Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Hall, Jennifer From: YIMBY Action <hello@yimbyaction.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 4:03 PM To: eCornment Subject: Tell Congress to support affordable, accessible housing The United States' efforts to provide accessible and affordable hoirnes have fallen short. Seniors and people with disabilities in particular face significant challenges in finding affordable housing options, as most homes do not have accommodations that meet their accessibility needs. The VITAL Act will promote the development of affordable and accessible housing while increasing the production of affordable housing overall at the sairne "M If passed, the VITAL Act will enable individuals with disabilities and senioir citizens to live in homes that acre safe, affoirdable, and inclusive. Tell Congress that housing for everyone, regardless of age or disability status can't wait, 1 Will you sign the petition and tell Congress to support affordable, accessible YOUR YIMBY ACTION MEMBERSHIP MEMBERSHIP STATUS LOCATION None DONOR LEVEL None Unknown, Unknown Unknown Add/update location MOBILE ALERTS lam VOLUNTEER LEVEL Add/update mobile Keeping this information up to date pourers our activism! Need help with your membership? Email hello@yirnbyaction.org. N C (�IrlVst i'ii lh li n YIMBY Action lip irnlrcu��irl4� u��i' I�ir...11�u��u�nliirn i' it irtt°noirc liinculivc I ou sn li n ICCpdllk,, es and a i'u to ire of abuindaint Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address, change your name or address, or to stop receiving emails from YIMBY Action, please click here. Hall, Jennifer From: Flores, Gaston Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 5:17 PM To: eComment Subject: FW: Contact the City Council Submission Gaston Flores I Management Analyst City of .;e Office 1 M Civic CenterPlaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 -. - .. .. power of .. Santa Ana city government e palm of your hand! The free app lets you quickly and easily report issues to the City, access City services, and find news and events. Download From: notify@proudcity.com <notify@proudcity.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 4:19 PM To: Flores, Gaston <GFlores@santa-ana.org> Subject: Contact the City Council Submission Name Sandra O'Neal Email Address Santa Ana, California 92705 United States Map It Phone ( Who is this message for? • Mayor Valerie Amezcua • Mayor Pro Tern Jessie Lopez • Councilmember Thai Viet Phan • Councilmember David Penaloza • Councilmember Phil Bacerra • Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez • Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez Comments or questions I visit the many parks in Santa Ana, and I live close to Santiago Park. One way to help make the parks safer is posting signage in various places through out the parks with the number for Lyons Security. Many do not know that there is a way to contact 1 them. I think this would help for people to report a problem in the park when they see it happening. Our parks are really beautiful and its a shame that they become a haven for the homeless. Please consider this idea. Hall, Jennifer From: Sandra Pocha Pena < Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 7:12 PM To: !City Clerk; Hall, Jennifer Cc: Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan Subject: Community Disenfranchisement: NO PLACE TO MEET in PACIFIC PARK Importance: High Dear Councilmembers, I am forwarding you the below email thread and cc'ing the City Clerk so that it may be included in the Public Record. ** Madame Clerk - Please ensure this email is forwarded to our Mayor and all City Councilmembers. ** If the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center is not accessible for Pacific Park Neighborhood Association committee meetings, than the need for an alternate space is critical. The current Roosevelt/Walker rental structure as outlined by Rudy (see email below) presents a systemic barrier and prevents use of the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center by our residents for neighborhood organizing and advocacy. With it's record of supporting youth empowerment, does the City really expect local youth to pay $116 an hour, plus a $300 deposit, and provide insurance, just to have a safe place to meet, work on projects and develop leadership skills? I hope we can work together to find City Resources to address this glaring inequity. The Cypress Fire Station presents a ready solution to address this pressing dilemma. Pacific Park needs the Cypress Fire Station to be made available to our Youth and Residents for convening community meetings, grassroots organizing, and students use (studying, project development), as soon as possible. Our residents have fought for nearly a decade to have the much -needed Cypress Fire Station restored to community use. We hope City Staff and Electeds will support our long-standing need for a new community space. I look forward to having an in -person meeting with our Pacific Park Residents, where they can communicate their needs and what resources and accessibility they would like to see at the historic firehouse. Sincerely, -- SIPS Sandra "Pocha" Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader -------- Original Message -------- Subject: NO PLACE TO MEET: RE: PACIFIC PARK: Aug and Sept Mtg Dates Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:20:31 -0400 From: "Sandra Pocha Pena" < To: bvazquez@santa-ana.org, kridge@santa-ana.org, dsoto@santa-ana.org Cc: vanevee@ymail. vpayan@alumni. mmacedonio@santa-ana.org, rhernandez5@santa-ana.org, tpagano@santa-ana.org Dear Councilmember Vazquez and City Management, As I mentioned during Public Comments at last night's July 18 City Council Meeting, our only public meeting space at the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center is not accessible for our Pacific Park Neighborhood Committee Meetings. For details, refer to Rudy's email forwarded below. This is a major Barrier to Participation for our residents. How are we to organize effectively if we don't have a public place to meet? Most of Pacific Park Neighborhood is working-class and live in crowded conditions. Pacific Park does not have the expansive homes of Wilshire Square or Floral Park to convene our meetings in. Our members don't golf or recreate together. That's why we are nurturing these neighborhood committees as a means to build community and foster local resident leadership. ** Even more disturbing is that HIES appears to have declared that our Pacific Park Neighborhood Committees are NOT a part of our Pacific Park Neighborhood Association and thus do not qualify for free use of our neighborhood community center. Can you look into this? ** These are the Pacific Park Committees that have been convening June & July: -- Youth Committee - To engage Pacific Park youth and build leadership -- Events Committee -To help residents plan a neighborhood resource fair on Sept 23 And to address the transition of leadership that Staff is demanding, we have created a new committee to start in August: -- Leadership Committee -To draft bylaws and build the bench of potential Pacific Park Leaders As you may know, we have no commercial corridors or strip malls in Pacific Park, except for the crime -infested Dollar Tree on the corner of Bishop & Cypress. It appears that Staff is deliberately targeting Pacific Park Neighborhood, to disempower our residents and block development of grassroots leadership. We don't even have a church within our neighborhood to turn to for space. Our residents, especially our PTA moms, have requested a PUBLIC place to meet. If Roosevelt/Walker School and Community Center are not available to us, and the CYPRESS FIRE STATION is being handed over to SAPID for a program that only meets 9 hours a week, then what's a public space we can convene at? I doubt we can even meet at our only public park, Pacific Electric Park, without a permit. Please advise. The ability for our residents to organize and advocate for themselves, hangs in the balance. Sincerely, -- SPS Sandra Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: PACIFIC PARK: Aug and Sept Mtg Dates Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 23:24:05 +0000 From: "Hernandez, Rodolfo" To: "' ' , "Macedonio, Margarita" Cc: "vanevee@ymail. , " , "Vazquez, Benjamin", "Soto, Daniel", "Pagano, Timothy" Sandra, Thank you for your email regarding this request to utilize the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center. I wanted to take this opportunity to clarify our facility reservation process with respect to Neighborhood Association (NA) use. Historically, the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency (PRCSA) has worked closely with the Neighborhood Initiatives Division in the Planning and Building Agency (PBA) to coordinate monthly meetings for the NA's at PRCSA Facilities. NA's have the ability to request a meeting space through Neighborhood Initiatives to reserve a facility/room/space for the purpose of the NA's regularly scheduled meeting. In this instance, there is no charge and insurance is covered for the use of the facility by the NA through Neighborhood Initiatives. Any other facility request beyond the regularly scheduled NA meeting which is verified by Neighborhood Initiatives is considered by PRCSA to be a third -party rental. For example, this would be similar to a resident/non-resident requesting space for a birthday, baby shower or anniversary celebration. All City Council approved fees assigned to the renting of the facility/room/space would be applied as well as the requirements for a Certificate of Insurance. The reason Pacific Park has not experienced these fees to date is that all previous meetings have been considered an extension of NA business (e.g. the requests Pacific Park made in July for the PAAL room). After consulting with Neighborhood Initiatives, it was determined that all meetings that take place outside of regularly scheduled (monthly/bi-monthly) meetings will be considered a third -party request to utilize PRCSA facilities/rooms/space. As a result, I am amenable to including your August request with your September request and I am willing to create a pending Facility Permit with all associated fees for all dates you outlined in your previous email with the times requested (Note: I only have a start time at this point, do you have an ending time for the dates you requested?). Moving forward, for all facility requests that are outside of the NA's regularly scheduled (monthly/bi-monthly) meeting a Facility Request Application is required 45 days in advance so that I, as the Facility Manager, can ensure that I have the personnel resources to accommodate the request as well as ensure that all Santa Ana residents have an equitable opportunity to submit their Facility Request Application to me and my team for review and approval. Additionally, any Special Event planned by the NA will have to go through the Special Event permitting process if and when an event is comprised of more than 40 people, food elements are incorporated (food truck and/or food vendor), inflatables etc. This will also introduce a new set of fees that will need to be addressed prior to the event taken place. I believe you may already be familiar with this process, however I wanted to make sure I was providing comprehensive information with regards to our ongoing relationship with the Pacific Park NA. As always, if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you, Rodolfo "Rudy' Hernandez I Recreation & Community Services Supervisor Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency 816 E. Chestnut Avenue I Santa Ana, CA 92701 714-571-4229 (0) rhernandez5@santa-ana.org This e-mail (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message ----- From: Sandra Pocha Pena Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 10:23 AM To: Hernandez, Rodolfo ; Macedonio, Margarita Cc: vanevee@ymail. Vazquez, Benjamin ; Soto, Daniel Subject: PACIFIC PARK: Aug and Sept Mtg Dates Importance: High Thank you Rudy for informing us about your reservation policy. No mention of this 45 Day requirement was made in May or June when we started requesting meeting space at our only community center in Pacific Park, the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center. Since you sent your informational email out on Friday the 14th, a 45 day requirement would eliminate ALL of August, leaving our residents with no place to meet for our Pacific Park Neighborhood Committees. This further disenfranchises our Pacific Park residents. Moreover, this is a critical period of organizing for our Pacific Park/Eastside Neighborhood, as staff has proposed a transition in Neighborhood Leadership. In order to create healthy bylaws and build the bench of potential neighborhood leaders, we are starting up a Leadership Committee. Moving forward, in not creating more Barriers To Participation in our DisAdvantaged Community (DAC) Neighborhood, I am requesting the following dates: AUGUST 2023 Aug 17, Thurs - 6pm - Pacific Park Youth Committee Aug 24, Thurs - 6pm - Pacific Park Events Committee Aug 31, Thurs - 6pm - Pacific Park Leadership Committee SEPTEMBER 2023 Sept 14, Thurs - Youth Committee Sept 21, Thurs - Events Committee Sept 28, Thurs - Leadership Committee I hope you can accommodate our neighborhood request to use our neighborhood community center for neighborhood association members at this important time. Please let me know what you decide by end of business day this Thursday, 7/20, so that I may inform our Youth and their parents. Thanks so much! -- SPS Sandra Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:43:40 +0000, "Hernandez, Rodolfo" wrote: Margarita, I will go ahead and move forward with you request for July 20th and 27th. Moving forward, we will not honor any request that are not 45 days in advance due our reservation policies and procedures. Please keep that in mind for future request and any recreation facilities Thankyou Rodolfo "Rudy' Hernandez I Recreation & Community Services Supervisor Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency 816 E. Chestnut Avenue I Santa Ana, CA 92701 714-571-4229 (0) rhernandez5@santa-ana.org This e-mail (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. 5 -----Original Message ----- From: Macedonio, Margarita Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 10:24 AM To: 'Pocha Pena' ; Hernandez, Rodolfo Cc: Vanessa Balderas ; Victor Payan ; Vazquez, Benjamin ; Macedonio, Margarita Subject: RE: REVISED: PACIFIC PARK: July Comm Mtg Dates Thank you Sandra for the updated info. Rudy - Please see request below and if the Thursdays, July 20th and 27th dates are available, let me know and we'll turn in the forms today. Thank you all. Margarita G. Macedonio I Principal Community Planner Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services 1 20 Civic Center Plaza I Santa Ana, CA 92701 714-667-2288 office 1 714-371-6112 cell 1 714-973-1461 fax I mmacedonio@santa-ana.org The mySantaAna mobile app puts the power of the Santa Ana city government in the palm of your hand! The free app allows residents to quickly and easily report issues to the City, access City services, and find news and events. Download the App: Click here to report an issue directly from the City website. -----Original Message ----- From: Pocha Pena Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 10:11 AM To: Macedonio, Margarita Cc: Vanessa Balderas ; Victor Payan ; Vazquez, Benjamin ; rhernandez5@santa—ana.org Subject: REVISED: PACIFIC PARK: July Comm Mtg Dates Hi Margarita, Thank you for facilitating use of the Roosevelt/Walker Community Center for our Pacific Park Committee meetings. Our neighborhood volunteer Vanessa has requested Thursdays instead of Wednesdays. So the revised dates are: THURS July 20 @ 6pm - YOUTH THURS July 27 @ 6pm - EVENTS I have copied Rudy to speed clearances along. Please confirm dates at your earliest convenience. Thank you! — SPS Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 11, 2023, at 12:41 PM, Pocha Pena wrote: > Hi Margarita, > I want to see if the dates below are available for our Events & Youth Committee meetings: > Weds, July 19 at 6 > Weds, July 26 at 6 > Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Would love to announce dates tonite. > Thanks! > — SPS Hall, Jennifer From: Pocha Pena < Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 1:38 PM To: Carvalho, Sonia R.; Ridge, Kristine; Amezcua, Valerie; Vazquez, Benjamin; Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan; !City Clerk Cc: Soto, Daniel; Rocha, Dulce; Macedonio, Margarita; Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services; Mark Lopez; Vanessa Balderas; Victor Payan Subject: PACIFIC PARK INEQUITY: Artesia Pilar Street Toppers Hello City Attorney, Electeds and Staff, I am forwarding Artesia Pilar's process in creating their Street Toppers in the email below. As you can see, the first thing they did was make a new Neighborhood Committee. Throughout Artesia Pilar's Street Topper process, resident consensus and staff support was key to success: "Concepts were discussed and presented at meetings. There will never be 100% agreement but you have to show up to vote. The design selected was voted in." Why didn't NIES Staff support Pacific Park in implementing a transparent & equitable process that included in - person meetings & in -person votes? Also note that Artesia Pilar worked with artist Marina Aguilera, who provided residents with a choice of designs to vote on. Marina was also contacted by my Pacific Park Co -Leader Selica Diaz to design our Pacific Park street toppers. Selica has since ghosted her, not even giving this professional artist the courtesy of returning her calls or emails. I will continue to forward neighborhood leader testimonials as I receive them. Kind Regards, SPS Sandra Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader www.pacific park neighborhood. corn Begin forwarded message: From: wooruby < Date: July 20, 2023 at 12:07:23 PM PDT To: Subject: RE: Artesia Pilar Street Toppers Hi Where do I start? IT took 10 year period. We started with a committee. Then another committee. Residents showing up was a problem and we had no staff. Councilman Jonathan Hernandez helped us organized. Concepts were discussed and presented at meetings. There will never be 100% agreement but you have to show up to vote. The design selected was voted in. Having done this process, the City staff are now more experienced and made the process more uniform and the approval better for staff and neighborhood associations and community organizations. Work with your Neighborhood Initiative staff. Your challenge will be raising the money for the project, installation and unveiling. Ruby Sent via the Samsung pia➢axy S We, an !Y 1'&r.T % I volution capable smarV.plione -------- Original message -------- From: Sandra Pocha Pena < Date: 7/20/23 8:10 AM (GMT-08:00) To: wooruby@yahoo. Subject: Artesia Pilar Street Toppers Good Morning Ruby, Thank you for giving such an informative presentation at the Community Ventures workshop in January. I viewed a video of the meeting and found your words very inspiring. I am writing to ask about the process you followed to create your Artesia Pilar street toppers. The talented artist Marina Aguilera says she provided your neighborhood association with several design options to consider. Were the designs presented at a neighborhood meeting? Did folks vote on it? Any details about the process would be much appreciated. IIiM, I'm -- SPS Sandra "Pocha" Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader www.pacificparkneighborhood.com Hall, Jennifer From: Pocha Pena < Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 2:20 PM To: Carvalho, Sonia R.; Ridge, Kristine; Amezcua, Valerie; Vazquez, Benjamin; Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan; !City Clerk Cc: Soto, Daniel; Rocha, Dulce; Macedonio, Margarita; Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services; Mark Lopez; Vanessa Balderas; Victor Payan Subject: Fwd: Floral Park Street Toppers Dear City Attorney, Electeds and Staff, I am forwarding you another testimonial from a Santa Ana neighborhood, Floral Park, which has successfully gone through the process of creating Street Toppers. As you will read, a choice of designs and transparent presentations on costs were shared with Floral Park leadership: " One of our neighbors created 4 different designs but all of them encompassed the floral park "fleur du lis" in the design." Why are residents of Pacific Park not afforded the same opportunity to review several design options before voting? Why have our residents been left in the dark with regards to our street topper costs? As the Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader, I ask that Staff remove the extremely biased on-line survey which is a mockery of "equitable inclusion." Please ensure that our residents can have design options presented in -person at our upcoming September Pacific Park Neighborhood meeting before being asked to vote. Also ensure that this presentation is placed on our official meeting agenda so that our residents can be properly noticed. Sincerely, SPS Sandra "Pocha" Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader www.pacificparkneighborhood.com Begin forwarded message: From: Darlene Glenn < Date: July 20, 2023 at 12:40:30 PM PDT To: Jeffrey Katz <jeffrey.katz@kesherlawgroup.com>, Subject: Re: Floral Park Street Toppers Hi Pocha Jeff Katz forwarded me your email. I will give you a brief history of the street sign toppers. This all happened about 30 years ago. One of our neighbors created 4 different designs but all of them encompassed the floral park "fleur du lis" in the design. I believe that the board person in charge coordinated with the Santa Ana arts council person and the public works to determine how to go about the whole thing. I believe that because of laws regarding street signs, only a "slide in" iron topper could be done. The board priced out the cost of making the toppers and having them installed. The board then saw designs and costs and made a decision (no neighborhood input). All funds to make the iron toppers and have them installed was borne by the neighborhood assoc. I believe a local iron works company made the toppers to city required specifications. I think the company is still in business but has been bought by new people so they would have no idea what we are talking about, if they were asked. That's about all I know. Hope that answers your questions. Regards, Darlene Glenn Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Darlene Glenn < wrote: I think you are talking about the iron around the street signs. That was done even before my time. I believe that Janelle was involved in that. I can reach out to her. Darlene Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2023, at 1:50 PM, Jeffrey Katz <jeffrey.katz@kesherlawgroup.com> wrote: Darlene ... did you work on the FP street toppers? If so, Pocha has some questions. (See below.) Can I connect you two? Kesher Law Group Jeffrey A. Katz I Attorney at Law 1919 N. Heliotrope Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92706 Direct Dial: (714) 296-8309 Email: jeffrey.katz@kesherlawgroup.com From: Jeffrey Katz <jeffrey.katz@kesherlawgroup.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:14 AM To: jeffrey.katz@kersherlawgroup.com; president@floralpark.com; Subject: Re: Floral Park Street Toppers Sandra, I don't know the answers to your questions. The street toppers were installed before my moving into the neighborhood. Do you want me to connect you with and "old timer" for these questions? Kesher Law Group Jeffrey A. Katz I Attorney at Law 1919 N. Heliotrope Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92706 Direct Dial: (714) 296-8309 Email: jeffrey.katz@kesherlawgroup.com From: Sandra Pocha Pena < Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 8:22:27 AM To: jeffrey.katz@kersherlawgroup.com; president@floralpark.com Subject: Floral Park Street Toppers Good Morning Jeff, Thank you for visiting us at our Media Arts Santa Ana space 3 on 17th and Main. It was a pleasure serving with you on the Art Commission and it's great to see the beautiful cultural events you produce in Floral Park. I am writing to ask about the process you followed to create your Floral Park street toppers. Did your association contract an artist? Were you presented with several design options to consider? Were the designs presented at a Floral Park neighborhood meeting? Did folks vote on it? Any details about the process would be much appreciated. 11101.73 -- SPS Sandra Tocha" Pena Sarmiento Pacific Park Neighborhood Co -Leader www.pacificparkneighborhood.com Hall, Jennifer From: Flores, Gaston Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 4:54 PM To: eComment Subject: FW: Contact the City Council Submission Gaston Flores I Management Analyst City of .;e Office 1 M Civic CenterPlaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 puts the power of the Santa Ana city government in the palm of your hand! The free app lets you quickly and easily report issues to the City, access City services, and find news and events. • •. From: notify@proudcity.com <notify@proudcity.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 10:06 AM To: Flores, Gaston <GFlores@santa-ana.org> Subject: Contact the City Council Submission Name Wayne Suraci Email Address Santa Ana, California 92706 United States Map It Phone ( Who is this message for? • Mayor Pro Tern Jessie Lopez Comments or questions I need help with the planning department, and I would like some advice. There is an unpermitted structure in my back yard that was there for at least 10 years before we purchased our home. We have had a solar project that was installed in early April that the city will not approve with the unpermitted structure. This is costing us every month in both utility bills and the fact that we have already paid the solar company. We are in the process of trying to get the structure permitted. I have an appointment this afternoon at 2:40 for that purpose. Putting that aside, the State guidelines prohibit a City from denying a solar permit being issued for an unpermitted structure on the property unless the solar is installed on that structure. In our case it has nothing to do with the solar. The reason I have been given is that our home is Historic. We are on the Historic Register for the City of Santa Ana. The unpermitted building was there when the historic designation was granted. Besides that, the building in question is located behind the garage at the very back of the property and is not visible anywhere except by drone or Google ariel view. My husband Merle and I were recently recognized by the City of Santa Ana as Neighborhood Hero for our work with the team in securing Floral Park as a State and Federal Historic District. In addition to that we lead two committees in Floral Park that have provided over $125,000 over the last seven years in scholarships for Santa Ana youth. Two of the fundraising events are ones that you have attended (thank you). We are following all the rules. If there is any guidance or assistance you can provide, we would appreciate it. Upload a file • Yard-Layout-wirh-Unpermitted-Building-In-Yellow. docx Hall, Jennifer From: Carolyn Killion/USA <Carolyn.Killion@cushwake.com> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 2:31 AM To: eComment Subject: 7/18/2023 Council Meeting - Supporting Councilmember Requested Item #39 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers for City of Santa Ana, As the general manager for 3 Hutton, 4 Hutton and Hutton Centre Association located in Ward 4 at Main Street and MacArthur Blvd and 2223 E. Wellington Ave and 1200 N. Tustin Ave, we are in full support of councilmember Phil Bacerra's Requested Item #39 to allow the City Manager to provide direct communication and policy to the Santa Ana Police Department Officers to detain any individuals that are within the City of Santa Ana boundaries who violate existing state law related to individuals found in public places under the influence of drugs or controlled substances where they are a danger to themselves or others. Officers would be granted the authority to transport these individuals to the Santa Ana Jail for processing, and prior to release, they would be provided with information on available substance -abuse treatment services. The individuals that are loitering or lingering around our properties are looking for food, money or trying to buy/sell illegal substances has continued to increase causing security concerns for our tenants, residents and customers and also lower property values. Our properties have experienced increased vandalism/theft (graffiti, stolen copper pipe, vehicle break-ins causing increased operational expenses for building owners and owners of vehicles to replace or repair stolen or damaged items) and health issues for our team members who have to clean up areas where these individuals have used our sidewalks, landscape areas and parking structures as restrooms (urine, feces, blood and drug paraphernalia — needles, foil, cigarette butts, etc.). Item 39 would be a step in the right direction to help mitigate the problem and yet it is compassionate in caring for those that have either fallen on hard times or have become addicts by providing these impaired individuals with resources that can aid them obtaining a better quality of life. We look forward to your full support and yes votes. Oairoiyin A... IlKiiiioin, IIR13A, Ol1f31 GeIrnelr n11 IIManager sse:d Seirvlk;es CAA Ilk,,ense 01178766 )lire c,t:..II J 714 8,50 1"703 !�Irglyn.killion a cuslhwake.com CUSHMAN '.1EL gip. IHU i¢:: I (",entire IE)irnve, SLIIlliate 4.40 Sai nta Ana, (,,A 9270°7 I USA cu,lisiIYifiialrnwakefleIIdI.colY7YYl The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material, and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only. Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access. For information on how your personal information is processed, including information on how to exercise state or country specific Privacy Rights please view our privacy notice here: https://www.cushmanwakefield.com/en/privacy-and-cookies Hall, Jennifer From: Flores, Gaston Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 9:20 AM To: eComment Subject: FW: Contact the City Council Submission Gaston Flores I Management Analyst City of .;e Office 1 M Civic CenterPlaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 -. - .. .. power of .. Santa Ana city government e palm of your hand! The free app lets you quickly and easily report issues to the City, access City services, and find news and events. Download From: notify@proudcity.com <notify@proudcity.com> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 8:15 AM To: Flores, Gaston <GFlores@santa-ana.org> Subject: Contact the City Council Submission Name Jessica Vargas Email Address Santa Ana, California 92703 United States Map It Phone ( Who is this message for? • Mayor Valerie Amezcua • Mayor Pro Tern Jessie Lopez • Councilmember Thai Viet Phan • Councilmember David Penaloza • Councilmember Phil Bacerra • Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez • Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez Comments or questions My name is Jessica Vargas and I am a 25 year resident of Santa Ana, 10 year resident of Washington Square. I am writing to oppose a proposal of a park on tract land owned by Alexander Dantes, LLC, located in Washington Square above 15th Street 1 between Olive and Lowell Streets. Assessors parcel #'s are 405-321-08, 09, 12 & 13. Owner has expressed interest in selling property to the city. The lot has been prone to homeless and the current residents have been warding them off for decades. Residents have been harassed and had to even remove a vagrant from their swimming pool. I am concerned a community park open to the public would escalate these occurrences. Upload a file • Mayor-Amezcua.pages Hall, Jennifer From: Tanya Renee < Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 10:46 AM To: eComment Subject: A Tenant Who Is Being Abused By Tenants Who are Assigned By The Owners /And or City Counsel My, name is Tanya Jones a resident at the Metro East Senor Park Apartments in Santa Ana I've been,treated like "Fecal Matter" far too long I'm in unit and the guy directly above me has been assigned to follow,harass watch, listen to everything I do and say inside my temporary home .He ,is illegally obtaining information about me for over a year. Tracking, Hacking my phone's,when I leave he calls up the other tenants who are involved with Snitching.Im ,now aware of the Retaliation Against me since they have assigned more tenants To be called a Snitch and be accused of whistle blowers remarks .it's a shame Sidney C Thomas is 6 meters in proximity I'm in 418 he 518 too close On my Wifi network my Ruko streaming device for over 9 months with out my permission He knows what I'm doing now he has my phone cloned Stealing data from my old phone before I can.transfer he has no business Watching me take showers anything he can hear he has the tenants follow me to the grocery store Del Taco everywhere I'm going to get a Lawyer to let me know my Rights isn't it time I , believe that the City Counsel and the Orange County Housing Authority and the Police are involved because no one tried helping me T Jones Hall, Jennifer From: Tanya Renee < Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 1:11 PM To: eComment Subject: The Guy directly above me Sidney C Thomas I believe he's received a copy of this Email . I'm , not at all worried .he and the other tenants have lied on me As ,I tried sending the email I just sent .I , received a message that the email just that fast went to Draft status . I'm not going to send you any more emails just had to let you know this .He stays inside his apartment all day watching.me Sidney C Thomas,might go smoke a cigarette, but he's right back upstairs in he follows me to the restroom.Days go by when I don't Shower because he can see me It's like looking at your TV .he has Screen Mirroring,Hotshot my phone's at least 7 phone's he's been on my old phone he still has attached to his devices estate his Computer .Smart Watches Micro Mini Speaker Microphones he has a lot of things he didn't purse them someone else did I believe that.He , knows where I am when I leave tracking and hacking my phone's Menlo Way CA Facebook Utube Tweeter Amazon are definitely hacking apps I don't bother anyone to know that the Manager is involved she Ignores Katie Young I have to think about my family when I planned on taking all my Blood Pressure Pills and Pray for Strength and a Sound Mind for this to end Definitely I need Psychological Services after this . I'm Sorry it's over kill Stalking, Harassing Lying on Me by Seniors I'm the youngest living here It's disturbing, Orozco, Norma From: Hall, Jennifer Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 8:55 AM To: eComment Subject: FW: Letter Opposing Heavier Trucks From: Nate Kaplan <nkaplan@gorail.org> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 8:15 AM To: Hall, Jennifer <jhall@santa-ana.org> Subject: Letter Opposing Heavier Trucks Dear City Clerk Hall, I work on transportation policy issues in California for GoRail, a national non-profit that advances smart transportation policy. I'm reaching out to you about a bill proposed in Congress to raise the federal weight limit of heavy trucks on our nation's roads. H.R 3372 would establish a 10-year "pilot program" for states to test 91,000-pound trucks, a 14% weight increase over the current limit of 80,000 pounds. We're asking for your help to stop this before it's imposed on your local roads. There is already a wealth of data showing this is bad policy, starting with the impact to local roads and bridges and the taxpayers who fund them. An analysis earlier this year looked specifically at local infrastructure — trucks don't just travel on the Interstate after all —and found that the overall cost of 91,000-pound trucks would be $60.8 billion. For example, in California: • Number of local bridges at risk with 91,000-pound trucks: 3,089 • Cost of replacing at -risk local bridges: $6,974,048,612 Heavier trucks also mean more trucks, more traffic, and more emissions as freight gets diverted away from rail. This so-called "pilot project" is really just a backdoor 11,000-pound increase in maximum truck weight. We're working with the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks on a group letter from state and local government officials like yourself to be sent to Congress before H.R. 3372 potentially comes up for a floor vote as early as September. A similar letter in 2019 had over 1,000 signers from communities across the country and we're hoping this effort will send a powerful message to Congress that local roads and bridges simply cannot handle heavier trucks. Please click this link to learn more and let us know if we can add your name to the letter. You can also simply respond "add my name" to this email if you wish to sign. Please reach out if I can answer any questions. Thank you, Nate RAIL (424) 291-4650 1 nkaplan@gorail.org See our Issue Brief on Truck Size and Weight for a deeper dive. Orozco, Norma From: Chelsea Boyle < Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 1:11 PM To: eComment Subject: Public comment city council meeting 8/1/23 Hello, My name is Chelsea and I am a concerned community member providing general public comment for the August 1, 2023 city council meeting. I oppose the inhumane criminalization within the proposed Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy. The policy is premised on false assumptions about the problem. The policy is premised on the false assumption that people are refusing housing and services and must be forced by our criminal legal system to get help. And while the Intoxication and Service Offering Policy does not overtly single out unhoused community members, comments by the Mayor and several city council members make clear that the target and underlying goal of this policy is to use law enforcement to forcibly clear public places of visibly unhoused and unsheltered neighbors. In fact, in a malicious and dangerous attempt to justify the policy, the Mayor engaged in unacceptable speech during discussion of agenda item #39 that otherized and denigrated unhoused residents and perpetuated several inflammatory, false, and broad brush stereotypes about them. The real Droblem is a dire shortage of housing and services DeODle need to survive and thrive. Santa Ana community members are not refusing housing and services. Santa Ana and California are experiencing a dire shortage of subsidized affordable housing and voluntary community based behavioral and mental health care. This is the real problem. Santa Ana's waiting list for housing choice vouchers is closed, as are the lists for all other housing authorities in Orange County. These lists remain closed for many years, then open for narrow windows of time, after which applicants wait years longer to receive subsidized affordable housing. 1 Meanwhile, market rate rent continues to spiral out of control. Waits for mental health and substance use treatment are also long, and are rarely available on demand. Criminalizing poverty, houselessness and healthcare issues is morally wrong, violent, harmful, and always ineffective. Experience and litigation have demonstrated that municipalities cannot target, arrest and jail unhoused people as a remedy or way out of the unmet housing and behavioral health needs of Santa Ana residents. Criminalizing houselessness has harmed and traumatized unsheltered community members, who are routinely harassed, displaced, cited, and jailed for being unhoused—but are rarely offered a safe, permanent, affordable home. Criminalizing substance use —the "war on drugs" is a failed and retrograde policy that is both immoral and ineffective. It has only served to expand our bloated carceral system, wage war on poor people and communities of color, and stigmatize substance use as a personal failure rather than what it is: a healthcare issue. An offer of "services" that rarely exist and have long wait lists is NOT an excuse for criminalizing poverty, houselessness, and behavioral health conditions. We demand humane and effective policies —not police and ,jails. Unsheltered houselessness is an affordable housing crisis and a humanitarian catastrophe. Decades of research have demonstrated what works: the Housing First model, wherein safe, permanent affordable housing and voluntary wrap -around services are provided as an immediate response to people's needs. Housing is a form of healthcare, and research has shown that mental and behavioral health services are much more effective when people are removed from the stressors of the streets. P) We demand a Santa Ana in which the basic needs of all are met and the dignity of every resident, no matter who they are, where they sleep, or where they live, is respected and protected by elected and public officials. Arresting, processing and jailing people will not magically create enough affordable housing and services to meet the need. In fact, this practice actually prevents many from qualifying for housing and sentences them to remain living on the streets as a result of being criminalized for being poor. Rather than criminalizing unhoused neighbors, our strong recommendation is for the city to invest in housing and care —not jail and one-way tickets out of town. These positive and much needed community investments will put Santa Ana on a path to being recognized as a model city in which all residents have the opportunity to participate as equals and to flourish —a community everyone can be proud of. Chelsea Boyle (they/them) Sent from my Whone 3 Hall, Jennifer From: Hall, Jennifer Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:51 AM To: eComment Subject: FW: New submission from Contact the Clerk of the Council's Office From: notify@proudcity.com <notify@proudcity.com> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 10:04 PM To: !City Clerk <CityClerk@santa-ana.org> Subject: New submission from Contact the Clerk of the Council's Office Name Daniel Dudley Email Message To: City Council members From: Dan Dudley email address Good day, As city council members, working with additional departments and officials, are the ones who make decisions regarding new business and land use, I ask that you review this information and for your opinion if this service would benefit your constituents. I filed a patent with the title of -Providing a Mobile Service For Charging The Batteries of Electric Vehicles- on 05/14/2021 with USPTO confirmation No. 6207, as I believe that adding this mobile service would have a positive impact, and promote the ownership and future sales of electric vehicles. Even after the years it may take to install as many public stationary EV charging stations as there are gas stations, and the goal of having some available every 50 miles on interstate highways, this Mobil EV Charging Service could continue to provide a major contribution, as many may either be full charging other EV's with owners having to wait to plug in, or not all charging ports operating for need of repair. Persons with Electric Vehicles would have the convenience of ordering this service to be delivered to their vehicle while at a restaurant, theater, the office, a hotel or apartment or home without any Electric Vehicle Charging ports. How many parents knowing that their daughters or sons who may drive electric vehicles, learn of their vehicles only having a partial charge and without access to a charging port, need to make an overnight trip. These parents would have the opportunity to order this Mobile Charging service so they would not need to stop in the middle of the night to recharge by themselves at a public charging station. I recently received a notice from a USPTO Examiner that my claim was rejected as being clearly anticipated by Kamen et al US PGPUB 2011/0025267 — (USPTO approved Patent No. 12/847,354) Regarding claim 1, Kamen discloses a mobile electric charging service [figs. 1-2 & 5; par. 33; a charging vehicle 104 can charge another vehicle 102, thus a "mobile electric charging service"] This Patent No. 12/847,354 also includes [0029] A "charging device" or "charging station" may be stationary, parked, mobile (such as a portable trailer or a pod), "the charging vehicle 104 may include any power source, including but not limited to, any external or internal combustion generator, solar panels or fuel cells." Mr. Kamen and additional listed patent holders have the option of applying these mobile charging applications themselves, to come to agreements with others to provide the customer service and additional infrastructure and battery systems, or for the reassignment and transfer of ownership of this patent. I have been in contact and sending information and suggestions to holders of Patent Number - 12/847,354 via http://www. deka resea rch . com/contact-us/#1470173215984-9d 6 b4822-ce42 And US mail to Correspondence address - DEKA Research & Development Corp. 340 Commercial Street Manchester, NH. 03101 603.669.5139, also to the auto manufactures of electric vehicles, including Ford, General Motors, Tesla, Rivian, Fisker, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia, BMW and Audi. This patent holder could choose to apply any of the specific methods and systems of charging electric vehicles. This may include a large capacity battery with the capability of charging an electric vehicle (similar to the Tesla Powerwall) manufactured with the North American Charging Standard (NACS) connectors and adapters for Combined Charging System (CCS-1) connector. These large capacity battery systems could then be retrofitted to any of the existing roadside assistance fleet of vehicles (similar to AAA roadside assistance). In the potential for additional mobile EV charging capability, the trailer or pod detailed in patent No. 12/847,354 could be designed and manufactured to include any type of battery with the self- contained charging capability and connectors, then possibility using the ridesharing business model similar to Lift and Uber, hire, and dispatch these independent contractors in any of their personal vehicles that have towing capabilities. In the rural areas of your state, these independent contractors who would like the job opportunity to provide this mobile EV charging service may have the space available to store these trailers or pods, and recharge them by plugging into their home electrical power supply. This could also be accomplished in using solar panels installed on top of these self- contained chargers, and perhaps adding additional recharging capacity to these units using portable ground placed solar panels. In your city where any potential independent contractors may not have this space, I ask if you would consider to begin to locate state, city, or privately owned property that could be used for the staging, storing and recharging area for these EV charging portable trailers or pods, which could also include overhead coverings, or rooftop solar panels installed and used as a source for this mobile EV recharging capacity, saving your state power grid supply. If you agree that this would benefit your constituents to have the option of using this service, and all the all the additional new job opportunities it will provide, I ask that you forward this to Tesla and/or any additional auto manufacturing companies, to send proposals to provide the customer service, additional infrastructure and battery systems for this. All city council members may consider that if you are willing to agree to show a commitment to the potential of approving the property for this staging and storage, with the overhead covering or rooftop solar panels to be used as a source for the recharging of these mobile EV battery systems, that every auto manufacture that sells electric vehicles in this country may also agree to commit to reallocate the portion of their battery manufacturing capacity to the designs for "a mobile electric charging service" that are detailed in this USPTO approved Patent No. 12/847,354 by Kamen et al US PGPUB 2011 /0025267. Best regards, Dan Dudley Orozco, Norma From: Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 12:08 PM To: eComment Subject: Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy I am very concerned about this new policy proposal to feed and process even more needy persons into the criminal system. It appears that this is a way to drum up new business for the new proposed jail facility, not truly addressing the underlying causes and problems of intoxication. And add even more concerns to police who are not at this moment very prepared to help with mental health services. Please rethink this and find different ways to spend our community resources to focus on helping people address their hopelessness. Thank you for your time. Denise Sawicz 1 Orozco, Norma From: Carrie Stein < Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 12:17 PM To: eComment Subject: I oppose the inhumane criminalization within the proposed Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy! We need to focus on housing and voluntary services —not police and jails. • The policy is premised on false assumptions about the problem. The policy is premised on the false assumption that people are refusing housing and services and must be forced by our criminal legal system to get help. And while the Intoxication and Service Offering Policy does not overtly single out unhoused community members, comments by the Mayor and several city council members make clear that the target and underlying goal of this policy is to use law enforcement to forcibly clear public places of visibly unhoused and unsheltered neighbors. In fact, in a malicious and dangerous attempt to justify the policy, the Mayor engaged in unacceptable speech during discussion of agenda item #39 that otherized and denigrated unhoused residents and perpetuated several inflammatory, false, and broad brush stereotypes about them. • The real problem is a dire shortage of housing and services people need to survive and thrive. Santa Ana community members are not refusing housing and services. Santa Ana and California are experiencing a dire shortage of subsidized affordable housing and voluntary community based behavioral and mental health care. This is the real problem. • Santa Ana's waiting list for housing choice vouchers is closed, as are the lists for all other housing authorities in Orange County. These lists remain closed for many years, then open for narrow 1 windows of time, after which applicants wait years longer to receive subsidized affordable housing. • Meanwhile, market rate rent continues to spiral out of control. • Waits for mental health and substance use treatment are also long, and are rarely available on demand. • Criminalizing poverty, houselessness and healthcare issues is morally wrong, violent, harmful, and always ineffective. Experience and litigation have demonstrated that municipalities cannot target, arrest and jail unhoused people as a remedy or way out of the unmet housing and behavioral health needs of Santa Ana residents. • Criminalizing houselessness has harmed and traumatized unsheltered community members, who are routinely harassed, displaced, cited, and jailed for being unhoused but are rarely offered a safe, permanent, affordable home. • Criminalizing substance use —the "war on drugs" is a failed and retrograde policy that is both immoral and ineffective. It has only served to expand our bloated carceral system, wage war on poor people and communities of color, and stigmatize substance use as a personal failure rather than what it is: a healthcare issue. • An offer of "services" that rarely exist and have long wait lists is NOT an excuse for criminalizing poverty, houselessness, and behavioral health conditions. • We demand humane and effective policies —not police and jails. Unsheltered houselessness is an affordable housing crisis and a humanitarian catastrophe. • Decades of research have demonstrated what works: the Housing First model, wherein safe, permanent affordable housing and voluntary wrap -around services are provided as an immediate response to people's needs. Housing is a form of healthcare, and research has shown that mental and behavioral health services are much more effective when people are removed from the stressors of the streets. • We demand a Santa Ana in which the basic needs of all are met and the dignity of every resident, no matter who they are, where they P) sleep, or where they live, is respected and protected by elected and public officials. • Arresting, processing and jailing people will not magically create enough affordable housing and services to meet the need. In fact, this practice actually prevents many from qualifying for housing and sentences them to remain living on the streets as a result of being criminalized for being poor. • Rather than criminalizing unhoused neighbors, our strong recommendation is for the city to invest in housing and care —not jail and one-way tickets out of town. These positive and much needed community investments will put Santa Ana on a path to being recognized as a model city in which all residents have the opportunity to participate as equals and to flourish —a community everyone can be proud of. With much concern, Carrie Stein 3 Orozco, Norma From: Bulmaro Vicente < boomer@chispaoc.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 1:44 PM To: eComment Subject: Letter of Opposition to Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy Attachments: Chispa Letter of Opposition to Intoxication Detention Policy.pdf Good evening, On behalf of Chispa, I am submitting the attached Letter of Opposition for last week's Agenda Item 439 - Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy. In Solidarity, Boomer Policy and Political Director I Chispa e: boomerPchispaoc.org c: 714-747.4271 1505 E 17th Street Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 5010 non-profit organization. Chispa � Chispa July 31th, 2023 Santa Ana City Council 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Re: Agenda Item #39 - Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy Chispa is writing to express our opposition to Agenda Item #39 from the previous City Council meeting. We believe our City should prioritize investments proven to address the root causes of crime, such as parks, libraries, and initiatives aimed at supporting our youth, rather than detaining individuals for intoxication. The appropriate approach to dealing with residents facing substance abuse in public areas is to provide them with immediate care without resorting to local jails. We advocate for a holistic and humane treatment of our residents, extending life-saving services without criminalization. The investments in our parks, libraries, and youth programs have doubled in recent years, thanks to the efforts of the previous Council, significantly enhancing the quality of life in our neighborhoods. As a result, Forbes has recognized our City as one of the safest in the country, highlighting the positive impact of community -centered investments. In contrast, increasing police budgets and adopting tough -on -crime policies, like Item 39, are not the solutions to improve community safety. For these reasons, Chispa urges you to oppose Item 39 and instead prioritize investments and approaches that address the root causes of crime and promote community well-being. Best, Bulmaro Vicente Political and Policy Director https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurabegleybloom/2 02 3/01/31/report-ranks-americas-15-safest-and-most-da ngerous-cities-for-2 02 3/?sh=1038d4673 09 a Hall, Jennifer From: Daisy Ramirez <DRamirez@aclusocal.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 7:02 PM To: eComment Subject: Public Comment re Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy Good afternoon, My name is Daisy Ramirez, and I am a senior policy advocate and organizer at ACLU of Southern California. My work includes examining conditions of confinement in the Orange County jail system and advocating with people in custody and their loved ones. I am writing to comment on the dangerous and regressive "Intoxication Detention and Service Offering Policy" that was introduced during the Santa Ana City Council Meeting on July 181n Criminalizing poverty, houselessness and healthcare issues is morally wrong, violent, harmful, and always ineffective. Experience and litigation have demonstrated that municipalities cannot target, arrest and jail unhoused people and people experiencing substance use needs as a remedy or way out of the unmet housing and behavioral health needs of Santa Ana residents. According to data from the Board of State and Community Corrections, nearly 50% of people in the Orange County jail system have an open mental health case, approximately 30% are receiving psychotropic medication, 70% are detained pre -trial —most too poor to afford bail, and 1 in 5 people behind bars are unhoused. Data obtained by Million Dollars Hoods, a research team at UCLA, reveals that although, respectively, Latinx and Black people make up 34.1% and 1.6% of the Orange County population, they represented 46.5% and 6.7% of Orange County Jail bookings between 2010 and 2018, indicating significant racial disparities. During the same time, the top three charges against people in OC jails were DUI, drug possession and probation supervision violations. Santa Ana was the top home city for those booked into an OC jail, accounting for 13% of the county jail population. Poor people, Black and brown people, and people with mental health and substance use needs are suffering in Santa Ana and countywide. Criminalizing substance use is a failed and retrograde policy that is both immoral and ineffective. It has only served to expand our bloated carceral system, wage war on poor people and communities of color, and stigmatize substance use as a personal failure. It is time to end the culture of disposability and treat substance use as the public health issue that it is. We cannot continue to throw money at police and jails and expect a different outcome. I strongly support the recommendation for the city to invest in housing and care —not jail and one-way tickets out of town. We demand humane and effective policies —not police and jails. Thank you, Daisy Ramirez, MSW Senior Policy Advocate & Organizer ACLU of Southern California (o) 714-450-3964 x102 dramir z(clas¢acI.p_rg Pronouns: She/Her/Hers website I f c 5bool< I 11�itter I I b1 g The ACLU: Stand for Justice THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FORTH E USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Hall, Jennifer From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michael and Jeni Varciag Santa Ana, CA, 92706 August 1, 2023 Michael Varciag < Tuesday, August 1, 2023 9:39 PM Lopez, Jessie; Carvalho, Sonia R.; Ridge, Kristine; Penaloza, David; Hernandez, Johnathan; Vazquez, Benjamin; Bacerra, Phil; Amezcua, Valerie; Phan, Thai Rosas, Rudy; !City Clerk Re: Agenda item 27: Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Vacate the portion of Public Right of Way Adjacent to2383 North Flower Street TO: City Council of Santa Ana 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 CC: City Attorney, Public Works, City Clerk Subject: Public Comment - Petition to Vacate Public Right of Way (Public alley) Dear Members of the City Council, Please note the following details as our reasons for objection to vacate the public's use of the alley adjacent to 2383 North Flower street: Legal description: Lot 57 in Tract 754, as per recorded in book 22, page 37, of miscellaneous maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county APN: 002-073-14 Legal descriptions on all recorded documents including but not limited the following share the same legal description: 1. Map- Lot 57 of Tract no:754 in book 22, page 37 (1 page Attached) a. Also referenced on map regarding streets, alleys on Tract 425 map supported in book of deeds 547 page 57 (2 pages attached) b. Said map/s state "We the undersigned owners of the land covered by the accompanying map, and also all other persons whose consent is necessary to pass a clear title to such lands, do hereby consent to the making of said map. We hereby dedicate to public use all boulevards, avenues, streets, drives, ways and alleys shows hereon. On this 23rd day of March 1925 AD." c. Lot 57 of tract no. 754 dimensions are 50' x 130' i. Note: map does not include any portion of the public alley to be a part of lot 57 2. Grant deed (3 pages Attached) 3. Deed of trust (9 pages attached) 4. Santa Ana Historic Resource commission: Resolution No. 2021-22 a. A resolution of the historic resources commission of the city of Santa Ana approving historic resources commission application no. 2021-20 to place the property located at 2328 north flower street, Santa Ana on the historical register and approving historic register categorization no. 2021-20 placing said property within the contributive category (4 pages attached) 5. Mills Act Agreement (16 pages attached) Summery Explicit Dedication to Public Use: The recorded maps, including Tract 754 and Tract 425, explicitly state that all boulevards, avenues, streets, drives, ways, and alleys shown on the maps are dedicated to public use. The dedication is clear and unambiguous, indicating that the intention of the property owners, including Lot 57, was to relinquish ownership and grant these areas to the public. Consistency of Legal Descriptions: The legal descriptions provided in all recorded documents consistently refer to Lot 57 in Tract 754 and Tract 425, but there is no indication that any part of the public alley is part of Lot 57. The dimensions of Lot 57 are specified as 50' x 130', clearly excluding the adjacent public alley. City Ownership of the Alley: Based on the explicit dedication to public use and the absence of any indication that the alley is part of Lot 57, the alley must be owned by the City of Santa Ana. As such, Lot 57 has no inherent right to claim ownership over the alley. In conclusion, all the recorded documents, including maps, grant deed, and approvals, support the fact that the alley adjoining Lot 57 is dedicated to public use and is owned by the City of Santa Ana. Lot 57 does not have any right to the alley based on the provided information. I would advise Lot 57's owner to respect the public's right to use the alley and to adhere to any applicable laws or regulations governing the public's access to the dedicated public areas. Prior to the upcoming public hearing I would appreciate a brief discussion with my ward representative Jesse Lopez or Val Amezcua to get an understanding of the position of the City Council in this matter. Many Thanks, Michael and Jeni Varciag 2383 N (Flower record .pdf On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:26 PM Michael Varciag < wrote: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Michael Varciag < Date: Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 5:03 PM Subject: Agenda item 27: Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Vacate the portion of Public Right of Way Adjacent to 2383 North Flower Street To: <eCommentgsanta-ana.org> Cc: <scarvalhogsanta-ana.org> Michael and Jeni Varciag Santa Ana, CA, 92706 July, 14 2023 TO: City Council of Santa Ana 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 CC: City Attorney Subject: Public Comment - Petition to Vacate Public Right of Way (Public alley) Dear Members of the City Council, As a citizen and taxpayer in Santa Ana, and Floral Park resident, I am submitting comment about a petition to vacate a public alley that was transferred by Floral Park residents to the City of Santa in March 1923. I bring your attention to the public record entitled "Tract No. 425 North Broadway Park" which is signed by numerous stakeholders and reads as follows: "We the undersigned owners of the land covered by the accompanying map, and also all other persons whose consent is necessary to pass a clear title to such lands, do hereby consent to the making of said map. We hereby dedicate to public use all boulevards, avenues, streets, drives, ways and alleys shows neuron. On this 23rd day of March 1925 AD. " The questions to be presented are (1) what is the precise legal and political process for ending public use of the alley, (2) what is the complete list of stakeholders, (3) is compensation to the City and/or other utility stakeholders required if the alley reverts to adjacent landowners, and (4) what is the official justification for eliminating emergency vehicle and general public access between Heliotrope and Flower? (1) What is the precise legal and political process for ending public use of the alley? The City Council is treating this matter as a zoning issue. Does it belong with the courts first or in parallel? (2) What is the complete list of stakeholders? Numerous stakeholders were involved in the making of the map that made official and explicit the public use of the alley. Is anyone missing from the conversation to change the scope and consider reversion to private property? One adjacent owner will not be able to exit from their circular driveway should the alley be split down the middle between neighbors. How will that be addressed? Should the City Attorney and City Fire Chief provide input and sign off for legal and practical public safety considerations? (3) Is compensation to the City and/or other utility stakeholders required if the alley reverts to adjacent landowners? The original vehicle to make the alley public use conformed with US constitutional 5th amendment Takings Clause requirements for just compensation to members of the public. How is the inverse case being taken into account? (4) What is the official justification for eliminating access for emergency vehicles and general public access between Heliotrope and Flower? The alley in question provides a practical connection between Flower Street and Heliotrope for pedestrian, emergency and other vehicle access. There are numerous car accidents on Flower that impede traffic on Flower. The alley serves as a critical alternative for vehicle access emergency and otherwise. On a personal level, I heavily rely on the public access provided by this alley for various activities. It allows me to walk my dog safely, navigate the neighborhood to visit friends, and attend community events with greater convenience. Additionally, I have direct access to my backyard through this alley, and I greatly value the ease and convenience it provides. It is worth mentioning that this alley has been an integral part of the community planning for well over a century, and as a resident of nearly six years, I have never witnessed any negative or criminal incidents until it was raised during the recent city planning meeting. The newest members to the neighborhood seem to be the ones who wish to end it for the rest of us. In conclusion, I urge the City Council to carefully consider and answer the questions posed above, and consider the ramifications of vacating public access to the alley. Thank you for your consideration, Michael Varciag Hall, Jennifer From: Cheryl Newton < Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 11:25 PM To: Lopez, Jessie; Rosas, Rudy; Saba, Nabil; Ortiz, Lorrie; Morris, Angie; Amezcua, Valerie; Phan, Thai; Bacerra, Phil; Vazquez, Benjamin; Hernandez, Johnathan; Penaloza, David; eComment; Ridge, Kristine; Carvalho, Sonia R. Subject: note from Cheryl Newton re: opposition to the alley between 2379 N. Flower and 2383 N Flower being given to the owners of 2383 N. Flower Attachments: alley between 2379 and 2383 flower doc from 1925.pdf, dispute claim about alley not usea blel MG_6988.J PG Dear City of Santa Ana — I am the owner of N. Flower in Santa Ana It has recently come to my attention that the City is gifting the alley between my property ( N. Flower) and the neighbor to the North (2383 N. Flower). I oppose giving the land to the owner at 2383 N Flower. If you agree it is not an easement, I would like something in writing that this application/resolution/process will be terminated immediately... as it was based on the property being an easement. If you decide to move forward with the application/resolution/process, I am requesting that any decision be delayed until I can find out what my legal rights are. If the property is going to be given away, I believe I have a claim to half of the property in question I have a document dated from 1925 attached that I believe shows the alley was given to the City .... and not an easement (see attached) If you have documentation proving it is an easement, please send to me immediately. My property has been used by three generations of my family. My grandmother lived there ... then my parents ... and now I have it leased until I retire. At that time, I plan to move into the house. I am very vested in keeping Floral Park the charming community that it is.... I am very familiar with the alley, and what an asset it is to the community. The alley provides an option to go south without having to make a U turn in the middle of the street on Flower. (I understand there was another recent accident on Flower) Since we moved to Floral Park in the early 1970's, the off ramp at the end of Flower was closed to minimize traffic/Santa Clara traffic going West from Broadway was eliminated and Memory lane( unless changed )had restricted hours ... all because the City wanted to ease the traffic on Flower. So why take away the alley that eases the traffic on Flower and also helps the homeowners have an option to avoid making a u turn on flower? With the cars parked on the street sometimes it is difficult making a u turn. This is just one reason. It also is used by residents walking the beautiful neighborhood with their Loved Ones and pets The alley access allows me to maintain the hedge I have created on the block wall It is a beautiful alley without any trash or debris ... I don't believe the applicant's claim about crime. All of the neighbors I spoke with said that is not true. I haven't verified... but one neighbor said she called the police department and there weren't any police reports for the alley Also, I don't agree with the applicants claim it is hard for a car to drive thru the alley... Attached is a photo of my car going thru just fine. (last weekend) On the right of the photo is my block wall that I keep hedged over to improve the look of the alley I am sure the police/fire/city services have used the alley also Closing off % of the alley means the other side is a dead end street ... which the city will maintain but the community will not be able to use it .... To me, that doesn't make sense. The community is being penalized because a fairly new resident (under two years) thinks they should be given free land, at the expense of the community.. If you agree it is not an easement, how quickly can this application/resolution/process be terminated? (since the application is based on it being an easement) Again, If you decide to move forward I am asking that you postpone the process as I would like to get a legal opinion on what I am entitled to. I would like to something from you in writing that is being delayed and for how long. I found all of this out recently ... and three neighbors I spoke with had no idea what was going on. Public works told me they put up a sign.... but none of the neighbors saw it ... That seems odd??? Unless someone immediately took it down so the community wouldn't have a say? Not sure... but hope that you will make the right decision and stop this process immediately. Please let me know as soon as possible. This is very distressing to my family. Thankyou Cheryl Newton Also, I am not sure if I got all of the emails right. Will everyone please reply to this email so I know you received? of Cz.tm. fCW/b—')S�ry otl, zgg'- t TRACT NO. 754 116199 q Rosubdivislov of Lots Qqd go of .'0w'r'9. 4AM)r� lt'.Ze* Lots 1 to 16, 61 f* 79, a 2 to toll 7 "."'r,0111164foll0l 00dwilivo of TRACT No, 4Z3 as pop map to 55 a94 R"o P09 14, do Couqty ILI, .V pq�aOragge Califorosa, Z.Z KhoAr and 1-oucks Civil Lngfrov Scale I inch ao reef W, far re r 11"I'd 11W —6'� be dMY 'r1b" , I —r Arc C;L �---ry at Y— . .. . . . ..... .. T"7;"S' P'w" S, 0—"qc 141, ,1 Mg Cry A d Nl' AW City Loy hereby 16"' Mete' '/Y ar A/ t"', Ca My S Ar�A- al. A,-6p, AM T re, an rhr ..t Sep .11 IQ in C."ev C—tv w'eh "h, "he, lowo,4 nh,,h are S 7F1— IM, 5 Cd.oAly Cle,* va 4'/eh o/' We C�11-1- 4 �k 11 a. Wr"14-S 'W*'Y'41041C��.-= hrreanta art joa," /he Q�k AoW e—'A—=A' 7,- 34 1'? A (.J"'r N 0. 4 5 SHOE T 2 A!W 6, 4.1 J. N,vM 44, N dbirn GA/fi Y"e±.l "M c7 c Gdl a G, Sr.cIM OQ' ' a ft, 17 to 15rp 121 ` 22 V 124 ;� 8 ? 27 .. 2e , �axac...UtFtz..DRIVE _._.. * FbFAb " � r yrA t .J 4 fv. � t09 d T. .1.1 .,H\➢ »^' 9m:fi:. ?!'!..tt� . �.. -- l� » W \\\ i i 139 "410,b 14 �?142. 143 l44 t 0„ 14G "oU1 p8�� 05 w `kf I!0. `. '.,c's�,>r > � �� •gyp 2 o-' rr r bi'BUX4E,- - m l9a. a I�� �r /9,X°� f31w yV 1 a �a, T�� 1 y'f 005 a .3i re, of Ca/forniq J. S yrors P i . ern/eot .rid v 15.r• .{ + County of dr'*z 9e � oro na / nns � yy e, /, H'=' C./rron.a, County AuUrfo�•, �d SM67r--, ' nr!/ef rha/ /hero l u �. Cor /rf G"/y /axxd by Y cr{/` f " Yaved o yrt _ �y",tl aae'az a.. [� psygb/r., ryoinsl The/urxr' care Gki�d the va -4by of AP/923 �il; Mr iV Wr. Jo.�r ,S.Eefae qfy 9 x ar, oi�� IYG. Q C nfy of O n.,✓el ,.r .,. � +�1 \ ,Y , G/y b'."iiyirleei-. vb /a�Gy cs of Y/,q/ an h /. ,I M Elxka. G only C/rrR n qnd ftv .. +t . /n a aromrnry //a /Ws od ,.xubo�vzAion as /y, A. Awwe v <rr Iiiy' /hqi /ccxs'u ✓ xuF �, ° .xAa. on /ha rr,/h{n map q 41 find them 'a/ //cJdirl drnd, QpproM✓d dy We a ou,'rJy Ch oM $. va/ n /or- re✓iWrrart ar• com mer•cio/ urns of ,yv/•+°rv/sa+v /Ars Darn f.et{ '/h /1 >;p' P /his __cby of _ _ .IR /9ta, kt9aarx>r a:ah,ch .nsJU iw d awn✓ / xd yfv ,Vie ^V z ,r, man/ c q// /r,•w✓ rvhirh ar'r <7 f en e , /✓ar W ry<..J,� /ono' coveia+Y /xl /ha occur /+q,ryyr/ry r up, rad • /r��Y eruai, hr/d nn the :4 f�f._' «ioy w`-- GonA4 1 /s?...3 — e� a. -•a- ..._ <., 7/.'77,�f -"..- F.�. 1.....✓ in..naa.•w .....x..r u""""" ., J C9! II O s° x �I� � I ?7g1178 �79' \ 80� 88 8�. 90; 91 '9ZP 93. 94; 99. %, 97 8z� e1 ro0 riot niA6° ro5 w4 ?103 roz, ror" roawyq _n ............... TRACT 'N 0. It 2 5 NORTH BROADWAY PARK Dei r) a Subdioinior) of orho#75 of Lofs e, 5, 4 and e6 of P016, l3ordety oqcr' idwell Tract accordirig to a n7ap recorded it) book 4 puge 624 MimceilaqaoU5 Records of Los Ongele3 County Goliforrpa. cTy or3ANTA ANA . ORANGE COUNTY CALM l5urop,/4 d pq 9.LLa.,k.5Cr, 4'Arci — 179 � SHEC"r I of Z SHEETS -A"e C/.. AM, A 46— A-Y- Lot C. v to �Zl$ A 97 109 S (to 11' It, - --------- - --- ------- - - ----------- ----- ----------- -.- 1. 1+eAv'jorj w/~. 33 131 Ila 41 rc 130 Ae A+r''rAJ '.4"0 "o Ito 43 7 lza al -Ahe zctf -10,4,rh 44 IN.17 IZ2 nnat1"a dt '91 1/ !7A21 AIV f-4,0 -6 10 '43 55 '4 1W.3 4! a, I4V 41 y 14 0 "m'v' 'N 0av 10I, Mm l,, 40 5ot�44 ewlarAemd ---- - —d' r,OA'& -'A04-1A. .-Mo- ='/$o wo ~r *-,b A4 ,2:v /V ' Pw.- of 1*10. /ire's 2#0 0 A,' A4w Ao-' C oe*, of Me"- of 100 Mo Ap AV WIAO" M lot 0AWWW ;94 -0WAw0lV2**W -A0 Ohm wdhl4 A�Mvma0l' st whoow ow lo - 44o� WA vmcjW w tr W---, / Ava Ao"-M ost' ae 'L:_ PIP :ii A.0 Kew dw -a" // '// —A �gg AW ^P0 r&-7A0�l,,wAeq w o7,V,,yvol0d 94 0'wof" 0 1 , xw'Ie alwe A'p of," at d-c+ /1" RECORDING REOUESTED BY: WESTERN RESOURCES TITLE COMPANY RLt`.bttllTm; RyQurs7"h.1) TIV: Kcliey'lascrow Cotporation Order No. 224981 escrow No. 42721-.1 Parcel No. 002-073.1 d Al\Tl \4 Til ti Itt;CY)TtttN,n MALT, TOt COLIN' DONN'131.1 V 2353 NORTH Fl.LO\VER STREET" SANTA ANA, CA 92706 ft,cortle(l it, Officw Records, orange County IMttlh fJtlttyen, Cle(k•itetriMot l II, I I I II' II I�' III I III II I I h it l l'll fl 10.00 6 H 5 t 202100056654012:05 pm la /10121 221 NC-5 002 211 509,85 509.55 0.00 0.00 3.00 0,00 0,000,000,00 0.00 GRAN'r ai%i) TTIE UNTaFRSIGNEI) GRANTOR(S) DECLARI ('S) T11AT I)OCIIMI3N'l'AIt'Y'll(ANSFisR TAX IS $1,019.70 and CTTY $ (Jf Ni computed on full value of property conveyed, or [] computed on full valueless liens or encumbrances remaining at the time of sale. F unincorporated area: M Santa Ana, and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Jeffrey Michael Plost and Kathleen E. Plost, husband and wife as joint tenants hereby GRANT(5) to COLIN EDWARD 4DONNELLY, A SINGLE MAN AND CAROLINE LA A SIN.GIE WOMAI �1S J%J.tT � Tlic following described real property m i to County o range, ate of a t o i . The legal description is supplied by the title company herein and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" Date August 1 V2121 Jeffrey Mich Plost # - Kathleen E. Pl t 1&� d �e�{re� r�i(�t�1 'Plost Yci+hl2�r3 E. Flosi A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document Pi to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF �'�'�9 Q' I S.S. on <6717 LZ, ( , before me, "��s $- , Notary Public, personally appeared lit ,J P1,51 " z , F °S who proved to me on the basis of satfsfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF WITNESS my Sig nature —/ under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Mail T`4 - atarnentvlti. g-AME AS A130VE or Address Noted Below COMM. #22 0043 ,� NotatyT"ub11c,•CatitoTnlat� Change o b 1Y Comm. gte t+ 13 2022 RX 111111, T A LWAL I)ESCRIPTION Real prop M��)t In the CItV of Song, Ann, colltltY Of OtAntleStnto of Colltomim, doscribed m fbllows: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS pril 1111CORI)W TN 00OK 22, PAOF 31, OF MISCEUANEOUS MAPS, IN Tile Orricp Or Tilt COUN1Y 015COADO OF SAW COUfftY. Amom gother things, said document provides for - An easement ovet the potlion of said land and for tote parposes therein shf.-iwn,and rights, incidental thereto. For. TELEPHONE ELECAI C LIGHT POLr,.s, wins m comurr PURPOSES AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL Affetts: THE REAR 3 FEET OF SAID LAND Hall, Jennifer From: Cheryl Newton < Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 11:53 PM To: Carvalho, Sonia R.; Ridge, Kristine; eComment; Penaloza, David; Hernandez, Johnathan; Vazquez, Benjamin; Bacerra, Phil; Phan, Thai; Amezcua, Valerie; Lopez, Jessie; Rosas, Rudy; Saba, Nabil; Morris, Angie; Ortiz, Lorrie Subject: FW: Alley - Flower/Heliotrope Attachments: agreement.PDF; Title Report - Copy.pdf, deeds.PDF See emails below and attached. Please confirm you have received. Thanks, Cheryl I didn't state in my previous email ....but would welcome any calls regarding this matter From: Marc Serrano - California Title Company <mares@caltitle.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 4:26 PM To: Cheryl Newton < Cc: TitleOC <TitleOC@caltitle.com> Subject: RE: Alley - Flower/Heliotrope ***Please note, we bank with COMMERCIAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA. Do not send any wires to our old account with COMERICA. * * * Marc Serrano Title Officer California Title Company 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 625 1 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Phone: 949-582-8709 • Fax: 949-582-2449 Email: mares&caltitle.com ------ _ Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and is non-public in nature and may be confidential and/or privileged. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system and promptly destroy any copies made of this electronic message. Thank you. From: Marc Serrano - California Title Company <m res(c ltitle..._.go.. r.> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 4:23 PM To: Cheryl Newton < Cc: TitleOC <TitlpC(cIt%tl.caarn> Subject: RE: Alley - Flower/Heliotrope Looking at the provided title report attachment further, this is not a title report, but a policy for an insured value of $1,000. I'm not sure what this policy corresponds to as this policy does not relate to any recording being posted on the chain. . policy,n that does notappears be partof a legaldescriptionas reflected on any previous full va. insured.. going a, a .e attached deeds for... ,. I have also included the agreement with the city that also contains a legal description that does not contain the added verbiage from t legal on the policy. You may want to inquire with Chicago Title to see why the added legal portion was added and for a copy of the 1931 easement. Also, you may want to consult with a real estate attorney for further guidance and assistance in your matter, as this is outside the realm of us issuing a title policy. ***Please note, we bank with COMMERCIAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA. Do not send any wires to our old account with COMERICA. * * * Marc Serrano Title Officer California Title Company 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 625 1 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 - Phone: 949-582-8709 • Fax: 949-582-2449 Email: mares&caltitle.com Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and is non-public in nature and may be confidential and/or privileged. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system and promptly destroy any copies made of this electronic message. Thank you. I RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Recorded in official Records, orange County Hugh Nguyen, Clerk -Recorder NO FEE IIIII I II (IIIII III IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII I IIII IIII 2022000295877 11: 30 am 09101122 48 RW11A Al2 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.000.000.00 0.00 FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § V383 Return FULLY EXECrUTED coPAMOCOTC M-30 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT A-2022-018 This Historic Property Preservation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Colin Edward Donnelly, a single man and Caroline La, a single woman as joint tenants, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), owner of real property located at 2383 North Flower Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. w z o: P Q,(Pedro Glev�e2) `�. RECITALS U C=J O O N �w a U N A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by • California Q = Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the "Mills Act") to enter into z0 2 LL c contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate w y O tv use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties zO X �r_ retain their historic character and integrity. UB. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property z Q together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2383 — p North Flower Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter c c referred to as the "Historic Property". Q o U C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of rm Y Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana 0 o Municipal Code. Z. m D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement U U which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to -ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner. 'f MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on February 16, 2022, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below. 2. Renewal. a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein. b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nomenewal of the Agreement on the other party. Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. C. Within 30 days from receipt of City's notice of nomenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City's decision of nomenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nomenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions: a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its character - defining features described in the "Historical Property Description" attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City. -2- MILLS ACT A GREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition. C. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character -defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Furnishing of Information. The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. Cancellation. a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 '/2) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the -3- MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement. b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. C. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days, and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 7. Binding effect of Agreement. a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2383 North Flower Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-073-14, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic -4- MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument. 8. No Compensation. Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property. 9. Notice. Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto. City: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Owners: Caroline La and Colin Donnelly 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 10. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. -5- MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 C. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. 11. Recordation. No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange. 12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. 13. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. (Signature page follows) A-2022-018 ATTEST: AISY GOMEZ ,Clerk of the. Council - -t OWNER Date: Date: 20 2Z APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA CARVALHO City Attorney By: ✓l , W JOHN64. FUNK Assistant City Attorney MILLS ACTAGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 CITY OF SANTA ANA KR STINE RIDG City Manager BX� COLIN EDWARD DONNELLY /.,�Z!t / RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: -492jQ�- MINH THAI Executive Director Planning and Building Agency tall attached ACKNOWLEDGMENT by Yvonne Flores, Notary Public, DATED: 5IW Ii�7�Z www. WestcliffPropeniesCA. oom/notary-pubft -7- ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Orange ) On July 29, 2022 before me, L.J. Ortiz, Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Kristine Ridge, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s).on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. L. J. ORTIZ Notary Public - California P . Orange County >: Commission C 2406079 • + N67t ,My COMM. Expires May 27, 2026 Signature (Seal) ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate -verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Orange On ZD la'z, before me, Yvonne Flores, Notary Public (� (insert (Jname and title o"f_ the officer) personally appeared ` b"fr7�TJ�( �'� G C1 `o� l n 1✓dLNgrA t�lLhG�� who proved'to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person CpKwhose name(g)49/jq subscribo to the within instrument and acknowledged to that4ae4 executed the same in hi9- I ei authorized capacityQ%), and that by 4L-dher/ Designatur on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the perso s acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature NOTARY PUBLIC: COMMISSION EXPIRES: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: (Seal) Yvonne Flores ° z YVONNE FLORES C0YM,8 2250623 N ? R NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA N ORANGE CULY2 y�.A.x• Yr Comm. EXP. Jutr It, IBIS July 21, 2022 (714) 215-7421 Yvonne. Flores@Westcliff. Properties www.westcliffpropertiesca.com/notary-public MILLS A CTAGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, AS PER RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number: 002-073-14 -8- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Head-Wimpey House 2383 N. Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 NAME Head-Wimpey House REF. NO. ADDRESS 2383 N. Flower street CITY Santa Ana ZIP 1 92706 ORANGE COUNTY YEAR BUILT 1935 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Contributive HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted ❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history' of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). EXPLANATION OF CODES: • California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values • It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Page 1 of 3 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Head-Wimpey Hous P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: ❑Not for Publicafion ■Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5' Quad TCA 1725 Date: March 3, 2015 *c. Address 2383 North Flower Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor's Parcel Number 002-073-14 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Located in Floral Park, the Head-Wimpey House is a one-story single-family residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival style. Asymmetrical in design, the house exhibits a complex gable and wing roof with a moderately steep pitch, clad in composition shingle roofing. The massing, roof configuration, and fenestration define a three -bay fagade, with an overlapping gable front porch and entrance stoop flanked by a side -gabled projecting wing on the south, a side -gabled projecting wing on the north and a prominent front -facing gable along the west elevation. The exterior of the building is clad in hand -troweled textured stucco. The entryway is characterized by a wooden front door, accessed via the entrance stoop. Fenestration consists of multi -paned and fixed casement windows used on the west elevation, while double -hung windows are used along the north, south, and east elevations. The property is simply landscaped with a mature tree, a lawn, low vegetation and simple walkway that connects the entry stoop to the main sidewalk. The driveway is located along the south elevation and leads to the detached, one-story, two -car garage, also clad in sandy -textured stucco. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single -Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: ■Building ❑Structure ❑Object OSite DDistrict ■Element of District 00ther Photo P5b. Photo: (view and date) West elevation, view east September2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Whistoric 19351 City of Santa Ana Building Permits *P7. Owner and Address: Colin Donnelly and Caroline La 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 *P8. Recorded by: Pedro Gomez 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 *P9. Date Recorded: November 4, 2021 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive Survey Update *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") None *Attachments: ONone ❑Location Map ❑Sketch Map ■Continuation Sheet ■Building, Structure, and Object Record DArchaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record OArtifact Record ❑Photograph Record ❑ Other (list) DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 5S3 'Resource Name or #: Head-Wimpey House B1. Historic Name: Head-Wimpey House B2. Common Name: Same B3. Original Use: Single -Family Residence B4. Present Use: Single -Family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): November 1, 1935. Constructed. $4,000. September 10, 1952. Disposal for A. Newcomer by Grimes. March 16, 1953. Range for John Crivner. July 10, 2018. Tear off existing comp shingle/shake roof and apply new comp shingle. $14,500, *B7. Moved? ■No OYes DUnknown Date: Original *88. Related Features: Detached Garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: H.C. Head *B10. Significance: Theme Residential architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1935 Property Type: Single -Family Residence Applicable Criteria: C13 (Discuss importance in terns of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Head-Wimpey House is architecturally significant as a characteristic example of the Tudor Revival style. This house was originally constructed in 1935, and was valued at approximately $4,000 according to the original building permit. It was built by Horace Caldwell Head, son of Dr. and Captain William Head who was a member of the California Assembly and surgeon. Dr. Head was said to have fought in the American Civil War on the Confederate side and was Grand Cyclops to the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee. Dr. Head is also said to have personally delivered the bill to Sacramento to allow Orange County to secede from Los Angeles County. He Horace Head was a graduate of University of California, Berkeley and was the attorney of the Orange County Flood Control District, and later, was District Attorney for the County of Orange from 1904 to 1908. He served as President of the Orange County Bar Association from 1915 to 1920. The Head-Wimpey House was first sold to Mr. and Mrs. A.B. Wimpey in 1936. Mrs. A.B. Wimpey was a member of the First Presbyterian Woman's auxiliary circles. Their daughter, Shirley Wimpey, was a member of the Christian Endeavor Society of the First Christian Church. The Wimpeys lived in the property until the late 1940s. A. Newcomer purchased the property in 1952 and then latersold it to John Scrivnerin 1953. Since then, the Head-Wimpey House has been occupied by various owners until the current homeowner purchased the home in 2021. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: City of Santa Ana Building Permits Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 3.) B13. Remarks: *B14. Evaluator: Sydney Andrea Landers/Chattel Inc. *Date of Evaluation: November 4, 2021 (This space reserved for official comments.) Sketch Map Head-Wimpey House 2383 North Flower Street 4 47 QP�a y 4B 46 45 ,r!B ,.*Xl n 1 54 55 56 5 11 k 72 N0. 4 .1 DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name: Head-Wimpey House 'Recorded by Pedro Gomez *Date November4, 2021171 Continuation ❑ Update '610. Significance (continued): The Head-Wimpey House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). "Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. "When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45, 000 each" (Orange County Register, September 15, 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War 11, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue. In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park. An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell's own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In the early post World War 11 years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, single-family houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, they were mostly revival in style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today (2021) Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens. The Head-Wimpey House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Tudor Revival tract home in Santa Ana. Characteristics of the Tudor Revival include steeply pitched complex gable roofs, shallow roof overhangs, asymmetrical massing, stucco exterior and multipaned windows. Additionally, the house has been categorized as "Contributive" because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Floral Park neighborhood and "is a good example of period architecture,"representing the Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana. Character - defining features of the house include a complex gable and wing roof of moderately steep pitch; shallow roof overhangs, roof detailing such as wooden bargeboards and exposed rafter tails; multi -paned wood casement windows used on the primary elevation; double -hung wood windows where extant; and hand -troweled textured stucco exterior walls. 'B12. References (continued): Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encvclooedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998. Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York. Alfred A. Knopf, 1984. National Register Bulletin 16A. "How to Complete the National Register Registration Form." Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept of the Interior, 1991. Office of Historic Preservation. 'Instructions for Recording Historical Resources." Sacramento: March 1995. Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-2017. Ancestry.com Newspapers.com (Santa Ana Register) Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 193Z and 1955. Armor, Samuel. History of Orange County. Los Angeles: History Record Company, 1921, page 989. Arellano, Gustavo. "Gustavo Arellano."OC Weekly, 17Apr.2008, https://www.ocweekly.com/the-kkk-took-my-county-away- meet-the-klansman-who-helped-to-found-orange-county-6398456/ DPR 523L MILLS ACT AGREEMENT 2383 North Flower Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 Exhibit C Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows: Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities.- Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project. 9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with MILLS ACTAGREEMENT 1383 North F(orver Street Santa Ana, CA 91706 size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. -2- NChicago Title Insurance Company GUARANTEE NO.: CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 CLTA GUARANTEE FACE PAGE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, AND THE GUARANTEE CONDITIONS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A of this Guarantee against loss or damage not exceeding the Amount of Liability stated in Schedule A sustained by the Assured by reason of any incorrectness in the Assurances set forth in Schedule A. Chicago Title Insurance Company Countersigned: Michml J. Wan By: <.� eanlenc Authorized Signature ss MmluAemm�x ni Semerory CLTA Guarantee Face Pane (06-05-14) Pane 1 © California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No. 00185550-994-LT2-lTW Guarantee No. CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 GUARANTEE EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS (06-05-14) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE Except as expressly provided by the assurances In Schedule A, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the Land. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the Public Records (1) that are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; or (2) that result In no loss to the Assured. (c) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters not shown by the Public Records. (d) The Identity of any party shown or referred to in any of the schedules of this Guarantee. (a) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to In any of the schedules of this Guarantee. (f) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) proceedings by a public agency which may result In taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the Public Records. (g) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the Public Records. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in Schedule A, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company., (b) "Land": the Land described or referred to In Schedule A, and Improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right, title, Interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "Mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "Public Records": those records established under California statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of Imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (a) "Date of Guarantee": the Date of Guarantee set forth in Schedule A. (f) "Amount of Liability": the Amount of Liability as stated In Schedule A. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured. The Assured shall notify the Company promptly In writing in case knowledge shall come to the Assured of any assertion of facts, or claim of title or interest that Is contrary to the assurances set forth in Schedule A and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable under this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of the Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sale option and cast, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in Paragraph 4 (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the correctness of the assurances set forth in Schedule A or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise Its options as stated In Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of Its choice (subject to the right of the Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured In the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, In its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid In any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the correctness of the assurances set forth in Schedule A or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. (a) In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Assured furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, Ilan, encumbrance, or other matter that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. (b) In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, In writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this paragraph shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, It is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested CLTA Guarantee Exclusions and Conditions (06-05-14) Pape 2 © California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No. 00185550-994-LT2-1 T W Information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary Information from third parties as required in the aboye paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Liability together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Assured that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. (b) To pay or otherwise settle with the Assured any claim assured against under this Guarantee. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Assured that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that that the Company is obligated to pay; or (c) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for the loss or damage provided for under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses Incurred by the Assured that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for In 6 (a), (b) or (c) of this paragraph the Company's obligations to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any duty to continue any and all litigation initiated by the Company pursuant to Paragraph 4. 7. Limitation of Liability. (a) This Guarantee Is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in Schedule A and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of this Guarantee. (b) If the Company, or the Assured under the direction of the Company at the Company's expense, removes the alleged defect, lien or, encumbrance or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, It shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (c) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom. (d) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 8. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the Amount of Liability under this Guarantee pro tanto. 9. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 10. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or Guarantee No. CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been Issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle In the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured In any transaction or litigation Involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 11. Arbitration. Either the Company or the Assured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules"). Except as provided In the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may Include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its Issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this Guarantee. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $2,000,000 shall he arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. Arbitration pursuant to this Guarantee and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered In any court of competent jurisdiction. 12. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, If any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 13. Severability In the event any provision of this Guarantee, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the Guarantee shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Choice of Law; Forum (a) Choice of Law: The Assured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this Guarantee and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests In real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of Guaranties of thejurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land Is located to determine the validity of claims that are adverse to the Assured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this Guarantee. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Assured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 15. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at Chicago Title Insurance Company, Attn: Claims Department, P.O. Box 45023, Jacksonville, FL 32232-5023. CLTA Guarantee Exclusions and Conditions (06-05-14) Pape 3 © California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers In good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No.: 00185550-994-LT2-tTW Guarantee No.: CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 CONDITION OF TITLE GUARANTEE SCHEDULE A Order No.: 00185550-994-LT2-1TW Guarantee No.: CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 Amount of Liability: $1,000.00 Date of Guarantee: October 24, 2022 at 7:30 A.M. Fee: $750.00 1. Name of Assured: Colin Edward Donnelly and Caroline La 2. The estate or interest in the Land which is covered by this Guarantee is: A FEE 3. The Land referred to in this Guarantee is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. ASSURANCES: According to the Public Records as of the Date of Guarantee, a. Title to the estate or interest in the Land is vested in: Colin Edward Donnelly, a single man and Caroline La, a single woman, as joint tenants b. Title to the estate or interest is subject to defects, liens or encumbrances shown in Schedule B which are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. 72G28 CLTA Guarantee Form No. 28 (06-05-14) Page 4 Condition of Title Guarantee OO California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No. 00185550-994-LT2-1TW EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Policy No. CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY SHOWN ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED TRACT MAP ADJOINING SAID LOT 57 ON THE SOUTH THAT WOULD REVERT TO SAID LOT 57 BY OPERATION OF LAW UPON VACATION OF SAID ALLEY BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. APN : 002-073-14 72G28 CLTA Guarantee Form No. 28 (06-05-14) Condition of Title Guarantee Page 5 © California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohbited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No. 00185550-994-LT2-1TW Policy No. CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 SCHEDULE B A. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, are as follows: Tax Identification No.. 002-073-14 Fiscal Year: 2022-2023 1st Installment: $5,374.53, unpaid (Delinquent after December 10) Penalty: $537.45 2nd Installment: $5,374.53, unpaid (Delinquent after April 10) Penalty and Cost: $560.45 Homeowners Exemption: $none Code Area: 11-003 B. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 1. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 2. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as condemned by an instrument, Entitled: Final Judgment Court: Superior In favor of: City of Santa Ana Purpose: public street Recording Date: March 17, 1931 Recording No: in Book 460 page 471, of Official Records Affects: a portion of said land 3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: in Book 527 page 26, of Official Records 72G28 CLTA Guarantee Form No. 28 (06-05-14) Condition of Title Guarantee Page 6 O California Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. Order No. 00185550-994-LT2-1Tw Policy No. CA-FBSC-IMP-72G28-1-22-00185550 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 4. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: $741,600.00 Dated: September 4, 2021 Trustor/Grantor Colin Edward Donnelly, a single man and Caroline La, a single woman, as joint tenants Trustee: Heather Lovier Beneficiary: Rocket Mortgage, LLC., fka Quicken Loans, LLC, a limited liability company Recording Date: September 10, 2021 Recording No: 2021-566541 of Official Records 5. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Historic Property Preservation Agreement Recording Date: September 1, 2022 Recording No: 2022-295877, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 6. Rights of the public to use that portion of the alley adjoining said Lot 57 on the South until such time said alley is vacated to the public by the City of Santa Ana. 72G28 CLTA Guarantee Form No. 28 (06-05-14) Page 7 Condition of Title Guarantee © California Land Title Association, All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to CLTA subscribers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license or express permission from the California Land Title Association. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Fidelity National Title Company Escrow No. 30294-Cy Title Order No. 09715917 _�— I When Recorded Mail Document and Tax Statement To: Mr. and Mrs. ROBERT H. PRICE 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA, CA Recorded in the County of Orange, California L. I II I I I hall 1111111111111111111111111111111 II Illvillll Ileii Clerk/R9.ecorder 19970426487 04:30PM 09/02/97 004 25004528 25 19 G02 2 11 101.75 6.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 101.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s) Documentary transfer tax is $203.50 I X ) computed on full value of property conveyed, or I I computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, I I Unincorporated Area City of S'Rpta Qna FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CAROL COVELL, TRUSTEE OF THE MARY JANE SMART TRUST DTD MAY 30, 1996 hereby GRANTIS) to ROBERT H. PRICE and PATRICIA YOUNG -PRICE, Husband and Wife as Joint -Tenants the following described real property in the County of ORANGE, State of California: Lot 57, Tract 754, County of ORANGE, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 22, Page 37 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. 070 DATED: August W, 1997 COU STATE O OFAIRIFORN(A e N before me, L� personally appeared proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the personX whose name is/X subscribed to the within instrument and acknowled ad to me that/she/t* executed the same in F /her/tT<authorized capacity*, and that by t (7,her/tW signaturelk on the instrument the personpqYor the entity upon behalf of which the personli%1 acted, executed the instrument. Witness my h d and official se Signature THE MA ' JANE SMAST TRUST DTD MAY 30, 1996 By: v/l CAROL COVELL, Trustee cwrwii�rlla110� �tiA�CNnq 1lyCml�►41��ONf.1M MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE FD-213 (Rev 7/96) GRANT DEED GOVERNMENT CODE 27361-7 I CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ON THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT IS ATTACHED READS AS FOLLOWS: NAME OF NOTARY: g1'eoe(l� A • Me CG II DATE COMMISSION EXPIRES: ! ) -741 COUNTY IN WHICH BOND IS FILED: , 4t N �ft Alr1 a ►77 COMMISSION 1: 107 (7 0 6 MANUFACTURER/VENDOR NO: N alp ,rMELITY NATIONJP TITLE SANTA ANA / CA - PLACE OF EXECUTION DATE: T`7 -0(/ RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WESTERN RESOURCES TITLE COMPANY RECORDING REQUESTED BY: KelleyEscrow Corporation Order No. 224981 Escrow No. 42721-J Parcel No. 002-073-14 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: COLIN DONNELLY 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92706 Recorded in Official Records, Orange County Hugh Nguyen, Clerk -Recorder I[ � � 11 II 11111 111I I[111111 II 10.00 *$ R 0 0 1 3 1 5 6 8 5 3 $ * 202100056654012:05 pm 09/10/21 227 NC-5 G02 2 11 509.85 509.85 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.000.000.00 0.00 W9 GRANT DEED Is USE THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S) THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $1,019.70 and CITY $ Qy ® computed on full value of property conveyed, or I" ❑ computed on full value less liens or encumbrances remaining at the time of sale. ❑ unincorporated area: ® Santa Ana, and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Jeffrey Michael Plost and Kathleen E. Plost, husband and wife as joint tenants hereby GRANT(S) to COLIN EDWARD DONNELLY, A SINGLE EENMAN AND CAROLINE LA the following described real propertty iG�e Countyp'ot &tinge W to a of aL^h-to3ni S The legal description is supplied by the title company herein and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" Date Aueust 11�2m21 Jeffrey Michol Plost Kathleen E. Pl Jef(yfY I�iC,lnc�1 Vim+ N+h u,&n E- f I o s-fi A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CAL ORNIA COUNTY OF �• v-yZ } S.S. /r On Z, P , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared F_ v ,4- who proved to me on the basis of sa sfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity, upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PAY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my Signature Mail T`x-StatGmentstto SAME AS ABOVE or Address Noted Below JUS`n T' S. Comm. M2230048 Notary Public California Orange County Comm. Expires Feb 13, 2022 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real properly in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: LOT 57 OF TRACT NO..754, AS PER RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. APN: 002-073-14 RECORDING REQUESTED BY LAWYERS TOLE RECORDING REQUESTED BY LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY When recorded mail document and tax statement to: JEFFREY MICHAEL PLOST 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92706 A.P.N.:002-073-14 Recorded in Official Records, Orange County Tom Daly, Clerk -Recorder IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 9.00 2004000648004 03:59pm 07/16/04 103 18 G02 2 334.95 334.95 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Order No.: 05313104-36 Above This Line for Recorder's Use Only Escrow No.: 63361-LW GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS: COUNTY $669.90 [ computed on full value of property conveyed, or [ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, [ ] unincorporated area; [ X ] City of SANTA ANA , and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, JAMES F. KUHNE, JR. and SUZANNE W. KUHNE, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY hereby GRANT(S) to JEFFREY MICHAEL PLOST, A MARRIED MAN AS HIS SOLE AND SEPARATE a PROPERTY A the following described property in the City of SANTA ANA, County of ORANGE State of California; Lot 57 of Tract No. 754, in the City of SANTA ANA, County of ORANGE, State of California as per map recorded in Book 22, Page 37 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. AMES '. KUHNE„ JR. SU E W. KUHNE Date: May 15, 2004 STATE OF CALIFQRNIA COUNTY OF ©© )SS Y 1'aAOdG/G personally appeared JoTMe3 F- /Kk#/ttt i JR !/'N/� �i./ZJ9"N/ut /fit/ rC2l lfN� , P ^^�°• Law— - w (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose nameis)-e/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me at t tey execu d the same in 44&41¢r/their authorized capacityM and that by hisfher/their signaturSillon the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person sLacted, executed the instrument. WITNESS `my hand and official seal. Signature This area for official notarial seal. MADE" L. COLON Comnlubn S 1357333 NORNY PtIM - COWaNa Orange Cou ly M V Comm. EIVMtMu/2D, M LuryersTide Company Subsidiary of )<auryeisTlde Insurance CoWmfion PENALTY OF PERJURY AFFIDAVIT (GOVERNMENT CODE 27361.7) I certify under the penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the document to which this statement is attached reads as follows: Name of the Notary: Date Commission expires: County Where Bond is Filed: Feb U Commission No.: 135-7333 ManufacturerNendor No.: Place of Execution: Irvine, Ca. Date 20 Signature: TITLE I further certify under the penalty of perjury that the illegible portion of the document to which this statement is attached reads as follows (if applicable): Date: ,20 Signature: LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY 18551 Von Karman, Suite 100-200, Irvine, California, 92612 (949) 223-5575 RECORDED !AT', 14E Cti1UTO TITL!, RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: JAMES F. KUHNE, JR. SUZANNE W.KUHNE 2383 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92706 Recorded in Official Records,County of Orange Ga L. Granville, Clerk -Recorder I I II III 1111 III III II I11 6.00 20010150812 03:50pm 03/15/01 103 49 G02 1 178.75 178.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use Only A.P.N.: 002-073-14./ Order No.: 18030337 Escrow No.: 52851-LW GRANT DEED / THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS: COUNTY jj57.50 J [ X ] computed on full value of property conveyed, or [[ ] computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, unincorporated area; [ X ] City of SANTA ANA , and t FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, MICHAEL J. FELSEN, A MARRIED MAN, who acquired title as MICHAEL J. FELSEN, A SINGLE MAN hereby GRANT(S) to JAMES F. KUHNE, JR. and SUZANNE W. KUHNE, Husband and Wife as Community the following described property in the City of SANTA ANA, County of ORANGE State of California; Property LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 754, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGE(S) 37, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. JM&CHA/LJ. FELSEN Document Date: January 26. 2001 STATE OF C. COUNTY OF On L )SS me, 0 A-)L 46- IVAWAWAK/ J�i7� !� j �it Q//C Personally appeared CAS E N P—Rnr""w*16ww.(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the personal whose namc(,y is/S subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/skek wy executed the same in his/harlawir authorized capacity(.69 and that by his/Ja ' signamre(y# on the instrument the person(y9 or the entity upon behalf of which the person(#) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature This area for official notarial seal. DIA1iE B. ICA'NAWAK7 Can nEssSx a 12666M NOtc.Y isti-6tc — CaAkLrda C :J. Ca�rr!y My Corm. E V*M JW 9, 2,004 Le 1W1qr"W_W_W.% Mail Tax Statements to: SAME AS ABOVE or Address Noted Below by: RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Recording Orange Coast Title Co. Orange AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Michael J. Felsen \ 2383 No. Flower St. ` Santa Ana, CA 92706 Order No. 269933-1 Escrow No: 89575 - CWS A.P.N.: 002-073-14 Title Recorded in the County of Orange, California Ga L. Granville, Clerk/Recorder I II I I I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 6.00 19990641842 3:52pm 09/03/99 004 23018681 23 08 G02 1 11 145.75 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $ 911 .SO Q computed on full value of property conveyed, or ❑ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. ❑ unincorporated area Q City of Santa Ana, AND FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Patricia Young -Price hereby GRANT(S) to Michael J. Felsen , a single man the following described real property in the County of Orange, State of California: t�l Lot 57 of Tract 754 as shown on a map recorded in Book 22, page 37 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Dated: July 15, 1999 STATE OF CALIFORNIA/ .� } S.S. COUNTY OF y_�Z..' ���L On _ sue_.. r/ bejoreme, Z 41 { k' ` I 1,411 .0 a Nofary Public in and for,syid rounty and St t personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s), acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. .1 Signaturey,j .�°y'Gc.: J:.l Signature of Notary Patricia Young -Price (This area for official notarial seal) IMICHELE ANN PUACELL N Comm. # 1213815 NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA \ Orange County /�3... My Comm. Expires March 21,2003 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Michael J. Felsen 2383 No. Flower St., Santa Ana, CA 92706 Name Street Address City & State