) $ (50,000) Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Public works required replacement of Fire and Domestic Water main in the street. Edison $ 181,967 $ 181,967 $ Concrete Work (Interior & Exterior) $ 475,000 $ 475,000 $ Paving $ $ 125,000 $ (125,000) Roofing $ 139,500 $ 139,500 $ Elevator $ 206,700 $ 206,700 $ - Additional City Agency Coordination including (1) City of Santa Ana Building & Safety, (2) Planning & OCFA for Shell Structural Set, (3) TI Sets Arch/Structural and Mech/Elec/Plumbing resubmittals, and (4) School District Fee coordination - Revise lighting plans - Revise roof top unit locations and ducting configurations - Provide additional responses to plan check corrections - Provide additional design services for archit-unsl features including shade sale conceptual design, vertical door lift options, and conceptual alternate of screening ro Bid documents preparation for city agency, city security consultant vendor, and city IT Architect $ 381,000 $ 432,275 $ (51,275) $ (51,275) Change of Scope -Additional construction meetings needed Civil Engineer $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ Structural Engineer $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ Demo/Excavation/Shoring $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ City request to revise lease, service, and general Consulting/Legal $ 26,116 $ 125,490 $ (99,374) $ (72,777) $ (26,597) contracting contracts - Timeline for project extended Shoring Tower Rentals $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ Equipment Rental $ 8,121 $ 8,121 $ Permit/Fees $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ Security Services(up to June 15th) $ 38,660 $ 38,660 $ - Because we were not allowed to use ICF construction method, scope of the drywall/insulation project was increased by 25%. - Framed Drywall/Insulation $ 730,000 $ 900'000 $ (170,000) $ (170,000) Change of Scope and increase in material cost upstairs which was an increase in scope -Framing Square footage increased substantially due to framing of the mezzanine. TIe $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ Paving $ $ 125,000 $ (125,000) $ (125,000) The following doors were added to the scope: - Wood doors (City decision to upgrade material) - 2 hour glass door - Dining room accordion door - Rollout door Doors/Windows $ 125,000 $ 260,000 $ (135,000) $ (135,000) Change of Scope - Glass bifold door CMU Block Wall $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ Shade Structures $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ Interior Finishes(Floor/Wall) $ 250,000 $ 250,01D0 $ Exterior Finishes/Landscaping $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ Exterior Painting $ $ 40,000 $ (40,000) $ (40,000) Change of Scope recently added to the scope as there was additional work to repair and complete work not completed by the former contractor Camera/Security System $ 12,000 $ 140,000 $ (128,000) $ (128,000) Change of Scope - Not part of original scope (part of FF&E). Lighting Package $ 200,520 $ 200,520 $ Roof Screening $ $ 76,146 $ (76,146) $ (76,146) Change of Scope -City permitting process required roof screening Contingency $ $ 300,000 $ (300,000) $ (300,00O)i Per City, amount determined per discussions with City Staff. Subtotal $ 7,448,854 $ 9,299,597 General Conditions $ 777,000 $ 1,016,077 1 $ (239,077( $ (239,077)1 Extended Timeline - Timeline for project finish date extended due to design and permitting delays; scope ofwork increased Overhead/Main Office $ 198,000 1 $ 258,923 1 $ (60,923( $ (60,923)1 Extended Timeline - Timeline for project finish date extended due to design and permitting delays; scope ofwork increased Total $ 8,423,854 1 $ 10,574,597 1 1 $ 850,000 $ 1,300,743 City Council 22 - 42 2/15/2022 Clerk of the Council Office www.santa-ana.org/cc Item # 23 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Assembly Bill 361 AGENDA TITLE: Consider Approving the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for Meetings of City Council and All Boards, Committees, and Commissions Pursuant to the Provisions of Assembly Bill 361 RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution to consider continuing the use of teleconferencing for City Council, board, committee, and commission meetings pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 361 for the next 30 days. DISCUSSION On March 17, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow legislative bodies to conduct their meetings completely telephonically or by other electronic means. City Council meetings have been conducted by Zoom with councilmembers and staff all joining from remote locations when necessary. The suspension of certain provisions of the Brown Act was further extended by Governor Newsom on June 11, 2021 by the issuance of Executive Order N-08-21 which continued to allow completely virtual City Council (and other legislative body) meetings. This order stayed in effect until September 30, 2021. In response, AB 361 was signed into effect by Governor Newsom on September 16, 2021. It amends the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to meet virtually, provided there is a state of emergency, and either (1) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or (2) the legislative body determines by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees. The City of Santa Ana's current practices with respect to live public comment via Zoom already satisfy all of the new requirements in AB 361. Additionally, the individual City Council 23 — 1 2/15/2022 Assembly Bill 361 February 15, 2022 Page 2 legislative bodies can make their own findings for the AB 361 telecommuting resolution for future meetings. Determinations to continue to utilize remote meetings as allowed by AB 361 must be re -visited by the legislative body every 30 days with the support of new findings. Staff recommends this extension period to act as a helpful transitional stage for boards, committees, and commissions who still currently meet virtually. Most recently on January 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-004, making the required findings under AB 361 in order to allow the City to continue to offer teleconference accessibility for public meetings after September 30, 2021, to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The attached resolution (Exhibit 1) declares additional findings to allow for the continued use of teleconferencing for City Council, board, commission, and committee meetings pursuant to AB 361. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution Submitted By: Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 23 — 2 2/15/2022 RESOLUTION 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCING PROVISIONS (AB 361) WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code section 54950 et seq.) generally requires local agencies meeting via teleconference, including through other virtual or electronic means, to, among other things, provide public access at each location in which members of the legislative body are teleconferencing; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361) amends Government Code section 54953 to allow local agencies to meet fully virtually, without fully adhering to the rules otherwise applicable to teleconferencing, during a proclaimed state of emergency if state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; and WHEREAS, the Governor issued a proclamation declaring a state of emergency on March 4, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act, and this proclaimed state of emergency currently remains in effect; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana declared a local emergency on March 17, 2020 pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code section 2-404A (now section 2-646A); and WHEREAS, in order to continue teleconferencing pursuant to the provisions of AB 361, the City Council is required to make certain findings every thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana, consistent with those provisions, approved Resolutions 2021-055, 2021-66, 2021-072, and 2022-004 authorizing the use of remote teleconferencing provisions pursuant to AB 361; and WHEREAS, Orange County continues to be an area of high community transmission of COVID-19 as determined by the Center for Disease Control; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and WHEREAS, state and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, the continuation of remote teleconferencing will allow for full participation by members of the public and the members of the City legislative bodies until social distancing recommendations are lifted; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana desires to continue to utilize remote teleconferencing pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code section 54953(e). Resolution 2022-XXX City Council 23 — 3 2/1 of 3 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and shall be the findings of the City of Santa Ana's City Council and each and every other legislative body of the City. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby authorizes the use of remote teleconferencing pursuant to AB 361. SECTION 3. The City Council and all other legislative bodies of the City of Santa Ana created by the City Council or created through its City Charter shall continue to meet virtually in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and without compliance with section 54953(b)(3) based upon the findings and determinations hereby made by the City Council. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest to and certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and it shall be effective immediately upon its approval. ADOPTED this day of February, 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor /_1»:to] ►T121D7_V2r011901 V OTA5 Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:'Ta"', N.��aM� Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Resolution 2022-XXX Pa i y ouncil 23 — 4 2/15/2022 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022- to be the original Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 12022 Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution 2022-XXX City Council 23 — 5 2/1 F7Mof 3 ?"i. Parks, Recreation, and Community Services www.santa-ana.org/parks Item # 24 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Proposed License Agreement for Use of Memorial Park Parking Lot AGENDA TITLE: Proposed License Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and Santa Ana Unified School District for use of Memorial Parking Lot RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute a License Agreement with Santa Ana Unified School District to allow Washington Elementary School staff to utilize Memorial Park east parking lot (46 spaces) for the period February 2, 2022 through June 30, 2023, for an amount not to exceed $39,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. DISCUSSION On February 1, 2022, the City Council considered a proposed License Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and Santa Ana Unified School District for use of Memorial Parking Lot, and directed staff as follows: 1. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: There are parking issues for little league, Pop Warner football league, cheerleading, swimming, and classes due to parents starting to arrive around 3 to 4 p.m. Parking has always been an issue during various programming at the facility and park. Did we check how we would be able to mitigate the parking issue? ANSWER: Over the past three years, the City has issued 1,800 permits for youth sports leagues and less than a dozen have started before 5 p.m. during the week. The weekday start times by leagues are as follows: • Memorial, Northeast and Santiago Little Leagues - 5:00 p.m. • Pop Warner Football — 5:30 p.m. • Pony Baseball — 6:00 p.m. Aquatics Programming • Winter aquatic programs are held at Jerome Park pool only (Swim Team, Water Polo, Masters Water Polo and Lifeguard certification courses). • Spring aquatic programs begin March 7, 2022 at 4:30 p.m. at Memorial Park City Council 24 — 1 2/15/2022 Proposed License Agreement for Use of Memorial Parking Lot February 15, 2022 Page 2 pool. • Summer aquatic programs begin May 30, 2022 from 12:30 to 5:00 p.m. at Memorial Park pool. In addition, swim team and swim lessons begin on June 6, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. Parking will be available to accommodate aquatics programming due to the District opening the parking lot gate when the school day ends (no later than 3 p.m.) so the teachers can exit and the community can enter to use the parking lot. In addition, the need by the District for the entire parking lot during the months when school is out for summer (June 2 through August 15) reduces, and allows program participants to use the parking lot. 2. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: Where will the District staff park if the City has an event or needs the parking lot opened earlier than 6 p.m. during the week? ANSWER: We do not anticipate any events or programs that will require City use of the parking lot during the week for the duration of the agreement. If so, the City will work with the District to come up with a solution to minimize impact to the surrounding community. 3. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: Is there a way the hours be restricted to 3 p.m.? ANSWER: The City discussed with the District if they would open the parking lot sooner than 6 p.m. and they were agreeable because frequently faculty members leave well before 6 p.m. each day. The District will open the gate when the school day ends so the teachers can exit and the community can enter to use the parking lot. 4. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: Have you reached out to the Memorial Park Neighborhood Association? ANSWER: On February 6, 2022, City and District staff had a meeting with the Memorial Park Neighborhood Association. 5. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: Why does Section 1.3 of the agreement not match what the staff report states regarding opening and closing the gates? ANSWER: The staff report is an overview of salient terms of the agreement. District will be responsible for unlocking the parking lot gate at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. The parking lot will remained locked from 6 a.m. until the end of the school day (no later than 3 p.m.). The District will open the gate when the school day ends so the teachers can exit and the community can enter to use the parking lot. 6. CITY COUNCIL QUESTION: Has the District spoken to any of the surrounding City Council 24 — 2 2/15/2022 Proposed License Agreement for Use of Memorial Parking Lot February 15, 2022 Page 3 property owners or owners of industrial spaces (off Warner) they might be able to use so our residents are not negatively affected? ANSWER: The City is not aware if the District reached out to property owners. However, on February 2, 2022, District staff met with representatives of Com-Link. The City is not aware that the District reached out to owners of industrial spaces for potential parking use. Background; Terms of Proposed Agreement Washington Elementary school, located at 910 West Anahurst Place, is undergoing construction next year and in need of a parking lot for their teachers. City staff, along with representatives from SAUSD, have prepared a License Agreement (Exhibit 1) to allow Washington Elementary school staff to use the parking lot at Memorial Park. Below is an overview of the terms of the agreement: a) USE OF CITY FACILITIES: Washington Elementary school staff will utilize the Memorial Community Center east parking lot off 2102 S. Flower St. b) TERM: The term of the agreement is February 2, 2022 through June 2023. Licensee will have access to the License Area, Monday through Friday 6 am to 6 pm. Licensee will be responsible for opening and closing the gates to the License area Monday through Friday during the term of the License Agreement. Licensee will be responsible for any loss, theft and/or vandalism to vehicles and parking lot area during usage time and responsible for enforcing parking logistics and all clean up upon completion of their respective use of the area. c) FEE: SAUSD will pay parking costs monthly at a rate of $2,300 (46 parking spaces) $39,000 total. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT The City of Santa Ana will receive revenue in the amount of $39,100 from this seventeen - month license. Funds will be deposited in the following account for the specified years. Fiscal Accounting Unit- Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Account # Description Account Description FY 21-22 01113002-57361 General fund PRCSA Revenue- $11,500 Recreation Facility Rental FY 22-23 01113002-57361 General fund PRCSA Revenue- $27,600 Recreation Facility Rental EXHIBIT(S) 1. License Agreement City Council 24 — 3 2/15/2022 LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL r DISTRICT FOR USE OF PARKING LOT AT MEMORIAL PARK This LICENSE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is dated as of February 1, 2022, and entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city and municipal corporation existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"), and the Santa Ana Unified School District ("Licensee"). RECITALS A. The City is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, California, more specifically identified as 2102 S. Flower Street (APN ## 0 15- 160-0 0("the Property") also known as Memorial Park. City will allows Licensee to use a portion of the Property consisting of the east side parking lot, with approximately forty-six (46) parking spaces as depicted on Exhibit A ("License Area") during the term of this License Agreement. B. Licensee desires to use the License Area for purposes of parking during the License period ("Permitted Uses"). C. The City has agreed''to grant Licensee a license to use the License Area, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE,, fbr and --in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other goo&and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: l . License. The City hereby grants to Licensee a nonexclusive license for the right to enter and use the License Area beginning on February 2, 2022 for the Permitted Uses described in Recital B, upon the terns and conditions set forth herein ("License"), subject to Licensee's performance of all of its obligations under this Agreement. This License shall remain in effect until June 30, 2023. The License may be terminated by the City or Licensee upon thirty (30) days written notice. This Agreement is intended and shall be construed only as a revocable license to use the License Area and not as a lease or grant of any possessory or other interest. Licensee agrees to the following obligations during the term of this License: 1.1 Licensee will have access to the License Area, Monday- Friday 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.; 1.2 Licensee will be responsible for paying the License fee set forth in Section 6 of this Agreement, regardless of how many parking spots are actually used of a daily basis, 1.3 Licensee will be responsible for opening and closing the gates to the License Area Monday- Friday during the term of the License Agreement; 1.4 Licensee will be responsible for any loss, theft and/or vandalism to vehicles and parking lot area during usage time and l .5 Licensee shall be responsible for parking logistics. Pnge ] of 7 City Council 24 — 4 2/15/2022 2. Restoration and Clean Up. At its sole cost, Licensee shall, after use of the License Area, restore the License Area to its original condition in which it existed immediately prior to the Agreement, leave the License Area in a neat and clean condition to the sole satisfaction of the City, free of trash and debris, and remove all property and materials of Licensee. Licensee shall cause the License Area to be cleaned, with such work to be completed no later than the times specified in the License as stated in paragraph 1 above, and the License shall be extended to such time for the limited purpose of allowing the cleaning work to be completed. 3. Compliance with Laws. Licensee shall cause all activities of Licensee under this Agreement and all activities on the License Area to be performed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, and permits. 4. Damage. In the event that Licensee damages any portion of the License Area or the improvements or equipment therein, Licensee shall immediately repair the damage at Licensee's sole cost. Alternatively, the City may, at its election, repair the damage in which case Licensee shall reimburse the City for its cost within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written demand from City. 5. Licensee Parties. Licensee, together with its employees, subcontractors, agents, representatives, invitees, and all persons entering the License Area, by or through or at the direction of Licensee, are collectively referred to herein as the "Licensee Parties." Licensee shall be responsible for the Licensee Parties and shall cause the Licensee Parties to comply with the terms of this Agreement. b. Fee. As consideration for this Agreement, Licensee shall pay City a total license fee of thirty-nine thousand one hundred dollars ($39,100) over the term of the License. Licensee shall pay two thousand and three hundred dollars ($2,300) per month starting February 1, 2022 and on the first of every month thereafter during the term of this License. Payment shall be made to "City of Santa Ana" and mailed to: City of Santa Ana Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Attention: Administrative Services Division 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-23 P.4. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 7, AS -IS Condition. City makes no representation or warranty of any kind as to the condition of the License Area or any other matter relating to Licensee's use of the License Area. Licensee hereby disclaims and waives any and all objections to the physical and other characteristics and conditions of the License Area, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the use of the License Area will be on the basis of Licensee's own investigation of the condition of the License Area. The license to use the License Area shall be granted on an "AS -IS," "WITH ALL FAULTS" basis, without representation or warranty expressed or implied by City, or by operation of law. City expressly disclaims, which Licensee hereby acknowledges and accepts, any implied warranty of condition or fitness for a particular purpose or use. Licensee's use of the License Area shall be subject to the License Area being in a usable and safe condition at the time of Licensee's Page 2 of 7 City Council 24 — 5 2/15/2022 use and Licensee shall be responsible for detennnining whether the License Area is in such condition. In connection therewith, in, the event that the License Area or access thereto is damaged or obstructed or the use by Licensee is otherwise impaired, prevented or limited, City shall have no obligation or duty to repair the damage or rectify the condition to make the License Area usable or safe. 8. Insurance. 8.1 Licensee shall secure or cause its agents or contractors performing any entry onto the License Area to secure, prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain or cause to be maintained during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows: 81.1 Commercial General. Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than. $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 8.1.2 Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Licensee has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9),, with limitno less than $1,0000000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 8.1.3 Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,060 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 8.2 If the Licensee maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Licensee. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. 8.3 The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 8.3.1 Additional Insured Endorsement- The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of Licensee Parties use of the License Area. General liability coverage can be provided in the Page 3. of 7 City Council 24 — 6 2/15/2022 form of an endorsement to the Licensee's insurance. 8.3.2 Primaiy Coverage- For any claims related to this License, the Licensee's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Licensee's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 8.4 Notice of Cancellation- Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 8.5 Waiver of Subrogation- Licensee hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation, which any insurer of said Licensee may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Licensee agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiverof subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 8.6 Self -Insured Retentions- Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theLicensee to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. &7 Acceptability of Insurers- Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 8.8 Verification of Coverage- Licensee shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all pdy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work Page 4 of 7 City Council 24 — 7 2/15/2022 beginning shall not waive the Licensee's obligation to provide them. 8.9 The City reserves the right to require con-iplete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 8.10 Special Risks or Circumstances- City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of therisk, prior experience, insurer., coverage, or other special circumstances. 9. Indemnity. Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, and its respective agents, representatives, employees, subsidiaries and affiliates ("Covered Parties") from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, demands, judgments, losses, expenses, or liabilities, injuries and damages to persons and property, including death, arising out of or related to Licensee's use of the License Area, the entry by any Licensee Party on the. License Area or surrounding property, or Licensee's breach or default in the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that Licensee will not be obligated to indemnify the Covered Parties from any claims arising solely from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of a Covered Party. If any action or proceeding is brought against any Covered Party by reason of any such. claim, Licensee; upoti receipt of written notice from Covered Party, shall defend the same at Licensee's expense with legal counsel. reasonably acceptable to Covered Party. Payment shall not be a condition precedent to recovery under any indemnification in this Agreement, and a fading of liability or an obligation to, indemnify shall not be: a condition precedent to the duty to defend. The provisions of this Section 10 shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 10, Miscellaneous, 10.1 Entire. Agreement, Waiver and Amendments. This Agreement incorporates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein, or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations and previous agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the party to be charged. Any amendment or modification to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Licensee. 10.2 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the retraining provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unless and to the extent the rights and obligations of one or both parties has been materially altered or abridged by such holding. 10.3 No Assignment, Licensee shall not assign or transfer or otherwise convey any interest in this Agreement to any party without the express ptior written consent of City, which consent may be withheld in City's sole and absolute discretion. Page 5 of 7 City Council 24 — 8 2/15/2022 10.4 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California. 10.5 Litigation Expenses. If either party to this Agreement commences an action against the other party to this Agreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, costs of investigation, and costs of suit from the losing party. 10.6 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto represent and warrant to the other party that they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such party, and by so executing this Agreement, said party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 10.7 Notices. Any notices, requests, or approvals given under this Agreement from one party to another shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or deposited with the United States Postal Service for mailing, postage prepaid, by certified mail, rettu-n receipt requested, to the addresses of the other party as stated in this section, and shall be deemed to have been received at the time of personal delivery or three (3) days after the deposit for mailing. Notices shall be sent to: If to Licensor: Santa Ana Unified School District Attn: Jeremy Cogan Director of Facilities Planning 1601 East Chestnut Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 If to City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-3 0) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 10.8 Execution in Counterpart. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, and all so executed shall constitute one agreement binding on both of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that both parties are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Licensee have entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTEST Kristine Ridge Daisy Gomez City Manager Clerk of the Council [Signatures continue on the next page] Page 6 of 7 City Council 24 — 9 2/15/2022 APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency LLCENSEE By: Its: Page 7 of 7 City Council 24 — 10 2/15/2022 Rim Ala 2 _ '& .� .." ?I� S ... _.-- - - _. .,_• . �� as ol3 S .� ... } � a tk f l it IL a.1 MaiIRA _ f ' N _ w i u ih �. I T.". I �• i �. - ' flu , "_ �_ �aed jppoiu y- euyT u ;• f 4PI IRAA it _.� _. rit�1.•—•ur-art--:,'mot.- - -.e a� � ...L _. ..--_ �- �:....�."_�' Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 25 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2021-03 AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX — ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE RECOMMENDED ACTION Place Ordinance on second reading and adopt. DISCUSSION The City Council conducted the first reading of the Ordinance on November 16, 2021. As part of the first reading of the Ordinance, the majority members of the City Council discussed, articulated, and directed staff to make conforming revisions to the Ordinance reflecting the following refinements for the second reading of the Ordinance: • Omit new priorities that do not directly relate to the production of new affordable housing units. • Reduce to 5% inclusionary for for -sale units. • Include a provision to vest entitled projects and make the necessary conforming changes to the Ordinance, and include a vested project list as an exhibit to the Ordinance. • Require and phase in the use of a local skilled and trained workforce only for new projects proposing 20 or more residential lots or units exercising the in -lieu fee option to satisfy the inclusionary requirements of the Ordinance, and clarify that the provision is not applicable to projects receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund. The implementation of this provision shall be phased as follows: 11/17/2021 — 12/31/2025 1/1/2026 thereafter $15 — No requirements $15 — 30% STW & 35% local hire $10 — 30% STW + 2 trades & 20% local hire $10 — 60% STW & 35% local hire $ 5 — 60% STW + 3 trades & 20% local hire $ 5 — 90% STW & 35% local hire City Council 25 — 1 2/15/2022 Second Reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2021-03 February 15, 2022 Page 2 • Require an affirmative vote by 5 members of the City Council in order to modify the in -lieu fee structure and the local skilled and train workforce provision. • Incorporate a local density bonus provision for for -sale units only. For ease of review, a redline version of the adopted Ordinance presented at the first reading on November 16, 2021 is attached (Exhibit 1) reflecting the necessary changes and conforming modifications. The clean version of this Ordinance is attached as Exhibit 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. It is recommended that the City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, even if the proposed Ordinance is considered a project, it falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." Adoption of this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed changes will only modernize, update, and clarify existing affordable and inclusionary housing requirements responding to the current economic and housing trends in the City and will not cause a physical change in the environment. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Redline of Ordinance adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2021-03 without Exhibit 2. Ordinance adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2021-03 and Exhibit A Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 25 — 2 2/15/2022 ORDINANCE NO. NS- ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 28, 2011, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2825, known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and appearing as "Article XVIII.I. — Housing Opportunity Ordinance" ("Housing Opportunity Ordinance") of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Housing Opportunity Ordinance was adopted to implement the City's Housing Element Goal of providing affordable housing within the City. B. On September 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2881, which amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance in various respects, including applicability, options to satisfy inclusionary requirements, and calculation of the in -lieu housing fee. These amendments were intended to make the inclusionary housing requirements more predictable for housing developers and to incentivize the production of more affordable housing. C. In response to impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development and construction of housing in the City, including the reduction of housing starts, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2994 on September 1, 2020. Ordinance No. NS- 2994 further amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance to lower the in -lieu housing fee for all projects from $15 to $5 per square foot, adjust the trigger of the ordinance, and expand the eligible uses of in -lieu fees collected by the City. D. On March 2, 2021, at the direction of the City Council, an Ad Hoc Committee for Housing was formed. The Ad Hoc Committee reviewed the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and recommended certain changes. The Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations were presented and discussed at the City Council Meeting on July 6, 2021. E. On July 26, 2021, the City Council conducted a work-study session to further evaluate the Committee's recommendations and to receive input from key stakeholders and members of the public. The City Council provided direction to staff to prepare amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance concerning the applicability City Council 25 — 3 orcLg4&2022-xxx Page 1 of 18 and triggers for the ordinance, adjustments to the in -lieu fee calculation, set -aside units, and options for satisfaction of inclusionary requirements. F. On September 7, 2021, the City Council further considered this matter and provided additional direction to staff regarding proposed amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance. G. At the City Council meeting of October 5, 2021, staff received direction to initiate the adoption hearing in order for the City Council to consider the changes recommended by the Housing Ad Hoc Committee. H. On October 25, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the proposed Ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance. I. The Request for City Council Action for this Ordinance dated November 16 and December 7, 2021 and duly signed by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency shall, by this reference, be incorporated herein, and together with this ordinance, any amendments or supplements, and oral testimony, constitute the necessary findings for this ordinance. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed Ordinance falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." Adoption of this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed changes will only modernize, update, and clarify existing affordable and inclusionary housing requirements responding to the current economic and housing trends in the City and will not cause a physical change in the environment. Section 3. Article XVIII.I of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 4. Article XVIII.I. of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby reenacted and amended to read in its entirety as follows: ARTICLE XVIII.I. - 2021 AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND CREATION ORDINANCE City Council 25 — 4 orc2y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 2 of 18 Sec. 41-1900. Purpose. This article establishes standards and procedures to encourage the development of housing that is affordable to a range of households with varying income levels. The purpose of this article is to encourage the development and availability of affordable housing by requiring the inclusion of affordable housing units within new developments when the number of units exceed the densities permitted under the general plan, zoning classification, or the conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. Sec. 41-1901. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Adjusted for household size appropriate for the unit means a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two (2) persons in the case of a one -bedroom unit, three (3) persons in the case of a two -bedroom unit, four (4) persons in the case of a three - bedroom unit, and five (5) persons in the case of a four -bedroom unit. Administrative procedures means those regulations promulgated by the executive director pursuant to section 41-1910 of this article. Affordable housing cost means the total housing costs paid by a qualifying household, which shall not exceed the fraction of gross income specified, as follows: Extremely low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning thirty (30) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Very low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning fifty (50) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning eighty (80) percent of the Orange County median income for family size appropriate for the unit. Moderate -income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning one hundred twenty (120) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. The qualifying limits for extremely low-income, very low-income, low-income and moderate -income households are established and amended annually pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The limits are published by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. lase uensltV means the maximum number of owelling units allowea per acre of lava ,vithin each land use category designated in the General Plan. City Council 25 — 5 orcLg4&2022-xxx Page 3 of 18 Developer means any association, corporation, firm, joint venture, partnership, person, or any entity or combination of entities, which seeks city approval for all or part of a residential project. Development agreement means an agreement approved by the city council between a property owner and the city pursuant to Government Code section 65864, et seq. Executive director means the executive director of community development for the city. General plan means the adopted general plan for the City of Santa Ana. Inclusionary housing agreement means a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. Inclusionary housing fund means the fund created by the city in which all fees collected in compliance with this article shall be deposited. Inclusionary housing plan means the plan submitted by the developer, in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. Inclusionary unit means a dwelling unit that will be offered for sale or rent to extremely low, very low, low, or moderate -income households, at an affordable housing cost, in compliance with this article. Low-income units, very low-income units, and extremely low-income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by low, very low, and extremely low-income households, respectively, at an affordable housing cost. Market rate units means dwelling units in a residential project that are not inclusionary units. Moderate -income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by moderate -income households at an affordable housing cost. Regulatory agreement means an agreement entered into between the City of Santa Ana or the Santa Ana Community Development Agency and a developer by which the developer covenants to keep certain housing units at an affordable housing cost for a specified period of time. Rehabilitated units/rehabilitation means the improvement of a unit in substandard condition to a decent, safe and sanitary level. Units are in substandard condition when, while they may be structurally sound, they do not provide safe and adequate shelter, and in their present condition endanger the health, safety or well-being of the occupants. Residential project/project means any of the following: A subdivision resulting in the creation of five (5) or more residential lots or residential condominium units; or City Council 25 — 6 orc24&, 2g22-xxx Page 4 of 18 The new construction of a project consisting of five (5) or more multi -family units; or The new construction of five (5) or more separate houses or dwelling units; or The conversion of five (5) or more existing residential rental units to condominium ownership. Target area means that area designated by the city from time to time, on an as -needed basis, as a priority area for rehabilitation due to health and safety concerns. Total housing costs the total monthly or annual recurring expenses required of a household to obtain shelter. For a rental unit, total housing costs shall include the monthly rent payment and utilities paid by the tenant (excluding telephone and television). For an ownership unit, total housing costs shall include the mortgage payment (principal and interest), insurance, homeowners' association dues (if applicable), private mortgage insurance (if applicable), taxes, utilities, an allowance for maintenance and any other related assessments. Sec. 41-1902. Applicability and inclusionary unit requirements. (a) Applicability. The requirements of this article shall apply to any new project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units including new construction and condominium conversions, which meets one or all of the following applicability thresholds: (1) A change in use to allow for residential or that exceeds the general plan or zoning prescribed densities or percentage of residential development of the subject property at the time of application. (2) Implementation of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development allowed as a result of city initiated zone changes or city initiated general plan amendments after November 28, 2011. (3) Increase of the permitted percentage of residential development allowed for a mixed -use development above the percentage permitted under the zoning classification at the time of application. (4) Development of new residential uses or increase of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development within an overlay zone approved pursuant to Division 28 of Article I of this Chapter. (5) Conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. (b) Applications. The inclusionary requirements shall only apply to the incremental units beyond that which is allowed as prescribed in Subsection (a) above. City Council 25 — 7 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 5 of 18 (c) Units for sale. If the new residential project consists of units for sale, then a minimum of te:n=five (549) percent of the total number of units in the project shall be sold to moderate -income households. (d) Rental units. If the new residential project consists of rental units, the inclusionary units shall be constructed as follows: (1) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the units shall be rented to low-income households, or (2) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be rented to very low-income households, or (3) A minimum of five (5) percent shall be rented to extremely low-income households, or (4) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be available at an affordable housing cost of which five (5) percent rented to low-income households, three (3) percent rented to very low-income households, and two (2) percent rented to extremely low-income households. (e) Rounding of quantities in calculations. In calculating the required number of inclusionary units, fractional units shall be rounded -up to the next whole unit. The developer may choose to pay an in -lieu fee set forth in section 41-1904(c) for the fractional units, which shall be calculated based on the number of habitable square feet applicable in each case. (f) Displacement of existing inclusionary units. Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, any residential project subject to this article that results in the displacement of extremely low, very low and/or low-income household(s) shall be required to provide on - site inclusionary units as required by this article. (g) Compliance with article. All inclusionary units required by this article shall be sold or rented in compliance with this article. Sec. 41-1903. Exempt projects. The following are exempt from the requirements of this article: (a) Development agreements. A residential project that is the subject of a development agreement under applicable provisions of the California Government Code that expressly provides for an exclusion to this article, provides for a different amount of inclusionary units, or provides for a different specified method for determining the in -lieu fee provisions of this ordinance, such as the timing of payment or the point in time for determining the applicable in -lieu fee amount, to satisfy the inclusionary units from that specified by this article. City Council 25 — 8 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 6 of 18 (b) Project with regulatory agreement. A residential project for which a regulatory agreement has been approved, provided that the regulatory agreement is effective at the time the residential project would otherwise be required to comply with the requirements of this article, and there is no uncured breach of the regulatory agreement before issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. This may include a residential project that has obtained a density bonus under article XVI.I of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Such projects cannot be used to satisfy the inclusionary requirement for another project. (c) Adaptive Reuse. Adaptive reuse development projects pursuant to Chapter 41, Article XVI.II - Adaptive Reuse. d) Development Projects Approved Under the Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 Adopted on September 1. 2020. A development project that has received entitlement approvals by city council action prior to November 16, 2021 to construct new residential units is hereby determined to have vested the right to carry out the completion and construction of the project under the regulations and provisions of Ordinance No. NS- 2994. The vested regulations and provisions in accordance with this section shall terminate if any or all of the entitlement approvals become invalid for any reasons or have expired under the various applicable time limits established in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. A list of these projects and the vested right(s) under Ordinance No. NS-2994 are attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference. Sec. 41-1904. Options to satisfy inclusionary requirements. (a) On -site units. The primary means of complying with the inclusionary requirements of this article shall be the provision of on -site inclusionary units in accordance with section 41-1902 above. A developer may only satisfy the requirements of this article by means of an alternative to on -site inclusionary units in accordance with the requirements and procedures of this section. (b) Off -site units. (1) New units. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by constructing the required new inclusionary housing at a different location within the city borders at the ratio of one square foot of habitable inclusionary unit space for each required habitable square foot. While the total habitable square footage area of the required new inclusionary units must be the same as the sum - total of the number of habitable square feet for the project as directed by this ordinance, the number of units and bedrooms associated with the off -site units may be approved by the review authority of the city, consistent with the type of affordable housing needed at the time of project review. (2) Rehabilitated units outside a designated target area. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of the city City Council 25 — 9 orcLg4&21()22-xxx Page 7 of 18 at a rate of one and one-half (1'/2) habitable square feet per each required habitable square foot of inclusionary units. (3) Rehabilitated units within a designated target area. Upon application, the developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of the city at a rate of one habitable square foot per each required habitable square foot of affordable inclusionary units. (c) In -lieu fee. (1) Five (5) or more units. For a residential project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units, the developer may elect to satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part, by payment of a fee in -lieu of constructing some or all of the required units. The total amount of the fee allowed by this section shall be calculated using the In -Lieu Fee Schedule in section 41-1904(c)(1)(i) multiplied by the sum total of the number of habitable square feet within the entire project, as measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways. (i) In -Lieu Fee Schedule Units/Lots Fee Per Square Foot of Habitable Area 5-9 $6.00 10 — 14 $9.00 15 — 19 $12.00 20 or more $15.00 (ii) Local Skilled and Trained Workforce. The use of a local skilled and trained workforce shall be phased in over time and shall only aDDly to a development project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units opting to exercise the in - lieu fee payment optionThe On lieu, The implementation of this subsection shall be phased as follows: A) Between November 16. 2021 and December 31. 2025. a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 Der sauare foot in -lieu fee amount shall not be reauired to utilize a local skilled and trained workforce for completing the construction of the project. However, Tthis fee shall be reduced if the developer provides the City with an executed enforceable commitment to use a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Fee Per Square Foot of Workforce Habitable Area City Council 25 — 10 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 8 of 18 30% of workforce utilizing 2 or more construction $10.00 trades 60% of workforce utilizing 3 or more construction $5.00 trades minimum of 2035% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (B) Effective January 1. 2026 and thereafter, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 per square foot in - lieu fee amount shall be required to provide the City with an executed enforceable commitment that 30 percent of the workforce utilized to complete the construction of the project be derived from a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601: and that a minimum of 35 percent of the required skilled and trained workforce total work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. This fee shall be reduced when the developer commits to a higher utilization level as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Fee Per Square Foot of Workforce Habitable Area 60% of workforce 10.00 90% of workforce 5.00 minimum of 35% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (2) Timing of payment. The total fee amount for the entirety of a project is calculated, determined, and set at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the project. All in -lieu fees allowed by this section shall be paid no later than prior to issuance of the first occupancy approval for any construction which adds net residential units. If the citv approves a phased proiect. a proportional share of the reauired fee shall be paid within each phase of the residential project. The in -lieu fees collected by the city are city funds over which the city has complete and absolute discretion. (3) Inclusionary housing fund. Fees collected in compliance with this section shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. City Council 25 — 11 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 9 of 18 4) The provisions of Section 41-1904(c)(1) may only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least five (5) members of the City Council. Sec. 41-1904.1. Inclusionary housing development incentives for production of units. (a) In order to make the production of new inclusionary units on -site or off -site or off - site rehabilitated units, certain incentives, standards and concessions shall be allowed and prescribed as set forth herein below. Such concessions shall not be available to those developers that choose to pay an in lieu fee rather than build the units. The developer may opt to take advantage of up to two (2) concessions among the following possible concessions: (1) Parking concession. One on -site parking space for each zero to one bedroom unit; two (2) on -site parking spaces for each two (2) to three (3) bedroom unit; two and one-half (2'/2) parking spaces for each four (4) or more bedroom unit. (2) Concession on one of the following Zoning Code site development standards: (i) Setback reduction of up to twenty-five (25) percent reduction on subject property; (ii) Height increase of up to twenty (20) additional feet. (b) A developer of a for sale residential project proposing to provide on -site moderate income units and a surrounding community benefit may opt to take advantage of up to three (3) of the above concessions. The surrounding community benefit will include but not be limited to park improvements, urban community gardens, developer -funded down payment assistance, or subsidy of services, activities or programs. 1) Local Density Bonus. For each 1 percent increase above 5 percent in the percentage of for -sale units affordable to moderate income households, the base density shall be increased by 1.5 percent up to a maximum of 35 percent. Sec. 41-1905. Housing plan and housing agreement. (a) Submittal and execution. The developer shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Inclusionary housing plan. The developer shall submit an inclusionary housing plan in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. The inclusionary housing plan and its supportive documents, plans, and details shall be submitted at the same time as the site plan and application materials for the original project. All inclusionary housing plans shall be subject to the approval of the executive director and subject to appeal processes and procedures set forth in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. City Council 25 — 12 0rcLq4&2J()22-xxx Page 10 of 18 2) Inclusionary housing agreement. The developer shall execute and cause to be recorded an inclusionary housing agreement. The inclusionary housing agreement shall be a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, executed by the city manager, or his or her designee, and in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. (b) Discretionary approvals. No discretionary approval shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article until the developer has submitted an inclusionary housing plan. (c) Issuance of building permit. No building permit shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the executive director has approved the inclusionary housing plan, and any required inclusionary housing agreement has been recorded. (d) Issuance of certificate of occupancy. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the approved inclusionary housing plan has been fully implemented. Sec. 41-1906. Standards. (a) Location within project, relationship to non-inclusionary units. All inclusionary units shall be: (1) Reasonably dispersed throughout the residential project; (2) Proportional, in number of bedrooms, gross floor area of habitable space, and location, to the market rate units; (3) Comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of design, materials, finished quality, and appearance; and (4) Permitted the same access to project amenities and recreational facilities, as are market rate units. (b) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (c) Location outside the proposed original project. For projects where the developer proposes to either produce new inclusionary units or rehabilitate existing off -site units to meet the inclusionary affordable housing requirements of this ordinance, the off -site project(s) containing the required inclusionary units shall be subject to the following requirements: City Council 25 — 13 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 11 of 18 (1) The sum -total area (in habitable square feet) of all the newly constructed off -site inclusionary units shall be the same number of habitable square feet of inclusionary area as required by this ordinance. For the purpose of the calculation of the number of square feet of required inclusionary housing, the total gross habitable square feet of the housing units of the original market rate project shall be used, as measured from exterior walls to exterior walls of the market units provided as the base for calculation. The common areas, exterior hallways, stairways, patios, and balconies shall not be calculated in determining the number of required square feet of inclusionary housing production. All new or rehabilitated units must meet all current zoning and general plan standards. (2) While the total number of square feet of inclusionary housing requirement is calculated based on the requirements of this ordinance, the number of units, bedrooms and other amenities on the proposed off -site inclusionary housing location shall be approved by the review authority commensurate with the size and type of units most in demand at the time of submittal of the application. (3) Any off -site affordable inclusionary housing project shall be substantially comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of quality of design, materials and finishes. (4) If tenants are displaced due to rehabilitation of housing to meet the inclusionary unit requirement, the developer shall be responsible for relocation costs as required by state law. (5) No city, housing authority, or public funds, subsidies, or participation of any kind shall be expended on the production or building of any inclusionary housing projects associated with meeting the inclusionary unit requirement. (d) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project or proposed off -site new inclusionary units or rehabilitated units shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (e) Units for sale. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A unit for sale shall be restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for a minimum of fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of purchasers. The developer and all subsequent owners of an inclusionary unit offered for sale shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of the purchaser and that such owners will live in such inclusionary unit as their primary residence. City Council 25 — 14 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 12 of 18 (3) Resale price control. In order to maintain the availability of inclusionary units required by this article, the resale price of an owner occupied inclusionary unit shall be limited to the lesser of the fair market value of the unit as established by a licensed real estate agent based upon three (3) comparable properties or the restricted resale price. For these purposes, the restricted resale price shall be the applicable affordable housing cost. (4) Inheritance of inclusionary units. Upon the death of an owner of an owner - occupied inclusionary unit, title in the property may transfer to the surviving joint tenant or heir (in the case of the death of a sole owner or all owners of the household). (5) Forfeiture. If an inclusionary unit for sale is sold for an amount in excess of the resale price controls required by this section, the buyer and the seller shall be jointly and severally liable to the city for the amount in excess of the affordable housing cost at the time of such sale of the inclusionary unit. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. Notwithstanding the foregoing, city may allow the buyer and seller to cure any violation of the resale price controls within one hundred eighty (180) days. (f) Rental units. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A rental inclusionary unit shall remain restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of renters. The owner of any rental inclusionary unit shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of all members of the household above the age of eighteen (18) at the time of the initial rental and annually thereafter. (3) Forfeiture. Any lessor who leases an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit to the city all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (g) Execution and recording of documents. The executive director may require the execution and recording of whatever documents are required to ensure enforcement of this section; including, but not limited to, promissory notes, deeds of trust, resale restrictions, rights of first refusal, options to purchase, and/or other documents, which shall be recorded against all inclusionary units. (h) General prohibitions. (1) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit at a price or rent in excess of the maximum amount allowed by any restriction placed on the unit in accordance with this article. City Council 25 — 15 orc2Y4c&2g22-xxx Page 13 of 18 (2) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit to a person or persons that do not meet the income restrictions placed on the unit in accordance with this article. (3) No person shall provide false or materially incomplete information to the city or to a seller or lessor of an inclusionary unit to obtain occupancy of housing for which that person is not eligible. (i) Principal residency requirement. 1. The owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall reside in the unit for not less than ten (10) out of every twelve (12) months. 2. No owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall lease or sublease, as applicable, an inclusionary unit without the prior permission of the executive director. Sec. 41-1907. Reserved. Sec. 41-1908. Enforcement. (a) Violation. Any violation of this article constitutes a misdemeanor. (b) Forfeiture of funds. Any individual who sells an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit any money in excess of the affordable housing cost at such time. Any individual who rents an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (c) Legal actions. The city may institute any appropriate legal actions or proceedings necessary to ensure compliance with this article, including actions: (1) To disapprove, revoke, or suspend any permit, including a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or discretionary approval; and (2) For injunctive relief or damages. (d) Recovery of costs. In any action to enforce this article, or an inclusionary housing agreement recorded hereunder, the city shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Sec. 41-1909. Inclusionary housing fund. (a) Inclusionary housing fund. There is hereby established a separate fund of the city, to be known as the inclusionary housing fund. All monies collected pursuant to this article shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. Additional monies from other sources may be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. The monies deposited in the inclusionary housing fund shall be subject to the following conditions: (1) Monies deposited into the inclusionary housing fund must be used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate, low, very low, and extremely low income households in the city as specified in the city's affordable housing City Council 25 — 16 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 14 of 18 funds policies and procedures. A priority will be on the creation of affordable housing opportunities or units from the existing market rate housing stock rather than construction of new affordable housing units and on the creation of new affordable housing opportunities for large families currently living in the City. This includes, but is not limited to, the purchase and rehabilitation of units for sale. Monies may also be used to pay for one-time programs for code enforcement, quality of life and general health and safety activities. Monies may also be used to cover reasonable administrative or related expenses associated with the administration of this article. (2) The fund shall be administered by the executive director, or his or her designee, who may develop procedures in the city's affordable housing funds policies and procedures to implement the purposes of the inclusionary housing fund consistent with the requirements of this article and any adopted budget of the city. (3) Monies deposited in accordance with this section shall be used in accordance with the affordable housing funds policies and procedures, housing element, consolidated plan, or subsequent plan adopted by the city council to construct, rehabilitate, or subsidize affordable housing or to recapture affordable housing at risk of market conversion, or to assist other government entities, private organizations, or individuals to do so. Permissible uses include, but are not limited to, assistance to housing development corporations, equity participation loans, grants, pre -home ownership co - investment, pre -development loan funds, participation leases, or other public -private partnership arrangements. The inclusionary housing fund may be used for the benefit of both rental and owner -occupied housing. (4) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund shall implement a local preference in their resident selection criteria and marketing policies meeting guidelines established by the executive director. (5) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund, as well as its contractors and subcontractors at every tier performing work for the new housing units is encouraged to negotiate in good faith to provide the City with an enforceable commitment that a minimum 30% of the labor utilizing 2 or more construction trades be performed by a= "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project. If so provided a minimum of 35% of such labor all work for the project shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. Sec. 41-1910. Administrative. (a) In -lieu fee calculation. The amount per square foot of the inclusionary housing in - lieu fee shall be subject to city council review and consideration as needed. City Council 25 — 17 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 15 of 18 (b) Administration fees. The council may by resolution establish reasonable fees and deposits for the administration of this article including an annual monitoring fee and an inclusionary housing plan submittal fee. (c) Monitoring/audits. At the time of initial occupancy, and annually thereafter, the city will monitor the project to ensure that the income verifications are correct and in compliance with the inclusionary housing administrative procedures. For ownership units, the city shall monitor to verify that owner -occupancy requirements are maintained. Developer/property owners are required to cooperate with the city in promptly providing all information requested by the city in monitoring compliance with program requirements. The city will conduct periodic random quality control audits of inclusionary units to ensure compliance with rules and requirements. Such audits may include verification of continued occupancy in inclusionary units by eligible tenants, compliance with the inclusionary housing plan and agreement, and physical inspections of the residential project. (e) Administrative procedures. The city manager is hereby authorized and directed to promulgate administrative procedures for the implementation of this article. Secs. 41-1911-41-1999. Reserved. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. City Council 25 — 18 orc2Y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 16 of 18 Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2021. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: -- 4 9k��- John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Vicente Sarmiento Mayor City Council 25 — 19 orcLqar&21()22-xxx Page 17 of 18 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 25 — 20 orc2y4c&2,g22-xxx Page 18 of 18 ORDINANCE NO. NS- ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 28, 2011, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2825, known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and appearing as "Article XVIII.I. — Housing Opportunity Ordinance" ("Housing Opportunity Ordinance") of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Housing Opportunity Ordinance was adopted to implement the City's Housing Element Goal of providing affordable housing within the City. B. On September 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2881, which amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance in various respects, including applicability, options to satisfy inclusionary requirements, and calculation of the in -lieu housing fee. These amendments were intended to make the inclusionary housing requirements more predictable for housing developers and to incentivize the production of more affordable housing. C. In response to impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development and construction of housing in the City, including the reduction of housing starts, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2994 on September 1, 2020. Ordinance No. NS- 2994 further amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance to lower the in -lieu housing fee for all projects from $15 to $5 per square foot, adjust the trigger of the ordinance, and expand the eligible uses of in -lieu fees collected by the City. D. On March 2, 2021, at the direction of the City Council, an Ad Hoc Committee for Housing was formed. The Ad Hoc Committee reviewed the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and recommended certain changes. The Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations were presented and discussed at the City Council Meeting on July 6, 2021. E. On July 26, 2021, the City Council conducted a work-study session to further evaluate the Committee's recommendations and to receive input from key stakeholders and members of the public. The City Council provided direction to staff to prepare amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance concerning the applicability City Council 25 — 21 orQY45C 24022-xxx Page 1 of 17 and triggers for the ordinance, adjustments to the in -lieu fee calculation, set -aside units, and options for satisfaction of inclusionary requirements. F. On September 7, 2021, the City Council further considered this matter and provided additional direction to staff regarding proposed amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance. G. At the City Council meeting of October 5, 2021, staff received direction to initiate the adoption hearing in order for the City Council to consider the changes recommended by the Housing Ad Hoc Committee. H. On October 25, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the proposed Ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance. I. The Request for City Council Action for this Ordinance dated November 16 and December 7, 2021 and duly signed by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency shall, by this reference, be incorporated herein, and together with this ordinance, any amendments or supplements, and oral testimony, constitute the necessary findings for this ordinance. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed Ordinance falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." Adoption of this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed changes will only modernize, update, and clarify existing affordable and inclusionary housing requirements responding to the current economic and housing trends in the City and will not cause a physical change in the environment. Section 3, Article XVIII.I of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 4. Article XVIII.I. of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby reenacted and amended to read in its entirety as follows: ARTICLE XVIII.I. - 2021 AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND CREATION ORDINANCE City Council 25 — 22 orc45W2022-xxx Page 2 of 17 Sec. 41-1900. Purpose. This article establishes standards and procedures to encourage the development of housing that is affordable to a range of households with varying income levels. The purpose of this article is to encourage the development and availability of affordable housing by requiring the inclusion of affordable housing units within new developments when the number of units exceed the densities permitted under the general plan, zoning classification, or the conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. Sec. 41-1901. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Adjusted for household size appropriate for the unit means a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two (2) persons in the case of a one -bedroom unit, three (3) persons in the case of a two -bedroom unit, four (4) persons in the case of a three - bedroom unit, and five (5) persons in the case of a four -bedroom unit. Administrative procedures means those regulations promulgated by the executive director pursuant to section 41-1910 of this article. Affordable housing cost means the total housing costs paid by a qualifying household, which shall not exceed the fraction of gross income specified, as follows: Extremely low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning thirty (30) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Very low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning fifty (50) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning eighty (80) percent of the Orange County median income for family size appropriate for the unit. Moderate -income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning one hundred twenty (120) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. The qualifying limits for extremely low-income, very low-income, low-income and moderate -income households are established and amended annually pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The limits are published by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Base Density means the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre of land within each land use category designated in the General Plan. Developer means any association, corporation, firm, joint venture, partnership, person, or any entity or combination of entities, which seeks city approval for all or part of a residential project. City Council 25 — 23 orc2Y45W2J M-xxx Page 3 of 17 Development agreement means an agreement approved by the city council between a property owner and the city pursuant to Government Code section 65864, et seq. Executive director means the executive director of community development for the city. General plan means the adopted general plan for the City of Santa Ana. Inclusionary housing agreement means a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. Inclusionary housing fund means the fund created by the city in which all fees collected in compliance with this article shall be deposited. Inclusionary housing plan means the plan submitted by the developer, in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. Inclusionary unit means a dwelling unit that will be offered for sale or rent to extremely low, very low, low, or moderate -income households, at an affordable housing cost, in compliance with this article. Low-income units, very low-income units, and extremely low-income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by low, very low, and extremely low-income households, respectively, at an affordable housing cost. Market rate units means dwelling units in a residential project that are not inclusionary units. Moderate -income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by moderate -income households at an affordable housing cost. Regulatory agreement means an agreement entered into between the City of Santa Ana or the Santa Ana Community Development Agency and a developer by which the developer covenants to keep certain housing units at an affordable housing cost for a specified period of time. Rehabilitated units/rehabilitation means the improvement of a unit in substandard condition to a decent, safe and sanitary level. Units are in substandard condition when, while they may be structurally sound, they do not provide safe and adequate shelter, and in their present condition endanger the health, safety or well-being of the occupants. Residential project/project means any of the following: A subdivision resulting in the creation of five (5) or more residential lots or residential condominium units; or The new construction of a project consisting of five (5) or more multi -family units; or The new construction of five (5) or more separate houses or dwelling units; or City Council 25 — 24 Ora 5W24022-xxx Page 4 of 17 The conversion of five (5) or more existing residential rental units to condominium ownership. Target area means that area designated by the city from time to time, on an as -needed basis, as a priority area for rehabilitation due to health and safety concerns. Total housing costs the total monthly or annual recurring expenses required of a household to obtain shelter. For a rental unit, total housing costs shall include the monthly rent payment and utilities paid by the tenant (excluding telephone and television). For an ownership unit, total housing costs shall include the mortgage payment (principal and interest), insurance, homeowners' association dues (if applicable), private mortgage insurance (if applicable), taxes, utilities, an allowance for maintenance and any other related assessments. Sec. 41-1902. Applicability and inclusionary unit requirements. (a) Applicability. The requirements of this article shall apply to any new project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units, including new construction and condominium conversions, which meets one or all of the following applicability thresholds: (1) A change in use to allow for residential or that exceeds the general plan or zoning prescribed densities or percentage of residential development of the subject property at the time of application. (2) Implementation of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development allowed as a result of city initiated zone changes or city initiated general plan amendments after November 28, 2011. (3) Increase of the permitted percentage of residential development allowed for a mixed -use development above the percentage permitted under the zoning classification at the time of application. (4) Development of new residential uses or increase of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development within an overlay zone approved pursuant to Division 28 of Article I of this Chapter. (5) Conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. (b) Applications. The inclusionary requirements shall only apply to the incremental units beyond that which is allowed as prescribed in Subsection (a) above. (c) Units for sale. If the new residential project consists of units for sale, then a minimum of five (5) percent of the total number of units in the project shall be sold to moderate -income households. (d) Rental units. If the new residential project consists of rental units, the inclusionary units shall be constructed as follows: City Council 25 — 25 orQ"2022-xxx Page 5 of 17 (1) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the units shall be rented to low-income households, or (2) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be rented to very low-income households, or (3) A minimum of five (5) percent shall be rented to extremely low-income households, or (4) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be available at an affordable housing cost of which five (5) percent rented to low-income households, three (3) percent rented to very low-income households, and two (2) percent rented to extremely low-income households. (e) Rounding of quantities in calculations. In calculating the required number of inclusionary units, fractional units shall be rounded -up to the next whole unit. The developer may choose to pay an in -lieu fee set forth in section 41-1904(c) for the fractional units, which shall be calculated based on the number of habitable square feet applicable in each case. (f) Displacement of existing inclusionary units. Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, any residential project subject to this article that results in the displacement of extremely low, very low and/or low-income household(s) shall be required to provide on - site inclusionary units as required by this article. (g) Compliance with article. All inclusionary units required by this article shall be sold or rented in compliance with this article. Sec. 41-1903. Exempt projects. The following are exempt from the requirements of this article: (a) Development agreements. A residential project that is the subject of a development agreement under applicable provisions of the California Government Code that expressly provides for an exclusion to this article, provides for a different amount of inclusionary units, or provides for a different specified method for determining the in -lieu fee provisions of this ordinance, such as the timing of payment or the point in time for determining the applicable in -lieu fee amount, to satisfy the inclusionary units from that specified by this article. (b) Project with regulatory agreement. A residential project for which a regulatory agreement has been approved, provided that the regulatory agreement is effective at the time the residential project would otherwise be required to comply with the requirements of this article, and there is no uncured breach of the regulatory agreement before issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. This may include a residential project that has City Council 25 — 26 orQ"2022-xxx Page 6 of 17 obtained a density bonus under article XVI.I of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Such projects cannot be used to satisfy the inclusionary requirement for another project. (c) Adaptive Reuse. Adaptive reuse development projects pursuant to Chapter 41, Article XVI.II - Adaptive Reuse. (d) Development Projects Approved Under the Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 Adopted on September 1, 2020. A development project that has received entitlement approvals by city council action prior to November 16, 2021 to construct new residential units is hereby determined to have vested the right to carry out the completion and construction of the project under the regulations and provisions of Ordinance No. NS- 2994. The vested regulations and provisions in accordance with this section shall terminate if any or all of the entitlement approvals become invalid for any reasons or have expired under the various applicable time limits established in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. A list of these projects and the vested right(s) under Ordinance No. NS-2994 are attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference. Sec. 41-1904. Options to satisfy inclusionary requirements. (a) On -site units. The primary means of complying with the inclusionary requirements of this article shall be the provision of on -site inclusionary units in accordance with section 41-1902 above. A developer may only satisfy the requirements of this article by means of an alternative to on -site inclusionary units in accordance with the requirements and procedures of this section. (b) Off -site units. (1) New units. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by constructing the required new inclusionary housing at a different location within the city borders at the ratio of one square foot of habitable inclusionary unit space for each required habitable square foot. While the total habitable square footage area of the required new inclusionary units must be the same as the sum - total of the number of habitable square feet for the project as directed by this ordinance, the number of units and bedrooms associated with the off -site units may be approved by the review authority of the city, consistent with the type of affordable housing needed at the time of project review. (2) Rehabilitated units outside a designated target area. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of the city at a rate of one and one-half (1'/2) habitable square feet per each required habitable square foot of inclusionary units. (3) Rehabilitated units within a designated target area. Upon application, the developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of City Council 25 — 27 orQ"2022-xxx Page 7 of 17 the city at a rate of one habitable square foot per each required habitable square foot of affordable inclusionary units. (c) In -lieu fee. (1) Five (5) or more units. For a residential project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units, the developer may elect to satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part, by payment of a fee in -lieu of constructing some or all of the required units. The total amount of the fee allowed by this section shall be calculated using the In -Lieu Fee Schedule in section 41-1904(c)(1)(i) multiplied by the sum total of the number of habitable square feet within the entire project, as measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways. (i) In -Lieu Fee Schedule Units/Lots Fee Per Square Foot of Habitable Area 5-9 $6.00 10 — 14 $9.00 15 — 19 $12.00 20 or more $15.00 (ii) Local Skilled and Trained Workforce. The use of a local skilled and trained workforce shall be phased in over time and shall only apply to a development project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units opting to exercise the in -lieu fee payment option. The implementation of this subsection shall be phased as follows: (A) Between November 16, 2021 and December 31, 2025, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 per square foot in -lieu fee amount shall not be required to utilize a local skilled and trained workforce for completing the construction of the project. However, this fee shall be reduced if the developer provides the City with an executed enforceable commitment to use a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Workforce Fee Per Square Foot of Habitable Area 30% of workforce utilizing 2 or more construction $10.00 trades 60% of workforce utilizing 3 or more construction $5.00 trades City Council 25 — 28 orQY455�20M-xxx Page 8 of 17 A minimum of 20% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (B) Effective January 1, 2026 and thereafter, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 per square foot in - lieu fee amount shall be required to provide the City with an executed enforceable commitment that 30 percent of the workforce utilized to complete the construction of the project be derived from a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601; and that a minimum of 35 percent of the required skilled and trained workforce total work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. This fee shall be reduced when the developer commits to a higher utilization level as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Fee Per Square Foot of Workforce Habitable Area 60% of workforce $10.00 90% of workforce $5.00 minimum of 35% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (2) Timing of payment. The total fee amount for the entirety of a project is calculated, determined, and set at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the project. All in -lieu fees allowed by this section shall be paid no later than prior to issuance of the first occupancy approval for any construction which adds net residential units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required fee shall be paid within each phase of the residential project. The in -lieu fees collected by the city are city funds over which the city has complete and absolute discretion. (3) Inclusionary housing fund. Fees collected in compliance with this section shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. (4) The provisions of Section 41-1904(c)(1) may only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least five (5) members of the City Council. Sec. 41-1904.1. Inclusionary housing development incentives for production of units. (a) In order to make the production of new inclusionary units on -site or off -site or off - site rehabilitated units, certain incentives, standards and concessions shall be allowed City Council 25 — 29 orc2Y4 2J022-xxx Page 9 of 17 and prescribed as set forth herein below. Such concessions shall not be available to those developers that choose to pay an in lieu fee rather than build the units. The developer may opt to take advantage of up to two (2) concessions among the following possible concessions: (1) Parking concession. One on -site parking space for each zero to one bedroom unit; two (2) on -site parking spaces for each two (2) to three (3) bedroom unit; two and one-half (2'/2) parking spaces for each four (4) or more bedroom unit. (2) Concession on one of the following Zoning Code site development standards: (i) Setback reduction of up to twenty-five (25) percent reduction on subject property; (ii) Height increase of up to twenty (20) additional feet. (b) A developer of a for sale residential project proposing to provide on -site moderate income units and a surrounding community benefit may opt to take advantage of up to three (3) of the above concessions. The surrounding community benefit will include but not be limited to park improvements, urban community gardens, developer -funded down payment assistance, or subsidy of services, activities or programs. (1) Local Density Bonus. For each 1 percent increase above 5 percent in the percentage of for -sale units affordable to moderate income households, the base density shall be increased by 1.5 percent up to a maximum of 35 percent. Sec. 41-1905. Housing plan and housing agreement. (a) Submittal and execution. The developer shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Inclusionary housing plan. The developer shall submit an inclusionary housing plan in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. The inclusionary housing plan and its supportive documents, plans, and details shall be submitted at the same time as the site plan and application materials for the original project. All inclusionary housing plans shall be subject to the approval of the executive director and subject to appeal processes and procedures set forth in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 2) Inclusionary housing agreement. The developer shall execute and cause to be recorded an inclusionary housing agreement. The inclusionary housing agreement shall be a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, executed by the city manager, or his or her designee, and in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. (b) Discretionary approvals. No discretionary approval shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article until the developer has submitted an inclusionary housing plan. City Council 25 — 30 orc245W24022-xxx Page 10 of 17 (c) Issuance of building permit. No building permit shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the executive director has approved the inclusionary housing plan, and any required inclusionary housing agreement has been recorded. (d) Issuance of certificate of occupancy. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the approved inclusionary housing plan has been fully implemented. Sec. 41-1906. Standards. (a) Location within project, relationship to non-inclusionary units. All inclusionary units shall be: (1) Reasonably dispersed throughout the residential project; (2) Proportional, in number of bedrooms, gross floor area of habitable space, and location, to the market rate units; (3) Comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of design, materials, finished quality, and appearance; and (4) Permitted the same access to project amenities and recreational facilities, as are market rate units. (b) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (c) Location outside the proposed original project. For projects where the developer proposes to either produce new inclusionary units or rehabilitate existing off -site units to meet the inclusionary affordable housing requirements of this ordinance, the off -site project(s) containing the required inclusionary units shall be subject to the following requirements: (1) The sum -total area (in habitable square feet) of all the newly constructed off -site inclusionary units shall be the same number of habitable square feet of inclusionary area as required by this ordinance. For the purpose of the calculation of the number of square feet of required inclusionary housing, the total gross habitable square feet of the housing units of the original market rate project shall be used, as measured from exterior walls to exterior walls of the market units provided as the base for calculation. The common areas, exterior hallways, stairways, patios, and balconies shall not be calculated in determining the number of required square feet of inclusionary housing production. All new or rehabilitated units must meet all current zoning and general plan standards. City Council 25 — 31 orQM'&2,g22-xxx Page 11 of 17 (2) While the total number of square feet of inclusionary housing requirement is calculated based on the requirements of this ordinance, the number of units, bedrooms and other amenities on the proposed off -site inclusionary housing location shall be approved by the review authority commensurate with the size and type of units most in demand at the time of submittal of the application. (3) Any off -site affordable inclusionary housing project shall be substantially comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of quality of design, materials and finishes. (4) If tenants are displaced due to rehabilitation of housing to meet the inclusionary unit requirement, the developer shall be responsible for relocation costs as required by state law. (5) No city, housing authority, or public funds, subsidies, or participation of any kind shall be expended on the production or building of any inclusionary housing projects associated with meeting the inclusionary unit requirement. (d) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project or proposed off -site new inclusionary units or rehabilitated units shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (e) Units for sale. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A unit for sale shall be restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for a minimum of fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of purchasers. The developer and all subsequent owners of an inclusionary unit offered for sale shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of the purchaser and that such owners will live in such inclusionary unit as their primary residence. (3) Resale price control. In order to maintain the availability of inclusionary units required by this article, the resale price of an owner occupied inclusionary unit shall be limited to the lesser of the fair market value of the unit as established by a licensed real estate agent based upon three (3) comparable properties or the restricted resale price. For these purposes, the restricted resale price shall be the applicable affordable housing cost. (4) Inheritance of inclusionary units. Upon the death of an owner of an owner - occupied inclusionary unit, title in the property may transfer to the surviving joint tenant or heir (in the case of the death of a sole owner or all owners of the household). City Council 25 — 32 orQM'&2,g22-xxx Page 12 of 17 (5) Forfeiture. If an inclusionary unit for sale is sold for an amount in excess of the resale price controls required by this section, the buyer and the seller shall be jointly and severally liable to the city for the amount in excess of the affordable housing cost at the time of such sale of the inclusionary unit. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. Notwithstanding the foregoing, city may allow the buyer and seller to cure any violation of the resale price controls within one hundred eighty (180) days. (f) Rental units. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A rental inclusionary unit shall remain restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of renters. The owner of any rental inclusionary unit shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of all members of the household above the age of eighteen (18) at the time of the initial rental and annually thereafter. (3) Forfeiture. Any lessor who leases an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit to the city all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (g) Execution and recording of documents. The executive director may require the execution and recording of whatever documents are required to ensure enforcement of this section; including, but not limited to, promissory notes, deeds of trust, resale restrictions, rights of first refusal, options to purchase, and/or other documents, which shall be recorded against all inclusionary units. (h) General prohibitions. (1) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit at a price or rent in excess of the maximum amount allowed by any restriction placed on the unit in accordance with this article. (2) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit to a person or persons that do not meet the income restrictions placed on the unit in accordance with this article. (3) No person shall provide false or materially incomplete information to the city or to a seller or lessor of an inclusionary unit to obtain occupancy of housing for which that person is not eligible. (i) Principal residency requirement. 1. The owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall reside in the unit for not less than ten (10) out of every twelve (12) months. City Council 25 — 33 orQM'&2022-xxx Page 13 of 17 2. No owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall lease or sublease, as applicable, an inclusionary unit without the prior permission of the executive director. Sec. 41-1907. Reserved. Sec. 41-1908. Enforcement. (a) Violation. Any violation of this article constitutes a misdemeanor. (b) Forfeiture of funds. Any individual who sells an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit any money in excess of the affordable housing cost at such time. Any individual who rents an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (c) Legal actions. The city may institute any appropriate legal actions or proceedings necessary to ensure compliance with this article, including actions: (1) To disapprove, revoke, or suspend any permit, including a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or discretionary approval; and (2) For injunctive relief or damages. (d) Recovery of costs. In any action to enforce this article, or an inclusionary housing agreement recorded hereunder, the city shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Sec. 41-1909. Inclusionary housing fund. (a) Inclusionary housing fund. There is hereby established a separate fund of the city, to be known as the inclusionary housing fund. All monies collected pursuant to this article shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. Additional monies from other sources may be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. The monies deposited in the inclusionary housing fund shall be subject to the following conditions: (1) Monies deposited into the inclusionary housing fund must be used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate, low, very low, and extremely low income households in the city as specified in the city's affordable housing funds policies and procedures. A priority will be on the creation of affordable housing opportunities or units from the existing market rate housing stock rather than construction of new affordable housing units and on the creation of new affordable housing opportunities for large families currently living in the City. This includes, but is not limited to, the purchase and rehabilitation of units for sale. Monies may also be used to pay for one-time programs for code enforcement, quality of life and general health and safety activities. Monies may also be used to cover reasonable administrative or related expenses associated with the administration of this article. (2) The fund shall be administered by the executive director, or his or her designee, who may develop procedures in the city's affordable housing funds policies and City Council 25 — 34 Ora 5W24022-xxx Page 14 of 17 procedures to implement the purposes of the inclusionary housing fund consistent with the requirements of this article and any adopted budget of the city. (3) Monies deposited in accordance with this section shall be used in accordance with the affordable housing funds policies and procedures, housing element, consolidated plan, or subsequent plan adopted by the city council to construct, rehabilitate, or subsidize affordable housing or to recapture affordable housing at risk of market conversion, or to assist other government entities, private organizations, or individuals to do so. Permissible uses include, but are not limited to, assistance to housing development corporations, equity participation loans, grants, pre -home ownership co - investment, pre -development loan funds, participation leases, or other public -private partnership arrangements. The inclusionary housing fund may be used for the benefit of both rental and owner -occupied housing. (4) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund shall implement a local preference in their resident selection criteria and marketing policies meeting guidelines established by the executive director. (5) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund, as well as its contractors and subcontractors at every tier performing work for the new housing units is encouraged to negotiate in good faith to provide the City with an enforceable commitment that a minimum 30% of the labor utilizing 2 or more construction trades be performed by a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project. If so provided, a minimum of 35% of such labor for the project shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. Sec. 41-1910. Administrative. (a) In -lieu fee calculation. The amount per square foot of the inclusionary housing in - lieu fee shall be subject to city council review and consideration as needed. (b) Administration fees. The council may by resolution establish reasonable fees and deposits for the administration of this article including an annual monitoring fee and an inclusionary housing plan submittal fee. (c) Monitoring/audits. At the time of initial occupancy, and annually thereafter, the city will monitor the project to ensure that the income verifications are correct and in compliance with the inclusionary housing administrative procedures. For ownership units, the city shall monitor to verify that owner -occupancy requirements are maintained. Developer/property owners are required to cooperate with the city in promptly providing all information requested by the city in monitoring compliance with program requirements. The city will conduct periodic random quality control audits of inclusionary units to ensure compliance with rules and requirements. Such audits may include verification of continued occupancy in inclusionary units by eligible tenants, compliance with the City Council 25 — 35 orQM1&2,g22-xxx Page 15 of 17 inclusionary housing plan and agreement, and physical inspections of the residential project. (e) Administrative procedures. The city manager is hereby authorized and directed to promulgate administrative procedures for the implementation of this article. Secs. 41-1911-41-1999. Reserved. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2021. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:_% John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Vicente Sarmiento Mayor City Council 25 — 36 orc24C5W2l022-xxx Page 16 of 17 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 25 — 37 0rQM'&2022-xxx Page 17 of 17 EXHIBIT A 2021 List of Entitled Projects Vested Under the Regulations and Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 The development projects listed in Table 1 have received entitlement approvals by Planning Commission and/or City Council action prior to November 16, 2021, to construct new residential units and are hereby determined to have vested the right to carry out the completion and construction of the project under the regulations and provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 (HOO). The vested regulations and provisions shall automatically terminate if any or all of the entitlement approvals become invalid for any reasons or have expired under the various applicable time limits established in the Santa Ana Municipal Code or any applicable State Covid-19 pandemic relief or other applicable time extension provisions. Ordinance No. NS-2994 is incorporated herein by reference. Table 1. Entitled Projects Vested Under the Regulations and Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 No. Project Address Project Name Number of HOO Compliance Requirements Dwelling Units 1. 1122 N. Bewley Street Bewley Townhomes 10 Provide inclusionary units as required under NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 2. 301 N. Mountain View Street Mountain View 8 Provide inclusionary units as required by Townhomes NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 3. 200 N. Cabrillo Park Drive The Madison 260 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 4. 1109 N. Broadway One Broadway Plaza 415 $15/sf in -lieu payment under a project Mutual Declaration 5. 3025 W. Edinger Avenue Haphan Townhomes 17 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 6. 2800 N. Main Street/Specific MainPlace Mall 1,900 Provide inclusionary units as required by Plan No. 4 Transformation 1,900 NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf residential units 7. 419 N. Harbor Boulevard Fifth and Harbor 94 Provide inclusionary units as required by (previously 421 N. Harbor Mixed Use Apartments NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf Boulevard) 8. 3417 W. Fifth Street West Fifth Villas 8 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf The development projects listed in Table 2 have received entitlement approvals by Planning Commission or City Council action prior to November 16, 2021, but did not trigger H00 provisions and have been identified herein for implementation clarity. Table 2. Entitled Projects Not Triggering HOO requirements No. Project Address Project Name Number of Dwelling Units HOO Compliance Requirements 1. 201 W. Third Street 3rd and Broadway 171 H00 provisions not applicable to project 2. 409 E. Fourth Street and 509 E. Fourth Street 4th and Mortimer 169 H00 provisions not applicable to project 3. 1801 E. Fourth Street Central Pointe 644 HOO provisions not applicable to project 4. 200 E. First American Way Legado at the Met 278 HOO provisions not applicable to project 5. 114 E. Fifth Street and 115 E. Fifth Street Rafferty (4t" + Main) 220 HOO provisions not applicable to project City Council 25 — 38 2/15/2022 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 26 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report February 15, 2022 TOPIC: EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing - Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa Ana General Plan Update RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution certifying Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 (SCH No. 2020029087), including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06. 3. Adopt a resolution of findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION & BACKGROUND At its regular meeting on November 8, 2021, and after receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03, including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; approve General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06; and approve findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. DISCUSSION At the direction of the Mayor and City Council in late 2015, the Planning Division began efforts to complete a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan. The General Plan City Council 26 — 1 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 2 is a state mandated document that includes goals, policies, implementation measures and maps that will guide Santa Ana's physical growth for the next 25 years. The State of California requires every city to prepare and adopt "a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city, and any land outside its boundaries which is in the planning agency's judgement bears relation to its planning." The role of the General Plan is often referred to as the "Constitution of the City" as it serves as the guiding document by which all land use related decisions must be derived. The City's current General Plan (with the exception of the Housing Element) was last comprehensively adopted in 1982 and is now 39 years old. The General Plan establishes a community vision and strategies to guide growth, change and community preservation within the City, providing goals and policies to enhance, preserve and protect the unique qualities that the Santa Ana community values. The General Plan is the single -most important tool used to guide communities achieve their vision. As the General Plan is a policy document, it differs from the Zoning Code in that the Zoning Code is a regulatory implementation document which will identify specific development standards (setbacks, parking, open space etc.) for each parcel in the City. Upon adoption of the General Plan, staff will begin the process to complete a comprehensive update to the Zoning Code to implement the land use policies of the General Plan and to ensure consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Code. The comprehensive update to the General Plan document, known as "Golden City Beyond — A Shared Vision for Santa Ana," is comprised of two separate documents: • The General Plan (comprised of three Sections and 12 Elements) • Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report At the Planning Commission public hearing on November 9, 2020, concern was voiced regarding the City's need to address existing and future need for park and recreation resources, environmental health concerns, and broadening the community outreach to environmental justice (EJ) communities. Through the 2021 EJ community outreach described below, and collaboration with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and interests parties; a number of Draft General Plan (August 2021) policies and programs were modified. These modifications, minor corrections to text and maps, and refinement to better align general plan land use density/ intensity with existing zoning were provided at the November 8, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, and incorporated into the December 2021 Draft General Plan. Exhibit 4 provides Clarifications to the General Plan related to aligning the proposed general plan land use intensity with the existing zoning, and other minor modifications, that have been incorporated in the December 2021. Additionally, other text corrections and implementation timeframes have been revised due to the delay in the adoption in the General Plan Update. City Council 26 — 2 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 3 Community Engagement The City's General Plan is a community -wide vision document that is intended to address and respond to community needs. As such, the comprehensive update to the General Plan required staff to advertise and educate community members about the process to as wide an audience as possible. Over the past six years, an extensive public outreach campaign was conducted to meaningfully engage the public and gather feedback and direction to create the vision for the future of Santa Ana and guide the update of the plan. These public outreach efforts included: • Over 60 community meetings and workshops • Individual community workshops within each of the five Focus Areas with over 300 residents, business leaders, and community stakeholders participating in the workshops. • Distribution of an online community survey with over 650 respondents to collect input on the content of the General Plan • Approximately 44,000 direct mailers sent to property owners and tenants in Focus Areas • Development of a multi lingual videos on the General Plan Update • A dedicated webpage (santa-ana.org/general-plan) with continuous updates on the General Plan update process and related documents as well as information about Environmental Justice. Also includes an online web learning tool with a narrated presentation to help educate and increase awareness on Environmental Justice issues. • Presentations at neighborhood Communication Linkages (Com-Link) meetings • Meetings with Environmental Justice groups and roundtables (Madison Park Neighborhood Association, Logan Neighborhood Association, Artesia-Pilar Neighborhood Association, Orange County Environmental Justice) • Attendance at approximately 100 CARES events (in neighborhoods and evening City Park events) from late -August through the end of October within Environmental Justice communities to discuss the General plan update with residents • Planning Commission study sessions, most recently on April 12th, August 9th, August 23rd and September 13th • City Council study sessions • One-on-one meetings with the Planning Commission and City Council General Plan Advisory Group Following direction from the City Council in 2015 to comprehensively update the General Plan, a 17-member General Plan Advisory Group (GPAG) was established to provide guidance to City staff and the consultant team early in the process. Building on the feedback from the prior community outreach, the GPAG was critical in developing goals and policies City Council 26 — 3 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 4 that would serve as the foundation of the General Plan elements. The GPAG was also tasked with functions such as formulating a community vision, identifying area -wide and community -wide land use planning issues, and prioritizing economic development activities. The GPAG was comprised of representatives from various commissions, residents, business owners, interest groups, youth and property owners to represent the community's interests. The GPAG held several meetings through 2016, providing direction to staff on key matters that are now embodied in the updated General Plan. Environmental Justice Focus As directed by Planning Commission public hearing on November 9, 2020, additional outreach was conducted to further provide Santa Ana's disadvantaged communities, or "environmental justice (EJ) communities", an opportunity to share their experiences and issues regarding environmental health and quality of life. Thus, Planning staff facilitated a multi -faceted outreach campaign during January through May 2021. The campaign began with the gathering of a General Plan Outreach Roundtable, with representatives from community serving organizations, neighborhood associations, and local stakeholders providing ideas and feedback on tools and strategies that could be used to effectively engage as many community members as possible. This effort included a multilingual EJ Survey (electronic and hard copy), which was publicized on various social media platforms, neighborhood yard signs, and collaboration with community groups and neighborhood leaders. Ten virtual community forums were held due to COVID-19; each focusing in on listening to the lived experiences of residents, property owners, and community stakeholders within specific geographic areas in the city that are identified as "EJ communities." Trilingual (English, Spanish and Vietnamese) flyers encouraging participation in the 10 community forums and EJ survey were mailed to over 40,000 property owners and residents/occupant within Santa Ana's EJ communities. Finally, in August 2021 one in -person EJ forum was held to share the results of the EJ survey and proposed general plan policy and program refinements, as well as to host a panel discussion with local EJ "champions" such a Madison Park, OCEJ and the Orange County Water District. PROPOSED 2020-2045 GENERAL PLAN — SANTA ANA: GOLDEN CITY BEYOND Development of Core Values A variety of community issues and considerations were identified through the different community outreach activities. With this community input, and with the input of the GPAG, a Draft General Plan Policy Framework was created in December 2018. Included within the Framework was a set of Community "Core Values" that were created to collectively reflect the voice of the Santa Ana community and to express its environmental justice principals. These Core Values: Health, Equity, Sustainability, Culture and Education, serve as the foundation of the goals, policies and implementation items found throughout the General Plan Elements. City Council 26 — 4 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 5 Communitv Vision Statement Through a robust dialogue with the community, including residents, business and property owners, and other interested citizens, a long-term General Plan Vision Statement was crafted. This Vision Statement is not only the foundation for the updated General Plan, but also for all long-term decision making in the City. The Vision Statement memorializes the community's aspirations and describes the "Santa Ana — Golden City Beyond" as embracing the following principles: • Protect and enhance our cultural and community assets • Create a land use pattern that promotes healthy and active lifestyles • Ensure equitable outcomes and land use distributions • Create a sustainable and livable city • Promote lifelong education and prosperity Format and Content of the General Plan The proposed General Plan is a comprehensive update and reorganization of the current General Plan Document, with the exception of Housing Element. The Housing Element is on a State mandated eight -year cycle and is being updated independently of this effort to comply with State law. The State mandated elements (Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, Conservation, Noise, Safety and Housing) and optional elements are organized into three Sections: Services and Infrastructure (Section 1) o Community Element o Mobility Element o Economic Prosperity Element o Public Services Element • Natural Environment (Section 11) o Conservation Element o Open Space Element o Noise Element o Safety Element • Built Environment (Section III) o Land Use Element o Historic Preservation Element o Housing Element (Undergoing standalone update process) o Urban Design Element City Council 26 — 5 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 6 Senate Bill 1000 was signed into law in 2016 requires cities to identify "environmental justice" or "disadvantaged communities" within their jurisdiction as part of the general plan process. This law has several purposes, including facilitating transparency and public engagement in local governments' planning and decision -making processes, and to identify objectives and policies to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities that prioritize improvements and programs to address the needs of disadvantaged communities. It also requires that cities promote equitable access to health - inducing benefits, such as healthy food options, housing, public facilities, and recreation. Given that the environmental justice issues touches all aspects and all elements of the General Plan, it was determined early in the process that the best fit for the City is to incorporate environmental justice policies woven into the fabric of the various Elements. To identify for the public and the reader, a unique identifying logo consisting of a colored tile with the letters "Eq" in the center and "EX in the upper right corner has been incorporated into the various General Plan policies and implementation measures that address environmental justice concerns in the City. Additionally, the City prepared optional elements based on the input from the community to address special and unique community priorities. These elements include the Community, Economic Prosperity, Public Services, Historic Preservation, and Urban Design elements. Outlined below is an overview of the 11 Elements that are being updated, excluding the Housing Element as mentioned previously: Community Element. The Community Element is a new element of the Santa Ana General Plan. The element reinforces the city's values of recreation, culture, education, health and wellness, and cultivates opportunities for improved quality of life for all residents. The goals and policies of this element can be realized through partnerships with local agencies and organizations on facilities, activities and events throughout Santa Ana This Element functions in tandem with other elements of the General Plan, such as Open Space, which contains policies related to parks and recreation facilities. Several plans and programs implemented by the City and other agencies and organizations overlap with the goals and policies of this Element, such as the Community Arts and Culture Master Plan, which establishes goals and strategies on topics such as cultural equity, infrastructure for the arts, communitywide access, youth programming, and place making. There are 3 goals, 28 policies and 18 implementation items associated with this element. This element is not mandated by State law and is an optional element. Mobility Element. The Mobility Element, known as the Circulation Element in the current General Plan, is the City's blueprint for moving people, goods, and resources throughout the community. Moving beyond mere functionality, the City seeks to improve the quality of life in Santa Ana by providing more complete streets, offering ways to be more active, and conserving natural resources. In planning the City's transportation system for the City Council 26 — 6 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 7 21st Century, the City is also making the community safer, more affordable, and more livable. Santa Ana envisions a balanced multimodal transportation system that supports community values. These values include a vibrant local economy, healthy neighborhoods, health and wellness, and an attractive environment. Context sensitive design solutions strengthen the livability, vitality and safety of our neighborhoods, districts, and corridors. There are 5 goals, 46 policies and 45 implementation items associated with this Element. This Element is one of the State mandated elements. Economic Prosperity Element. The Economic Prosperity Element, identified as the Economic Development in the existing General Plan, will ensure Santa Ana's local economy. The Element defines Santa Ana's role in the broader regional economy, expands, maintains, and enhances job opportunities, attracts and retains a balance of business types, provides sufficient revenue for public services, and contributes to the overall quality of life experienced by the City's residents. The goals and policies of this Element will inform and guide decisions across local government. The City intends that its allocation of resources, the operation of its agencies, and the application of its regulatory authority will grow and diversify the local economy. The City further intends that local economic growth and diversification will reduce poverty, increase overall prosperity, improve health and wellness outcomes, expand housing opportunities, and increase quality of life choices available to City residents. There are 4 goals, 39 policies and 31 implementation items associated with this Element. This Element is not a State mandated element. Public Services Element. The Public Services Element, identified as the Public Facilities Element in the current General Plan, provides Santa Ana's diverse population with quality services and infrastructure, including accessible public facilities and enhanced public safety. Anticipated growth will require the City to fulfill community needs and to ensure proper management of those needs. It is important that public facilities and services are equitably distributed and maintained at sustainable levels throughout the community. A wide range of City entities and external agencies work closely together to provide the full spectrum of services and facilities. There are 3 goals, 38 policies and 40 implementation items associated with this element. This Element is an optional General Plan Element. Conservation Element. The protection and management of Santa Ana's air, water, and energy resources are essential for a healthy, sustainable and equitable path forward. Additionally, the preservation of the remaining stretches of undisturbed plant and wildlife environment, such as in Santiago Park, is important to residents. The Conservation Element identifies the community's natural resources and illustrates the benefits for retention, enhancement, and development of these resources towards City Council 26 — 7 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 8 improving quality of life and the environment as a whole. This Element will guide the City in its efforts to prioritize sustainability and enhance the environment for current and future generations. The Core Values reinforce the City's commitment to enable all persons to enjoy equal access to healthy environments, healthy food, parks and recreational facilities, and civic engagement opportunities. However, the City recognizes that throughout Santa Ana's communities, some bear a disproportionate burden of pollution and associated health risks. As a result, this element also addresses environmental justice issues within disadvantaged communities, which aims to correct inequity by reducing pollution and increasing public investment in the communities most affected while ensuring their participation and input is considered in decision making -process. There are 4 goals, 39 policies and 39 implementation items associated with this element. This Element is a State mandated Element Open Space Element. Open space is a limited and valuable resource, providing multiple benefits to those living and working in Santa Ana. Open space provides a place of relaxation and reprieve from the urban environment. Open space also offers places to gather, celebrate, learn or exercise, whether alone, with friends or family, or with other members of the community. Open space is so important that its presence or absence can profoundly shape the physical, social, mental and economic health, and overall well- being of the community. The purpose of the Open Space Element is to identify and preserve open space areas that provide value to the community and enrich the quality of life. Such lands or waters provide value in the form of recreation, health, biodiversity, wildlife conservation and aesthetics. Additionally, open spaces are used for climate change, mitigation and adaption, flood risk reduction, managed natural resources production, agricultural production, and protection from hazardous conditions. The Open Space Element will guide the City in its efforts to plan for open space and public parklands in what is largely a built -out, urban environment. Through this element, opportunities for capturing additional open space and public parkland standards in the City is discussed. There are 3 goals, 36 policies and 32implementation items associated with this Element. This Element is a State mandated element. Noise Element. The purpose of the Noise Element is to appraise noise levels in the community, prepare noise contours to guide land use decisions, and establish measures that address current and future noise impacts. This Element works to ensure that the City limits the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels in noise -sensitive areas and at noise -sensitive times of day. This Element works in tandem with other Elements of the General Plan, such as the Mobility Element, which contains policies related to the mitigation of transportation related noise. There are 3 goals, 10 policies and 20 implementation items associated with this Element. This Element is one of the State mandated elements. City Council 26 — 8 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 9 Safety Element. The Safety Element combines the Public Safety and Seismic Safety elements of the existing General Plan into one document. Public health and safety and protection from the risks of natural and human -induced disasters, emergencies, and hazards are vital in establishing a safe and healthy environment for Santa Ana's residents, workers, and visitors. The purpose of the Safety Element is to eliminate and minimize risks associated with natural and human -generated hazards such as floods, earthquakes, and hazardous materials. By assessing and preparing for levels of risk, the City can endure the range of safety hazards and adapt to changes over time. This Element works in tandem with other elements of the General Plan, such as the Public Services Element, which contains goals and policies related to police, fire, and health services, as well as emergency planning and resiliency. There are 4 goals, 24 policies and 27 implementation items associated with this Element. This is a State mandated element. Historic Preservation Element. The Historic Preservation Element is a new element of the Santa Ana General Plan. Santa Ana was incorporated as a city in 1886 and designated the County seat in 1889. Historic preservation of the City's cultural and architectural heritage is an essential part of the City's economic vitality and identity. Residents take pride in the architectural heritage of the City, including its historical buildings and unique neighborhood character. Sites such as the Old Orange County Courthouse, Pacific Substation, Yost Theatre, and the Spurgeon Building reflect the City's rich cultural history and architectural diversity. The purpose of the Historic Preservation Element is to provide guidance in developing and implementing activities that ensure that identification, designation and protection of architectural, historical, cultural and archaeological resources are part of the City's planning, development and permitting processes. Through historic preservation policies and programs, Santa Ana's heritage and diversity will continue to be a source of community pride. There are 3 goals, 21 policies and 28 implementation items associated with this Element. This is an optional element of a General Plan. Land Use Element. The Land Use Element provides a long-range guide for the physical development of the City, reflecting the community's vision for a high quality of life. This Element guides the distribution, location, and size of new development, ensuring that residential neighborhoods are protected, and future growth is sustainable and minimizes potential conflicts. Through its focus on the pattern of land use, this element is also a tool to promote public health, reduce infrastructure costs, enhance local economies, and address long-term environmental issues such as air quality, climate change and water resources. The development, use and distribution of land are critical to achieving the City's vision and adhering to the Core Values. As stewards of the land, the City must plan for uses and development that creates a sustainable, healthy and livable City, ensures equitable City Council 26 — 9 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 10 outcomes and land use distributions, protects and enhances cultural and community assets, and provides opportunities for growth and prosperity. As in other cities, land is a finite and valuable resource. Its use dictates the City's economic and fiscal future. The Land Use Element preserves existing neighborhoods by directing new growth to major corridors and avoids land use changes in existing established neighborhoods. The five growth areas are identified as Focus Areas, and include: South Main Street, Grand /Seventeenth Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard (adjacent to the OC Streetcar line), 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street. The proposed Land Use Element will connect existing planning areas in the City (Transit Zoning Code, Harbor Boulevard Mixed -Use Corridor, Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, etc.,) with the five proposed Focus Areas. Within these Focus Areas, the City anticipates the most potential for major development. A list of the parcels proposed for General Plan land use designation changes are included in Exhibit 7. There are 4 goals, 42 policies and 58 implementation items associated with this element. This is one of the State mandated elements. Urban Design Element. Urban design is the process of shaping the physical character and organization of the City and defining the relationship between people and their environment. It respects the history of a place, considers existing organizational patterns and the form and character of existing buildings, supports healthy outdoor spaces, and is mindful of the natural environment. These considerations unite to define a distinct visual quality and sense of place that reflects community values. The Urban Design Element establishes the long-range vision for the physical development, visual qualities, and sensory experience of the City. This Element, in coordination with other elements of the General Plan, orchestrates a safe, functional and aesthetically pleasing urban environment. Specifically, the Urban Design Element addresses the public realm, building form, and establishes programs and measures to improve the physical setting in which community life takes place while curtailing obsolete, dysfunctional, and chaotic development. There are 7 goals, 50 policies and 30 implementation items associated with this Element. This is an optional element of the General Plan. City Council 26 — 10 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Draft Programs Environment Impact Report (August 2020) The comprehensive update to the General Plan required extensive environmental review. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and after completion of the Initial Study for the project, it was determined that CEQA required the preparation and certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for this project. The purpose of a PEIR is to identify and disclose the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and to indicate the way those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. To determine what potential effects would be caused by the project, the Draft PEIR analyzes issues related to: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Energy; Geology and Soils; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazard and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Mineral Resources; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Recreation; Transportation; Tribal Cultural Resources; and Utilities and Service Systems. The Draft PEIR also studies alternatives to the General Plan Update, as well as direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation of the proposed project. The original Draft PEIR (August 2020) for the General Plan Update (GPU) was prepared and distributed for the required 45-day public review between August 3, 2020, and September 16, 2020. However, due to community request for additional time to review the document, the comment period was extended by an additional 20 days to October 6, 2020. At the public hearing on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission voted to continue the consideration of the GPU and the certification of the Final PEIR (October 2020) to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities. Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (August 2021) In 2021, the City initiated an expanded outreach program focusing on environmental justice and specific community concerns raised in comments received. Pursuant to Draft PEIR comments, the Planning Commission public hearing, and the expanded community outreach program, the City made the decision to prepare a Recirculated Draft PEIR. The Recirculated document concluded that the recreation -related impacts of the proposed GPU would result in a significant impact and defined a new project alternative to reduce these impacts. It also further discussed and evaluated impacts related to environmental justice, including air quality, hazards, and recreation/open space. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, the Recirculated Draft PEIR does not need to include all the topical CEQA sections from the original Draft PEIR. Rather, the Recirculated Draft PEIR (August 2021) updates and supplements only the three topical City Council 26 — 11 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 12 environmental topics of Air Quality, Hazards, and Recreation. The Recirculated Draft PEIR also includes an updated/supplemented Project Alternatives chapter containing a new Reduced Park Demand Alternative to reduce the significant recreation impacts associated with the proposed GPU, as well as an additional mitigation measure and reference to General Plan policy and implementation action refinements. The Recirculated Draft PEIR incorporates the previous Draft PEIR by reference, as appropriate. In particular, the previous Draft PEIR document and its appendices are referenced for long and/or technical descriptions of the environmental setting that remain applicable to the updated GPU. Three project alternatives were analyzed within the Final PEIR (October 2020) document. These included a no project alternative, where the existing General Plan document would remain in effect (Alternative 1); a reduced intensity alternative with two focus areas (55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol Street) would be reduced to approximately 50 percent of the maximum densities allowed by their respective land use designation (Alternative 2); and build out of the site to be consistent with the Southern California's Association of Regional Government's (SCAG) RTP/SCS projections, which could result in an approximate 75 percent reduction in both the number of allowable units and commercial/industrial square footage (Alternative 3). The Recirculated Draft PEIR (August 2021) introduces a reduced park demand project (Alternative 4) that reduces residential growth by 11,225 units by eliminating or reducing residential land uses and intensity in the five focus areas. Overall, nonresidential square footage would be reduced by a total of approximately 2.8 million square feet within the focus areas compared to the proposed GPU. New residential growth under this alternative would largely be in currently planned areas that are generally near a number of existing park facilities, with some residential growth would be introduced into two focus areas at substantially lower intensities to reduce the potential impact on park facilities. As required, the Draft Recirculated PEIR (August 2021) was circulated for public review between August 6, 2021 and September 20, 2021, with the Notice of Availability (NOA) instructing reviewers to only submit comments on the three revised chapters included in the Recirculated Draft PEIR. The comments in the original Final PEIR adequately address comments received on portions of the Draft PEIR that have not been recirculated. During the review and comment period, staff held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Recirculated PEIR and a work-study session with the Planning Commission on September 13, 2021. The Draft PEIR (August 2020), Final PEIR (October 2020), and Final Recirculated PEIR including all report appendices, are posted on the City's website. https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan The City has evaluated the comments received from persons and agencies for both the Draft PEIR (August 2020) and Recirculated Draft PEIR (August 2021), and completed City Council 26 — 12 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 13 detailed Response to Comments, revisions to the Draft documents including clarifications and/or corrections to typographical errors, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The MMRP contains mitigation measures to address impacts to air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, tribal cultural resources, and recreation. The response to comments, MMRP and Final PEIR were published on November 2, 2021 for public review. The Draft PEIR (August 2020) and Draft Recirculated PEIR (August 2021) responses to comments document, revisions to the Draft PEIR, and the MMRP constitute the Final PEIR for the project. The Final Recirculated PEIR identifies six significant and unavoidable impacts associated with this project, which pertain to Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, Population and Housing, and Recreation. City of Santa Ana is within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). Air quality in the Basin is already significantly impacted and even without any new projects, air quality issues are beyond mitigation. The impact to air quality as a result of General Plan implementation falls into two categories: Operational Emissions impacts which are project specific and cumulative; and Localized Criterial Pollutant and Toxic Air Contaminants JAC) Impacts which are related to increased density and proximity of residential land uses to transit and commercial centers. Cultural Resource impacts result from the proposed General Plan allowing development in areas that have historic resources identified by previous cultural resource surveys, with development in these areas potentially causing the disturbance of historic resources in the plan area. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) impacts are project specific and cumulative. They are attributed to ongoing operational impacts of potential future businesses. The threshold for GHG would exceed established ratios thresholds under Executive Order S-03-05. Noise impacts are also project specific and cumulative. They are attributed to ongoing operational impacts of potential future businesses, as well as the location of sensitive receptors in relationship to noise generating activities. Further, buildout of the General Plan update would expose residents to projects generating traffic noise. Population and housing impacts associated with the General Plan buildout related to the anticipated growth both in population and housing units would exceed the Orange County Council of Government projections by up to 38 percent, with no feasible mitigation measure to address the issue. Finally, Recreation impacts from the proposed General Plan may result in substantial physical deterioration of recreational resources and the need to construct or expand City's public parks and recreational facilities to address existing and future demand. City Council 26 — 13 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 14 CEQA allows lead agencies to approve projects despite having significant and unavoidable impacts by adopting a statement of overriding considerations. A statement of overriding considerations documents the reasons why an agency chose to approve a project despite its significant and unavoidable impacts based on range of balancing factors, including economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits conveyed by project. City staff is recommending adoption of a statement of overriding consideration for the General Plan and its implementation actions. In this instance, the economic, social, and other benefits of the General Plan implementation collectively outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts noted above. Such benefits include the implementation of policies and programs preserving and enhancing community character, increasing community sustainability, providing high -quality and diverse housing opportunities, increasing economic vitality via new and business creation, supporting technological advancements, and maintaining compliance with current law. The acceptance of the noted significant and unavoidable impacts does not mean the City will forego efforts to mitigate the impacts to extent feasible. In addition, future projects will be subject to the discretionary review procedures through which the City will consider project specific environmental impacts and/or subject to regulations to offset impacts. As these reviews occur, decision makers will be updated on the status of application mitigation measures when making decision on such projects. Public notices for the City Council public hearing were mailed to interested parties, as well as property owners and occupants/tenants in the five Land Use Focus Area and a 500-foot radius from the Focus Area boundaries. In addition, a newspaper posting was published in the Orange County Reporter on November 26, 2021. Airport Land Use Commission Review The proposed changes to the Land Use Element to adopt the South Bristol and the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Areas required the General Plan update to be presented to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for a determination of consistency with their Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP). On October 15th, 2020 the ALUC determined that the General Plan update conflicts with the goals and objectives of the AELUP and voted 5:0 to find the General Plan update inconsistent with their plan. As a result, on October 16th, 2020, at a special City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to file a Notice of Intent to Overrule the ALUC's determination. The draft City Council resolution for overruling the ALUC's determination has been attached at Exhibit 8. Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the City Council certifying Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 (SCH No. 2020029087), including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and City Council 26 — 14 2/15/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update February 15, 2022 Page 15 adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and adopt a resolution of findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. EIR Resolution, including Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) 2. General Plan Amendment Resolution 3. General Plan 2045 — Santa Ana Beyond Link (December 2021) 4. Clarifications to Draft General Plan 5. Final Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Link 6. Planning Commission staff report, exhibits, presentation, and written public comments of November 8, 2021 are incorporated herein by reference and can be viewed at the following link: Item - PrimeGov Portal 7. List of Parcel with General Plan Land Use Designation Changes 8. Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Override Resolution Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 26 — 15 2/15/2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA (1) CERTIFYING THE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, (2) ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (3) ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND (4) APPROVING THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana seeks to approve the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update identified the following five focus areas for potential change and new growth: South Main Street, Grand Avenue/17th Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard, 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street; and WHEREAS, the total long-term potential growth within these focus areas is estimated at 17,575 new housing units, 2,263,130 non-residential building square footage, and 6,616 jobs; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update ("project") requires, among other things: (1) adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan Update; (2) certification of a Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report; (3) adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations; (4) adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and (5) adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, standards, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City of Santa Ana is the lead agency for the project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(a), the City as lead agency determined that a program EIR was required for the project, and therefore did not prepare an initial study; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, on February 26, 2020, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation —which was also published in the Orange Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 1 of 7 City Council 26 — 16 2/15/2022 County Register, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Santa Ana —stating that an environmental impact report would be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.9 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed scoping meeting on March 5, 2020, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR") (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087) was prepared for the proposed project addressing comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation and evaluating the proposed project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Draft PEIR identified five significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the project that pertain to Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Population and Housing; and WHEREAS, the Draft PEIR further determined that the proposed project would require mitigation related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and tribal cultural resources; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(e), the Draft PEIR was circulated for review and comment to the public, City Council, Planning Commission, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties for a 45-day review period, from August 3, 2020, to September 16, 2020, a period that was extended thereafter to October 6, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City released the Final PEIR, which consists of the Draft PEIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft PEIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft PEIR, errata to the Draft PEIR and technical appendices; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final PEIR and General Plan Update, at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities and in view of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR") was prepared as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect updates to the project and based on an intensive, extended Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 2of7 City Council 26 — 17 2/15/2022 community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; and WHEREAS, the Recirculated Draft PEIR provided an update of the project description, and environmental setting and impact analyses for Air Quality, Hazards, and Recreation; incorporated a new alternative; and identified an additional significant unavoidable adverse environmental impact that pertains to Recreation; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(e), the Recirculated Draft PEIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period, from August 6, 2021, to September 20, 2021; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Recirculated Draft PEIR were available for review and inspection at City Hall, on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, Planning Commission work- study sessions were held on August 9, 2021 and August 23, 2021, and a public hearing held on September 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, the City consulted with and received comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15086; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2021, the City released the Final Recirculated PEIR, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which consists of the Recirculated Draft PEIR, all technical appendices prepared in support thereof, all documents incorporated by reference (including the Final PEIR), all written comment letters received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, written responses to all written comment letters and verbal comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, revisions to the Recirculated Draft PEIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, at which hearing members of Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 3 of 7 City Council 26 — 18 2/15/2022 the public were afforded an opportunity to comment and the project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were sufficiently analyzed in the Final Recirculated PEIR; and WHEREAS, as contained herein, the City Council has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision and recommendations on the project; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of the Final Recirculated PEIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all of the findings and conclusions made by the City Council pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record for the project, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and not based solely on the information provided in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's environmental impacts that are less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures, as identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR, are described in Section IV of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's impacts that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts, and that upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the Final Recirculated PEIR, would be considered less than significant, are described in Section V of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's impacts that, even with mitigation measures, would remain significant and unavoidable are described in Section V of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the reasonable alternatives to the project are described in Section VI of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Statement of Overriding Considerations that indicates the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable significant environmental effects is described in Section VII of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 4 of 7 City Council 26 — 19 2/15/2022 WHEREAS, all the mitigation measures identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR and necessary to reduce the potentially significant impacts of the project to a level of less than significant are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), attached hereto as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including but not limited to the Final Recirculated PEIR and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the City Council and no additional information submitted to the City have produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the Final Recirculated PEIR or additional environmental review of the project under Public Resources Code Section 21092.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that it has been presented with the Final Recirculated PEIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City, acting as lead agency for the project. Section 3. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance," as defined by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Final Draft Recirculated PEIR that would require recirculation of the PEIR. Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 5 of 7 City Council 26 — 20 2/15/2022 Section 4. The City Council hereby: A. Certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings. B. Adopts the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, after balancing the significant and unavoidable air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, recreation, and population and housing impacts of the proposed project against the benefits of the proposed project. C. Adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, consistent with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6; makes implementation of the mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program a condition of approval of the project; and finds that in the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. D. Approves the project, based upon the entire record before it, including the Final Recirculated PEIR, Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and all written and oral evidence presented. E. Directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five working days of the City Council's final project approval. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of , 2021. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:! John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 6 of 7 City Council 26 — 21 2/15/2022 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2021-XXX Page 7of7 City Council 26 — 22 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT All materials for Exhibit A may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/general-plan-environmental-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 26 — 23 2/15/2022 Exhibit B CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of Santa Ana STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2020029087 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that a number of written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an environmental impact report ("EIR") prior to approval of the project pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. The State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of rio �ac an Statement 2 26-24 2O1c / 0 021i inonsiderations -1- oer (d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. (e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. (f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta ll).) The concept of "feasibility" also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001 ["an alternative 'may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record"'].) An alternative may also be rejected because it "would not 'entirely fulfill' [a] project objective." (Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.AppAth 296, 314-315.) "[l=]easibility" under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, "[t]he wisdom of approving ... any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta Il, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 576.) When adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 25 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -2- / c ober021 (a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." (b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. Having received, independently reviewed, and considered the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR"), the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final PEIR), the Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR"), and the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final Recirculated PEIR") for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, SCH No. 2020029087 (collectively, the "PEIR"), as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings of Facts ("Findings") are hereby adopted by the City of Santa Ana ("City") in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency. These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City for adoption and implementation of the Santa Ana General Plan Update ("Proposed Project"). This action includes the certification of the following: ■ Santa Ana General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2020029087 A. DOCUMENT FORMAT These Findings have been organized into the following sections: 1) Section I provides an introduction. 2) Section II provides a summary of the project, overview of the discretionary actions required for approval of the project, and a statement of the project's objectives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 26 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -3- 6c ober�021 3) Section III provides a summary of previous environmental reviews related to the project area that took place prior to the environmental review done specifically for the project, and a summary of public participation in the environmental review for the project. 4) Section IV sets forth findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be —as a result of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and consideration of comments received during the NOP comment period —either not relevant to the project or clearly not at levels that were deemed significant for consideration given the nature and location of the proposed project. 5) Section V sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that the City has determined are either not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of project design features and/or mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance and implementation, all of these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the project and adopted as conditions of the project by the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to project design features and/or mitigation measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. Section V also includes findings regarding those significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that will or may result from the project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level. 6) Section VI sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. 7) Section VI sets forth the statement of overriding considerations for the proposed project. 8) Section VIII sets forth the resolution regarding certification of the PEIR 9) Section IX sets for the resolution adopting a mitigation and monitoring plan for the proposed project. 10) Section X sets for the resolution regarding custodian of records for the proposed project. B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the proposed project consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: ■ The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project ■ The Draft PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Recirculated Draft PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 27 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -4- Oc ober021 ■ The Final PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Final Recirculated PEIR for the proposed project including the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II and III of the Final Recirculated PEIR) ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed project ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ■ The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments ■ All documents, studies, EIRs, or other materials incorporated by reference in the Draft PEIR, Recirculated Draft PEIR, Final PEIR and Final Recirculated PEIR ■ The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the proposed project, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, including comments received after the close of the comment period and responses thereto ■ Matters of common knowledge to the City of Santa Ana, including but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations ■ Any documents expressly cited in these Findings ■ Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). C. CUSTODIAN AND LOCATION OF RECORDS The documents and other materials that constitute the administrative record for the City's actions related to the project are at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 28 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -5- Oc ober021 Santa Ana, CA 92701. The City's Planning Division is the custodian of the administrative record for the project. Copies of these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings, are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the offices of the Planning Division Counter. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 29 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -6- Oc ober021 II. PROJECT SUMMARY A. PROJECT LOCATION Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of Newport Beach. Orange County is surrounded by the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego and is one of six counties comprising the Southern California Region. Santa Ana is bordered by Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, Tustin to the east, Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel in its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. Regional access to the city is provided by the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the Orange Freeway (SR-57) on the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) on the northeast, the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) on the east, and the San Diego Freeway (1-405) on the south. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In March 2014, the City Council adopted the Santa Ana Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan was the result of an extensive community outreach process and established specific goals, objectives, and strategies to guide the City's major efforts. One of the key strategies identified was to complete a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. The General Plan Update (GPU) will provide long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the Santa Ana community through 2045. The General Plan Update will identify areas of opportunity and provide options to enhance development potential in key areas of the city. It will also bring the city into compliance with recent State laws, reflect current conditions, and incorporate input from the general public, City staff, and other stakeholders. The proposed GPU is organized into three sections: I, Services and Infrastructure; 11, Natural Environment; and III, Built Environment. The proposed GPU addresses the eight topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements of the general plan. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace the 16 elements of the current General Plan. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 housing element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in early 2022 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed General Plan update are: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 30 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -7- Oc ober021 Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The proposed GPU is comprehensive both in its geography and subject matter. It addresses the entire territory within the plan area's boundary and the full spectrum of issues associated with management of the plan area. The GPU also includes forecasts of long-term conditions and outlines development goals and policies; exhibits and diagrams; and the objectives, principles, standards, and plan proposals throughout its various elements. The GPU can be found online at https://www.santa-ana.org/general-plan. The General Plan Policy Framework can be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/sites/default/files/pb/general- plan/documents/General Plan PolicyFrameworkMaster.DRAFT. cmo2.pdf. Coordination and consistency are essential between the elements of the GPU, but in particular with the land use element. The circulation element, which identifies proposed improvements to the transportation system, may impact surrounding land uses and future development. The urban design element sets forth policies and programs to improve the city's design and urban form. The conservation element protects and maintains the city's natural, cultural, and other resources, with a focus on preserving aesthetics and the environmental quality of the city. Both the land use element and the circulation element are described in more depth below. Focus areas and specific plan/special zoning areas are also described. Updated Land Use Element The updated land use element will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, use, and revitalization/restoration) within the plan area by designating land uses as shown in the proposed land use map. Figure 3-7 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Final Recirculated PEIR) shows the 13 proposed land use designations of the General Plan update, and Table 3-4 gives a general description of the land use designations that are added to the GPU and were not in the current General Plan. Land use designations define the type and nature of development that would be allowed in a given location of the plan area. The land use designations and patterns are intended to provide the basis for more detailed zoning designations and development intensities, requirements, and standards established in the City's development code. It is important to note that the updated land use element is a regulatory document that defines the framework for future growth and development in the plan area but does not directly result in Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 31 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -8- / c ober021 development in and of itself. Before any project can be developed in the plan area, it must be analyzed for conformance with the General Plan Update, zoning requirements, and other applicable local and state requirements; comply with the requirements of CEQA; and obtain all necessary clearances and permits. Updated Circulation Element The circulation element update is integrally related to federal, state, and regional transportation programs as well as local plans and regulations. The City's role in transportation planning has become increasingly important because recent legislation in the areas of growth management, congestion management, and air quality require more active local coordination to meet regional objectives. Furthermore, the circulation element update is intended to guide future development of the city's transportation system in a manner consistent with the updated land use element. The Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) details proposed street classifications to reflect buildout of the city's roadway system. The street classifications include Freeway, Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, Secondary Arterial, Divided Collector Arterial, and Collector Arterial. As part of the implementation of complete streets principles,' a series of modifications to the city's roadway network has been identified and includes both the reclassification of roadways and assignment of new MPSH roadway classifications to selected existing streets. A number of proposed roadway reclassifications, adoptions, and removals from the MPSH are as follows: ■ Reclassified as Divided Collector Arterial: Santa Clara Avenue west of Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Flower Street between Warner Avenue and 1 st Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Chestnut Avenue between Standard Avenue and eastern city limit (currently Secondary/Primary Arterial) • Raitt Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Santa Ana Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) • Civic Center Drive between Fairview Street and Bristol Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Penn Way between 1-5 on/off ramps and Washington Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Santiago Street between 15th Street and 6th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Standard Avenue between 6th Street and Warner Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Complete streets are transportation facilities that are planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 26-32 2O1c / 0 021i inonsiderations -9- oer . Santa Ana Boulevard between French Street and Santiago Street (currently Primary Arterial) . Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt Street and Flower Street (currently Major Arterial) . Cambridge Street between Fairhaven Avenue and SR-22 freeway (currently Local Arterial) Hazard Avenue between Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) Halladay Avenue between Warner Avenue and Dyer Road (currently Secondary Arterial) McFadden Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Grand Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Broadway between 1st Street and 17th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) 4th Street between French Street and Grand Avenue (currently Primary/Secondary Arterial) Fairhaven Avenue from Grand Avenue to Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) ■ Reclassified as Primary Arterial: . Santa Ana Boulevard between Flower Street and Ross Street (currently a Major Arterial) 1st Street between Bristol Street and Tustin Avenue (currently Major Arterial) ■ Reclassify as Collector Arterial: Civic Center Drive between French Street and Santiago Street (currently a Secondary Arterial) ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Divided Collector Arterial: . Greenville Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Warner Avenue ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Collector Streets: . Civic Center Drive between Spurgeon Street and Santiago Street (currently Local Street) Broadway from Anahurt Street to Main Street (currently Local Road) ■ Remove the following from the MPSH . Memory Lane from the City Center Drive to SR-22 . Wright Street from 14th Street to Fruit Street . 4th Street from French Street to Ross Street . Washington Avenue from Broadway to Main Street 10th street from Broadway to Main Street Columbine Avenue from Main Street to 55 FWY Halladay street from Dyer Road to Alton pkwy Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 33 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -10- 6c ober�021 The majority of the proposed reclassifications aim to reduce existing rights -of -way for vehicular traffic lanes to make room for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Landmark streets are also identified within or adjacent to the Santa Ana Downtown Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The circulation element update incorporates the proposed Santa Ana -Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project, which will introduce new transit service to the city. Santa Ana is working with Garden Grove and Orange County Transit Authority to build a fixed guideway system called the OC Streetcar. Expected to begin operations in 2021, the OC Streetcar will link the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center to a new multimodal hub at Harbor Boulevard/Westminster Avenue in Garden Grove. OC Streetcar will serve historic downtown Santa Ana and Civic Center. Along its four -mile route, OC Streetcar will connect with 18 Orange County Transit Authority bus routes and increase transportation options along Santa Ana Boulevard, 4th Street, the Pacific Electric right-of-way, and Harbor Boulevard. Focus Areas 1. South Main Street Focus Area The South Main Street focus area introduces the opportunity for greater flexibility and a more dynamic mix of land uses and urban design along the properties fronting Main Street. The intent is to transition an auto -dominated corridor into a transit- and pedestrian -friendly corridor through infill development without disrupting the surrounding lower -density neighborhoods. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Facilitate redevelopment and property improvements along Main Street. ■ Create a more active and dynamic streetscape. ■ Protect established residential neighborhoods. ■ Support transit, pedestrian, and nonmotorized travel. The majority of properties fronting Main Street will be designated Urban Neighborhood, allowing for future development to include commercial uses, low- and medium -density housing, or a combination of both in a vertically mixed -use format. South of Warner Avenue, the Industrial/Flex designation will offer new options for small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities. The balance of the focus area will remain designated for Low Density Residential or Institutional to reflect the existing development patterns and land uses. New buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods while still emphasizing the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. 2. Grand Avenue / 17th Street Focus Area The Grand Avenue / 17th Street focus area will foster the development of an urban mixed -use corridor connecting into the city's downtown and transit core. The intent is to create opportunities Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 34 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -11- c o er 021 for a new mix of land uses and design to transition Grand Avenue from a series of auto -oriented shopping plazas to a series of dynamic urban spaces. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Create mixed -use corridors and urban villages. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Foster community spaces and neighborhood -serving amenities. ■ Develop opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. ■ Maintain compatible nodes of commercial activity. The majority of land in this focus area is planned for Urban Neighborhood or District Center land use designations, which will allow a blend of residential and commercial uses to develop simultaneously, as market conditions allow. An intense mixed -use area is envisioned adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, along the east side of Grand Avenue south of 1-5. This part of the focus area will support larger, more visually dynamic buildings and urban spaces that complement and benefit from the adjacent regional transit center. North of 1-5, the buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. A mix of residential, retail, and office will be interspersed along the frontage of Grand Avenue, with a concentrated node of commercial and mixed -use residential uses at Grand Avenue and 17th Street. A small portion of the focus area is designated for Industrial/Flex and General Commercial to support small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities will be located along 17th Street near the Regional Transportation Center. 3. West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area The West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area connects the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan area and Downtown Santa Ana, and the OC Streetcar Project improvements will create the physical transit link in 2022. The intent is to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Develop housing and mixed -use opportunities near streetcar stations. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Buffer industrial land uses and residential neighborhoods. ■ Create opportunities for clean industrial/maker-type spaces. 4. 55 Freeway / Dyer Road Focus Area The 55 Freeway / Dyer Road focus area will transition from almost exclusively professional office to a range of commercial, industrial/flex, and mixed -use development. The intent is to create opportunities for a truly urban lifestyle with easy access to Downtown Santa Ana, multiple transit options, and the new investments and amenities in adjacent communities. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Provide housing opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the city's edge. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 35 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -12- c o er 021 ■ Enhance opportunities for corporate offices. ■ Attract economic activity into the city from surrounding communities. ■ Protect industrial and office employment base. ■ Maintain hotel and commercial uses. The overall scale and experience of the focus area along the freeway and city boundary will reflect an urban intensity and design, with inspiring building forms and public spaces. At the southeastern edge, the District Center land use designation will facilitate large residential mixed -use developments in structures that incorporate high -density housing, hotels, and complementary expansions of commercial uses. Adjacent to the 55 freeway, the Industrial/Flex land use designation will promote large-scale office -industrial flex spaces, multilevel corporate offices, and research and development uses. The node surrounding the freeway interchange will remain as currently planned for General Commercial uses, with new improvements introducing development and spaces that complement the existing examples and elements. South Bristol Street Focus Area The South Bristol Street focus area represents Santa Ana's southern gateway and is a part of the South Coast Metro area. Between Sunflower and Alton Avenues, the District Center land use designation will create opportunities to transform auto -oriented shopping plazas to walkable, bike - friendly, and transit -friendly urban villages that incorporate a mix of high intensity office and residential living with experiential commercial uses. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Capitalize on the success of the South Coast Metro area. ■ Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike friendly, and transit oriented. ■ Provide for mixed -use opportunities while protecting adjacent, established, low -density neighborhoods. Between MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Avenue, the form and intensity will scale down but remain distinctly urban in nature. The redevelopment of the auto -oriented commercial plazas will result in the construction of landmark buildings and structures set in and around spaces accessible to future occupants and the general public. The corridor north of Alton Avenue is planned with the Urban Neighborhood land use designation, allowing for commercial and residential projects, frequently in a mixed -use format, to develop in accordance with market fluctuations. The buildings and spaces in this part of the focus area will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 36 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -13- 6c ober021 Soecific Plan/Saecial Zonin There are seven planning areas that represent specific plans and other special zoning areas that were previously adopted: Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area (2014), Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan (1991/2018), Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan (2014), MainPlace Specific Plan (2019), Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (2007/2018), Midtown Specific Plan (1996), and Transit Zoning Code Specific Development (2010). The most recent adoption/amendment date for each document is noted in parentheses. Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area The Adaptive Reuse Ordinance, Section 41-1651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, provides alternative building and fire standards for the conversion of eligible buildings, or portions thereof, from nonresidential uses to dwelling units, guest rooms or joint living, and work quarters. Eligible structures are buildings within the Adaptive Reuse project incentive area that were constructed in accordance with building and zoning codes in effect prior to July 1, 1974, or which have been determined to be a Historically Significant. The Project Incentive Area includes properties in the Midtown Specific Plan area; the Transit Zoning Code area; the Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone; the North Main Street Corridor on both sides of Main Street, from 17th Street to the northernmost MainPlace Drive; and the East 1 st Street Corridor on both sides of 1 st Street from Grand Avenue to Elk Lane. Residential uses are allowed in the Project Incentive Area irrespective of the underlying zoning as part of an approved Adaptive Reuse Project. Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan covers the 2.5-mile segment of Harbor Boulevard on the west side of Santa Ana. The approximately 305-acre planning area includes parcels adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between Westminster Avenue and Lilac Avenue as well as parcels along Westminster Avenue, 1st Street, and 5th Street. The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan creates the zoning necessary to take advantage of the regional and local transit investments made along and around Harbor Boulevard. The plan expands development options to include residential alongside or integrated into a mix of nonresidential uses. MainPlace Specific Plan The purpose of the MainPlace Specific Plan is to transform MainPlace mall into a family -oriented retail, entertainment, and dining destination. The plan creates a mixed -use urban village with a revitalized mall at its central core. The Specific Plan area is on the north edge of Santa Ana, between Main Street on the east and SR-22 and 1-5 to the north and west. The property is identified in the current General Plan land use element as District Center. The District Center designation includes the major activity areas of the city, designed to serve as anchors to the city's commercial corridors and to accommodate major development activity. No General Plan amendment is required for the specific plan, and the MainPlace Specific Plan is the zoning for the property and defines the allowable uses within its boundaries. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan a emen 26 — 37 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -14- c o er 021 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone The Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone consists of an original MEMU Overlay Zone and an expansion component. The original MEMU Overlay Zone is largely developed with commercial and office uses and comprises approximately 200 acres immediately east of the 1-5 and immediately west of SR-55. It is bounded by 1-5 on the west and south, Tustin Avenue on the east, and East Sixth Street on the north. The MEMU expansion area added 33.52 acres or approximately 48 parcels to the original MEMU Overlay Zone area. The additional project area extends west primarily along First Street and is generally bounded by the 1-5 to the east, Grand Avenue to the west, East Chestnut Avenue to the south, and Fourth Street to the north. The overall objectives of the MEMU Overlay Zone are to encourage a more active commercial and residential community, provide an expanded economic base, maximize property sales tax revenues, improve the jobs/housing balance within the city, and provide for a range of housing options identified in the 2014 housing element. Midtown Specific Plan The Midtown Specific Plan area is generally bounded by 17th Street to the north, Civic Center Drive to the south, North Ross Street to the west, and North Spurgeon Street to the east. The Midtown area is readily accessible from the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5). Midtown is envisioned as an integrated district of civic, business, cultural, and retail activity with a small residential component. Transit Zoning Code Specific Development The City adopted a Transit Zoning Code to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to allow for the reuse of existing structures; to provide for a range of housing options, including affordable housing; and to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian -oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure. The code encompasses an area in the central urban core of Santa Ana that comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The area is west of 1-5 and bounded by First Street on the south, Flower Street on the west, Grand Avenue on the east, and Civic Center Drive on the north. General Plan Buildout Scenario In general, many areas currently designated for General Commercial and Professional Office will expand opportunities for residential development by a proposed change in General Plan land use designation to Urban Neighborhood or District Center. Industrial Flex will be introduced in each of the five focus areas and replace Industrial land use designations that currently exist to allow for cleaner industrial and commercial uses with live -work opportunities. Furthermore, state law allows a graduated density bonus for the inclusion of affordable housing units For an increasing amount of affordable units (by percentage), a project is allowed an increasing ability to exceed the permitted density (up to a cap of 35 percent). Recent updates to state housing law (Assembly Bill 1763, effective January 1, 2020), enables projects that are 100 Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 38 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -15- 6c ober021 percent affordable (either 100 percent lower income or 80 percent lower and 20 percent limited moderate), to obtain a density bonus of 80 percent, or no limit if within one-half mile of a major transit stop. However, not every proposed project pursuant to the GPU would include affordable units, and not every project that includes affordable units would need a density bonus. Proposed projects pursuant to the GPU are not required to build at densities that exceed maximum limits; the law only requires that jurisdictions grant the density bonus if requested. The buildout methodology for the GPU was based on past development trends, current development trends, and a forecast market analysis. These trends accounted for any units approved (density bonus or otherwise), to determine the appropriate density and amount of development to assume. Additionally, the optimal density of affordable units is at or below the density levels assumed for forecasting buildout. Generally, projects beyond 50 to 70 units per acre require Type 1 construction (steel and concrete structure), which is much more expensive than Type V construction (wood structure). Accordingly, affordable projects are rarely greater than 70 units per acre except for very small parcels. The average densities used to calculate projected buildout at 2045 are 50 to 90 units per acre in the three most intense focus areas; 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, Grand Avenue/17th Street, and South Bristol Street focus areas. For the remaining two focus areas, a residential assumption at 30 units per acre was used over a broad area to account for development at or above the maximum density of 30 units per acre. The maximum is 20 units per acre for projects proposed exclusively residential in the South Main Focus Area. The maximum is 30 units per acre for a relatively small part of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The City's buildout projections are therefore considered to include and account for the application of density bonus provisions of state law to future projects. Furthermore, the potential for development in specific plan and special zoning areas is based on the forecast buildout at the time of the respective zoning document's adoption, minus the amount of new development built between the adoption date and 2019. Growth outside of the focus areas and special planning areas is expected to be incremental and limited. Some growth was projected for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. Some growth was also projected for the commercial and retail area south of the West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area. Finally, some additional residential development is expected on a small portion (5 percent) of single-family and multifamily lots through the construction of second units. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. C. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS Project development requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City: ■ Adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan update ■ Certification of PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 39 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -16- 6c ober021 ■ Adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ■ Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program ■ Adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update D. STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The updated General Plan is based on a vision statement and core values established as part of an extensive, multiyear community outreach effort. The City has identified the following core values to guide the General Plan Update (GPU): ■ Health. The people of Santa Ana value a physical environment that encourages healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and a community that actively pursues policies and practices that improve the health of our residents. ■ Equity. Residents value taking all necessary steps to ensure equitable outcomes, expanding access to the tools and resources that residents need, and balancing competing interests in an open and democratic manner. ■ Sustainability. Santa Ana values land use decisions that benefit future generations, plans for the impacts of climate change, and incorporates sustainable design practices at all levels of the planning process. ■ Culture. The Santa Ana's community values efforts that celebrate our differences as a source of strength, preserve and build upon existing cultural resources, and nurture a citywide culture of empowered residents. ■ Education. Santa Ana values the creation of lifelong learners, the importance of opening up educational opportunities to all residents, and investing in educational programs that advance residents' economic well-being. These core values were used as the basis to define more specific project objectives to aid decision makers in their review of the GPU and associated environmental impacts. The objectives include: 1. Promote infill development while respecting and protecting established neighborhoods. 2. Optimize high density residential and mixed -use development that maximizes potential use of mass transit. 3. Provide locations for new housing development that maximizes affordable housing opportunities to achieve both City and regional housing goals. 4. Facilitate new development at intensities sufficient to generate community benefits and attract economic activity. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 40 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -17- 6c ober021 5. Provide housing and employment opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the City's edge. g. Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike -friendly, and transit -oriented. 7. Develop opportunities for live/work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 41 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -18- 6c ober021 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS In conformance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the proposed project. ■ The City of Santa Ana concluded that a PEIR should be prepared, and the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released for a 30-day public review period from February 26, 2020, through March 27, 2020. The NOP was posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on February 26, 2020. The notice was published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation. Under CEQA, a lead agency may proceed directly with preparation of a PEIR without preparation of an Initial Study if it is clear that a PEIR will be required (State CEQA Guidelines § 15060[d]). The City of Santa Ana made such a determination for this project and did not prepare an Initial Study. ■ Completion of a scoping process, in which the public was invited by the City of Santa Ana to participate. The scoping meeting for the PEIR was held on March 5, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. at the Santa Ana Police Community Room at 60 Civic Center Plaza in Santa Ana. The notice of a public scoping meeting was included in the NOP distributed on February 26, 2020. ■ Preparation of a Draft PEIR by the City of Santa Ana, which was made available for a 45- day public review period (August 3, 2020, through September 16, 2020) and extended to October 6, 2020. The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft PEIR was sent to all persons, agencies, and organizations on the list interested persons, sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to public agencies, and published in the August 3, 2020, Orange County Register. The NOAwas posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on August 3, 2020. Copies of the Draft PEIR were made available for public review at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701, and the City of Santa Ana Public Library at 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Draft EIR was also available for review and download on City website: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan. ■ The Final PEIR contained comments on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft PEIR, if any, and appended documents. The Final PEIR was released for a 10-day agency review period prior to certification of the Final PEIR. ■ At its November 91 2020, public hearing, the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the GPU to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities. ■ The City performed an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted between January and May 2021 as described in Section 2.4 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Recirculated Final PEIR). ■ Pursuant to Draft PEIR comments, the Planning Commission public hearing, and an expanded EJ community outreach program, the City made the decision to prepare a Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 42 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -19- 6c ober021 Recirculated Draft PEIR to discuss and evaluate impacts related to environmental justice, to conclude that the recreation -related impacts of the proposed GPU would result in a significant impact, and to define a new project alternative to reduce recreational impacts. ■ The City recirculate the Draft PEIR chapters that had been revised and the NOAwas released for a 45-day public review period from August 6, 2021 through September 20, 2021. The NOA directed reviewers to only submit comments on the revised Draft PEIR chapters included in the Recirculated Draft PEIR since the comments in the Final PEIR adequately addressed comments received on portions of the Draft PEIR that had not been recirculated. ■ One September 13th, the City conducted a Planning Commission Study Session to discuss the Recirculated Draft PEIR. Verbal comments from the public, received during the Study Session were addressed in the Final Recirculated PEIR. ■ After considering the PEIR and in conjunction with making these findings, the City of Santa Ana hereby finds that, pursuant to Section 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines, approval of the project will result in significant effects on the environment; however, the significant effects will be eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible, and the City has determined that remaining significant effects are acceptable under Section 15093. ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby adopted to ensure implementation of feasible mitigation measures identified in the PEIR. The City of Santa Ana finds that these mitigation measures are fully enforceable conditions on the project and shall be binding upon the City and affected parties. ■ The City of Santa Ana finds that the project is in the public interest and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare. ■ The City of Santa Ana hereby certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. ■ Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15095, staff is directed as follows: a) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be retained in the project files; b) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be provided to all CEQA "responsible" agencies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 43 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -20- 6c ober021 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE SCOPING PROCESS Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses and input at the public scoping meeting), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft PEIR, the City determined, based upon the threshold criteria for significance, that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact on the following potential environmental issues (see Updated Draft PEIR, Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant). It was determined, therefore, that these potential environmental issues would be precluded from detailed discussion in the Draft PEIR. Based upon the environmental analysis presented in the Draft PEIR, and the comments received by the public on the Draft PEIR, no substantial evidence was submitted to or identified by the City which indicated that the project would have an impact on the following environmental areas: (a) Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The City does not have any significant agricultural resources. Additionally, Santa Ana has no land designated or zoned for agricultural use and does not have any land subject to a Williamson Act contract. Santa Ana does not have any land designated or zoned for forestland, timberland, or zoned Timberland Production. (b) Wildfire: According to CAL FIRE, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about 4.0 miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in an LRA is about 3.8 miles away at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. The city is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the city is on the wildland-urban interface. All other topical areas of evaluation included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to require further assessment in the Draft PEIR. B. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IN THE PEIR This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures. This determination, however, does assume compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section of Chapter 5 in the Updated Draft PEIR. (a) Aesthetics: Buildout under the GPU will be at a greater intensity/density in all five focus areas compared to existing conditions. While maximum height would generally be similar to existing buildings, the overall increase in allowed intensity and height across the focus areas would lead to a visually denser urban setting and alter Santa Ana's existing skyline. Buildout under the GPU would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas (such as the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek) since these existing open space parcels would remain unchanged. Additionally, no state scenic highways, eligible or officially designated, traverse the city nor are located near the city. Therefore, the GPU would not damage scenic resources, including rock outcroppings, trees, and historic buildings within state scenic Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan a emen 26 — 44 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -21- 6c ober021 highways. The GPU would also create new sources of light or glare in the project area, but adverse impacts would be minimized with compliance to building codes. (b) Biological Resources: Development pursuant to the GPU would not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. Additionally, the GPU would not impact wetlands and jurisdictional waterways. The GPU would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP as the City is not within a NCCP/HCP area and would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (c) Cultural Resources: The likelihood that human remains may be discovered during clearing and grading activities is considered extremely low. In the unlikely event human remains are uncovered, impacts would be less than significant upon compliance with California and Safety Code Section 7050.5. (d) Energy: Implementation of proposed policies under the GPU, in conjunction with and complementary to regulatory requirements, will ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the GPU would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. (e) Geology and Soils: The plan area's location and underlying geology make it likely to experience seismic hazards, including strong seismic ground shaking, and secondary hazards, like liquefaction. No active surface faults are mapped and zoned under the AP Zoning Act in the plan area. Additionally, all structures that would be constructed in accordance with the GPU would be designed to meet or exceed current design standards as found in the latest CBC. Most of the plan area is within an area susceptible to liquefaction; however, all structures constructed under the GPU would be designed in accordance with current seismic design standards as found in the CBC. There are no substantial hazards with respect to slope stability, as the plan area is mostly flat. Unstable geologic unit or soils conditions, including soil erosion, could result from development of the GPU. Mandatory compliance with existing regulations, including the preparation and submittal of a SWPPP and a soil engineering evaluation, would reduce soil erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the CBC design code, which has been adopted by the City and requires that structures be designed to mitigate expansive and compressible soils, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The probability of subsidence impacts is generally low in the majority of Santa Ana; however, the statutorily required sustainable groundwater management practices of the Orange County Water District would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Future development in the plan area would require connection to the City's sewer system as the City of Santa Ana does not allow for the installation of septic tanks. (f) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The GPU would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan a emen 26 — 45 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -22- c o er 021 (g) Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Construction and operations under the GPU would involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials; however, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that construction workers and the general public are not exposed to any risks related to hazardous materials during demolition and construction. Furthermore, strict adherence to all emergency response plan requirements set by the Orange County Fire Authority would be required throughout the duration of project construction. GPU buildout is expected to result in some increase in the number of hazardous waste generators; however, hazardous wastes would be stored, transported, and disposed of in conformance with existing regulations of the EPA, US Department of Transportation, CalRecycle, and other agencies. Use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in conformance with regulations would reduce both the likelihood of an accidental release and the potential consequences in the event of an accidental release. The plan area includes 555 sites on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Any development, redevelopment, or reuse on or next to any of these sites would require environmental site assessment by a qualified environmental professional to ensure that the project would not disturb hazardous materials on any of the hazardous materials sites or plumes of hazardous materials diffusing from one of the hazardous materials sites, and that any proposed development, redevelopment, or reuse would not create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment. Santa Ana is in the vicinity of an airport or within the jurisdiction of an airport land use plan. Projects approved under the proposed GPU would be required to comply with FAA airspace protection regulations using the AELUP consistency determination process. The buildout of the GPU would not result in substantial changes to the circulation patterns or emergency access routes, and would not block or otherwise interfere with use of evacuation routes. Buildout would not interfere with operation of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies. Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone, and implementation of the GPU will not expose structures and/or residences to wildland fire danger. (h) Hydrology and Water Quality: Projects pursuant to the GPU would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the demand on groundwater use but would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the amount of pervious surfaces in the plan area, but could substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in some focus areas in a manner which would result in flooding off -site or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, development pursuant to the GPU would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation or impede or redirect flood flows. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 46 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -23- 6c ober021 pursuant to the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. (i) Land Use Planning: Implementation of the GPU would not divide an established community. Additionally, the GPU would be consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport. Implementation of the GPU would be consistent with the goals of the Southern California Association of Governments' RTP/SCS. Implementation of the GPU would also be consistent with the OCTA Congestion Management Plan. (j) Mineral Resources: Project implementation would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. (k) Noise: The proximity of the plan area to an airport or airstrip would not result in exposure of future residents and/or workers to excessive airport -related noise. (1) Population and Housing: The proposed GPU would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist. Therefore, implementation of the GPU would not displace people and/or housing. (m) Public Services: The GPU would introduce new structures and allow for up to 22,361 new residents and workers in the OCFA and Santa Ana Police Department service boundaries, thereby increasing the requirement for fire protection facilities and personnel, as well as increasing the service needs for the Main Library and the Newhope Library Learning Center. The GPU would also generate additional students who would impact the school enrollment capacities of the Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, and Orange Unified School District. However, upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval the project would not create significant impacts related to fire protection services, police protection, library services, or school services. (n) Transportation and Traffic: The GPU is consistent with adopted programs, plans, and policies addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Additionally, GPU implementation would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) in comparison to existing City conditions, and would achieve a VMT/SP at least 15 percent lower than the countywide VMT/SP. Finally, circulation improvements associated with future development that would be accommodated by the GPU would be designed to adequately address potentially hazardous conditions (sharp curves, etc.), potential conflicting uses, and emergency access. (o) Utilities and Service Systems: Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities. However, Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure will support future developments under the Santa Ana GPU. Additionally, OCSD and OC Water District have adequate capacity to serve development pursuant to the GPU in addition to the providers existing commitments. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 47 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -24- 6c ober021 pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities. However, the City would have adequate capacity for the proposed increases in water flows across the city under implementation of the GPU and would be able to serve the additional dwelling units and commercial square footage proposed. Furthermore, GPU policies encourage the maintenance and upgrade of water infrastructure through impact fees from new development, and the exploration of other funding sources. Water supply would be adequate to meet development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed stormwater drainage facilities would be able to accommodate proposed development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed solid waste facilities would be able to accommodate development pursuant to the GPU and comply with related solid waste regulations. Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power and natural gas. However, the net increases in natural gas demands due to the GPU buildout are within the amounts that SoCalGas forecasts that it will supply to its customers, and buildout would not require SoCalGas to obtain increased natural gas supplies over its currently forecast supplies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 48 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -25- 6c ober021 V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the PEIR, and the effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found —in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) (1)—that "Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." This is referred to herein as "Finding 1." Where the City has determined —pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that "Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency," the City's finding is referred to herein as "Finding 2." Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either (1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that "Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report." This is referred to herein as "Finding 3." A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the PEIR, the impacts would be considered less than significant. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-6: Industrial land uses accommodated under the General Plan update could create other emissions, such as those leading to objectionable odors, that would adversely affect a substantial number of people. Industrial land uses associated with the GPU may generate potentially significant odor impacts for a substantial number of people. Impacts from potential odors generated from residential and other nonresidential land uses associated with the GPU are considered less than significant. Impacts associated with construction -generated odors are considered less than significant. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 49 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -26- 6c ober021 The Industrial and Industrial Flex land uses are not anticipated to produce odors, and Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would ensure that odor impacts are minimized and facilities would comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402. Therefore, Impact 5.2-6 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is determined that a development project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities • Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 2. Biological Resources Impact 5.3-1: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The inventory of existing conditions determined that no parcels with a proposed land use designation that allows for development (i.e., not an open space designation) currently has Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 50 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -27- 6c ober021 sensitive vegetation. All parcels currently have ruderal vegetation and little to no biological value. Therefore, there is no current indication that future development in accordance with the GPU would have significant unavoidable biological impacts. However, the programmatic analysis prepared for this GPU was not at the detailed, site -specific analysis required for a specific development project. Site -specific analyses could reveal biological resources not identified in the Biological and Natural Resources Report. Therefore, there is a potential for biological impacts associated with implementation of the GPU. Therefore, implementation of the GPU could result in a potentially significant impact. The letter received from CDFW states that the Santa Ana River and its tributaries historically supported federally endangered southern California steelhead. CDFW's letter requests that the Draft PEIR include an analysis of any proposed major stream crossings in the context of fish passage, and states that the analysis should include, but not be limited to, steelhead presence or historic presence, existing conditions including habitat and barrier assessments, any known projects to remove barriers or restore habitat that would affect or be affected by this project, and cumulative impacts to steelhead populations and/or habitat resulting from this project. The GPU does not propose any major stream crossings. If any future development project entails improvements for stream crossings (e.g. Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek), project -level CEQA compliance would require a biological resources report that would address potential impacts to endangered species, including the California steelhead. Impact 5.3-1 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site -specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a biological resource assessment for the project, including an assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 51 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -28- 6c ober021 Impact 5.3-4: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The City of Santa Ana is largely urbanized, and migration corridors are generally limited to the Santa Ana River and the Santiago Creek. Development under the GPU would result in the further infill of the city and removal of vacant sites. The GPU would not change land use designations of parcels that encompass the Santa Ana River or the Santiago Creek. However, development under the GPU could further result in vegetation removal, intrusion by humans and pets, and increased noise and air pollutants, which could impact wildlife movement and nesting sites. Therefore, the buildout of the GPU could affect wildlife movement, nesting sites, and migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as state law. Impact 5.3-4 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures Refer to BIO-1 above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 3. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-2: Development in accordance with the General Plan Update could impact archaeological resources. Development involving ground disturbance within the plan area has the potential to impact known and unknown archaeological resources. Typically, surface -level and subsurface archaeological sites and deposits can be affected by ground -disturbing activities associated with most types of construction. Based on literature review and records searches, eight archaeological resources have been recorded within the plan area, including four prehistoric sites, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While most of the plan area has been developed over the course of the twentieth century, buried resources may remain in areas where developments such as parking lots, parks, or structures with shallow foundations have required only minimal ground disturbance. A review of historical and ethnographic maps indicates a moderate likelihood that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during redevelopment. Archaeological resources impacts are site specific, but more intensive development can result in cumulative impacts on a regional level and should be considered in addition to individual project Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 52 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -29- 6c ober021 impacts on individual sites. As determined by the respective lead agency on a project by project basis, Phase I Cultural Resources studies would be required before ground disturbances and demolition activities are permitted to occur. The study would identify resources on the affected project sites that are, or appear to be, eligible for listing on the National or California Register. Such studies would also recommend mitigation measures to protect and preserve archaeological and tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 were developed to reduce potential individual and cumulative impacts associated with future development and redevelopment. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an archaeological resources assessment be conducted for future development projects to identify any known archaeological resources and sensitivity of the site. Mitigation Measures CUL-5 through CUL-7 detail the next steps required should the archaeological resources assessment identify known resources or determine the site to have high or moderate resource sensitivity. Upon compliance with Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7, individual and cumulative impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade —prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 53 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -30- 6c ober021 and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 54 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -31- c o er 021 above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 4. Geology and Soils Impact 5.6-4: Future development that would be accommodated by the General Plan Update could imaact known and unknown aaleontoloaical resources. Paleontological resources are recognized as nonrenewable and therefore receive protection under the California Public Resources Code and CEQA. Adoption of the GPU in itself will not directly affect paleontological resources. Long-term implementation of the GPU land use plan could allow development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration), including grading, of known and unknown sensitive areas. Grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially disturb paleontological resources. Therefore, future development that would be accommodated by the GPU could potentially unearth previously unrecorded resources. Review and protection of paleontological resources are also afforded by CEQA for individual development projects that would be accommodated by the GPU, subject to discretionary actions that are implemented in accordance with the land use plan of the GPU. Fossil localities have been found in the vicinity of the plan area, although not in the plan area itself. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 prescribe requirements for monitoring based on the sensitivity of sites for paleontological resources. Under GEO-1, areas that range from high to low sensitivity are required to prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan. With adherence to mitigation measures GEO-1 through GEO-3, Impact 5.6-4 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities. GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity, the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 55 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -32- c o er 021 underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PER. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 5. Noise Impact 5.12-3: Buildout of the individual land uses and projects for implementation of the GPU may expose sensitive uses to excessive levels of groundborne vibration. Construction Vibration Impacts. Construction activity at projects within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Vibration from construction activities rarely reaches the levels that can damage structures but can achieve the audible and perceptible ranges in buildings close to the construction site. Vibration generated by construction equipment has the potential to be substantial, since it has the potential to exceed the FTA criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). Construction details and equipment for future project -level developments under the GPU are not known at this time but may cause vibration impacts. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 56 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -33- 6c ober021 With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Operational Vibration Impacts. Commercial and industrial operations within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the operational procedures and equipment. Such equipment -generated vibrations would spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the vibration source varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. In addition, future sensitive receptors could be placed within close proximity to existing railroad lines through buildout in the plan area. Because specific project -level information is not available at this time, it is not possible to quantify future vibration levels at vibration -sensitive receptors that may be near existing and future vibration sources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Mitigation Measures N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 57 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -34- c o er 021 this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 6. Tribal Cultural Resources Impact 5.17-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). The Sacred Land File search yielded positive results, indicating that known tribal resources exist within the plan area. Further, a CHRIS records search at SCCIC indicates that 23 archaeological resources were previously recorded within 0.5 mile of the plan area. Of these resources, eight archaeological resources were located within the plan area; these include four prehistoric sites with habitation debris and lithic scatters, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While the city is urbanized and most of the plan area has been developed, buried resources may remain in areas of minimal ground disturbance, such as parks, parking lots, and structures with shallow foundations. Tribal cultural resources are site specific in nature. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 58 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -35- 6c ober021 Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Impact 5.17-2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c). Future development as a result of the implementation of the GPU could include grading in portions of the City with sensitivity to tribal cultural resources. Grading and construction activities that require more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially cause disturbance to tribal cultural resources. Future development could potentially unearth previously unknown or unrecorded tribal cultural resources. Because the NAHC SLF search yielded positive results and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation identified sensitive areas within the city, the buildout of the GPU may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of tribal cultural resources. Earthwork activities may occur with buildout under the GPU that could impact previously undisturbed tribal cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 59 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -36- 6c ober021 B. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The following summary describes the unavoidable adverse impact of the GPU where mitigation measures were found to be either infeasible or would not lessen impacts to less than significant. The following impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-1: The additional population growth forecast for the General Plan Update and the associated emissions would not be consistent with the assumptions of the air aualitv manaaement clan. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-45 of the Updated Draft PEIR. The GPU would be inconsistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the GPU would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). Buildout of the GPU would exceed current population estimates for the city, and therefore the emissions associated with the additional population are not included in the current regional emissions inventory for the SoCAB. Additionally, air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations in the SoCAB. Therefore, overall, the GPU would be inconsistent with the AQMP. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 into future development projects for the operation phase would contribute to reduced criteria air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU. Additionally, goals and policies in the GPU would promote increased capacity for alternative transportation modes and implementation of transportation demand management strategies. However, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast AQMD thresholds. In addition, the population and employment assumptions of the AQMP would continue to be exceeded until the AQMP is revised and incorporates the projections of the GPU. Therefore, Impact 5.2-1 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 60 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -37- 6c ober021 projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that require refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug-in for the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. • Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 61 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -38- 6c ober021 finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. However, the City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-2: Construction activities associated with future development that would be accommodated under the General Plan Update could generate short-term emissions in exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-47 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU would occur over a period of approximately 25 years or longer. Construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the South Coast AQMD'S significance thresholds during this time and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects are not available at this time, and there is a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Therefore, despite adherence to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, Impact 5.2-2 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 62 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -39- 6c ober021 incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: ■ Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. ■ Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 63 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -40- 6c ober021 technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-3: Implementation of the General Plan Update would generate long-term emissions in exceedance of South Coast AQMD's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-48 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout in accordance with the GPU would generate long-term emissions that would exceed South Coast AQMD's regional significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Mitigation Measure AQ-2, in addition to the goals and policies of the GPU, would reduce air pollutant emissions to the extent feasible. The measures and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants in the city. Further, compared to existing baseline year conditions, emissions of NOx, CO, and SOx are projected to decrease from current levels despite growth associated with the GPU. However, Impact 5.2-3 would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the GPU. Contributing to the nonattainment status would also contribute to elevating health effects associated with these criteria air pollutants. Reducing emissions would further contribute to reducing possible health effects related to criteria air pollutants. It is speculative for this broad -based GPU to determine how exceeding the regional thresholds would affect the number of days the region is in nonattainment, since mass emissions are not correlated with concentrations of emissions, or how many additional individuals in the air basin would suffer health effects. South Coast AQMD is the primary agency responsible for ensuring the health and welfare of sensitive individuals to elevated concentrations of air quality in the SoCAB, and at the present time it has not provided methodology to assess the specific correlation between mass emissions generated and the effect on health in order to address the issue raised in the Friant Ranch case. Ozone concentrations are dependent upon a variety of complex factors, including the presence of sunlight and precursor pollutants, natural topography, nearby structures that cause building downwash, atmospheric stability, and wind patterns. Because of the complexities of predicting ground -level ozone concentrations in relation to the National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards, it is not possible to link health risks to the magnitude of emissions exceeding the significance thresholds. To achieve the health -based standards established by the EPA, the air districts prepare air quality management plans that detail regional programs to attain the ambient air quality standards. However, because cumulative development within the city would exceed the regional significance thresholds, the proposed project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the basin until the attainment standards are met in the SoCAB. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 64 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -41- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-4: Operation of industrial and warehousing land uses accommodated under the General Plan Update could expose sensitive receptors to substantial toxic air contaminant concentrations. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-50 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU could expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants JAC). Buildout could result in new sources of criteria air pollutant emissions and/or TACs near existing or planned sensitive receptors. Review of development projects by South Coast AQMD for permitted sources of air toxics (e.g., industrial facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities) would ensure that health risks are minimized. Additionally, Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would ensure mobile sources of TACs not covered under South Coast AQMD permits are considered during subsequent, project -level environmental review by the City of Santa Ana. Individual development projects would be required to achieve the incremental risk thresholds established by South Coast AQMD, and TACs would be less than significant. However, implementation of the GPU would generate TACs that could contribute to elevated levels in the air basin. Though individual projects would achieve the project -level risk threshold of 10 per million, they would nonetheless contribute to the higher levels of risk in the SoCAB. Therefore, the GPU's cumulative contribution to health risk is significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 65 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -42- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel - powered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 66 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -43- 6c ober021 Impact 5.2-5: Development and operation of land uses accommodated by the General Plan Update could generate emissions that exceed the localized significance thresholds and expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of criteria air Dollutants. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-53 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Because existing sensitive receptors may be close to project -related construction activities and large emitters of on -site operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, construction and operation emissions generated by individual development projects have the potential to exceed South Coast AQMD's Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would reduce the regional construction and operation emissions associated with buildout of the GPU and therefore also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, to the extent feasible. However, even with the implementation of these mitigation measures, Impact 5.2-5 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would also be applicable in reducing construction- and operation -related LST impacts. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 67 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -44- c o er 021 2. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout consistent with the General Plan Update could impact an identified historic resource. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, starting on page 5.4-26 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Generally, potential impacts to historical resources resulting from future projects developed pursuant to the GPU would be mitigated by the City's fulfillment of its statutory responsibilities under CEQA. However, for certain development pursuant to the GPU, the City may determine that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided. The City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits. Though the possible demolition or alteration of a historical resource cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. With fulfillment of the CUL-1 and CUL-2, future development consistent with the GPU would result in a less than significant impact to cultural resources. However, if significant impacts cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources are documented consistent with Mitigation Measure CUL-3. The Historical Resources Technical Report determined that unavoidable impacts to historical resources resulting from future development under the GPU will be reduced to the maximum extent feasible but will still be significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3. Therefore, the development under the GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects involving the relocation, conversion, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 68 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -45- 6c ober021 rehabilitation, or alteration of a historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 69 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -46- 6c ober021 changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.7-1: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in a decrease in GHG emissions in horizon year 2045 from existing baseline but may not meet the long-term GHG reduction goal under Executive Order S-03-05. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, starting on page 5.7-31 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions in order to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the state cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the state and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, Impact 5.7-1 would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 70 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -47- 6c ober021 • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: ■ Administration and Staffing ■ Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 4. Noise Impact 5.12-1: Construction activities associated with buildout of the plan area would result in temporary noise increases at sensitive receptors. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 71 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -48- 6c ober021 substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less -than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Factan a emen 26 — 72 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -49- 6c ober021 unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.12-2: Buildout of the plan area would cause a substantial traffic noise increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-30 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise -sensitive receptors below the thresholds. However, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 73 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -50- 6c ober021 residences along affected roadways. No individual measures and no set of feasible or practical mitigation measures are available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels in all cases. Thus, traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less - than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure N-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 5. Population and Housing Impact 5.13-1: The GPU would directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, starting on page 5.13-12 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Full buildout of the GPU would result in a population of 431,629, and the city's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Governments' 2045 projections. Furthermore, the city's housing units at buildout would be 115,053, which exceeds the Orange County Council of Governments' projection by 38 percent. There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 74 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -51- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 226-75 2�c /?0021i inonsiderations -52- ober 6. Recreation Impact 5.15-1: The General Plan Update would generate additional residents that would increase the use of existing park and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-27 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Although required park fees for development could be sufficient to fund new parks and improvements, there is a lack of available land and lack of land designated as Open Space within the General Plan Update to develop new parks or expand existing facilities. The City of Santa Ana is essentially built. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure REC-1 to monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area would contribute to reducing impacts to existing public parks within a '/z radius of the focus area. Compliance with this mitigation measure, regulatory requirements, and implementation of proposed GPU policies and implementation actions would reduce the potential impact of the proposed GPU on existing park facilities. However, because of the existing park deficiencies and scale of development in park -deficient areas, the project's impact would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 76 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -53- 6c ober021 Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.15-2: Population increases resulting from project implementation would increase recreation demands that would require construction or expansion of recreation facilities that would have potential to result in physical impacts to the environment. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Population increases resulting from the implementation of the GPU would increase recreation demands and require construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Although construction and/or expansion of new parks and recreation facilities would be subject to GPU policies and implementation actions; regulatory requirements, and future, project specific environmental review under CEQA, it is still possible that development of such facilities could result in significant unavoidable impacts Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts to recreation at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 77 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -54- c o er 021 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR include a discussion of reasonable project alternatives that would "feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[a]). As discussed above, the PEIR identified significant impacts in a number of categories. The following impacts could be mitigated below a level of significance: air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, tribal cultural resources impacts. The following impacts cannot be mitigated below a level of significance: certain air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation impacts. The PEIR analyzed four alternatives to the proposed project that could reduce some, if not all, of the impacts. A. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED DURING THE SCOPING/PROJECT PLANNING "Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[c]). Alternative Circulation Element— Roadway Classifications. The proposed circulation element in the GPU evolved over a long process and coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). During this process, alternative packages of arterial roadway classifications were considered that involved roadways in OCTA's Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The majority of reclassifications proposed were identified for bicycle facility safety improvements in the City's Safe Mobility Santa Ana (SMSA) Plan, prepared in 2016. Most of the reclassifications identified were for roadways where bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements would require roadway reconfiguration and a reduction in the number of existing or planned travel lanes. Many of the SMSA recommendations across the city have already been, or are in the process of being, implemented along arterial roadways without reducing the number of lanes. A cursory review of two optional roadway reclassification packages was conducted to determine whether these optional plans would have the potential to eliminate significant impacts of the proposed GPU and meet most the project objectives. It was determined that a detailed evaluation of this alternative was not needed to provide a reasonable range of EIR project alternatives. Transportation/traffic impacts of the proposed project were determined to be less than significant (VMT/SP falls below the significance threshold for the GPU without mitigation). Although these alternatives may have some potential to reduce VMT (by reducing the number of travel lanes for some roadways) and thereby also potentially reduce air quality, greenhouse gas, and traffic noise impacts, these alternatives would also result in more inconsistencies with the MPAH and result in more traffic congestion. Although traffic congestion is no longer a CEQA consideration, the GPU sets forth standards for level of service that will be considered by decision -makers. Moreover, the Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan a emen 26 — 78 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -55- 6c ober021 Reduced Density and RTP/SCS Consistency alternatives were determined to be meaningful alternatives to consider for the potential of reducing air quality, GHG, and traffic noise impacts. Reduced Traffic Noise Alternative. Since traffic noise was determined to be a significant, unavoidable impact of the proposed GPU, a project alternative designed to eliminate this significant impact was considered. The required reductions in traffic volumes (ADT) were determined along roadways where buildout of the GPU would result in significant noise increases. These estimates were compared to the surrounding land uses that would generate ADTs for those roadway segments. Traffic noise along these roadways would both exceed the noise standard and abut sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). Several segments would experience significant, unavoidable traffic noise impacts without the land use changes proposed under the GPU. Since significant traffic noise could not be avoided, further evaluation of this alternative was not deemed to be meaningful. B. ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS Given the significant, unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed GPU, project alternatives with the potential to substantially reduce development were identified for further review. Significant GPU impacts to long-term air quality, GHG emissions, population and housing, and recreation all directly relate to the level of development that would occur within the city. At the programmatic level of this GPU PEIR, site -specific information regarding potential significant historical impacts is not available, and therefore, an alternative could not be customized to reduce that impact. A reduced intensity alternative would also be expected to reduce the significant traffic noise impact (as discussed above). A reduced park demand alternative was also analyzed to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to recreation. The following development alternatives to the proposed GPU were chosen for further analysis. No Project / Current General Plan Alternative The evaluation of the No Project alternative is required by CEQA. The No Project alternative is typically defined as the development scenario that would occur if the project as proposed is not adopted. For a General Plan, the No Project alternative is typically represented by the jurisdiction's existing General Plan, including land use plan, circulation master plan, and policies in each General Plan element. Therefore, this alternative assumes that the existing General Plan —with various adoption dates for different elements between 1982 and 2014—would remain in effect. This existing General Plan also reflects amendments, including new Specific Plans and special zoning areas that have been adopted through the Notice of Preparation for this GPU. Finding. The City Council rejects the No Project/Current General Plan Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 79 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -56- 6c ober021 opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 11 impact categories, reduced impacts to 5 environmental impacts, and increase impacts to 4 categories. Impacts would be similar for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, noise, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. This alternative would reduce impacts for aesthetics, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems. Impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, and transportation would increase. This alternative does not mitigate any of the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the GPU to a less than significant impact. It would also exceed the City's VMT threshold. Overall, impacts under this alternative would decrease in comparison to the proposed project. The No Project/Current General Plan alternative would not achieve many of the proposed project objectives. The existing land use plan does not provide the opportunities to provide housing and employment at the levels required to meet local and regional goals. Moreover, the No Project alternative would not provide numerous general policies as included in the GPU to achieve these goals and invigorate communities. The current General Plan, however, protects established neighborhoods and several Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas would provide for infill opportunities, protect established neighborhoods, and result in mixed -use villages and bike- and pedestrian -friendly communities. Reduced Intensity Alternative (Reduced capacity for the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas) Under the GPU, the only areas that include revisions to land use designations to accommodate new growth are within the five focus areas. The majority of remaining growth would occur within previously approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. A nominal amount of growth is assumed to occur in other areas of the city and would not require land use amendments. The Reduced Intensity Alternative would substantially reduce development capacity within two focus areas, 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol Street, which accommodate approximately 65 percent of the housing unit growth and 72 percent of the nonresidential use (by building square footage) of the growth projected for the combined focus areas under the GPU. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. For this alternative, development of the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas would be reduced to approximately 50 percent of the maximum allowed per the land use designations. This alternative would reduce housing units by a total of 5,383 and would reduce total building square footage by approximately 4.2 million square feet distributed between these two focus areas. This alternative would also reduce population by 19,825 and jobs by 9,184. Overall, this alternative would reduce the housing growth accommodated by the GPU land use changes by approximately 18 percent and reduce nonresidential building square footage by approximately 27 percent. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 80 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -57- 6c ober021 Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Intensity Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 7 impact categories, reduce impacts to 12 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. The Reduced Density Alternative reduces the level of development for two of the five focus areas (55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol Street) relative to the GPU. No other changes to the GPU are made for this alternative. It is assumed to include the same General Plan policies and would not modify the circulation element or related improvements. Therefore, this alternative would attain many of the project's objectives. It would not "optimize" high density housing and mass transit opportunities, and so was found not to attain objective No. 2. It would, however, achieve objectives Nos. 3 through 5, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities, and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed -use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative (Reduced development for RTP/SCS population/housing consistency) This alternative was developed to evaluate an update to the General Plan that would be consistent with the population and housing projections used to develop the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) most recent Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)—Connect SoCal (adopted May 7, 2020). Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The plan embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 81 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -58- 6c ober021 Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The proposed GPU would result in a significant population and housing impact because development under the GPU would substantially exceed the projections used in Connect SoCal. SCAG uses locally prepared population and housing projections to develop the regional plan. For the City of Santa Ana, those projections were provided by the Orange County Council of Governments, as prepared by the Center for Demographic Research. The population/housing figures reflected for Santa Ana in the regional plan for 2045 are: population, 360,100; total housing units, 80,100; and total jobs, 176,400. Projections for the RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) use land use designations as approved in adopted general plans. The employment projections are similar for the GPU and RTP/SCS scenarios, but the RTP/SCS projections for population and housing units are substantially lower than GPU projections (18 percent and 27 percent lower, respectively). The RTP/SCS alternative, therefore, represents the least -development -intensive project alternative evaluated for the PEIR. ■ This alternative would substantially reduce the growth that would be accommodated within the focus areas under the GPU. New growth within the focus areas would total 6,380 housing units and approximately 3.7 million square feet of nonresidential uses, instead of a total additional 23,955 housing units and approximately 15.7 million square feet within the focus areas. This alternative distributes anticipated development through the focus areas and the approved Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas. For purposes of this alternative, it is assumed that a development cap would be used to limit total growth to the projections shown. ■ Subsequent updates of the regional plan would incorporate updated land use from the GPU and resolve the substantial discrepancy between the population and housing projections. Note also that the PEIR concludes that the GPU is consistent with the goals of the RTP/SCS. This alternative has been defined to eliminate the significant impact associated with substantial population growth that is inconsistent with the regional plan, as well as reduce other significant growth -related (AQ/GHG, traffic noise) impacts associated with the GPU as proposed. Finding. The City Council rejects the 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would reduce impacts to 12 environmental impacts, result in similar impacts to 6 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. It would reduce impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. Impacts would be very similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. It would increase impacts to land use and planning. It would also increase impacts to transportation and Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 82 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -59- 6c ober021 potentially introduce a new significant impact. It is anticipated, however, that under this alternative, transportation could be mitigated to less than significant. Under the GPU, transportation impacts are less than significant without mitigation. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. The impact to population and housing would be reduced to less than significant. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be reduced in comparison to the proposed project. Due to the substantial reduction in housing opportunities citywide, this alternative is the least effective in achieving the project objectives of the GPU. By setting a development cap to limit housing and nonresidential development to the projections for the city in the 2020 RTP/SCS, this alternative reduces housing units by 31,515 compared to the GPU. It reduces housing development potential within the focus areas by 73 percent in comparison to the GPU, and reduces overall city future development by 27 percent. To achieve this reduction, the development cap would not only limit focus area development but would restrict the entitled housing in Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas (reducing total housing within these areas by almost 14,000 units). This alternative clearly would not optimize high density housing that maximizes mass transit use (objective No. 2) or provide urban -level intensities at the urban edges (objective No. 3). Moreover, it would not facilitate intensities that attract economic activities, particularly since it would not allow the maximum entitlement of approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. It would achieve the remainder of the objectives, but to a lesser extent than the GPU. It would protect established neighborhoods, but not promote infill development as much as the GPU or other alternatives (objective No. 1). It would provide only limited opportunities for live -work and artist spaces and small-scale manufacturing (objective No. 7). Reduced Park Demand Alternative The City's Park standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents is not achieved under existing conditions and development allowed under the GPU would further exacerbate park and open space shortages. Without new parks, growth in any of the focus areas would exacerbate the current level of park deficiency either in or adjacent to disadvantaged communities. The areas proposed for substantial new residential development under the GPU were compared to the distribution of existing parks —location, size, and demand —to define the Reduced Park Demand Alternative. The Reduced Park Demand Alternative reduces residential growth by 11,225 units by eliminating or reducing residential land uses and intensity in the five focus areas. Overall, nonresidential square footage would be reduced by a total of approximately 2.8 million square feet within the focus areas compared to the proposed GPU. The nonresidential square footage would increase, however, in two of the focus areas: 17th Street/Grand Avenue by 697,000 square feet, and South Bristol by 739,000 square feet. New residential growth under this alternative would largely be in currently planned areas that are generally near a substantial number of existing park facilities. Some residential growth would be introduced into two focus areas at substantially lower intensities to reduce the potential impact on park facilities. Changes to the focus areas are as follows: ■ South Main Street. This focus area would remain as currently planned as a commercial corridor (GC) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) and District Center (DC) to reduce intensity Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 83 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -60- 6c ober021 so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities that are served by parks, but the existing parks are very small. ■ South Bristol Focus Area. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 2,273 units on sites that are more than a half mile from existing parks (generally west of Bristol and south of MacArthur Boulevard). ■ Grand Avenue/17th Street. Stay as currently planned as a lower density residential (LR-7) and commercial corridor (GC) to reduce intensity so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions, because much of the focus area is more than a half mile from existing parks. ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard. This focus area would remain as currently planned with lower density residential (LR-7) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity so that no additional units are constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities with areas that are farther than a half mile from existing parks in this focus area. ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 5,381 units because a majority of the area is more than a half mile from existing parks in Santa Ana; the reduced intensity would also reduce potential impacts on adjacent parkland in Tustin. Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Park Demand Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 6 impact categories, reduced impacts to 12 categories, and increased impacts to 2 categories. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would reduce the recreation impacts of the proposed GPU, as it was designed to do, and would improve the park acres/resident ratio compared to the proposed GPU. Recreation impacts to disadvantaged communities would also be reduced. Given the lack of available land for new parks, however, it would not eliminate the significant, unavoidable impact of the project. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 84 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -61- 6c ober021 population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. This alternative would attain some of the project's objectives. It would promote infill development to a lesser extent than the GPU and would protect established neighborhoods (Objective 1), and would also develop opportunities of live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing (Objective 7). Given the substantial reduction in housing units, it was also concluded that it would not meet Objectives 2 and 3, to maximize high density residential development and mixed use proximate to potential mass transit use (Objective 2) and to maximize affordable housing and achieve City and regional housing goals (Objective 3). It would, however, achieve Objectives 4 through 6, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With new opportunities eliminated in three focus areas and the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway /Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed - use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. C. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE CEQA requires a lead agency to identify the "environmentally superior alternative" and, in cases where the "No Project" Alternative is environmentally superior to the GPU, the environmentally superior development alternative must be identified. One alternative has been identified as "environmentally superior" to the GPU: ■ The RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative is concluded to be the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project alternative is not environmentally superior to the proposed GPU. Both the Reduced Density and RTP/SCS alternatives reduce environmental impacts in comparison to the GPU, but the RTP/SCS reduces more impacts and eliminates a significant, unavoidable impact of the GPU. This alternative was designed to eliminate the significant population impact of the GPU, but it also reduces potential future development more than any of the other alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 85 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -62- c o er 021 VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS A. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification of the PEIR for General Plan Update (project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the proposed project. In making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of Overriding Considerations, which states: a. CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b. When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c. If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against the unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 86 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -63- 6c ober021 with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed project, none of which both meets the project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed project, for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for this project, and having reviewed the PEIR for the GPU, and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the project. B. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations, which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impacts of the project, and each of which, standing alone, is sufficient to support approval of the project, in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. The specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project are as follows: 1. The community, land use, and public services elements of the project encourage healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and policies and practices that improve the health of residents. The policies also affirm and support a socially and economically diverse community with equitable distribution of resources. 2. Implementation of the GPU fulfills one of the key strategies identified in the Santa Ana Strategic Plan in the completion of a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. 3. The project improves the jobs -housing balance; the ratio of 1.5 would give the city a more equal distribution of employment and housing. The population growth resulting directly from the proposed GPU would be offset by the level of employment opportunity provided to the city's residents and workers commuting into Santa Ana. 4. The project results in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) and a reduction in related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions compared with existing conditions because the GPU includes policies that promote the reduction of VMT. Policy 2.5 of the land use element encourages infill mixed -use development at all ranges of affordability to reduce VMT, and policy 4.5 aims to concentrate development along high -quality transit corridors. Policy 4.6 of the circulation element promotes reductions in automobile trips and VMT by encouraging transit use and nonmotorized transportation as alternatives to augmenting roadway capacity. 5. The project provides additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 87 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -64- 6c ober021 6. Implementation of the project would introduce policies and actions that address the importance of protecting the health of residents and the environment by improving air quality, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and encouraging active transportation. 7. The project implements the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) land use policies related to population and housing by providing additional housing near employment centers. 8. The project facilitates the economic development of the city by promoting development that is mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, and clustered around activity centers through new and infill residential development. Additionally, the proposed project would improve the city's jobs/housing balance by supporting development that provides housing and employment opportunities to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. 9. Implementation of the project would coordinate air quality planning efforts to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards by considering the goals of the Climate Action Plan in all major decision on land use and public infrastructure investment and investing in low- to zero -emission vehicles. These policies also promote development that meets or exceeds standards for energy -efficient building design, and the consideration of sensitive of potential emission sources on sensitive uses. 10. The project promotes economic growth and diversity within the city. The economic prosperity element of the GPU includes policies related to improving Santa Ana's economy and its role within the region. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 26 — 88 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -65- 6c ober021 Vill. RESOLUTION REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF THE PEIR The City of Santa Ana finds that it has reviewed and considered the Final Recirculated PEIR in evaluating the proposed project, that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City of Santa Ana declares that no new significant information, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Recirculated Draft PEIR that would require further recirculation. The City of Santa Ana certifies the PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings, including but not limited to the following findings and conclusions: Findings: The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the PEIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section V of this Resolution but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality (project -related and cumulative), cultural resources (project - related), greenhouse gas emissions (project -related), noise (project -related), population and housing (project -related), recreation (project -related). Conclusions 1. Except the impacts (stated above) relating to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas, noise, population and housing, and recreation all significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the PEIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Other alternatives to the proposed project, which could potentially achieve the basic objectives of the proposed project, have been considered and rejected in favor of the proposed project. 3. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the proposed project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the proposed project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the proposed project. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 89 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -66- 6c ober021 IX. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan shall control. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 ac an a emen 26 — 90 2� /?b02?2 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -67- c o er 021 X. RESOLUTION REGARDING CONTENTS AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these records is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6. The record of proceedings for the City's decision on the project consists of the following documents, at a minimum: 1. The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the project. 2. The Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 3. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Draft PEIR and the 20-day extension to the comment period. 4. The Final PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 5. The Recirculated Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 6. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR. 7. The Final Recirculated PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 8. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the project. 9. All findings, resolutions, and ordinances adopted by the City in connection with the General Plan Update, and all documents cited or referred to therein. 10. All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 11. All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the General Plan Update PEIR up through project approval. Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 12. Any documents expressly cited or referenced in these findings, in addition to those cited above. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 91 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -68- 6c ober021 13. Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The following location is where the record may be reviewed: City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92701 This page intentionally left blank. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 92 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -69- 6c ober�021 EXHIBIT C October 2021 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Santa Ana General Plan Update City of Santa Ana Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Contact: Melanie G. McCann, Principal Planner 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 mmccann@santa-ana.org Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: JoAnn Hadfield, Principal 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 714.966.9220 info@placeworks.com www.placeworks.com City Council 26 — 93 2/15/2022 City Council 26 — 94 2/15/2022 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................1 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION........................................................... 6 List of Tables Table Page Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics.............................................................................. 3 Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary.............................................................................................................. 5 Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements...................................................................... 7 City Council October 2021 26 — 95 2/15/2022 Page i GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intenlionalyleft blank. City Council Page ii 26 — 96 2/15/2022 PlaceWorks 1. Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to provide a vehicle to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Final Recirculted Program Environmental Impact Report. The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Santa Ana monitoring requirements. Section 21081.6 states: (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision subsection (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. (c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a lead City Council October 2021 26 — 97 2/15/2022 Page 1 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. The MMRP will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures that are formulated to minimize impacts associated with future development that would be accommodated by the Santa Ana General Plan. 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY The GPU is the comprehensive update of the Santa Ana General Plan. The purpose of the General Plan Update is to comprehensively update the 1982 plan to reflect current conditions, establish a shared vision of the community's aspirations, and create the policy direction to guide Santa Ana's long-term planning and growth over the next two decades. The General Plan Update will include the City's future development goals and will provide policy statements to achieve those goals. Implementation actions related to each goal or policy will be included as a separate Implementation Plan to ensure successful monitoring of progress as a community. Furthermore, the GPU will focus on five areas in Santa Ana that are better suited for future development or overall improvement. These focus areas are: ■ South Main Street ■ Grand Avenue/ 17th Street ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road ■ South Bristol Street General Plan Update The updated General Plan is organized into three sections: Services and Infrastructure (1), Natural Environment (II), and Built Environment (III). The proposed GPU addresses the seven topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace 16 existing elements. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 Housing Element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in late 2021 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed GPU are: City Council 26 — 98 2/15/2022 Page 2 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The GPU will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration) in the plan area by designating land uses in the proposed land use map and through implementation of updated goals and policies of the GPU. Table 1-1 outlines the proposed land use designations under the GPU. Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Grand Avenue/17th Street 171.5 - District Center 23.7 13.8 General Commercial 19.9 11.6 Industrial/Flex 7.1 4.1 Open Space 1.1 0.6 Urban Neighborhood 119.7 69.8 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 354.5 - District Center 158.0 44.6 General Commercial 68.0 19.2 Industrial/Flex 127.4 35.9 Open Space 1.1 0.3 South Bristol Street 199.9 - District Center 108.3 54.2 Open Space 6.0 3.0 Urban Neighborhood 85.7 42.9 South Main Street 312.2 - Industrial/Flex 29.0 9.3 Institutional 19.2 6.1 Low Density Residential 162.3 52.0 City Council October 2021 26 - 99 2/15/2022 Page 3 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Urban Neighborhood 101.7 32.6 West Santa Ana Boulevard 481.6 - Corridor Residential 10.0 2.1 General Commercial 21.5 4.5 Industrial/Flex 87.9 18.3 Institutional 45.5 9.4 Low Density Residential 108.1 22.4 Low -Medium Density Residential 6.8 1.4 Medium Density Residential 27.0 5.6 Open Space 133.6 27.7 Professional and Administrative Office 6.2 1.3 Urban Neighborhood 35.0 7.3 Balance of City 11,598.8 - District Center 124.2 1.1 General Commercial 424.2 3.7 Industrial 2,159.6 18.6 Institutional 886.7 7.6 Low Density Residential 6,173.3 53.2 Low -Medium Density Residential 429.0 3.7 Medium Density Residential 335.3 2.9 One Broadway Plaza District Center 4.1 0.0 Open Space 793.8 6.8 Professional and Administrative Office 260.4 2.2 Urban Neighborhood 4.1 0.0 Not Specified 4.1 0.0 Total 13,118.5 100% Source: Figures aggregated and projected by PlaceWorks, 2020. The full buildout scenario is analyzed in comparison to existing conditions. Table 1-2 details buildout statistics. Similarly, the PEIR provides conclusions regarding impact significance for this scenario for both the proposed GPU and project alternatives. City Council 26 - 100 2/15/2022 Page 4 PlaceVorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary PLANNING AREA BUILDOUT I Housing Units Bldg. Sq. Ft.' Jobs FOCUS AREAS 23,955 15,684,285 35,044 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 9,952 6,142,283 13,302 Grand Avenue/17th Street 2,283 703,894 1,622 South Bristol Street 5,492 5,082,641 11,192 South Main Street 2,308 946,662 2,151 West Santa Ana Boulevard 3,920 2,808,805 6,777 SPECIFIC PLAN / SPECIAL ZONING 20,524 16,958,445 39,702 Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone2 1,260 976,935 2,567 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan 135 143,139 282 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan 4,622 1,967,982 1,578 MainPlace Specific Plan 1,900 2,426,923 5,380 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone 5,551 4,685,947 12,258 Midtown Specific Plan 607 1,818,253 4,615 Transit Zoning Code 6,449 4,939,266 13,022 ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY3 70,574 40,325,086 95,670 CITYWIDE TOTAL 115,053 72,967,816 170,416 Source: City of Santa Ana 2020. 1 Only includes nonresidential building square footage. 2 The figures shown on the row for the Adaptive Reuse Overlay represents parcels that are exclusively in the Adaptive Reuse Overlay boundary. Figures for parcels that are within the boundaries of both the Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone and a specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area boundary are accounted for in the respective specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area. 3 The City has included an assumption for growth on a small portion (5 percent) of residential parcels through the construction of second units, which is distributed throughout the city and is not concentrated in a subset of neighborhoods. Additional growth includes known projects in the pipeline and an increase of 10 percent in building square footage and employment for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The City of Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the city of Newport Beach. The city is bordered by the city of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the city of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel within its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. City Council 26 - 101 2/15/2022 October 2021 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). The mitigation monitoring and reporting program is designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Draft PEIR and Recirculated Draft PEIR, specifications are made herein that identify the action required and the monitoring and reporting that must occur. In addition, a responsible agency is identified for verifying compliance with individual conditions of approval contained in the MMRP. To effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix has been prepared (see Table 1-3). City Council Page 6 26 — 102 2/15/2022 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible I Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor 5.2 AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to Project Applicant City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary and Construction Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Contractor Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: • Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. • Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Tarp and/or maintain a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower. • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. October 2 age 7 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to the Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that requires refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug- in of the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. Page 8 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and Sec. 41-1307.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. October 2 age 9 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day project approval Safety Division Safety or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel -powered transport Division refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa determined that a development project has the potential to emit discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan project approval Safety Division Safety shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Division Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb Concurrent with Project Applicant/ City of Santa City of Santa vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified submittal of site Developer Ana Building Ana Building biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site- development plans Safety Division Safety Division specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified and prior to the biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a issuance of biological resource assessment for the project, including an grading permits assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources of grading permits Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or Developer Safety Division Safety historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Division October 2 age 91 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of Prior to any Property Owner City of Santa City of Santa the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be disturbance of a or Project Ana Building Ana Building used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects historical resource, Applicant/ Safety Division Safety involving the relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a as determined by Developer Division historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not the intensive -level impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards historical shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect evaluation of a meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification property Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. Page 9 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical grading permits, Developer Safety Division Safety resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and for any Division and may also require additional public education efforts and/or subsequent permit memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or involving alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially excavation to impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation increased depth of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. October 2 age 13 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Division Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). Page 14 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor activities Developer Safety Division Safety approved by a California Native American Tribe identified by the Native Division American Heritage Commission as culturally affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre - construction activities in areas of high sensitivity. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards. This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. October 2 age 15 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time Developer Safety Division Safety basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units Division during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities.. Page 16 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity (see Figure 5.6-3), grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to Division confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified Developer Safety Division Safety paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the Division point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) Every five years City of Santa City of Santa City of Santa every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress Ana Building Ana Building Ana Building toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target Safety Division in Safety Division Safety and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified coordination with Division level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG Project emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 Applicant/ for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG Developer emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: October 2 age 17 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: • Administration and Staffing • Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Furthermore, the following measures will be considered when the City updates the Climate Action Plan: • Measures to protect the most vulnerable populations • Measure to increase carbon sinks • Standards for electric vehicle parking • Standards for construction projects 5.12 NOISE N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction of demolition, Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and/or Developer and Safety Division Safety grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa building permits Architect Division Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise - sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the October 2 age 19 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings building permits Developer Safety Division Safety (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete Division and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal building permits Developer Safety Division Safety Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near building permits Developer and Safety Division Safety sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to Acoustical Division assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the Engineer operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. 5.15 RECREATION REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park occupancy permits Developer Safety Division Safety utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing Division public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 5.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa I City of Santa I trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division October 2 age 21 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Safety Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist Division that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing activities Developer Safety Division Safety construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously I I I I Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any October 2 age 23 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Page 24 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank. October 2 age 25 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-06 FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, in 1982, the City of Santa Ana last completed a comprehensive update to the General Plan; and WHEREAS, various elements of the General Plan have been amended and adopted from time to time; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana seeks to adopt a comprehensive update to the Santa Ana General Plan ("project" or "General Plan Update"); and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update identified the following five focus areas for potential change and new growth: South Main Street, Grand Avenue/17th Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard, 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street; and WHEREAS, the total long-term potential growth within these focus areas is estimated at 17,575 new housing units, 2,263,130 non-residential building square footage, and 6,616 jobs; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update also requires the certification of the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report and related documents that have been completed for the project, which approval will be concurrent with the approval of the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, pursuant to SB 1000, the City is required to address Environmental Justice in the General Plan Update due to a number of disadvantaged communities located within the City; and WHEREAS, the goals, policies, and implementation items associated with environmental justice have been selectively placed within the majority of the updated General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) the revision to the State mandated Elements of the General Plan; (2) the inclusion of optional Elements to the General Plan; and (3) approval of General Plan Amendment Resolution No. 2021-XXX City Council 26 — 122 2/15VNTT of 5 (GPA) No. 2020-06, which would result in a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan; and WHEREAS, the General Plan is a community -wide vision document that is intended to address and respond to community needs, with staff conducting outreach with community members about the process to as wide an audience as possible; and WHEREAS, over the past six years, an extensive public outreach campaign to engage the public was conducted to supplement the feedback, input and direction for the comprehensive update to the General Plan. Early public outreach efforts included hosting over 60 community meetings and workshops; hosting individual community workshops within each of the five Focus Areas with over 300 residents, business leaders, and community stakeholders participating in the workshops; distributing an online community survey with over 650 respondents to collect input on the content of the General Plan; the mailing of approximately 44,000 informational flyers to property owners and tenants; presentations at neighborhood Communication Linkages (CommLink) meetings; outreach meetings with Environmental Justice groups (Madison Park Neighborhood Association, Logan Neighborhood Association, Artesia-Pilar Neighborhood Association); and attendance at approximately 100 CARES events within environmental justice communities to discuss the General Plan Update with residents; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR") that was prepared for the General Plan Update (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087), at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Draft PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities and in view of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR") was prepared as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect updates to the General Plan Update and based on an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; and . WHEREAS, in collaboration with neighborhood and community serving organizations, the City reached out through direct mailers, yard signs, and social media to promote awareness of the General Plan Update, and participation in an EJ survey and 10 EJ virtual community forums. In August 2021, an in -person Open House was hosted to share results of outreach, EJ partnerships, and proposed General Plan policies and programs focused on improving environmental health and quality of life in EJ communities; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, Planning work-study sessions were held on August 9, 2021, and August 23, 2021, and a public hearing on September 13, 2021; and Resolution No. 2021-XXX City Council 26 — 123 2/15VM� of 5 WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project. The City Council hereby incorporates by reference, as if fully set forth herein, Resolution No. 2021-XXX certifying the Recirculated PEIR and adopting the findings of fact, statement of overriding considerations and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The General Plan Amendment consists of amendments to 11 Elements of the General Plan and text updates, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Council has concurrently reviewed, certified and adopted the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06, attached respectively as Exhibits B, C, and D. The City hereby finds and determines that all potential environmental impacts of the project, including the amendments to the General Plan, have been fully analyzed in the PEIR. No new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required. There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record to support a fair argument that the project may result in any significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed in the certified PEIR. Section 4. The General Plan Amendment, Recirculated Final Program Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are online, and on file and available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. Section 5. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana. Resolution No. 2021-XXX City Council 26 — 124 2/15VM� of 5 Section 6. The current General Plan will be consolidated into 12 elements, with 11 Elements being comprehensively updated including the Community Element, the Mobility Element, the Economic Prosperity Element, the Public Services Element, the Conservation Element, the Open Space Element, the Noise Element, the Safety Element, the Land Use Element, the Historic Preservation Element, and the Urban Design Element. Section 7. The Housing Element is on a separate update schedule and will be updated in 2022 in compliance with State law. Section 8 The new and updated goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan will be coordinated and consistent throughout the General Plan document. Section 9. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the General Plan Amendment is a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan that is intended to address issues such as incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies between General Plan goals or policies, and will mitigate adverse impacts to the environment. Section 10. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth below: A. The General Plan Amendment shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 20200029087 is certified by the City Council. B. General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 shall not take effect unless and until the City Council overrules the Determination of Inconsistency by the Airport Land Use Commission of Orange County. Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of )2021. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor Resolution No. 2021-XXX City Council 26 — 125 2/15VNTT of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2021-XXX City Council 26 — 126 2/15VNTT of 5 EXHIBIT All materials for Exhibit A may be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/draft-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 26 — 127 2/15/2022 EXHIBIT B All materials for Exhibit B may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/general-plan-environmental-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 26 — 128 2/15/2022 Exhibit C CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of Santa Ana STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2020029087 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that a number of written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an environmental impact report ("EIR") prior to approval of the project pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. The State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 129 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -1- Oc ober021 (d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. (e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. (f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta ll).) The concept of "feasibility" also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001 ["an alternative 'may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record"'].) An alternative may also be rejected because it "would not 'entirely fulfill' [a] project objective." (Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.AppAth 296, 314-315.) "[l=]easibility" under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, "[t]he wisdom of approving ... any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta Il, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 576.) When adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 130 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -2- / c ober021 (a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." (b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. Having received, independently reviewed, and considered the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR"), the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final PEIR), the Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR"), and the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final Recirculated PEIR") for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, SCH No. 2020029087 (collectively, the "PEIR"), as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings of Facts ("Findings") are hereby adopted by the City of Santa Ana ("City") in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency. These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City for adoption and implementation of the Santa Ana General Plan Update ("Proposed Project"). This action includes the certification of the following: ■ Santa Ana General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2020029087 A. DOCUMENT FORMAT These Findings have been organized into the following sections: 1) Section I provides an introduction. 2) Section II provides a summary of the project, overview of the discretionary actions required for approval of the project, and a statement of the project's objectives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 131 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -3- 6c ober�021 3) Section III provides a summary of previous environmental reviews related to the project area that took place prior to the environmental review done specifically for the project, and a summary of public participation in the environmental review for the project. 4) Section IV sets forth findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be —as a result of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and consideration of comments received during the NOP comment period —either not relevant to the project or clearly not at levels that were deemed significant for consideration given the nature and location of the proposed project. 5) Section V sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that the City has determined are either not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of project design features and/or mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance and implementation, all of these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the project and adopted as conditions of the project by the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to project design features and/or mitigation measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. Section V also includes findings regarding those significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that will or may result from the project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level. 6) Section VI sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. 7) Section VI sets forth the statement of overriding considerations for the proposed project. 8) Section VIII sets forth the resolution regarding certification of the PEIR 9) Section IX sets for the resolution adopting a mitigation and monitoring plan for the proposed project. 10) Section X sets for the resolution regarding custodian of records for the proposed project. B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the proposed project consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: ■ The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project ■ The Draft PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Recirculated Draft PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 132 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -4- Oc ober021 ■ The Final PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Final Recirculated PEIR for the proposed project including the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II and III of the Final Recirculated PEIR) ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed project ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ■ The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments ■ All documents, studies, EIRs, or other materials incorporated by reference in the Draft PEIR, Recirculated Draft PEIR, Final PEIR and Final Recirculated PEIR ■ The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the proposed project, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, including comments received after the close of the comment period and responses thereto ■ Matters of common knowledge to the City of Santa Ana, including but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations ■ Any documents expressly cited in these Findings ■ Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). C. CUSTODIAN AND LOCATION OF RECORDS The documents and other materials that constitute the administrative record for the City's actions related to the project are at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 133 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -5- Oc ober021 Santa Ana, CA 92701. The City's Planning Division is the custodian of the administrative record for the project. Copies of these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings, are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the offices of the Planning Division Counter. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 134 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -6- Oc ober021 II. PROJECT SUMMARY A. PROJECT LOCATION Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of Newport Beach. Orange County is surrounded by the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego and is one of six counties comprising the Southern California Region. Santa Ana is bordered by Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, Tustin to the east, Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel in its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. Regional access to the city is provided by the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the Orange Freeway (SR-57) on the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) on the northeast, the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) on the east, and the San Diego Freeway (1-405) on the south. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In March 2014, the City Council adopted the Santa Ana Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan was the result of an extensive community outreach process and established specific goals, objectives, and strategies to guide the City's major efforts. One of the key strategies identified was to complete a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. The General Plan Update (GPU) will provide long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the Santa Ana community through 2045. The General Plan Update will identify areas of opportunity and provide options to enhance development potential in key areas of the city. It will also bring the city into compliance with recent State laws, reflect current conditions, and incorporate input from the general public, City staff, and other stakeholders. The proposed GPU is organized into three sections: I, Services and Infrastructure; 11, Natural Environment; and III, Built Environment. The proposed GPU addresses the eight topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements of the general plan. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace the 16 elements of the current General Plan. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 housing element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in early 2022 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed General Plan update are: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 135 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -7- Oc ober021 Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The proposed GPU is comprehensive both in its geography and subject matter. It addresses the entire territory within the plan area's boundary and the full spectrum of issues associated with management of the plan area. The GPU also includes forecasts of long-term conditions and outlines development goals and policies; exhibits and diagrams; and the objectives, principles, standards, and plan proposals throughout its various elements. The GPU can be found online at https://www.santa-ana.org/general-plan. The General Plan Policy Framework can be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/sites/default/files/pb/general- plan/documents/General Plan PolicyFrameworkMaster.DRAFT. cmo2.pdf. Coordination and consistency are essential between the elements of the GPU, but in particular with the land use element. The circulation element, which identifies proposed improvements to the transportation system, may impact surrounding land uses and future development. The urban design element sets forth policies and programs to improve the city's design and urban form. The conservation element protects and maintains the city's natural, cultural, and other resources, with a focus on preserving aesthetics and the environmental quality of the city. Both the land use element and the circulation element are described in more depth below. Focus areas and specific plan/special zoning areas are also described. Updated Land Use Element The updated land use element will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, use, and revitalization/restoration) within the plan area by designating land uses as shown in the proposed land use map. Figure 3-7 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Final Recirculated PEIR) shows the 13 proposed land use designations of the General Plan update, and Table 3-4 gives a general description of the land use designations that are added to the GPU and were not in the current General Plan. Land use designations define the type and nature of development that would be allowed in a given location of the plan area. The land use designations and patterns are intended to provide the basis for more detailed zoning designations and development intensities, requirements, and standards established in the City's development code. It is important to note that the updated land use element is a regulatory document that defines the framework for future growth and development in the plan area but does not directly result in Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 136 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -8- / c ober021 development in and of itself. Before any project can be developed in the plan area, it must be analyzed for conformance with the General Plan Update, zoning requirements, and other applicable local and state requirements; comply with the requirements of CEQA; and obtain all necessary clearances and permits. Updated Circulation Element The circulation element update is integrally related to federal, state, and regional transportation programs as well as local plans and regulations. The City's role in transportation planning has become increasingly important because recent legislation in the areas of growth management, congestion management, and air quality require more active local coordination to meet regional objectives. Furthermore, the circulation element update is intended to guide future development of the city's transportation system in a manner consistent with the updated land use element. The Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) details proposed street classifications to reflect buildout of the city's roadway system. The street classifications include Freeway, Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, Secondary Arterial, Divided Collector Arterial, and Collector Arterial. As part of the implementation of complete streets principles,' a series of modifications to the city's roadway network has been identified and includes both the reclassification of roadways and assignment of new MPSH roadway classifications to selected existing streets. A number of proposed roadway reclassifications, adoptions, and removals from the MPSH are as follows: ■ Reclassified as Divided Collector Arterial: Santa Clara Avenue west of Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Flower Street between Warner Avenue and 1 st Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Chestnut Avenue between Standard Avenue and eastern city limit (currently Secondary/Primary Arterial) • Raitt Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Santa Ana Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) • Civic Center Drive between Fairview Street and Bristol Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Penn Way between 1-5 on/off ramps and Washington Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Santiago Street between 15th Street and 6th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Standard Avenue between 6th Street and Warner Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Complete streets are transportation facilities that are planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 26-137 2O1c / 0 021i inonsiderations -9- oer . Santa Ana Boulevard between French Street and Santiago Street (currently Primary Arterial) . Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt Street and Flower Street (currently Major Arterial) . Cambridge Street between Fairhaven Avenue and SR-22 freeway (currently Local Arterial) Hazard Avenue between Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) Halladay Avenue between Warner Avenue and Dyer Road (currently Secondary Arterial) McFadden Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Grand Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Broadway between 1st Street and 17th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) 4th Street between French Street and Grand Avenue (currently Primary/Secondary Arterial) Fairhaven Avenue from Grand Avenue to Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) ■ Reclassified as Primary Arterial: . Santa Ana Boulevard between Flower Street and Ross Street (currently a Major Arterial) 1st Street between Bristol Street and Tustin Avenue (currently Major Arterial) ■ Reclassify as Collector Arterial: Civic Center Drive between French Street and Santiago Street (currently a Secondary Arterial) ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Divided Collector Arterial: . Greenville Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Warner Avenue ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Collector Streets: . Civic Center Drive between Spurgeon Street and Santiago Street (currently Local Street) Broadway from Anahurt Street to Main Street (currently Local Road) ■ Remove the following from the MPSH . Memory Lane from the City Center Drive to SR-22 . Wright Street from 14th Street to Fruit Street . 4th Street from French Street to Ross Street . Washington Avenue from Broadway to Main Street 10th street from Broadway to Main Street Columbine Avenue from Main Street to 55 FWY Halladay street from Dyer Road to Alton pkwy Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 138 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -10- 6c ober�021 The majority of the proposed reclassifications aim to reduce existing rights -of -way for vehicular traffic lanes to make room for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Landmark streets are also identified within or adjacent to the Santa Ana Downtown Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The circulation element update incorporates the proposed Santa Ana -Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project, which will introduce new transit service to the city. Santa Ana is working with Garden Grove and Orange County Transit Authority to build a fixed guideway system called the OC Streetcar. Expected to begin operations in 2021, the OC Streetcar will link the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center to a new multimodal hub at Harbor Boulevard/Westminster Avenue in Garden Grove. OC Streetcar will serve historic downtown Santa Ana and Civic Center. Along its four -mile route, OC Streetcar will connect with 18 Orange County Transit Authority bus routes and increase transportation options along Santa Ana Boulevard, 4th Street, the Pacific Electric right-of-way, and Harbor Boulevard. Focus Areas 1. South Main Street Focus Area The South Main Street focus area introduces the opportunity for greater flexibility and a more dynamic mix of land uses and urban design along the properties fronting Main Street. The intent is to transition an auto -dominated corridor into a transit- and pedestrian -friendly corridor through infill development without disrupting the surrounding lower -density neighborhoods. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Facilitate redevelopment and property improvements along Main Street. ■ Create a more active and dynamic streetscape. ■ Protect established residential neighborhoods. ■ Support transit, pedestrian, and nonmotorized travel. The majority of properties fronting Main Street will be designated Urban Neighborhood, allowing for future development to include commercial uses, low- and medium -density housing, or a combination of both in a vertically mixed -use format. South of Warner Avenue, the Industrial/Flex designation will offer new options for small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities. The balance of the focus area will remain designated for Low Density Residential or Institutional to reflect the existing development patterns and land uses. New buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods while still emphasizing the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. 2. Grand Avenue / 17th Street Focus Area The Grand Avenue / 17th Street focus area will foster the development of an urban mixed -use corridor connecting into the city's downtown and transit core. The intent is to create opportunities Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 139 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -11- c o er 021 for a new mix of land uses and design to transition Grand Avenue from a series of auto -oriented shopping plazas to a series of dynamic urban spaces. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Create mixed -use corridors and urban villages. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Foster community spaces and neighborhood -serving amenities. ■ Develop opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. ■ Maintain compatible nodes of commercial activity. The majority of land in this focus area is planned for Urban Neighborhood or District Center land use designations, which will allow a blend of residential and commercial uses to develop simultaneously, as market conditions allow. An intense mixed -use area is envisioned adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, along the east side of Grand Avenue south of 1-5. This part of the focus area will support larger, more visually dynamic buildings and urban spaces that complement and benefit from the adjacent regional transit center. North of 1-5, the buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. A mix of residential, retail, and office will be interspersed along the frontage of Grand Avenue, with a concentrated node of commercial and mixed -use residential uses at Grand Avenue and 17th Street. A small portion of the focus area is designated for Industrial/Flex and General Commercial to support small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities will be located along 17th Street near the Regional Transportation Center. 3. West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area The West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area connects the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan area and Downtown Santa Ana, and the OC Streetcar Project improvements will create the physical transit link in 2022. The intent is to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Develop housing and mixed -use opportunities near streetcar stations. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Buffer industrial land uses and residential neighborhoods. ■ Create opportunities for clean industrial/maker-type spaces. 4. 55 Freeway / Dyer Road Focus Area The 55 Freeway / Dyer Road focus area will transition from almost exclusively professional office to a range of commercial, industrial/flex, and mixed -use development. The intent is to create opportunities for a truly urban lifestyle with easy access to Downtown Santa Ana, multiple transit options, and the new investments and amenities in adjacent communities. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Provide housing opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the city's edge. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 140 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -12- c o er 021 ■ Enhance opportunities for corporate offices. ■ Attract economic activity into the city from surrounding communities. ■ Protect industrial and office employment base. ■ Maintain hotel and commercial uses. The overall scale and experience of the focus area along the freeway and city boundary will reflect an urban intensity and design, with inspiring building forms and public spaces. At the southeastern edge, the District Center land use designation will facilitate large residential mixed -use developments in structures that incorporate high -density housing, hotels, and complementary expansions of commercial uses. Adjacent to the 55 freeway, the Industrial/Flex land use designation will promote large-scale office -industrial flex spaces, multilevel corporate offices, and research and development uses. The node surrounding the freeway interchange will remain as currently planned for General Commercial uses, with new improvements introducing development and spaces that complement the existing examples and elements. South Bristol Street Focus Area The South Bristol Street focus area represents Santa Ana's southern gateway and is a part of the South Coast Metro area. Between Sunflower and Alton Avenues, the District Center land use designation will create opportunities to transform auto -oriented shopping plazas to walkable, bike - friendly, and transit -friendly urban villages that incorporate a mix of high intensity office and residential living with experiential commercial uses. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Capitalize on the success of the South Coast Metro area. ■ Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike friendly, and transit oriented. ■ Provide for mixed -use opportunities while protecting adjacent, established, low -density neighborhoods. Between MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Avenue, the form and intensity will scale down but remain distinctly urban in nature. The redevelopment of the auto -oriented commercial plazas will result in the construction of landmark buildings and structures set in and around spaces accessible to future occupants and the general public. The corridor north of Alton Avenue is planned with the Urban Neighborhood land use designation, allowing for commercial and residential projects, frequently in a mixed -use format, to develop in accordance with market fluctuations. The buildings and spaces in this part of the focus area will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 141 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -13- 6c ober021 Soecific Plan/Saecial Zonin There are seven planning areas that represent specific plans and other special zoning areas that were previously adopted: Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area (2014), Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan (1991/2018), Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan (2014), MainPlace Specific Plan (2019), Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (2007/2018), Midtown Specific Plan (1996), and Transit Zoning Code Specific Development (2010). The most recent adoption/amendment date for each document is noted in parentheses. Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area The Adaptive Reuse Ordinance, Section 41-1651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, provides alternative building and fire standards for the conversion of eligible buildings, or portions thereof, from nonresidential uses to dwelling units, guest rooms or joint living, and work quarters. Eligible structures are buildings within the Adaptive Reuse project incentive area that were constructed in accordance with building and zoning codes in effect prior to July 1, 1974, or which have been determined to be a Historically Significant. The Project Incentive Area includes properties in the Midtown Specific Plan area; the Transit Zoning Code area; the Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone; the North Main Street Corridor on both sides of Main Street, from 17th Street to the northernmost MainPlace Drive; and the East 1 st Street Corridor on both sides of 1 st Street from Grand Avenue to Elk Lane. Residential uses are allowed in the Project Incentive Area irrespective of the underlying zoning as part of an approved Adaptive Reuse Project. Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan covers the 2.5-mile segment of Harbor Boulevard on the west side of Santa Ana. The approximately 305-acre planning area includes parcels adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between Westminster Avenue and Lilac Avenue as well as parcels along Westminster Avenue, 1st Street, and 5th Street. The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan creates the zoning necessary to take advantage of the regional and local transit investments made along and around Harbor Boulevard. The plan expands development options to include residential alongside or integrated into a mix of nonresidential uses. MainPlace Specific Plan The purpose of the MainPlace Specific Plan is to transform MainPlace mall into a family -oriented retail, entertainment, and dining destination. The plan creates a mixed -use urban village with a revitalized mall at its central core. The Specific Plan area is on the north edge of Santa Ana, between Main Street on the east and SR-22 and 1-5 to the north and west. The property is identified in the current General Plan land use element as District Center. The District Center designation includes the major activity areas of the city, designed to serve as anchors to the city's commercial corridors and to accommodate major development activity. No General Plan amendment is required for the specific plan, and the MainPlace Specific Plan is the zoning for the property and defines the allowable uses within its boundaries. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 142 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -14- c o er 021 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone The Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone consists of an original MEMU Overlay Zone and an expansion component. The original MEMU Overlay Zone is largely developed with commercial and office uses and comprises approximately 200 acres immediately east of the 1-5 and immediately west of SR-55. It is bounded by 1-5 on the west and south, Tustin Avenue on the east, and East Sixth Street on the north. The MEMU expansion area added 33.52 acres or approximately 48 parcels to the original MEMU Overlay Zone area. The additional project area extends west primarily along First Street and is generally bounded by the 1-5 to the east, Grand Avenue to the west, East Chestnut Avenue to the south, and Fourth Street to the north. The overall objectives of the MEMU Overlay Zone are to encourage a more active commercial and residential community, provide an expanded economic base, maximize property sales tax revenues, improve the jobs/housing balance within the city, and provide for a range of housing options identified in the 2014 housing element. Midtown Specific Plan The Midtown Specific Plan area is generally bounded by 17th Street to the north, Civic Center Drive to the south, North Ross Street to the west, and North Spurgeon Street to the east. The Midtown area is readily accessible from the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5). Midtown is envisioned as an integrated district of civic, business, cultural, and retail activity with a small residential component. Transit Zoning Code Specific Development The City adopted a Transit Zoning Code to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to allow for the reuse of existing structures; to provide for a range of housing options, including affordable housing; and to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian -oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure. The code encompasses an area in the central urban core of Santa Ana that comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The area is west of 1-5 and bounded by First Street on the south, Flower Street on the west, Grand Avenue on the east, and Civic Center Drive on the north. General Plan Buildout Scenario In general, many areas currently designated for General Commercial and Professional Office will expand opportunities for residential development by a proposed change in General Plan land use designation to Urban Neighborhood or District Center. Industrial Flex will be introduced in each of the five focus areas and replace Industrial land use designations that currently exist to allow for cleaner industrial and commercial uses with live -work opportunities. Furthermore, state law allows a graduated density bonus for the inclusion of affordable housing units For an increasing amount of affordable units (by percentage), a project is allowed an increasing ability to exceed the permitted density (up to a cap of 35 percent). Recent updates to state housing law (Assembly Bill 1763, effective January 1, 2020), enables projects that are 100 Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 143 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -15- 6c ober021 percent affordable (either 100 percent lower income or 80 percent lower and 20 percent limited moderate), to obtain a density bonus of 80 percent, or no limit if within one-half mile of a major transit stop. However, not every proposed project pursuant to the GPU would include affordable units, and not every project that includes affordable units would need a density bonus. Proposed projects pursuant to the GPU are not required to build at densities that exceed maximum limits; the law only requires that jurisdictions grant the density bonus if requested. The buildout methodology for the GPU was based on past development trends, current development trends, and a forecast market analysis. These trends accounted for any units approved (density bonus or otherwise), to determine the appropriate density and amount of development to assume. Additionally, the optimal density of affordable units is at or below the density levels assumed for forecasting buildout. Generally, projects beyond 50 to 70 units per acre require Type 1 construction (steel and concrete structure), which is much more expensive than Type V construction (wood structure). Accordingly, affordable projects are rarely greater than 70 units per acre except for very small parcels. The average densities used to calculate projected buildout at 2045 are 50 to 90 units per acre in the three most intense focus areas; 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, Grand Avenue/17th Street, and South Bristol Street focus areas. For the remaining two focus areas, a residential assumption at 30 units per acre was used over a broad area to account for development at or above the maximum density of 30 units per acre. The maximum is 20 units per acre for projects proposed exclusively residential in the South Main Focus Area. The maximum is 30 units per acre for a relatively small part of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The City's buildout projections are therefore considered to include and account for the application of density bonus provisions of state law to future projects. Furthermore, the potential for development in specific plan and special zoning areas is based on the forecast buildout at the time of the respective zoning document's adoption, minus the amount of new development built between the adoption date and 2019. Growth outside of the focus areas and special planning areas is expected to be incremental and limited. Some growth was projected for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. Some growth was also projected for the commercial and retail area south of the West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area. Finally, some additional residential development is expected on a small portion (5 percent) of single-family and multifamily lots through the construction of second units. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. C. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS Project development requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City: ■ Adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan update ■ Certification of PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 144 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -16- 6c ober021 ■ Adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ■ Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program ■ Adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update D. STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The updated General Plan is based on a vision statement and core values established as part of an extensive, multiyear community outreach effort. The City has identified the following core values to guide the General Plan Update (GPU): ■ Health. The people of Santa Ana value a physical environment that encourages healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and a community that actively pursues policies and practices that improve the health of our residents. ■ Equity. Residents value taking all necessary steps to ensure equitable outcomes, expanding access to the tools and resources that residents need, and balancing competing interests in an open and democratic manner. ■ Sustainability. Santa Ana values land use decisions that benefit future generations, plans for the impacts of climate change, and incorporates sustainable design practices at all levels of the planning process. ■ Culture. The Santa Ana's community values efforts that celebrate our differences as a source of strength, preserve and build upon existing cultural resources, and nurture a citywide culture of empowered residents. ■ Education. Santa Ana values the creation of lifelong learners, the importance of opening up educational opportunities to all residents, and investing in educational programs that advance residents' economic well-being. These core values were used as the basis to define more specific project objectives to aid decision makers in their review of the GPU and associated environmental impacts. The objectives include: 1. Promote infill development while respecting and protecting established neighborhoods. 2. Optimize high density residential and mixed -use development that maximizes potential use of mass transit. 3. Provide locations for new housing development that maximizes affordable housing opportunities to achieve both City and regional housing goals. 4. Facilitate new development at intensities sufficient to generate community benefits and attract economic activity. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 145 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -17- 6c ober021 5. Provide housing and employment opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the City's edge. g. Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike -friendly, and transit -oriented. 7. Develop opportunities for live/work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 146 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -18- 6c ober021 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS In conformance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the proposed project. ■ The City of Santa Ana concluded that a PEIR should be prepared, and the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released for a 30-day public review period from February 26, 2020, through March 27, 2020. The NOP was posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on February 26, 2020. The notice was published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation. Under CEQA, a lead agency may proceed directly with preparation of a PEIR without preparation of an Initial Study if it is clear that a PEIR will be required (State CEQA Guidelines § 15060[d]). The City of Santa Ana made such a determination for this project and did not prepare an Initial Study. ■ Completion of a scoping process, in which the public was invited by the City of Santa Ana to participate. The scoping meeting for the PEIR was held on March 5, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. at the Santa Ana Police Community Room at 60 Civic Center Plaza in Santa Ana. The notice of a public scoping meeting was included in the NOP distributed on February 26, 2020. ■ Preparation of a Draft PEIR by the City of Santa Ana, which was made available for a 45- day public review period (August 3, 2020, through September 16, 2020) and extended to October 6, 2020. The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft PEIR was sent to all persons, agencies, and organizations on the list interested persons, sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to public agencies, and published in the August 3, 2020, Orange County Register. The NOAwas posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on August 3, 2020. Copies of the Draft PEIR were made available for public review at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701, and the City of Santa Ana Public Library at 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Draft EIR was also available for review and download on City website: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan. ■ The Final PEIR contained comments on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft PEIR, if any, and appended documents. The Final PEIR was released for a 10-day agency review period prior to certification of the Final PEIR. ■ At its November 91 2020, public hearing, the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the GPU to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities. ■ The City performed an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted between January and May 2021 as described in Section 2.4 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Recirculated Final PEIR). ■ Pursuant to Draft PEIR comments, the Planning Commission public hearing, and an expanded EJ community outreach program, the City made the decision to prepare a Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 147 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -19- 6c ober021 Recirculated Draft PEIR to discuss and evaluate impacts related to environmental justice, to conclude that the recreation -related impacts of the proposed GPU would result in a significant impact, and to define a new project alternative to reduce recreational impacts. ■ The City recirculate the Draft PEIR chapters that had been revised and the NOAwas released for a 45-day public review period from August 6, 2021 through September 20, 2021. The NOA directed reviewers to only submit comments on the revised Draft PEIR chapters included in the Recirculated Draft PEIR since the comments in the Final PEIR adequately addressed comments received on portions of the Draft PEIR that had not been recirculated. ■ One September 13th, the City conducted a Planning Commission Study Session to discuss the Recirculated Draft PEIR. Verbal comments from the public, received during the Study Session were addressed in the Final Recirculated PEIR. ■ After considering the PEIR and in conjunction with making these findings, the City of Santa Ana hereby finds that, pursuant to Section 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines, approval of the project will result in significant effects on the environment; however, the significant effects will be eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible, and the City has determined that remaining significant effects are acceptable under Section 15093. ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby adopted to ensure implementation of feasible mitigation measures identified in the PEIR. The City of Santa Ana finds that these mitigation measures are fully enforceable conditions on the project and shall be binding upon the City and affected parties. ■ The City of Santa Ana finds that the project is in the public interest and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare. ■ The City of Santa Ana hereby certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. ■ Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15095, staff is directed as follows: a) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be retained in the project files; b) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be provided to all CEQA "responsible" agencies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 148 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -20- 6c ober021 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE SCOPING PROCESS Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses and input at the public scoping meeting), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft PEIR, the City determined, based upon the threshold criteria for significance, that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact on the following potential environmental issues (see Updated Draft PEIR, Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant). It was determined, therefore, that these potential environmental issues would be precluded from detailed discussion in the Draft PEIR. Based upon the environmental analysis presented in the Draft PEIR, and the comments received by the public on the Draft PEIR, no substantial evidence was submitted to or identified by the City which indicated that the project would have an impact on the following environmental areas: (a) Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The City does not have any significant agricultural resources. Additionally, Santa Ana has no land designated or zoned for agricultural use and does not have any land subject to a Williamson Act contract. Santa Ana does not have any land designated or zoned for forestland, timberland, or zoned Timberland Production. (b) Wildfire: According to CAL FIRE, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about 4.0 miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in an LRA is about 3.8 miles away at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. The city is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the city is on the wildland-urban interface. All other topical areas of evaluation included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to require further assessment in the Draft PEIR. B. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IN THE PEIR This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures. This determination, however, does assume compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section of Chapter 5 in the Updated Draft PEIR. (a) Aesthetics: Buildout under the GPU will be at a greater intensity/density in all five focus areas compared to existing conditions. While maximum height would generally be similar to existing buildings, the overall increase in allowed intensity and height across the focus areas would lead to a visually denser urban setting and alter Santa Ana's existing skyline. Buildout under the GPU would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas (such as the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek) since these existing open space parcels would remain unchanged. Additionally, no state scenic highways, eligible or officially designated, traverse the city nor are located near the city. Therefore, the GPU would not damage scenic resources, including rock outcroppings, trees, and historic buildings within state scenic Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 149 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -21- c o er 021 highways. The GPU would also create new sources of light or glare in the project area, but adverse impacts would be minimized with compliance to building codes. (b) Biological Resources: Development pursuant to the GPU would not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. Additionally, the GPU would not impact wetlands and jurisdictional waterways. The GPU would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP as the City is not within a NCCP/HCP area and would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (c) Cultural Resources: The likelihood that human remains may be discovered during clearing and grading activities is considered extremely low. In the unlikely event human remains are uncovered, impacts would be less than significant upon compliance with California and Safety Code Section 7050.5. (d) Energy: Implementation of proposed policies under the GPU, in conjunction with and complementary to regulatory requirements, will ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the GPU would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. (e) Geology and Soils: The plan area's location and underlying geology make it likely to experience seismic hazards, including strong seismic ground shaking, and secondary hazards, like liquefaction. No active surface faults are mapped and zoned under the AP Zoning Act in the plan area. Additionally, all structures that would be constructed in accordance with the GPU would be designed to meet or exceed current design standards as found in the latest CBC. Most of the plan area is within an area susceptible to liquefaction; however, all structures constructed under the GPU would be designed in accordance with current seismic design standards as found in the CBC. There are no substantial hazards with respect to slope stability, as the plan area is mostly flat. Unstable geologic unit or soils conditions, including soil erosion, could result from development of the GPU. Mandatory compliance with existing regulations, including the preparation and submittal of a SWPPP and a soil engineering evaluation, would reduce soil erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the CBC design code, which has been adopted by the City and requires that structures be designed to mitigate expansive and compressible soils, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The probability of subsidence impacts is generally low in the majority of Santa Ana; however, the statutorily required sustainable groundwater management practices of the Orange County Water District would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Future development in the plan area would require connection to the City's sewer system as the City of Santa Ana does not allow for the installation of septic tanks. (f) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The GPU would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 150 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -22- c o er 021 (g) Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Construction and operations under the GPU would involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials; however, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that construction workers and the general public are not exposed to any risks related to hazardous materials during demolition and construction. Furthermore, strict adherence to all emergency response plan requirements set by the Orange County Fire Authority would be required throughout the duration of project construction. GPU buildout is expected to result in some increase in the number of hazardous waste generators; however, hazardous wastes would be stored, transported, and disposed of in conformance with existing regulations of the EPA, US Department of Transportation, CalRecycle, and other agencies. Use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in conformance with regulations would reduce both the likelihood of an accidental release and the potential consequences in the event of an accidental release. The plan area includes 555 sites on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Any development, redevelopment, or reuse on or next to any of these sites would require environmental site assessment by a qualified environmental professional to ensure that the project would not disturb hazardous materials on any of the hazardous materials sites or plumes of hazardous materials diffusing from one of the hazardous materials sites, and that any proposed development, redevelopment, or reuse would not create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment. Santa Ana is in the vicinity of an airport or within the jurisdiction of an airport land use plan. Projects approved under the proposed GPU would be required to comply with FAA airspace protection regulations using the AELUP consistency determination process. The buildout of the GPU would not result in substantial changes to the circulation patterns or emergency access routes, and would not block or otherwise interfere with use of evacuation routes. Buildout would not interfere with operation of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies. Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone, and implementation of the GPU will not expose structures and/or residences to wildland fire danger. (h) Hydrology and Water Quality: Projects pursuant to the GPU would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the demand on groundwater use but would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the amount of pervious surfaces in the plan area, but could substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in some focus areas in a manner which would result in flooding off -site or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, development pursuant to the GPU would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation or impede or redirect flood flows. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 151 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -23- 6c ober021 pursuant to the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. (i) Land Use Planning: Implementation of the GPU would not divide an established community. Additionally, the GPU would be consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport. Implementation of the GPU would be consistent with the goals of the Southern California Association of Governments' RTP/SCS. Implementation of the GPU would also be consistent with the OCTA Congestion Management Plan. (j) Mineral Resources: Project implementation would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. (k) Noise: The proximity of the plan area to an airport or airstrip would not result in exposure of future residents and/or workers to excessive airport -related noise. (1) Population and Housing: The proposed GPU would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist. Therefore, implementation of the GPU would not displace people and/or housing. (m) Public Services: The GPU would introduce new structures and allow for up to 22,361 new residents and workers in the OCFA and Santa Ana Police Department service boundaries, thereby increasing the requirement for fire protection facilities and personnel, as well as increasing the service needs for the Main Library and the Newhope Library Learning Center. The GPU would also generate additional students who would impact the school enrollment capacities of the Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, and Orange Unified School District. However, upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval the project would not create significant impacts related to fire protection services, police protection, library services, or school services. (n) Transportation and Traffic: The GPU is consistent with adopted programs, plans, and policies addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Additionally, GPU implementation would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) in comparison to existing City conditions, and would achieve a VMT/SP at least 15 percent lower than the countywide VMT/SP. Finally, circulation improvements associated with future development that would be accommodated by the GPU would be designed to adequately address potentially hazardous conditions (sharp curves, etc.), potential conflicting uses, and emergency access. (o) Utilities and Service Systems: Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities. However, Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure will support future developments under the Santa Ana GPU. Additionally, OCSD and OC Water District have adequate capacity to serve development pursuant to the GPU in addition to the providers existing commitments. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 152 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -24- c o er 021 pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities. However, the City would have adequate capacity for the proposed increases in water flows across the city under implementation of the GPU and would be able to serve the additional dwelling units and commercial square footage proposed. Furthermore, GPU policies encourage the maintenance and upgrade of water infrastructure through impact fees from new development, and the exploration of other funding sources. Water supply would be adequate to meet development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed stormwater drainage facilities would be able to accommodate proposed development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed solid waste facilities would be able to accommodate development pursuant to the GPU and comply with related solid waste regulations. Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power and natural gas. However, the net increases in natural gas demands due to the GPU buildout are within the amounts that SoCalGas forecasts that it will supply to its customers, and buildout would not require SoCalGas to obtain increased natural gas supplies over its currently forecast supplies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 153 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -25- 6c ober021 V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the PEIR, and the effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found —in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) (1)—that "Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." This is referred to herein as "Finding 1." Where the City has determined —pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that "Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency," the City's finding is referred to herein as "Finding 2." Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either (1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that "Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report." This is referred to herein as "Finding 3." A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the PEIR, the impacts would be considered less than significant. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-6: Industrial land uses accommodated under the General Plan update could create other emissions, such as those leading to objectionable odors, that would adversely affect a substantial number of people. Industrial land uses associated with the GPU may generate potentially significant odor impacts for a substantial number of people. Impacts from potential odors generated from residential and other nonresidential land uses associated with the GPU are considered less than significant. Impacts associated with construction -generated odors are considered less than significant. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 154 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -26- 6c ober021 The Industrial and Industrial Flex land uses are not anticipated to produce odors, and Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would ensure that odor impacts are minimized and facilities would comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402. Therefore, Impact 5.2-6 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is determined that a development project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities • Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 2. Biological Resources Impact 5.3-1: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The inventory of existing conditions determined that no parcels with a proposed land use designation that allows for development (i.e., not an open space designation) currently has Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 155 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -27- 6c ober021 sensitive vegetation. All parcels currently have ruderal vegetation and little to no biological value. Therefore, there is no current indication that future development in accordance with the GPU would have significant unavoidable biological impacts. However, the programmatic analysis prepared for this GPU was not at the detailed, site -specific analysis required for a specific development project. Site -specific analyses could reveal biological resources not identified in the Biological and Natural Resources Report. Therefore, there is a potential for biological impacts associated with implementation of the GPU. Therefore, implementation of the GPU could result in a potentially significant impact. The letter received from CDFW states that the Santa Ana River and its tributaries historically supported federally endangered southern California steelhead. CDFW's letter requests that the Draft PEIR include an analysis of any proposed major stream crossings in the context of fish passage, and states that the analysis should include, but not be limited to, steelhead presence or historic presence, existing conditions including habitat and barrier assessments, any known projects to remove barriers or restore habitat that would affect or be affected by this project, and cumulative impacts to steelhead populations and/or habitat resulting from this project. The GPU does not propose any major stream crossings. If any future development project entails improvements for stream crossings (e.g. Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek), project -level CEQA compliance would require a biological resources report that would address potential impacts to endangered species, including the California steelhead. Impact 5.3-1 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site -specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a biological resource assessment for the project, including an assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 156 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -28- 6c ober021 Impact 5.3-4: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The City of Santa Ana is largely urbanized, and migration corridors are generally limited to the Santa Ana River and the Santiago Creek. Development under the GPU would result in the further infill of the city and removal of vacant sites. The GPU would not change land use designations of parcels that encompass the Santa Ana River or the Santiago Creek. However, development under the GPU could further result in vegetation removal, intrusion by humans and pets, and increased noise and air pollutants, which could impact wildlife movement and nesting sites. Therefore, the buildout of the GPU could affect wildlife movement, nesting sites, and migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as state law. Impact 5.3-4 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures Refer to BIO-1 above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 3. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-2: Development in accordance with the General Plan Update could impact archaeological resources. Development involving ground disturbance within the plan area has the potential to impact known and unknown archaeological resources. Typically, surface -level and subsurface archaeological sites and deposits can be affected by ground -disturbing activities associated with most types of construction. Based on literature review and records searches, eight archaeological resources have been recorded within the plan area, including four prehistoric sites, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While most of the plan area has been developed over the course of the twentieth century, buried resources may remain in areas where developments such as parking lots, parks, or structures with shallow foundations have required only minimal ground disturbance. A review of historical and ethnographic maps indicates a moderate likelihood that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during redevelopment. Archaeological resources impacts are site specific, but more intensive development can result in cumulative impacts on a regional level and should be considered in addition to individual project Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 157 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -29- 6c ober021 impacts on individual sites. As determined by the respective lead agency on a project by project basis, Phase I Cultural Resources studies would be required before ground disturbances and demolition activities are permitted to occur. The study would identify resources on the affected project sites that are, or appear to be, eligible for listing on the National or California Register. Such studies would also recommend mitigation measures to protect and preserve archaeological and tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 were developed to reduce potential individual and cumulative impacts associated with future development and redevelopment. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an archaeological resources assessment be conducted for future development projects to identify any known archaeological resources and sensitivity of the site. Mitigation Measures CUL-5 through CUL-7 detail the next steps required should the archaeological resources assessment identify known resources or determine the site to have high or moderate resource sensitivity. Upon compliance with Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7, individual and cumulative impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade —prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 158 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -30- 6c ober021 and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 159 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -31- c o er 021 above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 4. Geology and Soils Impact 5.6-4: Future development that would be accommodated by the General Plan Update could imaact known and unknown aaleontoloaical resources. Paleontological resources are recognized as nonrenewable and therefore receive protection under the California Public Resources Code and CEQA. Adoption of the GPU in itself will not directly affect paleontological resources. Long-term implementation of the GPU land use plan could allow development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration), including grading, of known and unknown sensitive areas. Grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially disturb paleontological resources. Therefore, future development that would be accommodated by the GPU could potentially unearth previously unrecorded resources. Review and protection of paleontological resources are also afforded by CEQA for individual development projects that would be accommodated by the GPU, subject to discretionary actions that are implemented in accordance with the land use plan of the GPU. Fossil localities have been found in the vicinity of the plan area, although not in the plan area itself. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 prescribe requirements for monitoring based on the sensitivity of sites for paleontological resources. Under GEO-1, areas that range from high to low sensitivity are required to prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan. With adherence to mitigation measures GEO-1 through GEO-3, Impact 5.6-4 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities. GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity, the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 160 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -32- c o er 021 underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PER. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 5. Noise Impact 5.12-3: Buildout of the individual land uses and projects for implementation of the GPU may expose sensitive uses to excessive levels of groundborne vibration. Construction Vibration Impacts. Construction activity at projects within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Vibration from construction activities rarely reaches the levels that can damage structures but can achieve the audible and perceptible ranges in buildings close to the construction site. Vibration generated by construction equipment has the potential to be substantial, since it has the potential to exceed the FTA criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). Construction details and equipment for future project -level developments under the GPU are not known at this time but may cause vibration impacts. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 161 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -33- 6c ober021 With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Operational Vibration Impacts. Commercial and industrial operations within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the operational procedures and equipment. Such equipment -generated vibrations would spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the vibration source varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. In addition, future sensitive receptors could be placed within close proximity to existing railroad lines through buildout in the plan area. Because specific project -level information is not available at this time, it is not possible to quantify future vibration levels at vibration -sensitive receptors that may be near existing and future vibration sources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Mitigation Measures N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 162 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -34- c o er 021 this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 6. Tribal Cultural Resources Impact 5.17-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). The Sacred Land File search yielded positive results, indicating that known tribal resources exist within the plan area. Further, a CHRIS records search at SCCIC indicates that 23 archaeological resources were previously recorded within 0.5 mile of the plan area. Of these resources, eight archaeological resources were located within the plan area; these include four prehistoric sites with habitation debris and lithic scatters, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While the city is urbanized and most of the plan area has been developed, buried resources may remain in areas of minimal ground disturbance, such as parks, parking lots, and structures with shallow foundations. Tribal cultural resources are site specific in nature. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 163 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -35- 6c ober021 Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Impact 5.17-2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c). Future development as a result of the implementation of the GPU could include grading in portions of the City with sensitivity to tribal cultural resources. Grading and construction activities that require more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially cause disturbance to tribal cultural resources. Future development could potentially unearth previously unknown or unrecorded tribal cultural resources. Because the NAHC SLF search yielded positive results and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation identified sensitive areas within the city, the buildout of the GPU may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of tribal cultural resources. Earthwork activities may occur with buildout under the GPU that could impact previously undisturbed tribal cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 164 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -36- 6c ober021 B. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The following summary describes the unavoidable adverse impact of the GPU where mitigation measures were found to be either infeasible or would not lessen impacts to less than significant. The following impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-1: The additional population growth forecast for the General Plan Update and the associated emissions would not be consistent with the assumptions of the air aualitv manaaement clan. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-45 of the Updated Draft PEIR. The GPU would be inconsistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the GPU would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). Buildout of the GPU would exceed current population estimates for the city, and therefore the emissions associated with the additional population are not included in the current regional emissions inventory for the SoCAB. Additionally, air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations in the SoCAB. Therefore, overall, the GPU would be inconsistent with the AQMP. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 into future development projects for the operation phase would contribute to reduced criteria air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU. Additionally, goals and policies in the GPU would promote increased capacity for alternative transportation modes and implementation of transportation demand management strategies. However, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast AQMD thresholds. In addition, the population and employment assumptions of the AQMP would continue to be exceeded until the AQMP is revised and incorporates the projections of the GPU. Therefore, Impact 5.2-1 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 165 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -37- 6c ober021 projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that require refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug-in for the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. • Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 166 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -38- 6c ober021 finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. However, the City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-2: Construction activities associated with future development that would be accommodated under the General Plan Update could generate short-term emissions in exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-47 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU would occur over a period of approximately 25 years or longer. Construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the South Coast AQMD'S significance thresholds during this time and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects are not available at this time, and there is a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Therefore, despite adherence to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, Impact 5.2-2 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 167 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -39- 6c ober021 incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: ■ Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. ■ Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 168 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -40- 6c ober021 technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-3: Implementation of the General Plan Update would generate long-term emissions in exceedance of South Coast AQMD's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-48 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout in accordance with the GPU would generate long-term emissions that would exceed South Coast AQMD's regional significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Mitigation Measure AQ-2, in addition to the goals and policies of the GPU, would reduce air pollutant emissions to the extent feasible. The measures and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants in the city. Further, compared to existing baseline year conditions, emissions of NOx, CO, and SOx are projected to decrease from current levels despite growth associated with the GPU. However, Impact 5.2-3 would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the GPU. Contributing to the nonattainment status would also contribute to elevating health effects associated with these criteria air pollutants. Reducing emissions would further contribute to reducing possible health effects related to criteria air pollutants. It is speculative for this broad -based GPU to determine how exceeding the regional thresholds would affect the number of days the region is in nonattainment, since mass emissions are not correlated with concentrations of emissions, or how many additional individuals in the air basin would suffer health effects. South Coast AQMD is the primary agency responsible for ensuring the health and welfare of sensitive individuals to elevated concentrations of air quality in the SoCAB, and at the present time it has not provided methodology to assess the specific correlation between mass emissions generated and the effect on health in order to address the issue raised in the Friant Ranch case. Ozone concentrations are dependent upon a variety of complex factors, including the presence of sunlight and precursor pollutants, natural topography, nearby structures that cause building downwash, atmospheric stability, and wind patterns. Because of the complexities of predicting ground -level ozone concentrations in relation to the National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards, it is not possible to link health risks to the magnitude of emissions exceeding the significance thresholds. To achieve the health -based standards established by the EPA, the air districts prepare air quality management plans that detail regional programs to attain the ambient air quality standards. However, because cumulative development within the city would exceed the regional significance thresholds, the proposed project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the basin until the attainment standards are met in the SoCAB. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 169 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -41- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-4: Operation of industrial and warehousing land uses accommodated under the General Plan Update could expose sensitive receptors to substantial toxic air contaminant concentrations. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-50 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU could expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants JAC). Buildout could result in new sources of criteria air pollutant emissions and/or TACs near existing or planned sensitive receptors. Review of development projects by South Coast AQMD for permitted sources of air toxics (e.g., industrial facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities) would ensure that health risks are minimized. Additionally, Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would ensure mobile sources of TACs not covered under South Coast AQMD permits are considered during subsequent, project -level environmental review by the City of Santa Ana. Individual development projects would be required to achieve the incremental risk thresholds established by South Coast AQMD, and TACs would be less than significant. However, implementation of the GPU would generate TACs that could contribute to elevated levels in the air basin. Though individual projects would achieve the project -level risk threshold of 10 per million, they would nonetheless contribute to the higher levels of risk in the SoCAB. Therefore, the GPU's cumulative contribution to health risk is significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 170 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -42- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel - powered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 171 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -43- 6c ober021 Impact 5.2-5: Development and operation of land uses accommodated by the General Plan Update could generate emissions that exceed the localized significance thresholds and expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of criteria air Dollutants. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-53 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Because existing sensitive receptors may be close to project -related construction activities and large emitters of on -site operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, construction and operation emissions generated by individual development projects have the potential to exceed South Coast AQMD's Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would reduce the regional construction and operation emissions associated with buildout of the GPU and therefore also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, to the extent feasible. However, even with the implementation of these mitigation measures, Impact 5.2-5 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would also be applicable in reducing construction- and operation -related LST impacts. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 172 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -44- c o er 021 2. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout consistent with the General Plan Update could impact an identified historic resource. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, starting on page 5.4-26 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Generally, potential impacts to historical resources resulting from future projects developed pursuant to the GPU would be mitigated by the City's fulfillment of its statutory responsibilities under CEQA. However, for certain development pursuant to the GPU, the City may determine that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided. The City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits. Though the possible demolition or alteration of a historical resource cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. With fulfillment of the CUL-1 and CUL-2, future development consistent with the GPU would result in a less than significant impact to cultural resources. However, if significant impacts cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources are documented consistent with Mitigation Measure CUL-3. The Historical Resources Technical Report determined that unavoidable impacts to historical resources resulting from future development under the GPU will be reduced to the maximum extent feasible but will still be significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3. Therefore, the development under the GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects involving the relocation, conversion, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 173 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -45- 6c ober021 rehabilitation, or alteration of a historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 174 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -46- 6c ober021 changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.7-1: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in a decrease in GHG emissions in horizon year 2045 from existing baseline but may not meet the long-term GHG reduction goal under Executive Order S-03-05. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, starting on page 5.7-31 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions in order to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the state cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the state and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, Impact 5.7-1 would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 175 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -47- 6c ober021 • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: ■ Administration and Staffing ■ Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 4. Noise Impact 5.12-1: Construction activities associated with buildout of the plan area would result in temporary noise increases at sensitive receptors. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 176 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -48- 6c ober021 substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less -than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 177 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -49- 6c ober021 unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.12-2: Buildout of the plan area would cause a substantial traffic noise increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-30 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise -sensitive receptors below the thresholds. However, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 178 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -50- 6c ober021 residences along affected roadways. No individual measures and no set of feasible or practical mitigation measures are available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels in all cases. Thus, traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less - than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure N-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 5. Population and Housing Impact 5.13-1: The GPU would directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, starting on page 5.13-12 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Full buildout of the GPU would result in a population of 431,629, and the city's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Governments' 2045 projections. Furthermore, the city's housing units at buildout would be 115,053, which exceeds the Orange County Council of Governments' projection by 38 percent. There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 179 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -51- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 226-180 2�c /?0021i inonsiderations -52- ober 6. Recreation Impact 5.15-1: The General Plan Update would generate additional residents that would increase the use of existing park and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-27 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Although required park fees for development could be sufficient to fund new parks and improvements, there is a lack of available land and lack of land designated as Open Space within the General Plan Update to develop new parks or expand existing facilities. The City of Santa Ana is essentially built. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure REC-1 to monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area would contribute to reducing impacts to existing public parks within a '/z radius of the focus area. Compliance with this mitigation measure, regulatory requirements, and implementation of proposed GPU policies and implementation actions would reduce the potential impact of the proposed GPU on existing park facilities. However, because of the existing park deficiencies and scale of development in park -deficient areas, the project's impact would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 181 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -53- 6c ober021 Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.15-2: Population increases resulting from project implementation would increase recreation demands that would require construction or expansion of recreation facilities that would have potential to result in physical impacts to the environment. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Population increases resulting from the implementation of the GPU would increase recreation demands and require construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Although construction and/or expansion of new parks and recreation facilities would be subject to GPU policies and implementation actions; regulatory requirements, and future, project specific environmental review under CEQA, it is still possible that development of such facilities could result in significant unavoidable impacts Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts to recreation at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 182 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -54- c o er 021 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR include a discussion of reasonable project alternatives that would "feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[a]). As discussed above, the PEIR identified significant impacts in a number of categories. The following impacts could be mitigated below a level of significance: air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, tribal cultural resources impacts. The following impacts cannot be mitigated below a level of significance: certain air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation impacts. The PEIR analyzed four alternatives to the proposed project that could reduce some, if not all, of the impacts. A. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED DURING THE SCOPING/PROJECT PLANNING "Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[c]). Alternative Circulation Element— Roadway Classifications. The proposed circulation element in the GPU evolved over a long process and coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). During this process, alternative packages of arterial roadway classifications were considered that involved roadways in OCTA's Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The majority of reclassifications proposed were identified for bicycle facility safety improvements in the City's Safe Mobility Santa Ana (SMSA) Plan, prepared in 2016. Most of the reclassifications identified were for roadways where bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements would require roadway reconfiguration and a reduction in the number of existing or planned travel lanes. Many of the SMSA recommendations across the city have already been, or are in the process of being, implemented along arterial roadways without reducing the number of lanes. A cursory review of two optional roadway reclassification packages was conducted to determine whether these optional plans would have the potential to eliminate significant impacts of the proposed GPU and meet most the project objectives. It was determined that a detailed evaluation of this alternative was not needed to provide a reasonable range of EIR project alternatives. Transportation/traffic impacts of the proposed project were determined to be less than significant (VMT/SP falls below the significance threshold for the GPU without mitigation). Although these alternatives may have some potential to reduce VMT (by reducing the number of travel lanes for some roadways) and thereby also potentially reduce air quality, greenhouse gas, and traffic noise impacts, these alternatives would also result in more inconsistencies with the MPAH and result in more traffic congestion. Although traffic congestion is no longer a CEQA consideration, the GPU sets forth standards for level of service that will be considered by decision -makers. Moreover, the Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 183 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -55- 6c ober021 Reduced Density and RTP/SCS Consistency alternatives were determined to be meaningful alternatives to consider for the potential of reducing air quality, GHG, and traffic noise impacts. Reduced Traffic Noise Alternative. Since traffic noise was determined to be a significant, unavoidable impact of the proposed GPU, a project alternative designed to eliminate this significant impact was considered. The required reductions in traffic volumes (ADT) were determined along roadways where buildout of the GPU would result in significant noise increases. These estimates were compared to the surrounding land uses that would generate ADTs for those roadway segments. Traffic noise along these roadways would both exceed the noise standard and abut sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). Several segments would experience significant, unavoidable traffic noise impacts without the land use changes proposed under the GPU. Since significant traffic noise could not be avoided, further evaluation of this alternative was not deemed to be meaningful. B. ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS Given the significant, unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed GPU, project alternatives with the potential to substantially reduce development were identified for further review. Significant GPU impacts to long-term air quality, GHG emissions, population and housing, and recreation all directly relate to the level of development that would occur within the city. At the programmatic level of this GPU PEIR, site -specific information regarding potential significant historical impacts is not available, and therefore, an alternative could not be customized to reduce that impact. A reduced intensity alternative would also be expected to reduce the significant traffic noise impact (as discussed above). A reduced park demand alternative was also analyzed to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to recreation. The following development alternatives to the proposed GPU were chosen for further analysis. No Project / Current General Plan Alternative The evaluation of the No Project alternative is required by CEQA. The No Project alternative is typically defined as the development scenario that would occur if the project as proposed is not adopted. For a General Plan, the No Project alternative is typically represented by the jurisdiction's existing General Plan, including land use plan, circulation master plan, and policies in each General Plan element. Therefore, this alternative assumes that the existing General Plan —with various adoption dates for different elements between 1982 and 2014—would remain in effect. This existing General Plan also reflects amendments, including new Specific Plans and special zoning areas that have been adopted through the Notice of Preparation for this GPU. Finding. The City Council rejects the No Project/Current General Plan Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 184 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -56- 6c ober021 opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 11 impact categories, reduced impacts to 5 environmental impacts, and increase impacts to 4 categories. Impacts would be similar for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, noise, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. This alternative would reduce impacts for aesthetics, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems. Impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, and transportation would increase. This alternative does not mitigate any of the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the GPU to a less than significant impact. It would also exceed the City's VMT threshold. Overall, impacts under this alternative would decrease in comparison to the proposed project. The No Project/Current General Plan alternative would not achieve many of the proposed project objectives. The existing land use plan does not provide the opportunities to provide housing and employment at the levels required to meet local and regional goals. Moreover, the No Project alternative would not provide numerous general policies as included in the GPU to achieve these goals and invigorate communities. The current General Plan, however, protects established neighborhoods and several Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas would provide for infill opportunities, protect established neighborhoods, and result in mixed -use villages and bike- and pedestrian -friendly communities. Reduced Intensity Alternative (Reduced capacity for the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas) Under the GPU, the only areas that include revisions to land use designations to accommodate new growth are within the five focus areas. The majority of remaining growth would occur within previously approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. A nominal amount of growth is assumed to occur in other areas of the city and would not require land use amendments. The Reduced Intensity Alternative would substantially reduce development capacity within two focus areas, 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol Street, which accommodate approximately 65 percent of the housing unit growth and 72 percent of the nonresidential use (by building square footage) of the growth projected for the combined focus areas under the GPU. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. For this alternative, development of the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas would be reduced to approximately 50 percent of the maximum allowed per the land use designations. This alternative would reduce housing units by a total of 5,383 and would reduce total building square footage by approximately 4.2 million square feet distributed between these two focus areas. This alternative would also reduce population by 19,825 and jobs by 9,184. Overall, this alternative would reduce the housing growth accommodated by the GPU land use changes by approximately 18 percent and reduce nonresidential building square footage by approximately 27 percent. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 185 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -57- 6c ober021 Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Intensity Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 7 impact categories, reduce impacts to 12 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. The Reduced Density Alternative reduces the level of development for two of the five focus areas (55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol Street) relative to the GPU. No other changes to the GPU are made for this alternative. It is assumed to include the same General Plan policies and would not modify the circulation element or related improvements. Therefore, this alternative would attain many of the project's objectives. It would not "optimize" high density housing and mass transit opportunities, and so was found not to attain objective No. 2. It would, however, achieve objectives Nos. 3 through 5, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities, and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed -use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative (Reduced development for RTP/SCS population/housing consistency) This alternative was developed to evaluate an update to the General Plan that would be consistent with the population and housing projections used to develop the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) most recent Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)—Connect SoCal (adopted May 7, 2020). Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The plan embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 186 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -58- 6c ober021 Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The proposed GPU would result in a significant population and housing impact because development under the GPU would substantially exceed the projections used in Connect SoCal. SCAG uses locally prepared population and housing projections to develop the regional plan. For the City of Santa Ana, those projections were provided by the Orange County Council of Governments, as prepared by the Center for Demographic Research. The population/housing figures reflected for Santa Ana in the regional plan for 2045 are: population, 360,100; total housing units, 80,100; and total jobs, 176,400. Projections for the RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) use land use designations as approved in adopted general plans. The employment projections are similar for the GPU and RTP/SCS scenarios, but the RTP/SCS projections for population and housing units are substantially lower than GPU projections (18 percent and 27 percent lower, respectively). The RTP/SCS alternative, therefore, represents the least -development -intensive project alternative evaluated for the PEIR. ■ This alternative would substantially reduce the growth that would be accommodated within the focus areas under the GPU. New growth within the focus areas would total 6,380 housing units and approximately 3.7 million square feet of nonresidential uses, instead of a total additional 23,955 housing units and approximately 15.7 million square feet within the focus areas. This alternative distributes anticipated development through the focus areas and the approved Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas. For purposes of this alternative, it is assumed that a development cap would be used to limit total growth to the projections shown. ■ Subsequent updates of the regional plan would incorporate updated land use from the GPU and resolve the substantial discrepancy between the population and housing projections. Note also that the PEIR concludes that the GPU is consistent with the goals of the RTP/SCS. This alternative has been defined to eliminate the significant impact associated with substantial population growth that is inconsistent with the regional plan, as well as reduce other significant growth -related (AQ/GHG, traffic noise) impacts associated with the GPU as proposed. Finding. The City Council rejects the 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would reduce impacts to 12 environmental impacts, result in similar impacts to 6 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. It would reduce impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. Impacts would be very similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. It would increase impacts to land use and planning. It would also increase impacts to transportation and Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 26 — 187 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -59- 6c ober021 potentially introduce a new significant impact. It is anticipated, however, that under this alternative, transportation could be mitigated to less than significant. Under the GPU, transportation impacts are less than significant without mitigation. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. The impact to population and housing would be reduced to less than significant. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be reduced in comparison to the proposed project. Due to the substantial reduction in housing opportunities citywide, this alternative is the least effective in achieving the project objectives of the GPU. By setting a development cap to limit housing and nonresidential development to the projections for the city in the 2020 RTP/SCS, this alternative reduces housing units by 31,515 compared to the GPU. It reduces housing development potential within the focus areas by 73 percent in comparison to the GPU, and reduces overall city future development by 27 percent. To achieve this reduction, the development cap would not only limit focus area development but would restrict the entitled housing in Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas (reducing total housing within these areas by almost 14,000 units). This alternative clearly would not optimize high density housing that maximizes mass transit use (objective No. 2) or provide urban -level intensities at the urban edges (objective No. 3). Moreover, it would not facilitate intensities that attract economic activities, particularly since it would not allow the maximum entitlement of approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. It would achieve the remainder of the objectives, but to a lesser extent than the GPU. It would protect established neighborhoods, but not promote infill development as much as the GPU or other alternatives (objective No. 1). It would provide only limited opportunities for live -work and artist spaces and small-scale manufacturing (objective No. 7). Reduced Park Demand Alternative The City's Park standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents is not achieved under existing conditions and development allowed under the GPU would further exacerbate park and open space shortages. Without new parks, growth in any of the focus areas would exacerbate the current level of park deficiency either in or adjacent to disadvantaged communities. The areas proposed for substantial new residential development under the GPU were compared to the distribution of existing parks —location, size, and demand —to define the Reduced Park Demand Alternative. The Reduced Park Demand Alternative reduces residential growth by 11,225 units by eliminating or reducing residential land uses and intensity in the five focus areas. Overall, nonresidential square footage would be reduced by a total of approximately 2.8 million square feet within the focus areas compared to the proposed GPU. The nonresidential square footage would increase, however, in two of the focus areas: 17th Street/Grand Avenue by 697,000 square feet, and South Bristol by 739,000 square feet. New residential growth under this alternative would largely be in currently planned areas that are generally near a substantial number of existing park facilities. Some residential growth would be introduced into two focus areas at substantially lower intensities to reduce the potential impact on park facilities. Changes to the focus areas are as follows: ■ South Main Street. This focus area would remain as currently planned as a commercial corridor (GC) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) and District Center (DC) to reduce intensity Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 188 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -60- 6c ober021 so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities that are served by parks, but the existing parks are very small. ■ South Bristol Focus Area. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 2,273 units on sites that are more than a half mile from existing parks (generally west of Bristol and south of MacArthur Boulevard). ■ Grand Avenue/17th Street. Stay as currently planned as a lower density residential (LR-7) and commercial corridor (GC) to reduce intensity so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions, because much of the focus area is more than a half mile from existing parks. ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard. This focus area would remain as currently planned with lower density residential (LR-7) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity so that no additional units are constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities with areas that are farther than a half mile from existing parks in this focus area. ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 5,381 units because a majority of the area is more than a half mile from existing parks in Santa Ana; the reduced intensity would also reduce potential impacts on adjacent parkland in Tustin. Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Park Demand Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 6 impact categories, reduced impacts to 12 categories, and increased impacts to 2 categories. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would reduce the recreation impacts of the proposed GPU, as it was designed to do, and would improve the park acres/resident ratio compared to the proposed GPU. Recreation impacts to disadvantaged communities would also be reduced. Given the lack of available land for new parks, however, it would not eliminate the significant, unavoidable impact of the project. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 189 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -61- c o er 021 population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. This alternative would attain some of the project's objectives. It would promote infill development to a lesser extent than the GPU and would protect established neighborhoods (Objective 1), and would also develop opportunities of live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing (Objective 7). Given the substantial reduction in housing units, it was also concluded that it would not meet Objectives 2 and 3, to maximize high density residential development and mixed use proximate to potential mass transit use (Objective 2) and to maximize affordable housing and achieve City and regional housing goals (Objective 3). It would, however, achieve Objectives 4 through 6, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With new opportunities eliminated in three focus areas and the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway /Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed - use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. C. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE CEQA requires a lead agency to identify the "environmentally superior alternative" and, in cases where the "No Project" Alternative is environmentally superior to the GPU, the environmentally superior development alternative must be identified. One alternative has been identified as "environmentally superior" to the GPU: ■ The RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative is concluded to be the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project alternative is not environmentally superior to the proposed GPU. Both the Reduced Density and RTP/SCS alternatives reduce environmental impacts in comparison to the GPU, but the RTP/SCS reduces more impacts and eliminates a significant, unavoidable impact of the GPU. This alternative was designed to eliminate the significant population impact of the GPU, but it also reduces potential future development more than any of the other alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 190 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -62- c o er 021 VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS A. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification of the PEIR for General Plan Update (project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the proposed project. In making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of Overriding Considerations, which states: a. CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b. When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c. If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against the unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 191 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -63- 6c ober021 with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed project, none of which both meets the project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed project, for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for this project, and having reviewed the PEIR for the GPU, and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the project. B. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations, which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impacts of the project, and each of which, standing alone, is sufficient to support approval of the project, in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. The specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project are as follows: 1. The community, land use, and public services elements of the project encourage healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and policies and practices that improve the health of residents. The policies also affirm and support a socially and economically diverse community with equitable distribution of resources. 2. Implementation of the GPU fulfills one of the key strategies identified in the Santa Ana Strategic Plan in the completion of a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. 3. The project improves the jobs -housing balance; the ratio of 1.5 would give the city a more equal distribution of employment and housing. The population growth resulting directly from the proposed GPU would be offset by the level of employment opportunity provided to the city's residents and workers commuting into Santa Ana. 4. The project results in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) and a reduction in related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions compared with existing conditions because the GPU includes policies that promote the reduction of VMT. Policy 2.5 of the land use element encourages infill mixed -use development at all ranges of affordability to reduce VMT, and policy 4.5 aims to concentrate development along high -quality transit corridors. Policy 4.6 of the circulation element promotes reductions in automobile trips and VMT by encouraging transit use and nonmotorized transportation as alternatives to augmenting roadway capacity. 5. The project provides additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 192 2� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -64- c o er 021 6. Implementation of the project would introduce policies and actions that address the importance of protecting the health of residents and the environment by improving air quality, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and encouraging active transportation. 7. The project implements the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) land use policies related to population and housing by providing additional housing near employment centers. 8. The project facilitates the economic development of the city by promoting development that is mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, and clustered around activity centers through new and infill residential development. Additionally, the proposed project would improve the city's jobs/housing balance by supporting development that provides housing and employment opportunities to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. 9. Implementation of the project would coordinate air quality planning efforts to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards by considering the goals of the Climate Action Plan in all major decision on land use and public infrastructure investment and investing in low- to zero -emission vehicles. These policies also promote development that meets or exceeds standards for energy -efficient building design, and the consideration of sensitive of potential emission sources on sensitive uses. 10. The project promotes economic growth and diversity within the city. The economic prosperity element of the GPU includes policies related to improving Santa Ana's economy and its role within the region. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 193 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -65- 6c ober021 Vill. RESOLUTION REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF THE PEIR The City of Santa Ana finds that it has reviewed and considered the Final Recirculated PEIR in evaluating the proposed project, that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City of Santa Ana declares that no new significant information, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Recirculated Draft PEIR that would require further recirculation. The City of Santa Ana certifies the PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings, including but not limited to the following findings and conclusions: Findings: The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the PEIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section V of this Resolution but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality (project -related and cumulative), cultural resources (project - related), greenhouse gas emissions (project -related), noise (project -related), population and housing (project -related), recreation (project -related). Conclusions 1. Except the impacts (stated above) relating to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas, noise, population and housing, and recreation all significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the PEIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Other alternatives to the proposed project, which could potentially achieve the basic objectives of the proposed project, have been considered and rejected in favor of the proposed project. 3. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the proposed project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the proposed project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the proposed project. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 194 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -66- 6c ober021 IX. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan shall control. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 ac an a emen 26 — 195 2� /?b02?2 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -67- c o er 021 X. RESOLUTION REGARDING CONTENTS AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these records is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6. The record of proceedings for the City's decision on the project consists of the following documents, at a minimum: 1. The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the project. 2. The Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 3. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Draft PEIR and the 20-day extension to the comment period. 4. The Final PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 5. The Recirculated Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 6. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR. 7. The Final Recirculated PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 8. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the project. 9. All findings, resolutions, and ordinances adopted by the City in connection with the General Plan Update, and all documents cited or referred to therein. 10. All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 11. All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the General Plan Update PEIR up through project approval. Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 12. Any documents expressly cited or referenced in these findings, in addition to those cited above. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 26 — 196 2/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -68- 6c ober021 13. Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The following location is where the record may be reviewed: City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92701 This page intentionally left blank. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement26 — 197 2 1 / 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -69- 6c ober�021 EXHIBIT D October 2021 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Santa Ana General Plan Update City of Santa Ana Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Contact: Melanie G. McCann, Principal Planner 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 mmccann@santa-ana.org Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: JoAnn Hadfield, Principal 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 714.966.9220 info@placeworks.com www.placeworks.com City Council 26 — 198 2/15/2022 City Council 26 — 199 2/15/2022 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................1 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION........................................................... 6 List of Tables Table Page Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics.............................................................................. 3 Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary.............................................................................................................. 5 Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements...................................................................... 7 City Council October 2021 26 — 200 2/15/2022 Page i GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intenlionalyleft blank. City Council Page ii 26 — 201 2/15/2022 PlaceWorks 1. Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to provide a vehicle to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Final Recirculted Program Environmental Impact Report. The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Santa Ana monitoring requirements. Section 21081.6 states: (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision subsection (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. (c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a lead City Council October 2021 26 — 202 2/15/2022 Page 1 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. The MMRP will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures that are formulated to minimize impacts associated with future development that would be accommodated by the Santa Ana General Plan. 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY The GPU is the comprehensive update of the Santa Ana General Plan. The purpose of the General Plan Update is to comprehensively update the 1982 plan to reflect current conditions, establish a shared vision of the community's aspirations, and create the policy direction to guide Santa Ana's long-term planning and growth over the next two decades. The General Plan Update will include the City's future development goals and will provide policy statements to achieve those goals. Implementation actions related to each goal or policy will be included as a separate Implementation Plan to ensure successful monitoring of progress as a community. Furthermore, the GPU will focus on five areas in Santa Ana that are better suited for future development or overall improvement. These focus areas are: ■ South Main Street ■ Grand Avenue/ 17th Street ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road ■ South Bristol Street General Plan Update The updated General Plan is organized into three sections: Services and Infrastructure (1), Natural Environment (II), and Built Environment (III). The proposed GPU addresses the seven topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace 16 existing elements. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 Housing Element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in late 2021 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed GPU are: City Council 26 — 203 2/15/2022 Page 2 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The GPU will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration) in the plan area by designating land uses in the proposed land use map and through implementation of updated goals and policies of the GPU. Table 1-1 outlines the proposed land use designations under the GPU. Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Grand Avenue/17th Street 171.5 - District Center 23.7 13.8 General Commercial 19.9 11.6 Industrial/Flex 7.1 4.1 Open Space 1.1 0.6 Urban Neighborhood 119.7 69.8 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 354.5 - District Center 158.0 44.6 General Commercial 68.0 19.2 Industrial/Flex 127.4 35.9 Open Space 1.1 0.3 South Bristol Street 199.9 - District Center 108.3 54.2 Open Space 6.0 3.0 Urban Neighborhood 85.7 42.9 South Main Street 312.2 - Industrial/Flex 29.0 9.3 Institutional 19.2 6.1 Low Density Residential 162.3 52.0 City Council October 2021 26 - 204 2/15/2022 Page 3 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Urban Neighborhood 101.7 32.6 West Santa Ana Boulevard 481.6 - Corridor Residential 10.0 2.1 General Commercial 21.5 4.5 Industrial/Flex 87.9 18.3 Institutional 45.5 9.4 Low Density Residential 108.1 22.4 Low -Medium Density Residential 6.8 1.4 Medium Density Residential 27.0 5.6 Open Space 133.6 27.7 Professional and Administrative Office 6.2 1.3 Urban Neighborhood 35.0 7.3 Balance of City 11,598.8 - District Center 124.2 1.1 General Commercial 424.2 3.7 Industrial 2,159.6 18.6 Institutional 886.7 7.6 Low Density Residential 6,173.3 53.2 Low -Medium Density Residential 429.0 3.7 Medium Density Residential 335.3 2.9 One Broadway Plaza District Center 4.1 0.0 Open Space 793.8 6.8 Professional and Administrative Office 260.4 2.2 Urban Neighborhood 4.1 0.0 Not Specified 4.1 0.0 Total 13,118.5 100% Source: Figures aggregated and projected by PlaceWorks, 2020. The full buildout scenario is analyzed in comparison to existing conditions. Table 1-2 details buildout statistics. Similarly, the PEIR provides conclusions regarding impact significance for this scenario for both the proposed GPU and project alternatives. City Council 26 - 205 2/15/2022 Page 4 PlaceVorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary PLANNING AREA BUILDOUT I Housing Units Bldg. Sq. Ft.' Jobs FOCUS AREAS 23,955 15,684,285 35,044 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 9,952 6,142,283 13,302 Grand Avenue/17th Street 2,283 703,894 1,622 South Bristol Street 5,492 5,082,641 11,192 South Main Street 2,308 946,662 2,151 West Santa Ana Boulevard 3,920 2,808,805 6,777 SPECIFIC PLAN / SPECIAL ZONING 20,524 16,958,445 39,702 Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone2 1,260 976,935 2,567 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan 135 143,139 282 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan 4,622 1,967,982 1,578 MainPlace Specific Plan 1,900 2,426,923 5,380 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone 5,551 4,685,947 12,258 Midtown Specific Plan 607 1,818,253 4,615 Transit Zoning Code 6,449 4,939,266 13,022 ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY3 70,574 40,325,086 95,670 CITYWIDE TOTAL 115,053 72,967,816 170,416 Source: City of Santa Ana 2020. 1 Only includes nonresidential building square footage. 2 The figures shown on the row for the Adaptive Reuse Overlay represents parcels that are exclusively in the Adaptive Reuse Overlay boundary. Figures for parcels that are within the boundaries of both the Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone and a specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area boundary are accounted for in the respective specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area. 3 The City has included an assumption for growth on a small portion (5 percent) of residential parcels through the construction of second units, which is distributed throughout the city and is not concentrated in a subset of neighborhoods. Additional growth includes known projects in the pipeline and an increase of 10 percent in building square footage and employment for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The City of Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the city of Newport Beach. The city is bordered by the city of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the city of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel within its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. City Council 26 - 206 2/15/2022 October 2021 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). The mitigation monitoring and reporting program is designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Draft PEIR and Recirculated Draft PEIR, specifications are made herein that identify the action required and the monitoring and reporting that must occur. In addition, a responsible agency is identified for verifying compliance with individual conditions of approval contained in the MMRP. To effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix has been prepared (see Table 1-3). City Council Page 6 26 — 207 2/15/2022 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible I Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor 5.2 AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to Project Applicant City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary and Construction Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Contractor Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: • Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. • Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Tarp and/or maintain a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower. • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. October 2 age 7 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to the Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that requires refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug- in of the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. Page 8 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and Sec. 41-1307.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. October 2 age 9 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day project approval Safety Division Safety or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel -powered transport Division refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa determined that a development project has the potential to emit discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan project approval Safety Division Safety shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Division Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb Concurrent with Project Applicant/ City of Santa City of Santa vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified submittal of site Developer Ana Building Ana Building biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site- development plans Safety Division Safety Division specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified and prior to the biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a issuance of biological resource assessment for the project, including an grading permits assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources of grading permits Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or Developer Safety Division Safety historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Division October 2 age 91 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of Prior to any Property Owner City of Santa City of Santa the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be disturbance of a or Project Ana Building Ana Building used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects historical resource, Applicant/ Safety Division Safety involving the relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a as determined by Developer Division historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not the intensive -level impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards historical shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect evaluation of a meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification property Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. Page 9 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical grading permits, Developer Safety Division Safety resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and for any Division and may also require additional public education efforts and/or subsequent permit memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or involving alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially excavation to impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation increased depth of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. October 2 age 13 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Division Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). Page 14 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor activities Developer Safety Division Safety approved by a California Native American Tribe identified by the Native Division American Heritage Commission as culturally affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre - construction activities in areas of high sensitivity. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards. This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. October 2 age 15 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time Developer Safety Division Safety basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units Division during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities.. Page 16 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity (see Figure 5.6-3), grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to Division confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified Developer Safety Division Safety paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the Division point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) Every five years City of Santa City of Santa City of Santa every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress Ana Building Ana Building Ana Building toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target Safety Division in Safety Division Safety and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified coordination with Division level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG Project emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 Applicant/ for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG Developer emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: October 2 age 17 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: • Administration and Staffing • Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Furthermore, the following measures will be considered when the City updates the Climate Action Plan: • Measures to protect the most vulnerable populations • Measure to increase carbon sinks • Standards for electric vehicle parking • Standards for construction projects 5.12 NOISE N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction of demolition, Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and/or Developer and Safety Division Safety grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa building permits Architect Division Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise - sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the October 2 age 19 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings building permits Developer Safety Division Safety (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete Division and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal building permits Developer Safety Division Safety Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near building permits Developer and Safety Division Safety sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to Acoustical Division assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the Engineer operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. 5.15 RECREATION REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park occupancy permits Developer Safety Division Safety utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing Division public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 5.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa I City of Santa I trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division October 2 age 21 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Safety Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist Division that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing activities Developer Safety Division Safety construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously I I I I Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any October 2 age 23 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Page 24 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank. October 2 age 25 EXHIBIT 3 All materials for Exhibit 3 may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/draft-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 26 — 227 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 29, 2021 golden city A SXAR0.11 YISFON FO0. BANSA-A The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan, in addition to the clarification of November 1 and November 8, 2021. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. 141e1d:111VA41 I&IaL1III 1 - Page 5-09, POLICY 5-4.2 FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION PART 77 Do not approve buildings and structures that would penetrate Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Obstruction Surfaces, unless, feund consistent with the California Public Utilities Code Section 21240, such building or structure is determined by FAA to pose "no hazard" to air aviation.by the Ai F P e Ft La d 6- se C-e;, FR,;ss+o„TAL IJQ. Additionally, under this Policy,^ efdane +" � P@Ft :7:7Fequ applicants proposing buildings or structures that penetrate the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City and the ALUC4-ef LAND USE ELEMENT Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU-16 Remove outlines to identify GC areas east of the 55 Freeway/Dyer Focus Area and the small parcels with the West Santa Ana Blvd Focus Area to the standard GC of 0.5 FAR. Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU-17 - Add the following to the end of Footnote 1. "FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage." - Add the following to the end of Footnote 4. "Westview Housing project (SD-97) designated as UN-40 allow density up to 42.5 Du/acre." Figure LU-15, Land Use Map, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-48 Remove the outline and label from the GC areas, with exception of the block of GC located northwest of First Street and Townsend. City Council 1 26 — 228 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-49 Remove the "GC-1.5" reference and replace with standard "GC" reference (0.5 FAR and 35 feet maximum height) and GC-1 for the block of GC northwest of First Street and Townsend (also 35 feet maximum height). Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Add the "GC" label to the area east of the 55 freeway. Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Change the 2-story maximum height reference to 35 feet for the CG-1.5 area. - Add a row for General Commercial with 0.5 FAR and 35' maximum height. Figure LU-1, Page LU-12: - Change land use designation on map for the Legacy Sunflower project to UN-50. Table LU-3, Page LU-17: Change Note 4 as follows: Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building types with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code. The 4th and Mortimer project in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allows densities up - 63 units per acre. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. Page LU 22, 23, 24 add Footnote #4. "Refer to page LU-14 for Mixed Use Intensity/Density clarification." Table LU-4, Page LU-30; Table LU-5, Page LU-40; Table LU-6, Page LU-49; Table LU-7, Page LU-56; Table LU-8, Page LU-62: - Revise the note as follows: Coo Table I I I_o Net r- fe— All F c n.e.a Desig atiens f.,.- ad-d-itie—RaI .IULebIveLe: :j Table LU-9 on pane LU-68 for additional criteria for all Focus Area desienations. Table LU-9, Page LU-68: Revise all references to "Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines" to "Focus Area Interim Development Standards" to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City's Municipal Code is updated. Land Use Maps: - Figure LU-1, Page LU-12; Figure LU-4, Page LU-17; and Figure LU-18, Page LU-56: Remove "GC" designation from Hotel Terrace Drive. - Figure LU-1, Page LU-12 and Figure LU-4, Page LU-16 as follows: City Council 2 26 — 229 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 Revise the following land use designations approved through prior general Plan amendments: Northeast block of Mountain View and First Street to match existing persuant GPA No. 2020-04. Hapham Project on Edinger Avenue GPA No. 2017-03; Sunflower Legacy Project GPA No. 2019-01; Westview Housing on 17t" Street GPA No. 2020- 07. The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with the existing land use designations (APN 003- 161-10, 144-551-52, 016-045-19, 398-441-06, 411-131-38). No land use changes are proposed for these sites. • The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with existing right-of-ways and will not be assigned a land use designation (APNs: 411-131-11, 008-131-33, 430-222-18, 430-222-19, 430-222-15, 430-222-17, 430-222-20, 430-222-22, 430-222-23, 398-082-33, 398-221-22, 398-221-23, 430-222-10, & 430-222-11). • The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number have been revised to coincide with surrounding land uses or City park project (APNs: 396- 261-26, 396-261-38, 396-261-37, 396-261-38, 011-251-17, 011-251-18, 011-251-19, & 011- 251-20) OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Figure OS-2, Page OS-09 Figure OS-2: - Change the legend to read "Joint -use P-ar* School". Table OS-3 Open Space Element Implementation, Page OS 16: OS 1.7: Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for I -Larger rResidential pRrojects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. OS 1.7a: Open Space and Park land Incentives. Allow developers a reduction in on -site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize developers to provide additional on -site and/or publicly accessible open space through the OFdonation between tw ^ 'clentoal PFGj ^Ets (of any sizeto create public park land and open space, such as expl^� ^^ ^ ^ housing density bonus eptiens Research and collaborate with residents, developers, and community organizations to design and implement an open space density bonus to incentivize the creation of additional on -site open space in exchange for more density in the project. Agency/Timeframe: PBA/PRCSA 2022 INTRODUCTION - Add an Introduction section for the General Plan to provide a brief overview of the GP's organization, a summary of the update process, and a glossary. City Council 3 26 — 230 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework and Maps golden city beyond A SHARED VISION FOR SANFA ANA November 8, 2021 The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with draft policy and implementation items displayed with tracked changed. Updates to maps, tables, time frames for implementation actions, and other text edits are either described or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. LAND USE ELEMENT Table LU-5, Land Use Designations, Grand Avenue and 171" Street Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Revise General Commercial Land Use designation references in the Focus Areas such that the maximum height is changed from two (2) stories to 35 feet, consistent with height limit in General Commercial land use designations citywide. Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Revise proposed General Commercial (GC) land use designation area east of the 55 Freeway, from 1.5 FAR back to existing 0.5 FAR (consistent with the existing land uses and zoning district allowances). Figure LU-19, Artist Rendering, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Note #2, General Commercial "The area surrounding .... allowing for existing hotel uses on both sides of the 55 Freeway to remain and promoting new commercial development. MOBILITY ELEMENT Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways - Revise to show the following: 1. Newhope Street (New Class II) a. between McFadden Avenue to 1st Street b. between Hazard Avenue to Westminster Avenue 2. McFadden Avenue between West City Limit to Harbor Boulevard (New Class II) 3. Fairview Street (New Class 1) City Council 1 26 - 231 2/15/2022 Clarification to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 8, 2021 a. Between Civic Center Drive and Trask Avenue b. Between Warner Avenue and Sunflower Avenue 4. Susan Street between Alton Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard (New Class 11) 5. Santa Ana River (New Class 1) a. between Edinger Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard b. between Memory Lane and SR-22 6. PE ROW between Westminster Avenue and Raitt Street (New Class 1) 7. OCFCD (New Class 1) a. between Westminster Avenue and West City Limit b. between 15t Street and Monta Vista Avenue c. between Occidental Street and Alton Avenue d. between Edinger Avenue and Sunflower Avenue 8. LOSSAN Corridor between 6t" Street and Chestnut Avenue (New Class 1) 9. Greenville Street between Edinger Avenue and Warner Avenue (New Class 11) 10. Willits Street between Orange County District Flood Channel and Raitt Street (Class IV to Class II) 11. Walnut Avenue (Class 11 to Class 111) a. between 15t street and Raitt Street b. between west of Pacific Avenue and Pacific Avenue 12. Bristol Street between Edinger Avenue and Washington Avenue (New Class IV) 13. Civic Center Drive between Bristol Street and Broadway (New Class II) 14. Chestnut Avenue between Cypress Avenue and Grand Avenue (New Class 11) 15. Cypress Avenue between Chestnut Avenue and 1st Street (New Class II) 16. Standard Avenue between 1st Street and 4t" Street (New Class II) 17. 5t" Street French Street to Lacy Street (New Class 11) 18. Lacy Street between 5t" Street and 6t" Street (New Class III) 19. Brown Street between Lacy Street and Garfield Street (New Class IV) 20. Garfield Street between Brown Street and 6t" Street (New Class IV) 21. 15t Street between Grand Avenue and East City Limit (New Class IV) 22. Cabrillo Park Drive between 1" Street and 4t" Street (New Class 11) 23. Grand Avenue (New Class II) a. between 215Y Street and Fairhaven Avenue b. 1" Street and 4t" Street 24. Fairhaven Avenue Dayna Street to East City Limit (New Class IV) 25. Sunflower Avenue Bristol Street to Main Street (New Class 11) 26. Warner Avenue Pullman Street to Red Hill Avenue (New Class II) Implementation Action M-4.4 - Reevaluate the Residential Permit Parking Program to ensure it complies with state law and best practices. City Council 26 — 232 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 1, 2021 golden city The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. VISION STATEMENT [each element] A SHARED VISION Santa Ana is a city that promotes the health and wellness of all residents, with a civic culture that actively embraces the power of diversity. Our city invests in resources that create economic opportunities for the next generation, and it is a community that celebrates our past while working together to create a sustainable future. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Implementation Action 1.19 - Climate Action Plan. Review and update the City's Climate Action Plan. Time frame: 2023 [updated to reflect Council Climate Action Resolution on 917121] Table CN-1, CalEnviroScreen Scores for Environmental Justice Communities The table was updated with the final CES 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074004). The individual composite, pollution, and population percentile scores, as well as the individual pollution and population variables were also updated based on the finalized CES 4.0 results. Figure CN-3, Environmental Justice Communities - The map updated with the final CalEnviroScreen (CES) 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074004). City Council 1 26 — 233 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT - POLICY OS-1.2 PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM* Provide and support a comprehensive and integrated network of parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space that is diverse, with a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities. - POLICY OS-1.3 PARK STANDARD* Establish and maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of two acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. - POLICY OS 1.4 PARK DISTRIBUTION* Ensure the City residents have access to public or private parks, recreation facilities, or trails in the City of Santa Ana, within 10-minute walking and biking distance of home. Prioritize provision, programs, and partnerships in park deficient an environmental justice areas. [Policy OS-1.4 was left out of the August 2021 draft due to an editing error and showed up as a duplicate of Policy OS-1.5.] Implementation Action 1.7 Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for Larger Residential Projects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10- minute walking distance of the new residential projects. Allow developers a reduction in on -site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize publicly accessible open space through the coordination between two or more residential projects (of any size) to create public park land and open space, such as exploring housing density bonus options . Implementation Action 1.16 [new action] - Acquisitions to meet park standard. Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to 2 acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Table OS-1, Open Space Resources - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to recategorize Roosevelt Community Center from a Neighborhood Park to as a joint -use facility and a part of the Roosevelt Community Center Park. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Griset Park and Neal Machander Tennis Center as both facilities are school facilities without joint -use agreements. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to rename "Willard Intermediate Park" to "Willard Intermediate Playlot", with the acreage figure update to reflect more accurate boundaries. City Council 2 26 — 234 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 - The table (listing) was updated rename "Willard Intermediate Park" to "Willard Intermediate School". - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Spurgeon Intermediate and Rosita Elementary schools as joint -use agreements are no longer active. - The table was updated to correct the number of linear miles of City bikeways/trails from 22.7 to 15.74 miles. - The table was updated to incorporate the numerical references found on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources - The map was corrected to be consistent with Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways. The correction involved the removal of the Class I Bikeway/Trail segment west of Broadway. The map was corrected to reflect changes in Table OS-1, to correct the categorization of Standard and McFadden as a public park, to remove the sole private park, and to update the legend accordingly. Figure OS-2, Walking Distance to Park Facilities The map was updated to reflect the correct darker blue colorization for the Joint -use Park symbology, to reflect changes in Table OS-1, and to reflect a more accurate listing of joint -use facilities. SAFETY ELEMENT Table of Contents - The reference date for the City's draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was updated from March 2021 to August 2021 to reflect the latest version. Preamble, page S 01 - The following text was added to specifically incorporate the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the General Plan. "The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for the City of Santa Ana planning area was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) and followed FEMA's 2011 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan guidance. The LHMP incorporates a process where hazards are identified and profiled, the people and facilities at risk are analyzed, and mitigation actions are developed to reduce or eliminate hazard risk. The implementation of these mitigation actions, which include both short and long-term strategies, involve planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities." W_1►1WRII441a &Ia►III 1 - POLICY LU-1.6 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT City Council 3 26 — 235 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 Encourage residential mixed -use development within the city's District Centers, Urban Neighborhoods, and adjacent to high -quality transit. - POLICY LU-2.8 CITY IMAGE Encourage land uses, development projects, and public art installations that promote the city's image as a cultural, governmental, and business -friendly regional center Implementation Action 3.25 - LU IA 3.25 Engage EJ communities. Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 17 - The table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. The table was revised to provide more specific maximum intensity and height standards for the MainPlace (DC-2.1) and City Place (DC-2.54) development areas that align with the approved zoning. Footnote 2, Typical Maximum Height, was revised as follows to add additional language to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to govern height through general plan policy standards and zoning regulations: Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max. - Revised Footnote 4, Exception Areas, to add the following language: The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. City Council 4 26 — 236 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, page LU 12 - The map was revised to reflect the Change from DC-5 to UN -SO for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center. Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU 16 - The map was revised to change: o From DC-3 to DC 2.1 for the MainPlace SP o From DC-3 to DC 2.54 for the City Place development o From DC-3 to DC-5 for portions of the Harbor Corridor SP designated as Transit Node o From DC-5 to UN-50 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center o From UN-20 to UN-40 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Corridor o From UN-50 to UN -30 for portion of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Neighborhood 2 Table of Contents - The title of Appendix A was revised from "Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines" to "Focus Area Interim Development Standards" to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City's Municipal Code is updated. Caption to image before preamble - Sana Ana County Seat and Downtown. Introduction, page LU 02 The city has also expanded beyond its historic role as the civic center and County Seat of Orange County and is emerging as the county's cultural and economic hub. Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 14 - First paragraph under previous header of "DENSITY AND INTENSITY IN SANTA ANA" moved to be first paragraph at the top of the page. - Nonresidential Intensity Floor area ratio (FAR) is a measurement used to identify nonresidential land use intensity. The FAR is the ratio of the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot compared to the total area of that lot. Higher FARs generally indicate larger buildings and/or more stories, but Figure LU-3, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), illustrates that the size and height of the building can vary a great deal within the same FAR. Note, FAR is also a measure used in mixed -use area buildout as described below. City Council 5 26 - 237 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 - Mixed Use Density and Intensity To encourage a dynamic mixture of residential, office, clean industrial, and commercial uses in mixed -use areas (Industrial/Flex, Urban Neighborhood, One Broadway Plaza District Center, and District Center'), when both residential and nonresidential uses are planned the density... [added Footnote 1]: 1. District Centers that are part of a special planning area, as shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to special development standards may be regulated by FAR alone. - Rounding [new text] When calculating the square footage allowed for a proposed development, no upward rounding is permitted in determining the final permitted intensity. Likewise, no upward rounding is permitted in calculating the allowable number of residential units. For example, in a calculation producing a yield of 12.7 units for a given development site, 12 units are permitted. Footnote 1, Typical Maximum Height, pages LU 18, 19, and 21 1. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. Industrial / Flex category revisions, page LU 22 - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Typical Maximum Height Footnote 1, page LU 22 1. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. UN category revisions, page LU 23 - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Typical Maximum Height Footnote 2, page LU 23 City Council 6 26 — 238 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - UN-30 in subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, UN-50 in subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - UN-40 in subzone Corridor = 3 story max. UN-30 Footnote 3, page LU 23 3. UN-30 designations in the South Bristol Street Focus Area have a maximum height of 3 stories (see Table LU-8 on page LU-62). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area conflicts with the height shown on this page, the focus area maximum height shall prevail. The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. DC category revisions, page LU 24 DC 2.1 and DC 2.54 categories added table with description of DC land uses, with maximum intensity and height standards to align with the approved zoning. - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Footnote 2, page LU 24 2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be differentthan listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - DC-3 in subzone Village Center= 6 story max, DC-3 in subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - DC-5 in subzone Transit Node =10 story max. Footnote 4, page LU 24 [new text] 4. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. City Council 7 26 — 239 2/15/2022 ABOUT THE MAP. This map displays the City's long-term plan for a comprehensive bicycle network, with a hierarchy of facilities that provide varying levels of design, signage, and separation from vehicles. The City intends to provide a safe and efficient system that reduces the reliance on the automobiles and facilitates an increase in bicycling by choice. Table M-2 describes each bicycle classification. Class I Path Class III Bike Route / Boulevard Class II Bike Lane Class IV Cycle Track Source: City of Santa Ana (2020) Date Published: 11/8/2021 Council I 1.,4 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 26 — 240 2/15/29?&RE M-2 MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS TABLE CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES Census Low Percentile Score & Quartile Rank Variables in the Upper Quartile Income Composite Pollution Population Pollution Population Tract Neighborhood(s) 6059074003 Delhi No •• 56 AQ DPM ITD I CS LB GWIHZIL 6059074300 Delhi, Madison Park Yes 73 AQ I S II I HZ LB I ED I HB i SW 6059074200 Delhi, Madison Park, Yes 71 AQ I GW I L I HZ ED I LI I POV Memorial Park Sunwood Central, 6059074005 Rosewood Baker, South Yes 65 AQ I L ED I LI Coast 6059074108 Centennial Park Yes ' • 66 AQ I L I CS I HZ LB I ED 6059074106 n/a Yes ' • ft4 AQ I CS I GW I HZ LB I ED 6059074109 Valley Adams Yes 65 AQ I L I HZ ED I HB 6059089004 Riverview West Yes AQ I DPM I L EDI LI I POV I HB 6059089001 Riverview West Yes 70 AQ ED I LI I POV I HB 6059089105 Santa Anita Yes 65 AQ I L I TD ED I LI POV I HB 6059074403 Cornerstone Village, Yes 57 AQ I TD I CS I HZ EDI LI I POV I HB Lyon St 6059074406 Lyon St, Saddleback AQ I DPM I TD I CS EDI LI I POV I HB View Yes Yes I SW L LB 6059074602 Madison Park, Pacific AQI CS I HZI L EDI LII POV I HB Park 6059074502 Cedar Evergreen, Yes AQ I CS I GW I HZ EDI LI I POV I HB Madison Park L French Court, French AQ I DPM I TD I CS 6059074405 Park, Lacy, Logan, Yes I SW I L ED LI POV HB Pacific Park Downtown, French Park, AQ I DPM I CS I HZ 6059075002 Heninger Park, Lacy, Yes I SW I L LB I ED LI I POV Pacific Park, Willard Rankings Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor • Variable in the CES 4.0 model: Pollution Exposure Environmental Effects Sensitive Population Socioeconomic Factors AQ = Air Quality (incl. CS = Toxic Cleanup Sites LB = Low Birth Weight LI = Linguistic Isolation Ozone, PM2.5, Toxic Releases) GW: Groundwater Threats POV = Poverty DPM- Diesel Particulate Matter HZ = Hazardous Waste HB = Housing Burden TD = Traffic Density SW = Solid Waste Sites/Facilities ED = Educational Attainment L = Lead UE = Unemployment Note: Indicators not ranked in upper quartile: air quality (ozone); air quality (PM2.5); drinking water contaminants; pesticide use; impaired water bodies; asthma; cardiovascular disease; unemployment. Low income status consistent with Assembly Bill 1550 and mapping by the California Air Resources Board. ity Council 26 — 241 2/15/2022 �� �� .1..A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN TABLE CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES 6059074901 Flower Park, Heninger Yes AQ I CS I HZ I L EDP LI I POV I UE Park, Pico Lowell 6059075201 Artesia Pillar Yes AQ I HZ L LBIEDILIIPOV � UE HB 6059075202 Artesia Pilar Yes AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI UE I HB 6059074801 Artesia Pilar, Central City Yes AQ I HZ I L ED I LI I POV 6059075004 French Court, Santa Ana Yes AQ DPM I TD L ED I LI I POV I HB Triangle 6059074805 Bella Vista Yes 63 AQ ED LI POV HB Flower Park, Washington 6059075100 Square, Willard, Floral Yes 64 AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI Park, West Floral Park 6059074802 Casa Bonita, Artesia Pilar Yes 58 AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI I POV Rankings uartile 1 =Good Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor Quartile ruartile I = Good Variable in the CES 4.0 model: Pollution Exposure Environmental Effects Sensitive Population Socioeconomic Factors AQ = Air Quality (incl. CS = Toxic Cleanup Sites LB = Low Birth Weight LI = Linguistic Isolation Ozone, PM2.5, Toxic Releases) GW: Groundwater Threats POV = Poverty DPM- Diesel Particulate Matter HZ = Hazardous Waste HB = Housing Burden TD = Traffic Density SW = Solid Waste Sites/Facilities ED = Educational Attainment L = Lead UE = Unemployment Note: Indicators not ranked in upper quartile: air quality (ozone); air quality (PM2.5); drinking water contaminants; pesticide use; impaired water bodies; asthma; cardiovascular disease; unemployment. Low income status consistent with Assembly Bill 1550 and mapping by the California Air Resources Board. City Council 26 — 242 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the boundaries of Santa Ana's environmental justice communities based on data from CalEPA's CalEnviroScreen tool. The boundaries represent the areas where the City's policies will emphasize and prioritize improving existing environmental conditions, expanding access to public facilities and resources, and augmenting opportunities for civic engagement. _ Environmental Justice Communities FIGURE CN-3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Date Published: 11/1/2021 Environmental Justice Community: The City uses a mapping tool from CaIEPA called CalEnviroScreen (CES) to identify the mostvulnerable and disadvantaged areas in Santa Ana. The CES tool measures 21 indicators for every census tract in California related to people's exposure to pollution and quality of life. The results for each census tract are combined and measured against every other census tract, producing a composite score that ranks census tracts from the least impacted to the most impacted. Those ranked in the top 25 percent —shown with values between 15 and 100 percent —are considered disadvantaged or environmental justice communities. City Council 26 — 243 2/1 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 10 ii-T1T! TABLE 05-1. OPEN SPACE RESOURCES Park Name COMMUNITY 1. Carl Thornton Park Acres 32.70 Park Name 3. Jerome Park Acres 19.27 Park Name 5. Santiago Park Acres 34.57 2. Centennial Regional Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 6. Adams Park 65.26 145.86 5.68 4. Memorial Park 14. Edna Park 16.30 3.56 -- 22. Portola Park -- 9.07 7. Angels Community Park 1.60 15. El Salvador Park 8.91 23. Riverview Park 8.33 8. Birch Park 2.37 16. Fisher Park 2.58 24. Rosita Park 8.68 9. Bomo Koral Park 10.40 17. Heritage Park 6.44 25. Sandpointe Park 7.73 10. Cabrillo Park 7.60 18. Lillie King Park 10.40 26. Santa Anita Park 5.05 11. Cabrillo Tennis Center 3.61 19. Mabury Park 5.46 27. Windsor Park 10.81 12. Cesar Chavez Campesino Park 6.48 20. Madison Park 6.04 -- -- 13. Delhi Park SMALL PARKS 28. 17th Street Triangle 9.94 11.84 0.70 21. Morrison Park 34. Garfield Fitness Park 5.12 0.10 -- 40. Raitt and Myrtle -- 1.09 29. Chepa's Park 0.41 35. Maple occidental Exercise Park 0.96 41. Saddleback View Park 0.92 30. Colonel William W. Eldridge Park 1.20 36. Mariposa Park 0.43 42. Sarah May Downie Herb Garden 0.13 31. Fairview Triangle 0.74 37. McFadden Triangle Park 0.77 43. Segerstrom Triangle Park 1.33 32. French Park 0.21 38. Memory Lane Park 0.56 44. Standard and McFadden Park 0.66 33. Friendship Park SPECIALTY PARKS 46. Civic Center Plaza 0.10 24.78 4.89 39. Pacific Electric Park 48. Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park 1.41 18.75 45. Willard Intermediate Playlot -- 0.12 -- 47. Plaza Calle Cuatro • •• 50. Garfield Community Center 0.20 0.39 49. Sasscer Park 0.94 53. Madison Elementary School 0.03 56. Willard Intermediate School -- 4.85 51. Godinez Fundamental High School 18.58 54. Monte Vista Elementary School 2.40 -- -- 52. James Monroe Elementary School OTHER OPEN SPACE 57. River View Golf Course 2.91 282.77 81.78 55. Roosevelt Community Center Park 2.62 59. Fairhaven Memorial Cemetery 66.83 -- 61. St. John's Lutheran Cemetery -- 4.23 58. Willowick Golf Course 102.11 City Bikeways/Trails - 15.74 miles 60. Santa Ana Cemetery 27.82 Santa Ana River Trail - 3.70 miles -- -- TOTAL• OTHER ••TOTAL Notes: The numbering corresponds to the labels on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources. The list of parks and acreage figures are accurate as of October 2021. All figures are subject to rounding. ity Council 26 - 244 2/15/2022 �� i A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the number, type, and distribution of open space areas in Santa Ana, with the majority representing parks and trails owned and operated by the City. The City also maintains joint -use agreements with schools to expand public parks and recreation resources. Golf course and cemetery areas provide a more limited form of recreation or open space. See Table OS-1, Open Space Resources, for a listing of parks and open space resources with numbering that is consistent with the labels on this figure. Open Space Type _ Community Park _ Neighborhood Park _ Small Park _ Specialty Park _ Joint -use School Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published:11/22/2021 Golf Course Class 1 Bikeway/Trail (Existing & Planned) Cemetery FIGURE &y Council OPEN SPACE RESOURCES 26 — 245 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1s .1� ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the walking distance from publicly accessible parks. This map can help identify neighborhoods that may be underserved or have limited access to parks and recreation facilities. The City seeks to ensure an equitable distribution of access to these facilities for all Santa Ana residents. GARDEN GROVE I! FOUNTAIN VALLEY TUSTIN 0\ 1Mi Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published: 11/29/2021 Park Type Walking Distance From Existing or Proposed Park _ Community Park Specialty Park 1/4 Mile _ Neighborhood Park Joint -use School 1/2 Mile _ Small Park Class 1 Bikeway/Trail Current or Future Residential Area more than 1/2 Mile (Existing & Planned) Walking Distance from an Existing or Planned Park Facility FIGURE 6 4 Council WALKING DISTANCE TO PARK FACILITIES 26 - 246 2/15/20 ` CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1� .1..• 1 • About the Map. Figure LU-1 shows the fundamental pattern of land use by displaying the pattern and distribution of land use designations across the entire city, down to the parcel level. GARDEN GROVE Garden Grove Blvd . ■ I. d. F� �Tr--ask Ave ---� j ■ r � Westminster Ave ��, ��`y,,I- P M - i Hazard /A, r (.A v 0 3 z FOUNTAIN VALLEY Slater Ave Talbert Ave = I � _i Segerstrom Ave ORANGE La Veta Ave - I '1101Falirrhavenit9ve I , San@a C.I,ara Ave ME IllChmie-Ceni)'fluf11I�� � •SaimitaaAn,a Bh � NEW � �r-----�■Y■Y��� ■— ��������� Chill I� L I� i16 MEN �- McFadden Ave ,j ���L a -- m iL E I I F- Farner Ave .r■+�I I I j i i MI" , Alton Ave W-0 MacArthur Blvd.w' •�� �11E. inni , I ) �10 55 � v a •• Edinger Ave P �a a TUSTIN 1 • ed�r •.9ir d��a Y IRVINE COSTA MESA \ \ Miles 0 0.5 1 General Plan Land Use Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published: 11/30/2021 LR-7, Low Density Residential INS, Institutional FLEX, Industrial/Flex LMR-11, Low -Medium Density Residential OS, Open Space UN, Urban Neighborhood _ MR-15, Medium Density Residential PAO, Professional and Administrative Office OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center _ CR-30, Corridor Residential GC, General Commercial DC, District Center IND, Industrial FIGURE LU-1 ity Council 26 - 247 2A,5MVE MAP �i �� P. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN About the Map. Figure LU-4 combined with Table LU-3 describe the general plan standards for development intensity and density and show where they apply. FOUNTAIN VALLEY General Plan Land Use LR-7, Low Density Residential LMR-11, Low -Medium Density Residential _ MR-15, Medium Density Residential _ CR-30, Corridor Residential INS, Institutional _ OS, Open Space _ PAO, Professional and Administrative Office _ GC, General Commercial IND, Industrial Miles 0 0.5 1 Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published:11/30/2021 _ FLEX, Industrial/Flex _ UN, Urban Neighborhood _ OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center _ DC, District Center FIGURE LU-4 DENSITY AND INTENSITY MAP ity Council 26 — 248 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN TABLE LU-3. DENSITY AND INTENSITY STANDARDS Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7 du/ac 2 storieSZ _ Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR-11) 11 du/ac 3 storieSZ - Medium Density Residential (MR-15) 15 du/ac 3 storieSZ _ Corridor Residential (CR-30) 30 du/ac 3 storieSZ - Institutional (INS) n/a n/a - Open Space (OS) n/a n/a Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) 0.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories' PAO-1 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium (PAO-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 storieS2,3 PAO-1.5 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium High (PAO-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories' PAO 2 Professional and Administrative Office -High (PAO-2) 2.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2,3 _ General Commercial (GC) 0.5 35 feet' General Commercial -Medium (GC-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet2,3 ® General Commercial -Medium High (GC-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet2,3 Industrial (IND) 0.45 FAR 35 feet' Industrial/Flex- Low (FLEX-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac 3 storieSZ FLEX- Industrial/Flex- Medium (FLEX-3) 3.0 FAR 10 storieSZ UN-20 Urban Neighborhood -Low (UN-20) 1.0 FAR and/or 20 du/ac 3 storieSZ UN-30 Urban Neighborhood -Medium Low (UN-30) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac4 4 stories2,3 UN-40 Urban Neighborhood -Medium (UN-40) 1.5 FAR and/or 40 du/ac4 5 storieSZ UN-50 Urban Neighborhood -Medium High (UN-50) 1.5 FAR and/or 50 du/ac4 6 storieSZ - One Broadway Plaza District Center (OBPDC) 2.9 FAR 37 storieSZ - District Center -Low (DC-1) 1.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 6 storieSZ - District Center -Medium Low (DC-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieSZ - District Center -Medium (DC-2) 2.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieS2,3 - District Center -Medium (DC-2.1) 2.1 FAR 20 stories - District Center -Medium (DC-2.54) 2.54 FAR 5 stories - District Center -Medium High (DC-3) 3.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieSZ - District Center -High (DC-5) 5.0 FAR and/or 125 du/ac4 25 storieS2,3 Notes: 1. Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum density/intensity identifies the upper limit of density and intensity allowed within each category. All development is also subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further restrict the allowable density or intensity. Zoning standards shall not exceed the maximum density/intensity standards herein unless listed as an exception area in the notes below. FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage. 2. Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor= 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max. 3. Maximum Heights in Focus Areas. Properties inside focus areas with PAO-1, PAO-2, GC-1, GC-1.5, UN-30, DC-2, and DC-5 designations may have a lower maximum height than shown here (see Focus Areas starting on page LU-26 for the maximum heights allowed in each focus area). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area is lower than the typical maximum height shown in this table, the focus area maximum height shall prevail. 4. Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building tyges with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code. The 4th and Mortimer ipro'ect in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densi t A^R Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allow sitie $�Q63 units per acre. The Harbor Corri r/ ijjo Plan Districtt-4A .s bla max of 90 units per acre. The Westview Housing project (S ) des�gn41 as UN-40 allows density up to 42.'G/ V2 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 110 11 .I�r FIGURE LU-1 1 LAND USE MAP GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET w V) Q JNTRY RD GROVLMUiv i -')I w w w Q RD a a z 0 z z � 0 0 u > a CLARA o AVE Q z O jJ BUFFALO AVE z z AVALON AVE t F CATALINA AVE 21ST ST Q ~ w 20TH ST n � 19TH ST II `2 2 SHINGTON AVE TABLE LU-5. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS RIO GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET Transit -oriented urban - District Center 2.0 FAR or 6 village with a wide range -Medium 90 du/ac stories and mix of residential, live -work, commercial, and employment -generating uses Urban Neighborhood 1.0 FAR or 3 Medium -high density urban 20 du/ac stories neighborhoods with a mix -Low of attached single- and multifamily housing; mixed - Urban Neighborhood 1.5 FAR or 4 -Medium -Medium Low du/ac stories use residential with ground- g floor retail, services, and 1.5FAR or 5 Urban restaurants; cultural uses; N-40 Neighborhood 40 du/ac stories public and open s aces p p -Medium F Office/industrial flex spaces, Industrial/Flex ® 1.5 FAR 3 small-scale R&D, clean -Low stories General Commercial 1.0 FAR -Medium 35 Shopping, restaurants, feet entertainment, service commercial Notes: 17TH The focus area also includes a nominal amount of land used by railroad operations and mapped with the = Open Space land use designation. See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes. LU aY 2 Q g o 14TH ST o J z m WELLINGTON AL, J Q r, u FRUIT ST D C) m z M m 70 City Council 1ST ST w z FIGURE LU-15 LAND USE MAP WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD SUNSWEPT AVE MpRNINGSOE AVE w d w SILVER DR J I � 0 � w � z Q � W � HAZARD AVE 0 o w w J L.LJ J c� co > 0 `L------------ m J z _ p v~i W Y J z = U w Q Q n z � N D Q (_ �r r r WE 1q9 TABLE LU-6. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD UN-20 �• _FLEX-1.5 .'\ __ I I------- _r'GC-1 Low Density 7 du/ac 2 stories Low-rise single-family neighborhoods Residential Low -Medium - Density 11 du/ac 2 stories Single-family homes, duplexes, small -lot subdivisions, and mobile -home parks Residential - Medium A mix of low- and medium -rise neighborhoods with single and multifamily housing, Density 15 du/ac 3 stories Residential including small lot subdivisions, townhomes, live/work units - Corridor Medium density urban housing, such as attached townhomes and apartments, Residential 30 du/ac 3 stories along corridors or adjacent to areas designated General Commercial, Urban Neighborhood, or District Center Urban 1.0 FAR or UN 20 Neighborhood 20 du/ac 3 stories -Low Medium density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single and multifamily housing; mixed -use residential with ground -floor retail, services, and restaurants; LnUrban 1.5 FAR or cultural uses; and public and open spaces Neighborhood 30 du/ac 4 stories Medium Low ity Council 26 — 251 2/15/2022 mom,.. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1q9 TABLE LU-6. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD UN-20 �• _FLEX-1.5 .'\ __ I I------- _r'GC-1 Low Density 7 du/ac 2 stories Low-rise single-family neighborhoods Residential Low -Medium - Density 11 du/ac 2 stories Single-family homes, duplexes, small -lot subdivisions, and mobile -home parks Residential - Medium A mix of low- and medium -rise neighborhoods with single and multifamily housing, Density 15 du/ac 3 stories Residential including small lot subdivisions, townhomes, live/work units - Corridor Medium density urban housing, such as attached townhomes and apartments, Residential 30 du/ac 3 stories along corridors or adjacent to areas designated General Commercial, Urban Neighborhood, or District Center Urban 1.0 FAR or UN 20 Neighborhood 20 du/ac 3 stories -Low Medium density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single and multifamily housing; mixed -use residential with ground -floor retail, services, and restaurants; LnUrban 1.5 FAR or cultural uses; and public and open spaces Neighborhood 30 du/ac 4 stories Medium Low ity Council 26 — 251 2/15/2022 mom,.. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 17TH ST - - ----- - i- i— z "' � `n 2 ~ 00 15TH ST z :RIDAY W � w J � ARTHA LN U_ N o w WASHINGTON AVE CO � J w 12TH ST o Q 0 o a Co � LIME ST 0 F- Q11TH LU > z o� �I N + n u N 9TH ST o „ 1 z o Ln� �P G Q Q z '� > 1< CIVIC CENTER DR ' 8TH ST o G&E z 7TH ST - LL UN-30 PAO 2_ _ _ --6TH-ST� i —- - - - - - - - w -5TH ST UN-30 ��• ; 3- W --- -- - -------- -- 5TH ST �-- - --SANTAANA�BLVD•- =-------•�--- ..,�-4TH w 3RD Or UN-20 2ND STO o ILU WALNUT ST N�C •.'r Q LL1 Q Ln General ® Commercial 1.0 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial -Medium ® General 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial ' Commercial Professional & Professional and administrative office and supporting service commercial and PAO-2 Administrative 2.0 FAR 3 stories Office -High restaurants Industrial/Flex 1.5 FAR 3 stories Office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale R&D, clean manufacturing, live -work -Low - Institutional 2.0 FAR 2 stories Government facilities, public service facilities, and public institutions - Open Space n/a 2 stories Recreational and green space, commercial open space, public infrastructure, and rail facilities — — OC Street Car (planned line / station) Note: See TablG ty. G0UQ jdIj Focus Area Designations, for notes. 26 — 252 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN Ii �� .1..• FIGURE LU-18 LAND USE MAP 55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD w Q = o „ z 0 (D /* ■ CENTRALAVE ADAMS ST Q lip ALTON AVE 1MBINE AVE COWAN MITCHEQ C.� WARNER AVE O� TABLE LU-7. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD High density urban villages consisting of District Center 2.0 FAR or visually stunning and vibrant buildings Medium 90 du/ac 6 stories and spaces with a wide range and mix of residential, live -work, commercial, hotel, and �Q employment -generating uses. Industrial/Flex Office/industrial flex spaces, R&D, clean -Medium 3.0 FAR 10 stories manufacturing, corporate headquarters and campuses. Live -work units are not permitted. General ® Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service Commercial 1.5 FAR 35 feet commercial. -Medium High ®General 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service Commercial commercial. PIF-- _-@Iss mapped with City Council the = Open Space land use c2 i r+@ti263 2/15/2022 See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes. ����.I Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text February 15, 2022 golden city beyond A 81IAR8D V1810YA FO8 BANSA ANA The following represents revisions and corrections to be incorporated into the December 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with text edits and additions displayed with tracked changes. A summary table is also provided to detail revisions to the timeframe for completion of the Implementation Actions due to the delay in the adoption in the General Plan Update. Note, the prior Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan dated November 1, 2021, November 8, 2021, and November 29, 2021 have already been incorporated into the document. II►111Tel P111411111[0► The following definitions to be added: 1. Environmental Justice Area. A disadvantage communitv as defined by Government Code Section 65302(h)(4)(A), as amended from time to time, i.e. a low-income area that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation, or an area identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 39711 pf the Health and Safetv Code. as amended from time to time. OPEN SPACE ELEMENT General Plan Policies, Page OS-15 Paragraph three (3) to be revised as follows: Goal OS-1, for example, is supported not only by the policies listed in this element (OS-1.1 through OS- 3.86), but also by six goals and policies in the Community Element, five goals and policies in the Public Service Element, four policies in the Land Use Element, and four policies in the Urban Design Element. 3. Table OS-2, Related General Plan Policies, Page OS-15 Goal OS-1 to be corrected as follows: OS-1: Parks, Open Space, and Recreation. Provide an integrated system of accessible parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space to serve the City of Santa Ana safe, accessible, sustaiRable and diveFse MOBILITY ELEMENT 4. Table M-1, Street Classifications. Page M-07. Add text to identify the typical sidewalk for the Street Classifications, as follows: Principal Arterial: 10 feet, Major Arterial: 10feet, Primary Arterial: 10 feet, Secondary Arterial 8feet, Divided Collector Arterial: 8 feet, and Collector Street: 10 feet. City Council 1 26 - 254 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 LAND USE ELEMENT 5. Figure LU-13, Artist Rendering, Page LU-43. Rendering to be revised to blur out vehicle license plates. 6. Appendix A, Table LU-A-1 Interim Development Standards, Page LU 74. Insert the following text below the Table title. Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, Page LU 68. Insert the following text as the second to the last sentence in note # 5. The Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-668 regarding Development Project Plan Approval and applications required pursuant to SIB 330, as amended from time to time, apply to development projects applying the Interim Development Standards. 7. The following adjustments to the Agency and Target Dates for completion of General Plan Implementation Actions: Element Implementation Action No. Implementation Action Topic Agency Page Prior Target Date New Target Date Community CM 1.1 Recreation & cultural programs PRCSA/PBA CM 14 2022 2023 Community CM 1.3 Collaboration PBA/PRSCA CN 14 2022 2022-2024 Community CM 1.7 Rental property outreach PBA CM 15 2022 2022 & ongoing Community CM 3.4 Prevention activities PBA/CMO CM 15 2022 2022-2024 Community CM 3.5 Environmental education PBA/CMO CM 15 2021 2022-2024 Community CM 3.8 Environ. soil screening measures PBA CM 15 2022 2023 Conservation CN 1.2 Community identification PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.3 Proactive engagement PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.4 Health risk criteria PBA CN 19 2022 2022-2027 Conservation CN 1.5 Agency permits PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.6 Emission monitoring PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.7 Truck idling PBA/PD CN 19 2023 2022-2024 Conservation CN 1.10 Interagency team PBA CN 20 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 2.4 Preservation resources PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.1 CALGreen voluntary measures PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.2 LEED/ENVISION certification PBA/PWA CN 21 2022 Conservation CN 3.3 Green design guidelines PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.5 Funding Energy Projects PBA/CDA CN 21 2023 2023 & ongoing Economic Prosperity EP 1.9 Retail Attraction CDA EP 15 2022 2023 Historic Preservation HP 1.1 Development standards update PBA HP 12 2025 2022-2027 Historic Preservation HP 1.3 Mills Act PBA HP 12 2022 2023 Historic Preservation HP 1.4 Design Guidelines update PBA HP 12 2024 2022-2027 Land Use LU 1.1 Development Code Update PBA LU 69 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 1.2 Community benefit PBA/CDA LU 69 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.1 Periodic evaluation PBA LU 70 2025 2027 Land Use LU 2.3 Projections PBA LU 70 2021 & ongoing 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.5 Developer outreach PBA/CDA LU 70 2022 2023 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.7 Fiscal impact model PBA CDA LU 70 2021 2022 City Council 2 26 - 255 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 Element Implementation Action No. Implementation Action Topic Agency Page Prior Target Date New Target Date Land Use LU 2.9 High -density housing PBA LU 70 2021 2024 Land Use LU 2.10 Open space requirements PBA/PRSCA LU 70 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 2.11 Displacement strategies PBA LU 70 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.12 Distinctive Districts PBA LU 70 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.2 Design guidelines and standards PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.6 Lead paint abatement CDA/PBA LU 71 2021 2021 & ongoing Land Use LU 3.7 Building massing PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.8 Signage PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.10 Code enforcement PBA LU 71 2022 Ongoing Land Use LU 3.11 Neighborhood aesthetics PBA LU 71 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 3.12 Adaptive reuse PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.15 Communication tools PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.16 Health in corridors PBA LU 72 Ongoing 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.18 Renovations & lead prevention PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.19 Promote health PBA LU 72 2022 2022-ongoing Land Use LU 3.21 Prevention education PBA LU 72 2022 2022-ongoing Land Use LU 3.22 Public health outcomes PBA LU 72 2021 & ongoing Ongoing Land Use LU 3.24 Public health PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.26 Health conditions PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.27 Groundwater practice PBA LU 72 2022 - annually Ongoing Land Use LU 3.28 Tenant Protections PBA LU 73 2022-annually 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 4.1 Complete communities PBA LU 73 2023 2024 Land Use LU 4.3 Public Improvements in nodes PBW/PWA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 4.4 Public/private open space PBA/PWA/PRSCA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 4.6 Fireworks & environment PBA/CMO/PD LU 73 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 4.8 Mixed Use Lifestyles PBA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Mobility M 2.5 Grade separation PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 2.6 Regional transit planning PWA/PBA/CDA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 2.7 Wayfinding program PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.1 Active transportation planning PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.4 Pedestrian opportunity zones PWA/PBA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.6 Drinking water access PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 4.1 Municipal code update PBA M 22 2022 2017 Mobility M 4.5 Citywide Design Guidelines PBA/PWA M 22 2023 2022-2027 Mobility M 4.7 Bike parking and amenities PBA M 22 2022 2022-2027 Mobility M 5.5 Tree preservation PWA M 23 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 5.10 Street medians PWA M 23 2030 2022-2035 Mobility M 5.11 Underground utilities program PWA M 23 2021-2035 2022-2035 Noise N 1.3 Noise mitigation impacted areas PBA N 12 Ongoing 2022-2024 Noise N 1.5 Noise ordinance PBA/PD N12 2022 2022-2027 Noise N 2.7 Best practices PBA/PD N12 2023 2022-2024 Open Space OS 1.3 Annual open space summit PWA PRSCA OS 16 2022 2023 & ongoing City Council 0 26 - 256 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 Element Implementation Action No. Implementation Action Topic Agency Page Prior Target Date New Target Date Open Space OS 1.5 Park opportunity fund PRSCA OS 16 2021 2022 & ongoing Open Space OS 1.7a Public parkland - residential PBA/PRSCA CN 17 2022 2022-2027 Open Space OS 1.11 Joint us agreements PRSCA OS 17 2022 2022 & ongoing Open Space OS 1.14 Community partnerships PRSCA OS 17 2021 & ongoing Ongoing Open Space OS 2.9 Hours of operation PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 Open Space OS 2.10 Evaluate programming PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 & annually Open Space OS 2.11 Program and facility fees PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 & ongoing Public Services PS 2.12 Health Need Assessment PBA/CMO PS 18 2023 2022-2024 Public Services PS 3.13 Administrative streamlining PBA PS 18 2022 2023 Public Service PS 3.14 Technology upgrades PBA/Finance PS 18 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 1.1 Agency coordination PBA S 14 Annually Ongoing Safety S 1.10 Climate resiliency PBA/PWA S 14 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 2.1 Facility location PBA/ OCFD S 15 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 2.4 Lead contamination PBA/CDA S 15 2022 2022-ongoing Safety S 2.5 Business education PBA/CDA S 15 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 4.3 Development code standards PBA S 16 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 1.2 Design guidelines PBA UD 23 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 1.3 Signage PBA UD 23 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 2.1 Emerging technology PBA/PWA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 2.2 Creative Expression PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 2.3 Billboards PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.2 Multimodal Transit Facilities PBA/PWA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.3 Bicycle parking PBA/CDA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.4 Cross -access PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.7 Streetscape Improvements PWA/PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.8 Maintenance district PWA/PBA UD 24 2023 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 4.3 Allowable uses PBA UD 25 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 5.1 Landscaping focus intersections PBA UD 25 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 5.3 Placemaking elements PWA/PBA UD 25 2024 2022-2027 City Council 26 — 257 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 29, 2021 golden city A SXAR0.11 YISFON FO0. BANSA-A The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan, in addition to the clarification of November 1 and November 8, 2021. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. 141e1d:111VA41 I&IaL1III 1 - Page 5-09, POLICY 5-4.2 FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION PART 77 Do not approve buildings and structures that would penetrate Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Obstruction Surfaces, unless, feund consistent with the California Public Utilities Code Section 21240, such building or structure is determined by FAA to pose "no hazard" to air aviation.by the Ai F P e Ft La d 6- se C-e;, FR,;ss+o„TAL IJQ. Additionally, under this Policy,^ efdane +" � P@Ft :7:7Fequ applicants proposing buildings or structures that penetrate the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City and the ALUC4-ef LAND USE ELEMENT Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU-16 Remove outlines to identify GC areas east of the 55 Freeway/Dyer Focus Area and the small parcels with the West Santa Ana Blvd Focus Area to the standard GC of 0.5 FAR. Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU-17 - Add the following to the end of Footnote 1. "FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage." - Add the following to the end of Footnote 4. "Westview Housing project (SD-97) designated as UN-40 allow density up to 42.5 Du/acre." Figure LU-15, Land Use Map, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-48 Remove the outline and label from the GC areas, with exception of the block of GC located northwest of First Street and Townsend. City Council 1 26 — 258 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-49 Remove the "GC-1.5" reference and replace with standard "GC" reference (0.5 FAR and 35 feet maximum height) and GC-1 for the block of GC northwest of First Street and Townsend (also 35 feet maximum height). Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Add the "GC" label to the area east of the 55 freeway. Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Change the 2-story maximum height reference to 35 feet for the CG-1.5 area. - Add a row for General Commercial with 0.5 FAR and 35' maximum height. Figure LU-1, Page LU-12: - Change land use designation on map for the Legacy Sunflower project to UN-50. Table LU-3, Page LU-17: Change Note 4 as follows: Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building types with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code. The 4th and Mortimer project in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allows densities up - 63 units per acre. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. Page LU 22, 23, 24 add Footnote #4. "Refer to page LU-14 for Mixed Use Intensity/Density clarification." Table LU-4, Page LU-30; Table LU-5, Page LU-40; Table LU-6, Page LU-49; Table LU-7, Page LU-56; Table LU-8, Page LU-62: - Revise the note as follows: Coo Table I I I_o Net r- fe— All F c n.e.a Desig atiens f.,.- ad-d-itie—RaI .IULebIveLe: :j Table LU-9 on pane LU-68 for additional criteria for all Focus Area desienations. Table LU-9, Page LU-68: Revise all references to "Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines" to "Focus Area Interim Development Standards" to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City's Municipal Code is updated. Land Use Maps: - Figure LU-1, Page LU-12; Figure LU-4, Page LU-17; and Figure LU-18, Page LU-56: Remove "GC" designation from Hotel Terrace Drive. - Figure LU-1, Page LU-12 and Figure LU-4, Page LU-16 as follows: City Council 2 26 — 259 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 Revise the following land use designations approved through prior general Plan amendments: Northeast block of Mountain View and First Street to match existing persuant GPA No. 2020-04. Hapham Project on Edinger Avenue GPA No. 2017-03; Sunflower Legacy Project GPA No. 2019-01; Westview Housing on 17t" Street GPA No. 2020- 07. The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with the existing land use designations (APN 003- 161-10, 144-551-52, 016-045-19, 398-441-06, 411-131-38). No land use changes are proposed for these sites. • The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with existing right-of-ways and will not be assigned a land use designation (APNs: 411-131-11, 008-131-33, 430-222-18, 430-222-19, 430-222-15, 430-222-17, 430-222-20, 430-222-22, 430-222-23, 398-082-33, 398-221-22, 398-221-23, 430-222-10, & 430-222-11). • The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number have been revised to coincide with surrounding land uses or City park project (APNs: 396- 261-26, 396-261-38, 396-261-37, 396-261-38, 011-251-17, 011-251-18, 011-251-19, & 011- 251-20) OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Figure OS-2, Page OS-09 Figure OS-2: - Change the legend to read "Joint -use P-ar* School". Table OS-3 Open Space Element Implementation, Page OS 16: OS 1.7: Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for I -Larger rResidential pRrojects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. OS 1.7a: Open Space and Park land Incentives. Allow developers a reduction in on -site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize developers to provide additional on -site and/or publicly accessible open space through the OFdonation between tw ^ 'clentoal PFGj ^Ets (of any sizeto create public park land and open space, such as expl^� ^^ ^ ^ housing density bonus eptiens Research and collaborate with residents, developers, and community organizations to design and implement an open space density bonus to incentivize the creation of additional on -site open space in exchange for more density in the project. Agency/Timeframe: PBA/PRCSA 2022 INTRODUCTION - Add an Introduction section for the General Plan to provide a brief overview of the GP's organization, a summary of the update process, and a glossary. City Council 3 26 — 260 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework and Maps golden city beyond A SHARED VISION FOR SANFA ANA November 8, 2021 The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with draft policy and implementation items displayed with tracked changed. Updates to maps, tables, time frames for implementation actions, and other text edits are either described or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. LAND USE ELEMENT Table LU-5, Land Use Designations, Grand Avenue and 171" Street Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Revise General Commercial Land Use designation references in the Focus Areas such that the maximum height is changed from two (2) stories to 35 feet, consistent with height limit in General Commercial land use designations citywide. Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Revise proposed General Commercial (GC) land use designation area east of the 55 Freeway, from 1.5 FAR back to existing 0.5 FAR (consistent with the existing land uses and zoning district allowances). Figure LU-19, Artist Rendering, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Note #2, General Commercial "The area surrounding .... allowing for existing hotel uses on both sides of the 55 Freeway to remain and promoting new commercial development. MOBILITY ELEMENT Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways - Revise to show the following: 1. Newhope Street (New Class II) a. between McFadden Avenue to 1st Street b. between Hazard Avenue to Westminster Avenue 2. McFadden Avenue between West City Limit to Harbor Boulevard (New Class II) 3. Fairview Street (New Class 1) City Council 1 26 - 261 2/15/2022 Clarification to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 8, 2021 a. Between Civic Center Drive and Trask Avenue b. Between Warner Avenue and Sunflower Avenue 4. Susan Street between Alton Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard (New Class 11) 5. Santa Ana River (New Class 1) a. between Edinger Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard b. between Memory Lane and SR-22 6. PE ROW between Westminster Avenue and Raitt Street (New Class 1) 7. OCFCD (New Class 1) a. between Westminster Avenue and West City Limit b. between 15t Street and Monta Vista Avenue c. between Occidental Street and Alton Avenue d. between Edinger Avenue and Sunflower Avenue 8. LOSSAN Corridor between 6t" Street and Chestnut Avenue (New Class 1) 9. Greenville Street between Edinger Avenue and Warner Avenue (New Class 11) 10. Willits Street between Orange County District Flood Channel and Raitt Street (Class IV to Class II) 11. Walnut Avenue (Class 11 to Class 111) a. between 15t street and Raitt Street b. between west of Pacific Avenue and Pacific Avenue 12. Bristol Street between Edinger Avenue and Washington Avenue (New Class IV) 13. Civic Center Drive between Bristol Street and Broadway (New Class II) 14. Chestnut Avenue between Cypress Avenue and Grand Avenue (New Class 11) 15. Cypress Avenue between Chestnut Avenue and 1st Street (New Class II) 16. Standard Avenue between 1st Street and 4t" Street (New Class II) 17. 5t" Street French Street to Lacy Street (New Class 11) 18. Lacy Street between 5t" Street and 6t" Street (New Class III) 19. Brown Street between Lacy Street and Garfield Street (New Class IV) 20. Garfield Street between Brown Street and 6t" Street (New Class IV) 21. 15t Street between Grand Avenue and East City Limit (New Class IV) 22. Cabrillo Park Drive between 1" Street and 4t" Street (New Class 11) 23. Grand Avenue (New Class II) a. between 215Y Street and Fairhaven Avenue b. 1" Street and 4t" Street 24. Fairhaven Avenue Dayna Street to East City Limit (New Class IV) 25. Sunflower Avenue Bristol Street to Main Street (New Class 11) 26. Warner Avenue Pullman Street to Red Hill Avenue (New Class II) Implementation Action M-4.4 - Reevaluate the Residential Permit Parking Program to ensure it complies with state law and best practices. City Council 26 — 262 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 1, 2021 golden city The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes. VISION STATEMENT [each element] A SHARED VISION Santa Ana is a city that promotes the health and wellness of all residents, with a civic culture that actively embraces the power of diversity. Our city invests in resources that create economic opportunities for the next generation, and it is a community that celebrates our past while working together to create a sustainable future. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Implementation Action 1.19 - Climate Action Plan. Review and update the City's Climate Action Plan. Time frame: 2023 [updated to reflect Council Climate Action Resolution on 917121] Table CN-1, CalEnviroScreen Scores for Environmental Justice Communities The table was updated with the final CES 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074004). The individual composite, pollution, and population percentile scores, as well as the individual pollution and population variables were also updated based on the finalized CES 4.0 results. Figure CN-3, Environmental Justice Communities - The map updated with the final CalEnviroScreen (CES) 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75t" percentile criteria (6059074004). City Council 1 26 — 263 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT - POLICY OS-1.2 PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM* Provide and support a comprehensive and integrated network of parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space that is diverse, with a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities. - POLICY OS-1.3 PARK STANDARD* Establish and maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of two acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. - POLICY OS 1.4 PARK DISTRIBUTION* Ensure the City residents have access to public or private parks, recreation facilities, or trails in the City of Santa Ana, within 10-minute walking and biking distance of home. Prioritize provision, programs, and partnerships in park deficient an environmental justice areas. [Policy OS-1.4 was left out of the August 2021 draft due to an editing error and showed up as a duplicate of Policy OS-1.5.] Implementation Action 1.7 Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for Larger Residential Projects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10- minute walking distance of the new residential projects. Allow developers a reduction in on -site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize publicly accessible open space through the coordination between two or more residential projects (of any size) to create public park land and open space, such as exploring housing density bonus options . Implementation Action 1.16 [new action] - Acquisitions to meet park standard. Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to 2 acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA 2022 & ongoing Table OS-1, Open Space Resources - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to recategorize Roosevelt Community Center from a Neighborhood Park to as a joint -use facility and a part of the Roosevelt Community Center Park. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Griset Park and Neal Machander Tennis Center as both facilities are school facilities without joint -use agreements. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to rename "Willard Intermediate Park" to "Willard Intermediate Playlot", with the acreage figure update to reflect more accurate boundaries. City Council 2 26 — 264 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 - The table (listing) was updated rename "Willard Intermediate Park" to "Willard Intermediate School". - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Spurgeon Intermediate and Rosita Elementary schools as joint -use agreements are no longer active. - The table was updated to correct the number of linear miles of City bikeways/trails from 22.7 to 15.74 miles. - The table was updated to incorporate the numerical references found on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources - The map was corrected to be consistent with Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways. The correction involved the removal of the Class I Bikeway/Trail segment west of Broadway. The map was corrected to reflect changes in Table OS-1, to correct the categorization of Standard and McFadden as a public park, to remove the sole private park, and to update the legend accordingly. Figure OS-2, Walking Distance to Park Facilities The map was updated to reflect the correct darker blue colorization for the Joint -use Park symbology, to reflect changes in Table OS-1, and to reflect a more accurate listing of joint -use facilities. SAFETY ELEMENT Table of Contents - The reference date for the City's draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was updated from March 2021 to August 2021 to reflect the latest version. Preamble, page S 01 - The following text was added to specifically incorporate the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the General Plan. "The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for the City of Santa Ana planning area was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) and followed FEMA's 2011 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan guidance. The LHMP incorporates a process where hazards are identified and profiled, the people and facilities at risk are analyzed, and mitigation actions are developed to reduce or eliminate hazard risk. The implementation of these mitigation actions, which include both short and long-term strategies, involve planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities." W_1►1WRII441a &Ia►III 1 - POLICY LU-1.6 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT City Council 3 26 — 265 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 Encourage residential mixed -use development within the city's District Centers, Urban Neighborhoods, and adjacent to high -quality transit. - POLICY LU-2.8 CITY IMAGE Encourage land uses, development projects, and public art installations that promote the city's image as a cultural, governmental, and business -friendly regional center Implementation Action 3.25 - LU IA 3.25 Engage EJ communities. Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 17 - The table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. The table was revised to provide more specific maximum intensity and height standards for the MainPlace (DC-2.1) and City Place (DC-2.54) development areas that align with the approved zoning. Footnote 2, Typical Maximum Height, was revised as follows to add additional language to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to govern height through general plan policy standards and zoning regulations: Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max. - Revised Footnote 4, Exception Areas, to add the following language: The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. City Council 4 26 — 266 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, page LU 12 - The map was revised to reflect the Change from DC-5 to UN -SO for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center. Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU 16 - The map was revised to change: o From DC-3 to DC 2.1 for the MainPlace SP o From DC-3 to DC 2.54 for the City Place development o From DC-3 to DC-5 for portions of the Harbor Corridor SP designated as Transit Node o From DC-5 to UN-50 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center o From UN-20 to UN-40 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Corridor o From UN-50 to UN -30 for portion of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Neighborhood 2 Table of Contents - The title of Appendix A was revised from "Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines" to "Focus Area Interim Development Standards" to ensure that readers understand the City's intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City's Municipal Code is updated. Caption to image before preamble - Sana Ana County Seat and Downtown. Introduction, page LU 02 The city has also expanded beyond its historic role as the civic center and County Seat of Orange County and is emerging as the county's cultural and economic hub. Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 14 - First paragraph under previous header of "DENSITY AND INTENSITY IN SANTA ANA" moved to be first paragraph at the top of the page. - Nonresidential Intensity Floor area ratio (FAR) is a measurement used to identify nonresidential land use intensity. The FAR is the ratio of the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot compared to the total area of that lot. Higher FARs generally indicate larger buildings and/or more stories, but Figure LU-3, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), illustrates that the size and height of the building can vary a great deal within the same FAR. Note, FAR is also a measure used in mixed -use area buildout as described below. City Council 5 26 - 267 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 - Mixed Use Density and Intensity To encourage a dynamic mixture of residential, office, clean industrial, and commercial uses in mixed -use areas (Industrial/Flex, Urban Neighborhood, One Broadway Plaza District Center, and District Center'), when both residential and nonresidential uses are planned the density... [added Footnote 1]: 1. District Centers that are part of a special planning area, as shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to special development standards may be regulated by FAR alone. - Rounding [new text] When calculating the square footage allowed for a proposed development, no upward rounding is permitted in determining the final permitted intensity. Likewise, no upward rounding is permitted in calculating the allowable number of residential units. For example, in a calculation producing a yield of 12.7 units for a given development site, 12 units are permitted. Footnote 1, Typical Maximum Height, pages LU 18, 19, and 21 1. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. Industrial / Flex category revisions, page LU 22 - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Typical Maximum Height Footnote 1, page LU 22 1. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. UN category revisions, page LU 23 - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Typical Maximum Height Footnote 2, page LU 23 City Council 6 26 — 268 2/15/2022 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - UN-30 in subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, UN-50 in subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - UN-40 in subzone Corridor = 3 story max. UN-30 Footnote 3, page LU 23 3. UN-30 designations in the South Bristol Street Focus Area have a maximum height of 3 stories (see Table LU-8 on page LU-62). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area conflicts with the height shown on this page, the focus area maximum height shall prevail. The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. DC category revisions, page LU 24 DC 2.1 and DC 2.54 categories added table with description of DC land uses, with maximum intensity and height standards to align with the approved zoning. - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. Footnote 2, page LU 24 2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be differentthan listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - DC-3 in subzone Village Center= 6 story max, DC-3 in subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - DC-5 in subzone Transit Node =10 story max. Footnote 4, page LU 24 [new text] 4. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. City Council 7 26 — 269 2/15/2022 ABOUT THE MAP. This map displays the City's long-term plan for a comprehensive bicycle network, with a hierarchy of facilities that provide varying levels of design, signage, and separation from vehicles. The City intends to provide a safe and efficient system that reduces the reliance on the automobiles and facilitates an increase in bicycling by choice. Table M-2 describes each bicycle classification. Class I Path Class III Bike Route / Boulevard Class II Bike Lane Class IV Cycle Track Source: City of Santa Ana (2020) Date Published: 11/8/2021 Council I 1.,4 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 26 — 270 2/15/29?&RE M-2 MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS TABLE CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES Census Low Percentile Score & Quartile Rank Variables in the Upper Quartile Income Composite Pollution Population Pollution Population Tract Neighborhood(s) 6059074003 Delhi No •• 56 AQ DPM ITD I CS LB GWIHZIL 6059074300 Delhi, Madison Park Yes 73 AQ I S II I HZ LB I ED I HB i SW 6059074200 Delhi, Madison Park, Yes 71 AQ I GW I L I HZ ED I LI I POV Memorial Park Sunwood Central, 6059074005 Rosewood Baker, South Yes 65 AQ I L ED I LI Coast 6059074108 Centennial Park Yes ' • 66 AQ I L I CS I HZ LB I ED 6059074106 n/a Yes ' • ft4 AQ I CS I GW I HZ LB I ED 6059074109 Valley Adams Yes 65 AQ I L I HZ ED I HB 6059089004 Riverview West Yes AQ I DPM I L EDI LI I POV I HB 6059089001 Riverview West Yes 70 AQ ED I LI I POV I HB 6059089105 Santa Anita Yes 65 AQ I L I TD ED I LI POV I HB 6059074403 Cornerstone Village, Yes 57 AQ I TD I CS I HZ EDI LI I POV I HB Lyon St 6059074406 Lyon St, Saddleback AQ I DPM I TD I CS EDI LI I POV I HB View Yes Yes I SW L LB 6059074602 Madison Park, Pacific AQI CS I HZI L EDI LII POV I HB Park 6059074502 Cedar Evergreen, Yes AQ I CS I GW I HZ EDI LI I POV I HB Madison Park L French Court, French AQ I DPM I TD I CS 6059074405 Park, Lacy, Logan, Yes I SW I L ED LI POV HB Pacific Park Downtown, French Park, AQ I DPM I CS I HZ 6059075002 Heninger Park, Lacy, Yes I SW I L LB I ED LI I POV Pacific Park, Willard Rankings Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor • Variable in the CES 4.0 model: Pollution Exposure Environmental Effects Sensitive Population Socioeconomic Factors AQ = Air Quality (incl. CS = Toxic Cleanup Sites LB = Low Birth Weight LI = Linguistic Isolation Ozone, PM2.5, Toxic Releases) GW: Groundwater Threats POV = Poverty DPM- Diesel Particulate Matter HZ = Hazardous Waste HB = Housing Burden TD = Traffic Density SW = Solid Waste Sites/Facilities ED = Educational Attainment L = Lead UE = Unemployment Note: Indicators not ranked in upper quartile: air quality (ozone); air quality (PM2.5); drinking water contaminants; pesticide use; impaired water bodies; asthma; cardiovascular disease; unemployment. Low income status consistent with Assembly Bill 1550 and mapping by the California Air Resources Board. ity Council 26 — 271 2/15/2022 �� �� .1..A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN TABLE CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES 6059074901 Flower Park, Heninger Yes AQ I CS I HZ I L EDP LI I POV I UE Park, Pico Lowell 6059075201 Artesia Pillar Yes AQ I HZ L LBIEDILIIPOV � UE HB 6059075202 Artesia Pilar Yes AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI UE I HB 6059074801 Artesia Pilar, Central City Yes AQ I HZ I L ED I LI I POV 6059075004 French Court, Santa Ana Yes AQ DPM I TD L ED I LI I POV I HB Triangle 6059074805 Bella Vista Yes 63 AQ ED LI POV HB Flower Park, Washington 6059075100 Square, Willard, Floral Yes 64 AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI Park, West Floral Park 6059074802 Casa Bonita, Artesia Pilar Yes 58 AQ I CS I HZ I L ED I LI I POV Rankings uartile 1 =Good Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor Quartile ruartile I = Good Variable in the CES 4.0 model: Pollution Exposure Environmental Effects Sensitive Population Socioeconomic Factors AQ = Air Quality (incl. CS = Toxic Cleanup Sites LB = Low Birth Weight LI = Linguistic Isolation Ozone, PM2.5, Toxic Releases) GW: Groundwater Threats POV = Poverty DPM- Diesel Particulate Matter HZ = Hazardous Waste HB = Housing Burden TD = Traffic Density SW = Solid Waste Sites/Facilities ED = Educational Attainment L = Lead UE = Unemployment Note: Indicators not ranked in upper quartile: air quality (ozone); air quality (PM2.5); drinking water contaminants; pesticide use; impaired water bodies; asthma; cardiovascular disease; unemployment. Low income status consistent with Assembly Bill 1550 and mapping by the California Air Resources Board. City Council 26 — 272 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the boundaries of Santa Ana's environmental justice communities based on data from CalEPA's CalEnviroScreen tool. The boundaries represent the areas where the City's policies will emphasize and prioritize improving existing environmental conditions, expanding access to public facilities and resources, and augmenting opportunities for civic engagement. _ Environmental Justice Communities FIGURE CN-3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Date Published: 11/1/2021 Environmental Justice Community: The City uses a mapping tool from CaIEPA called CalEnviroScreen (CES) to identify the mostvulnerable and disadvantaged areas in Santa Ana. The CES tool measures 21 indicators for every census tract in California related to people's exposure to pollution and quality of life. The results for each census tract are combined and measured against every other census tract, producing a composite score that ranks census tracts from the least impacted to the most impacted. Those ranked in the top 25 percent —shown with values between 15 and 100 percent —are considered disadvantaged or environmental justice communities. City Council 26 — 273 2/1 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 10 ii-T1T! TABLE 05-1. OPEN SPACE RESOURCES Park Name COMMUNITY 1. Carl Thornton Park Acres 32.70 Park Name 3. Jerome Park Acres 19.27 Park Name 5. Santiago Park Acres 34.57 2. Centennial Regional Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 6. Adams Park 65.26 145.86 5.68 4. Memorial Park 14. Edna Park 16.30 3.56 -- 22. Portola Park -- 9.07 7. Angels Community Park 1.60 15. El Salvador Park 8.91 23. Riverview Park 8.33 8. Birch Park 2.37 16. Fisher Park 2.58 24. Rosita Park 8.68 9. Bomo Koral Park 10.40 17. Heritage Park 6.44 25. Sandpointe Park 7.73 10. Cabrillo Park 7.60 18. Lillie King Park 10.40 26. Santa Anita Park 5.05 11. Cabrillo Tennis Center 3.61 19. Mabury Park 5.46 27. Windsor Park 10.81 12. Cesar Chavez Campesino Park 6.48 20. Madison Park 6.04 -- -- 13. Delhi Park SMALL PARKS 28. 17th Street Triangle 9.94 11.84 0.70 21. Morrison Park 34. Garfield Fitness Park 5.12 0.10 -- 40. Raitt and Myrtle -- 1.09 29. Chepa's Park 0.41 35. Maple occidental Exercise Park 0.96 41. Saddleback View Park 0.92 30. Colonel William W. Eldridge Park 1.20 36. Mariposa Park 0.43 42. Sarah May Downie Herb Garden 0.13 31. Fairview Triangle 0.74 37. McFadden Triangle Park 0.77 43. Segerstrom Triangle Park 1.33 32. French Park 0.21 38. Memory Lane Park 0.56 44. Standard and McFadden Park 0.66 33. Friendship Park SPECIALTY PARKS 46. Civic Center Plaza 0.10 24.78 4.89 39. Pacific Electric Park 48. Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park 1.41 18.75 45. Willard Intermediate Playlot -- 0.12 -- 47. Plaza Calle Cuatro • •• 50. Garfield Community Center 0.20 0.39 49. Sasscer Park 0.94 53. Madison Elementary School 0.03 56. Willard Intermediate School -- 4.85 51. Godinez Fundamental High School 18.58 54. Monte Vista Elementary School 2.40 -- -- 52. James Monroe Elementary School OTHER OPEN SPACE 57. River View Golf Course 2.91 282.77 81.78 55. Roosevelt Community Center Park 2.62 59. Fairhaven Memorial Cemetery 66.83 -- 61. St. John's Lutheran Cemetery -- 4.23 58. Willowick Golf Course 102.11 City Bikeways/Trails - 15.74 miles 60. Santa Ana Cemetery 27.82 Santa Ana River Trail - 3.70 miles -- -- TOTAL• OTHER ••TOTAL Notes: The numbering corresponds to the labels on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources. The list of parks and acreage figures are accurate as of October 2021. All figures are subject to rounding. ity Council 26 - 274 2/15/2022 �� i A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the number, type, and distribution of open space areas in Santa Ana, with the majority representing parks and trails owned and operated by the City. The City also maintains joint -use agreements with schools to expand public parks and recreation resources. Golf course and cemetery areas provide a more limited form of recreation or open space. See Table OS-1, Open Space Resources, for a listing of parks and open space resources with numbering that is consistent with the labels on this figure. Open Space Type _ Community Park _ Neighborhood Park _ Small Park _ Specialty Park _ Joint -use School Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published:11/22/2021 Golf Course Class 1 Bikeway/Trail (Existing & Planned) Cemetery FIGURE &y Council OPEN SPACE RESOURCES 26 — 275 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1s .1� ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the walking distance from publicly accessible parks. This map can help identify neighborhoods that may be underserved or have limited access to parks and recreation facilities. The City seeks to ensure an equitable distribution of access to these facilities for all Santa Ana residents. GARDEN GROVE I! FOUNTAIN VALLEY TUSTIN 0\ 1Mi Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published: 11/29/2021 Park Type Walking Distance From Existing or Proposed Park _ Community Park Specialty Park 1/4 Mile _ Neighborhood Park Joint -use School 1/2 Mile _ Small Park Class 1 Bikeway/Trail Current or Future Residential Area more than 1/2 Mile (Existing & Planned) Walking Distance from an Existing or Planned Park Facility FIGURE 6 4 Council WALKING DISTANCE TO PARK FACILITIES 26 - 276 2/15/20 ` CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1� .1..• 1 • About the Map. Figure LU-1 shows the fundamental pattern of land use by displaying the pattern and distribution of land use designations across the entire city, down to the parcel level. GARDEN GROVE Garden Grove Blvd . ■ I. d. F� �Tr--ask Ave ---� j ■ r � Westminster Ave ��, ��`y,,I- P M - i Hazard /A, r (.A v 0 3 z FOUNTAIN VALLEY Slater Ave Talbert Ave = I � _i Segerstrom Ave ORANGE La Veta Ave - I '1101Falirrhavenit9ve I , San@a C.I,ara Ave ME IllChmie-Ceni)'fluf11I�� � •SaimitaaAn,a Bh � NEW � �r-----�■Y■Y��� ■— ��������� Chill I� L I� i16 MEN �- McFadden Ave ,j ���L a -- m iL E I I F- Farner Ave .r■+�I I I j i i MI" , Alton Ave W-0 MacArthur Blvd.w' •�� �11E. inni , I ) �10 55 � v a •• Edinger Ave P �a a TUSTIN 1 • ed�r •.9ir d��a Y IRVINE COSTA MESA \ \ Miles 0 0.5 1 General Plan Land Use Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published: 11/30/2021 LR-7, Low Density Residential INS, Institutional FLEX, Industrial/Flex LMR-11, Low -Medium Density Residential OS, Open Space UN, Urban Neighborhood _ MR-15, Medium Density Residential PAO, Professional and Administrative Office OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center _ CR-30, Corridor Residential GC, General Commercial DC, District Center IND, Industrial FIGURE LU-1 ity Council 26 - 277 2A,5MVE MAP �i �� P. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN About the Map. Figure LU-4 combined with Table LU-3 describe the general plan standards for development intensity and density and show where they apply. FOUNTAIN VALLEY General Plan Land Use LR-7, Low Density Residential LMR-11, Low -Medium Density Residential _ MR-15, Medium Density Residential _ CR-30, Corridor Residential INS, Institutional _ OS, Open Space _ PAO, Professional and Administrative Office _ GC, General Commercial IND, Industrial Miles 0 0.5 1 Source: City of Santa Ana 2021 Date Published:11/30/2021 _ FLEX, Industrial/Flex _ UN, Urban Neighborhood _ OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center _ DC, District Center FIGURE LU-4 DENSITY AND INTENSITY MAP ity Council 26 — 278 2/15/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN TABLE LU-3. DENSITY AND INTENSITY STANDARDS Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7 du/ac 2 storieSZ _ Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR-11) 11 du/ac 3 storieSZ - Medium Density Residential (MR-15) 15 du/ac 3 storieSZ _ Corridor Residential (CR-30) 30 du/ac 3 storieSZ - Institutional (INS) n/a n/a - Open Space (OS) n/a n/a Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) 0.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories' PAO-1 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium (PAO-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 storieS2,3 PAO-1.5 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium High (PAO-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories' PAO 2 Professional and Administrative Office -High (PAO-2) 2.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2,3 _ General Commercial (GC) 0.5 35 feet' General Commercial -Medium (GC-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet2,3 ® General Commercial -Medium High (GC-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet2,3 Industrial (IND) 0.45 FAR 35 feet' Industrial/Flex- Low (FLEX-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac 3 storieSZ FLEX- Industrial/Flex- Medium (FLEX-3) 3.0 FAR 10 storieSZ UN-20 Urban Neighborhood -Low (UN-20) 1.0 FAR and/or 20 du/ac 3 storieSZ UN-30 Urban Neighborhood -Medium Low (UN-30) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac4 4 stories2,3 UN-40 Urban Neighborhood -Medium (UN-40) 1.5 FAR and/or 40 du/ac4 5 storieSZ UN-50 Urban Neighborhood -Medium High (UN-50) 1.5 FAR and/or 50 du/ac4 6 storieSZ - One Broadway Plaza District Center (OBPDC) 2.9 FAR 37 storieSZ - District Center -Low (DC-1) 1.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 6 storieSZ - District Center -Medium Low (DC-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieSZ - District Center -Medium (DC-2) 2.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieS2,3 - District Center -Medium (DC-2.1) 2.1 FAR 20 stories - District Center -Medium (DC-2.54) 2.54 FAR 5 stories - District Center -Medium High (DC-3) 3.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 storieSZ - District Center -High (DC-5) 5.0 FAR and/or 125 du/ac4 25 storieS2,3 Notes: 1. Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum density/intensity identifies the upper limit of density and intensity allowed within each category. All development is also subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further restrict the allowable density or intensity. Zoning standards shall not exceed the maximum density/intensity standards herein unless listed as an exception area in the notes below. FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage. 2. Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor= 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max. 3. Maximum Heights in Focus Areas. Properties inside focus areas with PAO-1, PAO-2, GC-1, GC-1.5, UN-30, DC-2, and DC-5 designations may have a lower maximum height than shown here (see Focus Areas starting on page LU-26 for the maximum heights allowed in each focus area). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area is lower than the typical maximum height shown in this table, the focus area maximum height shall prevail. 4. Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building tyges with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code. The 4th and Mortimer ipro'ect in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densi t A^R Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allow sitie �Q63 units per acre. The Harbor Corri r/ ijjo Plan District L`4f� s bla max of 90 units per acre. The Westview Housing project (S) Tes�gnbt>5d as UN-40 allows density up to 42.G//L CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN FIGURE LU-1 1 LAND USE MAP GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET w V) Q JNTRY RD GROVLMUiv i -')I w w w Q RD a a z 0 z z � 0 0 u > a CLARA o AVE Q z O jJ BUFFALO AVE z z AVALON AVE t F CATALINA AVE 21ST ST Q ~ w 20TH ST n � 19TH ST II `2 2 SHINGTON AVE TABLE LU-5. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS RIO GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET Transit -oriented urban - District Center 2.0 FAR or 6 village with a wide range -Medium 90 du/ac stories and mix of residential, live -work, commercial, and employment -generating uses Urban Neighborhood 1.0 FAR or 3 Medium -high density urban 20 du/ac stories neighborhoods with a mix -Low of attached single- and multifamily housing; mixed - Urban Neighborhood 1.5 FAR or 4 -Medium -Medium Low du/ac stories use residential with ground- g floor retail, services, and 1.5FAR or 5 Urban restaurants; cultural uses; N-40 Neighborhood 40 du/ac stories public and open s aces p p -Medium F Office/industrial flex spaces, Industrial/Flex ® 1.5 FAR 3 small-scale R&D, clean -Low stories General Commercial 1.0 FAR -Medium 35 Shopping, restaurants, feet entertainment, service commercial Notes: 17TH The focus area also includes a nominal amount of land used by railroad operations and mapped with the = Open Space land use designation. See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes. LU aY 2 Q g o 14TH ST o J z m WELLINGTON AL, J Q r, u FRUIT ST D C) m z M m 70 City Council 1ST ST w z FIGURE LU-15 LAND USE MAP WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD SUNSWEPT AVE MpRNINGSOE AVE w d w SILVER DR J I � 0 � w � z Q � W � HAZARD AVE 0 o w w J L.LJ J c� co > 0 `L------------ m J z _ p v~i W Y J z = U w Q Q n z � N D Q (_ �r r r WE 1q9 TABLE LU-6. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD UN-20 �• _FLEX-1.5 .'\ __ I I------- _r'GC-1 Low Density 7 du/ac 2 stories Low-rise single-family neighborhoods Residential Low -Medium - Density 11 du/ac 2 stories Single-family homes, duplexes, small -lot subdivisions, and mobile -home parks Residential - Medium A mix of low- and medium -rise neighborhoods with single and multifamily housing, Density 15 du/ac 3 stories Residential including small lot subdivisions, townhomes, live/work units - Corridor Medium density urban housing, such as attached townhomes and apartments, Residential 30 du/ac 3 stories along corridors or adjacent to areas designated General Commercial, Urban Neighborhood, or District Center Urban 1.0 FAR or UN 20 Neighborhood 20 du/ac 3 stories -Low Medium density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single and multifamily housing; mixed -use residential with ground -floor retail, services, and restaurants; LnUrban 1.5 FAR or cultural uses; and public and open spaces Neighborhood 30 du/ac 4 stories Medium Low ity Council 26 — 281 2/15/2022 mom,.. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 1q9 TABLE LU-6. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD UN-20 �• _FLEX-1.5 .'\ __ I I------- _r'GC-1 Low Density 7 du/ac 2 stories Low-rise single-family neighborhoods Residential Low -Medium - Density 11 du/ac 2 stories Single-family homes, duplexes, small -lot subdivisions, and mobile -home parks Residential - Medium A mix of low- and medium -rise neighborhoods with single and multifamily housing, Density 15 du/ac 3 stories Residential including small lot subdivisions, townhomes, live/work units - Corridor Medium density urban housing, such as attached townhomes and apartments, Residential 30 du/ac 3 stories along corridors or adjacent to areas designated General Commercial, Urban Neighborhood, or District Center Urban 1.0 FAR or UN 20 Neighborhood 20 du/ac 3 stories -Low Medium density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single and multifamily housing; mixed -use residential with ground -floor retail, services, and restaurants; LnUrban 1.5 FAR or cultural uses; and public and open spaces Neighborhood 30 du/ac 4 stories Medium Low ity Council 26 — 281 2/15/2022 mom,.. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 17TH ST - - ----- - i- i— z "' � `n 2 ~ 00 15TH ST z :RIDAY W � w J � ARTHA LN U_ N o w WASHINGTON AVE CO � J w 12TH ST o Q 0 o a Co � LIME ST 0 F- Q11TH LU > z o� �I N + n u N 9TH ST o „ 1 z o Ln� �P G Q Q z '� > 1< CIVIC CENTER DR ' 8TH ST o G&E z 7TH ST - LL UN-30 PAO 2_ _ _ --6TH-ST� i —- - - - - - - - w -5TH ST UN-30 ��• ; 3- W --- -- - -------- -- 5TH ST �-- - --SANTAANA�BLVD•- =-------•�--- ..,�-4TH w 3RD Or UN-20 2ND STO o ILU WALNUT ST N�C •.'r Q LL1 Q Ln General ® Commercial 1.0 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial -Medium ® General 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial ' Commercial Professional & Professional and administrative office and supporting service commercial and PAO-2 Administrative 2.0 FAR 3 stories Office -High restaurants Industrial/Flex 1.5 FAR 3 stories Office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale R&D, clean manufacturing, live -work -Low - Institutional 2.0 FAR 2 stories Government facilities, public service facilities, and public institutions - Open Space n/a 2 stories Recreational and green space, commercial open space, public infrastructure, and rail facilities — — OC Street Car (planned line / station) Note: See TablG ty. G0UQ jdIj Focus Area Designations, for notes. 26 — 282 2/15/20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN Ii �� .1..• FIGURE LU-18 LAND USE MAP 55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD w Q = o „ z 0 (D /* ■ CENTRALAVE ADAMS ST Q lip ALTON AVE 1MBINE AVE COWAN MITCHEQ C.� WARNER AVE O� TABLE LU-7. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD High density urban villages consisting of District Center 2.0 FAR or visually stunning and vibrant buildings Medium 90 du/ac 6 stories and spaces with a wide range and mix of residential, live -work, commercial, hotel, and �Q employment -generating uses. Industrial/Flex Office/industrial flex spaces, R&D, clean -Medium 3.0 FAR 10 stories manufacturing, corporate headquarters and campuses. Live -work units are not permitted. General ® Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service Commercial 1.5 FAR 35 feet commercial. -Medium High ®General 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service Commercial commercial. PIF-- _-@Iss mapped with City Council the = Open Space land use c2 i ratiM 2/15/2022 See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes. ����.I EXHIBIT 5 All materials for Exhibit 5 may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/general-plan-environmental-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 26 — 284 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 411-131-22 2720 HOTEL TER GC 1.0 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-38 1251 DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-063-41 1231 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-063-42 641 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-06 2620 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-10 2601 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-12 2650 S GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-15 1351 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-23 2700 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-28 2651 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-29 2726 S GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-30 1325 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-31 2721 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-32 2701 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-33 1261 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-34 1251 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-36 1231 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-37 1221 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-39 1261 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-40 1241 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-132-01 2701 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-132-02 2721 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-11 ROW ROW LU change 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-04 1504 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-07 1530 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-08 1532 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-09 1534 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-10 1536 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-11 1538 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-13 1560 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-14 1570 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-15 1510 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-16 1508 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-17 1506 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-20 1524 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-22 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-23 1524 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-24 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-25 1506 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-26 1508 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-27 1580 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-28 1580 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-29 1581 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-30 1502 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-31 1500 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-32 1516 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-33 1518 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-34 1522 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-36 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-38 1518 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-39 152 - ad City Council 26 - 285 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte Focus Area/Location 016-221-40 1524 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-41 1520 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-42 1540 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-01 1801 E CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-02 1749 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-03 2441 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-04 2401 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-05 2331 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-02 2344 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-03 2400 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-04 2350 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-01 1831 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-02 1815 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-03 2321 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-04 2311 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-05 1830 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-022-02 2322 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-022-03 2300 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-10 2501 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-11 1824 E CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-17 1840 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-19 1813 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-23 2601 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-24 2621 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-25 2511 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-26 2525 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-05 3050 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-07 1740 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-09 1800 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-02 2961 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-04 2933 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-05 2943 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-06 1761 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-07 2913 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-08 2901 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-09 1750 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-10 2923 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-11 2922 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-12 1800 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-13 1830 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-14 2912 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-15 2932 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-16 2938 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-17 2960 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-18 2952 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-19 2942 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-20 1811 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-21 1801 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-22 1751 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-16 2801 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-18 1851 11 F QFFRF �AVF PAQ �O-S PAR ____��hangp I El LX-3 XLDgaLagad City Council 26 - 286 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte Focus Area/Location 430-181-31 2871 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-32 2865 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-33 2851 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-07 2901 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-08 2909 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-11 2921 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-12 3001 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-13 3009 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-10 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-11 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-031-02 2400 PULLMAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-21 1951 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.55 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-24 1951 E DYER RD DC 1.7 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-07 1821 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-16 1805 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-13 PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-15 1800 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-23 2001 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-24 2801 CATHERINE WAY PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-27 2040 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-28 2850 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-182-01 1958 E BLAIR AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-14 3030 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-15 1940 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-16 1900 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-20 1901 E ALTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-21 1921 E ALTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-14 2510 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-15 2540 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-17 2530 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-18 2500 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-22 2001 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-23 2600 S RED HILL PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-12 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-15 2310 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-17 2001 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-18 2300 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-19 2001 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-20 1951 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-22 1921 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-23 1922 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-07 2300 RED HILL AVE DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-16 2310 S RED HILL AVE DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 002-201-20 2800 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-34 2700 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-40 2700 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-44 2701 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 405-261-17 812 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-261-18 808 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-261-19 804 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-233-19 111 cific Dev Plan City Council 26 - 287 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ cus Area/Location 405-233-35 1111 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 1.0 FAR LU change INS Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-233-36 1112 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 1.0 FAR LU change INS Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 415-031-33 4040 W CARRIGE DR IND 0.47 FAR density/intensity IND Add Note GPA 2000-08.47 FAR ex 415-031-37 4140 W GARRY AVE IND 0.47 FAR density/intensity IND Add Note GPA 2000-08.47 FAR ex 400-131-02 1404 N TUSTIN AVE PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 First St/Tustin Ave 396-211-38 2003 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-39 2011 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-44 1823 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-48 1827 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-49 1821 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-52 1745 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-53 1735 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-54 1729 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-55 1805 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-57 1301 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-58 1325 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-01 902 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-08 1002 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-09 1008 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-231-01 1300 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-231-02 1330 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-243-01 1430 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-243-02 1618 N LINWOOD AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-02 1104 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-43 1116 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-44 1118 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-58 1108 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-60 1102 E Seventeenth St GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-62 1112 E Seventeenth ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-64 1112 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-66 1120 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-082-33 1124 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-082-39 1124 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-02 2201 N GRAND AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-01 2210 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-02 2200 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-01 2231 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-34 2302 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-02 2323 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-15 2345 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-09 1404 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-10 1263 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-11 1259 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-12 1255 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-23 1264 E 15TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-26 1258 E 15TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-03 1258 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-06 1302 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-13 1314 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-17 1264 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-261-14 131 - Street City Council 26 - 288 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 396-191-33 2110 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-34 2114 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-35 2118 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-36 2122 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-37 2126 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-38 2125 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-39 2121 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-40 2117 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-41 2113 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-42 2109 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-44 2130 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-03 2139 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-04 2121 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-06 2113 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-07 2109 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-08 2105 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-09 2101 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-31 1221 E BEECHWOOD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-32 1220 E SANTA CLARA AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-35 2320 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-36 2330 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-37 2340 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-38 1221 E BEECHWOOD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-261-15 1311 E WASHINGTON PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-02 2323 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-15 2345 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-17 1125 E 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-03 2701 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-07 2727 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-08 2761 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-01 2702 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-02 2710 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-03 2720 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-04 2740 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-58 2530 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-59 2510 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-60 2520 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-113-10 2428 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-24 2650 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-27 2626 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-28 2610 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-29 2602 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-31 2630 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-01 1900* N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-02 1800 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-03 1750 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-04 1227 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-06 1229 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-08 1818 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-09 1750 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-18 120 AStreet City Council 26 — 289 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 396-361-01 2637 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-05 2525 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-06 2421 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-07 2425 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-03 1126 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-04 1136 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-05 1202 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-06 1206 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-15 1602 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-16 1600 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-17 1520 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-48 1500 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-49 1202 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-68 1510 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-70 1244 E 17 TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-71 1248 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-72 1258 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-73 1268 S Grand ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-74 1238 E 17 TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-01 125 E 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-02 1300 E FAIRHAVEN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-03 1314 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-04 1320 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-05 1328 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-06 1330 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-07 1332 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-08 1334 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-01 315 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-02 1310 E 4TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-17 309 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-01 1310 E 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-16 1315 E 2ND ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-02 1308 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-03 1312 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-04 1314 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-05 1318 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-06 1322 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-07 1324 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-08 1326 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-09 1328 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-14 1315 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-15 1309 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-17 1325 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-18 107 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-19 119 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-09 302 N MCCLAY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-11 1315 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-12 1313 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-15 1319 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-02 1318 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-03 132 - Street City Council 26 - 290 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-455-04 1324 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-05 1328 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-06 1334 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-07 208 N MCCLAY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-08 1327 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-09 1325 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-10 1323 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-11 1321 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-07 625 N GRAND AVE GC 1.15 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-01 839 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-02 1300 E FRUIT ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-24 909 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-26 909 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-27 910 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-19 501 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-20 419 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-21 415 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-22 401 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 100-261-33 808 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-261-36 820 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-261-39 808 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-03 602 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-04 520 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-05 510 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-10 908 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-11 930 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-21 830 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-24 830 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-37 822 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-722-50 1002 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-01 411 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-02 417 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-03 423 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-04 427 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-05 3711 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-06 3705 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-01 501 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-03 3712 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-04 3706 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-22 3706 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-08 313 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-11 225 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-12 217 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-13 217 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-14 205 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-15 125 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-29 329 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-34 313 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-01 1001 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-05 1111 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-21 100 - r Specific Plan - C City Council 26 - 291 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 144-351-22 3720 W KENT AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-23 3710 W KENT AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-25 1103 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-26 1107 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-361-60 801 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-361-61 901 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-06 288 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-07 324 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-08 324 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-03 432 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-04 420 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-05 436 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-071-05 520 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-04 1114 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-05 1108 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-06 1020 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-07 1014 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-08 1000 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-09 960 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-10 914 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-11 902 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-12 3817 W HAZARD AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-15 980 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-99 1206 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-043-16 1406 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-043-17 1314 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-13 426 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-14 410 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-15 406 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-16 328 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-17 322 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-18 316 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-19 308 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-01 1221 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-02 3708 W WASHINGTON AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-11 3713 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-12 1109 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-13 1115 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-14 1201 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-15 1213 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-02 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-03 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-06 718 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-07 714 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-08 710 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-09 706 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-10 628 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-11 626 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-12 622 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-13 618 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-14 610 _L�U_��MUFROA �ST !UN �3-0 PAR -rrjPnqjtVjinjPn-qijg UN-S0 Harbor Cnrrud.Qr Specific Plan - C City Council 26 - 292 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198-162-15 610 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-16 610 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-17 606 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-18 602 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-19 522 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-20 518 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-24 511 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-25 501 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-26 511 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-27 513 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-28 523 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-29 601 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-30 603 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-31 609 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-32 613 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-35 701 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-36 705 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-37 709 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-42 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-43 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-44 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-45 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-46 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-47 501 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-49 722 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-50 715 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-51 609 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-01 3710 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-02 414 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-03 408 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-04 408 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-05 326 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-06 322 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-07 318 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-08 314 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-09 310 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-10 306 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-11 302 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-12 226 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-13 222 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-14 218 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-15 214 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-16 212 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-17 206 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-18 202 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-24 201 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-25 205 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-26 209 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-27 213 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-28 217 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-29 225 - r Specific Plan - C City Council 26 - 293 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198 182 30 301 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan C 198-182-31 309 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-32 321 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-33 325 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-34 405 N HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-35 405 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-36 421 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-01 1021 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-02 3714 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-03 3710 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-15 3713 W HAZARD AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-16 913 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-17 925 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-18 1011 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-321-02 101 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-03 105 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-04 109 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-05 113 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-52 3502 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-53 3520 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-322-01 3612 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-322-02 3610 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-341-07 3312 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-551-51 120 KENTON DR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-24 3621 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-25 3629 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-26 3631 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-23 3501 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-24 3505 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-25 3509 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-26 3515 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-27 3517 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-24 3525 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-25 3527 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-26 3601 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-27 3531 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-01 3622 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-20 114 N BEWLEY ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-25 115 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-44 3638 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-45 3628 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-46 3628 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-01 3502 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-19 3501 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-20 3521 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-38 3512 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-39 3512 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-40 3506 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-41 3510 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-01 3602 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-21 360 - Specific Plan - NT City Council 10 26 - 294 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198-242-22 3603 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-23 3605 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-45 3609 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-01 3314 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-28 3321 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-29 3319 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-60 3332 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-61 3330 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-62 3326 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-63 3324 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-64 3318 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-65 3317 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-66 3331 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-70 3332 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-01 3400 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-29 3405 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-34 3425 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-64 3424 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-65 3420 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-66 3418 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-24 3230 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-25 3226 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-26 3200 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-17 3301 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-18 3317 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-19 3319 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-20 3321 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-21 3327 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-22 3401 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-23 3405 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-24 3409 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-25 3417 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-26 3425 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-02 702 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-41 762 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-42 718 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-43 718 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-44 724 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-45 800 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-46 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-47 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-48 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-49 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-03 629 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-05 3639 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-09 3721 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-10 525 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-11 3701 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-12 605 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-16 121 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-21 103 - - Specific Plan NT City Council 11 26 - 295 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 144-311-22 3728 W BOLSA AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-27 3626 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-28 3626 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-30 3638 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-31 103 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-35 117 S FIGUEROA ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-01 3600 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-04 3710 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-07 751 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-08 701 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-09 3770 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-10 3760 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-01 100 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-02 120 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-03 3904 W 1ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-04 150 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-05 200 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-071-22 602 S HARBOR DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-05 1602 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-07 3822 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-08 3802 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-09 1602 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-07 1526 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-08 1518 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-09 1510 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-10 1500 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-12 1610 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-07 4201 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-17 228 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-18 124 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-22 208 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-23 200 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-24 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-25 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-26 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-27 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-28 3825 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-29 3835 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-30 3839 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-31 230 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-02 1401 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-16 1321 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-17 1415 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-18 1421 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-19 1501 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-20 1505 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-21 1513 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-22 1521 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-23 3710 W 17TH ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-24 3720 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-25 372 -s n PAR cip swtv/*ntpns*tg DC-S Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT City Council 12 26 - 296 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 198-081-26 3710 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-28 3630 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-31 3636 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-52 3500 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-53 3514 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-55 3526 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-57 3522 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-21 3621 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-22 3625 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-23 3635 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-24 3701 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-19 114 N FIGUEROA ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-20 3709 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-21 101 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-22 115 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-23 121 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-01 3412 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-02 3404 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-03 3400 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-04 3300 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-05 1514 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-06 1502 N HARPER ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-07 1501 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-08 1517 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-09 1605 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-10 3230 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-01 3118 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-02 3132 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-03 3216 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-06 14097 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-07 1506 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-08 1550 N CLINTON DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-09 1600 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-10 1417 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-211-01 1424 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-211-02 1417 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-15 1321 N HARBOR ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 411-152-11 3231 S STANDARD DC 2.0 FAR LU change IND MacArthur Place 411-071-05 1 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-071-06 2 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-08 201 E MACARTHUR DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-09 31 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-11 3401 S MAIN DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-073-01 3 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-073-06 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-03 200 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-04 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-05 4 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-06 2 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-08 1 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-09 9 - e City Council 13 26 - 297 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres L Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte cus Area/Location 411-074-10 3 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-11 5 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-075-01 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-081-22 201 SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-24 201 SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-28 8 MACARTHUR PL DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-30 100 E MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-24 7 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-25 7 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-29 3 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-30 4 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-34 7 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-38 3 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-42 9 MACARTHUR PL DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-093-03 2 E HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-102-06 5 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-111-03 3843* S MAIN ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-111-08 6 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 011-154-01 1406 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-02 123 S MCCLAY ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-03 1422 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-06 1504 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-10 1406 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-11 1610 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-20 206 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-21 210 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-22 214 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-23 220 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-24 224 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-25 310 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-27 322 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-28 1607 E CHESTNUT AVE UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-33 318 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-37 1530 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-38 1600 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-39 1600 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-42 1620 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-43 1440 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-07 1630 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-08 1634 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-09 1636 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-10 130 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-11 126 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-12 124 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-13 120 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-14 116 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-23 1609 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-25 109 N WRIGHT ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-27 1623 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-28 1617 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-20 153 - - rlay City Council 14 26 - 298 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ cus Area/Location 398-431-21 1533 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-22 1529 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-23 1525 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-24 1519 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-25 1503 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-07 1427 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-08 1421 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-28 1411 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-29 1411 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-30 1405 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-31 111 N MCCLAY ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-32 1403 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-01 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-02 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-03 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-04 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-05 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-06 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-07 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-11 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-12 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-422-01 131 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-02 127 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-03 125 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-04 121 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-05 117 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-06 1658 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-07 1662 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-08 1666 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-09 1668 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-10 1661 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-11 1649 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-03 2103 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-04 600 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-05 550 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-042-04 601 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-03 2201 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-04 501 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-06 555 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-02 1971 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-03 2001 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-05 600 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-06 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-09 1901 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-13 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-14 515 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-15 525 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-16 2021 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-052-01 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-061-05 1801 E Fourth ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-061-07 180 - rlay City Council 15 26 - 299 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN I Situs AddresjW Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte cus Area/Location 400-061-08 1801 E Fourth ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-02 1851 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-03 200 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-07 1750 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-03 1900 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-04 2000 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-05 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-06 2001 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-09 1901 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-02 2030 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-04 203 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-05 2031 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-01 2100 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-16 2201 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-17 2151 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-18 2131 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-19 2101 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-22 2112 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-23 2130 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-251-12 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-03 2210 W 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-04 2207 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-10 2222 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-11 2222 W 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-01 2114 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-02 2020 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-03 2020 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-04 2110 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-05 1900 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-13 2010 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-02 1818 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-03 1814 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-06 1800 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-07 1820 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-222-01 1660 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-222-04 212 S ELK LN DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-04 2204 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-07 1900 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 005-151-41 1525 N DURANT ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change MR-15 Midtown Plan 398-552-19 1010 N Broadway PAO 0.5 FAR LU change MR-15 Midtown Plan 398-522-11 313 W WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO Midtown Plan 005-151-40 1610 N BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-232-01 720 N SPURGEON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-232-04 201 E Civic Center Dr LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 005-151-32 1600 N BROADWAY MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-475-01 838 E 1ST ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC Midtown Plan 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-01 1201 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-02 116 E WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-03 120 E WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-04 100 - City Council 16 26 - 300 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Addre 0 Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-022-01 1117 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-022-10 1107 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-022-11 1111 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-023-01 1011 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-06 712 N BUSH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-07 108 E 8TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-01 1200 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-02 1104 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-06 1104 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-10 1010 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-09 1000 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-01 919 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-02 915 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-03 843 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-04 839 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-07 817 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-08 811 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-09 809 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-10 801 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-14 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-15 912 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-25 209 W CIVIC CENTER DR DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-26 818 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-27 825 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-29 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-30 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-27 902 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-29 800 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-30 888 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-34 921 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-37 915 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-01 817 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-02 813 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-03 809 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-01 717 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-02 715 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-03 711 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-244-01 800 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-244-02 710 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 002-161-13 2002 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-05 110 W 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-30 1910 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-31 1906 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-32 1914 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-33 1902 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-163-30 180 - t City Council 17 26 - 301 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 002-163-31 1810 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-180-45 2333 N BROADWAY DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-180-46 2323 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-03 2034 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-04 2030 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-05 2026 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-06 2022* N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-07 2016 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-08 2014 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-09 2010 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-10 2006 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-11 111 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-22 2019 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-25 2015 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-26 2017 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-27 2011 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-28 2025* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-29 2005 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-30 2033 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-33 2021 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-40 2052 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-41 2056 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-59 2135 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-61 2058 N Bush St DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-63 2119 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-78 2058 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-80 2058 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-81 2129 N Main St DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-18 1917 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-19 1909 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-22 1901 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-23 1811 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-24 1809 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-25 1805 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-26 1801 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-27 1727 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-28 1721 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-29 1717 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-33 210 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-34 1711 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-35 1715 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-41 1905 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-01 112 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-02 1910 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-03 1904 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-04 1900 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-05 1820 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-17 1903 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-18 1909 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-19 1905 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-22 190 - t City Council 18 26 - 302 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 003-142-23 1807 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-24 1800 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-15 1725 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-33 1722 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-01 2230 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-02 2222 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-03 2218* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-04 2212 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-05 2202 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-06 2208 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-07 107 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-08 119 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-01 2132 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-02 2122 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-03 2116 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-04 2112* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-05 2110 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-06 2106 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-07 2100 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-08 2036 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-09 2032 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-22 112 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-06 111 W 19TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-04 1714 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-16 1719 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-31 1701 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-013-18 2677 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 North Main St 411-111-07 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 411-111-09 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 411-111-10 Entitlements expired as c DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Pac Tel Office 411-111-11 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 410-223-11 1241 W ALTON AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change OS South Bristol Street 140-251-02 2910 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-03 2860 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-04 2840 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-05 2850 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-05 1212 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-06 2603 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-08 2701 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-09 1209 HEMLOCK WAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-12 2701 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-13 2621 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-01 2801 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-05 2911 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-06 2929 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-20 2823 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-21 1216 HEMLOCK WAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-22 2909 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-01 2523 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-03 2445 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-04 115 - eet City Council 19 26 - 303 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 410-421-05 1125 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-28 2501 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-29 2511 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-01 2303 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-02 2311 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-03 2401 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-04 1030 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-05 1120 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-06 1100 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-18 3001 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-19 3041 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-031-01 3000 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-01 3200 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-02 3200 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-03 3220 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-04 3220 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-01 2302 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-03 2320 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-04 2402 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-05 2430 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-06 1331 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-02 2740 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-03 2810 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-04 2650 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-05 2700 BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-07 2610 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-08 2640 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-12 2701 S BRISTOL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-17 3041 S BRISTOL ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-031-03 3050 S BRISTOL ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-222-22 3309 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-24 3313 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-25 3301 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-31 3361 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-32 3329 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-10 3401 S PLAZA DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-11 3420 BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-12 3430 BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-13 3500 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-22 3300 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-23 3310 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-301-10 1200 W MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-11 3601 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-14 3801 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-15 3811 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-17 3925 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-18 3941 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-21 3929 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-33 3861 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-38 3911 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-39 382 - eet City Council 20 26 - 304 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 410-301-40 3611 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-41 3611 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-43 3701 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-12 3730 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-14 3600 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-16 3606 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-17 3610 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-22 3900 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-24 3810 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-25 3820 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-26 3814* S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-10 1561 SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-20 3951 S PLAZA DR GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-01 3811 BEAR ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-02 1661 W SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-03 3851 S BEAR ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-04 1641 SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-42 3701 S BRISTOL ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-13 3700 S BRISTOL ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 403-151-09 2136 S CYPRESS AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 South Main Street 403-151-11 2116 S CYPRESS AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 South Main Street 015-090-03 2240 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 403-151-04 2133 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 403-151-05 2139 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 010-230-01 210 W CUBBON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS South Main Street 016-031-13 2327 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-32 128 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-37 124 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-38 120 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-51 222 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-54 2301 S Main St GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-04 2423 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-12 100 E CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-13 125 E CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-14 2405 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-18 2405 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-19 2409 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-17 2516 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-23 2509 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-24 2531 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-25 2515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-26 2533 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-27 2501 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-050-08 2541 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-050-09 2547 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-01 224 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-02 220 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-03 2302 S BROADWAY AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-01 120 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-06 2406 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-10 230- et City Council 21 26 - 305 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 410-372-11 2330 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-03 2426 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-05 2426 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-06 2500 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-15 2416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-06 2538 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-07 2500 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-07 2419 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-08 2401 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-09 2337 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-07 2517 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-08 2511 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-09 2509 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-10 2433 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-11 2431 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-12 2421 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-13 2421 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-14 2419 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-05 130 W CENTRAL AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 010-144-18 618 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-21 616 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-22 602 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-23 610 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-25 606 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-29 630 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-30 620 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-12 724 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-13 107 W RICHLAND ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-15 710 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-16 714 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-17 702 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-18 726 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-19 704 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-11 812 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-13 818 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-17 816 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-18 822 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-27 806 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-28 830 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-16 910 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-17 902 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-18 920 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-19 906 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-20 930 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-21 914 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-22 926 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-11 1026 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-12 1030 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-13 1022 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-23 731 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-26 725 - et City Council 22 26 - 306 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 011-041-27 721 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-28 809 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-29 803 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-30 807 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-31 701 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-32 112 E BISHOP ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-34 709 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-15 107 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-16 111 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-21 827 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-34 925 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-36 933 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-44 921 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-46 917 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-47 815 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-48 819 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-49 827 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-51 905 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-21 1123 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-43 1111 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-44 1109 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-50 1001 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-51 1131 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-58 1117 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-59 1005 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-69 1015 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-70 1105 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-15 1210 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-16 1216 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-20 1230 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-23 1242 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-24 1204 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-25 1234 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-29 1218 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-18 1306 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-19 1310 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-02 1402 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-03 1416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-08 1401 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-13 1419 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-14 1423 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-21 1415 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-22 1440 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-23 1427 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-27 1424 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-28 1444 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-08 1519 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-09 1527 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-10 1603 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-11 1607 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-16 151- et City Council 23 26 - 307 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 013-183-17 1518 S SYCAMORE7S11T GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-18 1520 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-19 1524 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-20 1606 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-21 1608 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-28 1501 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-29 208 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-30 202 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-31 212 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-32 205 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-33 1515 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-02 1509 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-04 155 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-08 1508 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-09 1516 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-10 1522 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-11 1606 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-12 1614 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-13 1622 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-14 1626 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-15 1517 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-17 115 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-19 1502 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-20 SEC SYCAMORE/EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-21 1607 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-23 1627 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-22 1221 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-23 1229 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-24 1231 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-25 1237 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-30 1235 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-31 1241 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-32 1247 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-34 1201 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-37 1211 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-25 1345 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-26 1303 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-27 1307 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-28 1311 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-29 1321 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-30 1325 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-31 1329 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-35 1333 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-36 1417 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-38 1445 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-39 1403 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-40 1407 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-43 1421 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-44 1427 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-57 1451 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-58 147 - et City Council 24 26 - 308 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 014-032-59 1415 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-60 1465 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-09 1812 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-10 1820 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-11 1808 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-08 1914 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-09 1922 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-17 1926 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-18 1906 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-07 2002 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-10 2014 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-11 2020 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-12 2022 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-15 2012 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-16 2010 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-17 2008 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-14 2026 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-17 2036 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-18 2040 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-24 2058 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-25 2064 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-26 2064 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-28 2054 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-29 2050 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-30 2030 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-27 2130 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-38 2116 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-39 2120 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-40 2140 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-41 2102 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-090-19 2222 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-090-21 2202 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-277-09 220 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-04 220 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-05 210 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-06 202 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-06 320 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-07 316 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-08 312 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-09 300 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-12 520 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-13 518 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-14 516 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-15 510 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-16 502 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-17 420 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-18 418 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-19 416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-20 408 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-01 104 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-02 110 - et City Council 25 26 - 309 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-512-03 111 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-04 119 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-05 127 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-06 124 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-07 120 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-05 122 S ORANGE AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-06 116 S ORANGE AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-07 224 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-08 210 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-01 2201 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-02 2209 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-03 2211 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-04 2223 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-05 2225 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-06 2231 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-07 2239 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-08 2245 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-151-01 2101 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-08 1959 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-09 1947 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-10 1933 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-11 1925 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-12 1919 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-18 2071 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-19 2059 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-20 2055 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-21 2049 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-22 2045 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-23 2041 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-24 2037 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-25 2035 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-26 2033 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-27 2025 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-28 2017 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-31 2009 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-01 1701 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-03 124 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-04 125 E BERKELEY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-08 1717 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-09 1707 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-10 1705 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-13 120 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-01 1801 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-06 1812 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-07 119 E OCCIDENTAL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-10 107 E OCCIDENTAL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-11 1815 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-01 1901 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-02 1911 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-01 1501 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-02 112 -Snuth Main StLget City Council 26 26 - 310 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 403-191-09 111 E STANFORD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-11 1511 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-12 1515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-01 1601 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-02 112 E STANFORD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-09 111 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-10 105 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-11 1617 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-12 1611 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-13 1603 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-01 401 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-02 110 E CHESTNUT AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-10 100 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-11 107 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-12 105 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-13 417 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-14 411 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-15 409 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-08 109 CAMILLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-09 519 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-10 515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-01 203 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-02 209 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-03 215 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-04 221 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-10 112 E WALNUT ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-01 108 E PINE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-02 305 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-03 311 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-04 315 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-05 319 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-01 601 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-03 611 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-04 615 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-10 607 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-12 609 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-13 112 E CAMILLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-05 631 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-16 1322 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-17 1344 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-01 2001 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-01 505 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-24 406 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-53 114 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-16 1010 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-04 1918 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-01 120 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-02 114 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-03 110 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-04 100 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-05 117 - et City Council 27 26 - 311 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN k Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-278-06 114 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-07 120 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-08 123 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-05 915 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-06 919 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-07 117 W MCFADDEN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-16 1010 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-53 114 E CUBBON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-01 1901 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-02 1905 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-03 1909 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-04 1918 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-14 1917 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-16 1921 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-01 201 S BROADWAY LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-02 211 S BROADWAY LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-16 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-01 120 W WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-02 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-03 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-07 111 E SAINT ANDREW PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-01 2001 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-17 101 E SAINT GERTRUDE PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-02 114 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-03 116 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-04 122 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-05 126 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-08 115 E OCCIDENTAL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-09 111 E OCCIDENTAL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-01 505 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-05 222 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-06 220 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-07 210 CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-01 208 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-02 203 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-03 207 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-04 209 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-05 215 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-06 219 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-07 221 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-08 213 E PINE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-09 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-10 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-11 216 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-12 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-13 202 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-14 214 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-05 631 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-05 210 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-02 1911 MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-01 190 - et City Council 28 26 — 312 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 403-163-12 1919 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-11 1925 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-10 1933 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-09 1947 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-28 2017 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-31 2009 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-21 827 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-51 905 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-46 917 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-69 1015 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 041-213-04 555 E MEMORY LN DC 1.27 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Town and Country Manor 398-461-06 117 N STANDARD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-08 901 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-09 907 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-21 701 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-26 521 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-27 521 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-32 719 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-34 515 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-35 607 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-11 110 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-12 829 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-13 823 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-14 823 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-18 801 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-12 936 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-10 938 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-01 1206 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-02 1212 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-03 1222 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-04 1225 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-05 1221 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-06 1219 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-07 1215 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-08 1211 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-09 1207 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-10 1203 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-01 1102 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-02 1108 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-03 1110 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-04 1114 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-05 1124 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-05 1214 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-06 202 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-07 1215 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-08 1211 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-09 1205 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-10 1201 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-14 1221 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-15 1221 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-234-01 631 - ode - DT & UC City Council 29 26 - 313 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-234-04 113 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-234-06 614 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-234-07 601 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-01 615 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-02 620 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-03 600 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-04 608 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-05 608 N SPURGEON DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-01 615 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-02 600 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-04 618 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-04 518 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-05 301 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-253-06 200 W SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-01 515 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-02 505 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-11 520 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-19 301 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-20 305 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-21 309 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-30 302 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-01 415 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-02 409 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-03 223 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-04 221 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-05 219 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-06 217 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-07 215 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-08 209 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-09 203 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-10 213 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-11 416 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-01 120 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-02 415 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-03 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-04 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-05 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-08 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-09 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-10 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-11 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-12 420 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-13 109 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-01 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-02 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-03 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-04 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-05 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-06 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-07 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-09 308 - ode - DT & UC City Council 30 26 - 314 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-264-10 300 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-13 201 W 3RD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-14 308 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-15 202 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-16 214 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-17 220 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-18 325 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-01 227 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-02 217 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-03 225 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-04 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-05 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-06 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-09 214 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-01 117 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-02 107 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-03 102 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-04 222 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-01 117 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-02 115 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-03 105 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-04 112 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-01 517 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-02 515 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-03 503 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-04 501 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-05 117 E 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-06 119 E 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-07 510 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-08 520 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-322-01 200 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-323-08 300 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-325-01 450 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-08 325 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-10 300 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-11 200 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-01 204 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-06 217-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-07 217 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-08 217 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-09 201 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-328-01 421 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-328-02 111 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-01 102 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-02 104 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-03 106 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-04 108 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-05 112 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-06 114 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-07 116 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-08 118 - ode - DT & UC City Council 31 26 - 315 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-501-09 120 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-10 314 N BUSH DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-11 308 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-12 302 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-13 301 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-14 309 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-01 200-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-02 206-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-03 216 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-10 216-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-04 310 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-07 316 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-08 318 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-09 320 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-10 302 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-11 302 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-12 309 E 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-13 301 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-15 312-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-16 300 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-507-08 400 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-507-11 450 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-511-09 111 S MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-01 202 E 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-02 116 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-04 211 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-06 201 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-07 219 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-516-19 301 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-516-20 401 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-01 324 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-02 318 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-03 312 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-04 310 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-05 302 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-06 306 BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-07 306 BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-08 315 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-09 329 W BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-10 313 BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-07 204 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-08 116 N BROADWAY ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-09 322 W 3RD St DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-01 450 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-02 414 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-03 412 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-04 410 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-05 406 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-06 402 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-07 310 N BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-08 310 - ode - DT & UC City Council 32 26 - 316 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-601-02 200 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-601-03 200 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-601-04 201 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-02 217 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-03 220 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-04 210 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-07 200 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-603-02 210 E 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-01 402 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-02 406 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-03 412 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-08 409 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-09 405 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-10 501 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-12 510 N MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-07 400 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-351-04 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR LU change INS Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-02 1024 FULLER ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-081-06 1107 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5-1.8FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-01 1102 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5-1.8FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-03 1024 N FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-04 1022 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-05 1022 FULLER UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-06 1020 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-07 1016 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-08 1012 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-13 1006 N FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-092-02 1013 N FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-08 1037 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-09 1045 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-10 1029 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-11 1021 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-13 1126 E WASHINGTON AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-14 1126 E WASHINGTON AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-02 940 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-03 930 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-04 1205 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-05 1201 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-06 1202 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-07 1206 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-08 1210 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-09 1214 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-13 1215 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-14 902 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-15 1207 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-203-02 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-204-04 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-207-01 1111 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-208-01 1143 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-351-07 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-361-01 114 - ode - TV City Council 33 26 - 317 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-361-07 1102 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-374-21 1160 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-351-08 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-255-31 411 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR LU change INS Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-315-11 919 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-01 901 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-02 910 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-05 921 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-06 913 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-07 518 N POINSETTIA ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-08 920 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-09 920 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-01 1000 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-03 1000 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-18 1039 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-01 902 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-02 417 N GARFIELD ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-09 932 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-352-06 610 N SANTIAGO ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-352-07 620 N SANTIAGO ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-02 1061 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-03 1051 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-12 606 N TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-01 530 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-02 510 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-03 508 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-04 506 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-05 420 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-373-05 1110 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-373-06 1102 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-374-19 1105 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-374-20 1101 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-01 531 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-02 415 N TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-03 1051 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-04 1064 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-06 416 N SANTA FE ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-07 414 N SANTA FE ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-08 1020 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-09 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-10 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-11 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-03 906 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-382-01 1111 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-12 1045 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-01 1140 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-05 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-15 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-15 1029 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-05 1064 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-181-06 841 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 34 26 - 318 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-181-09 1328 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-10 1330 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-11 1332 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-14 841 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-17 1338 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-18 1340 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-05 1321 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-06 1317 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-07 1315 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-08 1313 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-09 901 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-10 905 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-11 909 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-12 915 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-13 915 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-14 900 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-15 1312 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-16 1318 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-17 1322 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-21 1326 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-22 1325 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-25 1331 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-26 1329 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-28 1337 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-07 1019 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-13 1313 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-14 1011 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-17 1312 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-18 1310 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-19 1306 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-06 845 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-07 1018 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-08 1020 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-09 1024 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-10 1030 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-11 1000 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-12 1038 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-13 826 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-14 830 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-15 800 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-16 836 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-17 838 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-01 902 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-02 1000 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-03 1039 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-04 1037 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-05 1033 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-06 1027 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-07 1023 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-08 1019 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-10 903 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 35 26 - 319 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-193-11 907 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-12 1002 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-13 1006 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-15 1016 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-16 1018 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-17 1022 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-18 1026 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-19 1030 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-20 1034 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-21 1038 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-22 1042 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-23 912 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-24 916 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-25 920 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-26 1012 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-01 1004 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-02 1006 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-03 1008 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-04 1010 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-05 1041 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-06 1035 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-07 1035 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-08 1027 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-09 1021 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-10 1017 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-11 1015 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-12 1001 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-14 1008 LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-15 1018 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-16 1022 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-17 1024 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-18 1026 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-19 1030 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-20 1032 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-21 1042 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-22 1014 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-23 1002 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-02 904 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-03 906 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-04 908 E STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-05 912 E STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-06 926 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-07 924 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-08 922 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-09 920 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-01 935 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-02 929 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-03 925 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-04 923 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-05 917 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-06 920 - ode - UN-1 City Council 36 26 - 320 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-205-07 922 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-08 926 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-09 1016 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-13 717 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-14 713 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-15 711 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-16 705 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-17 701 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-18 623 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-19 619 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-20 615 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-25 604 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-27 608 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-02 518 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-03 522 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-04 602 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-05 606 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-06 610 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-07 614 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-08 618 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-09 624 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-10 626 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-11 710 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-12 712 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-13 714 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-14 720 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-15 208 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-16 721 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-17 719 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-18 709 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-19 705 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-20 701 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-21 619 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-22 615 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-23 609 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-24 607 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-25 605 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-26 601 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-27 519 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-28 515 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-29 511 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-32 430 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-08 831 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-09 825 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-10 823 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-13 815 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-14 809 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-15 805 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-16 801 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-17 819 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-01 802 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 37 26 - 321 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-484-02 213 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-03 810 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-04 814 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-06 829 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-07 825 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-08 821 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-09 819 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-10 815 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-11 801 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-04 514 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-05 518 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-06 606 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-07 608 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-08 610 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-09 612 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-10 614 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-11 618 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-12 620 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-13 702 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-14 706 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-15 710 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-16 714 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-17 720 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-39 510 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-40 510 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-01 802 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-02 808 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-03 810 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-04 814 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-05 818 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-06 820 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-07 824 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-08 826 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-09 830 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-10 112 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-315-04 901 E 6TH ST UN 5.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-033-05 1110 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-034-07 920 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-01 1115 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-02 1113 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-03 1105 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-09 715 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-10 717 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-13 820 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-14 830 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-15 810 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-150-02 627 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-08 1327 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-09 1300 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-10 615 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-11 611 - -in Tramot Zoning Code - UN-2 City Council 38 26 - 322 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address L- Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-152-16 627 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-181-16 1315 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-02 628 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-03 1016 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-04 827 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-05 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-06 921 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-07 911 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-08 811 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-01 800 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-02 1031 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-03 1031 SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-04 1025 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-05 1001 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-201-11 901 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-202-01 923 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-01 621 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-02 621 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-03 708 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-04 609 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-01 625 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-02 615 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-03 714 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-04 710 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-05 401 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-01 731 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-02 725 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-03 719 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-04 715 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-05 711 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-06 501 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-07 505 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-08 511 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-09 702 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-10 708 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-11 710 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-12 408 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-01 729 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-02 727 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-03 717 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-04 715 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-05 709 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-08 615 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-09 619 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-10 623 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-11 625 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-12 710 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-13 714 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-16 724 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-17 730 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-20 718 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 39 26 - 323 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-301-21 601 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-01 608 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-02 717 LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-08 729 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-10 724 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-11 730 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-14 711 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-15 703 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-01 725 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-02 717 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-03 711 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-04 801 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-05 807 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-06 809 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-07 809 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-08 715 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-09 817 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-10 724 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-11 730 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-311-05 607 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-311-21 621 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-10 811 BROWN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-11 602 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-21 702 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-22 610 GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-23 601 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-24 618 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-03 812 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-06 611 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-11 624 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-16 636 POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-17 638 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-20 804 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-01 902 BROWN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-09 620 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-10 620 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-12 901 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-01 502 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-02 506 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-03 510 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-04 514 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-05 520 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-06 519 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-07 515 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-08 509 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-09 507 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-10 501 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-01 601 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-02 512 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-05 515 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-06 516 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 40 26 - 324 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-332-04 520 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-05 519 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-06 515 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-10 502 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-11 505 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-02 610 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-07 609 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-10 512 N PORTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-11 601 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-12 621 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-01 702 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-02 706 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-03 710 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-04 714 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-05 720 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-06 713 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-07 701 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-01 702 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-02 708 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-03 712 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-04 716 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-05 416 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-06 719 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-07 713 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-11 701 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-12 701 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-01 602 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-06 615 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-07 609 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-08 601 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-09 409 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-11 606 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-08 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-09 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-10 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-11 941 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-12 1035 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-03 906 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-07 929 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-08 903 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-352-10 920 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-01 742 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-02 738 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-03 734 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-04 730 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-05 718 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-06 714 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-07 710 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-08 702 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-09 626 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-10 624 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 41 26 - 325 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-371-11 620 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-12 616 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-14 600 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-15 601 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-16 609 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-17 615 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-18 617 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-19 621 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-20 623 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-21 629 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-22 703 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-23 707 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-24 711 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-25 715 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-26 717 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-27 721 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-28 725 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-29 731 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-30 735 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-31 739 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-32 1214 E FRUIT ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-33 610 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-34 606 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-01 516 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-02 510 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-03 508 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-04 511 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-05 515 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-06 519 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-07 1202 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-01 528 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-02 524 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-07 514 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-01 742 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-02 740 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-03 736 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-04 732 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-05 728 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-06 724 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-07 720 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-08 716 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-09 710 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-10 706 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-11 704 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-12 628 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-13 626 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-14 622 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-15 618 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-16 610 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-17 606 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-18 604 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 42 26 - 326 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-381-08 412 N SANTA FE ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-09 412 N SANTA FE ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-10 1061 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-11 1055 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-12 1051 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-13 1051 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-01 1111 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-02 508 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-03 506 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-04 420 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-05 416 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-01 507 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-02 501 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-03 419 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-04 411 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-05 1201 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-08 404 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-09 416 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-10 420 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-11 424 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-12 502 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-13 400 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-06 1121 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-07 1119 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-08 1115 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-09 1111 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-10 1105 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-01 1108 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-04 1116 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-05 1122 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-06 212 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-07 208 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-08 202 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-01 1102 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-02 1108 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-03 1116 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-04 1118 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-05 120 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-06 108 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-07 104 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-08 1102 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-01 1202 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-02 1202 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-03 1208 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-04 1210 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-08 1209 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-09 1207 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-10 209 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-11 1205 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-01 117 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-02 111 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 43 26 - 327 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-454-03 1208 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-11 107 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-03 1002 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-07 1044 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-18 1030 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-19 1038 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-01 1026 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-02 1022 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-03 1008 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-04 922 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-05 924 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-06 927 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-07 900 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-01 1000 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-02 1000 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-03 928 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-04 905 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-05 910 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-06 905 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-04 914 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-06 902 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-10 938 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-12 936 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-08 610 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-09 612 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-10 616 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-11 710 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-12 716 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-24 604 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-26 608 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-01 802 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-02 806 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-03 800 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-04 818 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-05 820 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-06 822 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-07 832 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-484-05 818 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-18 1039 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-362-05 420 TERMINAL ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-03 1055 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-15 1029 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-06 117 N STANDARD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 198-101-03 3704 W WASHINGTON AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-04 1222 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-05 1218 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-07 1122 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-08 1114 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-09 1102 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-10 3625 W 11TH ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-17 121 - Boulevard City Council 44 26 - 328 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 198-211-04 3424 W WASHINGTON AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-10 2901 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-12 2767 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-13 2767 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-01 1922 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-02 1918 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-03 1914 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-04 1912 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-05 1906 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-06 1904 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-07 209 N TOWNSEND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-08 1921 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-09 1917 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-10 1915 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-11 1911 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-12 1907 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-13 1901 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-01 1924 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-02 1918 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-03 1916 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-04 1912 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-05 1906 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-06 1904 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-02 1826 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-03 1822 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-04 1818 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-05 1814 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-07 1837 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-08 1831 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-10 1819 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-11 1815 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-12 1809 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-13 1805 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-14 1801 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-15 1821 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-16 1825 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-17 1832 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-18 1834 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-19 1810 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-21 1802 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-22 1806 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-01 1832 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-02 1826 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-03 1824 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-04 1820 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-05 1816 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-06 1810 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-07 1808 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-08 1802 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-02 1724 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-03 172 Boulevard City Council 45 26 — 329 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-201-04 1718 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-06 1706 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-07 1702 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-14 110 N WESTERN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-17 1716 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-18 1712 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-28 1732 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-29 1728 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-01 271 N RAITT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-02 1726 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-03 1722 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-04 1722 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-05 1716 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-06 1716 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-07 1706 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-08 1702 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-09 1701 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-10 1705 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-11 1709 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-12 1715 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-13 1717 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-14 1721 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-15 1727 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-131-33 1249 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change OS West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-19 1225 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-20 1217 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-21 1213 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-22 1211 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-23 1207 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-24 1201 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-11 1139 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-12 1131 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-13 1129 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-14 1127 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-26 1107 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-07 1222 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-08 1218 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-09 1214 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-10 1210 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-11 1206 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-12 1202 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-01 1140 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-05 1120 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-08 1106 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-09 1102 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-23 1128 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-24 1114 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-01 1076 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-02 1070 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-08 1042 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-39 103 -W Boulevard City Council 46 26 — 330 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-161-40 1040 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-41 1054 E SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-24 1111 E SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-19 2025 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-21 2015 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-28 2201 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-29 2209 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-21 2317 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-22 2313 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-23 2301 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-24 2301 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-25 2233 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-26 2217 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-29 2415 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-02 1908 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-04 1922 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-05 2002 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-06 1900 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-07 1804 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-01 2308 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-02 2304 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-03 2224 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-04 2222 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-06 2210 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-07 2204 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-10 2120 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-11 2110 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-12 2114 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-13 2106 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-14 2102 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-15 2026 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-16 2022 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-17 2020 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-20 2216 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-21 2202 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-24 2400 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-25 2401 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-26 2350 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-27 2351 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-28 2330 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-32 2231 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-33 2221 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-34 2220 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-35 2230 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-36 2300 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-37 2310 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-38 321 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-39 311 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-40 301 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-41 312 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-43 234 - Boulevard City Council 47 26 - 331 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 007-120-44 2331 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-45 2311 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-46 2321 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-47 2301 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-49 302 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-50 308 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-52 302 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-53 304 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-01 2430 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-02 2410 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-03 411 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-04 410 NANTUCKET PL IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-05 401 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-06 400 NANTUCKET PL IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-07 321 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-08 301 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-09 2430 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-10 2420 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-11 2400 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-12 300 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-04 302 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-11 2602 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-24 2520 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-26 2518 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-29 408 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-31 406 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-35 412 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-42 402 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-45 2521 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-46 2513 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-47 2603 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-48 2521 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-49 2649 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-50 2655 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-51 2639 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-56 2505 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-66 419 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-67 401 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-76 308 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-77 404 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-78 280 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-79 212 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-80 124 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-82 201 N Fairview St IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-142-01 2702 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-08 200 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-09 2323 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-10 216 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-15 2431 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-17 201 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-18 242 - Boulevard City Council 48 26 - 332 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 007-361-19 2420 W 3RD ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-20 2411 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-21 2421 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-22 121 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-03 2309 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-06 2233 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-09 2221 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-10 2217 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-11 2218 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-12 2222 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-13 2226 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-20 201 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-30 2305 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-31 2310 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-32 2302 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-33 2225 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-34 2230 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-35 2317 W 2ND St IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-05 2808 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-06 2812 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-07 2818 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-14 2828 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-15 2829 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-01 2501* W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-03 501 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-04 601 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-02 802 N FAIRVIEW ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-313-15 2237 W 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-313-16 2223 W 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-04 2334 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-05 2328 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-06 2324 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-07 2318 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-09 2304 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-16 2325 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-17 2317 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-19 2310 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-23 2338 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-24 2334 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-25 2329 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-30 2301 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-31 2314 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-32 2301 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-33 2315 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-01 1924 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-02 1920 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-03 1918 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-04 1910 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-05 1906 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-06 1902 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-07 192 - Boulevard City Council 49 26 - 333 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-101-08 1919 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-10 1909 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-11 1905 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-12 1903 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-13 1913 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-14 1915 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-01 1836 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-02 1830 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-03 1824 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-04 1822 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-05 1800 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-06 1812 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-07 1802 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-08 1839 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-09 1829 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-10 1825 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-14 1815 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-15 1811 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-16 1807 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-17 1801 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-19 1817 W 3RD St LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-351-01 717 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-352-46 711 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-03 1730 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-04 1728 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-05 1724 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-06 1722 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-07 1710 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-08 1706 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-09 1702 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-10 1701 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-11 1707 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-12 1709 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-13 1717 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-14 1721 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-15 1725 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-16 1727 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-19 1731 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-20 1735 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-02 1720 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-03 1714 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-04 1710 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-05 1706 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-06 1702 E 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-07 1701 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-08 1705 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-09 1709 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-10 301 N RAITT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-01 730 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-02 802 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-03 720 - Boulevard City Council 50 26 — 334 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-211-04 804 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-07 2502 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-08 2506 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-09 2510 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-10 2510 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-11 2520 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-36 804 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-14 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-15 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-16 888 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-17 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-19 500 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-24 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-26 520 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-27 311 N VAN NESS ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-28 520 W 4TH ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-05 1310 W 5TH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-14 1314 W 5TH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-17 410 N BRISTOL ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-16 1235 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-17 1233 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-18 1231 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-03 1240 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-04 1236 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-05 1230 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-06 1226 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-22 520 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-23 520 W SANTA AN BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-15 1305 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-25 1306 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-01 415 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-02 415 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-14 1243 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-15 1241 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-29 1247 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-01 315 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-02 1244 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-14 1247 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-15 1239 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-06 418 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-17 410 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-01 1336 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-02 1332 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-03 1326 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-04 1322 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-05 1318 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-10 305 N HESPERIAN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-12 1323 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-13 1319 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-14 1315 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-19 133 - Boulevard City Council 51 26 - 335 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-183-20 1325 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-03 1236 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-04 1234 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-05 1232 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-16 1237 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-17 1233 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-18 1229 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-19 1225 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 410-301-28 1000 W MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 010-232-18 902 S BROADWAY INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 010-232-22 917 S BIRCH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-26 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-56 2414 N TUSTIN AVE INS/OS/LR-7 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-38 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 016-045-19 2533 ORANGE AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-56 2414 N TUSTIN AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-20 801 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-21 807 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-22 811 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-312-02 1617 N ROSEWOOD AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-321-01 1010 W 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-082-02 1148 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-082-25 1136 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-37 2360 N TUSTIN AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-38 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-09 526 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-10 522 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-11 518 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-12 514 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-13 510 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-14 506 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-27 530 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-081-23 611 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-496-04 113 S HALLADAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 410-311-02 2970 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 414-012-01 2732 W ORION AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change LR-7 410-111-02 651 W SUNFLOWER AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change LR-7 407-107-19 3007 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-20 3013 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-22 3019 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-29 3019 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-31 3025 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-32 3109 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 412-423-01 1702 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-02 1706 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-03 1710 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-04 1714 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-05 1718 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-06 1722 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-07 1802 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-08 180 - City Council 52 26 — 336 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addre! I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ igtensity Focus Area/Location 108-741-03 4918 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 108-741-04 4906 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 108-741-05 4920 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-07 201 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-09 113 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-11 117 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-12 121 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-16 4326 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-23 4318 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-24 4322 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-26 211 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-28 207 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-29 203 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-30 4330 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-31 4330 W 5th ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-32 4310 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-33 4314 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-431-19 120 N WRIGHT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-441-06 301 N LINWOOD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-441-09 302 N LINWOOD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-05 301 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-25 4307 W 1ST ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-37 321 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-40 243 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-41 409 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 402-051-08 727 S LYON ST ROW LU change MR-15 396-261-21 2031 E SANTA CLARA AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change INS 412-341-01 2701 S RAITT ST OS 0.2 FAR LU change INS 398-391-15 1324 E 4TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS 016-035-12 417 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 109-062-33 1001 S GRAHAM LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 109-064-40 1001 S GRAHAM LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 396-211-40 2019 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 396-201-05 2100 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 405-233-36 1112 W CIVIC CENTER DR LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 004-070-38 1714 W MARTHA LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 016-090-27 400 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 405-121-11 1825 W CIVIC CENTER DR INS 0.5 FAR LU change OS 415-031-16 4501 W MACARTHUR BLVD IND 0.45 FAR LU change OS 016-035-15 417 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-691-08 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-691-09 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-07 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-08 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 405-121-11 1825 W CIVIC CENTER DR LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-07 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-06 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 001-011-22 1817 W 21TH ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change OS 405-251-02 1212 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 399-072-17 1139 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 405-312-29 112 City Council 53 26 — 337 2/15/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address fL Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-312-30 1108 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 398-522-24 1324 N BROADWAY MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 398-535-10 1024 N ROSS ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 398-535-11 1032 N ROSS ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 396-261-30 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-31 2370 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-32 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-35 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-33 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-34 2370 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change GC 011-263-25 1100 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC 198-132-21 2530 W 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change GC 198-132-23 2534 W 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change GC 003-161-10 2015 POINSETTIA ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-213-53 502 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-221-22 414 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-222-39 306 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-223-26 202 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-33 114 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-40 122 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-41 118 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-21 1715 N BRISTOL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 414-022-20 3730 S GREENVILLE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 414-022-37 3730 S GREENVILLE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-16 1223 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-17 1205 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-18 1225 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-19 1227 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 002-104-47 521 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-26 5201 W 1ST ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 004-044-48 1916 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 396-292-01 2101 N TUSTIN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 100-281-36 4315 W 1ST ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change GC 430-251-14 2100 EDINGER AVE LU change GC 396-314-06 1722 E 17TH ST LU change GC 007-321-02 1526 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-04 1506 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-17 1525 W WALNUT ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-18 1548 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 003-153-48 317 E 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 011-251-17 1113 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-18 1117 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-19 1121 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-20 1125 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS City Council 54 26 — 338 2/15/2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA OVERRULING THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION'S DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, INCLUDING SUPPORTIVE FINDINGS WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana now seeks to adopt a comprehensive update to the Santa Ana General Plan; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update ("project") also requires the certification of the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report and related documents that have been completed for the project, which approval will be concurrent with the approval of the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) the revision to the State mandated Elements of the General Plan; (2) the inclusion of optional Elements to the General Plan; and (3) approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2020-06, which would result in a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana is also located partially within the area contained within the scope of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport ("AELUP"); and WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code section 21676(b) requires the City to refer projects requiring a general plan amendment or a zone change to the Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County ("ALUC") for consistency with the AELUP; and WHEREAS, the City submitted the General Plan Update to the ALUC for consistency review on September 17, 2020; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2020, the ALUC, by vote of 5-0, found the General Plan Update to be inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport pursuant to AELUP sections 1.2, 2.1.4, and 3.2.1, and Public Utilities Code section 21674, due to (1) proferred aircraft noise and safety issues relative to the allowed placement of residential units within the flight corridor in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area and (2) proferred building height issues in a portion of the South Bristol Street Focus Area (between MacArthur Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue); and City Council 26 — 339 Resolution f W..INXRRX Page 1 of 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 21676(b), the City may overrule the ALUC by a two-thirds vote of the City Council if it makes specific findings that the project is consistent with the purpose of the State Aeronautics Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 21676(b), on October 16, 2020, with the requisite 45-day notice, the Santa Ana City Council adopted a resolution of intent to overrule the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC, Resolution No. 2020-078, and provided the ALUC with notice thereof, including proposed findings; and WHEREAS, by letter dated November 12, 2020, and in accordance with Public Utilities Code section 21676, the ALUC submitted written comments to the City addressing the City's proposed overruling; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Program Environmental Report and General Plan Update, at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice communities and in view of the COVID- 19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana General Plan Update subsequently underwent revisions that were not materially different from what was originally submitted to the ALUC for review, leaving the Land Use Element unchanged, nor were any new elements added that include changes within the JWA Planning area; and WHEREAS, the written comments received from the ALUC have been included in the public record as required by Public Utilities Code section 21676; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report was prepared and circulated in accordance with all legal requisites, as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect the updates to the project and based on an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, General Plan Update, and the proposed overruling of the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment and the project was fully considered. City Council 26 — 340 Resolution f W..INXRRX Page 2 of 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The City of Santa Ana is required to provide findings of fact supporting the overrule of the ALUC's determination of inconsistency as required by Public Utilities Code section 21676(b). Those findings are attached as Exhibit A and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Based on these findings of fact and the associated substantial evidence in the public record, the City Council finds that the proposed action by the City on the General Plan Update is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act as stated in PUC Section 21670 and consistent with the AELUP. Section 3. Based on the above evidence and findings made, and the remainder of the record in this matter, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby overrules the Orange County ALUC's determination that the General Plan Update is inconsistent with Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: %- John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers , 2021. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor City Council 26 — 341 Resolution f W.IN RRX Page 3 of 11 CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2021-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 26 — 342 Resolution 1�19-21ORRX Page 4 of 11 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS OF FACT SUBJECT: CITY OF SANTA ANA NOTICE OF INTENT TO OVERRULE THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION'S DETERMINATION OF INCONSISTENCY FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, GOLDEN CITY BEYOND (2045) I. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana ("City") is required to provide findings supporting the overrule of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's ("ALUC") determination of inconsistency as required in the California Public Utilities Code ("PUC") Section 21676(b). Based on the following Findings of Fact and the associated substantial evidence in the public record, the proposed action by the City on the General Plan Update, Golden City Beyond (2045) ("Project") is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act as stated in PUC Section 21670, which provides, in relevant part: "It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses." Specifically, the City's proposed action on the Project provides for the orderly development of John Wayne Airport ("JWA"), and its surrounding area and promotes the overall goals and objectives of the State noise standards by avoiding new noise and safety problems, and protecting the public health, safety and welfare through the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards to the extent that this area is not already devoted to incompatible uses. II. FRAMEWORK It is in the public interest to: (1) provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to (2) promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to PUC Section 21669 and to (3) prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems. A. To provide for the orderly development of JWA and the area surrounding the airport, the ALUC adopted the 2008 Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport ("JWA AELUP") on April 17, 2008. The JWA AELUP guides development proposals to provide for orderly development of the airport and the area surrounding the airport through implementation of the standards in Section 2.1 (aircraft noise, safety compatibility zones, building height restrictions). B. The ALUC also adopted a separate Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Heliports ("Heliports AELUP") on June 19, 2008. City Council 26 — 343 Resolution f W..INXRRX Page 5 of 11 C. The ALUC is required to use the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook ("Handbook") that was updated by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics ("Caltrans") in 2011. Neither the JWA AELUP nor the Heliports AELUP have been updated to incorporate the Handbook's guidance. Likewise, the JWA AELUP has not been updated with information about the operation and environmental effects of JWA as reflected in its most recent Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), certified by the Orange County Board of Supervisors on June 25, 2019 for the General Aviation Improvement Program ("GAIP"). D. On September 17, 2020, the City of Santa Ana presented the Project to the ALUC for a determination of consistency with the JWA AELUP and Heliports AELUP. E. The ALUC staff report dated October 15, 2020 ("Staff Report") recommends that the ALUC find the Project inconsistent with the JWA AELUP per Sections 1.2, 2.4.1, and 3.2.1 of the JWA AELUP, and per PUC Section 21674, due to 1) proffered aircraft "noise and safety issues" relative to the allowed placement of residential units "within the flight corridor" in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area; and 2) proffered building height issues in a portion of the South Bristol Street Focus Area (between MacArthur Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue). F. The ALUC Staff Report recommends that the ALUC find the Project consistent with the Heliports AELUP, with the condition that the City include a statement in the General Plan Update (Safety Element Policy S-4.4) that any proposals for heliports/helipads within the City be submitted through the City to ALUC for a consistency determination. G. On October 15, 2020, the ALUC held a public hearing and adopted a resolution finding the Project inconsistent with the JWA AELUP for the stated reasons set forth in the Staff Report, and further finding the Project consistent with the Heliports AELUP on the condition set forth in the Staff Report. H. The City of Santa Ana has the general police power to control land use within its territorial jurisdiction. (Cal. Const., art. XI 11, § 7). This constitutional authority is acknowledged in State law (PUC §§ 21670, 21676) and the ALUC process (JWA AELUP § 4.11) allowing for overrule of an ALUC finding of inconsistency. I. Pursuant to PUC Section 21676(b), the City may overrule the commission by a two- thirds vote of the City Council if it makes specific findings that the Project is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act, as stated in PUC Section 21670. J. The City finds that the Project is consistent with the JWA AELUP and with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act based on the following Findings of Fact and substantial evidence. III. FINDINGS OF FACT A. General Plan Update. The Project encompasses the entire City of Santa Ana. The General Plan Update set forth in the Project will change zoning and land use within five (5) geographic Focus Areas within the City. The comments in ALUC's Staff Report and ALUC's determination of inconsistency refer only to changes in land use within these five (5) Focus Areas. 1. The vast majority of the Project falls outside of the JWA AELUP planning area, which is defined in Section 1.7 of the JWA AELUP as "the furthest extent of the 60 CNEL City Council 26 — 344 Resolution 1�19-21ORRX Page 6 of 11 Contour, the FAR Part 77 Notification Surface and the runway safety zones associated with the airport." 2. Both the Grand Ave/171" Street Focus Area and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area fall completely outside of the JWA AELUP planning area. 3. The 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area and South Bristol Focus Area are both located entirely within the JWA AELUP planning area. 4. The South Main Focus Area is located partially within the JWA AELUP planning area. B. Justification for Finding Project Consistent with the Purposes of PUC Section 21670. 1. Noise. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed Project are consistent with the aircraft noise standards of the JWA AELUP and the requirements of PUC Section 21670. a. The majority of the Project falls outside of the 60 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour (Exhibit 2). (1) Per the JWA AELUP, all land uses are normally consistent within the 60 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour using conventional construction methods. No special noise reduction methods are required. See JWA AELUP at 23, Table 1. b. The vast majority of the Project is located outside of the JWA 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. (1) Per the JWA AELUP, commercial (e.g. retail and office), community facilities (e.g. churches, libraries, schools, preschools, day-care centers, hospitals, nursing/convalescent homes, & other noise sensitive uses), and industrial uses are all normally consistent within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. See JWA AELUP at 23, Table 1. (2) Per the JWA AELUP, single and multifamily residential uses are conditionally consistent within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. c. Of the five (5) Focus Areas that will include a change in zoning and land use designation under the Project, only the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area lies partially within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. d. The General Plan Update states, as Policy N-1.3, that it shall be City policy to "[c]ollaborate with local and regional transit agencies and other jurisdictions to minimize regional traffic noise and other sources of noise in the City." e. Consistent with the JWA AELUP, the General Plan Update states, as Policy N- 3.3, that it shall be City policy to "[r]equire all residential land uses in 60 dB(A) CNEL or 65 dB(A) CNEL Noise Contours to be sufficiently mitigated so as not to exceed an interior standard of 45 Db(A) CNEL." f. Based on the foregoing, the Project will not result in the exposure of City residents to excess noise within the meaning of PUC Section 21670. City Council 26 — 345 Resolution lW..IMAORRX Page 7 of 11 2. Safety. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed project are consistent with the safety standards of the JWA AELUP. a. Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP describes the airport's safety compatibility zones. (1) Per Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP, "Safety and compatibility zones depict which land uses are acceptable and which are unacceptable in various portions of airport environs." (2) The purpose of these zones, per the JWA AELUP, is to "support the continued use and operation of an airport by establishing compatibility and safety standards to promote air navigational safety and to reduce potential safety hazards for persons living, working or recreating near JWA." b. The JWA AELUP identifies the following Safety Zones: (1) Zone 1: Runway Protection Zone (2) Zone 2: Inner Approach/Departure (3) Zone 3: Inner Turning Zone (4) Zone 4: Outer Approach/Departure Zone (5) Zone 5: Sideline Zone (6) Zone 6: Traffic Pattern Zone c. The Project is not in the JWA runway protection zones (RPZ). d. None of the Project Focus Areas are in any of the JWA AELUP safety zones. JWA AELUP Safety Zone 6 overlays a small portion of the City south of MacArthur Boulevard, however the Project does not propose any change in land use or zoning in this area. e. The ALUC Staff Report states that "The proposed changes in Land Use in the 55/Dyer Focus Area would result in 9,952 total residential units within the flight corridor for John Wayne Airport subjecting future residents to noise and safety issues." (1) As noted above and in Section 2.1.2 and Appendix D of the JWA AELUP, the "flight corridor for John Wayne Airport" is not an identified Safety Zone for JWA. Nor is a "flight corridor" a defined, restrictive term in the JWA AELUP, the PUC, or the Federal Aviation Regulations. f. No part of the Project will be inconsistent with the policies set forth in Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP regarding Safety Compatibility Zones. Furthermore, the ALUC did not find, and cannot find, that the Project is inconsistent with Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP. g. Based on the foregoing, the Project will not result in the exposure of City residents to excessive safety hazards within the meaning of PUC Section 21670. City Council 26 — 346 Resolution 1�19-21ORRX Page 8 of 11 3. Height. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed project are consistent with the height standards of the JWA AELUP, which are stated in the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 C.F.R. Part 77, relating to Safe, Efficient Use and Protection of the Navigable Airspace. a. The General Plan Update states, as Policy S-4.1 Structures above 200 feet, "[p]roposed projects that would exceed a height of 200 feet above existing grade shall be required to file a Form 7460-1 with the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). b. In response to Recommendation 1.b. from the ALUC Staff Report, the General Plan Update is revised to state, as Policy S-4.2 Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77, "[d]o not approve buildings and structures that would penetrate Federal Aviation Regulation ("FAR") Part 77 Imaginary Obstruction Surfaces, unless, consistent with PUC Section 21240, such building or structure is determined by the FAA to pose "no hazard" to air navigation." Additionally, under this Policy, applicants proposing buildings or structures that penetrate the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City and the ALUC. Referral to FAA for study under its Form 7460-1 process is appropriate because: (1) "The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States" (49 U.S.C. § 40103(a)(1)). (2) In order to use this airspace, the FAA Administrator is responsible for: (i) Plans and policy for the safe use of the navigable airspace (49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(1)); and (ii) "[R]egulations on the flight of aircraft (including regulations on safe altitudes) for (A) navigating, protecting and identifying aircraft; (B) protecting individuals and property on the ground; (C) using the navigable airspace efficiently; and (D) preventing collision between aircraft, between aircraft and land or water vehicle, and between aircraft and airborne objects" (49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(2)). (3) The FAA's aeronautical studies under FAR Part 77 are the definitive standard for assessing compliance with federal aviation safety laws and regulations (49 U.S.C. § 77.1(c)). This federal authority is recognized in State law. (PUC § sb21240). c. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area range between 6 and 10 stories, or about 60 and 100 feet above ground level ("AGL"). These maximum allowable building heights would not exceed the FAR Part 77 imaginary obstruction surfaces for JWA, including the sloping, three-dimensional 50:1 Departure Surface, the sloping, three-dimensional 20:1 conical surface, and the 206' above mean sea level ("AMSL") horizontal surface. d. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the South Bristol Street Focus Area range between 10 and 25 City Council 26 — 347 Resolution 1�19_210RRX Page 9 of 11 stories, or about 100 to 250 feet AGL. Proponents of future structures exceeding 200 feet AGL and/or structures penetrating the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City. Per Policy S-4.2, the applicant would be required to obtain an FAA determination of no obstruction or no hazard to air navigation before seeking City approval. e. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the South Main Street Focus Area range between 2 and 3 stories, or about 20 to 30 feet AGL. These maximum allowable building heights would not exceed the FAR Part 77 imaginary obstruction surfaces for JWA, including the sloping, three-dimensional 20:1 conical surface, and the 206' AMSL horizontal surface. f. The Project's requirement that future construction and development comply with the FAA's 7460-1 process ensures that building heights within the Project area will not pose a hazard to air navigation. This is consistent with and furthers the purposes of PUC Section 21670 by minimizing the public's exposure to safety hazards. g. The Project is an approval only as to land use designation and zoning. No specific structures are contemplated as part of the Project. Therefore, nothing in the Project will create an obstruction or hazard to air navigation within the meaning of 14 C.F.R. Part 77, and no part of the Project involves the proposed construction or alteration of any structure. Accordingly, no aeronautical study is required as part of the Project. See 49 U.S.C. § 44718; 14 C.F.R. Part 77; FAA Order JO 7400.2M. h. The Project does not create a safety hazard pursuant to PUC Section 21670. 4. Heliports. Heliports are not permitted in any residential (R1, R2, R3, or R4) District pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-621. Outside of residential Districts, heliports are only allowed with a conditional use permit ("CUP"). a. The General Plan Update states, as Policy S-4.4 Heliport/helistop approval and requirements, "Approve the development of a heliport or helistop only if it complies with the ALUP for heliports." Policy S-4.4 further makes it City policy to "[e]nsure that each applicant seeking a conditional use permit or similar approval for the construction or operation of a heliport or helistop complies fully with the state permit recommended by the FAA, by Orange County ALUC, and by Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics. This requirement shall be in addition to all other City development requirements." b. As described in Draft PEIR Section 5.8, any applicant proposing a heliport "shall undergo review by the ALUC, obtain an Airspace Analysis from the FAA as specified in Section 2.1.5 of the JWA AELUP, and confirm consistency with the JWA AELUP prior to construction, as specified in Section 4.7 of the JWA AELUP." c. The Project and existing provisions within the Santa Ana Municipal Code restrict the establishment of heliports within the City. Heliports are only allowed in non- residential districts, and only once the applicant obtains a CUP following FAA City Council 26 — 348 Resolution lPWIN WRX Page 10 of 11 Airspace analysis and other review procedures. These restrictions minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards, in furtherance of the purposes of PUC Section 21670. d. ALUC has determined that the Project is consistent with the Heliports AELUP on condition that the City include a statement in the General Plan Update (Safety Element Policy S-4.4) that any proposals for heliports/helipads within the City be submitted through the City to ALUC for a consistency determination. City Council 26 — 349 Resolution 1�INAORRX Page 11 of 11